MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED — Regulatory Filings 2021

Mar 1, 2021

NEW HIGH GRADE GOLD ZONES

AT EAST SAMPSON DAM GOLD PROSPECT

HIGHLIGHTS:

• Further encouraging high grade gold results:

• SSMH0117: 1m @ 9.6 g/t Au from 92m

• SSMH0126: 5m @ 5.95 g/t Au from 47m incl. 1m @ 15.2 g/t Au from 49m, & 1m @ 11.1 g/t Au from 51m

• • SSMH0123: 6m @ 3.57 g/t Au from 83m incl. 2m @ 2.43 g/t Au from 84m, & 1m @ 15.6 g/t Au from 88m
• • SSMH0119: 2m @ 2.67 g/t Au from 43m incl. 1m @ 4.04 g/t Au from 43m

• Master composite metallurgical testwork underway

• Geotechnical reporting on diamond core underway

NEXT STEPS:

• Collate Phase 2 RC drill assay results with downhole density and structural data – Q1 2021

• Refine structural controls on gold mineralisation and build new geological model of ESD – Q1 2021

• Complete metallurgical sighter testwork with master composite analysis – Q2 2021

• Resource model and JORC Mineral Resource Estimate for ESD - H1 2021

• Undertake aircore drilling of historic auger gold anomalies north of ESD – H1 2021

“The latest RC drilling results have identified a number of high-grade mineralised intervals and new mineralised zones at the East Sampson Dam gold prospect. This new information, in combination with the ongoing structural control interpretation and geological modelling by Moho’s geologists and consultants, provides further confidence that the prospect has the potential to generate a suitable gold resource which could provide important cash flow for the Company”

• Mr Shane Sadleir, Moho Managing Director

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

Moho Resources Ltd (ASX:MOH) ( Moho or Company ) is pleased to announce the identification of additional high grade gold zones during the Phase 2 reverse circulation (RC) drilling program as part of its resource definition studies, to infill and extend gold mineralisation at the East Sampson Dam (ESD) prospect on M27/263 (Figure 1).

==> picture [413 x 497] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Moho’s Silver Swan North Project tenements, including M27/263 (highlighted) in relation to regional geology

NEW PHASE 2 RC DRILLING RESULTS

Results from an additional twelve holes, SSMH115-SSMH0126 (Table 1), have been received and contain a number of significant high grade mineralised intervals and new mineralised zones. Figure 2 shows drill hole collar locations in relation to the gold mineralising envelope projected to the surface. This release discusses the available assay results for the drillholes above that cover infill RC drilling in the central portion of the ESD gold prospect.

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [476 x 648] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Phase 2 ESD RC drill program collars in relation to known mineralised zones

The drilling highlighted a number of significant gold intersections (Table 2, Figure 2). All holes were sampled with a primary and duplicate sample collected on a 1m basis from the cone splitter. All samples were analysed at Bureau Veritas Laboratories Perth by 40g fire assay and AAS finish, with certified reference material (CRM) inserted every 33 samples and duplicates assayed every 50 samples throughout the program.

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

Moho has experienced long delays of up to 8 weeks in receiving assay results from Perth assay laboratories, in part due to several pallets of samples being erroneously shipped to Adelaide in late December. Additional ESD RC assay results will be reported as they become available.

