AI assistant
PATERSON RESOURCES LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2018
Aug 23, 2018
65618_rns_2018-08-23_1ce5e119-ca95-4361-a6af-288cc5eac2d5.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 24 August 2018
NORTHERN TERRITORY PROJECTS IN THE RIGHT VANADIUM NEIGHBOURHOOD
HIGHLIGHTS
- Vanadium Mining (VanMin), which Hardey is in the process of acquiring, has two assets – Wollagalong and Chisholm – in the Northern Territory (complementing its tenure in Queensland) that are contiguous to TNG Limited's high-quality Mt Peake project which has a JORC (2012) compliant total resource – 160Mt @ 0.28% V2O51
- Through aeromagnetic imaging, the Hardey geology team has verified that Mt Peake's underlying mineralisation – vanadiferous titano-magnetite (VTM) hosted in layered ultramafics – is similar to anomalies within VanMin's two projects
- Specifically, the Anningie Formation that underpins the VTM mineralisation at Mt Peake has been mapped into the adjoining Wollagalong project, representing significant exploration upside
- Due diligence includes commencing a review of historic surface sampling results across the two projects, which if aligned with aeromagnetic anomalies, can expedite targeting anomalous vanadium within exposed outcrops
- As TNG's analogue VTM mineralisation is relatively shallow, a comprehensive highlevel exploration program (comprising drilling, sampling and assaying) can be implemented rapidly across the two projects to facilitate potentially modelling a mineral resource under the JORC (2012) code
- If shallow VTM mineralisation is confirmed, then open pit mining methods can potentially be utilised to rapidly exploit high grade VTM ore
- Overall, the geological review on VanMin's six assets points towards them all being highly prospective for vanadium mineralisation
Hardey Resources Executive Chairman, Terence Clee commented: "Undoubtedly, the two Northern Territory projects are in the right neighbourhood, given the proximity to TNG's highcalibre Mt Peake VTM operation. The aeromagnetic and soil sampling evidence is quite compelling that both projects are highly prospective for vanadium mineralisation. Taking a holistic view, the Board is delighted the due diligence to date on Vanadium Mining's six assets across Queensland and the Northern Territory is heading in the right direction."
***
Hardey Resources Limited (ASX: HDY) ("Hardey" or "the Company") is pleased to present the geology team's preliminary due diligence findings on two highly prospective vanadium projects in the Northern Territory, part of a package of six projects the Company has agreed to acquire from privately owned Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd (VanMin).
***
THE RIGHT VANADIUM NEIGHOURHOOD
VanMin's Northern Territory assets are located adjacent to TNG's advanced Mt Peake VTM project. A key positive with Mt Peake is the underlying mineralisation, which comprises a high-grade form of VTM associated with ore bodies that can be selectively mined utilising open pit methods. This delivers considerable comparative advantages in being able to tailor economically efficient mining operations.
Relative to Mt Peake, which is ~190km north of Alice Springs, the Wollagalong project is 6km north while the Chisholm prospect 13km east (Figure 1). Both VanMin's projects are contiguous to the Mt Peake tenure, forming the north and east boundaries.


Source: HDY geology team
Geological overview
The largest vanadium resources in the Northern Territory are associated with mafic-hosted vanadium magnetite deposits in the Arunta Region's Aileron Geological Province. These mafic-hosted VTM deposits (which is the type targeted within the Wollagalong and Chisholm projects) have only recently been identified in the Jervois area (Arafura Resources, 2017) and at the Mt Peake project (TNG, 2011).
Implicitly, this means that due to the Wollagalong and Chisholm projects' proximity to Mt Peake (which has a JORC [2012] code reported total mineral resource – 160Mt @ 0.28% V2O5, 5% TiO2 and 22% Fe, cut-off grade 0.1% V2O5)1, there is clearly significant exploration upside to uncover additional vanadium mineralisation (Figure 2). The probability would appear to be higher for the Wollagalong project given the surface exposures of the Anningie Formation, which underpins the VTM economic mineralisation at Mt Peake, has been mapped within its boundaries.3

