AI assistant
RAMELIUS RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2016
Apr 3, 2016
65718_rns_2016-04-03_a233ea48-89a9-4de4-baf7-fbabe76a3aa9.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
4 April 2016 For Immediate Release
Milky Way Exploration Update – Mt Magnet, WA
Ramelius Resources Limited (ASX:RMS) is pleased to announce further dip and strike continuity to the high grade, bedrock gold mineralisation, reported last year from drilling beneath the Milky Way open pit. Milky Way is located 1km south of the Galaxy mine area & 3.6km southwest of the Checker Mill at Mt Magnet in Western Australia (refer Figures 1 & 2).
Ramelius has completed an aggregate 4,457m of infill resource development reverse circulation (RC) drilling below the Milky Way pit (GXRC0400 series) and 5,040m in step out deeper exploration drilling (including a diamond drill hole GXDD0046 for 201.5m) throughout the broader Boogardie Basin, south of the Galaxy mine area (GXRC1300 series) since January 2016 (refer Figure 3 for Boogardie Basin location).
MILKY WAY – INFILL DRILLING
Significant resource development infill drilling intersections (using 0.5g/t Au lower cut) include:
-
19m at 9.05 g/t Au from 104m in GXRC0452, incl. 2m at 66.88 g/t Au
-
6m at 7.05 g/t Au from 3m in GXRC0456, incl. 2m at 15.85 g/t Au
-
17m at 7.75 g/t Au from 60m in GXRC0457, incl. 5m at 20.81 g/t Au
-
15m at 12.62 g/t Au from 39m in GXRC0459, incl. 2m at 87.32 g/t Au
-
15m at 6.90 g/t Au from 102m in GXRC0466, incl. 2m at 24.28 g/t Au
-
12m at 4.66 g/t Au from 126m in GXRC0467, incl. 4m at 11.58 g/t Au
-
16m at 3.85 g/t Au from 131m in GXRC0473, incl. 1m at 39.60 g/t Au
-
15m at 3.60 g/t Au from 163m in GXRC0476, incl. 1m at 36.60 g/t Au
BOOGARDIE BASIN – STEP-OUT DRILLING
Significant step-out exploration drilling intersections (using 0.10g/t Au lower cut) targeting broad mineralised porphyry intervals below the resource development drilling and elsewhere throughout the larger Boogardie Basin include:
-
67m at 1.04 g/t Au from 126m in GXRC1347, incl. 32m at 1.62 g/t Au
-
74m at 0.82 g/t Au from 55m in GXRC1350, incl. 5m at 5.14 g/t Au
-
48m at 1.03 g/t Au from 101m in GXRC1351, incl. 20m at 1.80 g/t Au
-
42m at 1.36 g/t Au from 46m in GXRC1363, incl. 7m at 7.36 g/t Au
-
18m at 2.65 g/t Au from 54m in GXRC1364, incl. 1m at 45.30 g/t Au
-
19m at 4.50 g/t Au from 65m in GXRC1373, incl. 1m at 18.95 g/t Au
As previously reported the high grade gold mineralisation at Milky Way is associated with an anastomosing shear zone (Milky Way Fault) passing on or near the eastern contact of the 50m wide (estimated true width) felsic porphyry unit (Milky Way Porphyry) and subsidiary hangingwall felsic lenses (refer Figures 4 and 5).
The mineralised intersections returned to date and reported today are highly encouraging as they continue to demonstrate potential for a larger tonnage mineralised porphyry within the broader Mt Magnet gold camp. The Company is working towards a maiden Mineral Resource estimate for Milky Way early in the June 2016 Quarter.
Selected infill drilling along with further step out drilling along predicted high grade shear zones will also continue during the June 2016 Quarter. Results will be reported as they become available.
For further information contact:
Mark Zeptner Managing Director Ramelius Resources Limited Ph: (08) 9202 1127
Duncan Gordon Executive Director Adelaide Equity Partner Ph: +61 404 006 444
ABOUT RAMELIUS
==> picture [412 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [412 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [412 x 97] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [412 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Ramelius’ Operations & Development Project Locations
Ramelius owns 100% of the Mt Magnet gold mine and associated Checker processing plant in Western Australia. The Company has commenced production from the high grade Vivien and Kathleen Valley gold mines near Leinster, also in Western Australia. The Burbanks Treatment Plant is located approximately 9 kilometres south of Coolgardie and is currently on care and maintenance.
2
EXPLORATION
Mt Magnet Gold Mine (WA)
An aggregate of 9,356m of RC drilling and 141.5m of NQ diamond core has been completed over the larger Milky Way Porphyry target area since the beginning of January 2016. The drilling programme comprised infill resource development drilling (GXRC0400 series holes) ahead of planned resource estimation work (refer Figures 4 and 5) and step-out reconnaissance exploration drilling (GXRC1300 series holes) targeting favourable litho-structural repeats of the Milky Way Porphyry mineralisation elsewhere within the larger Boogardie Basin environment (refer Figure 6).
The infill resource development drilling confirms significant stockwork gold mineralisation is associated with the altered felsic porphyry host rock at Milky Way. The prospective Milky Way Porphyry is characterised as a sericite-silica-pyrite altered fine grained felsic unit intruded into the basal ultramafic flow sequences that dominate the larger Boogardie Basin at Mt Magnet. The apparent patchy nature of the high grade gold mineralisation is typical of other gold rich stockwork gold systems at Mt Magnet, including the high grade Latecomer Porphyry mined below the Morning Star open pit. At Morning Star, historical mine records (circa 1993 to 1996), as sourced from Harmony Gold, suggest the Latecomer Porphyry provided the bulk of the ore developed from Morning Star during that period, representing 486,604 tonnes milled and a recovered grade of 4.75 g/t Au.
