Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

MCS SERVICES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2012

Jan 12, 2012

65377_rns_2012-01-12_250daaa9-3a7a-49a8-a4fd-c7c5ffac1f77.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [150 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

13 January 2012

Red Gum Resources Limited ACN 119 641 986 (“Red Gum” or “the Company”) ASX conditions of quotation

As required under the ASX conditions of quotation, Red Gum advises as follows:

1. Prospectus Closure

As previously advised, the offer set out in the Prospectus of the Company dated 21 October 2011 and Supplementary Prospectus dated 21 November 2011 ( Prospectus ) was closed on 28 November 2011.

The Company raised a total of $4,003,563 under the Prospectus, represented by an issue of 20,017,818 ordinary fully paid shares at an issue price of $0.20 per share.

2. Despatch

The Company confirms dispatch of each of the following:

  • (a) In relation to all holdings on the CHESS sub-register, notices from the Company under the ASX Settlement Operating Rule 8.9.1;

  • (b) In relation to all other holdings, issuer sponsored holding statements; and

  • (c) Any refund money.

3. Issue of Securities

The Company confirms the issue of the following securities referred to in the Prospectus:

  • (a) 1,000,000 options have been issued to CCZ Corporate Finance Pty Ltd as referred to in Section 10.4(c) of the Prospectus;

  • (b) 3,000,000 options have been issued to Dr Paul Pearson pursuant to the Executive Services Agreement between Dr Pearson and the Company as referred to in Section 10.2 of the Prospectus; and

  • (c) 750,000 shares have been issued to Dr Pearson in connection with the termination of the Management Agreement and Finder’s Fee Agreements with Ore-Forming Solutions S.A as referred to in Sections 10.5 and 10.6 of the Prospectus.

4. Restricted Securities

The table below sets out the classes and number of securities of the Company which are subject to escrow and the escrow periods that apply to those securities.

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [150 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

Security Number of securities
subject to escrow
Escrow period
Ordinary
shares
30,425,932 24 months from date of quotation of RGX
securities
350,000 12 months from the date of issue of
securities being 10 January 2011
150,000 12 months from the date of issue of
securities being 24 January 2011
30,682 12 months from the date of issue of
securities being 2 March 2011
1,027,636 12 months from the date of issue of
securities being 7 July 2011
2,887,159 12 months from the date of issue of
securities being 4 August 2011
1,895,000 12 months from the date of issue of
securities being 28 October 2011
Options 4,000,000 24 months from date of quotation of RGX
securities

5. Exploration Targets

Red Gum Resources Limited ( Company ) disclosed in its Prospectus dated 21 October 2011 the following exploration targets:

(a) La Negra Project in Chile – 10 Mt – 70 Mt* polymetallic deposit; and

(b) Chongos 2006A Project in Peru – 5 Mt – 15 Mt* high grade metal ore.

The Company provides the following further information in relation to the above exploration targets.

La Negra Project

The Exploration Target of 10 Mt - 70 Mt grading 0.21%-11.75% Pb, 0.21%-11.55% * Zn, and 0.03%-1.1% Cu has been ascribed to the La Negra Project .

*Note : With regard to the above exploration targets - the potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature and that there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve.

The Exploration Target is constrained in dimensions based on the 3 dimensional induced polarisation survey that has been processed and interpreted, geological mapping and geochemistry (soil and rockchip), in addition to standard assumptions on density.

The relative abundance of metals expected to be encountered within the Exploration Target is constrained by available soil geochemical data, rock chip derived geochemical data and underground sampling (both historic and recent). Data used has been weighted towards recent information in preference for

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [150 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

historically reported grades that are not adequately verifiable. Presented below are the tabulated summaries of the geochemistry interpreted for this purpose:

==> picture [400 x 256] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [334 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

Chongos 2006A Project

The Exploration Target of 5 Mt - 15 Mt of potential high grade base metal ore (grading 0.002%-5.87% Pb, 0.006%-2.78% Zn) * , has been ascribed to the Chongos 2006A Project.

*Note : With regard to the above exploration targets - the potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature and that there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve.

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [150 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

The Exploration Target is constrained in dimensions based on a standard basic interpretation of geological mapping and geochemistry data (soil and rockchip), in addition to standard assumptions on density.

