Skip to main content
Captor Therapeutics S.A. logo

Captor Therapeutics S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · CTX ISIN · PLCPTRT00014 LEI · 259400JHH1S2I2S4O735 WAR Professional, scientific and technical activities
Open in API
Filings indexed 920 across all filing types
Latest filing 2025-04-15 Board/Management Inform…
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR CTX

About Captor Therapeutics S.A.

https://www.captortherapeutics.com/

Captor Therapeutics is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of novel therapeutics for diseases with high unmet medical needs. The company specializes in Targeted Protein Degradation (TPD), a technology that enables the elimination of disease-causing proteins previously considered "undruggable." Its core research and development activities are centered on creating new treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases. To achieve this, Captor Therapeutics utilizes its proprietary Optigrade™ platform. This integrated drug discovery engine combines advanced technologies, including structural biology, proteomics, molecular modeling, and protein engineering, to identify and optimize novel drug candidates. The platform is designed to accelerate the development of degraders with superior therapeutic properties, aiming to provide new treatment options for severe conditions.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Oświadczenie Rady Nadzorczej w sprawie Komitetu Audytu
Board/Management Information Classification · 99% confidence The document is a formal statement from the Supervisory Board (Rada Nadzorcza) of Captor Therapeutics S.A. regarding the Audit Committee (Komitet Audytu). It confirms compliance with regulations concerning the appointment, composition, functioning, independence, and expertise of the Audit Committee members. This content directly relates to the internal rules, board structure, and governance practices of the company. Therefore, it fits best under Governance Information (CGR). The document is short and formal, but its content is substantive governance reporting, not just an announcement of a report's publication.
2025-04-15 Polish
Ocena Rady Nadzorczej Captor Therapeutics
Board/Management Information Classification · 99% confidence The document is dated April 15, 2025, and explicitly discusses the assessment by the Supervisory Board ('Rada Nadzorcza') regarding the Management Board's report on activities and the Financial Statements ('sprawozdanie finansowe') for the year ended December 31, 2024. This content—the formal review and approval of the annual financial statements and management report by the supervisory body—is characteristic of the documentation accompanying or summarizing the Annual Report (10-K) process, specifically focusing on the audit/review outcome. Since the text is a formal assessment/opinion rather than the full financial statements or the management discussion and analysis itself, and it heavily references the audit opinion ('opinią biegłego rewidenta i raportem z badania sprawozdania finansowego'), it aligns best with the Audit Report / Information category (AR), which covers applied accounting principles and results of internal/regulatory stress tests/reviews, distinct from the full 10-K filing.
2025-04-15 Polish
Sprawozdanie Zarządu za rok 2024 - podpis
Capital/Financing Update Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML digital signature blocks ('Signature', 'SignedInfo', 'KeyInfo', 'X509Data', 'DigestValue', etc.). This structure is characteristic of digitally signed documents, often used for regulatory filings to ensure authenticity and integrity. The presence of references to files like "CAPTOR_SzD_2024-12-31_PL.xhtml" and the overall structure strongly suggest this is the signature block *accompanying* a primary document, rather than the primary document itself (which would contain narrative or financial tables). Since the text is not the report but the signature/metadata wrapper, and it doesn't explicitly announce a report release (which would be RPA), the most appropriate general category for a signed regulatory artifact that doesn't fit a specific financial report type is the fallback category for miscellaneous regulatory filings. However, upon closer inspection of the certificate details within the signature blocks, one certificate mentions 'Narodowy Bank Polski' (National Bank of Poland) and the other mentions 'Certum QCA 2017' and Polish VAT ID. This suggests a Polish regulatory or financial context. The file name reference "CAPTOR_SzD_2024-12-31_PL.xhtml" is highly specific. Given the context of financial documents, a digitally signed document wrapper like this, especially when it doesn't contain the actual report content, is best classified as a general Regulatory Filing (RNS) or potentially a specific type if the content was known. Since the content is only the signature, RNS is the safest fallback for a non-standard, signed artifact.
2025-04-15 Polish
Sprawozdanie Zarządu za rok 2024
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is extremely long (over 10 million characters) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML content of a rendered document, including extensive CSS styling and font definitions. The presence of complex HTML structure, CSS, and embedded font data strongly suggests this is the full content of a complex report or filing, rather than a brief announcement about a filing. Given the massive size, it is highly unlikely to be a short 'Report Publication Announcement' (RPA) or a simple 'Regulatory Filing' (RNS) that just links to the main document. Since the content is comprehensive and large, it points towards a major regulatory filing. Without specific keywords like '10-K', 'Annual Report', or 'Interim Report' visible in the truncated text, and considering the nature of the data (raw document structure), the most appropriate classification for a very large, complex, and potentially comprehensive filing that doesn't fit a more specific category (like 10-K or IR) is the general fallback category for regulatory documents: Regulatory Filings (RNS). However, the sheer size (10 million characters) usually implies a full report. Since the text is mostly structural noise and not the actual report content, and we must rely on the provided definitions, the size suggests a full report, but the content itself is unreadable/unclassifiable based on keywords. Given the context of financial databases, a document this large is almost certainly a primary filing. If it were a 10-K or IR, those codes would be preferred. Since it is not clearly identifiable as 10-K or IR, and it is clearly a substantial document, RNS is the safest general regulatory classification, although it might mask a 10-K or IR if the full text were parsed. Given the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule applies to *short* announcements, this large document is the 'meal'. I will default to the most comprehensive report type that isn't explicitly named, or the general regulatory fallback if no report type is evident. Since no specific report title (like 'Annual Report' or 'Interim Report') is clearly visible in the noise, RNS is the best fit as a catch-all for substantial, non-specifically defined regulatory documents.
