MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED — Regulatory Filings 2021

Feb 1, 2021

==> picture [229 x 813] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

2 February 2021
----- End of picture text -----

PROGRESS REPORT - EAST SAMPSON DAM GOLD PROSPECT

HIGHLIGHTS:

• First 9 holes of Phase 2 RC drilling return encouraging results, including:

• SSMH0102: 2m @ 4.48 g/t Au from 100m

  • incl. 1m @ 8.31 g/t Au from 100m

• SSMH0103: 3m @ 1.13 g/t Au from 115m

• SSMH0105: 6m @ 2.3 g/t Au from 105m

• incl. 1m @ 3.63 g/t Au from 105m, incl. 1m @ 6.80 g/t Au from 110m

• • SSMH0109: 2m @ 2.98 g/t Au from 58m incl. 1m @ 5.26 g/t Au from 58m

• SSMH0110: 2m @ 2.61 g/t Au from 61m

  • incl. 1m @ 8.27 g/t Au from 62m

• SSMH0102 and SSMH0103 extend high-grade

• mineralisation 20m south; open to south

• Downhole logging of RC holes for structural, density data completed

• Master Composite metallurgical testwork underway

• Geotechnical reporting on diamond core underway

NEXT STEPS:

• Collate Phase 2 RC drill assay results with downhole density and structural data

• Complete metallurgical sighter testwork with master composite analysis

• Complete review of downhole logging & diamond drill data to define structural controls on gold mineralisation – Q1 2021

• Review geotechnical consultant report on ESD diamond core

• Undertake aircore drilling of historic auger gold anomalies north of ESD – H1 2021

• Resource model and JORC Mineral Resource Estimate- H1 2021

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

“Moho’s exploration team continue to make excellent progress at East Sampson Dam. The initial phase 2 RC drill results extend gold mineralisation down plunge at the southern end of the prospect and highlight the potential to discover additional gold mineralisation at the prospect”

Mr Shane Sadleir, Moho Managing Director

Moho Resources Ltd (ASX:MOH) ( Moho or Company ) is pleased to announce encouraging results for the first 9 holes of the Phase 2 reverse circulation (RC) drilling program as part of its resource definition studies, to infill and extend gold mineralisation, at the East Sampson Dam (ESD) prospect, M27/263 (Figure 1).

==> picture [402 x 483] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Moho’s Silver Swan North Project tenements, including M27/263 (highlighted) in relation

to regional geology

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

PHASE 2 RC DRILLING RESULTS

Phase 2 of the current resource infill drilling program finished in early January 2021 and totalled 45 holes for 3,850m of drilling (Table 1). Refer to Figure 2 for final drill hole collar locations in relation to gold projected to the surface as outlined from previous Moho drilling. This release will discuss available assay results for the first 9 drillholes, SSMH0102 to SSMH0110 which cover the southern quarter of the ESD gold prospect.

==> picture [415 x 583] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Phase 2 ESD RC drill program collars in relation to known mineralised zones

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

The drilling highlighted a number of significant gold intersections (Table 2, Figure 2). All holes were sampled with a primary and duplicate sample collected on a 1m basis from the cone splitter. All samples were analysed at Bureau Veritas Laboratories Perth by 40g fire assay and AAS finish, with certified reference material (CRM) inserted every 33 samples and duplicates assayed every 50 samples throughout the program. Moho continues to experience long delays of up to 8 weeks in receiving assay results from Perth assay laboratories. Additional ESD RC assay results will be reported as they become available.

