Skip to main content
Betacom S.A. logo

Betacom S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · BCM ISIN · PLBTCOM00016 LEI · 259400BRMBG9E27RG043 WAR Telecommunications, computer programming, consultancy, computing infrastructure, and other information service activities
Open in API
Filings indexed 651 across all filing types
Latest filing 2017-11-30 Board/Management Inform…
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR BCM

About Betacom S.A.

https://betacom.com.pl/en/

Betacom is an information technology provider that supports enterprises through digital transformation by delivering innovative solutions in a partnership model. The company focuses on designing and deploying IT systems, software development, and consulting services. It combines classic IT solutions with cloud services to create unique competencies in Hybrid IT, Smart Workplace, Education, and Logistics. Betacom develops its own proprietary technologies while also extending the products of its key partners. Core service offerings include the design and implementation of network services, security systems, data management, private cloud, and virtualization solutions. The company also aims to create a direct impact in sectors such as child therapy and health.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Oświadczenie Zarządu w sprawie firmy audytorskiej za I półrocze 2017
Board/Management Information Classification · 99% confidence The document is a formal declaration ('OŚWIADCZENIE ZARZĄDU') from the Management Board of Betacom S.A., dated November 28, 2017. The content specifically addresses the selection and qualifications of the entity authorized to review the 'półrocznego skróconego sprawozdania finansowego' (condensed half-year financial statement) for the first half of 2017. This declaration confirms compliance regarding the review of an interim financial report. Since the document is a formal statement about the audit/review process for a half-year report, it aligns best with the Audit Report / Information category (AR), which covers applied accounting principles and results of internal/regulatory stress tests, or potentially an Interim Report (IR) if it were the report itself. However, as it is a statement *about* the review of the half-year report, AR is the most appropriate fit among the provided options, as it relates to the assurance/audit aspect of financial reporting, distinct from the comprehensive Interim Report (IR) or the Earnings Release (ER). The document length is short (1102 chars), but it is a substantive declaration, not just an announcement of publication.
2017-11-30 Polish
Oświadczenie Zarządu w sprawie rzetelności za I półrocze 2017
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The document is a formal statement (Oświadczenie) signed by the Management Board of Betacom S.A. It serves as an officer certification/attestation regarding the accuracy of the company's interim financial statements for the first half of 2017. Per the 'Certification Rule', documents that are primarily officer certifications or attestations, even when referencing a specific report type, should be classified as Regulatory Filings (RNS) rather than the report itself, as it does not contain the actual financial data. H1 2017
2017-11-30 Polish
Raport audytora z przeglądu SF za I półrocze 2017
Audit Report / Information Classification · 99% confidence The document is explicitly titled 'Raport z przeglądu śródrocznego skróconego sprawozdania finansowego za okres 6 miesięcy zakończony dnia 30 września 2017 roku' (Report on the review of the condensed interim financial statements for the 6-month period ended September 30, 2017) and contains the 'Raport niezależnego biegłego rewidenta z przeglądu śródrocznego skróconego sprawozdania finansowego' (Report of the independent auditor on the review of the condensed interim financial statements). This content describes the results of an audit/review for a period shorter than a year (6 months). This aligns perfectly with the definition of an Audit Report / Information (AR), which covers standalone audit reports and results of internal/regulatory stress tests, distinguishing it from a full Annual Report (10-K) or a comprehensive Interim Report (IR) which typically contains the statements themselves, not just the auditor's review conclusion. Given the content is the auditor's review report on interim financials, the code AR is the most appropriate classification. H1 2018
2017-11-30 Polish
Obroty w ramach umowy ramowej - Content (PL)
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The document is a short announcement in Polish from a company (Emitent) regarding a significant transaction (an order worth over 4.1 million PLN) with a counterparty (PKN Orlen SA). The text explicitly states that the information is being made public because the turnover with this counterparty exceeded 10% of the company's revenue over the last 12 months. This type of disclosure, concerning material transactions or changes in significant relationships that impact the company's financial standing or operations, often falls under general regulatory announcements or specific transaction disclosures. Since there is no specific category for 'material contract award' or 'related party transaction disclosure' that fits perfectly, and given the short length (under 5,000 characters) and the nature of providing key financial/operational updates to the public, it aligns best with a general Regulatory Filing (RNS) or potentially a Capital/Financing Update (CAP) if the order was related to financing, but RNS is the most appropriate fallback for significant, non-standard regulatory disclosures. Reviewing the definitions, none perfectly capture a 'material contract award' disclosure. However, it is a specific regulatory disclosure made public. Given the options, RNS (Regulatory Filings - general fallback) is the most suitable classification for a mandatory public disclosure of a material business event that doesn't fit 10-K, ER, or IR. If the document were longer and contained detailed financial analysis, it might lean towards MDA, but its brevity and focus on a single material event suggest a regulatory notification.
2017-11-30 Polish
Zawiadomienie o zbyciu akcji
Major Shareholding Notification Classification · 99% confidence The document is a formal notification dated October 23, 2017, from SURPLUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT to Betacom S.A. It explicitly references Article 69, Paragraph 1 of the Polish Public Offering Act ('Ustawa o ofercie publicznej...'). The content details a change in shareholding percentage, specifically that the entity's stake in Betacom S.A. decreased from 5.01% to 4.92% following a transaction on October 19, 2017. This type of mandatory disclosure regarding changes in significant share ownership thresholds (crossing the 5% mark) directly corresponds to the definition of Major Shareholding Notification.
2017-10-24 Polish
Zawiadomienie o zmianie stanu posiadania akcji - Content (PL)
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The document text is very short (439 characters) and states that a notification ('zawiadomienie') was received by BETACOM S.A. from Surplus Capital Management Sp. z o.o. S.K.A. regarding Article 69(1) of the Public Offering Act. Crucially, the text explicitly states: 'Treść zawiadomienia Emitent przekazuje w załączeniu do niniejszego raportu' (The Issuer transmits the content of the notification attached to this report). This structure—announcing the receipt of information and stating the actual content is attached—fits the definition of a Report Publication Announcement (RPA) or a general Regulatory Filing (RNS), according to the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule. Since the content is a notification about a change in significant share ownership (Art. 69 relates to major shareholdings), the most specific code is MRQ (Major Shareholding Notification). However, because this document is merely the *announcement* that the MRQ content is attached, RPA is the most appropriate classification based on the document's function as a publication notice, or RNS as a general regulatory filing fallback. Given the specific nature of the underlying content (major shareholding change), and the short length indicating an announcement rather than the full filing, RNS is a safe fallback, but MRQ is the subject matter. Since the text is an announcement of a filing/notification being attached, RPA is the best fit for the *action* described, but MRQ describes the *subject*. Let's re-evaluate based on the definitions. The content is a notification of a change in significant share ownership (Art. 69). This subject matter maps directly to MRQ. However, the document itself is an announcement that the actual MRQ content is attached. If the actual MRQ document was provided, it would be MRQ. Since this is the cover announcement, RPA or RNS applies. Given the specific nature of the underlying event (major shareholding), and the fact that RNS is the general fallback, I will classify it as RNS as it is a general regulatory announcement whose content is external/attached, unless the user intended for the subject matter (MRQ) to override the announcement format. Given the strict 'MENU VS MEAL' rule, RPA or RNS is correct. I choose RNS as the general regulatory filing fallback for announcements of attached regulatory documents that aren't explicitly defined as RPA.
2017-10-24 Polish

Browse filings by year

11 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.