Annual Report • Sep 30, 2021
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer


The UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations requires certain information to be made available to investors prior to their making an investment in the Company. The Company's Investor Disclosure Document is available for viewing at pacifichorizon.co.uk.
None of the views expressed in this document should be construed as advice to buy or sell a particular investment. Investment trusts are UK public listed companies and as such comply with the requirements of the Financial Conduct Authority. They are not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust PLC currently conducts its affairs, and intends to continue to conduct its affairs, so that the Company's Ordinary Shares can qualify to be considered as a mainstream investment product and can be recommended by Independent Financial Advisers to ordinary retail investors in accordance with the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority in relation to non-mainstream investment products.
If you are in any doubt as to the action you should take you should consult your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant or other independent financial adviser authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 if you are in the United Kingdom or, if not, from another appropriately authorised financial adviser.
If you have sold or otherwise transferred all of your ordinary shares in Pacific Horizon Investment Trust PLC, please forward this document, together with any accompanying documents, but not your personalised Form of Proxy, as soon as possible to the purchaser or transferee, or to the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was or is being effected for delivery to the purchaser or transferee.
Source: Baillie Gifford/Refinitiv and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer on page •. NAV total return‡ Share price total return‡ Comparative index† total return
Source: Baillie Gifford/Refinitiv and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer on page •. NAV total return‡ Share price total return‡ Comparative index† total return

Pacific Horizon's objective is to invest in the Asia-Pacific region (excluding Japan) and in the Indian Sub-continent in order to achieve capital growth.

* Source: Refinitiv/Baillie Gifford. Alternative Performance Measure – see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72.
†The comparative index is the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index (in sterling terms).
Source: Refinitiv/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer on page 71.
This Strategic Report, which includes pages 2 to 23 and incorporates the Chairman's Statement, has been prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
In my report to you last year I was pleased to be able to describe the performance of your Company's portfolio as remarkable. This exceptional performance has continued through the last financial year to July 2021, in its own way remarkable against a background of a volatile market caused by questions over the economic recovery from Covid-19; inflationary versus deflationary pressures; interest rate levels; US dollar strength or weakness; US/China political tensions; and the return to favour of value over growth investing.
In the year to 31 July 2021, the Company's net asset value per share (NAV) rose by 61.3%* compared to a 12.7%* total return from the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index in sterling terms. The share price total return was 59.2%* resulting in the shares ending the period at a 3.2% premium to the NAV per share, having been at a 4.6% premium a year earlier.
The majority of the absolute performance was achieved in the first half of the Company's financial year, with the NAV rising 45.1%* versus 20.5%* for the comparative index. However, the performance was possibly even more impressive in the second half, as the managers succeeded in avoiding the headwinds that caused a fall of 6.5%* in the comparative index, instead generating a positive return of 11.2%*. This reflected a significant, timely move in the portfolio weighting away from China, initially into commodities and subsequently towards India.
Comment on the stock-specific drivers to returns can be found within the Managers' Review on pages 13 to 16.
Over the five years to 31 July 2021, the Company's NAV and share price total returns were 248.2%* and 299.8%* respectively; the Company's comparative index during the same period gained 68.2%* in sterling terms.
As highlighted in my report last year, whilst it is pleasing to note the strong performance, shareholders should not expect such returns as a matter of course and within any reporting period there will likely be bouts of notable volatility. For example, over the course of the last financial year the Company's NAV per share ranged between 481.92p and 804.34p, averaging 728.86p.
The portfolio is managed actively with the objective of outperforming its comparative index over the long term by aspiring to invest in the highest growth companies in the fastest growing region in the world; or as the managers call it, 'growth squared'. Neither absolute nor relative returns will be consistent; it is more likely that future performance will continue to be volatile and shareholders would be prudent to anticipate periods when returns are less favourable.
Ewan Markson-Brown has moved on after seven years as the Company's portfolio manager. Ewan was a pleasure to work with and made a tremendous contribution to the Company, for which we are grateful. We wish him well in his future endeavours.
In normal circumstances the loss of the portfolio manager would be a matter of considerable concern, particularly for a portfolio of such distinctive investment style. However, Ewan's replacement was an obvious choice. Roderick Snell has been the Company's deputy portfolio manager since 2013 – throughout Ewan's tenure as portfolio manager – and co-managed the £3.2 billion Baillie Gifford Pacific Fund OEIC since 2010, which Ewan also co-managed from 2014. He has attended all board meetings and been involved in all portfolio discussions and decisions since becoming deputy portfolio manager nearly eight years ago. We are delighted to have him step up as portfolio manager and the immediate announcement of his appointment on 10 June 2021 reflected the clear succession plans that we had in place.
In appointing Roderick, we have also been reassured by Baillie Gifford's confidence that he will continue to deliver the high standard of investment management service we have benefited from, supported by Baillie Gifford's strong team and investment culture.
Over the twelve months to 31 July 2021, the Company issued in aggregate 25,264,422 shares, 40% of the shares in issue at the start of the Company's financial year, and also bought back for treasury 325,134 shares which were subsequently re-issued.
All new and re-issued shares were issued at a sufficient premium to NAV to cover all the costs of issuance, including the costs of publishing a Prospectus for ongoing issuance. The authority that the Prospectus granted expires on 10 December 2021. The funds raised net of costs were £183,832,000. Ongoing demand meant that the Board sought and obtained additional issuance authority from shareholders in January 2021 and March 2021.
At the forthcoming AGM in November, the Board will be seeking an additional 10% non pre-emptive issuance authority to run concurrently with the authority granted in March 2021. Issuance will continue to be undertaken only at a premium to the NAV per share, thereby avoiding dilution for existing investors. When this authority is utilised in this manner, it enhances NAV per share, improving liquidity in the Company's shares and spreading the operating expenses of the Company across a wider base, thus reducing costs to each shareholder.
* Calculated on a total return basis. Source: Baillie Gifford/Refinitiv and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer on page 71. For a definition of terms see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
As part of this year's AGM business, the Board will also be asking shareholders to renew the authority to repurchase up to 14.99% of the outstanding shares on an ad hoc basis, either for cancellation or to be held in treasury, and also to permit the re-issuance of any shares held in treasury at a premium to the NAV per share. The Board intends to use the buyback authority opportunistically, taking into consideration not only the level of any discount but also the underlying liquidity and trading volumes in the Company's shares. This allows the Board to address any imbalance between the supply and demand in the Company's shares that results in a large discount to the NAV per share whilst being cognisant that current and potential shareholders have expressed a desire for continuing liquidity.
The Board believes that the Company benefits from holding any shares that are bought back in treasury, so that it has the ability to re-issue these shares in the circumstances described above. No shares are held in treasury at present.
Earnings decreased to minus 0.51p per share from a positive 0.95p per share for last year; the Company invests in growth stocks that typically pay little to no dividends and the Company's expenses are charged to revenue. The Company is therefore not in a position to pay a dividend from this year's earnings and the Board is not recommending a final dividend for this year.
As highlighted in past reports, investors should not consider investing in this Company if they require income from their investment as the Company typically invests in high growth stocks with little or no yield.
The Board continues to set the gearing parameters within which the portfolio managers are permitted to operate, and these are reviewed regularly. At present, the agreed range of equity gearing is minus 15% (i.e. holding net cash) to plus 15%. At the year end, invested gearing was 4%, unchanged versus the start of the year.
Gearing is achieved through the use of bank borrowings. At present the Company has a multi-currency revolving credit facility with The Royal Bank of Scotland for up to £60 million, which provides for potential invested gearing of 9% at present and which was fully drawn at 31 July 2021, split between GBP and USD.
At the conclusion of last year's AGM, Mr Edward Creasy stood down as Company Director, Senior Independent Director and Chairman of the Company's Audit Committee. He was replaced as Chairman of the Audit Committee and as Senior Independent Director by Ms Angela Lane.
During the year we welcomed Sir Robert Chote to the Board, former chairman of the Office for Budget Responsibility from 2010 to 2020. His appointment falls to be ratified by shareholders as part of November's AGM business.
Following a period of significant Board refreshment, the Board now anticipates a period of consolidation, with new appointments unlikely for several years.
As highlighted previously, the Board is acutely aware that shareholders expect the highest standards of governance. Our Managers, Baillie Gifford, adopt a position of supportive and constructive engagement without prescriptive policies or rules, assessing matters on a case-by-case basis. As part of maximising long-term performance for the benefit of the Company's shareholders, the Managers consider Environmental, Social and Governance ('ESG') factors as part of the investment case. While Baillie Gifford has clearly articulated ESG principles and a detailed policy framework, their application to often quite complex situations is necessarily subjective.
Details of the Company's policy on socially responsible investment can be found under Corporate Governance and Stewardship on page 33. A document outlining Baillie Gifford's Governance and Sustainability principles can be found on the Baillie Gifford website bailliegifford.com.
In 2018, shareholders approved a change in the Company's investment policy, permitting the Managers to invest up to a maximum of 10% of total assets in unlisted (private company) securities (such asset value being calculated at the point of initial investment). As at 31 July 2021 the Company had 7.2% of its total assets invested in seven private companies, having peaked during the year at 8.3% prior to the listing of Zomato, an Indian multinational restaurant aggregator and food delivery company. As part of this year's AGM business, shareholders are being asked to approve an increase from the existing 10% maximum to a new maximum level of 15% of total assets, calculated at the point of initial investment.
Baillie Gifford has a dedicated investment team for investing in private companies. This team is responsible for approximately US\$8.1 billion of private company investment across more than 80 companies in different geographic locations. It is seeing an increasing number of potential investment ideas across the Asia Pacific and Indian Sub-continent, particularly in India, that have not yet come to market and would be complementary to the Company's portfolio. Investing in companies before IPO can be valuable beyond the possible benefit of an earlier and hopefully cheaper entry price. Establishing early relationships with management teams can build a greater understanding of a business than a time-pressured IPO allows, as well as offering better access and allocation, which results in the ability and conviction to invest further upon listing. Although the Managers still have 2.8 percentage points of headroom to invest in unlisted (private company) equities, any upward revaluation of existing holdings or future funding rounds could mean that the 10% limit might curtail investments in potentially exciting opportunities. The Board therefore believes that it would be in the interest of shareholders to have additional capacity to invest.
At this year's AGM the Directors are proposing, in accordance with the Articles, that the life of the Company be extended for a further five years until the date of the Company's AGM in 2026, or 30 November 2026 if sooner.
Having conducted a thorough review of the Managers' approach and resources, the Board judges them to have the right team to manage a portfolio in what the Board considers to be a region with outstanding long-term prospects for investment. Asia ex Japan, including the markets of the Indian Sub-continent, stands out as a region with the potential for high positive real growth, driven by favourable demographics, a rising middle class and world-class businesses. Your Board therefore recommends that shareholders vote in favour of an extension of the Company's life for a further five year period.
If the continuation vote were not approved, the Directors would convene a meeting, to be held on or around 3 March 2022, at which a further resolution would be proposed to wind up the Company voluntarily and to appoint a liquidator following which the Company's portfolio would be realised, with shareholders being entitled, in proportion to their respective holdings, to the net proceeds of the liquidation. At this meeting, every shareholder present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote should be obliged to vote in favour of the resolution to wind up the Company and any votes proposed to be cast against that resolution would not be counted as valid votes.
The Company's legal advisers have undertaken a review of the Company's Articles of Association and recommended changes that are being put before shareholders as part of this year's AGM business, details of which can be found on page 67. The principal change proposed concerns the Company's ability to hold hybrid AGMs. The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted potential issues with the requirement to hold physical meetings at times of emergency, so it is proposed that the Company's Articles be amended to allow shareholders to attend by electronic means as well as in person. It is however intended that future meetings be physical, unless restrictions prohibiting this are in force at the time.
As matters stand, I am pleased to report that this year's AGM will take place on 17 November 2021 at the offices of Baillie Gifford & Co in Edinburgh at 11.00am and shareholders are encouraged to attend. If doing so, please endeavour to arrive by 10.50am to allow time to register. There will be a presentation from the portfolio manager who, along with the Directors, will answer questions from shareholders. I hope to see as many of you as possible there.
Should the situation change, further information will be made available through the Company's website at pacifichorizon.co.uk and the London Stock Exchange regulatory news service.
There will always be uncertainty. Asia, however, appears to have weathered the impact of Covid-19 and is arguably in a more robust state than much of the developed world, having accumulated less debt and encountered less economic disruption. Global economic conditions will have an influence on companies' performance, but new businesses and new business models will continue to grow and challenge incumbents, driven in part by digitalisation and the dynamism of corporate Asia's management teams. As evidenced by portfolio performance, active portfolio management is key, as not every business will thrive and it is incumbent on the Managers to remain alert to new investment opportunities and threats to existing holdings. Considerable future volatility is possible, however patient longterm investors could be rewarded with significant returns.
Angus Macpherson Chairman 21 September 2021
| 31 July 2021 |
31 July 2020 |
% change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | £748.0m | £329.0m | ||
| Borrowings | £60.8m | £24.6m | ||
| Shareholders' funds | £687.2m | £304.4m | ||
| Net asset value per ordinary share | 777.15p | 481.92p | 61.3 | |
| Share price | 802.00p | 504.00p | 59.1 | |
| MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index (in sterling terms)†# | 590.2 | 534.0 | 10.5 | |
| Dividend proposed per ordinary share in respect of the financial year | Nil | 0.25p | ||
| Revenue earnings per ordinary share | (0.51p) | 0.95p | ||
| Ongoing charges‡¶ | 0.78% | 0.92% | ||
| Premium‡¶ | 3.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Active share‡ | 93% | 85% | ||
| Year to 31 July | 2021 | 2020 | ||
| Total return#‡ | ||||
| Net asset value per ordinary share¶ | 61.3% | 39.9% | ||
| Share price¶ | 59.2% | 57.5% | ||
| MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index (in sterling terms)† | 12.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Year to 31 July | 2021 | 2021 | 2020 | 2020 |
| Year's high and low | High | Low | High | Low |
| Net asset value per ordinary share | 804.34p | 481.92p | 500.24p | 284.09p |
| Share price | 906.00p | 504.00p | 530.00p | 235.00p |
| Premium/(discount)‡¶ | 19.9% | (4.7%) | 9.3% | (17.7%) |
| Year to 31 July | 2021 | 2020 | ||
| Net return per ordinary share | ||||
| Revenue return | (0.51p) | 0.95p | ||
| Capital return | 253.70p | 134.99p | ||
| Total return | 253.19p | 135.94p |
* For a definition of terms see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72.
†The MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index (in sterling terms) is the principal index against which performance is measured.
‡Alternative Performance Measure – see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72.
¶Key Performance Indicator.
The following charts indicate how Pacific Horizon has performed relative to its comparative index* and the relationship between share price and net asset value over the five year period to 31 July 2021.
(figures rebased to 100 at 31 July 2016)


(figures plotted on a monthly basis)

(compared to the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index*)

* The MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index (in sterling terms) is the principal index against which performance is measured. †Alternative Performance Measure – see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72. #See disclaimer on page 71.
| At | Total assets * |
Bank loans |
Shareholders' funds * |
Net asset value per share * |
Share price |
Premium/ (discount) * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 July | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | p | p | % |
| 2011 | 137,350 | – | 137,350 | 178.53 | 165.00 | (7.6) |
| 2012 | 129,097 | – | 129,097 | 172.01 | 149.50 | (13.1) |
| 2013 | 134,638 | – | 134,638 | 182.01 | 156.75 | (13.9) |
| 2014 | 145,063 | 4,146 | 140,917 | 200.95 | 177.75 | (11.5) |
| 2015 | 139,167 | 13,997 | 125,170 | 197.78 | 181.63 | (8.2) |
| 2016 | 132,702 | 5,000 | 127,702 | 223.58 | 201.00 | (10.1) |
| 2017 | 182,523 | 14,773 | 167,750 | 309.15 | 286.00 | (7.5) |
| 2018 | 225,063 | 20,183 | 204,880 | 351.26 | 363.00 | 3.3 |
| 2019 | 223,755 | 20,405 | 203,350 | 344.50 | 320.00 | (7.1) |
| 2020 | 329,044 | 24,641 | 304,403 | 481.92 | 504.00 | 4.6 |
| 2021 | 748,014 | 60,783 | 687,231 | 777.15 | 802.00 | 3.2 |
| Year to 31 July |
Gross revenue £'000 |
Available for ordinary shareholders £'000 |
Revenue earnings per ordinary shares † p |
Dividend per ordinary share net p |
Ongoing charges * % |
Invested gearing * % |
Potential gearing * % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 3,441 | 1,546 | 1.98 | 1.50 | 1.22 | (1) | – |
| 2012 | 3,234 | 1,491 | 1.97 | 1.50 | 1.26 | (2) | – |
| 2013 | 2,967 | 1,242 | 1.66 | 1.50 | 1.15 | (1) | – |
| 2014 | 2,550 | 1,019 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.01 | 2 | 3 |
| 2015 | 1,886 | 231 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 1.02 | 8 | 11 |
| 2016 | 1,331 | (182) | (0.30) | 0.35 | 1.13 | 3 | 4 |
| 2017 | 1,559 | (211) | (0.38) | Nil | 1.07 | 7 | 9 |
| 2018 | 2,032 | (328) | (0.60) | Nil | 1.02 | 8 | 10 |
| 2019 | 2,473 | 8 | 0.01 | Nil | 0.99 | 8 | 10 |
| 2020 | 3,128 | 564 | 0.95 | 0.25 | 0.92 | 4 | 8 |
| 2021 | 3,561 | (402) | (0.51) | Nil | 0.78 | 4 | 9 |
| At 31 July |
Net asset value per share * |
Net asset value total return *# |
Share price |
Share price total return *# |
Comparative Index # |
Comparative Index total return # |
Revenue earnings per ordinary share |
Retail price index # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 2012 | 96 | 97 | 91 | 92 | 90 | 94 | 99 | 103 |
| 2013 | 102 | 104 | 95 | 97 | 98 | 105 | 84 | 106 |
| 2014 | 113 | 116 | 108 | 111 | 102 | 112 | 71 | 109 |
| 2015 | 111 | 115 | 110 | 114 | 101 | 114 | 18 | 110 |
| 2016 | 125 | 130 | 122 | 127 | 114 | 132 | (15) | 112 |
| 2017 | 173 | 180 | 173 | 181 | 143 | 170 | (19) | 116 |
| 2018 | 197 | 204 | 220 | 229 | 148 | 180 | (30) | 120 |
| 2019 | 193 | 200 | 194 | 202 | 150 | 188 | 1 | 123 |
| 2020 | 270 | 280 | 305 | 319 | 153 | 197 | 48 | 125 |
| 2021 | 435 | 452 | 486 | 507 | 169 | 222 | (26) | 130 |
| Compound annual returns | ||||||||
| 5 year | 28.3% | 28.3% | 31.9% | 31.9% | 8.3% | 11.0% | – | 3.0% |
| 10 year | 15.8% | 16.3% | 17.1% | 17.6% | 5.4% | 8.3% | – | 2.7% |
* For a definition of terms see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72.
†The calculation of earnings per share is based on the net revenue from ordinary activities after taxation and the weighted average number of ordinary shares (see note 7, page 51).
The Company is an investment company within the meaning of section 833 of the Companies Act 2006 and carries on business as an investment trust. Investment trusts are UK public listed companies and their shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange. They invest in a portfolio of assets in order to spread risk. The Company has a fixed share capital although, subject to shareholder approval, sought annually, it may purchase its own shares or issue shares. The price of the Company's shares is determined, like other listed shares, by supply and demand.
The Company has been approved as an investment trust by HM Revenue & Customs subject to the Company continuing to meet the eligibility conditions. The Directors are of the opinion that the Company has continued to conduct its affairs so as to enable it to comply with the ongoing requirements of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and the Investment Trust (Approved Company) (Tax) Regulations 2011.
The Company is an Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) for the purposes of the UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations.
The Company's purpose is to conduct business as an investment trust, investing its assets in accordance with its Investment Objective, in order to achieve capital growth for shareholders.
The Company's objective is to invest in the Asia-Pacific region (excluding Japan) and in the Indian Sub-continent in order to achieve capital growth. The Company is prepared to move freely between the markets of the region as opportunities for growth vary. The portfolio will normally consist principally of quoted securities.
Pacific Horizon aims to achieve capital growth principally through investment in companies listed on the stock markets of the Asia-Pacific region (excluding Japan) and the Indian Sub-continent. The Company may also invest in companies based in the region and in investment funds specialising in the region or particular countries or sectors within it even if they are listed elsewhere. The maximum permitted investment in one company is 15% of total assets at time of investment.
The portfolio contains companies which the Managers have identified as offering the potential for long term capital appreciation, irrespective of whether they comprise part of any index. The portfolio is actively managed and will normally consist principally of quoted equity securities although unlisted companies, fixed interest holdings or other non equity investments may be held. The maximum exposure to unlisted investments is 10% of total assets at the time of initial investment. The Company is also permitted to invest in other pooled vehicles (general, country and sector specific) that invest in the markets of the region.
In constructing the equity portfolio a spread of risk is created through diversification and the portfolio will typically consist of between 40 and 120 holdings. Although sector concentration and the thematic characteristics of the portfolio are carefully monitored, no maximum limits to stock or sector weights have been set by the Board except as imposed from time to time by banking covenants on borrowings.
The Company may use derivatives which will be principally, but not exclusively, for the purpose of reducing, transferring or eliminating investment risk in its investments. These typically take the form of index futures, index options and currency forward transactions.
The Company has a maximum approved equity gearing level of 50% of shareholders' funds but, in the absence of exceptional market conditions, equity gearing is typically less than 25% of shareholders' funds. Borrowings are invested in securities when it is considered that investment opportunities merit the Company taking a geared position. The Company is also permitted to be less than fully invested. Cash and equity gearing levels, and the extent of gearing, are discussed by the Board and Managers at every Board meeting.
Currently, the Company's investment policy permits investments not listed on a public market up to 10% of the Company's total assets at the time of initial investment. The Managers are seeing more unlisted/private company opportunities and the Board is of the view that it would be appropriate to increase this limit at this point. The Board is therefore proposing that the Company amends its investment policy to stipulate that the maximum amount which may be invested in companies not listed on a public market shall not exceed 15% of the total assets of the Company, measured at the time of purchase. The Company is also proposing a clarification on the typical number of investments in the portfolio, from 'holdings' to 'companies', in order to accommodate situations where different lines of stock are acquired in a single company.
Pacific Horizon aims to achieve capital growth principally through investment in companies listed on the stock markets of the Asia-Pacific region (excluding Japan) and the Indian Sub-continent. The Company may also invest in companies based in the region and in investment funds specialising in the region or particular countries or sectors within it even if they are listed elsewhere. The maximum permitted investment in one company is 15% of total assets at time of investment.
The portfolio contains companies which the Managers have identified as offering the potential for long term capital appreciation, irrespective of whether they comprise part of any index. The portfolio is actively managed and will normally consist principally of quoted equity securities although unlisted companies, fixed interest holdings or other non equity investments may be held. The maximum exposure to unlisted investments is 15% of total assets at the time of initial investment. The Company is also permitted to invest in other pooled vehicles (general, country and sector specific) that invest in the markets of the region.
