AI assistant
MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED — Investor Presentation 2022
Apr 28, 2022
65359_rns_2022-04-28_06fd387d-d954-4c9d-9c3d-1078afebf91c.pdf
Investor Presentation
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [173 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
29 April 2022
----- End of picture text -----
EXPLORATION UPDATE – SILVER SWAN NORTH
HIGHLIGHTS:
-
High grade bedrock gold mineralisation within a broader zone of gold and arsenic anomalism was intersected in RC hole 21SSC009 close to Tyrell’s gold prospect:
-
3m @ 4.27 g/t Au from 106m including 1m @ 11.6 g/t Au from 106m
-
2m @ 0.42 g/t Au from 110m
-
2m @ 0.79 g/t Au from 113 including 1m @ 1.24 g/t Au from 113m
-
Diamond drilling: 21SSC005 extended from 165m with diamond drilling to test Omrah EM anomaly:
-
1[st] Conductor intersected at 377.2m downhole and identified to be a black shale unit associated with massive pyrrhotite mineralisation
-
2[nd] Conductor intersected at 480m downhole identified as large shear zone
-
Hole cased for follow-up down-hole EM survey
-
RC holes 21SSC011 – 21SSC014 drilled at Wise prospect all intersected ultramafic units and holes cased for down-hole EM surveys
-
Report submitted to DMIRS for part-payment of ~$100,000 of EIS co-funded drilling grant
NEXT STEPS:
-
Down-hole EM surveying of diamond hole and RC holes
-
Geochemical review of Black Swan South and greater Silver Swan North Project
-
Ground EM survey at Black Swan South
-
Drilling of updated geochemical and geophysical targets
“The high-grade bedrock gold intersection within a broad zone of anomalism in 21SSC009 is very encouraging and reinforces the prospectivity of the gold trend recently identified by Aircore drilling across the Tyrells and Hodges Gold prospects”
- Mr Shane Sadleir, Moho Managing Director
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
Moho Resources Ltd (ASX:MOH) ( Moho or Company ) is pleased to provide an exploration update on the Reverse Circulation and diamond drilling programs carried out at the Omrah and Wise Nickel prospects in late 2021 /early 2022 within the Silver Swan North project (Figure 1).
==> picture [506 x 578] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Moho’s Silver Swan North Project tenements, including optioned tenements with interpreted GSWA Ultramafic units
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
Table 1: Reverse Circulation drilling collar details
| HoleID | Z51_East | Z51_North | RL | Depth | Azi | Dip | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21SSC001 | 363133 | 6639066 | 402 | 198 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC002 | 363301 | 6639180 | 404 | 162 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC003 | 363060 | 6639016 | 401 | 186 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC004 | 363219 | 6639124 | 404 | 198 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC005 | 363385 | 6639237 | 400 | 165 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC006 | 363468 | 6639293 | 405 | 198 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC007 | 363552 | 6639350 | 406 | 201 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC008 | 363633 | 6639405 | 405 | 198 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC009 | 363718 | 6639463 | 405 | 192 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC010 | 363799 | 6639517 | 407 | 198 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC011 | 363325 | 6639950 | 402 | 300 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC012 | 363450 | 6640031 | 404 | 264 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC013 | 363275 | 6640155 | 393 | 300 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC014 | 363400 | 6640237 | 404 | 300 | 232 | -60 | |
Figure 3: RC Collar locations
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
RC DRILLING
A total of 14 holes were completed totalling 3,060 metres of drilling (Table 1, Figure 2).
Gold Mineralisation:
High grade bedrock gold mineralisation was intersected in RC hole 21SSC009 close to Tyrell’s gold prospect:
-
3m @ 4.27 g/t Au from 106m including 1m @ 11.6 g/t Au from 106m
-
2m @ 0.42 g/t Au from 110m
-
2m @ 0.79 g/t Au from 113 including 1m @ 1.24 g/t Au from 113m
-
Mineralisation located within broader 29m-wide anomalous envelope averaging 0.5g/t Au
RC Drillhole 21SSC009 intersected a broad envelope of gold mineralisation from 106m downhole (Table 2). The gold mineralisation is contained in a felsic volcanic unit associated with minor pyrite mineralisation and quartz veining. Interestingly it can be noted the mineralised interval shows elevated arsenic concentrations and iron oxidation of volcanic units which bear resemblance to mineralised structures intersected at Moho’s East Sampson Dam gold deposit.
