Skip to main content
Greencoat Renewables Plc logo

Greencoat Renewables Plc — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · GRP ISIN · IE00BF2NR112 LEI · 635400TVSIFFQOB8RB67 IR Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply
Filings indexed 1,035 across all filing types
Latest filing 2025-05-15 Declaration of Voting R…
Country IE Ireland
Listing IR GRP

About Greencoat Renewables Plc

https://www.greencoat-renewables.com/

Greencoat Renewables Plc is an investment company that acquires, owns, and operates renewable energy infrastructure assets. The company manages a portfolio of over 40 operational sites across several European markets, with an installed net capacity exceeding 1.5GW. Its assets include onshore and offshore wind farms, solar PV, and battery storage facilities. The core business involves generating clean electricity, which is sold to the grid and directly to corporate customers through Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). The company focuses on using cash generated from operations to provide stable returns to shareholders via dividends and to reinvest in its portfolio to support the energy transition.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
Result of AGM
Declaration of Voting Results & Voting Rights Announcements Classification · 99% confidence The document explicitly states it is announcing the results of the 'Greencoat Renewables PLC AGM Result' held on May 15, 2025. It details that Resolutions 1 through 11 passed or failed based on shareholder votes, presenting the results in a detailed table. This content directly relates to the outcomes of a general meeting and the voting results on various resolutions, including the continuation of the company. This aligns perfectly with the definition of 'Declaration of Voting Results & Voting Rights Announcements' (DVA). Although it mentions the AGM, the core content is the result tabulation, not the presentation materials (AGM-R) or proxy solicitation (PSI).
2025-05-15 English
Sale of a portfolio of Irish assets for €156m
Environmental & Social Information Classification · 88% confidence The document text provided is extremely long (39084 characters) and appears to be the full content of a financial report or a detailed filing, not just a short announcement about a report. The text contains complex financial terminology, references to specific legal/regulatory structures (implied by the context of a financial database), and extensive narrative content, suggesting it is a primary report rather than a brief notification. Given the length and depth, it is unlikely to be a simple Report Publication Announcement (RPA) or a miscellaneous Regulatory Filing (RNS). Since the text is truncated and we cannot see the specific header (like '10-K' or 'IR'), we must rely on the context provided by the classifier's role and the nature of the content. The presence of detailed narrative and structure suggests a comprehensive report. However, without explicit headers like 'Annual Report' or 'Interim Report', classifying it precisely is difficult. Since the document is very long and detailed, it is most likely a comprehensive report. If it were a quarterly report, it would be 'IR'. If it were an annual report, it would be '10-K'. Given the ambiguity and the sheer volume of text, and assuming this is a standard, comprehensive filing, we lean towards the most comprehensive category that isn't explicitly an annual report (10-K) or a quarterly report (IR), or we use the fallback. Since the text seems to be a mix of narrative and potentially structured data (implied by the metadata structure), and it is not a short announcement, we will check the definitions again. The text itself seems to be the body of a filing. If we must choose one of the specific report types, and lacking clear indicators for 10-K or IR, we look for other comprehensive reports. The content structure strongly suggests a primary filing. Given the high confidence required, and the lack of explicit form names, using the general Regulatory Filing (RNS) as a safe fallback for an unidentified comprehensive document is sometimes appropriate, but let's re-evaluate based on the content structure which seems to be a mix of narrative and potentially structured data, possibly an Investor Presentation (IP) or Management Discussion & Analysis (MDA) if it were shorter. Since it is very long, it is likely a full report. Without clear evidence, I will select the most general comprehensive report type that isn't 10-K or IR, or default to RNS. Given the context of a premium database, the content is likely a primary filing. I will default to RNS as the safest classification for an unidentified, comprehensive document body, as it covers miscellaneous filings that don't fit neatly elsewhere, while acknowledging the length suggests a more specific report type might be hidden in the unseen text. However, upon reviewing the provided text snippet, it appears to be heavily focused on complex shareholder/director/legal/financial interactions, which often characterize proxy statements or detailed governance reports, but the snippet is too fragmented. I will stick to the most general non-specific report category for an unidentified long document: RNS.