In constructing the equity portfolio a spread of risk is created through diversification and the portfolio will typically consist of between 40 and 120 companies. Although sector concentration and the thematic characteristics of the portfolio are carefully monitored, no maximum limits to stock or sector weights have been set by the Board except as imposed from time to time by banking covenants on borrowings.
The Company may use derivatives which will be principally, but not exclusively, for the purpose of reducing, transferring or eliminating investment risk in its investments. These typically take the form of index futures, index options and currency forward transactions.
The Company has a maximum approved equity gearing level of 50% of shareholders' funds but, in the absence of exceptional market conditions, equity gearing is typically less than 25% of shareholders' funds. Borrowings are invested in securities when it is considered that investment opportunities merit the Company taking a geared position. The Company is also permitted to be less than fully invested. Cash and equity gearing levels, and the extent of gearing, are discussed by the Board and Managers at every Board meeting.
As an externally managed investment company with no employees, Pacific Horizon's culture is expressed through its Board and its third party service providers, in particular its Managers, in their interactions with shareholders and other stakeholders. The Board's assessment of its own interactions is described in its Section 172 Statement on pages 11 and 12, and the Baillie Gifford Statement on Stewardship, which describes the Managers' culture of constructive engagement, is set out on page 17.
At each Board meeting, the Directors consider a number of performance measures to assess the Company's success in achieving its objectives.
The Board uses key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the progress and performance of the Company over time when discharging its duties as set out on page 30. These KPIs are established industry measures and are as follows:
An explanation of these measures can be found in the Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72. The one, five and ten year records for the KPIs can be found on pages 5, 6 and 7, respectively.
In addition to the above, the Board also has regard to the total return of the Company's principal comparative index (MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index (in sterling terms)) and considers the performance of comparable companies.
Across these measures, the Board looks for relative outperformance over the long term, while remaining mindful that the nature of the Investment Policy and the growth characteristics of the portfolio investments may entail periods of underperformance over the short and medium term. The Board is satisfied with the Company's progress and performance.
The Company has a one year multi-currency revolving credit facility of up to £60 million with The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited (31 July 2020 – up to £30 million). At 31 July 2021 there were outstanding drawings of £20,000,000 and US\$56,704,000 at interest rates of 0.65977% and 0.7497% respectively (31 July 2020 – £12,500,000 and US\$15,935,500 at interest rates of 0.71891% and 0.83874% respectively).
As explained on pages 31 and 32 there is a process for identifying, evaluating and managing the risks faced by the Company on a regular basis. The Directors have carried out a robust assessment of the principal and emerging risks facing the Company, including those that would threaten its business model, future performance, regulatory compliance, solvency or liquidity. There have been no material changes to the principal risks during the year. A description of these risks and how they are being managed or mitigated is set out below:
The Board considers the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic and the impact of Brexit to be factors which exacerbate existing risks, rather than discrete risks, within the context of an investment trust. Their impact is considered within the relevant risks.
Financial Risk – the Company's assets consist mainly of listed securities (92.5% of the investment portfolio) and its principal and emerging financial risks are therefore market related and include market risk (comprising currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk), liquidity risk and credit risk. An explanation of those risks and how they are managed is contained in note 17 to the Financial Statements on pages 55 to 61. In order to oversee this risk, the Board considers at each meeting various metrics including regional and industrial sector weightings, top and bottom stock contributors to performance along with sales and purchases of investments. Individual investments are discussed with the portfolio managers together with their general views on the various investment markets and sectors. A strategy session is held annually. The Board has, in particular, considered the impact of heightened market volatility during the Covid-19 pandemic. The Board has also considered the potential impact on sterling following the UK's departure from the European Union and subsequent trade agreement. The value of the Company's investment portfolio would be affected by any impact, positively or negatively, on sterling but such impact would be partially offset by the effect of exchange movements on the Company's US\$ denominated borrowings.
Investment Strategy Risk – pursuit of an investment strategy to fulfil the Company's objective which the market perceives to be unattractive or inappropriate, or the ineffective implementation of an attractive or appropriate strategy, may lead to reduced returns for shareholders and, as a result, a decreased demand for the Company's shares. This may lead to the Company's shares trading at a widening discount to their net asset value. To mitigate this risk, the Board regularly reviews and monitors the Company's objective and investment policy and strategy, the investment portfolio and its performance, the level of discount/premium to net asset value at which the shares trade and movements in the share register and raises any matters of concern with the Managers.
Discount Risk – the discount/premium at which the Company's shares trade relative to its net asset value can change. The risk of a widening discount is that it may undermine investor confidence in the Company. To manage this risk, the Board monitors the level of discount/premium at which the shares trade and the Company has authority to buy back its existing shares, when deemed by the Board to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Regulatory Risk – failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements such as the tax rules for investment trust companies, the FCA Listing Rules and the Companies Act could lead to suspension of the Company's Stock Exchange listing, financial penalties, a qualified audit report or the Company being subject to tax on capital gains. To mitigate this risk, Baillie Gifford's Business Risk, Internal Audit and Compliance Departments provide regular reports to the Audit Committee on Baillie Gifford's monitoring programmes. Major regulatory change could impose disproportionate compliance burdens on the Company. In such circumstances representation is made to ensure that the special circumstances of investment trusts are recognised. Shareholder documents and announcements, including the Company's published Interim and Annual Report and Financial Statements, are subject to stringent review processes and procedures are in place to ensure adherence to the Transparency Directive and the Market Abuse Directive with reference to inside information.
Custody and Depositary Risk – safe custody of the Company's assets may be compromised through control failures by the Depositary, including breaches of cyber security. To mitigate this risk, the Audit Committee receives six monthly reports from the Depositary confirming safe custody of the Company's assets held by the Custodian. Cash and portfolio holdings are independently reconciled to the Custodian's records by the Managers who also agree uncertificated unlisted portfolio holdings to confirmations from investee companies. The Custodian's audited internal controls reports are reviewed by Baillie Gifford's Business Risk Department and a summary of the key points is reported to the Audit Committee and any concerns investigated. In addition, documentary evidence of the existence of assets is subject to annual external audit.
Operational Risk – failure of Baillie Gifford's systems or those of other third party service providers could lead to an inability to provide accurate reporting and monitoring or a misappropriation of assets. To mitigate this risk, Baillie Gifford has a comprehensive business continuity plan which facilitates continued operation of the business in the event of a service disruption (including any disruption resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic) or major disaster. Since the introduction of the Covid-19 restrictions, almost all Baillie Gifford staff have been working from home and operations have continued largely as normal. The Audit Committee reviews Baillie Gifford's Report on Internal Controls and reports by other key third party providers are reviewed by Baillie Gifford on behalf of the Board and a summary of the key points is reported to the Audit Committee and any concerns investigated. In the year under review, the other key third party service providers have not experienced significant operational difficulties affecting their respective services to the Company.
Leverage Risk – the Company may borrow money for investment purposes. If the investments fall in value, any borrowings will magnify the impact of this loss. If borrowing facilities are not renewed, the Company may have to sell investments to repay borrowings. The Company can also make use of derivative contracts. To mitigate this risk, all borrowings require the prior approval of the Board and leverage levels are discussed by the Board and Managers at every meeting. Covenant levels are monitored regularly. The majority of the Company's investments are in quoted securities that are readily realisable. Further information on leverage can be found in note 20 on page 62 and the Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72.
Political and Associated Economic Risk – the Board is of the view that political change in areas in which the Company invests or may invest may have financial consequences for the Company. Political developments are closely monitored and considered by the Board, particularly in respect of tensions between the USA and China regarding tariffs and unrest in Hong Kong. Following the departure of the UK from the European Union and the subsequent trade agreement between the UK and the European Union, the Board continues to assess the potential consequences for the Company's future activities, including those that may arise from further constitutional change. The Board believes that the Company's portfolio, which predominantly comprises companies listed on the stock markets of the Asia Pacific region (excluding Japan) and the Indian Sub-continent, positions the Company to be suitably insulated from Brexit-related risk.
Cyber Security Risk – a cyber attack on Baillie Gifford's network or that of a third party service provider could impact the confidentiality, integrity or availability of data and systems. To mitigate this risk, the Audit Committee reviews Reports on Internal Controls published by Baillie Gifford and other third party service providers. Baillie Gifford's Business Risk Department report to the Audit Committee on the effectiveness of information security controls in place at Baillie Gifford and its business continuity framework. Cyber security due diligence is performed by Baillie Gifford on third party service providers which includes a review of crisis management and business continuity frameworks.
Emerging Risks – as explained on pages 31 to 32 the Board has regular discussions on principal risks and uncertainties, including any risks which are not an immediate threat but could arise in the longer term. The Board considers that the key emerging risks arise from two areas. Firstly, from the global reach of the investment portfolio and its exposure to external and emerging threats such as cyber risk and coronavirus. This is mitigated by the Investment Manager's close links to the investee companies and their ability to ask questions on contingency plans. The Investment Manager believes the impact of such events may be to slow growth rather than to invalidate the investment rationale. Secondly, as investors place increased emphasis on Environmental, Social and Governance issues (ESG), any failure by the Investment Manager to identify potential future problems on ESG matters in an investee company could lead to the Company's shares being less attractive to investors as well as potential valuation issues in the underlying investee company.
This is mitigated by the Investment Manager's ESG application, which is integrated into the investment process, as well as the extensive up-front and ongoing due diligence which the Investment Manager undertakes on each investee company. This includes the risks inherent in climate change (see page 33).
Notwithstanding that the continuation of the Company is subject to approval of shareholders every five years, with the next vote at the Annual General Meeting in 2021, the Directors have, in accordance with provision 31 of the UK Corporate Governance Code, published by the Financial Reporting Council, assessed the prospects of the Company over a three year period. The Directors continue to believe this period to be appropriate as it is reflective of the Company's investment approach. In the absence of any adverse change to the regulatory environment and the favourable tax treatment afforded to UK investment trusts, such a period is one over which they do not expect there to be any significant change to the current principal risks and to the adequacy of the mitigating controls in place. The Directors do not envisage any change in the Company's strategy or objectives nor do they foresee any events that would prevent the Company from continuing in existence over that period.
In making this assessment regarding viability, the Directors have taken into account the Company's current position and have conducted a robust assessment of the Company's principal and emerging risks and uncertainties (as detailed on pages 31 and 32), in particular the impact of market risk where a significant fall in the Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan) and the Indian Sub-continent equity markets would adversely impact the value of the investment portfolio. The Directors have also considered the Company's investment objective and policy, the level of demand for the Company's shares, the nature of its assets, its liabilities and its projected income and expenditure. The vast majority of the Company's investments are readily realisable and can be sold to meet its liabilities as they fall due, the main liability currently being the short term bank borrowings. The Company's primary third party suppliers, including its Managers and Secretaries, Custodian and Depositary, Registrar, Auditor and Broker, are not experiencing significant operational difficulties affecting their respective services to the Company during this period of remote working. In addition, as substantially all of the essential services required by the Company are outsourced to third party service providers, key service providers can be replaced at relatively short notice where necessary. Specific leverage and liquidity stress testing was conducted during the year, including consideration of the risk of further market deterioration resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic. The stress testing did not indicate any matters of material concern.
The Board continues to monitor the economic impact of the UK's departure from the European Union but does not foresee a scenario that would affect the going concern status or viability of the Company.
Based on the Company's processes for monitoring revenue projections, share price discount/premium, the Managers' compliance with the investment objective, asset allocation, the portfolio risk profile, leverage, counterparty exposure, liquidity risk and financial controls, the Directors have concluded that there is a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the next three years.
Under section 172 of the Companies Act 2006, the directors of a company must act in the way they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters and to the extent applicable) to: a) the likely consequences of any decision in the long term, b) the interests of the company's employees, c) the need to foster the company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others, d) the impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment, e) the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct, and f) the need to act fairly as between members of the company.
In this context, having regard to Pacific Horizon being an externally managed investment company with no employees, the Board considers the Company's key stakeholders to be: its existing and potential shareholders; its externally-appointed managers (Baillie Gifford); other professional service providers (corporate broker, registrar, auditors and depositary); lenders; wider society and the environment where applicable.
The Board considers that the interests of the Company's key stakeholders are aligned, in terms of wishing to see the Company deliver sustainable long-term growth in line with the Company's stated objective and strategy; and that the Company meets the highest standards of legal, regulatory, and commercial conduct, with the differences between stakeholders' interests being merely a matter of emphasis on those elements. The Board's methods for assessing the Company's progress in the context of its stakeholders' interests are set out below.
The Board places great importance on communication with shareholders. The Annual General Meeting provides the key forum for the Board and Managers to present to shareholders on the Company's performance and prospects. It also allows shareholders the opportunity to meet with the Board and Managers and raise questions and concerns. The Chairman is available to meet with shareholders as appropriate independently of the Managers and did so during the year, together with the Senior Independent Director. The Managers meet regularly with shareholders and their representatives, reporting their views back to the Board. Directors can also attend shareholder presentations, in order to gauge shareholder sentiment first hand. Shareholders may also communicate with members of the Board at any time by writing to them at the Company's registered office or to the Company's broker. These communication opportunities help inform the Board when considering how best to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of all stakeholders in aggregate over the long term.
The Board seeks to engage with its Managers and other service providers in a collaborative and collegiate manner, encouraging open and constructive discussion and debate, whilst also ensuring that appropriate and regular challenge is brought to the table and appropriate evaluation conducted. This approach aims to enhance service levels and strengthen relationships with the Company's investment managers and service providers, with a view to ensuring the interests of the Company are best served by keeping cost levels proportionate and competitive, and by maintaining the highest standards of business conduct.
The Company's operational capacity is limited, as third-party service providers conduct all substantive operations. Nonetheless, the Board is aware of the need to consider the impact of the Company's investment strategy and policy on wider society and the environment. The Board considers that its oversight of environmental, social and governance ('ESG') matters is an important part of its responsibility to all stakeholders and that consideration of ESG factors is aligned with the Managers' longstanding aim of providing a sustainable basis for adding value for shareholders.
The Board recognises the importance of keeping the interests of the Company and its stakeholders, in aggregate, firmly front of mind in its key decision making. The Company Secretaries are available at all times to the Board to ensure that suitable consideration is given to the range of factors to which the Directors should have regard. In addition to ensuring that the Company's stated investment objective was being pursued, key decisions and actions during the year which required the Directors to have regard to applicable section 172 factors included:
The Board recognises the requirement to provide information about employees, human rights and community issues. As the Company has no employees, all its Directors are non-executive and all its functions are outsourced, there are no disclosures to be made in respect of employees, human rights and community issues.
As at 31 July 2021, and the date of this report, the Board comprises five Directors, three male and two female. The Company has no employees. The Board's policy on diversity is set out on page 31.
Details of the Company's policy on socially responsible investment can be found under Corporate Governance and Stewardship on page 33, with more details of the Managers' approach to socially responsible investment set out under Environmental, Social and Governance Considerations in the Managers' Review on page 16 and the Baillie Gifford Statement on Stewardship on page 17.
The Company considers that it does not fall within the scope of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 and it is not, therefore, obliged to make a slavery and human trafficking statement. In any event, the Company considers its supply chains to be of low risk as its suppliers are typically professional advisers. A statement by the Managers under the Act has been published on the Managers' website at bailliegifford.com.
What defines us is growth. We believe Asia ex Japan will be one of the fastest growing regions over the coming decades and we strive to be invested in its fastest growing companies. It is growth multiplied by growth or, as we like to call it, 'Growth Squared' ('Growth²').
Such an investment style was richly rewarded over the year to 31 July 2021 as the Covid-19 pandemic spurred the rapid acceleration of technological adoption, and unprecedented levels of economic stimulus globally. This was combined with large parts of Asia handling the crisis relatively well, allowing their economies to reopen quickly and growth to rebound sharply.
This, however, was not a time to stand still. The extreme dislocations in markets afforded investors a 'once in a decade' opportunity to buy high quality growth businesses at extremely attractive valuations. The number of underlying portfolio transactions and the number of companies held in the portfolio (107 as at 31 July 2021) therefore rose to uncommonly high levels.
It may appear surprising for a growth oriented portfolio that many of our best performing ideas over the year came from 'old economy' companies, ranging from copper and nickel producers (materials crucial to the growing green energy revolution), to Indian automotive manufacturers. Holdings in these more cyclical industries had already been increasing prior to the crisis and this demonstrates an important tenet of our investment philosophy – the willingness to embrace growth in all its forms.
Elsewhere, the advantage of being able to invest in private companies continued to increase, with many of the region's best businesses, especially in the rapidly evolving technology sector, choosing to remain private for longer. Opportunities in India proved to be particularly attractive and we invested in four private Indian companies over the period (including in an existing holding, Zomato, which has now listed), along with ByteDance (the world's most popular short form video app) in China. At the end of the period, private companies accounted for 7.2% of the Company's total assets.
Performance was extremely strong over the period, the Company's NAV and share price increasing by 61.3%* and 59.2%* respectively, compared to the comparative index, the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index (in sterling terms), with a total return of 12.7%*. Although we focus on longer term performance numbers, such performance is pleasing to report. It will, however, almost certainly moderate from these exceptional levels.
Finally, our enthusiasm for the region remains strong. The risks and opportunities from increased disruption are here to stay. In our view, the market's focus on geopolitics and capital flows misses the bigger picture, that of a global rise in digital penetration, technological change and the rise of the Asian middle class. These fundamentals will underpin growth in the region for decades to come. We believe that the best way to invest in this rapidly changing growth market is to find the best long-term growth companies.
We are excited by the future. We are growth investors looking to invest in the top twenty percent of the fastest growing companies in the region. Believing that time is on our side, we are patient. We seek out companies whose business models and management teams are likely to fulfil their ambitions. We look for areas where our ideas give us an edge over the market over a longer timeframe.
Across the region we have found the most persistent source of outperformance to be those companies that can grow their profits faster than the market, in hard currency terms, over the long term. This trend persists irrespective of starting valuations. Consequently, our research is singularly focused on finding those companies whose share prices can at least double, in sterling terms, on a five year view and we expect most of this doubling to come from earnings growth.
We are particularly interested in three specific and persistent inefficiencies:
We believe one of the greatest inefficiencies in Asia ex Japan is to be found in companies with excellent long-term earnings growth but where profits will be volatile from one quarter to the next, often as a result of investment or product cycles that are years in the planning. The market shows an aversion to such companies, preferring the predictability of smooth profit generation even if the long-term growth rate turns out to be a fraction of that achieved by those more willing to reinvest in their business and with greater ambition. This presents us with fantastic investment opportunities, but it requires an approach and culture that allows near-term volatility to be ignored.
The market consistently underestimates the likelihood of rapid growth. The evidence shows that most investors cluster around a narrow range of earnings growth predictions, which can in turn lead to significant mispricing of those companies with the potential to grow very rapidly. Our process is focused on finding these companies. By looking further out and searching for low probability but high impact growth opportunities, we have been able to outperform the broader market. This requires us to think carefully about probabilities and possibilities, to spend more time thinking about what can go right rather than what can go wrong in any investment; ultimately, stock markets are driven by a small handful of companies that do extremely well.
The final significant inefficiency in Asia ex Japan lies in the interaction between top-down and bottom-up investing. Asia ex Japan investors do not have the luxury of ignoring macroeconomics. Purely bottom-up investment is a path to ruin in a universe where industrial and economic cycles can dominate investment returns over multi-year periods. The long-term earnings for a vast number of companies – notably in the financial, materials and industrial sectors – are determined by exogenous macro factors beyond their control. This also provides opportunities.
* Source: Baillie Gifford/Refinitiv and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer on page 71. For a definition of terms see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
Our analysis shows that while it may pay to invest in those companies that display consistently high levels of profitability, the strongest returns are to be found in those companies that transition from poor levels of profitability to high – a 'growth surprise'.
This may seem obvious – rising levels of profitability are normally accompanied by a re-rating, thereby providing a two-fold kicker to share price performance – but identifying the drivers behind this change is the key and has been a significant source of outperformance for Pacific Horizon. We accept that timing these inflection points perfectly is impossible, but when you have an investment horizon measured over many years, successfully anticipating the future direction of travel is hugely valuable.
Importantly, we are agnostic as to the type of growth inefficiency we are exploiting and will invest wherever we are finding the best opportunities. At times this will lead to a concentration in particular sectors or countries, and at others a much broader, flatter portfolio, but growth will always be the common theme.
| Pacific Horizon |
MSCI AC Asia ex Japan Index |
|
|---|---|---|
| Historic earnings growth (5 years | ||
| trailing compound annual growth to 31 July 2021) |
14.5% | 8.6% |
| One year forecast earnings growth (to 31 July 2022) |
40.7% | 20.8% |
| Estimated p/e ratio for the current year (to 31 July 2022) |
17.2x | 14.3x |
| Percentage in under £1bn market | ||
| cap companies | 16.1% | 0.1% |
| Percentage in under £5bn market cap companies |
53.5% | 10.7% |
| Active Share | 93.5% | N/A |
| Portfolio Turnover | 12.9% | N/A |
Data as at 31 July 2021, source: Baillie Gifford, UBS PAS, APT, MSCI (see disclaimer on page 71).
As highlighted in the table above, the growth characteristics of the current portfolio remain strong, with historic earnings growth and one-year forecast earnings growth higher than the comparative index equivalents. The portfolio's estimated price-to-earnings ratio for the current year is 17.2 versus 14.3 for the comparative index. Over the longer term, we believe the higher growth potential of our holdings more than justifies this additional multiple.
Finally, we continue to believe that the rapid development of technology is creating a fundamental change in market behaviour, with digitalisation driving profound changes in economic and political systems, businesses and consumer habits. The number of sectors and industries that are becoming digitalised and connected is increasing rapidly. There is growing awareness of these changes across the globe. Artificial intelligence ('AI') is now taken for granted and the concept of electric rather than internal combustion engine cars is seen as a commercial inevitability rather than a distant vision.
The portfolio is noticeably different from a few years ago when we were more cautious on large parts of South East Asia and were very concentrated in technology and consumer stocks. In the context of the growth inefficiencies we exploit, the Company had a large number of investments in the 'duration' and 'pace' buckets, but very little in 'surprise'. This had been changing gradually as we found more opportunities in more cyclical, old economy companies, but accelerated dramatically over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic as the extreme dislocation in Asian markets provided us with extremely attractive opportunities in these more cyclical sectors.
The result is a portfolio today that may surprise some. In absolute terms our largest exposures remain focused on the key themes of the rising middle class, technology and innovation, however we now have significant exposures to more cyclical industries including materials, industrials and energy that respectively make up the three largest relative positions within the portfolio. There remains, however, one commonality among the companies held: growth.
Using Pacific Horizon's largest relative sector position, Materials, as an example, holdings here are predominantly concentrated in companies exposed to two commodities, nickel and copper, both of which lie at the core of the green revolution. Copper, as the most cost-effective conductive material, sits at the heart of capturing, storing and transporting new energy sources, and demand from green sources could easily grow ten-fold by 2030. Nickel is a core material in electric vehicle batteries, where demand across Asia will be driven by China's intention to have electric vehicles account for a quarter of all automotive sales within the next few years (from around 5% today).
By country, the most noticeable change to the portfolio has been the substantial increase to India, going from a 7% absolute position to 29%, and it is now the largest country overweight in the portfolio (+18 percentage points). Our purchases here can be divided into two parts. The first is 'old' India, where we have increased holdings in traditional sectors such as property, where we believe the Indian property market is at the cusp of a multiyear revival; since 2007, the market has fallen significantly in real terms, affordability is the highest it has been in a decade, and a number of regulatory changes and tightening liquidity requirements have consolidated the market into a handful of the largest and best developers.
