Skip to main content
Comarch S.A. logo

Comarch S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · CMR ISIN · PLCOMAR00012 LEI · 2594001MNJ3BH1UVVG70 WAR Telecommunications, computer programming, consultancy, computing infrastructure, and other information service activities
Open in API
Filings indexed 932 across all filing types
Latest filing 2024-04-26 Audit Report / Informat…
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR CMR

About Comarch S.A.

https://www.comarch.com/

Comarch is a global software house and systems integrator that designs, develops, and delivers advanced IT solutions. The company's portfolio includes a wide range of business software such as ERP, CRM, sales, and analytics systems, alongside specialized platforms for loyalty marketing and IT infrastructure management. Comarch provides these innovative products and services to clients across multiple sectors, including telecommunications, banking, airlines, and retail. The primary focus is on implementing solutions that enhance operational productivity, increase profitability, and deliver measurable return on investment for its global clientele.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Oświadczenie Zarządu w sprawie rzetelności sporządzenia sprawozdania finansowego - podpisy - załącznik nr 8b
Audit Report / Information Classification · 1% confidence The provided document text consists entirely of XML digital signature blocks (Signatures, SignedInfo, SignatureValue, KeyInfo, QualifyingProperties). The URI reference within these signatures contains the text "SRR 2023 Oświadczenie Zarządu w sprawie rzetelności sporządzenia sprawozdań finansowych.xhtml". This Polish phrase translates to "Management Board Statement on the reliability of the preparation of financial statements for 2023". This strongly indicates the document is a formal statement or report related to financial statements, likely signed by management. Given the context of financial reporting documents, a 'Management Board Statement on the reliability of the preparation of financial statements' is most closely aligned with the content covered by an Audit Report / Information (AR) or potentially part of a larger Annual Report (10-K). Since this appears to be a specific, signed component (a management assertion regarding financial statement reliability, often required alongside the audit opinion), and the document itself is just the signature block (implying the actual content is referenced or attached, though the length suggests it might be the full content in XML format), classifying it as an Audit Report / Information (AR) is the most appropriate fit among the specific options, as it deals directly with the reliability and principles of financial reporting. However, the presence of multiple signatures and the structure suggest this might be the signed component of a larger filing. If the content is indeed the full management assertion, AR is suitable. If this were a short announcement *about* this statement, RPA would apply, but the document length (56KB) suggests substantial content, making it the report/statement itself. I will classify it as AR. FY 2023
2024-04-26 Polish
Oświadczenie Zarządu w sprawie rzetelności sporządzenia sprawozdania finansowego - załącznik nr 8a
Regulatory Filings Classification · 1% confidence The document text provided is extremely short (less than 5,000 characters, as indicated by the metadata) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a document viewer or reader, containing CSS styles and font definitions, rather than the substantive content of a financial report. The document length is 491,046 characters, but the provided snippet is only the beginning structure. Given the nature of the provided text (mostly structural code and styles) and the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule, which prioritizes classifying short announcements that reference an attached or published report, this snippet strongly suggests it is an announcement or wrapper document rather than the full report itself. Since the actual content of the report is not visible, and this appears to be the container/viewer interface, the most appropriate classification for a document that is primarily a wrapper or announcement of content availability, especially when the full content is large but the provided text is minimal, is Report Publication Announcement (RPA) or Regulatory Filing (RNS). Since RPA is more specific for announcing the publication of a report, I will lean towards that, assuming the full document is the report being announced, or RNS if it's a generic filing wrapper. Given the context of financial documents, and the high likelihood that this is the wrapper for a much larger filing, RPA is a strong candidate if the full document is a report. However, without any keywords indicating *what* report is being published (10-K, IR, etc.), RNS (Regulatory Filings - fallback) is safer if it's just a generic wrapper. Since the document length is large (491k chars), it implies a substantial report exists, and this snippet is just the header/viewer shell. I will classify it as RPA, assuming this HTML structure is the announcement that the actual report (which is large) is now available.
2024-04-26 Polish
Informacja Zarządu w sprawie w sprawie wyboru firmy audytorskiej - podpisy - załącznik nr 7b
Audit Report / Information Classification · 1% confidence The document text consists entirely of XML digital signature blocks (Signatures, SignedInfo, KeyInfo, etc.). The URI referenced in the signature blocks contains the text "SRR 2023 Informacja Zarządu w sprawie wyboru firmy audytorskiej.xhtml". This Polish phrase translates to "Management Board Information regarding the selection of the audit firm". This content strongly suggests a formal announcement or report related to the selection of an external auditor, which falls under the scope of an Audit Report / Information (AR) or potentially Governance Information (CGR). However, since the document provided is *only* the digital signature metadata and not the substantive content of the report itself, and given the specific nature of the content referenced (selection of an audit firm), the most appropriate classification is Audit Report / Information (AR), as this category covers applied accounting principles and results of internal/regulatory stress tests, which often includes auditor ratification. If the document were the actual report, AR would be the fit. Since this is just the signature block, it could technically be RPA or RNS, but the content reference is highly specific to auditing/reporting functions. Given the high specificity of the content reference ("wyboru firmy audytorskiej"), classifying it as AR is more informative than the generic RPA or RNS, assuming the signature block is attached to the actual report document. Revisiting the rules: Rule 2 (MENU VS MEAL) suggests if it's short and announces a report, use RPA/RNS. This document is 56,074 characters, which is substantial, suggesting it might be the full document or a significant attachment, not just a brief announcement. The content points directly to an audit-related document. Therefore, AR is the best fit for the *subject matter* indicated by the signature reference. FY 2023
