AI assistant
METALSGROVE MINING LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2025
Dec 10, 2025
65325_rns_2025-12-10_fa715931-8ac9-471a-9efe-112f71b0d06b.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [294 x 42] intentionally omitted <==
MetalsGrove Expands its Footprint in Côte d’Ivoire to 75 km Strike-length
11 December 2025
HIGHLIGHTS
-
MetalsGrove has expanded its gold exploration assets in Côte d’Ivoire , West Africa, by securing the high-potential Stellar Joint Venture (JV)
-
This acquisition complements the earlier acquisition of three gold JV permits earlier this year
-
The Zuénoula permit (PR-750) , owned by TSX-V-listed Stellar AfricaGold Inc., is strategically located between MetalsGrove’s Kounahiri West and Vavoua permits, and gives MetalsGrove contiguous exploration control over 75-strike-km of this highly prospective greenstone belt
-
The Zuénoula permit (395.78 km²) also expands MetalsGrove’s total controlled exploration footprint to 1,315 km²
-
The geological characteristics and structural complexity of MetalsGrove’s JV project areas are interpreted to be highly favourable for the discovery of large gold deposits
-
Extensive artisanal mining activity within the district also highlights untapped gold deposit discovery potential
-
Granted on April 17, 2024, the Zuénoula permit allows immediate commencement of exploration activities by MetalsGrove
-
MetalsGrove is well positioned to initiate surface sampling activities this month , with the objective of defining gold corridors to be followed by drill testing.
MANAGEMENT COMMENTARY
Managing Director and CEO, Mr Lijun Yang, commented:
“The acquisition of the Zuénoula permit through forming a joint venture with Stellar AfricaGold marks a significant milestone in the expansion of our West African gold exploration portfolio. This strategic addition builds on our recent consolidation of three gold permits in central-west Côte d’Ivoire, increasing our total landholding to 1,315 km² in one of the most prospective yet underexplored gold provinces in the region.
The location of the Zuénoula permit, adjacent to our existing Kounahiri West and Vavoua permits, creates a contiguous exploration corridor with shared geological characteristics, including favourable lithological sequences, complex structural features, and active artisanal workings, all of which are strong indicators of gold mineralisation potential.
Through this acquisition, we are rapidly moving forward and will commence surface sampling programs this month, with the objective of identifying gold trends (gold corridors) and significant gold anomalies along these trends. Drill testing of these gold exploration targets will follow soon after. Our approach remains methodical and data-driven, leveraging regional knowledge and partnerships to unlock value efficiently and sustainably.”
Page 1 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
MetalsGrove Mining Limited ( ASX: MGA ) (“ MetalsGrove ” or the “ Company ”) is pleased to announce that, following the acquisition of three Central West Gold joint venture (JV) permits in Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa, earlier this year, the Company has entered into another JV with Aucrest Sarl, an Ivorian subsidiary of TSX-V listed Stellar AfricaGold Inc. (TSX-V-SPX) (“ Stellar JV” ) covering its PR750-Zuénoula permit (Zuénoula), which is located between the existing MetalsGrove controlled Kounahiri West and Vavoua Permits in the same Birimian greenstone belt.
The addition of the Zuénoula permit to the Company’s existing three joint ventured gold permits, now covering a combined area of 1,315 km² , are strategically situated along the Abujar–Napié gold trend within the Oumé–Fetekro Birimian greenstone belt in central Côte d’Ivoire, 100km north of the Abujar Gold Mine and 160 km south of the Napié Gold Deposit (Figure 1). Further details of the permits are provided in Table 1.
