MOHO RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2025

Aug 27, 2025

Moho Resources Ltd P. +61 8 9481 0389 ABN 81 156 217 971 E. admin@mohoresources.com.au Office 3, 9 Loftus Street mohoresources.com.au West Leederville WA 6007 ASX MOH

ASX RELEASE | 28 August 2025

Moho stakes new gold project in Western Australia’s Pilbara Region.

Highlights

• Moho has secured a non-dilutive high-grade gold project in the Pilbara Region of Western Australia, the Bush Chook Gold Project.

• 109 tenements have been pegged covering 225 km[2] in the Mosquito Creek Basin which hosts 2.4 million ounces (Moz) of gold in past production and current resources[1] . There is no active Native Title Determination over 33% of the Project.

• Moho’s project surrounds the Mark Creasy-owned AIM Mining Nullagine Gold Project, which produced 543 Koz of gold @ 1.6 g/t between 2012 and 2019[2] and hosts the Blue Spec and Gold Spec Gold-Antimony Deposits (242 Kt Au @ 24.3 g/t Au and 1.6% Sb[3] ).

• AIM mining is active in the area with construction of a new mining camp, upgrading roads, and drilling. Additional infrastructure owned by AIM mining includes the 1.8 Mtpa Golden Eagle gold processing plant.

• The Project has demonstrated high-grade gold at surface:

• Two areas with gold mineralisation in historic rock chip samples >0.5 g/t up to 5.6 g/t Au .

• Over 100 anomalous areas in historic soil and stream sediment samples covering a total area of ~4.6 km[2] ( >32 ppb up to 2.6 g/t Au ).

• None of these areas have been drill tested.

• Moho will initiate an aggressive program of soil sampling, rock chip sampling, and geological mapping to generate drill targets.

Moho Resources Ltd (ASX:MOH) has secured a compelling opportunity to discover high-grade gold resources by securing the Bush Chook Gold Project in Western Australia’s Pilbara District, host to multiple gold mines and deposits including Northern Star’s 11.2 Moz Hemi Gold Project[4] .

Moho Resources Chairman, Mr Peter Christie said:

“The Bush Chook Gold Project represents a major new project for Moho Resources with no dilution of equity. We have identified high-grade gold and compelling soil anomalies in our review of historic exploration data. Our new acreage has never been drilled so our plan is to undertake an aggressive exploration program to generate drill targets.”

1 Source: DMPE MINDEX Database – Site Resource Estimates and Site Production

2 Source: https://aimmining.com.au/nullagine-gold-project/

3 Source: https://aimmining.com.au/blue-spec-project/

4 Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves estimates as released to the ASX in De Grey’s announcement “Hemi Gold Project Mineral Resource Estimate 2024” on 14 November 2024.

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

The Bush Chook Gold Project

The project neighbours AIM Mining Corp’s Nullagine Gold Project, which produced 543 Koz of gold @ 1.6 g/t between 2012 and 2019 and serves the 1.8 Mtpa Golden Eagle gold processing plant which is in good condition. Other mine infrastructure includes a 10Mw power station, communications network, and water supply. The area has a well-established network of roads and tracks to the nearby townsite of Nullagine which is 200 km north of Newman.

AIM Mining is active in the region, currently constructing a new mining camp, upgrading roads and drilling at their Blue Spec Gold-Antimony Deposit (242 Koz Au @ 24.3 g/t Au and 1.6% Sb).

==> picture [480 x 326] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Location of Moho Resource's Bush Chook Gold Project, AIM Mining’s tenements and other companies within the Mosquito Creek Basin (GSWA 500k Bedrock Geology Interpretation)

2

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Geology

The Pilbara Craton is one of Western Australia’s largest and best exposed Archean Cratons. It can broadly be subdivided into the older greenstone belts, granitic intrusions, and sedimentary basins.

The two largest sedimentary basins are the Mallina Basin, which host the 11.2 Moz Hemi gold deposits (acquired by Northern Star in May 2025 for A$5 billion[5] ) and the Mosquito Creek Basin, where Moho’s Bush Chook Gold Project is located.

There are at least two main gold mineralisation events in the Pilbara Craton, an older 3.4 Ga to 3.2 Ga event (e.g. Bamboo Creek, Warrawoona/Klondyke) and a younger 2.9 Ga to 2.8 Ga event which includes gold deposits found in the Mallina and Mosquito Creek Basins[6] .

