Annual Report • Mar 3, 2021
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer

LIABILITY STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS
At a meeting held on February 25, 2021, the directors of International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A. state that, to the best of their knowledge, the individual and consolidated financial statements for the year to December 31, 2020, prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, and that the individual and consolidated management reports include a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with the description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.
February 25, 2021
| Javier Ferrán Larraz Chairman |
Luis Gallego Martín Chief Executive Officer |
|---|---|
| Giles Agutter | Peggy Bruzelius |
| Eva Castillo Sanz | Margaret Ewing |
| Heather Ann McSharry | Robin Phillips |
| Emilio Saracho Rodríguez de Torres | Lucy Nicola Shaw |
Alberto Terol Esteban


| Risk | Our response to the risk | |
|---|---|---|
| Recoverability of investments in subsidiaries (€7,573 million, FY19: €7,658 million) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the risk that the carrying value of investments in subsidiaries may not be recoverable. The key assumptions may be incorrectly stated or may not be in line with external evidence. Changes to assumptions can have a significant impact on the available headroom and any impairment that may be required. Refer to notes 6 of the financial statements. |
Our procedures included the following: We confirmed that the Base Case and Downside Case forecasts used in the impairment analysis were consistent with those used in other accounting assessments, including the going concern assessment. |
|
| We evaluated the key assumptions in the Base Case and Downside Case forecasts, in the context of other evidence gained from our audit work. We reviewed independent external market data, including industry and analyst forecasts and competitor trading updates for indicators of contradictory evidence to challenge these forecasts. This included specific consideration of the expected rate of recovery of passenger numbers in the context of the current travel restrictions and the expectations of how long they may remain in place as well as consideration of current uncertainty over the global roll-out of vaccines and the impact of this on future capacity levels and travel demand. |
||
| With the assistance of a valuation specialist, we assessed the appropriateness of the other assumptions made by management and used in the impairment assessment. We evaluated the alignment of long-term growth rates with our view of long-term inflation and GDP growth for the regions in which the Group's operating companies operate and considered whether the discount rates used to determine the net present value of the investments were within acceptable ranges. |
||
| We tested the arithmetic accuracy of the impairment calculations. We also assessed management's sensitivity analysis to evaluate whether a reasonable change in the key assumptions for any of the investments would cause the carrying amounts to exceed the recoverable amounts. This included consideration of the impact of COVID-19 and other external factors, including climate change related risks, and how management considered them in its forecasts. |
||
| We compared the total recoverable amounts in comparison to the market capitalisation of the Group at 31 December 2020, to determine if there was contra evidence in assessing the appropriateness of the Group's cash flow forecasts. |
||
| We assessed the appropriateness of the related disclosures including the disclosures of reasonably possible changes in key assumptions which would cause the carrying amounts to exceed the recoverable amount. |



Financial statements for the year to December 31, 2020
| ▪ | Balance sheet at December 31, 2020 | 1 |
|---|---|---|
| ▪ | Income statement for the year to December 31, 2020 | 2 |
| ▪ | Statement of changes in equity for the year to December 31, 2020 | 3 |
| ▪ | Cash flow statement for the year to December 31, 2020 | 5 |
| ▪ | Notes to the financial statements for the year to December 31, 2020 | 6 |
| MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR THE YEAR TO DECEMBER 31, 2020 | ||
STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITIES
| ASSETS NON-CURRENT ASSETS 9.340.132 7.864.567 Investments in Group companies Equity instruments 6 7.573.190 7.658.193 Loan receivable from Group companies 7,14 1.746.961 184.234 Non-current financial assets Equity instruments 7 17.945 14.536 Deferred tax asset 10 2.036 7.604 CURRENT ASSETS 1.785.011 1.004.129 Trade and other receivables Clients, Group companies 7,14 130.548 201.678 Current tax receivable 10 95.658 88.718 Other receivables 7 15.489 10.828 Investments in Group companies Loan receivable from Group companies 7,14 16.078 8.822 Cash and cash equivalents Cash 7,8 3.987 80.415 Cash equivalents 7,8 1.523.251 613.668 TOTAL ASSETS 11.125.143 8.868.696 EQUITY AND LIABILITIES EQUITY 8.580.805 6.209.366 SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDS Capital Registered share capital 9 497.147 996.016 Share premium 9 7.770.439 5.327.295 Reserves Legal and statutory reserves 9 205.799 205.799 Other reserves 9 309.146 (897.437) Own shares and equity holdings 9 (39.168) (59.568) (Loss)/profit for the year 3 (296.305) 763.583 Interim dividend 3 - (287.728) Other equity instruments 9 130.338 166.141 VALUATION ADJUSTMENTS Currency differences 9 3.409 (4.735) LIABILITIES NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 2.273.705 2.499.510 Non-current debt Bond and other marketable securities 7 1.461.828 1.448.995 Group companies, non-current 7,14 811.877 1.047.515 Deferred tax liability 10 - 3.000 CURRENT LIABILITIES 270.633 159.820 Current provisions 10 5.391 4.347 Current debt Bond and other marketable securities 7 13.125 13.125 Group companies, current 7,14 217.047 6.271 Trade and other payables Suppliers, Group companies 7,14 7.397 40.316 Various creditors 7 15.135 15.768 Payroll accruals 7 - 9.723 Current tax payable 10 - 447 Other amounts due to tax authorities 10 12.538 69.823 |
Note | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 11.125.143 8.868.696 |
| Note | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuing operations | |||
| Revenue from operations | 42.489 | 893.487 | |
| Rendering of services to Group companies | 11,14 | 42.489 | 68.341 |
| Dividend income | 14 | - | 825.146 |
| Employee costs | 11 | (18.949) | (52.459) |
| Wages, salaries and other costs | (15.413) | (44.483) | |
| Social security costs | (3.536) | (7.976) | |
| Other operating expenses | (19.863) | (29.846) | |
| External services received | (18.607) | (28.315) | |
| Other operating expenses | (1.256) | (1.531) | |
| Impairment and (losses)/gains on financial instruments | 6 | (160.003) | - |
| Impairment losses on equity instruments, Group companies | (160.003) | - | |
| OPERATING (LOSS)/PROFIT | (156.326) | 811.182 | |
| Finance income | 26.257 | 13.250 | |
| Marketable securities and other financial instruments | |||
| Receivable from debt with Group companies and associates | 11,14 | 15.995 | 13.110 |
| Receivable from third parties | 11 | 10.262 | 140 |
| Finance costs | (52.360) | (59.929) | |
| Payable on debt with Group companies and associates | 11,14 | (17.950) | (15.905) |
| Payable on debt with third parties | 11 | (34.410) | (44.024) |
| Impairment and (losses)/gains on financial instruments | 6,11 | (108.917) | - |
| Impairment losses on loans receivable from Group companies | (108.917) | - | |
| Change in fair value of financial instruments | - | (18.715) | |
| Currency differences | 17 | 344 | |
| NET FINANCE EXPENSE | (135.003) | (65.050) | |
| (LOSS)/PROFIT BEFORE TAX | (291.329) | 746.132 | |
| Taxes | 10 | (4.976) | 17.451 |
| (LOSS)/PROFIT FOR THE YEAR | 3 | (296.305) | 763.583 |
| Note | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (LOSS)/PROFIT FOR THE YEAR | 3 | (296.305) | 763.583 |
| Income and expenses recognised directly in equity | |||
| Currency differences | 8.144 | (1.134) | |
| TOTAL INCOME AND EXPENSES RECOGNISED DIRECTLY IN EQUITY | 9 | 8.144 | (1.134) |
| TOTAL INCOME AND EXPENSES RECOGNISED | (288.161) | 762.449 |
| Issued | Own shares | Other | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| share capital |
Share premium |
Reserves | and equity holdings |
(Loss)/profit for the year |
Interim dividend |
equity instruments |
Valuation adjustments 1 |
TOTAL | |
| BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2018 | 996.016 | 6.021.802 | (777.971) | (67.292) | 662.180 | (287.580) | 186.752 | (3.601) | 6.730.306 |
| Total recognised income and expense | - | - | - | - | 763.583 | - | - | (1.134) | 762.449 |
| Transactions with shareholders and owners | - | (694.507) | (288.267) | 7.724 | - | (287.728) | (53.485) | - | (1.316.263) |
| Vesting of share-based payment schemes | - | - | 726 | 7.724 | - | - | (14.583) | - | (6.133) |
| Equity portion of convertible bond redeemed | - | - | 38.418 | - | - | - | (38.902) | - | (484) |
| Dividend | - | (694.507) | (327.411) | - | - | (287.728) | - | - | (1.309.646) |
| Other movements in equity | - | - | - | - | - | - | 32.874 | - | 32.874 |
| Share-based payments cost (note 15) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 32.874 | - | 32.874 |
| Appropriation of prior year profit | 374.600 | (662.180) | 287.580 | - | |||||
| BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2019 | 996.016 | 5.327.295 | (691.638) | (59.568) | 763.583 | (287.728) | 166.141 | (4.735) | 6.209.366 |
| Total recognised income and expense | - | - | - | - | (296.305) | - | - | 8.144 | (288.161) |
| Transactions with shareholders and owners | - | - | 3.576 | 20.400 | - | - | (25.568) | - | (1.592) |
| Vesting of share-based payment schemes | - | - | 3.576 | 20.400 | - | - | (25.568) | - | (1.592) |
| Other movements in equity | (498.869) | 2.443.144 | 727.152 | - | - | - | (10.235) | - | 2.661.192 |
| Share-based payments credit (note 15) | - | - | - | - | - | - | (10.235) | - | (10.235) |
| Share capital reduction | (796.813) | - | 796.813 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rights issue | 297.944 | 2.443.144 | (69.661) | - | - | - | - | - | 2.671.427 |
| Appropriation of prior year profit | - | - | 475.855 | - | (763.583) | 287.728 | - | - | - |
| BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2020 | 497.147 | 7.770.439 | 514.945 | (39.168) | (296.305) | - | 130.338 | 3.409 | 8.580.805 |
1 Relates to currency translation adjustments only.
(Expressed in thousands of euros)
| Note | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||
| (Loss)/profit for the year before tax (Loss)/profit from continuing operations |
|||
| (291.329) | 746.132 | ||
| Adjustments to (loss)/profit | |||
| Finance income | 11 | (26.257) | (13.250) |
| Dividend income | 14 | - | (825.146) |
| Finance expenses | 11 | 52.360 | 59.929 |
| Change in fair value of financial instruments | - | 18.715 | |
| Currency differences | (17) | (344) | |
| Share-based payments | 15 | (5.086) | 14.381 |
| Impairment charge | 6,14 | 268.920 | - |
| Changes in working capital | |||
| Trade and other payables | (48.746) | 35.464 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 43.947 | (62.246) | |
| Other current liabilities | - | 2.225 | |
| Other current assets | - | (5.783) | |
| Other cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Interest paid | (7.887) | (1.594) | |
| Taxation received | - | 112.808 | |
| Dividend received from Group companies | - | 825.146 | |
| CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | (14.095) | 906.437 | |
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||
| Amounts paid | |||
| Purchase of other equity instruments | 7 | (3.409) | (8.329) |
| Amount paid to Group companies | (1.753.550) | (43.054) | |
| Amounts received | |||
| Interest received | 9.753 | 256 | |
| Amount received from Group companies | 15.755 | 12.714 | |
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | (1.731.451) | (38.413) | |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||
| Receipts and payments on equity instruments | |||
| Repayment of equity instruments | (13.125) | (507.465) | |
| Proceeds from rights issue | 9 | 2.674.321 | - |
| Receipts and payments on financial liabilities | |||
| Issue | |||
| Debt with Credit institutions | - | 987.062 | |
| Debt with Group companies | - | 348.231 | |
| Repayment | |||
| Debt with Group companies | (27.554) | (24.012) | |
| Dividend payments and receipts from other equity instruments | |||
| Dividend paid | 3 | (53.285) | (1.308.240) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | 2.580.357 | (504.424) | |
| IMPACT OF EXCHANGE DIFFERENCES | (1.656) | (7.221) | |
| INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 833.155 | 356.379 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 7,8 | 694.083 | 337.704 |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT THE END OF THE YEAR | 7,8 | 1.527.238 | 694.083 |
Notes to the financial statements continued
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (hereinafter the 'Company' or 'IAG') is a leading European airline group, formed to hold the interests of airline and ancillary operations. IAG is a Spanish company registered in Madrid and was incorporated December 17, 2009. On January 21, 2011 British Airways Plc and Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España S.A. Operadora (hereinafter 'British Airways' and 'Iberia' respectively) completed a merger transaction becoming the first two airlines of the Group. Vueling Airlines, S.A. (hereinafter 'Vueling') was acquired on April 26, 2013 and Aer Lingus Group DAC (hereinafter 'Aer Lingus') was acquired on August 18, 2015. During 2017, the Group incorporated FLY LEVEL S.L. and FLYLEVEL UK Limited (hereinafter 'LEVEL') and IAG Connect Limited (hereinafter 'IAG Connect'), with a 100 per cent investment by the Company. The objective and main activity, among others, of the Company is the acquisition, ownership, management and disposal of shares or other equity interests in other companies, provision of management services to those companies, and significant Group investments including aircraft procurement.
IAG is a Spanish Private Law entity, incorporated for an indefinite period by virtue of a public deed granted before the Public Notary of Madrid Ignacio Martínez-Gil Vich on December 17, 2009 under number 3.866 of his files, with its registered office in Madrid, at El Caserío, Iberia Zona Industrial nº 2 (La Muñoza), Camino de La Muñoza, s/n, 28042, Madrid, Spain and entered at the Madrid Mercantille Registry with registration number M-492129 in Volume 27312, Book 0, Section 8, Folio 11.
IAG holds a premium listing on the FTSE's UK index series. IAG shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange's main market for listed securities and also on the stock exchanges of Madrid, Barcelona, Bilbao and Valencia (the 'Spanish Stock Exchanges'), through the Spanish Stock Exchanges Interconnection System ('Mercado Continuo Español').
IAG is the parent Company of British Airways, Iberia, Vueling, Aer Lingus, IAG Cargo Ltd (hereinafter 'IAG Cargo'), Veloz Holdco, S.L.U. (hereinafter 'Veloz'), IAG GBS, AERL Holding Limited (hereinafter 'AERL Holding'), LEVEL and IAG Connect all collectively defined as the 'Group'. The Group presents consolidated financial statements separately.
The Company's presentation currency is euro. The United Kingdom ('UK') branch's functional currency is pound sterling as this is the currency of the economic environment in which it operates.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles approved by Royal Decree 1514/2007, of November 16, which was amended in 2016 by Royal Decree 602/2016 of December 2, and the remaining prevailing mercantile law.
These financial statements have been prepared by the Directors of the Company for submission to and for approval at the General Shareholders' Meeting, where it is expected they will be approved without modification.
The Company has net assets of €8.580.805.000 (2019: €6.209.366.000) on the Balance sheet and recorded a €296.305.000 loss for the year (2019: €763.583.000 profit).
The figures shown in these financial statements are presented in thousands of euros unless otherwise indicated.
The economic uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmented and varied responses from governments have had a significant impact on the Company's and the Group's results and cash flows. At December 31, 2020, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of €1.5 billion and a further €0.2 billion of committed and undrawn general facilities and the Group had cash and interest-bearing deposits of €5.9 billion, €0.9 billion of committed and undrawn general facilities and a further €1.2 billion of committed and undrawn aircraft specific facilities. Group liquidity has been enhanced through to the date of this report by a further €2.2 billion arising from the Group finalising the terms of a UK Export Credit Facility.
The increase in liquidity in the Company during 2020 principally arose from the successful completion of the Rights issue in October 2020, which generated €2.7 billion of proceeds. Of these proceeds, the Company has provided long term loans to its undertakings of €1.7 billion.
In addition to the Rights issue, the Group has undertaken other mitigating actions, which amongst other actions, included accessing Spain's Instituto de Crédito Oficial (ICO) facility, the UK's Coronavirus Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF) and Ireland's Strategy Investment Fund (ISIF). These actions raised an additional €1.4 billion, of which €0.3 billion matures within 12 months from the date of this report. The Group's facilities do not contain significant financial covenants, but there are a number of non-financial covenants to protect the position of the banks, including restrictions on the upstreaming of cash to the Company or lending to other Group companies.
Despite the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Group has continued to successfully secure financing arrangements for all aircraft delivered in 2020. This includes the one-year aircraft-backed financing facilities for old and new aircraft which were secured in the second quarter of 2020 and subsequently repaid prior to year-end and the aircraft-specific facility achieved as part of the Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificate (EETC) financing structure. In total the Group raised proceeds of €2.2 billion through aircraft specific financing.
In its assessment of going concern over the period to March 31, 2022, (the 'going concern period'), the Company and the Group have modelled two scenarios referred to below as the Base Case and the Downside Case.
Notes to the financial statements continued
The Group's three-year Business plan, prepared and approved by the Board in December 2020, was subsequently refreshed with the latest available internal and external information in February 2021. This refreshed Business plan supports the Base Case, which takes into account the Board's and management's views on the anticipated impact and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic on the Group across the going concern period. The key inputs and assumptions underlying the Base Case include:
The Downside Case applies further stress to the Base Case to model a more prolonged downturn, with a more gradual recovery relative to the Base Case. The Downside Case is representative of a slower roll out of the vaccination programme on a regional basis, with travel restrictions remaining in place and the gradual recovery of capacity being delayed longer than in the Base Case. The Downside Case also models a more acute impact on the longhaul sector, with the domestic sector and European shorthaul sectors recovering faster than longhaul. The result of which is that the levels of capacity assumed under the Base Case for the third quarter of 2021 are not achieved under the Downside Case until the first quarter of 2022. In the Downside Case, over the going concern period capacity would be 60 per cent down on 2019. The Directors of the Company consider the Downside Case to be a severe but plausible scenario.
The Company and the Group have modelled the impact of further deteriorations in capacity operated and yield, including mitigating actions to reduce operating and capital expenditure. The Company and the Group expect to be able to continue to secure financing for future aircraft deliveries and in addition has further potential mitigating actions, including asset disposals, it would pursue in the event of adverse liquidity experience.
Furthermore, to add resilience to the liquidity position of the Company and the Group, the Directors are actively pursuing a range of financing options, including the renegotiation of existing financing arrangements and securing additional long term financial facilities, but these have not been included in the Base or Downside Cases.
Having reviewed the Base Case, Downside Case and additional sensitivities, the Directors of the Company have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group have sufficient liquidity to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and hence continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
However, due to the uncertainty created by COVID-19, there are a number of significant factors that are outside of the control of the Company and the Group, including: the status and impact of the pandemic worldwide, the emergence of new variants of the virus and potential resurgence of existing strains of the virus; the availability of vaccines worldwide; together with the speed at which they are deployed; the efficacy of those vaccines; and the restrictions imposed by national governments in respect of the freedom of movement and travel. The Company and the Group, therefore, are not able to provide certainty that there could not be a more severe downside scenario than those they have considered, including the sensitivities in relation to the timing of recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, capacity operated, impact on yield, cost mitigations achieved and the availability of aircraft financing to offset capital expenditure. In the event that a more severe scenario were to occur, the Company and the Group will need to secure sufficient additional funding. As set out above, sources of additional funding are expected to include the renegotiation of existing financing arrangements and securing additional long term financial facilities. However, the Company's and the Group's ability to obtain this additional funding in the event of a more severe downside scenario represents a material uncertainty at February 25, 2021 that could cast significant doubt upon the Company's and the Group's ability to continue as a going concern.
The financial statements do not include the adjustments that would result if the Company was unable to continue as a going concern.
Notes to the financial statements continued
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared from the Company's accounting records in accordance with prevailing Spanish accounting legislation to give a true and fair view of its equity, financial position and reserves. The cash flow statement has been prepared to present fairly the origin and usage of monetary assets, such as cash and cash equivalents.
According to corporate law, the prior year information in the Balance sheet, Income statement, Statement of other comprehensive income, Statement of changes in equity and Cash flow statement is presented for comparison purposes, in addition to figures for 2020. The notes to the financial statements also include quantitative information for the prior year, unless an accounting standard specifies that it is not necessary.
The Directors have prepared the financial statements using estimates and assumptions based on current and historical experience and various other factors that affect the reported value of the assets and liabilities, and are considered reasonable under the circumstances. The carrying amount of assets and liabilities, which are not readily apparent from other sources, were established on the basis of these estimates. The Directors are not aware of any specific risks that might significantly alter the value of the assets or liabilities in the following year and, therefore, considers that it is not necessary to make estimates of uncertainty at the end of the reporting period.
The Company assesses whether there are any indicators of impairment for non-financial assets at each reporting date. Equity investments in Group companies are tested annually for impairment. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amounts of equity investments in Group companies have been determined based on the future cash flows of the investments, which require the use of estimates and assumptions, including three year business plan assumptions, long-term growth rates and discount rates.
Impairment losses can be reversed and recognised in the Income statement if there is any indication that the impairment loss no longer exists. The reversal is limited to the carrying value of the asset that would have been recognised on the reversal date had the original impairment not occurred.
The Group operates a number of equity-settled, share-based payment plans, under which the Group awards equity instruments of the Company for services rendered by employees. The fair value of the share-based payment plans is measured at the date of grant using an appropriate valuation model. The resulting cost in respect of employees of the Company, as adjusted for the expected and actual level of vesting of the plan, is charged to the Income statement over the period in which the options vest. At each balance sheet date before vesting, the cumulative expense is calculated representing the extent to which the vesting period has expired and management's best estimate of the achievement or otherwise of non-market conditions, of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The movement in the cumulative expense since the previous balance sheet date is recognised in the Income statement with a corresponding entry in equity.
The Company recorded a loss for the year of €296.305.000 (2019: €763.583.000 profit). Accordingly, the Board of Directors will submit the following proposed appropriation of the 2020 result for approval at the Shareholders' Meeting:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Proposed appropriation: | ||
| (Loss)/profit for the year | (296.305) | 763.583 |
| (296.305) | 763.583 | |
| Appropriation to: | ||
| Legal reserves | - | - |
| Interim dividend | - | 287.728 |
| Voluntary reserve (remaining amount of the profit for the year after the above referred distributions) |
- | 475.855 |
| Prior year losses | (296.305) | - |
| (296.305) | 763.583 |
In addition, the Company's Board will submit for approval at the Shareholders' Meeting the reclassification of the excess of the legal reserve over the legal requirement (20% of the share capital), i.e., an amount of €106.369.600, to voluntary reserves.
Notes to the financial statements continued
On October 30, 2019 the Board of Directors approved an interin dividend of 14,5 € cents per share. The interim cash dividend was paid on December 2, 2019 for a total amount (net of withholding tax of €54.688.000) of €287.728.000. The withholding tax was paid from December 2019.
Proposed dividends on ordinary shares are subject to approval at the Annual Shareholders' Meeting and, subject to approval, are recognised as a liability on that date.
As a result of the impact of COVID-19, on April 2, 2020, IAG's Board of Directors resolved to withdraw the proposal to the subsequent Annual Shareholders' Meeting to pay a final dividend for 2019 of 17,0 € cents per share.
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash dividends on ordinary shares declared | ||
| Interim dividend for 2019 of 14,5 € cents per share | - | 287.728 |
| Final dividend for 2018 of 16,5 € cents per share | - | 327.411 |
| Special dividend of 35,0 € cents per share | 694.507 | |
| Proposed dividends on ordinary shares | ||
| Final dividend of 17,0 € cents per share | - | 337.483 |
The Company is obliged to transfer 10 per cent of the profit for the year to a legal reserve until this reserve reaches an amount at least equal to 20 per cent of share capital. Unless the balance of the reserve exceeds this amount, it cannot be distributed to shareholders. The distributable reserves at December 31, 2020 are €7.770.439.000 (2019: €5.213.350.000).
Once the guidance provided by the law or the statutes has been covered, dividends can only be distributed from profit for the year, or from distributable reserves, if the value of equity is not or, does not become as a result of the distribution, lower than share capital. In this case, the profit charged directly to equity cannot be distributed, directly or indirectly. If losses from previous years existed, that make the Company's equity lower than share capital, the profits would be used to compensate those losses.
The main recognition and measurement accounting policies applied in the preparation of the 2020 financial statements are the following:
Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the Company. All other lease arrangements are classified as operating leases.
For operating leases, the total minimum payments, measured at inception, are charged to the Income statement in equal annual amounts over the term of the lease.
Intangible assets are stated at acquisition price or the cost of development if internally generated, less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses.
The Company recognises costs incurred to acquire and develop computer software that is separable from an item of related hardware as intangible assets. These are amortised from the date the system is available for use and amortised on a straightline basis generally over a period of five years with certain specific software developments amortised over a period of up to 10 years.
Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The Company depreciates property, plant and equipment on a straight-line basis at annual rates over their useful economic lives. The estimated useful economic lives of property, plant and equipment are as follows:
Computer equipment: 4 years Fixtures and fittings: 15 years
Notes to the financial statements continued
Equity investments in Group companies include investments in entities over which the Company has control. On intial recognition the investments are measured at fair value, which generally is equal to the fair value of the consideration paid, plus directly attributable transaction costs. Equity investments are subsequently measured at cost less, where appropriate, provisions for impairment, or distributions received recognised against the cost of the investment.
Assets that are subject to amortisation are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Equity investments in Group companies are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less cost to dispose and the equity value, which is based on the associated future cash flows of the related CGUs. Non-financial assets other than goodwill that have suffered an impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.
Other current interest-bearing deposits, principally comprising funds held with banks and other financial institutions, are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets including listed and unlisted investments, excluding interests in subsidiaries. After initial recognition, available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognised in other comprehensive income until the investment is sold or becomes impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in other comprehensive income is recognised in the income statement. Where there is no active market, fair value is determined using valuation techniques. Where fair value cannot be reliably estimated, assets are carried at cost.
Derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date the derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at their fair value. The resulting gain or loss arising from remeasurement is recognised in the Income statement unless the derivative financial instrument has been designated as a hedge of a highly probable expected future cash flow and is assessed as effective, when gains and losses are recognised in equity. Gains or losses recorded in equity are reflected in the Income statement when either the hedged cash flow impacts the Income statement or the hedged item is no longer expected to occur.
The Company assesses at each balance sheet date whether a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired.
The carrying amount of financial assets is adjusted to the Income statement when there is objective evidence of actual impairment.
To determine an impairment loss, the Company assesses the loss of individual as well as groups of assets with similar risk characteristics.
There is objective evidence that debt instruments (trade receivables and loans) are impaired when an event has occurred after the initial recognition of the instrument that has a negative impact on related estimated future cash flows.
The Company classifies as impaired assets (doubtful exposures) debt instruments for which there is objective evidence of impairment, which refers primarily to the existence of unpaid balances, non-compliance issues, refinancing and data which evidences the possible irrecoverability of total agreed upon future cash flows or collection delays.
The reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in the Income statement. Such reversal is limited to the carrying amount of the financial asset that would have been recognised on the reversal date had no impairment loss been recognised.
Notes to the financial statements continued
4.6.1 Financial assets continued
There is objective evidence that equity instruments are impaired when one or more events have occurred after initial recognition that indicate that the carrying value may not be recovered due to a prolonged or significant decline in fair value.
For investments in Group companies, joint ventures and associates, the reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in the Income statement and is limited to the carrying value of the investment that would have been recognised on the reversal date had the original impairment not occurred. An impairment loss recognised in previous years from available-for-sale financial assets cannot be reversed.
On initial recognition, the financial liabilities included in this category are recognised at fair value, which unless there is information to the contrary, is the transaction price, which will be equal to the fair value of the consideration received adjusted by directly attributable transaction costs. However, trade and other payables maturing within 12 months where there is no contractual interest rate can be measured at their nominal value when the effect of discounting is not material.
Subsequent to initial measurement, financial liabilities in this category are measured at amortised cost. However, other payables maturing within 12 months which, as indicated above, are initially recognised at their nominal value, continue to be recognised at that amount.
Financial assets are derecognised in the Company's balance sheet when the contractual rights on the financial assets' cash flows have expired or when they are transferred, as long as the risks and rewards of ownership are substantially transferred. The Company derecognises a financial liability when the obligation is extinguished.
Where an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, such that the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised in the Income statement.
Convertible bonds are classified as compound instruments, consisting of a liability and an equity component. At the date of issue, the fair value of the liability component is estimated using the prevailing market interest rate for similar non-convertible debt, and is subsequently recorded at an amortised cost basis using the effective interest method until extinguished on conversion or maturity of the convertible bonds, and is recognised within Bond and other securities payable. The difference between the proceeds of issue of the convertible bond and the fair value assigned to the liability component, representing the embedded option to convert the liability into equity of the Group, is included in Other equity instruments within the balance sheet and is not subsequently remeasured.
Issue costs are apportioned between the liability and equity components of the convertible bonds where appropriate based on their relative carrying amounts at the date of issue. The portion relating to the equity component is charged directly against equity.
The interest expense on the liability component is calculated by applying the effective interest rate for similar non-convertible debt to the liability component of the instrument. The difference between this amount and the interest paid is added to the carrying amount of the liability.
Shares in the Company purchased and held directly by the Company are classified as Treasury shares and shown as deductions from Shareholders' funds at cost. When these shares are cancelled, Share capital is reduced by the nominal value of the cancelled shares, with an increase in the Redeemed capital reserve. No gain or loss is recognised in the Income statement on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of equity shares.
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand and deposits with any qualifying financial institution repayable on demand or maturing within three months of the date of acquisition and which are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value.
Notes to the financial statements continued
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency of the branch using the spot exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. At each balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated into euro at the rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at balance sheet exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the Income statement.
The net assets of foreign operations are translated into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. Profits and losses of such operations are translated into euros at average rates of exchange during the year. The resulting exchange differences are taken directly to a separate component of equity until all or part of the interest is sold, when the relevant portion of the cumulative exchange is recognised in the Income statement.
Current tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities, based on the legislation in force.
Deferred income tax is recognised on all temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements, with the following exceptions:
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured on an undiscounted basis at the tax rates that are expected to apply when the related asset is realised or liability is settled, based on legislation in force.
Income tax is charged or credited directly to equity if it relates to items that are credited or charged to equity. Otherwise income tax is recognised in the Income statement.
Revenue and expenses are recognised on an accrual basis, regardless of when the resulting monetary or financial flow arises.
Provisions are made when an obligation exists for a present liability in respect of a past event and where the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated. Restructuring provisions are made for direct expenditures of a business reorganisation where the plans are sufficiently detailed and well advanced and where appropriate communication to those affected has been undertaken at the balance sheet date.
If the effect is material, expected future cash flows are discounted using a rate that reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the provision. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to unwinding the discount is recognised as a finance cost.
The Company offers a defined contribution pension plan to all IAG employees. A defined contribution plan is a pension plan under which the Company pays fixed contributions into a separate entity. The Company has no legal or constructive obligations to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior years. Current service costs are recognised within the Income statement in the year in which they arise. At each financial year end, accrued contributions payable are recognised in the Balance sheet.
Notes to the financial statements continued
The Company operates a number of equity-settled, share-based payment plans, under which the Company awards equity instruments for services rendered by employees. The fair value of the share-based payment plans is measured at the date of grant using an appropriate valuation model (note 15). The resulting cost is adjusted to reflect expected and actual levels of vesting, and is charged to the Income statement over the vesting period.
At each balance sheet date before vesting, the cumulative expense is calculated, representing the extent to which the vesting period has expired and management's best estimate of the achievement or otherwise of non-market conditions, and accordingly the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The movement in the cumulative expense since the previous balance sheet date is recognised in the Income statement with a corresponding entry in equity.
Dividend distributions are recognised as a liability in the year in which the dividends are approved by the Company's shareholders. Interim dividends are recognised when they are paid and final dividends are recognised when authorised in general meetings by shareholders.
Related party transactions are carried out at an arm's length basis and recorded according to the accounting policies set out in this note.
Assets and liabilities are presented in the Balance sheet as either current or non-current. The assets and liabilities are classified as current when linked to the normal operating cycle of the Company.
When an asset or liability is not linked to the normal operating cycle but the Company expects the asset or liability to mature or liquidate, or plans to dispose of the asset or liability within 12 months, then these are also classified as current when they are maintained for the purposes of operations, or the instrument is related to cash and cash equivalents.
Any asset or liability whose use is restricted to beyond one year is classified as non-current.
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the Balance sheet when there is a legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis or realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
The Company has a leased property in Madrid which is leased from Iberia and expires in one year. The contract has an option to review the duration of the lease on an annual basis. The Company also has an office in London which is leased from British Airways. The lease expires in two years.
The annual cost of the leases is €542.000 (2019: €693.000). The amount of future minimum lease payment is €531.000 (2019: €558.000) for less than one year and €390.000 for between 1 year and 2 years.
The details and movement of individual items that comprise this section are:
| €'000 | January 1 | Additions | Impairment | December 31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | ||||
| Equity instruments | ||||
| Cost | 8.000.959 | 75.000 | (160.003) | 7.915.956 |
| Distribution received | (342.766) | - | - | (342.766) |
| 7.658.193 | 75.000 | (160.003) | 7.573.190 | |
| 2019 | ||||
| Equity instruments | ||||
| Cost | 7.973.959 | 27.000 | - | 8.000.959 |
| Distribution received | (342.766) | - | - | (342.766) |
| 7.631.193 | 27.000 | - | 7.658.193 |
Notes to the financial statements continued
On August 24, 2020, November 19, 2020 and December 16, 2020 the Company invested €25.000.000, €25.000.000 and €25.000.000 respectively in the equity of FLY LEVEL S.L. which is a 100 per cent owned subsidiary. The full carrying amount of the investment in LEVEL of €160.003.000 was impaired during the year as explained in section 3 of this note.
On June 10, 2019 and December 17, 2019 the Company invested €17.000.000 and €10.000.000 respectively in the equity of FLY LEVEL S.L. which is a 100 per cent owned subsidiary.
Brexit has led the Company to implement plans approved by national regulators in Spain and Ireland to ensure the EU-licensed airlines continue to meet EU ownership and control rules. As required, the EU has been notified about them. They include creating a national ownership structure for Aer Lingus and changes to IAG's long-standing Spanish structure.
Information at December 31 on the Group companies, prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, is as follows:
| Business activity |
Percentage of ownership¹ |
Capital | Reserves | Profit/(loss) after tax for the year |
Total shareholders' equity |
Operating profit/(loss) |
Dividend received during the year |
Net book value €'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | |||||||||
| €'000 | |||||||||
| Iberia | Passenger air transport |
100% | 743.420 | 893.504 | (1.648.465) | (11.541) | (1.465.850) | - | 2.388.548 |
| Aer Lingus | Passenger air transport |
Indirect³ | 28.015 | 792.924 | (502.995) | 317.944 | (562.840) | - | - |
| Vueling | Passenger air transport |
Indirect² | 29.905 | 151.663 | (778.773) | (597.205) | (861.685) | - | - |
| Veloz | Holding company |
100% | 33 | 267.420 | (52.498) | 214.955 | (187) | - | 166.139 |
| Aerl Holding |
Holding company |
100% | 760.000 | 533.868 | (3.421) | 1.290.447 | (94) | - | 836.000 |
| LEVEL | Passenger air transport |
100% | 3 | 106.055 | (200.427) | (94.369) | (192.214) | - | - |
| £'000 | |||||||||
| British Airways |
Passenger air transport |
100% | 290.000 | 4.766.000 | (3.489.000) | 1.567.000 | (3.881.000) | - | 4.155.397 |
| IAG Cargo | Cargo air transport |
100% | - | 4.459 | (2.488) | 1.971 | (2.509) | - | - |
| IAG GBS | Business services |
100% | 20.000 | (16.390) | (12.256) | (8.646) | (15.927) | - | 22.218 |
| IAG Connect |
eCommerce platform |
100% | - | 1.985 | 2.064 | 4.049 | 2.546 | - | 4.888 |
| Polish złoty '000 IAG GBS Poland |
Business services |
1%⁴ | - | 4.418 | 1.060 | 5.478 | 1.626 | - | - |
| Other Group companies |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||
| 7.573.190 |
Notes to the financial statements continued
| Business activity |
Percentage of ownership¹ |
Capital | Reserves | Profit/(loss) after tax for the year |
Total shareholders' equity |
Operating profit/(loss) |
Dividend received during the year |
Net book value €'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | |||||||||
| €'000 | |||||||||
| Iberia | Passenger air transport |
100% | 743.420 | 672.921 | 376.762 | 1.793.103 | 481.508 | 181.965 | 2.388.548 |
| Aer Lingus | Passenger air transport |
Indirect³ | 27.015 | 558.943 | 225.589 | 811.547 | 275.639 | - | - |
| Vueling | Passenger air transport |
Indirect² | 29.905 | 75.793 | 165.076 | 270.774 | 240.835 | - | - |
| Veloz | Holding company |
100% | 33 | 230.516 | 36.906 | 267.455 | 37.492 | 30.000 | 166.139 |
| Aerl Holding | Holding company |
100% | 760.000 | 256.780 | 277.088 | 1.293.868 | 61 | - | 836.000 |
| LEVEL | Passenger air transport |
100% | 3 | 58.458 | (39.262) | 19.199 | (29.735) | - | 85.003 |
| £'000 | |||||||||
| British Airways | Passenger air transport |
100% | 290.000 | 4.408.000 | 1.109.000 | 5.807.000 | 1.338.000 | 534.218 | 4.155.397 |
| IAG Cargo | Cargo air transport |
100% | - | 4.270 | 189 | 4.459 | 330 | - | - |
| IAG GBS | Business services |
100% | 20.000 | (15.872) | (517) | 3.611 | 479 | - | 22.218 |
| IAG Connect | eCommerce platform |
100% | - | 1.233 | 752 | 1.985 | 928 | - | 4.888 |
| Polish złoty '000 IAG GBS Poland |
Business services |
1%⁴ | - | 3.403 | 1.015 | 4.418 | 1.533 | - | - |
| Other Group companies |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||
| 7.658.193 |
1 IAG holds a direct investment of 90,02 per cent in British Airways and a direct investment of 86,45 per cent in Iberia. The remaining indirect investment by IAG is represented by the cross-holdings between British Airways and Iberia.
The Company holds 49,9 per cent of the total nominal share capital and the total number of voting rights in IB Opco Holding, S.L. (and thus, indirectly, in Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España, S.A. Operadora), such stake having almost 100 per cent of the economic rights in these companies. The remaining shares, representing 50,1 per cent of the total nominal share capital and the total number of voting rights belong to a Spanish company incorporated for the purposes of implementing the Iberia nationality structure.
The Company holds 49,9 per cent of the total number of voting rights and 99,65 per cent of the total nominal share capital in British Airways Plc, such stake having almost 100 per cent of the economic rights. The remaining nominal share capital and voting rights, representing 0,35 per cent and 50,1 per cent respectively, correspond to a trust established for the purposes of implementing the British Airways nationality structure.
2IAG holds an indirect investment of 99,50 per cent in Vueling through its subsidiaries Iberia (50,00 per cent) and Veloz (49,50 per cent).
3IAG holds 49,75 per cent of the total number of voting rights and almost 100 per cent of the economic rights in Aer Lingus. The remaining voting rights, representing 50,25 per cent, correspond to a trust established for implementing the Aer Lingus nationality structure.
4 IAG holds a direct investment of 1 per cent in IAG GBS Poland and an indirect investment of 99 per cent through IAG GBS.
IAG holds a direct investment of 100 per cent in IAG Connect Limited.
IAG holds a direct investment of 100 per cent in FLY LEVEL S.L.
Notes to the financial statements continued
British Airways' registered office is at Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, London, UB7 0GB, United Kingdom. The main activity of British Airways is the operation of international and domestic air services for the carriage of passengers and cargo. In addition it provides ancillary services, BA Holidays and aircraft maintenance services.
Iberia's registered office is at Calle Martínez Villergas 49, 28027, Madrid, Spain. The main business of Iberia is the operation of international and domestic air services for the carriage of passengers and cargo. In addition it provides ancillary services including aircraft maintenance services.
Veloz's registered office is at Parque de Negocios Mas Blau II Pla de l'Estany 5, 08820 El Prat de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. The main business of Veloz consists of the acquisition and holding of shares or equity interests in Vueling, as well as the management and disposition of such equity interests.
IAG Cargo's registered office is at Carrus Cargo Centre, PO Box 99, Sealand Road, London Heathrow Airport, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW6 2JS, United Kingdom. The principal activity of IAG Cargo is commercial sales, support and management services in the provision of air freight on the British Airways, Iberia and Aer Lingus networks.
IAG GBS's registered office is at Waterside (HAA2), PO Box 365, Speedbird Way, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UB7 0GB, United Kingdom. The principal activity is the provision of business services to the IAG Group.
IAG GBS Poland's registered office is at ul. Opolska 114, 31-323 Kraków, Poland. The principal activity is the provision of business services to the IAG Group.
AERL Holding's registered office is at Waterside (HAA2), PO Box 365, Speedbird Way, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UB7 0GB, United Kingdom. The principal activity is acquisition and holding of equity interests in Aer Lingus Group DAC and the management and disposition of such equity interests.
FLY LEVEL S.L.'s registered office is at El Caserío, Camino de la Muñoza s/n, Iberia zona Industrial no 2, 28042 Madrid, Spain. The principal activity is passenger air transport.
IAG Connect Limited's registered office is at Dublin Airport, County Dublin, Republic of Ireland. The principal activity is the provision of the Group's inflight eCommerce platform.
In accordance with article 155 of the Spanish Companies Law (Ley de Sociedades de Capital), the Company has duly notified the abovementioned subsidiaries of the acquisitions of its share capital.
The principal equity investments in Group companies comprise British Airways, Iberia, Veloz (the holding company of Vueling) and AERL Holding (the holding company of Aer Lingus).
The recoverable amounts of investments have been measured based on their value-in-use, which utilises a weighted average multi-scenario discounted cash flow model. The recoverable amounts are determined by the difference between the carrying amount of the investments and their respective value-in-use calculations. The details of these scenarios are given in the going concern section of note 2, with a weighting of 70 per cent to the base case and 30 per cent to the downside case.
Cash flow projections are based on the business plans approved by the relevant operating companies covering a three-year period. Cash flows extrapolated beyond the three-year period are projected to increase based on long-term growth rates. Cash flow projections are discounted using pre-tax discount rate for each investment.
Annually the relevant operating companies prepare and approve three-year business plans, and the Board approved the Group three-year business plan in the fourth quarter of the year. The business plan cash flows used in the value-in-use calculations reflect the Group's estimated climate related impacts that are foreseeable and reflect all restructuring of the business where relevant that has been approved by the Board and which can be executed by Management under existing agreements.
