AI assistant
RESIMAC GROUP LTD — Annual Report 2006
Oct 5, 2006
65714_rns_2006-10-05_f7cb94b2-a15f-45b0-8f24-d70fe7ae5179.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
HOMELOANS LIMITED
ABN 55 095 034 003
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
30 JUNE 2006
CONTENTS TO FINANCIAL REPORT
| CORPORATE INFORMATION | |
|---|---|
| DIRECTORS' REPORT | |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT | |
| INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006 | |
| BALANCE SHEET AS AT 30 JUNE 2006 | |
| STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006 | |
| STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006 (CONTINUED) 29 | |
| CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006 | |
| NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006 | |
| DIRECTORS' DECLARATION | |
| INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT TO MEMBERS OF HOMELOANS LIMITED |
CORPORATE INFORMATION
This annual report covers both Homeloans Limited as an individual entity and the Consolidated entity's financial report incorporating the entities that it controlled during the financial year. The Consolidated entity's functional and presentation currency is AUD ($).
A description of the consolidated operations and of its principal activities is included in the review of operations and activities in the directors' report on pages 5 to 19. The directors' report is not part of the financial report.
Directors
Timothy Holmes (Non-Executive Chairman) Brian Jones (Managing Director) Robert Salmon (Non Executive Director) Robert Scott (Non Executive Director) Jarrod Smith (Finance Director)
Company Secretary
Jennifer Murray
Registered Office
Level 9, The Quadrant 1 William Street Perth WA 6000 (08) 9327 1777 Phone: Facsimile: (08) 9327 1778
Corporate Office
Level 7, BT Tower 1 Market Street Sydney NSW 2000 Phone: (02) 8267 2007 Facsimile: (02) 8267 2045
National Office
Level 2, The Atrium 168 St George's Terrace Perth WA 6000 Phone: (08) 9261 7000 Facsimile: (08) 9261 7079 Web site: www.homeloans.com.au
Postal Address
PO Box 7216 Cloisters Square Perth WA 6850
Share Registry
Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd Level 2, Reserve Bank Building 45 St George's Terrace Perth WA 6000 Telephone: Facsimile:
(08) 9323 2000 (08) 9323 2033
Bankers
Westpac Institutional BankWestpac Place, Kent Tower275 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000
Auditors
Ernst & YoungThe Ernst & Young Building11 Mounts Bay RoadPerth WA 6000
DIRECTORS' REPORT
Your directors submit their report for the year ended 30 June 2006.
DIRECTORS
The names and details of the company's directors in office during the financial year and until the date of this report are as follows. Directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated.
Names, qualifications, experience and special responsibilities
TIMOTHY ALASTAIR HOLMES (NON-EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN)
Tim was appointed Chairman on 1 July 2003. He has 38 years experience in the finance and banking industry, is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Company Directors, and Honorary Consul of Austria in WA. He is also the former International President of the Young President's Organisation and a former Vice President of the WA Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
ROBERT PETER SALMON (NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Appointed 9 November 2000. Rob has 36 years experience in the finance and banking industry. In 1985, Rob joined with Tim Holmes to establish International Financing and Investment Pty Ltd, the predecessor to Homeloans Limited. He has a Bachelor of Economics from the University of Western Australia.
BRIAN DONALD JONES (MANAGING DIRECTOR)
Brian was appointed to the board in an executive capacity on 28 May 2004. He has 40 years experience in the finance and banking industry. Brian was a senior executive with National Australia Bank from 1993 to 2003. Most recently he was head of the bank's Australian third party mortgage origination arm, HomeSide Lending. Prior to this he held senior positions with the bank's subsidiary, Bank of New Zealand Australia including Head of Consumer Markets and Head of Banking Services. He has a Master of Business Administration from the AGSM. Brian was appointed Managing director on 1 January 2006.
ROBERT NORMAN SCOTT (NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Appointed 9 November 2000. Rob is a Chartered Accountant with over 39 years experience. Rob was an International Partner with Arthur Andersen, retiring from that firm in 1995. Rob now consults on corporate structuring and taxation to Perth based Gooding Pervan Chartered Accountants.
Rob serves as a director of the following listed companies:
- Amadeus Energy Ltd (Appointed 30 October 1996) Chairman
- BioMD Limited (Appointed 23 June 1999) Chairman
- Australian Renewable Fuels Limited (Appointed 24 December 2002) Chairman ٠
- Evans & Tate Limited (Appointed 18 July 2005) ٠
- New Guinea Limited (Appointed 17 July 2006)
JARROD LORNE ANDREW SMITH (FINANCE DIRECTOR)
Appointed 20 February 2006. Jarrod joined Homeloans Ltd as Chief Financial Officer in January 2002. Since that time he has been a key part of the company's executive team and has been instrumental in the company's recent cost cutting initiatives and the increasing penetration of Homeloans Ltd's proprietary funding line. Prior to joining Homeloans Ltd, Jarrod was a Director of Westpac Institutional Bank. Jarrod has a Bachelor of Commerce (UNSW), a Masters of Business Administration (AGSM) and is a graduate member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
JENNIFER MURRAY (COMPANY SECRETARY)
Jennifer Murray was appointed company secretary to Homeloans Ltd on 9 November 2000. She is a Chartered Secretary and has over 23 years experience in providing corporate secretarial services for both public and proprietary companies. She is presently the Senior Manager, Corporate Secretarial Services for Perth based Gooding Pervan Chartered Accountants.
Interests in the shares and options of the company and related bodies corporate.
As at the date of this report, the interests of the directors in the shares, reset preference shares, and options of Homeloans Limited were:
| Number of OrdinaryShares | Number of 10%ResetPreferenceShares | Number ofOptionsOver OrdinaryShares | |
|---|---|---|---|
| T A Holmes | 9,019,781 | 170,750 | $\blacksquare$ |
| B D Jones | 225,952 | 2,000,000 | |
| R P Salmon | 8,705,366 | 170.441 | $\blacksquare$ |
| R N Scott | 1,489,794 | 29,458 | $\blacksquare$ |
| J L A Smith | 82,723 | 208 | 1,350,000 |
DIVIDENDS
| Cents | $'000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Final dividends recommended: | ||
| - on ordinary shares | 2.5 | 1,259 |
| Dividends paid in the year: | ||
| Interim for the year | ||
| - on ordinary shares | 2.5 | 1,259 |
| Final dividend for 2005 shown asrecommended in the 2005 report | ||
| - on ordinary shares | 1.5 | 755 |
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
The principal activities during the year of entities within the consolidated entity were:
- mortgage origination;
- management of home loan mortgages for a number of financiers; and
- funding of mortgages through the Residential Mortgage Trust (RMT)
The principal activities were conducted under the brand names Homeloans Limited, Access Home Loans and FAI Home Loans. As of the balance date, the Company has mortgage origination and management agreements with Adelaide Bank Limited, Origin Mortgage Management Services, ING Bank (Australia) Limited, Residential Mortgage Trust and other institutions.
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
Group Overview
Homeloans Limited is a company limited by shares that is incorporated and domiciled in Australia. The Company was incorporated on 9 November 2000 acquiring the assets and liabilities of IF & I Securities Pty Ltd (as trustee for the IF & I Securities Unit Trust) and Anedo Pty Ltd. On 19 March 2001, Homeloans Limited shares commenced trading on the Australian Stock Exchange.
Homeloans Limited has prepared a consolidated financial report incorporating the entities that it controlled during the financial year.
Review of operations
A review of operations of the consolidated entity during the financial year, the results of those operations, the changes in the state of affairs and the likely developments in the operations of the consolidated entity are set out in this report.
Performance Indicators
Management and the Board monitor the Consolidated entity's overall performance, from its implementation of the strategic plan through to the performance of the company against operating plans and financial budgets. The Board, together with management, have identified key performance indicators (KPIs) that are used to monitor performance. Management monitor KPIs on a regular basis. Directors receive the KPIs for review prior to each monthly board meeting allowing all directors to actively monitor the Consolidated Entity's performance.
Directors also have access to an on-line reporting database allowing access to details of performance against KPIs on a daily, month to date, and year to date basis.
Operating Results for the Year
The consolidated entity experienced an increase in loan originations of 14.8% on the prior corresponding year. A pleasing part of this was the increased penetration of the Homeloans Ltd proprietary funding line, the Residential Mortgage Trust ("RMT").
Revenue increased to $76,497,000 (2005: $71,727,000) primarily due to the increased usage of RMT. However, under AIFRS there is no origination income recognised on the RMT loans. Instead income is recognised as a net interest margin on the loans over the life of the loans. Consolidated net profit after tax for the year was $2,597,000 (2005:$2,492,000), up 4.2% on the previous corresponding period, reflecting a positive result from:
- increased loan volumes; $\bullet$
- continued cost reductions; and, ۰
- the refund of the stamp duty assessment, and
- an adverse result from the need to defer income recognition on RMT volumes. $\bullet$
Summarised operating results are as follows:
| 2006 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenues$'000 | Results$'000 | |
| Business segmentsOrigination and Management | 37,009 | 7.155 |
| Securitisation of Mortgages | 51,580 | 342 |
| 88,589 | 7,497 | |
| Consolidated entity adjustments | (13,028) | (3,746) |
| Non-segment and unallocated revenues | 936 | 936 |
| Non-segment and unallocated expenses | (1,060) | |
| Consolidated entity sales and profit from ordinaryactivities before income tax expense | 76,497 | 3.627 |
Shareholder Returns
The Consolidated entity is pleased to report that return to shareholders, both through dividends and capital growth, continues in line with measures implemented by management in the last 2 years. This is reflected in the significant improvement in most financial measures for the current year.
| AIFRS | Non-AIFRS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004^^ | 2003^^ | ||
| Basic earning per share (cents) | 5.16 | 3.95 | 1.73 | (40.01) | |
| Return on assets (%) | 0.3% | 0.4% | $1.7%$ | (35.6%) | |
| Return on equity (%) | 8.1% | 6.9% | 2.9% | $(64.9%)$ | |
| Dividend payout ratio (%) | 97.0% | 30.3% | $0.0%$ | $N/A**$ |
Debt to equity measures have not been disclosed due to the impact of the consolidation of RMT during the year. Consolidation of RMT has added over $650 million of debt to the Consolidated Entity's balance sheet without any commensurate impact on equity. RMT, under its trust structure, has assets and liabilities that offset and no equity interests. The traditional ratios do not provide an accurate measure of the Consolidated Entity's ability to manage its debts.
^^ These ratios were calculated under Australian Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (AGAAP). The results for 2005 and 2006 are calculated under Australian equivalents of International Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS).
As a result of the AIFRS requirement under AASB 127 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements to consolidate the special purpose entity, Residential Mortgage Trust (RMT), significant assets have been added to the consolidated balance sheet without any appreciable increase in net profit. The group previously recognised the distributions from the RMT as revenue and was not required to include the RMT asset base. The unadjusted measure is using current AIFRS results.
**Dividend paid of 1.2 cents per share cannot be measured against reported loss for the relevant financial year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The consolidated entity's cash flow statement illustrates that there was an increase in cash and cash equivalents in the year ended 30 June 2006 of $8,628,000 (2005: Decrease of $11,413,000). The increase in cash inflow in comparison with the prior year is caused by a number of factors. Operating activities generated $8,980,000 (2005: $2,042,000) of net cash in-flows.
The increase in cash from operating activities was largely due to the continuation of tighter controls imposed on expenditure across the Consolidated entity's operations, new fees introduced, and more consistent fee charges across the Consolidated entity's product range. The increase in loans originated through RMT resulted in a significant increase in the net interest income collected.
There was an increase in receipts from funders of approximately 10% (2005: 2%) and the ratio of payments to suppliers as a percentage of receipts from customers improved slightly to 107% (2005: 109%).
The Consolidated entity has sufficient funds to finance its operations. The Consolidated Entity also has an overdraft facility of $900,000 which was unutilised at 30 June 2006, primarily to allow for timing mismatches. The Consolidated entity has a cash advance facility with its bankers at 30 June 2006 of $3,800,000 which was only drawn down to the extent of $1,000,000. The Residential Mortgage Trust has a net interest margin facility of $6,000,000 drawn to $5,377,000 and a warehouse facility of $500 million drawn to $60,531,000 at 30 June 2006.
Asset and capital structure
| Profile of Debts | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| The profile of the Consolidated entity's debt finance isas follows: | ||
| Lease liability - secured | 1,061 | 1,559 |
| HP liability - secured | 101 | 157 |
| Bank loans -- secured | 66,908 | 219,901 |
| Due to bondholders | 635,915 | 294,164 |
| Other Loans | 3,529 | |
| Reset preference shares | 4,998 | |
| 712,512 | 515,781 |
The amount of the Consolidated entity's debts have increased over the last year due to the increased usage of RMT.
Capital Expenditure
There has been a slight increase in cash used to purchase plant and equipment for 30 June 2006 to $199,000 from $168,000 in the year ended 30 June 2005.
Risk Management
The Board is responsible for overseeing the establishment and implementation by management of risk management systems and reviewing the effectiveness of these systems. The Board is assisted in this process by the Audit Committee, which has in its charter, responsibility for overseeing the effective operation of the company's risk management framework.
The fundamental aim of the company's risk management strategy is to balance risk against reward, and to optimise returns to all stakeholders. The company recognises 3 main types of risk:
- Market risk the risk of change in earnings from changes in market factors such as interest rates, housing market and economic conditions;
- Operational risk the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events; and
- Liquidity risk the risk of failure to adequately fund cash demand in the short term.
The Managing Director and Finance Director periodically provide formal statements to the Board that in all material aspects:
- the company's financial statements present a true and fair view of the company's financial condition and operational results; and
- the risk management and internal compliance and control systems are sound, appropriate and operating efficiently and effectively.
The Board has a number of mechanisms in place to ensure that management's objectives and activities are aligned with the risks identified by the Board. These include the following:
- Board approval of a strategic plan, which encompasses the Consolidated entity's vision, mission and strategy statements, designed to meet stakeholders' needs and manage business risk.
- Implementation of Board approved operating plans and budgets and Board monitoring of progress against these budgets, including the establishment and monitoring of KPIs of both a financial and non-financial nature.
- The establishment of committees to report on specific business risks, including for example, such matters as occupational health and safety.
Statement of Compliance
This report is based on the guidelines in The Consolidated entity of 100 Incorporation publication Guide to the Review of Operations and Financial Condition.
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS
There were no significant changes in the state of affairs of the Consolidated entity during the financial year.
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE DATE
There were no significant events after the balance date.
LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS
Other than as referred to in this report, further information as to likely developments in the operations of the consolidated entity would, in the opinion of the directors, be likely to result in unreasonable prejudice to the consolidated entity.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND PERFORMANCE
The Consolidated entity is not subject to any specific licence or agreement to comply with the requirements of environmental protection authorities in Australia.
SHARE OPTIONS
Unissued shares
As at the date of this report, there were 7,665,000 unissued ordinary shares under options.
| Balance at 30 June 2006 (Note 15) | 7,880,000 |
|---|---|
| Options forfeited on resignation of staff since 30 June | 215,000 |
| Balance at the date of this report | 7,665,000 |
Option holders do not have any right, by virtue of the option, to participate in any share issue of the company or any related body corporate or in the interest issue of any other registered scheme.
No shares were issued as a result of the exercise of options during the year under review. No shares have been issued as a result of the exercise of options since the end of the financial year to the date of this report.
INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
During or since the financial year, the company has paid premiums in respect of a contract insuring all the directors of Homeloans Limited against a liability incurred in their role as directors of the company, except where:
- The liability arises out of conduct involving a wilful breach of duty; or $(a)$
- There has been a contravention of Sections 182 or 183 of the Corporations Act 2001, $(b)$
as permitted by section 199B of the Corporations Act 2001.
Terms, conditions and rates are commensurate with the market. The policy prohibits disclosure of the nature of the indemnification and insurance cover, and the amount of the premium.
REMUNERATION REPORT
This report outlines the remuneration arrangements in place for directors and executives of Homeloans Limited (the company).
Remuneration philosophy
The performance of the company depends upon the quality of its directors and executives. To prosper, the company must attract, motivate and retain highly skilled directors and executives. To this end, the company embodies the following principles in its remuneration framework:
- Provide competitive rewards to attract high calibre executives;
- Link executive rewards to shareholder value;
- Significant portion of executive remuneration 'at risk', dependent upon meeting pre-determined performance benchmarks; and,
- Establish appropriate, demanding performance hurdles in relation to variable executive remuneration.
Nomination and Remuneration Committee
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is responsible for determining and reviewing compensation arrangements for the directors, the chief executive officer (CEO) and the senior management team.
The Remuneration Committee assesses the appropriateness of the nature and amount of remuneration of directors and senior managers on a periodic basis by reference to relevant employment market conditions with the overall objective of ensuring maximum stakeholder benefit from the retention of a high quality board and executive team.
Remuneration structure
In accordance with best practice corporate governance, the structure of non-executive director and senior manager remuneration is separate and distinct.
Non-executive director remuneration
Objective
The Board seeks to set aggregate remuneration at a level which provides the company with the ability to attract and retain directors of the highest calibre, whilst incurring a cost which is acceptable to shareholders.
Structure
The Constitution and the ASX Listing Rules specify that the aggregate remuneration of non-executive directors shall be determined from time to time by a general meeting. An amount not exceeding the amount determined is then divided between the directors as agreed. At last year's annual general meeting the aggregate maximum sum available for the remuneration of non-executive directors was increased to $250,000 per anum with effect from and including 1 January 2006.
The amount of aggregate remuneration sought to be approved by shareholders and the manner in which it is apportioned amongst directors is reviewed annually. The board considers advice from external consultants as well as the fees paid to non-executive directors of comparable companies when undertaking the annual review process.
Each director receives a fee for being a director of the company.
Homeloans Limited-Annual Report
Non-executive directors have long been encouraged by the board to hold shares in the company (purchased by the director on market). It is considered good governance for directors to have a stake in the company whose board he or she sits. The remuneration of non-executive directors for the period ending 30 June 2006 is detailed in Table 1 on page 15 of this report.
Senior manager and executive director remuneration
Objective
The company aims to reward executives with a level and mix of remuneration commensurate with their position and responsibilities within the company and so as to:
- reward executives for company, business unit and individual performance against targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks;
- align the interests of executives with those of shareholders; and
- link reward with the strategic goals and performance of the company.
Structure
In determining the level and make-up of executive remuneration, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee will, from time to time, engage an external consultant to provide independent advice both in the form of a written report detailing market levels of remuneration for comparable executive roles as well as the participation of the independent consultant in the meeting from which the Nomination and Remuneration Committee makes its recommendations to the Board.
Remuneration consists of the following key elements:
- Fixed Remuneration
- Variable Remuneration
- Short Term Incentive ('STI'); and
- $\overline{a}$ Long Term Incentive ('LTI').
The proportion of fixed remuneration and variable remuneration (potential short term and long term incentives) is established for each senior manager by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Table 2 on page 15 details the variable component of the 5 most highly remunerated senior managers.
Fixed remuneration
Objective
The level of fixed remuneration is set so as to provide a base level of remuneration which is both appropriate to the position and is competitive in the market.
Fixed remuneration is reviewed annually by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and the process consists of a review of companywide, business unit and individual performance, relevant comparative remuneration in the market and internal and, where appropriate, external independent advice on policies and practices.
Structure
The fixed remuneration component is usually paid in cash.
The fixed remuneration component of the 5 most highly remunerated senior managers is detailed in Table 2 on page 15.
Variable remuneration - Short term incentive (STI)
Objective
The objective of the STI program is to link the achievement of the company's operational targets with the remuneration received by the executives charged with meeting those targets. The total potential STI available is set at a level so as to provide sufficient incentive to the senior manager to achieve the operational targets and such that the cost to the company is reasonable in the circumstances.
Structure
Actual STI payments granted to each senior manager depend on the extent to which specific operating targets set at the beginning of the financial year are met. The operational targets consist of a number of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) covering both financial and non-financial measures of performance.
Typically included are measures such as contribution to net profit after tax, loan originations, customer service, risk management, product management, and leadership/team contribution. The company has predetermined benchmarks which must be met in order to trigger payments under the short term incentive scheme. These measures are designed so as to align employee behaviour with long term shareholder wealth creation.
On an annual basis, after consideration of performance against KPIs, an overall performance rating for the company and each individual business unit is approved by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. The individual performance of each executive is also rated and all three ratings are taken into account when determining the amount, if any, of the short term incentive pool that is allocated to each executive.
The aggregate of annual STI payments available for executives across the company is subject to the approval of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Payments made are usually delivered as a cash bonus.
Variable remuneration - Long term incentive (LTI)
Objective
The objective of the LTI plan is to reward senior managers in a manner which aligns this element of remuneration with the creation of shareholder wealth.
As such LTI grants are only made to executives who are able to influence the generation of shareholder wealth and thus have a direct impact on the Company's performance against the relevant long term performance hurdle.
Structure
LTI grants to executives are delivered in the form of options.
These options vest with the executive over varying periods and are not usually subject to a performance hurdle. They usually have a life from date of grant of five years, and are exercisable at specific dates and proportions set at the time of granting the options. Usually 50% of these options are exercisable after two years with the remaining 50% exercisable after three years.
Table 3 on page 16 provides details of options granted, the value of options, vesting periods and lapsed options under the LTI plan.
Employment contracts
No executives are currently employed under a fixed term contract.
Upon termination all vested options remain in place.
Managing Director
Under his conditions of employment, the employment of the Managing Director may be terminated:
- by the Company by giving 12 months notice; or,
- by the Managing Director giving the Company 3 months notice.
The Company may make a payment in lieu of requiring the service of the notice period.
Upon termination of employment, the Managing Director is also entitled to his statutory entitlements to accrued annual and long service leave.
Upon termination of employment by the Managing Director giving notice, the Managing Director is entitled to any STI than would otherwise be payable.
Finance Director
Under his conditions of employment, the employment of the Finance Director may be terminated by either party, by giving 3 months notice. The Company may make a payment in lieu of requiring the service of the notice period.
Upon termination of employment, the Finance Director is entitled to his statutory entitlements to accrued annual and long service leave.
Upon termination of employment, the Board has discretion to direct the forfeiture, or to pay the benefit of, any award made under either the STI or LTI plan that remain subject to the satisfaction of any performance or other criteria.
Mortgage Asset Services Pty Ltd
The services of the General Manager Sales are provided by way of a contract with Mortgage Asset Services Pty Ltd ("MAS"). This contract may be terminated by either party, by giving 3 months notice.
Should the Company terminate the contract prior to 31 December 2007, then MAS is entitled to six months payment and any unvested options from those granted on 7 December 2005 will vest, provided loan origination volumes are within 90% of the hurdle volumes.
Other Key Management Personnel
Under their conditions of employment the employment of the Key Management Personnel may be terminated by either party, by giving 1 months notice. The Company may make a payment in lieu of requiring the service of the notice period.
Upon termination of employment, the Key Management Personnel are entitled to their statutory entitlements to accrued annual and long service leave.
Upon termination of employment the Board has discretion to direct the forfeiture, or to pay the benefit of, any award made under either the STI or LTI plan that remain subject to the satisfaction of any performance or other criteria.