The project contains a clastic sedimentary succession (the Mosquito Creek Formation), which includes pelites, psammites, and conglomerates which are subsequently intruded by a suite of younger felsic intrusions (the Bridget Suite).

==> picture [481 x 327] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Significant rock chip results.

5 Refer ASX release dated 2 December 2024 Northern Star Agrees to Acquire De Grey

6 Blewett & Huston 1999, Deformation and gold mineralisation of the Archaean Pilbara Craton, Western Australia

3

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [475 x 323] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Gold assays from soil and stream sediment sampling.

Historic Sampling Results

Table 1: Significant historical rock chip sampling results

Areport Number	Company Sample Id	Easting	Northing	Grid Id	Sample Type	Au ppb
93700	800003	234478.9	7588148	GDA94 z51	ROCKCHIP	501
127337	R06260	229267	7580529	GDA94 z51	ROCKCHIP	5606
127337	X10627	228179	7580103	GDA94 z51	ROCKCHIP	1717
127337	X10626	228182	7580096	GDA94 z51	ROCKCHIP	1482
127337	X10604	229911	7580595	GDA94 z51	ROCKCHIP	1481

The historical soil and stream sediment sample details can be found in the follow WAMEX reports: 67028, 72078, 74779, 74982, 77603, 78066, 79889, 80142, 81499, 81550, 81551, 81637, 81830, 81939, 81945, 81946, 81947, 81948, 81949, 81950, 81988, 81989, 81991, 81992, 81993, 81994, 81995, 81996, 81997, 81999, 82427, 82429, 82430, 82431, 82575, 82576, 82577, 82578, 82579, 82580, 82581, 82582, 82591, 82592, 82593, 82712, 82713, 82714, 82715, 82716, 82717, 82718, 82719, 82720, 82721, 82865, 82868, 82869, 84146, 84163, 88425, 88426, 88427, 88428, 98185, 101752, 103897, 105234, 106969, 112414, 114836 , 115986, 116834, 117452, 117814, 121318, 123985, 124105, 127337, 128258, and 128311.

4

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Tenement Schedule

Tenement Status	Holder	Tenement ID		Tenement Status	Holder	Tenement ID
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	E 46/1606		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2270
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	E 46/1607		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2271
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	E 46/1608		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2272
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2222		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2273
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2223		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2274
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2224		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2275
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2225		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2276
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2226		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2277
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2227		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2278
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2228		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2279
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2229		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2280
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2230		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2281
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2231		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2282
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2232		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2283
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2233		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2284
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2234		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2285
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2235		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2286
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2236		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2287
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2237		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2288
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2238		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2289
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2239		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2290
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2240		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2291
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2241		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2292
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2242		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2293
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2243		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2294
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2244		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2295
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2245		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2296
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2246		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2297
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2247		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2298
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2248		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2299
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2249		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2300
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2250		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2301
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2251		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2302
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2252		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2303
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2253		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2304
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2254		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2305
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2255		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2306
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2256		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2307
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2257		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2308
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2258		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2309
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2259		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2310
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2260		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2311
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2261		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2312
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2262		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2313
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2263		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2314
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2264		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2315
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2265		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2316
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2266		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2317
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2267		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2318
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2268		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2319
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2269		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2320
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2270		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2321
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2271		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2322
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2272		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2323
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2273		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2324
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2274		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2325
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2275		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2326
Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2276		Pending	Moho Resources Ltd	P 46/2327

5

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

This ASX announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Moho Resources Limited.

For further information, please contact:

Mr Peter Christie Gareth Quinn Chairman Investor Relations Moho Resources Limited gareth@republicir.com.au admin@mohoresources.com.au 0417 711 108

COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENTS

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results and Exploration Targets is based on information compiled by Mr. Graeme Hardwick. Mr. Hardwick is a Member of Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and Moho Resource’s Geologist and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr. Hardwick consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears

Forward-Looking Statements

This document may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning Moho Resources Limited’s planned exploration program and other statements that are not historical facts. When used in this document, words such as "could," "plan," "expect," "intend," "may”, "potential," "should," and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although Moho believes that its expectations reflected in these forward- looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that further exploration activities will result in the actual values, results or events expressed or implied in this document.