The Morning Star gold mine is credited with producing over 1.3Moz of gold since gold was first discovered in 1894 through to the cessation of underground mining in 2005. Selected deeper exploration drilling, designed to target poorly explored porphyry bodies peripheral to the previously mined Latecomer Porphyry at Morning Star, will be undertaken during the June 2016 Quarter.
The Company also intends to follow-up highly encouraging reconnaissance drill intersections reported away from the Milky Way Porphyry, during the June 2016 Quarter (refer Figure 6). Drilling will target high grade intersections including 7m at 7.36 g/t Au from 47m in GXRC1363 at Brown Cow (refer Figure 7), 19m at 4.50 g/t Au from 65m in GXRC1373 located west of the old Stellar pit and 5m at 4.89 g/t Au from 140m in GXRC1369, located south of the old Franks Tower pit.
==> picture [317 x 71] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [317 x 72] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [317 x 71] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [317 x 71] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Mt Magnet gold camp geology showing the felsic porphyry rock units, south of the Galaxy mining area
3
==> picture [400 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [400 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [400 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [400 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [400 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Aerial photo highlights the location of the Milky Way pit. For reference Morning Star is located ~1.5km south of the Checker Mill. As shown, the Boogardie Basin broadly occupies the southwestern quadrant of the aerial photo image bound by the arcuate folded banded iron formation trend extending from the Galaxy Mining Area, through Boomer and towards St George/Water Tank Hill.
==> picture [400 x 82] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [400 x 81] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [400 x 82] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [400 x 81] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Milky Way pit 2016 infill resource definition drilling plan. The north east trending dashed line represents the Milky Way Fault – see longitudinal section Figure 5.
4
==> picture [459 x 75] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [459 x 75] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [459 x 75] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [459 x 75] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5: Longitudinal section along the trace of the vertical dipping Milky Way Fault (search +/-20m), highlighting the higher grade depth potential along the fault below the shallow oxide Milky Way pit
==> picture [465 x 72] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [465 x 72] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [465 x 72] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [465 x 72] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [465 x 71] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6: Imaged gold ppm from historical shallow drilling @ 30mbs within the larger Boogardie Basin area, highlighting new infill drill targets beyond Milky Way to be targeted during the June 2016 Quarter
5
==> picture [474 x 66] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [474 x 66] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [474 x 65] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [474 x 66] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 7: Cross section through Brown Cow to the old Milky Way pit, located 400m east, highlighting the potential for new buried porphyry related gold mineralisation below the historical shallow drilling
6
Attachment 1: Anomalous (>0.1 g/t Au) RC drilling data from Milky Way and environments - Mt Magnet, WA
| Hole Id | Easting | Northing | Az/Dip | RL | F/Depth (m) |
From (m) | To (m) | Interval (m) |