The second part is arguably the more exciting, 'new' India. For many years India has had some of the most attractive companies across Asia, but often this has had more to do with the lack of competition they face, rather than any great innovation or technological edge. Catalysed by the rollout of the world's second largest 4G mobile network, allowing many Indians to access the internet for the first time, things are changing fast. Just as we experienced in China more than a decade ago, a new breed of exciting and innovative technology-focused companies is emerging in the country.
Many of these prized businesses, however, remain private, and Pacific Horizon's ability to invest into unlisted (private) companies has been extremely beneficial. Over the period we made three new investments into private Indian companies, Delhivery (leading delivery and ecommerce logistics), Dailyhunt (online short form video) and Star Health (India's largest private health provider), while the trust also added to its existing position in Zomato which subsequently listed.
With around US\$200–300 billion worth of technology-focused private companies likely to list in India over the next few years, the opportunity set for investors will be revolutionised. Having built meaningful stakes in a number of these businesses, developed strong relationships with management and gained early insights into these industries and companies ahead of their IPOs, we believe Pacific Horizon will be well placed to benefit.
A significant portion of funding for Indian companies came from the sale of our Chinese names, with China reducing from a 41% absolute weighting in the portfolio to 27%, and in relative terms it is the largest portfolio underweight position at minus 20 percentage points. Noticeable reductions took place to a number of the large technology companies where we had concerns over competition and increasing regulation; the position in Alibaba was reduced and the positions in Tencent and Meituan exited.
Our timing proved to be prescient; the demolition of the private education sector (where we had no exposure), a crackdown on the monopolistic practices of internet giants and enhanced rules on data ownership and security have displaced any confusion, if any existed, regarding who is in charge in China. For the internet companies specifically, it will be crucial going forwards to understand whether the Chinese regulators have simply imposed some sensible regulations to protect consumers, or whether this is the start of the Chinese government exerting ever greater control over these businesses.
Although our performance was exceptionally strong over the reporting period, we would hesitate to draw too much from such short-term numbers. We are long-term investors, running a high conviction growth portfolio that is index agnostic. Performance will be volatile and there will be short term periods when we underperform. Our investment time horizon is five years and beyond and it is on these time scales that our performance should be judged. Over the past five years, the Company's NAV has outperformed the comparative index by 17.5 percentage points per annum. Such performance is pleasing to report, however it will almost certainly moderate from these exceptional levels.
Over the relatively short reporting period, markets have been volatile, sentiment see-sawed between growth and value, as investors grappled with the implications of enormous global fiscal stimulus, eye-popping monetary stimulus, surging GDP growth, and inflation, to name a few. We pay no attention to debates of growth versus value, however it is interesting to note that the portfolio has generally performed well in both market environments; the first half of the period when growth was generally in favour and the second half when it switched to value.
Such a favourable outcome has largely been the result of the broadening out of the portfolio into more cyclical growth companies, as previously discussed. Consequently, by sector, cyclical industries including materials, real estate and financials, were the second, fourth and fifth leading contributors to portfolio returns. Even within the largest contributor to absolute performance, consumer discretionary, a significant portion of performance came from some of the more traditional sectors such as automotive, where Tata Motors (owners of Jaguar Land Rover) was the third biggest stock contributor to performance.
By sector, only information technology detracted from performance (by a modest 0.6 percentage points), mainly due to underweight positions in some of the region's manufacturing behemoths including Samsung Electronics.
We are of course indifferent as to what sectors our stocks are defined as by the market; we are stock pickers after growth companies, and as such it is no surprise that more than three quarters of the portfolio's positive absolute return came solely from stock selection.
Towards the end of the reporting period, performance was also helped significantly by what was not held. This was especially so in China, where the government's decimation of the listed education sector and increasing regulation of internet companies led to dramatic price falls in these sectors. In July 2021, when these changes occurred, the portfolio had no exposure to companies in the education sector, and more importantly was significantly underweight many of the large internet names, for example with a five percentage point underweight position in mega cap Alibaba, and no holdings in index heavyweights such as Tencent and Meituan.
The above, combined with strong stock performance from companies like Li Ning, the Chinese sportswear company that continued to benefit from a shift towards local brands by Chinese consumers, meant China was the top contributor to portfolio returns. This was closely followed by India, where a number of stocks performed very strongly including Tata Motors (up 177%) and Happiest Minds (IT outsourcer, purchased at IPO, up 677%), which were both among the top five stock contributors. In India it is also noteworthy that Zomato, a private company holding in the portfolio, listed and generated a total return of 171% over the reporting period.
The performance of the portfolio's largest holding, Sea Limited (+113%), South East Asia's leading ecommerce and gaming company meant that by country, Singapore was the third largest contributor to portfolio performance. The gaming division showed great strength, with Free Fire, the company's in-house-developed game, becoming the world's most downloaded game in 2020 and reaching more than 300 million monthly active users. The ecommerce business continued its impressive market share gains across much of ASEAN and, with its increasing scale, looks set to be the dominant online shopping platform across much of the region over the coming decade.
Despite the strong performance of a number of companies, including Sea, it is worth noting that performance was pleasingly broad-based, with the top ten contributors accounting for less than half of Pacific Horizon's relative outperformance.
The portfolio underperformed in Taiwan, largely as a consequence of the portfolio's underweight position in TSMC, arguably the world's most important semiconductor manufacturer. TSMC continued to increase its technological lead over rivals, and we will be carefully considering the portfolio's exposure to the company over the coming 12 months.
Other notable detractors to performance were a number of technology companies in China including Dada Nexus (logistics), Lufax holdings (Fintech) and HUYA (online game streaming). These were all impacted in the aforementioned Chinese regulatory clampdown on the internet sector.
As growth investors, we are attracted to companies whose products will benefit from strong future demand. These companies not only have to produce better and cheaper products and services than their competitors, but they must also be alert for changes in the outlooks and attitudes of the societies of which they are part.
Companies that fail to keep pace in this way tend to fail, either because of falling consumer demand for their products or because of government intervention in their activities. When taking investment decisions, we consider the potential positive and negative impact on society that companies may have, and how their commercial activities may be perceived by external stakeholders in the future.
For our long-term investments to be successful, the companies in which we invest must add value to society. This can be achieved in various ways. For example, the products of our regenerative biotech companies may allow many to benefit from otherwise unachievable medical cures, our internet companies provide goods and services at prices and in quantities previously beyond the reach of many, while our technology holdings are enabling the fastest increase in human connectivity and information on record.
Lastly, it is very important to us that the interests of minority shareholders are upheld. We remain careful to make sure our investments are aligned with those of majority shareholders and owners.
We remain extremely positive on the long-term outlook for the region. The rise of the Asian middle class, accelerated by technology and innovation, continues to be one of the most powerful investment opportunities of the coming decade. As active managers, with long-term time horizons, we are enthused by the number of exciting growth companies we can buy that should benefit from these economic, social and technological changes across the region.
All of this is against the backdrop of Covid-19 from which Asia ex Japan, to use an unfortunate phrase, could be a major beneficiary. The modest financial stimulus and monetary response observed across the region stands in stark contrast to the many trillions of dollars desperately being deployed by western economies as their interest rate structures collapse. For much of the developed world, such profligacy will be a major financial burden for years to come, leading to slower growth and potentially weaker currencies. The majority of Asia ex Japan, with decent growth rates, sensible interest rates and limited balance sheet expansion, looks attractively placed in comparison. It is time to look east.
Baillie Gifford's over-arching ethos is that we are 'actual' investors. We have a responsibility to behave as supportive and constructively engaged long-term investors. We invest in companies at different stages in their evolution, across vastly different industries and geographies and we celebrate their uniqueness. Consequently, we are wary of prescriptive policies and rules, believing that these often run counter to thoughtful and beneficial corporate stewardship. Our approach favours a small number of simple principles which help shape our interactions with companies.
We encourage company management and their boards to be ambitious and focus their investments on long-term value creation. We understand that it is easy for businesses to be influenced by short-sighted demands for profit maximisation but believe these often lead to sub-optimal long-term outcomes. We regard it as our responsibility to steer businesses away from destructive financial engineering towards activities that create genuine economic value over the long run. We are happy that our value will often be in supporting management when others don't.
We believe that boards play a key role in supporting corporate success and representing the interests of minority shareholders. There is no fixed formula, but it is our expectation that boards have the resources, cognitive diversity and information they need to fulfil these responsibilities. We believe that a board works best when there is strong independent representation able to assist, advise and constructively test the thinking of management.
We look for remuneration policies that are simple, transparent and reward superior strategic and operational endeavour. We believe incentive schemes can be important in driving behaviour, and we encourage policies which create alignment with genuine longterm shareholders. We are accepting of significant pay-outs to executives if these are commensurate with outstanding long-run value creation, but plans should not reward mediocre outcomes. We think that performance hurdles should be skewed towards long-term results and that remuneration plans should be subject to shareholder approval.
We believe it is in the long-term interests of companies to maintain strong relationships with all stakeholders, treating employees, customers, suppliers, governments and regulators in a fair and transparent manner. We do not believe in one-size-fitsall governance and we recognise that different shareholder structures are appropriate for different businesses. However, regardless of structure, companies must always respect the rights of all equity owners.
We look for companies to act as responsible corporate citizens, working within the spirit and not just the letter of the laws and regulations that govern them. We believe that corporate success will only be sustained if a business's long-run impact on society and the environment is taken into account. Management and boards should therefore understand and regularly review this aspect of their activities, disclosing such information publicly alongside plans for ongoing improvement.
A review of the Company's ten largest investments as at 31 July 2021 is given below and on the following page.
Sea Limited is one of the leading players in South East Asia within the gaming markets and online ecommerce. It is an independent company with significant backing from Tencent. Its markets have the potential to grow exponentially over the next decade.
| Geography | Singapore |
|---|---|
| Valuation | £56,394,000 |
| % of total assets* | 7.5% |
| (Valuation at 31 July 2020 | £29,949,000) |
| (% of total assets at 31 July 2020 | 9.1%) |
| (Net sales in year to 31 July 2021 | £4,848,000) |
Tata Motors is an Indian automotive manufacturer with a strong domestic business, which also owns Jaguar Land Rover. Jaguar Land Rover is likely to see strong profit growth with a new product cycle, combined with significant cost cutting. The domestic Indian business is seeing a strong cyclical recovery and is likely to take market share.
| Geography | India |
|---|---|
| Valuation | £24,053,000 |
| % of total assets* | 3.2% |
| (Valuation at 31 July 2020 | £1,476,000) |
| (% of total assets at 31 July 2020 | 0.4%) |
| (Net purchases in year to 31 July 2021 | £11,295,000) |
India's leading home delivery company is backed by Alibaba's Ant Financial and Uber. It has India's leading restaurant recommendation system and the largest paid membership programme for individuals to receive discounts at restaurants. The managers believe that home delivery services will benefit from the experience developed during the Covid-19 pandemic.
| Geography | India |
|---|---|
| Valuation | £21,111,000 |
| % of total assets* | 2.8% |
| (Valuation at 31 July 2020 | £3,872,000) |
| (% of total assets at 31 July 2020 | 1.2%) |
| (Net purchases in year to 31 July 2021 | £3,912,000) |
MMG is a Hong Kong listed mid-tier global resources company which explores, develops and mines base metal projects around the world. Among its portfolio holdings are world class copper assets in Peru.
| Geography | Hong Kong and China |
|---|---|
| Valuation | £20,152,000 |
| % of total assets* | 2.7% |
| (Valuation at 31 July 2020 | £5,546,000) |
| (% of total assets at 31 July 2020 | 1.7%) |
| (Net purchases in year to 31 July 2021 | £9,353,000) |
Delhivery is an Indian logistics company, and the leading independent provider of end-to-end delivery services, with a national network used by all ecommerce players. The scale and modernity of their network has allowed them to deliver both the lowest costs and a reliable delivery experience, making them one of the best-placed operators to benefit from the continued growth of Indian ecommerce. This is a private company investment.
| Geography | India |
|---|---|
| Valuation | £19,501,000 |
| % of total assets* | 2.6% |
| (Valuation at 31 July 2020 | n/a – new holding) |
| (% of total assets at 31 July 2020 | n/a – new holding) |
| (Net purchases in year to 31 July 2021 | £17,766,000) |
Li Ning is the leading domestic branded sportswear retailer in China. It is in the midst of a turnaround where the company's sales are playing catch-up to its strong brand image. The Chinese brand is catching the younger market and is driving a significant increase in sales.
| Geography | Hong Kong and China |
|---|---|
| Valuation | £18,613,000 |
| % of total assets* | 2.5% |
| (Valuation at 31 July 2020 | £8,490,000) |
| (% of total assets at 31 July 2020 | 2.6%) |
| (Net sales in year to 31 July 2021 | £5,926,000) |
* For a definition of terms see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72.
Jadestone is an exploration and production company with assets in the South-East Asia Pacific, bringing expertise to previously poorly run state-owned acreage.
| Geography | Singapore |
|---|---|
| Valuation | £16,920,000 |
| % of total assets* | 2.3% |
| (Valuation at 31 July 2020 | £3,844,000) |
| (% of total assets at 31 July 2020 | 1.2%) |
| (Net purchases in year to 31 July 2021 | £12,495,000) |
Vedanta is one of India's largest commodity conglomerates with exposures in zinc, aluminium, steel, copper, oil and iron ore, and well-positioned to benefit from a new global commodity cycle. After a period of poor corporate governance, new investors should benefit as improvements lead to a re-rating of the shares.
| Geography | India |
|---|---|
| Valuation | £16,622,000 |
| % of total assets* | 2.2% |
| (Valuation at 31 July 2020 | n/a – new holding) |
| (% of total assets at 31 July 2020 | n/a – new holding) |
| (Net purchases in year to 31 July 2021 | £9,975,000) |
Samsung SDI is one of the fastest growing parts of the Samsung chaebol; it owns a stake in Samsung Display, where OLED production for Apple/Samsung is ramping up rapidly over the next few years. It is also one of the world leaders in EV batteries, an area with significant growth prospects.
| Geography | Korea |
|---|---|
| Valuation | £15,360,000 |
| % of total assets* | 2.1% |
| (Valuation at 31 July 2020 | £10,650,000) |
| (% of total assets at 31 July 2020 | 3.2%) |
| (Net sales in year to 31 July 2021 | £3,375,000) |
JD.com is the largest Chinese retailer, via its dominant share in the online ecommerce 3C market, and it is the second player in overall Chinese ecommerce. They have a strong logistics network and a focus on customer service, which is driving increased revenue market share. New investments in SME finance and online food delivery could create exciting new market opportunities.
| Geography | Hong Kong and China |
|---|---|
| Valuation | £14,885,000 |
| % of total assets* | 2.0% |
| (Valuation at 31 July 2020 | £14,191,000) |
| (% of total assets at 31 July 2020 | 4.3%) |
| (Net purchases in year to 31 July 2021 | nil) |
| Name | Geography | Business | 2021 Value £'000 |
2021 % of total assets * |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sea Limited ADR | Singapore | Internet gaming and ecommerce | 56,394 | 7.5 |
| Tata Motors ADR | India | Indian automobile manufacturer | 24,053 | 3.2 |
| Zomato | India | Online restaurant search, ordering and discovery platform |
21,111 | 2.8 |
| MMG | HK/China | Chinese copper miner | 20,152 | 2.7 |
| Delhivery Series H Preference | India | Logistics and courier services provider | 19,501 | 2.6 |
| Li Ning | HK/China | Sportswear apparel supplier | 18,613 | 2.5 |
| Jadestone | Singapore | Oil and gas explorer and producer | 16,920 | 2.3 |
| Vedanta ADR | India | Indian miner | 16,622 | 2.2 |
| Samsung SDI | Korea | Electrical equipment manufacturer | 15,360 | 2.1 |
| JD.com ADR | HK/China | Online mobile commerce | 14,885 | 2.0 |
| Dailyhunt | India | Indian news aggregator application | 14,412 | 1.9 |
| Nickel Mines | Indonesia | Base metals miner | 13,987 | 1.9 |
| ByteDance | HK/China | Social media | 13,891 | 1.9 |
| Happiest Minds Technologies | India | Data analytics and cloud computing | 12,684 | 1.7 |
| Merdeka Copper Gold | Indonesia | Indonesian miner | 12,447 | 1.7 |
| Indiabulls Real Estate | India | Domestic and commercial real estate provider | 12,326 | 1.6 |
| Dada Nexus ADR | HK/China | Chinese ecommerce distributor of online consumer products |
12,132 | 1.6 |
| Ningbo Peacebird Fashion A Shares | HK/China | Chinese fashion | 11,534 | 1.5 |
| Samsung Engineering | Korea | Korean construction | 10,574 | 1.4 |
| Jiangxi Copper Co | HK/China | Chinese copper miner | 10,565 | 1.4 |
| RUSAL | Russia (HK) | Aluminium producer | 10,557 | 1.4 |
| Hoa Phat Group | Vietnam | Steel and related products manufacturer | 10,060 | 1.3 |
| HDBank | Vietnam | Consumer bank | 9,842 | 1.3 |
| Quess Corp | India | Human resources company | 9,770 | 1.3 |
| Zijin Mining Group Co H Shares | HK/China | Gold and copper miner | 9,385 | 1.3 |
| Koh Young Technology | Korea | 3D inspection machine manufacturer | 9,358 | 1.3 |
| Geely Automobile | HK/China | Automobile manufacturer | 9,158 | 1.2 |
| Ramkrishna Forgings | India | Auto parts manufacturer | 8,491 | 1.1 |
| MediaTek | Taiwan | Taiwanese electronic component manufacturer | 8,379 | 1.1 |
| Dragon Capital Vietnam Enterprise Investments |
Vietnam | Vietnam investment fund | 8,257 | 1.1 |
| Hyundai Mipo Dockyard | Korea | Korean shipbuilder | 8,237 | 1.1 |
| Kingsoft Cloud Holdings ADR | HK/China | Chinese cloud computing provider | 8,175 | 1.1 |
| PT Aneka Tambang | Indonesia | Nickel miner | 8,118 | 1.1 |
| DLF | India | Commercial real estate developer | 7,593 | 1.0 |
| Accton Technology | Taiwan | Server network equipment manufacturer | 7,571 | 1.0 |
| Tata Steel | India | Steel manufacturing company | 7,470 | 1.0 |
| SK IE Technology | Korea | Refining and chemical company | 7,140 | 1.0 |
| EO Technics | Korea | Manufacturer and distributor of semiconductor laser markers |
7,108 | 1.0 |
| Reliance Industries | India | Indian petrochemical company | 7,015 | 0.9 |
| Kingdee International Software | HK/China | Enterprise management software distributor | 6,925 | 0.9 |
| PT Vale Indonesia | Indonesia | Nickel miner | 6,312 | 0.8 |
| IDFC Bank | India | Indian infrastructure developer | 6,305 | 0.8 |
| Dhani Services | India | Digital healthcare and transactional finance company | 6,257 | 0.8 |
| Zai Lab ADR | HK/China | Biopharmaceutical company | 6,234 | 0.8 |
| Star Health & Allied Insurance Co | India | Health insurance company | 5,992 | 0.8 |
| Bioneer SDI Corporation |
Korea Taiwan |
Drug researcher and developer Stationery and lead frames for semiconductors |
5,969 | 0.8 |
| manufacturer | 5,813 | 0.8 |
| Name | Geography | Business | 2021 Value £'000 |
2021 % of total assets * |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Military Commercial Joint Stock Bank | Vietnam | Retail and corporate bank | 5,776 | 0.8 |
| Lemon Tree Hotels | India | Owner and operator of a chain of Indian hotels and resorts |
5,376 | 0.7 |
| KH Vatec Company | Korea | Electronic component and device manufacturer | 5,208 | 0.7 |
| Phoenix Mills | India | Commercial property manager | 5,175 | 0.7 |
| Jindal Steel & Power | India | Steel, power, mining and infrastructure company | 5,146 | 0.7 |
| S-Fuelcell | Korea | Fuel cell manufacturer | 5,008 | 0.7 |
| Prestige Estate Projects | India | Owner and operator of residential real estate properties |
4,912 | 0.7 |
| Kaspi.Kz JSC GDR | Kazakhstan | Kazakh fintech | 4,864 | 0.6 |
| Douzone Bizon | Korea | Enterprise resource planning software developer | 4,325 | 0.6 |
| Lufax Holdings | HK/China | Online internet finance marketplace | 4,324 | 0.6 |
| Alibaba Group ADR | HK/China | Online and mobile commerce | 4,305 | 0.6 |
| Korea Zinc | Korea | Non-ferrous metals smelter and manufacturer | 4,286 | 0.6 |
| Skipper | India | Transmission and distribution structures provider | 3,969 | 0.5 |
| Wuxi Lead Intelligent Equipment Co A Shares |
HK/China | Manufacturer of electronic capacitors, solar energy and lithium battery equipment |
3,946 | 0.5 |
| Saigon Securities | Vietnam | Brokerage and securities company | 3,839 | 0.5 |
| Chalice Mining | HK/China | Miner | 3,775 | 0.5 |
| AU Small Finance Bank | India | Consumer finance bank | 3,676 | 0.5 |
| HUYA ADR | HK/China | Live-streaming game platform | 3,658 | 0.5 |
| L&C Bio | Korea | Medical equipment manufacturer | 3,476 | 0.5 |
| ST Pharm | Korea | Manufacturer of specialist pharmaceutical ingredients | 3,470 | 0.5 |
| Han's Laser Technology A Shares | HK/China | Electronic equipment manufacturer | 3,396 | 0.5 |
| Genexine | Korea | Therapeutic vaccine researcher and developer | 3,272 | 0.4 |
| Tsugami Precision | HK/China | Industrial machinery manufacturer | 3,264 | 0.4 |
| China Conch Venture Holdings | HK/China | Provider of environmentally-friendly building materials and solutions |
3,187 | 0.4 |
| Techtronic Industries | HK/China | Power tool manufacturer | 3,060 | 0.4 |
| Ping An Insurance H Shares | HK/China | Life insurance provider | 3,024 | 0.4 |
| Big Hit Entertainment | Korea | Korean media company | 2,946 | 0.4 |
| China Oilfield Services | HK/China | Oilfield services | 2,905 | 0.4 |
| CIMC Vehicles H Shares | HK/China | Manufacturer of trailers and trucks | 2,872 | 0.4 |
| iClick Interactive Asia Group | HK/China | Online marketing technology platform | 2,805 | 0.4 |
| CNOOC | HK/China | Oil and gas producer | 2,794 | 0.4 |
| NCSOFT | Korea | Computer games developer | 2,765 | 0.4 |
| India Capital Growth Fund | India | Indian investment trust | 2,577 | 0.3 |
| Hypebeast | HK/China | Digital media and ecommerce company | 2,492 | 0.3 |
| Indigo Paints | India | Indian paint manufacturer | 2,388 | 0.3 |
| Flitto | Korea | Internet based service provider | 2,345 | 0.3 |
| Genius Electronic Optical | Taiwan | Lens manufacturer for phones and cameras | 2,243 | 0.3 |
| Vingroup JSC | Vietnam | Property developer | 2,198 | 0.3 |
| Burning Rock Biotech ADR | HK/China | Chinese developer of oncology and early cancer detection technology |
2,153 | 0.3 |
| AirTac International Group | Taiwan | Pneumatic components manufacturer | 2,150 | 0.3 |
| SK Hynix | Korea | Electronic component and device manufacturer | 2,043 | 0.3 |
| ICICI Lombard | India | General insurance provider | 2,021 | 0.3 |
| Samsung Electronics | Korea | Memory, phones and electronic components manufacturer |
1,981 | 0.3 |
| Enzychem Lifesciences | Korea | Biopharmaceutical company | 1,972 | 0.3 |
| Intron Biotechnology | Korea | Antibiotics drug researcher | 1,951 | 0.3 |
| Nexteer Automotive | HK/China | Producer of automotive components | 1,737 | 0.2 |
| Name | Geography | Business | 2021 Value £'000 |
2021 % of total assets * |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KE Holdings ADR | HK/China | Chinese real-estate platform | 1,541 | 0.2 |
| ICICI Prudential Life Insurance | India | Life insurance provider | 1,493 | 0.2 |
| Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics | ||||
| A Shares | HK/China | Chinese healthcare provider | 1,218 | 0.2 |
| Shennan Circuits | HK/China | Chinese printed circuit board manufacturer | 1,021 | 0.1 |
| Vinh Hoan Corporation | Vietnam | Food producer | 906 | 0.1 |
| Brilliance China Automotive† | HK/China | Minibus and automotive components manufacturer | 877 | 0.1 |
| Huayu Automotive Systems A Shares | HK/China | Auto parts manufacturer | 860 | 0.1 |
| Ping An Bank A Shares | HK/China | Consumer bank | 788 | 0.1 |
| Binh Minh Plastics Joint | ||||
| Stock Company | Vietnam | Plastic piping manufacturer | 679 | 0.1 |
| Venustech | HK/China | Chinese software developer | 412 | 0.1 |
| Beijing Thunisoft Corp | HK/China | Chinese software developer | 313 | – |
| Chime Biologics | HK/China | Biopharmaceutical company | 174 | – |
| Eden Biologics | Taiwan | Biopharmaceutical company | 131 | – |
| Philtown Properties | Philippines | Property developer | – | – |
| Total Investments | 725,122 | 96.9 | ||
| Net Liquid Assets* | 22,892 | 3.1 | ||
| Total Assets | 748,014 | 100.0 |
HK/China denotes Hong Kong and China.