Remuneration of directors and named executives
TABLE 1: DIRECTORS' REMUNERATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006
| Primary benefits | Post employment | Equity | Other | Total | %performancerelated | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary &Fees | Non.monetary | Cash STI | Superannuation | Retirementbenefits | Options | |||||
| T.A.Holmes | 2006 | 166.723 | 2.767 | $\mathbf{w}$ | 11.630 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 181.120 | 0% | ||
| 2005 | 160.218 | 2.986 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 89.629 | $\mathbf{w}$ | 252.833 | 0% | |||
| B.D.Jones | 2006 | 275,000 | 4.854 | - | 24.750 | 75.887 | $\tilde{\phantom{a}}$ | 380,491 | 0% | |
| 2005 | 231.528 | 4.612 | 300,000 | 20.838 | 103.030 | $\mathbf{w}$ | 660.008 | 61% | ||
| R.P.Salmon | 2006 | 154.223 | 2.767 | $\mathbf{w}$ | 11.630 | $\mathbf{w}$ | 168.620 | 0% | ||
| 2005 | 160.218 | 2.986 | $\sim$ | 89.629 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 252.833 | 0% | |||
| R.N.Scott | 2006 | 50.000 | $\mathbf{w}$ | $\mathbf{w}$ | 50,000 | $0%$ | ||||
| 2005 | 42,500 | $\omega$ | $\omega$ | $\tilde{\phantom{a}}$ | 42,500 | 0% | ||||
| J.L. Smith | 2006 | 240.000 | 4.854 | 60,000 | 21,600 | 77.726 | $\mathbf{w}$ | 404.181 | 34% | |
TABLE 2: REMUNERATION OF THE 5 NAMED EXECUTIVES WHO RECEIVED THE HIGHEST REMUNERATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006
| Primary benefits | Post employment | Equity | Other | Total | %performancerelated | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary & | Non | Cash STI | Superannuation | Retirement | Options | |||||
| Fees | monetary | benefits | ||||||||
| L.McDonald | 2006 | 150,000 | 4.854 | 50.000 | 13.500 | 11.375 | $\omega$ | 229.729 | 27% | |
| K.Carter | 2006 | 125.000 | 2.767 | 40.000 | 11.250 | 15.725 | w | 194.742 | 29% | |
| A.Curr | 2006 | 117.500 | AMP | 25.000 | 10.575 | 8.950 | $\omega$ | 162.025 | 21% | |
| T.Phillips ** | 2006 | 282.271 | $\mathbf{w}$ | $\mathbf{w}$ | 24,186 | $\sim$ | 306,457 | 62% | ||
| 2005 | 73.020 | ALC | 148.222 | $\tilde{\phantom{a}}$ | 221,242 | 100% | ||||
| G.McFadden | 2006 | 130.000 | $\omega$ | 10,000 | 11.770 | 4.600 | $\omega$ | 156.370 | 9% | |
| 2005 | 129.987 | $\omega$ | 5.000 | 12.149 | $\tilde{ }$ | .412 | $\omega$ | 148.548 | 4% |
** Troy Phillips is a director of Morfgage Asset Services Pty Ltd (MAS). His services as General Manager Sales for the Consolidated Entity are remunerated by way of a monthly commission payment to MAS based on mortgages settled during the previous month. This amounted to $282,271 (2005: $73,020) in the current financial year. MAS also holds 2,500,000 options over unissued shares in Homeloans Limited. The amortised value of these options during the year has been included. None of the remuneration noted above was actually paid directly to Troy Phillips.
The options on issue to MAS include 750,000 options exercisable any time from grant date with the balance subject to performance hurdles. These hurdles are as follows:
-
1,000,000 options exercisable if home foan settlements in any 3 month period prior to 31 March 2007 exceed an average $225m per month.
-
250,000 options exercisable if home loan settlements in any 3 month period prior to 30 Sept 2006 exceed an average $100m per month.
-
250,000 options exercisable if home loan settlements in any 3 month period prior to 31 March 2007 exceed an average $112.5m per month.
-
250,000 options exercisable if home loan settlements in any 3 month period prior to 31 Dec 2007 exceed an average $137.5m per month.
Homeloans Limited-Annual Report
TABLE 3: OPTIONS GRANTED AS PART OF REMUNERATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006
(IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LTI PLAN)
| Grant date | Grantnumber | Vest | Value peroption atgrant date@ | ExercisedNumber | Value per option atexercise date | Value at dateoption lapsed | $%$ ofremuneration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B.D.Jones | 23/11/05 | 315,000 | 31/08/06 | 0.1459 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 5.2% |
| 23/11/05 | 310,000 | 31/08/07 | 0.1294 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 2.0% | |
| J.L.A.Smith | 14/10/05 | 100,000 | 31/08/06 | 0.1859 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 3.7% |
| 14/10/05 | 150,000 | 31/08/07 | 0.1583 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 2.2% | |
| 20/02/06 | 200,000 | 31/08/06 | 0.1535 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 5.2% | |
| 20/02/06 | 300,000 | 31/08/07 | 0.1363 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 1.8% | |
| T.Phillips ** | 7/04/06 | 250.000 | 30/09/06 | 0.1456 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 4.6% |
| 7/04/06 | 250.000 | 31/03/07 | 0.1154 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 1.4% | |
| 7/04/06 | 250,000 | 31/12/07 | 0.1058 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 0.6% | |
| L.McDonald | 14/10/05 | 30,000 | 31/08/06 | 0.1859 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 2.0% |
| 14/10/05 | 45,000 | 31/08/07 | 0.1583 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | $0.9%$ | |
| K. Carter | 14/10/05 | 50,000 | 31/08/06 | 0.1859 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 3.9% |
| 14/10/05 | 75,000 | 31/08/07 | 0.1583 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 1.7% | |
| A. Curr | 14/10/05 | 30.000 | 31/08/06 | 0.1859 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 2.6% |
| 14/10/05 | 45.000 | 31/08/07 | 0.1583 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 1.2% | |
| G.McFadden | 14/10/05 | 10,000 | 31/08/06 | 0.1859 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 1.0% |
| 14/10/05 | 15.000 | 31/08/07 | 0.1583 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | 0.4% |
@ From 1 July 2002, options granted as part of senior manager remuneration have been valued using a Binomial option pricing model, which takes account of factors including the option exercise price, the current level and volatility of the underlying share price, the risk-free interest rate, expected dividends on the underlying share, current market price of the underlying share and the expected life of the option.
** Refer to Note on Table 2 Page 15.
Fair values of options:
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using a Binomial option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants made:
| Grant Date | 29 Apr 2002 | 2 May 2002 | 2 May 2002 | Apr 2003 | Dec 2004 | 7 Dec 2004 | 14 Jan 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% | $3.0%$ | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Expected volatility | 38% | 44% | 44% | 38% | 45% | 45% | 45% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 5.532% | 5.442% | 5.518% | 4.700% | 4.905% | 4.900% | 5.005% |
| Expected life of option | 4.9 vears | 4.9 vears | 4.9 vears | 4.8 vears | 5.0 vears | 5.0 vears | 4.9 vears |
| Grant Date | 14 Oct 05 | 14 Oct 05 | 23 Nov 05 | 23 Nov 05 | 20 Feb 06 | 20 Feb 06 | 7 Apr 06 | Apr 06 | Apr 06 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.0% | s.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Expected volatility | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% |
| Risk-free interest rate | .266% | 5.276% | 5.143% | 5.157% | 5.052% | 5.048% | 5.423% | 5.337% | 5.337% |
| Expected life of option | 3.9 years | vears | 3.8 vears | 4.8 vears | 3.5 vears | 4.5 vears | vears | vears | vears |
The dividend yield reflects the assumption that the current dividend payout will continue with no anticipated increases. The expected life of the options is based on period from grant date to expiry as so far no options have been exercised, and is therefore not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may also not necessarily be the actual outcome.
The resulting weighted average fair values per option for those options vesting after 1 July 2005 are:
| Number | Grant Date | Vesting date | Weighted Average | Vesting Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair Value Per Option | ||||
| 100.000 | 1 Apr 2003 | 21 Jan 2006. | $0.1398 | 100% vested |
| 950.000 | 14 Jan 2005 | 14 Dec 2006 | $0.1420 | 475,000 vest on 14 Dec 2006 and 475,000 vest on 14 Dec 2007 |
| 1.030.000- | 14 Oct 2005 | 31 Aug 2006 | $0.1693 | 412,000 vest on 31 Aug 2006 and 618,000 vest on 31 Aug 2007 |
| 500.000 | 20 Feb 2006 | 31 Aug 2006 | $0.1432 | 200,000 vest on 31 Aug 2006 and 300,000 vest on 31 Aug 2007 |
| 615,000 | 23 Nov 2005 | 31 Aug 2006 | $0.1377 | 315,000 vest on 31 Aug 2006 and 310,000 vest on 31 Aug 2007 |
| 1,000,000 | 7 Dec 2004. | 31 Mar 2007 | $0.0924 | Vesting will only occur if settlements targets are met. |
| 750.000 | 7 Apr 2006 | 30 Sep 2006 | $0.1223 | 250,000 to vest on 30 Sep 2006, 250,000 to vest on 31 Mar |
| 2007 and a further 250,000 to vest on 31 Dec 2007. Vesting will | ||||
| only occur if settlements targets are met. |
COMPANY PEFORMANCE AND SHAREHOLDER RETURNS
The Consolidated entity is pleased to report that return to shareholders, both through dividends and increased share price, is now reflecting the numerous changes effected by the Board and management over the past 2 years. This is highlighted by the significant improvement in most financial measures for the current year as listed below:
| AIFRS | Non-AIFRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004^^ | 2003^^ | |
| Basic earnings per share (cents) | 5.16 | 3.95 | 1.73 | (40.01) |
| Return on assets (%) | 0.3% | 0.4% | 1.7% | (35.6 %) |
| Return on equity (%) | 8.1% | 6.9% | 2.9% | (64.9% |
| Dividend payout ratio (%) | 97.0% | 30.3% | 0.0 % | $NA^*$ |
| Total Shareholder Return (TSR) | ||||
| Share price (cents) | 10.5 | 0.0 | (7.5) | (32.5) |
| Dividends (cents) | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| 15.5 | 1.5 | (7.5) | (31.3) |
۸۸ These ratios were calculated under Australian Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (AGAAP). The results for 2005 and 2006 are calculated under Australian equivalents of International Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS).
As a result of the AIFRS requirement under AASB 127 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements to consolidate the special purpose entity, Residential Mortgage Trust (RMT), significant assets have been added to the consolidated balance sheet without any appreciable increase in net profit. The group previously recognised the distributions from the RMT as revenue and was not required to include the RMT asset base.
* Dividend paid of 1.2 cents per share in 2003 cannot be measured against reported loss for the relevant financial year.
The share price increased during the financial year under review and at the date of this report has shown the benefit of our improved performance with a strong appreciation since the end of the financial year. It is pleasing to see this reflected in the Total Shareholder return measure which is now showing a positive trend. The Board is confident that, as a result of the initiatives in place to increase mortgage origination volumes, increase the penetration of the Homeloans managed securitisation vehicle and continue cost control measures, the Consolidated entity will continue to improve profitability.
DIRECTORS' MEETINGS
The number of meetings of directors (including meetings of committees of directors) held during the year and the number of meetings attended by each director was as follows:
| Directors'Meetings | Audit Committee | Nominations andRemunerationCommittee | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of meetings held: | 12 | 2 | |
| Number of meetings attended: | |||
| T. A. Holmes | 12 | 2 | 2 |
| R. P. Salmon | 12 | 2 | 2 |
| R. N. Scott | 12 | 2 | 2 |
| B. D. Jones | 11 | $\blacksquare$ | |
| J.L.A.Smith | $3^*$ |
* There were 3 Director's meetings held during the period in which J.L.A. Smith was in office.
Committee Membership
As at the date of this report, the company had an Audit Committee and the Nomination and Remuneration Committee.
Members acting on the committees of the Board during the year were:
Audit
R.N Scott (Chairman) T.A.Holmes R.P.Salmon
Nomination and Remuneration Committee
T.A.Holmes (Chairman) R.N Scott R.P.Salmon
ROUNDING
The amounts contained in this report and in the financial report have been rounded to the nearest $1,000 (where rounding is applicable) under the option available to the company under ASIC Class Order 98/0100. The company is an entity to which the Class order applies.
AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
The directors received the required declaration from the auditor of Homeloans Limited as to their compliance with auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act. This declaration is shown on the next page and forms part of this report.
Non-Audit Services
The following non-audit services were provided by the entity's auditor, Ernst & Young. The directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act. The nature and scope of each type of nonaudit service provided means that auditor's independence was not compromised.
Ernst & Young received or are due to receive the following amounts for the provision of non-audit services:
Tax compliance services
$21,583
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors
Timothy A. Holmes Executive Chairman
6 October 2006
EIFRNST & YOU INC.
# The Ernst & Young Building 11 Nounts Bay Read Perris WA 6000 Australia
■ 1d 61091292222 Tax 61 8 9429 2436
CPO Box M939 Penh WA 6843
Auditor's Independence Declaration to the Directors of Homeloans Limited
In relation to our audit of the financial report of Homeloans Limited for the financial year ended 30 June 2006, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 or any applicable code of professional conduct.
$kmA + \frac{hc}{2}$
Ernst & Young
R A Kirkby Partner Perth
6 October 2006
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
The Board of Homeloans Ltd is committed to maintaining the highest standards of corporate governance. Corporate Governance establishes the framework for how the Board oversees the company and performs its functions on behalf of shareholders. The Board believes that good governance should be fully embedded in the company's framework and culture.
The Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations published in March 2003 by the Australian Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Council, the Commonwealth Government's CLERP 9 reforms and the Australian Standard AS8000 Good Governance Principles have been examined in developing the company's corporate governance principles.
Due to the size of the company's operations, the Board is of the belief that a number of the ASX's recommendations are not appropriate or in the best interest of shareholders. In these cases, the board has elected not to follow the recommendations.
Homeloans Limited's corporate governance practices were in place throughout the year ended 30 June 2006 and were fully compliant with the Council's best practice recommendations except where noted.
For further information on corporate governance policies adopted by Homeloans Limited refer to our website:
www.homeloans.com.au/Corp/CorporateGovernance.aspx
Structure of the Board
The Board consists of directors with an appropriate mix of skill and experience, from different backgrounds, whom together provide the necessary breadth and depth of experience to meet the Board's roles and responsibilities.
The size of the Board is determined by the company's constitution which specifies a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 7 directors. The Board presently consists of 3 non-executive directors and 2 executive directors.
Board Responsibilities
The Board of Homeloans Ltd has the following responsibilities:
- oversee the conduct of the company's business to evaluate whether the business is being properly managed and to ensure that it is conducted in an honest and ethical manner;
- ensure that adequate procedures are in place to identify the principal risks of the company's business and delegate the implementation of appropriate systems to manage these risks to Board Committees and management;
- select, appoint, evaluate the performance of, determine the remuneration of, plan for the successor of, and removal of the Managing Director;
- ensure that adequate plans and procedures are in place for succession planning, including appointing, training and monitoring the performance of senior management;
- adopt a strategic planning process and review the company's financial objectives and major corporate plans and actions; and
- perform other functions as prescribed by law, or assigned to the Board to maximise shareholder value.
The Board of Directors may delegate the above responsibilities to its committees, a director or any other person of authority to perform any of its functions and exercise any of its powers.
Ultimate responsibility for the management and control of the company is vested in the directors, who may then delegate their power to management. The Board has a Delegation of Authority schedule in place, which is reviewed regularly.
An independent director is a non-executive director (i.e. is not a member of management) and:
- is not a substantial shareholder of the company or an officer of, or otherwise associated directly with, a substantial shareholder of the company;
- within the last three years has not been employed in an executive capacity by the company or another Consolidated member;
- within the last three years has not been a principal of a material professional adviser or a material consultant to the company or another Consolidated entity member, or an employee materially associated with the service provided:
- is not a material supplier or customer of the company or other Consolidated member, or an officer of or otherwise associated directly or indirectly with a material supplier or customer;
- has no material contractual relationship with the company or another Consolidated member other than as a director of the company; and
- is free from any interest and any business or other relationship, which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with the director's ability to act in the best interests of the company.
It is the Board's view that Mr R.N. Scott is an independent non-executive director. The Board does not consist of a majority of independent directors.
The Board of Directors believes that it is hard to justify a larger Board given the size of the company's operations. They are also of the opinion that the company is actually benefiting from having the company's founders give of their experience in the industry and have a financial interest.
The term in office held by each director in office at the date of this report is as follows:
| Name | Term in Office | Name | Term in Office |
|---|---|---|---|
| T.A Holmes | 5yrs 11 months B.D Jones | 2 yrs 4 months | |
| R.P Salmon | 5yrs 11 months J.L.A. Smith | 7.5 months | |
| R.N Scott | Syrs 11 months |
For additional details regarding Board appointments, please refer to our website.
Chairman of the Board
The Chairman of the Board is a non-executive director but is not an independent director. The Board believes that the Company benefits from the Chairman having a significant financial interest in the Company. Mr R N Scott is the lead independent director.
Succession Planning
The Board plans succession of its own members in conjunction with the Board Nomination and Remuneration Committee, taking into account the skill and experience of current board members and the company's future direction and needs.
The Board retains overall responsibility for succession planning of the Managing Director, via the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee and the Managing Director are responsible for the succession planning of other senior executives.
Review of Board and Senior Executives' Performance
The Board reviews its overall performance, the performance of Board Committees and the performance of each individual director annually. The performance of directors is subject to annual peer review.
The Managing Director's performance is reviewed annually by the Board and is assessed on achievement of the targets and applicable budgets.
Senior executives participate in an annual performance review process which involves the establishment of performance objectives and measures, and the review of achievement. The process also involves assessment of remuneration tied to the company achieving its goals.
Conflict of Interest
Directors are required to disclose private or other business interests and any other matters which may lead to potential or actual conflict of interest to the Board.
Director's dealings with the company will always be at arm's length to avoid the possibility of actual and perceived conflict of interest.
Any director who has a material personal interest in a matter being considered by the Board must not be present when the matter is being considered and may not vote on the matter.
Nomination and Appointment of New Directors
The Board's Nomination and Remuneration Committee has the responsibility for reviewing the membership of the Board on an annual basis to ensure the appropriate skill mix of the board as a whole.
Procedure for the selection and appointment of new directors:
- The Nomination and Remuneration Committee identifies the required skills, experience, and other qualities required of new directors;
- Potential candidates are then interviewed by members of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and a short list prepared;
- The Board meets to consider the potential candidates, which is followed by Board members having the opportunity to interview any prospective candidate; and
- An appointment is then made by the Board.
Rotation of Directors
The company's constitution specifies that one third of the Board, excluding the Managing Director, must retire from the office and stand for re-election at each Annual General Meeting. Further, each director, excluding the Managing Director, must stand for re-election every 3 years.
Code of Conduct
The Company has a Code of Conduct to quide the directors, key management personnel as to:
the practices necessary to maintain confidence in the company's integrity;
the responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical practices: and.
the guidelines for trading in the Company's securities.
Board Access to Information and Advice
All directors have access to any employees, company advisers, records and information they may require to carry out their duties. The Board also receive regular financial and operational reports from executive management.
Directors have the right to seek independent professional advice in connection with their duties and responsibilities at the company's expense, to help them carry out their responsibilities. Prior notification to the Chairman, or the Board's approval is required.
Board Education
The Board is committed to ensuring that new directors are familiar with the company's businesses. New directors are provided with an orientation and education program. Directors may undertake continuing education courses at the company's expense, with the prior approval of the Chairman or the Board.
Board Committees
There are currently two Board Committees whose powers and procedures are governed by the company's Constitution and the relevant Committee's charter. Other Committees may be established from time to time to consider matters of special importance.
The Board uses its committees to support it in matters which require more intensive review. Each committee has a written charter, approved by the Board defining its duties, reporting procedures and authority. Minutes from all Committee meetings are tabled at Board meetings.
Copies of the Board Committee charters are available on the company's website.
Nomination and Remuneration Committee
The primary duties of the committee are to:
- review the Board size and composition (mix of skill, experience and other competencies);
- determine and review position descriptions of directors and the Managing Director;
- develop and implement a process for the orientation and education of new directors;
- review and advise the Board on the remuneration of directors and senior management in light of company goals and objectives;
- recommend to the Board the succession plan for key senior management positions; and
- evaluate the effectiveness of the Board, its Committees and individual directors.
For a full discussion of the company's remuneration philosophy and framework and the remuneration received by directors and executives in the current period please refer to the remuneration report, which is contained within the Directors' Report.
Audit Committee
The primary functions of the Audit Committee are to:
- evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal control system and implement a risk management framework;
- appoint, monitor and review the activities of the company's external auditors;
- monitor the effectiveness and independence of the auditors;
- review and report to the board on the company's annual and half-year financial statements, and its accounting policies and principles adopted;
- ensure adequate compliance controls; and
- review and recommend any appropriate amendments to corporate governance policies and framework.
The Audit Committee consists of three non-executive directors and an independent chairman. Owing to the size of the board and the fact that there is only one independent director it is not possible for the majority of the committee to comprise of independent directors.
For details of the number of meetings of the Audit Committee held during the year and the attendees at those meetings, refer to page 18 of the Directors' Report.
The members of the Audit Committee during the year were: Mr R.N. Scott (Chairman), Mr R.P. Salmon, Mr T.A. Holmes
Qualifications of audit committee members were:
R.N Scott CA R.P Salmon BA Economics T.A Holmes
Performance
The Board reviews its overall performance, the performance of Board Committees and the performance of each individual director annually. The performance of directors is subject to annual peer review.
The Managing Director's performance is reviewed annually by the Board and is assessed on achievement of the targets and budget applicable.
Senior executives participate in an annual performance review process which involves the establishment of performance objectives and measures, and the review of achievement. The process also involves assessment of remuneration tied to the company achieving its goals.
INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Interest income | 4(a) | 45,806 | 38,580 | 162 | 69 |
| Interest expense | 4(d) | (36, 824) | (32, 843) | (670) | (456) |
| Net interest income | 8,982 | 5,737 | (508) | (387) | |
| Fees and commission income | 4(b) | 29,410 | 32,792 | 29,963 | 28,520 |
| Fees and commission expense | 4(e) | (19, 129) | (15, 200) | (15, 653) | (13, 509) |
| Other operating income | 4(c) | 1,281 | 355 | 5,834 | 6,241 |
| Impairment losses on loans andadvances | |||||
| General administrative expenses | (5,940) | (7, 522) | (5,683) | (7,034) | |
| Other operating expenses | (10, 977) | (12, 474) | (10, 518) | (11, 750) | |
| Profit before income tax | 3,627 | 3,688 | 3,435 | 2,081 | |
| Income tax expense | 5 | (1,030) | (1, 196) | (1, 152) | (739) |
| Net profit after income tax | 2,597 | 2,492 | 2,283 | 1,342 | |
| Net profit attributable to membersof the Homeloans Limited | 2,597 | 2,492 | 2,283 | 1,342 | |
| Basic earnings per share (cents pershare) | 6 | 5.16 | 3.95 | ||
| Diluted earnings per share | 4.03 | 3.70 | |||
| Unfranked dividend (cents per share)Ordinary shares | 2.50 | 1.50 |
BALANCE SHEET AS AT 30 JUNE 2006
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| ASSETS | |||||
| Cash assets | 8 | 25,574 | 16,946 | 300 | 769 |
| Receivables | 9 | 11,652 | 10,074 | 11,180 | 8,575 |
| Loans and advances to customers | 10 | 686,855 | 496,855 | ||
| Deferred expenses | 11 | 19,514 | 22,149 | 19,514 | 19,895 |
| Other financial assets | 12 | 17 | 19,195 | 19,178 | |
| Plant and equipment | 13 | 1,672 | 1,957 | 1,672 | 1,957 |
| Goodwill | 14 | 15,996 | 15,996 | ||
| TOTAL ASSETS | 761,280 | 563,977 | 51,861 | 50,374 | |
| LIABILITIES | |||||
| Payables | 16 | 9,383 | 6,045 | 11,721 | 8,932 |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 17 | 707,514 | 515,781 | 2,162 | 4,691 |
| Reset preference shares | 18 | 4,998 | 4,998 | ||
| Lease incentives | 19 | 561 | 665 | 561 | 665 |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 5 | 5,944 | 4,788 | 3,690 | 3,119 |
| Provisions | 20 | 680 | 573 | 680 | 573 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 729,080 | 527,852 | 23,812 | 17,980 | |
| NET ASSETS | 32,200 | 36,125 | 28,049 | 32,394 | |
| EQUITY | |||||
| Issued capital | 21 | 48,624 | 53,395 | 48,624 | 53,395 |
| Reserves | 21 | 367 | 102 | 367 | 102 |
| Accumulated losses | 21 | (16, 791) | (17, 372) | (20, 942) | (21, 103) |
| TOTAL EQUITY | 32,200 | 36,125 | 28,049 | 32,394 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006
| Attributable to equity holders of the parent | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IssuedCapital$'000 | AccumulatedLosses$'000 | OtherReserves$'000 | Total$'000 | ||
| CONSOLIDATED | |||||
| At 1 July 2004 | 53,395 | (19,360) | 6 | 34,041 | |
| Profit for the year | 2,492 | 2,492 | |||
| Cost of share-based payment * | 96 | 96 | |||
| Equity dividends | (504) | (504) | |||
| At 30 June 2005 | 53,395 | (17, 372) | 102 | 36,125 | |
| At 30 June 2005 | 53,395 | (17, 372) | 102 | 36,125 | |
| Adoption of AASB 132 and AASB 139effective 1 July 2005 * | |||||
| - reset preference shares now treated as aliability | (4, 771) | (134) | (4,905) | ||
| - reset preference dividend paid in respectof prior financial period | (42) | (42) | |||
| - net loss on recognition of derivativeinstruments | (46) | (46) | |||
| - net gain on recognition of financial assetsand liabilities associated with the presentvalue of future trailing commission incomeand expenses | 415 | 415 | |||
| - tax effect of above adjustments | (195) | (195) | |||
| At 1 July 2005 | 48,624 | (17, 374) | 102 | 31,352 | |
| Profit for the year | 2,597 | 2,597 | |||
| Cost of share-based payment* | 265 | 265 | |||
| Equity dividends | (2,014) | (2,014) | |||
| At 30 June 2006 | 48,624 | (16, 791) | 367 | 32,200 |
* Please refer Note 30 for details of all movements in equity arising from AIFRS.
