Regulatory Filings • Feb 7, 2017
Regulatory Filings
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
(Name of Registrant)
2 Dov Friedman Street, Ramat Gan 5250301, Israel
(Address of Principal Executive Office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F ☒ Form 40-F ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ☐
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ___________
99.1 A report of Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Ltd., a controlled subsidiary of B Communications, itself a subsidiary of Internet Gold - Immediate Report - Class Action.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
INTERNET GOLD-GOLDEN LINES LTD. (Registrant)
By /s/ Doron Turgeman
Doron Turgeman Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 7, 2017
99.1 A report of Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Ltd., a controlled subsidiary of B Communications, itself a subsidiary of Internet Gold - Immediate Report - Class Action.
On February 5, 2017, the Company received a claim together with a class action certification motion which had been filed against the Company with the Lod Central District Court by a customer of the Company.
The motion alleges that the Company was charging a portion of its customers for "anti-virus services" when it did not actually provide them with such service, and that it began charging for such service upon executing the agreement with customers and not as of the actual provision of the service. Accordingly, the petitioner seeks to require the Company to compensate customers of the Company who purchased the service and did not actually receive it for damages they were caused, including reimbursement of the amounts charged for such service.
The petitioner does not indicate a precise amount of the collective damage claimed, but notes that in his estimation, the damage totals tens of millions of shekels.
The Company is studying the motion and it is unable to evaluate its likelihood of success at the present stage.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.