FIGURE 2: THE ARUNTA REGION RELATIVE TO THE WOLLAGALONG AND CHISHOLM PROJECTS
Source: HDY geology team
As an aside, the Jervois vanadium deposit forms part of a joint venture (now known as Bonya JV) between Arafura Resources Limited and Thor Mining Limited. A drill intersection, which returned 49m @ 0.96% V2O5, 8.55% TiO2 and 34.5% Fe (over 0-49m depth range)2, further highlights the vanadium potential within the region.
The second known style of vanadium mineralisation in the Northern Territory is associated with sandstone-hosted uranium deposits. The largest known resource is at the Bigrlyi uranium prospect, which has a total mineral resource of 7.46Mt at 0.13% U3O8 and 0.12% V2O5 cut-off grade 500ppm U3O8 (reported under the JORC [2004] code).4
Aerial geophysics
In Australia, VTM deposits are typically formed on cratons of Archean to Proterozoic age and are closely associated with large igneous provinces, which is the focus when undertaking exploration activities. Further, mafic to ultramafic complexes that host VTM deposits are generally apparent as strong clearly defined anomalies from aeromagnetic surveys, even if no exposure occurs at surface. Aeromagnetic surveys confirm that Wollagalong and Chisholm have highly magnetic anomalies within their boundaries.
Assessing the geophysics, the aeromagnetic image (Figure 3) identifies two phases of potential mineralisation with east-west and north-south trending structures visible and intersecting within the project areas. Importantly, VanMin's projects have similar geological and magnetic features to the Mt Peake deposit. Further, they are highly probable to be gabbro-hosted magnetite deposits, the same as those that underlie Mt Peake's VTM mineral resource.

FIGURE 3: AEROMAGNETIC IMAGE HIGHLIGHTS MINERALISATION FOR THE PROJECTS
Source: HDY geology team
As vanadium mineralisation within these systems is relatively shallow, selecting prospective targets for further follow-up within the two projects is straightforward (Figure 4). Moreover, this delivers the opportunity to expedite and de-risk the projects materially with a high-level exploration program that aims to potentially model, estimate, and report a JORC (2012) compliant vanadium mineral resource.

FIGURE 4: POTENTIAL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY TARGETS FOR THE PROJECTS
Source: HDY geology team
Next steps
Complete due diligence reviews for Nelly Vanadium Mine, Argentina and VanMin projects.
Terence Clee Executive Chairman
References
-
- TNG ASX Announcement 18 March 2013
-
- ARU ASX Announcement 29 July 2010
-
- Refer to Table 1 of the current ASX Announcement
-
- EME ASX Announcement 28 June 2011
COMPETENT PERSON'S STATEMENT:
The information in this report that relates to Geological Interpretation, Historical Exploration Results, or Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Nicholas Ryan, a Competent Person who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Ryan has been a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy for 12 years and is a Chartered Professional (Geology). Mr Ryan is employed by Xplore Resources Pty Ltd. Mr Ryan has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Ryan consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information and the form and context in which it appears.


JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Samplingtechniques | •Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, orspecific specialised industry standardmeasurement tools appropriateto the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gammasondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples shouldnot be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| •Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivityand the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systemsused. | ||
| •Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to thePublic Report. | ||
| •In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would berelatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1m samples from which 3 kg was pulverized to produce a 30 g chargefor fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required,such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent samplingproblems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g.submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. | ||
| Drillingtechniques | •Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary airblast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, tripleor standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or othertype, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| Drill samplerecovery | •Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveriesand results assessed. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensurerepresentative nature of the samples. | ||
| • | Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and gradeand whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferentialloss/gain of fine/coarse material. | ||
| Logging | • | Whether core and chip samples have been geologically andgeotechnically logged to a level ofdetail to support appropriateMineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgicalstudies. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| • | Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (orcostean, channel, etc) photography. | ||
| • | The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. | ||
| Subsampling | • | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all coretaken. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| techniquesand sample | • | If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc andwhether sampled wet or dry. | |
| preparation | • | For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of thesample preparation technique. | |
| • | Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages tomaximise representivity of samples. | ||
| • | Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the insitu material collected, including for instance results for fieldduplicate/second-half sampling. | ||
| • | Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the materialbeing sampled. | ||
| Qualityofassay dataand | • | The nature, quality and appropriatenessof the assaying andlaboratory procedures used and whether the technique is consideredpartial or total. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| laboratorytests | • | For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc,the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and theirderivation, etc. | ||
| •Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levelsof accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precisionhave been established. | ||
| Verificationof sampling | •The verification of significant intersections by either independent oralternative company personnel. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| and | •The use of twinned holes. | |
| assaying | •Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, dataverification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. | |
| •Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | ||
| Location ofdata points | •Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar anddown-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locationsused in Mineral Resource estimation. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| •Specification of the grid system used. | ||
| •Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | ||
| Data | •Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| spacinganddistribution | •Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish thedegree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the MineralResource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) andclassifications applied. | |
| •Whether sample compositing has been applied. | ||
| Orientationof data inrelationtogeologicalstructure | •Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling ofpossible structures and the extent to which this is known, consideringthe deposit type. | •Presented geological data is from 2D aeromagnetic geophysicalsurveys or geological mapping completed by Northern TerritoryGovernment or the Federal Government.•No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| •If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientationof key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced asampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. | ||
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samplesecurity | •The measures taken to ensure sample security. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcementfor the Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. | |
| Auditsreviews | or | •The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | •Nodrilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory VanadiumMining Pty Ltd projects. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineraltenementandlandtenurestatus | •Type, reference name/number, location and ownership includingagreements or material issues with third parties such as jointventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests,historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmentalsettings.•The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with anyknown impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | •Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd holds 100% of the following mineraltenure applications:1.Sharptooth Project, Queensland ("QLD"), Australia –TenureIdentifier EPM26801 [Exploration Permit Mineral Application], 100sub-blocks, submitted to the QLD Department of NaturalResources, Mines, and Energy ("DNRM") on the 23 February2018;2.Cera Project, QLD, Australia –Tenure Identifier EPM26802[Exploration Permit Mineral Application], 100 sub-blocks,submitted to the DNRM on the 26 February 2018;3.Spike Project, QLD, Australia –Tenure Identifier EPM26803[Exploration Permit Mineral Application], 100 sub-blocks,submitted to the DNRM on the 26 February 2018;4.Petrie Project, QLD, Australia –Tenure Identifier EPM26804[Exploration Permit Mineral Application], 100 sub-blocks,submitted to the DNRM on the 26 February 2018;5.Wollagalong Project, Northern Territory ("NT"), Australia –TenureIdentifier EL31841 [Exploration Licence Application], submittedto the NT Department of Primary Industries and Resources("DPIR") on the 5 March 2018; &6.Chisholm Project, NT, Australia –Tenure Identifier EL31842[Exploration Licence Application], submitted to the NT DPIR onthe5 March 2018. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Explorationdonebyotherparties | •Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects.•The Competent Person anticipates upon the completion ofcomprehensive Desktop Studies are complete, additionalHistorical Exploration Activity could be publicly reported. |
| Geology | •Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | •Northern Territory projects –Titano-magnetite Vanadium (Ti-Fe-V)mineralization associated with the Arunta orogen. The Aruntaorogen is overlain by the NT, and the State of Western Australia.The Arunta orogen age range spans the Paleoproterozoic toOrdovician and has been affected by tectonothermal eventsthat extend to the Carboniferous. It is mostly sedimentary in originbut had been extensively affected by felsic and maficmagmatism, mostly in the Paleoproterozoic. The highly magneticfeatures in the Geophysical Survey Imagery of Total MagneticIntensity available as features correspond to outcrops of theAnningie member, the same Formation that the Mt Peake projectexploits for Ti-Fe-V mineralisation. The magnetic features areinterpreted to be gabbro hosted magnetite deposits that aresources of potential Ti-Fe-V mineralisation. |
| DrillholeInformation | •A summary of all information material to the understanding of theexploration results including a tabulation of the following informationfor all Material drill holes: | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| easting and northing of the drill hole collaro | ||
| elevation or RL (Reduced Level –elevation above sea level inometres) of the drill hole collar | ||
| dip and azimuth of the holeo | ||
| down hole length and interception deptho | ||
| hole length.o | ||
| •If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that theinformation is not Material and this exclusion does not detract fromthe understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearlyexplain why this is the case. | ||
| Dataaggregatio | •In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| n methods | grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. | |
| •Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high graderesults and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure usedfor such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples ofsuch aggregations should be shown in detail. | ||
| •The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent valuesshould be clearly stated. | ||
| Relationshipbetween | •These relationships are particularly important in the reporting ofExploration Results. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| mineralisationwidths | •If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill holeangle is known, its nature should be reported. | |
| andinterceptlengths | •If it isnot known and only the down hole lengths are reported, thereshould be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, truewidth not known'). | |
| Diagrams | •Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations ofintercepts should be included for any significant discovery beingreported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view ofdrill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| Balancedreporting | •Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is notpracticable, representative reporting of both low and high gradesand/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting ofExploration Results. | •No drilling or sample results are reported in this announcement forthe Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects. |
| Othersubstantiveexplorationdata | •Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reportedincluding (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysicalsurvey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples –size andmethod of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density,groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potentialdeleterious or contaminating substances. | •The Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd Geology Team sourced theGeophysical Survey Imagery of Total Magnetic Intensity availableon the Northern TerritoryStrike Tenure and GeoscienceInformation System, hosted by the NT Department of PrimaryIndustries and Resources.Geological maps and structures statedin the Announcement body were from the Northern TerritoryStrikeTenure and Geoscience Information System. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Further work | •The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateralextensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).•Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas,provided this information is not commercially sensitive. | •The Northern Territory Vanadium Mining Pty Ltd projects requiretechnical evaluation to prioritize areas within theprojects to focusmineral exploration efforts, from historical drilling, sampling andassayin order to systematically explore for vanadiummineralisation. |