g/t Au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXRC1347 | 577530 | 6896356 | 300/-61 | 442 | 200 Incl. Incl. Incl. + + + |
56 89 115 117 126 145 147 171 180 187 |
60 99 121 118 193 177 148 172 184 192 |
4 10 6 1 67 32 1 1 4 5 |
0.79 0.67 0.81 4.21 1.04 1.62 15.25 8.09 1.24 0.94 |
| GXRC1348 | 577508 | 6896339 | 300/-61 | 442 | 200 | 100 | 166 | 66 | 0.40 |
| GXRC1349 | 577548 | 6896362 | 270/-60 | 442 | 240 | 22 67 102 129 171 |
36 77 114 167 214 |
14 10 12 38 43 |
0.63 0.40 0.27 0.68 0.81 |
| GXRC1350 | 577468 | 6896372 | 328/-51 | 443 | 140 Incl. Incl. |
32 44 55 97 100 132 |
40 49 129 102 101 140 |
8 5 74 5 1 8 |
0.24 0.13 0.82 5.14 21.90 0.89 |
| GXRC1351 | 577514 | 6896375 | 300/-56 | 442 | 204 Incl. |
36 64 88 101 126 |
37 77 90 149 146 |
1 13 2 48 20 |
1.01 0.30 0.51 1.03 1.80 |
| GXRC1352 | 577579 | 6896387 | 300/-67 | 442 | 90 | 33 43 80 |
40 69 85 |
7 26 5 |
0.23 0.48 0.83 |
| GXRC1353 | 577609 | 6896824 | 270/-60 | 444 | 206 | 118 140 |
119 141 |
1 1 |
1.01 0.88 |
| GXRC1354 | 577832 | 6895662 | 270/-55 | 436 | 162 | 104 | 106 | 2 | 2.21 |
| GXRC1355 | 578450 | 6896097 | 270/-55 | 438 | 192 | 123 167 |
141 170 |
18 3 |
0.16 2.03 |
| GXRC1356 | 578725 | 6895880 | 270/-51 | 437 | 174 Incl. |
2 58 |
81 65 |
79 7 |
0.35 1.33 |
| GXRC1357 | 578558 | 6895746 | 270/-60 | 437 | 132 Incl. |
24 56 62 |
52 71 70 |
28 15 8 |
0.30 0.88 1.28 |
| GXRC1358 | 578440 | 6895178 | 270/-60 | 435 | 168 | 119 | 135 | 16 | 0.21 |
| GXRC1359 | 578577 | 6895178 | 270/-60 | 434 | 150 | 120 | 137 | 17 | 0.18 |
| GXRC1360 | 579566 | 6895501 | 270/-55 | 436 | 102 Incl. |
1 26 48 |
2 91 54 |
1 65 6 |
0.52 0.26 0.72 |
| GXRC1361 | 579605 | 6895300 | 270/-60 | 413 | 100 Incl. + |
29 36 48 |
62 38 50 |
33 2 2 |
0.29 1.31 1.30 |
| GXRC1362 | 579712 | 6895371 | 270/-60 | 436 | 100 | 29 | 47 | 18 | 0.23 |
| GXRC1363 | 577053 | 6896450 | 270/-55 | 440 | 186 Incl. Incl. |
46 47 47 112 |
88 54 49 144 |
42 7 2 32 |
1.36 7.36 21.35 0.28 |
| GXRC1364 | 577540 | 6896251 | 300/-55 | 442 | 300 | 54 | 72 | 18 | 2.65 |
7
| Incl. | 67 101 130 144 180 |
68 111 131 169 226 |
1 10 1 25 46 |
45.3 0.15 0.49 0.13 0.23 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXRC1365 | 577353 | 6896117 | 320/-55 | 441 | 198 Incl. |
64 72 |
78 75 |
14 3 |
0.51 1.50 |
| GXRC1366 | 577214 | 6896035 | 320/-57 | 441 | 156 | NSR | |||
| GXRC1367 | 576965 | 6896012 | 135/-55 | 439 | 200 | 103 | 124 | 21 | 0.19 |
| GXRC1368 | 577703 | 6894574 | 313/-55 | 433 | 168 Incl. |
37 47 77 |
38 150 80 |
1 103 3 |
1.05 0.25 0.83 |
| GXRC1369 | 577466 | 6894415 | 315/-60 | 431 | 150 Incl. |
33 36 67 140 |
43 37 115 145 |
10 1 48 5 |
1.46 10.75 0.17 4.89 |
| GXRC1370 | 578003 | 6895013 | 313/-55 | 435 | 150 Incl. |
12 67 126 126 |
27 87 133 127 |
15 20 7 1 |
0.11 0.10 0.23 1.11 |
| GXRC1371 | 578805 | 6892905 | 123/-55 | 424 | 288 | 146 250 |
151 253 |
5 3 |
1.60 1.00 |
| GXRC1372 | 577580 | 6896360 | 270/-68 | 443 | 288 Incl. Incl. + + + + + |
42 47 62 81 144 157 180 181 189 207 235 251 260 |
52 48 63 84 145 161 266 182 203 208 243 252 264 |
10 1 1 3 1 4 86 1 14 1 8 1 4 |
1.65 11.4 0.51 1.09 0.91 0.45 0.56 0.51 1.32 0.81 0.79 0.99 2.60 |
| GXRC1373 | 576445 | 6897134 | 331/-60 | 445 | 195 Incl. |
14 59 65 75 89 97 108 115 125 131 136 141 146 154 162 167 176 193 |
16 62 84 76 90 98 110 117 127 132 137 143 147 155 163 168 183 194 |
2 3 19 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 7 1 |
1.37 0.58 4.50 18.95 10.35 0.55 0.64 1.25 0.53 1.27 0.93 0.76 0.56 13.65 0.53 2.33 0.86 3.42 |
| GXDD0046 | 577520 | 6896364 | 300/-57 | 443 | 201.5 Incl. + + + |
84.50 110.45 111.45 116.45 117.45 128.45 |
85.50 188.50 112.45 122.60 117.75 130.45 |
1 78.05 1 6.15 0.30 2 |
0.52 0.62 0.52 1.88 29.2 0.66 |
8
| + | 135.45 | 139.45 | 4 | 0.67 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | 143.45 | 144.45 | 1 | 3.60 | |
| + | 150.45 | 151.45 | 1 | 1.29 | |
| + | 155.45 | 159.60 | 4.15 | 1.53 | |
| + | 164.60 | 168.65 | 4.05 | 0.95 | |
| + | 172.65 | 178.55 | 5.90 | 1.34 | |
