Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

CRITICAL RESOURCES LIMITED Governance Information 2018

Apr 2, 2018

64708_rns_2018-04-02_0d18a0ef-5860-4518-8efc-6e8e121c3542.pdf

Governance Information

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3[1]

Appendix 4G

Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations

Name of entity:
Force Commodities Limited
ABN / ARBN:
12 145 184 667
Financial year ended:
12 145 184 667 31 December 2017

Our corporate governance statement[2] for the above period above can be found attached as an appendix to this document and at:[3]

These pages of our annual report: This URL on our website: https://forcecommodities.com.au/corporategovernance

The Corporate Governance Statement is accurate and up to date as at 31 March 2018 and has been approved by the Board of Directors of Force Commodities Limited.

The annexure includes a key to where our corporate governance disclosures can be located.

Date: 31 March 2018

Name of Director or Secretary authorising lodgement:

==> picture [125 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Michael Fry

1 Under Listing Rule 4.7.3, an entity must lodge with ASX a completed Appendix 4G at the same time as it lodges its annual report with ASX. Listing Rule 4.10.3 requires an entity that is included in the official list as an ASX Listing to include in its annual report either a corporate governance statement that meets the requirements of that rule or the URL of the page on its website where such a statement is located. The corporate governance statement must disclose the extent to which the entity has followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council during the reporting period. If the entity has not followed a recommendation for any part of the reporting period, its corporate governance statement must separately identify that recommendation and the period during which it was not followed and state its reasons for not following the recommendation and what (if any) alternative governance practices it adopted in lieu of the recommendation during that period.

Under Listing Rule 4.7.4, if an entity chooses to include its corporate governance statement on its website rather than in its annual report, it must lodge a copy of the corporate governance statement with ASX at the same time as it lodges its annual report with ASX. The corporate governance statement must be current as at the effective date specified in that statement for the purposes of rule 4.10.3.

2 “Corporate governance statement” is defined in Listing Rule 19.12 to mean the statement referred to in Listing Rule 4.10.3 which discloses the extent to which an entity has followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council during a particular reporting period.

3 Mark whichever option is correct and then complete the page number(s) of the annual report, or the URL of the web page, where the entity’s corporate governance statement can be found. You can, if you wish, delete the option which is not applicable.

Throughout this form, where you are given two or more options to select, you can, if you wish, delete any option which is not applicable and just retain the option that is applicable. If you select an option that includes “OR” at the end of the selection and you delete the other options, you can also, if you wish, delete the “OR” at the end of the selection.

Page 1

ANNEXURE – KEY TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DISCLOSURES

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
PRINCIPLE 1 – LAY SOLID FOUNDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT
1.1 A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
the respective roles and responsibilities of its board and
management; and
(b)
those matters expressly reserved to the board and those
delegated to management.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and information about the respective roles and responsibilities of
our board and management (including those matters expressly
reserved to the board and those delegated to management):

at https://forcecommodities.com.au/corporategovernance

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.2 A listed entity should:
(a)
undertake appropriate checks before appointing a person, or
putting forward to security holders a candidate for election,
as a director; and
(b)
provide security holders with all material information in its
possession relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect
or re-elect a director.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.3 A listed entity should have a written agreement with each director
and senior executive setting out the terms of their appointment.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.4 The company secretary of a listed entity should be accountable
directly to the board, through the chair, on all matters to do with the
proper functioning of the board.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at https://forcecommodities.com.au/corporategovernance

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

4 If you have followed all of the Council’s recommendations in full for the whole of the period above, you can, if you wish, delete this column from the form and re-format it.

Page 2

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
1.5 A listed entity should:
(a)
have a diversity policy which includes requirements for the
board or a relevant committee of the board to set
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and to
assess annually both the objectives and the entity’s progress
in achieving them;
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it; and
(c)
disclose as at the end of each reporting period the
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by
the board or a relevant committee of the board in accordance
with the entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards
achieving them and either:
(1) the respective proportions of men and women on the
board, in senior executive positions and across the
whole organisation (including how the entity has defined
“senior executive” for these purposes); or
(2) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under the Workplace
Gender Equality Act, the entity’s most recent “Gender
Equality Indicators”, as defined in and published under
that Act.
… the fact that we have a diversity policy that complies with
paragraph (a):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of our diversity policy or a summary of it:
at https://forcecommodities.com.au/corporategovernance
… and the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by
the board or a relevant committee of the board in accordance with our
diversity policy and our progress towards achieving them:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at https://forcecommodities.com.au/corporategovernance
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (c)(1) or (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.6 A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the
performance of the board, its committees and individual
directors; and
(b)
disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a
performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting
period in accordance with that process.
… the evaluation process referred to in paragraph (a):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraph (b):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.7 A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the
performance of its senior executives; and
(b)
disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a
performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting
period in accordance with that process.
… the evaluation process referred to in paragraph (a):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraph (b):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