Table 2: East Sampson Dam – SSMH0115-SSMH0126 significant gold assay results

Prospect	Hole ID	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Significant Intercept
ESD	SSMH0115	46	47	1	1m @ 0.59 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0116	48	49	1	1m @ 1.95 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0116	57	58	1	1m @ 0.51 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0117	66	67	1	1m @ 1.54 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0117	75	78	3	3m @ 0.96 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0117	92	93	1	1m @ 9.6 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0118	67	68	1	1m @ 0.73 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0118	76	77	1	1m @ 0.68 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0118	85	86	1	1m @ 0.50 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0119	1	2	1	1m @ 0.98 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0119	43	45	2	2m @ 2.67 g/t Au
	incl	43	44	1	1m @ 4.04 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0119	58	59	1	1m @ 0.57 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0122	32	35	3	3m @ 0.79 g/t Au
	incl	34	35	1	1m @ 1.49 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0122	38	40	2	2m @ 0.76 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0122	45	46	1	1m @ 0.62 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0122	64	68	4	4m @ 1.49 g/t Au
	incl	65	66	1	1m @ 2.75 g/t Au
	incl	67	68	1	1m @ 1.82 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0122	75	76	1	1m @ 1.96 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0123	47	49	2	2m @ 0.99 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0123	83	89	6	6m @ 3.57 g/t Au
	incl	84	86	2	2m @ 2.43 g/t Au
	incl	88	89	1	1m @ 15.6 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0126	34	37	3	3m @ 1.26 g/t Au
	incl	34	35	1	1m @ 2.62 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0126	47	52	5	5m @ 5.95 g/t Au
	incl	49	50	1	1m @ 15.2 g/t Au
	incl	51	52	1	1m @ 11.1 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0126	55	59	4	4m @ 1.15 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0126	62	63	1	1m @ 2.60 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0126	65	66	1	1m @ 1.03 g/t Au
ESD	SSMH0126	67	68	1	1m @ 0.90 g/t Au

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

Notes:

1. Intercepts are an aggregation of 1m intercepts ≥0.5 g/t Au with up to 1m of internal dilution

• 2 Results are based on a 1m samples from RC rig cone splitter.

3. Samples were assayed for gold using 40g charge fire assay with AAS finish.

4. Sample intervals are down-hole and true widths are yet to be determined.

SECTION 6637800N

Hole SSMH0116 (Figure 3) discovered 1m @ 1.95 g/t Au in ferruginised quartz veins at the contact between porphyry and tuff. This extends the medium grade mineralisation intersected in SSMH0088 another 20m up-dip. The middle hole on this section SSMH0117 broadened and extended mineralised intervals into saprock with intervals of 1m @ 1.54 g/t Au, 1m @ 1.64 g/t Au and 1m @ 9.6 g/t Au on the contact between tuff and black shale. This high grade intercept is the northern, upplunge extension of the very high grade mineralisation (1m @ 15.0 g/t Au) intersected in MRC020 on 6637780N.

==> picture [449 x 444] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: ESD cross section 6637800N (looking north) showing drilling and mineralised grade shells

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 6637820N

Hole SSMH0119 (Figure 4) discovered high grade Au mineralisation (1m @ 4.04 g/t Au) associated with brecciated quartz veins in massive goethite altered tuff. The low grade Au intercept (~0.5 g/t) in SSMH0119 is associated with an interpreted low angle NW trending structure. On section 6637800N both SSMH0115 & 116 have similar low grade intercepts in the same structural position. Other holes on these and other cross sections that have intersected this structure also contain higher grades of mineralisation.

==> picture [467 x 470] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: ESD cross section 6637820N (looking north) showing drilling and mineralised grade shells

SECTION 6637840N

Drilling on this section (Figure 5) discovered a number of new medium and high grade Au intersections that are expected to extend mineralised grade shells and enhance tonnages. Shallow mineralisation in SSMH0122 from 32m will extend grade shells up dip towards the surface while deeper mineralisation of 4m @ 1.49 g/t Au and 1m @ 1.96 g/t Au extends mineralisation for 30m between SSMH0067 and 68.

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [458 x 457] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: ESD cross section 6637840N (looking north) showing drilling and mineralised grade shells

New shallow gold intersections in SSMH0123 link with new intersections in SSMH0122 and historical mineralisation in Mt Kersey hole GINB0668 to extend modelled shoots on the eastern side of the prospect. Broad intersections of high grade gold mineralisation deeper in SSMH0123 (6m@ 3.57 g/t Au, including 1m @ 15.6 g/t Au) are related to a sheared porphyry and associated quartz veins intruding into tuff. This broad intercept significantly enhances known mineralisation in the area and may justify deepening the modelled pit in this central section of the prospect.

