Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Sheffield Resources Ltd. Capital/Financing Update 2012

Nov 4, 2012

44780_rns_2012-11-04_e68da6c3-cf23-415e-a90a-216d5732d347.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX and Media Release

5 November 2012

MINERAL ASSEMBLAGE RESULTS CONFIRM HIGH ZIRCON CONTENT AT DAMPIER HMS PROJECT

KEY POINTS

  • Initial mineral assemblage testwork (QEMSCAN) indicates a high value, zircon-rich mineral assemblage for the Thunderbird deposit
  • High in situ zircon content of 0.6% indicated for the high grade (9% HM) central portion of deposit
  • Drilling results and mineral assemblage testwork continue to demonstrate Thunderbird has the hallmarks of a Tier 1 zircon deposit

Mineral sands explorer Sheffield Resources ("Sheffield") (ASX:SFX) today announced initial mineral assemblage testwork results from its Dampier heavy mineral sand (HMS) project near Derby in the Kimberley Region of Western Australia, confirming the anticipated high in-situ zircon content of the Thunderbird HMS discovery.

Significantly, the mineral assemblage results indicate a high in situ zircon content of 0.6% for the High Grade domain. This figure is derived from multiplying the average zircon content of 6.6% by the average grade within the High Grade domain of 9.0% HM. The High Grade domain averages 15m thickness over an area of 12km2 and remains open in all directions (see Figure 1 and ASX release dated 19 September 2012).

Managing Director, Bruce McQuitty said the results place Thunderbird in the top tier of zircon deposits worldwide.

"There are few heavy mineral sands deposits of this scale with higher in situ zircon content. The Thunderbird discovery is proving to be both high grade and large scale, presenting an outstanding opportunity for Sheffield to emerge as a major HMS developer."

The mineral assemblages have been determined using QEMSCAN on 35 composited HM samples derived from 14 drill holes. The composites were selected from high, medium and low grade 'domains', corresponding to 5% HM, 2% HM and 1% HM cut-offs, respectively. Averages for the high and medium grade domains are summarised below in Table 1 (see Tables 2-5 for full details).

Domain Zircon % Rutile % High-TiLeucoxene % Leucoxene % AlteredIlmenite % Ilmenite %
HighGrade 6.6 1.0 1.2 2.3 4.5 25.5
MediumGrade 7.9 1.5 1.7 3.7 9.2 25.1

Table 1: Averages of Mineral Assemblage Results from High and Medium Grade Domains

TiO2 minerals are defined according to the following ranges: Rutile >98% TiO2; High-Ti Leucoxene 90-98% TiO2; Leucoxene 70-90% TiO2 Altered Ilmenite 60-70% TiO2.; Ilmenite 40-60% TiO2.

For the high and medium grade domains, the initial mineral assemblage averages 7.1% zircon, 1.2% rutile, 1.4% high Ti Leucoxene, 2.9% leucoxene, and 31.7% ilmenite, with the zircon content ranging up to 12.3% in certain sections of the deposit.

These results indicate significant mineralogical variability within the thick, high-grade heavymineral intervals. However, the composite samples were selected from just 14 of the first 71 drill holes for which assay results have been received. Further QEMSCAN analyses will be undertaken once assay results from the remaining 93 holes of the maiden drilling programme have been received.

Composite samples were first screened at 212µm, with the minus 212µm fraction submitted for QEMSCAN analysis. The plus 212 µm fraction contains aggregated heavy mineral grains.

Additional heavy mineral may be liberated from these aggregates by more aggressive scrubbing and attritioning steps prior to concentration. This will be investigated by metallurgical testwork, which is currently underway.

Figure 1: Summary plan of results of the 71 drill holes received to date, showing the 12km2 area containing intersections greater than 5% HM on a greyscale elevation image. Grades within this area average 9.0% HM and the mineralisation averages 15m thickness.

About the Thunderbird Prospect

The Dampier project contains two significant heavy mineral sands prospects: a large, shallow eastern zone, named Thunderbird; and a smaller, deeper western zone, named Argo.

Sheffield's maiden drilling programme tested the Thunderbird prospect over an 8km strike length. The drilling pattern is nominally 500m x 500m at the centre of the target area to 500m x 1,000m at the strike extremities (Figures 1 & 2).

Drill results released to date relate to an area about 5km long by 4km wide (20km2). At a 2% HM cut-off, the main mineralised zone varies in thickness from 4.5m to 43.6m, with an average of 25m. There is a higher-grade core (>5% HM) to the mineralised zone which varies in thickness from 4.5m to 32.5m, with an average thickness of 15m over an area of 12km2. The mineralisation shows excellent continuity and remains open in all directions (Figure 1). It is hosted in fine loose sand, with minor 30-50cm bands of cemented sand and ironstone.

