Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

ION VIDEO LTD Governance Information 2022

Sep 29, 2022

65133_rns_2022-09-29_d5d297cb-7895-42e1-8055-59a46905320d.pdf

Governance Information

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

LINIUS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ACN 149 796 332

(Company)

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT

This Corporate Governance Statement is current as at 30 June 2022 and has been approved by the Board of the Company.

This Corporate Governance Statement discloses the extent to which the Company will follow the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council in its publication Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations, 4[th] Edition ( Recommendations ). The Recommendations are not mandatory, however the Recommendations that will not be followed have been identified and reasons provided for not following them along with what (if any) alternative governance practices the Company intends to adopt in lieu of the recommendation.

The Company has adopted a Corporate Governance Plan which provides the written terms of reference for the Company’s corporate governance duties.

Due to the current size and nature of the existing Board and the magnitude of the Company’s operations, the Board does not consider that the Company will gain any benefit from individual Board committees and that its resources would be better utilised in other areas as the Board is of the strong view that at this stage the experience and skill set of the current Board is sufficient to perform these roles. Under the Company’s Board Charter, the duties that would ordinarily be assigned to individual committees are currently carried out by the full Board under the written terms of reference for those committees.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan and related policies are available on the Company’s website at www.linius.com/corporate-governance/.

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight
Recommendation 1.1
A listed entity should have and disclose a board charter setting out:
a) the respective roles and responsibilities of its board and
management; and
b) those matters expressly reserved to the board and those
delegated to management.
YES The Company has adopted a Board Charter as part of its Corporate Governance
Plan. Full details of the Board’s and Company Secretary’s roles and
responsibilities are contained in the Board Charter. The Board collectively and
each director has the right to seek independent professional advice at the
Company’s expense, with the Chairman’s approval, to assist them to carry out
their responsibilities.

1

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 1.2
A listed entity should:
(a)
undertake appropriate checks before appointing a
director, or senior executive or putting forward for
election as a director; and
(b)
provide security holders with all material information in
its possession relevant to a decision on whether or not to
elect or re-elect a director.
YES (a)
The Company has guidelines for the appointment and selection of the
Board in its Corporate Governance Plan. The Company’s Nomination
Committee Charter (in the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan)
requires the Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) to
ensure appropriate checks (including checks in respect of character,
experience, education, criminal record and bankruptcy history (as
appropriate)) are undertaken before appointing a person, or putting
forward to security holders a candidate for election, as a director.
(b)
Under the Nomination Committee Charter, all material information
relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re-elect a director
must be provided to security holders in the Notice of Meeting
containing the resolution to elect or re-elect a director.
Recommendation 1.3
A listed entity should have a written agreement with each director
and senior executive setting out the terms of their appointment.
YES The Company’s Nomination Committee Charter requires the Nomination
Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) to ensure that each director and senior
executive is a party to a written agreement with the Company which sets out the
terms of that director’s or senior executive’s appointment.
The Company has written agreements with each of its directors and senior
executives.
Recommendation 1.4
The company secretary of a listed entity should be accountable
directly to the board, through the chair, on all matters to do with
the proper functioning of the board.
YES Full details of the Board’s and Company Secretary’s roles and responsibilities are
contained in the Board Charter.
Recommendation 1.5
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a diversity policy
(b)
through its board or a committee of the board set
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity in
the composition of its board, senior executives and
workforce generally; and
(c)
disclose as at the end of each reporting period:
PARTIALLY
YES
(a)
The Company has adopted a Diversity Policy, which is available, as part
of the Corporate Governance Plan, on the Company’s website. The
Policy provides a framework for the Company to establish and achieve
measurable diversity objectives, including in respect of gender
diversity. The Diversity Policy allows the Board to set measurable
gender diversity objectives and to assess annually both the objectives
and the Company’s progress in achieving them. The Diversity Policy is
available, as part of the Corporate Governance Plan, on the Company’s
website.