SECTION 6637860N

Results on this section (Figure 6) show new high grade mineralised zones and enhanced shallow mineralisation in SSMH0126 with 3m @ 1.26 g/t Au, including 1m @ 2.62 g/t Au in the oxide zone. At 47m, broad high grade mineralisation of 5m @ 5.95 g/t Au including 1m @ 15.2 g/t Au and 1m @ 11.1 g/t Au is a significant new zone. The individual very high grade intercepts are associated with ferruginised quartz veins in saprolitic tuff in close proximity to an intruding porphyry.

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [453 x 457] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: ESD cross section 6637860N (looking north) showing drilling and mineralised grade shells

STRUCTURAL MODELLING OF FAULTS AT ESD

Structural modelling of the ESD prospect is ongoing. Work to date has focussed on structures observed in diamond drill core and recognised in RC drill chips and tracing them from section to section using the geological information in the drill logs. This is an iterative process that has generated many queries and necessitated relogging of drill chips from some RC drill holes.

Down hole televiewer data has been acquired and received for all the diamond drill and selected RC holes over the length of the mineralised envelope. The data is being reformatted for import into the database. The next stage will be to import this data for the relevant drill holes to compare the interpreted structures with those captured by the televiewer.

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

The East Sampson Dam gold Project is well located close to existing gold processing facilities and mining infrastructure. Moho believes that establishment of a suitable gold resource could provide important cash flow for the Company.

NEXT STEPS

• Collate outstanding Phase 2 RC drilling assay results when available along with downhole density and structural data – Q1 2021

• Complete metallurgical sighter testwork with master composite analysis - Q2 2021

• Complete review of downhole logging & diamond drill data to define structural controls on gold mineralisation - Q1 2021

• Complete new geological model of ESD area in conjunction with RockIT and CSA Global

• Review geotechnical consultant report on ESD diamond core and site visit – Q1 2021

• Aircore drilling of auger gold anomalies and geophysical targets north of ESD – H1 2021

• Resource model and JORC resource – H1 2021

COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT

The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information and supporting documentation compiled by Mr Robert Affleck, a Competent Person who is a RPGeo in the field of Mineral Exploration of The Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Affleck is Exploration Manager and a full-time employee of Moho Resources and holds shares in the Company.

Mr Affleck has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Affleck consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.

MOHO’S INTEREST IN SILVER SWAN NORTH TENEMENTS

Moho is the 100% registered owner of granted tenements M27/263, E27/528, E27/626, P27/2232, P27/2390 & E27/613 and applications for E27/623, E27/633, E27/641, P27/2441, & P27/2456 all of which comprise the Silver Swan North Project. The Company has also signed option agreements to acquire M27/488, P27/2200, P27/2216, P27/2217, P27/2218, P27/2226 and P27/2229.

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

About Moho Resources Ltd

==> picture [304 x 251] intentionally omitted <==

Moho Resources Ltd is an Australian mining company which listed on the ASX in November 2018. The Company is focused on gold and nickel exploration at Empress Springs, Silver Swan North and Burracoppin.

Moho’s Board is chaired by Mr Terry Streeter, a well-known and highly successful West Australian businessman with extensive experience in funding and overseeing exploration and mining companies, including Jubilee Mines NL, Western Areas NL and Midas Resources Ltd.

Moho has a strong and experienced Board lead by geoscientist Shane Sadleir as Managing Director, Commercial Director Ralph Winter and Adrian Larking, lawyer and geologist, as Non-Executive Director.

Highly experienced geologists Bob Affleck (Exploration Manager) and Max Nind (Principal Geologist) are supported by leading industry consultant geophysicist Kim Frankcombe (ExploreGeo Pty Ltd) and experienced consultant geochemists Richard Carver (GCXplore Pty Ltd) and Dr Carl Brauhart (CSA Global Pty Ltd).

Moho’s geophysical programs and processing and analysis of the results are supervised by Kim Frankcombe (ExploreGeo Pty Ltd) who is a geologist and geophysicist with 40 years’ experience in mineral exploration. He has worked for major mining companies, service companies and for over 20 years as an independent geophysical consultant. He was a member of the discovery team for several significant deposits including one Tier 1 deposit. He manages the ExploreGeo consulting group which provides specialist geophysical advice to explorers.