==> picture [505 x 489] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1. Map illustrating location of Stellar JV permit together with Central West Gold JV permits in Côte d’Ivoire
Page 2 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [503 x 471] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2. Map of the Kounahiri Area JV Projects and Historical Exploration Results[1]
Table 1. MetalsGrove Gold JV Permits
| Name | Permit ID | Type | Status | MGA Ownership | Area **(Km2) ** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zuénoula | PR-750 | Exploration | Granted | Earning up to 80% | 395.78 |
| Vavoua | PR-454 | Exploration | Application | Earning up to 80% | 378.25 |
| Kounahiri West | PR-1063 | Exploration | Application | 90% on granting | 338.48 |
| Vavoua West | 0544DMICM31/03/2022 | Exploration | Application | 90% on granting | 203.33 |
| Total Area | 1,315.84 |
1 Historical BLEG results sourced from African Gold Limited Annual Report 2023; Historical Auger drilling result sourced from Ricca Resources Limited Financial Report for half year ending 31 December 2021
Page 3 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
Zuénoula Permit (PR750) and Exploration Plans
The Zuénoula permit was granted on 17 April 2024 and covers a highly prospective area of structurally disrupted greenstone intruded by granite. The Central West Gold JV tenements (3) and the Stellar JV tenement (1) together provide MetalsGrove a commanding exploration position along this gold mineralised belt of volcanic and metasediment greenstone, with the Abujar Gold Mine (3.3 Moz.) to the south。 In addition, there are historical auger and BLEG gold soil geochemistry anomalies in areas immediately adjacent to, and along-strike of the MetalsGrove project area (Figure2). MetalsGrove is not aware of any historical systematic exploration having been conducted within the Zuénoula permit area.
Initial Soil Sampling Program (Program 1)
An initial soil sampling program on the Zuénoula permit, excluding agricultural areas and settlements, shall commence in this month (Figure 3). Approximately 300 soil samples shall be collected on a 1km by 1km offset grid pattern, with the samples assayed on-site using the new and innovative PortablePPB technique developed in Australia. The sampling and assaying shall be conducted by the highly professional and experienced SEMS Exploration Services (SEMS) team which have been operating in West Africa for over 20 years. The assay results will be available within 48 hours of sample collection, enabling infill soil sampling to be conducted before the sampling crew has been demobilised. It is anticipated that the first results shall be reported in February 2026.
will be conducted on 400m by 100m and then 200m by 50m spacing to fine-tune the gold targets. The follow up sampling will be analyses with conventional fire assay and should provide robust targets for drill hole planning.
==> picture [502 x 392] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3. Map illustrating planned initial soil sampling program on Zuénoula permit
Page 4 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
Joint Venture Summary
• Payment:
-
MetalsGrove to pay US$50,000 upon signing to secure exclusivity and initiate the partnership.
-
MetalsGrove to pay US$1,000,000 in cash upon reaching 1,000,000 ounces of gold resources with at least 500,000 ounces in the Indicated category.
Management & Governance :
-
Management Committee : comprising two representatives from Stellar and two representatives from MetalsGrove to oversee the JV. While MetalsGrove is sole funding the JV or has a contributing JV interest of more than 50% it can nominate the Chaiman, who has a casting vote. When the parties each hold a 50% JV interest and are contributing to expenditure, the Chairmanship role rotates on an annual basis.
-
Operatorship : MetalsGrove has operatorship of the Zuénoula project while it is sole-funding exploration.
Earn-in Structure and Joint Venture Equity :
-
MetalsGrove is required to spend a minimum of US$150,000 by 16 April 2026 before it can withdraw from the JV.
-
If MetalsGrove elects to withdraw before earning a 50% stake, it retains no interest in the JV.
-
MetalsGrove is required to invest US$1,000,000 by 16 July 2027 to maintain its interest in the JV.
-
MetalsGrove can then invest an additional US$2,000,000 by 16 April 2029 to acquire a 50% interest in the JV, at which stage Aucrest can elect:
-
to allow MetalsGrove to continue funding up to an additional US$3,000,000 to take its JV interest to 80% ; or
-
to co-fund the JV.
-
If Aucrest elects to allow MetalsGrove to continue sole funding, MetalsGrove may elect at any time to cease sole funding, and it will have a 50% joint venture interest.
-
When both parties are contributing to expenditure, if a party ceases funding, its JV interest will dilute pursuant to an industry standard formula.
-
If either party’s JV interest falls below 10% it converts to a 1% Net Smelter Royalty.
Pre-existing Arrangements :
•
- There is a 1% Net Smelter Royalty to Elemental Altus which will remain a JV obligation .
Page 5 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
This announcement was authorised for release by the MetalsGrove Mining Ltd Board of Directors.
SHAREHOLDER ENQUIRIES MEDIA ENQUIRIES Mr Lijun Yang Sam Burns Managing Director & CEO SIXº Investor Relations MetalsGrove Mining Ltd +61 400 164 067 [email protected] [email protected]
COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT – EXPLORATION STRATEGY
The information in this announcement relating to exploration strategy and results is based on information provided to and compiled by Mr Robert Perring, who is a current member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and Exploration Manager of MetalsGrove Mining Limited.
