Skip to main content
CCC S.A. logo

CCC S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · CCC ISIN · PLCCC0000016 LEI · 259400NWPQ2HCSMZP970 WAR Wholesale and retail trade
Open in API
Filings indexed 1,170 across all filing types
Latest filing 2025-04-30 Audit Report / Informat…
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR CCC

About CCC S.A.

https://ccc.eu/start

CCC S.A. is a European company engaged in the production and retail sale of footwear, bags, and accessories. The company provides a diverse product portfolio for women, men, and children through its proprietary brands and third-party labels. It operates a large-scale, omnichannel business model that combines an extensive network of physical stores with numerous e-commerce platforms. The group's digital presence is anchored by key online retailers such as eobuwie.pl and MODIVO, complementing its traditional retail operations across various European markets.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Sprawozdanie finansowe CCC SA za 2024 rok
Audit Report / Information Classification · 1% confidence The document text provided is extremely long (over 10 million characters) and appears to be the raw content of an XBRL/iXBRL filing, indicated by the extensive XML/HTML namespaces (e.g., xmlns:ix, xmlns:ifrs-full, xmlns:esef_cor) and the presence of structured financial data representations within the text. This structure strongly suggests a comprehensive financial report, rather than a brief announcement (which would trigger the RPA/RNS rule). Given the length and the nature of the content (which typically contains full financial statements and notes), it is most likely the Annual Report (10-K) or a comprehensive Interim Report (IR). Since the text is highly structured and massive, it represents the full report content. Without explicit headers like '10-K' or '10-Q', the classification defaults to the most comprehensive annual filing type, 10-K, or the comprehensive interim report, IR. However, the presence of extensive structured data often points towards the primary annual filing in many contexts, or a very detailed interim report. Given the sheer volume and complexity implied by the XBRL tags, it is classified as a comprehensive report. Since there is no explicit mention of '10-Q' or 'Half-Year', and 10-K is the standard for full annual reports, I will lean towards 10-K as the most likely comprehensive filing type for such a large document, although IR is also possible if it's a detailed half-year report. Given the context of global databases, a massive structured filing is usually the 10-K or equivalent annual filing. I will select 10-K based on the document size suggesting a full annual filing. Q1 2025
2025-04-30 Polish
Oświadczenie Rady Nadzorczej CCC S.A. dotyczące oceny sprawozdań CCC S.A.
AGM Information Classification · 1% confidence The document text is extremely long (276,782 characters) and appears to be the full content of an Inline XBRL (iXBRL) filing, indicated by the extensive XML/HTML structure, namespaces like 'xmlns:ix="http://www.xbrl.org/2013/inlineXBRL"', and the presence of financial data representations (e.g., 'Q1', 'Q2', 'Q3', 'Q4' implied by the structure, and specific financial terms embedded in the text). The content is not a short announcement linking to a report, but the report itself, containing detailed financial figures and disclosures embedded within the markup. Given the comprehensive nature and the structure typical of regulatory financial statements, this is most likely an Annual Report (10-K) or a comprehensive Interim/Quarterly Report (IR). Since the text is very dense and structured like a full financial filing, and without explicit mention of '10-Q' or 'Half-Year', the default classification for a comprehensive annual filing structure is 10-K, although it could also be a very detailed IR. However, the sheer volume and complexity strongly suggest a primary annual filing or a very detailed quarterly filing. Given the options, and the lack of explicit '10-Q' or 'Half-Year' keywords, I will lean towards the most comprehensive yearly report type, 10-K, as it often encompasses the most detailed structure seen here. If it were a short announcement, RPA would be chosen, but this is the full data.
2025-04-30 Polish
Oświadczenie Rady Nadzorczej CCC S.A. w sprawie Komitetu Audytu
Governance Information Classification · 1% confidence The document text is extremely long (178,745 characters) and contains extensive structured data, including HTML tags, XML namespaces (like 'xmlns:ifrs-full', 'xmlns:esef_cor'), and references to financial concepts and data points embedded within the structure (e.g., 'xbrli', 'ix'). This strongly suggests a comprehensive, structured financial filing. Crucially, the document contains numerous embedded snippets that look like XBRL/iXBRL data representations, which are standard for regulatory filings like the 10-K or IR (Interim Report). Given the massive size and the presence of structured financial reporting elements, it is highly unlikely to be a short announcement (RPA/RNS). It is a full report. Since the text is truncated and we cannot see the explicit '10-K' header, we must rely on the content structure. The presence of extensive financial data, management commentary indicators (though fragmented), and the sheer volume points towards a comprehensive annual or interim report. If the document were an Annual Report (10-K), it would be the most comprehensive. If it were an Interim Report (IR), it would be comprehensive for a shorter period. Without explicit period indicators (like 'For the year ended' vs 'For the six months ended'), classifying between 10-K and IR is difficult based solely on the provided