Skip to main content
PCC Rokita S.A. logo

PCC Rokita S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · PCR ISIN · PLPCCRK00076 LEI · 2594003GVVF9U3PSDS82 WAR Manufacturing
Open in API
Filings indexed 1,105 across all filing types
Latest filing 2023-03-20 Annual Report (ESEF)
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR PCR

About PCC Rokita S.A.

https://en.pcc.rokita.pl/

PCC Rokita S.A. is a chemical manufacturing company specializing in the production and distribution of a diverse range of chemical products. The company's operations are centered around three main segments: Chlor-alkali, Polyurethanes, and Surfactants. The Chlor-alkali division produces chlorine using membrane electrolysis technology, chlorobenzene, and sodium hypochlorite. The Polyurethanes segment manufactures polyether and polyester polyols, prepolymers, and complete polyurethane systems. The Surfactants division supplies surface-active agents for the cosmetics and cleaning industries. The company also produces specialty chemicals, including phosphorous-based flame retardants and other additives. Its products serve various sectors such as plastics, construction, textiles, and cosmetics, with a focus on innovation and sustainable production technologies.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Skonsolidowane sprawozdanie finansowe PCC Rokita 2022
Annual Report (ESEF) Classification · 100% confidence FY 2022
2023-03-20 Polish
Ocena Rady Nadzorczej dotycząca spr. finansowego oraz spr. z działalności podpis
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided consists almost entirely of XML digital signature blocks (Signatures, SignedInfo, SignatureValue, KeyInfo, X509Certificate data, etc.). This structure is typical for digitally signed regulatory filings or official documents submitted electronically, often in formats like XML or XHTML. Crucially, the content references a file named "Ocena_Rady_Nadzorczej_sprawozdania_2022.xhtml". The Polish phrase "Ocena Rady Nadzorczej sprawozdania" translates to "Supervisory Board Assessment of the report". This strongly suggests the document is related to governance, board oversight, or an audit/annual report assessment. Given the options: 1. 10-K (Annual Report): Possible, but the title suggests an assessment *of* a report, not the full report itself. 2. AR (Audit Report / Information): This fits well, as an assessment by the Supervisory Board is a form of governance/audit-related information. 3. CGR (Governance Information): Also a strong candidate, as the Supervisory Board assessment is a key governance document. Since the content is the *signature* wrapping the assessment of a report for the year 2022, and the assessment itself is a formal governance/oversight function, Governance Information (CGR) is the most precise fit for the *nature* of the underlying content, which is an assessment by the board. However, without the actual content of the XHTML file, and relying only on the signature metadata pointing to a 'Supervisory Board Assessment of the report 2022', this is a formal governance document. Comparing CGR (Governance Information) vs AR (Audit Report/Information): An assessment by the Supervisory Board often precedes or accompanies the final audit opinion, focusing on internal controls and management's report. CGR is a broader, safer classification for board oversight documentation. I will classify this as Governance Information (CGR) due to the explicit reference to the Supervisory Board's assessment ('Ocena Rady Nadzorczej'). The document length (72k chars) is substantial, ruling out RPA/RNS based on the 'Menu vs Meal' rule, as this appears to be the full signed document structure, not just a brief announcement. FY 2022
2023-03-20 Polish
Ocena Rady Nadzorczej dotycząca spr. finansowego oraz spr. z działalności
Management Reports Classification · 99% confidence The document is a formal resolution or assessment ('Ocena Rady Nadzorczej') by the Supervisory Board of PCC Rokita SA. It explicitly reviews and approves several key annual documents for the year 2022: the management report, the individual financial statement, and the consolidated financial statement. It details the contents of these statements (balance sheets, income statements, cash flows) and references specific Polish commercial code articles and EU regulations (like Regulation (EU) 2019/815 for ESEF tagging). Since the document is the Supervisory Board's formal approval/assessment of the full annual financial statements and management report, it is closely related to the Annual Report (10-K equivalent in structure, though Polish context). However, the core content is the *assessment* of the financial reports, not the reports themselves. Given the options, this document is a formal review/approval of the annual reporting package. It is not the 10-K itself, nor is it a simple Audit Report (AR) as it includes management reports and governance statements review. It is most closely aligned with the comprehensive nature of annual reporting oversight. Since it is a formal review of the annual financial and management reports, and not a general regulatory filing (RNS) or a specific audit report (AR), and it covers the full year's performance review, it fits best as a component related to the Annual Report cycle. In many contexts, the formal approval document accompanying the 10-K/Annual Report is classified based on the primary subject matter being approved. Given the detailed review of the 'jednostkowego sprawozdania finansowego' (individual financial statement) and 'skonsolidowanego sprawozdania finansowego' (consolidated financial statement) for the full year 2022, the closest category is related to the Annual Report (10-K). However, if this is a standalone document *about* the approval, and not the report itself, 'AR' (Audit Report/Information) might be considered, but 