The relative abundance of metals expected to be encountered in the exploration target is constrained by available soil and rock chip derived geochemical data. Data used has been based on historically reported grades obtained in previous systematic exploration that are not adequately verifiable. In addition, it must be qualified that the low number of rock chip samples previously taken from the prospect makes a statistically meaningful estimation of expected mineralisation grade somewhat difficult. However, the author is of the opinion that they serve as a potentially realistic guide. Presented below are the tabulated summaries of the geochemistry from the Chongos 2006A Exploration Target interpreted for this purpose, which serve as a reference in highlighting the possibility of high grade base metal ore:

Table 5 Chongos 2006A Soil Geochemical Survey Statistics (ppm)

Element n Minimum Maximum Mean Anomalous
Zinc 1621 15.5 24,500 1,018 +1500
Lead 1621 5 2,091 94 +185
Silver 1621 0.1 144 0.47 +0.6
Gold 1621 >0.005 0.017 0.007 +0.01
Copper 1621 3.6 215 32 +51

Table 6 Chongos 2006A Rock Chip Sampling Survey Statistics (ppm)

Element n Minimum Maximum Mean
Zinc 45 56 27,800 3,292
Lead 45 16 58,700 1,645
Silver 45 >0.1 1.1 0.12
Gold 45 >0.001 0.016 0.0014
Copper 45 >5 302 17.0

Competent person statement in respect of the exploration targets

The information in this document that relates to Exploration Targets is based on information compiled by Dr Paul Pearson, who is a Member or Fellow of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy or the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (Membership No 220639). Dr Pearson is the Managing Director of Red Gum Resources Limited.

Dr Pearson has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Dr Pearson consents to the inclusion in this document of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

==> picture [334 x 128] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [150 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

6. Updated Pro-Forma Statement of Financial Position

An updated Pro-Forma Statement of Financial Position as at 30 April 2011 based on actual funds raised under the Prospectus is set out below:

Historical as
at 30 April
2011
(audited)
Actual
Subscription
under IPO
(unaudited)
$,000
$,000
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 1) 129
4,513

Other receivables
21
21
Total Current Assets 150
4,534
Non-Current Assets
Plant and equipment 3
3
Explorationand evaluationexpenditure 953
953
Total Non-Current Assets 956
956
Total Assets 1,106
5,490
Current Liabilities
Trade and otherpayables 181
181
Total Current Liabilities 181
181
Total Liabilities 181
181
Net Assets 925
5,309
Equity
Issued capital 1,465
5,849
Accumulated losses (540)
(540)
Total Equity 925
5,309

Note 1 Cash and Cash Equivalents

Actual
Subscription
(unaudited)
$,000
Adjustments arising in the preparation of the pro-forma balance
are summarised below:
Reviewed balance at 30 April 2011 129
Processed from Issue of Shares pursuant to the Prospectus
4,003
Processed from Issue of Shares pursuant to the Information

==> picture [150 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

Memorandum dated May 2011 1,007
Payment of balance of estimated Share Issue costs of the Offer
andInformation MemorandumShareissue
(626)
Pro-forma Balance 4,513

7. Updated Program and Budget

An updated Program and Budget based on the actual amount of funds raised under the Prospectus is set out below:

Year 1 Year 2 Total
INFLOW
Funds Raised IPO 4,003,000 - 4,003,000
Interest 120,090 69,707 189,797
Total Inflow 4,123,090 69,707 4,192,797
EXPENDITURE
Exploration Activity
Geological 60,000 65,000 125,000
Geophysical - - -
Geochemical 99,445 - 99,445
Drilling 530,000 710,000 1,240,000
Total Exploration
Expenditure
689,445 775,000 1,464,445
Option Payments
Project: La Negra - 555,555 555,555
Total Option Payments - 555,555 555,555
Total Working Capital &
Administration
990,000 990,000 1,980,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURE 1,679,445 2,320,555 4,000,000

==> picture [150 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

Yours faithfully

==> picture [104 x 39] intentionally omitted <==

Malcolm Lucas-Smith

Company Secretary Red Gum Resources Limited

Contact Details: Telephone: (08) 8212 5724 Fax: (08) 8212 2230 Email: [email protected]

==> picture [334 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [334 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [334 x 128] intentionally omitted <==