snippet structure. However, the presence of complex financial data structures and the overall length strongly favor a comprehensive report over a brief summary or presentation. Let's re-examine the definitions: - 10-K: Official yearly report. - IR: Comprehensive financial report for a period shorter than a year (e.g., half-year). Since the document is very large and appears to be a full regulatory filing containing detailed financial information (implied by the XBRL/iXBRL structure), it fits the description of either 10-K or IR. In the absence of clear annual period markers, and given the high complexity often associated with annual filings, I will lean towards the most comprehensive category, 10-K, but acknowledge the possibility of IR. Given the context of premium databases, these large structured filings are often the 10-K. Upon closer inspection of the embedded data snippets (e.g., 'Q1', 'Q2', 'Q3', 'Q4' implied by the structure, and the general nature of such large iXBRL documents), it is most likely a comprehensive report. I will select 10-K as the primary classification for a large, structured, comprehensive financial report unless clear quarterly indicators strongly suggest IR. *Self-Correction/Refinement*: The document structure is typical of an iXBRL filing, which can be 10-K, 10-Q (not listed, but IR covers quarterly/interim), or other major reports. Since 'IR' covers comprehensive reports shorter than a year, and 10-K covers the full year, and both are large, I will default to the most common large annual filing type, 10-K, as the structure suggests a full regulatory submission.
2025-04-30 Polish
Podpis Raport z atestacji sprawozdawczości zrównoważonego rozwoju Grupy CCC SA za 2024 rok
Regulatory Filings Classification · 1% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Digital Signature block, specifically referencing a file named "24 CCC Raport z atestacji Grupy CCC.xhtml" which translates to "24 CCC Attestation Report of the CCC Group". This structure strongly indicates a digitally signed document, likely an official filing or report that has been authenticated. Since the content is the signature metadata itself and not the report content, and given the reference to a 'Raport z atestacji' (Attestation Report), this is most likely a regulatory filing or an official document that requires verification. Because 'Attestation Report' does not map directly to a specific code like 10-K or AR, and the document is essentially a wrapper/metadata for a signed file, the most appropriate classification is the general regulatory fallback category, RNS (Regulatory Filings), or potentially AR (Audit Report / Information) if 'atestacji' is interpreted as an audit. Given the context of digital signatures often accompanying official regulatory submissions, RNS is a safer general classification, but since 'Raport z atestacji' is very close to an audit/assurance report, AR is also plausible. However, the document is the signature, not the report content. Following Rule 2, if this were an announcement of the report, it would be RPA/RNS. Since it is the signature block of a document that appears to be an attestation/audit report, and it is not the full report content, I will classify it as RNS as the most general regulatory container for signed official documents that don't fit elsewhere, or AR if we assume the signed document is an audit report. Given the high specificity required, and the text being the signature block itself, RNS (Regulatory Filings) is the best fit for this metadata wrapper.
2025-04-30 Polish
Raport z atestacji sprawozdawczości zrównoważonego rozwoju Grupy CCC SA za 2024 rok
Audit Report / Information Classification · 1% confidence The document text contains the title "24 CCC Raport z atestacji Grupy CCC". The term "Raport z atestacji" translates to "Attestation Report" or "Audit Report". Given the context of financial documents and the specific mention of an attestation/audit, this strongly suggests a formal audit or assurance report. The length (over 2 million characters) indicates it is a comprehensive document, not just a brief announcement. This aligns best with the definition for Audit Report / Information (AR), which covers standalone audit reports and applied accounting principles, distinguishing it from the full Annual Report (10-K). FY 2024
2025-04-30 Polish
Podpis Sprawozdanie z badania skonsolidowanego sprawozdania CCC SA za 2024 rok
Regulatory Filings Classification · 1% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Digital Signature block, specifically containing elements like 'Signature', 'SignedInfo', 'SignatureValue', 'KeyInfo', and 'QualifyingProperties'. This structure is characteristic of a digitally signed file, often used to verify the authenticity and integrity of an associated document. The reference URI within the signature points to a file named '24 CCC Sprawozdanie z badania [email protected]'. The Polish phrase 'Sprawozdanie z badania' translates to 'Audit Report' or 'Examination Report'. Since the text itself is only the signature wrapper and not the content of the report, and it explicitly references an 'Audit Report' ('Sprawozdanie z badania'), the most appropriate classification is Audit Report / Information (AR). The document length is short (4788 chars), suggesting it is likely an announcement or the signature block accompanying a filing, but given the explicit reference to an audit report, AR is the primary classification, though RPA could be considered if the text was purely an announcement *about* the report. However, the content strongly implies the nature of the underlying document is an audit report.
2025-04-30 Polish

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.