Skip to main content
Labo Print S.A. logo

Labo Print S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · LAB ISIN · PLLBPRT00013 LEI · 259400KNZOKYOY658A64 WAR Manufacturing
Filings indexed 690 across all filing types
Latest filing 2022-04-29 Management Reports
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR LAB

About Labo Print S.A.

https://laboprint.eu/en/

Labo Print S.A. is a digital printing house specializing in large-format printing and advertising solutions. The company utilizes modern machinery and various printing technologies, including UV, sublimation, solvent, and latex, to produce graphics on both roll and flat materials. Its core offerings encompass a diverse portfolio of products such as banners, foils, textiles, labels, event and exhibition systems like tents and rollups, point-of-sale (POS) materials, cardboard stands, and custom packaging. The digital printing model allows for high flexibility, enabling the fulfillment of personalized orders starting from a single unit with quick turnaround times. The company serves various sectors, including retail, events, and corporate clients. It also offers a line of eco-friendly products made from biodegradable, recycled, or recyclable materials, emphasizing quality control and professional client consultation.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Sprawozdanie Zarządu z działalności
Management Reports Classification · 98% confidence The document text begins with the title "Raport SPRAWOZDANIE ZARZĄDU Z DZIAŁALNOŚCI LABO PRINT S.A. ORAZ GRUPY KAPITAŁOWEJ LABO PRINT ZA ROK OBROTOWY 2021". This translates to "Management Board Report on the Activities of LABO PRINT S.A. and the LABO PRINT Capital Group for the Financial Year 2021". The content details the company structure, management, business strategy, and financial performance highlights for the year 2021, including consolidated revenues and discussion of operational challenges. This structure and content are characteristic of a comprehensive annual report or a management discussion and analysis (MDA) section thereof. Given the context of a full report for the 'Financial Year 2021' and the detailed nature, it strongly aligns with the content expected in a 10-K (Annual Report) or a detailed Management Report (MDA). Since the text explicitly states it is the 'Management Board Report' for the full year, and it contains extensive operational and financial review, the most appropriate classification is either 10-K (if it is the full statutory filing) or MDA (if it is specifically the management commentary section). In many jurisdictions, the Management Board Report is a core component of the Annual Report. Given the depth and the reference to the full 'Financial Year 2021', classifying it as a comprehensive Annual Report (10-K) or a detailed Management Report (MDA) is appropriate. Since the text is explicitly titled as the 'Management Board Report' (SPRAWOZDANIE ZARZĄDU), MDA is a very strong fit, but often these reports are filed as part of the larger annual filing (10-K). However, the definition for MDA is 'Management's detailed explanation of financial results, business trends, and outlook,' which perfectly matches the content shown (description of activities, strategy, structure, and financial performance review). I will classify it as MDA based on the explicit title, which is a detailed management explanation.
2022-04-29 Polish
Skonsolidowane sprawozdanie roczne podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML structures related to digital signatures (ds:Signature, KeyInfo, X509Certificate, SignedProperties, DigestValue). This structure is characteristic of digitally signed regulatory filings or official documents submitted electronically, often in XBRL format, which is common for SEC filings in the US or similar regulatory submissions globally. The presence of a long, complex structure containing cryptographic data and references to signing time ('2022-04-29T12:03:05Z') strongly suggests this is the signature block of a formal filing, rather than the content of the report itself (like a 10-K or IR). Since the content is not the report but metadata about its authenticity, and given the complexity and formal nature, it is most likely associated with a major regulatory filing. Without the actual report content, the most appropriate classification for a document that is essentially a digital signature wrapper for a formal submission is the general 'Regulatory Filings' fallback category (RNS), or potentially the signature block of a known form if context allowed. Given the lack of specific form identifiers (like 10-K headers) in the visible text, RNS is the safest general regulatory fallback for an unsigned document body, although the presence of the signature block itself points to a formal submission. However, upon closer inspection of the embedded data (e.g., 'BINAR Y_FORMAT [ZIP]', 'text/plain', and