Table 2: East Sampson Dam – SSMH0102-SSMH0110 significant gold assay results > 0.5 g/t Au

PROSPECT	Hole ID	Depth From (m)	Depth To (m)	Interval (m)	Significant Intercept
ESD	SSMH0102	77	78	1	1m @ 1.32 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0102	96	97	1	1m @ 0.67 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0102	100	102	2	2m @ 4.48 g/t Au
ESD	incl	100	101	1	1m @ 8.31 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0103	115	118	3	3m @ 1.13 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0104	57	58	1	1m @ 0.76 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0105	105	111	6	6m @ 2.3 g/t Au
ESD	incl	105	106	1	1m @ 3.63 g/t Au
ESD	incl	110	111	1	1m @ 6.80 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH109	58	60	2	2m @ 2.98 g/t Au
ESD	incl	58	59	1	1m @ 5.26 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH110	61	63	2	2m @ 2.61 g/t Au
ESD	incl	62	63	1	1m @ 4.27 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH110	111	112	1	1m @ 1.71 g/t Au

Notes:

1. Results are based on a 1m samples from RC rig cone splitter.

2. Samples were assayed for gold using 40g charge fire assay with AAS finish.

3. Sample intervals are down-hole and true widths are yet to be determined.

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

SSMH0102

This hole (Figure 3) confirmed moderate grade mineralisation previously found in ESR235 with 1m @1.32 g/t Au, which is higher than previously located. Moho geologists believe this mineralisation is spatially related to low angle east dipping structures and may be the continuation of high-grade mineralisation discovered in SSMH0049. It was also successful in extending high grade mineralisation down plunge from SSMH0051 on section 6637680 to the north with 1m @ 8.31 g/t Au from 100m down hole. This mineralisation sits on the lower contact of black shale against a narrow quartzporphyry (leucotonalite) unit.

SSMH0103

This hole (Figure 3) successfully extended the high-grade mineralised pod, 20m down dip from SSMH102 with 3m @ 1.13 g/t Au in black shale beneath andesite.

==> picture [393 x 401] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: East Sampson Dam cross section 6637660N, looking north, showing current drilling with oxidation interpretation

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

SSMH0104

The drill hole (Figure 4) was designed to clarify mineralisation located in an historical RAB hole (ESR054) and confirmed low grade mineralisation with 1m @ 0.79 g/t Au in tuff.

SSMH0105

SSMH0105 (Figure 4) was designed to explore down dip of mineralisation previously found in SSMH0051 and SSMH0062. It intercepted additional high-grade mineralisation of 6m @ 2.3 g/t Au from 105m downhole, including 1m @ 3.63 from 105m and 1m @ 6.80 g/t Au from 110m. The highgrade intervals are hosted in quartz-porphyry (leucotonalite) and tuff.

==> picture [405 x 429] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: East Sampson Dam cross section 6637680N, looking north, showing current drilling with oxidation interpretation

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

SSMH0106

This hole was designed to explore structures believed to be offsetting high grade shoots in the western wall of the preliminary Whittle pit shell successfully locating quartz veins associated with an NNE trending fault.

SSMH0107

SSMH0107 was also drilled in the western section of the preliminary Whittle pit shell to essentially sterilise the area. It did not intersect any gold mineralisation > 0.5 g/t Au.

SSMH0108

This hole (Figure 5) targeted the inferred southerly plunge extension of shallow high-grade intersections on section 6637740 to the North but failed to locate mineralisation. It is now believed the mineralisation may have been truncated and offset to the west by an NNE trending fault. Further drilling at a later date will be required to test for this mineralisation.

SSMH0109

This eastern hole on section 6637720 (Figure 5) explored for mineralisation down dip of grade previously located in SSMH0081 and MRC012. SSMH0109 intersected 2m @ 2.98 g/t Au including 1m @ 5.26 g/t Au hosted by quartz veins in tuff. This extends the mineralised pod containing the SSMH0081 and MRC012 intercepts 12m down dip and has successfully delineated this mineralisation on the southern side of an NNE trending fault.

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [436 x 448] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: East Sampson Dam cross section 6637720N, looking north, showing current drilling with oxidation interpretation

SSMH0110

This hole drilled in the east targeted the southerly down plunge extensions to high grade mineralisation 20m north in SSMH0056 on section 6637760 (Figure 6). SSMH0110 intersected 2m @ 2.61 g/t Au from 61m including 1m @ 4.27 g/t Au from 62m. In addition, it located moderate grade mineralisation of 1m @ 1.71 g/t Au from 111m on the underside of a quartz vein in quartz-porphyry. This drill hole, like SSMH0109, has successfully delineated new mineralisation on the southern side of an NNE trending fault in a previously untested area.