Overburden thickness averages 10m, increasing with the dip of the mineralised unit towards the southwest. Significantly, over half of the mineralisation outlined to date (2.5km across strike) has less than 3m of overburden.

Further information on the Thunderbird prospect is contained in the Company's ASX releases of 7 September 2011, 8 November 2011, 12 July 2012, 3 September 2012 and 19 September 2012.

Figure 2: Thunderbird prospect drill collar plan showing location of drill holes from which composite samples were obtained for QEMSCAN mineral assemblage analyses

Results Tabulation

Results of QEMSCAN testwork are tabulated below. QEMSCAN analysis has been undertaken on minus 212 micron composites, on high, medium and low-grade domains. Results for samples with >60% minus 212µm fraction are reported in Tables 2-4, below.

Comp_ID THCP001 THCP005 THCP007 THCP009 THCP012 THCP013 THCP017 THCP018 THCP019 THCP020 THCP021 THCP023 THCP024 THCP032 THCP033 THCP034 THCP035
HM% 9.70 13.63 10.06 10.63 6.30 15.79 6.58 10.67 12.08 22.38 5.25 8.35 14.06 7.30 2.85 13.12 15.15
Rutile/ Anatase % 0.8 1.0 1.9 0.8 1.4 1.3 0.6 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.6 1.5 1.0
High Ti Leucoxene% 0.9 1.2 2.0 0.9 1.5 1.2 0.7 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.6 1.7 2.0 1.7 1.1
Leucoxene % 1.8 1.8 5.4 1.6 2.6 2.1 2.0 2.6 2.8 1.5 1.7 2.4 1.4 2.2 2.6 3.1 1.8
Altered Ilmenite % 3.3 3.5 13.0 3.5 4.7 4.5 2.8 4.3 4.4 2.5 2.6 4.2 2.9 5.0 5.5 6.3 3.2
Ilmenite % 20.9 27.7 25.6 19.5 27.9 25.6 17.0 28.2 28.2 24.3 21.6 20.2 19.2 35.8 41.5 28.4 21.5
Titano Magnetite % 1.2 2.1 1.9 0.8 1.5 1.7 1.2 2.0 2.0 2.1 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.5
Titano MagnetiteCoated % 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.3
Si bearing Ti oxide % 1.8 2.1 3.0 2.2 2.7 1.6 1.5 2.0 2.9 1.9 1.8 2.1 1.5 3.7 4.3 2.2 2.0
Zircon % 5.5 6.9 9.2 5.5 7.3 6.5 3.1 6.2 5.9 5.9 6.4 3.4 4.5 10.7 12.3 6.4 5.5
Cemented HMParticles % 10.6 10.9 15.5 11.3 11.3 9.1 10.5 15.1 16.7 13.4 10.5 14.8 12.2 8.2 7.6 13.0 13.5
Quartz % 7.3 5.1 6.6 7.4 4.1 4.1 5.8 4.1 4.2 5.4 5.8 8.7 6.4 7.0 7.2 7.9 9.7
REE-bearing % 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.3
Fe Oxide % 10.8 15.0 7.5 8.9 10.4 10.9 18.2 16.3 14.4 14.9 8.2 14.5 11.2 6.0 6.0 9.5 10.1
Silicates % 1.9 1.9 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.5 1.4 1.5 2.7 1.4 2.8 2.7 2.5 1.9
sub-total % 67.3 80.1 95.1 65.6 78.5 70.2 65.4 85.6 86.3 75.6 63.9 76.8 64.2 87.0 96.0 84.4 73.5
Plus 212umaggregates 32.7 19.9 4.9 34.4 21.5 29.8 34.6 14.4 13.7 24.4 36.1 23.2 35.8 13.0 4.0 15.6 26.5
TOTAL 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Table 2: Initial QEMSCAN – High Grade Domain