| 190.20 | 198.10 | 7.90 | 0.72 |
==> picture [248 x 84] intentionally omitted <==
Reported significant gold assay intersections (using a 0.1 g/t Au lower cut) are reported using 1m downhole intervals at plus 0.1 g/t gold, with up to 4m of internal dilution. Gold determination was by Fire Assay using a 50gm charge with AAS finishes and a lower limit of detection of 0.01 ppm Au. NSR denotes no significant results. True widths of the high grade shear zone are interpreted to be 25-50% of reported downhole intersections while the broader porphyry intersections are estimated to be 85% of the reported downhole intersections. Coordinates are MGA94-Z50.
Attachment 2: Anomalous (>0.50 g/t Au) Resource Development RC drilling from Milky Way - Mt Magnet, WA
| Hole Id | Easting | Northing | Az/Dip | RL | F/Depth (m) |
From (m) | To (m) | Interval (m) |
g/t Au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXRC0444 | 577564 | 6896424 | 300/-51 | 442 | 138 | 43 69 85 95 111 124 137 |
64 75 92 96 112 127 138 |
21 6 7 1 1 3 1 |
1.07 0.52 0.54 1.04 1.40 0.72 0.72 |
| GXRC0445 | 577560 | 6896427 | 120/-60 | 442 | 100 Incl. |
34 35 40 49 51 |
41 37 41 87 79 |
7 2 1 38 28 |
0.91 2.61 0.55 1.31 1.73 |
| GXRC0446 | 577572 | 6896680 | 180/-51 | 391 | 126 Incl. |
0 0 37 46 52 72 78 |
18 6 41 49 53 74 85 |
18 6 4 3 1 2 7 |
0.66 1.40 0.66 2.35 0.59 0.70 0.60 |
| GXRC0447 | 577592 | 6896730 | 139/-52 | 394 | 54 | NSR | |||
| GXRC0448 | 577458 | 6896454 | 303/-74 | 422 | 120 | NSR | |||
| GXRC0449 | 577468 | 6896446 | 315/-82 | 422 | 126 | 38 47 52 61 69 80 98 104 109 116 |
40 49 53 66 74 92 100 105 111 124 |
2 2 1 5 5 12 2 1 2 8 |
0.55 0.58 0.67 0.56 1.16 0.86 1.00 0.63 1.05 0.98 |
| GXRC0450 | 577444 | 6896435 | 241/-72 | 423 | 90 | 10 17 28 50 65 76 80 |
11 18 36 53 72 77 84 |
1 1 8 3 7 1 4 |
0.86 0.58 0.47 0.52 2.89 0.91 0.98 |
| GXRC0451 | 577446 | 6896438 | 293/-79 | 422 | 126 | 2 13 27 |
3 16 28 |
1 3 1 |
0.59 3.34 0.56 |
9
| 34 42 46 62 78 93 99 112 122 |
43 43 53 63 79 96 104 113 123 |
9 1 7 1 1 3 5 1 1 |
0.78 0.96 0.98 0.57 0.77 0.64 1.21 0.82 4.80 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXRC0452 | 577455 | 6896426 | 169/-68 | 423 | 132 Incl. |
1 10 49 67 73 79 93 104 107 131 |
2 11 50 70 75 84 94 123 109 132 EOH |
1 1 1 3 2 5 1 19 2 1 |
1.09 0.84 0.63 0.49 0.70 0.64 0.95 9.05 66.88 1.54 |
| GXRC0453 | 577456 | 6896431 | 288/-85 | 423 | 133 Incl. |
6 10 34 51 70 74 84 89 99 119 123 |
7 11 47 66 71 75 85 95 116 126 125 |
1 1 13 15 1 1 1 6 17 7 2 |
0.91 1.08 0.62 0.82 1.40 1.89 0.71 0.78 1.75 3.90 10.98 |
| GXRC0454 | 577572 | 6896681 | 120/-52 | 391 | 98 | 5 39 55 68 |
9 43 57 69 |
4 4 2 1 |
1.07 1.52 0.88 0.54 |
| GXRC0455 | 577580 | 6896707 | 123/-52 | 393 | 80 | 1 13 52 62 70 |
9 14 57 66 72 |
8 1 5 4 2 |
1.05 2.39 1.22 1.56 0.58 |
| GXRC0456 | 577618 | 6896732 | 149/-52 | 395 | 60 Incl. + |
3 3 8 15 23 31 37 43 |
9 5 9 19 25 33 40 59 |
6 2 1 4 2 2 3 16 |
7.05 15.85 8.88 0.48 0.72 0.64 0.90 1.10 |
| GXRC0457 | 577622 | 6896654 | 261/-50 | 404 | 132 Incl. + |
10 16 21 40 49 60 60 72 82 86 |
12 18 23 41 54 77 65 73 83 93 |
2 2 2 1 5 17 5 1 1 7 |
0.67 0.77 1.04 0.52 0.95 7.75 20.81 17.60 0.70 1.28 |
| GXTC0458 | 577614 | 6896638 | 241/-66 | 406 | 110 | 13 21 27 |
16 23 28 |
3 2 1 |
1.30 0.87 1.01 |
10
| 42 53 82 90 99 109 |
43 77 83 93 102 110 |
1 24 1 3 3 1 |
0.70 1.05 2.76 0.63 0.51 0.97 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXRC0459 | 577595 | 6896598 | 270/-57 | 412 | 132 Incl. Incl. |
18 35 39 44 44 60 82 101 108 118 128 |
25 36 54 46 45 68 83 105 110 121 129 |
7 1 15 2 1 8 1 4 2 3 1 |
1.17 0.65 12.62 87.32 158.0 0.67 0.54 0.76 0.73 0.71 0.54 |
| GXRC0460 | 577567 | 6896573 | 268/-53 | 416 | 135 | 8 21 49 69 87 101 127 |
16 22 53 70 88 104 135 EOH |
8 1 4 1 1 3 8 |
1.09 0.66 0.88 0.62 0.90 1.12 0.49 |
| GXRC0461 | 577544 | 6896548 | 271/-54 | 420 | 140 Incl. |
36 40 74 80 90 99 112 125 |
52 41 75 81 95 106 114 128 |
16 1 1 1 5 7 2 3 |
1.98 13.5 0.65 0.86 1.38 0.59 2.41 0.78 |
