AI assistant
METALSGROVE MINING LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2025
Dec 15, 2025
65325_rns_2025-12-15_43252c09-1e87-49bc-a8dd-b75a2decec42.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [294 x 42] intentionally omitted <==
Vavoua Permit Granted in Côte d’Ivoire and Soil Sampling Planned
16 December 2025
HIGHLIGHTS
-
The Vavoua Permit comprising one of four gold joint venture (JV) permits in central-west Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa, formally granted .
-
The gold JV permits are strategically located between 60 km and 140 km northeast of the 3.8 Moz Abujar gold mine , currently in operation.
-
JV permits cover a total area of 1315 km² , encompassing over 75-strike-km of highly prospective Abujar fault/shear structures .
-
Regional geological sequences indicate favourable characteristics for gold mineralization, aligning with Côte d’Ivoire’s well-endowed gold terrains.
-
in neighbouring permit to the
-
immediate south suggests mineralised trends likely to extend into the acquired JV permits.
-
Aeromagnetic surveys reveal a complex structural setting, including several structural pressure shadows and low-strain zones, further enhancing prospectivity.
-
Initial soil sampling program planned and will commence following a similar program on the adjoining Zuénoula permit.
MANAGEMENT COMMENTARY
Managing Director and CEO, Mr Lijun Yang, commented:
"I am pleased to announce that MetalsGrove has been advised of the grant of the Vavoua permit, one of its four gold JV permits in Côte d’Ivoire, a highly prospective region renowned for hosting multi-million-ounce gold deposits.
MetalsGrove has built solid portfolio covers an extensive 1315 km² area within the highly prospective Birimian greenstone belt. This land package includes over 75 km of major fault and shear zone structures. Supported by a favourable geological setting, encouraging anomalous gold results from adjacent projects, and robust structural data from aeromagnetic surveys, we believe the region holds strong potential for significant major gold discoveries.
An initial soil sampling program over the Vavoua permit area will commence immediately upon completion of a similar program on the adjoining, recently joint ventured Zuénoula permit”
Page 1 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
MetalsGrove Mining Limited ( ASX: MGA ) (“ MetalsGrove ” or the “ Company ”) is pleased to announce that the Vavoua permit, which comprises one of four gold joint venture (JV) permits in central-west Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa, has been granted . An initial soil sampling program will be commenced once the similar soil sampling program is completed on the adjoining Zuénoula permit.
Vavoua Permit
The Vavoua permit (PR-0454) covers 378.25 km[2] of highly prospective geology and is adjoined by the Vavoua West permit to the west and Zuénoula permit to the northeast. A coherent gold trend defined by strongly anomalous auger results[1] in a neighbouring permit to the immediate south suggest that this mineralised trend is highly likely to extend along the structure into the MetalsGrove’s JV permits (Figure 1).
The favourable structural complexity and the interpreted pressure shadows and low-strain zones that lie adjacent to the terminating granite intrusion define an immediate exploration target area.
The Vavoua permit has been granted for an initial 4 year term, which can be extended for a further two terms of three years each.
==> picture [501 x 404] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1. Map illustrating Vavoua, Vavoua West, Kounahiri West and Zuénoula permits on geology and historical gold anomalous auger geochemistry[1 ]
1 Ricca Resources Limited Financial Report for half year ending 31 December 2021
Page 2 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
Soil Sampling Program
The initial Phase 1 soil sampling program on the Zuénoula and Vavoua permits, excluding agricultural areas and settlements, shall commence this month (Figure 2). Approximately 600 soil samples are to be collected on a 1km by 1km offset grid pattern, with the samples assayed on-site using the new and innovative PortablePPB technique developed in Australia. The sampling and assaying will be conducted by the highly professional and experienced SEMS Exploration Services (SEMS) team, who have been operating in West Africa for over 20 years. The assay results are to be available within 48 hours of sample collection, enabling infill soil sampling to be conducted while the sampling crew are still on-site. It is anticipated that the first results will be reported in February-March 2026.
will be conducted on 400m by 100m and then reduced to 200m by 50m spacing to further define gold targets. The Phase 2 follow-up samples will be analyses by conventional fire assay with the view to defining robust gold targets for drill testing.