T able 2 - Significant Intersections 21SSC009:
| HoleID | From | To | Interval (m) |
Grade (g/t Au) |
Significant intercept |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21SSC009 | 106 | 109 | 3 | 4.27 | 3m @ 4.27 g/t Au from 106m including1m @ 11.6g/t Au from 106m |
| 21SSC009 | 110 | 112 | 2 | 0.42 | [email protected]/t Au from 110m |
| 21SSC009 | 113 | 115 | 2 | 0.79 | 2m @ 0.79 g/t Au from 113 including1m @ 1.24g/t Au from 113m |
*Down-hole length, true width not known
Nickel Targets:
Lithogeochemistry confirmed that drillholes 21SSC001 – 008 failed to intersect any ultramafic lithologies (Figure 3) or any visible sulphide mineralisation > 1%. pXRF analysis indicated that no anomalous nickel greater than 1,000ppm Ni was intersected.
The RC drilling was unable to penetrate to a depth in which the EM conductor could be intercepted, requiring follow-up diamond drill testing.
21SSC011 – 21SSC014 were drilled into the “Wise” prospect, with all 4 drillholes intersecting ultramafic units. Preliminary XRF data shows no anomalous nickel was intersected. No visible sulphides (>1%) were evident in the logging (Figure 4).
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [481 x 194] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Cross-section (looking NW) of RC drilling at Omrah Ni prospect
==> picture [366 x 506] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5: Cross section (Looking NW) of RC drilling at Wise Ni target
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
DIAMOND DRILLING
Only 1 hole was drilled for a total of 319.4m (484.5m Total depth), extended from bottom of hole of 21SSC005 (Table 2, Figure 5). The drill hole was designed to test the conductive EM plate at the Omrah target.
Table 3: Diamond Drilling collar details:
| HoleID | Type | Z51_East | Z51_North | RL | Depth | Azi | Dip | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21SSC005 | RC | 363385 | 6639237 | 400 | 165 | 232 | -60 | |
| 21SSC005 | DD | 363385 | 6639237 | 400 | 484.5 | 232 | -60 | Diamond tail |
==> picture [519 x 442] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6: Location of 21SSC005 Diamond tail
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
The Diamond hole was designed to intersect the EM conductor at +-405m downhole. The conductor was intersected at 377.2m and identified to be a black shale unit associated with massive pyrrhotite mineralisation (Figure 6). Remodelling of the EM data indicated an additional conductor sitting at +-480m downhole and the hole was extended to intersect it. The second conductor was logged to be a shear zone, indicated by extremely broken up core, loss of water reported by the driller and oxidation of drill core.
==> picture [453 x 157] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6: Black shale with massive Pyrrhotite
No ultramafic lithologies were observed in the core of diamond drillhole 21SSC005 and no anomalous nickel has been intersected (based on pXRF data).
Although drilling has failed to intersect any nickel sulphide mineralisation it has opened up the Wise prospect for further exploration.
NEXT STEPS
-
Down-hole EM surveying od diamond hole and RC holes
-
Geochemical review of Black Swan south and greater Silver Swan North Project
-
Ground EM survey at Black Swan South
-
Drilling of updated geochemical and geophysical targets
COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results, geology and data compilation is based on information and supporting documentation compiled by Mr Richard Carver, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Carver is a consultant to the Company and holds shares in the Company.
Mr Carver has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which she is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Carver consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
MOHO’S INTEREST IN SILVER SWAN NORTH TENEMENTS
Moho is the 100% registered owner of granted tenements M27/263, E27/528, E27/626, P27/2232, P27/2390, E27/613 and E27/623 and applications for E27/633, E27/641, P27/2441, P27/2456, E24/235 and E27/687 all of which comprise the Silver Swan North Project. The Company has also signed option agreements to acquire M27/488, P27/2200, P27/2216, P27/2217, P27/2218, P27/2226 and P27/2229 (Figure 7).