The value-in-use calculations for each investment reflected the increased risks arising from COVID-19, including updated projected cash flows for the decreased activity from 2021 through to the end of 2023 and an increase in the pre-tax discount rates to incorporate increased equity market volatility. For each of the Company's investments the key assumptions used in the valuein-use calculations are as follows:
Notes to the financial statements continued
| 2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per cent | British Airways | Iberia | Veloz | Aerl Holding |
| Operating margin | (20)-16 | (12)-11 | (22)-12 | (14)-13 |
| ASK as a proportion of 20191 | 45-95 | 49-98 | 46-107 | 40-100 |
| Long-term growth rate | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,9 |
| Pre-tax discount rate | 11,2 | 11,6 | 11,5 | 10,4 |
1 In prior periods the Group applied the average ASK growth per annum as a key assumption. Given the impact of COVID-19, the Group has presented ASKs as a proportion of the level of ASKs achieved in 2019, prior to the application of the terminal value calculation.
| 2019 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per cent | British Airways | Iberia | Veloz | Aerl Holding | |
| Operating margin | 15 | 10-15 | 10-14 | 13-15 | |
| Average ASK growth per annum | 2-4 | 3,0 | 1-5 | 2-11 | |
| Long-term growth rate | 2,2 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 1,8 | |
| Pre-tax discount rate | 8,0 | 9,1 | 9,4 | 8,0 | |
| Jet fuel price (\$ per MT) | Within 12 months |
1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3 years and thereafter |
|
| 2020 | 373 | 420 | 449 | 449 | |
| 2019 | 639 | 612 | 598 | 598 |
Forecast ASKs reflect the range of ASKs as a percentage of the 2019 actual ASKs over the forecast period, based on planned network growth and taking into account Management's expectation of the market.
The long-term growth rate is calculated for each investment based on the forecast weighted average exposure in each primary market using gross domestic product (GDP) (source: Oxford Economics). The airlines' network plans are reviewed annually as part of the Business plan and reflect Management's plans in response to specific market risk or opportunity.
Pre-tax discount rates represent the current market assessment of the risks specific to each investment, taking into consideration the time value of money and underlying risks of its primary market. The discount rate calculation is based on the circumstances of the airline industry, the Group and the investment. It is derived from the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). The WACC takes into consideration both debt and equity available to airlines. The cost of equity is derived from the expected return on investment by airline investors and the cost of debt is derived from both market data and the Group's existing debt structure. Investment specific risk is incorporated by applying individual beta factors which are evaluated annually based on available market data. The pre-tax discount rate reflects the timing of future tax flows.
Jet fuel price assumptions are derived from forward price curves in the fourth quarter of each year and sourced externally. The cash flow forecasts reflect these price increases after taking into consideration the level of fuel derivatives and their associated prices that the Group has in place.
At December 31, 2020 Management reviewed the recoverable amount of each of the investments and concluded the recoverable amounts exceeded the carrying values. The impairment review of the carrying value of the Company investment in FLY LEVEL S.L is presented in the next section of this note.
Reasonable possible changes in key assumptions, both individually and in combination, have been considered for each investment, where applicable, which include reducing the operating margin by 2 per cent in each year, ASKs by 5 per cent in each year, long-term growth rates in the terminal value calculation to zero, increasing pre-tax discount rates by 2.5 percentage points, changing the weighting of the base case and the downside case to be 100 per cent weighted towards the downside case, and increasing the fuel price by 40 per cent. These sensitivities, in part, incorporate the potential impact that climate related risks would have on the Group.
For the British Airways, Iberia and AERL Holding investments, while the recoverable amounts are estimated to exceed the carrying amounts by €11,038 million, €1,307 million and €1,621 million, respectively, the recoverable amounts would be below the carrying amounts when applying reasonable possible changes in assumptions in each of the following scenarios:
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the remainder of the reasonable possible changes in key assumptions applied to the British Airways, Iberia and AERL Holding investments and for all the reasonable possible changes in key assumptions applied to the remaining investments, no impairment arises.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the resultant structural change to the airline sector, the FLY LEVEL S.L. subsidiary, Openskies SASU, operating its flights from Paris, France, commenced and completed a consultation process during the second half of 2020 regarding the permanent cessation of operations. Accordingly, as at December 31, 2020, Openskies SASU, and as a result FLY LEVEL S.L., had no further cash generating operations and the Company has assessed the recoverability of its investment in and its trading and non-trading receivable balances due from FLY LEVEL S.L., which acts in its capacity as a holding company of Openskies SASU.
In undertaking this assessment, the Company has taken into consideration the remaining expected costs to cease existing operations, the closing cash and cash equivalents and the fair value, sourced from external market data, of the aircraft that Openskies SASU owns. The principal closure costs relate to the executed severance agreements and the discharge of the existing third party liabilities of Openskies SASU.
As a result of this analysis an impairment charge of €160.003.000 has been recorded against the investment value of FLY LEVEL S.L. and a further impairment charge of €108.917.000 against Loan receivable from Group company. These charges have been included in the "Impairment losses on equity instruments, Group companies" and "Impairment losses on loans receivable from Group companies" lines in the Income statement.
Details of the Company's financial assets at December 31 by nature and classification for measurement purposes is as follows:
| At December 31, 2020 €'000 |
Loans and receivables |
Available for-sale |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | |||
| Loan receivable from Group company (note 14.1) | 1.746.961 | - | 1.746.961 |
| Investment in other equity instruments (note 7.1.2) | - | 17.945 | 17.945 |
| 1.746.961 | 17.945 | 1.764.906 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Trade and other receivables (note 7.1.1) | 146.037 | - | 146.037 |
| Loan receivable from Group company (note 14.1) | 16.078 | - | 16.078 |
| Cash and cash equivalents (note 8) | 1.527.238 | - | 1.527.238 |
| 1.689.353 | - | 1.689.353 |
Notes to the financial statements continued
| At December 31, 2019 €'000 |
Loans and receivables |
Available for-sale |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | |||
| Loan receivable from Group company (note 14.1) | 184.234 | - | 184.234 |
| Investment in other equity instruments (note 7.1.2) | - | 14.536 | 14.536 |
| 184.234 | 14.536 | 198.770 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Trade and other receivables (note 7.1.1) | 212.506 | - | 212.506 |
| Loan receivable from Group company (note 14.1) | 8.822 | - | 8.822 |
| Cash and cash equivalents (note 8) | 694.083 | - | 694.083 |
| 915.411 | - | 915.411 |
The breakdown of trade and other receivables at December 31 is as follows:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Current | ||
| Receivables from Group companies (note 14.1) | 130.548 | 201.678 |
| Other receivables | 15.489 | 10.828 |
| 146.037 | 212.506 |
The breakdown of non-current investments in other equity instruments at December 31 is as follows:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||
| Unlisted investments | 17.945 | 14.536 |
| 17.945 | 14.536 |
Details of the Company's financial liabilities at December 31 by nature and classification for measurement purposes is as follows:
| €'000 | Loans and payables 2020 |
Loans and payables 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current liabilities | ||
| Bond and other marketable securities | 1.461.828 | 1.448.995 |
| Group companies (note 14.1) | 811.877 | 1.047.515 |
| 2.273.705 | 2.496.510 | |
| Current liabilities | ||
| Trade and other payables (note 7.2.1) | 15.135 | 25.491 |
| Group companies (note 14.1) | 224.444 | 46.587 |
| Bond and other marketable securities | 13.125 | 13.125 |
| 252.704 | 85.203 |
Notes to the financial statements continued
Two senior unsecured bonds convertible into ordinary shares of IAG were issued by the Group in November 2015; €500 million fixed rate 0,25 per cent raising net proceeds of €494 million and due in 2020, and €500 million fixed rate 0,625 per cent raising net proceeds of €494 million and due in 2022. The conversion price for both tranches was set at a premium of 62,5 per cent over the Group's share price on the date of issuance. The Group holds an option to redeem the outstanding convertible bond at its principal amount, together with accrued interest, no earlier than two years prior to the final maturity date. In July 2019 the Group early redeemed all of the €500 million 0,25 per cent convertible bonds due in 2020 with no conversion to ordinary shares.
In July 2019, the Group issued two tranches of senior unsecured bonds for an aggregate principal amount of €1 billion, €500 million due 4 July 2023 and €500 million due 4 July 2027. The bonds bear a fixed rate of interest of 0,5 per cent and 1,5 per cent per annum annually payable in arrears, respectively. The bonds were issued at 99,417 per cent and 98,803 per cent of their principal amount, respectively, and, unless previously redeemed or purchased and cancelled, will be redeemed at 100 per cent of their principal amount on their respective maturity dates.
The breakdown of trade and other payables at December 31 is as follows:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Trade and other payables | ||
| Various creditors | 15.135 | 15.768 |
| Payroll accruals | - | 9.723 |
| 15.135 | 25.491 |
The information on average period for payment to suppliers in commercial transactions at December 31, is as follows:
| Average days for payment to suppliers 59 Ratio of transactions paid 60 |
2019 |
|---|---|
| 58 | |
| 59 | |
| Ratio of transactions outstanding for payment 31 |
47 |
| 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|
| Total payments made | 19.998 | 26.117 |
| Total payments outstanding | 3.202 | 2.206 |
The cash and cash equivalents as at December 31 is as follows:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank | 3.987 | 80.415 |
| Cash equivalents | 1.523.251 | 613.668 |
| 1.527.238 | 694.083 |
There are no restrictions on the use of these amounts.
At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had no outstanding bank overdrafts.
Notes to the financial statements continued
At December 31, 2020, the share capital of the Company amounts to €497.147.000, divided into 4.971.476.000 ordinary shares of the same class and series and with a nominal value of 0,10 € each, fully subscribed and paid.
On September 8, 2020, the Company undertook a share capital reduction of €796.813.000, that reduced the nominal value of each ordinary share from 0,50 € per share to 0,10 € per share. A corresponding amount has been recognised within Capital reserves (note 9.2).
On October 2, 2020, the Company raised €2.741.088.000 (and incurred related transaction costs of €69.661.000 as detailed in Note 9.2) through a rights issue of 2.979.443.376 new ordinary shares at a price of 92 € cents per share on the basis of 3 shares for every 2 existing shares.
The share capital and premium for the Company is as follows:
| Number of shares | Share capital | Share premium | |
|---|---|---|---|
| '000s | €'000 | €'000 | |
| At December 31, 2018 | 1.992.033 | 996.016 | 6.021.802 |
| Special 2019 dividend of 0,35 € per share | - | - | (694.507) |
| At December 31, 2019: Ordinary shares of 0,50 € each | 1.992.033 | 996.016 | 5.327.295 |
| Share capital reduction | - | (796.813) | - |
| Rights issue | 2.979.443 | 297.944 | 2.443.144 |
| At December 31, 2020: Ordinary shares of 0,10 € each | 4.971.476 | 497.147 | 7.770.439 |
Details of shareholders and their equity at December 31 is as follows:
| Per cent | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Significant shareholders: | ||
| Qatar Airways (Q.C.S.C.) | 25,100 | 21,426 |
| Marshall Wace LLP | 3,022 | - |
| Invesco Limited | 1,327 | 2,050 |
| Lansdowne Partners International Limited | 1,255 | 3,957 |
| Allan & Gill Gray Foundation | 1,100 | - |
| Capital Research and Management Company | - | 10,013 |
| Europacific Growth Fund | - | 5,261 |
| Lansdowne Developed Markets Master Fund Limited | - | 1,999 |
| Citadel Multi-Strategy Equities Master Fund Limited | - | 1,006 |
| Other shareholders | 68,196 | 54,288 |
| 100 | 100 |
Notes to the financial statements continued
| €'000 | January 1 |
Appropriation of prior year profit/(loss) |
Vesting of share based payments |
Conversion of bond |
Dividend | Share capital reduction |
Equity related transactions costs |
December 31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | ||||||||
| Legal reserve |
205.799 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 205.799 |
| Other reserve |
(897.437) | 475.855 | 3.576 | - | - | 796.813 | (69.661) | 309.146 |
| (691.638) | 475.855 | 3.576 | - | - | 796.813 | (69.661) | 514.945 | |
| 2019 | ||||||||
| Legal reserve |
205.799 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 205.799 |
| Other reserve |
(983.770) | 374.600 | 726 | 38.418 | (327.411) | - | - | (897.437) |
| (777.971) | 374.600 | 726 | 38.418 | (327.411) | - | - | (691.638) |
Details of any movements through reserves for the years to December 31 is as follows:
According to the Spanish Companies Law, the legal reserve is not distributable to shareholders until it exceeds 20 per cent of the share capital, and may only be used in the case that no other reserves are available to offset losses. This reserve may also be used to increase the share capital in excess of 10 per cent of the increased capital stock.
As permitted by the Spanish Companies law, the Company may decrease its share capital without granting its creditors the right of objection legally contemplated in connection with such capital reduction if it records from unrestricted reserves a reserve for redeemed capital for an amount equal to the nominal value of the cancelled shares. This reserve can only be used if the same requirements as those applicable to the reduction of share capital are met.
Other reserves include a Redeemed capital reserve of €70.478.000 (2019: €70.478.000) associated with the decrease in share capital relating to cancelled shares and a Share capital reduction reserve of €796.813.000 (2019: nil) associated with a reduction in the nominal value of the Company's share capital.
Equity related transactions costs of €69.661.000 were incurred in 2020 associated with the Rights Issue.
A breakdown of movements through the valuation reserve for the years to December 31 is as follows:
| €'000 | January 1 | Valuation adjustment | December 31 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | |||
| Currency translation differences | (4.735) | 8.144 | 3.409 |
| (4.735) | 8.144 | 3.409 | |
| 2019 | |||
| Currency translation differences | (3.601) | (1.134) | (4.735) |
| (3.601) | (1.134) | (4.735) |
The currency differences include the impact of converting the functional currency of the UK branch into the Company's presentation currency.
Notes to the financial statements continued
The Company has authority to acquire its own shares, subject to specific conditions. The treasury shares balance consists of shares held directly by the Company. A total of 2.605.000 shares (2019: 1.019.000) were issued to employees during the year as a result of vesting of employee share schemes. At December 31, 2020 the Group held 5.097.000 shares (2019: 7.702.000) which represented 0.10 per cent of the issued share capital of the Company.
| €'000 | January 1 | Share-based payment scheme vesting |
December 31 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | |||
| Treasury shares | (59.568) | 20.400 | (39.168) |
| (59.568) | 20.400 | (39.168) | |
| 2019 | |||
| Treasury shares | (67.292) | 7.724 | (59.568) |
| (67.292) | 7.724 | (59.568) |
The detail of balances related to other equity instruments at December 31 is as follows:
| €'000 | January 1 | Equity instruments movement for the year |
December 31 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | |||
| Share-based payments credit (note 15) | 249.971 | (10.235) | 239.736 |
| Vesting of share-based payment | (145.866) | (25.568) | (171.434) |
| Equity portion of convertible bond issue (note 7.2) | 62.036 | - | 62.036 |
| 166.141 | (35.803) | 130.338 | |
| 2019 | |||
| Share-based payments cost (note 15) | 217.097 | 32.874 | 249.971 |
| Vesting of share-based payment | (131.283) | (14.583) | (145.866) |
| Equity portion of convertible bond issue (note 7.2) | 100.938 | (38.902) | 62.036 |
| 186.752 | (20.611) | 166.141 |
Notes to the financial statements continued
The detail of balances related to tax assets and liabilities at December 31 is as follows:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Other balances with public administrations: | ||
| Spanish current tax receivable | 95.658 | 88.718 |
| Receivables, Spanish group companies (tax) | 3.118 | 45.285 |
| UK current tax liability | - | (447) |
| Liabilities, UK group companies (tax) | (6.860) | (4.061) |
| Provisions for taxes | (5.391) | (4.347) |
| Social security payable | (12.538) | (16.538) |
| Value added tax receivable | 8.805 | 4.592 |
| Withholding tax payable on interim dividend | - | (53.285) |
| 82.792 | 59.917 |
The reconciliation of the accounting (loss)/profit to taxable loss is as follows:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| (Loss)/profit for the year from continuing operations | (296.305) | 763.583 |
| Current tax | 790 | (17.406) |
| Deferred tax | 2.160 | (844) |
| Impact of rate change | (756) | - |
| Adjustments in respect of prior years | 2.782 | 799 |
| (Loss)/profit before tax | (291.329) | 746.132 |
| Permanent differences | 163.922 | (819.974) |
| Timing differences | 102.921 | 4.444 |
| Taxable loss | (24.486) | (69.398) |
The reconciliation between the accounting (loss)/profit and tax (charge)/credit is as follows:
| 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| €'000 | Total | Spain | UK | Total | Spain | UK | |
| (Loss)/profit before tax | (291.329) | (303.072) | 11.743 | 746.132 | 751.012 | (4.880) | |
| Tax at the standard rates in Spain and the UK | 73.537 | 75.768 | (2.231) | (186.826) | (187.753) | 927 | |
| Permanent differences increasing the tax charge |
- | - | - | 206.808 | 206.287 | 521 | |
| Permanent differences decreasing the tax charge |
(40.941) | (40.825) | (116) | (1.732) | (8) | (1.724) | |
| Share based payments | (3.603) | - | (3.603) | - | - | - | |
| Adjustment in respect of prior years | (2.782) | - | (2.782) | (799) | (220) | (579) | |
| Prior year tax liabilities derecognised | 3.000 | 3.000 | - | - | - | - | |
| Impact of rate change | 756 | - | 756 | - | - | - | |
| Unrecognised losses and deductible differences arising in the year |
(34.943) | (34.943) | - | - | - | - | |
| Tax (charge)/credit | (4.976) | 3.000 | (7.976) | 17.451 | 18.306 | (855) |
Notes to the financial statements continued
Permanent differences decreasing the tax credit primarily relate to non-deductible expenses and other taxable income.
Part of the impairment booked in 2020 (€108.917.000) corresponding to a loan with Openskies SASU has been considered as an unrecognised temporary difference (non-deductible expense). The remaining impairment booked (€160.003.000) is related to the investment in a subsidiary FLY LEVEL, S.L. and has been classified as a permanent difference accounting wise. However, from a tax standpoint, it is considered as a temporary difference to the extent that it will be reversed in the future.
From January 1, 2015 onwards the Spanish companies IAG, Vueling, Veloz, the Avios Spanish branch, the IAG GBS Spanish branch and the IAG Cargo Spanish branch filed consolidated tax returns as part of the Spanish tax unity (0061/15, pursuant to title VII, Chapter VI of the Spanish Corporate Income Tax Law set forth in the Law 27/2014 of 27 November 2014). Fly Level S.L. joined the tax unity on 7 November 2017. Yellow Handling S.L. joined the tax unity on 17 October 2019. Vueling and Yellow Handling S.L. are no longer part of the Spanish tax unity in 2020 due to modifications in their shareholding. IAG will be responsible for filing consolidated tax returns with these other companies that belong to this tax unity.
The taxable loss for the year to December 31, arises between the UK and Spain as follows:
| 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| €'000 | Total | Spain | UK | Total | Spain | UK | |
| (Loss)/profit before tax | (291.329) | (303.072) | 11.743 | 746.132 | 751.012 | (4.880) | |
| Permanent differences | 163.922 | 163.301 | 621 | (819.974) | (825.114) | 5.140 | |
| Timing differences | 102.921 | 108.917 | (5.996) | 4.444 | - | 4.444 | |
| Taxable loss | (24.486) | (30.854) | 6.368 | (69.398) | (74.102) | 4.704 |
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Provisions for taxes | 5.391 | 4.347 |
| 5.391 | 4.347 |
Under prevailing tax regulations, tax returns in Spain may not be considered final until they have either been inspected by tax authorities or until the four-year inspection period has expired. In December 2015 the Spanish Tax Authority opened audits into all corporate income tax, VAT and withholding taxes for which the company is liable, covering the preceding four years. The Company's directors have decided to book a tax provision in the balance sheet amounting to €600.000 (2019: €600.000) that arise as a result of potentially varying interpretations of the tax legislation applicable to the Company's transactions.
Under prevailing tax regulations, tax returns in the UK may not be considered final until they have either been inspected by tax authorities or until the six-year inspection period for discovery assessment has expired. In December 2016 the UK Tax Authority opened an audit into corporate income tax for the year ended 31 December 2014. Audits into subsequent years have since been opened each year for all years up to and including 31 December 2018. The Company's directors have decided to book a tax provision in the balance sheet amounting to €4.791.000 (2019: €3.747.000) that arise as a result of potentially varying interpretations of the tax legislation applicable to the Company's transactions.
Notes to the financial statements continued
The detail and movements of balances related to deferred tax assets at December 31 is as follows:
| Variations reflected in | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| €'000 | January 1 | Income statement |
Equity | Exchange difference |
December 31 |
| 2020 | |||||
| Temporary differences on share-based payments |
7.604 | (3.860) | (1.235) | (473) | 2.036 |
| 7.604 | (3.860) | (1.235) | (473) | 2.036 | |
| 2019 | |||||
| Temporary differences on share-based payments |
6.755 | 844 | (279) | 284 | 7.604 |
| 6.755 | 844 | (279) | 284 | 7.604 |
The deferred tax asset has been booked at the UK tax rate of 19 per cent (2019: 17 per cent).
The detail and movements of balances related to deferred tax liabilities at December 31 is as follows:
| Variations reflected in | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| €'000 | January 1 | Income statement |
Equity | Exchange difference |
December 31 |
| 2020 | |||||
| Temporary differences on unremitted earnings | (3.000) | 3.000 | - | - | - |
| (3.000) | 3.000 | - | - | - | |
| 2019 | |||||
| Temporary differences on unremitted earnings | (3.000) | - | - | - | (3.000) |
| (3.000) | - | - | - | (3.000) |
The deferred tax liability has been booked at the Spanish tax rate of 25 per cent (2019: 25 per cent).
The Company has €8,3 million of tax losses that arose in Spain in 2014 before the tax unity was formed and €23,5 million of deductible temporary differences that arose in Spain in 2015 and 2016. These are not recognised.
The Company has certain contingent liabilities, across all taxes, which at December 31, 2020 amounted to €92 million. No material losses are likely to arise from such contingent liabilities. As such the Company does not consider it appropriate to make a provision for these amounts. Included in the tax related contingent liability is the following:
Following tax audits covering the period 2011 to 2014, the Spanish Tax Authorities issued a corporate income tax assessment to the Company regarding the merger in 2011 between British Airways and Iberia. The maximum exposure in this case is €92 million (2019: €90 million), being the amount in the tax assessment with an estimate of the interest accrued on that assessment through to December 31, 2020.
The Company appealed the assessment to the Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Central or 'TEAC' (Central Administrative Tax Tribunal). On October 23, 2019 the TEAC ruled in favour of the Spanish Tax Authorities. The Company subsequently appealed this ruling to the Audiencia Nacional (National High Court) on December 20, 2019, and on July 24, 2020 filed submissions in support of its case. The Company does not expect a hearing at the National High Court until 2022 at the earliest.
The Company disputes the technical merits of the assessment and ruling of the TEAC, both in terms of whether a gain arose and in terms of the quantum of any gain. The Company believes that it has strong arguments to support its appeals. The Company does not consider it appropriate to make a provision for these amounts and accordingly has recognised this matter as a contingent liability.
Notes to the financial statements continued
The Company has a sole activity as described in note 1, which is the acquisition, ownership, management and disposal of shares or other equity interests in other companies and provision of management services to those companies. The distribution of management service revenue for the year to December 31, from continuing operations by geographical segments can be represented by the following information:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue by area of geographical sale: | ||
| UK | 42.489 | 68.341 |
| 42.489 | 68.341 |
The breakdown of finance income and cost is as follows:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Finance income | ||
| Receivable from third parties | 10.262 | 140 |
| Receivable on debt with Group companies and associates | 15.995 | 13.110 |
| 26.257 | 13.250 | |
| Finance costs | ||
| Payable on debt with Group companies and associates | (17.950) | (15.905) |
| Payable interest on convertible bond and other securities payables | (25.841) | (41.362) |
| Payable to third parties | (8.569) | (2.662) |
| (52.360) | (59.929) | |
| Changes in fair value of finanacial instruments | ||
| Changes in fair value of finanacial instruments | - | (18.715) |
| - | (18.715) | |
| Impairment and (losses)/gains on financial instruments | ||
| Impairment losses on loans receivable from Group companies | (108.917) | - |
| (108.917) | - |
The breakdown of personnel expenses is as follows:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Wages, salaries and other costs | ||
| Salaries and wages | 20.344 | 30.102 |
| Share-based payments (credit)/charge (note 15) | (4.931) | 14.381 |
| Social security costs | ||
| Social security | 855 | 4.665 |
| Other social costs | 2.681 | 3.311 |
| 18.949 | 52.459 |
The Company offers a defined contribution pension plan to all IAG employees. The contributions paid into the defined contribution scheme during the year to December 31, 2020 totalled €2.681.000 (2019: €3.311.000), and have been recognised in Other social costs.
Notes to the financial statements continued
IAG is a Spanish Company with a UK branch which has a pound sterling functional currency. The breakdown of assets and liabilities of the UK branch, all denominated in pound sterling, is as follows:
| Pound sterling '000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Assets | ||
| Investment in other equity instruments | 39.218 | 36.314 |
| Deferred tax asset | 1.848 | 6.437 |
| Amounts owed by Group companies | 184.159 | 175.803 |
| Other receivables | 568 | 4.881 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 7.199 | 26.312 |
| 232.992 | 249.747 | |
| Liabilities | ||
| Current tax liability | - | 3.623 |
| Provisions for taxes | 4.351 | 3.366 |
| Other taxes and social security | 12.962 | 13.997 |
| Accruals and others payables | 8.777 | 19.167 |
| Amounts due from Group companies | 280.073 | 282.644 |
| 306.163 | 322.797 | |
| Net liabilities | (73.171) | (73.050) |
The Income statement, all denominated in '000 pound sterling, of the branch is as follows:
| Pound sterling '000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 37.310 | 60.115 |
| Finance income | 1.138 | 160 |
| Employee costs | (13.080) | (41.756) |
| Other costs | (12.235) | (21.195) |
| Finance costs | (3.240) | (1.552) |
| Profit/(loss) for the year before tax | 9.893 | (4.228) |
The nature of the Company's business model and its ability to pay dividends to shareholders means the Company is primarily exposed to capital and credit risk.
The Company is exposed to the non-performance by its counterparties in respect of financial assets receivable. The Group has policies and procedures to monitor the risk by assigning limits to each counterparty. The underlying exposures are monitored on a daily basis and the overall exposure limit by counterparty is periodically reviewed by using available market information.
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum exposure to counterparty risk.
The Company undertakes external foreign exchange derivatives trading activity to mitigate the exposure arising from potential dividends received in currencies other than the Euro.
Notes to the financial statements continued
The Company invests cash in interest-bearing accounts, time deposits and money market funds, choosing instruments with appropriate maturities or liquidity to retain sufficient headroom to readily generate cash inflows required to manage liquidity risk. The Company has also committed revolving credit facilities. At December 31, 2020 the Company had undrawn revolving credit facilities of €166 million (2019: €20 million).
The Company's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, to maintain an optimal capital structure, to reduce the cost of capital and to provide returns to shareholders.
The Company has the following related parties at December 31:
| Nature of relationship | |
|---|---|
| British Airways Plc | Other Group companies |
| Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España S.A. Operadora | Other Group companies |
| Veloz Holdco, S.L.U. | Other Group companies |
| Vueling Airlines, S.A. | Other Group companies |
| IAG Cargo Ltd | Other Group companies |
| IAG GBS Ltd | Other Group companies |
| IAG GBS Poland sp. z o.o. | Other Group companies |
| Aerl Holding Limited | Other Group companies |
| Aer Lingus Group DAC | Other Group companies |
| Avios Group (AGL) Limited | Other Group companies |
| IAG Connect | Other Group companies |
| FLY LEVEL S.L. | Other Group companies |
| FLYLEVEL UK Limited | Other Group companies |
| Invesco Limited | Significant shareholder |
| Allan & Gill Gray Foundation | Significant shareholder |
| Marshall Wace LLP | Significant shareholder |
| Lansdowne Partners International Limited | Significant shareholder |
| Qatar Airways (Q.C.S.C.) | Significant shareholder |
| Key management personnel | Directors and Management Committee |
Notes to the financial statements continued
The following transactions took place with related parties for the financial years to December 31:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue from operations | ||
| Rendering of services to Group companies | 42.489 | 68.341 |
| Dividend income received from Group companies | - | 825.146 |
| Purchases of services Purchases from Group companies |
5.838 | 9.572 |
| Finance income Receivable from debt with Group companies |
15.995 | 13.110 |
| Finance Costs Payable on debt with Group companies |
17.950 | 15.905 |
| Transfer of assets to Group companies | - | 18.528 |
| December balances |
| 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables from related parties | ||
| Amounts owed by Group companies | 130.548 | 201.678 |
| Loan receivable from Group companies | 1.763.039 | 193.056 |
| Payables to related parties | ||
| Amounts owed to Group companies | 7.397 | 40.316 |
| Loan payable to Group companies | 1.028.924 | 1.053.786 |
The details of the loans receivable from Group companies is as folllows:
| Amount outstanding | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | Finance Income | |||||
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 | Due date | Interest rate | 2020 | 2019 |
| IAG GBS | - | 3.030 | 2020 | 6 months LIBOR +0,90 per cent |
- | 43 |
| AERL Holdings | 64.676 | 60.425 | 2021 | 3 year mid swap vs 3 months EURIBOR +4,00 per cent |
4.150 | 4.798 |
| LEVEL | 16.065 | 54.751 | 2021-2023 | 5 year euro mid swap rate +6,00 per cent |
3.475 | 3.591 |
| LEVEL | - | 74.850 | 2021-2023 | 5 year euro mid swap rate +6,00 per cent |
4.620 | 4.678 |
| British Airways | 1.632.285 | - | 2024 | 3 months EURIBOR + 4,60 per cent |
3.737 | - |
| Aer Lingus | 50.013 | - | 2022 | 3 months EURIBOR + 4,70 per cent |
13 | - |
| 1.763.039 | 193.056 | 15.995 | 13.110 |
Notes to the financial statements continued
The details of the loans payable to Group companies is as folllows:
| Amount outstanding | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31 | Finance Costs | |||||
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 | Due date | Interest rate | 2020 | 2019 |
| Veloz | - | - | 2019 | 1 year euro mid swap rate (floored at zero) +0,50 per cent |
- | 360 |
| Veloz | 109.044 | 109.413 | 2024 | 1,20 per cent | 1.308 | 43 |
| Avios | 203.967 | 219.615 | 2021 | 2 year GILT + 1,491 per cent |
3.112 | 1.814 |
| Iberia | 200.302 | 200.457 | 2022 | 6 months euro mid swap rate + 1,75 per cent |
2.815 | 2.928 |
| Iberia | 100.762 | 100.762 | 2023 | 5 year euro mid swap rate +1,95 per cent |
2.105 | 2.210 |
| Aer Lingus | 100.447 | 100.429 | 2023 | 5 year euro mid swap rate +2,00 per cent |
2.322 | 2.336 |
| Aer Lingus | 100.027 | 100.046 | 2023 | 5 year euro mid swap rate +2,00 per cent |
2.410 | 2.399 |
| Aer Lingus | 100.014 | 100.012 | 2024 | 5 year euro mid swap rate +1,03 per cent |
1.086 | 829 |
| British Airways | 48.193 | 51.866 | 2021-2023 | 5 year euro mid swap rate +2,00 per cent |
1.221 | 1.306 |
| British Airways | 66.168 | 71.186 | 2021-2023 | 5 year euro mid swap rate +2,00 per cent |
1.571 | 1.680 |
| 1.028.924 | 1.053.786 | 17.950 | 15.905 |
Ordinary transactions with Group companies were carried out at an arm's length basis according with the Group's transfer pricing policies. Outstanding balances that relate to trading balances are placed on intragroup accounts with payment terms of 90 days.
Non-current loans owed by Group companies bear market rates of interest in accordance with the intragroup loan agreements.
In 2015, IAG GBS borrowed €3.291.000 from IAG, bearing interest at 0,90 per cent over the 6 month LIBOR rate. The loan was for general treasury management purposes. The loan was fully repaid in January 2020, carrying nil balance as at December 31, 2020 (2019: €3.030.000). Interest receivable for the year was nil (2019: €43.000).
In 2015, AERL Holding borrowed €804.568.000 from IAG, bearing interest at 0,90 per cent over the 6 months EURIBOR rate. The purpose of this loan was for consideration and expenses relating to the acquisition of Aer Lingus. During 2017 AERL Holding repaid €836.000.000 of the loan by issuing ordinary shares to IAG. During 2018, IAG made payments on behalf of AERL Holding of €155.778.000, received a distribution on behalf of AERL Holding of €225.000.000 and received a dividend declared by AERL Holding of €74.000.000. During 2019, AERL Holding borrowed €301.745.000 from IAG and IAG received a distribution on behalf of AERL Holding of €285.000.000. Interest receivable for the year was €4.150.000 (2019: €4.798.000). As at December 31, 2020 the amount outstanding was €64.676.000 (2019: €60.425.000). The loan is repayable in 2021.
In 2013, Veloz borrowed €149.705.000 from the Company for the purpose of the increase in the Group's shareholding in Vueling. The holding was 99,50 per cent at December 31, 2020. In December 2018 €146.000.000 of the loan was capitalised and the Company borrowed €74.000.000, bearing interest at 0.50 per cent over the 1 year euro mid swap rate (floored at zero). Accrued interest receivable for 2019 was €360.000. In December 2019, the loan was repaid and the Company borrowed the amount of €109.000.000. Accrued interest for the new loan was €1.308.000 (2019: €43.000). The amount repaid during the year was €1.308.000 (2019: nil). As at December 31, 2020 the outstanding balance was €109.044.000 which is repayable in 2024.
In May 2018, LEVEL borrowed €57.000.000 from IAG for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest receivable for the year was €3.475.000 (2019: €3.591.000). The amount repaid during the year was €5.426.000 (2019: €5.427.000). The balance outstanding at the end of the year was partially impaired and a loss of €36.735.000 was recognised in the Income statement. As at December 31, 2020 the borrowed balance was €16.065.000 (2019: €54.751.000) which is repayable from 2021 to 2023.
Notes to the financial statements continued
In July 2018 LEVEL borrowed €77.000.000 from IAG for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest receivable for the year was €4.620.000 (2019: €4.678.000). The amount repaid during the year was €7.288.000 (2019: €7.288.000). The balance outstanding at the end of the year was fully impaired and a loss of €72.182.000 was recognised in the Income statement. As at December 31, 2020 the borrowed balance was nil (2019: €74.850.000).
In December 2020, British Airways borrowed €1.645.000.000 net of fees of €16.450.000 from IAG for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest receivable for the year was €3.737.000. The borrowed balance as at December 31, 2020 was €1.632.285.000 and is repayable in 2024.
In December 2020, Aer Lingus borrowed €50.000.000 from IAG for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest receivable for the year was €13.000. The borrowed balance as at December 31, 2020 was €50.013.000 and is repayable in 2022.
In 2017, the Company borrowed €200.000.000 from Iberia for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest payable for the year was €2.815.000 (2019: €2.928.000). The amount repaid during the year was €2.970.000 (2019: €2.683.000). As at December 31, 2020 the borrowed balance was €200.302.000 (2019: €200.457.000) which is repayable in 2022.
In 2018, the Company borrowed €100.000.000 from Iberia for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest payable for the year was €2.105.000 (2019: €2.210.000). The amount repaid during the year was €2.105.000 (2019: €2.553.000). As at December 31, 2020 the borrowed balance was €100.762.000 (2019: €100.762.000) which is repayable in 2023.
In May 2018, the Company borrowed €100.000.000 from Aer Lingus for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest payable for the year was €2.410.000 (2019: €2.399.000). The amount repaid during the year was €2.429.000 (2019: €2.540.000). As at December 31, 2020 the borrowed balance was €100.027.000 (2019: €100.046.000) which is repayable in 2023.
In June 2018, the Company borrowed €100.000.000 from Aer Lingus for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest payable for the year was €2.322.000 (2019: €2.336.000). The amount repaid during the year was €2.304.000 (2019: €2.188.000). As at December 31, 2020 the borrowed balance was €100.447.000 (2019: €100.429.000) which is repayable in 2023.
In March 2019, the Company borrowed €100.000.000 from Aer Lingus for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest payable for the year was €1.086.000 (2019: €829.000). The amount repaid during the year was €1.084.000 (2019: €817.000). As at December 31, 2020 the borrowed balance was €100.014.000 (2019: €100.012.000) which is repayable in 2024.
In May 2018, the Company borrowed €57.000.000 from British Airways for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest payable for the year was €1.221.000 (2019: €1.306.000). The amount repaid during the year was €4.894.000 (2019: €4.848.000). As at December 31, 2020 the borrowed balance was €48.193.000 (2019: €51.866.000) which is repayable from 2021 to 2023.
In July 2018, the Company borrowed €77.000.000 from British Airways for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest payable for the year was €1.571.000 (2019: €1.680.000 ). The amount repaid during the year was €6.589.000 (2019: €6.534.000). As at December 31, 2020 the borrowed balance was €66.168.000 (2019: €71.186.000) which is repayable from 2021 to 2023.
In June 2019, the Company borrowed €218.540.000 (£185.000.000) from Avios for general corporate purposes. Accrued interest payable for the year was €3.112.000 (2019: €1.814.000). The amount repaid during the year was €3.872.000 (2019: €739.000). As at December 31, 2020 the borrowed balance was €203.967.000 (2019: €219.615.000) which is repayable in 2021.
Notes to the financial statements continued
A breakdown of the remuneration received by the Board of Directors and Management Committee for the years to December 31 is as follows:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Board of Directors | ||
| Salaries (fixed and variable) | 2.924 | 7.481 |
| Benefits in kind | 548 | 663 |
| Life insurance policies | 19 | 27 |
| 3.491 | 8.171 | |
| Management Committee | ||
| Salaries (fixed and variable) | 4.499 | 12.212 |
| Benefits in kind | 1.022 | 1.372 |
| Life insurance policies | 19 | 36 |
| Pension contributions | 25 | 11 |
| 5.565 | 13.631 |
The pension obligation outstanding, which represents the transfer value of the accrued pension was €1.293.000 (2019: €985.000) for the Management Committee.
At December 31, 2020 and 2019, no advances or loans had been given to members of the Board of Directors.
The Directors have also confirmed that they have not engaged in activities on their own behalf or on behalf of others that involve effective competition, whether actual or potential, with the Company or that in any other way places them in permanent conflict with the interests of the company.
The Company operates share-based payment schemes as part of the total remuneration package provided to employees. These schemes comprise both share option schemes where employees acquire shares at nil cost and share award plans whereby shares are issued to employees at no cost, subject to the achievement by the Group of specified performance targets.
The IAG Performance Share Plan (PSP) is granted to senior executives and managers of the Group who are most directly involved in shaping and delivering business success over the medium to long term. Since 2015, awards have been made as nil-cost options, with a two-year holding period following the three-year performance period, before options can be exercised. All awards since 2015 have three independent performance measures with equal weighting: Total Shareholder Return (TSR) relative to the STOXX Europe 600 Travel and Leisure Index (for 2020 awards) or MSCI European Transportation Index (for prior to 2020 awards), earnings per share, and Return on Invested Capital.
In 2020, the outstanding PSP awards granted to participants other than Executive Directors from 2018 onwards were modified and the resulting incremental fair value granted was £1.61 per award.
The IAG Incentive Award Deferral Plan (IADP) is granted to qualifying employees based on performance and service tests. It will be awarded when an incentive award is triggered subject to the employee remaining in employment with the Group for three years after the grant date. The relevant population will receive 50 per cent of their incentive award up front in cash, and the remaining 50 per cent in shares after three years through the IADP.
Notes to the financial statements continued
| Outstanding at January 1, 2020 |
Granted number |
Rights issue adjustment |
Lapsed number |
Exercised number |
Outstanding at December 31, 2020 |
Exercisable December 31, 2020 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000s | 000s | 000s | 000s | 000s | 000s | 000s | |
| Incentive Award Deferral Plan |
1.982 | 715 | 1.221 | - | 295 | 3.623 | - |
| Performance Share Plan |
7.646 | 2.538 | 4.417 | 1.595 | 789 | 12.217 | 307 |
| 9.628 | 3.253 | 5.638 | 1.595 | 1.084 | 15.840 | 307 |
The weighted average share price at the date of exercise of options exercised during the year to December 31, 2020 was €2,90 (2019: not applicable).
The fair value of equity-settled share-based payment plans determined using the Monte Carlo model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted, used the following weighted average assumptions:
| 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weighted average fair value (£) | 1,84 | 1,93 |
| Expected share price volatility (per cent) | 35 | 35 |
| Expected comparator group volatility (per cent) | 20 | 20 |
| Expected comparator correlation (per cent) | 70 | 55 |
| Expected life of options (years) | 4,4 | 4,8 |
| Share price at date of grant (£) | 4,59 | 5,67 |
Volatility was calculated with reference to the Group's weekly pound sterling share price volatility. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may not necessarily be the actual outcome. The fair value of the IAG Perfomance Share plan takes into account a market condition of total shareholder returns as compared to strategic competitors. No other features of share-based payment plans granted were incorporated into the measurement of fair value.
The Company recognised a share-based payments credit of €4.931.000 for the year to December 31, 2020 (2019: €14.381.000 charge). A debit of €10.235.000 (2019: €32.874.000 credit) representing the total Group charge was recognised in Reserves including the deferred tax asset debit of €1.245.000 (2019: debit of €279.000). Group companies are recharged for the grants made to employees of those Group companies.
| Number of employees at year end | Average number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional category | Men | Women | Total | of employees |
| 2020 | ||||
| Management Committee | 9 | 2 | 11 | 10 |
| All other employees | 70 | 58 | 128 | 133 |
| 79 | 60 | 139 | 143 | |
| 2019 | ||||
| Management Committee | 8 | 2 | 10 | 10 |
| All other employees | 77 | 56 | 133 | 132 |
| 85 | 58 | 143 | 142 |
There are no employees with a certified disability greater than 33 per cent.
At December 31, 2020, the Board consisted of 12 people, including 7 men and 5 women (2019: 12 people, including 8 men and 4 women).
Notes to the financial statements continued
As part of the palns implemented to ensure that the Group's EU licensed airlines continue to comply with EU ownership and control rules following Brexit, the composition of the Board of Directors was changed so that it has a majority of independent EU non-executive directors. Furhter details of these appointments are set out in the Nominations Committee report of the Group Annual Report and Accounts 2020.