==> picture [506 x 331] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2. Map illustrating Phase 1 soil sampling program planned for
Vavoua and Zuénoula permit areas
This announcement was authorised for release by the MetalsGrove Mining Ltd Board of Directors.
SHAREHOLDER ENQUIRIES MEDIA ENQUIRIES Mr Lijun Yang Sam Burns Managing Director & CEO SIXº Investor Relations MetalsGrove Mining Ltd +61 400 164 067 [email protected] [email protected]
Page 3 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
Central West Gold Project in Côte d’Ivoire
Côte d’Ivoire, located in West Africa, shares borders with Liberia and Guinea to the west, Mali and Burkina Faso to the north, and Ghana to the east (Figure 3). The country is widely recognised as a stable and attractive destination for foreign investment, supported by a mature democracy, well-developed infrastructure, reliable energy supply, and skilled workforce.
The Central West Gold Project comprises three Gemica JV permits and 1 Stellar JV permit over a total area of approximately 1315 km² in a highly prospective green stone belt. The Project is situated along the Abujar– Napié gold trend in central Côte d’Ivoire, 160 km south of the 0.9M ounces Napié gold deposit and 100km north of the 3.8M ounces Zhaojin operated Abujar gold mine (Figure 3). Further details of the permits are provided in Table 1.
==> picture [421 x 415] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Map illustrating location of Central West Gold Project permits
Table 1. Central West Gold Project Permits
| Name | Permit ID | Type | Status | MGA Ownership | **Area (Km2) ** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zuénoula | PR-750 | Exploration | Granted | Earning up to 80% | 395.78 |
| Vavoua | PR-454 | Exploration | Granted | Earning up to 80% | 378.25 |
| Kounahiri West | PR-1063 | Exploration | Application | 90% on granting | 338.48 |
| Vavoua West | 0544DMICM31/03/2022 | Exploration | Application | 90% on granting | 203.33 |
| Total Area | 1,315.84 |
Page 4 of 13
COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT – EXPLORATION STRATEGY
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
The information in this announcement relating to exploration strategy and results is based on information provided to and compiled by Mr Robert Perring, who is a current member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and Exploration Manager of MetalsGrove Mining Limited.
Mr Perring has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and exploration processes as reported herein, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’.
Mr Perring consents to the inclusion of the information contained herein in the form and context in which it appears in this announcement.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This announcement may contain certain “forward-looking statements” which may not have been based solely on historical facts but rather may be based on the Company’s current expectations about future events and results. Where the Company expresses or implies an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis.
However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks include, but are not limited to, exploration risk, mineral resource risk, metal price volatility, currency fluctuations, increased production costs and variances in ore grade or recovery rates from those assumed in mining plans, as well as political and operational risks in the countries and states in which we sell our product to, and government regulation and judicial outcomes.
For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other factors, see the Company’s website about the Company’s other filings. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to any “forward-looking statement” to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this announcement, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.