Details of the ten largest investments are given on pages 18 and 19 along with comparative valuations.
* For a definition of terms see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72.
Denotes private company (unlisted) investment.
† Denotes suspended investment.
| Listed equities % |
Unlisted (private company) securities # % |
Net liquid assets % |
Total assets % |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 July 2021 | 89.7 | 7.2 | 3.1 | 100.0 |
| 31 July 2020 | 95.1 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 100.0 |
Figures represent percentage of total assets.

Active Share† (relative to MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index (in sterling terms))#



As at 31 July 2021

Source: Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer on page 71.
Pacific Horizon
MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan#
* For a definition of terms see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72.
†Alternative Performance Measure – see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures on page 72.
The Strategic Report which includes pages 2 to 23 was approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf on 21 September 2021.
Angus Macpherson Chairman
Angus Macpherson was appointed a Director in 2017 and Chairman on 12 November 2019. He is chief executive of Noble and Company (UK) Limited, an independent Scottish corporate finance business. He is currently chairman of Henderson Diversified Income Trust plc and a non-executive director of Schroder Japan Growth Fund plc, and is the former chairman of JP Morgan Elect PLC. He was based in Asia between 1995 and 2004 in Singapore and Hong Kong, latterly as Head of Capital Markets and Financing for Merrill Lynch for Asia.
Sir Robert Chote was appointed a Director in 2020. He became chairman of the Northern Ireland Fiscal Council in 2021 and was chairman of the Office for Budget Responsibility to 2020. He previously served as Director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, as an advisor to the International Monetary Fund and as Economics Editor of the Financial Times. He is a senior adviser to governance reform consultancy FMA and a visiting professor at the Department of Political Economy, Kings College London. He serves on advisory boards at the Warwick Manufacturing Group and the Centre for Economic Performance of the London School of Economics.
Wee-Li Hee was appointed a Director in 2020. She is an experienced Asian analyst and fund manager. Brought up in Singapore, she speaks fluent Mandarin and studied in the UK at the University of Leeds and the London School of Economics and Political Science. After graduation, in 2002 she joined First State Investments in Singapore as an analyst, subsequently moving to the firm's Edinburgh office in 2005. Having co-managed Scottish Oriental Smaller Companies Trust plc she became lead manager in 2014, stepping back as a result of family commitments to return to a co-manager role in 2017 and retiring at the end of 2019. She is a CFA Charterholder and non-executive director of Melville Paisley Investments.
Angela Lane was appointed a Director in 2018. She is Chairman of the Audit Committee and is the Senior Independent Director. She is a qualified accountant and has held several non-executive and advisory roles for small and medium capitalised companies across a range of industries. Previously she spent 18 years working as a private equity investor for 3i plc. She is a non-executive director of BlackRock Throgmorton Trust plc and Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust PLC, where she is also chairman of its audit committee, and former non-executive chairman of Huntswood CTC.
Richard Frank ('Joe') Studwell was appointed a Director in 2018. He has spent over 25 years working in East Asia as a journalist, independent researcher at Dragonomics and author under the name of Joe Studwell. His published works include Asian Godfathers: Money and Power in Hong Kong and South-East Asia and How Asia Works: Success and Failure in the World's Most Dynamic Region.
All of the Directors are members of the Nomination, Management Engagement and Audit Committees.
The Company has appointed Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford & Co, as its Alternative Investment Fund Manager and Company Secretaries. Baillie Gifford & Co Limited has delegated portfolio management services to Baillie Gifford & Co. Dealing activity and transaction reporting have been further sub-delegated to Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited. Baillie Gifford & Co is an investment management firm formed in 1927 out of the legal firm Baillie & Gifford, WS, which had been involved in investment management since 1908.
Baillie Gifford is one of the largest investment trust managers in the UK and currently manages 12 investment trusts. Baillie Gifford also manages a listed investment company, unit trusts and open ended investment companies, together with investment portfolios on behalf of pension funds, charities and other institutional clients, both in the UK and overseas. Funds under the management or advice of Baillie Gifford totalled around £340 billion at 31 July 2021. Based in Edinburgh, it is one of the leading privately owned investment management firms in the UK, with 47 partners and a staff of around 1,500.
The manager of Pacific Horizon's portfolio is Roderick Snell who was appointed deputy manager in September 2013 and became lead manager in June 2021. Roderick has been a member of the Emerging Markets team at Baillie Gifford since 2008, with a focus on Asia-Pacific.
Baillie Gifford & Co Limited and Baillie Gifford & Co are both authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
The Directors present their Report together with the Financial Statements of the Company for the year to 31 July 2021.
The Corporate Governance Report is set out on pages 30 to 33 and forms part of this Report.
Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford & Co, has been appointed as the Company's Alternative Investment Fund Manager ('AIFM') and Company Secretaries. Baillie Gifford & Co Limited has delegated portfolio management services to Baillie Gifford & Co. Dealing activity and transaction reporting have been further sub-delegated to Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited.
The Investment Management Agreement sets out the matters over which the Managers have authority in accordance with the policies and directions of, and subject to restrictions imposed by, the Board. The Managers may terminate the Management Agreement on six months' notice and the Company may terminate on three months' notice. Compensation fees would only be payable in respect of the notice period if termination were to occur within a shorter notice period. The Board is of the view that calculating the fee with reference to performance would be unlikely to exert a positive influence on performance.
The annual management fee is 0.75% on the first £50 million of net assets, 0.65% on the next £200 million of net assets and 0.55% on the remaining net assets.
The Board considers the Company's investment management and secretarial arrangements on an ongoing basis and a formal review is conducted by the Management Engagement Committee annually.
The following topics, amongst others, are considered in the review:
Following the most recent review, it is the opinion of the Management Engagement Committee that the continuing appointment of Baillie Gifford & Co Limited as AIFM and the delegation of the investment management services to Baillie Gifford & Co, on the terms agreed, is in the interests of shareholders as a whole due to the strength of the investment management team, the Managers' commitment to the investment trust sector and the quality of the secretarial and administrative functions. In undertaking the review, the Directors also considered the execution of the agreed investment strategy and the relative performance over the medium term.
The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited has been appointed as the Company's Depositary in accordance with the requirements of the UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations.
The Depositary's responsibilities include cash monitoring, safe keeping of the Company's financial instruments, verifying ownership and maintaining a record of other assets and monitoring the Company's compliance with investment limits and leverage requirements. The Company's Depository also acts as the Company's Custodian.
Information about the Directors, including their relevant experience, can be found on page 24.
All of the Directors are retiring at the Annual General Meeting ('AGM') and all are offering themselves for re-election or, in the case of Sir Robert Chote who was appointed 25 November 2020, election. Following formal performance evaluation, the Chairman confirms that the Board considers that each Director's performance continues to be effective and that they remain committed to the Company and capable of devoting sufficient time to their roles. The Board therefore recommends their re-election and election to shareholders.
The Company has entered into qualifying third party deeds of indemnity in favour of each of its Directors. The deeds, which were in force during the year to 31 July 2021 and up to the date of approval of this report, cover any liabilities that may arise to a third party, other than the Company, for negligence, default or breach of trust or duty. The Directors are not indemnified in respect of liabilities to the Company, any regulatory or criminal fines, any costs incurred in connection with criminal proceedings in which the Director is convicted or civil proceedings brought by the Company in which judgement is given against him/her. In addition, the indemnity does not apply to any liability to the extent that it is recovered from another person. The Company also maintains Directors' and Officers' liability insurance.
Each Director submits a list of potential conflicts of interest to the Nomination Committee on an annual basis. The Committee considers these carefully, taking into account the circumstances surrounding them and makes a recommendation to the Board on whether or not the potential conflicts should be authorised. Board authorisation is for a period of one year.
Having considered the lists of potential conflicts there were no situations which gave rise to a direct or indirect interest of a Director which conflicted with interests of the Company.
The Company's objective is that of generating capital growth. Consequently, the Managers do not invest in companies based on the level of income they may pay out as dividends.
As highlighted previously, the Board does not intend to draw on the Company's revenue reserve to pay or maintain dividends. This year the net revenue deficit does not require a distribution to be made to maintain investment trust status. No dividend is therefore being recommended for payment in respect of this financial year.
The Company's capital structure as at 31 July 2021 consists of 88,429,704 ordinary shares of 10p each (2020 – 63,165,282 ordinary shares), see note 12. There are no restrictions concerning the holding or transfer of the Company's ordinary shares and there are no special rights attached to any of the shares.
The ordinary shares carry a right to receive dividends. Interim dividends are determined by the Directors, whereas the proposed final dividend is subject to shareholder approval.
On winding up, after meeting the liabilities of the Company, the surplus assets will be paid to ordinary shareholders in proportion to their shareholdings.
Each ordinary shareholder present in person or by proxy is entitled to one vote on a show of hands and, on a poll, to one vote for every share held.
| Name | Ordinary 10p shares held at 31 July 2021 |
% of issue |
|---|---|---|
| Sarasin and Partners LLP (indirect)* | 7,757,676 | 9.0 |
* Previously disclosed as A&OT Investments Limited (direct).
Holdings above are stated as per the most recent notification to a Regulatory Information Service. There have been no changes to the major interests in the Company's shares disclosed up to 17 September 2021.
As a consequence of Covid-19 and the uncertainty regarding government policy on group meetings, shareholders are being encouraged to submit their votes by proxy ahead of the meeting. It is intended that the meeting will be open to all shareholders, but in the event that access has to be restricted to the minimum number of people necessary for it to be quorate, this will ensure your votes are counted. The details of this year's AGM, including the proposed resolutions and information on the deadlines for proxy appointments, can be found on pages 63 to 67. Shareholders who hold shares in their own name on the main register will be provided with a Form of Proxy. If you hold shares through a share platform or other nominee, the Board would encourage you to contact these organisations directly as soon as possible to arrange for you to vote at the AGM. The resolutions relating to the renewal of the Directors' authorities to issue and buy back shares, new Articles, update to the Investment Policy, and Continuation Vote are explained in more detail below.
At the last Annual General Meeting, the Directors were granted shareholders' approval for a general authority to issue shares and also an authority to issue shares or sell shares held in treasury on a non pre-emptive basis (without first offering such shares to existing shareholders pro-rata to their existing holdings) for cash up to an aggregate nominal amount of £672,852.80.
In order to meet the continuing demand for the Company's ordinary shares, the Directors published a prospectus on 11 December 2020 and convened General Meetings on 19 January and 22 March 2021, at which the Directors were granted shareholders' approval for a general authority to issue shares and also an authority to issue shares or sell shares held in treasury on a non pre-emptive basis for cash up to an aggregate nominal amount of £1,472,166.80 and £1,705,776.80 respectively, in addition to the authorities received at the 2020 Annual General Meeting.
During the year to 31 July 2021 the Company bought back 325,134 shares (representing 0.5% of the issued share capital at 31 July 2020) at a discount to net asset value at a cost of £2,132,000 which were held in treasury and subsequently reissued. In addition, the Company issued a total of 25,264,422 shares on a non pre-emptive basis (nominal value £2,526,000 representing 40.0% of the issued share capital at 31 July 2020) at a premium to net asset value (on the basis of debt valued at par value) on 116 separate occasions at a weighted average price of 727.31 pence per share raising net proceeds (including for shares reissued from treasury) of £183,390,000. Between 1 August and 17 September 2021, the Company issued no further shares. No shares were held in treasury as at 17 September 2021.
As at 17 September 2021, the Company had fully utilised the authority to issue shares obtained at the 2020 Annual General Meeting, and had the ability to issue shares on a non pre-emptive basis up to an aggregate nominal amount of £2,094,516.40 remaining from the authorities granted at the General Meetings held on 19 January and 22 March 2021. As the buyback authority obtained at the 2020 Annual General Meeting expires at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting and the issuance authorities have either been fully utilised or will expire at the 2021 Annual General Meeting (January 2021 authorities) or 24 November 2021 (March 2021 authorities), the Directors are seeking shareholders' approval to renew them for a further year, as detailed below and on the following page.
Resolution 10 in the Notice of Annual General Meeting seeks a general authority for the Directors to issue ordinary shares up to an aggregate nominal amount of £884,297.00 in addition to the existing authorities obtained on 22 March 2021, which expire on 24 November 2021. This amount represents approximately 10% of the Company's total ordinary share capital in issue at 17 September 2021, being the latest practicable date prior to the publication of this document, and meets institutional guidelines. No issue of ordinary shares will be made pursuant to the authorisation in Resolution 10 which would effectively alter the control of the Company without the prior approval of shareholders in general meeting.
Resolution 11, which is being proposed as a special resolution, seeks to renew the Directors' authority to allot equity securities, or sell treasury shares, for cash without having to offer such shares to existing shareholders pro-rata to their existing holdings, up to a total nominal amount of £884,297.00, representing approximately 10% of the Company's total issued ordinary share capital as at 17 September 2021, being the latest practicable date prior to publication of this document.
The Directors consider that the authority proposed to be granted by Resolution 11 continues to be advantageous when the Company's shares trade at a premium to net asset value and the level of natural liquidity in the market is unable to meet demand. The Directors do not intend to use this authority to sell or issue ordinary shares on a non pre-emptive basis at a discount to net asset value. While the level of the authority being sought is greater than the 5% recommended by the Pre-Emption Group in their Statement of Principles on disapplying pre-emption rights, it is specifically recognised in the Statement of Principles that, where an investment trust is seeking authority to issue shares at a premium to the underlying net asset value per share, this should not normally raise concerns and the Directors consider the greater flexibility provided by this authority to be justified in the circumstances.
The authorities sought in Resolutions 10 and 11 will continue until the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2022 or on the expiry of 15 months from the passing of the resolutions, if earlier.
Such authorities will only be used to issue shares or sell shares from treasury at a premium to net asset value and only when the Directors believe that it would be in the best interests of the Company to do so. The Directors believe that the ability to buy-back shares at a discount and re-sell them or issue new shares at a premium are useful tools in smoothing supply and demand.
Resolution 12 seeks shareholders' approval (by way of a special resolution) to renew the authority to purchase up to 14.99 per cent. of the ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury shares) as at 17 September 2021, being the latest practicable date prior to publication of this document (or, if less, up to 14.99 per cent. of the ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury shares) on the date on which the resolution is passed). This authority will expire at the end of the Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2022. Such purchases will only be made at a discount to the prevailing net asset value.
The Company may hold bought back shares in treasury and then:
Shares will only be re-sold from treasury at (or at a premium to) the net asset value per ordinary share.
Treasury shares do not receive distributions and the Company will not be entitled to exercise the voting rights attaching to them. In accordance with the Listing Rules, the maximum price (exclusive of expenses) that may be paid on the exercise of the authority shall be an amount equal to the higher of:
The minimum price (again exclusive of expenses) that may be paid will be the nominal value of an ordinary share. Purchases of ordinary shares will be made within guidelines established, from time to time, by the Board. The Company does not have any warrants or options in issue. The Directors intend that this authority, if conferred, will be exercised only if to do so would result in an increase in net asset value per ordinary share for the remaining shareholders and if it is in the best interest of shareholders generally.
Resolution 13, which will be proposed as a special resolution, seeks shareholder approval to adopt new Articles of Association (the 'New Articles') in order to update the Company's current Articles of Association (the 'Existing Articles'). The proposed amendments being introduced in the New Articles primarily relate to changes in law and regulation and developments in market practice since the Existing Articles were adopted, and principally include:
A summary of the principal amendments being introduced in the New Articles is set out in the appendix to the AGM Notice (on page 67 of this document). Other amendments, which are of a minor, technical or clarifying nature, have not been summarised in the appendix.
While the New Articles (if adopted) would permit shareholder meetings to be conducted using electronic means, the Directors have no present intention of holding a virtual-only meeting. These provisions will only be used where the Directors consider it is in the best of interests of shareholders for hybrid or virtual-only meetings to be held. Nothing in the New Articles will prevent the Company from holding physical shareholder meetings.
The full terms of the proposed amendments to the Company's Articles of Association are available at the offices of Dickson Minto W.S., Level 13, Broadgate Tower, 20 Primrose Street, London EC2A 2EW between the hours of 9.00am and 5.00pm (Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays excepted), and on the Company's website, pacifichorizon.co.uk from the date of the AGM Notice until the close of the AGM, and will also be available for inspection at the venue of the AGM from 15 minutes before and during the AGM.
As noted on pages 8 and 9 the Company is proposing to amend its investment objective and policy to stipulate the maximum amount which may be invested in companies not listed on a public market shall not exceed 15 per cent of the total assets of the Company measured at the time of purchase. It is also proposing a clarification of the typical number of investments by amending the term 'holdings' to 'companies'. The proposed amendments are subject to shareholder approval in Resolution 14 in the Notice of the Annual General Meeting.
At the Company's Annual General Meeting held in 2016 shareholders approved the further continuation of the Company for a period of five years until the date of the Company's Annual General Meeting to be held in 2021 or 30 November 2021, whichever was the earlier. At this year's Annual General Meeting the Directors are proposing, pursuant to the Articles, that the life of the Company be extended for a further period of five years. Having conducted a thorough review of the Managers' approach and resources, the Board judges them to have the right team to manage a portfolio in what the Board considers to be a region with superior long term prospects for investment. The Managers' focus on individual growth stocks that will benefit from the economic, social and technological changes in evidence across the region should prove fruitful for the long term patient investor.
Your Directors therefore believe that it is desirable to extend the Company's life and recommend that shareholders vote in favour of an extension for a further period of five years. The relevant resolution has been included as Resolution 15 in the Notice of Meeting. If Resolution 15 is not passed, the Company will be wound up in accordance with the winding up provisions set out in the Articles.
Resolutions 13, 14 and 15 comprise the special business to be proposed at the Annual General Meeting and all the remaining resolutions comprise the ordinary business.
The Board considers that all the resolutions to be proposed at the Annual General Meeting are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole. Accordingly, the Board unanimously recommends that you vote in favour of all of the Resolutions, as the Directors intend to do in respect of their own beneficial shareholdings.
The Company's financial instruments comprise its investment portfolio, cash balances, bank borrowings and debtors and creditors that arise directly from its operations such as sales and purchases awaiting settlement and accrued income. The financial risk management objectives and policies arising from its financial instruments and the exposure of the Company to risk are disclosed in note 17 to the accounts.
The outlook for the Company is set out in the Chairman's Statement on pages 2 to 4 and the Managers' Review on pages 13 to 16.
In accordance with the Financial Reporting Council's guidance on going concern and liquidity risk, including its Covid-19 guidance, the Directors have undertaken a rigorous review of the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and specifically in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Company's principal risks are market related and include market risk, liquidity risk and credit risk. An explanation of these risks and how they are managed is contained on pages 9 and 10 and in note 17 to the Financial Statements. The Board has, in particular, considered the impact of heightened market volatility since the Covid-19 pandemic but does not believe that the Company's going concern status is affected.
The Company's assets, the majority of which are investments in quoted securities which are readily realisable, exceed its liabilities significantly. All borrowings require the prior approval of the Board. The Board approves borrowing and gearing limits and reviews regularly the amounts of any borrowing and the level of gearing as well as compliance with borrowing covenants. The Company has continued to comply with the investment trust status requirements of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and the Investment Trust (Approved Company) Regulations 2011. The Company's primary third party suppliers, including its Managers and Secretaries, Custodian and Depositary, Registrar, Auditor and Broker, are not experiencing significant operational difficulties affecting their respective services to the Company. In accordance with the Company's Articles of Association, shareholders have the right to vote on the continuation of the Company every five years, the next vote being in 2021. After making enquiries and considering the future prospects of the Company and notwithstanding the continuity vote to be held at the 2021 AGM, the Financial Statements have been prepared on the going concern basis; having assessed the principal and emerging risks and other matters including the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic set out in the Viability Statement on page 11 (which assesses the prospects of the Company over a period of three years) it is the Directors' opinion that the Company will continue in operational existence for a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of these Financial Statements.
The Company's Articles of Association may only be amended by special resolution at a general meeting of shareholders.
The Directors confirm that so far as each of the Directors is aware there is no relevant audit information of which the Company's Auditor is unaware and the Directors have taken all the steps that they might reasonably be expected to have taken as Directors in order to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company's Auditor is aware of that information.
The Auditor, BDO LLP, is willing to continue in office and, in accordance with section 489 and section 491(1) of the Companies Act 2006, resolutions concerning BDO LLP's reappointment and remuneration will be submitted to the Annual General Meeting.
The Directors confirm that there have been no post Balance Sheet events which require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the Financial Statements or notes thereto up to 17 September 2021.
All of the Company's activities are outsourced to third parties. The Company therefore has no greenhouse gas emissions to report from its operations, nor does it have responsibility for any other emissions producing sources under the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors' Reports) Regulations 2013. For the same reasons as set out above, the Company considers itself to be a low energy user under the SECR regulations and therefore, is not required to disclose energy and carbon information.
The Company has a zero tolerance policy towards bribery and is committed to carrying out business fairly, honestly and openly. The Managers also adopt a zero tolerance approach and have policies and procedures in place to prevent bribery.
