Skip to main content
AGORA S.A. logo

AGORA S.A. — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · AGO ISIN · PLAGORA00067 LEI · 259400E54CE0AFAK0F30 WAR Publishing, broadcasting, and content production and distribution activities
Open in API
Filings indexed 1,007 across all filing types
Latest filing 2024-04-02 Regulatory Filings
Country PL Poland
Listing WAR AGO

About AGORA S.A.

https://www.agora.pl/en

Agora S.A. is a diversified multimedia and entertainment company. Its operations span several key sectors, including digital and printed press, where it publishes the daily newspaper 'Gazeta Wyborcza' and various magazines. The company is a significant participant in the cinema and film market, operating a large network of cinemas (Helios) and engaging in film production and distribution (Next Film). Additionally, Agora has a strong presence in outdoor advertising and manages numerous internet websites and portals, offering comprehensive digital advertising services. Other core business segments include a network of radio stations and a publishing house that produces books, music albums, and other media. The group also organizes cultural and entertainment events.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
List Prezesa
Regulatory Filings Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is extremely long (552,419 characters) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, including extensive CSS styling and font definitions. The presence of complex styling elements (like CSS animations, font-face definitions, and layout structures) strongly suggests this is the full content of a complex report or filing, rather than a brief announcement about a filing. Given the length and the nature of the content (which seems to be a fully rendered document, possibly a PDF converted to HTML), it is highly unlikely to be a short 'Report Publication Announcement' (RPA) or a simple 'Regulatory Filing' (RNS) which typically just announces the availability of a report. Since the text itself is the body of the document, we must look for keywords to determine the specific type. The text contains complex, structured data, including references to financial concepts (though heavily obscured by the rendering code). However, without clear headers like '10-K', 'Annual Report', or specific financial statements, classifying it precisely is difficult based only on the provided snippet. However, the structure strongly suggests a comprehensive document. If this were a standard SEC filing, the length would point towards a 10-K or a comprehensive Interim Report (IR). Since the content is too garbled by the HTML wrapper to definitively identify specific sections (like MD&A or financial tables), and it is clearly not a short announcement, I will default to the most comprehensive annual filing type, the 10-K, as a strong possibility for such a large document, or use the fallback 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS) if the content is too generic/unreadable. Re-evaluating the structure: The document contains a large block of text that seems to be encoded data (base64 strings for fonts/SVGs) mixed with HTML tags. This often happens when viewing a complex, formatted document (like an Annual Report or a detailed Investor Presentation) through a viewer that renders the source. Given the sheer size (over half a million characters), it represents a major filing. If we assume the underlying content is a standard, comprehensive filing, 10-K is the primary candidate for the largest annual document. If the content were clearly a quarterly report, IR would be chosen. Without clear textual evidence, and recognizing this is the full content, I will select the most comprehensive filing type, 10-K, while acknowledging the high uncertainty due to the formatting noise. *Self-Correction based on context:* Since the text is overwhelmingly composed of rendering instructions and encoded data rather than readable financial text, it is impossible to confirm the content type (10-K vs IR vs IP). Therefore, the safest classification for a large, unreadable, fully rendered document that doesn't fit a specific category is the general fallback. Final decision: Due to the document being almost entirely composed of HTML/CSS/Font data wrappers, making content analysis impossible, and its large size ruling out short announcements, I will use the general Regulatory Filings fallback (RNS) as the most appropriate category for an unclassifiable, large filing.
2024-04-02 Polish
Sprawozdanie z badania jednostkowe
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text consists almost entirely of XML structures related to digital signatures (Signature, SignedInfo, KeyInfo, X509Certificate, DigestValue, etc.) and embedded data objects. The presence of 'SigningTime: 2024-03-29T15:30:19Z' and the structure strongly suggest this is a digitally signed regulatory filing or document wrapper, likely an XBRL instance or a similar structured data file that has been signed for authenticity. Crucially, the embedded data object description contains a filename hint: 'filename="szb_jedn_2024-03-29_pl.xhtml"'. This suggests the core content is an XHTML document, which is often used for financial reports. However, the document length is very large (2.9 million characters), indicating it is the full content of a report, not just a short announcement. Given the complexity and the presence of a full document structure (even if wrapped in a signature block), and the lack of explicit keywords for 10-K, IR, or ER, this is most likely a comprehensive financial report or a related structured filing. Since the content is very long and appears to be the actual data (not just an announcement of data), and it is not explicitly identified as a 10-K (Annual Report) or IR (Interim Report), the most appropriate classification for a comprehensive, structured financial document that doesn't fit the primary report types is often the general 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS) or, if it contains detailed financial statements, potentially 'AR' (Audit Report/Information) if it's an audited document, or 'IP' (Investor Presentation) if it's a presentation. Given the structure is highly technical (XML signature wrapper) and the embedded content hints at an XHTML report, and without clear headers like '10-K' or 'Quarterly Report', classifying it as a general 'Regulatory Filing' (RNS) is the safest fallback