Mr Perring has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and exploration processes as reported herein, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’.
Mr Perring consents to the inclusion of the information contained herein in the form and context in which it appears in this announcement.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This announcement may contain certain “forward-looking statements” which may not have been based solely on historical facts but rather may be based on the Company’s current expectations about future events and results. Where the Company expresses or implies an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis.
However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks include, but are not limited to, exploration risk, mineral resource risk, metal price volatility, currency fluctuations, increased production costs and variances in ore grade or recovery rates from those assumed in mining plans, as well as political and operational risks in the countries and states in which we sell our product to, and government regulation and judicial outcomes.
For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other factors, see the Company’s website about the Company’s other filings. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to any “forward-looking statement” to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this announcement, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.
Page 6 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Section 1- Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)
| Criteria |
JORC Code Explanation |
Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling Techniques |
• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or ifi ilid idt tdd |
• No drilling has been undertaken. Sil Sli (PtblPPB)Iitil bd |
| specc specaze nusry sanar measurement tools appropriate to the |
o ampng orae:na roa- spaced (1km by 1km) soil sampling |
|
| minerals under investigation, such as | supported by rapid field analysis of samples | |
| down hole gamma sondes, or | using the PortablePPB analytical technique is | |
| handheld XRF instruments, etc.) These | planned so that gold anomalous trends can | |
| examples should not be taken as | be identified, and infill sampling conducted | |
| limiting the broad meaning of | before the field crew is demobilized. | |
| sampling. | • MGA has provided SEMS Exploration | |
| • Include reference to measures taken | Services with an Excel table listing the | |
| to ensure sample representivity and | designated sample point locations using | |
| the appropriate calibration of any | WGS-84 UTM zone 29N coordinates | |
| measurement tools or systems used. | • Each soil sample to be collected from | |
| • Aspects of the determination of | within 100 metres of the designated | |
| mineralisation that are Material to the | sample point, with the actual sample | |
| Public Report. | point then recorded | |
• At each sample point: 1) brush away all |
||
| In cases where ‘industry standard’ work | organic material from the surface, 2) dig a | |
has been done, this would be |
15cm deep hole and collect the sample |
|
relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse |
by taking a channel-cut along the entire |
|
| circulation drilling was used to obtain | length of the hole, 3) collect 600g of the | |
| 1 m samples from which 3 kg was | minus 2mm fraction of soil from each | |
| pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for |
sample point, 4) use the hand-held XRF to |
|
| fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as |
determine and record arsenic, copper, nickel, tungsten, iron and manganese |
|
| where there is coarse gold that has | concentrations 5) gold to be determined | |
| inherent sampling problems. Unusual | at the SEMS field compound using the | |
| commodities or mineralisation types | PortablePPB technique | |
| (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant | • Duplicate sample is to be collected every | |
| disclosure of detailed information. | 20th sample and given the next sample | |
| number | ||
| • No Standards will be used to avoid low- | ||
| level gold contamination. Gold | ||
| anomalous sample sites (+50ppb Au) | ||
| shall be resampled and assayed using the | ||
| fire assay technique | ||
| • Samples are to be stored and processed | ||
at a secure SEMS field compound |
||
• Assay results to be reported to |
||
| MetalsGrove within 48 hours so that infill | ||
| samplingcan beplanned and scheduled. | ||
| Drilling | • Drill type (e.g. core, reverse | • No drilling has been undertaken. |
| Techniques | circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary |
|
| air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) | ||
| and details (e.g. core diameter, triple | ||
or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, |
||
| face-sampling bit or other type, whether core | ||
| is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). | ||
Page 7 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| Drill Sample | • Method of recording and assessing | • No drilling has been undertaken. |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery | core and chip sample recoveries and | |