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [404 x 448] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: East Sampson Dam cross section 6637740N, looking north, showing current drilling with oxidation interpretation

GEOPHYSICAL LOGGING OF RC HOLES

Following the completion of drilling at East Sampson Dam in January 2021, Moho contracted Wireline Services Ltd from Perth to undertake down hole logging with geophysical probes of the 7 diamond holes and 10 RC holes. The output from this work was magnetic susceptibility, density and calliper, as well as televiewer (optical and acoustic) data for each hole. These data will be used to elucidate structural information and rock density to aid resource modelling and planning of further drill holes.

METALLURGICAL TESTWORK

JT Metallurgical services of Perth have been commissioned to finalise sighter testwork started in 2020 and prepare a master composite of likely mill feed from the ESD prospect and complete testwork as soon as possible. Moho has also been in discussions on parameters for phase 2 testwork using diamond drill core or current high-grade RC samples.

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Consultant geotechnical engineer Mike Turner has been commissioned to prepare a report on the structural integrity of the rocks at ESD. This work will analyse all the available structural data to assess the competency of the rocks to support pit wall stability design for a future pit. This data will also be critical in defining the potential angles of the pit walls.

The East Sampson Dam gold Project is well located close to existing gold processing facilities and mining infrastructure. Moho believes that, if a suitable gold resource is established, it could provide important cash flow for the Company.

NEXT STEPS

• Collate Phase 2 RC drilling assay results when available along with downhole density and structural – Q1 2021

• Complete metallurgical sighter testwork with master composite analysis - Q1/Q2 2021

• Complete review of downhole logging & diamond drill data to define structural controls on gold mineralisation - Q1 2021

• Review geotechnical consultant report on ESD diamond core and site visit – Q1 2021

• Aircore drilling of auger gold anomalies and geophysical targets north of ESD – H1 2021

• Resource model and JORC resource – H1 2021

COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT

The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information and supporting documentation compiled by Mr Robert Affleck, a Competent Person who is a RPGeo in the field of Mineral Exploration of The Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Affleck is Exploration Manager and a full-time employee of Moho Resources and holds shares in the Company.

Mr Affleck has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Affleck consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.

MOHO’S INTEREST IN SILVER SWAN NORTH TENEMENTS

Moho is the 100% registered owner of granted tenements M27/263, E27/528, E27/626, P27/2232, P27/2390 & E27/613 and applications for E27/623, E27/633, E27/641, P27/2441, & P27/2456 all of which comprise the Silver Swan North Project. The Company has also signed option agreements to acquire M27/488, P27/2200, P27/2216, P27/2217, P27/2218, P27/2226 and P27/2229

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

About Moho Resources Ltd

==> picture [304 x 251] intentionally omitted <==

Moho Resources Ltd is an Australian mining company which listed on the ASX in November 2018. The Company is focused on gold and nickel exploration at Empress Springs, Silver Swan North and Burracoppin.

Moho’s Board is chaired by Mr Terry Streeter, a well-known and highly successful West Australian businessman with extensive experience in funding and overseeing exploration and mining companies, including Jubilee Mines NL, Western Areas NL and Midas Resources Ltd.

Moho has a strong and experienced Board lead by geoscientist Shane Sadleir as Managing Director, Commercial Director Ralph Winter and Adrian Larking, lawyer and geologist, as Non-Executive Director.

Highly experienced geologists Bob Affleck (Exploration Manager) and Max Nind (Principal Geologist) are supported by leading industry consultant geophysicist Kim Frankcombe (ExploreGeo Pty Ltd) and experienced consultant geochemists Richard Carver (GCXplore Pty Ltd) and Dr Carl Brauhart (CSA Global Pty Ltd).