Dr Jon Hronsky (OA) provides high level strategic and technical advice to Moho. Jon has more than thirty years of experience in the global mineral exploration industry, primarily focused on project generation, technical innovation and exploration strategy development. He has worked across a diverse range of commodities and geographies, and has particular expertise in targeting nickel sulphide and gold deposits.

ENDS

The Board of Directors of Moho Resources Ltd authorised this announcement to be given to ASX.

For further information please contact:

Shane Sadleir, Managing Director Ralph Winter, Commercial Director T: +61 411 704 498 T: +61 435 336 538 E: shane@mohoresources.com.au E: ralph@mohoresources.com.au

==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1: Collar Coordinate details – Phase 1 RC Drilling July 2020, East Sampson Dam Prospect, Silver Swan North Project (M27/263)

Hole ID	Easting	Northing	RL	Depth	Dip	Azimuth- Mag
SSMH0102*	363882.489	6637661.011	371	108	-65	270
SSMH0103*	363906.618	6637663.94	371	126	-65	270
SSMH0104*	363827.364	6637676.723	370	78	-65	270
SSMH0105*	363895.478	6637680.264	370.5	126	-68	270
SSMH0106*	363817.195	6637700.792	370	72	-65	270
SSMH0107*	363812.338	6637723.375	370	60	-65	270
SSMH0108*	363845.43	6637720.069	370	48	-65	270
SSMH0109*	363890.38	6637719.976	371	73	-65	270
SSMH0110*	363885.43	6637734.148	370.9	113	-73	270
SSMH0111	363810.23	6637759.962	368.7	54	-65	270
SSMH0112	363875.068	6637760.216	371	150	-65	270
SSMH0113	363806.167	6637775.123	369	54	-65	270
SSMH0114	363902.604	6637779.886	371	144	-65	270
SSMH0115*	363800.193	6637799.835	369	68	-65	270
SSMH0116*	363818.503	6637799.799	369	78	-65	270
SSMH0117*	363861.734	6637800.021	369	114	-65	270
SSMH0118*	363883.724	6637799.922	370	126	-65	270
SSMH0119*	363818.043	6637821.151	369	66	-65	270
SSMH0120*	363888.36	6637819.541	370	128	-65	270
SSMH0121*	363805.609	6637839.961	369	72	-65	270
SSMH0122*	363835.332	6637840	369.4	90	-65	270
SSMH0123*	363853.076	6637839.836	370.2	102	-65	270
SSMH0124*	363774.834	6637860.09	369.4	54	-65	270
SSMH0125*	363790.289	6637864.938	369.4	66	-65	270
SSMH0126*	363828.532	6637860.175	369	90	-65	270
SSMH0127	363861.455	6637860.059	370	108	-65	270
SSMH0128	363885.32	6637859.857	370.9	120	-65	270
SSMH0129	363767.6	6637880.059	369	53	-65	270

SSMH0130	363798.941	6637880.116	369	66	-65	270
SSMH0131	363844.643	6637878.753	370	108	-65	270
SSMH0132	363791.44	6637900.004	369.5	68	-65	270
SSMH0133#	363816	6637900	369.8	108	-65	270
SSMH0134	363831.275	6637900	400	108	-65	270
SSMH0135	363854.262	6637899.922	369.7	148	-65	270
SSMH0136#	363750	6637920	368	48	-65	270
SSMH0137#	363770	6637920	369	60	-65	270
SSMH0138	363799.765	6637920.861	370	84	-60	270
SSMH0139#	363812	6637920	370	102	-65	270
SSMH0140	363728.489	6637940.282	368	48	-65	270
SSMH0141	363760.643	6637939.992	369	60	-65	270
SSMH0142	363779.758	6637940.266	370	72	-65	270
SSMH0143	363719.768	6637959.994	369	43	-65	270
SSMH0144	363739.615	6637959.892	369	48	-65	270
SSMH0145	363759.524	6637958.876	369	60	-65	270
SSMH0146	363791.63	6637960.1	370	78	-65	270

Notes:

1. Drill hole coordinates MGA94 Zone 51 (GDA94).

2. Collars located with Differential GPS (+/- 30cm accuracy) except for holes marked # that were located with a handheld GPS (+/- 3m accuracy).

