Skip to main content
NPL Nova S.A. logo

NPL Nova S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · PRI ISIN · PLPRGNK00017 LEI · 259400UFGNWWFSEQHE02 WAR Financial and insurance activities
Open in API
Filings indexed 279 across all filing types
Latest filing 2025-05-16 Regulatory Filings
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR PRI

About NPL Nova S.A.

https://nplnova.pl/home-en/

NPL Nova S.A. is a financial services company specializing in the non-performing loans (NPLs) market, with a primary focus on bank receivables secured by mortgages from the corporate and SME sectors. The company's core activities include acquiring, trading, and restructuring debt assets. It serves as an intermediary connecting banks' restructuring and debt enforcement departments with investors, facilitating transactions for both portfolios and single receivables. Services offered include legal and restructuring advisory, due diligence audits, and transaction support. NPL Nova is licensed to manage securitization funds and integrates an in-house law firm to provide legal oversight throughout the transaction process.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Wykonanie umów które łącznie spełniają kryterium znaczącej umowy - Content (PL)
Regulatory Filings Classification · 99% confidence The document text is very short (749 characters) and appears to be a formal notification from the Management Board (Zarząd) of NPL NOVA S.A. regarding the status of loans (pożyczki) granted to PragmaGO S.A. It references previous regulatory reports (RB 1/2024, RB 10/2024, RB 3/2025) and details the repayment status of these financial agreements. This type of specific, periodic update concerning financial obligations or material contracts, often issued in Polish regulatory formats (RB), fits best under the general 'Regulatory Filings' category (RNS) as it doesn't precisely match the definitions for ER, IR, 10-K, or CAP, but is clearly a mandatory disclosure.
2025-05-16 Polish
Oświadczenie Rady Nadzorczej
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text is extremely long (625,299 characters) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML content of a rendered document, likely a PDF converted to HTML, given the extensive CSS styling and structure tags (like '.pf', '.pc', font definitions, etc.). The length strongly suggests this is a comprehensive report rather than a short announcement. Since the text itself does not contain explicit headers like '10-K', 'Annual Report', or 'Interim Report', but represents the full body of a filing, and given the context of financial documents, the most appropriate classification for a very large, comprehensive, but uncategorized filing body is the general 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS) or potentially an 'Annual Report' (10-K) if it were confirmed to be yearly. However, without explicit content confirming the nature (e.g., MD&A, Balance Sheet, Income Statement), and given the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule suggesting short announcements are RPA/RNS, a very long, full document body defaults to the most comprehensive available category that isn't explicitly defined by keywords, or the fallback. Given the sheer volume, it is highly likely to be a primary regulatory filing. Since no specific keywords for 10-K, IR, or AR are present in the truncated view, and it's not a short announcement, I will use the fallback 'RNS' for a large, unidentifiable regulatory document body, while noting the high confidence in it being a primary report type. Q3 2024
2025-03-28 Polish
Oświadczenie Zarządu SSF XADES
Remuneration Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is not human-readable content like a report or announcement summary. Instead, it consists almost entirely of XML structures related to digital signatures, specifically using namespaces like 'ds' (for XML Digital Signature) and 'xades' (for XML Advanced Electronic Signatures). Key elements found are <Signature>, <SignedInfo>, <SignatureValue>, <KeyInfo>, and <QualifyingProperties>. This structure strongly indicates that the document is a digitally signed file, likely an XML document or a container holding another document (referenced by URI="O%C5%9Bwiadczenia%20Zarz%C4%85du%20NPL%20NOVA%20SSF%202024.xhtml"). The presence of Polish text in the URI ("Oświadczenia Zarządu NPL NOVA SSF 2024.xhtml", which translates to "Statements of the Management Board NPL NOVA SSF 2024") suggests the underlying document relates to management statements or declarations. Given the options, this is not a standard financial filing type (10-K, ER, IR, etc.). It is a technical wrapper. The most appropriate classification for a document that is primarily a technical regulatory artifact or a container for a specific filing, especially when the content itself is not the report but the signature/metadata, is the general fallback category for regulatory filings that don't fit elsewhere, which is RNS (Regulatory Filings). Alternatively, if the underlying document is a management statement, it could relate to MANG or MDA, but the *provided text* is the signature block, making RNS the safest classification for the artifact itself. However, looking closely at the content referenced in the signature: "Oświadczenia Zarządu NPL NOVA SSF 2024.xhtml" (Statements of the Management Board NPL NOVA SSF 2024), this points towards Management/Board information (MANG) or Management Discussion & Analysis (MDA). Since the document is a signed file wrapper, and the content it wraps is a 'Statement of the Management Board', it is highly likely this is a formal submission related to management disclosures. Given the specific nature of 'Statements of the Management Board', it aligns best with **MANG** (Board/Management Information) or **MDA** (Management Reports). Since 'Statements of the Management Board' often accompany or form part of the MDA, and MANG is specifically for *changes* in management, MDA seems slightly more appropriate if we assume the content is the report itself. But since the text is purely the signature, RNS is technically correct for the wrapper. I will prioritize the content implied by the signature reference over the wrapper format, leaning towards a management disclosure document type. Revisiting the definitions: MANG is for *changes* in the board/management. MDA is for *Management's detailed explanation of financial results, business trends, and outlook*. A 'Statement of the Management Board' often falls under MDA or ER/IR. Given the ambiguity and the technical nature of the provided text (XML signature), RNS is the most robust classification for the *artifact provided*. Let's check if the content implies a specific filing type that is not RNS. The certificate issuer is 'Narodowy Bank Polski' (Polish National Bank) and 'Asseco Data Systems'. This suggests a Polish regulatory filing. If we must choose a filing type based on the *implied content* ('Statements of the Management Board'), and assuming this is the actual filing being submitted, MDA or ER/IR would be candidates. Since the document length is substantial (10k+ chars), it's likely the full content, not just an announcement (RPA). Given the context of 'Zarządu' (Management Board), MDA is a strong fit for management commentary. However, the document *is* the signature block. In the absence of the actual content, classifying the signature block itself as RNS (Regulatory Filings - fallback) is the most accurate classification for the provided text snippet. I will use RNS as the fallback for this technical artifact.
