MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED — Regulatory Filings 2025

Oct 6, 2025

Moho Resources Ltd P. +61 8 9481 0389 ABN 81 156 217 971 E. admin@mohoresources.com.au 168 Stirling Highway mohoresources.com.au Nedlands WA 6009 ASX MOH

ASX RELEASE | 7 October 2025

18 prospecting licences granted at the Bush Chook Gold Project.

Highlights

• 18 prospecting licences have been granted at Moho’s Bush Chook Project, just two months after the initial applications were submitted.

• No Native Title or Pastoral Lease conditions have been imposed on the licences enabling rapid and cost-effective exploration.

• Multiple historical soil anomalies on the granted licences are priority targets, including an 800m x 200m >200ppb gold anomaly (up to 1.34g/t).

• Field work has begun to validate historical results on the granted licences; samples will be submitted for rapid assay turn-around.

• A Program of Work (PoW) has been submitted with the Department of Mines, Petroleum and Exploration (DMPE) to expedite drill planning.

• Drilling is planned for late 2025 or early 2026 depending on results, approvals and weather.

Moho Resources Ltd (ASX: MOH) (Moho or the Company) is confident of starting maiden drilling at its Bush Chook Gold Project in Western Australia’s Pilbara region within the next six months after the DMPE granted 18 prospecting licences at the project just two months after the submission of applications.

Field work is already underway to validate multiple historical soil anomalies, including an 800m x 200m >200ppb gold anomaly (up to 1.34g/t Au) which represents one of thirty-six priority soil anomalies on the granted licences. Project wide, there are over one hundred, >32ppb gold-in-soil anomalies which cover a total of >6,500,000m[2] .

Moho Resources Chairman, Mr Peter Christie said:

“Despite neighbouring multiple gold mines, which has produced over half a million ounces of gold[1] , the significant gold targets on the Bush Chook acreage have never been drilled. We are moving fast to change that. With the rapid granting of licences and a Program of Work already submitted, we plan to be drilling late in the 2025 field season or early 2026.”

1 Source: https://aimmining.com.au/nullagine-gold-project/

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [452 x 310] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Figure 2
----- End of picture text -----

Figure 1: Granted licences and the >32ppb gold-in-soils contour within Moho’s Bush Chook Gold Project.

==> picture [453 x 310] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Two priority historical soil anomalies on granted licences.

2

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Field work has begun to expedite a drill program

Eighteen prospecting licences have been granted at Moho’s Bush Chook Gold Project; the licences are in areas with no native title claim or pastoral leases. Several priority historic soil anomalies exist on these granted licences, including an 800m x 200m >200ppb gold anomaly, up to 1.3g/t Au.

Field work has begun to validate the historical soil sample results. Samples will be sent for fast turn around at the lab.

A Program of Work has been submitted with the DMPE for a drill program over the area of priority soil anomaly.

A maiden drill program is planned for late 2025 or early 2026 depending on approvals, assay results and weather.

Schedule of tenements

Table 1: List of granted licences

Tenement Id	Type	Status	Holder	Start Date	Grant Date	Area	Unit
P 46/2224	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	31/07/2025	18/09/2025	109.81941	HA.
P 46/2236	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	9/08/2025	23/09/2025	180.26585	HA.
P 46/2237	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	9/08/2025	23/09/2025	158.68376	HA.
P 46/2239	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	9/08/2025	23/09/2025	185.99285	HA.
P 46/2240	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	9/08/2025	23/09/2025	185.72623	HA.
P 46/2243	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	9/08/2025	23/09/2025	186.0406	HA.
P 46/2244	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	9/08/2025	23/09/2025	185.86945	HA.
P 46/2255	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	10/08/2025	30/09/2025	161.21231	HA.
P 46/2285	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	11/08/2025	30/09/2025	193.20062	HA.
P 46/2286	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	11/08/2025	30/09/2025	193.28145	HA.
P 46/2287	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	11/08/2025	30/09/2025	193.21952	HA.
P 46/2289	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	11/08/2025	30/09/2025	192.90997	HA.
P 46/2290	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	11/08/2025	30/09/2025	192.94918	HA.
P 46/2291	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	11/08/2025	30/09/2025	193.02254	HA.
P 46/2292	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	11/08/2025	30/09/2025	193.01675	HA.
P 46/2293	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	11/08/2025	30/09/2025	190.16549	HA.
P 46/2294	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	11/08/2025	30/09/2025	190.14317	HA.
P 46/2296	PROSPECTING LICENCE	LIVE	MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED	12/08/2025	30/09/2025	192.91203	HA.

Historical Soil Results

The historical soil sampling results can be found in the following WAMEX annual reports: 82721, 128258, 105234, 115986, 81551, 72078, 82579, 123985, 112414, 81499, 82720, 82718, 101752, 82716, 79889, 82717, 81997, 82719, 81999, 77603, and 82580

3

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

This ASX announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Moho Resources Limited.