About Moho Resources

Moho Resources Ltd is an Australian exploration company exploring for gold and other minerals across Australia. Moho’s Board is chaired by Mr Peter Christie, a qualified accountant and tax agent and highly successful businessman. He has served on the boards of several public companies in the resource sector since 2006 and is the current club president of WAFL club, the South Fremantle Bulldogs. Moho has a strong and experienced Board with Mr Michael Pereira and Mr Bryce Gould, corporate advisors, both as Non-Executive Directors.

6

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1: Bush Chook Project

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut	•The surface samples presented are
technique s	channels, random chips, or specific specialized industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as	compiled from several WAMEX Areports (The original Areports should be consulted for detailed sampling techniques). This historic sampling is considered appropriate to generate
	limiting the broad meaning of sampling.	avenues for follow up work on the
	• Include reference to measures taken to	Project. Rock chip samples are to be
	ensure sample representivity and the	considered grab samples of outcrop,
	appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public	subcrop or float material. Soil and stream sediment samples are collected from unconsolidated soil
	Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’	material. The samples have been
	work has been done this would be relatively	analysed in Western Australia by
	simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was	reputable laboratories using a variety
	used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg	of industry standard gold assay
	was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for	methods.
	fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or	•Rock chip sample have had brief geological descriptions to provide geological context. Soil and stream
	mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules)	sediment samples have been sieved
	may warrant disclosure of detailed	to a variety of size fractions to reduce
	information.	the effect of nuggety gold.
		•The sampling has not yet been
		validated in the field by Moho
		Resources.
Drilling	• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-	•Not applicable.
technique	hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
s	Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core
	diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of
	diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
	type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
	_what method, etc). _
Drill	• Method of recording and assessing core and	•Not applicable
sample recovery	chip sample recoveries and results assessed.	•Not applicable.
	• Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature	•Not applicable.
	of the samples.
	• Whether a relationship exists between
	sample recovery and grade and whether
	sample bias may have occurred due to
	preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have been	•Not applicable
	geologically andgeotechnically logged to a

7

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
	Resource estimation, mining studies and
	metallurgical studies.
	• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative
	in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
	photography.
	• The total length and percentage of the
	relevant intersections logged.
Sub-	• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether	•Not applicable.
sampling technique s and sample preparatio n	quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and	•Soil and stream sediment samples were sieved in the field to a variety of particulate sizes to reduce the effect of nuggety gold and is considered
	appropriateness of the sample preparation	appropriate for gold exploration.
	technique.	•Soil sampling is an industry standard
	• Quality control procedures adopted for all	technique utilised in first pass
	sub-sampling stages to maximise	geochemical sampling over suitable
	representivity of samples.	regolith landform regions.
	• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling	•A variety of QAQC measure have been
	is representative of the in situ material	implemented by the historic exploration
	collected, including for instance results for	groups and these methods are
	field duplicate/second-half sampling.	considered to be industry standard.
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the	Further details are described in the
	grain size of the material being sampled.	relevant Areports.
Quality of	• The nature, quality and appropriateness of	•All samples were processed and
assay data and laboratory tests	the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers,	analysed in a variety of Western Australian Laboratories following protocols where are considered industry standard. Further details are described
	handheld XRF instruments, etc, the	in the relevant Areports.
	parameters used in determining the analysis
	including instrument make and model,
	reading times, calibrations factors applied
	and their derivation, etc.
	• Nature of quality control procedures adopted
	(eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external
	laboratory checks) and whether acceptable
	levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and
	precision have been established.
Verificatio	• The verification of significant intersections	•Not applicable.
n of sampling and assaying	by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry	•Not applicable. •The data from the Areports was carefully compiled by Moho Resource’s geologist.
	procedures, data verification, data storage	•In some instances, gold assay units
	(physical and electronic) protocols.	were converted from PPM to PPB using
	• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	the multiplication factor of 1000.
Location	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to	•Sample locations are taken from the
of data points	locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other	Areports, these locations were validated against tenement boundaries to ensure
	locations used in Mineral Resource	the general location is correct.
	estimation.	•MGA94 Zone 51
	• Specification of the grid system used.	•Not applicable
	• Quality and adequacy of topographic