for complex, signed data packages that don't match the specific report definitions. Revisiting the definitions: 10-K is the official yearly report. IR is the comprehensive interim report. Since this is a very large document, it is the report itself, not an RPA. The content is too generic (signature block) to definitively choose between 10-K, IR, or AR. However, the presence of a digital signature often accompanies official filings submitted to regulators. I will lean towards the most comprehensive non-annual report category that covers detailed financial information, which is 'IR' (Interim Report), assuming this is a period-end filing, or 'AR' if it's an audit document. Given the lack of period context, and the structure being a signed data package, 'RNS' remains a strong fallback. Let's check the embedded filename hint again: 'szb_jedn_2024-03-29_pl.xhtml'. This doesn't map directly to a standard US SEC filing code. I will classify this as a general Regulatory Filing (RNS) due to the non-standard format (signed XML wrapper) that doesn't clearly map to 10-K, IR, or ER, but is clearly a formal submission. FY 2024
2024-04-02 Polish
Sprawozdanie z badania jednostkowe
Audit Report / Information Classification · 100% confidence The document text is titled "SPRAWOZDANIE Z BADANIA sprawozdania finansowego za 2023 rok" (Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements for 2023) and contains the heading "SPRAWOZDANIE NIEZALE??NEGO BIEG??EGO REWIDENTA Z BADANIA ROCZNEGO SPRAWOZDANIA FINANSOWEGO" (Independent Auditor's Report on the Audit of the Annual Financial Statements). It explicitly details the auditor's opinion on the financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2023, referencing accounting standards (MSSF/IFRS) and legal requirements. This content perfectly matches the definition of an Audit Report / Information (AR), which covers standalone audit reports and applied accounting principles, distinguishing it from a full Annual Report (10-K) or an Earnings Release (ER). FY 2023
2024-04-02 Polish
Ocena RN sprawozdań za 2023
Board/Management Information Classification · 95% confidence The provided document text is extremely long (over 1.1 million characters) and appears to be the raw HTML/XML content of a rendered document, not a short announcement. The content structure, including extensive CSS styling and embedded font data, suggests this is the full body of a comprehensive report rather than a brief notification. Given the length and the nature of the content (which, despite being heavily obfuscated by HTML/CSS, implies a detailed filing), it is highly unlikely to be a simple Report Publication Announcement (RPA) or a general Regulatory Filing (RNS) based on the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule. Since the text is too long to be a summary or factsheet, and without specific headers indicating 10-K, IR, or AR, the most appropriate classification for a very large, detailed, and potentially complex corporate document that doesn't fit a specific financial report category is the general 'Regulatory Filings' fallback, although it is more likely a full report like 10-K or IR that is heavily wrapped in presentation code. However, since the content itself is not readable for specific financial terms (like 'balance sheet' or 'MD&A'), and it is clearly a complete document structure, I must rely on the length rule. The length strongly argues against RPA/RNS. Given the ambiguity of the content structure, I will lean towards the most comprehensive category that isn't explicitly defined by keywords, which often defaults to a major filing type if the length is indicative. Since the document is massive, it suggests a primary filing. Without clear keywords, I will use the fallback 'RNS' as the safest general classification for an unidentifiable, large regulatory document structure, acknowledging the high confidence in it *not* being an RPA.
2024-04-02 Polish
Oświadczenie RN w sprawie Komitetu Audytu
Remuneration Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text provided is heavily truncated and appears to be the raw HTML/XML structure of a rendered document, including CSS styles, font definitions, and structural tags (like head, style, pf, pc). There is no discernible content indicating a specific financial report type (like 10-K, ER, IR) or a clear announcement title. The document length is very large (756,193 chars), suggesting it is a full report or a complex filing, but the visible text is purely boilerplate structure. Given the lack of specific financial or regulatory keywords, and the nature of the visible text being the container/rendering code, this is most likely a generic regulatory filing or a document that failed to render its content properly, falling into the miscellaneous category.
2024-04-02 Polish
Sprawozdanie jednostkowe za 2023
Audit Report / Information Classification · 95% confidence The document text consists almost entirely of XML digital signature blocks (Signatures, SignedInfo, KeyInfo, X509Data, etc.). These signatures reference a file named "yarrl_sprawozdanie_jednostkowe_31-12-2023_pl.xhtml". The Polish phrase "sprawozdanie jednostkowe" translates to "individual/separate report" and the date "31-12-2023" indicates a year-end report. Since the document provided is not the report content itself but rather the digital signature metadata confirming the integrity of the report file, it strongly suggests this is an announcement or filing related to the publication of that report. Given the context of a year-end report (which is typically a 10-K equivalent or a comprehensive annual report), and the fact that the provided text is metadata about the signature of the report file rather than the report content, the most appropriate classification is Report Publication Announcement (RPA), as it signals the release or validation of a major document. If the document were the full report, it would likely be classified as 10-K or AR, but the structure here points to a publication notice/validation wrapper. However, looking closely at the definitions, the document is extremely short (37k chars, mostly metadata) and contains the actual signed file name. This fits the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule for RPA. If the underlying document is an Annual Report (10-K), this wrapper is the RPA. FY 2023
2024-04-02 Polish

Browse filings by year

11 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.