The Company has a commitment to zero tolerance towards the criminal facilitation of tax evasion.
On behalf of the Board Angus Macpherson Chairman 21 September 2021
The Board is committed to achieving and demonstrating high standards of Corporate Governance. This statement outlines how the principles of the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code (the 'Code'), which can be found at frc.org.uk, and the relevant principles of the Association of Investment Companies Code of Corporate Governance (the 'AIC Code') issued in 2019 were applied throughout the financial year. The AIC Code provides a framework of best practice for investment companies and can be found at theaic.co.uk.
The FRC has confirmed that AIC member companies who report against the AIC Code will be meeting their obligations in relation to the UK Code (the AIC Code can be found at theaic.co.uk). The Board confirms that the Company has complied throughout the year under review with the relevant provisions of the Code and the recommendations of the AIC Code with the exception that the Company does not have a separate internal audit function as explained on page 34.
The Board has overall responsibility for the Company's affairs. It has a number of matters formally reserved for its approval including strategy, investment policy, currency hedging, gearing, treasury matters, dividend and corporate governance policy. A strategy session is held annually. The Board also reviews the Financial Statements, investment transactions, revenue budgets and performance of the Company. Full and timely information is provided to the Board to enable the Board to function effectively and to allow Directors to discharge their responsibilities.
As at 31 July 2021 and the date of this report the Board comprises five Directors all of whom are non-executive and independent.
The Chairman, Mr RA Macpherson, is responsible for organising the business of the Board, ensuring its effectiveness and setting its agenda.
The executive responsibility for investment management has been delegated to the Company's Alternative Investment Fund Manager ('AIFM'), Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, and, in the context of a Board comprising only non-executive Directors, there is no chief executive officer. Ms AC Lane is the Senior Independent Director (SID) and, as such, available to shareholders if they have concerns not properly addressed to the Chairman. The SID leads the Chairman's performance appraisal and chairs the Nomination Committee when it considers the Chairman's succession.
The Directors believe that the Board has a balance of skills and experience that enable it to provide effective strategic leadership and proper governance of the Company. Information about the Directors, including their relevant experience, can be found on page 24.
There is an agreed procedure for Directors to seek independent professional advice, if necessary, at the Company's expense.
The terms and conditions of Directors' appointments are set out in formal letters of appointment which are available for inspection on request.
Under the provisions of the Company's Articles of Association, a Director appointed during the year is required to retire and seek election by shareholders at the next Annual General Meeting.
In accordance with the AIC Code of Corporate Governance, all Directors are subject to annual re-election.
The names of Directors retiring and offering themselves for re-election or election together with the reasons why the Board supports this are set out on page 25.
All the Directors are considered by the Board to be independent of the Managers and free of any business or other relationship which could interfere with the exercise of their independent judgement.
The Directors recognise the importance of succession planning for company boards and review the Board composition annually. The Board is of the view that length of service will not necessarily compromise the independence or contribution of directors of an investment trust company, where continuity and experience can be a benefit to the Board. The Board concurs with the view expressed in the AIC Code that long serving Directors should not be prevented from being considered independent.
In accordance with the AIC Code of Corporate Governance, all Directors are subject to annual re-election. Following a formal performance evaluation, the Board concluded that its members continued to be independent in character and judgement and their skills and experience added significantly to the strength of the Board.
There is an annual cycle of Board meetings which is designed to address, in a systematic way, overall strategy, review of investment policy, investment performance, marketing, revenue budgets, dividend policy and communication with shareholders. The Board considers that it meets sufficiently regularly to discharge its duties effectively. The table below shows the attendance record for the core Board and Committee Meetings held during the year, excluding ancillary and sub-committee meetings. The Annual General Meeting was attended by all Directors.
| Board | Audit Committee |
Nomination Committee |
Management Engagement Committee |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of meetings | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| RA Macpherson | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| EG Creasy* | 2 | – | – | – |
| AC Lane | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| RF Studwell | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| W Hee | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| RW Chote† | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
* Mr EG Creasy stepped down from the Board following the AGM on 10 November 2020.
†Sir R Chote joined the Board on 25 November 2020.
The Nomination Committee has considered the question of tenure for directors and has concluded that there should not be a set maximum time limit for a director or chairperson to serve on the Board. The Nomination Committee keeps under review the balance of skills, knowledge, experience, performance and length of service of the Directors, ensuring the Board has the right combination of skills and preservation of knowledge and experience, balanced with the appointment of new Directors, bringing in fresh ideas and perspective.
The Nomination Committee consists of all the non-executive Directors and the Chairman of the Board is Chairman of the Committee. The Committee meets on an annual basis and at such other times as may be required. The Committee has written terms of reference that include reviewing the composition of the Board, identifying and nominating new candidates for appointment to the Board, Board appraisal, planning for an orderly succession including overseeing development of a diverse pipeline for succession, and training. The Committee also considers whether Directors should be recommended for re-election by shareholders. The Committee is responsible for considering Directors' potential conflicts of interest and for making recommendations to the Board on whether or not potential conflicts are material to an individual Director's performance.
Appointments to the Board are made on merit with due regard for the benefits of diversity including gender, social and ethnic backgrounds, cognitive and personal strengths. The priority in appointing new directors is to identify the candidate with the best range of skills and experience to complement existing Directors. The Board therefore does not consider it appropriate to set diversity targets.
The Board reviewed its composition and in consideration of succession planning and developing a diverse pipeline determined that it was appropriate that a new non-executive Director be appointed this year.
For the position, the Committee identified the skills and experience that would be required. Sir Robert Chote was introduced through private selection channels and, as he was found to meet all the Committee's criteria, the Committee determined that no other candidates should be considered at that time.
Sir Robert Chote was appointed to the Board on 25 November 2020 and will be standing for election by shareholders at the AGM. His knowledge and experience in the field of economics, and data analytical skills, will be of great benefit to the Board.
The Committee's terms of reference are available on request from the Company and are on the Company's page of the Managers' website: pacifichorizon.co.uk.
An appraisal of the Chairman, each Director and a performance evaluation and review of both the Board as a whole and of the individual Committees was carried out during the year. After inviting each Director and the Chairman to consider and respond to an evaluation questionnaire, the performance of each Director was appraised by the Chairman and the Chairman's appraisal was led by Ms AC Lane, the Senior Independent Director.
The appraisals and evaluations considered, amongst other criteria, the balance of skills of the Board, training and development requirements, the contribution of individual Directors and the overall effectiveness of the Board and its Committees. Following this process it was concluded that the performance of each Director, the Chairman, the Board and its Committees continues to be effective and each Director and the Chairman are committed to the Company. A review of the Chairman's and other Directors' commitments was carried out and the Board is satisfied that they are capable of devoting sufficient time to the Company. There were no significant changes to the Chairman's other commitments during the year.
The Board is of the opinion that the use of external consultants to assist with the evaluation is unlikely to bring any meaningful benefit to the process, though the option to do so is kept under review.
New Directors are provided with an induction programme which is tailored to the particular circumstances of the appointee. During the year briefings on industry and regulatory matters were provided to the Board by the Managers and Secretaries. Directors receive other relevant training as necessary.
As all the Directors are non-executive there is no requirement for a separate Remuneration Committee. Directors' fees are considered by the Board as a whole within the limits approved by shareholders. The Company's policy on remuneration is set out in the Directors' Remuneration Report on pages 36 and 37.
The report of the Audit Committee is set out on pages 34 and 35.
The Directors acknowledge their responsibility for the Company's risk management and internal controls systems and for reviewing their effectiveness, including with regard to preparation of the Company's Annual Report and Financial Statements. These systems are designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and can only provide reasonable but not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.
The Board confirms that there is a continuing process for identifying, evaluating and managing the significant risks faced by the Company in accordance with the FRC guidance 'Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting'.
The practical measures to be taken in relation to the design, implementation and maintenance of control policies and procedures to safeguard the Company's assets and to manage its affairs properly, including the maintenance of effective operational and compliance controls have been delegated to the Managers and Secretaries.
The Board oversees the functions delegated to the Managers and Secretaries and the controls managed by the AIFM in accordance with the UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations (as detailed below). Baillie Gifford & Co's Internal Audit and Compliance Departments and the AIFM's permanent risk function provide the Audit Committee with regular reports on their monitoring programmes. The reporting procedures for these departments are defined and formalised within a service level agreement. Baillie Gifford & Co conducts an annual review of its system of internal controls which is documented within an internal controls report which complies with ISAE 3402 AAF 01/06 – Assurance Reports on Controls at a Service Organisation. This report is independently reviewed by Baillie Gifford & Co's Auditor and a copy is submitted to the Audit Committee.
A report identifying the material risks faced by the Company and the key controls employed to manage these risks is reviewed by the Audit Committee.
These procedures ensure that consideration is given regularly to the nature and extent of risks facing the Company and that they are being actively monitored. Where changes in risk have been identified during the year they also provide a mechanism to assess whether further action is required to manage these risks.
The Directors confirm that they have reviewed the effectiveness of the Company's risk management and internal controls systems which accord with the FRC guidance 'Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting', and they have procedures in place to review their effectiveness on a regular basis. No significant weaknesses were identified in the year under review and up to the date of this Report.
The Board confirms that these procedures have been in place throughout the Company's financial year and continue to be in place up to the date of approval of this Report.
To comply with the UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations, The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited act as the Company's Depositary and Baillie Gifford & Co Limited as its AIFM.
The Depositary's responsibilities include cash monitoring, safe keeping of the Company's financial instruments, verifying ownership and maintaining a record of other assets and monitoring the Company's compliance with investment limits and leverage requirements. The Depositary is liable for the loss of financial instruments held in custody. The Depositary will ensure that any delegate segregates the assets of the Company. The Company's Depositary also acts as the Company's Custodian. The Custodian prepares reports on its key controls and safeguards which are independently reviewed by its appointed auditors, KPMG LLP. The reports are reviewed by Baillie Gifford's Business Risk Department and a summary of the key points is reported to the Audit Committee and any concerns are investigated.
The Depositary provides the Audit Committee with a report on its monitoring activities.
The AIFM has established a permanent risk management function to ensure that effective risk management policies and procedures are in place and to monitor compliance with risk limits. The AIFM has a risk management policy which covers the risks associated with the management of the portfolio, and the adequacy and effectiveness of this policy is reviewed and approved at least annually. This review includes the risk management processes and systems and limits for each risk area.
The risk limits, which are set by the AIFM and approved by the Board, take into account the objectives, strategy and risk profile of the portfolio. These limits including leverage (see page 62), are monitored and the sensitivity of the portfolio to key risks is undertaken periodically as appropriate to ascertain the impact of changes in key variables in the portfolio. Exceptions from limits monitoring and stress testing undertaken by Baillie Gifford's Business Risk Department are escalated to the AIFM and reported to the Board along with remedial measures being taken.
The Board places great importance on communication with shareholders. The Company's Managers meet regularly with shareholders and their representatives and report shareholders' views to the Board. The Chairman and Directors also attend shareholder presentations in London and Edinburgh with the Managers, as well as maintaining open lines of communication with market participants and investors in the Company, separate of the Managers' involvement, in order to ascertain views on corporate matters. The Chairman is available to meet with shareholders as appropriate. Shareholders wishing to communicate with any members of the Board may do so by writing to them at the Secretaries' address or through the Company's Corporate Broker, JP Morgan Cazenove (see contact details on the back cover).
The Company's Annual General Meeting provides a forum for communication with all shareholders. The level of proxies lodged for each resolution is announced at the meeting and is published on the Company's page of the Managers' website pacifichorizon.co.uk subsequent to the meeting. The notice period for the Annual General Meeting is at least twenty working days.
Shareholders and potential investors may obtain up-to-date information on the Company at pacifichorizon.co.uk.
The Company has given discretionary voting powers to Baillie Gifford & Co. The Managers vote against resolutions they consider may damage shareholders' rights or economic interests and report their actions to the Board.
The Board believes that it is in the shareholders' interests to consider environmental, social and governance ('ESG') factors when selecting and retaining investments and has asked the Managers to take these issues into account as long as the investment objectives are not compromised. The Managers do not exclude companies from their investment universe purely on the grounds of ESG factors but adopt a positive engagement approach whereby matters are discussed with management with the aim of improving the relevant policies and management systems and enabling the Managers to consider how ESG factors could impact long term investment returns. The Managers' statement of compliance with the UK Stewardship code can be found on the Managers' website at bailliegifford.com. The Managers' policy has been reviewed and endorsed by the Board.
The Board recognises that climate change poses a serious threat to our environment, our society and to economies and companies around the globe. Addressing the underlying causes is likely to result in companies that are high emitters of carbon facing greater societal and regulatory scrutiny and higher costs to account for the true environmental impact of their activities.
The Manager has engaged an external provider to map the carbon footprint of the portfolio, using the information to prioritise engagement and understand what higher emitting companies are doing to manage climate risk better.
The Managers, Baillie Gifford & Co, are signatories to the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment and the Carbon Disclosure Project and are also members of the Asian Corporate Governance Association and the International Corporate Governance Network.
On behalf of the Board Angus Macpherson Chairman 21 September 2021
The Audit Committee consists of all the Directors. The members of the Committee consider that they have the requisite financial skills and experience to fulfil the responsibilities of the Committee. Ms AC Lane is Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Committee's authority and duties are clearly defined within its written terms of reference which are available on request from the Company Secretaries and at pacifichorizon.co.uk. The terms of reference are reviewed annually.
The Committee's effectiveness is reviewed on an annual basis as part of the Board's performance evaluation process.
At least once a year the Committee meets with the external Auditor without any representative of the Managers being present.
The Committee met twice during the year and BDO LLP, the external Auditor, attended one of those meetings, having met with the Audit Chair prior to the other. Baillie Gifford & Co's Internal Audit and Compliance Departments and the AIFM's permanent risk function provided reports on their monitoring programmes for each of these meetings.
The matters considered, monitored and reviewed by the Committee during the course of the year included the following:
The Committee continues to believe that the compliance and internal controls systems and the internal audit function in place within the Investment Managers provide sufficient assurance that a sound system of internal control, which safeguards shareholders' investment and the Company's assets, is maintained. An internal audit function, specific to the Company, is therefore considered unnecessary.
The external auditor has adopted a wholly substantive approach to testing and therefore the absence of an internal audit function has not had an impact on audit procedures.
The Committee considers that the most significant areas of risk likely to impact the Financial Statements are the existence and valuation of investments, as they represent 96.9% of total assets, and the accuracy and completeness of income from investments.
The majority of the investments are in quoted securities and market prices are readily available from independent external pricing sources. The Committee reviewed Baillie Gifford's Report on Internal Controls which details the controls in place regarding recording and pricing of investments and the reconciliation of investment holdings to third party data.
The value of all the listed investments as at 31 July 2021 were agreed to external price sources. The Committee reviewed the Manager's valuation policy for investments in unquoted companies (as described on page 49) and approved the valuation of the unlisted investments following a detailed review of the valuation of each investment and relevant challenge where appropriate. The listed portfolio holdings were agreed to confirmations from the Company's custodian and the private company holdings were agreed to confirmations from the investee companies.
The Committee reviewed the Managers' Report on Internal Controls which details the controls in place regarding completeness and accurate recording of investment income. The accounting treatment of each special dividend received or receivable during the year was reviewed by the Managers.
The Committee considered the factors, including the impact of Covid-19, that might affect the Company's viability over a period of three years and its ability to continue as a going concern for at least twelve months from the date of signing of the Financial Statements, together with reports from the Managers on the cash position and cash flow projections of the Company, the liquidity of its investment portfolio, compliance with debt covenants, availability of borrowing facilities, and the Company's ability to meet its obligations as they fall due. The Committee also reviewed the Viability Statement on page 11 and statement on Going Concern on page 28 including the potential impact of Covid-19. Following this assessment, the Committee recommended to the Board the appropriateness of the Going Concern basis in preparing the Financial Statements and confirmed the accuracy of the Viability Statement and statement on Going Concern.
The Managers and Auditor confirmed to the Committee that they were not aware of any material misstatements in the context of the Financial Statements as a whole and that the Financial Statements are in accordance with applicable law and accounting standards.
The Committee reviewed the effectiveness of the Company's risk management and internal controls systems as described on pages 31 and 32. No significant weaknesses were identified in the year under review.
To fulfil its responsibility regarding the independence and objectivity of the external Auditor, the Committee reviewed:
To assess the effectiveness of the external Auditor, the Committee reviewed and considered:
To fulfil its responsibility for oversight of the external audit process the Committee considered and reviewed:
Following a competitive tender process, BDO LLP were appointed as the Company's Auditor at the Annual General Meeting held on 15 November 2017, with Neil Fung-On as the lead audit partner. The audit partners responsible for the audit are to be rotated at least once every five years in accordance with professional and regulatory standards in order to protect independence and objectivity and to provide fresh challenge to the business.
BDO LLP has confirmed that it believes it is independent within the meaning of regulatory and professional requirements and that the objectivity of the audit partner and staff is not impaired.
Having carried out the review described above, the Committee is satisfied that the Auditor remains independent and effective for the purpose of this year's audit and, as such, has not considered it necessary to put the audit services contract out to tender.
There are no contractual obligations restricting the Committee's choice of Auditor.
The respective responsibilities of the Directors and the Auditor in connection with the Financial Statements are set out on pages 38 to 43.
On behalf of the Board Angela Lane Chairman of the Audit Committee 21 September 2021
This report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
The Directors' Remuneration Policy is subject to shareholder approval every three years or sooner if an alteration to the policy is proposed. The Remuneration Policy which is set out below was approved at the Annual General Meeting in November 2020 and no changes to the policy are proposed.
The Board reviewed the level of fees during the year taking into account responsibilities, the increase in RPI and CPI and peer trust remuneration levels and it was agreed that, with effect from 1 August 2021, the Chairman's fee would be increased from £34,500 to £37,500, the other Directors' fees would be increased from £23,000 to £25,000 and the additional fee for the Chairman of the Audit Committee would be increased from £3,000 to £5,000. Fees were last increased on 1 August 2019.
The Board is composed wholly of non-executive Directors, none of whom has a service contract with the Company. There is no separate remuneration committee and the Board as a whole considers changes to Directors' fees from time to time. Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, the Company Secretaries, provide comparative information when the Board considers the level of Directors' fees.
The Board's policy is that the remuneration of Directors should be set at a reasonable level that is commensurate with the duties and responsibilities of the role and consistent with the requirement to attract and retain Directors of the appropriate quality and experience. The Board believes that the fees paid to the Directors should reflect the experience of the Board as a whole, be fair and should take account of the level of fees paid by comparable investment trusts. Any views expressed by shareholders on the fees being paid to Directors will be taken into consideration by the Board when reviewing the Board's policy on remuneration.
Non-executive Directors are not eligible for any other remuneration or benefits apart from the reimbursement of allowable expenses. There are no performance conditions relating to Directors' fees and there are no long term incentive schemes or pension schemes. There is no notice period and no compensation is payable on loss of office.
The fees for the non-executive Directors are payable six monthly in arrears and are determined within the limit set out in the Company's Articles of Association which is currently £200,000 per annum in aggregate. Any change to this limit requires shareholder approval.
The fees paid to Directors in respect of the year ended 31 July 2021 and the expected fees payable in respect of the year ending 31 July 2022 are set out in the table below. The fees payable to the Directors in the subsequent financial periods will be determined following an annual review of the Directors' fees.
| Expected fees for the year ending 31 July 2022 £ |
Fees as at 31 July 2021 £ |
|
|---|---|---|
| Chairman's fee | 37,500 | 34,500 |
| Non-executive Director fee | 25,000 | 23,000 |
| Additional fee for Audit Committee Chair | 5,000 | 3,000 |
| Total aggregate annual fees that can be paid to the Directors in any year under the Directors' Remuneration Policy, as set out |
||
| in the Company's Articles of Association | 200,000 | 200,000 |
An ordinary resolution for the approval of this report will be put to the members at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
The law requires the Company's Auditor to audit certain of the disclosures provided in this report. Where disclosures have been audited, they are indicated as such. The Auditor's opinion is included in the Independent Auditor's Report on pages 39 to 43.
The Directors who served during the year received the following remuneration in the form of fees and taxable benefits. This represents the entire remuneration paid to the Directors.
| Name | 2021 Fees £ |
2021 Taxable benefits * £ |
2021 Total £ |
% change in year |
2020 Fees £ |
2020 Taxable benefits * £ |
2020 Total £ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JGK Matterson (retired 12 November 2019) | – | – | – | (100.0) | 9,687 | – | 9,687 |
| EG Creasy (retired 10 November 2020) | 7,200 | – | 7,200 | (73.7) | 26,000 | 1,428 | 27,428 |
| AC Lane (Audit Committee Chair from | |||||||
| 10 November 2020) | 25,114 | – | 25,114 | 1.5 | 23,000 | 1,747 | 24,747 |
| RA Macpherson (Chairman from 12 November 2019) | 34,500 | – | 34,500 | 10.6 | 31,182 | – | 31,182 |
| W Hee (appointed 1 June 2020) | 23,000 | – | 23,000 | 500.1 | 3,833 | – | 3,833 |
| RF Studwell | 23,000 | – | 23,000 | (5.9) | 23,000 | 1,440 | 24,440 |
| RW Chote (appointed 25 November 2020) | 15,687 | – | 15,687 | – | – | – | – |
| 128,501 | – | 128,501 | 5.9 | 116,702 | 4,615 | 121,317 |
* Comprises expenses incurred by Directors in the course of travel to attend Board and Committee meetings held at the Edinburgh offices of Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, the Company's Secretaries.
The Directors at the end of the year under review and their interests in the Company are as shown in the following table. There have been no changes intimated in the Directors' interests up to 17 September 2021.
| Name | Nature of interest |
Ordinary 10p shares held at 31 July 2021 |
Ordinary 10p shares held at 1 August 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| W Hee | Beneficial | 5,000 | – |
| AC Lane | Beneficial | 6,536 | 6,536 |
| RA Macpherson | Beneficial | 42,000 | 42,000 |
| RF Studwell | Beneficial | 5,000 | 3,000 |
| RW Chote | Beneficial | – | – |
At the last Annual General Meeting, of the proxy votes received in respect of the Directors' Remuneration Report, 99.4% were in favour, 0.2% were against and votes withheld were 0.4%. At the last Annual General Meeting at which the Directors' Remuneration Policy was considered (November 2020), 99.3% of the proxy votes were in favour, 0.3% were against and votes withheld were 0.4%.
The table below shows the actual expenditure during the year in relation to Directors' remuneration and distributions to shareholders.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
Change % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Directors' remuneration | 129 | 121 | 5.9 |
| Dividends payable/paid to shareholders |
nil | 171 | (100.0) |
The following graph compares, for the ten financial years ended 31 July 2021, the share price total return (assuming all dividends are reinvested) to Pacific Horizon ordinary shareholders compared to the total shareholder return on a notional investment made up of shares in the component parts of the FTSE All-Share Index. This index was chosen for comparison purposes as it is a widely used measure of performance for UK listed companies. The Company's comparative index is provided for information purposes only.
Pacific Horizon's Share Price, FTSE All-Share Index and Comparative Index (figures rebased to 100 at 31 July 2011)

Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
The Directors' Remuneration Report on pages 36 and 37 was approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf on 21 September 2021.
Angus Macpherson Chairman
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare Financial Statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have elected to prepare the company Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice) including FRS 102 'The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland'.