Page 5 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Section 1- Sampling Techniques and Data
| Criteria |
JORC Code Explanation |
Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling Techniques |
• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or |
• No drilling has been undertaken. Soil Sampling (PortablePPB):Initial broad- |
| specific specialized industry | spaced (1km by 1km) soil sampling supported |
|
| standard measurement tools | by rapid field analysis of samples using the |
|
| appropriate to the minerals under | PortablePPB analytical technique is planned so |
|
| investigation, such as down hole | that gold anomalous trends can be identified, | |
| and infill sampling conducted before the field | ||
| gamma sondes, or handheld XRF | ||
| crew is demobilized. | ||
| instruments, etc). These examples | • MGA has provided SEMS Exploration | |
| should not be taken as limiting the | Services with an Excel table listing the | |
| broad meaning of sampling. | designated sample point locations using |
|
• Include reference to measures taken |
WGS-84 UTM zone 29N coordinates | |
| • Each soil sample to be collected from within | ||
| to ensure sample representivity and | 100 metres of the designated sample point, |
|
| the appropriate calibration of any | with the actual sample point then recorded |
|
| measurement tools or systems used. | • At each sample point: 1) brush away all | |
organic material from the surface, 2) dig a |
||
| • Aspects of the determination of |
||
| 15cm deep hole and collect the sample by | ||
| mineralisation that are Material to | taking a channel-cut along the entire length | |
| the Public Report. | of the hole, 3) collect 800g of the minus | |
| 2mm fraction of soil from each sample | ||
| point, 4) use the hand-held XRF to |
||
| In cases where ‘industry standard’ | ||
work has been done this would be |
determine and record arsenic, copper, | |
| nickel tungsten iron and manganese | ||
| relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain |
, , concentrations 5) gold to be determined at |
|
1 m samples from which 3 kg was |
the SEMS field compound using the PortablePPB technique |
|
| pulverised to produce a 30 g charge | • Duplicate sample is to be collected every |
|
| for fire assay’). In other cases more | 20th sample and given the next sample | |
| explanation may be required, such as | number | |
| where there is coarse gold that has | • No Standards will be used to avoid low-level | |
| inherent sampling problems. | gold contamination. Gold anomalous | |
Unusual commodities or |
sample sites (+15ppb Au) shall be | |
| resampled and assayed using the fire assay | ||
| mineralisation types (e.g. submarine | ||
| technique to achieve total digestion. | ||
| nodules) may warrant disclosure of | ||
| • Samples are to be stored and processed at | ||
| detailed information. | ||
| a secure SEMS field compound | ||
• Assay results to be reported to MetalsGrove |
||
within 48 hours so that infll sampling can be |
||
| planned and scheduled. | ||
| Drilling | • Drill type (e.g. core, reverse |
• No drilling has been undertaken. |
| Techniques | circulation, open-hole hammer, | |
| rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, | ||
| etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, | ||
| triple or standard tube, depth of | ||
| diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other | ||
| type, whether core is oriented and if so, by | ||
| what method, etc). | ||
Page 6 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| Drill Sample | • Method of recording and assessing |
• No drilling has been undertaken. |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery | core and chip sample recoveries and | |
| results assessed. | ||
| • Measures taken to maximise sample |
||
| recovery and ensure representative | ||
| nature of the samples. | ||
• Whether a relationship exists between samle recover and grade |
||
| p y , and whether sample bias may have |
||
| occurred due to preferential | ||
loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples |
• No drilling has been undertaken. |
| have been geologically and | ||
| geotechnically logged to a level of | ||
| detail to support appropriate | ||
| Mineral Resource estimation, | ||
| mining studies and metallurgical | ||
| studies. | ||
| • Whether logging is qualitative or |
||
| quantitative in nature. Core (or | ||
| costean, channel, etc.) |
||
| photography. | ||
| • The total length and percentage of |
||
the relevant intersections logged. |
||
| Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and |
• No drilling has been undertaken. |
| Techniques | whether quarter, half or all core | |
| and Sample | taken. | |
| Preparation | • If non-core, whether riffled, tube |
|
| sampled, rotary split, etc. and | ||