Table 3: Initial QEMSCAN – Medium Grade Domain

Comp_ID THCP002 THCP004 THCP006 THCP008 THCP011 THCP015 THCP016 THCP025 THCP028 THCP031 THCP036 THCP038
HM% 4.38 3.85 3.43 3.60 3.10 3.70 2.26 3.53 3.48 3.92 2.92 3.84
Rutile/Anatase % 1.0 1.5 2.1 0.9 1.4 1.1 0.4 2.4 1.1 1.4 2.5 1.4
High Ti Leucoxene % 1.0 1.2 3.0 0.8 1.4 1.9 0.8 3.5 1.1 1.1 3.0 1.1
Leucoxene % 1.9 2.6 6.0 1.4 3.1 3.6 2.8 6.6 2.5 1.8 8.3 3.5
Altered Ilmenite % 2.9 4.3 32.5 3.0 5.2 5.3 3.8 13.2 4.1 8.6 18.8 8.6
Ilmenite % 21.5 31.1 17.0 17.9 25.9 24.0 16.0 35.1 34.9 28.2 26.8 23.1
Titano Magnetite % 1.1 1.7 2.0 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.8 1.7
Titano Magnetite Coated % 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1
Si bearing Ti oxide % 2.5 2.5 5.4 1.9 3.0 3.2 3.2 5.8 4.3 3.2 5.8 2.6
Zircon % 7.4 8.7 7.9 6.7 9.7 3.8 1.9 6.7 11.6 12.0 8.7 9.5
Cemented HM Particles % 7.1 9.4 6.0 8.2 9.5 10.1 13.7 7.9 8.1 7.6 6.7 7.7
Quartz % 8.8 5.9 3.6 7.9 4.8 5.8 6.3 3.0 6.9 7.1 4.3 7.8
REE-bearing % 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.3 1.1
Fe Oxide % 8.7 11.8 2.3 7.7 8.8 9.2 26.3 2.7 7.4 7.4 3.4 9.2
Silicates % 1.9 2.5 5.7 2.3 2.7 4.3 3.5 6.6 2.2 2.8 4.7 1.7
sub-total % 66.6 84.2 94.0 60.1 77.8 73.9 80.4 95.2 86.5 83.6 95.2 79.2
Plus 212um aggregates % 33.4 15.8 6.0 39.9 22.2 26.1 19.6 4.8 13.5 16.4 4.8 20.8
TOTAL 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Comp_ID THCP003 THCP014 THCP026 THCP029 THCP030 THCP037
HM% 2.09 1.43 1.45 1.41 1.35 1.15
Rutile/Anatase % 0.5 1.6 2.1 1.2 2.0 2.5
High Ti Leucoxene % 0.7 1.6 2.9 1.7 2.1 3.2
Leucoxene % 1.4 2.7 6.2 2.7 7.0 11.4
Altered Ilmenite % 2.1 4.9 17.4 3.7 14.8 19.9
Ilmenite % 14.6 21.0 15.7 22.2 8.1 9.3
Titano Magnetite % 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.4 0.7 0.4
Titano Magnetite Coated % 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Si bearing Ti oxide % 1.6 2.7 5.8 3.8 4.4 5.3
Zircon % 3.2 7.4 4.6 6.6 6.5 7.5
Cemented HM Particles % 18.7 7.3 5.0 14.8 6.2 6.2
Quartz % 6.1 7.0 5.2 7.8 5.1 4.7
REE-bearing % 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3
Fe Oxide % 12.3 6.9 2.8 11.5 6.6 3.5
Silicates % 3.9 1.9 7.0 3.0 4.2 6.1
sub-total % 66.6 66.5 75.7 80.8 68.1 80.4
Plus 212 µm aggregates % 33.4 33.5 24.3 19.2 31.9 19.6
TOTAL 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
  • 6 -

Table 4: Initial QEMSCAN – Low Grade Domain

Total particle chemistry is used in the mineral classification. TiO2 minerals are defined according to the following ranges: Rutile >98% TiO2; High-Ti Leucoxene 90-98% TiO2; Leucoxene 70-90% TiO2 Altered Ilmenite 60- 70% TiO2.; Ilmenite 40-60% TiO2 and Titanomagnetite <40% TiO2;. "Coated" refers to particles which have >80% coatings. Refer to Table 5 for details of composite samples.

Table 5: Location of Composite sample holes. Coordinate system is MGA Zone 51 (GDA94), all holes drilled vertically.