Moho’s geophysical programs and processing and analysis of the results are supervised by Kim Frankcombe (ExploreGeo Pty Ltd) who is a geologist and geophysicist with 40 years’ experience in mineral exploration. He has worked for major mining companies, service companies and for over 20 years as an independent geophysical consultant. He was a member of the discovery team for several significant deposits including one Tier 1 deposit. He manages the ExploreGeo consulting group which provides specialist geophysical advice to explorers.

Dr Jon Hronsky (OA) provides high level strategic and technical advice to Moho. Jon has more than thirty years of experience in the global mineral exploration industry, primarily focused on project generation, technical innovation and exploration strategy development. He has worked across a diverse range of commodities and geographies, and has particular expertise in targeting nickel sulphide and gold deposits.

ENDS

The Board of Directors of Moho Resources Ltd authorised this announcement to be given to ASX.

For further information please contact:

Shane Sadleir, Managing Director Ralph Winter, Commercial Director T: +61 411 704 498 T: +61 435 336 538 E: shane@mohoresources.com.au E: ralph@mohoresources.com.au

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1: Collar Coordinate details – Phase 1 RC Drilling July 2020, East Sampson Dam Prospect, Silver Swan North Project (M27/263)

Hole ID	Easting	Northing	RL	Depth	Dip	Azimuth- Mag
SSMH0102*	363882.489	6637661.011	371	108	-65	270
SSMH0103*	363906.618	6637663.94	371	126	-65	270
SSMH0104*	363827.364	6637676.723	370	78	-65	270
SSMH0105*	363895.478	6637680.264	370.5	126	-68	270
SSMH0106*	363817.195	6637700.792	370	72	-65	270
SSMH0107*	363812.338	6637723.375	370	60	-65	270
SSMH0108*	363845.43	6637720.069	370	48	-65	270
SSMH0109*	363890.38	6637719.976	371	73	-65	270
SSMH0110*	363885.43	6637734.148	370.9	113	-73	270
SSMH0111	363810.23	6637759.962	368.7	54	-65	270
SSMH0112	363875.068	6637760.216	371	150	-65	270
SSMH0113	363806.167	6637775.123	369	54	-65	270
SSMH0114	363902.604	6637779.886	371	144	-65	270
SSMH0115	363800.193	6637799.835	369	68	-65	270
SSMH0116	363818.503	6637799.799	369	78	-65	270
SSMH0117	363861.734	6637800.021	369	114	-65	270
SSMH0118	363883.724	6637799.922	370	126	-65	270
SSMH0119	363818.043	6637821.151	369	66	-65	270
SSMH0120	363888.36	6637819.541	370	128	-65	270
SSMH0121	363805.609	6637839.961	369	72	-65	270
SSMH0122#	6637840	363835.332	369.4	90	-65	270
SSMH0123	363853.076	6637839.836	370.2	102	-65	270
SSMH0124	363774.834	6637860.09	369.4	54	-65	270
SSMH0125	363790.289	6637864.938	369.4	66	-65	270
SSMH0126	363828.532	6637860.175	369	90	-65	270
SSMH0127	363861.455	6637860.059	370	108	-65	270
SSMH0128	363885.32	6637859.857	370.9	120	-65	270
SSMH0129	363767.6	6637880.059	369	53	-65	270
SSMH0130	363798.941	6637880.116	369	66	-65	270

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

SSMH0131	363844.643	6637878.753	370	108	-65	270
SSMH0132	363791.44	6637900.004	369.5	68	-65	270
SSMH0133#	6637900	363816	369.8	108	-65	270
SSMH0134	6637900	363831.275	400	108	-65	270
SSMH0135	363854.262	6637899.922	369.7	148	-65	270
SSMH0136#	6637920	363750	368	48	-65	270
SSMH0137#	6637920	363770	369	60	-65	270
SSMH0138	363799.765	6637920.861	370	84	-60	270
SSMH0139#	6637920	363812	370	102	-65	270
SSMH0140	363728.489	6637940.282	368	48	-65	270
SSMH0141	363760.643	6637939.992	369	60	-65	270
SSMH0142	363779.758	6637940.266	370	72	-65	270
SSMH0143	363719.768	6637959.994	369	43	-65	270
SSMH0144	363739.615	6637959.892	369	48	-65	270
SSMH0145	363759.524	6637958.876	369	60	-65	270
SSMH0146	363791.63	6637960.1	370	78	-65	270