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006 (CONTINUED)
| Attributable to equity holders of the parent | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IssuedCapital | AccumulatedLosses | OtherReserves | Total | ||
| S. | $ | $ | $ | ||
| PARENT | |||||
| At 1 July 2004 | 53,395 | (21, 941) | 6 | 31,460 | |
| Profit for the year | 1,342 | 1,342 | |||
| Cost of share-based payment * | 96 | 96 | |||
| Equity dividends | (504) | $\blacksquare$ | (504) | ||
| At 30 June 2005 | 53,395 | (21, 103) | 102 | 32,394 | |
| At 30 June 2005 | 53,395 | (21, 103) | 102 | 32,394 | |
| Adoption of AASB 132 and AASB 139effective 1 July 2005 * | |||||
| - reset preference shares now treated as aliability | (4, 771) | (134) | (4,905) | ||
| - reset preference dividend paid in respectof prior financial period | (42) | (42) | |||
| - tax effect of above adjustments | 68 | 68 | |||
| At 1 July 2005 | 48,624 | (21, 211) | 102 | 27,515 | |
| Profit for the year | 2,283 | 2,283 | |||
| Cost of share-based payment* | 265 | 265 | |||
| Equity dividends | (2,014) | (2,014) | |||
| At 30 June 2006 | 48,624 | (20, 942) | 367 | 28,049 |
* Please refer Note 30 for details of all movements in equity arising from AIFRS.
CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||||
| Interest received | 46,570 | 38,260 | 133 | 71 | |
| Interest paid | (35, 577) | (32, 715) | (579) | (451) | |
| Loan fees and other income | 35,531 | 39,451 | 25,866 | 30,043 | |
| Salaries and other expenses | (37, 462) | (42, 945) | (21, 892) | (25, 760) | |
| Income taxes paid | (82) | (9) | (79) | ||
| Net cash flows from operatingactivities | 8 | 8,980 | 2,042 | 3,449 | 3,903 |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||||
| Acquisition of Match FundsManagement Limited | 22 | (262) | (262) | ||
| Purchase of plant and equipment | (199) | (168) | (199) | (168) | |
| Refund of stamp duty claim | 861 | 861 | |||
| Loan to associate | (17) | (17) | |||
| Bond issuance costs | (716) | (154) | |||
| Net loans (advanced)/repaymentsfrom borrowers | (190,000) | 65,579 | (245) | ||
| Net cash flows (used in)/frominvesting activities | (190, 071) | 64,995 | 400 | (430) | |
| Cash flows from financing activities(Repayments to)/proceeds from | (153, 978) | ||||
| warehouse facility | 6,488 | 130,716 | 1,500 | ||
| Proceeds from borrowings | (2, 247) | (3,804) | (2, 234) | ||
| Repayment of borrowings(Repayments to)/proceeds frombondholders | (2,529)341,751 | (206, 415) | |||
| Payment of dividends | 7 | (2,014) | (504) | (2,014) | (504) |
| Net cash flows from/(used in)financing activities | 189,719 | (78, 450) | (4, 318) | (2,738) | |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash held | 8,628 | (11, 413) | (469) | 735 | |
| Add: Opening cash brought forward | 16,946 | 28,359 | 769 | 34 | |
| Closing cash carried forward | 8 | 25,574 | 16,946 | 300 | 769 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006
Note 1: CORPORATE INFORMATION
The financial report of Homeloans Limited for the year ended 30 June 2006 was authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of directors on 2 October 2006.
Homeloans Limited is a company limited by shares incorporated and domiciled in Australia. On 19 March 2001, Homeloans Limited shares commenced trading on the Australian Stock Exchange.
The nature of the operations and principal activities of the Consolidated entity are described in note 3.
Note 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
$(a)$ Basis of preparation
The financial report is a general-purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and Australian Accounting Standards. The financial report has also been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for derivative financial instruments and certain financial liabilities, which have been measured at fair value.
The Consolidated entity provides mortgage origination services and housing loans and is a financial institution to which AASB 130 "Disclosures in the Financial Statements of Banks and Similar Financial Institutions" applies.
The financial report is presented in Australian dollars and all values are rounded to the nearest thousand dollars ($'000) unless otherwise stated under the option available to the Company under ASIC Class Order 98/0100. The Company is an entity to which the class order applies.
$(b)$ Statement of compliance
The financial report complies with Australian Accounting Standards, which include Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS). Compliance with AIFRS ensures that the financial report, comprising the financial statements and notes thereto, complies with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
This is the first year financial report prepared based on Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards ("AIFRS") and except for financial institutions comparatives for the full-year ended 30 June 2005 have been restated accordingly. From 1 July 2005, the Consolidated Entity elected to take the exemption under AASB 1 First Time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards to apply AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation from 1 July 2005.
For information on previous accounting policies, refer to the 30 June 2005 full financial report under previous AGAAP.
Reconciliations of AIFRS equity and profit for 30 June 2005 to the balances reported in the 30 June 2005 financial report and at transition to AIFRS are detailed in note 30.
A summary of the significant accounting policies of the Consolidated entity under AIFRS are disclosed below.
| AASBAmendment | Affected Standard(s) | Nature of changeto accountingpolicy | Applicationdate ofstandard | Applicationdate forCompany |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-1 | AASB 139: FinancialInstruments: Recognition andMeasurement | No change toaccounting policyrequired. Thereforeno impact | 1 January2006 | 1 July 2006 |
| 2005-5 | AASB 1: First-time adoptionof AIFRS, AASB 139:Financial Instruments:Recognition and Measurement | No change toaccounting policyrequired. Thereforeno impact | 1 January2006 | 1 July 2006 |
| 2005-10 | AASB 132: FinancialInstruments: Disclosure andPresentation, AASB 101:Presentation of FinancialStatements, AASB 114:Segment Reporting, AASB117: Leases, AASB 133:Earnings per share, AASB139: Financial Instruments:Recognition and Measurement,AASB 1: First-time adoptionof AIFRS, AASB 1023:General Insurance Contactsand AASB 1038: LifeInsurance Contracts | No change toaccounting policyrequired. Thereforeno impact | 1 January2007 | 1 July 2007 |
| 2006-1 | AASB 121: The Effects ofChange in Foreign CurrencyRates | No change toaccounting policyrequired. Thereforeno impact | 1 January2006 | 1 July 2006 |
| NewStandard | AASB 7: FinancialInstruments: Disclosures | No change toaccounting policyrequired. Thereforeno impact | 1 January2007 | 1 July 2007 |
| New UIG | UIG 4: Determining whetheran Arrangement contains aLease | No change toaccounting policyrequired. Thereforeno impact | 1 January2006 | 1 July 2006 |
* Application date is for the annual reporting periods beginning on or after the date shown in the above table.
The following amendments are not applicable to the Company and therefore have no impact.
| AASB | Amendment Affected Standard(s) |
|---|---|
| AASB 1: First time adoption of AIFRS, AASB 101: Presentation of Financial | |
| 2004-3 | Statements, AASB124: Related Party Disclosures |
| 2005-4 | AASB 139: Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, |
| AASB 132: Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation, AASB | |
| 1: First-time adoption of AIFRS, AASB 1023: General Insurance | |
| Contracts and AASB 1028: Life Insurance Contracts | |
| 2005-6 | AASB 3: Business Combinations |
| 2005-9 | AASB 4: Insurance Contracts, AASB 1023: General Insurance Contracts, |
| AASB 139: Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and | |
| AASB 132: Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation | |
| AASB 119 | AASB 119 Employee Benefits |
| NEW UIG | UIG 5: Rights to Interests in Decommissioning, Restoration and |
| Environmental Rehabilitation Funds | |
| NEW UIG | UIG 6: Liabilities Arising form Participating in a Specific Market - |
| Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment | |
| NEW UIG | UIG 7: Applying the Restatement Approach under AASB 129 Financial |
| Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies | |
| NEW UIG | UIG 8: Scope of AASB 2 |
| NEW UIG | UIG 9: Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives |
$(c)$ Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Homeloans Limited and its subsidiaries as at 30 June each year (the Consolidated entity). The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all inter-company balances and transactions, income and expenses and profit and losses resulting from intra-Consolidated transactions have been eliminated in full. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Consolidated entity and cease to be consolidated from the date on which control is transferred out of the Consolidated entity.
(d) Investment in associate
Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting in the consolidated financial statements. An associate is an entity in which the Consolidated entity has significant influence and which is neither a subsidiary nor a joint venture.
Under the equity method, the investment in the associate is carried in the consolidated balance sheet at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Consolidated entity's share of net assets of the associate. Goodwill relating to an associate is included in the carrying amount of the investment and is not amortised. After application of the equity method, the Consolidated entity determines whether it is necessary to recognize any additional impairment loss with respect to the Consolidated entity's net investment in the associate. The consolidated income statement reflects the Consolidated entity's share of the results of operations of the associate.
Where there has been a change recognised directly in the associate's equity, the Consolidated entity recognises its share of any changes and discloses this in the consolidated statement of recognised income and expense
$(e)$ Leases
Leases are classified at their inception as either operating or finance leases based on the economic substance of the agreement so as to reflect the risks and benefits incidental to ownership.
Operating leases
The minimum lease payments of operating leases, where the lessor effectively retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the leased item, are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis.
Contingent rentals are recognised as an expense in the financial year in which they are incurred. Lease incentives are recognised in the income statement as an integral part of the total lease.
Finance leases
Leases which effectively transfer substantially all of the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item to the consolidated entity are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments and disclosed as property, plant and equipment under lease. A lease liability of equal value is also recognised.
Capitalised lease assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the assets and the lease term. Minimum lease payments are allocated between interest expense and reduction of the lease liability with the interest expense calculated using the interest rate implicit in the lease and charged directly to profit and loss.
The cost of improvements to or on leasehold property is capitalised, disclosed as leasehold improvements, and amortised over the unexpired period of the lease or estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is the shorter.
$(f)$ Goodwill
Goodwill on acquisition is initially measured at cost being the excess of the cost of the business combination over the acquirer's interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities.
Following initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is not amortised.
Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired.
As at the acquisition date, any goodwill acquired is allocated to each of the cash-generating units expected to benefit from the combination's synergies.
Impairment is determined by assessing the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the goodwill relates.
Where the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognised.
Where goodwill forms part of a cash-generating unit and part of the operation within that unit is disposed of, the goodwill associated with the operation disposed of is included in the carrying amount of the operation when determining the gain or loss on disposal of the operation.
Goodwill disposed of in this circumstance is measured on the basis of the relative values of the operation disposed of and the portion of the cash-generating unit retained.
$(q)$ Share-based payment transactions
The Consolidated entity provides benefits to employees (including directors) and to business partners of the Consolidated entity in the form of share-based payment transactions, whereby the recipients render services in exchange for shares or rights over shares ('equity-settled transactions').
There is currently an Employee Share Scheme in place which provides benefits to directors and senior executives.
The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by the use of a binomial model.
In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any performance conditions, other than conditions linked to the price of the share of Homeloans Limited ('market conditions').
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in which the performance conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award ('vesting date').
The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until vesting date reflects:
(i) the extent to which the vesting period has expired; and
(ii) the number of awards that, in the opinion of the directors of the Consolidated, will ultimately vest.
This opinion is formed based on the best available information at balance date. No adjustment is made for the likelihood of market performance conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination of fair value at grant date.
No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market condition.
Where the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, as a minimum an expense is recognised as if the terms had not been modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any increase in the value of the transaction as a result of the modification, as measured at the date of modification.
Where an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award, and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were a modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.
The dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation of earnings per share.
At balance date, the Consolidated entity did not have on issue any options with attaching market based performance conditions.
$(h)$ Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the entity and the revenue can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognised:
Origination and loan management business-Managed Loans
- Application fee revenue received in respect of loans is recognised when the service has been provided:
- Origination commissions are recognised as revenue once the origination of the loan has been completed:
- Management commission income in respect of loans is recognised once the management service has been provided.
Origination of Non-managed Loans
- The company receives trailing commissions from lenders on settled loans over the life of the loan based on the loan book balance outstanding to which the Consolidated entity is entitled to without having to perform further services. The company makes trailing commission payments to brokers and commission staff based on the amounts received under the trailing commission arrangement.
- On initial recognition, trailing commission revenue and receivables are recognised at fair value, being the expected future trailing commission receivables discounted to their net present value. In addition, an associated payable and expense to the brokers and commissioned staff are also recognised, initially at fair value being the future trailing commission payable to brokers and commissioned staff discounted to their net present value.
- Subsequent to initial recognition and measurement, both the trailing commission asset and trailing commission payable are measured at amortised cost. The carrying amount of the trail commission asset and trailing commission payable are adjusted to reflect actual and revised estimated cash flows by recalculating the carrying amount through computing the present value of estimated future cash flows at the original effective interest rate. The resulting adjustment is recognised as income or expense in the Income Statement.
Securitisation of mortgages
Interest income from loans and advances operated by the Residential Mortgage Trusts is recognised as it accrues using the effective interest method.
$(i)$ Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense when incurred.
$\mathbf{d}$ Cash and cash equivalents
Cash on hand and in banks and short-term deposits in the balance sheet comprise cash at bank and in hand and short-term deposits with an original maturity of three months or less.
For the purposes of the Cash Flow Statement, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.
Receivables $(k)$
Trade receivables are recognised and carried at the original invoice amount less a provision for any uncollectible debts. An estimate for doubtful debts is made when there is objective evidence of impairment. Bad debts are written-off as incurred.
Receivables from related parties are recognised and carried at the nominal amount due. Interest is taken up as income on an accrual basis.
Bills of exchange and promissory notes are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value.
$\mathbf{I}$ Derecognition of financial instruments
The derecognition of a financial instrument takes place when the Consolidated entity no longer controls the contractual rights that comprise the financial instrument, which is normally the case when the instrument is sold, or all the cash flows attributable to the instrument are passed through to an independent third party.
The Consolidated entity utilises a special purpose vehicle (SPV), which issues securities to investors. This SPV meets the criteria of being a 'subsidiary' under AASB 127 - Consolidated and separate financial statements. This transaction does not meet the criteria under AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement in regards to derecognition of financial instruments. Accordingly, the value of the securitised loans has been recorded in the balance sheet with the related interest earned and interest paid recognised through the consolidated income statement.
Recoverable amount of assets $(m)$
At each reporting date, the Consolidated entity assesses whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired. Where an indicator of impairment exists, the Consolidated entity makes a formal estimate of recoverable amount. Where the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.
Recoverable amount is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. It is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset's value in use cannot be estimated to be close to its fair value less costs to sell and it does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets, in which case, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
Recoverable amount of financial assets $(n)$
The Consolidated entity assesses at each balance sheet date whether a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired.
$(i)$ Financial assets carried at amortised cost
If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on loans and receivables carried at amortised cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial asset's original effective interest rate (ie the effective interest rate computed at initial recognition). The carrying amount of the asset is reduced either directly or through use of an allowance account. The amount of the loss is recognised in profit or loss.
The Consolidated entity first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for financial assets that are individually significant, and individually or collectively for financial assets that are not individually significant. If it is determined that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or not, the asset is included in a group of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and that group of financial assets is collectively assessed for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is or continues to be recognised are not included in a collective assessment of impairment.
If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed. Any subsequent reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss, to the extent that the carrying value of the asset does not exceed its amortised cost at the reversal date.
Loans and advances $(0)$
All loans and advances are initially recognised at fair value and include transaction costs associated with the loans and advances.
Loans and advances are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any fees and points paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transactions costs, and all other premiums or discounts on acquisition, over the period to maturity.
Gains and losses are recognised in income when the loans and advances are derecognised or impaired, as well as through the amortisation process.
Plant and equipment $(p)$
Cost and valuation
Items of plant and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment in value.
Depreciation
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis on all plant and equipment over the estimated useful life of the asset as follows:
Plant and equipment - over 5 to 15 years.
Impairment
The carrying values of plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
If any such indication exists and where the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amount, the assets or cash generating units are written down to their recoverable amount.
The recoverable amount of plant and equipment is the greater of a fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset.
Any gain or loss arising on derecognising of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the item) is included in the Income Statement in the period the item is derecognised.
$(q)$ Trade and other payables
Liabilities for trade creditors and other amounts are carried at amortised cost.
Payables to related parties are carried at the principal amount. Interest, when charged by the lender, is recognised as an expense on an accrual basis.
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings $(r)$
All loans and borrowings are initially recognised at fair value.
After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method other than those which are measured at fair value through the profit and loss. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any fees paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transactions costs, and all other premiums or discounts on acquisition, over the period to maturity.
Gains or losses are recognised in the income statement when the liabilities are derecognised and also as well as through the amortisation process.
$(s)$ Reset preference shares
Reset Preference Shares are classified as debt within the Balance Sheet and measured at amortised cost. Distributions to the holders are treated as interest expense in the Income Statement and are not deductible for tax purposes. The costs associated with the issue of the Reset Preference Shares are charged to the Income Statement on an effective yield basis.
$(t)$ Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the economic entity has a legal, equitable or constructive obligation to make a future sacrifice of economic benefits to other entities as a result of past transactions or other past events and it is probable that a future sacrifice of economic benefits will be required and reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
The expense relating to any provision is presented in the income statement net of any reimbursement.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.
Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a finance cost.
A provision for dividends is not recognised as a liability unless the dividends are declared, determined or publicly recommended on or before the reporting date.
$(u)$ Deferred expenses
Mortgage origination costs relating to managed loans that are directly attributable to establishing specific loans, other than those funded by a Residential Mortgage Trust, and which would not have been incurred had these contracts not been entered into, have been deferred. They are amortised at a rate of 2.335% (2005: 2.335%) per month on a reducing balance basis. This rate is equal to the long-term average monthly run-off rate applicable to the underlying loan book upon which the management income is earned.
Taxes $(v)$
Income tax
Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry-forward of unused assets and unused tax losses can be utilised:
- Except where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affect neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
- In respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, and associates, deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised.
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in the income statement.
(w) Goods and services tax (GST)
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except:
- where the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST is recognised as part of the costs of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and
- Receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or pavable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in the Balance Sheet.
Cash flows are included in the Statement of Cash Flows on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is classified as operating cash flows.
Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority.
Investments and other financial assets $(x)$
The Consolidated entity has elected to apply the option available under AASB 1 of adopting AASB 132 and AASB 139 from 1 July 2005. Outlined below are the relevant accounting policies for investments and other financial assets applicable for the years ending 30 June 2006 and 30 June 2005.
Accounting policies applicable for the year ending 30 June 2006
Financial assets in the scope of AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement is classified as either financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-tomaturity investments, or available-for-sale investments, as appropriate. When financial assets are recognised initially, they are measured at fair value, plus, in the case of investments not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transactions costs. The Consolidated entity determines the classification of its financial assets after initial recognition and, when allowed and appropriate, reevaluates this designation at each financial year-end.
All regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on the trade date i.e. the date that the Consolidated entity commits to purchase the asset. Regular way purchases or sales are purchases or sales of financial assets under contracts that require delivery of the assets within the period established generally by regulation or convention in the marketplace.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets classified as held for trading are included in the category 'financial assets at fair value through profit or loss'. Financial assets are classified as held for trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling in the near term. Derivatives are also classified as held for trading unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments. Gains or losses on investments held for trading are recognised in profit or loss.
Held-to-maturity investments
Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity are classified as held-to-maturity when the Consolidated entity has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Investments intended to be held for an undefined period are not included in this classification. Investments that are intended to be held-to-maturity, such as bonds, are subsequently measured at amortised cost. This cost is computed as the amount initially recognised minus principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative amortisation using the effective interest method of any difference between the initially recognised amount and the maturity amount. This calculation includes all fees and points paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums and discounts. For investments carried at amortised cost, gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the investments are derecognised or impaired, as well as through the amortisation process.
Available-for-sale investments are those non-derivative financial assets that are designated as availablefor-sale or are not classified as any of the three preceding categories. After initial recognition availablefor sale investments are measured at fair value with gains or losses being recognised as a separate component of equity until the investment is derecognised or until the investment is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is recognised in profit or loss.
The fair value of investments that are actively traded in organised financial markets is determined by reference to quoted market bid prices at the close of business on the balance sheet date. For investments with no active market, fair value is determined using valuation techniques. Such techniques include using recent arm's length market transactions; reference to the current market value of another instrument that is substantially the same; discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models.
Accounting policies applicable for the year ending 30 June 2005
Listed shares held for trading were carried at net market value. Changes in net market value were recognised as a revenue or expense in determining the net profit for the period.
All other non-current investments were carried at the lower of cost and recoverable amount.
Recoverable amount
Non-current financial assets measured using the cost basis were not carried at an amount above their recoverable amount, and when a carrying value exceeded this recoverable amount, the financial asset was written down to its recoverable amount. In determining recoverable amount, the expected net cash flows were discounted to their present value using a market determined risk adjusted discount rate of 15.2%.
Derivative financial instruments $(v)$
The Consolidated entity uses derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps to manage its risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. Such derivative financial instruments are stated at fair value. For derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting, any gains or losses arising from changes in fair value are taken directly to the income statement.
The fair value of interest rate swap contracts is determined by reference to market values for similar instruments.
$(z)$ Employee benefits
Provision is made for employee benefits accumulated as a result of employees rendering services up to the reporting date. These benefits include wages and salaries, annual leave, sick leave and long service leave.
Liabilities arising in respect of wages and salaries, annual leave, sick leave and any other employee benefits expected to be settled within twelve months of the reporting date are measured at their nominal amounts based on remuneration rates which are expected to be paid when the liability is settled. All other employee benefit liabilities are measured at the present value of the estimated future cash outflow to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date. In determining the present value of future cash outflows, the market yield as at the reporting date on national government bonds, which have terms to maturity approximating the terms of the related liability, are used.
Employee benefit expenses and revenues arising in respect of the following categories:
- wages and salaries, non-monetary benefits, annual leave, long service leave, sick leave and other leave benefits; and
- other types of employee benefits
Are recognised against profits on a net basis in their respective categories.