Page 3

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
PRINCIPLE 2 - STRUCTURE THE BOARD TO ADD VALUE
2.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a nomination committee which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that
fact and the processes it employs to address board
succession issues and to ensure that the board has the
appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience,
independence and diversity to enable it to discharge its
duties and responsibilities effectively.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have a nomination committee that complies with
paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have a nomination committee and the
processes we employ to address board succession issues and to
ensure that the board has the appropriate balance of skills,
knowledge, experience, independence and diversity to enable it to
discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
2.2 A listed entity should have and disclose a board skills matrix
setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the board currently
has or is looking to achieve in its membership.
… our board skills matrix:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

Page 4

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
2.3 A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
the names of the directors considered by the board to be
independent directors;
(b)
if a director has an interest, position, association or
relationship of the type described in Box 2.3 but the board
is of the opinion that it does not compromise the
independence of the director, the nature of the interest,
position, association or relationship in question and an
explanation of why the board is of that opinion; and
(c)
the length of service of each director.
… the names of the directors considered by the board to be
independent directors:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and, where applicable, the information referred to in paragraph (b):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and the length of service of each director:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
2.4 A majority of the board of a listed entity should be independent
directors.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
2.5 The chair of the board of a listed entity should be an independent
director and, in particular, should not be the same person as the
CEO of the entity.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
2.6 A listed entity should have a program for inducting new directors
and provide appropriate professional development opportunities
for directors to develop and maintain the skills and knowledge
needed to perform their role as directors effectively.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
PRINCIPLE 3 – ACT ETHICALLY AND RESPONSIBLY
3.1 A listed entity should:
(a)
have a code of conduct for its directors, senior executives
and employees; and
(b)
disclose that code or a summary of it.
… our code of conduct or a summary of it:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at https://forcecommodities.com.au/corporategovernance
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 5

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
PRINCIPLE 4 – SAFEGUARD INTEGRITY IN CORPORATE REPORTING
4.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have an audit committee which:
(1) has at least three members, all of whom are non-
executive directors and a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director, who is not the
chair of the board,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the relevant qualifications and experience of the
members of the committee; and
(5) in relation to each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have an audit committee, disclose that fact
and the processes it employs that independently verify and
safeguard the integrity of its corporate reporting, including
the processes for the appointment and removal of the
external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement
partner.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have an audit committee that complies with
paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have an audit committee and the processes
we employ that independently verify and safeguard the integrity of our
corporate reporting, including the processes for the appointment and
removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit
engagement partner:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
4.2 The board of a listed entity should, before it approves the entity’s
financial statements for a financial period, receive from its CEO
and CFO a declaration that, in their opinion, the financial records
of the entity have been properly maintained and that the financial
statements comply with the appropriate accounting standards
and give a true and fair view of the financial position and
performance of the entity and that the opinion has been formed
on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal
control which is operating effectively.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 6

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
4.3 A listed entity that has an AGM should ensure that its external
auditor attends its AGM and is available to answer questions
from security holders relevant to the audit.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity that does not hold an
annual general meeting and this recommendation is therefore
not applicable
PRINCIPLE 5 – MAKE TIMELY AND BALANCED DISCLOSURE
5.1 A listed entity should:
(a)
have a written policy for complying with its continuous
disclosure obligations under the Listing Rules; and
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it.
… our continuous disclosure compliance policy or a summary of it:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at https://forcecommodities.com.au/corporategovernance

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
PRINCIPLE 6 – RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS
6.1 A listed entity should provide information about itself and its
governance to investors via its website.
… information about us and our governance on our website:
at https://forcecommodities.com.au/corporategovernance