2

  • RECOMMENDATIONS (4[TH] EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION (i) the measurable objectives for achieving gender (b) The Board does not presently intend to set measurable gender diversity; diversity objectives for achieving gender diversity because: -

  • (ii) the entity’s progress towards achieving those the Board does not anticipate there will be a need to appoint any objectives; and new directors or senior executives due to limited nature of the

  • (iii) either: Company’s existing and proposed activities and the Board’s view

    • the Board does not anticipate there will be a need to appoint any new directors or senior executives due to limited nature of the Company’s existing and proposed activities and the Board’s view that the existing directors and senior executives have sufficient skill and experience to carry out the Company’s plans; and
  • (A) the respective proportions of men and women on the Board, in senior executive positions and across the whole workforce (including how the entity has defined “senior executive” for these purposes); or

  • if it becomes necessary to appoint any new directors or senior executives, the Board considered the application of a measurable gender diversity objective requiring a specified proportion of women on the Board and in senior executive roles will, given the small size of the Company and the Board, unduly limit the Company from applying the Diversity Policy as a whole and the Company’s policy of appointing based on skills and merit.

  • (B) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under the Workplace Gender Equality Act, the entity’s most recent “Gender Equality Indicators”, as defined in and published under that Act

  • (c) The Company is not a ‘relevant employer’ under the Workplace Gender Equality Act. The respective proportions of men and women employees in the whole organisation as at 30 June 2022 were as follows:

If the entity was in the S&P/ASX 300 Index at the commencement of the reporting period, the measurable objective for achieving gender diversity in the composition of its board should be to have not less than 30% of its directors of each gender within a specified period.

If the entity was in the S&P/ASX 300 Index at the commencement
of the reporting period, the measurable objective for achieving
gender diversity in the composition of its board should be to have
Equality Act. The respective proportions of men and women
employees in the whole organisation as at 30 June 2022 were as
follows:
not less than 30% of its directors of each gender within a specified Representation
Male
Female
period. Board and senior executives
100%
0%
Other employees
88%
12%
Total
90%
10%
Recommendation 1.6 YES (a) The Company’s Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) is
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the
performance of the Board, its committees and individual
directors; and
responsible for evaluating the performance of the Board, its committees
and individual directors on an annual basis. It may do so with the aid of
an independent advisor. The process for this is set out in the Company’s
Corporate Governance Plan, which is available on the Company’s
website.
(b)
disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a
performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting
period in accordance with that process.
(b) The Company completes performance evaluations in respect of the
Board, its committees (if any) and individual directors for each financial
year in accordance with the above process.

3

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 1.7
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for evaluating the
performance of its senior executives at least once every
reporting period; and
(b)
disclose for each reporting period whether a performance
evaluation has been undertaken in accordance with that
process during or in respect of that period.
YES (a)
It is the policy of the Board to conduct evaluation of individuals’ senior
executive performance. The objective of this evaluation is to provide
best practice corporate governance to the Company. The process for
this is set out in the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan, which is
available on the Company’s website.
(b)
The Company completes performance evaluations in respect of its
senior executives each financial year in accordance with the above
process.
Principle 2: Structure the Board to be effective and add value
Recommendation 2.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a nomination committee which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the members of the committee; and
(v)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number
of
times
the
committee
met
throughout the period and the individual
attendances of the members at those meetings;
or
(b)
if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that
fact and the processes it employs to address Board
succession issues and to ensure that the Board has the
appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence
and knowledge of the entity to enable it to discharge its
duties and responsibilities effectively.
YES Due to the Company’s current size and stage of development, the directors do
not consider it appropriate to establish a Nomination Committee.
The directors understand the need to achieve a structured Board that adds value
to the Company by ensuring an appropriate mix of skills are present in directors
on the Board at all times.
The responsibilities of the Board of Directors includes devising criteria for Board
membership, regularly reviewing the need for various skills and experience on
the Board and identifying specific individuals for nomination as directors for
review by the Board. The Board also oversees management succession plans
including the managing director and his/her direct reports and evaluates their
own performance and make recommendations for the appointment and removal
of directors. Matters such as remuneration, expectations, terms, the procedures
for dealing with conflicts of interest and the availability of independent
professional advice are clearly understood by all directors, who are experienced
public company directors.
The Board collectively and each director has the right to seek independent
professional advice at the Company’s expense, up to specified limits, with the
Chairman’s approval, to assist them to carry out their responsibilities.