$(aa)$ Earnings per share
Basic EPS is calculated as net profit attributable to members, adjusted to exclude costs of servicing equity (other than dividends), divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, outstanding during the period, adjusted for any bonus element.
Diluted EPS is calculated as net profit attributable to members, adjusted for the after tax effect of:
- Costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends; $\bullet$
- Dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares that have been recognised as expenses; and
- Other non discretionary changes in revenues and expenses during the period that would result from the dilution of potential ordinary shares, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares and dilutive potential ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.
$(bb)$ Provision for impairment of loans and advances
Provision is made for impaired loans when there is objective evidence that the principal amount of the loan can be collected in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.
The Consolidated entity provides for impaired loans based on the difference between the carrying amount and the present value of future principal and interest repayments as well as expected recoveries.
$(cc)$ Contributed equity
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
$(dd)$ Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions
Significant accounting judgements
In the process of applying the group's accounting policies, management has made judgements, apart from those involving estimations, which have had an impact on the amounts recognized in the financial statements. No judgements have been determined to be individually significant.
Significant accounting estimates and assumptions
The carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities are often determined based on estimates and assumptions of future events. The key estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities within the next reporting period are:
Impairment of goodwill
The Company determines whether goodwill is impaired at least on an annual basis. This requires an estimation of the value in use of the cash-generating units to which the goodwill is allocated. The assumptions used in this estimation of recoverable amount and the carrying amount of goodwill are discussed in note 14.
Share-based payment transactions
The Company measures the cost of equity-settled transactions by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by using either the Binomial valuation model, based on assumptions in note 15.
Provisions for loans and advances
The Company provides for impaired loans where there is a reasonable doubt whether the principal amount of the loan can be collected in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.
The Company provides for loans and advances based on anticipated losses on loans that are known to be impaired (specifically impaired assets), and also based on prior historical loss evidence and other factors on a group basis (collectively impaired assets).
Deferred expenses
Mortgage origination costs relating to managed loans that are directly attributable to establishing specific loans, other than those funded by a Residential Mortgage Trust, and which would not have been incurred had these contracts not been entered into, are deferred. They are amortised at a rate of 2.335% per month on a reducing balance basis. This rate is equal to the long-term average monthly runoff rate applicable to the underlying loan book upon which the management income is earned.
Note 3: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Consolidated entity's primary segment reporting format is business segments as the Consolidated entity's risks and rates of return are affected predominantly by differences in the products and services produced.
The operating businesses are organised and managed separately according to the nature of the products and services provided, with each segment representing a strategic business unit that offers different products and serves different markets.
Business segments
The following tables present revenue and profit information and certain asset and liability information regarding business segments for the years ended 30 June 2006 and 30 June 2005. The Consolidated Entity has two identifiable business segments:
Origination and management; and
Securitisation of mortgages
The origination and management segment originates residential mortgages through external mortgage brokers, satellite offices and internal consultants. The funding for these mortgages is supplied by a pool of funders, and then the origination and management segment continues the ongoing management of that loan after it is processed and settled.
The securitisation of mortgages segment is the Consolidated Entity's own funding source. Using a series of mortgage trusts, this segment packages groups of mortgages and sells the income stream via a securitised mortgage trust.
| Year ended 30 June 2006 | OriginationandManagement$'000 | Securitisationof Mortgages$'000 | Total$'000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | |||
| Interest Income | 112 | 45,434 | 45,546 |
| Fee and commission income | 34,924 | 5,976 | 40,900 |
| Other operating income | 1,973 | 170 | 2,143 |
| Total segment revenue | 37,009 | 51,580 | 88,589 |
| Non-segment revenue | 936 | ||
| Inter-segment elimination | (13,028) | ||
| Total consolidated revenue | 76,497 | ||
| Result | |||
| Segment results | 7,155 | 342 | 7,497 |
| Unallocated expenses | (2,810) | ||
| Profit / (loss) before tax andfinance costs | |||
| Finance costs | 4,687 | ||
| (1,060) | |||
| Profit / (loss) before income taxand minority interest | 3,627 | ||
| Income tax expense | (1,030) | ||
| Net profit for the year | 2,597 | ||
| Assets and liabilities | |||
| Segment assets | 50,360 | 710,920 | 761,280 |
| Total assets | 761,280 | ||
| Segment liabilities | 8,401 | 703,360 | 711,761 |
| Unallocated liabilities | 17,319 | ||
| Total liabilities | 729,080 | ||
| Other segment information | |||
| Capital expenditure | 199 | 199 | |
| Depreciation | 457 | 457 | |
| Other non-cash expenses: | 595 | 310 | 905 |
| Cash flow information | |||
| Net cash flow from operating | |||
| activities | 3,538 | 5,442 | 8,980 |
| Net cash flow from investing | |||
| activities | (418) | (189, 653) | (190, 071) |
| Net cash flow from financing | |||
| activities | (1,808) | 191,527 | 189,719 |
| Year ended 30 June 2005 | OriginationandManagement$'000 | Securitisationof Mortgages$'000 | Total$'000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | |||
| Interest Income | 108 | 38,473 | 38,581 |
| Fee and commission income | 34,805 | 3,378 | 38,183 |
| Other operating income | 1,722 | 1,722 | |
| Total segment revenue | 36,635 | 41,851 | 78,486 |
| Inter-segment eliminations | (6, 759) | ||
| Total consolidated revenue | 71,727 | ||
| Result | |||
| Segment results | 4,700 | 1,731 | 6,431 |
| Unallocated expenses | (2,064) | ||
| Profit / (loss) before tax andFinance costs | 4,367 | ||
| Finance costs | (679) | ||
| Share of profit of associate | |||
| Profit / (loss) before income tax | |||
| and minority interest | 3,688 | ||
| Income tax expense | (1, 196) | ||
| Net profit for the year | 2,492 | ||
| Assets and liabilities | |||
| Segment assets | 48,179 | 515,798 | 563,977 |
| Total assets | 563,977 | ||
| Segment liabilities | 7,121 | 510,539 | 517,660 |
| Unallocated liabilities | 10,192 | ||
| Total liabilities | 527,852 | ||
| Other segment information | |||
| Capital expenditure | 168 | 168 | |
| Depreciation | 562 | 562 | |
| Other non-cash expenses: | 1,386 | 303 | 1,689 |
| Cash flow information | |||
| Net cash flow from operatingactivities | 4,174 | (2, 132) | 2,042 |
| Net cash flow from investingactivities | 3,593 | 61,402 | 64,995 |
| Net cash flow from financingactivities | (2,750) | (75, 700) | (78, 450) |
Geographical Segments
The Consolidated entity's business segments are located in Australia.
REVENUES AND EXPENSES Note 4:
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | ||
| REVENUE | |||||
| (a) Interest income | |||||
| Interest received - other person/corporations | 45,806 | 38,580 | 162 | 69 | |
| (b) Fee and commission income | |||||
| Mortgage origination income | 12,654 | 16,276 | 17,574 | 16,320 | |
| Loan management fees | 16,756 | 16,516 | 12,389 | 12,200 | |
| (c) Other operating income | |||||
| Rental income | 101 | 66 | 101 | 66 | |
| Management Fees - Wholly owned controlledentities | 4,563 | 5,917 | |||
| Telemarketing | 79 | 201 | 79 | 201 | |
| Insurance commission | 87 | 85 | 87 | 85 | |
| Stamp duty refund | 846 | 846 | |||
| Other | 168 | 3 | 158 | (28) | |
| 76,497 | 71,727 | 35,959 | 34,830 | ||
| EXPENSES | |||||
| (d) Interest expense | |||||
| Interest on bank loan | 464 | 678 | 166 | 456 | |
| Interest on reset preference shares | 504 | 504 | |||
| Interest payable to bondholders | 16,632 | 22,736 | |||
| Interest payable to warehouse facility provider | 19,224 | 9,429 | |||
| 36,824 | 32,843 | 670 | 456 | ||
| (e) Fee and commission expense | |||||
| Mortgage origination expense | 10,886 | 7,570 | 10,469 | 8,151 | |
| Loan management expense | 8,243 | 7,630 | 5,184 | 5,358 | |
| 19,129 | 15,200 | 15,653 | 13,509 | ||
| (f) | General administrative expenses | ||||
| (i) | Depreciation consists of: | ||||
| Depreciation and amortisation of: | |||||
| Plant and equipment | 39 | 38 | 39 | 38 | |
| Plant and equipment under lease | 418 | 524 | 418 | 524 | |
| 457 | 562 | 457 | 562 | ||
| (ii) Employee benefits consists of: | |||||
| Wages & salaries | 8,080 | 9,115 | 8,080 | 9,115 | |
| Workers' compensation costs | 49 | 52 | 49 | 52 | |
| Annual leave provision | $\overline{2}$ | (42) | 2 | (42) | |
| Long service leave provision | 94 | (16) | 94 | (16) | |
| Share-based payments expense | 265 | 96 | 265 | 96 | |
| Other employee costs | 1,853 | 2,426 | 1,843 | 2,426 | |
| 10,343 | 11,631 | 10,343 | 11,631 |
Note 5: INCOME TAX
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| The major components of income tax expenseare: | ||||
| Income Statement | ||||
| Current income tax | ||||
| Current income tax charge | 635 | 679 | ||
| Adjustments in respect of current income tax | 70 | |||
| of previous years | ||||
| Deferred income tax | ||||
| Relating to origination and reversal of temporary | ||||
| differences | 1,030 | 1,196 | 447 | 60 |
| Income tax expenses reported in the | ||||
| income statement | 1,030 | 1,196 | 1,152 | 739 |
| A reconciliation between tax expense and theproduct of accounting profit before income taxmultiplied by the Consolidated entity's applicableincome tax rate is as follows: | ||||
| Accounting profit before income tax | 3,627 | 3,688 | 3,435 | 2,081 |
| At the Consolidated entity's statutory income taxrate of 30% (2005: 30%) | 1,088 | 1,106 | 1,030 | 624 |
| Reset preference share interest | 151 | 151 | ||
| Stamp duty settlement | (258) | (258) | ||
| Entertainment expenses | 32 | 35 | 32 | 35 |
| Share option expense | 79 | 29 | 79 | 29 |
| Other | (62) | 26 | 118 | 51 |
| Income tax expense reported in the consolidatedincome statement | 1,030 | 1,196 | 1,152 | 739 |
| Balance Sheet | Income Statement | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | ||
| Deferred tax income | |||||
| Deferred income tax at 30 June related to thefollowing: | |||||
| CONSOLIDATED | |||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | |||||
| Deferred expenses | (5,854) | (6, 645) | (791) | 454 | |
| Effective interest adjustments - Deferredselling expenses | (1,673) | (1,002) | 671 | 24 | |
| Derivative instrument | (14) | 21 | |||
| Prepayments | (59) | (79) | (20) | (56) | |
| Leased assets | (375) | (500) | (125) | (214) | |
| Accrued income | (1, 377) | (882) | 495 | (71) | |
| Application of AASB 132 and AASB 139 | (799) | 664 | |||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | (10, 151) | (9, 108) | |||
| Deferred tax assetsLosses available for offset against futuretaxable income | 3,022 | 3,145 | 123 | 766 | |
| Accrued expenses | 223 | 104 | (119) | 44 | |
| Effective interest adjustments - Deferredapplication fee margins | 223 | 142 | (81) | (7) | |
| Lease incentives | 168 | 199 | 31 | (21) | |
| Finance leases | 318 | 463 | 145 | 180 | |
| Provisions | 204 | 172 | (32) | 50 | |
| Capital items | 49 | 95 | 48 | 47 | |
| Deferred income tax assets | 4,207 | 4,320 | |||
| Net deferred income tax liabilities | (5,944) | (4,788) | |||
| Deferred tax expense | 1,030 | 1,196 |
| Balance Sheet | Income Statement | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | ||
| PARENT | |||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | |||||
| Deferred expenses | (5,854) | (5, 840) | 14 | 121 | |
| Prepayments | (56) | (74) | (17) | (49) | |
| Leased assets | (375) | (500) | (125) | (214) | |
| Accrued income | (1, 377) | (882) | 495 | (69) | |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | (7,662) | (7, 296) | |||
| Deferred tax assets | |||||
| Losses available for offset against futureprofits | 3,022 | 3,145 | |||
| Accrued expenses | 209 | 104 | (105) | 44 | |
| Lease incentives | 168 | 199 | 31 | (21) | |
| Provisions | 204 | 172 | (32) | 50 | |
| Capital items | 51 | 95 | 44 | 18 | |
| Finance leases | 318 | 463 | 142 | 180 | |
| Deferred income tax assets | 3,972 | 4,178 | |||
| Net deferred income tax liabilities | (3,690) | (3, 118) | |||
| Deferred tax expense | 447 | 60 |
Tax consolidation
Effective 1 July 2003, for the purposes of income taxation, Homeloans Limited and its 100% owned subsidiaries formed a tax consolidated group. The members of the group have entered into a tax sharing and funding arrangement in order to allocate income tax liability to the wholly-owned subsidiaries on a pro-rata basis. In addition the agreement provides for the allocation of income tax liabilities between the entities should the head entity default on its tax payment obligations. The head entity of the tax consolidated group is Homeloans Limited.
Homeloans Limited formally notified the Australian Tax Office of its adoption of the tax consolidation regime when it lodged its 30 June 2004 consolidated tax return.
Tax effect accounting by members of the tax consolidated group
Members of the tax consolidated group have entered into a tax sharing and funding agreement. The tax sharing and funding agreement provides for the allocation of the current income tax liability to members of the tax consolidated group based on a group allocation approach.
The allocation of taxes under the tax sharing and funding agreement is recognised as an increase/decrease in the subsidiaries' inter-company accounts with the tax consolidated entity's head company, Homeloans Limited.
Note 6: EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing net profit for the year attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent (after deducting interest on the convertible redeemable preference shares) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year.
Diluted earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing the net profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent (after deducting interest on the convertible redeemable preference shares) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year plus the weighted average number of ordinary shares that would be issued on the conversion of all the dilutive potential ordinary shares into ordinary shares.
The following reflects the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations:
| CONSOLIDATED | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | ||
| $'000 | $'000 | ||
| Net profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent | 2,597 | 2,492 | |
| Reset preference share dividend | (504) | ||
| Net profit used in calculating basic earnings per share | 2,597 | 1,988 | |
| Add back: reset preference share dividend | 504 | ||
| Net profit attributable to ordinary equity holders used in thecalculation of diluted EPS | 2,597 | 2,492 | |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares (excludingreserved shares) for basic earnings per share | 50,354 | 50,354 | |
| Effect of dilution:Share options | 155 | ||
| Reset preference shares | 13,886 | 16,976 | |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares adjusted for theeffect of dilution | 64,395 | 67,330 | |
| Weighted average number of converted, lapsed or cancelledpotential ordinary shares included in diluted earnings pershare | 6 |
There have been no other transactions involving ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares between the reporting date and the date of completion of these financial statements.
Note 7: DIVIDENDS PAID AND PROPOSED
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Declared and paid during the year:Unfranked dividends: | ||||
| Final dividend on ordinary shares for $2005 - 1.5$cents per share $(2004 - \text{nil})$ | 755 | 755 | ||
| Interim dividend on ordinary shares for 2006 - 2.5cents per share (2005: Nil cents) | 1,259 | 1,259 | ||
| Reset preference shares for 2006 - 100 cents pershare (2005: 100 cents)* | 504 | 504 | ||
| 2,014 | 504 | 2,014 | 504 | |
| Proposed for approval at AGM (not recognisedas a liability as at 30 June):Dividends on ordinary shares: | ||||
| Final unfranked dividend for 2006 - 2.5cents (2005: 1.5 cents) | 1.259 | 755 | 1.259 | 755 |
* As of 1 July 2005 Reset Preference Shares are now treated as a liability under the application of AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation. The Company has adopted the AASB 1 First Time adoption of AIFRS option of applying AASB 132 and AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement from 1 July 2005. Correspondingly, the dividends paid on the Reset Preference Shares are now treated as an interest expense.
Franking credit balance available at 30 June 2006 was $109,000 (2005 - $21,000).
Note 8: CASH ASSETS
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Reconciliation to Cash Flow Statement | ||||
| For the purposes of the Cash Flow Statement,cash and cash equivalents comprise the followingat 30 June: | ||||
| Cash at banks and in hand | 25,505 | 16,392 | 300 | 269 |
| Short-term deposits | 69 | 554 | $\blacksquare$ | 500 |
| 25,574 | 16,946 | 300 | 769 |
Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates.
Short-term deposits are made for varying periods of between one day and three months, depending on the immediate cash requirements of the Consolidated entity, and earn interest at the respective short-term deposit rates.
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents is $25,574,000 (2005: $16,946,000).
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | ||
| Reconciliation of net profit after tax to netcash flows from operations | |||||
| Net profit | 2,597 | 2,492 | 2,283 | 1,342 | |
| Adjustments for: | |||||
| Depreciation | 457 | 562 | 457 | 562 | |
| Asset write off | 537 | 537 | |||
| Amortisation of bond distribution costs | 310 | 303 | |||
| Amortisation of Eurofinance | 249 | 949 | 249 | 949 | |
| Amortisation of prepaid royalties &commissions | 81 | 342 | 81 | 326 | |
| Amortisation of reset preference share issuecost | 92 | 92 | |||
| Stamp duty refund | (861) | (861) | |||
| Net (profit)/loss on disposal of plant andequipment | 35 | 33 | |||
| Share options expensed | 265 | 96 | 265 | 96 | |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||
| (Increase)/decrease in receivables | (1,502) | (2,612) | (2,605) | (1, 385) | |
| (Increase)/decrease in deferred expenses | 2,636 | (1, 515) | 381 | (828) | |
| (Decrease)/increase in deferred tax liabilities | 1,156 | 1,188 | 571 | 1,196 | |
| (Decrease)/increase in current tax liability | (12) | $(12)$ - | (12) | (12) | |
| (Increase)/decrease in trade and otherpayables | 3,508 | (311) | 1,775 | 1,099 | |
| (Decrease)/increase in non-interest bearingliabilities | (104) | 56 | (104) | 56 | |
| (Decrease)/increase in provisions | 108 | (68) | 108 | (68) | |
| Net cash from operating activities | 8,980 | 2,042 | 2,680 | 3,903 |
Disclosure of financing facilities Refer to note 17.
Disclosure of non-cash financing andinvesting activities
Refer to note 13 and note 22.
Note 9: RECEIVABLES
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Fees receivables | ||||
| Non-related parties (i) | 10,035 | 8,063 | 6,787 | 4,816 |
| Related parties - wholly owned controlledentity (ii) | $\overline{a}$ | 4,031 | 2,679 | |
| Associate | 11 | |||
| 10,046 | 8,063 | 10,818 | 7,495 | |
| Prepaid royalties and trailing commissions (iii) | 145 | 214 | 134 | 192 |
| Loan book receivable (Eurofinance) | 249 | $\blacksquare$ | 249 | |
| Prepayments and other (iv) | 1,461 | 1,548 | 228 | 639 |
| 11,652 | 10,074 | 11,180 | 8,575 |
Terms and conditions relating to the above financial instruments
- Fees receivable are non-interest-bearing and on settlement terms of between 4 to 60 days $(i)$
- Details of the terms and conditions of related party receivables are set out in Note 26. $(ii)$
- Prepaid royalties and trailing commissions represent the buyout of royalty and trailer commitments. $(iii)$ These are amortised over the average loan life of 50 months (See Note 11).
- Prepayments and other are non-interest-bearing and include GST refunds due in the ordinary $(iv)$ course of business within 30 days and various retrospective GST claims receivable within 6 months
Note 10: LOANS AND ADVANCES TO CUSTOMERS
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Loans and advances to customers | 686,855 | 496,855 | ||
| Maturity Analysis | ||||
| Loans will be repaid under current repaymentarrangements over the following periods:Up to 3 months | 335 | $\blacksquare$ | ||
| From 3 months to 1 year | 171 | |||
| From 1 year to 5 years | 14,205 | 14.979 | $\blacksquare$ | |
| From 5 years and over | 672,144 | 481,876 |
Loans and advances to customers represents lending for residential mortgages at either fixed or floating rates. At 30 June 2006 the weighted average interest rate on these loans was 7.35% (2005: 7.27%). Refer Financial Risk Management - Note 24.
Note 11: DEFERRED EXPENSES
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | ||
| Deferred expenses | 19,514 | 22,149 | 19.514 | 19,895 |
Mortgage origination costs relating to managed loans that are directly attributable to establishing specific loans, other than those funded by a Residential Mortgage Trust, and which would not have been incurred had these contracts not been entered into, have been deferred. They are amortised at a rate of 2.335% (2005: 2.335%) per month on a reducing balance basis. This rate is equal to the long-term average monthly run-off rate applicable to the underlying loan book upon which the management income is earned.
Note 12: OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Loan to associate | 17 | $_{\rm m}$ | 17 | |
| Investments in controlled entities (Note 26) | $\blacksquare$ | $\tilde{\phantom{a}}$ | 19,178 | 19,178 |
| 17 | $\tilde{\phantom{a}}$ | 19,195 | 19,178 |
Note 13: PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |
|---|---|---|
| Plant and equipment | Plant and equipment | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Year ended 30 June 2006 | ||
| At 1 July 2005, net of accumulated depreciationand impairment | 1,957 | 1,957 |
| Additions | 172 | 172 |
| Depreciation charge for the year | (457) | (457) |
| At 30 June 2006, net of accumulated depreciationand impairment | 1,672 | 1,672 |
| At 30 June 2006 | ||
| Cost or fair value | 5,212 | 5,212 |
| Accumulated depreciation and impairment | (3,540) | (3,540) |
| Net carrying amount | 1,672 | 1,672 |
| Year ended 30 June 2005 | ||
| At 1 July 2004, net of accumulated depreciationand impairment | 2,809 | 2,809 |
| Additions | 288 | 288 |
| Disposals | (41) | (41) |
| Write-off* | (537) | (537) |
| Depreciation charge for the year | (562) | (562) |
| At 30 June 2005, | ||
| net of accumulated depreciation and impairment | 1,957 | 1,957 |
| At 30 June 2005 | ||
| Cost or fair value | 5,044 | 5,044 |
| Accumulated depreciation and impairment | (3,087) | (3,087) |
| Net carrying amount | 1,957 | 1,957 |
The useful life of the assets was estimated as follows both for 2005 and 2006:
Plant and equipment
5 to 15 years
All balances of Plant & Equipment have been granted first mortgages as security over bank loans. The terms of the first mortgages preclude the assets being sold or being used as security for further mortgages without the permission of the first mortgage holder. The first mortgage holder also requires all assets to be fully insured at all times.
The carrying value of plant and equipment held under finance leases at 30 June 2006 is $1,249,000 (2005: $1,668,000). Additions during the year include $Nil (2005: $70,000) of plant and equipment held under finance leases. Leased assets are pledged as security for the related finance lease.
* The $537,000 represents the write-off of certain plant and equipment as a result of the closure and relocation of various Homeloans offices during the financial year.
Note 14: GOODWILL
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Year ended 30 June 2006 | ||
| At 1 July 2005, net of impairment | 15,996 | |
| Less: Impairment | ||
| At 30 June 2006, net of impairment | 15,996 | $\blacksquare$ |
| At 30 June 2006 | ||
| Cost (gross carrying amount) | 15,996 | |
| Less: Impairment | ||
| Net carrying amount | 15,996 | |
| Year ended 30 June 2005 | ||
| At 1 July 2004, net of impairment | 15,996 | |
| Less: Impairment | ||
| At 30 June 2005, net of impairment | 15,996 | |
| At 30 June 2005 | ||
| Cost (gross carrying amount) | 15,996 | |
| Less: Impairment | ||
| Net carrying amount | 15,996 |
Goodwill acquired through business combinations have been allocated to two individual cash generating units, which are reportable segments, for impairment testing as follows:
- Origination and Management
- Securitisation of Mortgages $\blacksquare$
Origination and Management
The recoverable amount of the Origination and Management cash generating unit has been determined based on a value in use calculation using cash flow projections covering a 3 year period, which are then extrapolated for 32 years at a constant growth rate of 3% per annum.