For further information, please contact:

Mr Peter Christie Gareth Quinn Chairman Investor Relations Moho Resources Limited gareth@republicir.com.au admin@mohoresources.com.au 0417 711 108

Competent Persons Statements

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results and Exploration Targets is based on information compiled by Mr. Graeme Hardwick. Mr. Hardwick is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and Moho Resource’s Exploration Manager. Mr. Hardwick has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr. Hardwick consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears

Forward-Looking Statements

This document may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning Moho Resources Limited’s planned exploration program and other statements that are not historical facts. When used in this document, words such as "could," "plan," "expect," "intend," "may”, "potential," "should," and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although Moho believes that its expectations reflected in these forward- looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that further exploration activities will result in the actual values, results or events expressed or implied in this document.

About Moho Resources

Moho Resources Ltd is an Australian natural resources company advancing early-stage gold and other metals projects in Western Australia. through exploration towards development. Moho controls a 100% interest of its portfolio. The Bush Chook Gold Project in the Pilbara Craton and the Silver Swan North Project in the Yilgarn Craton are currently the company’s priority focus areas. Moho’s Board is chaired by Mr Peter Christie, a qualified accountant and tax agent and highly successful businessman. He has served on the boards of several public companies in the resource sector since 2006 and is the current club president of WAFL club, the South Fremantle Bulldogs. Me Christie is joined on the Board by experienced corporate advisors Mr Michael Pereira and Mr Bryce Gould, both of whom have a long track record of helping small-cap companies to meet their capital raising goals, and engage and attract investors.

For more information, visit www.mohoresources.com.au

4

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1: Bush Chook Project

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sampling	•	Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut	•	The surface samples presented are
techniques		channels, random chips, or specific specialized		compiled from several WAMEX Areports
		industry standard measurement tools		(The original Areports should be consulted
		appropriate to the minerals under investigation,		for detailed sampling techniques). This
		such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld		historic sampling is considered appropriate
		XRF instruments, etc). These examples should		to generate avenues for follow up work on
		not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of		the Project. Soil and stream sediment
		sampling.		samples are collected from unconsolidated
	•	Include reference to measures taken to ensure		soil material. The samples have been
		sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.		analysed in Western Australia by reputable laboratories using a variety of industry standard gold assay methods.
	•	Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done	•	Soil and stream sediment samples have been sieved to a variety of size fractions to reduce the effect of nuggety gold.
		this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse	•	The sampling has not yet been validated in
		circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m		the field by Moho Resources.
		samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to
		produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
		cases more explanation may be required, such
		as where there is coarse gold that has inherent
		sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
		mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules)
		may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
Drilling	•	Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-		• Not applicable.
techniques		hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
		sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple
		or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
		sampling bit or other type, whether core is
		oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Drill sample	•	Method of recording and assessing core and		• Not applicable
recovery		chip sample recoveries and results assessed.		• Not applicable.
	•	Measures taken to maximise sample recovery
		and ensure representative nature of the samples.		• Not applicable.
	•	Whether a relationship exists between sample
		recovery and grade and whether sample bias
		may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain
		of fine/coarse material.
Logging	•	Whether core and chip samples have been	•	Not applicable
		geologically and geotechnically logged to a
		level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
		Resource estimation, mining studies and
		metallurgical studies.
	•	Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
		nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
		photography.
	•	The total length and percentage of the relevant
		intersections logged.

5

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sub-	•	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether		• Not applicable.
sampling techniques and sample preparation	•	quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.		• Soil and stream sediment samples were sieved in the field to a variety of particulate sizes to reduce the effect of nuggety gold and is considered
	•	For all sample types, the nature, quality and		appropriate for gold exploration.
		appropriateness of the sample preparation		• Soil sampling is an industry standard
		technique.		technique utilised in first pass
	•	Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.		geochemical sampling over suitable regolith landform regions. • A variety of QAQC measure have been implemented by the historic exploration
	•	Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is		groups and these methods are
		representative of the in situ material collected,		considered to be industry standard.
		including for instance results for field		Further details are described in the
		duplicate/second-half sampling.		relevant Areports.
	•	Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the
		grain size of the material being sampled.
Quality of	•	The nature, quality and appropriateness of the		• All samples were processed and
assay data		assaying and laboratory procedures used and		analysed in a variety of Western
and		whether the technique is considered partial or		Australian Laboratories following
laboratory		total.		protocols where are considered
tests	•	For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in		industry standard. Further details are described in the relevant Areports.
		determining the analysis including instrument
		make and model, reading times, calibrations
		factors applied and their derivation, etc.
	•	Nature of quality control procedures adopted
		(eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external
		laboratory checks) and whether acceptable
		levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision
		have been established.
Verification of sampling and assaying	• •	The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes.	• • •	Not applicable. Not applicable. The data from the Areports was carefully compiled by Moho Resource’s geologist.
	•	Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.		In some instances, gold assay units were converted from PPM to PPB using the multiplication factor of 1000.
	•	Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of data points	•	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.		• Sample locations are taken from the Areports, these locations were validated against tenement boundaries to ensure the general location is correct.
	•	Specification of the grid system used.		• MGA94 Zone 51
	•	Quality and adequacy of topographic control.		• Not applicable
Data spacing and distribution	• •	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.	• • • •	The soil sampling has taken are a variety of spacing include 80mx20m, 760mx20m, 360mx80m, and 40mx200m This sample spacing is sufficient for first- pass soil sampling for gold exploration. Not applicable. Some soil samples were composited over a 40m area to combine into one sample.
	•	Whether sample compositing has been applied.