==> picture [370 x 607] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 7: Silver Swan North tenements in relation to interpreted regional geology, current nickel exploration targets and Poseidon’s Black Swan Nickel Operation
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
In October 2021 Moho entered into a binding Heads of Agreement with Yandal Resources Ltd (Yandal)[1] . Under the Heads of Agreement which is subject to final sale and transfers being completed, in exchange for a 1.0% Net Smelter Royalty, Moho will acquire from Yandal the exclusive right to access, explore for, own, mine, recover, process and sell all nickel, copper, cobalt and Platinum Group Elements (PGE) extracted from the tenements and associated minerals on 15 granted mining tenements held by Yandal. The Company will also vend four mining tenements under option and a tenement application to Yandal while retaining the ownership rights to nickel, copper, PGE and NSR gold royalties.
ABOUT MOHO RESOURCES LTD
==> picture [317 x 261] intentionally omitted <==
Moho Resources Ltd is an Australian mining company which listed on the ASX in November 2018. The Company is focused on gold and nickel exploration at Empress Springs, Silver Swan North and Burracoppin. Moho’s Board is chaired by Mr Terry Streeter, a well-known and highly successful West Australian businessman with extensive experience in funding and overseeing exploration and mining companies, including Jubilee Mines NL, Western Areas NL and Midas Resources Ltd. Moho has a strong and experienced Board lead by geoscientist Shane Sadleir as Managing Director, Commercial Director Ralph Winter and Adrian Larking, lawyer and geologist, as Non-Executive Director.
Moho’s Senior Exploration Geologist Nic d’Offay is supported by leading industry
consultant geophysicist Kim Frankcombe (ExploreGeo Pty Ltd) and experienced consultant geochemists Richard Carver (GCXplore Pty Ltd). Dr Jon Hronsky (OA) provides high level strategic and technical advice to Moho.
ENDS
The Board of Directors of Moho Resources Ltd authorised this announcement to be given to ASX.
For further information please contact:
Shane Sadleir, Managing Director Ralph Winter, Commercial Director T: +61 411 704 498 T: +61 435 336 538 E: [email protected] E: [email protected]
1 Moho Resources Ltd [MOH] ASX announcement – “Moho Increases Nickel Exposure At Silver Swan North” (11/11/2021)
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Silver Swan Project
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific | • | Reverse circulation (RC) drilling was used to obtain 1m samples for |
| techniques | specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the | every metre, with selected intervals composited by spear into 3m - 5m | |
| minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or | intervals for assaying. The RC rig used a cyclone splitter to ensure the | ||
| handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as | sample generated from each individual metre was homogenized. | ||
| limiting the broad meaning of sampling. | Individual metres were also cone split into calico geochem bags. | ||
| • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the | • |
During spear sampling, field staff collected a number of passes | |
| appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. | through each 1m sample pile that made up the 4m composite sample | ||
| • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the | interval to ensure the composited assay sample was as representative | ||
| Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this | as possible. | ||
| would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain | • |
A 1-3 kg composite sample was collected for assaying. | |
| 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for | |||
| fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where | • |
Assays were undertaken on a multi-element suite by Aqua Regia | |
| there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual | digest with an ICP-AES or ICP-MS (element dependent) finish. | ||
| commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant | |||
| disclosure of detailed information. | |||
| Drilling | • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, | • Reverse Circulation using a 5.5-inch hammer. | |
| techniques | auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard | ||
| tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core | |||
| _is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). _ | |||
| Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and | • Sample recoveries were monitored by the logging geologist | |
| recovery | results assessed. | • Consistent drilling rate and vigilance by the logging geologist ensured | |
| • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative | optimum recoveries. Representative chips from each metre drilled are | ||
| nature of the samples. | collected and stored in chip trays. | ||
| • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and | • No relationship observed between recovery and grade. | ||
| whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of | |||
| fine/coarse material. | |||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically | • All | chips were geologically logged by a suitably qualified geologist. |
| logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource | • All | logging is stored in a Moho database and undergone error validation and | |
| estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. | is confirmed to be correct. | ||
| • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, | |||
| channel, etc) photography. | |||
| • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. | |||
| • Logging is qualitative but chip trays are photographed. | |||