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
6.2 A listed entity should design and implement an investor relations
program to facilitate effective two-way communication with
investors.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
6.3 A listed entity should disclose the policies and processes it has in
place to facilitate and encourage participation at meetings of
security holders.
… our policies and processes for facilitating and encouraging
participation at meetings of security holders:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity that does not hold
periodic meetings of security holders and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
6.4 A listed entity should give security holders the option to receive
communications from, and send communications to, the entity
and its security registry electronically.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 7

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
PRINCIPLE 7 – RECOGNISE AND MANAGE RISK
7.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a committee or committees to oversee risk, each of
which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a risk committee or committees that
satisfy (a) above, disclose that fact and the processes it
employs for overseeing the entity’s risk management
framework.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have a committee or committees to oversee risk
that comply with paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
at www.globemm.com
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have a risk committee or committees that
satisfy (a) and the processes we employ for overseeing our risk
management framework:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
7.2 The board or a committee of the board should:
(a)
review the entity’s risk management framework at least
annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be sound; and
(b)
disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether such
a review has taken place.
… the fact that board or a committee of the board reviews the entity’s
risk management framework at least annually to satisfy itself that it
continues to be sound:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and that such a review has taken place in the reporting period
covered by this Appendix 4G:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 8

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
7.3 A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
if it has an internal audit function, how the function is
structured and what role it performs; or
(b)
if it does not have an internal audit function, that fact and
the processes it employs for evaluating and continually
improving the effectiveness of its risk management and
internal control processes.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… how our internal audit function is structured and what role it
performs:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have an internal audit function and the
processes we employ for evaluating and continually improving the
effectiveness of our risk management and internal control processes:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
7.4 A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material
exposure to economic, environmental and social sustainability
risks and, if it does, how it manages or intends to manage those
risks.
… whether we have any material exposure to economic,
environmental and social sustainability risks and, if we do, how we
manage or intend to manage those risks:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 9

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
PRINCIPLE 8 – REMUNERATE FAIRLY AND RESPONSIBLY
8.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a remuneration committee which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose that
fact and the processes it employs for setting the level and
composition of remuneration for directors and senior
executives and ensuring that such remuneration is
appropriate and not excessive.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have a remuneration committee that complies with
paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have a remuneration committee and the
processes we employ for setting the level and composition of
remuneration for directors and senior executives and ensuring that
such remuneration is appropriate and not excessive:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is
therefore not applicable
8.2 A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and
practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive directors
and the remuneration of executive directors and other senior
executives.
… separately our remuneration policies and practices regarding the
remuneration of non-executive directors and the remuneration of
executive directors and other senior executives:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
8.3 A listed entity which has an equity-based remuneration scheme
should:
(a)
have a policy on whether participants are permitted to
enter into transactions (whether through the use of
derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk of
participating in the scheme; and
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it.
… our policy on this issue or a summary of it:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

w e do not have an equity-based remuneration scheme and this
recommendation is therefore not applicableOR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

Page 10

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES APPLICABLE TO EXTERNALLY MANAGED LISTED ENTITIES
- Alternative to Recommendation 1.1 for externally managed listed
entities:
The responsible entity of an externally managed listed entity
should disclose:
(a)
the arrangements between the responsible entity and the
listed entity for managing the affairs of the listed entity;
(b)
the role and responsibility of the board of the responsible
entity for overseeing those arrangements.
… the information referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
NOT APPLICCABLE

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
- Alternative to Recommendations 8.1, 8.2 and 8.3 for externally
managed listed entities:
An externally managed listed entity should clearly disclose the
terms governing the remuneration of the manager.
… the terms governing our remuneration as manager of the entity:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]
NOT APPLICCABLE

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 11

==> picture [112 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

2017 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT

Force Commodities Limited ( Force or Company ) and the entities it controls believe corporate governance is a critical pillar on which business success, and in turn shareholder value is built.

The Board of Directors ( Board ) of Force has adopted a suite of corporate governance charters and policies, commensurate with the Company’s needs, which articulate the practices and procedures followed by Force. These charters and policies are available in the Corporate Governance section of the Company’s website www.forcecommodities.com.au.

This Corporate Governance Statement ( Statement ) reports Force’s compliance with the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s “ Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations -3rd Edition ” ( ASX Principles and Recommendations ) in relation to the financial year ended 31 December 2017.

