Regulatory Filings • Sep 14, 2016
Regulatory Filings
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
(Name of Registrant)
2 Dov Friedman Street, Ramat Gan 5250301, Israel (Address of Principal Executive Office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ☐
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- __________
| EXHIBIT NO. | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| 99.1 | A report of Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Ltd., a controlled subsidiary of B Communications Ltd., itself a subsidiary of Internet Gold - Immediate Report - Class Action against Pelephone. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
INTERNET GOLD-GOLDEN LINES LTD. (Registrant)
By /s/ Doron Turgeman
Doron Turgeman Chief Executive Officer
Date: September 13, 2016
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
99.1 A report of Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Ltd., a controlled subsidiary of B Communications Ltd., itself a subsidiary of Internet Gold - Immediate Report - Class Action against Pelephone.
The Company today was notified by the subsidiary, Pelephone Communications Ltd. ("Pelephone") of a claim together with a class action certification motion that had been filed against it with the District Court in Lod.
According to the claim, Pelephone was automatically and forcibly providing subscribers who had used up their prepaid monthly data allowance with an additional data allowance and charging subscribers for such addition without their prior consent. In this manner, the petitioner alleges that Pelephone is becoming unjustly enriched.
The petitioner seeks, for each subscriber who was charged for extra data allowance without their prior consent, compensation for monetary damage in the amount of approximately NIS 95 and compensation for non-monetary damage in the amount of NIS 200. The aggregate claim amount is estimated at NIS 295 million.
It is noted that a hearing on the class action certification motion against Pelephone in the same matter is pending in the Tel Aviv District Court (the "existing motion"). The amount sought in the existing motion is estimated at NIS 75 million. In light of the fact that a hearing is pending on the existing motion, Pelephone will move for the summary dismissal of the present motion.
The above summary constitutes a translated summary of Immediate Report published by the Company. The Hebrew version was submitted by the Company to the relevant authorities pursuant to Israeli law,and represents the binding version and the only one having legal effect. This translation was prepared for convenience purposes only.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.