The pre tax discount rate applied to cash flow projections is 15.2%. (2005: 15.2%).
Securitisation of Mortgages
The recoverable amount of the Securitisation of Mortgages cash generating unit is determined based on a value in use calculation using cash flow projections covering a 3 year period, which are then extrapolated for 32 years at a constant growth rate of 3% per annum.
The pre tax discount rate applied to cash flow projections is 15.2%.(2005: 15.2%).
Carrying amount of goodwill allocated to each of the cash generating units
| Origination andManagement | CONSOLIDATEDSecuritisation ofMortgages | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Carrying amount of goodwill | 10,467 | 10.467 | 5.529 | 5,529 | 15,996 | 15,996 |
Key assumptions used in the value in use calculation for the Origination and Management CGU and the Securitisation of Mortgages CGU for 30 June 2006 and 30 June 2005
The following describes each key assumption on which management has based its cash flow projections when determining the value in use of the Origination and Management CGU and the Securitisation of Mortgages CGU:
- Inflation constant 3.5% per annum
- Taxation Cashflows are gross of tax and any deferred tax asset or liability has been excluded from the net assets used in valuing the goodwill. Tax losses are currently available to the Consolidated group.
- Volumes Management have allowed for a continuation of the current growth patterns in our market as follows:
| 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | Post 2009 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Origination and Management | ||||
| - Formalled Ioans | 16% | 8% | 5% | 3% |
| - Funds under management | 8% | 10% | 10.6% | 8% |
| Securitisation of Mortgages | ||||
| - Volume of formalled loans | 31% | 31% | 31% | 31% |
| through RMT | ||||
| - RMT funds under | 37% | 27% | 22% | 15% |
| management |
- RMT trusts pay to the Origination and Management CGU both an origination and $\blacksquare$ management fee based on external funders rates.
- Interest margin earned of 0.9% within RMT
- Maintenance of existing commission rates earned and paid
Note 15: SHARE-BASED PAYMENT PLANS
Employee Share Option Plan
An employee option plan exists where eligible employees of the consolidated entity, as determined by the directors, are issued with options over the ordinary shares of Homeloans Limited. The options, issued for nil consideration, are issued in accordance with the guidelines established by the directors of Homeloans Limited. The options issued carry various terms and exercising conditions. There are currently 22 members of this plan of whom 18 are current employees or directors.
Information with respect to the number of options granted under the employee option scheme, options issued to the non-executive directors of the Company and options issued to the Company's Chief Operating Officer and Finance Director are as follows:
| 2006 | 2005 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number ofoptions | Weightedaverageexerciseprice$ | Number ofoptions | WeightedaverageexercisepriceS | |
| Outstanding at the beginning of the year | 8,130,000 | 0.66 | 3,720,000 | 1.03 |
| Granted during the year | 2,905,000 | 0.42 | 5,175,000 | 0.43 |
| Forfeited during the year | (3, 155, 000) | 0.89 | (315,000) | 0.80 |
| Exercised during the year | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | |||
| Outstanding at the end of the year | 7,880,000 | 0.48 | 8,130,000 | 0.66 |
| Exercisable at the end of the year | 3,025,000 | 0.57 | 4,580,000 | 0.82 |
Options held at the beginning of the reporting period:
The following table summarises information about options held by employees as at 1 July 2005:
| Number ofoptions | Grant date | Vesting date | Expiry date | Weightedaverageexerciseprice$ | Weightedaverageshareprice ^^$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 400,000 | 9 March 2001 | 19 March 2002 | 9 March 2006 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
| 400,000 | 9 March 2001 | 19 March 2003 | 9 March 2006 | 1.15 | 0.99 |
| 400,000 | 9 March 2001 | 19 March 2004 | 9 March 2006 | 1.30 | 0.99 |
| 227,500 | 27 March 2001 | 27 March 2003 | 27 March 2006 | 1.01 | 1.05 |
| 227,500 | 27 March 2001 | 27 March 2004 | 27 March 2006 | 1.01 | 1.05 |
| 100,000 | 29 April 2002 | 1 April 2004 | 1 April 2007 | 0.99 | 0.94 |
| 100,000 | 29 April 2002 | 1 April 2005 | 1 April 2007 | 0.99 | 0.94 |
| 250,000 | 2 May 2002 | 27 March 2003 | 27 March 2006 | 1.01 | 0.90 |
| 250,000 | 2 May 2002 | 27 March 2004 | 27 March 2006 | 1.01 | 0.90 |
| 250,000 | 2 May 2002 | 1 April 2004 | 1 April 2007 | 0.99 | 0.90 |
| 250,000 | 2 May 2002 | 1 April 2005 | 1 April 2007 | 0.99 | 0.90 |
| 100,000 | 1 April 2003 | 21 January 2005 | 21 January 2008 | 0.52 | 0.50 |
| 100,000 | 1 April 2003 | 21 January 2006 | 21 January 2008 | 0.52 | 0.50 |
| 375,000 | 1 December 2004 | 1 December 2004 | 1 December 2009 | 0.40 | 0.34 |
| 500,000 | 1 December 2004 | 1 June 2005 | 1 December 2009 | 0.45 | 0.34 |
| 500,000 | 1 December 2004 | 1 June 2006 | 1 December 2009 | 0.50 | 0.34 |
| 750,000 | 7 December 2004 | 7 December 2004 | 7 December 2009 | 0.40 | 0.35 |
| 1,000,000 | 7 December 2004 | 31 March 2006# | 7 December 2009 | 0.45 | 0.35 |
| 1,000,000 | 7 December 2004 | 31 March 2007# | 7 December 2009 | 0.50 | 0.35 |
| 475,000 | 14 January 2005 | 14 December 2006 | 14 December 2009 | 0.35 | 0.38 |
| 475,000 | 14 January 2005 | 14 December 2007 | 14 December 2009 | 0.53 | 0.38 |
| 8,130,000 | 0.66 | 0.57 |
#Performance hurdles are involved in the conditions for vesting of these options(see note 29)
^^ Average share price on the date of grant.
Options granted:
The following table summarises information about options granted by Homeloans Limited during the year:
| Favouree | Grant Date | NumberGranted | Vesting date | Expiry date | Weightedaverageexerciseprice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ | |||||
| Director | 14 October 2005 | 100,000 | 31 August 2006 | 31 August 2009 | 0.36 |
| 14 October 2005 | 150,000 | 31 August 2007 | 31 August 2010 | 0.46 | |
| 23 November 2005 | 315,000 | 31 August 2006 | 31 August 2009 | 0.36 | |
| 23 November 2005 | 310,000 | 31 August 2007 | 31 August 2010 | 0.46 | |
| 20 February 2006 | 200,000 | 31 August 2006 | 31 August 2009 | 0.36 | |
| 20 February 2006 | 300,000 | 31 August 2007 | 31 August 2010 | 0.46 | |
| Mortgage Asset | 7 April 2006 (A) | 250,000 | 30 September 2006 | 7 December 2009 | 0.36 |
| Services Pty | 7 April 2006 (B) | 250,000 | 31 March 2007 | 7 December 2009 | 0.46 |
| Ltd | 7 April 2006 (c) | 250,000 | 31 December 2006 | 7 December 2009 | 0.51 |
| Staff | 14 October 2005 | 312,000 | 31 August 2006 | 31 August 2009 | 0.36 |
| 14 October 2005 | 468,000 | 31 August 2007 | 31 August 2010 | 0.46 | |
| 2,905,000 |
(A) - only exercisable if average mortgage settlements in any three (3) month period prior to 30 September 2006 exceeds $100 million per month.
- (B) only exercisable if average mortgage settlements in any three (3) month period prior to 31 March 2007 exceeds $112.5 million per month.
- (C) only exercisable if average mortgage settlements in any three (3) month period prior to 31 December 2007 exceeds $137.5 million per month.
Fair values of options:
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using a Binomial option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants made:
| Grant Date | 14 Oct 05 | 14 Oct 05 | 23 Nov 05 | 23 Nov 05 | 20 Feb 06 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.0% | $3.0%$ | 3.0% | $3.0%$ | $3.0%$ |
| Expected volatility | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 5.266% | 5.276% | 5.143% | 5.157% | 5.052% |
| Expected life of option | 3.9 years | 4.9 years | 3.8 years | 4.8 years | 3.5 years |
| Grant Date | 20 Feb 06 | 7 Apr 06 | 7 Apr 06 | 7 Apr 06 | |
| Dividend yield | 3.0% | $3.0%$ | $3.0%$ | $3.0%$ | |
| Expected volatility | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | |
| Risk-free interest rate | 5.048% | 5.423% | 5.337% | 5.337% | |
| Expected life of option | 4.5 years | 3.7 years | 3.7 years | 3.7 years |
The dividend yield reflects the assumption that the current dividend payout will continue with no anticipated increases. The expected life of the options is based on period from grant date to expiry as so far no options have been exercised, and is therefore not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may also not necessarily be the actual outcome.
Options exercised:
No options were exercised by employees during the year ended 30 June 2006, or during the previous year ended 30 June 2005.
Options held as at the end of the year:
The following table summarise information about options held by employees as at 30 June 2006:
| Number ofoptions | Grant date | Vesting dateExpiry date | Weightedaverageexerciseprice | Weightedaverageshareprice 44 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ | $ | ||||
| 100,000 | 29 April 2002 | 1 April 2004 | 1 April 2007 | 0.99 | 0.94 |
| 100,000 | 29 April 2002 | 1 April 2005 | 1 April 2007 | 0.99 | 0.94 |
| 250,000 | 2 May 2002 | 1 April 2004 | 1 April 2007 | 0.99 | 0.90 |
| 250,000 | 2 May 2002 | 1 April 2005 | 1 April 2007 | 0.99 | 0.90 |
| 100,000 | 1 April 2003 | 21 January 2005 | 21 January 2008 | 0.52 | 0.50 |
| 100,000 | 1 April 2003 | 21 January 2006 | January 200821 | 0.52 | 0.50 |
| 375,000 | 1 December 2004 | 1 December 2004 | 1 December 2009 | 0.40 | 0.34 |
| 500,000 | 1 December 2004 | 1 June 2005 | 1 December 2009 | 0.45 | 0.34 |
| 500,000 | 1 December 2004 | 1 June 2006 | 1 December 2009 | 0.50 | 0.34 |
| 750,000 | 7 December 2004 | 7 December 2004 | 7 December 2009 | 0.40 | 0.35 |
| 1,000,000 | 7 December 2004 | 7 December 2004 (b) | 7 December 2009 | 0.50 | 0.35 |
| 475,000 | 14 January 2005 | 14 December 2006 | 14 December 2009 | 0.35 | 0.38 |
| 475,000 | 14 January 2005 | 14 December 2007 | 14 December 2009 | 0.35 | 0.38 |
| 412,000 | 14 October 2005 | 31 August 2006 | 31 August 2009 | 0.36 | 0.45 |
| 618,000 | 14 October 2005 | 31 August 2007 | 31 August 2010 | 0.46 | 0.45 |
| 315,000 | 23 November 2005 | 31 August 2006 | 31 August 2009 | 0.36 | 0.40 |
| 310,000 | 23 November 2005 | 31 August 2007 | 31 August 2010 | 0.46 | 0.40 |
| 200,000 | 20 February 2006 | 31 August 2006 | 31 August 2009 | 0.36 | 0.42 |
| 300,000 | 20 February 2006 | 31 August 2007 | 31 August 2010 | 0.46 | 0.42 |
| 250,000 | 7 April 2006 | 30 September 2006 (A) | 7 December 2009 | 0.36 | 0.40 |
| 250,000 | 7 April 2006 | 31 March 2007 (B) | 7 December 2009 | 0.46 | 0.40 |
| 250,000 | 7 April 2006 | 31 December 2007 (c) | 7 December 2009 | 0.51 | 0.40 |
| 7,880,000 | 0.48 | 0.43 |
(A) - only exercisable if average mortgage settlements in any three (3) month period prior to 30 September 2006 exceeds $100 million per month.
(B) - only exercisable if average mortgage settlements in any three (3) month period prior to 31 March 2007 exceeds $112.5 million per month.
(C) - only exercisable if average mortgage settlements in any three (3) month period prior to 31 December 2007 exceeds $137.5 million per month.
(D) - Only exercisable if average Mortgage settlements in any three (3) month period prior to 31 March 2007 exceeds $225 million per month
^^ Weighted average share price on the date of grant.
Superannuation Commitments
Employees and the employer contribute to a number of complying accumulation funds at varying percentages of salaries and wages. The consolidated entity's contributions of up to 9% of employees' wages and salaries are not legally enforceable other than those payable in terms of ratified award obligations required by the Occupational Superannuation Act.
PAYABLES Note 16:
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Trade payables (i) | 520 | 515 | 520 | 515 |
| Payable to related parties: | ||||
| Wholly-owned Consolidated entity | ||||
| - controlled entity | 7,474 | 5.151 | ||
| Accrued commissions (ii) | 2,262 | 1,550 | 2,231 | 1,510 |
| Sundry creditors and accruals (iii) | 3,607 | 2,231 | 1,291 | 1,549 |
| Cash flow claim creditors (iv) | 205 | 195 | 205 | 195 |
| Current income tax payable | $\mathbf{r}$ | 12 | 12 | |
| Interest payable $(v)$ | 2,789 | 1,542 | $\blacksquare$ | $\blacksquare$ |
| 9,383 | 6,045 | 11,721 | 8,932 |
Terms and conditions relating to the above financial instruments:
$(i)$ Trade payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30 day terms.
Accrued commissions are non-interest bearing and are payable between 30 and 90 days. $(ii)$
Sundry creditors and accruals are non-interest bearing are normally settled on 30 day terms. $(iii)$
Cash flow claim creditors are non-interest bearing are normally settled on 30 day terms. $(iv)$
Interest payable is non-interest bearing and is payable within 30 days. $(V)$
Note 17: INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
| Maturity | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Bank loans | |||||
| Secured bank loans (ii) | 31/12/2007 | 1,000 | 2,975 | 1,000 | 2,975 |
| Net interest margin (iii) | 12/12/2007 | 5,377 | 2,418 | $\blacksquare$ | |
| Warehouse facility (iv) | 20/12/2006 | 60,531 | 214,508 | $\blacksquare$ | |
| Non-bank loans | |||||
| Obligations under finance leasesand hire purchase contracts (v) | $2007 - 2009$ | 1.162 | 1.716 | 1,162 | 1,716 |
| Bonds (vi) | $2028 - 2038$ | 635,915 | 294,164 | $\blacksquare$ | |
| Other (vii) | On demand | 3,529 | |||
| 707,514 | 515,781 | 2,162 | 4,691 |
Terms and conditions relating to the above financial instruments:
The Company has a bank overdraft which is not utilised at year end. The bank overdraft is $(i)$ repayable on demand. Interest is charged at the bank's floating rate. The overdraft is secured by way of registered first mortgages over all assets and undertakings of the Company and its controlled entities
- Secured bank loans incur interest at the bank bill rate plus a margin. The bank loans are secured $(ii)$ by way of registered first mortgages over all assets and undertakings of the Company and its controlled entities. Interest is recognised at an average rate of 6.7% (2005: 6.6%).
- $(ii)$ The Net interest margin facility incurs interest at the bank bill rate plus a margin. The facility is secured by specified cash flows from the assets of the Residential Mortgage Trusts and is guaranteed by the Company. Interest is recognised at an average rate 7.7% (2005: 7.4%).
- $(iii)$ The Warehouse Facility incurs interest at the bank bill rate plus a margin. The facility is secured by the assets of the warehouse trust. Interest is recognised at an average rate 6.15% (2005: 5.99%).
- Finance leases and hire purchases have an average lease term of 4.8 years with the option to $(vii)$ purchase the asset at the completion of the lease term for the asset's market value. The average discount rate implicit in the leases is 8.74% (2005: 8.14%). The lease liability is secured by a charge over the leased assets.
- $(vi)$ Residential Mortgage Backed Securities with a legal final maturity of 32 years from issue, and an expected maturity of at least 5 years. Interest is recognised at an average rate 6.09% (2005: $6.09%$ ).
- (vii) Other loans represents short term funding provided by the sub-servicer appointed to administer the Residential Mortgage Trusts. This funding is usually for 24 hours only and is repaid from RMT bank accounts the following day. Interest is recognised at an average rate 5.25% (2005: 5.25%).
Fair value disclosures
Details of the fair value of the Consolidated entity's interest bearing liabilities are set out in note 24.
Financing facilities available
At reporting date, the following financing facilities had been negotiated and were available:
| CONSOLIDATED | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 200620052006 | $'000$'000 | 2005 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | ||
| 900 | 900 | 900 | 900 |
| 9,800 | 11,100 | 3,800 | 5,100 |
| 500,000 | 350,000 | $\blacksquare$ | $\overline{\phantom{m}}$ |
| 510,700 | 362,000 | 4,700 | 6,000 |
| HOMELOANSLIMITED |
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Facilities used at reporting date | ||||
| - bank overdraft | ||||
| - cash advance | 6,377 | 5,392 | 1,000 | 2,975 |
| - RMT warehouse facility | 60,531 | 214,508 | ||
| 66,908 | 219,900 | 1,000 | 2,975 | |
| Facilities unused at reporting date | ||||
| - bank overdraft | 900 | 900 | 900 | 900 |
| - cash advance | 3,423 | 5,708 | 2,800 | 2,125 |
| - RMT warehouse facility | 439,469 | 135,492 | $\blacksquare$ | ÷ |
| 443,792 | 142,100 | 3,700 | 3,025 | |
| Total facilities | 510,700 | 362,000 | 4.700 | 6,000 |
| Facilities used at reporting date | 66,908 | 219,900 | 1,000 | 2,975 |
| Facilities unused at reporting date | 443,792 | 142,100 | 3,700 | 3,025 |
Assets pledged as security
The carrying amounts of assets pledged as security for current and non-current interest bearing liabilities are:
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| ASSETS | ||||
| First mortgage | ||||
| Finance lease | 1,249 | 1,668 | 1,249 | 1,668 |
| Plant and equipment | 423 | 289 | 423 | 289 |
| Loans and advances to customers | 686,855 | 496,855 | $\overline{a}$ | |
| Floating charge | ||||
| Cash assets | 25,574 | 16,946 | 300 | 769 |
| Receivables | 11,652 | 10,074 | 11,180 | 8,575 |
| Total assets pledged as security | 725,753 | 525,832 | 13,152 | 11,301 |
Note 18: RESET PREFERENCE SHARES
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Reset preference shares | 4,998 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 4,998 | $\blacksquare$ |
At 30 June 2006, there are 503.528 reset preference shares on issue. Each share has a nominal value of $10.00 and may be convertible at the option of the Company or the shareholder into ordinary shares on 30 November 2006 on the basis of a minimum of 20 ordinary shares and a maximum of 50 ordinary shares for each reset preference share. The final conversion factor will depend on the average share price over the last 20 trading days prior to the reset date.
Reset preference shares carry a cumulative entitlement to an unfranked dividend of 10% per annum payable half yearly (31 May and 30 November) in arrears until conversion to ordinary shares or into cash.
The first reset date is 30 November 2006. Reset dates after the first reset date are expected to be every three years. If the dividend is franked to any extent, it will be reduced so that the after tax return to the holder is the same as it would have been if the dividend were unfranked.
Reset preference shares do not entitle their holder to a vote at a meeting of the company, except in certain circumstances.
As of 1 July 2005, Reset Preference Shares are now treated as a liability under the application of AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation. The Company has adopted the AASB 1 First Time adoption of AIFRS option of applying AASB 132 and AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement from 1 July 2005. Correspondingly, the dividends paid on the Reset Preference Shares are now treated as an interest expense.
LEASE INCENTIVES Note 19:
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Lease incentives. | 561 | 665 | 561 | 665 |
Terms and conditions relating to the lease incentive
Net rental incentives were received or are receivable in the form of an upfront cash incentive and $(i)$ rent-free periods by the consolidated entity for entering into a non-cancellable operating lease for premises occupied by the chief entity. This was entered into in September 2003 in respect of the Head Office of the chief entity.
The lease term for the Head office premises is 10 years. The value of these incentives has been deferred and amortised against occupancy costs over the lease term.
PROVISIONS Note 20:
| Long ServiceLeave | Annual Leave | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| CONSOLIDATED | |||
| At 1 July 2005 | 25 | 548 | 573 |
| Arising during the year | 96 | 11 | 107 |
| At 30 June 2006 | 121 | 559 | 680 |
| PARENT | |||
| At 1 July 2005 | 25 | 548 | 573 |
| Arising during the year | 96 | 11 | 107 |
| At 30 June 2006 | 121 | 559 | 680 |
CONTRIBUTED EQUITY AND RESERVES Note 21:
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | |
| Ordinary shares issued and fully paid | 48.624 | 48.624 | 48.624 | 48,624 |
| Reset preference shares fully paid | 4,771 | $\blacksquare$ | 4,771 | |
| 48,624 | 53,395 | 48,624 | 53,395 |
Effective 1 July 1998, the Corporations legislation in place abolished the concepts of authorized capital and par value shares. Accordingly, the Parent does not have authorized capital nor par value in respect of its issued shares. Fully paid ordinary shares carry one vote per share and carry the right to dividends.
Terms and conditions of contributed equity
Ordinary shares
Ordinary shares have the right to receive dividends as declared and, in the event of the winding up of the company, to participate in the proceeds from the sale of all surplus assets in proportion to the number of and amounts paid up on shares held.
Ordinary shares entitle their holder to one vote, either in person or by proxy, at a meeting of the company.
Reset preference shares
Reset preference shares carry a cumulative entitlement to an unfranked dividend of 10% per annum payable half yearly (31 May and 30 November) in arrears until conversion to ordinary shares or into cash.
The first reset date is 30 November 2006. Reset dates after the first reset date is expected to be every three years. If the dividend is franked to any extent it will be reduced so that the after tax return to the holder is the same as it would have been if the dividend were unfranked.
Reset preference shares do not entitle their holder to a vote at a meeting of the company, except in certain circumstances.
As of 1 July 2005, Reset Preference Shares are now treated as a liability under the application of AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation. The Company has adopted the AASB 1 First Time adoption of AIFRS option of applying AASB 132 and AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement from 1 July 2005. Correspondingly, the dividends paid on the Reset Preference Shares are now treated as an interest expense.
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands | $'000 | Thousands | $'000 | |
| Movement in ordinary shares on issue | ||||
| At 1 July 2004 | 50,354 | 48,624 | 50,354 | 48,624 |
| Issued during the year | ||||
| At 1 July 2005 | 50,354 | 48,624 | 50,354 | 48,624 |
| Issued during the year | ||||
| At 30 June 2006 | 50,354 | 48,624 | 50,354 | 48,624 |
| Movement in reset preference shares on issue | ||||
| At 1 July 2004 | 504 | 4,771 | 504 | 4,771 |
| Issued during the year | ||||
| At 30 June 2005 | 504 | 4,771 | 504 | 4,771 |
| Reclassification as interest bearing liability 1 July | (504) | (4, 771) | (504) | (4, 771) |
| Issued during the year | ||||
| At 30 June 2006 |
Refer to note 18 for the terms attaching to the reset preference shares.
Share options
There were 2,905,000 options (2005: 5,175,000) over ordinary shares granted during the financial year At the end of the year there were 7,880,000 (2005: 8,130,000) unissued ordinary shares in respect of which options were outstanding. For more information refer to note 15.