| results assessed. | ||
| • Measures taken to maximise sample | ||
| recovery and ensure representative | ||
| nature of the samples. | ||
| • Whether a relationship exists between | ||
sample recovery and grade, and |
||
| whether sample bias may have |
||
| occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples |
• No drilling has been undertaken. |
| have been geologically and | ||
| geotechnically logged to a level of | ||
detail to support appropriate Mineral |
||
Resource estimation, mining studies |
||
| and metallurgical studies. | ||
| • Whether logging is qualitative or |
||
| quantitative in nature. Core (or | ||
| costean, channel, etc.) photography. | ||
| • The total length and percentage of |
||
| the relevant intersections logged. | ||
| Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and |
• No drilling has been undertaken. |
| Techniques | whether quarter, half or all core | |
| and Sample | taken. | |
Preparation |
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube |
|
| sampled, rotary split, etc. and | ||
| whether sampled wet or dry. | ||
| • For all sample types, the nature, |
||
| quality and appropriateness of the | ||
| sample preparation technique. | ||
| • Quality control procedures adopted |
||
| for all sub-sampling stages to |
||
| maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the |
||
| sampling is representative of the in- | ||
| situ material collected, including, for | ||
| instance, results for field | ||
duplicate/second-half sampling. |
||
| • Whether sample sizes are appropriate |
||
| to the grain size of the material being | ||
| sampled. |
Page 8 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and |
• Samples are to be analysed using the |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Data and | appropriateness of the assaying and |
patented detectORE™ process developed |
| Laboratory | laboratory procedures used and | by Portable PPB Pty Ltd in Australia. |
| Tests | whether the technique is considered | • The process involves a partial extraction |
| partial or total. | using the safe, non-dangerous GLIX-20® | |
| • For geophysical tools, |
reagent that is akin to traditional BLEG | |
| spectrometers, handheld XRF | (which uses a cyanide leach). | |
| instruments, etc., the parameters | • The 400g samples are added to the |
|
| used in determining the analysis, |
reagent and tumbled for 12 hours, into ™ |
|
| including instrument make and model, reading times, calibration |
which the detectORE collector device had been inserted. |
|
| factors applied, and | • After the bottle roll process has |
|
| their derivation, etc. | completed, the collector device is |
|
| • Nature of quality control procedures |
removed, washed, and dried prior to |
|
| adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, | reading on a Vanta M (VMR) pXRF loaded | |
| duplicates, external laboratory | with Evident/Olympus’s detectORE™ | |
| checks) and whether acceptable | mode. | |
| levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) | • The entire process is managed using |
|
| and precision have been established. | Portable PPB’s Portable Lab Information |
|
Management System (pLIMSTM), which |
||
| records all aspects of the sample | ||
| throughput, including QAQC and control | ||
| of the pXRF via the Application | ||
| Programming Interface to | ||
| Olympus/Evident’s co-developed |
||
| detectORE™ mode. |
||
| • Certified Collector Devices (CCDs) |
||
| supplied by PortablePPB with known | ||
| quantities of gold ranging from 0 -1000 | ||
ppb are used to check that the pXRF was |
||
| functioning correctly and that the | ||
| instrument settings were as intended. | ||
| One CCD serves as a blank. | ||
• The pLIMS software confirmed the |
||
| instrument settings are correct and the | ||
| VMR is operating as expected, controlled | ||
by the pLIMS API and Evident’s |
||
| detectORE™ firmware. | ||
| Verification of | • The verification of significant | • The detectORE™ process is checked in |
| Sampling and | intersections by either independent | accordance with PortablePPB’s |
| Assaying | or alternative company personnel. | recommended processes and |
| • The use of twinned holes. | procedures. These include the insertion | |
| • Documentation of primary data, data | of 250g reference materials (RMs). | |
| entry procedures, data verification, | • The RMs comprise mixtures of |
|
| data storage (physical and electronic) | commercial Certified Reference | |
| protocols. |
Materials (CRMs) and barren regolith til Th RM f k bt |
|
| • Discuss any adjustments to assay data. |
maera. e s are o nown, u uncertified gold concentration and are |
|
| used to check that the leach and collect | ||
| process has worked as intended during | ||
| the 12-hour bottle roll. | ||
| • RMs were inserted at a rate of 1 every 44 |
||
| samples throughout the sample | ||
| batches. The RMs were checked against | ||
| Portable PPB’s cloud-based database | ||
| and passed within the accepted | ||
| tolerance ranges for the technique, |
||