3. * Denotes RC drillhole with available assays

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data – East Sampson Dam RC Drilling

Criteria		JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling		• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut	•The results in this ASX release relates to
techniques		channels, random chips, or specific	RC drill holes SSMH0115t o SSMH0126 at
		specialised industry standard	the East Sampson Dam Prospect, Silver
		measurement tools appropriate to the	Swan North Project.
		minerals under investigation, such as
		down hole gamma sondes, or handheld
		XRF instruments, etc.). These examples	•1 metre samples were obtained direct from
		should not be taken as limiting the	a cone splitter off the RC rig along with a
		broad meaning of sampling.	duplicate of every metre for future QAQC.
		• Include reference to measures taken to	•The cyclone and cone splitter were levelled
		ensure sample representivity and the	prior to every hole and checked at each rod
		appropriate calibration of any	change. In clayey horizons the splitter and
		measurement tools or systems used.	cyclone were cleaned every metre.
		• Aspects of the determination of
		mineralisation that are Material to the
		Public Report.
		• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work
		has been done this would be relatively
		simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling
		was used to obtain 1 m samples from
		which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a
		30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
		cases, more explanation may be
		required, such as where there is coarse
		gold that has inherent sampling
		problems. Unusual commodities or
		mineralisation types (e.g. submarine
		nodules) may warrant disclosure of
		detailed information.
Drilling		• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation,	•A 5.5-inch face-sampling RC hammer was
techniques		open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,	used throughout the program.
		auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details
		(e.g. core diameter, triple or standard
		tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
		sampling bit or other type, whether core
		is oriented and if so, by what method,
		_etc.). _
Drill		• Method of recording and assessing core	•Sample recoveries were monitored by the
sample		and chip sample recoveries and results	logging geologist and were very high for the
recovery		assessed.	program.
		• Measures taken to maximise sample	•Drillers focussed on steady advance rather
		recovery and ensure representative	than chasing metres, with pausing after
		nature of the samples.	each metre drilled.
		• Whether a relationship exists between	•No relationship between recovery and
		sample recovery and grade and	grade was observed.
		whether sample bias may have
		occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
		fine/coarse material.
Logging		• Whether core and chip samples have	•All holes were thoroughly logged by an
		been geologically and geotechnically	experienced senior geologist and project
		logged to a level of detail to support	geologist as per industry standard.
		appropriate Mineral Resource	•Logging is qualitative but chip trays are
		estimation, mining studies and	retained for oversight and check logging.
		metallurgical studies.
		• Whether logging is qualitative or
		quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
		channel, etc.) photography.
		• The total length and percentage of the
		_relevant intersections logged. _
Sub-		• If core, whether cut or sawn and	•All bulk samples were collected in plastic
sampling		whether quarter, half or all core taken.	green bags at the bottom of a cone splitter
techniques		• If non-core, whether riffled, tube	and ingeneral were dry. Two 1m samples