Accumulated losses
Movements in accumulated losses were as follows:
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Balance 30 June | (17, 372) | (19, 360) | (21, 103) | (21, 941) |
| Application of AASB 132 and AASB 139 | ||||
| - reset preference shares now treated as aliability | (134) | (134) | ||
| - net loss on recognition of derivativeinstruments | (46) | |||
| - reset preference dividend paid during theperiod in respect of the prior year | (42) | (42) | ||
| - net gain on recognition of financial assets andliabilities associated with the present value offuture trailing commission income andexpenses | 415 | |||
| - tax effect of changes in respect of the aboveitems | (195) | 68 | ||
| Balance 1 July | 17,374 | (19,360) | (21, 211) | (21, 941) |
| Net profit for the year | 2,597 | 2,492 | 2,283 | 1,342 |
| Dividends | (2,014) | (504) | (2,014) | (504) |
| Balance 30 June | (16, 791) | (17, 372) | (20, 942) | (21, 103) |
Employee Option Reserve
Movements in the employee option reserve were as follows:
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 20052006 | 2005 | |||
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | ||
| Balance 1 July | 102 | 6 | 102 | 6 | |
| Charge for the period | 265 | 96 | 265 | 96 | |
| Balance 30 June | 367 | 102 | 367 | 102 |
The employee option reserve recognises the fair value of options issued to employees and other related parties as remuneration and charges this to the income statement. It applies to all share-based payments issued after 7 November 2002, which have not vested as at 1 January 2005. The option value is calculated using a Binomial model and the value is charged to the Employee Option Reserve over the period in which the options are due to vest. The value allocated to each option issue is determined, among other things, by reference to likelihood of the recipient exercising the option, the share price at the date of grant, the volatility of the share price, and current risk free interest rates (see Note 15).
ACQUISITION OF CONTROLLED ENTITY Note 22:
On 16 September 2004, Homeloans Ltd acquired 100% of the voting share capital of Match Funds Management Limited, a public company incorporated in Australia, that holds an Australian Financial Services Licence to operate as a Responsible Entity. The components of the acquisition cost were:
| $000's | |
|---|---|
| Consideration | |
| - cash paid in the year ended 30 June 2004 | 28 |
| - cash paid in the year ended 30 June 2005 | 315 |
| 343 | |
| Net Assets acquired | |
| - cash | 53 |
| - plant and equipment | 4 |
| - other financial assets | 4 |
| 61 | |
| - trade creditors | (2) |
| - fair value of net tangible assets acquired | 60 |
| - goodwill arising on acquisition | 280 |
| Carrying value of investment | 340 |
| - GST paid on acquisition costs | 3 |
| 343 | |
| Net cash effect | |
| Cash consideration paid | 315 |
| Cash included in net assets acquired | (53) |
| Net cash paid for purchase of controlled entity | 262 |
J.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006 (CONTINUED)
Note 23: AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND INTEREST RATES
The following table sets out the major categories of interest earning assets and liabilities
| Consolidated2006 | Consolidated2005 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AverageBalance$000's | Interest$000's | AverageRate% | AverageBalance$000's | Interest$000's | AverageRate% | |
| Interest earning assets | ||||||
| Cash | 12,242 | 591 | 4.83 | 18,919 | 858 | 4.53 |
| Loan and advances | 587,895 | 45,215 | 7.69 | 517,797 | 37,722 | 7.29 |
| Total interest earningassets | 600,137 | 45,806 | 7.63 | 536,716 | 38,580 | 7.19 |
| Interest bearingliabilities | ||||||
| Bonds and warehousefacility | 600,137 | 35,993 | 6.00 | 536,716 | 32,623 | 6.08 |
| Cash advance and netinterest margin facilities | 4,407 | 327 | 7.42 | 3,045 | 220 | 7.22 |
| Reset preference shares | 4,951 | 504 | 10.18 | |||
| Total interest bearingliabilities | 609,495 | 36,824 | 6.04 | 539,761 | 32,843 | 6.08 |
| NET INTEREST MARGIN | 8,982 | 1.59 | 5,737 | 1.11 |
Note 24: FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
The Consolidated entity has other financial assets and liabilities such as cash assets, trade receivables, payables and interest bearing liabilities, which arise directly from its operations. The Consolidated entity also enters into derivative transactions, including interest rate swaps. The purpose is to manage the interest rate arising from the Consolidated entity's operations and its sources of finance. The main risks arising from the Consolidated entity's financial instruments are interest rate risk and credit risk. The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks and they are summarised below.
Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are recognised, in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument are disclosed in note 2 to the financial statements.
Interest rate risk
The consolidated entity's exposure to interest rate risks and the effective interest rates of financial assets and financial liabilities, both recognised and unrecognised at a floating interest rate.
Credit risk exposures
The consolidated entity's maximum exposure to credit risk at balance date in relation to each class of recognised financial assets is the carrying amount, net of any provision for doubtful debts, of those assets as indicated in the balance sheet.
Concentration of credit risk
The consolidated entity minimises concentrations of credit risk in relation to accounts receivable by undertaking transactions with a number of investment grade lending institutions within the APRA regulated banking industry. The consolidated entity is not materially exposed to any individual lender. Some agreements with lenders also contain provisions requiring the consolidated entity to pay instalments due from borrowers until securities are enforced or an insurance claim has been paid and to purchase the mortgage from the lender if Homeloans Limited is in default. The consolidated entity's risk in this area is mitigated by insurance policies.
Fair values
Set out below is a comparison by category of carrying amounts and fair values of all of the Consolidated entity's financial instruments recognised in the financial statements.
The following methods and assumptions are used to determine the net fair values of financial assets and liabilities:
Recognised Financial Instruments
Cash and cash equivalent: The carrying amount approximates fair value because of their short-term maturity.
Receivables, payables, non-interest bearing liabilities and variable rate interest bearing liabilities: The carrying amount approximates fair value. In the case of Non-interest bearing liabilities, this is because they are short term in nature.
The fair value of interest rate swap contracts and fixed rate interest bearing liabilities is determined by reference to market value for similar instruments.
| Carrying Amount | Fair value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| CONSOLIDATED | ||||
| Financial assets | ||||
| Cash | 25,574 | 16,946 | 25,574 | 16,946 |
| Receivables | 10,046 | 8,063 | 10,046 | 8,063 |
| Loans and advances to customers | 686,855 | 496,855 | 686,809 | 496,878 |
| Financial liabilities | ||||
| On balance sheet | ||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||
| Leases and hire purchase | 1,162 | 1,716 | 1,162 | 1,716 |
| Secured bank loans | 66,908 | 219,901 | 66,908 | 219,901 |
| Reset preference shares | 4,998 | 5,035 | ||
| Bonds | 635,915 | 294,164 | 635,915 | 294,064 |
| Other | 3,529 | 3,529 | ||
| PARENT | ||||
| Financial assets | ||||
| Cash | 300 | 769 | 300 | 769 |
| Receivables | 10,818 | 7,495 | 10,818 | 7,495 |
| Financial liabilities | ||||
| On balance sheet | ||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||
| Leases and hire purchase | 1,162 | 1,716 | 1,162 | 1,716 |
| Secured bank loans | 1,000 | 2,975 | 1,000 | 2,975 |
| Reset preference shares | 4,998 | 5,035 |
Interest rate risk
The following table sets out the carrying amount, by maturity, of the financial instruments exposed to interest rate risk:
| Fixed Rate | Weightedaverageeffective | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONSOLIDATED | Floating$'000 | <1 year$'000 | >1-<2years$'000 | >2 < 3years$'000 | $>3 - 4$years$'000 | >4-<5years$'000 | 5 years$'000 | Total$'000 | interestRate% |
| Year ended 30 June2006 | |||||||||
| FINANCIAL ASSETS | |||||||||
| Cash assets | 25,574 | $\blacksquare$ | 25,574 | 4.83% | |||||
| Receivables | 158 | 100 | 8.60%- | ||||||
| Loans and advances tocustomers | 674,597 | 321 | 982 | 4,765 | 583 | 5,607 | $\blacksquare$ | 686,855 | 7.26% |
| Weighted averageeffective interest rate | 7.17% | 7.95% | 7.35% | 7.14% | 6.86% | 7.36% | |||
| FINANCIALLIABILITIES | |||||||||
| Reset preferenceshares | 4,998 | 4,998 | 10.0% | ||||||
| Leases and hirepurchase | 337 | 357 | 468 | 1,162 | 8.74% | ||||
| Interest bearingliabilities | |||||||||
| Secured bank loans- Cash advancefacility | 1,000 | 1,000 | 6.95% | ||||||
| - Net interest marginfacility | 5,377 | 5,377 | 7.70% | ||||||
| - RMT Warehousefacility | 60,531 | $\blacksquare$ | 60,531 | 6.15% | |||||
| - Bonds | 635,915 | 635,915 | 6.09% | ||||||
| Other loan | 3,529 | 3,529 | 5.25% | ||||||
| Interest rate swaps | (12, 258) | 321 | 982 | 4,765 | 583 | 5,607 | |||
| Weighted averageeffective interest rate | 6.10% | 9.92% | 8.74% | 8.74% | 8.74% | 8.74% |
| Fixed Rate | Weightedaverageeffective | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONSOLIDATED | Floating$'000 | <1 year$'000 | $>1 - 2$years$'000 | $>2 - 3$years$'000 | $>3 - 4$years$'000 | >4 < 5years$'000 | 5 years$'000 | Total$'000 | interestRate$%$ |
| Year ended 30 June2005 | |||||||||
| FINANCIAL ASSETS | |||||||||
| Cash assets | 16,946 | 16,946 | 4.53% | ||||||
| Loans and advances tocustomers | 479,972 | 4,398 | 3,913 | 2,407 | 4,285 | 1,880 | $-496,855$ | 7.27% | |
| Weighted averageeffective interest rate | 7.19% | 6.57% | 7.18% | 6.92% | 7.28% | 7.36% | |||
| FINANCIALLIABILITIES | |||||||||
| Leases and hirepurchase | 554 | 337 | 357 | 468 | 1,716 | 8.14% | |||
| Interest bearingliabilities | |||||||||
| Secured bank loans- Cash advance | 2,975 | 2,975 | 6.73% | ||||||
| facility- Net interest margin | $\tilde{}$ | ||||||||
| facility | 2,418 | 2,418 | 7.40% | ||||||
| - RMT Warehousefacility | 214,508 | $-214,508$ | 5.99% | ||||||
| - Bonds | 224,164 | 70,000 | $-294,164$ | 6.14% | |||||
| Interest rate swap-bonds | 70,000 (70,000) | ||||||||
| Interest rate swaps-loans | (16, 883) | 4,398 | 3,913 | 2,407 | 4,285 | 1,880 | $_{\rm sc}$ | $_{\rm esc}$ | |
| Weighted averageeffective interest rate | 6.09% | 6.60% | 8.14% | 8.14% | 8.14% | 8.14% |
| Weightedaverage | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | Floating | <1 year | $>1 - 2$years | $>2 - 3$years | Fixed Rate$>3 - 4$years | >4-<5years | 5 years | Total | effectiveinterestRate |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $%$ | |
| Year ended 30 June2006 | |||||||||
| FINANCIAL ASSETS | |||||||||
| Cash assets | 300 | 300 | 4.83% | ||||||
| Receivables | $\blacksquare$ | 158 | 100 | $_{\rm sc}$ | $\mathbf{r}$ | $\blacksquare$ | 258 | 8.6% | |
| Weighted averageeffective interest rate | 4.83% | 8.6% | 8.6% | ||||||
| FINANCIALLIABILITIES | |||||||||
| Reset preferenceshares | 4,998 | 4,998 | 10.0% | ||||||
| Leases and hirepurchase | 337 | 357 | 468 | $\blacksquare$ | 1,162 | 8.74% | |||
| Secured bank loans | 1,000 | $_{\rm rec}$ | $\blacksquare$ | $\overline{a}$ | $\overline{a}$ | $\blacksquare$ | 1,000 | 6.95% | |
| Weighted averageeffective interest rate | 6.95% | 9.92% | 8.74% | 8.74% | |||||
| Year ended 30 June2005 | |||||||||
| FINANCIAL ASSETS | |||||||||
| Cash assets | 769 | 769 | 4.60% | ||||||
| Weighted averageeffective interest rate | 4.60% | ||||||||
| FINANCIALLIABILITIES | |||||||||
| Cash advance facility | 2,975 | 2,975 | 6.73% | ||||||
| Leases and hirepurchase | $_{\rm sc}$ | 554 | 337 | 357 | 468 | $_{\rm m}$ | 1,716 | 8.14% | |
| Weighted averageeffective interest rate | 6.73% | 8.14% | 8.14% | 8.14% | 8.14% |
Note 25: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating lease commitments - Consolidated entity as lessee
The Consolidated entity has entered into commercial property leases on its office space requirements. Operating leases have an average lease term of 5.8 years. Assets, which are the subject of operating leases, include office space and items of office machinery.
Future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases as at 30 June are as follows:
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | ||
| Within one year | 1,642 | 1,548 | 1.642 | 1,548 | |
| After one year but not more than five years | 6,185 | 6,164 | 6,185 | 6,164 | |
| More than five years | 2,774 | 4.043 | 2,774 | 4,043 | |
| 10,601 | 11,754 | 10,601 | 11,754 |
Operating lease commitments - Consolidated entity as lessor
The Consolidated entity has entered into commercial property leases on its surplus office space requirements. Operating leases have an average lease term of 6.3 years.
Future minimum rentals receivable under non-cancellable operating leases as at 30 June are as follows:
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | 2006$'000 | 2005$'000 | ||
| Within one year | 238 | 46 | 238 | 46 | |
| After one year but not more than five years | 1,404 | 198 | 1,404 | 198 | |
| More than five years | 18 | 72 | 18 | 72 | |
| 1,660 | 316 | 1,660 | 316 |
The average discount rate implicit in the leases is 8.74% (2005: 8.14%).
Contingent liabilities and capital commitments
The directors were not aware of any contingent liabilities or capital commitments as at the end of the financial year or arising since balance date.
Finance lease commitments - Consolidated entity as lessee
The Consolidated entity has entered into finance leases of plant and equipment. The leases have an average lease term of 4.8 years with the option to purchase the asset at the completion of the lease term for the asset's market value. The average discount rate implicit in the leases is 8.74% (2005: 8.14%). The lease liability is secured by a charge over the leased assets.
Future minimum lease payments under finance leases and hire purchase contracts together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments are as follows:
| 2006 | 2005 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MinimumPresent valueof leaseleasepaymentspayments | Minimumleasepayments | Present valueof leasepayments | |||
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | ||
| CONSOLIDATED | |||||
| Within one year | 424 | 337 | 676 | 554 | |
| After one year but not more than five years | 893 | 825 | 1,317 | 1,162 | |
| Total minimum lease payments | 1,317 | 1,162 | 1,993 | 1,716 | |
| Less amounts representing finance charges | (155) | $\sim$ | (277) | ||
| Present value of minimum lease payments (Note17) | 1,162 | 1.162 | 1,716 | 1,716 | |
| 2006 | 2005 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimumleasepayments | Present valueof leasepayments | Minimumleasepayments | Present valueof leasepayments | |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| PARENT | ||||
| Within one year | 424 | 337 | 676 | 554 |
| After one year but not more than five years | 893 | 825 | 1,317 | 1,162 |
| Total minimum lease payments | 1,317 | 1.162 | 1,993 | 1,716 |
| Less amounts representing finance charges | (155) | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | (277) | $\blacksquare$ |
| Present value of minimum lease payments (Note17) | 1,162 | 1,162 | 1,716 | 1,716 |
The weighted average interest rate impact in the leases for both the Consolidated entity and Homeloans is 8.74% (2005: 8.14%).
Note 26: RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Homeloans Limited and the subsidiaries listed in the following table:
| Name | Country of | % Equity interest | Investment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| incorporation | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | ||
| Chief Entity | |||||
| Homeloans Limited | |||||
| Controlled entities of HomeloansLimited: | |||||
| NSW Home Loans Pty Ltd | Australia | 100% | 100% | ||
| VIC Home Loans Pty Ltd | Australia | 100% | 100% | ||
| QLD Home Loans Pty Ltd | Australia | 100% | 100% | ||
| SA Home Loans Australia PtyLtd | Australia | 100% | 100% | ||
| WA Home Loans Australia PtyLtd | Australia | 100% | 100% | ||
| IF & I Securities Pty Ltd | Australia | 100% | 100% | ||
| FAI First Mortgage Pty Ltd | Australia | 100% | 100% | 7.115 | 7,115 |
| Access Home LoansConsolidated incorporating: | 11,723 | 11,723 | |||
| - Access NetworkManagement Pty Ltd | Australia | 100% | 100% | ||
| - Access Home Loans Pty Ltd | Australia | 100% | 100% | ||
| - HLL Pty Ltd | Australia | 100% | 100% | ||
| St Michael Investments Pty Ltd | Australia | 100% | 100% | ||
| Match Funds ManagementLimited | Australia | 100% | 100% | 340 | 340 |
| 19,178 | 19,178 |
The following table provides the total amount of transactions that were entered into with related parties for the relevant financial year (for information regarding outstanding balances at year-end, refer to note 9 and note 17).
| Sales torelatedparties | Purchasesfromrelatedparties | Amountsowed byrelatedparties | Amountsowed torelatedparties | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Related party | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| PARENT | |||||
| Subsidiaries: | |||||
| FAI First Mortgage Pty Ltd | 2006 | 4,564 | 4,023 | ||
| 2005 | 5,466 | w. | 2,679 | ||
| Access Network ManagementPty Ltd | 2006 | $\blacksquare$ | 4,661 | ||
| 2005 | 450 | 4.111 | |||
| Match Funds ManagementLimited | 2006 | w. | 8 | ||
| 2005 | 5 | ||||
| St Michael Investments Pty Ltd | 2006 | ł. | 5 | ||
| 2005 | 5 | ||||
| Residential Mortgage Trusts | 2006 | 5,142 | $_{\rm{ref}}$ | 2,810 | |
| 2005 | 972 | $\tilde{\phantom{a}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 1,040 | |
| Associate: | |||||
| Mosaic Financial Services PtyLtd | 2006 | 17 |
* Transaction between subsidiaries:
FAI First Mortgage Pty Ltd (FAI) is the sole beneficiary of the Residential Mortgage Trust holding the sole income unit for each securitisation trust that is on issue. FAI receives a fee as manager, a fee as servicer of the trust, and the excess distribution payable at the monthly anniversary date after payment of all third parties including bondholders and the warehouse facility provider (Westpac Banking Corporation).
FAI does not pay anything to the trust, nor does it pay the trust for any services.
The loans to and from subsidiaries are interest free and are on demand.
Associate
The group has a 23.67% interest in Mosaic Financial Services Pty Ltd (acquired 1 July 2005).
EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE Note 27:
There were no significant events after the balance date.
Note 28: AUDITORS' REMUNERATION
The auditor of Homeloans Limited is Ernst & Young.
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANSLIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Amounts received or due and receivable by Ernst& Young (Australia) for: | ||||
| . an audit or review of the financial report of theentity and any other entity in the consolidatedgroup | 366,128 | 90,150 | 320,185 | 80,150 |
| • other services in relation to the entity and anyother entity in the consolidated group | ||||
| - tax compliance | 21,583 | 115,554 | 21,583 | 115,554 |
| - accounting advice | 6,800 | 6,800 | ||
| 21,583 | 122,354 | 21,583 | 122,354 | |
| 387,711 | 212,504 | 341,768 | 202,504 |
Note 29: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE DISCLOSURES
Details of Key Management Personnel $(a)$
- $(i)$ Directors
- T.A.Holmes Chairman (Non-Executive)
- B.D.Jones Managing Director
- R.P.Salmon Director (non-executive)
- R.N.Scott Director (non-executive)
- J.L.A.Smith Finance Director
- $(ii)$ Executives
| T.Phillips | General Manager Sales (also a Director of MAS) |
|---|---|
| L.McDonald | National Head of Underwriting |
| K.Carter | National Manager Human Resources |
| A.Curr | National Marketing Manager |
$(b)$ Compensation of Key Management Personnel
$(i)$ Compensation Policy
The Board of Directors of Homeloans Limited is responsible for determining and reviewing compensation arrangements for the directors and the executive team. The Board assesses the appropriateness of the nature and amount of emoluments of such officers on a periodic basis by reference to relevant employment market conditions with the overall objective of ensuring maximum stakeholder benefit from the retention of a high quality board and executive team. Such officers are given the opportunity to receive their base emolument in a variety of forms including cash and fringe benefits such as motor vehicles and expense payment plans. It is intended that the manner of payment chosen will be optimal for the recipient without creating undue cost for the company.
To assist in achieving these objectives, the Board links the nature and amount of executive directors' and officers emoluments to the company's financial and operational performance.
In addition, all executives are entitled to annual bonuses payable upon the achievement of KPIs and annual corporate profitability measures, the most important being return on shareholder's equity.
$(A)$ Nomination and Remuneration Committee
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee of the Board of Directors of Homeloans Limited is responsible for determining and reviewing compensation arrangements for the directors and other key management personnel.
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee assesses the appropriateness of the nature and amount of compensation of key management personnel on a periodic basis by reference to relevant employment market conditions with the overall objective of ensuring maximum stakeholder benefit from the retention of a high quality board and executive team.
$(B)$ Non-executive Director Compensation
Objective
The Board seeks to set aggregate remuneration at a level which provides the company with the ability to attract and retain directors of the highest calibre, whilst incurring a cost which is acceptable to shareholders.
Structure
The Constitution and the ASX Listing Rules specify that the aggregate remuneration of non-executive directors shall be determined from time to time by a general meeting. An amount not exceeding the amount determined is then divided between the directors as agreed. At last year's annual general meeting the aggregate maximum sum available for the remunerate of non-executive directors was increased to $250,000 per anum with effect from and including 1 January 2006.
The amount of aggregate remuneration sought to be approved by shareholders and the manner in which it is apportioned amongst directors is reviewed annually. The board considers advice from external consultants as well as the fees paid to non-executive directors of comparable companies when undertaking the annual review process.
Each director receives a fee for being a director of the company. No additional fee is paid for each board committee on which a director sits.
Non-executive directors have long been encouraged by the board to hold shares in the company (purchased by the director on market). It is considered good governance for directors to have a stake in the company whose board he or she sits.
$(C)$ Executive Compensation
Objective
The company aims to reward executives with a level and mix of remuneration commensurate with their position and responsibilities within the company and so as to:
- reward executives for company, business unit and individual performance against targets set by $\bullet$ reference to appropriate benchmarks;
- align the interests of executives with those of shareholders;
- link reward with the strategic goals and performance of the company; and $\bullet$
- ensure total remuneration is competitive by market standards.
Structure
In determining the level and make-up of executive remuneration, the Board will from time to time engage an external consultant to provide independent advice both in the form of a written report detailing market levels of remuneration for comparable executive roles as well as the participation of the independent consultant in the meeting from which the Committee makes its recommendations to the Board.
Remuneration consists of the following key elements:
- Fixed Remuneration
- Variable Remuneration
- Short Term Incentive ('STI'); and
- Long Term Incentive ('LTI').
The proportion of fixed remuneration and variable remuneration (potential short term and long term incentives) is established for each senior manager by the Board.
Fixed Compensation $(D)$
Objective
The level of fixed remuneration is set so as to provide a base level of remuneration which is both appropriate to the position and is competitive in the market.
Fixed remuneration is reviewed annually by the Board and the process consists of a review of companywide, business unit and individual performance, relevant comparative remuneration in the market and internal and, where appropriate, external advice on policies and practices. As noted above, the Board has access to external advice independent of management.
Structure
Senior managers are given the opportunity to receive their fixed (primary) remuneration in a variety of forms including cash and fringe benefits such as motor vehicles and expense payment plans. It is intended that the manner of payment chosen will be optimal for the recipient without creating undue cost for the company.
