Skip to main content
VRG S.A. logo

VRG S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · VRG ISIN · PLVSTLA00011 LEI · 259400JK2AT927YR9N41 WAR Manufacturing
Open in API
Filings indexed 213 across all filing types
Latest filing 2025-04-24 Audit Report / Informat…
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR VRG

About VRG S.A.

https://www.vrg.pl/en

VRG S.A. is a capital group specializing in the design, manufacturing, and distribution of fashion and jewelry. The company manages a portfolio of distinct brands across two primary business segments. The apparel segment features collections for both men and women, including the men's fashion brands Vistula, Bytom, and Wólczanka, which are recognized for formal and casual wear, suits, and shirts. This segment also includes the women's fashion brand Deni Cler. The jewelry segment is represented by W.KRUK, a prominent brand offering fine jewelry, watches, and accessories. The group's operations encompass the entire product lifecycle, from design and development to marketing and distribution through a network of retail stores and e-commerce platforms.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Informacja Zarządu VRG S.A.
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text is primarily composed of HTML structure, CSS styles, and metadata related to a PDF conversion utility ('pdf2htmlEX'). The title tag contains 'Informacja_Z_SRR-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml'. The presence of 'SRR' in the filename, combined with the context of financial reporting, strongly suggests a regulatory filing or report. Given the structure is not the content of a full report (like 10-K or IR) but rather the wrapper/metadata of a converted document, and 'SRR' is not explicitly defined, I must look for the closest fit or use the fallback. The document length is substantial (410k chars), suggesting it contains significant data, but the visible text is structural. Since 'SRR' is not a defined code, and this appears to be a regulatory document wrapper, I will check the definitions. 'SR' is Environmental & Social Information, which is a possibility if SRR stands for something similar, but without confirmation, the safest classification for an unidentified regulatory document wrapper is the general fallback, 'RNS' (Regulatory Filings), as it covers miscellaneous filings that don't fit elsewhere. However, the filename 'Informacja_Z_SRR' suggests a specific type of report. If 'SRR' is interpreted as a type of regulatory filing, 'RNS' is the best fit among the provided codes for an unknown or general regulatory document wrapper. FY 2024
2025-04-24 Polish
Podpis do Sprawozdania Zarządu
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML structure, specifically related to digital signatures (xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"), certificate data (X509Certificate), and signed properties (xades). The Object element contains Base64 encoded data, and the description within the QualifyingProperties references a filename: "VRG_SzD-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml". This structure strongly indicates a digitally signed document, likely an official filing or report that has been secured using XML Digital Signature standards (XAdES). The presence of the filename suggests the underlying content is an XHTML document, which could be an Annual Report (10-K), Interim Report (IR), or another formal filing. However, the document *itself* is the signature block wrapping the content, not the content in its final readable form. Given the massive document length (13 million characters) and the fact that the visible text is the signature wrapper, this is most likely a complete, signed regulatory filing. Since the content is wrapped and signed, and the filename suggests a structured report (ending in .xhtml), the most appropriate classification for the *container* holding the signed data, especially when the actual content type isn't fully visible, is a general Regulatory Filing (RNS), or potentially the underlying report type if the signature is merely an attachment wrapper. Since the visible text is the signature block and not the report narrative, and it's a complex, structured filing, RNS is a safe fallback. However, the presence of the filename 'VRG_SzD-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml' suggests a structured report. Given the context of financial documents, a signed document of this complexity is usually a 10-K or IR. Without more context from the decoded content, RNS is the most accurate classification for the *format* presented (a signed wrapper). If we assume the underlying content is the primary document, the filename structure doesn't map perfectly to 10-K or IR, making RNS the best fit for an unknown, complex, signed regulatory document.
2025-04-24 Polish
Sprawozdanie Zarządu z działalności GK VRG S.A. za 2024 r.
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is an HTML structure containing CSS styles and font definitions, likely generated from converting a PDF file (indicated by the presence of 'pdf2htmlEX' in the CSS comments and the title 'VRG_SzD-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml'). The document length is very large (over 11 million characters), suggesting it is the full content of a substantial report, not just a brief announcement. The title 'VRG_SzD-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml' suggests a filing related to a specific date (2024-12-31) and potentially a Polish entity ('pl'). Given the large size and the nature of the content being the full rendered document structure, it is most likely a comprehensive financial report. Since it is not explicitly labeled as a 10-K (Annual Report) or an IR (Interim/Quarterly Report), and it is a full document conversion, the most appropriate classification for a comprehensive, full-period report that isn't explicitly a 10-K is the general 'Interim / Quarterly Report' (IR) if it covers a period shorter than a year, or we must consider the possibility that this is the full content of an Annual Report (10-K) that was converted. However, without explicit headers like '10-K' or 'Annual Report', and given the structure, it represents the core content of a major filing. Since the document is extremely long and appears to be the full content, it is highly unlikely to be a simple RPA or RNS. If this were a standard SEC filing, the length suggests 10-K or IR. Lacking specific period