Skip to main content
Grupa Pracuj S.A. logo

Grupa Pracuj S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · GPP ISIN · PLGRPRC00015 LEI · 259400BSBFEIIIDAAL82 WAR Telecommunications, computer programming, consultancy, computing infrastructure, and other information service activities
Open in API
Filings indexed 1,263 across all filing types
Latest filing 2022-02-16 Regulatory Filings
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR GPP

About Grupa Pracuj S.A.

https://grupapracuj.pl/home

Grupa Pracuj S.A. is an HR technology platform that provides digital solutions to support organizations in the recruitment, retention, and development of employees. The company operates a portfolio of brands across two main segments: digital recruitment and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) systems. Its recruitment services include the job boards Pracuj.pl and robota.ua, along with the:protocol, a platform specialized in the IT sector. The SaaS offerings provide tools for automating HR processes and include eRecruiter for recruitment management, softgarden for candidate experience, worksmile for employee engagement, and absence for leave management.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Podpis Członka Zarządu - Olga Prasał
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Signature block, specifically containing elements like 'Signature', 'SignedInfo', 'Reference', 'DigestValue', 'SignatureValue', and 'KeyInfo' with X.509 data. This structure is characteristic of a digitally signed document, often used to verify the authenticity and integrity of an attached or referenced file. The reference URI points to a file named 'Grupa+Kapitalowa+Zywiec+SA+31.12.2021+Komentarz+Zarzadu%2C+Lad+Korporacyjny%2C+Raport+Niefinansowy.xhtml'. This strongly suggests the document itself is not the report but rather the signature wrapper for a Non-Financial Report (which might fall under SR or RNS, but the wrapper itself is metadata). Since the document is extremely short (4797 chars) and appears to be a signature block referencing a report, it fits the criteria for a Report Publication Announcement (RPA) or a general Regulatory Filing (RNS) announcing the availability of the signed document, rather than the content of the report itself. Given the context of financial filings, an announcement about a published, signed document is best classified as RPA if it's announcing the publication, or RNS if it's just the signature block itself without context. Since the URI mentions 'Raport Niefinansowy' (Non-Financial Report), and the document is just the signature, RPA is a strong candidate if this is the announcement of publication. However, without the actual announcement text, and only the signature structure, RNS (Regulatory Filings - fallback) is the safest classification for an unclassified, technical filing component.
2022-02-16 Polish
Podpis Prezesa Zarządu - Simon Amor
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Digital Signature block, specifically containing elements like 'Signature', 'SignedInfo', 'Reference', 'DigestValue', 'KeyInfo', and 'X509Data'. This structure indicates that the document is a digitally signed file, likely an attachment or the file itself, rather than a standard financial report like a 10-K, ER, or IR. The reference URI mentions 'Grupa Kapitalowa Zywiec SA 31.12.2021 Komentarz Zarzadu, Lad Korporacyjny, Raport Niefinansowy.xhtml', suggesting the underlying content relates to a Management Commentary, Corporate Governance, and Non-financial Report for the year ended 12/31/2021. Since the text provided is purely the signature metadata and not the report content itself, and there is no explicit announcement text (like 'Report published today'), the most appropriate classification based on the available options is the fallback category for miscellaneous regulatory/technical filings that don't fit standard reporting types, which is 'RNS' (Regulatory Filings). Alternatively, if the system expects the classification of the *content* being signed, it would lean towards Governance Information (CGR) or Management Reports (MDA), but the *document provided* is the signature block. Given the ambiguity and the nature of the text being technical metadata, RNS is the safest general classification for non-standard document formats.
2022-02-16 Polish
Grupa Kapitałowa Żywiec S.A. - Sprawozdanie i Oświadczenia Zarządu wraz z Raportem Niefinansowy
Annual Report Classification · 100% confidence The document is a comprehensive consolidated financial report for Grupa Kapitałowa Żywiec S.A. for the fiscal year ending 31.12.2021. It includes a letter from the CEO, detailed financial statements (income statement, cash flow statement), management discussion and analysis (MDA), risk factors, and operational data. Since it covers the full fiscal year and contains substantive financial statements, it is classified as an Annual Report (10-K). FY 2021
