Skip to main content
Mex Polska S.A. logo

Mex Polska S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · MEX ISIN · PLMEXPL00010 LEI · 259400QHOBTD4VCFCZ84 WAR Accommodation and food service activities
Filings indexed 761 across all filing types
Latest filing 2025-04-09 Regulatory Filings
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR MEX

About Mex Polska S.A.

https://mexpolska.pl/

Mex Polska S.A. is a holding company that develops, manages, and franchises a diverse portfolio of restaurant and bistro concepts. The company operates a network of establishments under various distinct brands, each offering a unique culinary experience and atmosphere. Its portfolio includes 'The Mexican,' 'Pijalnia Wódki i Piwa,' 'Pan Kejk,' 'Prosty Temat,' 'Chicas & Gorillas,' 'Spoko Taco,' 'Pizza Nova,' and 'Barrio Latino.' The company focuses on creating innovative interpretations of classic dishes using high-quality ingredients. In addition to operating its own locations, Mex Polska S.A. expands its presence through a franchise system, providing partners with established brands, a proven business model, and comprehensive operational support.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
zal04_inf_zarzad_wybor_firmy_audytorskiej.T.xhtml.xades
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML structures, specifically a digital signature block (XML Signature/XAdES) containing certificates, digests, and timestamps. This structure is characteristic of digitally signed regulatory filings or documents requiring cryptographic verification, such as those submitted to financial authorities (like SEC filings or equivalent European filings, given the Polish certificate details). The document is not readable narrative content like an Earnings Release (ER), Annual Report (10-K), or Investor Presentation (IP). Since the content is a signed artifact rather than the report content itself, and it represents a formal submission, the most appropriate general classification for a highly structured, signed regulatory artifact that doesn't fit a specific content type is 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS). The document length is very large (1.4M chars), suggesting it contains the full content, but the visible text is only the signature block, which is common when viewing the raw XML of a filing. Given the context of financial document classification, a signed submission points strongly towards a formal filing.
2025-04-09 Polish
INFORMACJA ZARZĄDU MEX POLSKA S.A. ODNOŚNIE WYBORU FIRMY AUDYTORSKIEJ
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is extremely short (relative to the expected length of a full report like a 10-K or IR) and consists almost entirely of HTML/CSS boilerplate code, metadata, and styling instructions. There is no discernible financial content, regulatory headers (like '10-K', 'Annual Report', 'Quarterly Results'), or specific reporting periods mentioned in the visible text snippet. Given the structure, which appears to be the raw source code of a web page wrapper, and the very small amount of actual content visible, this strongly suggests the document is not the report itself but rather an announcement or wrapper indicating that a report is available or has been published. According to Rule 2 (The 'MENU VS MEAL' Rule), if a document is very short and implies a report is attached or available, it should be classified as a Report Publication Announcement (RPA). Since the content is essentially empty of substance, RPA is the most appropriate classification. Q3 2024
2025-04-09 Polish
zal07_osw_zarzad_skonsolidowane.T.xhtml.xades
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML structures, specifically a digital signature block (indicated by tags like <Signature>, <SignedInfo>, <SignatureValue>, <KeyInfo>, and <QualifyingProperties>) and embedded data, including a Base64 encoded object containing what appears to be HTML/CSS/XML content related to document rendering or signing properties. The presence of extensive digital signature metadata (including signing time '2025-04-08T13:42:14Z', certificate details, and digest values) strongly suggests this is a digitally signed regulatory filing or document wrapper, rather than the content of a standard financial report (like 10-K, ER, or IR). Since the content is not the report itself but rather the technical wrapper/signature, and it doesn't fit specific categories like DIRS or DIV, the most appropriate general classification for a signed regulatory artifact that doesn't fit elsewhere is the fallback category, Regulatory Filings (RNS). The document length is substantial (449,475 chars), suggesting it is a full filing, not just a short announcement, which slightly contradicts the RPA rule, but the content type (signature block) points away from standard report types.
2025-04-09 Polish