The fees for the audit of the Company's financial statements, the audit of the Group consolidation and non-audit services provided to the Company by the auditor Ernst & Young S.L. are as follows:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Fees for the audit of the financial statements | 924 | 704 |
| Other audit related services | 189 | 144 |
| All other services | 30 | - |
| 1.143 | 848 |
Information on services provided to the Company and its subsidiaries by Ernst & Young S.L. and other network firms is included in the Group's consolidated financial statements.
The undersigned, as Directors of the Company, hereby state that the accounting records relating to these financial statements do not contain any item of an environmental nature that should be included pursuant to point 5 of the Valuation Standard 4ª Financial Statements, or Section 3 of the Spanish National Chart of Accounts (Royal Decree 1514/2010, of 16 November).
There have been no post balance sheet events subsequent to the year end that require disclosure in the accounts.
Management report for the year to December 31, 2020
International Consolidated Airlines Group, known as International Airlines Group or IAG is the parent company of British Airways, Iberia, Vueling, Aer Lingus, IAG Cargo, Veloz, IAG GBS, AERL Holding, LEVEL and IAG Connect. The Group was formed on January 21, 2011 when the merger between British Airways and Iberia was completed.
IAG is a Spanish registered company with the majority its Board meetings held in Spain. IAG operates a head office through its UK branch in London, with an average staff of 143 (2019: 142) managing key support functions for the Group. The Company's focus is on the Group strategy, synergies, digital and connectivity, and support of finance, legal and communications functions as well as the administration of the Company.
Costs in relation to work carried out for the operating companies of the Group are recharged back to those companies.
It is expected that the IAG Company will remain relatively small within the Group, whilst continuing to provide support to the operating companies where required and providing leadership for the Group strategy.
Our vision is to be the world's leading airline group, maximising sustainable value creation for our shareholders, customers and other stakeholders.
The Group's current strategic priorities include:
How we create value:
IAG is committed to creating a supportive and inclusive environment for all employees, as well as to ensuring equal development opportunities. The Board monitors and reports on diversity at all levels across the Group. In particular, diversity has been a key consideration in planning the long-term composition of the Board itself. The Board diversity policy is described on the Company's website, where the gender diversity figures are also disclosed.
2020 has been an exceptional and challenging year for the Group, with the unparalleled set of circumstances brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic. IAG, thanks to its unique structure was able to react quickly, with an intense focus on liquidity. The Group took, and continues to take, decisive actions to preserve liquidity and to ensure it is positioned for the recovery, when it comes. Multiple workstreams and initiatives have been delivered, which can be summarised n five areas: capacity, operating costs, working capital, capital expenditure and funding. For further information please refer to the Group Annual Report and Accounts 2020.
Revenue which is derived from charging the airline companies for the services that IAG provides to them, totalled €42 million for the year to December 31, 2020 (2019: €68 million). Such services cover financial control over treasury policy, treasury support including hedging, financing and refinancing, major capital investments, co-ordination and delivery support of the synergies, strategy and general management of the Group. Revenue in 2020 was 38 per cent lower than in prior year reflecting the lower employee and external services costs incurred in the year.
The Company did not receive dividend income from its operating companies during the year (2019: €825 million from British Airways, Iberia and Veloz).
The Company's expenses are split between employee costs, services received and other operating expenses.
Employee costs for the year are €19 million (2019: €52 million). The decrease in employee costs reflects salary reductions implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and a credit in relation to share-based payment cost and related social security of €6 million (2019: €16m charge).
Services received largely relate to supporting the activities of the key departments, other expenses reflect the cost of operating the IAG offices and IT costs, as well as the costs supporting the Group's market listings with CNMV and UKLA. Operating expenses reduced by 33 per cent to €20 million in 2020 (2019: €30 million) reflecting management actions implemented in response to market environment and resulting in all non-essential discretionary spend and non-urgent projects being suspended.
The increase in finance income from third party relates mostly to a refund received from the Spanish Tax Authorities regarding interest on prior years tax overpayments following a judgement issued by the Constitutional Court. Finance cost payable on debt with third parties of €34 million (2019:€44 million) includes interest expense on the bonds and negative yields on deposits and money market funds. The Company did not enter derivative contracts in 2020. The change in fair value of financial instruments in 2019 reflects €19 million loss on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting.
Loss before tax for the year was €291 million (2019: €746 million profit).
The tax charge of €5 million (2019: €17 million credit) reflects:
The loss after tax for the year from continuing operations is €296 million (2019: €764 million profit).
IAG's primary assets are its subsidiaries. IAG's investments in British Airways and Iberia were created at the time of the merger on January 21, 2011 and amounted to €6.208 million. During 2020, the Company made investments of €75 million in LEVEL. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the resultant structural change to the airline sector, the FLY LEVEL S.L. subsidiary, Openskies SASU, operating its flights from Paris, France, commenced and completed a consultation process during the second half of 2020 regarding the permanent cessation of operations resulting in an impairment of the full carrying amount of the investment in LEVEL of €160m and €109m of the loan payable to the Company. At the year end, IAG held an investment of €4.155 million in British Airways, €2.389 million in Iberia, €836 million in AERL Holding, €166 million in Veloz, €22 million in IAG GBS and €5 million in IAG Connect totalling €7.573.190 million. It also holds the investment in IAG Cargo.
During 2019, the Company made investments of €27 million in LEVEL.
At December 31, 2020 the Company held 5.1 million shares (2019: 7.7 million).
A total number of 2.6 million shares vested during the year in relation to share-based payment schemes. The total number of the Company's treasury shares as at December 31, 2020 accounts for 0,10 per cent (2019: 0,39 per cent) of the total issued capital at that date.
On February 27, 2020 IAG's Board of Directors proposed a distribution in cash of a final 2019 dividend of 17 € cents per share at the Annual Shareholders' Meeting. As a result of the impact of COVID-19, on April 2, 2020, IAG's Board of Directors resolved to withdraw the proposal to the next Annual Shareholders' Meeting to pay a final dividend for 2019 of 17 € cents per share.
There have been no post balance sheet events subsequent to the year end that require disclosure in the accounts.
The Company does not undertake any research or development activity.
The nature of the Company's business model and ability to pay dividends to shareholders means the Company is primarily exposed to capital and credit risk. The Company's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, to maintain an optimal capital structure in order to reduce the cost of capital and to provide future returns to shareholders.
The Directors of the Company believe that the risks and uncertainties described below are the ones that may have the most significant impact on the day to day operations of IAG as a parent company. These risks are considered by the IAG management team as part of its wider consideration of Group risks under the IAG Enterprise Risk Management framework. The list is not intended to be exhaustive.
The Company could face financial loss, disruption or damage to brand reputation arising from an attack on the Company's systems. There is oversight of critical systems and suppliers to ensure that the Company understands the data it holds, that it is secure and regulations are adhered to.
The failure to manage the financial counterparties credit exposure arisen from cash investments and derivatives trading may result in financial losses. The Company is exposed to non-performance of financial contracts by counterparties, for activities such as money market deposits, fuel and currency hedging. The Group has a financial counterparty credit limit allocation by airline and by type of exposure and monitors the financial and counterparty risk on an ongoing basis.
The governance structure the Group put in place at the time of the merger had a number of complex features, including nationality structures to protect British Airways' and Iberia's routes and operating licences. IAG could face a challenge to its ownership and control structure. Following the UK's exit from the EU on 31 December 2020, after the transition period, the Group initiated the remedial plans on the ownership and control of its European airlines that were agreed with all national regulators in 2019. IAG will continue to engage with the relevant regulatory bodies as appropriate regarding the Group structure.
The dependency on IT systems for key business and customer processes is increasing and the failure of a critical system may cause significant disruption. Obsolescence within the IAG Tech estate could result in service outages and/or operational disruption, particularly if the Company needs to defer investment to preserve cash.
System controls, disaster recovery and business continuity arrangements exist to mitigate the risk of a critical system failure. IAG Tech works with the business to deliver digital and IT change initiatives to enhance security and stability.
The Company fails to attract, motivate, retain or develop its people. Succession planning, engagement surveys and action plans mitigate this risk.
The Company is exposed to the risk of individual employees' or groups of employees' inappropriate and/or unethical behaviour resulting in reputational damage, fines or losses. The Company has clear frameworks in place including comprehensive Groupwide policies designed to ensure compliance. There are mandatory training programmes in place to educate employees in these matters, including an IAG Code of Conduct framework and training.
As a listed entity in Spain and the United Kingdom, and as owner of British Airways, Iberia, IAG Cargo, Vueling, Aer Lingus, Avios and LEVEL, the Company is exposed to reputational risk and consequent impact to the Group's brands. This risk is mitigated through a Disclosure Committee that meets monthly to consider the adequacy and accuracy of external communications. The Company's communications department also works closely with the operating companies to ensure consistency in external communications.
The Company is exposed to systemic tax risks arising from either changes to tax legislation and accounting standards or challenges by tax authorities on the interpretation or application of tax legislation. The Company may be subject to higher levels of taxation as governments seek to recover the national debts arising from pandemic support measures. The Group adheres to the Tax Policy approved by the IAG Board and is committed to complying with all tax laws, to acting with integrity in all tax matters and to working openly with tax authorities. Tax risk is managed by the IAG tax department and overseen by the Board through the Audit and Compliance Committee.
The Annual Corporate Governance Report is part of this Management Report but has been presented separately. This report has been filed with the CNMV, together with the required statistical annex, in accordance with the CNMV Circular 2/2018, dated June 12. The Annual Corporate Governance Report and the statistical annex are also available on the Company's website (www.iairgroup.com).
The Non-Financial Information Statement in response to the requirements of Law 11/2018, of December 28, (amending the Commercial Code, the revised Capital Companies Law approved by Legislative Royal Decree 1/2010, of July 2, 2010 and Audit Law 22/2015, of July 20, 2015), is part of this Management Report and is available on the Company's website (www.iairgroup.com).
The 2020 Spanish Annual Corporate Governance Report of International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A., prepared according to Circular 1/2020, of October 6, of the Spanish National Stock Exchange Commission is part of this Management Report and, from the date of the publication of the 2020 Financial Statements, is available in the Spanish National Stock Exchange Commission website and in the International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A. website, being incorporated by reference to this report as appropriate.
The Board of Directors of International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A., in compliance with the provisions of Article 253 of the Capital Companies Law and of Article 37 of the Commercial Code, proceeded to formulate on February 25, 2021 the individual financial statements and the individual management report of the company for the year to December 31, 2020, which appear in the attached documents preceding this sheet.
In witness whereof, the members of the Board of Directors of International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A. signed below on February 25, 2021:
| Javier Ferrán Larraz Chairman |
Luis Gallego Martín Chief Executive Officer |
|---|---|
| Giles Agutter | Peggy Bruzelius |
| Eva Castillo Sanz | Margaret Ewing |
| Heather Ann McSharry | Robin Phillips |
| Emilio Saracho Rodríguez de Torres | Lucy Nicola Shaw |
Alberto Terol Esteban


| Risk | Our response to the risk | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The assessment of the carrying value of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (€20,739 million, 2019: €22,610 million) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the risk that the carrying value of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets may not be recoverable or that specific fleet or other assets may no longer be used by the Group. The key assumptions may be incorrectly stated or may not be in line with external evidence. Changes to assumptions can have a significant impact on the available headroom and any impairment that may be required. Refer to Notes 2, 3, 12, 13 and 15 of the consolidated financial statements. |
Our procedures included the following: We confirmed that the Base Case and Downside Case forecasts used in the impairment analysis were consistent with those used in other accounting assessments, including the going concern assessment. With input from full scope components, we evaluated the key 4 assumptions in the Base Case and Downside Case forecasts, in the context of other evidence gained from our audit work. We reviewed independent external market data, including industry and analyst forecasts and competitor trading updates for indicators of contradictory evidence to challenge these forecasts. This included specific consideration of the expected rate of recovery of passenger numbers in the context of the current travel restrictions and the expectations of how long they may remain in place as well as consideration of current uncertainty over the global roll-out of vaccines and the impact of this on future capacity levels and travel demand. With the assistance of a valuation specialist, we assessed the A appropriateness of the other assumptions made by management and used in the impairment assessment. We evaluated the alignment of long-term growth rates with our view of long-term inflation and GDP growth for the regions in which the Group's operating companies operate and considered whether the discount rates used to determine the net present value of the Group's cash generating units ("GUs") were within acceptable ranges. We tested the arithmetic accuracy of the impairment Ar calculations. We also assessed management's sensitivity analysis to evaluate whether a reasonable change in the key assumptions for any of the Group's CGUs would cause the carrying amounts to exceed the recoverable amounts. This included consideration of the impact of COVID-19 and other external factors, including climate change related risks, and how management considered them in its forecasts. We compared the total recoverable amounts in comparison to the market capitalisation of the Group at 31 December 2020, to determine if there was contra evidence in assessing the appropriateness of the Group's cash flow forecasts. We assessed the appropriateness of the related disclosures including the disclosures of reasonably possible changes in key assumptions which would cause the carrying amounts to exceed the recoverable amount. The audit procedures performed to address this risk were performed |


| Risk | Our response to the risk |
|---|---|
| by management and considered the impact of changes in customer behaviour as a result of COVID-19. We assessed the appropriateness of management's adjustments to the third-party statistical models and the deferred revenue balance recognised. To check the completeness of deferred revenue, we reconciled the points issued and redeemed in the year and the closing balance sheet position from the financial records to the respective loyalty programme membership databases. We assessed the disclosures related to the key assumptions affecting the customer loyalty programmes. Our procedures for loyalty revenue were performed by one specific scope component which is responsible for auditing the Group's principal loyalty programmes. |
|
| Risk | Our response to the risk |
| Valuation of British Airways and Iberia's employee benefit liabilities (€31,281 million, 2019: €31,094 million) The valuation of the employee benefit liabilities requires technical expertise to select appropriate valuation assumptions. Changes in the key assumptions (discount rates, price inflation, salary increases, and demographic assumptions) can have a material impact on the valuation of the benefit obligations. |
We involved internal pension actuaries to assist in the evaluation of the assumptions used in the valuation of the Group's long-term employee commitments. The procedures were performed by the audit teams responsible for British Airways and Iberia and included the following: We met with the Group's external actuaries to understand the process used to develop the key assumptions. We compared the key inputs used to independent sources, current market information and expectations. We compared the assumptions applied to those used in the prior year and understood the basis for any changes. |
| British's Airways APS and NAPS defined benefit pension scheme liabilities amount to €30,294 million (2019: €30,051 million) with a net pension deficit of €120 million (2019: surplus of €228 million). Iberia's benefit commitments to its employees amount to €987 million (2019: €1,043 million), which includes obligations relating to pension schemes, early retirements and redundancy plans. |
We compared the assumptions selected to our own independent assessment of appropriate actuarial assumptions for the respective scheme durations. We independently checked a sample of the scheme membership data provided to the actuaries to the pension plan membership records to test the accuracy and completeness of the data used to determine the schemes' liabilities. We evaluated the independence and qualifications of management's external actuaries involved in the valuation process. |
| Refer to Notes 2, 24 and 30 of the consolidated financial statements. |
The Group audit team assessed the appropriateness of the related disclosures. |
| Risk | Our response to the risk |

| Risk | Our response to the risk |
|---|---|
| maintenance costs and aircraft conditions and there | compared the valuation of maintenance and restoration expenses |
| is a risk that they are inappropriate and the | to historic invoices, third-party price lists and/or agreed |
| provisions are understated as a result. | maintenance contracts. |
| Risk | Our response to the risk |
|---|---|
| Other matters related to the impact of the COVID- | During 2020 and throughout the course of the audit, we continued to |
| 19 pandemic | assess the risks arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. We focused on |
| During 2020, the Group has been impacted by the | areas where significant additional audit effort was required as well as |
| COVID-19 pandemic with significantly reduced | those areas susceptible to a material financial impact on the |

| Recoverability of deferred tax assets - The Group recognised deferred tax assets of €1,075 million and unrecognised deferred tax assets of €1,275 million. Due to the significant impact of the COVID- 19 pandemic and the related uncertainty, there is a risk that the deferred tax assets recognised may not be recoverable. |
In respect of the recoverability of deferred tax assets we performed the following procedures: We checked the future forecasts used to support the recoverability of deferred tax assets were consistent with those used in the going concern and impairment analyses; and We challenged the assumptions and forecasts used in management's assessment of the recoverability of deferred tax assets. |
|---|---|
| Compliance with conditions pursuant to new financing arrangements - In order to secure its |
In respect of the assessment of the Group's compliance with conditions related to financing agreements we performed the following |


Consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020
| € million Note 20191 2020 Passenger revenue 5,512 22,468 Cargo revenue 1,117 1,306 Other revenue 988 1,921 Total revenue 4 7,806 25,506 Employee costs 7 3,560 5,634 Fuel, oil costs and emissions charges 6,021 3,735 Handling, catering and other operating costs 1,340 2,972 Landing fees and en-route charges 918 2,221 Engineering and other aircraft costs 2,092 1,456 Property, IT and other costs 782 811 Selling costs 1,038 405 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment 5 2,955 2,111 Currency differences (7) 81 Total expenditure on operations 22,893 15,232 Operating (loss)/profit (7,426) 2,613 Finance costs 8 (670) (611) Finance income 8 50 41 Net financing credit relating to pensions 8 26 4 Net currency retranslation credits 245 201 Other non-operating charges 8 (4) (4) Total net non-operating costs (338) (384) 2,275 (Loss)/profit before tax (7,810) Tax 9 887 (560) 1,715 (Loss)/profit after tax for the year (6,923) Attributable to: Equity holders of the parent (6,923) 1,715 Non-controlling interest – – (6,923) 1,715 |
Year to December 31 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic (loss)/earnings per share (€ cents)2 | 10 | (196.2) | 56.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diluted (loss)/earnings per share (€ cents)2 | 10 | (196.2) | 55.5 |
1 In 2020 the Group has presented the Income statement using a single column approach whereas in prior years the Group presented the Income statement using a three-column approach. The 2019 comparative figures have also been re-presented. Further information is given in the basis of preparation in note 2.
2 The earnings per share information for 2019 has been restated to reflect the impact of the rights issue. Further information is given in note 10.
142 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
Attributable to:
preparation in note 2.
138
€ million Note 2020 20191 Passenger revenue 5,512 22,468 Cargo revenue 1,306 1,117 Other revenue 988 1,921 Total revenue 4 7,806 25,506
Employee costs 7 3,560 5,634 Fuel, oil costs and emissions charges 3,735 6,021 Handling, catering and other operating costs 1,340 2,972 Landing fees and en-route charges 918 2,221 Engineering and other aircraft costs 1,456 2,092 Property, IT and other costs 782 811 Selling costs 405 1,038 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment 5 2,955 2,111 Currency differences 81 (7) Total expenditure on operations 15,232 22,893 Operating (loss)/profit (7,426) 2,613
Finance costs 8 (670) (611) Finance income 8 41 50 Net financing credit relating to pensions 8 4 26 Net currency retranslation credits 245 201 Other non-operating charges 8 (4) (4) Total net non-operating costs (384) (338) (Loss)/profit before tax (7,810) 2,275 Tax 9 887 (560) (Loss)/profit after tax for the year (6,923) 1,715
Equity holders of the parent (6,923) 1,715 Non-controlling interest – –
Basic (loss)/earnings per share (€ cents)2 10 (196.2) 56.1 Diluted (loss)/earnings per share (€ cents)2 10 (196.2) 55.5 1 In 2020 the Group has presented the Income statement using a single column approach whereas in prior years the Group presented the Income statement using a three-column approach. The 2019 comparative figures have also been re-presented. Further information is given in the basis of
2 The earnings per share information for 2019 has been restated to reflect the impact of the rights issue. Further information is given in note 10.
Year to December 31
(6,923) 1,715
| Year to December 31 | ||
|---|---|---|
| € million Note |
2020 | 2019 |
| Items that may be reclassified subsequently to net profit | ||
| Cash flow hedges: | ||
| Fair value movements in equity | (2,171) | 610 |
| Reclassified and reported in net profit | 1,871 | 141 |
| Fair value movements on cost of hedging | (16) | 36 |
| Cost of hedging reclassified and reported in net profit | (19) | (10) |
| Currency translation differences 29 |
(192) | 296 |
| Items that will not be reclassified to net profit | ||
| Fair value movements on other equity investments | (53) | (8) |
| Fair value movements on cash flow hedges | (45) | (70) |
| Fair value movements on cost of hedging | 26 | 32 |
| Remeasurements of post-employment benefit obligations | (632) | (788) |
| Total other comprehensive (loss)/income for the year, net of tax | (1,231) | 239 |
| (Loss)/profit after tax for the year | (6,923) | 1,715 |
| Total comprehensive (loss)/income for the year | (8,154) | 1,954 |
| Total comprehensive (loss)/income is attributable to: | ||
| Equity holders of the parent | (8,154) | 1,954 |
| Non-controlling interest 29 |
– | – |
| (8,154) | 1,954 |
Items in the consolidated Statement of other comprehensive income above are disclosed net of tax.
139
www.iairgroup.com 143
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
| December 31, | December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Note | 2020 | 20191 |
| Non-current assets | |||
| Property, plant and equipment | 12 | 17,531 | 19,168 |
| Intangible assets | 15 | 3,208 | 3,442 |
| Investments accounted for using the equity method | 16 | 29 | 31 |
| Other equity investments | 17 | 29 | 82 |
| Employee benefit assets | 30 | 282 | 314 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 26 | 42 | 268 |
| Deferred tax assets | 9 | 1,075 | 546 |
| Other non-current assets | 18 | 228 | 273 |
| 22,424 | 24,124 | ||
| Current assets | |||
| Inventories | 351 | 565 | |
| Trade receivables | 18 | 557 | 2,255 |
| Other current assets | 18 | 792 | 1,314 |
| Current tax receivable | 9 | 101 | 186 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 26 | 122 | 324 |
| Current interest-bearing deposits | 19 | 143 | 2,621 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 19 | 5,774 | 4,062 |
| 7,840 | 11,327 | ||
| Total assets | 30,264 | 35,451 | |
| Shareholders' equity | |||
| Issued share capital | 27 | 497 | 996 |
| Share premium | 27 | 7,770 | 5,327 |
| Treasury shares | (60) | ||
| (40) | |||
| Other reserves | (6,917) | 560 | |
| Total shareholders' equity | 1,310 | 6,823 | |
| Non-controlling interest | 29 | 6 | 6 |
| Total equity | 1,316 | 6,829 | |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | 23 | 13,464 | 12,411 |
| Employee benefit obligations | 30 | 719 | 400 |
| Deferred tax liability | 9 | 40 | 290 |
| Provisions | 24 | 2,286 | 2,416 |
| Deferred revenue on ticket sales | 21 | 473 | - |
| Derivative financial instruments | 26 | 310 | 286 |
| Other long-term liabilities | 22 | 140 | 71 |
| 17,432 | 15,874 | ||
| Current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | 23 | 2,215 | 1,843 |
| Trade and other payables | 20 | 2,810 | 4,344 |
| Deferred revenue on ticket sales | 21 | 4,657 | 5,486 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 26 | 1,160 | 252 |
| Current tax payable | 9 | 48 | 192 |
| Provisions | 24 | 626 | 631 |
| 11,516 | 12,748 | ||
| Total liabilities | 28,948 | 28,622 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 30,264 | 35,451 |
1 The 2019 Balance sheet includes a reclassification in the presentation of assets and liabilities for employee benefits and deferred tax. Refer to note 2 for further information.
144 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
Non-current assets
Current assets
Shareholders' equity
Non-current liabilities
Current liabilities
for further information.
€ million Note
Property, plant and equipment 12 17,531 19,168 Intangible assets 15 3,208 3,442 Investments accounted for using the equity method 16 29 31 Other equity investments 17 29 82 Employee benefit assets 30 282 314 Derivative financial instruments 26 42 268 Deferred tax assets 9 1,075 546 Other non-current assets 18 228 273
Inventories 351 565 Trade receivables 18 557 2,255 Other current assets 18 792 1,314 Current tax receivable 9 101 186 Derivative financial instruments 26 122 324 Current interest-bearing deposits 19 143 2,621 Cash and cash equivalents 19 5,774 4,062
Total assets 30,264 35,451
Issued share capital 27 497 996 Share premium 27 7,770 5,327 Treasury shares (40) (60) Other reserves (6,917) 560 Total shareholders' equity 1,310 6,823 Non-controlling interest 29 6 6 Total equity 1,316 6,829
Borrowings 23 13,464 12,411 Employee benefit obligations 30 719 400 Deferred tax liability 9 40 290 Provisions 24 2,286 2,416 Deferred revenue on ticket sales 21 473 - Derivative financial instruments 26 310 286 Other long-term liabilities 22 140 71
Borrowings 23 2,215 1,843 Trade and other payables 20 2,810 4,344 Deferred revenue on ticket sales 21 4,657 5,486 Derivative financial instruments 26 1,160 252 Current tax payable 9 48 192 Provisions 24 626 631
Total liabilities 28,948 28,622 Total equity and liabilities 30,264 35,451 1 The 2019 Balance sheet includes a reclassification in the presentation of assets and liabilities for employee benefits and deferred tax. Refer to note 2
December 31, 2020
December 31, 20191
22,424 24,124
7,840 11,327
17,432 15,874
11,516 12,748
140
| Year to December 31 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Note | 2020 | 2019 |
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Operating (loss)/profit | (7,426) | 2,613 | |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment | 5 | 2,955 | 2,111 |
| Movement in working capital | 1,227 | (70) | |
| Decrease/(increase) in trade receivables, inventories and other current assets | 2,347 | (935) | |
| (Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables and deferred revenue on ticket sales | (1,120) | 865 | |
| Payments related to restructuring | 24 | (383) | (180) |
| Employer contributions to pension schemes | (318) | (870) | |
| Pension scheme service costs | 30 | 5 | 5 |
| Provisions and other non-cash movements | 556 | 951 | |
| Unrealised loss on discontinuance of fuel and foreign exchange hedge accounting | 569 | – | |
| Interest paid | (548) | (481) | |
| Interest received | 22 | 42 | |
| Tax received/(paid) | 45 | (119) | |
| Net cash (outflows)/inflows from operating activities | (3,296) | 4,002 | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Acquisition of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets | (1,939) | (3,465) | |
| Sale of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets | 1,133 | 911 | |
| Decrease/(increase) in current interest-bearing deposits | 2,366 | (103) | |
| Other investing movements | 2 | (1) | |
| Net cash inflows/(outflows) from investing activities | 1,562 | (2,658) | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Proceeds from borrowings | 3,567 | 2,286 | |
| Repayment of borrowings | (978) | (730) | |
| Repayment of lease liabilities | (1,536) | (1,507) | |
| Dividend paid | 11 | (53) | (1,308) |
| Proceeds from rights issue | 2,674 | – | |
| Net cash inflows/(outflows) from financing activities | 3,674 | (1,259) | |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 1,940 | 85 | |
| Net foreign exchange differences | (228) | 140 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January | 4,062 | 3,837 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at year end | 19 | 5,774 | 4,062 |
| Interest-bearing deposits maturing after more than three months | 19 | 143 | 2,621 |
| Cash, cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits | 19 | 5,917 | 6,683 |
For details on restricted cash balances refer to note 19 Cash, cash equivalents and current interest-bearing deposits.
141
www.iairgroup.com 145
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
For the year to December 31, 2020
| Issued share |
Share | Treasury | Other | Total | Non controlling |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | capital (note 27) |
premium (note 27) |
shares (note 27) |
reserves (note 29) |
Retained earnings |
shareholders' equity |
interest (note 29) |
Total equity |
| January 1, 2020 | 996 | 5,327 | (60) | (2,579) | 3,139 | 6,823 | 6 | 6,829 |
| Loss for the year | – | – | – | – | (6,923) | (6,923) | – | (6,923) |
| Other comprehensive loss for the year | ||||||||
| Cash flow hedges reclassified and reported in net profit: |
||||||||
| Passenger revenue | – | – | – | 50 | – | 50 | – | 50 |
| Fuel and oil costs | – | – | – | 356 | – | 356 | – | 356 |
| Currency differences | – | – | – | 18 | – | 18 | – | 18 |
| Finance costs | – | – | – | 12 | – | 12 | – | 12 |
| Discontinuance of hedge accounting | – | – | – | 1,435 | – | 1,435 | – | 1,435 |
| Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges |
– | – | – | (2,216) | – | (2,216) | – | (2,216) |
| Net change in fair value of equity investments |
– | – | – | (53) | – | (53) | – | (53) |
| Net change in fair value of cost of hedging |
– | – | – | 10 | – | 10 | – | 10 |
| Cost of hedging reclassified and reported in the net profit |
– | – | – | (19) | – | (19) | – | (19) |
| Currency translation differences | – | – | – | (192) | – | (192) | – | (192) |
| Remeasurements of post-employment | ||||||||
| benefit obligations | – | – | – | – | (632) | (632) | – | (632) |
| Total comprehensive loss for the year | – | – | – | (599) | (7,555) | (8,154) | – | (8,154) |
| Hedges reclassified and reported in property, plant and equipment |
– | – | – | (18) | – | (18) | – | (18) |
| Cost of share-based payments | – | – | – | – | (10) | – | ||
| (10) | (10) | |||||||
| Vesting of share-based payment schemes |
– | – | 20 | – | (22) | (2) | – | (2) |
| Share capital reduction | (797) | – | – | 797 | – | – | – | – |
| Rights issue | 298 | 2,443 | – | – | (70) | 2,671 | – | 2,671 |
| December 31, 2020 | 497 | 7,770 | (40) | (2,399) | (4,518) | 1,310 | 6 | 1,316 |
146 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
For the year to December 31, 2019
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Issued share capital (note 27)
Share premium (note 27)
Treasury shares (note 27)
January 1, 2020 996 5,327 (60) (2,579) 3,139 6,823 6 6,829
Loss for the year – – – – (6,923) (6,923) – (6,923)
Passenger revenue – – – 50 – 50 – 50 Fuel and oil costs – – – 356 – 356 – 356 Currency differences – – – 18 – 18 – 18 Finance costs – – – 12 – 12 – 12 Discontinuance of hedge accounting – – – 1,435 – 1,435 – 1,435
hedges – – – (2,216) – (2,216) – (2,216)
investments – – – (53) – (53) – (53)
hedging – – – 10 – 10 – 10
reported in the net profit – – – (19) – (19) – (19) Currency translation differences – – – (192) – (192) – (192)
benefit obligations – – – – (632) (632) – (632) Total comprehensive loss for the year – – – (599) (7,555) (8,154) – (8,154)
property, plant and equipment – – – (18) – (18) – (18) Cost of share-based payments – – – – (10) (10) – (10)
schemes – – 20 – (22) (2) – (2) Share capital reduction (797) – – 797 – – – – Rights issue 298 2,443 – – (70) 2,671 – 2,671 December 31, 2020 497 7,770 (40) (2,399) (4,518) 1,310 6 1,316
Other reserves (note 29)
Retained earnings
Total shareholders' equity
Noncontrolling interest (note 29)
Total equity
142
For the year to December 31, 2020
Other comprehensive loss for the year Cash flow hedges reclassified and
Net change in fair value of cash flow
Net change in fair value of equity
Net change in fair value of cost of
Cost of hedging reclassified and
Remeasurements of post-employment
Hedges reclassified and reported in
Vesting of share-based payment
reported in net profit:
€ million
| € million | Issued share capital (note 27) |
Share premium (note 27) |
Treasury shares (note 27) |
Other reserves (note 29) |
Retained earnings |
Total shareholders' equity |
Non controlling interest (note 29) |
Total equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2019 | 996 | 6,022 | (68) | (3,556) | 2,770 | 6,164 | 6 | 6,170 |
| Profit for the year | – | – | – | – | 1,715 | 1,715 | – | 1,715 |
| Other comprehensive income for the year |
||||||||
| Cash flow hedges reclassified and reported in net profit: |
||||||||
| Passenger revenue | – | – | – | 55 | – | 55 | – | 55 |
| Fuel and oil costs | – | – | – | 106 | – | 106 | – | 106 |
| Currency differences | – | – | – | (26) | – | (26) | – | (26) |
| Finance costs | – | – | – | 6 | – | 6 | – | 6 |
| Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges |
– | – | – | 540 | – | 540 | – | 540 |
| Net change in fair value of equity investments |
– | – | – | (8) | – | (8) | – | (8) |
| Net change in fair value of cost of hedging |
– | – | – | 68 | – | 68 | – | 68 |
| Cost of hedging reclassified and reported in net profit |
– | – | – | (10) | – | (10) | – | (10) |
| Currency translation differences | – | – | – | 296 | – | 296 | – | 296 |
| Remeasurements of post-employment benefit obligations |
– | – | – | – | (788) | (788) | – | (788) |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | – | – | – | 1,027 | 927 | 1,954 | – | 1,954 |
| Hedges reclassified and reported in property, plant and equipment |
– | – | – | (11) | – | (11) | – | (11) |
| Cost of share-based payments | – | – | – | – | 33 | 33 | – | 33 |
| Vesting of share-based payment | ||||||||
| schemes | – | – | 8 | – | (14) | (6) | – | (6) |
| Dividend | – | (695) | – | – | (615) | (1,310) | – | (1,310) |
| Redemption of convertible bond | – | – | – | (39) | 38 | (1) | – | (1) |
| December 31, 2019 | 996 | 5,327 | (60) | (2,579) | 3,139 | 6,823 | 6 | 6,829 |
143
www.iairgroup.com 147
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (hereinafter 'International Airlines Group', 'IAG' or the 'Group') is a leading European airline group, formed to hold the interests of airline and ancillary operations. IAG is a Spanish company registered in Madrid and was incorporated on December 17, 2009. On January 21, 2011 British Airways Plc and Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España S.A. Operadora (hereinafter 'British Airways' and 'Iberia' respectively) completed a merger transaction becoming the first two airlines of the Group. Vueling Airlines S.A. ('Vueling') was acquired on April 26, 2013, and Aer Lingus Group Plc ('Aer Lingus') on August 18, 2015. A list of the subsidiaries of the Group is included in the Group investments section.
IAG shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange's main market for listed securities and also on the stock exchanges of Madrid, Barcelona, Bilbao and Valencia (the 'Spanish Stock Exchanges'), through the Spanish Stock Exchanges Interconnection System (Mercado Continuo Español).
The consolidated financial statements of the Group have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards as endorsed by the European Union (IFRSs as endorsed by the EU). The consolidated financial statements are rounded to the nearest million unless otherwise stated. These financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost convention except for certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative financial instruments and other equity investments that are measured at fair value. The carrying value of recognised assets and liabilities that are subject to fair value hedges are adjusted to record changes in the fair values attributable to the risks that are being hedged. The financial statements for the prior year include reclassifications that were made to conform to the current year presentation.
The Group's financial statements for the year to December 31, 2020 were authorised for issue, and approved by the Board of Directors on February 25, 2021.
Deferred tax assets arising on the restriction of surpluses to reflect minimum funding requirements of the British Airways Airways Pension Scheme (APS) and New Airways Pension Scheme (NAPS) defined benefit schemes, previously recognised within Employee benefit assets in the Balance sheet at December 31, 2019, have been reclassified to be presented net within Deferred tax liabilities at both December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2019 to conform to the current period presentation. The reclassification had the effect of reducing Deferred tax liabilities, reducing the Employee benefit assets and increasing the Employee benefit obligations at both balance sheet dates.
There is no impact to Profit after tax for the year, Other comprehensive income for the year, Net assets or the Statement of changes in equity in any year presented. The following table summarises the impact of the reclassification on the Consolidated balance sheet line items at December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2019:
| € million | Previously reported |
Reclassification | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | |||
| Employee benefit assets | 524 | (210) | 314 |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Employee benefit obligations | 328 | 72 | 400 |
| Deferred tax liability | 572 | (282) | 290 |
| Consolidated balance sheet (at January 1, 2019) € million |
Previously reported |
Reclassification | Adjusted |
| Non-current assets | |||
| Employee benefit assets | 1,129 | (365) | 764 |
| Deferred tax assets | 536 | 131 | 667 |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Employee benefit obligations | 289 | 138 | 427 |
| Deferred tax liability | 453 | (372) | 81 |
Following consideration of regulatory publications, the Group has re-presented its results in the Income statement from using a three-column approach to a single column approach. The comparative figures have also been re-presented. The impact of exceptional items on the performance of the Group is detailed in the Alternative performance measures section.
The economic uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmented and varied responses from governments have had a significant impact on the Group's results and cash flows. At December 31, 2020, the Group had cash and interest-bearing deposits of €5.9 billion, €0.9 billion of committed and undrawn general facilities and a further €1.2 billion of committed and undrawn aircraft specific facilities. Liquidity has been enhanced through to the date of this report by a further €2.2 billion arising from the Group finalising the terms of a UK Export Credit Facility.
The reduction in liquidity during 2020 was partially mitigated by, amongst other actions, accessing Spain's Instituto de Crédito Oficial (ICO) facility, the UK's Coronavirus Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF) and Ireland's Strategy Investment Fund (ISIF). These actions raised an additional €1.4 billion, of which €0.3 billion matures within 12 months from the date of this report. The Group's
148 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
facilities have limited financial covenants, but there are a number of non-financial covenants to protect the position of the banks, including restrictions on the upstreaming of cash to IAG or lending to other Group companies.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS For the year to December 31, 2020
(Mercado Continuo Español).
Directors on February 25, 2021.
Reclassification
balance sheet dates.
Non-current assets
Non-current liabilities
Non-current assets
Non-current liabilities
Presentation of results
Going concern
€ million
€ million
Basis of preparation
1 Background and general information
2 Significant accounting policies
that were made to conform to the current year presentation.
line items at December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2019: Consolidated balance sheet (at December 31, 2019)
Consolidated balance sheet (at January 1, 2019)
finalising the terms of a UK Export Credit Facility.
the subsidiaries of the Group is included in the Group investments section.
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (hereinafter 'International Airlines Group', 'IAG' or the 'Group') is a leading European airline group, formed to hold the interests of airline and ancillary operations. IAG is a Spanish company registered in Madrid and was incorporated on December 17, 2009. On January 21, 2011 British Airways Plc and Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España S.A. Operadora (hereinafter 'British Airways' and 'Iberia' respectively) completed a merger transaction becoming the first two airlines of the Group. Vueling Airlines S.A. ('Vueling') was acquired on April 26, 2013, and Aer Lingus Group Plc ('Aer Lingus') on August 18, 2015. A list of
IAG shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange's main market for listed securities and also on the stock exchanges of Madrid, Barcelona, Bilbao and Valencia (the 'Spanish Stock Exchanges'), through the Spanish Stock Exchanges Interconnection System
The consolidated financial statements of the Group have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards as endorsed by the European Union (IFRSs as endorsed by the EU). The consolidated financial statements are rounded to the nearest million unless otherwise stated. These financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost convention except for certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative financial instruments and other equity investments that are measured at fair value. The carrying value of recognised assets and liabilities that are subject to fair value hedges are adjusted to record changes in the fair values attributable to the risks that are being hedged. The financial statements for the prior year include reclassifications
The Group's financial statements for the year to December 31, 2020 were authorised for issue, and approved by the Board of
Deferred tax assets arising on the restriction of surpluses to reflect minimum funding requirements of the British Airways Airways Pension Scheme (APS) and New Airways Pension Scheme (NAPS) defined benefit schemes, previously recognised within Employee benefit assets in the Balance sheet at December 31, 2019, have been reclassified to be presented net within Deferred tax liabilities at both December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2019 to conform to the current period presentation. The reclassification had the effect of reducing Deferred tax liabilities, reducing the Employee benefit assets and increasing the Employee benefit obligations at both
There is no impact to Profit after tax for the year, Other comprehensive income for the year, Net assets or the Statement of changes in equity in any year presented. The following table summarises the impact of the reclassification on the Consolidated balance sheet
Employee benefit assets 524 (210) 314
Employee benefit obligations 328 72 400 Deferred tax liability 572 (282) 290
Employee benefit assets 1,129 (365) 764 Deferred tax assets 536 131 667
Employee benefit obligations 289 138 427 Deferred tax liability 453 (372) 81
Following consideration of regulatory publications, the Group has re-presented its results in the Income statement from using a three-column approach to a single column approach. The comparative figures have also been re-presented. The impact of
The economic uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmented and varied responses from governments have had a significant impact on the Group's results and cash flows. At December 31, 2020, the Group had cash and interest-bearing deposits of €5.9 billion, €0.9 billion of committed and undrawn general facilities and a further €1.2 billion of committed and undrawn aircraft specific facilities. Liquidity has been enhanced through to the date of this report by a further €2.2 billion arising from the Group
The reduction in liquidity during 2020 was partially mitigated by, amongst other actions, accessing Spain's Instituto de Crédito Oficial (ICO) facility, the UK's Coronavirus Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF) and Ireland's Strategy Investment Fund (ISIF). These actions raised an additional €1.4 billion, of which €0.3 billion matures within 12 months from the date of this report. The Group's
exceptional items on the performance of the Group is detailed in the Alternative performance measures section.
Previously
Previously
reported Reclassification Adjusted
reported Reclassification Adjusted
144
Despite the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Group has continued to successfully secure financing arrangements for all aircraft delivered in 2020. This includes the one-year aircraft-backed financing facilities for old and new aircraft which were secured in the second quarter of 2020 and subsequently repaid prior to year-end and the aircraft-specific facility achieved as part of the Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificate (EETC) financing structure. In total the Group raised proceeds of €2.2 billion through aircraft specific financing.
In its assessment of going concern over the period to March 31, 2022 (the 'going concern period'), the Group has modelled two scenarios referred to below as the Base Case and the Downside Case. The Group's three-year Business plan, prepared and approved by the Board in December 2020, was subsequently refreshed with the latest available internal and external information in February 2021. This refreshed Business plan supports the Base Case, which takes into account the Board's and management's views on the anticipated impact and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic on the Group across the going concern period. The key inputs and assumptions underlying the Base Case include:
The Downside Case applies further stress to the Base Case to model a more prolonged downturn, with a more gradual recovery relative to the Base Case. The Downside Case is representative of a slower roll out of the vaccination programme on a regional basis, with travel restrictions remaining in place and the gradual recovery of capacity being delayed longer than in the Base Case. The Downside Case also models a more acute impact on the longhaul sector, with the domestic sector and European shorthaul sectors recovering faster than longhaul. The result of which is that the levels of capacity assumed under the Base Case for the third quarter of 2021 are not achieved under the Downside Case until the first quarter of 2022. In the Downside Case, over the going concern period capacity would be 60 per cent down on 2019. The Directors consider the Downside Case to be a severe but plausible scenario.