| GXRC0462 | 577578 | 6896577 | 234/-79 | 415 | 114 | 0 14 22 65 75 104 |
1 17 32 66 80 105 |
1 3 10 1 5 1 |
0.61 2.62 0.87 0.86 0.51 0.70 |
| GXRC0463 | 577532 | 6896526 | 270/-55 | 421 | 141 | 7 23 37 44 60 77 91 10 |
8 29 38 45 61 86 95 107 |
1 6 1 1 1 9 4 6 |
2.56 0.63 3.57 13.82 0.57 0.73 2.42 1.03 |
| GXRC0464 | 577536 | 6896520 | 200/-66 | 421 | 110 Incl. |
29 29 40 58 95 109 |
36 30 52 83 104 110 |
7 1 12 25 9 1 |
1.86 10.47 0.71 1.52 1.48 1.94 |
| GXRC0465 | 577492 | 6896501 | 202/-59 | 422 | 135 | 18 25 38 56 60 66 71 118 |
23 27 52 57 62 67 79 126 |
5 2 14 1 2 1 8 8 |
1.08 1.37 1.34 1.41 11.71 4.25 1.14 0.61 |
11
| GXRC0466 | 577542 | 6896525 | 116/-74 | 421 | 117 Incl. + Incl. Incl. |
6 17 35 53 63 70 76 83 84 102 110 |
7 24 36 71 64 71 79 88 85 117 EOH 112 |
1 7 1 18 1 1 3 5 1 15 2 |
2.61 1.15 0.62 2.44 15.35 17.30 6.42 4.28 17.50 6.90 24.28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXRC0467 | 577563 | 6896454 | 300/-62 | 443 | 138 Incl. |
38 58 75 84 89 98 126 132 |
39 59 80 85 93 102 138 136 |
1 1 5 1 4 4 12 4 |
0.66 1.33 0.66 0.53 0.57 0.82 4.66 11.58 |
| GXRC0468 | 577606 | 6896429 | 300/-61 | 443 | 90 | 27 34 46 56 71 |
28 42 49 58 83 |
1 8 3 2 12 |
8.77 1.79 0.87 0.59 1.05 |
| GXRC0469 | 577602 | 6896461 | 300/-62 | 443 | 90 | 23 35 40 47 54 |
27 37 42 48 62 |
4 2 2 1 8 |
1.37 0.88 4.64 10.25 1.38 |
| GXRC0470 | 577622 | 6896506 | 300/-60 | 443 | 90 Incl. + + |
31 36 41 41 42 52 67 72 77 |
32 37 59 42 44 57 68 74 78 |
1 1 18 1 2 5 1 2 1 |
0.58 0.80 1.57 10.35 0.96 0.75 0.51 0.57 0.61 |
| GXRC0471 | 577642 | 6896524 | 300/-60 | 443 | 90 | 42 52 67 72 77 |
44 57 68 74 78 |
2 5 1 2 1 |
0.96 0.75 0.51 0.57 0.61 |
| GXRC0472 | 577698 | 6896636 | 300/-50 | 444 | 150 Incl. |
3 5 16 38 53 60 88 93 105 115 146 |
8 6 17 39 54 62 90 102 110 121 147 |
5 1 1 1 1 2 2 9 5 6 1 |
2.75 9.24 0.50 0.52 0.54 0.53 0.87 0.70 2.07 1.66 0.92 |
| GXRC0473 | 577706 | 6896658 | 300/-50 | 444 | 150 Incl. |
1 32 89 116 131 141 |
5 33 108 125 147 142 |
4 1 19 9 16 1 |
0.55 0.95 0.98 0.95 3.85 39.60 |
12
| GXRC0474 | 577694 | 6896611 | 282/-52 | 444 | 216 | 1 66 85 145 166 172 179 |
5 67 90 146 167 173 184 |
4 1 5 1 1 1 5 |
0.64 0.88 0.75 0.69 0.52 0.70 0.56 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXRC0475 | 577634 | 6896539 | 290/-55 | 443 | 216 Incl. Incl. |
32 42 47 55 94 107 124 146 156 174 189 197 209 |
43 43 49 58 119 108 125 152 162 177 193 198 215 |
11 1 2 3 25 1 1 6 6 3 4 1 6 |
1.26 9.64 1.28 0.80 1.87 28.1 1.53 1.04 0.89 1.91 0.92 1.99 0.55 |
| GXRC0476 | 577636 | 6896540 | 315/-56 | 443 | 198 | 86 120 129 142 152 163 164 185 195 |
90 121 137 148 157 178 165 192 198 |
4 1 8 6 5 15 1 7 3 |
1.32 0.58 2.22 1.21 2.08 3.60 36.60 0.99 1.29 |
| GXRC0477 | 577537 | 6896456 | 298/-55 | 443 | 180 | 37 45 57 86 98 118 129 |
42 46 62 87 113 120 140 |
5 1 5 1 15 2 11 |
1.04 2.75 1.08 0.75 2.06 3.99 1.38 |
| GXRC0478 | 577474 | 6896360 | 302/-55 | 443 | 120 | 32 36 40 45 51 58 64 70 |
33 37 42 46 53 61 66 78 |
1 1 2 1 2 3 2 8 |
3.10 0.74 0.80 0.66 1.00 1.12 0.61 0.49 |
| GXRC0479 | 577624 | 6896731 | 135/-50 | 395 | 80 | 16 25 44 52 |
18 26 45 55 |
2 1 1 3 |
1.49 4.56 1.17 4.29 |
Reported significant gold assay intersections (using a 0.50 g/t Au lower cut) are reported using minimum 1m downhole intervals at plus.0.50 g/t gold, with up to 2m of internal dilution. Gold determination was by Fire Assay using a 50gm charge with AAS finishes and a lower limit of detection of 0.01 ppm Au. NSR denotes no significant results. True widths of the high grade shear zone are interpreted to be 25-50% of reported downhole intersections while the broader porphyry intersections are estimated to be 85% of the reported downhole intersections. Coordinates are MGA94-Z50.
13
Competent Person
The Information in this report relates to Exploration Results based on information compiled by Kevin Seymour whom is a Competent Person and Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Kevin Seymour is a full-time employee of Ramelius Resources Limited.