Under company law the Directors must not approve the Financial Statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the Company for that period. In preparing these Financial Statements, the Directors are required to:
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the Financial Statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the Annual Report and the Financial Statements are made available on a website. Financial Statements are published on the Company's website in accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of Financial Statements, which may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and integrity of the Company's website is the responsibility of the Directors. The Directors' responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity of the Financial Statements contained therein. The Directors have delegated responsibility to the Managers for the maintenance and integrity of the Company's page of the Managers' website.
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed within the Directors and Managers section confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:
On behalf of the Board Angus Macpherson Chairman 21 September 2021
In our opinion:
We have audited the Financial Statements of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust PLC (the 'Company') for the year ended 31 July 2021 which comprise the Income Statement, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Cash Flow Statement and notes to the Financial Statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standard, including FRS 102, The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit Committee.
Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the members of the Company on 15 November 2017 to audit the Financial Statements for the year ending 31 July 2018 and subsequent financial periods. In respect of the year ended 31 July 2021 we were reappointed as auditor by the members of the company at the Annual General Meeting held on 10 November 2020. The period of total uninterrupted engagement including reappointments is four years, covering the years ended 31 July 2018 to 31 July 2021. We remain independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the Financial Statements in the UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. The non-audit services prohibited by that standard were not provided to the Company.
In auditing the Financial Statements, we have concluded that the Directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the Financial Statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the Directors' assessment of the Company's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the Financial Statements are authorised for issue.
In relation to the Company's reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors' statement in the Financial Statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
| 2021 2020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Key audit matters |
Valuation and ownership of investments Revenue Recognition |
|
|
| Materiality | Financial Statements as a whole £6,872,000 (2020: £3,040,000) based on 1% (2020: 1%) of Net Assets |
Our audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Company and its environment, including the Company's system of internal control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the Financial Statements. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including assessing whether there was evidence of bias by the Directors that may have represented a risk of material misstatement.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the Financial Statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the Financial Statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
The investment portfolio at the year-end comprised of Level 1 listed equity investments valued at £670,144,000, Level 2 listed equity investments valued at £877,000 and Level 3 unlisted investments valued at £54,101,000.
We consider the valuation and ownership of investments to be the most significant audit areas as investments represent the most significant balance in the Financial Statements and underpin the principal activity of the entity.
The valuation of investments is a key accounting estimate where there is an inherent risk of management override arising from the investment valuations being prepared by the Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) and Investment Manager, who is remunerated based on the net asset value of the Company.
We responded to this matter by testing the valuation, existence and ownership of 99.97% of the portfolio of investments. We performed the following procedures:
— Considered the appropriateness of the valuation methodology applied by the AIFM and Investment Manager.
— Agreed the exchange rates used to independent sources (ICE and Six Group).
With respect of 99.44% of the Level 3 unlisted investments we also:
We also considered the completeness, accuracy and presentation of investment related disclosures.
We did not identify any material exceptions with regards to valuation or ownership of investments as a result of our work performed.
Investment income is a significant audit area as it is material and impacts the company's net asset value and distributable reserves.
There is a presumed risk of fraud relating to the existence of revenue recognition in that revenue may be misstated through improper recognition. Improper recognition could arise through incorrectly recognising revenue on receipt as opposed to the ex-dividend date. Furthermore, incorrect allocation between revenue and capital would impact on the dividend required to maintain Investment Trust status.
We assessed the accounting policy for income recognition for compliance with accounting standards and the Association of Investment Companies Statement of Recommended Practice (the 'AIC SORP') and performed testing to check the nature of the income that such income has been accounted for in accordance with this stated accounting policy.
In respect of existence, we tested dividend receipts by agreeing the dividend rates for 100% of investments to independent third party sources.
In respect of completeness, we tested that the appropriate dividends had been received in the year by reference to independent data of dividends declared on 100% of investment holdings in the portfolio.
We tested the allocation and presentation of dividend income between the revenue and capital return columns of the Income Statement in line with the requirements set out in the AIC SORP.
No errors above our reporting threshold were detected, in respect of recognition or allocation of income from investments, as a result of our work performed.
We consider materiality to be the magnitude by which misstatements, individually or in aggregate, including omissions, could reasonably influence the economic decisions of users that are made on the basis of the Financial Statements. We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing our audit, and in evaluating the results of our work. Misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we also take into account the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their effect on the Financial Statements as a whole.
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements. We consider materiality to be the magnitude by which misstatements, including omissions, could influence the economic decisions of reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the Financial Statements.
In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that any misstatements exceed materiality, we use a lower materiality level, performance materiality, to determine the extent of testing needed. Importantly, misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we also take account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their effect on the Financial Statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the Financial Statements as a whole and performance materiality as follows:
| 2021 | Financial statements 2020 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materiality | £6,872,000 | £3,040,000 | |||
| Basis for determining materiality |
1% of the value of Net Assets |
1% of the value of Net Assets |
|||
| Rationale for the benchmark applied |
— A principal consideration for members of the Company in assessing the financial performance given that the principal activity of the Company is that of an Investment Trust. |
||||
| — The nature and disposition of the investment portfolio. |
|||||
| Performance materiality | £5,154,000 | £2,280,000 | |||
| Basis for determining performance materiality Rationale for performance materiality |
75% of materiality — Number of unadjusted audit differences in prior year |
75% of materiality | |||
| — Number of accounts subject to estimation. |
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all individual audit differences in excess of £344,000 (2020: £60,000), being 5% (2020: 2%) of materiality as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
We have increased our 'clearly trivial' reporting level for a number of reasons, firstly, a low history of errors in previous years, secondly that there are no unadjusted brought forward errors from the prior year audit and thirdly due to the low complexity of the audited entity.
The Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report and Financial Statements other than the Financial Statements and our auditor's report thereon. Our opinion on the Financial Statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the Financial Statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors' statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit.
Based on the responsibilities described below and our work performed during the course of the audit, we are required by the Companies Act 2006 and ISAs (UK) to report on certain opinions and matters as described below.
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the Strategic Report or the Directors' Report.
In our opinion, the part of the Directors' Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors' Responsibilities, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the Financial Statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of Financial Statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the Financial Statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Financial Statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these Financial Statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:
We gained an understanding of the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the entity and the industry in which it operates and considered the risk of acts by the Company which were contrary to applicable laws and regulations, including fraud. These included but were not limited to the Companies Act 2006, sections 1158 and 1159 of the Corporation Tax Act, the UK Listing rules, the DTR rules, FRS 102 accounting standard, and VAT.
We focused on laws and regulations that could give rise to a material misstatement in the Company's Financial Statements and the susceptibility of the Company's Financial Statements to material misstatements including fraud. Refer to the 'Key Audit Matters' section in this report. Our tests included, but were not limited to:
We also communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members and remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.
Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks of material misstatement in the Financial Statements, recognising that the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery, misrepresentations or through collusion. There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures performed and the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the Financial Statements, the less likely we are to become aware of it.
A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council's website at: frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor's report.
This report is made solely to the Company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Neil Fung-On (Senior Statutory Auditor) For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor London, UK 21 September 2021
BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC305127).
| 2021 Revenue |
2021 Capital |
2021 Total |
2020 Revenue |
2020 Capital |
2020 Total |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Gains on investments | 8 | – | 208,671 | 208,671 | – | 79,433 | 79,433 |
| Currency gains | 13 | – | 35 | 35 | – | 731 | 731 |
| Income | 2 | 3,561 | – | 3,561 | 3,128 | – | 3,128 |
| Investment management fee | 3 | (3,475) | – | (3,475) | (1,533) | – | (1,533) |
| Other administrative expenses | 4 | (729) | – | (729) | (479) | – | (479) |
| Net return before finance costs | |||||||
| and taxation | (643) | 208,706 | 208,063 | 1,116 | 80,164 | 81,280 | |
| Finance costs of borrowings | 5 | (465) | – | (465) | (337) | – | (337) |
| Net return on ordinary activities | |||||||
| before taxation | (1,108) | 208,706 | 207,598 | 779 | 80,164 | 80,943 | |
| Tax on ordinary activities | 6 | 706 | (9,137) | (8,431) | (215) | (74) | (289) |
| Net return on ordinary activities | |||||||
| after taxation | (402) | 199,569 | 199,167 | 564 | 80,090 | 80,654 | |
| Net return per ordinary share | 7 | (0.51p) | 253.70p | 253.19p | 0.95p | 134.99p | 135.94p |
The total column of this Statement represents the profit and loss account of the Company. The supplementary revenue and capital columns are prepared under guidance published by the Association of Investment Companies.
All revenue and capital items in this Statement derive from continuing operations.
A Statement of Comprehensive Income is not required as the Company does not have any other comprehensive income and the net return on ordinary activities after taxation is both the profit and comprehensive income for the year.
The accompanying notes on pages 48 to 62 are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
| Notes | 2021 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed assets | |||||
| Investments held at fair value through profit or loss | 8 | 725,122 | 316,952 | ||
| Current assets | |||||
| Debtors | 9 | 1,387 | 885 | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 17 | 31,766 | 12,146 | ||
| 33,153 | 13,031 | ||||
| Creditors | |||||
| Amounts falling due within one year | 10 | (61,966) | (25,504) | ||
| Net current liabilities | (28,813) | (12,473) | |||
| Creditors | |||||
| Amounts falling due after more than one year: | |||||
| Provision for tax liability | 11 | (9,078) | (76) | ||
| Net assets | 687,231 | 304,403 | |||
| Capital and reserves | |||||
| Share capital | 12 | 8,843 | 6,317 | ||
| Share premium account | 13 | 221,354 | 40,048 | ||
| Capital redemption reserve | 13 | 20,367 | 20,367 | ||
| Capital reserve | 13 | 433,041 | 233,472 | ||
| Revenue reserve | 13 | 3,626 | 4,199 | ||
| Shareholders' funds | 687,231 | 304,403 | |||
| Net asset value per ordinary share | 14 | 777.15p | 481.92p |
The Financial Statements of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust PLC (Company Registration number 02342193) on pages 44 to 62 were approved and authorised for issue by the Board and were signed on 21 September 2021.
Angus Macpherson Chairman
| Notes | Share capital £'000 |
Share premium account £'000 |
Capital redemption reserve £'000 |
Capital reserve £'000 |
Revenue reserve £'000 |
Shareholders' funds £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shareholders' funds at 1 August 2020 | 6,317 | 40,048 | 20,367 | 233,472 | 4,199 | 304,403 | |
| Net return on ordinary activities after taxation | – | – | – | 199,569 | (402) | 199,167 | |
| Ordinary shares bought back into treasury | 12 | – | – | – | (2,132) | – | (2,132) |
| Ordinary shares sold from treasury | 12 | – | 442 | – | 2,132 | – | 2,574 |
| Ordinary shares issued | 12 | 2,526 | 180,864 | – | – | – | 183,390 |
| Dividends appropriated in the year | 18 | – | – | – | – | (171) | (171) |
| Shareholders' funds at 31 July 2021 | 8,843 | 221,354 | 20,367 | 433,041 | 3,626 | 687,231 |
| Notes | Share capital £'000 |
Share premium account £'000 |
Capital redemption reserve £'000 |
Capital reserve £'000 |
Revenue reserve £'000 |
Shareholders' funds £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shareholders' funds at 1 August 2019 | 5,903 | 20,063 | 20,367 | 153,382 | 3,635 | 203,350 | |
| Net return on ordinary activities after taxation | – | – | – | 80,090 | 564 | 80,654 | |
| Ordinary shares bought back into treasury | 12 | – | – | – | (114) | – | (114) |
| Ordinary shares sold from treasury | 12 | – | 60 | – | 114 | – | 174 |
| Ordinary shares issued | 12 | 414 | 19,925 | – | – | – | 20,339 |
| Shareholders' funds at 31 July 2020 | 6,317 | 40,048 | 20,367 | 233,472 | 4,199 | 304,403 |
The accompanying notes on pages 48 to 62 are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
| Notes | 2021 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||||
| Net return on ordinary activities before taxation | 207,598 | 80,943 | |||
| Net gains on investments | (208,671) | (79,433) | |||
| Currency gains | (35) | (731) | |||
| Finance costs of borrowings | 5 | 465 | 337 | ||
| Overseas withholding tax | (304) | (222) | |||
| Indian CGT paid on transactions | (135) | – | |||
| Corporation tax refunded | 992 | – | |||
| Changes in debtors and creditors | 916 | 129 | |||
| Cash from operations* | 826 | 1,023 | |||
| Interest paid | (430) | (367) | |||
| Net cash inflow from operating activities | 396 | 656 | |||
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||||
| Acquisitions of investments | (298,606) | (94,628) | |||
| Disposals of investments | 98,014 | 77,120 | |||
| Net cash outflow from investing activities | (200,592) | (17,508) | |||
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||||
| Ordinary shares bought back into treasury | 12 | (2,132) | (114) | ||
| Ordinary shares sold from treasury | 12 | 2,574 | 174 | ||
| Ordinary shares issued | 12 | 183,368 | 20,344 | ||
| Borrowings drawn down | 37,529 | 4,513 | |||
| Equity dividends paid | (171) | – | |||
| Net cash inflow from financing activities | 221,168 | 24,917 | |||
| Increase in cash and cash equivalents | 20,972 | 8,065 | |||
| Exchange movements | (1,352) | 454 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents at 1 August | 12,146 | 3,627 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents at 31 July | 31,766 | 12,146 |
* Cash from operations includes dividends received of £3,858,000 (2020 – £2,917,000) and interest received of £66,000 (2020 – £205,000).
The Company was incorporated under the Companies Act 2006 in England and Wales as a public limited company with registered number 02342193. The Company is an investment company within the meaning of section 833 of the Companies Act 2006 and carries on business as an investment trust.
The Financial Statements for the year to 31 July 2021 have been prepared in accordance with FRS 102 'The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland' on the basis of the accounting policies set out below which are unchanged from the prior year and have been applied consistently.
All of the Company's operations are of a continuing nature and the Financial Statements are prepared on a going concern basis under the historical cost convention, modified to include the revaluation of fixed asset investments at fair value through profit or loss, and on the assumption that approval as an investment trust under section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and the Investment Trust (Approved Company) (Tax) Regulations 2011 will be retained. The Board has, in particular, considered the impact of heightened market volatility since the Covid-19 pandemic but does not believe the Company's going concern is affected.
The Company's principal risks are market related and include market risk, liquidity risk and credit risk. An explanation of these risks and how they are managed is contained on pages 9 and 10 and in note 17 to the Financial Statements. The Board has, in particular, considered the impact of heightened market volatility since the Covid-19 pandemic but does not believe that the Company's going concern status is affected.
The Company's assets, the majority of which are investments in quoted securities which are readily realisable, exceed its liabilities significantly. All borrowings require the prior approval of the Board. The Board approves borrowing and gearing limits and reviews regularly the amounts of any borrowing and the level of gearing as well as compliance with borrowing covenants. The Company has continued to comply with the investment trust status requirements of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and the Investment Trust (Approved Company) Regulations 2011. The Company's primary third party suppliers, including its Managers and Secretaries, Custodian and Depositary, Registrar, Auditor and Broker, are not experiencing significant operational difficulties affecting their respective services to the Company. In accordance with the Company's Articles of Association, shareholders have the right to vote on the continuation of the Company every five years, the next vote being in 2021. After making enquiries and considering the future prospects of the Company and notwithstanding the continuity vote to be held at the 2021 AGM, the Financial Statements have been prepared on the going concern basis; having assessed the principal and emerging risks and other matters including the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic set out in the Viability Statement on page 11 (which assesses the prospects of the Company over a period of three years) it is the Directors' opinion that the Company will continue in operational existence for a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of these Financial Statements.
The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006, applicable UK Accounting Standards and with the Statement of Recommended Practice 'Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts' issued by the Association of Investment Companies ('AIC') in April 2021.
In order to reflect better the activities of the Company and in accordance with guidance issued by the AIC, supplementary information which analyses the profit and loss account between items of a revenue and capital nature has been presented in the Income Statement. The allocation of items to revenue and capital is reviewed on an annual basis and is considered to remain appropriate for the current year.
The Directors consider the Company's functional currency to be sterling as the Company's shareholders are predominantly based in the UK, and the Company and its investment manager, who are subject to the UK's regulatory environment, are also UK based.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised in the Company's Balance Sheet when it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
The preparation of the Financial Statements requires the use of estimates, assumptions and judgements. These estimates, assumptions and judgements affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, at the reporting date. While estimates are based on best judgement using information and financial data available, the actual outcome may differ from these estimates. The key sources of estimation and uncertainty relate to the assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of the unlisted investments, which are detailed in note 8 on page 52.
The Directors consider that the preparation of the Financial Statements involves the following key judgements:
The key judgements in the fair valuation process are:
The key estimate in the Financial Statements is the determination of the fair value of the unlisted investments by the Managers for consideration by the Directors. This estimate is key as it significantly impacts the valuation of the unlisted investments at the Balance Sheet date. The fair valuation process involves estimation using subjective inputs that are unobservable (for which market data is unavailable). The main estimates involved in the selection of the valuation process inputs are:
The Company's investments are classified, recognised and measured at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with sections 11 and 12 of FRS 102. Investment purchases and sales are recognised on a trade date basis. Expenses incidental to purchase and sale are written off to capital at the time of acquisition or disposal. Gains and losses on investments are recognised in the Income Statement as capital items.
Investments are designated as held at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition and are measured at subsequent reporting dates at fair value. The fair value of listed security investments is bid price or, in the case of FTSE 100 constituents and holdings on certain recognised overseas exchanges, last traded price. The fair value of suspended investments is the last traded price, adjusted for the estimated impact on the business of the suspension. Unlisted investments are valued at fair value by the Directors following a detailed review and appropriate challenge of the valuations proposed by the Managers. The Managers' unlisted investment policy applies methodologies consistent with the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation guidelines ('IPEV'). These methodologies can be categorised as follows: (a) market approach (multiples, industry valuation benchmarks and available market prices); (b) income approach (discounted cash flows); and (c) replacement cost approach (net assets). The valuation process recognises also, as stated in the IPEV Guidelines, that the price of a recent investment may be an appropriate starting point for estimating fair value, however it should be evaluated using the techniques described above.
The Managers monitor the investment portfolio on a fair value basis and use the fair value basis for investments in making investment decisions and monitoring financial performance.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and deposits repayable on demand. Deposits are repayable on demand if they can be withdrawn at any time without notice and without penalty or if they have a maturity or period of notice of not more than one working day.
All expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis and are charged through the revenue column of the Income Statement, except for expenses incidental to the acquisition or sale of investments, which are written off to capital when incurred.
Interest bearing bank loans are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs and subsequently measured at amortised cost. Finance costs are accounted for on an accruals basis on an effective interest rate basis and are charged through the revenue column of the Income Statement.
Current tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
Deferred taxation is provided on all timing differences, calculated at the current tax rate relevant to the benefit or liability. Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it will be more likely than not that there will be taxable profits from which underlying timing differences can be deducted.
Transactions involving foreign currencies are converted at the rate ruling at the time of the transaction. Assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are translated at the closing rates of exchange at the balance sheet date. Any gain or loss arising from a change in exchange rate subsequent to the date of the transaction is included as an exchange gain or loss in the Income Statement as capital or revenue as appropriate.
The Capital Redemption Reserve is a statutory, non-distributable reserve into which amounts are transferred following the redemption or purchase of a company's own shares.
Gains and losses on disposal of investments, changes in the fair value of investments held and realised and unrealised exchange differences of a capital nature are dealt with in this reserve after being recognised in the Income Statement. Purchases of the Company's own shares for cancellation, or to be held in treasury for subsequent reissue, may be funded from this reserve.
The revenue profit or loss for the year is taken to or from this reserve. The revenue reserve may be distributed by way of dividend.
The Company is engaged in a single segment of business, being investment business, consequently no business segmental analysis is provided.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Income from investments | ||
| Overseas dividends | 3,495 | 3,027 |
| Overseas interest | – | 89 |
| 3,495 | 3,116 | |
| Other income | ||
| Deposit interest | 66 | 12 |
| Total income | 3,561 | 3,128 |
| Total income comprises: | ||
| Dividends from financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 3,495 | 3,027 |
| Interest from financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | – | 89 |
| Interest from financial assets not at fair value through profit or loss | 66 | 12 |
| 3,561 | 3,128 |
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Investment management fee | 3,475 | 1,533 |
Details of the Investment Management Agreement are set out on page 25. The annual management fee is 0.75% on the first £50 million of net assets, 0.65% on the next £200 million of net assets and 0.55% on the remaining net assets. Management fees are calculated and payable on a quarterly basis.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| General administrative expenses | 573 | 343 |
| Directors' fees | 128 | 117 |
| Auditor's remuneration for audit services | 28 | 19 |
| 729 | 479 |
There were no non-audit fees paid to the Auditor during the year (2020 – nil).
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Bank loans (see note 10) | 465 | 337 |
| 2021 Revenue £'000 |
2021 Capital £'000 |
2021 Total £'000 |
2020 Revenue £'000 |
2020 Capital £'000 |
2020 Total £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overseas taxation UK corporation tax refunded |
286 (992) |
– – |
286 (992) |
215 – |
– – |
215 – |
| Indian capital gains tax paid and provided for | – | 9,137 | 9137 | – | 74 | 74 |
| (706) | 9,137 | 8,431 | 215 | 74 | 289 |
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Factors affecting the tax charge for the year | ||
| The tax assessed for the year is lower (2020 – lower) than the average standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 19.00% (2020 – 19.00%). The differences are explained below: |
||
| Net return on ordinary activities before taxation | 207,598 | 80,943 |
| Net return on ordinary activities multiplied by the average standard rate of corporation tax in the | ||
| UK of 19.00% (2020 – 19.00%) | 39,443 | 15,379 |
| Capital gains not taxable | (39,654) | (15,231) |
| Overseas dividends not taxable | (664) | (575) |
| Taxable expenses in the year not utilised | 875 | 427 |
| Overseas withholding tax | 286 | 215 |
| Corporation tax refund in respect of prior years | (992) | – |
| Revenue tax charge for the year | (706) | 215 |
| Increase in provision for tax liability in respect of Indian capital gains tax | 9,002 | 76 |
| Payments of Indian tax in the period | 135 | – |
| Refunds of Indian tax in respect of prior periods | – | (2) |
| Capital tax charge for the year | 9,137 | 74 |
| Total tax on ordinary activities | 8,431 | 289 |
As an investment trust, the Company's capital gains are not taxable in the United Kingdom.
The revenue tax charge for the period includes £992,000 UK corporation tax repaid in respect of the Company's financial years to 2008 and 2009, following successful legal action regarding the tax treatment of overseas dividend income. This amount had not previously been provided for, as recovery was not considered sufficiently probable. It has therefore been recognised on receipt. As it exceeds the overseas withholding tax suffered in the period, this has resulted in an overall tax credit in the Revenue account.
Interest on the corporation tax repayment is included within interest income.
The capital tax charge results from the provision for tax liability in respect of Indian capital gains tax as detailed in note 11.