2025-04-15 Polish
Jednostkowe Sprawozdanie Finansowe za rok 2024 - podpis
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML digital signature blocks (Signatures, SignedInfo, SignatureValue, KeyInfo, etc.). These blocks are metadata used to verify the authenticity and integrity of a document, not the content of the report itself. Crucially, the references within the signatures point to a file named "CAPTOR_SF_2024-12-31_PL.xhtml". This suggests the document is either the signature wrapper for a report or an announcement about a report. Given the context of financial filings, a reference to an XHTML file, especially one containing a date (2024-12-31), strongly implies a structured financial document. Since the text provided is only the signature block and not the full content of the referenced report (which would likely be an Annual Report (10-K) or Interim Report (IR) if it were a full financial filing), and the document length is relatively short (21,078 chars, but the content is just signatures), this structure is typical of a regulatory filing wrapper. However, the reference URI contains 'CAPTOR_SF', which might hint at a specific type of filing or supplement. Without the actual content, and seeing this is a signed wrapper, the most appropriate classification is the general fallback for regulatory filings that don't fit specific content criteria, or if we interpret the reference 'SF' as 'Supplement File', it could lean towards 'XLSX' (Financial Supplement Data) or 'RNS' (Regulatory Filings). Since the primary content is the signature structure itself, and it's a formal, signed submission, 'RNS' (Regulatory Filings) is the safest general classification for a document whose main purpose is regulatory submission/verification, rather than content delivery. If 'SF' strongly implied 'Financial Supplement', 'XLSX' would be considered, but 'RNS' covers the nature of the submission wrapper itself.
2025-04-15 Polish
Jednostkowe Sprawozdanie Finansowe za rok 2024
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is extremely long (over 4.7 million characters) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, including extensive CSS styling and font definitions, rather than a concise summary or a standard regulatory filing narrative. Given the massive size, it is highly unlikely to be a short announcement like RPA or RNS, which are typically brief notices. However, the content itself is not the narrative of a standard report (like 10-K, IR, or ER). It is the underlying structure of a document viewer or a complex report. Since the document is very large and contains the full structure of what is likely a comprehensive report, and without clear textual evidence of a specific filing type (like '10-K', 'Earnings Release', or 'Proxy Statement'), the most appropriate classification based on the provided definitions and the nature of the input (a massive, structured file) is difficult. If this massive file *is* the content of a full report (like a 10-K or IR), it should be classified as such. However, the structure suggests it might be a container or a data dump. Let's re-examine the definitions: - 10-K: Official yearly report covering company activity and full financial performance. - IR: Comprehensive financial report for a period shorter than a year (e.g., half-year). Since the text is too large to be a simple announcement and represents the full content, it must be one of the comprehensive reports. Without explicit headers, I must rely on the sheer volume. If this were a standard SEC filing, the length suggests a 10-K or a large Quarterly Report (IR). Since I cannot confirm the period (annual vs. interim), and the content is presented as raw HTML/XML, this suggests a complex, full document. Given the ambiguity and the structure suggesting a complete, detailed document, I will lean towards the most comprehensive annual filing type, 10-K, as a strong possibility for a very large document, or use the fallback 'RNS' if it's just a generic data dump. However, looking closely at the structure, it strongly resembles the output of a PDF/document rendering engine (with CSS for sidebars, page containers, etc.). This often happens when a full report is converted to HTML. If I must choose a specific report type based on size alone, 10-K is the largest standard filing. If the content were readable and contained financial statements, 10-K or IR would be correct. Since it's unreadable raw code, I will use the fallback 'RNS' as the safest classification for an unidentifiable, large, structured data file that doesn't fit the narrative definitions. Revisiting the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule: This is not a short announcement *about* a meal; it *is* the meal (the entire document structure). Therefore, RPA/RNS as an announcement is less likely than classifying the underlying document type. Given the lack of specific keywords, and the document being a massive, unparsed HTML blob, I will default to the general regulatory filing category, RNS, as the most appropriate fallback for an unclassifiable, large filing structure. *Self-Correction based on typical database behavior*: When a document is this large and structured, it usually represents the full content of a major filing. Since I cannot confirm annual vs. interim, and 10-K is the primary large filing, I will select 10-K as the best guess for a massive document, acknowledging the low confidence due to unreadable text. *Final Decision*: The document is massive (4.7M chars) and structured as HTML, indicating a full report. Without explicit content, 10-K is the default for the largest annual report type. FY 2023
2025-04-15 Polish

Browse filings by year

9 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.