Skip to main content
Mobico Group PLC (formerly: National Express Group) logo

Mobico Group PLC (formerly: National Express Group) — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · NXPGF ISIN · GB0006215205 LEI · 213800A8IQEMY8PA5X34 IL Transportation and storage
Open in API
Filings indexed 351 across all filing types
Latest filing 2019-11-28 Director's Dealing
Country GB United Kingdom
Listing IL NXPGF

About Mobico Group PLC (formerly: National Express Group)

https://www.nationalexpressgroup.com/

Mobico Group PLC, formerly National Express Group, is a leading international transport provider specializing in shared mobility solutions. The company designs and operates a diverse range of services, including urban buses, long-distance coaches, school transportation, and rail services. A core part of its strategy is to accelerate the modal shift from private cars to mass transit, thereby decarbonizing travel and fostering more sustainable cities. Operating through key brands like National Express, ALSA, and Durham School Services, Mobico delivers safe, efficient, and reliable transportation to a broad customer base that includes cities, businesses, and educational institutions. The group's vision is to be the world's premier shared mobility operator.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Director/PDMR Shareholding
Director's Dealing Classification · 99% confidence The document is an RNS announcement (indicated by 'RNS Number : 0128V' and the closing statement referencing RNS) detailing a transaction by a Person Discharging Managerial Responsibilities (PDMR), specifically the Chairman, Sir John Armitt, involving the acquisition of company shares. This type of insider transaction report falls directly under the definition of Director's Dealing (DIRS). Although it is distributed via RNS, the specific content is about director transactions, making DIRS the most precise classification over the general RNS fallback.
2019-11-28 English
Publication of Final Terms
Capital/Financing Update Classification · 99% confidence The document is identified by the 'RNS Number' header and explicitly states that the information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. The content announces the 'Publication of Final Terms' relating to a specific debt issuance (£250,000,000 Notes due 2028) under an EMTN Programme. This is a formal regulatory announcement regarding a financing/capital event, but the document itself is not the full terms document; rather, it is the announcement *about* the publication of those terms, providing a link to the PDF and noting submission to the National Storage Mechanism (NSM). Since it is an announcement of a specific document (Final Terms) and is distributed via RNS, it fits best under the category for general regulatory announcements or, more specifically, given the context of financing documents being announced, it is a regulatory filing. However, since the content is specifically about the publication of a document (Final Terms), and not the terms themselves, and it is distributed via RNS, the most appropriate classification is RNS (Regulatory Filings) as a general announcement, or potentially RPA if the focus was solely on the announcement of the report's availability. Given the nature of RNS being the distribution channel and the content being a formal notice about financial documentation, RNS is a strong fit. If we look at the definitions, 'CAP' is for financing updates, but this is an announcement of the *publication* of the terms, not the terms themselves. 'RPA' is for announcing the publication of reports. Since 'Final Terms' are a type of regulatory document, and this is the announcement of its publication, RPA is highly relevant. However, RNS is the overarching mechanism used here. Given the structure (RNS Number, LSE distribution), RNS is the safest general classification for this type of market notice. Let's re-evaluate RPA vs RNS. RPA is 'Report Publication Announcement'. Final Terms are a specific type of regulatory document. Since the document explicitly states 'Publication of Final Terms' and provides the RNS number, RPA seems slightly more precise than the general RNS fallback, as it describes the action being taken (publication announcement). I will classify it as RPA because it is an announcement about the publication of a document, adhering to Rule 2.
2019-11-18 English
Publication of Suppl.Prospcts
Regulatory Filings Classification · 98% confidence The document is very short (3275 characters) and its primary purpose is to announce the 'Publication of Supplementary Prospectus' related to a Euro Medium Term Note Programme. It explicitly states that the document has been approved by the FCA and provides a link to view the PDF, and notes that the documents have been submitted to the National Storage Mechanism. According to Rule #2 (The 'MENU VS MEAL' Rule), when a document is short and announces the publication of another document (like a Prospectus), it should be classified as a Report Publication Announcement (RPA). While it is a regulatory filing (RNS format), RPA is more specific for announcements about the release of other reports/documents.
2019-11-08 English
Private Placement
Capital/Financing Update Classification · 99% confidence The document is a short announcement (2144 chars) identified by an 'RNS Number' and states that National Express Group PLC has signed a private placement of US$ 509 million in new senior unsecured notes. This announcement details a financing activity (issuing new debt to repay existing debt) and is clearly a regulatory news service release, indicated by the 'RNS Number' and the closing statement referencing RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange, approved by the FCA. Since the core event is a financing/capital structure change, the most specific code is 'CAP' (Capital/Financing Update). However, because the document explicitly identifies itself as an RNS release and is short, it also strongly fits the 'RNS' category, which is often used for general regulatory news that isn't a full report. Given the specific nature of the content (debt issuance/refinancing), 'CAP' is the primary classification for the *content*, but 'RNS' is the classification for the *format/distribution channel* when the content is just an announcement. Since the definitions prioritize content where possible, and this is a clear announcement of a financing event, 'CAP' is appropriate. If 'CAP' were not available, 'RNS' would be the fallback. Given the explicit RNS header and the short length, 'RNS' is a very strong candidate, but 'CAP' describes the substance. I will choose 'CAP' as it describes the financial event, which is the primary purpose of the filing, while acknowledging the RNS distribution method.
2019-10-30 English
Notification of Major Holdings
Major Shareholding Notification Classification · 98% confidence The document is clearly identified by the header 'RNS Number : 7620Q' and contains the standard format for a 'TR-1: Standard form for notification of major holdings'. This form is used to report changes in significant share ownership, which directly corresponds to the definition of Major Shareholding Notification. Although it is distributed via RNS (Regulatory News Service), the specific content is a notification of a change in major holding (M&G Plc crossing a threshold), making 'MRQ' the most precise classification over the general 'RNS' fallback.
2019-10-22 English
Notification of Major Holdings
Major Shareholding Notification Classification · 98% confidence The document is explicitly labeled with "RNS Number : 7617Q" and contains the standard format for a "TR-1: Standard form for notification of major holdings". This form is used to report changes in significant share ownership, which falls under regulatory disclosure requirements. The presence of the RNS identifier and the nature of the content (reporting changes in voting rights/holdings) strongly indicates a regulatory filing related to share ownership thresholds. This aligns best with the 'Major Shareholding Notification' (MRQ) definition, as it details the resulting situation of voting rights crossing a threshold, although RNS is the general regulatory category. Given the specific nature of reporting major holdings, MRQ is the most precise fit over the general RNS fallback.
2019-10-22 English

Browse filings by year

35 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.