2024-04-26 Polish
Informacja Zarządu w sprawie w sprawie wyboru firmy audytorskiej - załącznik nr 7a
Regulatory Filings Classification · 1% confidence The document text provided is extremely long (679,194 characters) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, including extensive CSS styling and font definitions. The presence of HTML tags, CSS, and the sheer size strongly suggests this is the full content of a comprehensive report, rather than a short announcement about a report. Given the length and the nature of financial filings usually being presented in this structured format, it is highly likely to be a major regulatory filing. Since the text itself does not contain explicit headers like '10-K' or 'Annual Report', but represents a large, structured document, I must rely on the context of typical SEC filings. However, without specific keywords identifying it as a 10-K, IR, or MDA, and given the fallback nature of some large documents, I will look for clues. The document structure is typical of a rendered PDF/HTML filing. Since it is not a short announcement (ruling out RPA/RNS based on the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule), and it is very large, it is most likely a comprehensive report. If it were an earnings release (ER) or interim report (IR), it would usually contain clear financial tables or summaries. Since the content is mostly structural code, I will default to the most comprehensive annual filing if no other specific type is evident, or the general Regulatory Filing (RNS) if it's too generic. Given the size, it is a full report. In the absence of explicit content confirming 10-K, I will classify it as a general Regulatory Filing (RNS) as a safe classification for a large, unidentifiable structured document, although 10-K is statistically more probable for such a large file. Revisiting the definitions: 10-K is the 'Official yearly report covering company activity and full financial performance.' IR is the 'Comprehensive financial report for a period shorter than a year.' Since the document is massive, it is a comprehensive report. Without content keywords, I cannot definitively choose between 10-K or IR. I will use RNS as the fallback for a large, structurally present document whose content type is obscured by the raw formatting, as per Rule 3, unless it clearly announces a report (which it doesn't, it *is* the content). However, upon closer inspection, the document length (679k chars) is characteristic of a full annual or quarterly report that has been converted to HTML. If it were a short announcement, the length would be small. Since it is the full content, it must be one of the comprehensive reports (10-K or IR). Given the ambiguity, RNS is the safest catch-all for a document whose specific content type cannot be confirmed from the provided raw structure, even if it is large.
2024-04-26 Polish
Ocena przez Radę Nadzorczą zgodności sprawozdania skonsolidowanego - załącznik nr 6
Regulatory Filings Classification · 1% confidence The document text provided is extremely long (over 500,000 characters) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, likely a PDF viewer output, given the extensive CSS styling related to page layout, sidebars, and printing (`<style>` tags defining `.pf`, `.pc`, etc.). The length strongly suggests this is a comprehensive report rather than a brief announcement. Since the content is not directly readable as a standard financial filing text but is a full document structure, and given the context of financial reporting databases, the most appropriate classification for a very large, comprehensive report that isn't explicitly identified as a 10-K (Annual Report) or IR (Interim Report) is often the general 'Annual Report' category if it represents the full yearly filing, or we must look for clues within the structure. However, without clear headers like '10-K' or 'Annual Report', and given the sheer volume, it represents a full, detailed document. If this were a standard SEC filing, its size would point towards a 10-K. Since the text is just the container structure and not the content itself, and it's massive, I will default to the most comprehensive report type, the Annual Report (10-K), assuming the underlying content is the full yearly performance review, as it is far too large to be an RPA or ER.
2024-04-26 Polish
Oświadczenie Rady Nadzorczej w sprawie Komitetu Audytu - załącznik nr 5
Board/Management Information Classification · 1% confidence The document text provided is extremely short (relative to the 437k character total length, but the provided snippet is HTML/CSS structure, not substantive content) and appears to be the raw source code or rendering instructions for a document viewer, rather than the actual content of a financial filing. Crucially, there are no keywords indicating a specific report type (like '10-K', 'Earnings Release', 'Audit Report', 'Proxy Statement', etc.). The document length is large (437,785 chars), suggesting it *should* contain substantive text, but the provided snippet is just boilerplate HTML/CSS/font data. Given the lack of content and the presence of rendering code, this is highly indicative of a document that failed to render its primary content or is simply metadata/viewer wrapper. Following Rule 2 (Menu vs Meal), if the document is short and announces a report, it's RPA/RNS. Since the document is very long but the provided text is non-substantive boilerplate, I must rely on the fallback if no content can be identified. However, in a real-world scenario where the full text is available, this structure often precedes a major filing. Since I cannot identify the content type from the provided snippet, and it's not a short announcement, the safest classification based on the *absence* of specific content markers is the general regulatory fallback category.
2024-04-26 Polish

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.