Skip to main content
Rainbow Tours S.A. logo

Rainbow Tours S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · RBW ISIN · PLRNBWT00031 LEI · 25940062QUG3WEUEGE88 WAR Administrative and support service activities
Open in API
Filings indexed 1,024 across all filing types
Latest filing 2025-04-18 Governance Information
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR RBW

About Rainbow Tours S.A.

https://r.pl/

Rainbow Tours S.A. is a tour operator and travel agency offering a comprehensive portfolio of travel services. The company specializes in organizing package holidays, guided tours, city breaks, and specialized vacations to a wide array of international destinations. Its product range includes all-inclusive stays, last-minute deals, and exotic long-haul trips. In addition to its consumer-facing business, the company operates an incoming tourism division that functions as a Destination Management Company (DMC), providing tailor-made group travel and business programs for foreign partners. Rainbow Tours also manages its own hotel brand and provides booking services for flights, accommodations, and car rentals.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
2.6. Oświadczenie_RN_nt_Komitetu_Audytu_JSF+SSF_2024-sig
Governance Information Classification · 95% confidence The document is titled "OŚWIADCZENIE RADY NADZORCZEJ W ZAKRESIE POWOŁANIA, SKŁADU I FUNKCJONOWANIA KOMITETU AUDYTU" (Statement of the Supervisory Board regarding the appointment, composition, and functioning of the Audit Committee). It explicitly references Polish financial regulations concerning periodic reports and details the history, composition, and compliance of the Audit Committee. This content directly relates to internal governance, board structure, and compliance oversight, which aligns best with the Governance Information (CGR) category, as it details the structure and functioning of a key board committee, rather than being a standalone Audit Report (AR) or a general management/board change announcement (MANG).
2025-04-18 Polish
Podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 98% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML structure, specifically containing `<Signatures>`, `<Signature>`, `<SignedInfo>`, `<Reference>`, `<DigestValue>`, `<SignatureValue>`, `<KeyInfo>`, and `<Object>` tags. This structure is characteristic of digitally signed documents, often used in regulatory filings (like XBRL/iXBRL filings) to ensure authenticity and integrity. The presence of certificate data (X509Certificate) and signing time further confirms this is a digitally signed artifact. Given the highly technical, non-narrative content (which is just the signature block itself) and the extreme length (2.5 million characters, suggesting a large underlying data file), this is most likely the signature wrapper for a comprehensive regulatory filing. Since the text does not contain the actual content of a 10-K, IR, ER, or DEF 14A, but rather the technical wrapper, and it doesn't explicitly announce a report release (which would be RPA/RNS), the most appropriate classification for a document that is fundamentally a signed data structure used for regulatory compliance, especially when the underlying content is not visible, is the general fallback category for regulatory filings. However, if this XML structure *is* the entire submission, it strongly implies a structured data filing (like XBRL). Since there is no specific code for XBRL, and the content is clearly a regulatory artifact, 'RNS' (Regulatory Filings - general fallback) is the best fit among the provided options, as it represents a submission to a regulator.
2025-04-18 Polish
1.5. Informacja_Zarządu_nt_wyboru_firmy_audytorskiej_JSF+SSF_2024
Board/Management Information Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text is extremely short (relative to the 1.9 million character total length, although the provided snippet is HTML/CSS boilerplate) and appears to be the raw structure of a document viewer or a very brief announcement wrapper, indicated by the extensive HTML/CSS styling tags and the lack of substantive financial or regulatory content (like '10-K', 'Earnings Release', 'Financial Statements', etc.). Given the context of a financial database, such a minimal structure, especially when the full document length is large but the visible text is boilerplate, often signifies an announcement that the main report is available elsewhere, or it is a placeholder/wrapper. Since the document length is large (1.9M chars), it is likely the full content is a comprehensive report, but the provided snippet is just the viewer shell. However, following Rule 2 (The 'MENU VS MEAL' Rule), if the visible text is just boilerplate and doesn't contain the report itself, and assuming this wrapper is what is being classified, it might point towards a general announcement. Since there is no explicit mention of a report being published (like 'Report attached' or 'Available now'), and the content is purely structural/formatting, I must rely on the context of what this structure usually wraps. Given the massive size (1.9M chars), it strongly suggests a full report (10-K or IR). Without any keywords pointing to 10-K, AR, or IR, and given the HTML structure, I will check for the most generic announcement type that fits a wrapper. However, the document length is 1,904,447 characters, which is characteristic of a full Annual Report (10-K) or a comprehensive Interim Report (IR). Since the text provided is only HTML/CSS boilerplate and contains no identifying financial text, I must assume the underlying document is one of the major reports based on size, but I cannot confirm which one. In the absence of content, and given the structure is not a typical RPA/RNS announcement text, I will default to the most comprehensive annual filing based on typical document size, which is the 10-K, while acknowledging the low confidence due to lack of textual evidence. Re-evaluating: The document is clearly a viewer interface (HTML/CSS). If this is the *entire* filing being submitted, it's not a financial report. If it's a wrapper for a large report, the wrapper itself might be classified as RNS if it's just a notification. Given the massive size, it's highly probable the full document is a 10-K, and this is just the rendering engine's output. I will classify it as 10-K based on size, as the boilerplate is likely masking the actual content.
2025-04-18 Polish
Podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML structure related to digital signatures (Signatures, SignedInfo, Reference, DigestValue, X509Data, etc.) and embedded data objects, including a base64 encoded block. This structure is characteristic of documents that have been digitally signed for authenticity and integrity, often accompanying official regulatory filings or legal documents. Crucially, the document length is very large (2,482,889 characters), indicating it is the full content of a substantial report, not just a short announcement. However, the content itself does not contain typical financial report headers (like '10-K', 'Consolidated Statements', 'MD&A', or 'Earnings Release'). The presence of the XML signature block strongly suggests this is the underlying data or the signed wrapper of a filing. Given the options, and recognizing that this is a highly structured, signed document that is clearly not a simple announcement (ruling out RPA/RNS based on length/content), we must look for the most likely comprehensive report type. Since the text is dominated by signature metadata and the embedded data is base64 encoded (which we cannot easily decode to confirm the content type), we rely on the context of typical SEC/regulatory filings that use such robust signing mechanisms. The structure is common for filings submitted via EDGAR or similar systems. If the document were a standard 10-K or IR, we would expect to see section headers. The lack of these headers, combined with the heavy signature data, suggests this might be a raw data file or a specific type of regulatory submission wrapper. Let's re-evaluate the definitions: - 10-K/IR: Unlikely without content. - AR: Possible if it's a signed audit report. - ER/MRQ: Unlikely without results. Since the document is extremely long and signed, it is most likely a comprehensive report. If it were an Audit Report (AR), it would fit the description of a standalone report. However, without any textual evidence of 'Audit', 'Financial Statements', or 'Balance Sheet', classifying it as AR is speculative. The most generic category for a large, signed, non-standardly formatted regulatory document that doesn't fit the specific report types is 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS), which serves as a fallback for miscellaneous filings. Given the high confidence required for specific codes, and the ambiguity caused by the signature wrapper obscuring the actual content, RNS (Regulatory Filings - general fallback) is the safest classification for a large, signed, but textually unidentifiable document. *Self-Correction/Refinement*: The presence of a digital signature block (XMLDSIG) is extremely common for official filings like 10-K, 10-Q, or AR filings submitted to regulatory bodies. Since the document is massive, it is a full report. If we assume this is a standard filing wrapper, and it's not explicitly an Annual Report (10-K) or Interim Report (IR), the most appropriate catch-all for a large, official, signed document that doesn't match other specific definitions is RNS, or perhaps AR if we assume the signature implies an audit context. Given the lack of keywords, RNS is the most conservative choice for an unidentifiable large filing. *Final Check*: The document is too large to be RPA. It is not clearly ER, IR, or 10-K. RNS is the best fit for a large, signed, but otherwise unclassified regulatory document.
2025-04-18 Polish
1.4. Oświadczenie_Zarządu_JSF+SSF_2024
Board/Management Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is extremely long (1,854,762 characters) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, including extensive CSS styling and font definitions. The presence of HTML tags, CSS styles, and the sheer size strongly suggests this is the full content of a comprehensive report, rather than a short announcement about a report. Given the length and the nature of financial document databases, this is most likely a full Annual Report (10-K) or a comprehensive Interim/Quarterly Report (IR). Since there are no explicit headers like '10-K' or 'Quarterly Report' visible in the truncated text, and the document is clearly a full filing rather than a brief notice (violating the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule for RPA/RNS), I must rely on the context that very large, detailed filings are typically Annual Reports or Interim Reports. Without further textual evidence pointing to a specific period (like 'Q3' or 'Year Ended December 31'), classifying it as the most comprehensive annual filing, 10-K, is a strong initial hypothesis for a large, unclassified document, or IR if it were shorter. However, given the massive size, 10-K is the most probable candidate for a full-length regulatory filing. Revisiting the definitions: 10-K is the 'Official yearly report covering company activity and full financial performance.' IR is for shorter periods. Since the document is massive, it suggests a full annual filing. If this were a short announcement, it would be RPA or RNS. Since it is huge, it is the report itself. I will classify it as 10-K based on size indicating a full annual filing.
2025-04-18 Polish
Podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML digital signature blocks (Signatures, SignedInfo, SignatureValue, KeyInfo, etc.) and base64-encoded content, which is typical for digitally signed regulatory filings or documents submitted via secure electronic filing systems (like those used by the Polish financial market authority, indicated by the Polish certificate details in KeyInfo). The base64 content, when decoded (as suggested by the 'BINARY_FORMAT [XHTML]' description in the signature object), reveals an HTML structure containing CSS styling. This structure strongly resembles a wrapper or container for a document, rather than the content of a major financial report itself (like a 10-K or IR). Crucially, the document is extremely long (over 21 million characters, though truncated), suggesting it contains substantial data, but the visible text is metadata/signature wrapper. Given the presence of a digital signature structure, this is a formal submission. Since the visible content is primarily the signature block and the decoded content appears to be a container/wrapper for the actual document (which is base64 encoded), this points towards a general regulatory submission that doesn't fit the specific categories like 10-K, ER, or IR. If the underlying document were accessible, a better classification could be made. However, based solely on the provided text which is dominated by the signature structure and the fact that the actual content is hidden within a base64 blob described as XHTML/text/plain, the most appropriate general classification for a formal, signed, but uncategorized regulatory submission is 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS). It is not an announcement of a report (RPA) because the signature implies the document itself is being filed, not just announcing its availability.
2025-04-18 Polish

Browse filings by year

11 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.