| currently 20% (3 sigma). • The pXRF instrument settings are |
||
| checked usinga range of Certified |
Page 9 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| Collector Devices, which are used to | ||
|---|---|---|
| confirm the pXRF is operating as | ||
| expected. The pXRF spectral files are | ||
| reviewed by Portable PPB’s cloud and | ||
| SME procedures. | ||
| Location of Data Points |
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drillholes (collar and down- |
• A handheld GPS is used to locate the soil data positions, with a +/-5m vertical and |
| hole surveys), trenches, mine | horizontal accuracy | |
| workings and other locations used in | • Sample locations and sample |
|
| Mineral Resource estimation. | descriptions are digitally recorded in the |
|
| • Specification of the grid system used. | field using grid system: UTM WGS84 zone | |
| • Quality and adequacy of topographic | 29N | |
| control. | • GPS measurements of sample positions |
|
| are sufficiently accurate for first pass. | ||
| Data Spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of | • The 1km by 1km offset soil sample |
| and | Exploration Results. | pattern over the permit area is considered |
| Distribution | • Whether the data spacing and |
to be an effective technique for identifying |
| distribution is sufficient to establish | and delimiting gold anomalous areas, | |
| the degree of geological and grade | which will then be followed up with higher | |
continuity appropriate for the Mineral |
density sampling. | |
| Resource and Ore Reserve estimation | ||
| procedure(s) and classifications | ||
| applied. |
||
| • Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
||
| Orientation | • Whether the orientation of sampling | • The sample location configuration has |
| of data in | achieves unbiased sampling of | been deliberately planned to avoid |
| relation to | possible structures and the extent to | directional bias. |
| geological al | which this is known, considering the | |
| structure | deposit type. |
|
| • If the relationship between the drilling | ||
| orientation and the orientation of key | ||
| mineralised structures is considered to | ||
| have introduced a sampling bias, this | ||
| should be assessed and reported if | ||
| material. | ||
| Sample security |
• The measures taken to ensure sample security. |
• Samples are collected in calico bags, assigned individual sample numbers and |
| transported to the secure SEMS site | ||
| facility for gold determination by | ||
| PortablePPB. | ||
| Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of | • The sampling and assay technique |
| Reviews | sampling techniques and data. | adopted by MetalsGrove has been |
| effectively used in the Vavoua-Kounahiri | ||
district, and more widely in Cote d’Ivoire, |
||
| to define drill targets and is considered an | ||
| effective, initial approach for defining gold | ||
anomalous structural trends. |
||
Page 10 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
Section 2 - Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, location |
• Following the acquisition of the three |
| Tenement and | and ownership, including agreements or | Central West Gold joint venture (JV) |
| Land Tenure | material issues with third parties such as | permits in Côte d’Ivoire, MetalsGrove |
| Status | joint ventures, partnerships, overriding | entered into another JV with TSX-V |
| royalties, native title interests, historical | listing company Stellar AfricaGold Inc. | |
| sites, wilderness or national park and | (Stellar) for its PR-0750 Zuénoula | |
| environmental settings. | permit. PR-0750 was granted on 17 April | |
| • The security of the tenure held at the time |
2024 for an initial four years period, | |
| of reporting, along with any known | renewable for two additional 3 years | |
| impediments to obtaining a licence to | period. | |
| operate in the area. | • The Zuenoula permit is located between |
|
| existing MetalsGrove controlled |
||
| Kounahiri West and Vavoua permits | ||
| along the same Birimian greenstone | ||
| belt. The two groups of joint venture | ||
| permits (4) occupy a combined area of |
||
| 1,315 km², strategically situated along | ||
| the Abujar–Napie gold trend within the | ||
| Oumé–Fetekro Birimian greenstone belt | ||
| in central Côte d’Ivoire, approximately | ||
| 100 km north of the Abujar gold mine | ||
| and 160 km south of the Napie gold | ||
| project. | ||
| Exploration | • Acknowledgement and appraisal of |
• MetalsGrove is not aware of any |
| Done by Other | exploration by other parties. | previous systematic exploration for gold |
Parties. |
being conducted with the Zuénoula |
|
| permit PR-0750. | ||
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style |
• The Zuénoula permit (Stellar JV), |
| of mineralisation. | together with the Vavoua, Vavoua West, | |
| and Kounahiri West permits acquired | ||
| through the Central West Gold JV, are | ||
| located in the central west of Côte | ||
| d'Ivoire at the south edge of the West | ||
| Africa craton. This region is the world’s | ||
largest Proterozoic gold-producing |
||
| region, and Cote d’Ivoire contains 35% | ||
