Skip to main content
Aquila SA logo

Aquila SA — Investor Relations & Filings

Ticker · ALAQU ISIN · FR0010340711 LEI · 969500RSAK1B1K2EFO38 PA Administrative and support service activities
Open in API
Filings indexed 50 across all filing types
Latest filing 2018-11-22 Regulatory Filings
Country FR France
Listing PA ALAQU

About Aquila SA

https://www.reseau-aquila.fr

Aquila SA operates and manages a national network of private security companies. The company specializes in providing mobile security solutions, primarily offering alarm intervention services, which involve on-site verification to determine the cause of an alarm. Additional services include scheduled or random security rounds and on-site surveillance and guarding for both corporate and private clients. Aquila SA coordinates these services through its extensive network of vetted and regularly monitored partner firms. Operations are managed via a central 24/7 telephone regulation platform that coordinates the dispatch and flow of mobile security services across its coverage area.

Recent filings

Filing Released Lang Actions
AQUILA Chiffre d’affaires du 3e trimestre 2018
Regulatory Filings Classification · 85% confidence The document text provided is not the content of a financial filing but rather an error message indicating that the processing system failed to extract text from a .doc file because the necessary conversion tools (doc2txt, antiword) were unavailable or failed. Since there is no actual content to analyze for keywords, regulatory headers, or reporting periods, this must be classified as a miscellaneous or unprocessable filing. Given the options, 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS) is the most appropriate fallback category for an unclassifiable or failed document extraction, although it technically represents a system failure rather than a standard filing type.
2018-11-22 English
Aquila Eligibilité au PEA-PME
Regulatory Filings Classification · 85% confidence The document text provided is not the content of a financial filing but rather an error message indicating that the processing system failed to extract text from a .doc file because the necessary conversion tools (doc2txt, antiword) were unavailable or failed. Since there is no actual content to analyze for keywords, regulatory headers, or reporting periods, this must be classified as a miscellaneous or unprocessable filing. Given the options, 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS) is the most appropriate fallback category for an unclassifiable or failed document extraction, although it technically represents a system failure rather than a standard filing type.
2018-04-16 English
AFFECTATION du RESULTAT 2017
Environmental & Social Information Classification · 85% confidence The document text is extremely long (over 30,000 characters) and contains extensive financial data, discussions of business performance, market position, and likely includes detailed financial statements, as suggested by the sheer volume and the presence of terms related to financial reporting and company operations (e.g., 'financial performance', 'ESG factors', 'capital structure changes', 'shareholder votes', 'dividends', 'management reports', 'audit report' mentioned in the definitions context, and the general structure suggesting a comprehensive filing). Crucially, the document is not short and does not appear to be a simple announcement stating that a report is attached or published (ruling out RPA/RNS based on the 'MENU VS MEAL' rule). Given the comprehensive nature implied by the length and content structure, it is most likely a major regulatory filing. Since it is not explicitly identified as a 10-K (Annual Report) or an IR (Interim/Quarterly Report) based on explicit headers, and it contains a mix of operational and financial details, the most appropriate classification for a comprehensive, non-specific major report is the general 'Annual Report' (10-K) if it covers a full year, or 'Interim Report' (IR) if it covers a shorter period. Without explicit period markers (like 'For the fiscal year ended...') or a clear '10-K' header, classifying it as a comprehensive report is necessary. However, upon closer inspection of the provided text, it is heavily fragmented, contains many base64 image data strings, and seems to be a poorly parsed dump of various elements, possibly including presentation slides or a very complex document structure. The presence of terms like 'AGM-R' related concepts (though not explicitly stated as AGM-R), 'ESG' (SR), 'Management Reports' (MDA), and 'Audit Report' (AR) suggests it might be a compilation or a very detailed document. Given the high confidence required and the ambiguity of the text dump (which looks like a mix of raw data and text), I must rely on the definitions. Since it is a very large document, it represents a core report. If it were a standard 10-K, it would be classified as 10-K. If it were a comprehensive quarterly report, it would be IR. Since the text is too messy to definitively confirm the period (annual vs. interim), and it contains elements that might relate to investor presentations or management discussions, I will lean towards the most comprehensive report type that isn't explicitly ruled out. The length strongly suggests a primary filing. Let's re-evaluate based on the provided definitions and the sheer size (30k chars). This size is typical for a 10-K or a detailed IR. Since there is no explicit mention of 'quarter' or 'half-year', and 'Annual Report' (10-K) is the primary yearly filing, I will tentatively select 10-K, assuming the comprehensive nature points to the main annual filing, unless strong evidence points elsewhere. *Self-Correction/Refinement*: The text is highly corrupted with image data and seems to be a dump of presentation/meeting materials rather than a clean SEC filing text body. The presence of 'Olivier' as an author and the image data suggests this might be an Investor Presentation (IP) or AGM material that was OCR'd poorly, despite the length. However, without clear headers like 'Proxy Statement' or 'Annual Report', and given the high corruption, classifying it as a known, structured report (10-K, IR) is risky. If it's a presentation, IP is the best fit. If it's a general regulatory filing that doesn't fit, RNS is the fallback. Given the structure seems to be a presentation/meeting dump (implied by the author/image data), Investor Presentation (IP) is a strong candidate for a large, detailed document that isn't a formal 10-K/IR. Given the ambiguity and corruption, and the length suggesting a detailed document, I will choose Investor Presentation (IP) as it often contains detailed operational and financial slides, which aligns with the fragmented data dump better than a clean 10-K text body. *Final Check*: The document is too long for a simple ER or RPA. It is not clearly a 10-K or IR. IP fits a detailed presentation document. Confidence is moderate due to text corruption.
2018-03-28 French
Eligibilité au PEA-PME
Regulatory Filings Classification · 85% confidence The document text provided is not the content of a financial filing but rather an error message indicating that the processing system failed to extract text from a .doc file because the necessary conversion tools (doc2txt, antiword) were unavailable or failed. Since there is no actual content to analyze for keywords, regulatory headers, or reporting periods, this must be classified as a miscellaneous or unprocessable filing. Given the options, 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS) is the most appropriate fallback category for an unclassifiable or failed document extraction, although it technically represents a system failure rather than a standard filing type.
2017-04-27 English
AQUILA AFFECTATION du RESULTAT 2016
Regulatory Filings Classification · 85% confidence The document text provided is not the content of a financial filing but rather an error message indicating that the processing system failed to extract text from a .doc file because the necessary conversion tools (doc2txt, antiword) were unavailable or failed. Since there is no actual content to analyze for keywords, regulatory headers, or reporting periods, this must be classified as a miscellaneous or unprocessable filing. Given the options, 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS) is the most appropriate fallback category for an unclassifiable or failed document extraction, although it technically represents a system failure rather than a standard filing type.
2017-04-05 English
Chiffre d’affaires du 1er semestre 2016
Regulatory Filings Classification · 85% confidence The document text provided is not the content of a financial filing but rather an error message indicating that the processing system failed to extract text from a .doc file because the necessary conversion tools (doc2txt, antiword) were unavailable or failed. Since there is no actual content to analyze for keywords, regulatory headers, or reporting periods, this must be classified as a miscellaneous or unprocessable filing. Given the options, 'Regulatory Filings' (RNS) is the most appropriate fallback category for an unclassifiable or failed document extraction, although it technically represents a system failure rather than a standard filing type.
2016-07-28 English

Browse filings by year

13 years

Report missing filing

Can't find a specific document? Let us know and we'll add it within 24 hours.

We will notify you once the filing is added.
Report sent
Thank you. We will check the data and update it shortly.