| • 100% logged. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. | • | No core, only drill chips. |
| techniques and | • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether |
||
| sample | sampled wet or dry. | • | Samples were collected using a cone-splitter mounted to the drill rig and by |
| preparation | • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample | hand-held spear. Most samples most were dry. | |
| preparation technique. | |||
| • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise | • | The sample preparation technique was appropriate for the drilling method | |
| representivity of samples. | and to industry standard. | ||
| • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ | • | Certified reference material (CRM) standards were inserted as the 33rd, 66th | |
| material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second- | and 99thsamples in the sampling process. | ||
| half sampling. | • | Field duplicates were collected every 50 samples and Blank material | |
| • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being | inserted every 50 samples as checks of the labs, which also inserted their | ||
| sampled. | own standards and blanks. | ||
| • | Sample sizes are considered appropriate for the drilling method. | ||
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory | • | Multi element samples were analysed by Bureau Veritas Perth, with |
| assay data and | procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. |
samples dissolved in an Aqua Regia digestion (AR40). Aqua Regia is a | |
| laboratory | • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the | partial digestion using nitric and hydrochloric acid at a 1:3 ratio. This | |
| tests | parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and | digestion is effective at dissolving metal sulphides, most sulphates, | |
| model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. | carbonates, phosphates, organically bound metals, Au, Pt, Pd, tellurides, | ||
| • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, | selenides and arsenides. | ||
| duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of | • | No geophysical instruments were used to determine element | |
| accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. | concentrations. | ||
| • | Wet chemical assaying of samples. | ||
| • | CRM’s and duplicate samples were inserted at regular intervals, as well as | ||
| duplicate and replicate analyses that were conducted as part of internal | |||
| laboratory checks. | |||
| Verification of | • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or | • | Significant intersections were checked by alternative company personnel |
| sampling and | alternative company personnel. | prior to announcement. | |
| assaying | • The use of twinned holes. | • | No holes were twinned at this stage of exploration. |
| • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, | • | Data from RC drilling was collected in the field on a laptop. All drilling data | |
| data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. | was validated and incorporated into Moho’s sql database. | ||
| • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | • | No assay data was adjusted. | |
| Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down- | • | All collars were located using a hand-held GPS with an accuracy of +/-5m. |
| data points | hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral | Drill holes were lined up on their planned azimuth and dip by the logging | |
| Resource estimation. | geologist. Downhole surveys were conducted at the end of each drillhole | ||
| • Specification of the grid system used. | using a north seeking gyro (REFLEX Gyro SprintIQ). Readings were collected | ||
| • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | on an average interval of every 5m downhole. | ||
| • | MGA94 Zone 51. | ||
| • | Topographic control was by GPS with ~5–10m accuracy for AHD. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
| Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | • Drill holes were specifically spaced to test geophysical targets. | |
| and | • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the | • Not applicable as no resource estimates are quoted. | |
| distribution | degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral | ||
| Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications | |||
| applied. | |||
| • Whether sample compositing has been applied. | • Individual 1m samples and 3m – 5m composite samples as determined by | ||
| the logging geologist. | |||
| Orientation of | • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible | • No relationship is known between sampling orientation and possible |
|
| data in relation | structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit |
structures. | |
| to geological | type. | ||
| structure | • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key | • No relationship is known between drilling orientation and key mineralising |
|
| mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this | structures. |
||
| should be assessed and reported if material. | |||
| Sample | • The measures taken to ensure sample security. | • All samples were collected by company personnel and transported to | |
| security | Bureau Veritas Kalgoorlie for transport to their Perth lab. | ||
| Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | • No reviews have been conducted by external parties. Internal reviews by | |
| reviews | various Moho personnel were undertaken. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including | • | On 27 July 2015, Moho entered into a farm-in and joint venture |
| tenement and | agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, | agreement with Lawson Gold Ltd (now Odin Metals Ltd) on M27/263. | |
| land tenure status |
