Skip to main content
Muza S.A. logo

Muza S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · MZA ISIN · PLMUZA000019 LEI · 259400WBTWXE2J828F18 WAR Publishing, broadcasting, and content production and distribution activities
Open in API
Filings indexed 720 across all filing types
Latest filing 2024-04-30 Audit Report / Informat…
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR MZA

About Muza S.A.

https://muza.com.pl/

Muza S.A. is a publishing company founded in 1991. The firm's primary activities involve the publication and sale of a diverse range of books. Its portfolio includes fiction, poetry, atlases, encyclopedias, lexicons, dictionaries, and textbooks. The company also produces and distributes magazines, games, and puzzles. In addition to traditional publishing, Muza S.A. operates an online bookstore and a readers' club to directly engage with its customer base. A key aspect of its business model is the collaboration with international publishers and copyright agencies to acquire rights for Polish-language editions of foreign works. The company actively participates in national and international book fairs and organizes author events to promote its publications.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Raport Audytora - podpis
Audit Report / Information Classification · 98% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of XML structures related to digital signatures, specifically XAdES (XML Advanced Electronic Signatures). It contains elements like <Signatures>, <SignedInfo>, <SignatureValue>, <KeyInfo>, and <QualifyingProperties>. The reference URI points to "Opinia_z_badania_jednostkowe_Muza_2023.xhtml", which translates to 'Individual Audit Opinion Muza 2023'. This strongly suggests the document is an Audit Report or related certification/opinion, but the content itself is the signature block, not the report narrative. Since the definitions include 'Audit Report / Information (Code: AR)' for standalone audit reports and applied accounting principles, and this text is clearly the digital certification of such a document, AR is the most appropriate classification. It is not an announcement (RPA/RNS) because it contains the core cryptographic proof of the document's integrity, rather than just stating a report is available. FY 2023
2024-04-30 Polish
Raport Audytora
Audit Report / Information Classification · 98% confidence The document text provided is an HTML structure containing CSS styles and what appears to be the raw content of a converted PDF file, indicated by the presence of `pdf2htmlEX` tool references and the title tag: "Opinia_z_badania_jednostkowe_Muza_2023.xhtml". The title itself, which translates roughly to "Opinion from the individual audit of Muza 2023", strongly suggests an official audit report or opinion. Given the definitions, 'Audit Report / Information' (AR) is the most appropriate classification for a standalone audit opinion, as it is not the full Annual Report (10-K) and is specifically related to auditing results. FY 2023
2024-04-30 Polish
Oświadczenie Zarządu - podpis
Management Reports Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML structure related to digital signatures ('Signatures', 'SignedInfo', 'SignatureValue', 'KeyInfo', 'X509Certificate', 'SigningTime'). Crucially, within the 'SignedProperties' section, there is a 'DataObjectFormat' description containing the filename: 'filename="Informacja Zarządu.xhtml"'. 'Informacja Zarządu' translates from Polish to 'Management Information' or 'Board Information'. Furthermore, the document length is substantial (209,433 chars), suggesting it is the content of a report or filing, not just a brief announcement. Given the content points towards management information, the most fitting category is 'Management Reports' (MDA), which covers management's explanation of results and business trends. While 'Informacja Zarządu' could sometimes relate to governance (CGR) or board changes (MANG), in a financial context, it often refers to the management discussion and analysis section of a larger report, aligning best with MDA.
2024-04-30 Polish
Oświadczenie Zarządu
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is extremely short (truncated to 15000 chars, but the actual length is 151036 chars, suggesting a large document) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, including CSS styles and font definitions, rather than the content of a standard financial filing (like a 10-K, ER, or IR). The presence of extensive styling elements, font loading data (base64 encoded), and structural tags (head, style, pf, pc) strongly indicates this is the underlying source code or a rendered view of a document viewer, not the narrative or tabular content of a specific regulatory filing type defined in the list. However, given the context of financial document classification, if this structure is the *entire* document provided, it most closely resembles a generic container or a file that failed to render its content properly, or perhaps a supplementary data file that was incorrectly submitted as HTML/XML. Since the document is very long (151k chars) but the content is purely structural/styling, and it doesn't contain keywords for specific reports (like 'Consolidated Statements', 'Management's Discussion', 'Proxy Statement', etc.), the most appropriate classification based on the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule is difficult because it's not a short announcement either. It is a large, structurally defined file. If we must choose from the provided list, and assuming this structure is the *result* of a filing that wasn't a standard text report, the closest fallback for a non-standard, large data structure that might accompany a filing, or a filing that is primarily structural data, is 'XLSX' (Financial Supplement Data) if we assume the underlying data is meant to be extracted, or 'RNS' (Regulatory Filings) as a general fallback. Given the HTML/XML nature, it is not a typical XLSX. It is most likely a complex filing or a viewer wrapper. Revisiting the definitions, none fit perfectly. 'RNS' is the general fallback for miscellaneous filings. Given the lack of specific financial content keywords, I will default to the general regulatory fallback, RNS, as it represents a document that doesn't fit the specific content-based categories. Q3 2024
2024-04-30 Polish
Oświadczenie RN dot. Komitetu Audytu
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is heavily truncated and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a document viewer or renderer, containing CSS styles, font definitions (WOFF data), and structural elements (like #sidebar, #pagecom0container, .pf, .pc). There are no discernible keywords, regulatory headers (like '10-K', 'Annual Report', 'Earnings Release'), or specific reporting periods that would allow for classification into the defined categories (10-K, ER, IR, etc.). The document length is substantial (182,273 chars), but the visible content is purely technical scaffolding for rendering, not the financial content itself. Given the lack of content identifying the nature of the filing, the most appropriate fallback category is 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS), as it serves as the general miscellaneous category for unclassifiable documents, although this classification is based on the absence of information rather than positive identification. Q3 2024
2024-04-30 Polish
Ocena RN
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text is heavily truncated and appears to be the raw HTML/CSS structure of a document viewer, not the substantive content of a financial filing. It contains extensive styling information, font definitions (WOFF data), and structural elements like '#sidebar', '#pagecom0container', and CSS animations. There are no discernible keywords, regulatory headers (like '10-K', 'Annual Report', 'Earnings Release'), or specific financial reporting periods that would allow for classification into the defined categories (AGM-R, 10-K, ER, IR, etc.). Given the lack of content and the nature of the text being presentation/viewer code, the most appropriate fallback category is 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS), as it serves as the general category for miscellaneous or unclassifiable documents, although a more accurate assessment would require the actual content. Since the document length is substantial (211,221 chars), it is unlikely to be a simple RPA, but without content, RNS is the safest general classification. Q2 2024
2024-04-30 Polish

Browse filings by year

11 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.