Kevin Seymour has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity they have undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Kevin Seymour consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
14
JORC Table 1 Report for Milky Way, RC + Diamond Drilling
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg | • Potential gold mineralised intervals are |
| techniques | cut channels, random chips, or | systematically sampled using industry standard |
| specific specialised industry standard | 1m intervals, collected from reverse circulation | |
| measurement tools appropriate to the | (RC) drill holes and geological intervals for |
|
| minerals under investigation, such as | diamond drill core. | |
| down hole gamma sondes, or | • Drill hole locations were designed to allow for | |
| handheld XRF instruments, etc). These | spatial spread across the interpreted |
|
| examples should not be taken as | mineralised zone. All RC samples were | |
| limiting the broad meaning of | collected and riffle split to 3-4kg samples on 1m | |
| sampling. | metre intervals. Diamond core is half cut, with | |
| • Include reference to measures taken | one half dispatched to the laboratory and the | |
| to ensure sample representivity and | remainder retained for reference material | |
| the appropriate calibration of any | • Standard fire assaying was employed using a | |
| measurement tools or systems used. | 50gm charge with an AAS finish. Trace element | |
| • Aspects of the determination of | determination was undertaken using a multi (4) | |
| mineralisation that are Material to | acid digest and ICP- AES finish. | |
| the Public Report. | ||
| • In cases where ‘industry standard’ | ||
| work has been done this would be | ||
| relatively simple (eg ‘reverse | ||
| circulation drilling was used to obtain | ||
| 1 m samples from which 3 kg was | ||
| pulverised to produce a 30 g charge | ||
| for fire assay’). In other cases more | ||
| explanation may be required, such as | ||
| where there is coarse gold that has | ||
| inherent sampling problems. Unusual | ||
| commodities or mineralisation types | ||
| (eg submarine nodules) may warrant | ||
| disclosure ofdetailed information. | ||
| Drilling | • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, | • Drilling was completed using best practice 5 ¾” |
| techniques | open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, | face sampling RC drilling hammers for all RC drill |
| auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details | holes, and NQ-2 diamond core for the one | |
| (eg core diameter, triple or standard | diamond tail | |
| tube, depth of diamond tails, face- | ||
| sampling bit or other type, whether | ||
| core is oriented and if so, by what | ||
| method,etc). | ||
| Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing | • Bulk RC drill holes samples were visually |
| recovery | core and chip sample recoveries and | inspected by the supervising geologist to ensure |
| results assessed. | adequate clean sample recoveries were | |
| • Measures taken to maximise sample | achieved. Any wet, contaminated or poor | |
| recovery and ensure representative | sample returns are flagged and recorded in the | |
| nature of the samples. | database to ensure no sampling bias is | |
| • Whether a relationshipexists | introduced. |
15
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| between sample recovery and grade | • Zones of poor sample return both in RC and | |
| and whether sample bias may have | diamond core are recorded in the database and | |
| occurred due to preferential loss/gain | cross checked once assay results are received | |
| of fine/coarse material. | from the laboratory to ensure no | |
| misrepresentation of sampling intervals has | ||
| occurred. Of note, excellent RC drill recovery is | ||
| reported from all RC holes. | ||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have | • All drill samples are geologically logged on site |
| been geologically and geotechnically | by professional geologists. Details on the host | |
| logged to a level of detail to support | lithologies, deformation, dominant minerals | |
| appropriate Mineral Resource | including sulphide species and alteration | |
| estimation, mining studies and | minerals plus veining are recorded relationally | |
| metallurgical studies. | (separately) so the logging is interactive and not | |
| • Whether logging is qualitative or | biased to lithology. | |
| quantitative in nature. Core (or | • Drill hole logging is qualitative on visual | |
| costean, channel, etc) photography. | recordings of rock forming minerals and | |
| • The total length and percentage of | quantitative on estimates of mineral | |
| the relevant intersections logged. | abundance. | |
| • The entire length of each drill hole is | ||
| geologicallylogged. | ||
| Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and |
• Duplicate samples are collected every 25th |
| techniques | whether quarter, half or all core | sample from the RC chips and diamond core. |
| and sample | taken. | • Dry RC 1m samples are riffle split to 3-4kg as |
| preparation | • If non-core, whether riffled, tube | drilled and dispatched to the laboratory. Half |
| sampled, rotary split, etc and whether | cut diamond core cut along geological contacts |
|
| sampled wet or dry. | up to 1m maximum length are also sampled. | |
| • For all sample types, the nature, | Any wet samples are recorded in the database | |
| quality and appropriateness of the | as such and allowed to dry before splitting and | |
| sample preparation technique. | dispatching to the laboratory. | |
| • Quality control procedures adopted | • All samples are pulverized prior to splitting in | |
| for all sub-sampling stages to | the laboratory to ensure homogenous samples | |
| maximise representivity of samples. | with 85% passing 75um. 200gm is extracted by | |
| • Measures taken to ensure that the | spatula that is used for the 50gm charge on | |
| sampling is representative of the in | standard fire assays. | |
| situ material collected, including for | • All samples submitted to the laboratory are | |
| instance results for field | sorted and reconciled against the submission | |
| duplicate/second-half sampling. | documents. In addition to duplicates a high | |
| • Whether sample sizes are appropriate | grade or low grade standard is included every |
|
| to the grain size of the material being | 25thsample, a controlled blank is inserted every | |
| sampled. | 100thsample. The laboratory uses barren | |
| flushes to clean their pulveriser and their own | ||
| internal standards and duplicates to ensure | ||
| industry best practice quality control is | ||
| maintained. | ||
| • The sample size is considered appropriate for | ||
| the type, style, thickness and consistency of | ||
| mineralization. | ||
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and | • The fire assay method is designed to measure |
| assay data | appropriateness of the assaying and | the total gold in the sample. The technique |
| and | laboratory procedures used and | involves standard fire assays using a 50gm |
| whether the technique is considered | sample charge with a lead flux(decomposed in |
16
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| laboratory | partial or total. | the furnace). The prill is totally digested by HCl |
| tests | • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, | and HNO3acids before measurement of the |
| handheld XRF instruments, etc, the | gold determination by AAS. | |
| parameters used in determining the | • No field analyses of gold grades are completed. | |
| analysis including instrument make | Quantitative analysis of the gold content and | |
| and model, reading times, | trace elements is undertaken in a controlled | |