The Group has modelled the impact of further deteriorations in capacity operated and yield, including mitigating actions to reduce operating and capital expenditure. The Group expects to be able to continue to secure financing for future aircraft deliveries and in addition has further potential mitigating actions, including asset disposals, it would pursue in the event of adverse liquidity experience.
Furthermore, to add resilience to the liquidity position of the Group, the Directors are actively pursuing a range of financing options, including the renegotiation of existing financing arrangements and securing additional long term financial facilities, but these have not been included in the Base or Downside Cases.
Having reviewed the Base Case, Downside Case and additional sensitivities, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group has sufficient liquidity to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and hence continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
However, due to the uncertainty created by COVID-19, there are a number of significant factors that are outside of the control of the Group, including: the status and impact of the pandemic worldwide; the emergence of new variants of the virus and potential resurgence of existing strains of the virus; the availability of vaccines worldwide, together with the speed at which they are deployed; the efficacy of those vaccines; and the restrictions imposed by national governments in respect of the freedom of movement and travel. The Group, therefore, is not able to provide certainty that there could not be a more severe downside scenario than those it has considered, including the sensitivities in relation to the timing of recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, capacity operated, impact on yield, cost mitigations achieved and the availability of aircraft financing to offset capital expenditure. In the event that a more severe scenario were to occur, the Group will need to secure sufficient additional funding. As set out above, sources of additional funding are expected to include the renegotiation of existing financing arrangements and securing additional long term financial facilities. However, the Group's ability to obtain this additional funding in the event of a more severe downside scenario represents a material uncertainty at February 25, 2021 that could cast significant doubt upon the Group's ability to continue as a going concern.
The financial statements do not include the adjustments that would result if the Group was unable to continue as a going concern.
145
www.iairgroup.com 149
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
2 Significant accounting policies continued
The Group financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries, each made up to December 31, together with the attributable share of results and reserves of associates and joint ventures, adjusted where appropriate to conform to the Group's accounting policies.
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of their acquisition, which is the date on which the Group obtains control and continue to be consolidated until the date that such control ceases. Control exists when the Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity.
The Group applies the acquisition method to account for business combinations. The consideration paid is the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred and the equity interests issued by the Group. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. Non-controlling interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets in subsidiaries that are not held by the Group and are presented separately within equity in the consolidated Balance sheet. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
If the business combination is achieved in stages, the acquisition date fair value of the acquirer's previously held equity interest in the acquiree is remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date through the Income statement.
Goodwill is initially measured as the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the fair value of non-controlling interest over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
All intragroup account balances, including intragroup profits, are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
The Group regularly uses sale and leaseback transactions to finance the acquisition of aircraft. In certain instances the Group will finance several such transactions at once through Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates (EETCs). Under each of these financing structures, a company (the EETC Issuer) is established to facilitate such financing on behalf of a number of unrelated investors. The proceeds from the issuance of the EETCs by the EETC Issuer are then used to purchase aircraft solely from the Group. Payments by the Group (under the asset financed liabilities) to the EETC Issuer are distributed, through a trust, to the aforementioned unrelated investors. The main purpose of the trust structure is to enhance the credit worthiness of the Group's debt obligations through certain bankruptcy protection provisions and liquidity facilities, and also to lower the Group's total borrowing cost.
The EETC Issuer is established solely with the purpose of providing the asset-backed financing and upon maturity of such financing is expected to have no further activity. The relevant activities of the EETC Issuer are restricted to pre-established financing agreements and the retention of the title of the associated financed aircraft. Accordingly, the Group has determined that each EETC Issuer is a structured entity. Under the contractual terms of the EETC structure, the Group does not own any of the share capital of the EETC Issuer, does not have any representation on the respective boards and has no ability to influence decision making.
In considering the aforementioned facts, management has concluded that the Group does not have access to variable returns from the EETC Issuers because its involvement is limited to the payment of principal and interest under the arrangement and, therefore, it does not control the EETC Issuers and as such does not consolidate them.
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with how resource allocation decisions are made by the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for resource allocation and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the IAG Management Committee.
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group's entities are measured using the functional currency, being the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. In particular, British Airways and Avios have a functional currency of pound sterling. The Group's consolidated financial statements are presented in euros, which is the Group's presentation currency.
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency using the rate of exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. Monetary foreign currency balances are translated into the functional currency at the rates ruling at the balance sheet date. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at balance sheet exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the Income statement, except where hedge accounting is applied. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising on the retranslation of monetary assets and liabilities classified as non-current on the Balance sheet are recognised within Net currency retranslation (charges)/credits in the Income statement. All other gains and losses arising on the retranslation of monetary assets and liabilities are recognised in operating profit.
The net assets of foreign operations are translated into euros at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. Profits and losses of such operations are translated into euros at average rates of exchange during the year. The resulting exchange differences are taken directly to a separate component of equity (Currency translation reserve) until all or part of the interest is sold, when the relevant portion of the cumulative exchange difference is recognised in the Income statement.
150 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Property, plant and equipment is held at cost. The Group has a policy of not revaluing property, plant and equipment. Depreciation is calculated to write off the cost less the estimated residual value on a straight-line basis, over the economic life of the asset. Residual values, where applicable, are reviewed annually against prevailing market values for equivalently aged assets and depreciation rates adjusted accordingly on a prospective basis.
Interest attributed to progress payments made on account of aircraft and other qualifying assets under construction are capitalised and added to the cost of the asset concerned. All other borrowing costs are recognised in the Income statement in the year in which they are incurred.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
to the Group's accounting policies.
Unconsolidated structured entities
Segmental reporting
presentation currency.
c Group companies
Foreign currency translation
b Transactions and balances
are recognised in operating profit.
a Functional and presentation currency
Consolidation
2 Significant accounting policies continued
The Group financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries, each made up to December 31, together with the attributable share of results and reserves of associates and joint ventures, adjusted where appropriate to conform
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of their acquisition, which is the date on which the Group obtains control and continue to be consolidated until the date that such control ceases. Control exists when the Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity.
The Group applies the acquisition method to account for business combinations. The consideration paid is the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred and the equity interests issued by the Group. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. Non-controlling interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets in subsidiaries that are not held by the Group and are presented separately
If the business combination is achieved in stages, the acquisition date fair value of the acquirer's previously held equity interest in
Goodwill is initially measured as the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the fair value of non-controlling
All intragroup account balances, including intragroup profits, are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
The Group regularly uses sale and leaseback transactions to finance the acquisition of aircraft. In certain instances the Group will finance several such transactions at once through Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates (EETCs). Under each of these financing structures, a company (the EETC Issuer) is established to facilitate such financing on behalf of a number of unrelated investors. The proceeds from the issuance of the EETCs by the EETC Issuer are then used to purchase aircraft solely from the Group. Payments by the Group (under the asset financed liabilities) to the EETC Issuer are distributed, through a trust, to the aforementioned unrelated investors. The main purpose of the trust structure is to enhance the credit worthiness of the Group's debt obligations through
The EETC Issuer is established solely with the purpose of providing the asset-backed financing and upon maturity of such financing
agreements and the retention of the title of the associated financed aircraft. Accordingly, the Group has determined that each EETC Issuer is a structured entity. Under the contractual terms of the EETC structure, the Group does not own any of the share capital of the EETC Issuer, does not have any representation on the respective boards and has no ability to influence decision making.
In considering the aforementioned facts, management has concluded that the Group does not have access to variable returns from the EETC Issuers because its involvement is limited to the payment of principal and interest under the arrangement and, therefore, it
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with how resource allocation decisions are made by the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for resource allocation and assessing performance of the
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group's entities are measured using the functional currency, being the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. In particular, British Airways and Avios have a functional currency of pound sterling. The Group's consolidated financial statements are presented in euros, which is the Group's
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency using the rate of exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. Monetary foreign currency balances are translated into the functional currency at the rates ruling at the balance sheet date. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at balance sheet exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the Income statement, except where hedge accounting is applied. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising on the retranslation of monetary
(charges)/credits in the Income statement. All other gains and losses arising on the retranslation of monetary assets and liabilities
The net assets of foreign operations are translated into euros at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. Profits and losses of such operations are translated into euros at average rates of exchange during the year. The resulting exchange differences are taken directly to a separate component of equity (Currency translation reserve) until all or part of the interest is sold, when the
assets and liabilities classified as non-current on the Balance sheet are recognised within Net currency retranslation
relevant portion of the cumulative exchange difference is recognised in the Income statement.
certain bankruptcy protection provisions and liquidity facilities, and also to lower the Group's total borrowing cost.
is expected to have no further activity. The relevant activities of the EETC Issuer are restricted to pre-established financing
within equity in the consolidated Balance sheet. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
the acquiree is remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date through the Income statement.
interest over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
does not control the EETC Issuers and as such does not consolidate them.
operating segments, has been identified as the IAG Management Committee.
146
All aircraft are stated at the fair value of the consideration given after taking account of manufacturers' credits. Fleet assets owned or right of use ('ROU') assets are disaggregated into separate components and depreciated at rates calculated to write down the cost of each component to the estimated residual value at the end of their planned operational lives (which is the shorter of their useful life or lease term) on a straight-line basis. Depreciation rates are specific to aircraft type, based on the Group's fleet plans, within overall parameters of 23 years and up to 5 per cent residual value for shorthaul aircraft and between 25 and 29 years (depending on aircraft) and up to 5 per cent residual value for longhaul aircraft. Right of use assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and the aforementioned depreciation rates.
Cabin interior modifications, including those required for brand changes and relaunches, are depreciated over the lower of five years and the remaining economic life of the aircraft.
Aircraft and engine spares acquired on the introduction or expansion of a fleet, as well as rotable spares purchased separately, are carried as property, plant and equipment and generally depreciated in line with the fleet to which they relate.
Major overhaul expenditure, including replacement spares and labour costs, is capitalised and amortised over the average expected life between major overhauls. All other replacement spares and other costs relating to maintenance of fleet assets (including maintenance provided under 'pay-as-you-go' contracts) are charged to the Income statement on consumption or as incurred respectively.
Provision is made for the depreciation of all property, plant and equipment. Property, with the exception of freehold land, is depreciated over its expected useful life over periods not exceeding 50 years, or in the case of leasehold properties, over the duration of the lease if shorter, on a straight-line basis. Equipment is depreciated over periods ranging from 4 to 20 years.
The Group leases various aircraft, properties and equipment. The lease terms of these assets are consistent with the determined useful economic life of similar assets within property, plant and equipment.
At inception of a contract, the Group assesses whether a contract is, or contains a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
Leases are recognised as a ROU asset and a corresponding lease liability at the date at which the leased asset is available for use by the Group.
At the lease commencement date a ROU asset is measured at cost comprising the following: the amount of the initial measurement of the lease liability; any lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives received; any initial direct costs; and restoration costs to return the asset to its original condition. (with a corresponding amount recognised within Provisions).
The ROU asset is depreciated over the shorter of the asset's useful life and the lease term on a straight-line basis. If ownership of the ROU asset transfers to the Group at the end of the lease term or the cost reflects the exercise of a purchase option, depreciation is calculated using the estimated useful life of the asset.
Lease liabilities are initially measured at their present value, which includes the following lease payments: fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments), less any lease incentives receivable; variable lease payments that are based on an index or a rate; amounts expected to be payable by the Group under residual value guarantees; the exercise price of a purchase option if the Group is reasonably certain to exercise that option; payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the Group exercising that option; and payments to be made under reasonably certain extension options.
The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease. The interest rate implicit in the lease is the discount rate that, at the inception of the lease, causes the aggregate present value of the minimum lease payments and the unguaranteed residual value to be equal to the fair value of the leased asset and any initial indirect costs of the lessor. For aircraft leases these inputs are either observable in the contract or readily available from external market data. The initial direct costs of the lessor are considered to be immaterial. If the interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be determined, the Group entity's incremental borrowing rate is used.
Each lease payment is allocated between the principal and finance cost. The finance cost is charged to the Income statement over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the lease liability for each period. After the commencement date, the amount of lease liabilities is increased to reflect the accretion of interest and reduced for the lease payments made.
147
www.iairgroup.com 151
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
The carrying amount of lease liabilities is remeasured if there is a modification of the lease contract, a re-assessment of the lease term (specifically in regard to assumptions regarding extension and termination options) and changes in variable lease payments that are based on an index or a rate.
The Group has elected not to recognise ROU assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less and those leases of low-value assets. Payments associated with short-term leases and leases of low-value assets are recognised on a straight line basis as an expense in the Income statement. Short-term leases are leases with a lease term of 12 months or less, that do not contain a purchase option. Low-value assets comprise IT equipment and small items of office furniture.
The Group is exposed to potential future increases in variable lease payments based on an index or rate, which are not included in the lease liability until they take effect. When adjustments to lease payments based on an index or rate take effect, the lease liability is reassessed and adjusted against the ROU asset. Extension options are included in a number of aircraft, property and equipment leases across the Group and are reflected in the lease payments where the Group is reasonably certain that it will exercise the option. The Group is also exposed to variable lease payments based on usage or revenue generated over a defined period. Such variable lease payments are expensed to the Income statement as incurred.
The Group regularly uses sale and lease transactions to finance the acquisition of aircraft. Each transaction is assessed as to whether it meets the criteria within IFRS 15 'Revenue from contracts with customers' for a sale to have occurred. If a sale has occurred, then the associated asset is de-recognised and a ROU asset and lease liability is recognised. The ROU asset recognised is based on the proportion of the previous carrying amount of the asset that is retained. Any gain or loss is restricted to the amount that relates to the rights that have been transferred to the counter-party to the transaction. Where a sale has not occurred, the asset is retained on the balance sheet within Property, plant and equipment and an asset financed liability recognised equal to the financing proceeds.
Financing arrangements with the following features that do not meet the recognition criteria as a sale under IFRS 15 are therefore not eligible for recognition under IFRS 16: the lessor has legal ownership retention as security against repayment and interest obligations; the Group initially acquired the aircraft or took a major share in the acquisition process from the manufacturer; in view of the contractual conditions, it is virtually certain that the aircraft will be purchased at the end of the lease term.
Lease payments are presented as follows in the Consolidated cash flow statement: the repayments of the principal element of lease liabilities are presented within cash flows from financing activities; the payments of the interest element of lease liabilities are included within cash flows from operating activities, and; the payments arising from variable elements of a lease, short-term leases and low-value assets are presented within cash flows from operating activities.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
2 Significant accounting policies continued
On May 28, 2020, the IASB issued 'COVID-19 Related Rent Concessions – amendments to IFRS 16 Leases'. The EU subsequently adopted the amendment on October 9, 2020. The amendment provides a practical expedient for lessees not to assess whether a COVID-19 related rent concession is a lease modification. The amendment is effective for annual reporting periods commencing on or after June 1, 2020 and the Group has elected to adopt this amendment for the year to December 31, 2020.
Goodwill arises on the acquisition of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures and represents the excess of the consideration paid over the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquiree. Where the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquiree is in excess of the consideration paid, a gain on bargain purchase is recognised immediately in the Income statement.
For the purpose of assessing impairment, goodwill is grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash generating units). Goodwill is tested for impairment annually and whenever indicators exist that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
Brands arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries are initially recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Long established brands that are expected to be used indefinitely are not amortised but assessed annually for impairment.
Customer loyalty programmes arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries are initially recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. A customer loyalty programme with an expected useful life is amortised over the expected remaining useful life. Established customer loyalty programmes that are expected to be used indefinitely are not amortised but assessed annually for impairment.
Landing rights acquired in a business combination are recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Landing rights acquired from other airlines are capitalised at cost.
Capitalised landing rights based outside of the United Kingdom and the EU are amortised on a straight-line basis over a period not exceeding 20 years. Capitalised landing rights based within the EU are not amortised, as regulations provide that these landing rights are perpetual.
152 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Contract based intangibles acquired in a business combination are recognised initially at fair value at the acquisition date and amortised over the remaining life of the contract.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
that are based on an index or a rate.
Cash flow presentation
Intangible assets a Goodwill
Income statement.
not be recoverable.
d Landing rights
rights are perpetual.
b Brands
COVID-19 related rent concessions
c Customer loyalty programmes
other airlines are capitalised at cost.
2 Significant accounting policies continued
variable lease payments are expensed to the Income statement as incurred.
and low-value assets are presented within cash flows from operating activities.
The carrying amount of lease liabilities is remeasured if there is a modification of the lease contract, a re-assessment of the lease term (specifically in regard to assumptions regarding extension and termination options) and changes in variable lease payments
The Group has elected not to recognise ROU assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less and those leases of low-value assets. Payments associated with short-term leases and leases of low-value assets are recognised on a straight line basis as an expense in the Income statement. Short-term leases are leases with a lease term of 12 months or less,
The Group is exposed to potential future increases in variable lease payments based on an index or rate, which are not included in the lease liability until they take effect. When adjustments to lease payments based on an index or rate take effect, the lease liability is reassessed and adjusted against the ROU asset. Extension options are included in a number of aircraft, property and equipment leases across the Group and are reflected in the lease payments where the Group is reasonably certain that it will exercise the option. The Group is also exposed to variable lease payments based on usage or revenue generated over a defined period. Such
The Group regularly uses sale and lease transactions to finance the acquisition of aircraft. Each transaction is assessed as to whether it meets the criteria within IFRS 15 'Revenue from contracts with customers' for a sale to have occurred. If a sale has occurred, then the associated asset is de-recognised and a ROU asset and lease liability is recognised. The ROU asset recognised is based on the proportion of the previous carrying amount of the asset that is retained. Any gain or loss is restricted to the amount that relates to the rights that have been transferred to the counter-party to the transaction. Where a sale has not occurred, the asset is retained on the balance sheet within Property, plant and equipment and an asset financed liability recognised equal to the financing proceeds. Financing arrangements with the following features that do not meet the recognition criteria as a sale under IFRS 15 are therefore not eligible for recognition under IFRS 16: the lessor has legal ownership retention as security against repayment and interest obligations; the Group initially acquired the aircraft or took a major share in the acquisition process from the manufacturer; in view
Lease payments are presented as follows in the Consolidated cash flow statement: the repayments of the principal element of lease liabilities are presented within cash flows from financing activities; the payments of the interest element of lease liabilities are included within cash flows from operating activities, and; the payments arising from variable elements of a lease, short-term leases
On May 28, 2020, the IASB issued 'COVID-19 Related Rent Concessions – amendments to IFRS 16 Leases'. The EU subsequently adopted the amendment on October 9, 2020. The amendment provides a practical expedient for lessees not to assess whether a COVID-19 related rent concession is a lease modification. The amendment is effective for annual reporting periods commencing on
Goodwill arises on the acquisition of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures and represents the excess of the consideration paid over the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquiree. Where the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquiree is in excess of the consideration paid, a gain on bargain purchase is recognised immediately in the
For the purpose of assessing impairment, goodwill is grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash generating units). Goodwill is tested for impairment annually and whenever indicators exist that the carrying value may
Brands arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries are initially recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Long established brands
Customer loyalty programmes arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries are initially recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. A customer loyalty programme with an expected useful life is amortised over the expected remaining useful life. Established customer
Landing rights acquired in a business combination are recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Landing rights acquired from
Capitalised landing rights based outside of the United Kingdom and the EU are amortised on a straight-line basis over a period not exceeding 20 years. Capitalised landing rights based within the EU are not amortised, as regulations provide that these landing
loyalty programmes that are expected to be used indefinitely are not amortised but assessed annually for impairment.
that do not contain a purchase option. Low-value assets comprise IT equipment and small items of office furniture.
of the contractual conditions, it is virtually certain that the aircraft will be purchased at the end of the lease term.
or after June 1, 2020 and the Group has elected to adopt this amendment for the year to December 31, 2020.
that are expected to be used indefinitely are not amortised but assessed annually for impairment.
148
The cost to purchase or develop computer software that is separable from an item of related hardware is capitalised separately and amortised on a straight-line basis generally over a period not exceeding five years, with certain specific software developments amortised over a period of up to 10 years.
Purchased emissions allowances are recognised at cost. Emissions allowances are not revalued or amortised but are tested for impairment whenever indicators exist that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
From time to time the Group enters into sale and repurchase transactions for specified emission allowances. Such transactions do not meet the recognition criteria of a sale under IFRS 15 and accordingly the asset is retained on the balance sheet within Intangible assets and an other financing liability recognised equal to the proceeds received.
Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to amortisation are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the value by which the asset's carrying value exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less cost to sell and value-in-use. Non-financial assets other than goodwill that were subject to an impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.
The carrying value is reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable and the cumulative impairment losses are shown as a reduction in the carrying value of property, plant and equipment.
Intangible assets are held at cost and are either amortised on a straight-line basis over their economic life, or they are deemed to have an indefinite economic life and are not amortised. Indefinite life intangible assets are tested annually for impairment or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
An associate is an undertaking in which the Group has a long-term equity interest and over which it has the power to exercise significant influence. Where the Group cannot exercise control over an entity in which it has a shareholding greater than 51 per cent, the equity interest is treated as an associated undertaking.
A joint venture is a type of joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the joint venture. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. The considerations made in determining significant influence or joint control are similar to those necessary to determine control over subsidiaries.
Investments in associates and joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method, and initially recognised at cost. The Group's interest in the net assets of associates and joint ventures is included in Investments accounted for using the equity method in the Balance sheet and its interest in their results is included in the Income statement, below operating result. The attributable results of those companies acquired or disposed of during the year are included for the periods of ownership.
Other equity investments are non-derivative financial assets including listed and unlisted investments, excluding interests in associates and joint ventures. On initial recognition, these equity investments are irrevocably designated as measured at fair value through Other comprehensive income. They are subsequently measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognised in Other comprehensive income with no recycling of these gains and losses to the Income statement when the investment is sold. Dividends received on other equity investments are recognised in the Income statement.
The fair value of quoted investments is determined by reference to bid prices at the close of business on the balance sheet date. Where there is no active market, fair value is determined using valuation techniques.
Interest-bearing deposits, principally comprising funds held with banks and other financial institutions with contractual cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest, and held in order to collect contractual cash flows, are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
149
www.iairgroup.com 153
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
2 Significant accounting policies continued
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
Derivative financial instruments, comprising interest rate swap agreements, foreign exchange derivatives and fuel hedging derivatives (including options, swaps and futures) are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at their fair value. They are classified as financial instruments through the Income statement. The method of recognising the resulting gain or loss arising from remeasurement depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged (as detailed below under cash flow hedges). The time value of options is excluded from the designated hedging instrument and accounted for as a cost of hedging. Movements in the time value of options are recognised in Other comprehensive income until the underlying transaction affects the Income statement.
When a derivative is designated as a hedging instrument and that instrument expires, is sold or is restructured, any cumulative gain or loss remains in the cash flow hedge reserve until such time as the hedging instrument was due to mature at inception of the relationship. Where a forecast transaction which was previously determined to be highly probable and hedge accounting applied, is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss in the cash flow hedge reserve is immediately reclassified to the Income statement.
Exchange gains and losses on monetary investments are taken to the Income statement unless the item has been designated and is assessed as an effective hedging instrument. Exchange gains and losses on non-monetary investments are reflected in equity.
Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments designated as a hedge of a highly probable expected future cash flow and assessed as effective are recorded in equity. Gains and losses on derivative instruments not designated as a cash flow hedge are reported in the Income statement. Gains and losses recorded in equity are reflected in the Income statement when either the hedged cash flow impacts the Income statement or the hedged item is no longer expected to occur.
Certain loan repayment instalments denominated in US dollars, euros, Japanese yen and Chinese yuan are designated as cash flow hedges of highly probable future foreign currency revenues. Exchange differences arising from the translation of these loan repayment instalments are recorded in equity and subsequently reflected in the Income statement when either the future revenue impacts income or its occurrence is no longer expected to occur.
Long-term borrowings are recorded at amortised cost, including lease liabilities which contain interest rate swaps that are closely related to the underlying financing and as such are not accounted for as an embedded derivative.
Convertible bonds are classified as compound instruments, consisting of a liability and an equity component. At the date of issue, the fair value of the liability component is estimated using the prevailing market interest rate for similar non-convertible debt, and is subsequently recorded at an amortised cost basis using the effective interest method until extinguished on conversion or maturity of the bonds, and is recognised within Interest-bearing borrowings. The difference between the proceeds of issue of the convertible bond and the fair value assigned to the liability component, representing the embedded option to convert the liability into equity of the Group, is included in Equity portion of convertible bond in Other reserves and is not subsequently remeasured.
Issue costs are apportioned between the liability and equity components of the convertible bonds where appropriate based on their relative carrying values at the date of issue. The portion relating to the equity component is charged directly against equity.
The interest expense on the liability component is calculated by applying the effective interest rate for similar non-convertible debt to the liability component of the instrument. The difference between this value and the interest paid is added to the carrying amount of the liability.
At each balance sheet date, the Group recognises provisions for expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortised cost, based on 12-month or lifetime losses depending on whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition. The simplified approach, based on the calculation and recognition of lifetime expected credit losses, is applied to contracts that have a maturity of one year or less, including trade receivables.
When determining whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition and when estimating the expected credit loss, the Group considers reasonable and supportable information that is relevant and available. This includes both quantitative and qualitative information and analysis, based on the Group's historical experience and informed credit assessment, including forward-looking information. Such forward-looking information takes into consideration the forecast economic conditions expected to impact the outstanding balances at the balance sheet date. A financial asset is written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery, such as the customer having filed for liquidation.
154 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
Income statement.
d Cash flow hedges
e Long-term borrowings
f Convertible debt
amount of the liability.
g Impairment of financial assets
2 Significant accounting policies continued c Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities
impacts income or its occurrence is no longer expected to occur.
contracts that have a maturity of one year or less, including trade receivables.
expectation of recovery, such as the customer having filed for liquidation.
Derivative financial instruments, comprising interest rate swap agreements, foreign exchange derivatives and fuel hedging derivatives (including options, swaps and futures) are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at their fair value. They are classified as financial instruments through the Income statement. The method of recognising the resulting gain or loss arising from remeasurement depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged (as detailed below under cash flow hedges). The time value of options is excluded from the designated hedging instrument and accounted for as a cost of hedging. Movements in the time value of options are recognised in Other comprehensive income until the underlying transaction affects the Income statement. When a derivative is designated as a hedging instrument and that instrument expires, is sold or is restructured, any cumulative gain or loss remains in the cash flow hedge reserve until such time as the hedging instrument was due to mature at inception of the relationship. Where a forecast transaction which was previously determined to be highly probable and hedge accounting applied, is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss in the cash flow hedge reserve is immediately reclassified to the
Exchange gains and losses on monetary investments are taken to the Income statement unless the item has been designated and is assessed as an effective hedging instrument. Exchange gains and losses on non-monetary investments are reflected in equity.
Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments designated as a hedge of a highly probable expected future cash flow and assessed as effective are recorded in equity. Gains and losses on derivative instruments not designated as a cash flow hedge are reported in the Income statement. Gains and losses recorded in equity are reflected in the Income statement when either the
Certain loan repayment instalments denominated in US dollars, euros, Japanese yen and Chinese yuan are designated as cash flow hedges of highly probable future foreign currency revenues. Exchange differences arising from the translation of these loan repayment instalments are recorded in equity and subsequently reflected in the Income statement when either the future revenue
Long-term borrowings are recorded at amortised cost, including lease liabilities which contain interest rate swaps that are closely
Convertible bonds are classified as compound instruments, consisting of a liability and an equity component. At the date of issue, the fair value of the liability component is estimated using the prevailing market interest rate for similar non-convertible debt, and is subsequently recorded at an amortised cost basis using the effective interest method until extinguished on conversion or maturity of the bonds, and is recognised within Interest-bearing borrowings. The difference between the proceeds of issue of the convertible bond and the fair value assigned to the liability component, representing the embedded option to convert the liability into equity of
Issue costs are apportioned between the liability and equity components of the convertible bonds where appropriate based on their
The interest expense on the liability component is calculated by applying the effective interest rate for similar non-convertible debt to the liability component of the instrument. The difference between this value and the interest paid is added to the carrying
At each balance sheet date, the Group recognises provisions for expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortised cost, based on 12-month or lifetime losses depending on whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition. The simplified approach, based on the calculation and recognition of lifetime expected credit losses, is applied to
When determining whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition and when estimating the expected credit loss, the Group considers reasonable and supportable information that is relevant and available. This includes both quantitative and qualitative information and analysis, based on the Group's historical experience and informed credit assessment, including forward-looking information. Such forward-looking information takes into consideration the forecast economic conditions expected to impact the outstanding balances at the balance sheet date. A financial asset is written off when there is no reasonable
relative carrying values at the date of issue. The portion relating to the equity component is charged directly against equity.
the Group, is included in Equity portion of convertible bond in Other reserves and is not subsequently remeasured.
hedged cash flow impacts the Income statement or the hedged item is no longer expected to occur.
related to the underlying financing and as such are not accounted for as an embedded derivative.
150
The Group has both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. A defined contribution plan is a pension plan under which the Group pays fixed contributions into a separate entity. The Group has no legal or constructive obligations to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior years.
Typically defined benefit plans define an amount of pension benefit that an employee will receive on retirement, usually dependent on one or more factors such as age, years of service and compensation.
The Group's net obligation in respect of defined benefit pension plans is calculated separately for each plan by estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior years. The benefit is discounted to determine its present value, and the fair value of any plan assets are deducted. The discount rate is the yield at the balance sheet date on AA-rated corporate bonds of the appropriate currency that have durations approximating those of the Group's obligations. The calculation is performed by a qualified actuary using the projected unit credit method. When the net obligation calculation results in an asset for the Group, the recognition of an asset is limited to the present value of any future refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan ('the asset ceiling'). The fair value of the plan assets is based on market price information and, in the case of quoted securities, is the published bid price. The fair value of insurance policies which exactly match the amount and timing of some or all benefits payable under the scheme are deemed to be the present value of the related obligations. Longevity swaps are measured at their fair value.
Current service costs are recognised within employee costs in the year in which they arise. Past service costs are recognised in the event of a plan amendment or curtailment, or when the Group recognises related restructuring costs or severance obligations. The net interest is calculated by applying the discount rate used to measure the defined benefit obligation at the beginning of the period to the net defined benefit liability or asset, taking into account any changes in the net defined benefit liability or asset during the period as a result of contributions and benefit payments. Net interest and other expenses related to the defined benefit plans are recognised in the Income statement. Remeasurements, comprising actuarial gains and losses, the effect of the asset ceiling (excluding interest) and the return on plan assets (excluding interest), are recognised immediately in Other comprehensive income. Remeasurements are not reclassified to the Income statement in subsequent periods.
Severance obligations are recognised when employment is terminated by the Group before the normal retirement date, or whenever an employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange for these benefits. The Group recognises a provision for severance payments when it is demonstrably committed to either terminating the employment of current employees according to a detailed formal plan without realistic possibility of withdrawal, or providing severance payments as a result of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy.
Other employee benefits are recognised when there is deemed to be a present obligation.
Current income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities, based on tax rates and laws that are enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Deferred income tax is recognised on all temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements, with the following exceptions:
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured on an undiscounted basis at the tax rates that are expected to apply when the related asset is realised or liability is settled, based on tax rates and laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Income tax is charged or credited directly to equity if it relates to items that are credited or charged to equity. Otherwise income tax is recognised in the Income statement.
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Such cost is determined by the weighted average cost method. Inventories include mainly aircraft spare parts, repairable aircraft engine parts and fuel.
151
www.iairgroup.com 155
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and deposits with any qualifying financial institution repayable on demand or maturing within three months of the date of acquisition and which are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
2 Significant accounting policies continued
The Group operates a number of equity-settled, share-based payment plans, under which the Group awards equity instruments of the Group for services rendered by employees. The fair value of the share-based payment plans is measured at the date of grant using a valuation model provided by external specialists. The resulting cost, as adjusted for the expected and actual level of vesting of the plan, is charged to the Income statement over the period in which the options vest. At each balance sheet date before vesting, the cumulative expense is calculated, representing the extent to which the vesting period has expired and management's best estimate of the achievement or otherwise of non-market conditions, and accordingly the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The movement in the cumulative expense since the previous balance sheet date is recognised in the Income statement with a corresponding entry in equity.
Provisions are made when an obligation exists for a present liability in respect of a past event and where the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated.
Employee leaving indemnities and other employee provisions are recorded for flight crew who, meeting certain conditions, have the option of being placed on reserve or of taking early retirement. The Group is obligated to remunerate these employees until they reach the statutory retirement age. The calculation is performed by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method.
Other employee related provisions are recognised for direct expenditures of business reorganisation such as severance payments (restructuring provisions) where plans are sufficiently detailed and well advanced, and where appropriate communication to those affected has been undertaken at the balance sheet date.
Restoration and handback provisions arising on the commencement of a lease are recognised as a provision with a corresponding amount recognised as part of the ROU asset. Any change in estimation relating to such costs are reflected in the ROU asset. Maintenance and handback provisions that occur through usage or through the passage of time are recognised with a corresponding amount recorded over time in the Income statement.
If the effect is material, expected future cash flows are discounted using a rate that reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the provision. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to unwinding the discount is recognised as a finance cost.
The Group's revenue primarily derives from transportation services for both passengers and cargo. Revenue is recognised when the transportation service has been provided. Passenger tickets are generally paid for in advance of transportation and are recognised, net of discounts, as deferred revenue on ticket sales in current liabilities until the customer has flown. Prior to the impact of COVID-19 on the ability of passengers to utilise the Group's transportation services, unused tickets were recognised as revenue after the contracted date of departure using estimates regarding the timing of recognition based on the terms and conditions of the ticket and statistical analysis of historical trends. If as a result of the impact of COVID-19 a flight is cancelled, the passenger is entitled to either a refund, changing to an alternative flight or the receipt of a voucher. Where a voucher is issued, given the relative short period of historical data, no revenue is recognised until either the voucher is redeemed through transportation services or it expires. Revenue is stated net of compensation for flight delays and cancellations, taking into consideration the level of expected claims.
The Group considers whether it is an agent or a principal in relation to transportation services by considering whether it has a performance obligation to provide services to the customer or whether the obligation is to arrange for the services to be provided by a third party. The Group acts as an agent where (i) it collects various taxes and fees assessed on the sale of tickets to passengers and remits these to the relevant taxing authorities; and (ii) where it provides interline services to airline partners outside of the Group.
Other revenue including maintenance; handling; hotel and holiday and commissions is recognised as the related performance obligations are satisfied (over time), being where the control of the goods or services are transferred to the customer.
The Group operates four loyalty programmes: the British Airways Executive Club, Iberia Plus, Vueling Club and the Aer Lingus Aer Club. The customer loyalty programmes award travellers Avios to redeem for various rewards, primarily redemption travel, including flights, hotels and car hire. Avios are also sold to commercial partners to use in loyalty activity.
The Group has identified several performance obligations associated with the sale of Avios. Revenue associated with brand and marketing services and revenue associated with Avios has been determined based on the relative stand-alone selling price of each of the performance obligations. Revenue associated with brand and marketing services is recognised as the points are issued. Revenue allocated to the Avios is deferred on the balance sheet as a current liability, and recognised when the points are redeemed. When the points are redeemed for products provided by suppliers outside the Group, revenue is recognised in the Income statement net of related costs, as the Group is considered to be an agent in these redemption transactions.
The Group estimates the stand-alone selling price of the brand and marketing performance obligations by reference to the amount that a third party would be prepared to pay in an arm's length transaction for access to comparable brands for the period over which they have access. The stand-alone selling price of Avios is based on the value of the awards for which the points could be redeemed. The Group also recognises revenue associated with the proportion of Avios which are not expected to be redeemed, based on the results of statistical modelling.
156 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
statement with a corresponding entry in equity.
affected has been undertaken at the balance sheet date.
corresponding amount recorded over time in the Income statement.
obligation can be reliably estimated.
Share-based payments
Provisions
Revenue recognition
of the Group.
Customer loyalty programmes
based on the results of statistical modelling.
2 Significant accounting policies continued
The Group operates a number of equity-settled, share-based payment plans, under which the Group awards equity instruments of the Group for services rendered by employees. The fair value of the share-based payment plans is measured at the date of grant using a valuation model provided by external specialists. The resulting cost, as adjusted for the expected and actual level of vesting of the plan, is charged to the Income statement over the period in which the options vest. At each balance sheet date before vesting, the cumulative expense is calculated, representing the extent to which the vesting period has expired and management's best estimate of the achievement or otherwise of non-market conditions, and accordingly the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The movement in the cumulative expense since the previous balance sheet date is recognised in the Income
Provisions are made when an obligation exists for a present liability in respect of a past event and where the amount of the
Employee leaving indemnities and other employee provisions are recorded for flight crew who, meeting certain conditions, have the option of being placed on reserve or of taking early retirement. The Group is obligated to remunerate these employees until they reach the statutory retirement age. The calculation is performed by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method. Other employee related provisions are recognised for direct expenditures of business reorganisation such as severance payments (restructuring provisions) where plans are sufficiently detailed and well advanced, and where appropriate communication to those
Restoration and handback provisions arising on the commencement of a lease are recognised as a provision with a corresponding amount recognised as part of the ROU asset. Any change in estimation relating to such costs are reflected in the ROU asset. Maintenance and handback provisions that occur through usage or through the passage of time are recognised with a
If the effect is material, expected future cash flows are discounted using a rate that reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the provision. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to unwinding the discount is recognised as a finance cost.
The Group's revenue primarily derives from transportation services for both passengers and cargo. Revenue is recognised when the transportation service has been provided. Passenger tickets are generally paid for in advance of transportation and are recognised, net of discounts, as deferred revenue on ticket sales in current liabilities until the customer has flown. Prior to the impact of COVID-19 on the ability of passengers to utilise the Group's transportation services, unused tickets were recognised as revenue after the contracted date of departure using estimates regarding the timing of recognition based on the terms and conditions of the ticket and statistical analysis of historical trends. If as a result of the impact of COVID-19 a flight is cancelled, the passenger is entitled to either a refund, changing to an alternative flight or the receipt of a voucher. Where a voucher is issued, given the relative short period of historical data, no revenue is recognised until either the voucher is redeemed through transportation services or it expires. Revenue is stated net of compensation for flight delays and cancellations, taking into consideration the level of expected claims. The Group considers whether it is an agent or a principal in relation to transportation services by considering whether it has a performance obligation to provide services to the customer or whether the obligation is to arrange for the services to be provided by a third party. The Group acts as an agent where (i) it collects various taxes and fees assessed on the sale of tickets to passengers and remits these to the relevant taxing authorities; and (ii) where it provides interline services to airline partners outside
Other revenue including maintenance; handling; hotel and holiday and commissions is recognised as the related performance obligations are satisfied (over time), being where the control of the goods or services are transferred to the customer.
including flights, hotels and car hire. Avios are also sold to commercial partners to use in loyalty activity.
statement net of related costs, as the Group is considered to be an agent in these redemption transactions.
The Group operates four loyalty programmes: the British Airways Executive Club, Iberia Plus, Vueling Club and the Aer Lingus Aer Club. The customer loyalty programmes award travellers Avios to redeem for various rewards, primarily redemption travel,
The Group has identified several performance obligations associated with the sale of Avios. Revenue associated with brand and marketing services and revenue associated with Avios has been determined based on the relative stand-alone selling price of each of the performance obligations. Revenue associated with brand and marketing services is recognised as the points are issued. Revenue allocated to the Avios is deferred on the balance sheet as a current liability, and recognised when the points are redeemed.
The Group estimates the stand-alone selling price of the brand and marketing performance obligations by reference to the amount that a third party would be prepared to pay in an arm's length transaction for access to comparable brands for the period over which they have access. The stand-alone selling price of Avios is based on the value of the awards for which the points could be redeemed. The Group also recognises revenue associated with the proportion of Avios which are not expected to be redeemed,
When the points are redeemed for products provided by suppliers outside the Group, revenue is recognised in the Income
152
Exceptional items are those that in management's view need to be separately disclosed by virtue of their size or nature and where such presentation is relevant to an understanding of the entity's financial performance. The exceptional items recorded in the Income statement include items such as significant settlement agreements with the Group's pension schemes; significant restructuring; the impact of business combination transactions that do not contribute to the ongoing results of the Group; significant discontinuance of hedge accounting; legal settlements; and the impact of the sale, disposal or impairment of an asset or investment in a business.
Business combination transactions include cash items such as the costs incurred to effect the transaction and non-cash items such as accounting gains or losses recognised through the Income statement, such as bargain purchase gains and step acquisition losses.
Government grants are recognised where there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received. Loans provided and/or guaranteed by governments that represent market rates of interest are recorded at the amount of the proceeds received and recognised within Borrowings. Those loans provided and/or guaranteed by governments that represent below market rates of interest are measured at inception at their fair value and recognised within Borrowings, with the differential to the proceeds received recorded within Deferred income and released to the relevant financial statement caption in the Income statement on a systematic basis. Grants that compensate the Group for expenses incurred are recognised in the Income statement in the relevant financial statement caption on a systematic basis in the periods in which the expenses are recognised.
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. These judgements, estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results in the future may differ from judgements and estimates upon which financial information has been prepared. These underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised prospectively.
The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are as follows:
At December 31, 2020 the Group recognised €282 million in respect of employee benefit assets (2019: €314 million) and €719 million in respect of employee benefit obligations (2019: €400 million). Further information on employee benefit obligations is disclosed in note 30.
The cost of employee benefit obligations, employee leaving indemnities and other employee related provisions is determined using actuarial valuations. Actuarial valuations involve making assumptions about discount rates, expected rates of return on assets, future salary increases, mortality rates and future pension increases. Due to the long-term nature of these schemes, such assumptions are subject to significant uncertainty. The assumptions relating to these schemes are disclosed in note 30. The Group determines the assumptions to be adopted in discussion with qualified actuaries. Any difference between these assumptions and the actual outcome will impact future net assets and total comprehensive income. The sensitivity to changes in pension assumptions is disclosed in note 30.
Under the Group's APS and NAPS defined benefit schemes, increases to pensions are based on the annual Government Pension Increase (Review) Orders, which since 2011 have been based on the Consumer Prices Index (CPI). Additionally, in APS there is provision for the Trustee to pay increases up to the level of the Retail Prices Index (RPI), subject to certain affordability tests. Historically market expectations for RPI could be derived by comparing the prices of UK Government fixed-interest and index-linked gilts, with CPI assessed by considering the Bank of England's inflation target and comparison of the construction of the two inflation indices.