In addition to the ASX Principles and Recommendations , the Board has taken into account a number of important factors in determining its corporate governance practices and procedures, including the:

  • size and scale of the Company;

  • relatively simple operations of the Company, which currently only undertakes mineral exploration and development activities;

  • cost verses benefits of additional corporate governance requirements or processes;

  • size of the Board;

  • Board’s experience in the resources sector;

  • organisational reporting structure and number of reporting functions, operational divisions and employees;

  • relatively simple financial affairs with limited complexity and quantum; and

  • direct shareholder feedback.

Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
1.1 Role of Board
and
management
The Board has established a clear distinction between the
functions and responsibilities reserved for the Board and those
delegated to management, which are set out in the Company’s
Board Charter.
A copy of the Board Charter is available in the Corporate
Governance section of the Company’s website.
Yes
1.2 Information
regarding
election and re-
election of
director
candidates.
The Company conducts background and reference checks
including those described in Guidance Note 1, paragraph 3.18
issued by the ASX before appointing any additional person, or
putting forward to Shareholders a candidate for election, as a
Director.
Yes
1.3 Written
contracts of
appointment
All Directors and the Company Secretary have written agreements
setting out the terms of their appointment.
Yes
1.4 Company
Secretary
The Company Secretary reports directly to the Board through the
Chairman on Board matters and all Directors have access to the
Company Secretary.
In accordance with the Company’s Constitution, the appointment
or removal of the Company Secretary is a matter for the Board as
a whole. Details of the Company Secretary’s experience and
qualifications are set out in the Directors’ Report of the
Company’s Annual Report.
Yes

Page 12

==> picture [112 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight (continued)

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
1.5 Diversity The Company is committed to providing an environment in
which all employees and consultants are treated with fairness
and respect, and have equal access to opportunities available at
work. The Company believes diversity enables it to attract
people with the best skills and attributes, and contributes to the
achievement of the Company's corporate objectives.
Due to its size, the Company has not set any measurable
objectives with respect to diversity.
At the reporting date, the Company has 5 male and 1 female full
time equivalent employees/contractors.
The Group is not a “relevant employer” under the Workplace
Gender Equality Act.
The Company has established a Diversity Policy. A copy of the
Diversity Policy is available in the Corporate Governance section
of the Company’s website.
Yes
1.6 Board Reviews The Board has not conducted a formal performance evaluation.
as all current directors have been on the Board for less than 12
months and the Board believes that a formal performance
evaluation is not required at this point in time and that no
efficiencies or other benefits would be gained from a formal
performance evaluation process.
The Chairman is responsible for evaluating the Board and
Committees. Informal discussion between the Chairman and
individual Directors is undertaken periodically to focus
performance. As the Company grows and develops, it will
continue to consider the efficiencies and merits of a more
formal performance evaluation of the Board, its committees and
individual Directors.
No
1.7 Management
Reviews
Due to its size and the fact that all current management have
been engaged for less than 12 months, the Board has not
conducted a formal performance evaluation of management.
As the Company grows it is expected that a management team
will be put in place together with a formal performance
evaluation plan.
No

Page 13

==> picture [112 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

Principle 2. Structure the Board to add value

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
2.1 Nominations
Committee








The Board has decided not to form a separate Nomination
Committee.
The Board believes that no efficiencies or other benefits would be
gained by establishing a separate Nomination Committee.
The Board periodically reviews whether it has the appropriate
balance of skills, knowledge, and experience suitable for a
Company in the junior resources sector.
As the Company grows and develops, it will review the merits of
establishing a formal Nomination Committee.
No
2.2 Board skills
matrix




The Board seeks a mix of skills suitable for a junior resources
company. A summary of the key board skills matrix is set out
below. Further details regarding the skills and experience of each
Director are included in the Directors’ Report of the Company’s
Annual Report.
Director/Skills
Capital
Markets
Resources
Mining/
Geology
Finance/
Accounting
Listed
Company
David Sanders





Jason Brewer





Gedeon Pelesa




Yes
2.3 Disclose
independence
and length of
service

The Board has assessed the independence status of its Directors
and has determined the following as at 31 December 2017:
Name
Position
Independent Length of Service
David Sanders
Non-Executive Chairman