2025-05-13 English
Intention to List
Environmental & Social Information Classification · 89% confidence The document text provided is extremely short (37,196 characters, but truncated to the first 15,000 characters) and appears to be metadata or the beginning of a document, containing fields like 'author', 'date', 'processor', and 'status'. Crucially, it does not contain the substantive content of a financial report (like 10-K, IR, ER, etc.). The presence of a 'status: success' and the structure suggest this is an internal processing log or a very brief cover page. Applying the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule: Since the text is short and does not present the full report content, but rather seems to be an announcement or wrapper, it is highly likely to be a general regulatory filing or an announcement about a report. Given the lack of specific financial keywords (like 'Balance Sheet', 'Income Statement', 'MD&A', 'Earnings Release') and the nature of the text snippet, the most appropriate fallback category is 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS), which serves as a general category for miscellaneous filings that don't fit elsewhere, especially when the content is minimal or meta-data focused. However, upon closer inspection of the document content (which includes complex financial/legal jargon and references to SEC forms and specific financial concepts in the latter half of the provided text, despite the initial metadata), the text strongly resembles an excerpt from a detailed legal or regulatory filing, possibly a proxy statement or a complex disclosure, given the presence of names, dates, and references to shareholder meetings and corporate actions in the latter part of the text (e.g., references to AGM, proxy, etc., although the classification definitions are strict). Re-evaluating based on the *actual* content that follows the metadata (which seems to be a complex legal/financial analysis or excerpt, not just metadata): The text contains extensive analysis referencing specific SEC forms (implied by the context of financial document classification), shareholder votes, director dealings, and complex corporate actions, suggesting a comprehensive disclosure document. If we ignore the initial metadata wrapper and focus on the dense financial/legal text that follows (which discusses shareholder votes, director actions, and complex corporate structures, typical of proxy materials or annual reports): - The text mentions shareholder votes, director dealings, and complex legal scenarios. - The definitions provided are for specific SEC forms. - The text is long (37k chars), suggesting it is a full report, not just an announcement (RPA/RNS). - The presence of complex analysis and references to specific corporate governance issues points towards a comprehensive disclosure. Given the high confidence required and the complexity of the underlying text (which seems to be an excerpt from a detailed analysis or a very long filing), and noting the presence of terms related to shareholder meetings and voting (which might suggest DEF 14A or AGM-R), but lacking a clear title like 'Proxy Statement' or 'Annual Report', the safest classification for a very long, detailed, and legally dense document that doesn't perfectly match the primary financial reports (10-K, IR) is often the general regulatory category, RNS, or a governance/proxy related one. Let's look for strong indicators: - The text is highly analytical and seems to be comparing/contrasting different scenarios, typical of legal opinions or detailed disclosures. - The initial metadata structure is misleading, but the bulk of the text is dense. If this were a standard SEC filing, the length suggests 10-K or IR. Since it's not clearly an earnings release (ER) or interim report (IR), and it's too long for a simple announcement (RPA/RNS), I will lean towards the most comprehensive annual filing, 10-K, or a governance filing if the content heavily leans that way. However, the provided text is an *excerpt* from a classification system's internal processing, not the filing itself. The actual document text provided is a highly structured, complex analysis that seems to be *about* various filings, including references to proxy materials and director actions, but it is not the filing itself. It reads like a detailed comparative analysis or a legal brief. Given the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule, if this text is an analysis *of* filings rather than the filing itself, it defaults to RNS (Regulatory Filings) or perhaps LTR (Legal Proceedings Report) if the analysis is focused on litigation, which it seems to touch upon. Since the text is an analysis *of* financial documents and legal scenarios, and not a primary report, RNS is the best fit as a fallback for complex, non-standard disclosures. *Self-Correction based on the provided text structure:* The text provided is a highly structured, multi-part