In February 2019, following the UK House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee report on measuring inflation, the National Statistician concluded that the existing methodology was unsatisfactory and proposed a number of options to the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA). In March 2019, the UKSA recommended to the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer that the publication of the RPI cease at a point to be determined in the future and in the intervening period, the RPI be addressed by bringing in the methods of the CPIH (a proposed variant to CPI). In September 2019, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer announced his intention to consult with the Bank of England and the UKSA on whether to implement these proposed changes to RPI in the period of 2025 to 2030. Following consultation during 2020, on November 25, 2020 the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer and the UKSA confirmed that from February 2030 onwards CPIH will replace RPI with no compensation to holders of index-linked gilts.
Following the Chancellor of the Exchequer's announcement in September 2019 and through to December 31, 2020, market-implied break-even RPI inflation forward rates for periods after 2030 have reduced in the investment market. Therefore, in assessing RPI and CPI from investment market data, allowance has been made for partial alignment between RPI and CPI from 2030 onwards.
153
www.iairgroup.com 157
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
On October 26, 2018 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales issued a judgment in a claim between Lloyds Banking Group Pension Trustees Limited as claimant and Lloyds Banking Group plc and others as defendants (collectively referred to as the 'Lloyds Bank case') regarding the rights of female members of certain pension schemes to equality of treatment in relation to pension benefits. The judgment in the Lloyd's Bank case confirmed that all pension schemes were required to equalise, with immediate application, for the effects of unequal Guaranteed Minimum Pension ('GMP') benefits accrued over the period since May 17, 1990 ('GMP equalisation'). On November 20, 2020 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales issued a further judgment requiring all pension schemes, if requested by their individual members, to revisit individual transfer payments made between May 17, 1990 and April 5, 1997 to assess the shortfall, if any, between the original transfer payments and the impact of GMP equalisation. Where a shortfall exists, the pension scheme is required to make an additional payment to the individual member, including interest accrued at 1.0 per cent above the base rate per annum. The APS and NAPS estimated Defined benefit obligations as at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 includes allowance for the estimated effect of GMP equalisation based on the assessments made by the respective APS and NAPS Scheme Actuaries.
Restructuring provisions are estimates of future obligations. The Group exercises judgement in determining the expected direct expenditures of reorganisation based on plans which are sufficiently detailed and advanced.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
2 Significant accounting policies continued
At December 31, 2020 the Group recognised €5,130 million (2019: €5,486 million) in respect of deferred revenue on ticket sales of which €2,725 million (2019: €1,917 million) related to customer loyalty programmes.
Passenger revenue is recognised when the transportation is provided. At the time of transportation, revenue is also recognised in respect of tickets that are not expected to be used ('unused tickets'). Revenue associated with unused tickets is estimated based on the terms and conditions of the tickets and historical trends.
Revenue associated with the issuance of points under customer loyalty programmes is based on the relative stand-alone selling prices of the related performance obligations (brand, marketing and points), determined using estimation techniques. The transaction price of brand and marketing services is determined using specific brand valuation methodologies. The transaction price of the points is based on the value of the awards for which the points can be redeemed and is reduced to take account of the proportion of the award credits that are not expected to be redeemed by customers. The Group estimates the number of points not expected to be redeemed (using statistical modelling and historical trends) and the mix and fair value of the award credits. A five percentage point change in the assumption of points outstanding and not expected to be redeemed would result in an adjustment to deferred revenue of €100 million, with an offsetting adjustment to revenue and operating profit recognised in the year.
In August 2020, the Group received an upfront payment of €830 million (£754 million) related to the fulfilment of future performance obligations under the renewal of the multi-year commercial partnership with American Express. The Group estimates the number of points expected to issued over the life of the contract and allocates the upfront payment to the relevant performance obligations. At each reporting date, the Group updates its estimate of the number of points expected to be issued over the total contract term and recognises a cumulative catch-up adjustment where necessary. The Group considers that these upfront payments include a significant financing component considering the length of time between the payment and the expected allocation to performance obligations. Accordingly, the transaction price for the contract is discounted using the prevailing market interest rate.
The following three accounting estimates involve a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or are areas where assumptions are significant to the financial statements however these accounting estimates are not major sources of estimation uncertainty that have a significant risk of resulting in material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next year.
At December 31, 2020 the Group recognised €1,075 million in respect of deferred tax assets (2019: €546 million). Further information on current and deferred tax liabilities is disclosed in note 9.
The Group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Estimates are required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain because it may be unclear how tax law applies to a particular transaction or circumstance. Where the Group determines that it is more likely than not that the tax authorities would accept the position taken in the tax return, amounts are recognised in the financial statements on that basis. Where the amount of tax payable or recoverable is uncertain, the Group recognises a liability based on either: the Group's judgement of the most likely outcome; or, when there is a wide range of possible outcomes, uses a probability weighted average approach.
The Group recognises deferred income tax assets only to the extent that it is probable that the taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, carried forward tax credits or tax losses can be utilised. Management considers past and current operating performance and the future projections of performance laid out in the approved business plan in order to assess the probability of recoverability. The Business plan relies on the use of assumptions, estimates and judgements in respect of future performance and economics.
158 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
At December 31, 2020 the Group recognised €2,390 million (2019: €2,460 million) in respect of intangible assets with an indefinite life, including goodwill. Further information on these assets is included in note 15.
The Group assesses whether there are any indicators of impairment for all non-financial assets at each reporting date. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite economic lives are tested for impairment annually and at other times when such indicators exist. The recoverable amounts of cash-generating units have been determined based on value-in-use calculations, which use a weighted average multi-scenario discounted cash flow model. The Group has applied judgement in the weighting of each scenario in the discounted cash flow model and these calculations require the use of estimates in the determination of key assumptions and sensitivities as disclosed in note 15.
Other non-financial assets are tested for impairment when there are indicators that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
At December 31, 2020 the Group recognised €17,531 million (2019: €19,168 million) in respect of property, plant and equipment, including the ROU assets recognised in the year. Further information on these assets is included in note 12 and note 13.
The Group estimates useful lives and residual values of property, plant and equipment, including fleet assets based on network plans and recoverable values. Useful lives and residual values are reassessed annually, taking into consideration the latest fleet plans and other business plan information.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
respective APS and NAPS Scheme Actuaries.
the terms and conditions of the tickets and historical trends.
information on current and deferred tax liabilities is disclosed in note 9.
b Revenue recognition
interest rate.
c Income taxes
average approach.
of future performance and economics.
2 Significant accounting policies continued
On October 26, 2018 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales issued a judgment in a claim between Lloyds Banking Group Pension Trustees Limited as claimant and Lloyds Banking Group plc and others as defendants (collectively referred to as the 'Lloyds Bank case') regarding the rights of female members of certain pension schemes to equality of treatment in relation to pension benefits. The judgment in the Lloyd's Bank case confirmed that all pension schemes were required to equalise, with immediate application, for the effects of unequal Guaranteed Minimum Pension ('GMP') benefits accrued over the period since May 17, 1990 ('GMP equalisation'). On November 20, 2020 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales issued a further judgment requiring all pension schemes, if requested by their individual members, to revisit individual transfer payments made between May 17, 1990 and April 5, 1997 to assess the shortfall, if any, between the original transfer payments and the impact of GMP equalisation. Where a shortfall exists, the pension scheme is required to make an additional payment to the individual member, including interest accrued at 1.0 per cent above the base rate per annum. The APS and NAPS estimated Defined benefit obligations as at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 includes allowance for the estimated effect of GMP equalisation based on the assessments made by the
Restructuring provisions are estimates of future obligations. The Group exercises judgement in determining the expected direct
At December 31, 2020 the Group recognised €5,130 million (2019: €5,486 million) in respect of deferred revenue on ticket sales of
Passenger revenue is recognised when the transportation is provided. At the time of transportation, revenue is also recognised in respect of tickets that are not expected to be used ('unused tickets'). Revenue associated with unused tickets is estimated based on
Revenue associated with the issuance of points under customer loyalty programmes is based on the relative stand-alone selling prices of the related performance obligations (brand, marketing and points), determined using estimation techniques. The
to deferred revenue of €100 million, with an offsetting adjustment to revenue and operating profit recognised in the year. In August 2020, the Group received an upfront payment of €830 million (£754 million) related to the fulfilment of future
the number of points expected to issued over the life of the contract and allocates the upfront payment to the relevant performance obligations. At each reporting date, the Group updates its estimate of the number of points expected to be issued over the total contract term and recognises a cumulative catch-up adjustment where necessary. The Group considers that these upfront payments include a significant financing component considering the length of time between the payment and the expected allocation to performance obligations. Accordingly, the transaction price for the contract is discounted using the prevailing market
At December 31, 2020 the Group recognised €1,075 million in respect of deferred tax assets (2019: €546 million). Further
transaction price of brand and marketing services is determined using specific brand valuation methodologies. The transaction price of the points is based on the value of the awards for which the points can be redeemed and is reduced to take account of the proportion of the award credits that are not expected to be redeemed by customers. The Group estimates the number of points not expected to be redeemed (using statistical modelling and historical trends) and the mix and fair value of the award credits. A five percentage point change in the assumption of points outstanding and not expected to be redeemed would result in an adjustment
performance obligations under the renewal of the multi-year commercial partnership with American Express. The Group estimates
The following three accounting estimates involve a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or are areas where assumptions are significant to the financial statements however these accounting estimates are not major sources of estimation uncertainty that have a significant risk of resulting in material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next year.
The Group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Estimates are required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain because it may be unclear how tax law applies to a particular transaction or circumstance. Where the Group determines that it is more likely than not that the tax authorities would accept the position taken in the tax return, amounts are recognised in the financial statements on that basis. Where the amount of tax payable or recoverable is uncertain, the Group recognises a liability based on either: the Group's judgement of the most likely outcome; or, when there is a wide range of possible outcomes, uses a probability weighted
The Group recognises deferred income tax assets only to the extent that it is probable that the taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, carried forward tax credits or tax losses can be utilised. Management considers past and current operating performance and the future projections of performance laid out in the approved business plan in order to assess the probability of recoverability. The Business plan relies on the use of assumptions, estimates and judgements in respect
expenditures of reorganisation based on plans which are sufficiently detailed and advanced.
which €2,725 million (2019: €1,917 million) related to customer loyalty programmes.
154
At December 31, 2020, the Group recognised €1,588 million in respect of maintenance, restoration and handback provisions (2019: €1,675 million). Information on movements on the provision is disclosed in note 24.
The Group has a number of contracts with service providers to replace or repair engine parts and for other maintenance checks. These agreements are complex and generally cover a number of years. The Group exercises judgement in determining the assumptions used to match the consumption of replacement spares and other costs associated with fleet maintenance with the appropriate income statement charge. Aircraft maintenance obligations are based on aircraft utilisation, expected maintenance intervals, future maintenance costs and the aircraft's condition.
The Group determines the lease term as the non-cancellable term of the lease, together with any periods covered by an option to extend the lease if it is reasonably certain to be exercised, or any periods covered by an option to terminate the lease, if it is reasonably certain not to be exercised. The Group applies judgement in evaluating whether it is reasonably certain whether or not to exercise the option to renew or terminate the lease. Such judgement includes consideration of fleet plans which underpin approved business plans and historical experience regarding the extension of leases. After the commencement date, the Group reassesses the lease term if there is a significant event or change in circumstances and affects the Group's ability to exercise or not to exercise the option to renew or to terminate. Further information is given in note 13.
The following amendments and interpretations apply for the first time in 2020, but do not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Group:
The IASB and IFRIC have issued the following standards, amendments and interpretations with an effective date after the year end of these financial statements which management believe could impact the Group in future periods. Unless otherwise stated, the Group plans to adopt the following standards, interpretations and amendments on the date they become mandatory:
155
www.iairgroup.com 159
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
As a result of COVID-19 the Group has experienced a significant decline in the level of flight activity and does not expect to return to the level of 2019 activity until at least 2023. Accordingly, the Group has applied critical estimation and judgement in the evaluation of the impact of COVID-19 regarding the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities within the Consolidated financial statements.
The Group has applied estimation and judgement in the evaluation of the impact of COVID-19 on the estimation uncertainty of determining cash flow forecasts as part of the approved Business plans. The details regarding the inputs and assumptions used in the determination of these cash flow forecasts are given in the going concern basis of preparation.
The following critical accounting estimates, assumptions and judgements utilise these cash flow forecasts consistently, which are in some instances significantly different from judgements applied in previous years:
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
In determining whether hedge accounting is required to be discontinued or to remain in a hedge relationship, judgement is required as to whether a forecast transaction that was previously highly probable continues to be expected to occur or is no longer expected to occur. The Group applied the capacity output from the cash flow forecasts as part of the approved Business plans in order to determine the forecast level of revenue generation and fuel consumption over the periods in which hedge accounting has been applied.
In 2020 the Group recognised a charge arising from such discontinuance of €1,756 million represented by an expense of €62 million relating to revenue foreign currency derivatives, an expense of €1,781 million relating to fuel derivatives and a credit of €87 million related to the associated fuel foreign currency derivatives. These amounts relate to the discontinuance of hedge accounting of the associated foreign currency and fuel derivatives on forecast revenue and fuel consumption. These losses have arisen from the substantial deterioration in demand for air travel caused by COVID-19, which has caused a significant level of hedged passenger revenue transactions and fuel purchases in US dollars to no longer be expected to occur based on the Group's operating forecasts prevailing at the Balance sheet date. The Group's risk management strategy has been to build up these hedges gradually over a three-year period when the level of forecast passenger revenue and fuel consumption were higher than current expectations. Accordingly, the hedge accounting for these transactions has been discontinued and the losses recognised in the Income statement. The exceptional charge relating to revenue derivatives and fuel derivatives has been recorded in the Income statement within Passenger revenue and Fuel, oil and emission charges, respectively.
The Group derives long-term fleet plans from the cash flow forecasts arising from the approved business plans. In deriving the long-term fleet plans, the Group applies judgement with respect to consideration of the period of temporary and permanent grounding of fleet assets, the deferral of the delivery of certain aircraft and the assumptions around specific provisions relating to leased fleet assets.
In 2020 the Group recognised an impairment charge of €856 million, represented by an impairment of fleet assets of €837 million and an impairment of other assets of €19 million. The fleet impairment relates to 82 aircraft, their associated engines and rotable inventories that have been stood down permanently and 2 further aircraft which have been impaired down to their recoverable value at December 31, 2020, which includes 32 Boeing 747 aircraft, 23 Airbus A320 aircraft, 15 Airbus A340 aircraft, 4 Airbus A330- 200 aircraft, 2 Airbus A318 aircraft, 1 Airbus A321 aircraft, 1 Airbus A319 aircraft, 2 Boeing 777-200 aircraft and 4 Embraer E170 aircraft. Of the fleet impairment, €676 million is recorded within Property, plant and equipment relating to owned aircraft and €161 million is recorded within Right of use assets relating to leased aircraft.
Further, the Group has recognised additional inventory write downs of €71 million and additional specific provisions relating to leased fleet assets of €37 million. The inventory write down expense represents those expendable inventories that, given the asset impairments, are no longer expected to be utilised. The charge relating to the recognition of contractual lease provisions represents the estimation of the additional cost to fulfil the hand back conditions associated with the leased aircraft that have been permanently stood down and impaired.
Further information is given in the Alternative performance measures section, note 12, note 13 and note 24.
Due to the estimation uncertainty of the timing and duration of the recovery from COVID-19, the Group has adopted a weighted average multi-scenario discounted cash flow model derived from the cash flow forecasts from the approved business plans. The Group exercises judgement in determining the weighting between these scenarios in the value-in-use model.
Having undertaken this impairment testing, the Group has not recognised any impairment charge. While no impairment charge is arising, the headroom in the impairment test of the British Airways, Iberia and Aer Lingus cash generating units are particularly sensitive to changes in key assumptions. Further information is given in note 15.
160 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
In determining the recoverable amounts of the Group's deferred tax assets, the Group applied the future cash flow projections from the approved business plans. Given the estimation uncertainty of the timing and duration of the recovery from COVID-19, the Group exercises judgement in the determination of cash flows during this recovery and subsequent periods.
As at December 31, 2020, the Group had unrecognised deferred tax assets of €1,337 million relating to tax losses the Group does not reasonably expect to utilise. Further information is given in note 9.
In addition to the estimation uncertainty relating to cash flow forecasts, the Group has applied the following critical accounting estimates, assumptions and judgements that impact the consolidated financial statements:
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
a Discontinuance of hedge accounting
COVID-19
financial statements.
been applied.
leased fleet assets.
3 Impact of COVID-19 on financial reporting
Critical accounting estimates, assumptions and judgements – cash flow forecast estimation
some instances significantly different from judgements applied in previous years:
within Passenger revenue and Fuel, oil and emission charges, respectively.
million is recorded within Right of use assets relating to leased aircraft.
c Impairment testing of the Group's cash generating units
sensitive to changes in key assumptions. Further information is given in note 15.
b Long-term fleet plans and associated impairment
permanently stood down and impaired.
the determination of these cash flow forecasts are given in the going concern basis of preparation.
Significant transactions and critical accounting estimates, assumptions and judgements in the determination of the impact of
As a result of COVID-19 the Group has experienced a significant decline in the level of flight activity and does not expect to return to the level of 2019 activity until at least 2023. Accordingly, the Group has applied critical estimation and judgement in the evaluation of the impact of COVID-19 regarding the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities within the Consolidated
The Group has applied estimation and judgement in the evaluation of the impact of COVID-19 on the estimation uncertainty of determining cash flow forecasts as part of the approved Business plans. The details regarding the inputs and assumptions used in
The following critical accounting estimates, assumptions and judgements utilise these cash flow forecasts consistently, which are in
In determining whether hedge accounting is required to be discontinued or to remain in a hedge relationship, judgement is required as to whether a forecast transaction that was previously highly probable continues to be expected to occur or is no longer expected to occur. The Group applied the capacity output from the cash flow forecasts as part of the approved Business plans in order to determine the forecast level of revenue generation and fuel consumption over the periods in which hedge accounting has
In 2020 the Group recognised a charge arising from such discontinuance of €1,756 million represented by an expense of €62 million relating to revenue foreign currency derivatives, an expense of €1,781 million relating to fuel derivatives and a credit of €87 million related to the associated fuel foreign currency derivatives. These amounts relate to the discontinuance of hedge accounting of the associated foreign currency and fuel derivatives on forecast revenue and fuel consumption. These losses have arisen from the substantial deterioration in demand for air travel caused by COVID-19, which has caused a significant level of hedged passenger revenue transactions and fuel purchases in US dollars to no longer be expected to occur based on the Group's operating forecasts prevailing at the Balance sheet date. The Group's risk management strategy has been to build up these hedges gradually over a three-year period when the level of forecast passenger revenue and fuel consumption were higher than current expectations. Accordingly, the hedge accounting for these transactions has been discontinued and the losses recognised in the Income statement. The exceptional charge relating to revenue derivatives and fuel derivatives has been recorded in the Income statement
The Group derives long-term fleet plans from the cash flow forecasts arising from the approved business plans. In deriving the long-term fleet plans, the Group applies judgement with respect to consideration of the period of temporary and permanent grounding of fleet assets, the deferral of the delivery of certain aircraft and the assumptions around specific provisions relating to
In 2020 the Group recognised an impairment charge of €856 million, represented by an impairment of fleet assets of €837 million and an impairment of other assets of €19 million. The fleet impairment relates to 82 aircraft, their associated engines and rotable inventories that have been stood down permanently and 2 further aircraft which have been impaired down to their recoverable value at December 31, 2020, which includes 32 Boeing 747 aircraft, 23 Airbus A320 aircraft, 15 Airbus A340 aircraft, 4 Airbus A330- 200 aircraft, 2 Airbus A318 aircraft, 1 Airbus A321 aircraft, 1 Airbus A319 aircraft, 2 Boeing 777-200 aircraft and 4 Embraer E170 aircraft. Of the fleet impairment, €676 million is recorded within Property, plant and equipment relating to owned aircraft and €161
Further, the Group has recognised additional inventory write downs of €71 million and additional specific provisions relating to leased fleet assets of €37 million. The inventory write down expense represents those expendable inventories that, given the asset impairments, are no longer expected to be utilised. The charge relating to the recognition of contractual lease provisions represents
Due to the estimation uncertainty of the timing and duration of the recovery from COVID-19, the Group has adopted a weighted average multi-scenario discounted cash flow model derived from the cash flow forecasts from the approved business plans. The
Having undertaken this impairment testing, the Group has not recognised any impairment charge. While no impairment charge is arising, the headroom in the impairment test of the British Airways, Iberia and Aer Lingus cash generating units are particularly
the estimation of the additional cost to fulfil the hand back conditions associated with the leased aircraft that have been
Further information is given in the Alternative performance measures section, note 12, note 13 and note 24.
Group exercises judgement in determining the weighting between these scenarios in the value-in-use model.
156
Historically, where a voucher has been issued to a customer in the event of a flight cancellation, the Group estimated, based on historical evidence, the level of such vouchers that would not be used prior to expiry and recognised revenue accordingly. Due to the significant level of flight cancellations arising from COVID-19 there remains insufficient historical data by which to reliably estimate the amount of these vouchers that will not be used prior to expiry. Accordingly, the Group has not recognised revenue arising from those vouchers issued due to COVID-19 related cancellations until either the voucher is redeemed or it expires.
The Group has recorded the following additional significant transactions as a result of management actions in response to COVID-19:
As a result of the structural changes to the airline sector, the Group has undertaken significant restructuring activities during 2020 to align the size of the workforce with the expected level of capacity. This has led to the recognition of severance pay of €313 million arising in British Airways, Aer Lingus, Iberia, and LEVEL and relating to a forecast reduction of employee numbers of approximately 10,500 as at December 31, 2020. This amount excludes those payments associated with restructuring programmes that were approved prior to COVID-19. These restructuring costs have been recorded as a charge to Employee costs. Further information is given in note 24 and the Alternative performance measures section.
To enhance the liquidity of the Group as a direct result of the impact of COVID-19, on October 2, 2020, the Group raised €2,741 million through a rights issue of 2,979,443 thousand new ordinary shares at a price of 92 € cents per share on the basis of 3 shares for every 2 existing shares. The transaction resulted in an increase of Share capital of €298 million and an increase in Share premium of €2,443 million. Further information is given in note 27.
To enhance liquidity due to the impact of COVID-19, the Group has entered into a number of financing arrangements during 2020, which have been fully drawn unless otherwise stated, including:
Further information is given in note 23.
Under the renewal of the multi-year commercial partnership with American Express, the Group took into account the liquidity requirements in the light of COVID-19 in negotiating an upfront payment of €830 million (£754 million) related to the fulfilment of future performance obligations, which included the pre-purchase of Avios. This upfront payment has been recorded within Deferred revenue from ticket sales until such time as the fulfilment of the associated performance obligations. Further information is given in note 21.
Given the significant reduction in operations that have occurred during 2020, the Group has availed itself of the various employee support mechanisms in the jurisdictions in which it operates. This has led to an amount of €344 million being received directly from governments (classified as government grants) and savings of €214 million (classified as government assistance) where employees have been paid directly by their respective governments. Those amounts received in the form of government assistance have been recorded net within Employee costs. Further information is given in note 32.
157
www.iairgroup.com 161
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
On December 18, 2020 British Airways reached agreement with the Trustee of NAPS to defer deficit contributions on an interim basis for the period between October 1, 2020 and January 31, 2021. The deferral of such contributions amounted to €165 million. On February 19, 2021 British Airways reached further agreement with the Trustee of NAPS to defer deficit contributions through to September 30, 2021. The deferral of such contributions will amount to €330 million. Further information is given in note 30 on the deferral of contributions in 2020 and note 34 on the deferral of contributions in 2021.
3 Impact of COVID-19 on financial reporting continued
The Group typically is either issued with or acquires emissions allowances in advance of the associated flight activity. Due to the unprecedented decline in capacity during 2020, the Group has entered into a number of sale and repurchase agreements for emission allowances, where the Group has sold the excess allowances with a commitment to repurchase them in 2021. As at December 31, 2020, the value of such emission sale and repurchase agreements was €97 million. These sale and repurchase transactions give rise to a liability for the repurchase, which is classified as an other financing liability. Further information is given in note 23a.
On November 4, 2019, the Group entered into an agreement to acquire the entire share capital of Air Europa for €1 billion, subject to receipt of the approval by the European Commission. During the course of 2020 and as a result of the impact COVID-19 has had on both the Group and Air Europa, the Group had been negotiating with the current shareholder of Air Europa regarding amending the agreement to better reflect the current economic environment. On January 19, 2021, the Group announced the successful completion of these negotiations, which has resulted in the reduction of the purchase price to €500 million and deferred this payment until the sixth anniversary of the date of completion of the acquisition conditional on the satisfactory negotiation between Iberia and SEPI regarding the non-financial terms associated with the financial support provided by SEPI to Iberia. The transaction is still subject to approval by the European Commission. Further information is given in note 34.
The chief operating decision-maker is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, and has been identified as the IAG Management Committee (IAG MC).
The Group has a number of entities which are managed as individual operating companies including airline and platform functions. Each airline operates its network operations as a single business unit and the IAG MC assesses performance based on measures including operating profit, and makes resource allocation decisions for the airlines based on network profitability, primarily by reference to the passenger markets in which the companies operate. The objective in making resource allocation decisions is to optimise consolidated financial results.
The Group has determined its operating segments based on the way that it treats its businesses and the manner in which resource allocation decisions are made. British Airways, Iberia, Vueling and Aer Lingus have been identified for financial reporting purposes as reportable operating segments. IAG Loyalty and LEVEL are also operating segments but do not exceed the quantitative thresholds to be reportable and management has concluded that there are currently no other reasons why they should be separately disclosed.
The platform functions of the business primarily support the airline operations. These activities are not considered to be reportable operating segments as they either earn revenues incidental to the activities of the Group and resource allocation decisions are made based on the passenger business or are not reviewed regularly by the IAG MC and are included within Other Group companies.
162 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
m Renegotiation of Air Europa acquisition
4 Segment information
optimise consolidated financial results.
a Business segments
separately disclosed.
note 23a.
k Defined benefit pension scheme contributions
l Sale and repurchase agreements for emission allowances
3 Impact of COVID-19 on financial reporting continued
deferral of contributions in 2020 and note 34 on the deferral of contributions in 2021.
still subject to approval by the European Commission. Further information is given in note 34.
and has been identified as the IAG Management Committee (IAG MC).
On December 18, 2020 British Airways reached agreement with the Trustee of NAPS to defer deficit contributions on an interim basis for the period between October 1, 2020 and January 31, 2021. The deferral of such contributions amounted to €165 million. On February 19, 2021 British Airways reached further agreement with the Trustee of NAPS to defer deficit contributions through to September 30, 2021. The deferral of such contributions will amount to €330 million. Further information is given in note 30 on the
The Group typically is either issued with or acquires emissions allowances in advance of the associated flight activity. Due to the unprecedented decline in capacity during 2020, the Group has entered into a number of sale and repurchase agreements for emission allowances, where the Group has sold the excess allowances with a commitment to repurchase them in 2021. As at December 31, 2020, the value of such emission sale and repurchase agreements was €97 million. These sale and repurchase transactions give rise to a liability for the repurchase, which is classified as an other financing liability. Further information is given in
On November 4, 2019, the Group entered into an agreement to acquire the entire share capital of Air Europa for €1 billion, subject to receipt of the approval by the European Commission. During the course of 2020 and as a result of the impact COVID-19 has had on both the Group and Air Europa, the Group had been negotiating with the current shareholder of Air Europa regarding amending the
The chief operating decision-maker is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments,
The Group has a number of entities which are managed as individual operating companies including airline and platform functions. Each airline operates its network operations as a single business unit and the IAG MC assesses performance based on measures including operating profit, and makes resource allocation decisions for the airlines based on network profitability, primarily by reference to the passenger markets in which the companies operate. The objective in making resource allocation decisions is to
The Group has determined its operating segments based on the way that it treats its businesses and the manner in which resource allocation decisions are made. British Airways, Iberia, Vueling and Aer Lingus have been identified for financial reporting purposes as reportable operating segments. IAG Loyalty and LEVEL are also operating segments but do not exceed the quantitative thresholds to be reportable and management has concluded that there are currently no other reasons why they should be
The platform functions of the business primarily support the airline operations. These activities are not considered to be reportable operating segments as they either earn revenues incidental to the activities of the Group and resource allocation decisions are made based on the passenger business or are not reviewed regularly by the IAG MC and are included within Other Group companies.
agreement to better reflect the current economic environment. On January 19, 2021, the Group announced the successful completion of these negotiations, which has resulted in the reduction of the purchase price to €500 million and deferred this payment until the sixth anniversary of the date of completion of the acquisition conditional on the satisfactory negotiation between Iberia and SEPI regarding the non-financial terms associated with the financial support provided by SEPI to Iberia. The transaction is
158
| 2020 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| British | Aer | Other Group | ||||
| € million | Airways | Iberia | Vueling | Lingus | companies1 | Total |
| Revenue | ||||||
| Passenger revenue | 3,242 | 1,148 | 577 | 376 | 169 | 5,512 |
| Cargo revenue | 994 | 224 | – | 88 | – | 1,306 |
| Other revenue | 232 | 605 | 5 | – | 146 | 988 |
| External revenue | 4,468 | 1,977 | 582 | 464 | 315 | 7,806 |
| Inter-segment revenue | 90 | 282 | (8) | 3 | 343 | 710 |
| Segment revenue | 4,558 | 2,259 | 574 | 467 | 658 | 8,516 |
| Depreciation and amortisation charge | (1,214) | (370) | (277) | (133) | (84) | (2,078) |
| Impairment charge | (445) | (242) | (68) | (24) | (98) | (877) |
| Operating loss | (4,378) | (1,411) | (875) | (563) | (199) | (7,426) |
| Exceptional items2 | (1,778) | (652) | (252) | (202) | (177) | (3,061) |
| Operating loss before exceptional items | (2,600) | (759) | (623) | (361) | (22) | (4,365) |
| Net non-operating costs | (384) | |||||
| Loss before tax | (7,810) | |||||
| Total assets | 17,707 | 7,009 | 2,850 | 1,814 | 884 | 30,264 |
| Total liabilities | (15,979) | (7,014) | (3,299) | (1,495) | (1,161) | (28,948) |
1 Includes eliminations on total assets of €14,998 million and total liabilities of €5,100 million.
2 For details on exceptional items refer to the Alternative performance measures section.
For the year to December 31, 2019
| 2019 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| British | Aer | Other Group | ||||
| € million | Airways | Iberia | Vueling | Lingus | companies1 | Total |
| Revenue | ||||||
| Passenger revenue | 13,307 | 4,020 | 2,437 | 2,060 | 644 | 22,468 |
| Cargo revenue | 805 | 255 | – | 54 | 3 | 1,117 |
| Other revenue | 752 | 912 | 18 | 2 | 237 | 1,921 |
| External revenue | 14,864 | 5,187 | 2,455 | 2,116 | 884 | 25,506 |
| Inter-segment revenue | 242 | 458 | – | 9 | 575 | 1,284 |
| Segment revenue | 15,106 | 5,645 | 2,455 | 2,125 | 1,459 | 26,790 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment | (1,258) | (390) | (250) | (130) | (83) | (2,111) |
| Operating profit | 1,510 | 497 | 240 | 276 | 90 | 2,613 |
| Exceptional items2 | (672) | (672) | ||||
| Operating profit before exceptional items | 2,182 | 497 | 240 | 276 | 90 | 3,285 |
| Net non-operating costs | (338) | |||||
| Profit before tax | 2,275 | |||||
| Total assets3 | 22,102 | 8,733 | 3,756 | 2,131 | (1,271) | 35,451 |
| Total liabilities3 | (15,235) | (6,940) | (3,354) | (1,320) | (1,773) | (28,622) |
159
www.iairgroup.com 163
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
1 Includes eliminations on total assets of €14,982 million and total liabilities of €4,603 million.
2 For details on exceptional items refer to the Alternative performance measures section.
3 Total assets and total liabilities at December 31, 2019 have been reclassified for the effects given in note 2.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
4 Segment information continued
| Year to December 31 | ||
|---|---|---|
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
| UK | 2,390 | 8,362 |
| Spain | 1,845 | 4,399 |
| USA | 933 | 4,379 |
| Rest of world | 2,638 | 8,366 |
| 7,806 | 25,506 |
December 31, 2020
| Property, | ||
|---|---|---|
| plant and | Intangible | |
| € million | equipment | assets |
| UK | 11,313 | 1,251 |
| Spain | 4,850 | 1,353 |
| USA | 122 | 15 |
| Rest of world | 1,246 | 589 |
| 17,531 | 3,208 |
| € million | Property, plant and equipment |
Intangible assets |
|---|---|---|
| UK | 12,214 | 1,401 |
| Spain | 5,324 | 1,402 |
| USA | 188 | 19 |
| Rest of world | 1,442 | 620 |
| 19,168 | 3,442 |
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment of non-current assets:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Depreciation charge on right of use assets | 1,153 | 1,153 |
| Depreciation charge on owned assets | 720 | 776 |
| Impairment charge on owned property, plant and equipment | 681 | – |
| Amortisation and impairment of intangible assets | 196 | 142 |
| Impairment charge on right of use assets | 161 | – |
| Depreciation charge on other leasehold interests | 44 | 40 |
| 2,955 | 2,111 | |
| Cost of inventories: | ||
|---|---|---|
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
| Cost of inventories recognised as an expense, mainly fuel | 1,405 | 3,242 |
| Impairment charge on inventories1 | 71 | – |
| 1,476 | 3,242 |
1 For details regarding the impairment charge on inventories refer to note 3.
164 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Year to December 31
7,806 25,506
17,531 3,208
19,168 3,442
1,476 3,242
Intangible assets
Intangible assets
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
b Geographical analysis Revenue by area of original sale
Assets by area December 31, 2020
December 31, 2019
Cost of inventories:
5 Expenses by nature
Operating result is arrived at after charging
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment of non-current assets:
1 For details regarding the impairment charge on inventories refer to note 3.
€ million
€ million
4 Segment information continued
160
€ million 2020 2019 UK 2,390 8,362 Spain 1,845 4,399 USA 933 4,379 Rest of world 2,638 8,366
UK 11,313 1,251 Spain 4,850 1,353 USA 122 15 Rest of world 1,246 589
UK 12,214 1,401 Spain 5,324 1,402 USA 188 19 Rest of world 1,442 620
€ million 2020 2019 Depreciation charge on right of use assets 1,153 1,153 Depreciation charge on owned assets 720 776 Impairment charge on owned property, plant and equipment 681 – Amortisation and impairment of intangible assets 196 142 Impairment charge on right of use assets 161 – Depreciation charge on other leasehold interests 44 40 2,955 2,111
€ million 2020 2019 Cost of inventories recognised as an expense, mainly fuel 1,405 3,242 Impairment charge on inventories1 71 – The fees for audit and non-audit services provided by the auditor of the Group's consolidated financial statements and of certain individual financial statements of the consolidated companies, Ernst & Young S.L., and by companies belonging to Ernst & Young's network, were as follows:
| €'000 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Fees payable for the audit of the Group and individual accounts | 4,180 | 3,916 |
| Fees payable for other services: | ||
| Audit of the Group's subsidiaries pursuant to legislation | 696 | 632 |
| Other services pursuant to legislation | 532 | 496 |
| Other services relating to taxation | 30 | 3 |
| Other assurance services | 350 | 727 |
| Services relating to working capital review | 1,036 | 1,218 |
| Services relating to corporate finance transactions | 370 | 175 |
| All other services | 55 | 3 |
| 7,249 | 7,170 |
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 2,236 | 3,334 |
| Social security costs | 385 | 561 |
| Costs related to pension scheme benefits | 247 | 932 |
| Share-based payment (credit)/charge | (8) | 34 |
| Other employee costs1 | 700 | 773 |
| Total employee costs | 3,560 | 5,634 |
1 Other employee costs include allowances and accommodation for crew.
The number of employees during the year and at December 31 was as follows:
| 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | December 31, 2020 | Average | December 31, 2019 | ||||
| number of employees1 |
Number of employees |
Percentage of women |
number of employees |
Number of employees |
Percentage of women |
||
| In the air: | |||||||
| Cabin crew | 7,689 | 17,946 | 71% | 25,774 | 25,342 | 71% | |
| Pilots | 4,787 | 7,794 | 6% | 8,217 | 8,310 | 6% | |
| On the ground: | |||||||
| Airports | 8,841 | 14,339 | 39% | 19,689 | 18,970 | 39% | |
| Corporate | 7,954 | 11,246 | 48% | 11,798 | 11,855 | 48% | |
| Maintenance | 5,153 | 6,410 | 7% | 7,620 | 7,593 | 8% | |
| Senior executives | 196 | 193 | 30% | 201 | 198 | 30% | |
| 34,620 | 57,928 | 73,299 | 72,268 |
1 The average number of employees excludes those employees on furlough, wage support and equivalent schemes, including the Temporary Redundancy Plan arrangements in Spain. For further details see note 32. The total average number of employees including those in these schemes is 65,481.
The number of employees is based on actual headcount. The 2019 figures have been updated to represent actual headcount (rather than manpower equivalent as disclosed in the prior year), and classified according to the updated categories (rather in the categories of senior executives, ground employees and technical crew as disclosed in the prior year), to align with the categories used in the Non-Financial Information Statement.
The average manpower equivalent for 2020 was 60,612 (2019: 66,034), which includes employees on furlough, wage support and equivalent schemes, including Temporary Redundancy Plan arrangements in Spain.
161
www.iairgroup.com 165
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
| a Finance costs |
||
|---|---|---|
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
| Interest expense on: | ||
| Bank borrowings | (45) | (12) |
| Asset financed liabilities | (41) | (9) |
| Lease liabilities | (442) | (489) |
| Provisions unwinding of discount | (14) | (37) |
| Other borrowings | (103) | (77) |
| Capitalised interest on progress payments | 8 | 17 |
| Other finance costs | (33) | (4) |
| (670) | (611) | |
| b Finance income |
||
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
| Interest on interest-bearing deposits | 21 | 47 |
| Other finance income | 20 | 3 |
| 41 | 50 | |
| c Net financing credit relating to pensions |
||
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
| Net financing credit relating to pensions | 4 | 26 |
| d Other non-operating charges |
||
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
| Gains/(losses) on sale of property, plant and equipment and investments | 38 | (22) |
| Credit related to equity investments (note 17) | 1 | 3 |
| Share of profits in investments accounted for using the equity method (note 16) | 1 | 6 |
| Realised (losses)/gains on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting | (13) | 8 |
| Unrealised (losses)/gains on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting | (31) | 1 |
| (4) | (4) |
Tax (charge)/credit in the Income statement, Other comprehensive income and Statement of changes in equity:
| Other | Statement | Other | Statement | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income | comprehensive | of changes | Income | comprehensive | of changes | ||
| Total | |||||||
| 6 | – | – | 6 | 26 | (8) | – | 18 |
| 273 | (17) | – | 256 | (494) | 146 | – | (348) |
| 279 | (17) | – | 262 | (468) | 138 | – | (330) |
| – | – | (8) | (14) | – | – | (14) | |
| 690 | 129 | (2) | 817 | (79) | (403) | (1) | (483) |
| 44 | – | (30) | 1 | 3 | – | 4 | |
| 608 | 173 | (2) | 779 | (92) | (400) | (1) | (493) |
| 887 | 156 | (2) | 1,041 | (560) | (262) | (1) | (823) |
| statement | income (8) (74) |
2020 in equity |
Total | statement | 2019 income |
in equity |
The current tax credit in Other comprehensive income relates to cash flow hedges of €17 million (2019: €16 million) and employee retirement benefit plans of €nil (2019: €154 million).
Tax in the Statement of changes in equity relates to share-based payment schemes of €2 million (2019: €1 million).
Within tax in Other comprehensive income is a tax credit of €92 million (2019: tax credit of €184 million) that may be reclassified to the Income statement and a tax credit of €64 million (2019: tax credit of €165 million) that will not.
166 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
| b Current tax (liability)/asset |
||
|---|---|---|
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
| Balance at January 1 | (6) | 218 |
| Income statement | 279 | (468) |
| Other comprehensive income | (17) | 138 |
| Cash | (45) | 119 |
| Offset against other taxes | (152) | – |
| Exchange movements and other | (6) | (13) |
| Balance at December 31 | 53 | (6) |
| Current tax asset | 101 | 186 |
| Current tax liability | (48) | (192) |
| Balance at December 31 | 53 | (6) |
A tax repayment of €152 million arising from losses carried back to an earlier period was offset, by HMRC, against liabilities arising in relation to other taxes.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
c Net financing credit relating to pensions
d Other non-operating charges
a Finance costs
Interest expense on:
b Finance income
9 Tax
€ million
Current tax
Deferred tax
Movement in respect of prior
Movement in respect of prior
retirement benefit plans of €nil (2019: €154 million).