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
and	sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether	were collected every metre from the cone
sample	sampled wet or dry.	splitter in pre-numbered bags.
preparatio	• For all sample types, the nature, quality	•Field duplicates were collected every 50
n	and appropriateness of the sample	samples. These showed acceptable levels
	preparation technique.	of variation given the sometime nuggety
	• Quality control procedures adopted for	nature of gold in the area.
	all sub-sampling stages to maximise
	representivity of samples.
	• Measures taken to ensure that the
	sampling is representative of the in-situ
	material collected, including for instance
	results for field duplicate/second-half
	sampling.
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate
	to the grain size of the material being
	_sampled. _
Quality of	• The nature, quality and appropriateness	•Samples submitted to the assay laboratory
assay data	of the assaying and laboratory	were weighed, crushed and pulverized to
and	procedures used and whether the	+95% passing -75 micron. A 40g charge
laboratory	technique is considered partial or total.	was selected for Fire Assay and AAS finish
tests	• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,	with a detection limit of 0.01ppm Au.
	handheld XRF instruments, etc., the	•Assay reference standard material was
	parameters used in determining the	inserted every 50 samples and showed
	analysis including instrument make and	good agreement with specifications.
	model, reading times, calibrations	•Internal laboratory assay repeats showed
	factors applied and their derivation, etc.	good agreement with first results and
	• Nature of quality control procedures	internal standards were in line with
	adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,	specifications.
	duplicates, external laboratory checks)
	and whether acceptable levels of
	accuracy (i.e lack of bias) and precision
	_have been established. _
Verification	• The verification of significant	•Significant intersections were checked by
of	intersections by either independent or	alternative company personnel prior to
sampling	alternative company personnel.	announcement.
and	• The use of twinned holes.	•No holes were twinned during this drilling
assaying	• Documentation of primary data, data	phase.
	entry procedures, data verification, data	•Geological logging was on laptop using
	storage (physical and electronic)	Ocris logging software which was then
	protocols.	incorporated into Moho’s SQL database.
	• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	•No assay data are adjusted.
Location of	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to	•All collars were picked up using a DGPS
data points	locate drill holes (collar and down-hole	with an accuracy of 0.3m except for those
	surveys), trenches, mine workings and	surveyed with a GPS and noted in Table 1
	other locations used in Mineral	in the body of the report.
	Resource estimation.	•MGA94 Zone 51.
	• Specification of the grid system used.	•Topographic control was by DGPS.
	• Quality and adequacy of topographic
	control.
Data	• Data spacing for reporting of	•Drill holes were approximately 20m apart.
spacing	Exploration Results.
and	• Whether the data spacing and	•No resource estimates are quoted.
distribution	distribution is sufficient to establish the	•Individual 1m samples not composited for
	degree of geological and grade	reporting purposes.
	continuity appropriate for the Mineral
	Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
	procedure(s) and classifications
	applied.
	• Whether sample compositing has been
	_applied. _
Orientation	• Whether the orientation of sampling	•The orientation of structures controlling
of data in	achieves unbiased sampling of possible	grade distribution are not fully defined at
relation to	structures and the extent to which this is	this stage.
	known, considering the deposit type.	•At this stage, therelationship between