4

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 2.2
A listed entity should have and disclose a Board skill matrix setting
out the mix of skills and diversity that the Board currently has or is
looking to achieve in its membership.
YES Under the Nomination Committee Charter (in the Company’s Corporate
Governance Plan), the Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) is
required to maintain a Board that has an appropriate mix of skills and
experience to be an effective decision-making body.
The Board Charter requires the disclosure of each Board member’s qualifications
and expertise. Full details as to each director and senior executive’s relevant skills
and experience are available in the Company’s Annual Report.
Recommendation 2.3
A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
the names of the directors considered by the Board to be
independent directors;
(b)
if a director has an interest, position, affiliation or
relationship of the type described in Box 2.3 by the board
is of the opinion that it does not compromise the
independence of the director, the nature of the interest,
position, association or relationship in question and an
explanation of why the Board is of that opinion; and
(c)
the length of service of each director
YES (a)
The Board Charter requires the disclosure of the names of directors
considered by the Board to be independent. The Company will disclose
those directors it considers to be independent in its Annual Report and
on its ASX website. The Board considers that non-executive director
Stephen McGovern and John Wallace are independent directors.
(b)
There are no independent directors who fall into this category. The
Company will disclose in its Annual Report and ASX website any
instances where this applies and an explanation of the Board’s opinion
why the relevant director is still considered to be independent.
(c)
The Company’s Annual Report will disclose the length of service of each
director, as at the end of each financial year.
Recommendation 2.4
A majority of the Board of a listed entity should be independent
directors.
NO The Board does not currently have a majority of directors who are independent.
See comment regarding 2.5 below. The Board has during the year appointed an
additional non-executive director.
Recommendation 2.5
The chair of the board of a listed entity should be an independent
director and, in particular, should not be the same person as the
CEO of the entity.
NO The Chair of the Board is not an independent director, additionally the Chair is
not the Company’s CEO and as of November 2021 changed role from Executive
Chair to Non-Executive Chair. Further details regarding the Directors are set out
in the Directors’ Report in the Company’s Annual Report.

5

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 2.6
A listed entity should have a program for inducting new directors
and for periodically reviewing whether there is a need for existing
directors to undertake professional development to maintain the
skills and knowledge needed to perform their role as directors
effectively.
YES In accordance with the Company’s Board Charter, the Nominations Committee
(or, in its absence, the Board) is responsible for the approval and review of
induction and continuing professional development programs and procedures for
directors to ensure that they can effectively discharge their responsibilities. The
Company Secretary is responsible for facilitating inductions and professional
development.
Principle 3: Instil a culture of acting lawfully, ethically and responsibly
Recommendation 3.1
A listed entity should articulate and disclose its values.
YES The Company’s website contains references to the values abided by the
Company.
Recommendation 3.2
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a code of conduct for its directors,
senior executives and employees; and
(b)
ensure that the board or a committee of the board is
informed of any material breaches of that code.
YES The Company’s code of conduct applies to the Company’s directors, senior
executives and employees. The Company’s code of conduct (which forms part of
the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan) is available on the Company’s
website.
Recommendation 3.3
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a whistleblower policy; and
(b)
ensure that the board or a committee of the board is
informed of any material incidents reported under that
policy
YES The Company’s whistleblower policy applies to the Company’s directors, senior
executives and employees. The Company’s whistleblower policy is available on
the Company’s website.
Recommendation 3.4
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose an anti-bribery and corruption policy;
and
(b)
ensure that the board or a committee of the board is
informed of any material breaches of that policy.
YES The Company’s anti-bribery and corruption policy applies to the Company’s
directors, senior executives and employees. The Company’s anti-bribery and
corruption policy (which forms part of the Company’s Corporate Governance
Plan) is available on the Company’s website.