2022-02-16 Polish
Podpis Członka Zarządu - Andrzej Borczyk
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Digital Signature block, specifically referencing a file named "ESEF_Grupa_Zywiec_Spolka_Akcyjna_20211231.zip". The presence of 'ESEF' (European Single Electronic Format) strongly suggests a regulatory filing, and the date '20211231' indicates a year-end filing. Since the text is not the report itself but rather the signature metadata for a zipped file containing the report, and given the context of year-end financial reporting, this is most likely related to the Annual Report (10-K equivalent in ESEF context, which is usually the Annual Financial Report). However, the document itself is just the signature wrapper, not the content. Because the content is not present, and this is a technical signature wrapper for a year-end filing, it doesn't fit perfectly into 10-K (the report) or ER (the release). It is a technical component of a regulatory submission. Given the options, and recognizing that ESEF filings often contain the Annual Report, if the underlying content is the full annual report, 10-K would be the closest conceptual match for the *data* being signed. However, following Rule 2 (Menu vs Meal), this is not the report itself, nor is it explicitly an announcement of the report's publication. It is a technical signature block. In the absence of clear content indicating a specific report type (like MDA or IR), and given it's a regulatory artifact related to year-end data, the most appropriate fallback for a non-standard, technical regulatory component that doesn't fit the specific report types is RNS (Regulatory Filings). If this were the actual ESEF filing package, 10-K would be the target, but as a signature block, RNS is safer.
2022-02-16 Polish
Podpis Członka Zarządu - Tomasz Klima
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Digital Signature block, specifically referencing a ZIP file named "ESEF_Grupa_Zywiec_Spolka_Akcyjna_20211231.zip". The presence of ESEF (European Single Electronic Format) and a reference to a specific annual period (20211231) strongly suggests this is a regulatory filing containing annual financial data, likely an Annual Report (10-K equivalent for the relevant jurisdiction, which is often submitted in XBRL/ESEF format). However, the document itself is not the report content (like an ER or IR) but rather the digital signature wrapper for the report file. Since the content is purely technical metadata (a signature) related to a filing, and it doesn't contain the actual financial narrative or results, it falls best under the general 'Regulatory Filings' category (RNS) or potentially a specific financial filing if the context implied the full report was attached/linked. Given the structure is a signature wrapper for a file dated year-end 2021, it is most likely associated with the Annual Report (10-K). However, following the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule, if this were an announcement *about* the report, it would be RPA/RNS. Since this is the signature *of* the report file itself, and the file name implies a full annual filing, I will classify it based on the content it secures, which is the Annual Report (10-K). If a more specific ESEF code existed, it would be used, but among the provided options, 10-K is the closest analogue for a year-end comprehensive filing.
2022-02-16 Polish
Podpis Członka Zarządu - Karolina Tarnawska
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Digital Signature block, specifically containing elements like 'Signature', 'SignedInfo', 'SignatureValue', 'KeyInfo', and 'Object' with 'QualifyingProperties'. This structure is characteristic of a digitally signed file, often used to secure regulatory submissions (like ESEF filings in Europe, indicated by the reference to 'ESEF_Grupa_Zywiec_Spolka_Akcyjna_20211231.zip' and Polish issuer details). Since the content is purely the signature metadata and not the actual financial report content (like an ER, 10-K, or IR), it does not fit any of the specific report categories (10-K, ER, IR, etc.). It is a technical component of a filing. Therefore, the most appropriate classification is the general fallback category for miscellaneous regulatory components that don't fit elsewhere, which is 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS). The document length is short (4806 chars), but the content is technical metadata, not an announcement *about* a report, so RPA is less fitting than RNS for a raw signature block.
2022-02-16 Polish

Browse filings by year

11 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.