Movement in respect of
Movement in respect of
a Tax charges
8 Finance costs, income and other non-operating (charges)/credits
€ million 2020 2019
€ million 2020 2019 Interest on interest-bearing deposits 21 47 Other finance income 20 3
€ million 2020 2019 Net financing credit relating to pensions 4 26
€ million 2020 2019 Gains/(losses) on sale of property, plant and equipment and investments 38 (22) Credit related to equity investments (note 17) 1 3 Share of profits in investments accounted for using the equity method (note 16) 1 6 Realised (losses)/gains on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (13) 8 Unrealised (losses)/gains on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (31) 1
Statement of changes
years 6 – – 6 26 (8) – 18
current year 273 (17) – 256 (494) 146 – (348) Total current tax 279 (17) – 262 (468) 138 – (330)
years (8) – – (8) (14) – – (14)
current year 690 129 (2) 817 (79) (403) (1) (483) Rate change/rate differences (74) 44 – (30) 1 3 – 4 Total deferred tax 608 173 (2) 779 (92) (400) (1) (493)
Total tax 887 156 (2) 1,041 (560) (262) (1) (823) The current tax credit in Other comprehensive income relates to cash flow hedges of €17 million (2019: €16 million) and employee
Within tax in Other comprehensive income is a tax credit of €92 million (2019: tax credit of €184 million) that may be reclassified to
Tax in the Statement of changes in equity relates to share-based payment schemes of €2 million (2019: €1 million).
the Income statement and a tax credit of €64 million (2019: tax credit of €165 million) that will not.
in equity Total
2020 2019
Income statement
Other comprehensive income
Statement of changes
Tax (charge)/credit in the Income statement, Other comprehensive income and Statement of changes in equity:
Other comprehensive income
Income statement
Bank borrowings (45) (12) Asset financed liabilities (41) (9) Lease liabilities (442) (489) Provisions unwinding of discount (14) (37) Other borrowings (103) (77) Capitalised interest on progress payments 8 17 Other finance costs (33) (4)
(670) (611)
41 50
(4) (4)
in equity Total
162
| € million | Fixed | assets Leases | Borrowings on right of use assets |
Employee leaving indemnities and others |
Employee benefit plans |
Fair value gain/ losses |
Share based payment schemes |
Tax loss carried forward and other tax credits |
Other temporary differences |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at January 1, 20201 | (732) | (195) | 24 | 312 | 323 | 70 | 19 | 401 | 34 | 256 | |
| Income statement | 116 | (76) | (2) | (120) | 3 | – | (6) | 643 | 50 | 608 | |
| Other comprehensive income | – | – | – | 3 | (4) | 118 | – | 56 | – | 173 | |
| Statement of changes in equity |
– | – | – | – | – | – | (2) | – | – | (2) | |
| Exchange movements and | |||||||||||
| other | 27 | 23 | (1) | (1) | (24) | 7 | (1) | (10) | (20) | – | |
| Balance at December 31, 2020 |
(589) (248) | 21 | 194 | 298 | 195 | 10 | 1,090 | 64 | 1,035 | ||
| Balance at January 1, 20191 | (712) | (148) | 31 | 348 | 545 | 234 | 16 | 411 | 31 | 756 | |
| Income statement | 4 | (26) | (7) | (52) | (7) | – | 5 | (10) | 1 | (92) | |
| Other comprehensive income | – | – | – | 13 | (240) | (173) | – | – | – | (400) | |
| Statement of changes in equity |
– | – | – | – | – | – | (1) | – | – | (1) | |
| Exchange movements and other |
(24) | (21) | – | 3 | 25 | 9 | (1) | – | 2 | (7) | |
| Balance at December 31, 20191 |
(732) | (195) | 24 | 312 | 323 | 70 | 19 | 401 | 34 | 256 | |
| € million | 2020 | 20191 | |||||||||
| Deferred tax asset | 1,075 | 546 | |||||||||
| Deferred tax liability | (40) | (290) | |||||||||
| Balance at December 31 | 1,035 | 256 |
1 Deferred taxes arising on Employee benefit plans at December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2019 have been reclassified for the effects given in note 2.
The deferred tax assets mainly arise in Spain and the UK and are expected to reverse beyond one year. Recognition of the deferred tax assets is supported by the expected reversal of deferred tax liabilities in corresponding periods, and projections of operating performance laid out in the Management approved business plans.
163
www.iairgroup.com 167
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
9 Tax continued
The tax credit/(charge) is calculated at the domestic rates applicable to (losses)/profits in the country in which the (losses)/profits arise. The tax credit (2019: charge) on the loss for the year to December 31, 2020 (2019: profit) is lower (2019: higher) than the notional tax credit (2019: charge). The differences are explained below:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Accounting (loss)/profit before tax | (7,810) | 2,275 |
| Weighted average tax credit/(charge) of the Group1 | 1,615 | (440) |
| Unrecognised losses and deductible temporary differences arising in the year | (342) | (11) |
| Disposal and write down of investments | (83) | – |
| Effect of tax rate changes | (74) | 1 |
| Employee benefit plans accounted for net of withholding tax – recurring | 2 | 7 |
| Employee benefit plans accounted for net of withholding tax – non-recurring | – | (128) |
| Prior year assets derecognised | (176) | – |
| Investment incentives | 2 | 11 |
| Effect of lower tax rate in the Canary Islands | (40) | (3) |
| Movement in respect of prior years | (2) | 12 |
| Non-deductible expenses – recurring items | (22) | (14) |
| Other items | 7 | 5 |
| Tax credit/(charge) in the income statement | 887 | (560) |
1 The expected tax credit/(charge) is calculated by aggregating the expected tax charges arising in each company in the Group and changes each year as tax rates and profit mix change. The corporate tax rates for the Group's main countries of operation are Spain 25% (2019: 25%), the UK 19% (2019: 19%) and Ireland 12.5% (2019: 12.5%).
The Group was also subject to other taxes paid during the year which are as follows:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Payroll related taxes | 400 | 555 |
| UK Air Passenger Duty | 307 | 967 |
| 707 | 1,522 |
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Income tax losses | ||
| Spanish corporate income tax losses | 848 | 11 |
| Openskies SASU trading losses | 450 | 249 |
| UK trading losses | 39 | 25 |
| 1,337 | 285 | |
| Other losses and temporary differences | ||
| UK capital losses | 350 | 335 |
| Spanish deductible temporary differences | 1,287 | 36 |
| Irish capital losses | 25 | 25 |
| 1,662 | 396 |
None of the unrecognised temporary differences have an expiry date.
No deferred tax liability has been recognised in respect of €547 million (2019: €2,959 million) of temporary differences relating to subsidiaries and associates. The Group either controls the reversal of these temporary differences and it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future or no tax consequences would arise from their reversal to a material extent.
A reduction in the UK corporation tax rate to 17 per cent (effective April 1, 2020) was substantively enacted on September 6, 2016. This reduction from 19 per cent to 17 per cent was reversed in Finance Act 2020, which has led to the remeasurement of deferred tax balances and will increase the Group's future current tax charge accordingly.
The Group has certain contingent liabilities, across all taxes, which at December 31, 2020 amounted to €166 million (December 31, 2019: €165 million). No material losses are likely to arise from such contingent liabilities. The tax related contingent liabilities include the following:
168 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
(2019: 19%) and Ireland 12.5% (2019: 12.5%).
e Payroll related taxes and UK Air Passenger Duty
f Factors that may affect future tax charges
Other losses and temporary differences
g Tax related contingent liabilities
Income tax losses
Tax rate changes
the following:
Unrecognised deductible temporary differences and losses
None of the unrecognised temporary differences have an expiry date.
Unrecognised temporary differences – investment in subsidiaries and associates
tax balances and will increase the Group's future current tax charge accordingly.
The Group was also subject to other taxes paid during the year which are as follows:
d Reconciliation of the total tax charge in the income statement
notional tax credit (2019: charge). The differences are explained below:
The tax credit/(charge) is calculated at the domestic rates applicable to (losses)/profits in the country in which the (losses)/profits arise. The tax credit (2019: charge) on the loss for the year to December 31, 2020 (2019: profit) is lower (2019: higher) than the
€ million 2020 2019 Accounting (loss)/profit before tax (7,810) 2,275
Weighted average tax credit/(charge) of the Group1 1,615 (440) Unrecognised losses and deductible temporary differences arising in the year (342) (11) Disposal and write down of investments (83) – Effect of tax rate changes (74) 1 Employee benefit plans accounted for net of withholding tax – recurring 2 7 Employee benefit plans accounted for net of withholding tax – non-recurring – (128) Prior year assets derecognised (176) – Investment incentives 2 11 Effect of lower tax rate in the Canary Islands (40) (3) Movement in respect of prior years (2) 12 Non-deductible expenses – recurring items (22) (14) Other items 7 5 Tax credit/(charge) in the income statement 887 (560) 1 The expected tax credit/(charge) is calculated by aggregating the expected tax charges arising in each company in the Group and changes each year as tax rates and profit mix change. The corporate tax rates for the Group's main countries of operation are Spain 25% (2019: 25%), the UK 19%
€ million 2020 2019 Payroll related taxes 400 555 UK Air Passenger Duty 307 967
€ million 2020 2019
Spanish corporate income tax losses 848 11 Openskies SASU trading losses 450 249 UK trading losses 39 25
UK capital losses 350 335 Spanish deductible temporary differences 1,287 36 Irish capital losses 25 25
No deferred tax liability has been recognised in respect of €547 million (2019: €2,959 million) of temporary differences relating to subsidiaries and associates. The Group either controls the reversal of these temporary differences and it is probable that they will
A reduction in the UK corporation tax rate to 17 per cent (effective April 1, 2020) was substantively enacted on September 6, 2016. This reduction from 19 per cent to 17 per cent was reversed in Finance Act 2020, which has led to the remeasurement of deferred
The Group has certain contingent liabilities, across all taxes, which at December 31, 2020 amounted to €166 million (December 31, 2019: €165 million). No material losses are likely to arise from such contingent liabilities. The tax related contingent liabilities include
not reverse in the foreseeable future or no tax consequences would arise from their reversal to a material extent.
707 1,522
1,337 285
1,662 396
9 Tax continued
164
Following tax audits covering the period 2011 to 2014, the Spanish Tax Authorities issued a corporate income tax assessment to the Company regarding the merger in 2011 between British Airways and Iberia. The maximum exposure in this case is €92 million (2019: €90 million), being the amount in the tax assessment with an estimate of the interest accrued on that assessment through to December 31, 2020.
The Company appealed the assessment to the Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Central or 'TEAC' (Central Administrative Tax Tribunal). On October 23, 2019 the TEAC ruled in favour of the Spanish Tax Authorities. The Company subsequently appealed this ruling to the Audiencia Nacional (National High Court) on December 20, 2019, and on July 24, 2020 filed submissions in support of its case. The Company does not expect a hearing at the National High Court until 2022 at the earliest.
The Company disputes the technical merits of the assessment and ruling of the TEAC, both in terms of whether a gain arose and in terms of the quantum of any gain. The Company believes that it has strong arguments to support its appeals. The Company does not consider it appropriate to make a provision for these amounts and accordingly has recognised this matter as a contingent liability.
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| (Losses)/earnings attributable to equity holders of the parent for basic (losses)/earnings | (6,923) | 1,715 |
| Interest expense on convertible bonds | – | 26 |
| Diluted (losses)/earnings attributable to equity holders of the parent and diluted (losses)/earnings per | ||
| share | (6,923) | 1,741 |
| 2020 | 2019 | |
| Number '000 |
Number '0001 |
|
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue2 | 3,528,052 | 3,055,638 |
| Assumed conversion on convertible bonds | – | 59,398 |
| Dilutive employee share schemes outstanding | – | 22,305 |
| Weighted average number for diluted earnings per share | 3,528,052 | 3,137,341 |
| € cents | 2020 | 20191 |
| Basic earnings per share | (196.2) | 56.1 |
Diluted earnings per share (196.2) 55.5 1 Earnings per share information has been restated for the comparative period presented, by adjusting the weighted average number of shares to include the impact of the rights issue (note 27). The discount element inherent in the rights issue has been accounted for as a bonus issue of 1,071,565 thousand shares in 2019.
2 In 2020, includes 734,657 thousand shares as the weighted average impact for 2,979,443 thousand new ordinary shares issued through the rights issue (note 27).
The effect of the assumed conversion of the IAG €500 million convertible bond 2022 and outstanding employee share schemes is antidilutive for the year to December 31, 2020, and therefore has not been included in the diluted earnings per share calculation.
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share before exceptional items is included in the Alternative performance measures section.
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash dividend declared | ||
| Interim dividend for 2019 of 14.5 € cents per share | – | 288 |
| Final dividend for 2019 of 17.0 € cents per share | – | 337 |
| Special dividend for 2018 of 35.0 € cents per share | – | 695 |
Proposed dividends on ordinary shares are subject to approval at the Annual Shareholders' Meeting and, subject to approval, are recognised as a liability on that date.
As a result of the impact of COVID-19, on April 2, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Group resolved to withdraw the proposal to the subsequent Annual Shareholders' Meeting to pay a final dividend for 2019 of 17.0 € cents per share.
The dividend paid in the year to December 31, 2020 of €53 million relates to the withholding tax on the 2019 interim dividend, which was proposed in October 2019.
165
www.iairgroup.com 169
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
| € million | Fleet | Property | Equipment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||||
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | 25,296 | 2,923 | 1,505 | 29,724 |
| Additions | 3,946 | 67 | 147 | 4,160 |
| Modification of leases | 128 | 94 | – | 222 |
| Disposals | (1,319) | (85) | (71) | (1,475) |
| Reclassifications | 44 | – | (44) | – |
| Exchange movements | 1,287 | 163 | 68 | 1,518 |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | 29,382 | 3,162 | 1,605 | 34,149 |
| Additions | 2,854 | 84 | 32 | 2,970 |
| Modification of leases | 21 | 16 | (1) | 36 |
| Disposals | (3,878) | (95) | (50) | (4,023) |
| Reclassifications | (4) | 8 | (4) | – |
| Exchange movements | (1,439) | (193) | (81) | (1,713) |
| December 31, 2020 | 26,936 | 2,982 | 1,501 | 31,419 |
| Depreciation and impairment | ||||
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | 10,776 | 1,078 | 948 | 12,802 |
| Depreciation charge for the year | 1,710 | 169 | 90 | 1,969 |
| Disposals | (447) | (63) | (57) | (567) |
| Reclassifications | 8 | – | (8) | – |
| Exchange movements | 660 | 65 | 52 | 777 |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | 12,707 | 1,249 | 1,025 | 14,981 |
| Depreciation charge for the year | 1,659 | 165 | 93 | 1,917 |
| Impairment charge for the year1 | 820 | – | 22 | 842 |
| Disposals | (2,886) | (52) | (44) | (2,982) |
| Exchange movements | (729) | (80) | (61) | (870) |
| December 31, 2020 | 11,571 | 1,282 | 1,035 | 13,888 |
1 For details regarding the impairment charge on fleet assets refer to note 3 and the Alternative performance measures section. The impairments principally arose from the permanent grounding of specific fleet assets and accordingly their full net book value was impaired. However, certain fleet assets have been impaired down to their fair value, which was determined based on independent appraisals of their market value.
| Net book values | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2020 | 15,365 | 1,700 | 466 | 17,531 |
| December 31, 2019 | 16,675 | 1,913 | 580 | 19,168 |
| Analysis at December 31, 2020 | ||||
| Owned | 5,457 | 920 | 382 | 6,759 |
| Right of use assets (note 13) | 9,124 | 695 | 56 | 9,875 |
| Progress payments | 710 | 85 | 28 | 823 |
| Assets not in current use | 74 | – | – | 74 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 15,365 | 1,700 | 466 | 17,531 |
| Analysis at December 31, 2019 | ||||
| Owned | 5,321 | 1,028 | 460 | 6,809 |
| Right of use assets (note 13) | 9,746 | 774 | 68 | 10,588 |
| Progress payments | 1,525 | 110 | 52 | 1,687 |
| Assets not in current use | 83 | 1 | – | 84 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 16,675 | 1,913 | 580 | 19,168 |
| The net book value of property comprises: | ||||
| € million | 2020 | 2019 | ||
| Freehold | 485 | 560 | ||
| Right of use assets (note 13) | 695 | 774 | ||
| Long leasehold improvements > 50 years | 297 | 321 | ||
| Short leasehold improvements < 50 years | 223 | 258 | ||
| Property | 1,700 | 1,913 |
At December 31, 2020, long-term borrowings of the Group are secured on owned fleet assets with a net book value of €2,794 million (2019: €1,576 million).
170 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
Depreciation and impairment
Net book values
Analysis at December 31, 2020
Analysis at December 31, 2019
million (2019: €1,576 million).
The net book value of property comprises:
Cost
12 Property, plant and equipment
166
€ million Fleet Property Equipment Total
Balance at January 1, 2019 25,296 2,923 1,505 29,724 Additions 3,946 67 147 4,160 Modification of leases 128 94 – 222 Disposals (1,319) (85) (71) (1,475) Reclassifications 44 – (44) – Exchange movements 1,287 163 68 1,518 Balance at December 31, 2019 29,382 3,162 1,605 34,149 Additions 2,854 84 32 2,970 Modification of leases 21 16 (1) 36 Disposals (3,878) (95) (50) (4,023) Reclassifications (4) 8 (4) – Exchange movements (1,439) (193) (81) (1,713) December 31, 2020 26,936 2,982 1,501 31,419
Balance at January 1, 2019 10,776 1,078 948 12,802 Depreciation charge for the year 1,710 169 90 1,969 Disposals (447) (63) (57) (567) Reclassifications 8 – (8) – Exchange movements 660 65 52 777 Balance at December 31, 2019 12,707 1,249 1,025 14,981 Depreciation charge for the year 1,659 165 93 1,917 Impairment charge for the year1 820 – 22 842 Disposals (2,886) (52) (44) (2,982) Exchange movements (729) (80) (61) (870) December 31, 2020 11,571 1,282 1,035 13,888 1 For details regarding the impairment charge on fleet assets refer to note 3 and the Alternative performance measures section. The impairments principally arose from the permanent grounding of specific fleet assets and accordingly their full net book value was impaired. However, certain fleet
assets have been impaired down to their fair value, which was determined based on independent appraisals of their market value.
December 31, 2020 15,365 1,700 466 17,531 December 31, 2019 16,675 1,913 580 19,168
Owned 5,457 920 382 6,759 Right of use assets (note 13) 9,124 695 56 9,875 Progress payments 710 85 28 823 Assets not in current use 74 – – 74 Property, plant and equipment 15,365 1,700 466 17,531
Owned 5,321 1,028 460 6,809 Right of use assets (note 13) 9,746 774 68 10,588 Progress payments 1,525 110 52 1,687 Assets not in current use 83 1 – 84 Property, plant and equipment 16,675 1,913 580 19,168
€ million 2020 2019 Freehold 485 560 Right of use assets (note 13) 695 774 Long leasehold improvements > 50 years 297 321 Short leasehold improvements < 50 years 223 258 Property 1,700 1,913
At December 31, 2020, long-term borrowings of the Group are secured on owned fleet assets with a net book value of €2,794
Property, plant and equipment includes the following amounts relating to right of use assets:
| € million | Fleet | Property | Equipment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||||
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | 12,491 | 734 | 119 | 13,344 |
| Additions | 1,039 | 13 | 16 | 1,068 |
| Modifications of leases | 128 | 94 | – | 222 |
| Disposals | (23) | – | – | (23) |
| Reclassifications1 | (290) | (4) | (16) | (310) |
| Exchange movements | 509 | 45 | 4 | 558 |
| December 31, 2019 | 13,854 | 882 | 123 | 14,859 |
| Additions | 1,194 | 58 | 1 | 1,253 |
| Modifications of leases | 21 | 16 | (1) | 36 |
| Disposals | (77) | (6) | (22) | (105) |
| Reclassifications1 | (389) | – | 3 | (386) |
| Exchange movements | (595) | (57) | (5) | (657) |
| December 31, 2020 | 14,008 | 893 | 99 | 15,000 |
| Depreciation and impairment | ||||
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | 3,056 | – | 36 | 3,092 |
| Depreciation charge for the year | 1,032 | 104 | 17 | 1,153 |
| Disposals | (21) | – | – | (21) |
| Reclassifications1 | (123) | – | – | (123) |
| Exchange movements | 164 | 4 | 2 | 170 |
| December 31, 2019 | 4,108 | 108 | 55 | 4,271 |
| Depreciation charge for the year | 1,035 | 103 | 15 | 1,153 |
| Impairment charge for the year2 | 161 | – | – | 161 |
| Disposals | (53) | (5) | (22) | (80) |
| Reclassifications1 | (166) | – | (3) | (169) |
| Exchange movements | (201) | (8) | (2) | (211) |
| December 31, 2020 | 4,884 | 198 | 43 | 5,125 |
| December 31, 2020 | 9,124 | 695 | 56 | 9,875 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2019 | 9,746 | 774 | 68 | 10,588 |
1 Amounts with a net book value of €217 million (2019: €187 million) were reclassified from ROU assets to Owned Property, plant and equipment at the cessation of the respective leases.
2 For details regarding the impairment charge on fleet assets refer to note 3 and the Alternative performance measures section.
Interest-bearing long-term borrowings includes the following amount relating to lease liabilities:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| January 1 | 11,046 | 11,123 |
| Additions | 1,179 | 1,017 |
| Modifications of leases | 20 | 182 |
| Repayments | (1,919) | (1,941) |
| Interest expense | 442 | 489 |
| Exchange movements | (744) | 176 |
| December 31 | 10,024 | 11,046 |
| Current | 1,560 | 1,694 |
| Non-current | 8,464 | 9,352 |
167
www.iairgroup.com 171
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
13 Leases continued
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Amounts not included in the measurement of lease liabilities | ||
| Variable lease payments | 1 | 28 |
| Expenses relating to short-term leases | 42 | 74 |
| Expenses relating to leases of low-value assets, excluding short-term leases of low value assets | – | 1 |
| Amounts expensed as a result of the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities | ||
| Interest expense on lease liabilities | 442 | 489 |
| Gain arising from sale and leaseback transactions | (10) | (1) |
| Depreciation charge for the year | 1,153 | 1,153 |
| Impairment charge for the year | 161 | – |
During 2020 the IASB issued 'COVID-19 related rent concessions – amendment to IFRS 16 Leases' to provide a practical expedient to lessees from applying IFRS 16 guidance on lease modification accounting for rent concessions for those lease modifications arising as a direct result of COVID-19. The Group has applied this practical expedient to all such modifications in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The net impact on the Income statement for 2020 has been a credit of €2 million reflecting the changes to lease payments that arose from such concessions.
The Group had total cash outflows for leases of €1,997 million in 2020 (2019: €2,057 million).
The Group had total cash inflows associated with sale and leaseback transactions of €898 million (2019: €824 million).
The Group is exposed to future cash outflows (on an undiscounted basis) as at December 31, 2020, for which no amount has been recognised in relation to leases not yet commenced to which the Group is committed of €183 million (2019: €787 million).
The maturity profile of the lease liabilities is disclosed in note 25e.
The Group has certain leases which contain extension options exercisable by the Group prior to the non-cancellable contract period. Where practicable, the Group seeks to include extension options in new leases to provide operational flexibility. The Group assesses at lease commencement whether it is reasonably certain to exercise the extension options.
The Group is exposed to future cash outflows (on an undiscounted basis) as at December 31, 2020, for which no amount has been recognised, for potential extension options of €998 million (2019: €871 million) due to it not being reasonably certain that these leases will be extended.
Capital expenditure authorised and contracted for but not provided for in the accounts amounts to €10,545 million (December 31, 2019: €12,830 million). The majority of capital expenditure commitments are denominated in US dollars, and as such are subject to changes in exchange rates.
The outstanding commitments include €10,485 million for the acquisition of 26 Airbus A320s (from 2021 to 2025), 38 Airbus A321s (from 2021 to 2024), 1 Airbus A330-300 (in 2021), 26 Airbus A350s (from 2021 to 2024), 18 Boeing 777-9s (from 2024 to 2027), 10 Boeing 787-10s (from 2021 to 2024) and 2 Embraer E190s (in 2021). The Group has certain rights to cancel commitments in the event of significant delays to aircraft deliveries caused by the aircraft manufacturers. No such rights had been exercised as at December 31, 2020.
172 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
b Amounts recognised in the Consolidated income statement
the changes to lease payments that arose from such concessions. c Amounts recognised in the Consolidated cash flow statement
The maturity profile of the lease liabilities is disclosed in note 25e.
14 Capital expenditure commitments
d Maturity profile of the lease liabilities.
e Extension options
leases will be extended.
changes in exchange rates.
December 31, 2020.
Amounts expensed as a result of the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities
The Group had total cash outflows for leases of €1,997 million in 2020 (2019: €2,057 million).
at lease commencement whether it is reasonably certain to exercise the extension options.
The Group had total cash inflows associated with sale and leaseback transactions of €898 million (2019: €824 million).
The Group is exposed to future cash outflows (on an undiscounted basis) as at December 31, 2020, for which no amount has been recognised in relation to leases not yet commenced to which the Group is committed of €183 million (2019: €787 million).
The Group has certain leases which contain extension options exercisable by the Group prior to the non-cancellable contract period. Where practicable, the Group seeks to include extension options in new leases to provide operational flexibility. The Group assesses
The Group is exposed to future cash outflows (on an undiscounted basis) as at December 31, 2020, for which no amount has been recognised, for potential extension options of €998 million (2019: €871 million) due to it not being reasonably certain that these
Capital expenditure authorised and contracted for but not provided for in the accounts amounts to €10,545 million (December 31, 2019: €12,830 million). The majority of capital expenditure commitments are denominated in US dollars, and as such are subject to
The outstanding commitments include €10,485 million for the acquisition of 26 Airbus A320s (from 2021 to 2025), 38 Airbus A321s (from 2021 to 2024), 1 Airbus A330-300 (in 2021), 26 Airbus A350s (from 2021 to 2024), 18 Boeing 777-9s (from 2024 to 2027), 10 Boeing 787-10s (from 2021 to 2024) and 2 Embraer E190s (in 2021). The Group has certain rights to cancel commitments in the event of significant delays to aircraft deliveries caused by the aircraft manufacturers. No such rights had been exercised as at
Amounts not included in the measurement of lease liabilities
€ million 2020 2019
Variable lease payments 1 28 Expenses relating to short-term leases 42 74 Expenses relating to leases of low-value assets, excluding short-term leases of low value assets – 1
Interest expense on lease liabilities 442 489 Gain arising from sale and leaseback transactions (10) (1) Depreciation charge for the year 1,153 1,153 Impairment charge for the year 161 – During 2020 the IASB issued 'COVID-19 related rent concessions – amendment to IFRS 16 Leases' to provide a practical expedient to lessees from applying IFRS 16 guidance on lease modification accounting for rent concessions for those lease modifications arising as a direct result of COVID-19. The Group has applied this practical expedient to all such modifications in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The net impact on the Income statement for 2020 has been a credit of €2 million reflecting
13 Leases continued
168
| Customer loyalty |
Landing | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Goodwill | Brand | programmes | rights1 | Software | Other | Total |
| Cost | |||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | 595 | 451 | 253 | 1,559 | 1,116 | 211 | 4,185 |
| Additions | – | – | – | 5 | 232 | 120 | 357 |
| Disposals | – | – | – | – | (28) | (55) | (83) |
| Exchange movements | 3 | – | – | 52 | 56 | 6 | 117 |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | 598 | 451 | 253 | 1,616 | 1,376 | 282 | 4,576 |
| Additions | – | – | – | – | 141 | 51 | 192 |
| Disposals | – | – | – | – | (18) | (121) | (139) |
| Reclassifications | – | – | – | – | 43 | (46) | (3) |
| Exchange movements | (5) | – | – | (61) | (68) | (5) | (139) |
| December 31, 2020 | 593 | 451 | 253 | 1,555 | 1,474 | 161 | 4,487 |
| Amortisation and impairment | |||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | 249 | – | – | 106 | 577 | 55 | 987 |
| Amortisation charge for the year | – | – | – | 6 | 131 | 5 | 142 |
| Disposals | – | – | – | – | (28) | – | (28) |
| Exchange movements | – | – | – | 3 | 30 | – | 33 |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | 249 | – | – | 115 | 710 | 60 | 1,134 |
| Amortisation charge for the year | – | – | – | 6 | 151 | 4 | 161 |
| Impairment charge for the year | – | – | – | 15 | 20 | – | 35 |
| Disposals | – | – | – | – | (7) | – | (7) |
| Exchange movements | – | – | – | (4) | (38) | (2) | (44) |
| December 31, 2020 | 249 | – | – | 132 | 836 | 62 | 1,279 |
| Net book values | |||||||
| December 31, 2020 | 344 | 451 | 253 | 1,423 | 638 | 99 | 3,208 |
| December 31, 2019 | 349 | 451 | 253 | 1,501 | 666 | 222 | 3,442 |
1 The net book value includes non-UK and non-EU based landing rights of €88 million (2019: €94 million) that have a definite life. The remaining life of these landing rights is 15 years.
The carrying amounts of intangible assets with indefinite life and goodwill allocated to cash generating units (CGUs) of the Group are:
| Landing | Customer loyalty |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million 2020 |
Goodwill | rights | Brand | programmes | Total |
| Iberia | |||||
| January 1 and December 31, 2020 | – | 423 | 306 | – | 729 |
| British Airways | |||||
| January 1, 2020 | 49 | 816 | – | – | 865 |
| Exchange movements | (5) | (53) | – | – | (58) |
| December 31, 2020 | 44 | 763 | – | – | 807 |
| Vueling | |||||
| January 1 and December 31, 2020 | 28 | 94 | 35 | – | 157 |
| Aer Lingus | |||||
| January 1 and December 31, 2020 | 272 | 62 | 110 | – | 444 |
| IAG Loyalty | |||||
| January 1 and December 31, 2020 | – | – | – | 253 | 253 |
| Other CGUs | |||||
| January 1, 2020 | – | 12 | – | – | 12 |
| Impairment charge for the year | – | (12) | – | – | (12) |
| December 31, 2020 | – | – | – | – | – |
| December 31, 2020 | 344 | 1,342 | 451 | 253 | 2,390 |
169
www.iairgroup.com 173
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
| Customer | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Goodwill | Landing rights |
Brand | loyalty programmes |
Total |
| 2019 | |||||
| Iberia | |||||
| January 1 and December 31, 2019 | – | 423 | 306 | – | 729 |
| British Airways | |||||
| January 1, 2019 | 46 | 767 | – | – | 813 |
| Exchange movements | 3 | 49 | – | – | 52 |
| December 31, 2019 | 49 | 816 | – | – | 865 |
| Vueling | |||||
| January 1, 2019 | 28 | 89 | 35 | – | 152 |
| Additions | – | 5 | – | – | 5 |
| December 31, 2019 | 28 | 94 | 35 | – | 157 |
| Aer Lingus | |||||
| January 1 and December 31, 2019 | 272 | 62 | 110 | – | 444 |
| IAG Loyalty | |||||
| January 1 and December 31, 2019 | – | – | – | 253 | 253 |
| Other CGUs | |||||
| January 1 and December 31, 2019 | – | 12 | – | – | 12 |
| December 31, 2019 | 349 | 1,407 | 451 | 253 | 2,460 |
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
15 Intangible assets and impairment review continued
The recoverable amounts of Group's CGUs have been measured based on their value-in-use, which utilises a weighted average multi-scenario discounted cash flow model. The details of these scenarios are given in the going concern section of note 2, with a weighting of 70 per cent to the base case and 30 per cent to the downside case. Cash flow projections are based on the business plans approved by the relevant operating companies covering a three-year period. Cash flows extrapolated beyond the three-year period are projected to increase based on long-term growth rates. Cash flow projections are discounted using each CGU's pre-tax discount rate.
Annually the relevant operating companies prepare and approve three-year business plans, and the Board approved the Group three-year business plan in the fourth quarter of the year. The business plan cash flows used in the value-in-use calculations reflect the Group's estimated climate related impacts that are foreseeable and reflect all restructuring of the business where relevant that has been approved by the Board and which can be executed by Management under existing agreements.
The value-in-use calculations for each CGU reflected the increased risks arising from COVID-19, including updated projected cash flows for the decreased activity from 2021 through to the end of 2023 and an increase in the pre-tax discount rates to incorporate increased equity market volatility. For each of the Group's CGUs the key assumptions used in the value-in-use calculations are as follows:
| 2020 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| British | |||||||
| Per cent | Airways | Iberia | Vueling | Aer Lingus | IAG Loyalty | ||
| Operating margin | (20)-16 | (12)-11 | (22)-12 | (14)-13 | 25-27 | ||
| ASK as a proportion of 20191 | 45-95 | 49-98 | 46-107 | 40-100 | n/a | ||
| Long-term growth rate | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.0 | ||
| Pre-tax discount rate | 11.2 | 11.6 | 11.5 | 10.4 | 10.3 |
1 In prior periods the Group applied the average ASK growth per annum as a key assumption. Given the impact of COVID-19, the Group has presented ASKs as a proportion of the level of ASKs achieved in 2019, prior to the application of the terminal value calculation.
| 2019 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per cent | British Airways |
Iberia | Vueling | Aer Lingus | IAG Loyalty |
| Operating margin | 15 | 10-15 | 10-14 | 13-15 | 20-23 |
| Average ASK growth per annum | 2-4 | 3 | 1-5 | 2-11 | n/a |
| Long-term growth rate | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Pre-tax discount rate | 8.0 | 9.1 | 9.4 | 8.0 | 8.5 |
174 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
| Jet fuel price (\$ per MT) | Within 12 months |
1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3 years and thereafter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 373 | 420 | 449 | 449 |
| 2019 | 639 | 612 | 598 | 598 |
Forecast ASKs reflect the range of ASKs as a percentage of the 2019 actual ASKs over the forecast period, based on planned network growth and taking into account Management's expectation of the market.
The long-term growth rate is calculated for each CGU based on the forecast weighted average exposure in each primary market using gross domestic product (GDP) (source: Oxford Economics). The airlines' network plans are reviewed annually as part of the Business plan and reflect Management's plans in response to specific market risk or opportunity.
Pre-tax discount rates represent the current market assessment of the risks specific to each CGU, taking into consideration the time value of money and underlying risks of its primary market. The discount rate calculation is based on the circumstances of the airline industry, the Group and the CGU. It is derived from the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). The WACC takes into consideration both debt and equity available to airlines. The cost of equity is derived from the expected return on investment by airline investors and the cost of debt is derived from both market data and the Group's existing debt structure. CGU specific risk is incorporated by applying individual beta factors which are evaluated annually based on available market data. The pre-tax discount rate reflects the timing of future tax flows.
Jet fuel price assumptions are derived from forward price curves in the fourth quarter of each year and sourced externally. The cash flow forecasts reflect these price increases after taking into consideration of level of fuel derivatives and their associated prices that the Group has in place.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
2019 Iberia
Vueling
Aer Lingus
IAG Loyalty
Other CGUs
discount rate.
Key assumptions
Per cent
Per cent
calculations are as follows:
Basis for calculating recoverable amount
British Airways
15 Intangible assets and impairment review continued
€ million Goodwill
Landing
January 1 and December 31, 2019 – 423 306 – 729
January 1, 2019 46 767 – – 813 Exchange movements 3 49 – – 52 December 31, 2019 49 816 – – 865
January 1, 2019 28 89 35 – 152 Additions – 5 – – 5 December 31, 2019 28 94 35 – 157
January 1 and December 31, 2019 272 62 110 – 444
January 1 and December 31, 2019 – – – 253 253
January 1 and December 31, 2019 – 12 – – 12
December 31, 2019 349 1,407 451 253 2,460
The recoverable amounts of Group's CGUs have been measured based on their value-in-use, which utilises a weighted average multi-scenario discounted cash flow model. The details of these scenarios are given in the going concern section of note 2, with a weighting of 70 per cent to the base case and 30 per cent to the downside case. Cash flow projections are based on the business plans approved by the relevant operating companies covering a three-year period. Cash flows extrapolated beyond the three-year period are projected to increase based on long-term growth rates. Cash flow projections are discounted using each CGU's pre-tax
Annually the relevant operating companies prepare and approve three-year business plans, and the Board approved the Group three-year business plan in the fourth quarter of the year. The business plan cash flows used in the value-in-use calculations reflect the Group's estimated climate related impacts that are foreseeable and reflect all restructuring of the business where relevant that
The value-in-use calculations for each CGU reflected the increased risks arising from COVID-19, including updated projected cash flows for the decreased activity from 2021 through to the end of 2023 and an increase in the pre-tax discount rates to incorporate increased equity market volatility. For each of the Group's CGUs the key assumptions used in the value-in-use
Operating margin (20)-16 (12)-11 (22)-12 (14)-13 25-27 ASK as a proportion of 20191 45-95 49-98 46-107 40-100 n/a Long-term growth rate 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.9 2.0 Pre-tax discount rate 11.2 11.6 11.5 10.4 10.3 1 In prior periods the Group applied the average ASK growth per annum as a key assumption. Given the impact of COVID-19, the Group has presented
Operating margin 15 10-15 10-14 13-15 20-23 Average ASK growth per annum 2-4 3 1-5 2-11 n/a Long-term growth rate 2.2 1.8 1.5 1.8 1.8 Pre-tax discount rate 8.0 9.1 9.4 8.0 8.5
British
British
has been approved by the Board and which can be executed by Management under existing agreements.
ASKs as a proportion of the level of ASKs achieved in 2019, prior to the application of the terminal value calculation.
rights Brand
Customer loyalty programmes Total
2020
2019
Airways Iberia Vueling Aer Lingus IAG Loyalty
Airways Iberia Vueling Aer Lingus IAG Loyalty
170
At December 31, 2020 Management reviewed the recoverable amount of each of the CGUs and concluded the recoverable amounts exceeded the carrying values.
Reasonable possible changes in key assumptions, both individually and in combination, have been considered for each CGU, where applicable, which include reducing the operating margin by 2 per cent in each year, ASKs by 5 per cent in each year, long-term growth rates in the terminal value calculation to zero, increasing pre-tax discount rates by 2.5 percentage points, changing the weighting of the base case and the downside case to be 100 per cent weighted towards the downside case, and increasing the fuel price by 40 per cent. These sensitivities, in part, incorporate the potential impact that climate related risks would have on the Group.
For the British Airways, Iberia and Aer Lingus CGUs, while the recoverable amounts are estimated to exceed the carrying amounts by €8,702 million, €1,701 million and €1,348 million, respectively, the recoverable amounts would be below the carrying amounts when applying reasonable possible changes in assumptions in each of the following scenarios:
For the remainder of the reasonable possible changes in key assumptions applied to the British Airways, Iberia and Aer Lingus CGUs and for all the reasonable possible changes in key assumptions applied to the remaining CGUs, no impairment arises.
For impairment charges recognised in relation to landing rights and fleet assets stood down permanently at December 31, 2020, refer to note 3 and the Alternative performance measures section.
The Group's subsidiaries at December 31, 2020 are listed in the Group investments section.
All subsidiary undertakings are included in the consolidation. The proportion of the voting rights in the subsidiary undertakings held directly do not differ from the proportion of ordinary shares held. There have been no significant changes in ownership interests of subsidiaries during the year.
The total non-controlling interest at December 31, 2020 is €6 million (2019: €6 million).
British Airways Employee Benefit Trustee (Jersey) Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of British Airways, governs the British Airways Plc Employee Share Ownership Trust (the Trust). The Trust is not a legal subsidiary of IAG; however, it is consolidated within the Group results.
171
www.iairgroup.com 175
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
16 Investments continued
The share of assets, liabilities, revenue and profit of the Group's associates and joint ventures, which are included in the Group's financial statements, are as follows:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 73 | 122 |
| Total liabilities | (50) | (92) |
| Revenue | 22 | 112 |
| Profit for the year | 1 | 6 |
The detail of the movement in Investment in associates and joint ventures is shown as follows:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| At beginning of year | 31 | 31 |
| Share of retained profits | 1 | 6 |
| Dividends received | (3) | (5) |
| Exchange movements | – | (1) |
| 29 | 31 |
At December 31, 2020 there are no restrictions on the ability of associates or joint ventures to transfer funds to the parent and there are no related contingent liabilities.
At both December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 the investment in Sociedad Conjunta para la Emisión y Gestión de Medios de Pago EFC, S.A. exceeded 50 per cent ownership by the Group (50.5 per cent). The entity is treated as a joint venture as decisions regarding its strategy and operations require the unanimous consent of the parties who share control, including IAG.
Other equity investments include the following:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Listed securities | ||
| Comair Limited | – | 10 |
| Unlisted securities | 29 | 72 |
| 29 | 82 |
The credit relating to other equity investments was €1 million (2019: €3 million).
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Amounts falling due within one year | ||
| Trade receivables | 682 | 2,368 |
| Provision for expected credit loss | (125) | (113) |
| Net trade receivables | 557 | 2,255 |
| Prepayments and accrued income | 596 | 1,040 |
| Other non-trade receivables | 196 | 274 |
| 1,349 | 3,569 | |
| Amounts falling due after one year | ||
| Prepayments and accrued income | 226 | 258 |
| Other non-trade receivables | 2 | 15 |
| 228 | 273 |
Movements in the provision for expected credit loss were as follows:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| At beginning of year | 113 | 98 |
| Provided during the year | 18 | 22 |
| Released during the year | (2) | (1) |
| Receivables written off during the year | (1) | (8) |
| Exchange movements | (3) | 2 |
| 125 | 113 |
Trade receivables are generally non-interest-bearing and on 30 days terms (2019: 30 days).
176 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
The credit risk exposure on the Group's trade receivables is set out below:
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
b Investments in associates and joint ventures
The share of assets, liabilities, revenue and profit of the Group's associates and joint ventures, which are included in the Group's
The detail of the movement in Investment in associates and joint ventures is shown as follows:
The credit relating to other equity investments was €1 million (2019: €3 million).
Movements in the provision for expected credit loss were as follows:
Trade receivables are generally non-interest-bearing and on 30 days terms (2019: 30 days).
€ million 2020 2019 Total assets 73 122 Total liabilities (50) (92) Revenue 22 112 Profit for the year 1 6
€ million 2020 2019 At beginning of year 31 31 Share of retained profits 1 6 Dividends received (3) (5) Exchange movements – (1)
At December 31, 2020 there are no restrictions on the ability of associates or joint ventures to transfer funds to the parent and there
At both December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 the investment in Sociedad Conjunta para la Emisión y Gestión de Medios de Pago EFC, S.A. exceeded 50 per cent ownership by the Group (50.5 per cent). The entity is treated as a joint venture as decisions
€ million 2020 2019
Comair Limited – 10 Unlisted securities 29 72
€ million 2020 2019
Trade receivables 682 2,368 Provision for expected credit loss (125) (113) Net trade receivables 557 2,255 Prepayments and accrued income 596 1,040 Other non-trade receivables 196 274 1,349 3,569
Prepayments and accrued income 226 258 Other non-trade receivables 2 15
€ million 2020 2019 At beginning of year 113 98 Provided during the year 18 22 Released during the year (2) (1) Receivables written off during the year (1) (8) Exchange movements (3) 2
regarding its strategy and operations require the unanimous consent of the parties who share control, including IAG.
29 31
29 82
228 273
125 113
16 Investments continued
financial statements, are as follows:
are no related contingent liabilities.
Listed securities
17 Other equity investments Other equity investments include the following:
18 Trade and other receivables
Amounts falling due within one year
Amounts falling due after one year
172
| € million | Current | <30 days | 30-180 days | 180-365 days | > 365 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 345 | 114 | 88 | 11 | 124 |
| Expected credit loss rate | 0.9% | 0.2% | 1.1% | 72.7% | 91.1% |
| Provision for expected credit loss | 3 | - | 1 | 8 | 113 |
| December 31, 2019 | |||||
| € million | Current | <30 days | 30-180 days | 180-365 days | > 365 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 1,411 | 198 | 338 | 78 | 343 |
| Expected credit loss rate | 0.03% | 0.2% | 0.9% | 9.0% | 29.7% |
| Provision for expected credit loss | 1 | - | 3 | 7 | 102 |
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand | 1,882 | 2,320 |
| Short-term deposits maturing within three months | 3,892 | 1,742 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 5,774 | 4,062 |
| Current interest-bearing deposits maturing after three months | 143 | 2,621 |
| Cash, cash equivalents and other interest-bearing deposits | 5,917 | 6,683 |
Cash at bank is primarily held in AAA money market funds and bank deposits. Short-term deposits are for periods up to three months and earn interest based on the floating deposit rates.