0.6years
Jason Brewer
ManagingDirector

0.6years
Gedeon Pelesa
Non-Executive Director

0.2years
Yes
Name Position Independent Length of Service
David Sanders Non-Executive Chairman 0.6years
Jason Brewer ManagingDirector 0.6years
Gedeon Pelesa Non-Executive Director 0.2years
2.4 Majority of
directors
independent







As reported above Mr Sanders and Mr Pelesa are independent
Directors; therefore 2 of the 3 or 67% of directors are
independent.
As such, the independent directors on the Board are in the
majority, when it comes to decision-making.
Directors having a conflict of interest in relation to a particular
item of business they must absent themselves form the Board
meeting before commencement of discussion on the topic.
No
2.5 Chair
Independent



The Chairman, Mr Sanders, is an independent non–executive
Director.
Further details regarding the Directors are set out in the Directors’
Report of the Company’s Annual Report.
Yes
2.6 Professional
Development
Program for
Directors

Due to the size of Company the Board has not yet established a
Professional Development Program.
No

Page 14

==> picture [112 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

Principle 3. Act ethically and responsibly

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
3.1 Code of Conduct The Board has established a Code of Conduct for its Directors,
executives, employees and consultants.
A copy of the Code of Conduct is available in the Corporate
Governance section of the Company’s website.
Yes

Principle 4. Safeguard integrity in corporate reporting

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
4.1 Audit Committee The Board has decided not to form a separate Audit Committee.
The Board believes that no efficiencies or other benefits would be
gained by establishing a separate Audit Committee. The Board has
adopted an Audit Committee Charter, however the Board as a
whole performs the function of the Audit Committee.
Due to the size and scale of its operations, the Board as a whole
considers that it is more efficient and effective for the corporate
reporting process to not have an Audit Committee at this stage.
The Board will monitor this position as the Company’s
circumstances change.
The Board as whole determines when to seek the appointment or
removal of the external auditor, and subject to any statutory
requirements, the Board will also seek rotation of the audit
partner on an as required basis.
A copy of the Audit Committee Charter which is available in the
Corporate Governance section of the Company’s website.
No
4.2 CEO and CFO
certification of
financial
statements
In respect to full year and half year financials reports, the Board
has obtained a written declaration from the CEO (or equivalent)
and CFO (or equivalent) that:
(i)
in their opinion, the financial records of the Company
have been properly maintained and the financial
statements comply with the appropriate accounting
standards and give a true and fair view of the financial
position and performance of the entity, and
(ii)
that opinion is formed on the basis of a sound system
of risk management and internal control and that
system is operating effectively in all material respects
in relation to financial reporting and material business
risks.
Yes
4.3 External Auditor
at AGM
At least one senior representative of the auditor will attend the
Annual General Meeting (‘AGM”) and be available to answer
shareholder questions regarding the audit.
Yes

Page 15

==> picture [112 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

Principle 5. Make timely and balanced disclosure

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
5.1 Disclosure and
Communications
Policy
The Company has adopted a Continuous Disclosure Policy which
sets out the processes and practices that ensure its compliance
with the continuous disclosure requirements under applicable
Listing Rules and applicable corporation law (including the
Corporations Act).
A copy of the Continuous Disclosure Policy is available in the
Corporate Governance section of the Company’s website.
Yes

Principle 6. Respect the rights of security holders

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
6.1 Information
about
governance and
itself on
Website
The Company keeps the investors informed of its corporate
governance, financial performance and prospects via its website.
Investors can access copies of all announcements to the ASX,
notices of meetings, annual reports, financial statements,
corporate governance charters and policies, investor
presentations and general information regarding the Company on
the Company’s website.
Yes
6.2 Design and
implement
Investors
relations
program
The Company conducts periodic investor briefings, roadshows,
site visits and attends regional and industry specific conferences
in order to facilitate effective two way communication with
investors and other financial market participants. Access to
Directors and KMP is provided at these events with separate one-
on-one or group meetings offered whenever possible.
The presentation material provided at these events is posted on
the Company’s website, which also provides the opportunity for
interested parties to join the mailing list to receive regular
updates from the Company.
The Company has adopted a Shareholder Communication Policy
because the Board is pf the view that an effective policy for
communication with shareholders enhances its strong culture of
disclosure to keep the shareholders and the relevant markets
informed of all major developments affecting the Company.
A copy of the Shareholder Communication Policy is available on
the Company’s website.
Yes