Notes:

1. Drill hole coordinates MGA94 Zone 51 (GDA94).

2. Collars located with Differential GPS (+/- 30cm accuracy) except for holes marked #.

3. • Denotes RC drillhole with available assays

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data – East Sampson Dam RC Drilling

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut	•The results in this ASX release relates to
techniques	channels, random chips, or specific	RC drill holes SSMH0102 to SSMH0110 at
	specialised industry standard	the East Sampson Dam Prospect, Silver
	measurement tools appropriate to the	Swan North Project.
	minerals under investigation, such as
	down hole gamma sondes, or handheld
	XRF instruments, etc.). These examples	•1 metre samples were obtained direct from
	should not be taken as limiting the	a cone splitter off the RC rig along with a
	broad meaning of sampling.	duplicate of every metre for future QAQC.
	• Include reference to measures taken to	•The cyclone and cone splitter were levelled
	ensure sample representivity and the	prior to every hole and checked at each rod
	appropriate calibration of any	change. In clayey horizons the splitter and
	measurement tools or systems used.	cyclone were cleaned every metre.
	• Aspects of the determination of
	mineralisation that are Material to the
	Public Report.
	• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work
	has been done this would be relatively
	simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling
	was used to obtain 1 m samples from
	which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a
	30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
	cases, more explanation may be
	required, such as where there is coarse
	gold that has inherent sampling
	problems. Unusual commodities or
	mineralisation types (e.g. submarine
	nodules) may warrant disclosure of
	detailed information.
Drilling	• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation,	•A 5.5-inch face-sampling RC hammer was
techniques	open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,	used throughout the program.
	auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details
	(e.g. core diameter, triple or standard
	tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
	sampling bit or other type, whether core
	is oriented and if so, by what method,
	_etc.). _
Drill	• Method of recording and assessing core	•Sample recoveries were monitored by the
sample	and chip sample recoveries and results	logging geologist and were very high for the
recovery	assessed.	program.
	• Measures taken to maximise sample	•Drillers focussed on steady advance rather
	recovery and ensure representative	than chasing metres, with pausing after
	nature of the samples.	each metre drilled
	• Whether a relationship exists between	•No relationship between recovery and
	sample recovery and grade and	grade was observed.
	whether sample bias may have
	occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
	fine/coarse material.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have	•All holes were thoroughly logged by an
	been geologically and geotechnically	experienced senior geologist and project
	logged to a level of detail to support	geologist as per industry standard.
	appropriate Mineral Resource	•Logging is qualitative but chip trays are
	estimation, mining studies and	retained for oversight and check logging.
	metallurgical studies.
	• Whether logging is qualitative or
	quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
	channel, etc.) photography.
	• The total length and percentage of the

