Skip to main content
Orange Polska S.A. logo

Orange Polska S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · OPL ISIN · PLTLKPL00017 LEI · 259400TOMPUOLS65II22 WAR Telecommunications, computer programming, consultancy, computing infrastructure, and other information service activities
Open in API
Filings indexed 2,210 across all filing types
Latest filing 2022-02-16 Regulatory Filings
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR OPL

About Orange Polska S.A.

https://www.orange.pl/lp/for-foreigners

Orange Polska S.A. is a major telecommunications operator providing a comprehensive range of services for individual and business clients. The company's portfolio includes mobile services for voice and data, alongside fixed-line solutions. A key offering is high-speed fiber-optic broadband internet, delivering speeds up to 1 Gb/s, often bundled with advanced customer equipment like Wi-Fi 6 modems. Services are available individually or within convergent packages that combine mobile, internet, and internet-based television. For the business market, the company provides integrated information and communication technology (ICT) solutions. Additionally, Orange Polska operates in the wholesale market, offering services to other telecommunications providers.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Digital Signature block, specifically referencing a file named "OPLGrupaMDA-2021-12-31-PL.xhtml" and containing cryptographic details (SignatureValue, KeyInfo, Certificates, etc.). The filename strongly suggests a Management Discussion and Analysis (MDA) document for the period ending December 31, 2021. However, the document *itself* is not the MDA report content; it is the digital signature/verification metadata attached to or accompanying the report. Since the content is purely metadata related to signing a document, and the underlying document appears to be a comprehensive report (MDA), this structure often accompanies official filings. Given the options, the most appropriate classification for a document that is essentially a signed attachment or verification wrapper, especially when the underlying content is implied to be a Management Report (MDA), is to classify it based on the implied content if the wrapper itself doesn't fit a specific announcement type. The filename explicitly contains 'MDA'. If this were just an announcement of the MDA, it would be RPA or RNS. Since the signature is tied directly to the content file (OPLGrupaMDA-2021-12-31-PL.xhtml), and the length is moderate (5043 chars), it is likely the signed content itself, or a wrapper containing the signed content. Based on the filename reference 'OPLGrupaMDA', the classification should be MDA.
2022-02-16 Polish
Podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Digital Signature block, specifically referencing a file named "OPLGrupaMDA-2021-12-31-PL.xhtml" and containing cryptographic details, signing time (2022-02-16), and certificate information. The reference URI explicitly contains "MDA", which strongly suggests the underlying document is a Management Discussion and Analysis (MDA) report for the period ending 2021-12-31. Since the text provided is only the signature wrapper and not the content of the MDA itself, and given the short length (under 5,000 characters), this is most likely an announcement or wrapper indicating the publication of the MDA report, which falls under the general category of Regulatory Filings (RNS) or potentially a specific report type if the wrapper itself is considered the filing. However, based on the definitions, if this were the full MDA, it would be MDA. Since it is a signature block referencing an MDA, and it's not a standard SEC form, the most appropriate classification for a digitally signed wrapper referencing a specific report type is the general Regulatory Filings category (RNS), as it doesn't fit the specific report definitions (like 10-K or IR) or the announcement definitions (like RPA, which usually announces a report release, not just sign it). Given the strong internal reference to 'MDA', I will classify it as MDA, assuming the signature block is attached to or is the primary component of the filing that identifies the underlying document type, which is Management Reports (MDA). If the document were longer and contained the actual MD&A content, MDA would be certain. As a wrapper, RNS is plausible, but MDA is the most specific identifier present.
2022-02-16 Polish
Podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Digital Signature block, including elements like Signature, SignedInfo, SignatureValue, KeyInfo, and X509Certificate data. This structure is characteristic of a digitally signed document, often used to verify the authenticity and integrity of an official filing (like an XBRL filing or an attached document). The reference URI points to "OPLGrupaMDA-2021-12-31-PL.xhtml", suggesting the signed content relates to a Management Discussion and Analysis (MDA) for the period ending December 31, 2021. Since the text provided is only the signature wrapper and not the content of the MDA itself, and given the highly specific nature of the other codes, the most appropriate classification for a document that is essentially a signed wrapper pointing to a specific report type is the general fallback category for regulatory filings that don't fit elsewhere, or the category matching the referenced content if the wrapper implies the content is present. However, based strictly on the provided text (which is the signature), and considering the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule, this is not the report itself. Since the URI points to an MDA, and this is a regulatory artifact, 'RNS' (Regulatory Filings) is the safest general fallback. If we strictly interpret the URI reference 'OPLGrupaMDA-2021-12-31-PL.xhtml', the underlying document is an MDA. Given the context of financial filings, a signature block itself is often submitted as part of a larger filing package or as a standalone verification document. Since 'MDA' is an option, and the URI explicitly names 'MDA', I will classify it as MDA, assuming the signature confirms the integrity of that specific report type, even though the text is only the signature.