At December 31, 2020 the Group had no outstanding bank overdrafts (2019: nil).
Current interest-bearing deposits are made for periods in excess of three months with maturity typically within 12 months and earn interest based on the market rates available at the time the deposit was made.
At December 31, 2020 Aer Lingus held €38 million of restricted cash (2019: €41 million) within interest-bearing deposits maturing after more than three months to be used for employee-related obligations.
Movements in net debt were as follows:
| € million | Balance at January 1, 2020 |
Cash flows | Exchange movements |
New leases and modifications |
Non-cash | Balance at December 31, 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank, other loans, asset financed liabilities and other financing liabilities |
3,208 | 2,589 | (227) | – | 85 | 5,655 |
| Lease liabilities | 11,046 | (1,536) | (726) | 1,179 | 61 | 10,024 |
| Liabilities from financing activities | 14,254 | 1,053 | (953) | 1,179 | 146 | 15,679 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | (4,062) | (1,940) | 228 | – | – | (5,774) |
| Current interest-bearing deposits | (2,621) | 2,366 | 112 | – | – | (143) |
| 7,571 | 1,479 | (613) | 1,179 | 146 | 9,762 |
| € million | Balance at January 1, 2019 |
Cash flows | Exchange movements |
New leases and modifications |
Non-cash | Balance at December 31, 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank, other loans and asset financed liabilities | 1,581 | 1,556 | (12) | – | 83 | 3,208 |
| Lease liabilities | 11,123 | (1,507) | 176 | 1,199 | 55 | 11,046 |
| Liabilities from financing activities | 12,704 | 49 | 164 | 1,199 | 138 | 14,254 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | (3,837) | (85) | (140) | – | – | (4,062) |
| Current interest-bearing deposits | (2,437) | (103) | (81) | – | – | (2,621) |
| 6,430 | (139) | (57) | 1,199 | 138 | 7,571 |
173
www.iairgroup.com 177
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade creditors1 | 1,609 | 2,311 |
| Other creditors | 679 | 1,099 |
| Other taxation and social security | 149 | 271 |
| Accruals and deferred income | 373 | 663 |
| 2,810 | 4,344 |
1 Trade creditors includes €55 million (2019: €nil) due to suppliers that have signed up to supply chain financing programmes offered by a number of partner financial institutions. Under these programmes either or both: (i) the suppliers can elect on an invoice-by-invoice basis to receive a discounted early payment from the partner financial institutions rather than being paid in line with the agreed payment terms; and/or (ii) the Group elects on an invoice-by-invoice basis for the partner financial institution to pay the supplier in line with the agreed payment terms and the Group enters into payment terms with the partner financial institution of up to 120 days with interest incurred at rates between 2.5 per cent and 3.5 per cent.
The Group assesses the arrangement against indicators to assess if liabilities which suppliers have transferred to the partner financial institutions under the supplier financing programmes continue to meet the definition of trade creditors or should be classified as borrowings. The cash flows arising from such arrangements are reported within cash flows from operating activities or within cash flows from financing activities, in the Consolidated cash flow statement, depending on whether the associated liabilities meet the definition of trade creditors or as borrowings.
At December 31, 2020 the liabilities met the criteria of Trade creditors and are excluded from the Net debt table in note 19a.
| Days | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Average payment days for payment to suppliers | 43 | 33 |
| Ratio of transactions paid | 36 | 32 |
| Ratio of transactions outstanding for payment | 135 | 43 |
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
| Total payments made | 3,694 | 7,165 |
| Total payments outstanding | 293 | 114 |
| Customer loyalty |
Sales in advance of |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| € million | programmes | carriage | Total |
| Balance at January 1, 2020 | 1,917 | 3,569 | 5,486 |
| Changes in estimates | – | 291 | 291 |
| Revenue recognised in the income statement1, 2 | (260) | (6,032) | (6,292) |
| Loyalty points issued to customers | 361 | 8 | 369 |
| Cash received from customers3, 4 | 850 | 4,714 | 5,564 |
| Exchange movements | (143) | (145) | (288) |
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | 2,725 | 2,405 | 5,130 |
| Analysis: | |||
| Current | 2,252 | 2,405 | 4,657 |
| Non-current | 473 | – | 473 |
| 2,725 | 2,405 | 5,130 |
| Customer loyalty |
Sales in advance of |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| € million | programmes | carriage | Total |
| Balance at January 1, 2019 | 1,769 | 3,066 | 4,835 |
| Changes in estimates | 6 | (20) | (14) |
| Revenue recognised in the income statement1, 2 | (805) | (22,691) | (23,496) |
| Loyalty points issued to customers | 844 | 47 | 891 |
| Cash received from customers4 | – | 23,029 | 23,029 |
| Exchange movements | 103 | 138 | 241 |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | 1,917 | 3,569 | 5,486 |
1 Where the Group acts as an agent in the provision of redemption products and services to customers through loyalty programmes, or in the
(at January 1, 2019: €3,361 million). 3 Included within cash received from customers is an amount of €830 million received from American Express upon signing of the multi-year
commercial partnership renewal with IAG Loyalty and unwinds over the duration of the contract term as the associated performance obligations are fulfilled.
4 Cash received from customers is net of refunds.
178 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
provision of interline flights to passengers, revenue is recognised in the Income statement net of the related costs. 2 Included within revenue recognised in the Income statement is an amount of €2,006 million previously held as deferred revenue at January 1, 2020
Deferred revenue relating to customer loyalty programmes consists primarily of revenue allocated to performance obligations associated with Avios. Avios are issued by the Group's airlines through their loyalty programmes, or are sold to third parties such as credit card providers, who issue them as part of their loyalty programme. Avios do not have an expiry date and can be redeemed at any time in the future. Revenue may therefore be recognised at any time in the future.
Deferred revenue in respect of sales in advance of carriage consists of revenue allocated to airline tickets to be used for future travel. Typically these tickets expire within 12 months after the planned travel date, if they are not used within that time period, however, with the significant disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Group has extended the expiry period up to 24 months after the planned travel date, depending on the operating company.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
20 Trade and other payables
Average payment days to suppliers – Spanish Group companies
21 Deferred revenue on ticket sales
€ million
Analysis:
€ million
are fulfilled.
(at January 1, 2019: €3,361 million).
4 Cash received from customers is net of refunds.
174
€ million 2020 2019 Trade creditors1 1,609 2,311 Other creditors 679 1,099 Other taxation and social security 149 271 Accruals and deferred income 373 663
1 Trade creditors includes €55 million (2019: €nil) due to suppliers that have signed up to supply chain financing programmes offered by a number of partner financial institutions. Under these programmes either or both: (i) the suppliers can elect on an invoice-by-invoice basis to receive a discounted early payment from the partner financial institutions rather than being paid in line with the agreed payment terms; and/or (ii) the Group elects on an invoice-by-invoice basis for the partner financial institution to pay the supplier in line with the agreed payment terms and the Group enters into payment terms with the partner financial institution of up to 120 days with interest incurred at rates between 2.5 per cent and 3.5 per cent. The Group assesses the arrangement against indicators to assess if liabilities which suppliers have transferred to the partner financial institutions under the supplier financing programmes continue to meet the definition of trade creditors or should be classified as borrowings. The cash flows arising from such arrangements are reported within cash flows from operating activities or within cash flows from financing activities, in the Consolidated cash flow statement, depending on whether the associated liabilities meet the definition of trade creditors or as borrowings. At December 31, 2020 the liabilities met the criteria of Trade creditors and are excluded from the Net debt table in note 19a.
Days 2020 2019 Average payment days for payment to suppliers 43 33 Ratio of transactions paid 36 32 Ratio of transactions outstanding for payment 135 43
€ million 2020 2019 Total payments made 3,694 7,165 Total payments outstanding 293 114
Balance at January 1, 2020 1,917 3,569 5,486 Changes in estimates – 291 291 Revenue recognised in the income statement1, 2 (260) (6,032) (6,292) Loyalty points issued to customers 361 8 369 Cash received from customers3, 4 850 4,714 5,564 Exchange movements (143) (145) (288) Balance at December 31, 2020 2,725 2,405 5,130
Current 2,252 2,405 4,657 Non-current 473 – 473
Balance at January 1, 2019 1,769 3,066 4,835 Changes in estimates 6 (20) (14) Revenue recognised in the income statement1, 2 (805) (22,691) (23,496) Loyalty points issued to customers 844 47 891 Cash received from customers4 – 23,029 23,029 Exchange movements 103 138 241 Balance at December 31, 2019 1,917 3,569 5,486 1 Where the Group acts as an agent in the provision of redemption products and services to customers through loyalty programmes, or in the
2 Included within revenue recognised in the Income statement is an amount of €2,006 million previously held as deferred revenue at January 1, 2020
3 Included within cash received from customers is an amount of €830 million received from American Express upon signing of the multi-year commercial partnership renewal with IAG Loyalty and unwinds over the duration of the contract term as the associated performance obligations
provision of interline flights to passengers, revenue is recognised in the Income statement net of the related costs.
2,810 4,344
Customer loyalty programmes
Customer loyalty programmes
Sales in advance of
2,725 2,405 5,130
Sales in advance of
carriage Total
carriage Total
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current trade creditors | 49 | 6 |
| Accruals and deferred income | 91 | 65 |
| 140 | 71 |
| a Current |
||
|---|---|---|
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
| Bank and other loans | 90 | 75 |
| Bank and other loans less than 12 months1 | 329 | – |
| Asset financed liabilities | 139 | 74 |
| Other financing liabilities2 | 97 | – |
| Lease liabilities | 1,560 | 1,694 |
| Interest-bearing borrowings | 2,215 | 1,843 |
1 Bank and other loans less than 12 months represents borrowings with a term on inception of less than 12 months in duration.
2 Other financing liabilities include sale and repurchase agreements entered into during the course of 2020 with regard to emission allowances and represents the amount the Group is expected to repurchase during the course of 2021.
| b Non-current |
||
|---|---|---|
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
| Bank and other loans | 2,950 | 1,879 |
| Asset financed liabilities | 2,050 | 1,180 |
| Lease liabilities | 8,464 | 9,352 |
| Interest-bearing borrowings | 13,464 | 12,411 |
Banks and other loans are repayable up to the year 2027. Long-term borrowings of the Group amounting to €2,412 million (2019: €1,520 million) are secured on owned fleet assets with a net book value of €2,794 million (2019: €1,576 million) (note 12). Asset financing liabilities are all secured on the associated aircraft or property, plant and equipment.
On April 12, 2020, British Airways availed itself of the Coronavirus Corporate Finance Facility, issuing commercial paper to the Government of the United Kingdom of €328 million (£298 million) and repayable in April 2021 for a principal value of £300 million.
On May 1, 2020, Iberia and Vueling entered into floating rate syndicated financing agreements backed by Spain's ICO for €750 million and €260 million, respectively. The facilities are amortising from April 30, 2023 with maturity in 2025.
On May 19, 2020, British Airways entered into a syndicated mortgage loan of €639 million (\$750 million) secured on specific aircraft. The loan was repaid in full on December 17, 2020.
On June 10, 2020, Iberia entered into a mortgage loan of €194 million (\$228 million) secured on specific aircraft. The loan was repaid in full on December 22, 2020.
On December 23, 2020, Aer Lingus entered into a floating rate financing agreement with the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) for €75 million. The facility is repayable in 2023.
In July 2019, two senior unsecured bonds were issued by the Group for an aggregate principal amount of €1 billion; €500 million fixed rate 0.50 per cent due in 2023, and €500 million fixed rate 1.50 per cent due in 2027.
175
www.iairgroup.com 179
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
During 2019 the Group early redeemed all of the €500 million 0.25 per cent convertible bonds due in 2020.
In November 2020, the Group entered into an asset-financing structure, under which nine aircraft were sold and leased back by December 31, 2020, with a further five aircraft expected to be sold and leased back during 2021. These transactions mature between 2028 and 2032. This arrangement was transacted through an unconsolidated structured entity, which in turn issued the British Airways Pass Through Certificates, Series 2020-1, commonly referred to as Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates (EETCs). Accordingly as at December 31, 2020, the Group recognised €472 million of Asset financed liabilities with a further €351 million expected to arise during the aforementioned sale and lease backs during 2021.
In the third quarter of 2019, the Group entered into an asset-financing structure, under which eight aircraft were sold and leased back, during the course of 2019 and 2020, with the transactions maturing between 2029 and 2034. This arrangement was transacted through an unconsolidated structured entity, which in turn issued the British Airways Pass Through Certificates, Series 2019-1. In doing so the Group recognised €725 million of Asset financed liabilities.
As at December 31, 2020, Asset financed liabilities include cumulative amounts of €1,312 million (2019: €416 million) associated with transactions with unconsolidated structured entities having issued EETCs.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
23 Long-term borrowings continued
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing long-term borrowings | 13,464 | 12,411 |
| Bank and other loans less than 12 months | 329 | – |
| Current portion of long-term borrowings | 1,886 | 1,843 |
| Interest-bearing long-term borrowings | 15,679 | 14,254 |
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Floating rate ICO guaranteed loans1 | 1,009 | – |
| €500 million fixed rate 0.50 per cent bond 20232 | 498 | 497 |
| €500 million fixed rate 1.50 per cent bond 20272 | 497 | 496 |
| €500 million fixed rate 0.625 per cent convertible bond 20223 | 480 | 470 |
| CCFF pound sterling commercial paper4 | 329 | – |
| Floating rate euro mortgage loans secured on aircraft5 | 198 | 226 |
| Fixed rate unsecured bonds6 | 137 | 136 |
| Fixed rate unsecured US dollar mortgage loan7 | 97 | 71 |
| ISIF facility8 | 75 | – |
| Fixed rate Chinese yuan mortgage loans secured on aircraft9 | 25 | 40 |
| Fixed rate unsecured euro loans with the Spanish State (Department of Industry)10 | 24 | 18 |
| 3,369 | 1,954 | |
| Less current instalments due on bank and other loans | (419) | (75) |
| 2,950 | 1,879 |
1 On April 30, 2020, Iberia and Vueling entered into floating rate syndicated financing agreements of €750 million and €260 million respectively. The loans are repayable between 2023 and 2025. The ICO in Spain guarantees 70 per cent of the value of loans. The loans contain a number of nonfinancial covenants to protect the position of the banks involved, including restrictions on the upstreaming of cash to the rest of the IAG companies.
2 In July 2019, the Group issued two tranches of senior unsecured bonds for an aggregate principal amount of €1 billion, €500 million due July 4, 2023 and €500 million due July 4, 2027. The bonds bear a fixed rate of interest of 0.5 per cent and 1.5 per cent per annum annually payable in arrears, respectively. The bonds were issued at 99.417 per cent and 98.803 per cent of their principal amount, respectively, and, unless previously redeemed or purchased and cancelled, will be redeemed at 100 per cent of their principal amount on their respective maturity dates.
3 Senior unsecured bond convertible into ordinary shares of IAG was issued by the Group in November 2015; €500 million fixed rate 0.625 per cent raising net proceeds of €494 million and due in 2022. The Group holds an option to redeem the convertible bond at its principal amount, together with accrued interest, no earlier than two years prior to the final maturity date. The bond contains dividend protection and a total of 40,306,653 options related to the bond were outstanding at December 31, 2020.
4 On April 12, 2020, British Airways availed itself of the Coronavirus Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF) implemented by the Government of the United Kingdom. Under the CCFF, British Airways issued commercial paper to the government of the United Kingdom of €328 million (£298 million). This loan is repayable in April 2021.
5 Floating rate euro mortgage loans are secured on specific aircraft assets of the Group and bear interest of between 0.04 and 1.01 per cent. The loans are repayable between 2024 and 2027.
6 Total of €200 million fixed rate unsecured bonds between 3.5 to 3.75 per cent coupon repayable between 2022 and 2027.
7 Fixed rate unsecured US dollar mortgage loan bearing interest between 1.38 to 2.86 per cent. The loan is repayable between 2023 and 2026. 8 On December 23, 2020, Aer Lingus entered into a floating rate financing agreement with the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) for €75 million. The facility is repayable in 2023.
9 Fixed rate Chinese yuan mortgage loans are secured on specific aircraft assets of the Group and bear interest of 5.20 per cent. The loans are repayable in 2022.
10 Fixed rate unsecured euro loans with the Spanish State (Department of Industry) bear interest of between nil and 5.68 per cent and are repayable between 2021 and 2028.
180 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
| e Total loans, lease liabilities, other financing liabilities and asset financed liabilities |
||
|---|---|---|
| Million | 2020 | 2019 |
| Loans | ||
| Bank: | ||
| US dollar | \$121 | \$79 |
| Pound sterling | £299 | £- |
| Euro | €1,303 | €380 |
| Chinese yuan | CNY 201 | CNY 314 |
| €1,756 | €491 | |
| Fixed rate bonds: | ||
| Euro | €1,613 | €1,463 |
| €1,613 | €1,463 | |
| Asset financed liabilities | ||
| US dollar | \$2,080 | \$996 |
| Euro | €448 | €319 |
| Japanese yen | ¥4,883 | ¥4,867 |
| €2,189 | €1,254 | |
| Other financing liabilities | ||
| Euro | €97 | €- |
| €97 | €- | |
| Lease liabilities | ||
| US dollar | \$8,436 | \$8,408 |
| Euro | €1,858 | €2,142 |
| Japanese yen | ¥74,734 | ¥77,984 |
| Pound sterling | £608 | £597 |
| €10,024 | €11,046 | |
| Total interest-bearing borrowings | €15,679 | €14,254 |
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
c Total borrowings
d Bank and other loans
loan is repayable in April 2021.
The facility is repayable in 2023.
repayable in 2022.
between 2021 and 2028.
are repayable between 2024 and 2027.
23 Long-term borrowings continued
expected to arise during the aforementioned sale and lease backs during 2021.
2019-1. In doing so the Group recognised €725 million of Asset financed liabilities.
transactions with unconsolidated structured entities having issued EETCs.
options related to the bond were outstanding at December 31, 2020.
In November 2020, the Group entered into an asset-financing structure, under which nine aircraft were sold and leased back by December 31, 2020, with a further five aircraft expected to be sold and leased back during 2021. These transactions mature between 2028 and 2032. This arrangement was transacted through an unconsolidated structured entity, which in turn issued the British Airways Pass Through Certificates, Series 2020-1, commonly referred to as Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates (EETCs). Accordingly as at December 31, 2020, the Group recognised €472 million of Asset financed liabilities with a further €351 million
In the third quarter of 2019, the Group entered into an asset-financing structure, under which eight aircraft were sold and leased back, during the course of 2019 and 2020, with the transactions maturing between 2029 and 2034. This arrangement was transacted through an unconsolidated structured entity, which in turn issued the British Airways Pass Through Certificates, Series
As at December 31, 2020, Asset financed liabilities include cumulative amounts of €1,312 million (2019: €416 million) associated with
€ million 2020 2019 Interest-bearing long-term borrowings 13,464 12,411 Bank and other loans less than 12 months 329 – Current portion of long-term borrowings 1,886 1,843 Interest-bearing long-term borrowings 15,679 14,254
€ million 2020 2019 Floating rate ICO guaranteed loans1 1,009 – €500 million fixed rate 0.50 per cent bond 20232 498 497 €500 million fixed rate 1.50 per cent bond 20272 497 496 €500 million fixed rate 0.625 per cent convertible bond 20223 480 470 CCFF pound sterling commercial paper4 329 – Floating rate euro mortgage loans secured on aircraft5 198 226 Fixed rate unsecured bonds6 137 136 Fixed rate unsecured US dollar mortgage loan7 97 71 ISIF facility8 75 – Fixed rate Chinese yuan mortgage loans secured on aircraft9 25 40 Fixed rate unsecured euro loans with the Spanish State (Department of Industry)10 24 18
Less current instalments due on bank and other loans (419) (75)
1 On April 30, 2020, Iberia and Vueling entered into floating rate syndicated financing agreements of €750 million and €260 million respectively. The loans are repayable between 2023 and 2025. The ICO in Spain guarantees 70 per cent of the value of loans. The loans contain a number of nonfinancial covenants to protect the position of the banks involved, including restrictions on the upstreaming of cash to the rest of the IAG companies. 2 In July 2019, the Group issued two tranches of senior unsecured bonds for an aggregate principal amount of €1 billion, €500 million due July 4, 2023 and €500 million due July 4, 2027. The bonds bear a fixed rate of interest of 0.5 per cent and 1.5 per cent per annum annually payable in arrears, respectively. The bonds were issued at 99.417 per cent and 98.803 per cent of their principal amount, respectively, and, unless previously redeemed
3 Senior unsecured bond convertible into ordinary shares of IAG was issued by the Group in November 2015; €500 million fixed rate 0.625 per cent raising net proceeds of €494 million and due in 2022. The Group holds an option to redeem the convertible bond at its principal amount, together with accrued interest, no earlier than two years prior to the final maturity date. The bond contains dividend protection and a total of 40,306,653
4 On April 12, 2020, British Airways availed itself of the Coronavirus Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF) implemented by the Government of the United Kingdom. Under the CCFF, British Airways issued commercial paper to the government of the United Kingdom of €328 million (£298 million). This
5 Floating rate euro mortgage loans are secured on specific aircraft assets of the Group and bear interest of between 0.04 and 1.01 per cent. The loans
7 Fixed rate unsecured US dollar mortgage loan bearing interest between 1.38 to 2.86 per cent. The loan is repayable between 2023 and 2026. 8 On December 23, 2020, Aer Lingus entered into a floating rate financing agreement with the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) for €75 million.
9 Fixed rate Chinese yuan mortgage loans are secured on specific aircraft assets of the Group and bear interest of 5.20 per cent. The loans are
10 Fixed rate unsecured euro loans with the Spanish State (Department of Industry) bear interest of between nil and 5.68 per cent and are repayable
or purchased and cancelled, will be redeemed at 100 per cent of their principal amount on their respective maturity dates.
6 Total of €200 million fixed rate unsecured bonds between 3.5 to 3.75 per cent coupon repayable between 2022 and 2027.
3,369 1,954
2,950 1,879
176
| € million | Restoration and handback provisions |
Restructuring provisions |
Employee leaving indemnities and other employee related provisions |
Legal claims provisions |
Other provisions |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net book value January 1, 2020 | 1,675 | 528 | 664 | 82 | 98 | 3,047 |
| Reclassifications | – | – | – | (22) | – | (22) |
| Provisions recorded during the year | 377 | 320 | 76 | 42 | 31 | 846 |
| Utilised during the year | (213) | (383) | (27) | (9) | (29) | (661) |
| Release of unused amounts | (136) | (27) | – | (7) | (4) | (174) |
| Unwinding of discount | 10 | – | 3 | 1 | – | 14 |
| Exchange differences | (125) | (6) | (2) | (3) | (2) | (138) |
| Net book value December 31, 2020 | 1,588 | 432 | 714 | 84 | 94 | 2,912 |
| Analysis: | ||||||
| Current | 270 | 200 | 62 | 47 | 47 | 626 |
| Non-current | 1,318 | 232 | 652 | 37 | 47 | 2,286 |
| 1,588 | 432 | 714 | 84 | 94 | 2,912 |
177
www.iairgroup.com 181
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
24 Provisions continued
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
The provision for restoration and handback costs is maintained to meet the contractual maintenance and return conditions on aircraft held under lease. The provision also includes an amount relating to leased land and buildings where restoration costs are contractually required at the end of the lease. Such costs are capitalised within ROU assets. The provision is long-term in nature, typically covering the leased asset term, which for aircraft is up to 12 years.
During 2020, as part of certain lease modifications, these pre-existing restoration and handback conditions have been removed and the associated provision released to the Income statement.
Within the amounts included in the additions to this provision is €37 million relating to the recognition of contractual lease provisions, representing the estimation of the additional cost to fulfil the handback conditions associated with the aforementioned leased aircraft that have been permanently stood down and impaired.
Included within the restructuring provision is an amount of €72 million that relates to the voluntary and compulsory redundancies arising in British Airways, Aer Lingus and LEVEL from the restructuring plans related to COVID-19. While the majority of employees affected by these restructuring plans had left the Group as at December 31, 2020, there remains a small portion of employees expected to leave the Group over 2021. Refer to note 3 and the Alternative performance measures section for further information.
In addition, the restructuring provision includes provisions for voluntary redundancies including the collective redundancy programme for Iberia's Transformation Plan implemented prior to 2020, which provides for payments to affected employees until they reach the statutory retirement age. The amount provided for has been determined by an actuarial valuation made by independent actuaries, and was based on the same assumptions as those made to determine the provisions for obligations to flight crew below, with the exception of the discount rate, which in this case was 0.00 per cent. The payments related to this provision will continue over the next eight years.
At December 31, 2020, €428 million of this provision related to collective redundancy programmes (2019: €513 million).
This provision includes employees leaving indemnities relating to staff under various contractual arrangements.
The Group recognises a provision relating to flight crew who, having met certain conditions, have the option of being placed on reserve and retaining their employment relationship until reaching the statutory retirement age, or taking early retirement. The Group is required to remunerate these employees until they reach the statutory retirement age, and an initial provision was recognised based on an actuarial valuation. The provision was reviewed at December 31, 2020 with the use of independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method, based on a discount rate consistent with the iBoxx index of 0.37 per cent and 0.00 per cent (2019: iBoxx index of 0.59 per cent and 0.00 per cent) depending on whether the employees are currently active or not, the PERM/F-2000P mortality tables, and assuming a 1.50 per cent annual increase (2019: 1.50 per cent annual increase) in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). This is mainly a long-term provision. The amount relating to this provision was €654 million at December 31, 2020 (2019: €600 million).
Legal claims provisions include:
The final amount required to pay the remaining claims and fines is subject to uncertainty (note 31).
Reclassifications from legal claims provisions include an amount of €22 million relating to the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018, which following the issue of the penalty notice by the UK Information Commissioner's Office on October 16, 2020 has been reclassified to Other creditors.
Other provisions include a provision for the Emissions Trading Scheme for CO2 emitted on flights within the EU in excess of the EU Emission Allowances granted.
182 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
The Group is exposed to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including fuel price risk, foreign currency risk and interest rate risk), counterparty risk and liquidity risk. Further information on the Group's financial exposure to these risks is disclosed on note 26. The Board approves the key strategic principles and the risk appetite, defining the amount of risk that the Group is prepared to retain. The Group's financial risk management focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise the risk of incremental costs arising from adverse financial markets movements.
The Group Treasury department is responsible for the oversight of the financial risk management. Fuel price fluctuations, euro-US dollar and sterling-US dollar exchange rate volatility represents the largest financial risks facing the Group. Other foreign exchange currencies and interest rate risks are also the subject of the Financial Risk Management. The IAG Audit and Compliance Committee approves the Group hedging profile and delegates to the operating company Risk Committee to agree on the degree of flexibility in applying the approved hedging levels. Each operating company Risk Committee meets at least once a month to review and approve a mandate to place hedging cover in the market including the instruments to be used.
The Group Treasury department provides a bi-annual report on the hedging position to the IAG Management Committee and the Audit and Compliance Committee. The Board reviews the strategy and risk appetite once a year.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
typically covering the leased asset term, which for aircraft is up to 12 years.
leased aircraft that have been permanently stood down and impaired.
Employee leaving indemnities and other employee related provisions
the associated provision released to the Income statement.
24 Provisions continued Restoration and handback provisions
Restructuring provisions
continue over the next eight years.
December 31, 2020 (2019: €600 million).
has been reclassified to Other creditors.
Emission Allowances granted.
additional holiday pay and for age discrimination; and
concerning the Group's passenger and cargo businesses.
Legal claims provisions Legal claims provisions include:
Other provisions
178
The provision for restoration and handback costs is maintained to meet the contractual maintenance and return conditions on aircraft held under lease. The provision also includes an amount relating to leased land and buildings where restoration costs are contractually required at the end of the lease. Such costs are capitalised within ROU assets. The provision is long-term in nature,
Within the amounts included in the additions to this provision is €37 million relating to the recognition of contractual lease provisions, representing the estimation of the additional cost to fulfil the handback conditions associated with the aforementioned
In addition, the restructuring provision includes provisions for voluntary redundancies including the collective redundancy programme for Iberia's Transformation Plan implemented prior to 2020, which provides for payments to affected employees until they reach the statutory retirement age. The amount provided for has been determined by an actuarial valuation made by independent actuaries, and was based on the same assumptions as those made to determine the provisions for obligations to flight crew below, with the exception of the discount rate, which in this case was 0.00 per cent. The payments related to this provision will
At December 31, 2020, €428 million of this provision related to collective redundancy programmes (2019: €513 million).
The Group recognises a provision relating to flight crew who, having met certain conditions, have the option of being placed on reserve and retaining their employment relationship until reaching the statutory retirement age, or taking early retirement. The Group is required to remunerate these employees until they reach the statutory retirement age, and an initial provision was recognised based on an actuarial valuation. The provision was reviewed at December 31, 2020 with the use of independent
actuaries using the projected unit credit method, based on a discount rate consistent with the iBoxx index of 0.37 per cent and 0.00 per cent (2019: iBoxx index of 0.59 per cent and 0.00 per cent) depending on whether the employees are currently active or not, the PERM/F-2000P mortality tables, and assuming a 1.50 per cent annual increase (2019: 1.50 per cent annual increase) in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). This is mainly a long-term provision. The amount relating to this provision was €654 million at
• Amounts for multi-party claims from groups of employees on a number of matters related to its operations, including claims for
• Amounts related to investigations by a number of competition authorities in connection with alleged anti-competitive activity
Reclassifications from legal claims provisions include an amount of €22 million relating to the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018, which following the issue of the penalty notice by the UK Information Commissioner's Office on October 16, 2020
Other provisions include a provision for the Emissions Trading Scheme for CO2 emitted on flights within the EU in excess of the EU
The final amount required to pay the remaining claims and fines is subject to uncertainty (note 31).
This provision includes employees leaving indemnities relating to staff under various contractual arrangements.
During 2020, as part of certain lease modifications, these pre-existing restoration and handback conditions have been removed and
Included within the restructuring provision is an amount of €72 million that relates to the voluntary and compulsory redundancies arising in British Airways, Aer Lingus and LEVEL from the restructuring plans related to COVID-19. While the majority of employees affected by these restructuring plans had left the Group as at December 31, 2020, there remains a small portion of employees expected to leave the Group over 2021. Refer to note 3 and the Alternative performance measures section for further information.
The Group is exposed to fuel price risk. The Group's fuel price risk management strategy aims to provide protection against sudden and significant increases in fuel prices while aiming that the Group is not competitively disadvantaged in the event of a substantial fall in the price. The Group Treasury Policies determine the list of approved over the counter (OTC) derivative instruments that can be contracted with approved counterparties.
The Group strategy is to hedge a proportion of fuel consumption up to three years within the approved hedging profile.
The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of financial instruments to a reasonable possible change in fuel prices, with all other variables held constant, on result before tax and equity:
| 2020 | 2019 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase/(decrease) | Effect on result | Effect on | Increase/(decrease) | Effect on result | Effect on | |
| in fuel price | before tax | equity | in fuel price | before tax | equity | |
| per cent | € million | € million | per cent | € million | € million | |
| 30 | 189 | 525 | 30 | - | 1,774 | |
| (30) | (219) | (664) | (30) | - | (1,824) |
During the year to December 31, 2020, following a substantial fall in the global price of crude oil and associated products, the fair value of such net liability derivative instruments was €778 million at December 31, 2020, representing a loss of €650 million since January 1, 2020, which was recognised in Other comprehensive income. In addition, with the substantial decline in demand for air travel and the grounding of the majority of the fleet during the second quarter of 2020, a significant proportion of the associated hedge relationships were no longer expected to occur and subsequently fuel hedge accounting was discontinued. As a result of this discontinuance, €1,781 million of the losses were reclassified to the Income statement and recognised within Fuel, oil costs and emission costs.
The loss arising from the discontinuance of fuel hedge accounting has been recorded as an exceptional item. Refer to note 3 and the Alternative performance measures section for further details.
The Group presents its consolidated financial statements in euros, has subsidiaries with functional currencies in euro and pound sterling, and conducts business in a number of different countries. Consequently the Group is exposed to currency risk on revenue, purchases and borrowings that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the entity. The currencies in which these transactions are denominated are primarily euro, US dollar and pound sterling. The Group generates a surplus in most currencies in which it does business. The US dollar is an exception as fuel purchases, maintenance expenses and debt repayments denominated in US dollars typically create a deficit.
The Group has a number of strategies to hedge foreign currency risk. The operational US dollar short position is subject to the same governance structure as the fuel hedging strategy set out above. The Group strategy is to hedge a proportion of up to three years within the approved hedging profile.
Each operating company hedges its net balance sheet assets and liabilities in US dollars through a rolling hedging programme using a number of derivative instruments to minimise the profit and loss volatility arising from revaluation of these items into its functional currency. British Airways utilises its euro, Japanese yen and Chinese yuan debt repayments as a hedge of future euro, Japanese yen and Chinese yuan revenues.
179
www.iairgroup.com 183
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of the Group's principal foreign exchange derivative exposure to a reasonable possible change in the US dollar, pound sterling and Japanese yen exchange rates, with all other variables held constant, on result before tax and equity:
25 Financial risk management objectives and policies continued
| Strengthening/ (weakening) in US dollar rate per cent |
Effect on result before tax € million |
Effect on equity € million |
Strengthening/ (weakening) in pound sterling rate per cent |
Effect on result before tax € million |
Effect on equity € million |
Strengthening/ (weakening) in Japanese yen rate per cent |
Effect on result before tax € million |
Effect on equity € million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 10 | 885 | 297 | 10 | 162 | (167) | 10 | (10) | (42) |
| (10) | (931) | (359) | (10) | (161) | 157 | (10) | 10 | 42 | |
| 2019 | 10 | 22 | 388 | 10 | (23) | (178) | 10 | (1) | (58) |
| (10) | – | (365) | (10) | 20 | 171 | (10) | 2 | 58 |
At December 31, 2020, the fair value of foreign currency net liability derivatives instruments was €321 million, representing a loss of €430 million, since January 1, 2020, which was recognised in Other comprehensive income. Similar to the fuel price risk above, a significant proportion of the hedge relationships associated with fuel foreign currency derivatives and revenue foreign currency derivatives were no longer expected to occur and subsequently were discontinued. As a result of this discontinuance, €116 million of the gains associated with the fuel foreign currency derivatives and €56 million of the losses associated with the revenue foreign currency derivatives were reclassified to the Income statement and recognised within Fuel, oil costs and emission costs and within Passenger revenue, respectively.
The gain arising from the discontinuance of foreign currency hedge accounting has been recorded as an exceptional item. Refer to note 3 and the Alternative performance measures section for further details.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
The Group is exposed to changes in interest rates on financial debt, leases, sale and lease backs and on cash deposits.
Interest rate risk on floating rate debt is managed through a list of approved OTC derivative instruments that can be contracted with approved counterparties. After taking into account the impact of these derivatives, 64 per cent of the Group's borrowings were at fixed rates and 36 per cent were at floating rates.
All cash deposits are generally on tenors less than one year. The interest rate is predominantly fixed for the tenor of the deposit.
The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of the Group's interest rate exposure to a reasonable possible change in the US dollar, euro and sterling interest rates, on result before tax and equity:
| Strengthening/ (weakening) in US interest rate Basis points |
Effect on result before tax € million |
Effect on equity € million |
Strengthening/ (weakening) in euro interest rate Basis points |
Effect on result before tax € million |
Effect on equity € million |
Strengthening/ (weakening) in sterling interest rate Basis points |
Effect on result before tax € million |
Effect on equity € million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 50 | – | - | 50 | 9 | (8) | 50 | – | – |
| (50) | – | - | (50) | (9) | 7 | (50) | – | – | |
| 2019 | 50 | – | 19 | 50 | (2) | 16 | 50 | 2 | – |
| (50) | – | (19) | (50) | 2 | (13) | (50) | (2) | – |
For details regarding the Group's management of interest rate benchmark reform, refer to note 25h.
The Group is exposed to the non-performance by its counterparties in respect of financial assets receivable. The Group has policies and procedures to monitor the risk by assigning limits to each counterparty by underlying exposure and by operating company. The underlying exposures are monitored on a daily basis and the overall exposure limit by counterparty is periodically reviewed by using available market information.
The financial assets recognised in the financial statements, net of impairment losses (if any), represent the Group's maximum exposure to credit risk, without taking account any guarantees in place or other credit enhancements.
At December 31, 2020 the Group's credit risk position, allocated by region, in respect of treasury managed cash and derivatives was as follows:
| Mark-to-market of treasury controlled financial instruments allocated by geography |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | 2020 | 2019 | |||
| United Kingdom | 53% | 41% | |||
| Spain | 3% | 3% | |||
| Ireland | 7% | 3% | |||
| Rest of Eurozone | 16% | 30% | |||
| Rest of world | 21% | 23% |
184 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
Strengthening/ (weakening) in US dollar rate per cent
Passenger revenue, respectively.
Strengthening/ (weakening) in US interest rate Basis points
c Interest rate risk
d Counterparty risk
as follows:
using available market information.
were at fixed rates and 36 per cent were at floating rates.
dollar, euro and sterling interest rates, on result before tax and equity:
Effect on result before tax € million
Effect on equity € million
For details regarding the Group's management of interest rate benchmark reform, refer to note 25h.
exposure to credit risk, without taking account any guarantees in place or other credit enhancements.
before tax and equity:
25 Financial risk management objectives and policies continued
Effect on equity € million
Effect on result before tax € million
note 3 and the Alternative performance measures section for further details.
The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of the Group's principal foreign exchange derivative exposure to a reasonable possible change in the US dollar, pound sterling and Japanese yen exchange rates, with all other variables held constant, on result
2020 10 885 297 10 162 (167) 10 (10) (42)
2019 10 22 388 10 (23) (178) 10 (1) (58)
At December 31, 2020, the fair value of foreign currency net liability derivatives instruments was €321 million, representing a loss of €430 million, since January 1, 2020, which was recognised in Other comprehensive income. Similar to the fuel price risk above, a significant proportion of the hedge relationships associated with fuel foreign currency derivatives and revenue foreign currency derivatives were no longer expected to occur and subsequently were discontinued. As a result of this discontinuance, €116 million of the gains associated with the fuel foreign currency derivatives and €56 million of the losses associated with the revenue foreign currency derivatives were reclassified to the Income statement and recognised within Fuel, oil costs and emission costs and within
The gain arising from the discontinuance of foreign currency hedge accounting has been recorded as an exceptional item. Refer to
Interest rate risk on floating rate debt is managed through a list of approved OTC derivative instruments that can be contracted with approved counterparties. After taking into account the impact of these derivatives, 64 per cent of the Group's borrowings
All cash deposits are generally on tenors less than one year. The interest rate is predominantly fixed for the tenor of the deposit. The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of the Group's interest rate exposure to a reasonable possible change in the US
2020 50 – - 50 9 (8) 50 – –
2019 50 – 19 50 (2) 16 50 2 –
The Group is exposed to the non-performance by its counterparties in respect of financial assets receivable. The Group has policies and procedures to monitor the risk by assigning limits to each counterparty by underlying exposure and by operating company. The underlying exposures are monitored on a daily basis and the overall exposure limit by counterparty is periodically reviewed by
At December 31, 2020 the Group's credit risk position, allocated by region, in respect of treasury managed cash and derivatives was
Region 2020 2019 United Kingdom 53% 41% Spain 3% 3% Ireland 7% 3% Rest of Eurozone 16% 30% Rest of world 21% 23%
The financial assets recognised in the financial statements, net of impairment losses (if any), represent the Group's maximum
Effect on result before tax € million
(50) – - (50) (9) 7 (50) – –
(50) – (19) (50) 2 (13) (50) (2) –
Effect on equity € million
Strengthening/ (weakening) in sterling interest rate Basis points
Effect on result before tax € million
Mark-to-market of treasury controlled financial instruments allocated by geography
Effect on equity € million
Strengthening/ (weakening) in euro interest rate Basis points
The Group is exposed to changes in interest rates on financial debt, leases, sale and lease backs and on cash deposits.
Effect on result before tax € million
(10) (931) (359) (10) (161) 157 (10) 10 42
(10) – (365) (10) 20 171 (10) 2 58
Effect on equity € million
Strengthening/ (weakening) in Japanese yen rate per cent
Effect on result before tax € million
Effect on equity € million
Strengthening/ (weakening) in pound sterling rate per cent
180
The Group invests cash in interest-bearing accounts, time deposits and money market funds, choosing instruments with appropriate maturities or liquidity to retain sufficient headroom to readily generate cash inflows required to manage liquidity risk. The Group has also committed revolving credit facilities.
At December 31, 2020 the Group had undrawn overdraft facilities of €52 million (2019: €13 million). The Group held undrawn uncommitted money market lines of €nil (2019: €nil).
The Group held undrawn general and committed aircraft financing facilities:
| 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Million | Currency | € equivalent |
| General facilities1 | ||
| Euro facilities expiring between January and June 2021 | €126 | 126 |
| Euro facilities expiring between January and July 2022 | €95 | 95 |
| US dollar facility expiring June 2021 | \$786 | 643 |
| US dollar facility expiring May 2022 | \$50 | 41 |
| 905 | ||
| Committed aircraft facilities | ||
| US dollar facility expiring March 20212 | \$428 | 351 |
| US dollar facilities expiring July 20233 | \$1,013 | 829 |
| 1,180 | ||
| 2019 | ||
| Million | Currency | € equivalent |
| General facilities1 | ||
| Euro facilities expiring between January and June 2020 | €129 | 129 |
US dollar facilities expiring December 20213, 4 \$1,217 1,096
1 The general facilities can be drawn at any time at the discretion of the Group subject to the provision of up to three days' notice of the intended utilisation, depending on the facility.
2 The aircraft facility maturing in 2021 is available for specific committed aircraft deliveries and further information is given in note 23b. 3 The aircraft facilities maturing in 2023 (2019: maturing in 2021) are available for specific committed aircraft deliveries and requires the Group to give three months' notice to the counterparty of its intention to utilise the facilities.
US dollar facility expiring June 2020 \$1,330 1,196
1,325
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
www.iairgroup.com 185
4 The figures relating to the US dollar facilities expiring in December 2021 have been updated to better reflect the amounts available to the Group at December 31, 2019.