| of the region’s Birimian Group rocks, | ||
| which host a number of multi-million- | ||
| ounce gold deposits. | ||
| • The Central West Gold JV permits and |
||
| Stellar JV permit, together cover a | ||
| combined area of 1,315 km², and are | ||
| strategically situated along the Abujar– | ||
| Napie gold trend within the Oumé– |
||
| Fetekro Birimian greenstone belt, and | ||
| are located approximately 100 km north | ||
| of the Abujar gold mine and 160 km |
Page 11 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| south of the Napie gold project. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| • | A summary of all information material | • | No drilling results are included in this |
| to the understanding of the exploration | release. | ||
| results, including a tabulation of the | |||
| following information for all Material | |||
| drill holes: | |||
| • | easting and northing of the drillhole collar | ||
| elevation or RL (Reduced Level – | |||
| elevation above sea level in metres) of | |||
| the drillhole collar dip and azimuth of the | |||
| hole | |||
| • | down hole length and interception depth | ||
| hole length. |
==> picture [81 x 140] intentionally omitted <==
| south of the Napie gold project. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Drillhole | • A summary of all information material |
• No drilling results are included in this |
| Information | to the understanding of the exploration |
release. |
| results, including a tabulation of the | ||
| following information for all Material | ||
| drill holes: | ||
| • easting and northing of the drillhole collar |
||
| elevation or RL (Reduced Level – | ||
| elevation above sea level in metres) of | ||
| the drillhole collar dip and azimuth of the | ||
| hole | ||
| • down hole length and interception depth |
||
| hole length. | ||
| Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, |
• No data aggregation methods were |
| Aggregation | weighting averaging techniques, | applied to the soil sampling data. |
| Methods | maximum and/or minimum grade | |
| truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) | ||
| and cut-off grades are usually Material | ||
| and should be stated. | ||
| • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate |
||
short lengths of high-grade results and |
||
| longer lengths of low-grade results, the | ||
| procedure used for such aggregation | ||
| should be stated, and some typical | ||
| examples of such aggregations should be | ||
| shown in detail. | ||
| • The assumption used for any reporting |
||
| of metal equivalent values should be | ||
| clearly stated. | ||
| Relationship |
• If the geometry of mineralisation with |
• Not applicable. |
| Between | respect to the drillhole angle is known, its | |
| Mineralisation |
nature should be reported. | |
| Widths and Intercept |
||
| Lengths | ||
Page 12 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with |
• See maps in the body of the report. |
|---|---|---|
| scales) and tabulations of intercepts | ||
| should be included for any significant | ||
| discovery being reported. These should | ||
| include, but not be limited to, a plan view | ||
| of drillhole collar locations and | ||
| appropriate sectional views. | ||
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all |
• Only the exploration strategy and |
| Reporting | Exploration Results is not practicable, |
planned fieldwork are reported in this |
| representative reporting of both low and | announcement. No assay data | |
| high grades and/or widths should be | collected by MetalsGrove or the | |
| practiced, avoiding misleading reporting | interpretation of that data are included | |
| of Exploration Results. | in this announcement. | |
| Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful and | • Any meaningful data and relevant |
| Substantive | material, should be reported, including |
information have been included in the |
| Exploration | (but not limited to): geological | body of this release. |
| Data | observations; geophysical survey results; | |
| geochemical survey results; bulk | ||
| samples – size and method of treatment; | ||
| metallurgical test results; bulk density, |
||
| groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or |
||
| contaminating substances. | ||
| Further Work | • The nature and scale of planned further |
• The initiation of the initial soil sampling |
| work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions, or | program is a high priority for | |
| depth extensions, or large-scale step-out | MetalsGrove, and SEMS has given a | |
| drilling). | commitment to being able to | |
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of |
commence sampling in December 2025 | |
| possible extensions, including the main | • Field programs will also be sequentially |
|
| geological interpretations and future | initiated on the adjoining Central West | |
| drilling areas, provided this information is | Gold JV permits once tenure is granted | |
| not commercially sensitive. | by the Government of Cote d'Ivoire | |
| • The images included show the location |
||
of the current proposed field programs. |
Page 13 of 13