| whether sampled wet or dry. | ||
| • For all sample types, the nature, |
||
quality and appropriateness of the |
||
| sample preparation technique. |
||
| • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to |
||
| maximise representivity of | ||
| samples. | ||
| • Measures taken to ensure that the |
||
| sampling is representative of the in- | ||
| situ material collected, including | ||
| for instance results for field | ||
| duplicate/second-half sampling. | ||
| • Whether sample sizes are |
||
| appropriate to the grain size of the |
Page 7 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| material being sampled. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and |
• Samples are to be analysed using the |
| Assay Data | appropriateness of the assaying | patented detectORE™ process developed by |
| and Laboratory Tt |
and laboratory procedures used and hth th thi i |
Portable PPB Pty Ltd in Australia. • The process involves a partial extraction |
| ess | weer e ecnque s considered partial or total. |
using the safe, non-dangerous GLIX-20® reagent that is akin to traditional BLEG |
| • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF |
(which uses a cyanide leach). |
|
| • The 400g samples are added to the reagent |
||
| instruments, etc., the parameters |
||
| and tumbled for 12 hours, into which the | ||
| used in determining the analysis |
detectORE™ collector device had been | |
| including instrument make and | inserted. | |
| model, reading times, calibrations | • After the bottle roll process has completed, |
|
| factors applied, and | the collector device is removed, washed, | |
| their derivation, etc. | and dried prior to reading on a Vanta M | |
| • Nature of quality control procedures |
(VMR) pXRF loaded with Evident/Olympus’s | |
| adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, | detectORE™ mode. | |
| duplicates, external laboratory | • The entire process is managed using |
|
| checks) and whether acceptable | Portable PPB’s Portable Lab Information | |
| Management System (pLIMSTM), which records all asects of the samle |
||
| levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) | ||
| and precision have been established. | p p throughput including QAQC and control of |
|
| , the pXRF via the Application Programming |
||
| Interface to Olympus/Evident’s co- | ||
| developed detectORE™ mode. | ||
| • Certified Collector Devices (CCDs) supplied |
||
by PortablePPB with known quantities of |
||
| gold ranging from 0 -1000 ppb are used to | ||
| check that the pXRF was functioning | ||
| correctly and that the instrument settings | ||
| were as intended. One CCD serves as a | ||
| blank. | ||
| • The pLIMS software confirmed the |
||
| instrument settings are correct and the VMR | ||
| is operating as expected, controlled by the | ||
| pLIMS API and Evident’s detectORE™ | ||
| firmware. | ||
| Verification of | • The verification of significant | • No Independent check was conducted |
| Sampling and | intersections by either independent | • Sample duplicates (1 in 20) to be used to |
| Assaying | or alternative company personnel. | verify results. |
• The use of twinned holes. |
• All samples that assay +15ppb Au by |
|
| • Documentation of primary data, data | PortablePPB shall be further assayed using |
|
| entry procedures, data verification, | the fire assay technique to achieve total |
|
| data storage (physical and | extraction of gold, and the data from both | |
| techniques shall be compared to quantify | ||
| electronic) protocols. | ||
| variance between the partial extraction | ||
| • Discuss any adjustment to assay | ||
| PortablePPB technique and the total | ||
| data. | ||
| extraction fire assay technique. |
Page 8 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys |
• A handheld GPS is used to locate the soil |
|---|---|---|
| Data Points | used to locate drillholes (collar and | data positions, with a +/-5m vertical and |
| horizontal accuracy | ||
| down-hole surveys), trenches, mine | ||
| • Sample locations and sample descriptions |
||
| workings and other locations used in | ||
| are digitally recorded in the field using grid | ||
| Mineral Resource estimation. | system: UTM WGS84 zone 29N | |
| • Specification of the grid system |
• GPS measurements of sample positions |
|
used. lit d d f thi |
are sufficiently accurate for first pass. | |
| • Quay an aequacy o opograpc control. |
||
| Data Spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of |
• The 1km by 1km offset soil sample pattern |
| and | Exploration Results. | over the entire permit areas, excluding |
| Distribution | • Whether the data spacing and |
intensive agricultural areas and townsites, |
| distribution is sufficient to establish |
is considered to be an effective technique | |