6

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Principle 4: Safeguard the integrity of corporate reports
Recommendation 4.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have an audit committee which:
(i)
has at least three members, all of whom are
non-executive directors and a majority of
whom are independent directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent director, who is
not the Chair of the Board,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the relevant qualifications and experience of
the members of the committee; and
(v)
in relation to each reporting period, the number
of times the committee met throughout the
period and the individual attendances of the
members at those meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have an audit committee, disclose that fact
and the processes it employs that independently verify
and safeguard the integrity of its financial reporting,
including the processes for the appointment and removal
of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit
engagement partner.
YES (a)
The Company does not an Audit and Risk Committee. The Company’s
Corporate Governance Plan contains an Audit and Risk Committee
Charter that provides for the creation of an Audit and Risk Committee
(if it is considered it will benefit the Company), with at least three
members, all of whom must be independent directors, and which must
be chaired by an independent director who is not the Chair.
(b)
The Company does not have an Audit and Risk Committee as the Board
considers the Company will not currently benefit from its
establishment. In accordance with the Company’s Board Charter, the
Board carries out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the
Audit and Risk Committee.
Recommendation 4.2
The Board of a listed entity should, before it approves the entity’s
financial statements for a financial period, receive from its CEO and
CFO a declaration that the financial records of the entity have been
properly maintained and that the financial statements comply with
the appropriate accounting standards and give a true and fair view
of the financialposition andperformance of the entityand that the
YES The Company’s Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires the CEO and CFO (or,
if none, the person(s) fulfilling those functions) to provide a sign off on these
terms.
The Company intends to obtain a sign off on these terms for each of its financial
statements in each financial year.

7

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk
management and internal control which is operating effectively.
Recommendation 4.3
A listed entity should disclose its process to verify the integrity of
any periodic corporate report it releases to the market that is not
audited or reviewed by an external auditor
YES The Company has appropriate processes to verify the integrity of any periodic
corporate report it releases to the market that is not audited or reviewed by its
external auditor.
Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure
Recommendation 5.1
A listed entity should have and disclose a written policy for
complying with its continuous disclosure obligations under listing
rule 3.1.
YES The Board Charter provides details of the Company’s disclosure policy. In
addition, the Corporate Governance Plan details the Company’s disclosure
requirements as required by the ASX Listing Rules and other relevant legislation.
The Corporate Governance Plan, which incorporates the Board Charter, is
available on the Company website.
Recommendation 5.2
A listed entity should ensure that its board receives all material
market announcements promptly after they have been made.
YES The Company has implemented a process to ensure all board members receive a
copy of all material market announcements immediately after they have been
made.
Recommendation 5.3
A listed entity that gives new and substantive investor or analyst
presentations should release a copy of the presentation materials
on the ASX Market Announcements Platform ahead of the
presentation.
YES The Company has implemented a process to ensure that new and substantive
investors or analyst presentations are released on the ASX Market
Announcements Platform ahead of the presentation.
Principle 6:Respect the rights of security holders
Recommendation 6.1
A listed entity should provide information about itself and its
governance to investors via its website.
YES Information about the Company and its governance is available in the Corporate
Governance Plan which can be found on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 6.2
A listed entity should design and implement an investor relations
program to facilitate effective two-way communication with
investors.
YES The Company has adopted a Shareholder Communications Strategy which aims
to promote and facilitate effective two-way communication with investors. The
Strategy outlines a range of ways in which information is communicated to
shareholders and is available on the Company’s website as part of the Company’s
Corporate Governance Plan.

8

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 6.3
A listed entity should disclose how it facilitates and encourages
participation at meetings of security holders.
YES The Company respects the rights of its shareholders and to facilitate the effective
exercise of those rights the Company is committed to making it easy for
shareholders to participate in shareholder meetings of the Company. The
Company also makes available a telephone number and email address for
shareholders to make enquiries of the Company.
Recommendation 6.4
A listed entity should ensure that all substantive resolutions at a
meeting of security holders are decided by poll rather than show of
hands.
YES The Company conducts voting at its general meetings by poll for all resolutions
put to a general meeting.
Recommendation 6.4
A listed entity should give security holders the option to receive
communications from, and send communications to, the entity and
its security registry electronically.
YES Shareholders are regularly given the opportunity to receive communications
electronically.
Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk
Recommendation 7.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a committee or committees to oversee risk, each of
which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the members of the committee; and
(v)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number
of
times
the
committee
met
throughout the period and the individual
attendances of the members at those meetings;
or
YES (a)
The Company does not have an Audit and Risk Committee. The
Company’s Corporate Governance Plan contains an Audit and Risk
Committee Charter that provides for the creation of an Audit and Risk
Committee (if it is considered it will benefit the Company), with at least
three members, all of whom must be independent directors, and which
must be chaired by an independent director.
A copy of the Corporate Governance Plan is available on the Company’s
website.
(b)
The Company does not have an Audit and Risk Committee as the Board
consider the Company will not currently benefit from its
establishment. In accordance with the Company’s Board Charter, the
Board carries out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the
Audit and Risk Committee under the Audit and Risk Committee
Charter.