2025-03-28 Polish
Oświadczenie Zarządu SSF
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is extremely long (over 500,000 characters) and appears to be the full content of a rendered document, likely a PDF or similar format converted to HTML/XML structure, indicated by the extensive use of CSS styling and structural tags (`<html>`, `<head>`, `<style>`). The content itself, while truncated in the input preview, is substantial. Crucially, there are no explicit keywords like "Earnings Release," "Annual Report," or specific SEC form identifiers (like 10-K or 8-K headers) visible in the provided snippet that would definitively point to a specific financial filing type (ER, 10-K, IR, etc.). However, the sheer size (515,452 characters) strongly suggests this is a comprehensive report, not a brief announcement. Given the lack of specific content markers, and the presence of complex internal structure suggesting a full document rendering, the most appropriate classification among the provided options for a large, comprehensive, but uncategorized document is the general fallback category. If the document were short and merely announced the availability of a report, RPA or RNS would be chosen (Rule 2). Since it is very large, it is likely the report itself. Without content confirming it as a 10-K (Annual Report) or IR (Interim Report), the safest classification based on the provided definitions and the nature of the input (a large, complex file structure) is the general Regulatory Filings fallback, as it covers miscellaneous filings that don't fit elsewhere. Revisiting the definitions: Since the document is very large, it is unlikely to be an RPA (Report Publication Announcement). It is a full document. Given the lack of specific content, RNS (Regulatory Filings - general/miscellaneous) is the best fit as a catch-all for large, complex filings that don't match the specific financial report types (10-K, IR, AR, etc.). Q3 2024
2025-03-28 Polish
Sprawozdanie Zarządu z działalności SSF XADES
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML structures related to digital signatures (Signature, SignedInfo, DigestValue, X509Certificate, etc.). Within the signature structure, specifically in the 'DataObjectFormat' description, there is a reference to a file named "Skonsolidowane Sprawozdanie z działalności 2024.xhtml". The Polish phrase "Skonsolidowane Sprawozdanie z działalności" translates to "Consolidated Report on Activities" or "Consolidated Annual Report". Since the document itself is not the report content but rather the digital signature wrapper for a report, and given the context of a full annual report (which is usually a 10-K in US context, but here it's a consolidated activity report for a full year), this strongly suggests the underlying document is the Annual Report. However, the document provided is the *signature* of the report, not the report content itself. If the underlying document is the full annual report, the classification should ideally be 10-K (Annual Report). But following Rule #2 (The 'MENU VS MEAL' Rule), if the document is short and announces/wraps another document, it should be classified as RPA or RNS. This document is 10,648 characters, which is substantial, but it is fundamentally a signature block wrapping an XHTML file. Given the explicit reference to a 'Consolidated Report on Activities 2024' (implying a full-year report) and the fact that the text provided is the signature/metadata *for* that report, it is most likely a filing that accompanies the main report or is the report itself presented in a specific format (XHTML). Since '10-K' is defined as the 'Official yearly report covering company activity and full financial performance,' and this signature points directly to the 'Consolidated Report on Activities 2024', the underlying document is an Annual Report. If this were purely an announcement stating the report was available, RPA would be appropriate. Since the signature block is complex and contains references to the actual content (even if the content isn't fully displayed), and the underlying document is clearly an annual activity report, classifying it as the report type itself (10-K) is the most accurate representation of the *subject matter*, even if the wrapper is technical. In many jurisdictions, the signed XHTML/XBRL filing *is* the official 10-K equivalent. I will classify it as 10-K based on the content reference, assuming the signature is part of the official submission package for the annual report. FY 2024
2025-03-28 Polish
Sprawozdanie Zarządu z działalności SSF
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text is extremely long (nearly 7 million characters, though truncated for analysis) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, not a clean regulatory filing text. Crucially, the document length is massive, suggesting it is a full report or presentation, not a short announcement. However, without any discernible keywords like '10-K', 'Earnings Release', 'Proxy Statement', or specific financial tables/sections, and given the context is just raw HTML/CSS/font data, a definitive classification based on content is impossible. Since the document is clearly a complete, large file structure (indicated by the length and HTML tags), it is likely a full report (like 10-K or IR). Given the ambiguity and the nature of the input being raw structure rather than content, the safest classification based on the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule is to assume it is the content of a major report, but since we cannot confirm which one, and the input is highly unstructured, I will default to the most general comprehensive report type, the Annual Report (10-K), while acknowledging the low confidence due to lack of textual evidence. Alternatively, given the lack of content, it could be a generic Regulatory Filing (RNS). Given the sheer size, it is unlikely to be a simple RPA. I will lean towards 10-K as the default for a large, comprehensive document structure, but the confidence is low due to the input format.
2025-03-28 Polish

Browse filings by year

6 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.