Regulatory Filings • Aug 10, 2016
Regulatory Filings
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
2 Dov Friedman Street, Ramat Gan 5250301, Israel
(Address of Principal Executive Office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F ☒ Form 40-F ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ☐
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ___________
99.1 A report of Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Ltd., a controlled subsidiary of B Communications Ltd., itself a subsidiary of Internet Gold - Immediate Report - Class Actions.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
INTERNET GOLD-GOLDEN LINES LTD. (Registrant)
By /s/ Doron Turgeman
Doron Turgeman Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 10, 2016
99.1 A report of Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Ltd., a controlled subsidiary of B Communications Ltd., itself a subsidiary of Internet Gold - Immediate Report - Class Actions.
The Company received two claims together with two class action certification motions which were filed with the Tel Aviv District Court by the same petitioner, who is a customer of the Company.
In one motion which was filed against both the Company and an Internet provider, it was alleged, inter alia, that the defendants acted unlawfully in connection with the transfer of Internet subscribers from one provider to another by not immediately disconnecting the service from the abandoned provider, thereby causing the subscriber to be double charged for the same service. As stated in the motion, the class action claim amount is unknown.
In the second motion, which was filed against the Company only, it was alleged, inter alia, that the Company unlawfully charged for a "support and warranty"service which the petitioner alleges is unnecessary, for a monthly fee of NIS 5.93. In this motion as well, the class action amount is unknown.
The Company is studying the motions and the claims and it is unable to evaluate their likelihood of success at the present stage.
The above summary constitutes a translated summary of Immediate Report published by the Company. The Hebrew version was submitted by the Company to the relevant authorities pursuant to Israeli law,and represents the binding version and the only one having legal effect. This translation was prepared for convenience purposes only.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.