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	_relevant intersections logged. _
Sub-	• If core, whether cut or sawn and	•All bulk samples were collected in plastic
sampling	whether quarter, half or all core taken.	green bags at the bottom of a cone splitter
techniques	• If non-core, whether riffled, tube	and in general were dry. Two 1m samples
and	sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether	were collected every metre from the cone
sample	sampled wet or dry.	splitter in pre-numbered bags
preparatio	• For all sample types, the nature, quality	•Field duplicates were collected every 50
n	and appropriateness of the sample	samples. These showed acceptable levels
	preparation technique.	of variation given the sometime nuggety
	• Quality control procedures adopted for	nature of gold in the area.
	all sub-sampling stages to maximise
	representivity of samples.
	• Measures taken to ensure that the
	sampling is representative of the in-situ
	material collected, including for instance
	results for field duplicate/second-half
	sampling.
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate
	to the grain size of the material being
	_sampled. _
Quality of	• The nature, quality and appropriateness	•Samples submitted to the assay laboratory
assay data	of the assaying and laboratory	were weighed, crushed and pulverized to
and	procedures used and whether the	+95% passing -75 micron. A 40g charge
laboratory	technique is considered partial or total.	was selected for Fire Assay and AAS finish
tests	• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,	with a detection limit of 0.01ppm Au. Base
	handheld XRF instruments, etc., the	metal analyses were determined by 4-acid
	parameters used in determining the	and ICP-OES finish.
	analysis including instrument make and	•Assay reference standard material was
	model, reading times, calibrations	inserted every 50 samples and showed
	factors applied and their derivation, etc.	good agreement with specifications.
	• Nature of quality control procedures	•Internal laboratory assay repeats showed
	adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,	good agreement with first results and
	duplicates, external laboratory checks)	internal standards were in line with
	and whether acceptable levels of	specifications.
	accuracy (i.e lack of bias) and precision
	_have been established. _
Verification	• The verification of significant	•Significant intersections were checked by
of	intersections by either independent or	alternative company personnel prior to
sampling	alternative company personnel.	announcement.
and	• The use of twinned holes.	•No holes were twinned at this stage of
assaying	• Documentation of primary data, data	exploration.
	entry procedures, data verification, data	•Geological logging was on laptop using
	storage (physical and electronic)	Ocris logging software which was then
	protocols.	incorporated into Moho’s SQL database.
	• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	•No assay data are adjusted.
Location of	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to	•All collars were picked up using a DGPS
data points	locate drill holes (collar and down-hole	with an accuracy of 0.3m.
	surveys), trenches, mine workings and	•MGA94 Zone 51.
	other locations used in Mineral	•Topographic control was by DGPS.
	Resource estimation.
	• Specification of the grid system used.
	• Quality and adequacy of topographic
	control.
Data	• Data spacing for reporting of	•Drill holes were approximately 20m apart
spacing	Exploration Results.
and	• Whether the data spacing and	•No resource estimates are quoted.
distribution	distribution is sufficient to establish the	•Individual 1m samples not composited for
	degree of geological and grade	reporting purposes.
	continuity appropriate for the Mineral
	Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
	procedure(s) and classifications
	applied.
	• Whether sample compositing has been
	_applied. _

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Orientation	• Whether the orientation of sampling	•The orientation of structures controlling
of data in	achieves unbiased sampling of possible	grade distribution are not fully defined at
relation to	structures and the extent to which this is	this stage.
geological	known, considering the deposit type.	•At this stage, the relationship between
structure	• If the relationship between the drilling	drilling orientation and possible mineralising
	orientation and the orientation of key	structures is unclear but it is expected that
	mineralised structures is considered to	forthcoming downhole geophysics and DDH
	have introduced a sampling bias, this	drilling will clarify this.
	should be assessed and reported if
	material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure sample	•Samples were delivered by company
security	security.	personnel to assay labs and bags are
		secured in the field.
Audits or	• The results of any audits or reviews of	•Inhouse and consultant audits of standards
reviews	sampling techniques and data.	and duplicate results was carried out which
		showed a good performance overall.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number, location	•Moho is the 100% registered owner of
tenement	and ownership including agreements or	granted tenements M27/263, E27/528,
and land	material issues with third parties such	P27/2232, P27/2390, E27/613 and the
tenure	as joint ventures, partnerships,	applicant for ELA27/623 and ELA27/626,
status	overriding royalties, native title interests,	E27/638, E27/633, E27/639, P27/2441 &
	historical sites, wilderness or national	P27/2456 all of which comprise the Silver
	park and environmental settings.	Swan North Project .
	• The security of the tenure held at the
	time of reporting along with any known
	impediments to obtaining a license to
	_operate inthe area. _
Exploratio	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of	Historical exploration has been completed over
n done by	exploration by other parties.	various areas covered by Moho’s tenements.
other		Companies who have worked in the area
parties		include:
		• Australian-Anglo American JV (1969–
		1976)
		• Union Miniere/WMC Resources Ltd JV
		(1974–1975)
		• Esso Australia Ltd (1979–1981)
		• Amax Resources Ltd (1982–1984)
		• CRA Exploration Pty Ltd (1985–1989)
		• Mount Kersey Mining (1990–1999)
		• Aurora Gold (1991–1994)
		• Fodina (MPI/Outokumpu) (1994–1995)
		• NiQuest (2000–2005)
		• Mithril Resources (2006–2007)
		• Lawson Gold (2010–2012)
		• MohoResources (2015 to present).
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and	•The East Sampson Dam gold mineralisation
	style of mineralisation.	is spatially related in late-stage porphyry
		(leucotonalite) dykes which intrude an east-
		dipping sequence of sediments, tuffs, black
		shale and diorite. The detailed controls on
		gold mineralisation are still unclear but high-
		grade intersections are close to quartz
		veins.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material to	•A summary of all relevant drill hole
Informatio	the understanding of the exploration	information and intersections for the East
n	results including a tabulation of the	Sampson Dam prospect are shown in Table
	following information for all Material drill	1 and Table 2 in this announcement.
	_holes: _