| calibrations factors applied and their | laboratory environment. | |
| derivation, etc. | • Industry best practice is employed with the | |
| • Nature of quality control procedures | inclusion of duplicates and standards as | |
| adopted (eg standards, blanks, | discussed above, and used by Ramelius as well | |
| duplicates, external laboratory | as the laboratory. All Ramelius standards and | |
| checks) and whether acceptable levels | blanks are interrogated to ensure they lie within |
|
| of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and | acceptable tolerances. Additionally, sample | |
| precision have been established. | size, grind size and field duplicates are | |
| examined to ensure no bias to gold grades | ||
| exists. | ||
| Verification | • The verification of significant | • Alternative Ramelius personnel have inspected |
| of sampling | intersections by either independent or | the RC chips and the diamond core in the field |
| and assaying | alternative company personnel. | to verify the correlation of mineralised zones |
| • The use of twinned holes. | between assay results and lithology, alteration | |
| • Documentation of primary data, data | and mineralization. | |
| entry procedures, data verification, | • All holes are digitally logged in the field and all | |
| data storage (physical and electronic) | primary data is forwarded to Ramelius’ | |
| protocols. | Database Administrator (DBA) in Perth where it | |
| • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | is imported into Datashed, a commercially |
|
| available and industry accepted database | ||
| software package. Assay data is electronically | ||
| merged when received from the laboratory. | ||
| The responsible project geologist reviews the | ||
| data in the database to ensure that it is correct | ||
| and has merged properly and that all the drill | ||
| data collected in the field has been captured | ||
| and entered into the database correctly. | ||
| • The responsible geologist makes the DBA aware | ||
| of any errors and/or omissions to the database | ||
| and the corrections (if required) are corrected | ||
| in the database immediately. | ||
| • No adjustments or calibrations are made to any | ||
| of the assay data recorded in the database. | ||
| • No new mineral resource estimate is included in | ||
| this report. | ||
| Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used | • All drill hole collars are picked up using accurate |
| data points | to locate drill holes (collar and down- | DGPS survey control. All down hole surveys are |
| hole surveys), trenches, mine | collected using downhole Eastman single shot | |
| workings and other locations used in | surveying techniques provided by the drilling | |
| Mineral Resource estimation. | contractors. | |
| • Specification of the grid system used. | • All Mt Magnet holes are picked up in MGA94 – | |
| • Quality and adequacy of topographic | Zone 50 grid coordinates. | |
| control. | • DGPS RL measurements captured the collar | |
| surveys of the drill holesprior to the resource |
17
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| estimation work. | ||
| Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of | • Exploration and resource development drill |
| and | Exploration Results. | holes were planned on nominal 40m parting at |
| distribution | • Whether the data spacing and | Milky Way to better define ore continuity. |
| distribution is sufficient to establish | • Given the limited understanding of the target | |
| the degree of geological and grade | horizon this spacing was considered adequate | |
| continuity appropriate for the Mineral | to help define the continuity of mineralisation, |
|
| Resource and Ore Reserve estimation | ahead of further step out drilling. | |
| procedure(s) and classifications | • No sampling compositing has been applied | |
| applied. | within key mineralised intervals. | |
| • Whether sample compositing has | ||
| been applied. | ||
| Orientation | • Whether the orientation of sampling | • The drilling is completed orthogonal to the |
| of data in | achieves unbiased sampling of | interpreted strike of the target horizon. |
| relation to | possible structures and the extent to | Orientations were completed on the diamond |
| geological | which this is known, considering the | drill core. |
| structure | deposit type. | • The diamond drill hole represented a twin of |
| • If the relationship between the drilling | previous drilling designed to confirm the |
|
| orientation and the orientation of key | distribution of gold down the hole. No drilling | |
| mineralised structures is considered | orientation and/or sampling bias is present, | |
| to have introduced a sampling bias, | albeit the true orientation of the high grade | |
| this should be assessed and reported | structure(s) is yet to be confirmed. | |
| if material. | ||
| Sample | • The measures taken to ensure sample | • Sample security is integral to Ramelius’ |
| security | security. | sampling procedures. All bagged samples are |
| delivered directly from the field to the assay | ||
| laboratory in Perth, whereupon the laboratory | ||
| checks the physically received samples against | ||
| Ramelius’ sample submission/dispatch notes. | ||
| Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of | • Sampling techniques and procedures are |
| reviews | sampling techniques and data. | reviewed prior to the commencement of new |
| work programmes to ensure adequate | ||
| procedures are in place to maximize the sample | ||
| collection and sample quality on new projects. | ||
| No external audits have been completed to | ||
| date. |
18
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, | • The results reported in this report are on |
| tenement and | location and ownership including | granted Mining Lease (ML) 58/136 (Mt Magnet |
| land tenure | agreements or material issues with | – Milky Way) owned 100% by Ramelius |
| status | third parties such as joint ventures, | Resources Limited. The tenement is located on |
| partnerships, overriding royalties, | pastoral/grazing leases. Heritage surveys were | |
| native title interests, historical sites, | completed prior to any ground disturbing | |
| wilderness or national park and | activities in accordance with Ramelius’ | |
| environmental settings. | responsibilities under the Aboriginal Heritage | |
| • The security of the tenure held at the | Act. | |
| time of reporting along with any | • At this time all the tenements are in good | |
| known impediments to obtaining a | standing. There are no known impediments to | |
| licence to operate in the area. | obtaininga licence to operate in the area. | |
| Exploration | • Acknowledgment and appraisal of | • Exploration by other parties has been reviewed |
| done by other | exploration by other parties. | and is used as a guide to Ramelius’ exploration |
| parties | activities. Previous parties have completed | |
| shallow RAB, Aircore, RC drilling and shallow | ||
| open pit mining at Milky Way plus geophysical | ||
| data collection and interpretation. This report | ||
| concerns only exploration results generated by | ||
| Ramelius. | ||
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and | • The mineralisation at Milky Way is typical of |
| style of mineralisation. | porphyry hosted orogenic structurally | |
| controlled Archaean gold lode systems. The | ||
| mineralisation is controlled by anastomosing | ||
| shear zones passing through competent rock | ||
| units, brittle fracture and stockwork | ||
| mineralization is common on the competent | ||
| porphyry rock. The bedrock Milky Way | ||
| mineralisation currently extends over 400m | ||
| strike and dips steeply eastwards along the | ||
| eastern flank of the NE striking Milky Way | ||
| Porphyry. The plunge of the system appears to | ||