Page 16

==> picture [112 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

Principle 6. Respect the rights of security holders

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
6.3 Facilitate
participation at
meetings of
security holders
The Board encourages participation of Shareholders at its
meetings and Shareholders are provided with all notices of
meeting prior to meetings, which are set at times and places to
promote maximum attendance by Shareholders.
Shareholders are always given the opportunity to ask questions of
Directors and management, either during or after meetings.
In addition, the company’s auditor is also made available for
questions at the Company’s AGM of Shareholders.
Yes
6.4 Facilitate
electronic
communications
The Company welcomes electronic communications from its
Shareholders via the Contacts page on the Company’s website.
The Company’s share registry also engages with Shareholders
electronically and makes available a range of relevant forms on its
website and provides Shareholders with options to receive
communications from, and send communications to, the
Company and its security registry electronically.
Shareholders can register with the share registry to access their
personal information and shareholdings via the internet.
Yes

Principle 7. Recognise and manage risk

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
7.1 Risk Committee The Board has decided not to from a separate Risk Committee.
The Board believes that no efficiencies or other benefits would be
gained by establishing a separate Risk Committee. The Board has
adopted a Risk Committee Charter, however the Board as a whole
performs the function of the Risk Committee.
Due to the size and scale of its operations, the Board as a whole
considers that no efficiencies or other benefits would be gained
by establishing a Risk Committee at this stage. The Board will
monitor this position as the Company’s circumstances change.
The Board as whole is responsible for identifying the principal
risks of the Company’s business and ensuring the implementation
of appropriate systems to manage those risks.
No

Page 17

==> picture [112 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
7.2 Annual Risk
Review
The Directors and Management identified in the early part of
2017 that the material risks faced by the Group that could have
an effect on the Group’s future prospects, include: (a) availability
of further funding: (b) exploration and development risk: (c)
fluctuations in commodity prices: (d) title risks: (e) Government
regulations risks; and (f) global financial conditions.
The current Board and management have all been engaged less
than 12 months and because of this, and the recently changed
focus of the Group away from Australia to the DRC, have not yet
established a formal Risk Register.
No
7.3 Internal Audit The Board has not established an internal audit function at this
time. The Board as a whole oversees the effectiveness of risk
management and internal control processes.
No
7.4 Sustainability
risks
The Company identifies and manages material exposures to
economic, environmental and social sustainability risks in a
manner consistent with its Environmental and Social Charter
which is available in the Corporate Governance section of the
Company’s website.
Yes

Principle 8. Remunerate fairly and responsibly

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
8.1 Remuneration
Committee
The Board has decided not to form a separate Remuneration
Committee. The Board believes that no efficiencies or other
benefits would be gained by establishing a separate
Remuneration Committee.
The Board has adopted a Remuneration Committee Charter,
however the Board as a whole performs the function of the
Remuneration Committee.
The Board periodically undertakes a review to ensure that the
level and composition of remuneration for directors and senior
executives is appropriate and not excessive.
No

Page 18

==> picture [112 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

RECOMMENDATION FORCE’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE APPROACH COMPLIES
8.2 Disclosure of
Executive and
Non-Executive
Director
remuneration
Policy
The Company seeks to attract and retain high performance
Directors and Executive with appropriate skills, qualifications
and experience to add value to the Company and fulfil the roles
and responsibilities required. It reviews requirements of
additional capabilities at least annually.
Executive remuneration is to reflect performance and,
accordingly, remuneration is structured with a fixed component
and performance-based remuneration component. Non-
Executive Directors are paid fixed fees for their services in
accordance with the Company’s Constitution. Fees paid are
composite fee (covering all Board and Committee
responsibilities) and any contributions by the Company to a fund
for the purposes of superannuation benefits for a Director. No
other retirement benefits schemes are in place in respect to
Non-Executive Directors.
Further details regarding the remuneration of the Executive and
Non-Executive Directors are set in the Remuneration Report
within the Annual Report.
Yes
8.3 Policy on
hedging equity
incentive
schemes
The Company’s Share Trading Policy prohibits executive staff
from undertaking hedging or other strategies that could limit
the economic risk associated with Company Securities issued
under any equity based remuneration scheme.
The Share Trading Policy can be viewed on the Company’s
website.
Yes

Page 19