'AR' definition excludes full Annual Reports. Since this document is the Supervisory Board's formal sign-off on the *entire* annual package (including financial statements and management report), and it is not a simple announcement (length is substantial), it is best classified as related to the comprehensive annual reporting cycle. Given the options, and recognizing this is a formal review of the annual financial statements, it is most analogous to the comprehensive reporting structure, but since it is the *assessment* rather than the report, and it heavily references the audit findings, 'AR' (Audit Report / Information) is a plausible secondary fit if 10-K is reserved strictly for the filed statements. However, the document explicitly covers the Management Report and Financial Statements approval, which are the core of the 10-K. I will classify this as 'AR' because it is the formal assessment/review document, often issued alongside or immediately following the audit, rather than the 10-K filing itself, which contains the statements.
2023-03-20 Polish
Oświadczenie Rady Nadzorczej ws. Komitetu Audytu podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The document text consists almost entirely of XML signature blocks, specifically containing `<Signature>`, `<SignedInfo>`, `<SignatureValue>`, and `<KeyInfo>` elements, which are characteristic of digitally signed documents, often regulatory filings or official statements in XML format (like XBRL or ESEF filings). The presence of Polish language text fragments within the signature data (e.g., "Oswiadczenie_Rady_Nadzorczej_dot_KA.xhtml", which translates to 'Statement of the Supervisory Board regarding KA') suggests this is an official corporate document from a Polish entity. Crucially, the document is not the content of a report (like 10-K, IR, or ER) but rather the metadata and cryptographic proof of its authenticity. Since the document itself is the signature structure and the referenced file name suggests a 'Statement of the Supervisory Board' (which relates to governance or board oversight), and given the document is extremely short (only signature blocks are visible, though the metadata indicates a larger original file), the most appropriate classification for a document that is primarily a regulatory signature block, especially when the underlying content is not provided, is the general fallback category for regulatory filings. However, if we infer the nature of the signed document based on the filename 'Oswiadczenie_Rady_Nadzorczej' (Statement of the Supervisory Board), this points towards governance or board-related information. Since there is no specific code for a signed statement, and the document provided *is* the signature structure, we must choose between the specific content type (if inferable) or the general regulatory filing type. Given the context of financial reporting databases, a signed statement about the Supervisory Board often relates to Governance (CGR) or Board/Management changes (MANG). Since the document *is* the signature, and not the content, the RPA/RNS rule applies if it were an announcement. Since this is the raw signature data, it is best classified as a general Regulatory Filing (RNS) or potentially Governance Information (CGR) if we assume the signed content is a governance report. Given the ambiguity and the structure being purely cryptographic, RNS is the safest general classification for an unclassified regulatory artifact. Revisiting the definitions: The document is not an announcement (RPA) but the signature block itself. It is not a full report. It is a regulatory artifact. RNS is the best fit for miscellaneous regulatory artifacts that don't fit elsewhere.
2023-03-20 Polish
Oświadczenie Rady Nadzorczej ws. Komitetu Audytu
Governance Information Classification · 98% confidence The document text is in Polish and discusses a statement ('Oświadczenie') from the Supervisory Board ('Rada Nadzorcza') regarding the Audit Committee ('Komitet Audytu') of PCC Rokita SA. It explicitly references compliance with regulations concerning the appointment, composition, functioning, independence, knowledge, and skills of the Audit Committee members, and confirms the committee executed its mandated tasks. This content directly relates to the internal rules, board structure, and governance practices of the company, specifically focusing on the oversight function of the Audit Committee. This aligns best with the Governance Information category (CGR). The document is a formal statement about governance compliance, not a general regulatory filing (RNS) or a standalone audit report (AR).
2023-03-20 Polish
Oświadczenie Zarządu ws. firmy audytorskiej podpis
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of XML digital signature blocks (specifically XAdES/XML-DSig structures) containing certificate information, digest values, and signing times. The key indicator is the presence of the file name reference within the signature block: "URI="Oswiadczenie_Zarzadu_firma_audytorska.xhtml"". The Polish phrase "Oswiadczenie Zarzadu" translates to "Management Statement" or "Statement of the Management Board," and "firma audytorska" means "auditing firm." This strongly suggests the document is related to the auditor's report or management's assertion regarding the audit, which aligns best with the 'Audit Report / Information' category (AR). Since the text itself is the signature metadata and not the financial content, and it explicitly references an 'auditing firm statement,' AR is the most appropriate classification, rather than a general Regulatory Filing (RNS). The document length (20688 chars) is substantial enough to be the report itself or a significant part of it, not just a short announcement. FY 2022
2023-03-20 Polish

Browse filings by year

11 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.