| be steepsoutherly. | ||
| Drill hole | • A summary of all information | • All the drill holes reported in this report have |
| Information | material to the understanding of the | the following parameters applied. All drill holes |
| exploration results including a | completed, including holes with no significant | |
| tabulation of the following | results as defined in the Attachments) are | |
| information for all Material drill holes: | reported in this announcement. | |
o easting and northing of the drill |
• Easting and northing are given in MGA94 | |
| hole collar | coordinates as defined in the Attachments. | |
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – |
• RL is AHD | |
| elevation above sea level in | • Dip is the inclination of the hole from the | |
| metres) of the drill hole collar | horizontal. Azimuth is reported in magnetic | |
o dip and azimuth of the hole |
degrees as the direction the hole is drilled. | |
o down hole length and interception |
MGA94 and magnetic degrees vary by <10in the | |
| depth | project area. | |
o hole length. |
• Down hole length is the distance measured | |
| • If the exclusion of this information is | along the drill hole trace. Intersection length is | |
| justified on the basis that the | the thickness of an anomalousgold intersection |
19
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| information is not Material and this | measured along the drill hole trace. | |
| exclusion does not detract from the | • Hole length is the distance from the surface to | |
| understanding of the report, the | the end of the hole measured along the drill | |
| Competent Person should clearly | hole trace. | |
| explain why this is the case. | • No results currently available from the | |
| exploration drilling are excluded from this | ||
| report. Gold grade intersections >0.1 g/t Au | ||
| with up to 4m of internal dilution are | ||
| considered significant in the broader felsic | ||
| porphyry host rock as a strong demarcation | ||
| between the mineralized porphyry and the non- | ||
| mineralised ultramafic rocks is noted. The | ||
| porphyry hosted results are reported in this | ||
| report. Gold grades greater than 0.5 g/t Au are | ||
| highlighted where good continuity of higher | ||
| grade mineralization is observed. | ||
| Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, | • The first gold assay result received from each |
| aggregation | weighting averaging techniques, | sample reported by the laboratory is tabled in |
| methods | maximum and/or minimum grade | the list of significant assays. Subsequent repeat |
| truncations (eg cutting of high | analyses when performed by the laboratory are | |
| grades) and cut-off grades are usually | checked against the original to ensure |
|
| Material and should be stated. | repeatability of the assay results. | |
| • Where aggregate intercepts | • Weighted average techniques are applied to | |
| incorporate short lengths of high | determine the grade of the anomalous interval | |
| grade results and longer lengths of | when geological intervals less than 1m have | |
| low grade results, the procedure used | been sampled. | |
| for such aggregation should be stated | • Exploration drilling results are generally |
|
| and some typical examples of such | reported using a 0.1 g/t Au lower cut-off (as | |
| aggregations should be shown in | described above and reported in the | |
| detail. | Attachments) and may include up to 4m of | |
| • The assumptions used for any | internal dilution. Significant resource | |
| reporting of metal equivalent values | development drill hole assays are reported | |
| should be clearly stated. | greater than 0.5 or 8.0 g/t Au and are also | |
| reported separately. For example the broader | ||
| plus 1.0 g/t Au intersection of 6.5m @ 30.5 g/t | ||
| Au contains a higher grade zone running plus 8 | ||
| g/t Au and is included as 4m @ 48.5 g/t Au. | ||
| Where extremely high gold intersections are | ||
| encountered as in this example, the highest | ||
| grade sample interval (eg 1.0m @ 150 g/t Au) is | ||
| also reported. All assay results are reported to | ||
| 3 significant figures in line with the analytical | ||
| precision of the laboratory techniques | ||
| employed. | ||
| • No metal equivalent reporting is used or | ||
| applied. | ||
| Relationship | • These relationships are particularly | • The intersection length is measured down the |
| between | important in the reporting of | length of the hole and is not usually the true |
| mineralisation | Exploration Results. |
width. When sufficient knowledge on the |
| widths and | • If the geometry of the mineralisation | thickness of the intersection is known an |
| with respect to the drill hole angle is | estimate of the true thickness isprovided in the |
20
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| intercept | known, its nature should be reported. | Attachment. |
| lengths | • If it is not known and only the down | • The known geometry of the mineralisation with |
| hole lengths are reported, there | respect to the drill holes reported in this report | |
| should be a clear statement to this | is now better constrained than from previous | |
| effect (eg ‘down hole length, true | drill hole intersections at Milky Way , ahead of | |
| width not known’). | pendingresource estimation work | |
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with | • Drillhole plan and sectional views of Milky Way |
| scales) and tabulations of intercepts | have been provided in this release and previous | |
| should be included for any significant | releases to enable the reader to see the | |
| discovery being reported These should | intersections relative to previous mining and |
|
| include, but not be limited to a plan | previous drill hole intersections plus the current | |
| view of drill hole collar locations and | interpretation of the overall lode geometry. | |
| appropriate sectional views. | Given the steep dip of the mineralisation at | |
| Milky Way the long sectional view presentation | ||
| is currently considered the best 2-D | ||
| representation of the known spatial extent of | ||
| the mineralization intersected to date. | ||
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all | • All drill holes completed to date are reported in |
| reporting | Exploration Results is not practicable, | this report and all material intersections as |
| representative reporting of both low | defined) are reported. | |
| and high grades and/or widths should | ||
| be practiced to avoid misleading | ||
| reportingofExploration Results. | ||
| Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful | • No other exploration data that has been |
| substantive | and material, should be reported | collected is considered meaningful and material |
| exploration | including (but not limited to): | to this report. |
| data | geological observations; geophysical | |
| survey results; geochemical survey | ||
| results; bulk samples – size and | ||
| method of treatment; metallurgical | ||
| test results; bulk density, | ||
| groundwater, geotechnical and rock | ||
| characteristics; potential deleterious | ||
| or contaminatingsubstances. | ||
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned | • Future exploration includes further step out |
| further work (eg tests for lateral | drilling below and along strike of the reported | |
| extensions or depth extensions or | intersections at Milky Way to better define the | |
| large-scale step-out drilling). | extent of the mineralization discovered to date. | |
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the | ||
| areas of possible extensions, including | ||
| the main geological interpretations | ||
| and future drilling areas, provided this | ||
| information is not commercially | ||
| sensitive. |
21