context (quarterly vs. annual), and assuming it's a comprehensive financial document, we lean towards the most comprehensive non-annual category, or the general report category if it's not a 10-K. Given the ambiguity, and the fact that it is the full content of a report, we must choose between 10-K and IR. Since the document is a full conversion and not an announcement, we treat it as a report. If we cannot definitively say it is annual, IR is the next best fit for a comprehensive report. However, the sheer size often correlates with 10-K filings. Since the provided text is just the raw HTML/CSS structure of the converted document and lacks any identifying financial text headers (like 'Consolidated Balance Sheets' or 'MD&A'), classifying the *type* of report is difficult. Given the context of financial databases, a very large document that is not an announcement is usually a primary report. I will classify it as 10-K as the default for a very large, comprehensive report when specific quarterly indicators are missing, acknowledging the high uncertainty due to the lack of content headers. FY 2024
2025-04-24 Polish
Podpis do Skonsolidowanego sprawozdania finansowego
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided consists almost entirely of XML structure related to digital signatures (DSIG, SignedInfo, SignatureValue, X509Data, etc.). Crucially, within the Object/QualifyingProperties section, there is a DataObjectFormat element that specifies the content being signed: Content-Disposition: filename="VRG-2024-12-31-0-pl.zip". This indicates that the primary content is a ZIP archive, and the XML itself is merely the signature wrapper. Furthermore, the document length is very large (over 4 million characters), but the provided text is only a truncated view of the signature block. The presence of a ZIP file containing reports (implied by the filename structure 'VRG-2024-12-31-0-pl.zip') suggests this is an announcement or container for the actual filing. Since the text itself is not the comprehensive financial report (like 10-K or IR) but rather a signed container/announcement referencing a zipped file, and given the context of financial filings, this structure strongly suggests a general regulatory filing or an announcement about the filing's availability. The 'VRG' prefix might hint at a specific type of report, but without more context, the most appropriate classification for a signed container referencing a zipped report is the general regulatory fallback category. Applying the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule: This is not the meal (the actual report inside the zip), but the wrapper/announcement. Since it doesn't explicitly announce the publication of a specific report type (like an ER or IR), the best fit is the general Regulatory Filings category (RNS) or potentially RPA if it were shorter and explicitly stated 'Report Published'. Given the complexity and the nature of the signature block, RNS is the safer fallback for a complex, signed regulatory artifact. FY 2024
2025-04-24 Polish
Skonsolidowane sprawozdanie finansowe GK VRG S.A. za 2024 r.
Annual Report (ESEF) Classification · 19% confidence FY 2024
2025-04-24 Polish
Podpis do Listu Prezesa
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The document provided is an XML structure containing digital signature information (Signature, SignedInfo, KeyInfo, DigestValue, etc.). Specifically, it references a file named "List_Prezesa_Zarzadu-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml". The Polish phrase "List Prezesa Zarządu" translates to "Letter from the President of the Management Board". This type of document, especially when presented as a signed attachment or part of a regulatory filing wrapper, often relates to official corporate communications or management statements. Given the options: 1. It is not a full Annual Report (10-K) or Interim Report (IR) as it's just the signature block. 2. It is not an Earnings Release (ER) or Call Transcript (CT). 3. It is not a standard governance document (CGR) or remuneration report (DEF 14A). 4. The content strongly suggests an official communication from management, signed digitally. This aligns best with documents related to management reporting or official correspondence. If this signature block is wrapping a formal letter or statement from the CEO/President, it most closely relates to Management Reports (MDA) or potentially a Regulatory Filing (RNS) if it's a general announcement. However, since the content being signed is a "Letter from the President of the Management Board" concerning a specific date (2024-12-31), it is highly indicative of a management commentary or report component. In the absence of the actual letter content, and considering the context of corporate filings, a letter from the President often accompanies or forms part of the Management Discussion and Analysis (MDA) or is a standalone official communication. Since the document is primarily the digital signature wrapper and not the report itself, and it pertains to a formal communication from the President, classifying it as a Regulatory Filing (RNS) as a general wrapper/attachment, or MDA if we assume the signed document is the MDA, is possible. However, the structure is typical of a document that has been officially submitted or attested to. Given the specific reference to the President's letter, and lacking the full context of what report it accompanies, RNS (Regulatory Filings - fallback) is the safest classification for the signature block itself, unless the signed document is known to be an MDA. Since the document is not short and doesn't announce a report (it *is* the signature of a report/document), I will lean towards the most specific category that covers official management statements if the signed document is assumed to be the content, which is MDA. But since the input *is* the signature block, RNS is the most accurate classification for the wrapper itself, as it's a generic submission artifact. Revisiting the definitions: This is a digital signature block. It is not the report itself. It is an artifact of a filing. RNS is the best fit for miscellaneous regulatory artifacts that don't fit elsewhere, or RPA if it were announcing the report. Given the nature of the content (a signed document reference), RNS is the most appropriate fallback for this specific XML structure.
2025-04-24 Polish

Browse filings by year

3 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.