Skip to main content
Prochem S.A. logo

Prochem S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · PRM ISIN · PLPRCHM00014 LEI · 259400Y049RUPUFT3G15 WAR Professional, scientific and technical activities
Open in API
Filings indexed 710 across all filing types
Latest filing 2025-04-25 Regulatory Filings
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR PRM

About Prochem S.A.

http://www.prochem.com.pl/

Prochem S.A., established in 1947, is an engineering company specializing in the design and implementation of investment projects. The company provides comprehensive, end-to-end services, from initial pre-investment concepts and design to turnkey delivery of facilities. Its core areas of operation encompass industrial investments, general construction, and environmental protection. Prochem serves clients across various key sectors, including oil and gas, chemicals, and energy. The company leverages extensive experience and modern technologies, such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), to deliver complex technical and organizational solutions for large-scale projects.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
zal27_prochemsa-infz-sf-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml.XAdES
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of XML digital signature blocks, specifically referencing a file named "prochemsa-infz-sf-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml". The presence of multiple digital signatures (Signature, SignedInfo, KeyInfo, etc.) indicates that this is a security wrapper or metadata file associated with a primary document, rather than the primary financial report itself. The reference URI points to an XHTML file, which is a common format for regulatory filings in Europe (often related to XBRL/ESEF reporting). Since the text is only the signature block and not the content of the report, and it is a regulatory artifact, the most appropriate classification is the general fallback for regulatory filings that don't fit a specific content category, or potentially a specific regulatory filing type if the context strongly suggested it. Given the structure and the reference to a specific file name ending in '-pl.xhtml' (suggesting Polish origin/filing), this is a regulatory artifact. Without the actual content, 'RNS' (Regulatory Filings - general fallback) is the safest classification, as it is clearly a regulatory/security component of a filing.
2025-04-25 Polish
Informacja Zarządu
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is primarily HTML structure containing CSS styling and font definitions, typical of a rendered PDF or web-based filing viewer. The actual content is heavily truncated or missing, showing only the boilerplate structure (head, style tags, font definitions). However, the document length is reported as 156,373 characters, which is substantial, suggesting a full report rather than a brief announcement. Since the content itself is inaccessible for keyword analysis (like '10-K', 'Earnings Release', 'Proxy Statement'), and given the context of a financial database classifier, I must rely on the structure or the lack of specific content indicators. In the absence of any specific filing keywords, and considering this is a large document, I cannot definitively classify it as a specific report type (10-K, IR, ER, etc.). Therefore, the most appropriate fallback category for an unidentifiable, large regulatory document is 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS), as it serves as the general catch-all for filings that don't fit the specific definitions. Update based on the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule: Since the document text provided is just the structural wrapper (HTML/CSS) and not the actual report content, it strongly suggests this is an announcement or a wrapper *about* a filing, rather than the filing itself. However, RNS is the general regulatory fallback. Given the large size (156k chars), it's unlikely to be a simple RPA, but without content, RNS remains the safest general classification. Q3 2024
2025-04-25 Polish
Sprawozdanie RN z oceny SF PROCHEM SA za 2024
AGM Information Classification · 98% confidence The document text provided is extremely long (681,337 characters) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, including extensive CSS styling and font definitions. The presence of complex HTML structure, rather than clean, structured financial data or narrative text typical of a formal filing (like 10-K, IR, or ER), suggests this is likely the underlying source code or a rendered view of a document that was processed or viewed through a specific platform. Given the length and the nature of the content (which seems to be the entire rendered page structure rather than just the content summary), it is highly unlikely to be a short announcement (RPA/RNS). Since the content itself is not readable financial data or narrative, and it represents the container for a document, the most appropriate classification based on the provided definitions and the context of a 'premium global corporate filing database' is to treat it as a generic, unclassified document format if it doesn't fit the specific financial reports. However, since the input is the *text* of a document, and it is not a known report type, the fallback category 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS) is used for miscellaneous or unclassifiable filings, although the content strongly suggests a rendering artifact rather than a standard regulatory submission. Revisiting the definitions: None of the specific financial report types (10-K, IR, ER, IP, etc.) match raw HTML/CSS. The document is not short enough to be an RPA based on the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule, as its length is massive. Therefore, the fallback 'RNS' is the safest choice for an unidentifiable, large document structure.
2025-04-25 Polish
Oświadczenie RN
Remuneration Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is heavily truncated and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a document viewer or rendering engine, containing CSS styles, font definitions (woff data), and structural tags (head, style, pf, pc). There are no discernible keywords, regulatory headers (like '10-K', 'Annual Report', 'Earnings Release'), or specific reporting periods that would allow for classification into the defined categories (AGM-R, 10-K, ER, IR, etc.). Since the content is purely structural metadata and styling rather than the actual financial or corporate filing text, it cannot be classified accurately based on the provided definitions. Therefore, the most appropriate fallback category is 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS), as it serves as the general miscellaneous category for unclassifiable documents, although this classification is based on the lack of content rather than the content itself.
2025-04-25 Polish
zal18_prochemsa-oswz-sf-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml.XAdES
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML signature blocks, specifically containing elements like <Signatures>, <Signature>, <SignedInfo>, <SignatureValue>, and <KeyInfo> with X509 certificates. This structure is characteristic of digitally signed documents, often used for regulatory filings in XML formats (like XBRL or ESEF filings in Europe, or specific SEC filings). The presence of multiple signatures and references to an XHTML file ('prochemsa-oswz-sf-2024-12-31-0-pl.xhtml') suggests this is the signature wrapper or metadata accompanying a primary financial document. Since the actual content of the financial report is not present, and the document is primarily metadata/signatures, the most appropriate classification is the general fallback for regulatory filings that don't fit a specific content type, which is 'RNS' (Regulatory Filings) or potentially 'XLSX' if the underlying document was a data file, but given the XML structure, RNS is safer as a wrapper/metadata file. However, since the document length is substantial (16008 chars) and it contains complex digital signature data, it is highly likely to be the signature block *of* a formal regulatory submission, rather than a simple announcement *about* a report (RPA). Given the options, and the highly technical, non-content nature of the snippet, 'RNS' (General Regulatory Filings) is the best fit for a document that is essentially a signed wrapper.
2025-04-25 Polish
Oświadczenie Zarządu do SF PROCHEM SA
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is heavily truncated and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, including CSS styles and font definitions (e.g., font-woff data, CSS keyframes, layout classes like .pf, .pc, .t). There are no discernible keywords, regulatory headers (like '10-K', 'Annual Report', 'Earnings Release'), or specific reporting periods that would allow for classification into a standard financial filing type (10-K, IR, ER, etc.). The document length is large (644,508 chars), suggesting it is a full report, but the content itself is unreadable structure rather than content. Given the lack of content and the presence of raw formatting/metadata, the most appropriate fallback category is 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS), as it serves as a general category for miscellaneous or unclassifiable regulatory submissions, although this classification is based purely on the failure to classify elsewhere due to missing content. Q3 2024
2025-04-25 Polish

Browse filings by year

11 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.