| for identifying and delimiting gold | ||
| the degree of geological and grade | anomalous areas which will then be |
|
| continuity appropriate for the | , followed-up with higher density sampling |
|
| Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve | ||
| • No sample compositing has been |
||
| estimation procedure(s) and | ||
| undertaken | ||
| classifications applied. | ||
| • Whether sample compositing |
||
| has been applied. | ||
| Orientation | • Whether the orientation of sampling |
• The 1km by 1km offset soil sample pattern |
| of data in | achieves unbiased sampling of | is considered to be an effective technique |
| relation to |
possible structures and the extent to |
for identifying and delimiting gold |
| anomalous areas, which will then be | ||
| geological al structure |
which this is known, considering the deposit type. |
followed up with higher density soil sampling. |
| • If the relationship between the drilling |
||
| orientation and the orientation of key | ||
| mineralised structures is considered | ||
| to have introduced a sampling bias, | ||
| this should be assessed and reported | ||
| if material. | ||
| Sample | • The measures taken to ensure sample |
• Samples are collected in calico bags, |
| security | security. | assigned individual sample numbers and |
| transported to the secure SEMS site facility | ||
| for gold determination by PortablePPB. | ||
| Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of |
• The soil sampling technique implemented |
| Reviews | sampling techniques and data. | at Vavoua and Zuénoula has been |
| responsible for the discovery of a number | ||
| of +1Moz. gold deposits in Cote d’Ivoire. | ||
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria JORC Code Explanation
Commentary
Page 9 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, location |
• Referred to the ASX announcement on 31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tenement | and ownership including agreements or | March 2025, MetalsGrove acquired three |
| and Land | material issues with third parties such | gold JV permits, including the Vavoua |
| Tenure Status | as joint ventures, partnerships, | permit granted in this release, together |
with the other two permit applications, |
||
| overriding royalties, native title interests, | ||
Vavoua West and Kounahiri West, from |
||
| historical sites, wilderness or national | ||
park and environmental settings. Th it f th t hld t th |
Desert Metals Limited (ASX: DM1). • Following the acquisition of the three |
|
| • e secury o e enure e a e time of reporting along with any known |
Central West Gold joint venture (JV) |
|
| permits in Côte d’Ivoire, MetalsGrove | ||
| impediments to obtaining a licence to | ||
operate in the area. |
entered into another JV with TSX-V listing | |
| company Stellar AfricaGold Inc. (Stellar) | ||
| for its PR-0750 Zuénoula permit. PR-0750 | ||
| was granted on 17 April 2024 for an initial | ||
| four years period, renewable for two | ||
| additional 3 years period. | ||
| • For the Vavoua permit, MetalsGrove is |
||
| earning up to 80% interest from its Ivory | ||
| Coast JV partner, Générale des Mines et | ||
| Carrières S.A.R.L (GEMICA). Subject to | ||
| specific mineral resources defined and | ||
| potential production may achieve in | ||
| future, A$1 million milestone cash | ||
| payment and/or a 1% net smelter royalty | ||
| becomes payable to DM1 | ||
| • Based on the nature of the JV, |
||
| MetalsGrove will earn 40%/60%/80% | ||
| interest in the Vavoua permit by spending |
||
| the accumulated amount at A$200,000 | ||
| (80M FCFA) / A$425,000 (170M FCFA) / | ||
| A$750,000 (300M FCFA). On the occasion | ||
| to apply for an exploitation permit, | ||
| MetalsGrove owns the right to acquire a | ||
| further 10% interest from GEMICA by | ||
| making a payment of A$2,100,000 (840M | ||
| FCFA) | ||
| • In granting an exploitation permit under |
||
| the Vavoua permit, the Ivory Coast |
||
| government will own 10% free-carried | ||
| interest, which will be deployed pro rata | ||
| from ultimate interests held by |
||
| MetalsGrove and Gemica | ||
| • There are no third-party arrangements or |
||
| royalties, etc., to impede exploration on | ||
| the tenure | ||
| • There are no reserves or national parks to |
||
| impede exploration on the tenure | ||
| • Ownership – MetalsGrove is earning up to |
||
| 80% interest in the Vavoua permit. |
Page 10 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| Exploration | • Acknowledgement and appraisal of |
• MetalsGrove is not aware of any previous |
|---|---|---|
| Done by | exploration by other parties. | material company exploration having |
| Other Parties. | being conducted with the permits. | |
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