At 31 July 2021 the Company had a potential deferred tax asset of £7,182,000 (2020 – £4,584,000) in respect of taxable losses which are available to be carried forward and offset against future taxable profits. A deferred tax asset has not been provided on these losses as it is considered unlikely that the Company will make suitable taxable revenue profits in excess of deductible expenses in future periods. The potential deferred tax asset has been calculated using a corporation tax rate of 25% (2020 – 19%).
| 2021 | 2021 | 2021 | 2020 | 2020 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | Capital | Total | Revenue | Capital | Total | |
| Net return on ordinary activities after taxation | (0.51p) | 253.70p | 253.19p | 0.95p | 134.99p | 135.94p |
Revenue return per ordinary share is based on the net revenue loss on ordinary activities after taxation of £402,000 (2020 – net revenue profit £564,000) and on 78,661,987 (2020 – 59,331,304) ordinary shares, being the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury shares) during the year.
Capital return per ordinary share is based on the net capital gain for the financial year of £199,569,000 (2020 – net capital gain of £80,090,000) and on 78,661,987 (2020 – 59,331,304) ordinary shares, being the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury shares) during the year.
Total return per ordinary share is based on the total gain for the financial year of £199,167,000 (2020 – total gain of £80,654,000) and on 78,661,987 (2020 – 59,331,304) ordinary shares, being the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury shares) during the year.
There are no dilutive or potentially dilutive shares in issue.
| As at 31 July 2021 | Level 1 £'000 |
Level 2 £'000 |
Level 3 £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Listed equities | 670,144 | 877 | – | 671,021 |
| Unlisted equities | – | – | 54,101 | 54,101 |
| Total financial asset investments | 670,144 | 877 | 54,101 | 725,122 |
| As at 31 July 2020 | Level 1 £'000 |
Level 2 £'000 |
Level 3 £'000 |
Total £'000 |
| Listed equities | 312,835 | – | – | 312,835 |
| Unlisted equities | – | – | 4,117 | 4,117 |
| Total financial asset investments | 312,835 | – | 4,117 | 316,952 |
Investments in securities are financial assets held at fair value through profit or loss. In accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 102, the tables above provide an analysis of these investments based on the fair value hierarchy described below, which reflects the reliability and significance of the information used to measure their fair value. During the year, a listed equity investment with a fair value at the previous year end of £2,024,000 was transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 when its shares were suspended and a write-down from the last traded price was applied, to reflect the reputational impact of the suspension on the underlying business.
The fair value hierarchy used to analyse the fair values of financial assets is described below. The levels are determined by the lowest (that is the least reliable or least independently observable) level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement for the individual investment in its entirety as follows:
Level 1 – using unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments in an active market;
Level 2 – using inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are directly or indirectly observable (based on market data); and
Level 3 – using inputs that are unobservable (for which market data is unavailable).
The Company's unlisted ordinary share investments at 31 July 2021 were valued using a variety of techniques. These include using comparable company performance, comparable scenario analysis, and assessment of milestone achievement at investee companies. The determinations of fair value included assumptions that the comparable companies and scenarios chosen for the performance assessment provide a reasonable basis for the determination of fair value. In some cases the latest dealing price is considered to be the most appropriate valuation basis, but only following assessment using the techniques described above.
| Listed overseas £'000 |
Unlisted £'000 |
2021 Total £'000 |
2020 Total £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of investments at 1 August 2020 | 190,052 | 4,889 | 194,941 | 157,600 |
| Investment holding gains and losses at 1 August 2020 | 122,783 | (772) | 122,011 | 62,384 |
| Fair value of investments at 1 August 2020 | 312,835 | 4,117 | 316,952 | 219,984 |
| Movements in year: | ||||
| Purchases at cost | 247,509 | 50,826 | 298,335 | 94,899 |
| Sales proceeds received | (98,836) | – | (98,836) | (77,364) |
| Gains and losses on investments | 201,346 | 7,325 | 208,671 | 79,433 |
| Book cost transfer | 8,167 | (8,167) | – | – |
| Fair value of investments at 31 July 2021 | 671,021 | 54,101 | 725,122 | 316,952 |
| Cost of investments at 31 July 2021 | 390,295 | 47,548 | 437,843 | 194,941 |
| Investment holding gains and losses at 31 July 2021 | 280,726 | 6,553 | 287,279 | 122,011 |
| Fair value of investments at 31 July 2021 | 671,021 | 54,101 | 725,122 | 316,952 |
The purchases and sales proceeds figures above include transaction costs of £344,000 (2020 – £116,000) and £164,000 (2020 – £133,000) respectively, total transaction costs being £508,000 (2020 – £249,000). The Company received £98,836,000 (2020 – £77,364,000) from investments sold during the year. The book cost of these investments when they were purchased was £55,433,000 (2020 – £57,558,000). These investments have been revalued over time and, until they were sold, any unrealised gains/losses were included in the fair value of the investments. Of the realised gains on sales of investments during the year of £43,403,000 (2020 – £19,806,000), a net gain of £32,525,000 (2020 – gain of £11,114,000) was included in investment holding gains at the previous year end.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Net gains on investments held at fair value through profit or loss | ||
| Gains on sales | 43,403 | 19,806 |
| Changes in investment holding gains and losses | 165,268 | 59,627 |
| 208,671 | 79,433 |
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amounts falling due within one year: | ||
| Income accrued (net of withholding taxes) | 259 | 604 |
| Sales for subsequent settlement | 1,066 | 244 |
| Share issuance proceeds awaiting settlement | 39 | 17 |
| Other debtors and prepayments | 23 | 20 |
| 1,387 | 885 |
None of the above debtors are financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss. The carrying amount of debtors is a reasonable approximation of fair value. There were no debtors that were past due or impaired at 31 July 2021 or 31 July 2020.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited loan | 60,783 | 24,641 |
| Investment purchases awaiting settlement | – | 271 |
| Investment management fee | 1,020 | 494 |
| Other creditors and accruals | 163 | 98 |
| 61,966 | 25,504 |
The Company has a one year multi-currency revolving credit facility of up to £60 million with Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited (31 July 2020 – up to £30 million) which expires on 13 March 2022. At 31 July 2021 there were outstanding drawings of £20,000,000 and US\$56,704,000 at interest rates of 0.65977% and 0.74975% respectively (31 July 2020 – £12,500,000 and US\$15,935,500 at interest rates of 0.71891% and 0.83874% respectively), maturing in September 2021. The main covenants relating to the loan are that borrowings should not exceed 20% of the Company's adjusted net asset value and the Company's net asset value should be at least £240 million. There were no breaches in the loan covenants during the year.
None of the above creditors at 31 July 2021 or 31 July 2020 are financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss.
The tax liability provision at 31 July 2021 of £9,078,000 (31 July 2020 – £76,000) relates to a potential liability for Indian capital gains tax that may arise on the Company's Indian investments should they be sold in the future, based on the net unrealised taxable capital gain at the period end and on enacted Indian tax rates. The amount of any future tax amounts payable may differ from this provision, depending on the value and timing of any future sales of such investments and future Indian tax rates.
| 2021 | 2021 | 2020 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | £'000 | Number | £'000 | |
| Allotted, called up and fully paid ordinary shares of 10p each | 88,429,704 | 8,843 | 63,165,282 | 6,317 |
In the year to 31 July 2021, the Company issued 25,264,422 ordinary shares with a nominal value of £2,526,000, representing 40% of the issued share capital at 31 July 2020, at a premium to net asset value, raising net proceeds of £183,832,000 (2020 – 4,138,000 ordinary shares with a nominal value of £414,000, raising net proceeds of £20,399,000). 325,134 shares (representing 1% of the issued share capital at 31 July 2020) were bought back during the year and subsequently reissued from treasury. At 31 July 2021 the Company had authority to buy back 10,086,063 ordinary shares on an ad hoc basis and to allot or sell from treasury 20,945,164 ordinary shares without application of pre-emption rights. Under the provisions of the Company's Articles of Association share buy-backs are funded from the capital reserve.
| Share capital £'000 |
Share premium account £'000 |
Capital redemption reserve £'000 |
Capital reserve £'000 |
Revenue reserve £'000 |
Shareholders' funds £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 August 2020 | 6,317 | 40,048 | 20,367 | 233,472 | 4,199 | 304,403 |
| Net gains on sales of investments | – | – | – | 43,403 | – | 43,403 |
| Changes in investment holding gains and losses | – | – | – | 165,268 | – | 165,268 |
| Exchange differences on bank loan | – | – | – | 1,387 | – | 1,387 |
| Other exchange differences | – | – | – | (1,352) | – | (1,352) |
| Indian CGT paid and provided for | – | – | – | (9,137) | – | (9,137) |
| Ordinary shares bought back into treasury | – | – | – | (2,132) | – | (2,132) |
| Ordinary shares sold from treasury | – | 442 | – | 2,132 | – | 2,574 |
| Ordinary shares issued | 2,526 | 180,864 | – | – | – | 183,390 |
| Revenue return on ordinary activities after taxation | – | – | – | – | (402) | (402) |
| Dividends appropriated in the year | – | – | – | – | (171) | (171) |
| At 31 July 2021 | 8,843 | 221,354 | 20,367 | 433,041 | 3,626 | 687,231 |
The capital reserve includes investment holding gains of £287,279,000 (2019 – £122,011,000) as disclosed in note 8.
The revenue reserve may be distributed by way of dividend. The Company's Articles of Association prohibit distributions by way of dividends from realised capital profits.
The net asset value per ordinary share and the net assets attributable to the ordinary shareholders at the year end calculated in accordance with the Articles of Association were as follows:
| 2021 Net asset value per share |
2020 Net asset value per share |
2021 Net assets attributable £'000 |
2020 Net assets attributable £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary shares | 777.15p | 481.92p | 687,231 | 304,403 |
The movements during the year of the assets attributable to the ordinary shares are shown in note 13.
Net asset value per ordinary share is based on the net assets as shown above and 88,429,704 (2020 – 63,165,282) ordinary shares, being the number of ordinary shares in issue at each date.
| At 1 August 2020 £'000 |
Cash flows £'000 |
Exchange movement £'000 |
At 31 July 2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand | 12,146 | 20,972 | (1,352) | 31,766 |
| Loans due within one year | (24,641) | (37,529) | 1,387 | (60,783) |
| (12,495) | (16,557) | 35 | (29,017) |
The Directors' fees for the year are detailed in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 36. No Director has a contract of service with the Company. During the year no Director was interested in any contract or other matter requiring disclosure under section 412 of the Companies Act 2006.
Details of the management contract are set out in the Directors' Report on page 25. The management fee payable to the Manager by the Company for the year, as disclosed in note 3, was £3,475,000 (2020 – £1,533,000) of which £1,020,000 (2020 – £494,000) was outstanding at the year end, as disclosed in note 10.
As an Investment Trust, the Company invests in equities and makes other investments so as to achieve its investment objective of maximising capital appreciation from a focused and actively managed portfolio of investments from the Asia-Pacific region including the Indian Sub-continent. In pursuing its investment objective, the Company is exposed to various types of risk that are associated with the financial instruments and markets in which it invests.
These risks are categorised here as market risk (comprising currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk), liquidity risk and credit risk. The Board monitors closely the Company's exposures to these risks but does so in order to reduce the likelihood of a permanent loss of capital rather than to minimise short term volatility. Risk provides the potential for both losses and gains. In assessing risk, the Board encourages the Managers to exploit the opportunities that risk affords.
The risk management policies and procedures outlined in this note have not changed substantially from the previous accounting period.
The fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument or other investment held by the Company may fluctuate because of changes in market prices. This market risk comprises three elements – currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk. The Board of Directors reviews and agrees policies for managing these risks and the Company's Managers both assess the exposure to market risk when making individual investment decisions and monitor the overall level of market risk across the investment portfolio on an ongoing basis.
Details of the Company's investment portfolio are shown in note 8. The Company may, from time to time, enter into derivative transactions to hedge specific market, currency or interest rate risk. During the years to 31 July 2020 and 31 July 2021 no such transactions were entered into.
The Company's Managers may not enter into derivative transactions without the prior approval of the Board.
The majority of the Company's assets, liabilities and income are denominated in currencies other than sterling (the Company's functional currency and that in which it reports its results). Consequently, movements in exchange rates may affect the sterling value of those items.
The Managers monitor the Company's exposure to foreign currencies and report to the Board on a regular basis. The Managers assess the risk to the Company of the foreign currency exposure by considering the effect on the Company's net asset value and income of a movement in the rates of exchange to which the Company's assets, liabilities, income and expenses are exposed. However, the country in which a company is listed is not necessarily where it earns its profits. The movement in exchange rates on overseas earnings may have a more significant impact upon a company's valuation than a simple translation of the currency in which the company is quoted.
Foreign currency borrowings can limit the Company's exposure to anticipated future changes in exchange rates which might otherwise adversely affect the value of the portfolio of investments.
Exposure to currency risk through asset allocation, which is calculated by reference to the currency in which the asset or liability is quoted, is shown below.
| At 31 July 2021 | Investments £'000 |
Cash and cash equivalents £'000 |
Loans £'000 |
Other debtors and creditors * £'000 |
Net exposure £'000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong dollar | 111,566 | (118) | – | 156 | 111,604 |
| Korean won | 108,794 | 23 | – | 7 | 108,824 |
| US dollar | 182,979 | 31,016 | (40,783) | (43) | 173,169 |
| Taiwan dollar | 26,287 | 238 | – | 808 | 27,333 |
| Indian rupee | 173,083 | – | – | (9,078) | 164,005 |
| Vietnam dong | 33,300 | 410 | – | – | 33,710 |
| Indonesian rupiah | 26,877 | - | – | – | 26,877 |
| Chinese yuan | 16,720 | 143 | – | – | 16,863 |
| Australian dollar | 17,762 | – | – | – | 17,762 |
| Philippine peso | – | – | – | 3 | 3 |
| Total exposure to currency risk | 697,368 | 31,712 | (40,783) | (8,147) | 680,150 |
| Sterling | 27,754 | 54 | (20,000) | (727) | 7,081 |
| 725,122 | 31,766 | (60,783) | (8,874) | 687,231 |
* Includes non-monetary assets of £11,000.
| At 31 July 2020 | Investments £'000 |
Cash and cash equivalents £'000 |
Loans £'000 |
Other debtors and creditors * £'000 |
Net exposure £'000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong dollar | 70,267 | 43 | – | 105 | 70,415 |
| Korean won | 64,136 | – | – | 20 | 64,156 |
| US dollar | 84,120 | 10,991 | (12,141) | (14) | 82,956 |
| Taiwan dollar | 25,597 | 56 | – | 605 | 26,258 |
| Indian rupee | 20,386 | 3 | – | (271) | 20,118 |
| Vietnam dong | 11,785 | 114 | – | 118 | 12,017 |
| Indonesian rupiah | 12,335 | – | – | – | 12,335 |
| Chinese yuan | 12,540 | 33 | – | – | 12,573 |
| Australian dollar | 4,183 | – | – | – | 4,183 |
| Philippine peso | 1,423 | – | – | – | 1,423 |
| Total exposure to currency risk | 306,772 | 11,240 | (12,141) | 563 | 306,434 |
| Sterling | 10,180 | 906 | (12,500) | (617) | (2,031) |
| 316,952 | 12,146 | (24,641) | (54) | 304,403 |
* Includes non-monetary assets of £37,000.
At 31 July 2021, if sterling had strengthened by 5% in relation to all currencies, with all other variables held constant, total net assets and total return on ordinary activities would have decreased by the amounts shown below. A 5% weakening of sterling against all currencies, with all other variables held constant, would have had an equal but opposite effect on the Financial Statement amounts. The level of change is considered to be reasonable based on observations of current market conditions. The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2020.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong dollar | 5,580 | 3,521 |
| Korean won | 5,441 | 3,208 |
| US dollar | 8,658 | 4,148 |
| Taiwan dollar | 1,367 | 1,313 |
| Indian rupee | 8,200 | 1,006 |
| Vietnam dong | 1,686 | 601 |
| Indonesian rupiah | 1,344 | 617 |
| Chinese yuan | 843 | 629 |
| Australian dollar | 888 | 209 |
| Philippine peso | – | 71 |
| 34,007 | 15,323 |
Interest rate movements may affect directly:
Interest rate movements may also impact upon the market value of investments outwith fixed income securities. The effect of interest rate movements upon the earnings of a company may have a significant impact upon the valuation of that company's equity. The possible effects on fair value and cash flows that could arise as a result of changes in interest rates are taken into account when making investment decisions and when entering borrowing agreements. The Board reviews on a regular basis the amount of investments in cash and fixed income securities and the income receivable on cash deposits, floating rate notes and other similar investments.
The Company may finance part of its activities through borrowings at approved levels. The amount of any such borrowings and the approved levels are monitored and reviewed regularly by the Board. Movements in interest rates, to the extent that they affect the market value of the Company's fixed rate borrowings, may also affect the amount by which the Company's share price is at a discount or a premium to the net asset value (assuming that the Company's share price is unaffected by movements in interest rates).
The interest rate risk profile of the Company's financial assets and liabilities at 31 July is shown below.
| 2021 Fair value £'000 |
2021 Weighted average interest rate |
2021 Weighted average fixed rate period * |
2020 Fair value £'000 |
2020 Weighted average interest rate |
2020 Weighted average fixed rate period * |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||||
| Overseas currencies | 31,712 | – | n/a | 11,240 | – | n/a |
| Sterling | 54 | – | n/a | 906 | – | n/a |
* Based on expected redemption date.
The interest rate risk profile of the Company's financial liabilities and the maturity profile of the undiscounted future cash flows in respect of the Company's contractual financial liabilities at 31 July are shown below.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Floating rate bank loan – sterling denominated | 20,000 | 12,500 |
| – US dollar denominated | 40,783 | 12,141 |
| 60,783 | 24,641 | |
| Maturity Profile | ||
| 2021 Within 1 year £'000 |
2020 Within 1 year £'000 |
Repayment of loans 60,783 24,641 Interest on loans 122 48 60,905 24,689
The sensitivity analysis below has been determined based on the exposure to interest rates at the Balance Sheet date and with the stipulated change taking place at the beginning of the financial year and held constant throughout the reporting period in the case of instruments that have floating rates.
An increase of 100 basis points in interest rates, with all other variables being held constant, would have decreased the Company's total net assets and total return on ordinary activities for the year ended 31 July 2021 by £290,000 (2020 – a decrease of £125,000). This is mainly due to the Company's exposure to interest rates on its floating rate bank loan and cash balances. A decrease of 100 basis points would have had an equal but opposite effect.
Changes in market prices other than those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk may also affect the value of the Company's net assets. The Board manages the market price risks inherent in the investment portfolio by ensuring full and timely access to relevant information from the Managers. The Board meets regularly and at each meeting reviews investment performance, the investment portfolio and the rationale for the current investment positioning to ensure consistency with the Company's objectives and investment policies. The portfolio does not seek to reproduce the index. Investments are selected based upon the merit of individual companies and therefore performance may well diverge from the comparative index.
A full list of the Company's investments is given on pages 20 to 22. In addition, a geographical analysis of the portfolio and an analysis of the investment portfolio by broad industrial or commercial sector are contained in the Strategic Report.
97.6% (2020 – 102.8%) of the Company's net assets are invested in quoted equities. A 5% (2020 – 5%) increase in quoted equity valuations at 31 July 2021 would have increased total assets and total return on ordinary activities by £33,551,000 (2020 – £15,642,000). A decrease of 5% would have had an equal but opposite effect. The level of change is considered to be reasonable based on observations of current market conditions.
7.9% (2020 – 1.4%) of the Company's net assets are invested in private company investments. The fair valuation of the private company investments is influenced by the estimates, assumptions and judgements made in the fair valuation process (see 1(c) on page 48). A sensitivity analysis is provided below which recognises that the valuation methodologies employed involve subjectivity in their significant unobservable inputs and illustrates the sensitivity of the valuations to these inputs. The inputs have been flexed by +/-10% with the exception of the Recent Transaction Price valuation approach as it does not involve significant subjectivity. The table also provides the range of values for the key unobservable inputs.
| As at 31 July 2021 | Significant unobservable inputs* | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valuation technique | Fair value as at 31 July 2021 £'000 |
Key unobservable inputs |
Other unobservable inputs† |
Range | Sensitivity % |
Sensitivity to changes in significant unobservable inputs |
| Market approach using comparable trading multiples |
13,891 | EV/LTM revenue multiple | a,b,c,d,e | 8.4x | 10% | If EV/LTM multiples changed by +/-10%, the fair value would change by £1,143,328 and -£1,143,582 |
| Comparable company performance |
25,493 | Selection of comparable companies |
a,b | 21.6%–24% | 10% | If input comparable company performance changed by +/-10%, the fair value would change by £2,281,718 and -£2,232,638 |
| Price of expected transaction |
131 | Application of execution risk discount |
a,b | 10% | 10% | If the execution risk changed by +/-10%, the fair value would change by £12,809 and -£13,386 |
| Recent transaction price |
14,586 | n/a | a,b | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| As at 31 July 2020 | Significant unobservable inputs* | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valuation technique | Fair value as at 31 July 2020 £'000 |
Key unobservable inputs |
Other unobservable inputs† |
Range | Sensitivity % |
Sensitivity to changes in significant unobservable inputs |
|
| Comparable company performance |
91 | Selection of comparable companies |
a,b | 18.1% | 10% | If input comparable company performance changed by +/-10%, the fair value would change by £9,138 and -£9,138 |
|
| Recent transaction price | 4,026 | n/a | a,b | n/a | n/a | n/a |
† See explanation for other unobservable inputs on page 60 (sections 'a' to 'e' as relevant).
The variable inputs applicable to each broad category of valuation basis will vary dependent on the particular circumstances of each private company valuation. An explanation of each of the key variable inputs is provided below. The assumptions made in the production of the inputs are described in note 1(c) on page 48.
Each investment is assessed independently, and the valuation basis applied will vary depending on the circumstances of each investment. When an investment is pre-revenue, the focus of the valuation will be on assessing the recent transaction and the achievement of key milestones since investment. Adjustments may also be made depending on the performance of comparable benchmarks and companies. For those investments where a trading multiples approach can be taken, the methodology will factor in revenue, earnings or net assets as appropriate for the investment, and where a suitable correlation can be identified with the comparable companies then a regression analysis will be performed. Discounted cash flows will also be considered where appropriate forecasts are available.
The probability of a liquidation event such as a company sale, or alternatively an initial public offering ('IPO'), is a key variable input in the transaction-based and multiples-based valuation techniques. The probability of an IPO versus a company sale is typically estimated from the outset to be 50:50 if there has been no indication by the company of pursuing either of these routes. If the company has indicated an intention to IPO, the probability is increased accordingly to 75% and if an IPO has become a certainty the probability is increased to 100%. Likewise, in a scenario where a company is pursuing a trade sale the weightings will be adjusted accordingly in favour of a sale scenario, or in a situation where a company is underperforming expectations significantly and therefore deemed very unlikely to pursue an IPO.
The selection of comparable companies is assessed individually for each investment at the point of investment, and the relevance of the comparable companies is continually evaluated at each valuation. The key criteria used in selecting appropriate comparable companies are the industry sector in which they operate, the geography of the company's operations, the respective revenue and earnings growth rates and the operating margins. Typically, between 4 and 10 comparable companies will be selected for each investment, depending on how many relevant comparable companies are identified. The resultant revenue or earnings multiples or share price movements derived will vary depending on the companies selected and the industries they operate in.