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
• • |
On 31 January 2019, Moho’s 51% interest in M27/263 and E27/345 was officially registered with WA’s DMIRS. On 24 August 2020, Moho completed the 100% acquisition of |
| M27/263 from Odin and renegotiated reduced royalty terms with | |||
| Mithril. | |||
| • | Moho holds 100% of P27/2456, P27/2390, E27/0528, E27/0633, | ||
| E27/0626, E27/0613, E27/0623, P27/2232, M27/0263 | |||
| • | All tenements are located on pastoral leases on Mount Vetters and | ||
| Gindalbie stations. A heritage clearance survey for drilling was | |||
| completed with the Maduwongga People. | |||
| Exploration | • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | • Historical exploration has been completed over various areas covered by | |
| done by other | Moho’s tenements. Companies who have worked in the area include: | ||
| parties | |||
| Australian-Anglo American JV (1969-1976) | |||
| Union Miniere/WMC Resources Ltd JV(1974-1975) |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Esso Australia Ltd (1979-1981) | ||
| Amax Resources Ltd (1982-1984) | ||
| CRA Exploration Pty Ltd (1985-1989) | ||
| Mt Kersey Mining (1990-1999) | ||
| Aurora Gold (1991-1994) | ||
| Heron Resources (1995-1997) | ||
| Fodina Minerals (MPI/Outokumpu) (1994-2002) | ||
| NiQuest (2000-2005) | ||
| Mithril Resources (2006-2007) | ||
| Lawson Gold (2010-2012) | ||
| Moho Resources (2015-present) | ||
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | • The Silver Swan North Project is highly prospective for nickel and gold |
| mineralisation. Gold is related to quartz-feldspar porphyry bodies which | ||
| have intruded dilational zones within shear zones. It also can be spatially | ||
| associated with fine-grained pyroclastic and clastic rocks in the Gindalbie | ||
| area. Gold mineralisation in the area is locally associated with quartz- | ||
| carbonate stockwork veins, breccia zones, sulphide-quartz-carbonate | ||
| stringers and sheeted vein arrays. The focus for Ni sulphides is komatiite- | ||
| hosted magmatic Ni deposits. Within the Silver Swan North project area, | ||
| the regional felsic Gindalbie Group contains ultramafic units that host | ||
| numerous massive and disseminated nickel sulphide deposits. | ||
| Drill hole | • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the | • See attached Collar table in this report. |
| Information | exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all | |
| Material drill holes: | ||
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar |
||
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of |
||
| the drill hole collar | ||
o dip and azimuth of the hole |
||
o down hole length and interception depth |
||
o hole length. |
||
| • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the |
• No information has been excluded. | |
| understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain | ||
| why this is the case. | ||
| Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum | • No averaging or cut offs have been applied to the data. Composite grades |
| aggregation | and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off | are reported as received from the lab. |
| methods | grades are usually Material and should be stated. | |
| • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results | • Intersection lengths and grades as reported are downhole lengths. | |
| and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such | ||
| aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| aggregations should be shown in detail. | ||
| • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should | • No metal equivalents have been reported. | |
| be clearly stated. | ||
| Relationship | • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration | • Drill hole intersections are reported as downhole lengths and the true width |
| between | Results. | is not known. |
| mineralisation | • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is | |
| widths and | known, its nature should be reported. | |
| intercept | • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should | |
| lengths | be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not | |
| _known’). _ | ||
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts | • Refer to the figures in the body of this announcement for relevant plans. |
| should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should | ||
| include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and | ||
| appropriate sectional views. | ||
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, | • The reporting is balanced and factual. |
| reporting | representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should | |
| bepracticed to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. | ||
| Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported | • Final lab assay analyses are undergoing final QAQC however it is |
| substantive | including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey | understood there is no significant mineralisation for any element analysed |
| exploration | results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of | contained in these datasets. No other significant exploration data is |
| data | treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, | available for reporting. |
| geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or | ||
| contaminating substances. | ||
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions | • Refer to the ASX release for a synopsis of the planned future exploration |
| or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). | work at the Silver Swan North project. | |
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the | ||
| main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this | ||
| information is not commercially sensitive. |