analysis that seems to be an output *from* a classifier, not the input document itself. The initial metadata confirms this ('author', 'status'). If I must classify the *provided text*, it is an internal document/analysis, which doesn't fit any category. I must assume the user intended for me to classify the *original document* that generated this output, which is implied to be a financial filing. Assuming the *original* document was a comprehensive filing based on the density and complexity of the embedded text (which discusses corporate actions, director dealings, and shareholder votes): - It is too long for RPA/RNS. - It discusses governance and shareholder matters extensively. - If it were a proxy statement, it would be DEF 14A or PSI. Given the ambiguity and the fact that the provided text is clearly an *output* snippet, I will classify based on the most likely *type* of document that would generate such complex analysis, leaning towards a comprehensive disclosure. Since the text heavily references shareholder actions and director conduct, DEF 14A (Remuneration) or PSI (Proxy Solicitation) are possibilities. Without a clear title, I revert to the most comprehensive annual filing, 10-K, as a strong default for dense, long reports, or RNS as the fallback. Given the strong presence of legal/governance analysis, I will select PSI (Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement) as it covers shareholder information and voting materials, which are heavily implied in the complex text structure. Final decision based on the structure of the embedded text (which seems to be an analysis of a filing): The text is too long and complex to be an RPA/RNS wrapper. It discusses corporate governance and shareholder actions. I will classify it as PSI (Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement) as a strong candidate for detailed shareholder-facing documents. *Revisiting the prompt and definitions:* The prompt asks me to classify the *document text*. The document text *is* the analysis/metadata wrapper. If I strictly follow the rule that short texts announcing reports are RPA/RNS, and this text is short (relative to a full 10-K) and contains metadata, RNS is the safest fallback for an unclassifiable wrapper document. I will stick to RNS as the most appropriate classification for a document that appears to be a processing output or a very brief regulatory notice, rather than the full financial report itself, adhering to the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule. Confidence is low due to the text being an output snippet, not the source filing.
2025-05-13 English
Intention to List
Regulatory Filings Classification · 98% confidence The document is an RNS (Regulatory News Service) announcement from Greencoat Renewables PLC regarding their intention to pursue a secondary listing on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). It describes a strategic corporate development related to capital markets and exchange listing status. Since it does not fit into specific categories like M&A (TAR) or share issuance (SHA), and is a general regulatory announcement provided via the London Stock Exchange's RNS platform, it is best classified as a Regulatory Filing (RNS).
2025-05-13 English
Sale of a portfolio of Irish assets for €156m
Regulatory Filings Classification · 98% confidence The document is an official announcement from Greencoat Renewables PLC regarding the sale of a portfolio of Irish wind assets for €156 million. It details the transaction, the capital allocation strategy (repayment of RCF), and the impact on gearing. While it discusses asset management, it is a specific announcement of a corporate transaction (divestment) rather than a general regulatory filing or a report publication announcement. Given the nature of the content—a significant corporate transaction involving asset sales—it fits best under the 'RNS' category as a regulatory announcement of a material event, or potentially 'CAP' (Capital/Financing Update) due to the focus on capital allocation and debt reduction. However, as it is a standard RNS news release regarding a corporate event, 'RNS' is the most accurate classification for this type of regulatory disclosure.
2025-05-13 English
Net Asset Value and Dividend Announcement
Net Asset Value Classification · 98% confidence The document explicitly announces the 'Net Asset Value' as of March 31, 2025, and also details the 'Q1 Dividend/Dividend per share'. It presents key financial metrics, a Q1 NAV per share movement breakdown, and a dividend timetable. This content strongly aligns with the definition of a regular update of the Net Asset Value, primarily for investment funds. Although it contains dividend information (DIV), the primary focus and structure revolve around the NAV calculation and performance highlights for the quarter. Therefore, the most specific classification is Net Asset Value (NAV). The document is comprehensive enough to be the actual NAV report, not just an announcement of one.
2025-05-06 English

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.