the certificate issuer mentioning 'Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa S.A.' which suggests a Polish context), this is a digitally signed document. In many filing systems, the signature block itself is often filed as part of the main document or as a separate attachment. Since the document is extremely long (5.9 million characters) but the provided text is only the signature block, this suggests the *actual* report content is attached or referenced within this structure (as seen by the Object reference to a ZIP file). If this were a short announcement *about* a filing, it would be RPA/RNS. Since the document length is massive (5.9M chars), it implies the full report is present, and this XML is the signature section of that report. Given the structure is typical of SEC filings (even if the issuer is non-US, the structure is common for structured data submissions), and the length suggests a full report, I will lean towards classifying it as the report it authenticates, but since no specific report type (10-K, IR) is evident, I must use the fallback or the closest fit. Given the ambiguity, and the fact that this is clearly a formal, structured submission wrapper, 'RNS' (General Regulatory Filings) is the most appropriate catch-all for a document whose primary content is structural/regulatory metadata rather than narrative financial results. Revisiting the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule: The document is 5.9M characters long, which is not short. This suggests it contains the meal (the report) and this XML is just one part of it (the signature). Therefore, classifying it as RPA/RNS based on length is incorrect. Since I cannot identify the specific report type (10-K, IR, etc.) from the visible text, I must use the general regulatory fallback, RNS.
2022-04-29 Polish
Skonsolidowane sprawozdanie roczne
Annual Report (ESEF) Classification · 100% confidence FY 2021
2022-04-29 Polish
List Prezesa Zarządu podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML structures related to digital signatures ('Signatures', 'SignatureValue', 'KeyInfo', 'X509Data', 'SignedProperties', 'SigningTime'). This structure is characteristic of digitally signed regulatory filings or official documents submitted electronically, often in the XBRL format (indicated by the presence of XML namespaces and signature blocks). The document length is very large (516,980 chars), suggesting it is the full content of a filing, not just a short announcement. Since the content is the technical backbone of a signed document rather than narrative financial results (ER, IR) or management discussion (MDA), and given the presence of a base64 encoded payload within an Object tag which is likely the actual report content, this points towards a comprehensive regulatory submission. However, without explicit headers like '10-K', '10-Q', or 'DEF 14A', and given the nature of the content being the signature block itself, the most appropriate classification for a large, complex, digitally signed regulatory document that doesn't fit a more specific category (like 10-K or IR) is the general 'Regulatory Filings' fallback category (RNS). The presence of Polish identifiers (PL, Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa S.A.) suggests a filing from that jurisdiction, but the classification schema is based on SEC/general filing types. RNS serves as the best fit for a large, technically structured regulatory document lacking specific narrative content.
2022-04-29 Polish
List Prezesa Zarządu
Management Reports Classification · 95% confidence The document is a letter from the CEO of Labo Print S.A. providing a detailed review of the company's 2021 performance, including financial results, operational challenges, investment activities, and future outlook. It functions as the management's commentary and analysis of the annual financial results. While it discusses the annual report, it is the narrative component (Management Discussion and Analysis) rather than the full audited financial statements themselves. Therefore, it is classified as a Management Report (MDA). FY 2021
2022-04-29 Polish
informacja w sprawie rekomendacji Zarządu w zakresie wypłaty dywidendy za rok 2021 - Content (PL)
Notice of Dividend Amount Classification · 98% confidence The document text is a formal announcement from the Management Board (Zarząd) of Labo Print S.A. regarding their recommendation for the distribution of profit for the year 2021, specifically proposing a dividend payment of PLN 0.20 per share. This content directly relates to the announcement of dividend amounts and payment details, which aligns perfectly with the definition for 'Notice of Dividend Amount' (DIV). The document is short and focuses solely on this announcement, not being a full financial report or a general regulatory filing.
2022-04-28 Polish

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.