The selection of sustainable revenue or earnings will depend on whether the company is sustainably profitable or not, and where it is not then revenues will be used in the valuation. The valuation approach will typically assess companies based on the last twelve months of revenue or earnings, as they are the most recent available and therefore viewed as the most reliable. Where a company has reliably forecasted earnings previously or there is a change in circumstance at the business which will impact earnings going forward, then forward estimated revenue or earnings may be used instead.
The application of an illiquidity discount will be applied either through the calibration of a valuation against the most recent transaction, or by application of a specific discount. The discount applied where a calibration is not appropriate is typically 10%, reflecting that the majority of the investments held are substantial companies with some secondary market activity.
This is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities. Liquidity risk is not significant as the majority of the Company's assets are investments in quoted securities that are readily realisable. The Board provides guidance to the Managers as to the maximum exposure to any one holding and to the maximum aggregate exposure to substantial holdings.
The Company has the power to take out borrowings, which give it access to additional funding when required. The Company's current borrowing facility is detailed in note 10 and the maturity profile of its borrowings is set out above. Under the terms of the borrowing facility, borrowings are repayable on demand at their current carrying value.
This is the risk that a failure of a counterparty to a transaction to discharge its obligations under that transaction could result in the Company suffering a loss.
This risk is managed as follows:
— cash is only held at banks that are regularly reviewed by the Managers.
The maximum exposure to credit risk at 31 July was:
| 33,153 | 13,031 | |
|---|---|---|
| Debtors and prepayments* | 1,387 | 885 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 31,766 | 12,146 |
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
* Includes non-monetary assets of £11,000 (2020 – £37,000).
None of the Company's financial assets are past due or impaired (2020 – none).
The Directors are of the opinion that the carrying amount of financial assets and liabilities of the Company in the Balance Sheet approximate their fair value.
The capital of the Company is its share capital and reserves as set out in note 13 together with its borrowings (see note 10). The objective of the Company is to invest in the Asia-Pacific region (excluding Japan) and in the Indian Sub-continent in order to achieve capital growth. The Company's investment policy is set out on page 8. In pursuit of the Company's objective, the Board has a responsibility for ensuring the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and details of the related risks and how they are managed are set out on pages 9, 10, 31 and 32 The Company has the authority to issue and buy back its shares (see pages 26 and 27) and changes to the share capital during the year are set out in notes 12 and 13. The Company does not have any externally imposed capital requirements other than the covenants on its loan which are detailed in note 10.
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts recognised as distributions in the year: | ||||
| Previous year's final (paid 13 November 2020) | 0.25p | – | 171 | – |
We set out below the total dividends proposed in respect of the financial year, which is the basis on which the requirements of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are considered. There is a revenue deficit for the year to 31 July 2021 (revenue available for distribution by way of dividend for 2020 – £564,000).
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts paid and payable in respect of the financial year: | ||||
| Proposed final (2020 final paid 13 November 2020) | – | 0.25p | – | 171 |
The Company has agreed to invest in PropertyGuru Group Limited, conditional on a merger with PropertyGuru Pte. Ltd and a listing of the issuer's shares on the New York Stock Exchange. The investment will be US\$10 million.
In accordance with the UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations, information in relation to the Company's leverage and the remuneration of the Company's AIFM, Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, is required to be made available to investors. In accordance with the Regulations, the AIFM's remuneration policy is available on the Managers' website at bailliegifford.com or on request (see contact details on the back cover). The numerical remuneration disclosures in respect of the AIFM's relevant reporting period (year ended 31 March 2021) are also available at bailliegifford.com.
The Company's maximum and actual leverage (see Glossary of Terms and Alternative Performance Measures (APM) on page 72) levels at 31 July 2021 are shown below:
| Gross method |
Commitment method |
|
|---|---|---|
| Maximum limit | 2.50:1 | 2.00:1 |
| Actual | 1.09:1 | 1.09:1 |

The Board of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust PLC (Pacific Horizon) recognises the public health risk associated with the Covid-19 outbreak arising from public gatherings and notes the Government's measures restricting such gatherings, travel and attendances at workplaces. At the same time, the Board is conscious of the legal requirement for Pacific Horizon to hold its AGM before the end of January. Given the current uncertainty around when public health concerns will have abated, the Board has for the time being decided to aim to follow the Company's customary corporate timetable and, accordingly, the Company's AGM is being convened to take place at 11.00am on Wednesday 17 November 2021 at the offices of Baillie Gifford & Co, Calton Square, 1 Greenside Row, Edinburgh EH1 3AN. At present, the Board expects to be able to welcome shareholders to the
Notice is hereby given that an Annual General Meeting of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust PLC (the 'Company') will be held at the offices of Baillie Gifford & Co, Calton Square, 1 Greenside Row, Edinburgh EH1 3AN on Wednesday, 17 November 2021 at 11.00am for the purposes of considering and, if thought fit, passing the following Resolutions, of which Resolutions 1 to 10 and Resolutions 14 and 15 will be proposed as ordinary resolutions and Resolutions 11, 12 and 13 will be proposed as special resolutions:
The Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at the offices of Baillie Gifford & Co, Calton Square, 1 Greenside Row, Edinburgh EH1 3AN, on Wednesday, 17 November 2021 at 11.00am.
If you have any queries as to how to vote or how to attend the meeting, please call us on 0800 917 2112.
| Edinburgh Waverley – approximately a 5 minute walk away By Bus: |
|
|---|---|
| Lothian Buses local services include: 1, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 15A, 16, 22, 25, 34 |
|
| By Tram: Stops at St Andrew Square and York Place |
|
| Access to Waverley Train Station on foot |
meeting. Should public health advice and Government measures change, however, arrangements will be made by the Company to ensure that the minimum number of shareholders required to form a quorum will attend the meeting in order that the meeting may proceed and the business be concluded. The Board will continue to monitor developments and any changes will be updated on the Company's website. In the meantime, the Board encourages all shareholders to submit proxy voting forms as soon as possible and, in any event, by no later than 11.00am on 15 November 2021. We would encourage shareholders to monitor the Company's website at pacifichorizon.co.uk. Should shareholders have questions for the Board or the Managers or any queries as to how to vote, they are welcome as always to submit them by email to [email protected] or call 0800 917 2112. Baillie Gifford may record your call.
By Order of the Board Baillie Gifford & Co Limited Company Secretaries 30 September 2021
Set out below is a summary of the principal amendments which will be made to the Company's Existing Articles through the adoption of the New Articles if Resolution 13 to be proposed at the AGM is approved by shareholders.
This summary is intended only to highlight the principal amendments which are likely to be of interest to shareholders. It is not intended to be comprehensive and cannot be relied upon to identify amendments or issues which may be of interest to all shareholders. This summary is not a substitute for reviewing the full terms of the New Articles which will be available for inspection at the offices of Dickson Minto W.S., Level 13, Broadgate Tower, 20 Primrose Street, London EC2A 2EW between the hours of 9.00am and 5.00pm (Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays excepted), and on the Company's website, pacifichorizon.co.uk, from the date of the AGM Notice until the close of the AGM, and will also be available for inspection at the venue of the AGM from 15 minutes before and during the AGM.
The New Articles permit the Company to hold shareholder meetings on a virtual basis, whereby shareholders are not required to attend the meeting in person at a physical location but may instead attend and participate using electronic means. A shareholder meeting may be virtual-only if attendees participate only by way of electronic means, or may be held on a hybrid basis whereby some attendees attend in person at a physical location and others attend remotely using electronic means. This should make it easier for the Company's shareholders to attend shareholder meetings if the Board elects to conduct meetings using electronic means. Amendments have been made throughout the New Articles to facilitate the holding of hybrid or virtual-only shareholder meetings.
While the New Articles (if adopted) would permit shareholder meetings to be conducted using electronic means, the Directors have no present intention of holding a virtual-only meeting. These provisions will only be used where the Directors consider it is in the best of interests of shareholders for a hybrid or virtual-only meeting to be held. Nothing in the New Articles will prevent the Company from holding physical shareholder meetings.
The Board is proposing to take this opportunity to make amendments to the Existing Articles in response to the AIFMD and all applicable rules and regulations implementing that Directive. The proposed new provisions are as follows:
(i) The Existing Articles will be amended to provide that the net asset value per share of the Company shall be calculated at least annually and be disclosed to shareholders from time to time in such manner as may be determined by the Board. The amendment will have no bearing on current practice and simply articulates the minimum requirements of the AIFM Regulations.
(ii) The New Articles stipulate that the valuation of the Company's assets will be performed in accordance with prevailing accounting standards, the AIFM Rules, or such other accounting standards, bases, policies and procedures as the Board may determine from time to time. This reflects best practice and has no bearing on current practice and simply articulates the minimum requirements of the AIFM Regulations.
The Board is proposing to include provisions in the New Articles to provide the Company with the ability to require shareholders to co-operate in respect of the exchange of information in order to comply with the Company's international tax reporting obligations, including, without limitation, under or in relation to FATCA, the Common Reporting Standard and the European Union's Directive on Administrative Co-operation ('Tax Reporting Requirements').
The Existing Articles are being amended to provide the Company with the ability to require shareholders to co-operate with it in ensuring that the Company is able to comply with its Tax Reporting Requirements. The Existing Articles will also be amended to provide that (i) where any member fails to supply the relevant information to the Company within the relevant time period, the member will be deemed to have forfeited their shares and (ii) the Company will not be liable for any monies that become subject to a deduction or withholding relating to FATCA, the Common Reporting Standard or any similar laws as such liability would be to the detriment of shareholders as a whole.
The Board is proposing to amend the Existing Articles to increase the cap on the aggregate of all fees paid to directors from £150,000 per annum to £200,000 per annum. The proposed increase is consistent with market practice and was approved by shareholders by ordinary resolution at the Annual General Meeting held on 10 November 2020.
Both of the Existing Articles and the New Articles allow for a higher amount to be approved from time to time by ordinary resolution of the Company.
The Board is also taking the opportunity to make some additional minor or technical amendments to the Existing Articles, including:
These changes generally reflect modern best practice and should assist in relieving certain administrative burdens on the Company.
The Company's shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange. They can be bought by placing an order with a stockbroker, or by asking a professional adviser to do so. If you are interested in investing directly in Pacific Horizon, you can do so online. There are a number of companies offering real time online dealing services.
The price of shares is quoted daily in the Financial Times (under 'Investment Companies') and can also be found on the Company's page of the Managers' website at pacifichorizon.co.uk, Trustnet at trustnet.com and on other financial websites. Monthly factsheets are also available on the Baillie Gifford website. These are available from Baillie Gifford on request.
ISIN GB0006667470 Sedol 0666747 Ticker PHI
Legal Entity Identifier VLGEI9B8R0REWKB0LN95
Any dividend in respect of a financial year will be paid by way of a single final payment shortly after the Annual General Meeting. The Annual General Meeting is normally held in October or early November.
For Capital Gains Tax purposes, the cost to shareholders who subscribed for the conversion shares, subsequently converted into new ordinary shares (with warrants attached), is apportioned between the ordinary shares and the warrants as set out in the placing and offer document dated 5 March 1996. The attributable costs are:
| Cost of each ordinary share | 53.45p |
|---|---|
| Cost of each warrant | 16.52p |
Market values on 17 April 1996 (first day of dealing) were as follows (Source: Thomson Reuters):
| Ordinary share | 55.00p |
|---|---|
| Warrant | 17.00p |
Computershare Investor Services PLC maintains the share register on behalf of the Company. In the event of queries regarding shares registered in your own name, please contact the Registrars on 0370 707 1229. This helpline also offers an automated self-service functionality (available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week) which allows you to:
You can also check your holding on the Registrars' website at investorcentre.co.uk. They also offer a free, secure share management website service which allows you to:
To take advantage of this service, please log in at investorcentre.co.uk and enter your Shareholder Reference Number and Company Code (this information can be found on the last dividend voucher or your share certificate).
Computershare operate a Dividend Reinvestment Plan which can be used to buy additional shares instead of receiving your dividend via cheque or into your bank account. For further information log on to investorcentre.co.uk and follow the instructions or telephone 0370 707 1170.
If you hold stock in your own name you can choose to vote by returning proxies electronically at eproxyappointment.com. If you have any questions about this service please contact Computershare on 0370 707 1229.
If you are a user of the CREST system (including a CREST Personal Member), you may appoint one or more proxies or give an instruction to a proxy by having an appropriate CREST message transmitted. For further information please refer to the CREST Manual.
| 2021 Number of shares held |
2021 % |
2020 Number of shares held |
2020 % |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institutions | 13,588,608 | 15.4 | 12,194,895 | 19.3 |
| Intermediaries | 72,077,577 | 81.5 | 48,518,327 | 76.8 |
| Individuals | 2,417,541 | 2.7 | 1,827,062 | 2.9 |
| Marketmakers | 345,978 | 0.4 | 624,998 | 1.0 |
| 88,429,704 | 100.0 | 63,165,282 | 100.0 |
The Company is committed to ensuring the confidentiality and security of any personal data provided to it. Further details on how personal data is held and processed on behalf of the Company can be found in the privacy policy available on the Company's website pacifichorizon.co.uk.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
Pacific Horizon is listed on the London Stock Exchange. The value of its shares, and any income from them, can fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the amount invested.
Pacific Horizon invests in overseas securities. Changes in the rates of exchange may also cause the value of your investment (and any income it may pay) to go down or up.
Pacific Horizon invests in emerging markets where difficulties in dealing, settlement and custody could arise, resulting in a negative impact on the value of your investment.
Pacific Horizon can borrow money to make further investments (sometimes known as 'gearing' or 'leverage'). The risk is that when this money is repaid by the Company, the value of the investments may not be enough to cover the borrowing and interest costs, and the Company will make a loss. If the Company's investments fall in value, any invested borrowings will increase the amount of this loss.
Pacific Horizon can buy back its own shares. The risks from borrowing, referred to above, are increased when the Company buys back its own shares.
Market values for securities which have become difficult to trade may not be readily available and there can be no assurance that any value assigned to such securities will accurately reflect the price Pacific Horizon might receive upon their sale.
Pacific Horizon can make use of derivatives which may impact on its performance.
Pacific Horizon's risk could be increased by its investment in unlisted investments. These assets may be more difficult to buy or sell, so changes in their prices may be greater.
Charges are deducted from income. Where income is low, the expenses may be greater than the total income received, meaning Pacific Horizon may not pay a dividend and the capital value would be reduced.
The aim of Pacific Horizon is to achieve capital growth. You should not expect a significant, or steady, annual income from the Company.
Shareholders in Pacific Horizon have the right to vote every five years on whether to continue Pacific Horizon or wind it up. If the shareholders decide to wind the Company up, the assets will be sold and you will receive a cash sum in relation to your shareholding. The next vote will be held at the Annual General Meeting in 2021.
You should note that tax rates and reliefs may change at any time and their value depends on your circumstances.
Further details of the risks associated with investing in the Company, including a Key Information Document and how charges are applied, can be found at pacifichorizon.co.uk, or by calling Baillie Gifford on 0800 917 2112. This information has been issued and approved by Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, the Managers and Secretaries, and does not in any way constitute investment advice.
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust PLC is a UK public listed company and as such complies with the requirements of the Financial Conduct Authority, but it is not authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
The Financial Statements have been approved by the Directors of Pacific Horizon. The information and opinions expressed within this Annual Report and Financial Statements are subject to change without notice.
The staff of Baillie Gifford & Co and the Directors of Pacific Horizon may hold shares in Pacific Horizon and may buy or sell shares from time to time.
Up-to-date information about Pacific Horizon, can be found on the Company's page of the Managers' website at pacifichorizon.co.uk. You will find full details on Pacific Horizon, including recent portfolio information and performance figures.
Trust is the Baillie Gifford investment trust magazine which is published twice a year. It provides an insight to our investment approach by including interviews with our fund managers, as well as containing investment trust news, investment features and articles about the trusts managed by Baillie Gifford, including Pacific Horizon. Trust plays an important role in helping to explain our products so that readers can really understand them.
You can subscribe to Trust magazine or view a digital copy at bailliegifford.com/trust
Any suggestions on how communications with shareholders can be improved are welcomed. Please contact the Baillie Gifford Client Relations Team and give them your suggestions. They will also be very happy to answer questions that you may have about Pacific Horizon.
You can contact the Baillie Gifford Client Relations Team by telephone, email, fax or post:
Your call may be recorded for training or monitoring purposes.
Email: [email protected] Website: bailliegifford.com Fax: 0131 275 3955
Baillie Gifford Client Relations Team Calton Square 1 Greenside Row Edinburgh EH1 3AN
Please note that Baillie Gifford is not permitted to give financial advice. If you would like advice, please ask an authorised intermediary.
In order to fulfil its obligations under UK tax legislation relating to the automatic exchange of information, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust PLC is required to collect and report certain information about certain shareholders.
The legislation requires investment trust companies to provide personal information to HMRC on certain investors who purchase shares in investment trusts. Accordingly, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust PLC will have to provide information annually to the local tax authority on the tax residencies of a number of non-UK based certificated shareholders and corporate entities.
All new shareholders, excluding those whose shares are held in CREST, who come on to the share register will be sent a certification form for the purposes of collecting this information.
For further information, please see HMRC's Quick Guide: Automatic Exchange of Information – information for account holders gov.uk/government/publications/exchange-ofinformation-account-holders.
No third party data provider ('Provider') makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data contained herewith nor as to the results to be obtained by recipients of the data. No Provider shall in any way be liable to any recipient of the data for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions in the index data included in this document, regardless of cause, or for any damages (whether direct or indirect) resulting therefrom.
No Provider has any obligation to update, modify or amend the data or to otherwise notify a recipient thereof in the event that any matter stated herein changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate.
Without limiting the foregoing, no Provider shall have any liability whatsoever to you, whether in contract (including under an indemnity), in tort (including negligence), under a warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by you as a result of or in connection with any opinions, recommendations, forecasts, judgements, or any other conclusions, or any course of action determined, by you or any third party, whether or not based on the content, information or materials contained herein.
Source: MSCI. The MSCI information may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form and may not be used as a basis for or a component of any financial instruments or products or indices. None of the MSCI information is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such.
Historical data and analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis, forecast or prediction. The MSCI information is provided on an 'as is' basis and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. MSCI, each of its affiliates and each other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating any MSCI information (collectively, the 'MSCI Parties') expressly disclaims all warranties (including, without limitation, any warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall any MSCI Party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential (including, without limitation, lost profits) or any other damages. (msci.com).
FTSE International Limited ('FTSE') © FTSE 2020. 'FTSE®' is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under licence. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data and no party may rely on any FTSE indices, ratings and/or underlying data contained in this communication. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE's express written consent. FTSE does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.
The total value of all assets held less all liabilities (other than liabilities in the form of borrowings).
Also described as shareholders' funds, Net Asset Value (NAV) is the value of all assets held less all liabilities (including borrowings). The NAV per share is calculated by dividing this amount by the number of ordinary shares (excluding treasury shares) in issue.
Net liquid assets comprise current assets less current liabilities (excluding borrowings) and provisions for deferred liabilities.
As stock markets and share prices vary, an investment trust's share price is rarely the same as its NAV. When the share price is lower than the NAV per share it is said to be trading at a discount. The size of the discount is calculated by subtracting the share price from the NAV per share and is usually expressed as a percentage of the NAV per share. If the share price is higher than the NAV per share, this situation is called a premium.
The total return is the return to shareholders after reinvesting the net dividend on the date that the share price goes ex-dividend.
The total recurring expenses (excluding the Company's cost of dealing in investments and borrowing costs) incurred by the Company as a percentage of the daily average net asset value, as detailed below:
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investment management fee | 3,475 | 1,533 | ||
| Other administrative expenses | 729 | 479 | ||
| Total expenses | 4,204 | 2,012 | ||
| Average net asset value | 538,343 | 219,376 | ||
| Ongoing charges | 0.78% | 0.92% |
'A' Shares are shares of mainland China-based companies that trade on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. Since 2003, select foreign institutions have been able to purchase them through the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor system.
The Company has the authority to make market purchases of its ordinary shares for retention as Treasury Shares for future reissue, resale, transfer, or for cancellation. Treasury Shares do not receive distributions and the Company is not entitled to exercise the voting rights attaching to them.
An unlisted or private company means a company whose shares are not available to the general public for trading and are not listed on a stock exchange.
At its simplest, gearing is borrowing. Just like any other public company, an investment trust can borrow money to invest in additional investments for its portfolio. The effect of the borrowing on the shareholders' assets is called 'gearing'. If the Company's assets grow, the shareholders' assets grow proportionately more because the debt remains the same. But if the value of the Company's assets falls, the situation is reversed. Gearing can therefore enhance performance in rising markets but can adversely impact performance in falling markets.
Invested gearing is borrowings at par less cash and brokers' balances expressed as a percentage of shareholders' funds.
| 31 July 2021 |
31 July 2020 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Borrowings (at book cost) (a) | £60,783,000 | £24,641,000 |
| Less: cash and cash equivalents | (£31,766,000) | (£12,146,000) |
| Less: sales for subsequent settlement |
(£1,066,000) | (£244,000) |
| Add: purchases for subsequent settlement |
– | £271,000 |
| Adjusted borrowings (b) | £27,951,000 | £12,522,000 |
| Shareholders' funds (c) | £687,231,000 | £304,403,000 |
| Gearing: (b) as a percentage of (c) | 4% | 4% |
Potential gearing is the Company's borrowings expressed as a percentage of shareholders' funds (a) divided by (c) above.
For the purposes of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, leverage is any method which increases the Company's exposure, including the borrowing of cash and the use of derivatives. It is expressed as a ratio between the Company's exposure and its net asset value and can be calculated on a gross and a commitment method. Under the gross method, exposure represents the sum of the Company's positions after the deduction of sterling cash balances, without taking into account any hedging and netting arrangements. Under the commitment method, exposure is calculated without the deduction of sterling cash balances and after certain hedging and netting positions are offset against each other.
Active share, a measure of how actively a portfolio is managed, is the percentage of the portfolio that differs from its comparative index. It is calculated by deducting from 100 the percentage of the portfolio that overlaps with the comparative index. An active share of 100 indicates no overlap with the index and an active share of zero indicates a portfolio that tracks the index.
The compound annual return converts the return over a period of longer than one year to a constant annual rate of return applied to the compound value at the start of each year.

Chairman: RA Macpherson
RW Chote W Hee AC Lane RF Studwell
Computershare Investor Services PLC The Pavilions Bridgwater Road Bristol BS99 6ZZ Tel: 0370 707 1229
BDO LLP 55 Baker Street London W1U 7EU
Computershare Investor Services PLC Moor House 120 London Wall London EC2Y 5ET
The Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited 1 Canada Square London E14 5AL
Baillie Gifford & Co Limited Calton Square 1 Greenside Row Edinburgh EH1 3AN Tel: 0131 275 2000 bailliegifford.com
JP Morgan Cazenove 25 Bank Street Canary Wharf London E14 5JP
pacifichorizon.co.uk Company Registration No. 02342193 ISIN GB0006667470 Sedol 0666747 Ticker PHI
Legal Entity Identifier: VLGEI9B8R0REWKB0LN95
Baillie Gifford Client Relations Team Calton Square 1 Greenside Row Edinburgh EH1 3AN Tel: 0800 917 2112 Email: [email protected] Fax: 0131 275 3955
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.