9

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
(b)
if it does not have a risk committee or committees that
satisfy (a) above, disclose that fact and the process it
employs for overseeing the entity’s risk management
framework.
Recommendation 7.2
The Board or a committee of the Board should:
(a)
review the entity’s risk management framework with
management at least annually to satisfy itself that it
continues to be sound; and
(b)
disclose in relation to each reporting period, whether
such a review has taken place.
YES The Company’s Risk Management Policy states that the Board as a whole is
responsible for the oversight of the Company’s risk management and control
framework. The objectives of the Company’s Risk Management Strategy are to:

identify risks to the Company;

balance risk to reward;

ensure regulatory compliance is achieved; and

ensure senior executives, the Board and investors understand the risk
profile of the Company.
The Board monitors risk through various arrangements including:

regular Board meetings;

share price monitoring;

market monitoring; and

regular review of financial position and operations.
The Company’s Risk Management Policy is considered a sound strategy for
addressing and managing risk and has been reviewed during the period.
Recommendation 7.3
A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
if it has an internal audit function, how the function is
structured and what role it performs; or
(b)
if it does not have an internal audit function, that fact and
the processes it employs for evaluating and continually
improving the effectiveness of its risk management and
internal control processes.
YES The Board performs the role of the Audit Committee. When the Board convenes
it carries various functions which include overseeing the establishment and
implementation by management of a system for identifying, assessing,
monitoring and managing material risk throughout the Company, which includes
the Company’s internal compliance and control systems. Due to the nature and
size of the Company's operations, and the Company’s ability to derive
substantially all of the benefits of an independent internal audit function, the
expense of an independent internal auditor is not considered to be appropriate.

10

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 7.4
A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material exposure
to environmental or social risks and, if it does, how it manages or
intends to manage those risks.
YES The Company has considered its environmental or social risks by way of internal
review and has concluded that it is not subject to material economic,
environmental and social sustainability risks.
Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly
Recommendation 8.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a remuneration committee which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent director, and
disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the members of the committee; and
(v)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number
of
times
the
committee
met
throughout the period and the individual
attendances of the members at those meetings;
or
(b)
if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose
that fact and the processes it employs for setting the level
and composition of remuneration for directors and senior
executives and ensuring that such remuneration is
appropriate and not excessive.
YES The role of a Remuneration Committee is carried out by the Board given the
current size of the Company and its stage of development.
The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan contains a Remuneration Committee
Charter that provides for the creation of a Remuneration Committee (if it is
considered it will benefit the Company), with at least two directors, and which
must be chaired by non-executive director.
The Board responsibilities include setting policies for senior officers’
remuneration, setting the terms and conditions of employment for the managing
director (if applicable), reviewing the Company’s incentive schemes and
superannuation arrangements, reviewing the remuneration of both executive
and non-executive directors, recommendations for remuneration by gender and
making recommendations on any proposed changes and undertaking reviews of
the managing director’s performance, including, setting with the managing
director (if applicable) goals and reviewing progress in achieving those goals. The
Board collectively and each director has the right to seek independent
professional advice at the Company’s expense, up to specified limits, with
Chairman’s approval, to assist them to carry out their responsibilities.
Recommendation 8.2
A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and practices
regarding the remuneration of non-executive directors and the
remuneration of executive directors and other senior executives
YES Non-executive directors are to be paid their fees out of the maximum aggregate
amount approved by shareholders for the remuneration of non-executive
directors. managing director (if applicable) remuneration is set by the Board with
the executive director in question not present. Full details regarding the
remuneration of is included in the Remuneration Report within the Annual
Report.

11

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 8.3
A listed entity which has an equity-based remuneration scheme
should:
(a)
have a policy on whether participants are permitted to
enter into transactions (whether through the use of
derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk of
participating in the scheme; and
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it.
YES Executives and non-executive directors are prohibited from entering into
transactions or arrangements which limit the economic risk of participating in
unvested entitlements.

12