OŚWIADCZENIE ZARZĄDU MEX POLSKA S.A. W SPRAWIE ZGODNOŚCI SF ZA ROK 2024 Z ZASADAMI RACHUNKOWOŚCI ORAZ RZETELNOŚCI SPRAWOZDANIA Z DZIAŁALNOŚCI W ROKU 2024
Board/Management Information Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text is heavily truncated and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, containing CSS styles, font definitions, and structural tags (like 'html', 'head', 'style', 'div', 'span'). There are no discernible keywords, regulatory headers (like '10-K', 'Annual Report', 'Earnings Release'), or specific reporting periods that would allow for classification into a standard financial filing type (10-K, IR, ER, etc.). The document length is substantial (323,589 chars), suggesting it is a full document, but the content provided is purely structural boilerplate. Given the lack of meaningful content and the presence of rendering instructions, this document cannot be confidently classified into any specific financial report category. Therefore, the most appropriate classification is the general fallback category for miscellaneous or unclassifiable regulatory filings, which is 'RNS'.
2025-04-09 Polish
zal05_Sp__Zarzadu_z_dziali_GRUPY__2024.T.xhtml.xades
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of XML Digital Signature blocks (SignedInfo, SignatureValue, KeyInfo, Object, QualifyingProperties) used for authenticating electronic documents, likely in a Polish regulatory context given the certificate details (Polska Wytwórnia Papierów Wartościowych S.A., KRAJOWA IZBA RORLICZENIOWA S.A.). This structure indicates the document is a digitally signed file, but it does not contain the actual financial report content (like an Annual Report, Earnings Release, or Interim Report). Since the content is purely metadata/signature information and does not announce the publication of another document (ruling out RPA/RNS based on content type, although it is a regulatory artifact), the most appropriate classification for a document that is fundamentally a signed electronic file without discernible financial narrative or standard report structure is the general fallback category for miscellaneous regulatory artifacts that don't fit specific financial reporting types. However, given the context of financial reporting databases, a document that is purely a signature block is often categorized as a 'Regulatory Filing' (RNS) if it's submitted to an exchange, or sometimes as 'XLSX' if it's an attachment wrapper, but here it seems to be the core structure of a submission. Since it is not a standard report (10-K, IR, ER) and is not explicitly announcing a report (RPA), RNS is the best fit for an unclassified regulatory artifact.
2025-04-09 Polish
SPRAWOZDANIE ZARZĄDU Z DZIAŁALNOŚCI GK MEX POLSKA S.A. ORAZ SPÓŁKI MEX POLSKA S.A. ZA ROK 2024
Remuneration Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is extremely long (over 7 million characters) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, including extensive CSS styling and font definitions. The presence of HTML tags, style blocks, and the sheer size strongly suggests this is the full content of a comprehensive report, rather than a short announcement about a report. Given the length and the nature of financial reporting documents that are often presented in this format when extracted, the most appropriate classification for a very large, comprehensive report that isn't explicitly identified as a 10-K (Annual Report) or IR (Interim Report) is often the general 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS) if no other specific comprehensive report type fits, or one of the major report types if the content strongly suggests it. However, without specific headers like '10-K', 'Consolidated Financial Statements', or 'Management's Discussion and Analysis' visible in the truncated text, and considering the document is massive, it is most likely a full regulatory filing. Since the document is not a short announcement (ruling out RPA/RNS based on the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule for short documents), and it is clearly a full document, I must choose the best fit among the comprehensive reports. Since the text is mostly structural noise and not content-identifying, and it is a very large document, I will default to the most comprehensive category that isn't the Annual Report (10-K) or Interim Report (IR), or use the fallback. Given the context of a premium database, a massive document that isn't clearly a 10-K or IR is often classified as a general Regulatory Filing (RNS) if its specific nature cannot be determined, or if it's a non-standard filing. However, the document length suggests a primary report. Since I cannot confirm 10-K or IR, RNS is the safest fallback for an unidentified large filing.
2025-04-09 Polish

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.