$(E)$ Variable Compensation - Short Term Incentive (STI)
Objective
The objective of the STI program is to link the achievement of the company's operational targets with the remuneration received by the executives charged with meeting those targets. The total potential STI available is set at a level so as to provide sufficient incentive to the senior manager to achieve the operational targets and such that the cost to the company is reasonable in the circumstances.
Structure
Actual STI payments granted to each senior manager depend on the extent to which specific operating targets set at the beginning of the financial year are met. The operational targets consist of a number of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) covering both financial and non-financial measures of performance. Typically included are measures such as contribution to net profit after tax, customer service, risk management, product management, and leadership/team contribution. The company has predetermined benchmarks which must be met in order to trigger payments under the short term incentive scheme.
On an annual basis, after consideration of performance against KPIs, an overall performance rating for the company and each individual business unit is approved by the the Board. The individual performance of each executive is also rated and all three ratings are taken into account when determining the amount, if any, of the short term incentive pool that is allocated to each executive.
The aggregate of annual STI payments available for executives across the company is subject to the approval of the Board. Payments made are usually delivered as a cash bonus.
$(F)$ Variable Pay - Long Term Incentive (LTI)
Objective
The objective of the LTI plan is to reward senior managers in a manner which aligns this element of remuneration with the creation of shareholder wealth.
As such LTI grants are only made to executives who are able to influence the generation of shareholder wealth and thus have a direct impact on the Company's performance against the relevant long term performance hurdle.
Structure
LTI grants to executives are delivered in the form of options.
These options vest with the executive over varying periods and are not usually subject to a performance hurdle. They usually have a life from date of grant of five years, and are exercisable at specific dates and proportions set at the time of granting the options. Usually 50% of these options are exercisable after two years with the other 50% exercisable after three years.
Table 3 on page 16 provide details of options granted, the value of options, vesting periods and lapsed options under the LTI plan.
$(ii)$ Compensation of Key Management Personnel (Consolidated) for the year-ended 30 June 2006
| Short-Term | Post Employment | Long-Term | Share-basedPayment | Total | TotalPerformanceRelated | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June 2006 | Salary &Fees | CashBonus | NonMonetarybenefits | Other | Superannuation | Retirementbenefits | IncentivePlans | Options | |||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $. | $ | $ | |||
| Directors | |||||||||||
| T.A.Holmes* | 166,723 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 2,767 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 11,630 | 181,120 | 0% | ||||
| R. P Salmon * | 154,223 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 2,767 | $\tilde{\phantom{a}}$ | 11,630 | $\overline{ }$ | 168,620 | 0% | |||
| B.D. Jones | 275,000 | $\cdot$ | 4.854 | ۰ | 24,750 | $\cdot$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 75,887 | 380,491 | 55% | |
| R. N. Scott | 50,000 | $\cdot$ | $\blacksquare$ | $\blacksquare$ | - | $\cdot$ | $\cdot$ | $\cdot$ | 50,000 | 0% | |
| J.L.A.Smith | 240,000 | 60,000 | 4854 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 21,600 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | ۰ | 77,726 | 404,180 | 34% | |
| ExecutivesL.McDonald | 150,000 | 50,000 | 4.854 | 13,500 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 11,375 | 229,729 | 27% | |||
| T. Phillips ** | 282,271 | $\overline{a}$ | $\cdot$ | ÷ | $\scriptstyle\star$ | ۰ | 24,186 | 306,457 | 100% | ||
| K. Carter | 125,000 | 40,000 | 2,767 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 11,250 | $\ddot{}$ | ۰ | 15,725 | 194,742 | 29% | |
| A. Curr | 117,500 | 25,000 | $\blacksquare$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 10,575 | $\scriptstyle\star$ | ۰ | 8,950 | 162,025 | 26% | |
| 1,560,717 | 175,000 | 22,863 | ۰ | 104,935 | $\cdot$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 213,849 | 2,077,364 | |||
* T. A. Holmes and R.P. Salmon were executive directors until 31 December 2005.
** T. Phillips is a director of Mortgage Asset Services Pty Ltd (MAS). Troy's services as General Manager Sales for the Consolidated entity are remunerated by way of a commission payment to MAS monthly based on home loans settled during the previous month. This amounted to $282,271 in the current financial year. MAS also holds 2,500,000 options over unissued shares in Homeloans Limited. The amortised value of these options during the year has been included. None of the remuneration noted above was actually paid directly to Troy Phillips.
| Short-Term | Post Employment | Long-Term | Share-basedPayment | Total | TotalPerformanceRelated | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary &Fees | CashBonus | NonMonetarybenefits | Other | Superannuation | Retirementbenefits | IncentivePlans | Options | |||
| 30 June 2005 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ₩ |
| Directors | ||||||||||
| T.A.Holmes | 160,218 | $\blacksquare$ | 2,986 | $\blacksquare$ | 89,629 | $\cdot$ | $\blacksquare$ | 252,833 | 0% | |
| R. P Salmon | 160,218 | $\blacksquare$ | 2,986 | $\blacksquare$ | 89,629 | ۰ | ÷ | 252,833 | 0% | |
| B.D. Jones | 231,528 | 300,000 | 4,612 | $\blacksquare$ | 20,838 | $\cdot$ | ÷ | 103,030 | 660,008 | 61% |
| R. N. Scott | 42,500 | ÷, | 42,500 | 0% | ||||||
| Executives | 19% | |||||||||
| J.L.A.Smith | 229,410 | 40,000 | 4,612 | $\blacksquare$ | 24,247 | ۰ | 21,953 | 320,222 | ||
| T. Phillips ** | 73,020 | $\blacksquare$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\blacksquare$ | ÷ | $\overline{ }$ | ۰ | 148,222 | 221,242 | 100% |
| J. McGee | 316,944 | $\overline{a}$ | 121 | $\blacksquare$ | 28,525 | $\overline{ }$ | 18,490 | 364,080 | 5% | |
| K.Carter | 153,340 | 15,000 | 2,986 | $\blacksquare$ | 13,801 | $\ddot{}$ | 2,232 | 187,359 | 9% | |
| L.McDonald | 82,283 | $\tilde{\phantom{a}}$ | 1,996 | 492 | 20,980 | $\ddot{}$ | ÷ | 2,232 | 107,983 | 2% |
| A.Curr | 123,455 | 10,000 | $\tilde{\phantom{a}}$ | $\blacksquare$ | 11,111 | ۰ | ۰ | 1,116 | 145,682 | 8% |
| 1,572,916 | 365,000 | 20,299 | 492 | 298,760 | ۰ | 297,275 | 2,554,742 |
** T. Phillips is a director of Mortgage Asset Services Pty Ltd (MAS). Troy's services as General Manager Sales for the Consolidated entity are remunerated by way of a commission payment to MAS monthly based on home loans settled during the previous month. None of the remuneration noted above was actually paid directly to Troy Phillips.
$(iii)$ Compensation by Category: Key Management Personnel
| CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANS LIMITED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Short-Term | 1,758,580 | 1,958,707 | 1,758,580 | 1,958,707 |
| Post Employment | 104,935 | 298,760 | 104,935 | 298,760 |
| Other Long-Term | $\overline{a}$ | |||
| Termination Benefits | $\overline{a}$ | |||
| Share-based Payment | 213,849 | 297,275 | 213,849 | 297,275 |
| 2,077,364 | 2,554,742 | 2,077,364 | 2,554,742 |
$(iv)$ Contracts for Services
Employment contracts
No executives are currently employed under a fixed term contract.
Upon termination all vested options remain in place.
Managing Director
Under his conditions of employment, the employment of the Managing Director may be terminated: by the Company by giving 12 months notice; or,
by the Managing Director giving the Company 3 months notice.
The Company may make a payment in lieu of requiring the service of the notice period.
Upon termination of employment, the Managing Director is also entitled to his statutory entitlements to accrued annual and long service leave.
Upon termination of employment by the Managing Director giving notice, the Managing Director is entitled to any STI than would otherwise be payable.
Finance Director
Under his conditions of employment, the employment of the Finance Director may be terminated by either party, by giving 3 months notice. The Company may make a payment in lieu of requiring the service of the notice period.
Upon termination of employment, the Finance Director is entitled to his statutory entitlements to accrued annual and long service leave.
Upon termination of employment, the Board has discretion to direct the forfeiture, or to pay the benefit of, any award made under either the STI or LTI plan that remain subject to the satisfaction of any performance or other criteria.
Mortgage Asset Services Pty Ltd
The services of the General Manager Sales are provided by way of a contract with Mortgage Asset Services Pty Ltd ("MAS"). This contract may be terminated by either party, by giving 3 months notice.
Should the Company terminate the contract prior to 31 December 2007, then MAS is entitled to six months payment and any unvested options from those granted on 7 December 2005 will vest, provided loan origination volumes are within 90% of the hurdle volumes.
Other Key Management Personnel
Under their conditions of employment the employment of the Key Management Personnel may be terminated by either party, by giving 1 months notice. The Company may make a payment in lieu of requiring the service of the notice period.
Upon termination of employment, the Key Management Personnel are entitled to their statutory entitlements to accrued annual and long service leave.
Upon termination of employment the Board has discretion to direct the forfeiture, or to pay the benefit of, any award made under either the STI or LTI plan that remain subject to the satisfaction of any performance or other criteria.
$(c)$ Compensation options: Granted and vested during the year (Consolidated)
During the financial year, options were granted as equity compensation benefits to certain specified directors and specified executives as disclosed below. The options were issued free of charge. Each option entitles the holder to subscribe for one fully paid ordinary share in the entity at various exercise prices. The options may only be exercised immediately on vesting and expire between one and five years after vesting. The options granted vest at various times up to three years from grant. All options granted during the financial year are not subject to meeting key performance criteria except for those issued to Mortgage Asset Services (MAS). The benefit of MAS is disclosed as part of the remuneration for the specified executive. Trov Phillips.
| Vested | Granted | Terms & Conditions for each Grant | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | No. | GrantDate | Fairvalueperoption atgrantdate(5) | Exerciseprice peroption(5) | Expirydate | FirstExercisedate | LastExercisedate | |
| 30 June 2006 | ||||||||
| Directors | ||||||||
| B.D.Jones | 315,000 | 23/11/2005 | 0.1459 | 0.36 | 31/8/2009 | 31/8/2006 | 31/8/2009 | |
| ÷ | 310,000 | 23/11/2005 | 0.1294 | 0.46 | 31/8/2010 | 31/8/2007 | 31/8/2010 | |
| 500,000 | 500.000 | 1/12/2004 | 0.0872 | 0.50 | 1/12/2009 | 1/6/2006 | 1/12/2009 | |
| J.L.A.Smith | 100,000 | 14/10/2005 | 0.1859 | 0.36 | 31/8/2009 | 31/8/2006 | 31/8/2009 | |
| ÷ | 150,000 | 14/10/2005 | 0.1583 | 0.46 | 31/8/2010 | 31/8/2007 | 31/8/2010 | |
| 100,000 | 100,000 | 1/4/2003 | 0.1398 | 0.50 | 21/1/2008 | 21/1/2006 | 21/1/2008 | |
| w. | 200,000 | 20/2/2006 | 0.1535 | 0.42 | 31/8/2009 | 31/8/2006 | 31/8/2009 | |
| 300,000 | 20/2/2006 | 0.1363 | 0.42 | 31/8/2010 | 31/8/2007 | 31/8/2010 | ||
| Executives | ||||||||
| L.McDonald | 30,000 | 14/10/2005 | 0.1859 | 0.36 | 31/8/2009 | 31/8/2006 | 31/8/2009 | |
| 45,000 | 14/10/2005 | 0.1583 | 0.46 | 31/8/2010 | 31/8/2007 | 31/8/2010 | ||
| K.Carter | w. | 50,000 | 14/10/2005 | 0.1859 | 0.36 | 31/8/2009 | 31/8/2006 | 31/8/2009 |
| 75,000 | 14/10/2005 | 0.1583 | 0.46 | 31/8/2010 | 31/8/2007 | 31/8/2010 | ||
| A.Curr | w. | 30,000 | 14/10/2005 | 0.1859 | 0.36 | 31/8/2009 | 31/8/2006 | 31/8/2009 |
| w, | 45,000 | 14/10/2005 | 0.1583 | 0.46 | 31/8/2010 | 31/8/2007 | 31/8/2010 | |
| T.Phillips* | $\blacksquare$ | 250,000 | 7/4/2006 (A) | 0.1456 | 0.36 | 7/12/2009 | 30/9/2006 | 7/12/2009 |
| $\blacksquare$ | 250,000 | 7/4/2006 (B) | 0.1154 | 0.46 | 7/12/2009 | 31/3/2007 | 7/12/2009 | |
| 250,000 | 7/4/2006 (C) | 0.1058 | 0.51 | 7/12/2009 | 31/12/2007 | 7/12/2009 | ||
| Total | 600,000 | 3,000,000 |
A - only exercisable if average mortgage settlements in any three (3) month period prior to 30 September 2006 exceeds $100 million per month
B - only exercisable if average mortgage settlements in any three (3) month period prior to 31 March 2007 exceeds $112.5 million per month
C - only exercisable if average mortgage settlements in any three (3) month period prior to 31 December 2007 exceeds $137.5 million per month
| Vested | Granted | Terms & Conditions for each Grant | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | No. | GrantDate | Fairvalueperoption atgrantdate$($ $) | Exerciseprice peroption(5) | Expirydate | FirstExercisedate | LastExercisedate | |
| 30 June 2005 | ||||||||
| Directors | ||||||||
| B.D.Jones | 375,000 | 375,000 | 1/12/2004 | 0.1019 | 0.40 | 1/12/2009 | 1/12/2004 | 1/12/2009 |
| 500.000 | 500.000 | 1/12/2004 | 0.0959 | 0.45 | 1/12/2009 | 1/6/2005 | 1/12/2009 | |
| 500,000 | 1/12/2004 | 0.0872 | 0.50 | 1/12/2009 | 1/6/2006 | 1/12/2009 | ||
| Executives | ||||||||
| J.Smith | 100,000 | $\blacksquare$ | 29/4/2002 | 0.2724 | 0.994 | 1/4/2007 | 1/4/2005 | 1/4/2007 |
| 100,000 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 1/4/2003 | 0.1398 | 0.52 | 21/1/2008 | 21/1/2005 | 21/1/2008 | |
| 100,000 | 14/1/2005 | 0.1420 | 0.35 | 14/12/2009 | 14/12/2006 | 14/12/2009 | ||
| 100,000 | 14/1/2005 | 0.1420 | 0.35 | 14/12/2009 | 14/12/2007 | 14/12/2009 | ||
| T.Phillips | 750,000 | 750,000 | 7/12/2004 | 0.1098 | 0.40 | 7/12/2009 | 7/12/2004 | 7/12/2009 |
| ä, | 1,000,000 | 7/12/2004 | 0.1010 | 0.45 | 7/12/2009 | 31/3/2006 | 7/12/2009 | |
| ÷ | 1,000,000 | 7/12/2004 | 0.0924 | 0.50 | 7/12/2009 | 31/3/2007 | 7/12/2009 | |
| J.McGee | 250,000 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 2/5/2002 | 0.2867 | 0.994 | 1/4/2007 | 1/4/2005 | 1/4/2007 |
| L.McDonald | 50,000 | 14/1/2005 | 0.1420 | 0.35 | 14/12/2009 | 14/12/2006 | 14/12/2009 | |
| 50,000 | 14/1/2005 | 0.1420 | 0.35 | 14/12/2009 | 14/12/2007 | 14/12/2009 | ||
| K.Carter | 50,000 | 14/1/2005 | 0.1420 | 0.35 | 14/12/2009 | 14/12/2006 | 14/12/2009 | |
| 50,000 | 14/1/2005 | 0.1420 | 0.35 | 14/12/2009 | 14/12/2007 | 14/12/2009 | ||
| A.Curr | 25,000 | 14/1/2005 | 0.1420 | 0.35 | 14/12/2009 | 14/12/2006 | 14/12/2009 | |
| 25,000 | 14/1/2005 | 0.1420 | 0.35 | 14/12/2009 | 14/12/2007 | 14/12/2009 | ||
| Total | 2,075,000 | 4,575,000 |
$(d)$ Shares issued on exercise of compensation options (Consolidated)
No shares were issued during the years ended 30 June 2006 or 30 June 2005 on exercise of Compensation Options.
Option holdings of Key Management Personnel (Consolidated) $(e)$
| Vested at 30 June 2006 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balanceatbeginning ofperiod 1July 05 | Granted asremuneration | Optionsexercised | NetChangeOther # | Balanceat endofperiod30 June06 | Total | Exercisable | NotExercisabl€ | |||
| 30 June 2006 | ||||||||||
| Directors | ||||||||||
| B.D.Jones | 1,375,000 | 625,000 | $\cdot$ | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 1,375,000 | 625,000 | |||
| J.L.Smith | 600,000 | 750,000 | $\cdot$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 1,350,000 | 1,350,000 | 400,000 | 950,000 | ||
| R.N.Scott | 300,000 | ٠ | (300,000) | |||||||
| Executives | ||||||||||
| L.McDonald | 100,000 | 75,000 | ٠ | $\scriptstyle\star$ | 175,000 | 175,000 | ÷ | 175,000 | ||
| K.Carter | 100,000 | 125,000 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 225,000 | 225,000 | $\cdot$ | 225,000 | ||
| T.Phillips | 2,750,000 | 750,000 | ۰ | (1,000,000) | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 750,000 | 1,750,000 | ||
| A.Curr | 50,000 | 75,000 | $\cdot$ | $\overline{r}$ | 125,000 | 125,000 | ۰ | 125,000 | ||
| Total | 5,275,000 | 2,400,000 | ۰ | (1,300,000) | 6,375,000 | 6,375,000 | 2,525,000 | 3,850,000 |
Includes forfeits and offer to all employees under the Employee Share Scheme.
| Vested at 30 June 2005 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balanceatbeginning ofperiod 1July 04 | Granted asremuneration | Optionsexercised | NetChangeOther # | Balanceat endofperiod30 June05 | Total | Exercisable | NotExercisablе | ||
| 30 June2005 | |||||||||
| Directors | |||||||||
| R.N.Scott | 300,000 | ٠ | ۰ | $\ddot{}$ | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | ||
| B.D.Jones | ÷ | 1,375,000 | ÷ | $,$ | 1,375,000 | 1,375,000 | 500,000 | 875,000 | |
| Executives | |||||||||
| J. McGee | 1,000,000 | ÷ | $,$ | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | |||
| J. Smith | 400,000 | 200.000 | ۰. | $\cdot$ | 600.000 | 600.000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | |
| T.Phillips | 2,750,000 | ÷ | $_{\star}$ | 2,750,000 | 2,750,000 | 2,000,000 | 750,000 | ||
| L.McDonald | 100,000 | $\overline{ }$ | 100,000 | 100,000 | $\blacksquare$ | 100,000 | |||
| K.Carter | ÷ | 100,000 | ÷ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 100,000 | 100,000 | ÷ | 100,000 | |
| A.Curr | ÷ | 50,000 | ÷ | $\cdot$ | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||
| Total | 1,700,000 | 4,575,000 | ٠ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 6,275,000 | 6,275,000 | 2,800,000 | 3,475,000 |
Includes forfeits and offer to all employees under the Employee Share Scheme.
Shareholdings of Key Management Personnel
Shares held in Homeloans Limited (number)
| Balance01 July 2005 | Granted asremuneration | Options | On exercise of | Net Change Other | Balance30 June 2006 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ord. | Pref. | Ord. | Pref. | Ord. | Pref. | Ord. | Pref. | Ord. | Pref. | ||
| 30 June2006 | |||||||||||
| Directors | |||||||||||
| T.A.Holmes | 8,869,781 | 170,750 | ۰ | 150,000 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 9,019,781 | 170,750 | ||||
| R.P.Salmon | 8,665,366 | 170,441 | $\cdot$ | ÷ | $\blacksquare$ | 40,000 | $\tilde{\phantom{a}}$ | 8,705,366 | 170,441 | ||
| B.D.Jones | 50,000 | ۰ | $\blacksquare$ | ۰ | ۰ | 175,952 | $\ddot{}$ | 225,952 | |||
| J.L.Smith | 67,723 | 208 | $\blacksquare$ | ٠ | ÷ | ÷ | 15,000 | ÷ | 82,723 | 208 | |
| R.N.Scott | 1,489,794 | 29,458 | ÷ | $\blacksquare$ | $\blacksquare$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 1,489,794 | 29,458 | |||
| Executives | |||||||||||
| L.McDonald | $\blacksquare$ | ÷ | $\blacksquare$ | $\blacksquare$ | $,$ | ||||||
| K.Carter | 1,048 | $\blacksquare$ | ۰ | ÷ | $\blacksquare$ | $\blacksquare$ | ٠ | 1,048 | |||
| T.Phillips | 2,419,456 | $\blacksquare$ | ÷ | $\blacksquare$ | 99,355 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 2,518,811 | ||||
| A.Curr | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | ÷ | $\blacksquare$ | ۰ | ٠ | ٠ | |||||
| Total | 21,563,168 | 370,857 | $\cdot$ | 480,307 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 22,043,475 | 370,857 |
| Balance01 July 2004 | Granted asremuneration | On exercise ofOptions | Net Change Other | Balance30 June 2005 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June2005 | Ord. | Pref. | Ord. | Pref. | Ord. | Pref. | Ord. | Pref. | Ord. | Pref. |
| Directors | ||||||||||
| T.A.Holmes | 8,776,281 | 170,750 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\cdot$ | ÷ | 93,500 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 8,869,781 | 170,750 | |
| R.P.Salmon | 8,665,366 | 170,441 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | ۰ | ٠ | ٠ | $\blacksquare$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 8,665,366 | 170,441 |
| B.D.Jones | 50,000 | $\blacksquare$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\blacksquare$ | $\blacksquare$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 50,000 | |
| R.N.Scott | 1,489,794 | 29,458 | $\overline{ }$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\blacksquare$ | ÷ | 1,489,794 | 29,458 | ||
| Executives | ||||||||||
| J.L.Smith | 20,766 | 208 | 46,957 | ٠ | 67,723 | 208 | ||||
| T.Phillips | 377,322 | $\blacksquare$ | 2,042,134 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 2,419,456 | |||||
| K.Carter | 1,048 | ٠ | ٠ | $\blacksquare$ | ÷ | ٠ | 1,048 | |||
| T.Phillips | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\blacksquare$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\scriptstyle\star$ | ÷ | $\blacksquare$ | ۰ | $\blacksquare$ | |
| A.Curr | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\blacksquare$ | $\cdot$ | $\overline{ }$ | $\cdot$ | $\blacksquare$ | ||||
| $\mathbf{r}$ | $\blacksquare$ | |||||||||
| Total | 19,379,529 | 370,857 | 2,182,591 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 21,562,120 | 370,857 |
$(f)$ Other transactions and balances with Key Management Personnel
There were no transaction between key management personnel and the consolidated group during the year. There were no balances owed by/to the key management personnel and any member of the Consolidated Entity.
Note 30: TRANSITION TO AIFRS
For all periods up to and including the year ended 30 June 2005, the Consolidated entity prepared its financial statements in accordance with Australian generally accepted accounting practice (AGAAP). These financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2006 are the first the Consolidated entity is required to prepare in accordance with Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS).
Accordingly, the Consolidated entity has prepared financial statements that comply with AIFRS applicable for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005 and the significant accounting policies meeting those requirements are described in note 2. In preparing these financial statements, the Consolidated entity has started from an opening balance sheet as at 1 July 2004, the Consolidated entity's date of transition to AIFRS, and made those changes in accounting policies and other restatements required by AASB 1 First-time adoption of AIFRS.
This note explains the principal adjustments made by the Consolidated entity in restating its AGAAP balance sheet as at 1 July 2004 and its previously published AGAAP financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2005.
Exemptions applied
AASB 1 allows first-time adopters certain exemptions from the general requirement to apply AIFRS retrospectively.