Comp_ID Hole_ID MGA_E(m) MGA_N(m) From(m) To(m)
THCP001 THAC041 496509 8073604 0.0 10.5
THCP002 THAC041 496509 8073604 10.5 30.0
THCP003 THAC037 495219 8072059 15.0 21.0
THCP003 THAC039 495865 8072834 0.0 4.5
THCP003 THAC041 496509 8073604 30.0 43.5
THCP004 THAC039 495865 8072834 4.5 9.0
THCP004 THAC039 495865 8072834 24.0 35.5
THCP005 THAC039 495865 8072834 9.0 24.0
THCP006 THAC037 495219 8072059 21.0 30.0
THCP006 THAC037 495219 8072059 45.0 47.9
THCP007 THAC037 495219 8072059 30.0 45.0
THCP008 THAC003 497203 8072857 0.0 1.5
THCP008 THAC003 497203 8072857 9.0 33.0
THCP009 THAC003 497203 8072857 1.5 9.0
THCP011 THAC017 496630 8072190 1.5 3.0
THCP011 THAC017 496630 8072190 19.5 30.0
Comp_ID Hole_ID MGA_E(m) MGA_N(m) From(m) To(m)
THCP012 THAC017 496630 8072190 3.0 12.0
THCP012 THAC017 496630 8072190 18.0 19.5
THCP013 THAC017 496630 8072190 12.0 18.0
THCP014 THAC016 496305 8071804 33.0 42.0
THCP014 THAC017 496630 8072190 30.0 40.5
THCP015 THAC016 496305 8071804 3.0 7.5
THCP016 THAC016 496305 8071804 7.5 13.5
THCP017 THAC016 496305 8071804 13.5 18.0
THCP018 THAC016 496305 8071804 18.0 22.5
THCP019 THAC016 496305 8071804 22.5 27.0
THCP020 THAC016 496305 8071804 27.0 30.0
THCP021 THAC016 496305 8071804 30.0 33.0
THCP023 THAC013 495651 8071026 25.5 36.0
THCP024 THAC013 495651 8071026 36.0 43.5
THCP025 THAC012 495347 8070660 37.5 39.0
THCP025 THAC013 495651 8071026 24.0 25.5
THCP025 THAC015 495996 8071439 16.5 24.0
THCP026 THAC012 495347 8070660 31.5 37.5
THCP026 THAC013 495651 8071026 22.5 24.0
THCP026 THAC015 495996 8071439 13.5 16.5
THCP028 THAC061 498040 8072314 4.5 19.5
THCP029 THAC061 498040 8072314 19.5 31.5
THCP030 THAC063 497394 8071547 4.5 6.0
THCP030 THAC063 497394 8071547 27.0 48.0
THCP031 THAC063 497394 8071547 6.0 7.5
THCP031 THAC063 497394 8071547 22.5 27.0
THCP032 THAC063 497394 8071547 7.5 12.0
THCP032 THAC063 497394 8071547 19.5 22.5
THCP033 THAC063 497394 8071547 12.0 19.5
THCP034 THAC064 496745 8070790 16.5 27.0
THCP035 THAC064 496745 8070790 27.0 36.0
THCP036 THAC006 496968 8071247 6.0 12.0
THCP036 THAC064 496745 8070790 15.0 16.5
THCP036 THAC064 496745 8070790 36.0 40.5
THCP036 THAC065 496425 8070382 10.5 24.0
THCP037 THAC006 496968 8071247 3.0 6.0
THCP037 THAC006 496968 8071247 48.0 61.5
THCP037 THAC064 496745 8070790 4.5 15.0
THCP038 THAC034 493696 8073358 46.5 76.5

For further information please contact:

Bruce McQuitty Managing Director Tel: 0409 929 121 [email protected]

Website: www.sheffieldresources.com.au

Media: Annette Ellis Cannings Purple Tel: 08 6314 6300 [email protected]

COMPETENT PERSONS' STATEMENT

The information in this announcement that relates to exploration results is based on information compiled by Mark Teakle. Mr Teakle is a full time employee of the Company. Mr Teakle is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Geoscientists and a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and the activity to which they are undertaking to qualify as Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves ("JORC Code")'. Mr Teakle consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some statements in this announcement regarding estimates or future events are forward-looking statements. They involve risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from estimated results. Forwardlooking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the Company's exploration programme, outlook, target sizes and mineralised material estimates. They include statements preceded by words such as "expected", "planned", "target", "scheduled", "intends", "potential", "prospective" and similar expressions.

ABOUT SHEFFIELD RESOURCES

Sheffield Resources Limited (Sheffield) is a rapidly emerging heavy mineral sands (HMS) company.

ASX Code – SFX Market Cap @ 69.5cps - $68.6m Issued shares – 98.7m Cash - $7.3m (at 30/9/2012)

The Company has over 6,000km2 of highly prospective tenure, all situated within the state of Western Australia.

HEAVY MINERAL SANDS

The Dampier project, located near Derby in WA's Kimberley region, contains the large, high grade zircon-rich Thunderbird HMS deposit.

The Eneabba project comprises multiple HMS deposits and is located near Eneabba approximately 140km south of the port of Geraldton in WA's Mid-West region.

Sheffield is also evaluating the large McCalls chloride ilmenite project, located 110km to the north of Perth.

NICKEL-COPPER

Sheffield's 525km2 Red Bull project is located in the highly prospective Fraser Complex within 20km of Sirius Resources NL's (ASX:SIR) Nova Ni-Cu discovery.

IRON

Sheffield has identified iron mineralisation on three of its tenements in the Pilbara iron ore province. Thick hematite mineralisation was intersected in first pass RC drilling at the Three Pools project, 20km north of Newman.

TALC

Sheffield's large Moora Talc Belt project contains numerous talc occurrences and is located near Imery's long-life Three Springs talc mine in WA's Mid-West region. The Company is targeting high purity talc, similar to that produced from the simple quarrying operation at Three Springs.