• The Vavoua permit, together with the Vavoua West, Kounahiri West and |
| Zuenoula permits acquired by MetalsGrove, are located in the central |
||
| west of Côte d'Ivoire at the south edge of | ||
| the West Africa craton. This region is the | ||
| world’s largest Proterozoic gold- | ||
| producing region, and owns 35% of the | ||
| region’s Birimian Group rocks, which are | ||
| considered the source of multi-million- | ||
| ounce gold deposits | ||
• Vavoua permit together with Vavoua |
||
| West, Kounahiri West and Zuenoula | ||
| permits are located between 60 and135 | ||
| km NE of the Abujar gold mine (3.8Moz), | ||
which is a typical orogenic gold deposit |
||
| • The Abujar gold mine falls in the same |
||
| greenstone belt as Vavoua, Vavoua West, | ||
| Kounahiri West and Zuenoula permits. | ||
| • MetalsGrove controls 75 strike- km of |
||
| structurally deformed greenstone and i idd hih i f |
||
| grante consere g prospectve or the discovery of orogenic gold deposit. |
||
| Drillhole | • A summary of all information material |
• No drilling results are included in this |
| Information | to the understanding of the exploration | release. |
| results including a tabulation of the | ||
| following information for all Material | ||
| drill holes: | ||
| • easting and northing of the drillhole |
||
| collar elevation or RL (Reduced Level – | ||
| elevation above sea level in metres) of | ||
| the drillhole collar dip and azimuth of | ||
| the hole | ||
| • down hole length and interception depth |
||
| hole length. | ||
| Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, |
• No data aggregation methods were |
| Aggregation | weighting averaging techniques, | applied to the soil sampling data. |
| Methods | maximum and/or minimum grade | |
| truncations (e.g. cutting of high | ||
| grades) and cut-off grades are | ||
| usually Material and should be | ||
| stated. | ||
| • Where aggregate intercepts |
||
incorporate short lengths of high- |
||
| grade results and longer lengths of |
Page 11 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| low-grade results, the procedure | ||
|---|---|---|
| used for such aggregation should be | ||
| stated and some typical examples of | ||
| such aggregations should be shown | ||
| in detail. | ||
| • The assumption used for any |
||
| reporting of metal equivalent values | ||
| should be clearly stated. | ||
| Relationship | • If the geometry of mineralisation with |
• Not applicable. |
Between |
respect to the drillhole angle is known, |
|
| Mineralisation | its nature should be reported. | |
| Widths and | ||
| Intercept |
||
| Lengths | ||
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with |
• See maps in the body of the report. |
| scales) and tabulations of intercepts | ||
| should be included for any significant | ||
| discovery being reported. These should | ||
include, but not be limited to, a plan |
||
| view of drillhole collar locations and | ||
| appropriate sectional views. | ||
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all |
• The reporting of these soil sample results |
| Reporting | Exploration Results is not practicable, | is representative and appropriate as first- |
| representative reporting of both low and | pass geochemical sampling of the permit | |
| high grades and/or widths should be | area. | |
| practiced avoiding misleading | ||
| reporting of Exploration Results. | ||
| Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful and | • All meaningful data and relevant |
| Substantive | material, should be reported including | information have been included in the |
| Exploration | (but not limited to): geological | body of this release. |
| Data | observations; geophysical survey | |
| results; geochemical survey results; | ||
| bulk samples – size and method of | ||
| treatment; metallurgical test results; | ||
| bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical | ||
| and rock characteristics; potential | ||
| deleterious or contaminating | ||
| substances. |
Page 12 of 13
==> picture [34 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
| Further Work | • The nature and scale of plannedfurther |
• Ongoing exploration of the Vavoua permit |
|---|---|---|
| work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or | is a high priority for the Company | |
• Soil sampling will be completed as |
||
| depth extensions or large-scale step-out | ||
outlined by this release |
||
| drilling). | ||
| • The images included show the location of |
||
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas f ibl ti ildi th |
||
| the current areas of interest. | ||
| o posse exensons, ncung e main geological interpretations and future drillin areas rovided this |
||
| g , p information is not commercially |
||
| sensitive. |
Page 13 of 13