The Consolidated entity has taken the following exemptions:
- Comparative information for financial instruments is prepared in accordance with AGAAP and the company and Consolidated have adopted AASB 132: Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement from 1 July 2005.
- AASB 3 Business Combinations has not been applied to acquisitions of subsidiaries or of interests in associates and joint ventures that occurred before 1 July 2004.
- AASB 2 Share-based Payment has not been applied to any equity instruments that were granted on or before 7 November 2002, nor has it been applied to equity instruments granted after 7 November 2002 that vested before 1 January 2005.
Explanation of material adjustments to the cash flow statement
The material difference between the cash flow statements presented under AIFRS and those presented under AGAAP relates to the consolidation of Residential Mortgage Trust ("RMT"). Under AASB 127 "Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements" the RMT has been consolidated as part of the Homeloans group, and the cash flows through the trusts form part of the consolidated cash flows. These cash flows are significantly larger than those previously recorded in the Homeloans Condensed Cash Flow Statement.
| Balance sheet reflectingreconciliation of adjustments to | Note | CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANS LIMITED | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFRS as at 1 July 2004 | AGAAP$'000 | AIFRSImpact$'000 | AIFRS$'000 | AGAAP$3000 | AIFRSImpact$3000 | AIFRS$'000 | ||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||||
| Cash assets | а | 623 | 27,736 | 28,359 | 34 | 34 | ||||
| Receivables | a, e | 12,793 | (3,867) | 8,926 | 9,763 | (1,092) | 8,671 | |||
| Loans and advances to customers | а | 562,414 | 562,414 | $\blacksquare$ | ||||||
| Deferred expenses | а | 32,052 | (11, 418) | 20,634 | 29,012 | (9,946) | 19,066 | |||
| Other financial assets | $\blacksquare$ | 18,838 | 18,838 | |||||||
| Plant and equipment | а | 2,809 | (1) | 2,808 | 2,808 | 2,808 | ||||
| Goodwill | 15,716 | 15,716 | ||||||||
| TOTAL ASSETSLIABILITIES | 63,993 | 574,864 | 638,857 | 60,455 | (11, 038) | 49,417 | ||||
| Payables | a, c | 4,387 | 1,529 | 5,916 | 5,862 | 1,823 | 7,685 | |||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | а | 6,755 | 587,303 | 594,058 | 6,755 | 6,755 | ||||
| Unearned revenue | а | 10,220 | (10, 220) | $\blacksquare$ | 9,229 | (9,229) | ||||
| Lease incentives | 609 | 609 | 609 | 609 | ||||||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | C | 4,597 | (1,005) | 3,592 | 4,597 | (2,330) | 2,267 | |||
| Provisions | 641 | 641 | 641 | 641 | ||||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 27,209 | 577,607 | 604,816 | 27,693 | (9,736) | 17,957 | ||||
| NET ASSETS | 36,784 | (2,743) | 34,041 | 32,762 | (1, 302) | 31,460 | ||||
| EQUITY | ||||||||||
| Issued capital | 53,395 | 53,395 | 53,395 | 53,395 | ||||||
| Reserves | d | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||
| Accumulated losses | a, c, d,е, | (16, 611) | (2,749) | (19, 360) | (20, 633) | (1,308) | (21, 941) | |||
| TOTAL EQUITY | 36,784 | (2, 743) | 34,041 | 32,762 | (1, 302) | 31,460 |
| Balance sheet reflectingreconciliation of adjustments to | HOMELOANS LIMITEDAIFRSAIFRS$'000Impact$'000 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFRS as at 30 June 2005 | Note | CONSOLIDATED | |||||||
| AGAAP$'000 | AIFRSImpact$'000 | AIFRS$'000 | AGAAP$'000 | ||||||
| ASSETS | |||||||||
| Cash assets | а | 1,468 | 15,478 | 16,946 | 769 | 769 | |||
| Receivables | a,e,c | 10,194 | (120) | 10,074 | 9,020 | (445) | 8,575 | ||
| Loans and advances to customers | a | $\blacksquare$ | 496,855 | 496,855 | |||||
| Deferred expenses | a | 34,762 | (12, 613) | 22,149 | 29,094 | (9, 199) | 19,895 | ||
| Investment in associate | 19,178 | 19,178 | |||||||
| Plant and equipment | 1,957 | 1,957 | 1,957 | 1,957 | |||||
| Goodwill | b | 15,071 | 925 | 15,996 | |||||
| TOTAL ASSETS | 63,452 | 500,525 | 563,977 | 60,018 | (9,644) | 50,374 | |||
| LIABILITIES | |||||||||
| Payables | a.c | 4,123 | 1,922 | 6,045 | 6,885 | 2,047 | 8,932 | ||
| Interest-bearing liabilities | a | 4,691 | 511,090 | 515,781 | 4,691 | 4,691 | |||
| Unearned revenue | a | 10,993 | (10, 993) | 9,199 | (9, 199) | ||||
| Lease incentives | 665 | 665 | 665 | 665 | |||||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | С | 5,611 | (823) | 4,788 | 5,611 | (2, 492) | 3,119 | ||
| Provisions | 573 | 573 | 573 | 573 | |||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 26,656 | 501,196 | 527,852 | 27,624 | (9,644) | 17,980 | |||
| NET ASSETS | 36,796 | (671) | 36,125 | 32,394 | $\blacksquare$ | 32,394 | |||
| EQUITY | |||||||||
| Issued capital | 53,395 | 53,395 | 53,395 | 53,395 | |||||
| Reserves | d | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | ||||
| Accumulated losses | a, c, d, e | (16, 599) | (773) | (17, 372) | (21,001) | (102) | (21, 103) | ||
| TOTAL EQUITY | 36,796 | (671) | 36,125 | 32,394 | $\blacksquare$ | 32,394 |
| Balance sheet reflectingreconciliation of adjustments toAIFRS as at 30 June 2005 to | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| changes under AIFRS effective | Note | CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANS LIMITED | |||||
| effective 1 July 2005 | AIFRS30 Jun 05$'000 | AIFRSImpact$'000 | AIFRS1 Jul 05$'000 | AIFRS30 Jun 05$'000 | AIFRSImpact$'000 | AIFRS1 Jul 05$'000 | ||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Cash assets | 16,946 | 16,946 | 769 | 769 | ||||
| Receivables | $(ii)(iii)$ ,C | 10,074 | 3,760 | 13,834 | 8,575 | 138 | 8,713 | |
| Loans and advances to customers | 496,855 | 496,855 | ||||||
| Deferred expenses | (i)(iii) | 22,149 | (2,679) | 19,470 | 19,895 | (425) | 19,470 | |
| Investment in associate | 19,178 | 19,178 | ||||||
| Plant and equipment | 1,957 | 1,957 | 1,957 | 1,957 | ||||
| Goodwill | 15,996 | 15,996 | ||||||
| TOTAL ASSETSLIABILITIES | 563,977 | 1,081 | 565,058 | 50,374 | (287) | 50,087 | ||
| Payables | (i)(iii) | 6,045 | 731 | 6,776 | 8,932 | (245) | 8,687 | |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | (ii) | 515,781 | 23 | 515,804 | 4,691 | 4,691 | ||
| Reset preference shares | (i) | 4,905 | 4,905 | 4,905 | 4,905 | |||
| Lease incentives | 665 | $_{\rm rec}$ | 665 | 665 | 665 | |||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | $c$ , (iii) | 4,788 | 195 | 4,983 | 3,119 | (68) | 3,051 | |
| Provisions | 573 | 573 | 573 | 573 | ||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 527,852 | 5,854 | 533,706 | 17,980 | 4,592 | 22,572 | ||
| NET ASSETS | 36,125 | (4, 773) | 31,352 | 32,394 | (4,879) | 27,515 | ||
| EQUITY | ||||||||
| Issued capital | (i) | 53,395 | (4, 771) | 48,624 | 53,395 | (4, 771) | 48,624 | |
| Reserves | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | ||||
| Accumulated losses | (i)(ii)c | (17, 372) | (2) | (17, 374) | (21, 103) | (108) | (21, 211) | |
| TOTAL EQUITY | 36,125 | (4, 773) | 31,352 | 32,394 | (4,879) | 27,515 |
Homeloans Limited-Annual Report
$\overline{\phantom{a}}$
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2006 (CONTINUED)
Income statement for the yearended 30 June 2005
| Note | CONSOLIDATED | HOMELOANS LIMITED | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGAAP$'000 | AIFRSimpact$'000 | AIFRS$'000 | AGAAP$'000 | AIFRSImpact$'000 | AIFRS$'000 | ||
| Interest income | a, e | 183 | 38,397 | 38,580 | 144 | (75) | 69 |
| Interest expense | a | (466) | (32, 377) | (32, 843) | (466) | 10 | (456) |
| Net interest income | (283) | 6,020 | 5,737 | (322) | (65) | (387) | |
| Fees and commission income | а | 36,870 | (4,078) | 32,792 | 28,520 | 28,520 | |
| Fees and commission expense | а | (14, 460) | (740) | (15,200) | (14, 226) | 717 | (13, 509) |
| Other operating income | 355 | 355 | 6,241 | 6,241 | |||
| General administrative expenses | a,e | (8, 346) | 824 | (7, 522) | (7,952) | 918 | (7,034) |
| Other operating expenses | a,b,d | (12, 590) | 116 | (12, 474) | (11, 654) | (96) | (11, 750) |
| Profit before income tax | 1,546 | 2,142 | 3,688 | 607 | 1,474 | 2,081 | |
| Income tax expense | с | (1,030) | (166) | (1, 196) | (471) | (268) | (739) |
| Net profit after income tax | 516 | 1,976 | 2,492 | 136 | 1,206 | 1,342 | |
| Net profit attributable to membersof the Homeloans Limited | 516 | 1,976 | 2,492 | 136 | 1,206 | 1,342 | |
| Basic earnings per share (cents pershare) | 0.02 | 3.95 | |||||
| Diluted earnings per share | 0.77 | 3.70 | |||||
| Unfranked dividend per share | |||||||
| Ordinary shares | 1.5 | 0.0 |
Impact of adopting AIFRS
Outlined below are the areas impacted upon adoption of AIFRS, including the financial impact on equity and profit.
| Reference | Item | AGAAP | AIFRS | Impact ($'000) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | Consolidation | Residential Mortgage Trust | The Consolidated entity utilises a special | CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |
| (RMT) was not | purpose vehicle (SPV), which issues securitiesto investors. This SPV meets the criteria of beingconsolidated undera 'subsidiary' under AASB 127 - Consolidatedand separate financial statements. This | Af transition: Retained Earnings decreased $1,934 | At transition: | |||
| Homeloans Limited and | Cash - increase $27,736 | Decrease in deferred | ||||
| was a standalone | Receivables - decrease $2,080 | expenses $9,946 | ||||
| securitisation trust. | transaction does not meet the criteria underAASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition | Deferred expenses - decrease $11,418 | Increase in receivables onre-allocation of deferred | |||
| and Measurement in regards to derecognition of | Loans & advances - increase $562,414 | expenses to subsidiary on | ||||
| financial instruments. Accordingly, the value of | Payables - increase $1,500 | consolidation of RMT $716 | ||||
| the securitised loans and correspondingliabilities has been recorded in the balance sheet | Interest Bearing Liabilities- increase $587,303 | Unearned revenue decrease | ||||
| using the effective interest method with the | Unearned revenue - decrease $10,220 | of $9.229 | ||||
| related interest earned and interest paid | At 30 June 2005: | |||||
| recognised through the consolidated incomestatement. | At 30 June 2005 the following assets & liabilitieschanged: | Decrease in deferred | ||||
| Cash - increase$15.478 | expenses $9,199 | |||||
| Receivables - increase $816 | Increase in receivables & | |||||
| Deferred expenses -decrease $12,613 | decrease in selling expenses | |||||
| Loans & advances - increase $496,855 | on reversal of AGAAP entry.AGAAP entry was a re- | |||||
| Payables - increase $1,910 | allocation of deferred | |||||
| Interest Bearing Liabilities- increase $511,090 | expenses to subsidiary. Thiswas already recognised on | |||||
| Unearned revenue - decrease $10,993 | consolidation of RMT in | |||||
| At 30 June 2005 the following income andexpense accounts changed: | previous period underAIFRS. Profit increase of | |||||
| Interest income - increase $38,473 | $716 | |||||
| Origination income - decrease $972 | Unearned revenue decreaseof $9,199 | |||||
| Mortgage management income - decrease $3,106 | ||||||
| Direct selling expenses -increase $421 | ||||||
| Management expense- increase $320 | ||||||
| Interest expense - increase $32,387 | ||||||
| Other expenses- increase $714 |
| Goodwill | Goodwill was amortised | The Group has chosen to adopt the exemption | CONSOLIDATED | PARENT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| over its useful life (notexceeding 20 years) | available under AASB 1 of not retrospectivelyapplying AASB 3 Business Combinations to itsbusiness combinations occurring beforetransition date. Under AASB 3 Goodwill issubject to annual impairment testing and | Equity at transition: No effectProfit for 30 June 2005: Increase to profit of $925 | No effect at any stage | |
| amortisation of goodwill is strictly prohibited. Anadjustment is thus required to reverse theamortisation charge for 30 June 2005. |
| c | Income tax | The income statement | AASB 112 Income Taxes requires the balance | CONSOLIDATED | PARENT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| method was used, whichinvolved tax-effecting onlythose items that impacted | sheet method to be used, which recognisesdeferred tax balances when there is a differencebetween the carrying value of an asset or liability | Transition: A reduction in Provision for DeferredTax by $1,005 | Transition: A reduction inProvision for Deferred Tax by | ||
| profit and loss. | and its tax base. | Increase in retained earnings $984 | $1,005 | ||
| UIG 1052 transfers only tax losses and tax | Increase in payables $25 | Ilncrease in payables $25 | |||
| Deferred tax balanceswere transferred to the | credits from the subsidiaries to the haed entity.As a result of the above adjustment, the deferred | At 30 June 2005: Provision for Deferred taxdecreased $823 | Increase in retained earnings$984 | ||
| head office. All recognised | tax liability changed as follows: | Increase in payables $12Increase in retained earnings $976Increase in tax expense $166 | UIG Changes: Receivabledecrease $19 | ||
| deferred tax balances weretransferred to the head | Increase payables $1,798 | ||||
| entity. | Decrease deferred tax | ||||
| At 1 July 2005: Decrease in retained earnings $70Increase in provision for deferred tax $70 | $1,325 | ||||
| Decrease retained earnings$497 | |||||
| At 30 June 2005: Provisionfor Deferred tax decreased$2,492 | |||||
| Increase in payables $12 | |||||
| Increase in retained earnings$976 | |||||
| Increase in tax expense$166 | |||||
| UIG Changes: Receivabledecrease $491 | |||||
| Payables increase $2,035 | |||||
| Deferred tax decrease$1,669 | |||||
| Reatained earnings increase$125 | |||||
| At 1 July 2005: Increase inretained earnings $68 | |||||
| Increase in provision fordeferred tax $70 | |||||
| Increase in receivables $138 | |||||
| UIG changes: | |||||
| Increase payables $180.Decrease retained earnings$42. | |||||
| Decrease deferred tax $138 | |||||
| d | Share-basedpayments | Share-based paymentswere not required to beexpensed | AASB 2 Share-based Payments requires entitiesto recognise an expense in relation to shares.options, and other equity instruments provided toemployees (including directors).These share-based payment transactions mustbe fair valued at grant date and recognised asan expense in profit or loss evenly over thevesting period.An adjustment was required to recognise sharebased payments granted after 7 November 2002and vesting after 1 January 2005. | CONSOLIDATEDEquity at transition: Decrease to retained earningsand increase to employee benefits reserve of $6.Net effect is zero.At 30 June 2005: Decrease to profit of $96Decrease in retained earnings $6 | PARENTEquity at transition:Decrease to retainedearnings and increase toemployee benefits reserve of$6. Net effect is zero.At 30 June 2005; Decreaseto profit of $96Decrease in retainedearnings $6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e | Contingent assets | In 2003 Homeloans paidstamp duty to the WAOffice of State Revenue inrespect of the transfer ofassets of IF&I SecuritiesPty Ltd as trustee for theIF&I Securities Unit Trust.This payment was indispute and the valuecarried on the balancesheet on the basis that afull refund was beingsought. Subsequently, inOctober 2005 the matterwas settled and the non-recoverable balance waswritten off in the 2005accounting period. | AASB 137 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities andContingent Assets prohibits the recognition of acontingent asset unless it is virtually certain thatan inflow of economic benefit will arise in respectof an asset in the future. In regards to the StampDuty claim carried as an asset at 30 June 2004under the previous AGAAP. As the amount wasnot virtually certain, under AASB 137 it cannotbe recognised and has been written offCorrespondingly, the write-off under AGAAP inthe year ended 30 June 2005 would need to bereversed. | CONSOLIDATEDAt transition: Charge to retained earnings of$1,789Decrease in receivables by $1,789At 30 June 2005:Interest revenue decreased by $75Interest expense decreased by $10General admin expense decreased by $918Receivables decreased by $936Retained earnings decreased by $1,789 | PARENTAt transition: Charge toretained earnings of $1,789Decrease in receivables by$1,789At 30 June 2005:Interest revenue decreasedby $75Interest expense decreasedby $10General admin expensedecreased by $918Receivables decreased by$936Retained earningsdecreased by $1,789 |
100
Impact of adopting AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement
The Consolidated elected to apply the option available under AASB 1 of adopting AASB 132 and AASB 139 from 1 July 2005. Outlined below are the areas impacted upon adoption of AASB 132 and AASB 139, including the financial impact to equity and profit.
| Reference | Item | AGAAP | AIFRS | Impact ($'000) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (i) | Reset preferenceshares | Reset preference shares were treatedas equity and dividends paid wereposted to retained earnings. | Under AASB 132 the definitions of liabilityand equity are more stringent, thusrequiring the reset preference shares to betreated as debt under AIFRS. Payments | CONSOLIDATEDEquity at transition: No effect | PARENTEquity at transition: No effect | |
| made to Reset Preference shareholders aretherefore classified as interest expenseunder AIFRS. | Equity at 30 June 2005: No effect | Equity at 30 June 2005: No effect | ||||
| The cost associated with the issue of thereset preference share issue are charged tothe income statement on an effective yield | Profit for 30 June 2005: No effect | Profit for 30 June 2005: No effect | ||||
| basis. | Equity at 1 July 2005: Decreasein shareholders equity of $4,771.a decrease in retained earningsof $134, for amortisation of set upcosts, and an increase in interestbearing liabilities of $4,905 | Equity at 1 July 2005: Decreasein shareholders equity of $4,771a decrease in retained earningsof $134 for amortisation of set upcosts, and an increase in interestbearing liabilities of $4,905 | ||||
| Interest expense of $50 andamortisation charge on set-upcosts of $92 | : Interest expense of $50 andamortisation charge on set-upcosts of $92 | |||||
| Payables increased by $42 fordividend accrued to 30 June | Payables increased by $42 fordividend accrued to 30 June | |||||
| Retained earnings decreased by$42 | Retained earnings decreased by$42 | |||||
| (i) | Interest rate swap | Interest rate swaps were notrecognised on balance sheet. Net | Under AASB 139, all derivatives must berecognised on balance sheet at fair value. | CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |
| receipts and payments wererecognised as an adjustment tointerest expense. | The interest rate swap held at 30 June2005 was not designated as a hedge andhas been accounted for as a derivative. | At 1 July 2005Decrease in retained earnings$46 | No impact | |||
| Recognition of derivative liabilityof $$23$ | ||||||
| Reduction in prepayments $23 |
| (iii) | Frailing commissions | Trailing commissions paid by thirdparties on Non-Managed Ioans arerecognised as income in the incomestatement.Trailing commission paid by thecompany to internal and externalparties in respect of Non-Managedloans is recognised as an expense inthe income statement. | Under AASB 139 on initial, recognition,trailing commision revenue aandreceivables are recognised at fair value,being the expected future trailingcommission receivables discounted to theirnet present value. | CONSOLIDATEDAs at 1 July 2005: The followingadjustments were made againstretained earnings increasing it by$290Recognise asset for presentvalue of Trailer income receivableof $3.783Recognise liability for presentvalue of Trailer expense payableof $688Write off deferred expenses inrespect of Non-Managed loans.Amount of write off was $2,679Increase in tax liability in respectto the above transactions $125 | PARENTAt 1 July 2005Decrease in deferred expenses$425Decrease in payables $425 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ------- | ---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
DIRECTORS' DECLARATION
In accordance with a resolution of the directors of Homeloans Limited, I state that:
- $\mathbf{1}$ . In the opinion of the directors:
- (a) the financial statements and notes of the company and of the consolidated entity are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
- (i) giving a true and fair view of the company's and consolidated entity's financial position as at 30 June 2006 and of their performance for the year ended on that date; and
- (ii) complying with Accounting Standards and Corporations Regulations 2001; and
- (b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
- (a) the financial statements and notes of the company and of the consolidated entity are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
- $2.$ This declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the directors in accordance with sections 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial period ending 30 June 2006.
On behalf of the Board
Timothy A. Holmes Executive Chairman
6 October 2006
EIFRAST & YOUNG
The fract & Young Suicity 11 Movarts Ray Road [11] Perth WA 6000 Australia
CPD Box M919 Peth WA 6843
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT TO MEMBERS OF HOMELOANS LIMITED
Scope
The financial report and directors' responsibility
The financial report comprises the balance sheet, income statement, statement of changes in equity, statement of cash flows, accompanying notes to the financial statements, and the directors' declaration for Homeloans Limited (the company) and the consolidated entity, for the year ended 30 June 2006. The consolidated entity comprises both the company and the entities it controlled during that year.
The directors of the company are responsible for preparing a financial report that gives a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the company and the consolidated entity, and that complies with Accounting Standards in Australia, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001. This includes responsibility for the maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal controls that are designed to prevent and detect fraud and error, and for the accounting policies and accounting estimates inherent in the financial report.
Audit approach
We conducted an independent audit of the financial report in order to express an opinion to the members of the company. Our audit was conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards in order to provide reasonable assurance as to whether the financial report is free of material misstatement. The nature of an audit is influenced by factors such as the use of professional judgement, selective testing. the inherent limitations of internal control, and the availability of persuasive rather than conclusive evidence. Therefore, an audit cannot guarantee that all material misstatements have been detected.
We performed procedures to assess whether in all material respects the financial report presents fairly, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including compliance with Accounting Standards in Australia, and other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia, a view which is consistent with our understanding of the company's and the consolidated entity's financial position, and of their performance as represented by the results of their operations and cash flows.
We formed our audit opinion on the basis of these procedures, which included:
- examining, on a test basis, information to provide evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial report; and
- assessing the appropriateness of the accounting policies and disclosures used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors.
While we considered the effectiveness of management's internal controls over financial reporting when determining the nature and extent of our procedures, our audit was not designed to provide assurance on internal controls.
We performed procedures to assess whether the substance of business transactions was accurately reflected in the financial report. These and our other procedures did not include consideration or judgement of the appropriateness or reasonableness of the business plans or strategies adopted by the directors and management of the company.
Independence
We are independent of the company and the consolidated entity and have met the independence requirements of Australian professional ethical pronouncements and the Corporations Act 2001. We have given to the directors of the company a written Auditor's Independence Declaration. In addition to our audit of the financial report, we were engaged to undertake the services disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. The provision of these services has not impaired our independence.
Audit opinion
In our opinion the financial report of Homeloans Limited is in accordance with:
- $(a)$ the Corporations Act 2001, including:
- giving a true and fair view of the financial position of Homeloans Limited and the $(i)$ consolidated entity at 30 June 2006 and of their performance for the year ended on that date; and
- $(ii)$ complying with Accounting Standards in Australia and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
- $(b)$ other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia.
Ernst & Young
R A Kirkby Partner Perth
6 October 2006