8

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	control.
Data	• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration	•The soil sampling has taken are a
spacing and distributio n	Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate	variety of spacing include 80mx20m, 760mx20m, 360mx80m, and 40mx200m •This sample spacing is sufficient for
	for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve	first-pass soil sampling for gold
	estimation procedure(s) and classifications	exploration.
	applied.	•Not applicable.
	• Whether sample compositing has been	•Some soil samples were composited
	applied.	over a 40m area to combine into one
		sample.
Orientatio n of data in relation to geological structure	• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling	•Sampling was general planned perpendicular to the structural and bedding trends of the Mosquito Creek Formation
	orientation and the orientation of key
	mineralised structures is considered to have	•Not applicable.
	introduced a sampling bias, this should be
	assessed and reported if material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure sample	•Some details are described in the
security	security.	relevant Areports.
Audits or	• The results of any audits or reviews of	•Available data has been reviewed by
reviews	sampling techniques and data.	company geologist.

9

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number, location	•The Bush Chook Project encompassed
tenemen t and land tenure status	and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical	part of the Bonney Downs Pastoral Lease, The Palyku and Palyku #2 and Nyamal Palyku Native Title groups, and some miscellaneous licences owned by
	sites, wilderness or national park and	AIM Mining. It is expected that
	environmental settings.	agreements will be reached with these
	• The security of the tenure held at the	parties to enable the tenements to be
	time of reporting along with any known	granted and exploration work to occur.
	impediments to obtaining a licence to	•The licences are all pending applications,
	operate in the area.	land access and heritage agreements
		have not yet been finalised.
Explorati	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of	•The project has predominantly been
on done by other parties	exploration by other parties.	explored for gold mineralisation using a variety of surface techniques which have outlined several anomalous and
		mineralised zones within the project.
		Adequate drill testing of these areas has
		not taken place.
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style	•Sediment-hosted orogenic gold and gold-
	of mineralisation.	antimony deposits are the principal
		target. These are hosted within the
		Mesoarchean Mosquito Creek basin of
		the Pilbara Craton. Examples of
		mineralisation in the region include the
		Blue Spec, Gold Spec, and Golden Eagle
		deposits.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material to	•Not applicable
Informati	the understanding of the exploration
on	results including a tabulation of the
	following information for all Material drill
	holes:
	o easting and northing of the drill hole
	collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
	elevation above sea level in metres)
	of the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception
	depth
	o hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is
	justified on the basis that the information
	is not Material and this exclusion does
	not detract from the understanding of the
	report, the Competent Person should
	clearly explain why this is the case.
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results,	•No averaging or cut offs have been
aggregat ion methods	weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades)	applied to the data.
	and cut-off grades are usually Material	•Not applicable.
	and should be stated.

10

==> picture [113 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
	short lengths of high grade results and
	longer lengths of low grade results, the	•No metal equivalents have been
	procedure used for such aggregation	reported.
	should be stated and some typical
	examples of such aggregations should
	be shown in detail.
	• The assumptions used for any reporting
	of metal equivalent values should be
	clearly stated.
Relation	• These relationships are particularly	•Not applicable.
ship between minerali sation widths	important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known,	•Not applicable. •Not applicable.
and	its nature should be reported.
intercept	• If it is not known and only the down hole
lengths	lengths are reported, there should be a
	clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down
	_hole length, true width not known’). _
Diagram	• Appropriate maps and sections (with	•Plan-view maps are presented showing
s	scales) and tabulations of intercepts	the location of the project, the sample
	should be included for any significant	locations and the gold results.
	discovery being reported These should
	include, but not be limited to a plan view
	of drill hole collar locations and
	appropriate sectional views.
Balance	• Where comprehensive reporting of all	•Not applicable
d reportin g	Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be
	practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
	Exploration Results.
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and	•GSWA geological maps, magnetic and
substant ive explorati on data	material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk	gravity data have been used to assist the interpretation of the target areas.
	samples – size and method of treatment;
	metallurgical test results; bulk density,
	groundwater, geotechnical and rock
	characteristics; potential deleterious or
	contaminating substances.
Further	• The nature and scale of planned further	•Follow up field mapping is planned,
work	work (eg tests for lateral extensions or	which will include repeating historic soil
	depth extensions or large-scale step-out	sampling, rock chip sampling, and
	drilling).	geological mapping.
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of	•Not applicable
	possible extensions, including the main
	geological interpretations and future
	drilling areas, provided this information is
	not commercially sensitive.

11