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
geological	• If the relationship between the drilling	drilling orientation and possible mineralising
structure	orientation and the orientation of key	structures is unclear. It is expected that
	mineralised structures is considered to	ongoing analysis of downhole geophysics in
	have introduced a sampling bias, this	conjunction with DDH logging will clarify
	should be assessed and reported if	these relationships.
	material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure sample	•Samples were delivered by company
security	security.	personnel to assay labs and bags are
		secured in the field.
Audits or	• The results of any audits or reviews of	•Inhouse and consultant audits of standards
reviews	sampling techniques and data.	and duplicate results was carried out which
		showed a good performance overall.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number, location	•Moho is the 100% registered owner of
tenement	and ownership including agreements or	granted tenements M27/263, E27/528,
and land	material issues with third parties such	P27/2232, P27/2390, E27/613 and the
tenure	as joint ventures, partnerships,	applicant for ELA27/623 and ELA27/626,
status	overriding royalties, native title interests,	E27/638, E27/633, E27/639, P27/2441 &
	historical sites, wilderness or national	P27/2456 all of which comprise the Silver
	park and environmental settings.	Swan North Project.
	• The security of the tenure held at the
	time of reporting along with any known
	impediments to obtaining a license to
	_operate inthe area. _
Exploratio	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of	Historical exploration has been completed over
n done by	exploration by other parties.	various areas covered by Moho’s tenements.
other		Companies who have worked in the area
parties		include:
		• Australian-Anglo American JV (1969–
		1976)
		• Union Miniere/WMC Resources Ltd JV
		(1974–1975)
		• Esso Australia Ltd (1979–1981)
		• Amax Resources Ltd (1982–1984)
		• CRA Exploration Pty Ltd (1985–1989)
		• Mount Kersey Mining (1990–1999)
		• Aurora Gold (1991–1994)
		• Fodina (MPI/Outokumpu) (1994–1995)
		• NiQuest (2000–2005)
		• Mithril Resources (2006–2007)
		• Lawson Gold (2010–2012)
		• MohoResources (2015 to present).
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and	•The East Sampson Dam gold mineralisation
	style of mineralisation.	is spatially related in late-stage porphyry
		(leucotonalite) dykes which intrude an east-
		dipping sequence of sediments, tuffs, black
		shale and andesite. The detailed controls
		on gold mineralisation are still unclear but
		empirically high grade intersections are
		closely associated to quartz veins.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material to	•A summary of all relevant drill hole
Informatio	the understanding of the exploration	information and intersections for the East
n	results including a tabulation of the	Sampson Dam prospect are shown in Table
	following information for all Material drill	1 and Table 2 in this announcement.
	holes:
	o easting and northing of the drill hole
	collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
	elevation above sea level in meters)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
	of the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception
	depth
	o hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is
	justified on the basis that the
	information is not Material and this
	exclusion does not detract from the
	understanding of the report, the
	Competent Person should clearly
	_explain why this is the case. _
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results,	•	No averaging or cut offs have been applied to
aggregatio	weighting averaging techniques,		the data.
n methods	maximum and/or minimum grade	•	Aggregation of intersections was undertaken
	truncations (eg: cutting of high		on the latest East Sampson Dam drill holes.
	grades) and cut-off grades are		All intervals aggregated were of variable
	usually Material and should be		length and variable grades. Intervals quoted
	stated.		contain gold values ≥0.5 g/t Au with up to 1m
	• Where aggregate intercepts		of internal dilution and quoted such as
	incorporate short lengths of high-		SSMH0126: 5m @ 5.95 g/t Au from 47m
	grade results and longer lengths of		_including_1m @ 15.2 g/t Au from 49m.
	low-grade results, the procedure	•	No metal equivalents have been reported.
	used for such aggregation should be
	stated and some typical examples of
	such aggregations should be shown
	in detail.
	• The assumptions used for any
	reporting of metal equivalent values
	_should be clearly stated. _
Relationshi	• These relationships are particularly	•	All results quoted herein are downhole lengths
p between	important in the reporting of		and the true width is not known.
mineralisat	Exploration Results.	•	The geometry of high grade mineralisation
ion widths	• If the geometry of the mineralisation		discovered in recent diamond drilling by Moho
and	with respect to the drill hole angle is		and structural measurements support a
intercept	known, its nature should be		shallow plunge to the south of around 20°.
lengths	reported.		This is supported by Leapfrog grade shell
	• If it is not known and only the down		images created by Moho’s consultant
	hole lengths are reported, there		database manager. Data from downhole
	should be a clear statement to this		televiewer structural logging will assist in
	effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true		confirming this orientation as part of resource
	width not known’).		modelling studies.
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with	•	Refer to drill hole plan and sections within this
	scales) and tabulations of intercepts		release.
	should be included for any significant
	discovery being reported These
	should include, but not be limited to
	a plan view of drill hole collar
	locations and appropriate sectional
	_views. _
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of	•	All results ≥ 0.5 g/t Au are quoted in Table 2 in
reporting	all Exploration Results is not		this release.
	practicable, representative reporting
	of both low and high grades and/or
	widths should be practiced to avoid
	misleading reporting of Exploration
	_Results. _
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful	•	No other significant unreported exploration
substantiv	and material, should be reported		data for East Sampson Dam is available at this
e	including (but not limited to):		time.
exploration	geological observations; geophysical	•	Samples were collected from every metre from
data	survey results; geochemical survey		12 holes of the current program to inform and
	results; bulk samples – size and		assist in bulk tonnage estimation during
	method of treatment; metallurgical		forthcoming resource estimation studies.
	test results; bulkdensity,

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	groundwater, geotechnical and rock
	characteristics; potential deleterious
	_or contaminating substances. _
Further	• The nature and scale of planned •	Future studies will include; metallurgical
work	further work (e.g. tests for lateral	testwork, mining studies including resource
	extensions or depth extensions or	modelling.
	large-scale step-out drilling). •	Exact sites of any future drilling are still being
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the	assessed.
	areas of possible extensions,
	including the main geological
	interpretations and future drilling
	areas, provided this information is
	_not commercially sensitive. _