6

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Orientation	•	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves	•	Sampling was general planned
of data in		unbiased sampling of possible structures and		perpendicular to the structural and bedding
relation to		the extent to which this is known, considering		trends of the Mosquito Creek Formation
geological		the deposit type.
structure	•	If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key	•	Not applicable.
		mineralised structures is considered to have
		introduced a sampling bias, this should be
		assessed and reported if material.
Sample	•	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	•	Some details are described in the relevant
security				Areports.
Audits or	•	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling	•	Available data has been reviewed by
reviews		techniques and data.		company geologist.

7

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section).

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Mineral	•	Type, reference name/number, location and	•	The Bush Chook Project encompassed
tenement and		ownership including agreements or material		part of the Bonney Downs Pastoral Lease,
land tenure		issues with third parties such as joint		The Palyku and Palyku #2 and Nyamal
status		ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties,		Palyku Native Title groups, and some
		native title interests, historical sites,		miscellaneous licences owned by AIM
		wilderness or national park and		Mining. It is expected that agreements will
		environmental settings.		be reached with these parties to enable
	•	The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments		the tenements to be granted and exploration work to occur.
		to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	•	The licences are all pending applications,
				land access and heritage agreements
				have notyet been finalised.
Exploration	•	Acknowledgment and appraisal of	•	The project has predominantly been
done by other		exploration by other parties.		explored for gold mineralisation using a
parties				variety of surface techniques which have
				outlined several anomalous and
				mineralised zones within the project.
				Adequate drill testing of these areas has
				not taken place.
Geology	•	Deposit type, geological setting and style of	•	Turbidite-hosted orogenic gold and gold-
		mineralisation.		antimony deposits are the principal
				target. These are hosted within the
				Mesoarchean Mosquito Creek basin of
				the Pilbara Craton. Examples of
				mineralisation in the region include the
				Blue Spec, Gold Spec, and Golden Eagle
				deposits.
Drill hole	•	A summary of all information material to the	•	Not applicable
Information		understanding of the exploration results
		including a tabulation of the following
		information for all Material drill holes:
		o easting and northing of the drill hole
		collar
		o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
		elevation above sea level in metres) of
		the drill hole collar
		o dip and azimuth of the hole
		o down hole length and interception depth
		o hole length.
	•	If the exclusion of this information is justified
		on the basis that the information is not
		Material and this exclusion does not detract
		from the understanding of the report, the
		Competent Person should clearly explain
		why this is the case.
Data	•	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting	•	No averaging or cut offs have been
aggregation		averaging techniques, maximum and/or		applied to the data.
methods		minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of
		high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
		Material and should be stated.
	•	Where aggregate intercepts incorporate	•	Not applicable.
		short lengths of high grade results and
		longer lengths of lowgrade results, the

8

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
		procedure used for such aggregation should
		be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.	•	No metal equivalents have been reported.
	•	The assumptions used for any reporting of
		metal equivalent values should be clearly
		stated.
Relationship	•	These relationships are particularly important	•	Not applicable.
between		in the reporting of Exploration Results.
mineralisatio n widths and intercept lengths	• •	If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole	• •	Not applicable. Not applicable.
		lengths are reported, there should be a clear
		statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole
		length, true width not known’).
Diagrams	•	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales)	•	Plan-view maps are presented showing
		and tabulations of intercepts should be		the location of the project, the sample
		included for any significant discovery being		locations and the gold results.
		reported These should include, but not be
		limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
		locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced	•	Where comprehensive reporting of all	•	Not applicable
reporting		Exploration Results is not practicable,
		representative reporting of both low and high
		grades and/or widths should be practiced to
		avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
		Results.
Other	•	Other exploration data, if meaningful and	•	GSWA geological maps, magnetic and
substantive		material, should be reported including (but		gravity data have been used to assist the
exploration		not limited to): geological observations;		interpretation of the target areas.
data		geophysical survey results; geochemical
		survey results; bulk samples – size and
		method of treatment; metallurgical test
		results; bulk density, groundwater,
		geotechnical and rock characteristics;
		potential deleterious or contaminating
		substances.
Further work	•	The nature and scale of planned further work	•	Follow up field mapping is planned, which
		(eg tests for lateral extensions or depth		will include repeating historic soil
		extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).		sampling, rock chip sampling, and
	•	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of		geological mapping.
		possible extensions, including the main	•	Not applicable
		geological interpretations and future drilling
		areas, provided this information is not
		commercially sensitive.

9