2022-02-16 Polish
Podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of XML signature blocks (XML Digital Signature/XAdES structure), including elements like Signature, SignedInfo, SignatureValue, KeyInfo, and references to specific files (e.g., URI="OPLGrupaMDA-2021-12-31-PL.xhtml"). This structure indicates that the document is a digitally signed container or metadata wrapper, not the primary financial report content itself. The reference URI suggests the original document might be related to 'MDA' (Management Discussion and Analysis) for the period ending 2021-12-31. However, since the text provided is only the signature block and the document length is relatively short (4939 chars), it strongly suggests this is an announcement or metadata wrapper confirming the authenticity of a report, rather than the report content (like 10-K or IR). Given the options, this is most likely a generic regulatory filing wrapper or an announcement about a report's publication. Since the content is purely technical metadata (a signature), and it doesn't explicitly announce a report release (like an RPA would), the most appropriate fallback for a technical/metadata filing that doesn't fit specific content types is RNS (Regulatory Filings). If the original document referenced was an MDA, the content itself would be classified as MDA, but the provided text is the signature, making RNS the safest classification based on the input provided.
2022-02-16 Polish
Podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Digital Signature block, specifically containing elements like 'SignedInfo', 'SignatureValue', 'KeyInfo', and 'QualifyingProperties'. This structure is characteristic of a digitally signed document, often used to ensure the integrity and authenticity of an official filing or report. The reference URI points to 'OPLGrupaMDA-2021-12-31-PL.xhtml', suggesting the underlying document relates to Management Discussion and Analysis (MDA) for the period ending December 31, 2021. However, the document provided *is* the signature block itself, not the report content. Since the content is purely metadata/signature information and does not contain the actual financial narrative or results, and given the reference to 'MDA', the most appropriate classification for the *container* or *wrapper* that holds this signature information, if it were a standalone announcement, would typically be a Regulatory Filing (RNS) or perhaps related to the specific report type if the signature was the primary content. Given the strong hint towards 'MDA' in the URI, but the actual content being only the signature, and lacking any announcement language (like 'attached' or 'published'), this is highly unusual. If we must classify the *type of data* being signed, it points to MDA. If we classify the *document provided*, it's a signature block. In the context of financial filings, a signature block alone is often part of a larger submission or an attachment. Since the URI explicitly mentions 'MDA', and this is a highly specific classification system, I will lean towards the implied content type, MDA, assuming this signature block is extracted from that filing. However, if this were a short announcement *about* the MDA, RPA or RNS would be better. Given the structure is pure XML signature, and no other context is present, I will default to the most general regulatory category for non-standard content, RNS, as it is a technical artifact rather than a standard report type, unless the URI is overwhelmingly indicative. The URI points to 'OPLGrupaMDA-2021-12-31-PL.xhtml'. MDA is 'Management Reports'. I will classify it as MDA based on the URI reference, assuming the signature is part of the MDA submission.
2022-02-16 Polish
Podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of an XML Digital Signature block, specifically referencing a file named "OPLGrupaMDA-2021-12-31-PL.xhtml" and containing cryptographic details (SignatureValue, KeyInfo, Certificates). This structure is characteristic of a digitally signed regulatory filing or document, but it is not the content of a financial report itself (like 10-K, ER, or IR). Since the content is purely metadata/signature information and does not describe business operations, financial results, or management changes, it is most appropriately classified as a general Regulatory Filing (RNS), which serves as a fallback for documents that are primarily structural or administrative in nature and don't fit a specific financial category. Given the document length is relatively short (4967 chars) and it is not the actual report content, RNS is the best fit among the available options, as it represents a general regulatory submission.
2022-02-16 Polish

Browse filings by year

11 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.