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
	o easting and northing of the drill hole
	collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
	elevation above sea level in meters)
	of the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception
	depth
	o hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is
	justified on the basis that the
	information is not Material and this
	exclusion does not detract from the
	understanding of the report, the
	Competent Person should clearly
	_explain why this is the case. _
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results,	•	No averaging or cut offs have been applied
aggregatio	weighting averaging techniques,		to the data.
n methods	maximum and/or minimum grade	•	Aggregation of intersections was
	truncations (eg: cutting of high		undertaken on the latest East Sampson
	grades) and cut-off grades are		Dam drill holes. All intervals aggregated
	usually Material and should be		were of variable length and variable grades.
	stated.		Intervals quoted contain gold values >0.5
	• Where aggregate intercepts		g/t Au with up to 1m of internal dilution and
	incorporate short lengths of high-		quoted such as SSMH0102: 4m @ 4.48g/t
	grade results and longer lengths of		Au from 100m_including_1m @ 8.31 g/t Au
	low-grade results, the procedure		from 100m.
	used for such aggregation should be	•	No metal equivalents have been reported.
	stated and some typical examples of
	such aggregations should be shown
	in detail.
	• The assumptions used for any
	reporting of metal equivalent values
	_should be clearly stated. _
Relationshi	• These relationships are particularly	•	All results quoted herein are downhole
p between	important in the reporting of		lengths and the true width is not known.
mineralisat	Exploration Results.	•	The geometry of high-grade mineralisation
ion widths	• If the geometry of the mineralisation		discovered in recent diamond drilling by
and	with respect to the drill hole angle is		Moho and structural measurements support
intercept	known, its nature should be		a shallow plunge to the south of around 20°.
lengths	reported.		This is supported by Leapfrog grade shell
	• If it is not known and only the down		images created by Moho’s consultant
	hole lengths are reported, there		database manager. Data from downhole
	should be a clear statement to this		televiewer structural logging will assist in
	effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true		confirming this orientation as part of
	width not known’).		resource modelling studies.
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with	•	Refer to drill hole plan and sections within
	scales) and tabulations of intercepts		this release.
	should be included for any significant
	discovery being reported These
	should include, but not be limited to
	a plan view of drill hole collar
	locations and appropriate sectional
	_views. _
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of	•	All results > 0.5 g/t Au are quoted in Table 2
reporting	all Exploration Results is not		in this release.
	practicable, representative reporting
	of both low and high grades and/or
	widths should be practiced to avoid
	misleading reporting of Exploration
	_Results. _
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful	•	No other significant unreported exploration
substantiv	and material, should be reported		data for East Sampson Dam is available at
e	including (but not limited to):		this time.
	_geological observations; geophysical _

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
exploration data survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious _or contaminating substances. _
Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. •Future studies will include; metallurgical testwork, mining studies including resource modelling. •Exact sites of any future drilling are still being assessed.