The following table analyses the Group's (outflows) and inflows in respect of financial liabilities and derivative financial instruments into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at December 31 to the contractual maturity date. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows and include interest.
| € million | Within 6 months |
6-12 months |
1-2 years |
2-5 years |
More than 5 years |
Total 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing loans and borrowings: | ||||||
| Asset financing liabilities | (101) | (97) | (193) | (571) | (1,673) | (2,635) |
| Lease liabilities | (901) | (919) | (1,500) | (4,122) | (5,962) | (13,404) |
| Fixed rate borrowings | (360) | (37) | (631) | (666) | (587) | (2,281) |
| Floating rate borrowings | (78) | (32) | (58) | (1,179) | (41) | (1,388) |
| Other financing liabilities | (97) | – | – | – | – | (97) |
| Trade and other payables | (2,810) | – | – | – | – | (2,810) |
| Derivative financial instruments (assets): | ||||||
| Forward contracts | 73 | 41 | 33 | 8 | – | 155 |
| Fuel derivatives | 6 | 2 | 1 | – | – | 9 |
| Derivative financial instruments (liabilities): | ||||||
| Interest rate swaps | (13) | (13) | (25) | (14) | (2) | (67) |
| Forward contracts | (370) | (91) | (115) | (56) | – | (632) |
| Fuel derivatives | (423) | (314) | (108) | (4) | – | (849) |
| December 31, 2020 | (5,074) | (1,460) | (2,596) | (6,604) | (8,265) | (23,999) |
| € million | Within 6 months |
6-12 months |
1-2 years |
2-5 years |
More than 5 years |
Total 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing loans and borrowings: | ||||||
| Asset finance obligations | (56) | (49) | (95) | (289) | (988) | (1,477) |
| Lease liabilities | (1,073) | (957) | (1,753) | (4,505) | (6,289) | (14,577) |
| Fixed rate borrowings | (20) | (31) | (46) | (1,158) | (599) | (1,854) |
| Floating rate borrowings | (13) | (17) | (30) | (110) | (67) | (237) |
| Trade and other payables | (3,881) | – | 1 | – | – | (3,880) |
| Derivative financial instruments (assets): | ||||||
| Aircraft lease hedges | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Interest rate derivatives | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | – | 5 |
| Foreign exchange contracts | 115 | 116 | 157 | 96 | – | 484 |
| Fuel derivatives | 66 | 25 | 12 | 2 | – | 105 |
| Derivative financial instruments (liabilities): | ||||||
| Aircraft lease hedges | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Interest rate derivatives | (9) | (19) | (18) | (22) | (1) | (69) |
| Foreign exchange contracts | (47) | (43) | (62) | (86) | – | (238) |
| Fuel derivatives | (61) | (73) | (90) | (11) | – | (235) |
| December 31, 2019 | (4,978) | (1,047) | (1,923) | (6,081) | (7,944) | (21,973) |
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
25 Financial risk management objectives and policies continued
The Group enters into derivative transactions under ISDA (International Swaps and Derivatives Association) documentation. In general, under such agreements the amounts owed by each counterparty on a single day in respect of all transactions outstanding are aggregated into a single net amount that is payable by one party to the other.
The following financial assets and liabilities are subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements.
December 31, 2020
| € million | Gross value of financial instruments |
Gross amounts set off in the balance sheet1 |
Net amounts of financial instruments in the balance sheet |
Related amounts not offset in the balance sheet1 |
Net amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets | |||||
| Derivative financial assets | 165 | (1) | 164 | (13) | 151 |
| Financial liabilities | |||||
| Derivative financial liabilities | 1,537 | (67) | 1,470 | (37) | 1,433 |
1 The Group has pledged cash and cash equivalents as collateral against certain of its derivative financial liabilities. As December 31, 2020, the Group recognised €66 million of collateral (2019: €nil) offset in the balance sheet and €24 million (2019: €nil) not offset in the balance sheet.
| € million | Gross value of financial instruments |
Gross amounts set off in the balance sheet |
Net amounts of financial instruments in the balance sheet |
Related amounts not offset in the balance sheet |
Net amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets | |||||
| Derivative financial assets | 550 | 42 | 592 | (9) | 583 |
| Financial liabilities | |||||
| Derivative financial liabilities | 580 | (42) | 538 | (9) | 529 |
The Group's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, to maintain an optimal capital structure, to reduce the cost of capital and to provide returns to shareholders.
The Group monitors capital on the basis of the net debt to EBITDA ratio. For the year to December 31, 2020, the net debt to EBITDA was minus 4.3 times (2019: 1.4 times). The definition and calculation for this performance measure is included in the Alternative performance measures section.
Further detail on liquidity and capital resources and capital risk management is disclosed in the going concern section in note 2.
186 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings:
Derivative financial instruments (assets):
Derivative financial instruments (liabilities):
f Offsetting financial assets and liabilities
€ million
agreements.
€ million
€ million
December 31, 2020
Financial assets
Financial liabilities
December 31, 2019
Financial assets
Financial liabilities
g Capital risk management
Alternative performance measures section.
25 Financial risk management objectives and policies continued
are aggregated into a single net amount that is payable by one party to the other.
Within 6 months
6-12 months
Asset finance obligations (56) (49) (95) (289) (988) (1,477) Lease liabilities (1,073) (957) (1,753) (4,505) (6,289) (14,577) Fixed rate borrowings (20) (31) (46) (1,158) (599) (1,854) Floating rate borrowings (13) (17) (30) (110) (67) (237) Trade and other payables (3,881) – 1 – – (3,880)
Aircraft lease hedges – – – – – – Interest rate derivatives 1 1 1 2 – 5 Foreign exchange contracts 115 116 157 96 – 484 Fuel derivatives 66 25 12 2 – 105
Aircraft lease hedges – – – – – – Interest rate derivatives (9) (19) (18) (22) (1) (69) Foreign exchange contracts (47) (43) (62) (86) – (238) Fuel derivatives (61) (73) (90) (11) – (235) December 31, 2019 (4,978) (1,047) (1,923) (6,081) (7,944) (21,973)
The Group enters into derivative transactions under ISDA (International Swaps and Derivatives Association) documentation. In general, under such agreements the amounts owed by each counterparty on a single day in respect of all transactions outstanding
Gross value of financial instruments
Derivative financial assets 165 (1) 164 (13) 151
Derivative financial liabilities 1,537 (67) 1,470 (37) 1,433 1 The Group has pledged cash and cash equivalents as collateral against certain of its derivative financial liabilities. As December 31, 2020, the Group recognised €66 million of collateral (2019: €nil) offset in the balance sheet and €24 million (2019: €nil) not offset in the balance sheet.
Gross value of financial instruments
Derivative financial assets 550 42 592 (9) 583
Derivative financial liabilities 580 (42) 538 (9) 529
The Group's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, to maintain an
The Group monitors capital on the basis of the net debt to EBITDA ratio. For the year to December 31, 2020, the net debt to EBITDA was minus 4.3 times (2019: 1.4 times). The definition and calculation for this performance measure is included in the
Further detail on liquidity and capital resources and capital risk management is disclosed in the going concern section in note 2.
optimal capital structure, to reduce the cost of capital and to provide returns to shareholders.
Gross amounts set off in the balance sheet1
Gross amounts set off in the balance sheet
Net amounts of financial instruments in the balance sheet
Net amounts of financial instruments in the balance sheet
Related amounts not offset in the
Related amounts not offset in the
balance sheet Net amount
balance sheet1 Net amount
The following financial assets and liabilities are subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangements and similar
1-2 years
2-5 years More than 5 years Total 2019
182
A reform of major interest rate benchmarks is being undertaken globally, including the replacement of certain interbank offered rates (IBORs) with alternative nearly risk-free rates (referred to as 'IBOR reform'). The Group has exposures to IBORs on its financial instruments that will be replaced or reformed as part of these market-wide initiatives. The Group anticipates that IBOR reform will impact its risk management and hedge accounting.
Group Treasury monitors and manages the Group's transition to alternative rates. Group Treasury tracks which contracts reference IBOR, whether such contracts will need to be amended, and how to manage communication about IBOR reform with counterparties.
The Group holds interest rate swaps for risk management purposes which are designated in cash flow hedge relationships. The interest rate swaps have floating legs that are indexed to both US dollar and sterling LIBOR.
The Group has evaluated the extent to which its cash flow hedging relationships are subject to uncertainty driven by IBOR reform as at December 31, 2020. As part of this evaluation, the Group has applied the hedging relief provided by the IFRS 9 amendments for IBOR reform phase one. Certain of the Group's hedged items and hedging instruments continue to be indexed to the aforementioned LIBORs. These benchmark rates are quoted each day and the IBOR cash flows are exchanged with counterparties as usual. However, certain of these LIBOR cash flow hedging relationships extend beyond the anticipated cessation date. There is uncertainty about when and how replacement may occur with respect to the relevant hedged items and hedging instruments. Such uncertainty may impact the hedging relationship.
Hedging relationships impacted by IBOR reform may experience ineffectiveness attributable to market participant's expectations of when the change in rates will occur, which may differ between the hedged item and the hedging instrument.
The Group's exposure to both US dollar and sterling LIBOR designated in hedging relationships had a nominal amount of €775 million as at December 31, 2020.
The detail of the Group's financial instruments at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 by nature and classification for measurement purposes is as follows:
| Financial assets | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Amortised cost |
Fair value through Other comprehensive income |
Fair value through Income statement |
Non financial assets |
Total carrying amount by balance sheet item |
| Non-current assets | |||||
| Other equity investments | – | 29 | – | – | 29 |
| Derivative financial instruments | – | – | 42 | – | 42 |
| Other non-current assets | 119 | 10 | – | 99 | 228 |
| Current assets | |||||
| Trade receivables | 557 | – | – | – | 557 |
| Other current assets | 350 | – | – | 442 | 792 |
| Derivative financial instruments | – | – | 122 | – | 122 |
| Other current interest-bearing deposits | 143 | – | – | – | 143 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 5,774 | – | – | – | 5,774 |
| Financial liabilities | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Amortised cost |
Fair value through Other comprehensive income |
Fair value through income statement |
Non financial liabilities |
Total carrying amount by balance sheet item |
| Non-current liabilities | |||||
| Lease liabilities | 8,464 | – | – | – | 8,464 |
| Interest-bearing long-term borrowings | 5,000 | – | – | – | 5,000 |
| Derivative financial instruments | – | – | 310 | – | 310 |
| Other long-term liabilities | 80 | – | – | 533 | 613 |
| Current liabilities | |||||
| Lease liabilities | 1,560 | – | – | – | 1,560 |
| Current portion of long-term borrowings | 655 | – | – | – | 655 |
| Trade and other payables | 2,572 | – | – | 238 | 2,810 |
| Derivative financial instruments | – | – | 1,160 | – | 1,160 |
183
www.iairgroup.com 187
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
26 Financial instruments continued
| Financial assets | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value | Fair value | Total carrying | |||
| through Other | through | Non | amount by | ||
| Amortised | comprehensive | income | financial | balance sheet | |
| € million | cost | income | statement | assets | item |
| Non-current assets | |||||
| Other equity investments | – | 82 | – | – | 82 |
| Derivative financial instruments | – | – | 268 | – | 268 |
| Other non-current assets | 133 | – | – | 140 | 273 |
| Current assets | |||||
| Trade receivables | 2,255 | – | – | – | 2,255 |
| Other current assets | 414 | – | – | 900 | 1,314 |
| Derivative financial instruments | – | – | 324 | – | 324 |
| Other current interest-bearing deposits | 2,621 | – | – | – | 2,621 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 4,062 | – | – | – | 4,062 |
| Financial liabilities | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Amortised cost |
Fair value through Other comprehensive income |
Fair value through Income statement |
Non financial liabilities |
Total carrying amount by balance sheet item |
| Non-current liabilities | |||||
| Lease liabilities | 9,352 | – | – | – | 9,352 |
| Interest-bearing long-term borrowings | 3,059 | – | – | – | 3,059 |
| Derivative financial instruments | – | – | 286 | – | 286 |
| Other long-term liabilities | 12 | – | – | 59 | 71 |
| Current liabilities | |||||
| Lease liabilities | 1,694 | – | – | – | 1,694 |
| Current portion of long-term borrowings | 149 | – | – | – | 149 |
| Trade and other payables | 3,881 | – | – | 463 | 4,344 |
| Derivative financial instruments | – | – | 252 | – | 252 |
The fair values of the Group's financial instruments are disclosed in hierarchy levels depending on the nature of the inputs used in determining the fair values and using the following methods and assumptions:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. A market is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service, or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm's length basis. Level 1 methodologies (market values at the balance sheet date) were used to determine the fair value of listed asset investments classified as equity investments and listed interest-bearing borrowings.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined by valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximise the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. Derivative instruments are measured based on the market value of instruments with similar terms and conditions at the balance sheet date using forward pricing models. The fair value of the Group's interest-bearing borrowings including leases is determined by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows at the relevant market interest rates at the balance sheet date.
Level 3: Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data. The principal method of such valuation is performed using a valuation model that considers the present value of the dividend cash flows expected to be generated by the associated assets.
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, other current interest-bearing deposits, trade receivables, other current assets and trade and other payables approximate their carrying value largely due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
188 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Group's financial assets and liabilities at December 31, 2020 are as follows:
| Carrying | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Level 1 | Fair value Level 2 |
Level 3 | Total | value Total |
| Financial assets | |||||
| Other equity investments | – | – | 29 | 29 | 29 |
| Derivative financial assets: | |||||
| Interest rate swaps1 | – | 1 | – | 1 | 1 |
| Foreign exchange contracts1 | – | 154 | – | 154 | 154 |
| Fuel derivatives1 | – | 9 | – | 9 | 9 |
| Financial liabilities | |||||
| Interest-bearing loans and borrowings: | |||||
| Asset financed liabilities | – | 2,417 | – | 2,417 | 2,189 |
| Fixed rate borrowings | 1,510 | 560 | – | 2,070 | 2,163 |
| Floating rate borrowings | – | 1,206 | – | 1,206 | 1,206 |
| Other financing liabilities | – | 97 | – | 97 | 97 |
| Derivative financial liabilities: | |||||
| Interest rate derivatives2 | – | 63 | – | 63 | 63 |
| Foreign exchange contracts2 | – | 620 | – | 620 | 620 |
| Fuel derivatives2 | – | 787 | – | 787 | 787 |
1 Current portion of derivative financial assets is €122 million
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
December 31, 2019
Non-current assets
Current assets
€ million
€ million
Non-current liabilities
Current liabilities
associated assets.
b Fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities
and listed interest-bearing borrowings.
determining the fair values and using the following methods and assumptions:
26 Financial instruments continued
184
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, other current interest-bearing deposits, trade receivables, other current assets and trade
and other payables approximate their carrying value largely due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Financial assets
Fair value through income statement
Fair value through Income statement
Nonfinancial assets
Nonfinancial liabilities Total carrying amount by balance sheet item
Total carrying amount by balance sheet item
Fair value through Other comprehensive income
Financial liabilities
Fair value through Other comprehensive income
Amortised cost
Amortised cost
Lease liabilities 9,352 – – – 9,352 Interest-bearing long-term borrowings 3,059 – – – 3,059 Derivative financial instruments – – 286 – 286 Other long-term liabilities 12 – – 59 71
Lease liabilities 1,694 – – – 1,694 Current portion of long-term borrowings 149 – – – 149 Trade and other payables 3,881 – – 463 4,344 Derivative financial instruments – – 252 – 252
The fair values of the Group's financial instruments are disclosed in hierarchy levels depending on the nature of the inputs used in
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. A market is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service, or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm's length basis. Level 1 methodologies (market values at the balance sheet date) were used to determine the fair value of listed asset investments classified as equity investments
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined by valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximise the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. Derivative instruments are measured based on the market value of instruments with similar terms and conditions at the balance sheet date using forward pricing models. The fair value of the Group's interest-bearing borrowings including leases is determined by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows at the relevant market interest rates at the balance sheet date. Level 3: Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data. The principal method of such valuation is performed using a valuation model that considers the present value of the dividend cash flows expected to be generated by the
Other equity investments – 82 – – 82 Derivative financial instruments – – 268 – 268 Other non-current assets 133 – – 140 273
Trade receivables 2,255 – – – 2,255 Other current assets 414 – – 900 1,314 Derivative financial instruments – – 324 – 324 Other current interest-bearing deposits 2,621 – – – 2,621 Cash and cash equivalents 4,062 – – – 4,062
2 Current portion of derivative financial liabilities is €1,177 million
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Group's financial assets and liabilities at December 31, 2019 are set out below:
| Carrying | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Level 1 | Fair value Level 2 |
Level 3 | Total | value Total |
| Financial assets | |||||
| Other equity investments | 10 | – | 72 | 82 | 82 |
| Derivative financial assets: | |||||
| Interest rate swaps1 | – | 1 | – | 1 | 1 |
| Foreign exchange contracts1 | – | 488 | – | 488 | 488 |
| Fuel derivatives1 | – | 103 | – | 103 | 103 |
| Financial liabilities | |||||
| Interest-bearing loans and borrowings: | |||||
| Asset financed liabilities | – | 1,623 | – | 1,623 | 1,254 |
| Fixed rate borrowings | 1,640 | 136 | – | 1,776 | 1,728 |
| Floating rate borrowings | – | 226 | – | 226 | 226 |
| Derivative financial liabilities: | |||||
| Interest rate derivatives2 | – | 67 | – | 67 | 67 |
| Foreign exchange contracts2 | – | 240 | – | 240 | 240 |
| Fuel derivatives2 | – | 231 | – | 231 | 231 |
1 Current portion of derivative financial assets is €324 million.
2 Current portion of derivative financial liabilities is €252 million.
There have been no transfers between levels of fair value hierarchy during the year.
The financial instruments listed in the previous table are measured at fair value in the consolidated financial statements, with the exception of interest-bearing borrowings, which are measured at amortised cost.
185
www.iairgroup.com 189
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
26 Financial instruments continued
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
The following table summarises key movements in Level 3 financial assets:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Opening balance for the year | 72 | 63 |
| Additions | 3 | 6 |
| Losses recognised in other comprehensive income | (44) | – |
| Exchange movements | (2) | 3 |
| Closing balance for the year | 29 | 72 |
At December 31, 2020 the Group's principal risk management activities that were hedging future forecast transactions were:
The amounts included in equity including the periods over which the related cash flows are expected to occur are summarised below:
| (Gains)/losses in respect of cash flow hedges included within equity € million |
2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Loan repayments to hedge future revenue | 220 | 141 |
| Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and expenditure1 | 168 | (80) |
| Crude, gas oil and jet kerosene derivative contracts1 | 295 | 113 |
| Derivatives used to hedge interest rates1 | 66 | 72 |
| Instruments for which hedge accounting no longer applies1 | 276 | 355 |
| 1,025 | 601 | |
| Related deferred tax credit | (168) | (94) |
| Total amount included within equity | 857 | 507 |
1 The carrying value of derivative instruments recognised in assets and liabilities is analysed in parts a and b above.
The notional amounts of significant financial instruments used as cash flow hedging instruments are set out below:
| Notional principal amounts (€ million) |
Hedge range | Within 1 year | 1-2 years | 2-5 years | Total December 31, 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and expenditure from US dollars to pound sterling1 |
1.15 – 1.50 | 2,402 | 1,321 | 442 | 4,165 |
| Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and expenditure from US dollars to euros1 |
0.74 – 1.37 | 1,009 | 960 | 155 | 2,124 |
| 1 Represents the value of the hedged item. | |||||
| Notional principal amounts (€ million) |
Hedge range | Within 1 year | 1-2 years | 2-5 years | Total December 31, 2019 |
| Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and expenditure from US dollars to pound sterling1 |
1.17-1.51 | 3,493 | 1,810 | 1,359 | 6,662 |
| Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and expenditure from US dollars to euros1 |
0.74 – 1.39 | 1,397 | 1,091 | 483 | 2,971 |
1 Represents the value of the hedged item.
190 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
| For the year to December 31, 2020 (€ million) |
Amounts recognised in Other comprehensive income1 |
Amounts associated with ineffectiveness recognised in the Income statement2 |
Discontinuance of hedge accounting reclassified to the Income statement |
Total recognised (gains)/ losses |
Other amounts reclassified to the Income statement |
Amounts reclassified to the Balance sheet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loan repayments to hedge future revenue | 123 | – | (22) | 101 | (19) | – |
| Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and expenditure |
88 | – | 54 | 142 | 55 | 32 |
| Crude, gas oil and jet kerosene derivative contracts |
2,369 | 2 | (1,757) | 614 | (461) | – |
| Derivatives used to hedge interest rates | 59 | – | – | 59 | (30) | (32) |
| Instruments for which hedge accounting no longer applies |
– | – | – | – | (63) | – |
| 2,639 | 2 | (1,725) | 916 | (518) | – |
1 Amounts recognised in Other comprehensive income represent gains and losses on the hedging instrument.
2 Ineffectiveness recognised in the Income statement is presented as Realised and Unrealised gains and losses on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting within non-operating items.
| For the year to December 31, 2019 (€ million) |
Amounts recognised in Other comprehensive income1 |
Amounts associated with ineffectiveness recognised in the Income statement2 |
Total recognised (gains)/ losses |
Amounts reclassified to the Income statement |
Amounts reclassified to the Balance sheet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loan repayments to hedge future revenue | (106) | – | (106) | (20) | – |
| Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and expenditure |
20 | – | 20 | 99 | 7 |
| Crude, gas oil and jet kerosene derivative contracts | (622) | 8 | (614) | (178) | – |
| Derivatives used to hedge interest rates | 56 | – | 56 | (11) | – |
| Instruments for which hedge accounting no longer applies | (38) | – | (38) | (54) | – |
| (690) | 8 | (682) | (164) | 7 |
1 Amounts recognised in Other comprehensive income represent gains and losses on the hedging instrument.
2 Ineffectiveness recognised in the Income statement is presented as Realised and Unrealised gains and losses on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting within non-operating items.
The losses associated with the discontinuance of hedge accounting recognised in the Income statement and the subsequent fair value movements of those derivative instruments recorded in the Income statement through to the earlier of the balance sheet date and the maturity date of the derivative are set out below:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Losses associated with the discontinuance of hedge accounting recognised in the Income statement | 1,725 | – |
| Fair value movements subsequently recorded in the Income statement | – | |
| Total effect of discontinuance of hedge accounting in the Income statement1 | 1,756 | – |
1 Refer to note 3 and the Alternative performance measures section.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
c Level 3 financial assets reconciliation
d Hedges Cash flow hedges
below:
Notional principal amounts
Notional principal amounts
1 Represents the value of the hedged item.
1 Represents the value of the hedged item.
26 Financial instruments continued
the future transaction is no longer expected to occur.
the future transaction is no longer expected to occur.
(Gains)/losses in respect of cash flow hedges included within equity
Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and
Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and
Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and
Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and
The following table summarises key movements in Level 3 financial assets:
€ million 2020 2019 Opening balance for the year 72 63 Additions 3 6 Losses recognised in other comprehensive income (44) – Exchange movements (2) 3 Closing balance for the year 29 72
At December 31, 2020 the Group's principal risk management activities that were hedging future forecast transactions were: • Future loan repayments in foreign currency (predominantly US dollar loan repayments), hedging foreign exchange fluctuations on revenue cash inflows. Remeasurement gains and losses on the loans are recognised in equity and transferred to the income
• Foreign exchange contracts, hedging foreign currency exchange risk on revenue cash inflows and certain operational payments. Remeasurement gains and losses on the derivatives are recognised in equity and transferred to the income statement or balance sheet to match against the related cash inflow or outflow. Reclassification gains and losses on derivatives, arising from the discontinuance of hedge accounting, are recognised in the income statement within fuel, oil costs and emissions charges when
• Forward crude, gas oil and jet kerosene derivative contracts, hedging price risk on fuel expenditure. Remeasurement gains and losses on the derivatives are recognised in equity and transferred to the income statement within fuel, oil costs and emissions charges to match against the related fuel cash outflow. Reclassification gains and losses on derivatives, arising from the discontinuance of hedge accounting, are recognised in the income statement within fuel, oil costs and emissions charges when
The amounts included in equity including the periods over which the related cash flows are expected to occur are summarised
€ million 2020 2019 Loan repayments to hedge future revenue 220 141 Foreign exchange contracts to hedge future revenue and expenditure1 168 (80) Crude, gas oil and jet kerosene derivative contracts1 295 113 Derivatives used to hedge interest rates1 66 72 Instruments for which hedge accounting no longer applies1 276 355
Related deferred tax credit (168) (94) Total amount included within equity 857 507
expenditure from US dollars to pound sterling1 1.15 – 1.50 2,402 1,321 442 4,165
expenditure from US dollars to euros1 0.74 – 1.37 1,009 960 155 2,124
expenditure from US dollars to pound sterling1 1.17-1.51 3,493 1,810 1,359 6,662
expenditure from US dollars to euros1 0.74 – 1.39 1,397 1,091 483 2,971
1,025 601
Total December 31, 2020
Total December 31, 2019
statement within revenue when the loan is repaid (generally in instalments over the life of the loan).
• Interest rate contracts, hedging interest rate risk on floating rate debt and certain operational payments.
1 The carrying value of derivative instruments recognised in assets and liabilities is analysed in parts a and b above.
The notional amounts of significant financial instruments used as cash flow hedging instruments are set out below:
(€ million) Hedge range Within 1 year 1-2 years 2-5 years
(€ million) Hedge range Within 1 year 1-2 years 2-5 years
186
The Group has no significant fair value hedges at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
187
www.iairgroup.com 191
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
| Allotted, called up and fully paid | Number of shares '000s |
Ordinary share capital € million |
Share premium € million |
|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2019: Ordinary shares of €0.50 each | 1,992,033 | 996 | 6,022 |
| Special 2018 dividend of €0.35 per share | (695) | ||
| January 1, 2020: Ordinary shares of €0.50 each | 1,992,033 | 996 | 5,327 |
| Share capital reduction | (797) | ||
| Rights issue | 2,979,443 | 298 | 2,443 |
| December 31, 2020: Ordinary shares of €0.10 each | 4,971,476 | 497 | 7,770 |
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
On September 8, 2020, the Company undertook a share capital reduction of €797 million, that reduced the nominal value of each ordinary share from €0.50 per share to €0.10 per share. A corresponding amount has been recognised within Capital reserves (note 29).
On October 2, 2020, the Company raised €2,741 million (and incurred related transaction costs of €70 million as detailed in Note 29) through a rights issue of 2,979,443,376 new ordinary shares at a price of 92 € cents per share on the basis of 3 shares for every 2 existing shares.
In accordance with accounting standards, the discount element inherent in the rights issue has been accounted for as a bonus issue of 1,071,565 thousand shares. Earnings per share information (note 10) has been restated for the comparative period presented, by adjusting the weighted average number of shares to include the impact of the bonus shares.
A total of 2.6 million shares were issued to employees during the year as a result of vesting of employee share schemes. At December 31, 2020 the Group held 5.1 million shares (2019: 7.7 million) which represented 0.10 per cent of the issued share capital of the Company.
The Group operates share-based payment schemes as part of the total remuneration package provided to employees. These schemes comprise both share option schemes where employees acquire shares at an option price and share award plans whereby shares are issued to employees at no cost, subject to the achievement by the Group of specified performance targets.
The IAG Performance Share Plan (PSP) is granted to senior executives and managers of the Group who are most directly involved in shaping and delivering business success over the medium to long term. Since 2015, awards have been made as nil-cost options, with a two-year holding period following the three-year performance period, before options can be exercised. All awards since 2015 have three independent performance measures with equal weighting: Total Shareholder Return (TSR) relative to the STOXX Europe 600 Travel and Leisure Index (for 2020 awards) or MSCI European Transportation Index (for prior to 2020 awards), earnings per share, and Return on Invested Capital.
In 2020, the outstanding PSP awards granted to participants other than Executive Directors from 2018 onwards were modified, and the resulting incremental fair value granted of £1.61 per award is recognised over the remaining vesting period.
The IAG Incentive Award Deferral Plan (IADP) is granted to qualifying employees based on performance and service tests. It will be awarded when an incentive award is triggered subject to the employee remaining in employment with the Group for three years after the grant date. The relevant population will receive 50 per cent of their incentive award up front in cash, and the remaining 50 per cent in shares after three years through the IADP.
| 23,651 | 9,082 | 14,118 | 3,287 | 2,397 | 41,167 | 1,313 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incentive Award Deferral Plans | 4,473 | 1,694 | 2,795 | 12 | 583 | 8,367 | 14 |
| Performance Share Plans | 19,178 | 7,388 | 11,323 | 3,275 | 1,814 | 32,800 | 1,299 |
| '000s | '000s | '000s | '000s | '000s | '000s | '000s | |
| at January 1, 2020 |
Granted number |
Rights issue adjustment |
Lapsed number |
Vested number |
at December 31, 2020 |
December 31, 2020 |
|
| Outstanding | Outstanding | Vested and exercisable |
The weighted average share price at the date of exercise of options exercised during the year to December 31, 2020 was £3.89 (2019: not applicable).
192 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
The fair value of equity-settled share-based payment plans determined using the Monte-Carlo valuation model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the plans were granted, used the following assumptions:
| December 31, 2020 |
December 31, 2019 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Expected share price volatility (per cent) | 35 | 35 |
| Expected comparator group volatility (per cent) | 20 | 20 |
| Expected comparator group correlation (per cent) | 70 | 55 |
| Expected life of options (years) | 4.6 | 4.8 |
| Weighted average share price at date of grant (£) | 4.59 | 5.67 |
| Weighted average fair value (£) | 1.84 | 1.93 |
Volatility was calculated with reference to the Group's weekly pound sterling share price volatility. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may not necessarily be the actual outcome. The fair value of the PSP also takes into account a market condition of TSR as compared to strategic competitors. No other features of share-based payment plans granted were incorporated into the measurement of fair value.
The Group recognised a share-based payment charge credit of €8 million for the year to December 31, 2020 (2019: €34 million).
For the year to December 31, 2020
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
Allotted, called up and fully paid
a Share capital reduction
(note 29).
b Rights issue
existing shares.
the Company.
c Treasury shares
28 Share-based payments
a IAG Performance Share Plan
share, and Return on Invested Capital.
b IAG Incentive Award Deferral Plan
(2019: not applicable).
per cent in shares after three years through the IADP.
c Share-based payment schemes summary
27 Share capital, share premium and treasury shares
January 1, 2019: Ordinary shares of €0.50 each 1,992,033 996 6,022 Special 2018 dividend of €0.35 per share (695) January 1, 2020: Ordinary shares of €0.50 each 1,992,033 996 5,327
Rights issue 2,979,443 298 2,443 December 31, 2020: Ordinary shares of €0.10 each 4,971,476 497 7,770
On September 8, 2020, the Company undertook a share capital reduction of €797 million, that reduced the nominal value of each ordinary share from €0.50 per share to €0.10 per share. A corresponding amount has been recognised within Capital reserves
On October 2, 2020, the Company raised €2,741 million (and incurred related transaction costs of €70 million as detailed in Note 29) through a rights issue of 2,979,443,376 new ordinary shares at a price of 92 € cents per share on the basis of 3 shares for every 2
In accordance with accounting standards, the discount element inherent in the rights issue has been accounted for as a bonus issue of 1,071,565 thousand shares. Earnings per share information (note 10) has been restated for the comparative period presented, by
December 31, 2020 the Group held 5.1 million shares (2019: 7.7 million) which represented 0.10 per cent of the issued share capital of
A total of 2.6 million shares were issued to employees during the year as a result of vesting of employee share schemes. At
The Group operates share-based payment schemes as part of the total remuneration package provided to employees. These schemes comprise both share option schemes where employees acquire shares at an option price and share award plans whereby
The IAG Performance Share Plan (PSP) is granted to senior executives and managers of the Group who are most directly involved in shaping and delivering business success over the medium to long term. Since 2015, awards have been made as nil-cost options, with a two-year holding period following the three-year performance period, before options can be exercised. All awards since 2015 have three independent performance measures with equal weighting: Total Shareholder Return (TSR) relative to the STOXX Europe 600 Travel and Leisure Index (for 2020 awards) or MSCI European Transportation Index (for prior to 2020 awards), earnings per
In 2020, the outstanding PSP awards granted to participants other than Executive Directors from 2018 onwards were modified, and
The IAG Incentive Award Deferral Plan (IADP) is granted to qualifying employees based on performance and service tests. It will be awarded when an incentive award is triggered subject to the employee remaining in employment with the Group for three years after the grant date. The relevant population will receive 50 per cent of their incentive award up front in cash, and the remaining 50
Performance Share Plans 19,178 7,388 11,323 3,275 1,814 32,800 1,299 Incentive Award Deferral Plans 4,473 1,694 2,795 12 583 8,367 14
The weighted average share price at the date of exercise of options exercised during the year to December 31, 2020 was £3.89
Rights issue adjustment '000s
Lapsed number '000s
23,651 9,082 14,118 3,287 2,397 41,167 1,313
Vested number '000s
Outstanding at December 31, 2020 '000s
Vested and exercisable December 31, 2020 '000s
shares are issued to employees at no cost, subject to the achievement by the Group of specified performance targets.
the resulting incremental fair value granted of £1.61 per award is recognised over the remaining vesting period.
Granted number '000s
Outstanding at January 1, 2020 '000s
adjusting the weighted average number of shares to include the impact of the bonus shares.
Share capital reduction (797)
Number of shares '000s
Ordinary share capital € million
Share premium € million
188
| (2,216) (53) Net change in fair value of cost of |
– – |
– – |
– – |
– – |
– – |
(2,216) (53) |
– – |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | 10 | – | – | – | – | 10 | – |
| 1,435 | – | – | – | – | – | 1,435 | – |
| 12 | – | – | – | – | – | 12 | – |
| 18 | – | – | – | – | – | 18 | – |
| 356 | – | – | – | – | – | 356 | – |
| 50 | – | – | – | – | – | 50 | – |
| (464) | 60 | 160 | 62 | (2,467) | 70 | (2,579) | 6 |
| gains and | hedging | Currency | convertible | Merger | Capital | Total other | Non controlling interest |
| Equity | |||||||
| Unrealised losses1 |
Cost of reserve2 |
translation3 | Other reserves portion of bond4 |
reserve5 | reserves6 | reserves |
189
www.iairgroup.com 193
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
| Other reserves | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Unrealised gains and losses1 |
Cost of hedging reserve2 |
Currency translation3 |
Equity portion of convertible bond4 |
Merger reserve5 |
Redeemed capital reserve6 |
Total other reserves |
Non controlling interest |
| January 1, 2019 | (1,130) | 6 | (136) | 101 | (2,467) | 70 | (3,556) | 6 |
| Other comprehensive income for the year: | ||||||||
| Cash flow hedges reclassified and reported in net profit: |
||||||||
| Passenger revenue | 55 | – | – | – | – | – | 55 | – |
| Fuel and oil costs | 106 | – | – | – | – | – | 106 | – |
| Currency differences | (26) | – | – | – | – | – | (26) | – |
| Finance costs | 6 | – | – | – | – | – | 6 | – |
| Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges | 540 | – | – | – | – | – | 590 | – |
| Net change in fair value of other equity investments |
(8) | – | – | – | – | – | (8) | – |
| Net change in fair value of cost of hedging | – | 68 | – | – | – | – | 18 | – |
| Cost of hedging reclassified and reported in the net profit |
– | (10) | – | – | – | – | (10) | – |
| Currency translation differences | – | – | 296 | – | – | – | 296 | – |
| Hedges reclassified and reported in | ||||||||
| property, plant and equipment | (7) | (4) | – | – | – | – | (11) | – |
| Redemption of convertible bond | – | – | – | (39) | – | – | (39) | – |
| December 31, 2019 | (464) | 60 | 160 | 62 | (2,467) | 70 | (2,579) | 6 |
1 The unrealised gains and losses reserve records fair value changes on equity investments and the portion of the gain or loss on a hedging instrument in a cash flow hedge that is determined to be an effective hedge. The amounts at December 31, 2020 that relate to the fair value changes on equity instruments and to the cash flow hedge reserve were €9 million credit and €891 million charge respectively.
2 The cost of hedging reserve records, amongst others, fair value changes on the time value of options. 3 The currency translation reserve records exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of non-euro functional currency subsidiaries and investments accounted for under the equity method into the Group's reporting currency of euros. The movement through this reserve is affected by the fluctuations in the pound sterling to euro foreign exchange translation rate.
4 The equity portion of convertible bond reserve represents the equity portion of convertible bonds issued. At December 31, 2019, this related to the €500 million fixed rate 0.625 per cent convertible bond (note 23). During 2019 the Group exercised its option to early redeem the €500 million fixed rate 0.25 per cent convertible bond with no conversion to ordinary shares.
5 The merger reserve originated from the merger transaction between British Airways and Iberia. The balance represents the difference between the fair value of the Group on the transaction date, and the fair value of Iberia and the book value of British Airways (including its reserves).
6 Capital reserves include a Redeemed capital reserve of €70 million (2019: €70 million) associated with the decrease in share capital relating to cancelled shares and a Share capital reduction reserve of €797 million (2019: nil) associated with a reduction in the nominal value of the Company's share capital (note 27).
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
29 Other reserves and non-controlling interests continued
The Group operates a variety of post-employment benefit arrangements, covering both defined contribution and defined benefit schemes. The Group also has a scheme for flight crew who meet certain conditions and therefore have the option of being placed on reserve and retaining their employment relationship until reaching the statutory retirement age, or taking early retirement (note 24).
The Group operates a number of defined contribution schemes for its employees.
Costs recognised in respect of defined contribution pension plans in Spain, UK and Ireland for the year to December 31, 2020 were €235 million (2019: €262 million).
The principal funded defined benefit pension schemes within the Group are the Airways Pension Scheme (APS) and the New Airways Pension Scheme (NAPS), both of which are in the UK and are closed to new members. NAPS has been closed to new members since 2004 and closed to future accrual since 2018, resulting in a reduction of the defined benefit obligation. Following closure members' deferred pensions will now be increased annually by inflation up to five per cent per annum (measured using the Government's annual Pension Increase (Review) Orders, which since 2011 have been based on CPI). As part of the closure of NAPS to future accrual in 2018, British Airways agreed to make certain additional transition payments to NAPS members if the deficit had reduced more than expected at either the 2018 or 2021 valuations. No payment was triggered by the 2018 valuation and no allowance for such payments has been made in the valuation of the defined benefit obligation on the expected outcome of the 2021 valuation. The NAPS actuarial valuation at March 31, 2018 resulted in a deficit of €2,736 million.
APS has been closed to new members since 1984, but remains open to future accrual. The benefits provided under APS are based on final average pensionable pay and, for the majority of members, are subject to inflationary increases in payment. The APS actuarial valuation at March 31, 2018 resulted in a surplus of €683 million.
194 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
APS and NAPS are governed by separate Trustee Boards. Although APS and NAPS have separate Trustee Boards, much of the business of the two schemes is common. Some main Board and committee meetings are held in tandem although each Trustee Board reaches its decisions independently. There are three sub committees which are separately responsible for the governance, operation and investments of each scheme. British Airways Pension Trustees Limited holds the assets of both schemes on behalf of their respective Trustees.
Deficit payment plans are agreed with the Trustee of each scheme every three years based on the actuarial valuation rather than the IAS 19 accounting valuation. In October 2019, the latest deficit recovery plan was agreed as at March 31, 2018 with respect to NAPS (see note 30i below). The actuarial valuations performed as at March 31, 2018 for APS and NAPS are different to the valuation performed as at December 31, 2019 under IAS 19 'Employee Benefits' mainly due to timing differences of the measurement dates and to the specific scheme assumptions in the actuarial valuation compared with IAS 19 guidance used in the accounting valuation assumptions. For example, IAS 19 requires the discount rate to be based on corporate bond yields regardless of how the assets are actually invested, which may not result in the calculations in this report being a best estimate of the cost to the Group of providing benefits under either Scheme. The investment strategy of each Scheme is likely to change over its life, so the relationship between the discount rate and the expected rate of return on each Scheme's assets may also change.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
Other comprehensive income for the year: Cash flow hedges reclassified and reported
Net change in fair value of other equity
Hedges reclassified and reported in
share capital (note 27).
Defined contribution schemes
€235 million (2019: €262 million).
Defined benefit schemes
APS and NAPS
(note 24).
30 Employee benefit obligations
March 31, 2018 resulted in a deficit of €2,736 million.
actuarial valuation at March 31, 2018 resulted in a surplus of €683 million.
Cost of hedging reclassified and reported in
in net profit:
€ million
29 Other reserves and non-controlling interests continued
Unrealised gains and losses1
instruments and to the cash flow hedge reserve were €9 million credit and €891 million charge respectively. 2 The cost of hedging reserve records, amongst others, fair value changes on the time value of options.
reserve is affected by the fluctuations in the pound sterling to euro foreign exchange translation rate.
rate 0.25 per cent convertible bond with no conversion to ordinary shares.
The Group operates a number of defined contribution schemes for its employees.
Cost of hedging reserve2
January 1, 2019 (1,130) 6 (136) 101 (2,467) 70 (3,556) 6
Passenger revenue 55 – – – – – 55 – Fuel and oil costs 106 – – – – – 106 – Currency differences (26) – – – – – (26) – Finance costs 6 – – – – – 6 – Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges 540 – – – – – 590 –
investments (8) – – – – – (8) – Net change in fair value of cost of hedging – 68 – – – – 18 –
the net profit – (10) – – – – (10) – Currency translation differences – – 296 – – – 296 –
property, plant and equipment (7) (4) – – – – (11) – Redemption of convertible bond – – – (39) – – (39) – December 31, 2019 (464) 60 160 62 (2,467) 70 (2,579) 6 1 The unrealised gains and losses reserve records fair value changes on equity investments and the portion of the gain or loss on a hedging instrument in a cash flow hedge that is determined to be an effective hedge. The amounts at December 31, 2020 that relate to the fair value changes on equity
3 The currency translation reserve records exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of non-euro functional currency subsidiaries and investments accounted for under the equity method into the Group's reporting currency of euros. The movement through this
4 The equity portion of convertible bond reserve represents the equity portion of convertible bonds issued. At December 31, 2019, this related to the €500 million fixed rate 0.625 per cent convertible bond (note 23). During 2019 the Group exercised its option to early redeem the €500 million fixed
5 The merger reserve originated from the merger transaction between British Airways and Iberia. The balance represents the difference between the fair value of the Group on the transaction date, and the fair value of Iberia and the book value of British Airways (including its reserves). 6 Capital reserves include a Redeemed capital reserve of €70 million (2019: €70 million) associated with the decrease in share capital relating to cancelled shares and a Share capital reduction reserve of €797 million (2019: nil) associated with a reduction in the nominal value of the Company's
Costs recognised in respect of defined contribution pension plans in Spain, UK and Ireland for the year to December 31, 2020 were
The principal funded defined benefit pension schemes within the Group are the Airways Pension Scheme (APS) and the New Airways Pension Scheme (NAPS), both of which are in the UK and are closed to new members. NAPS has been closed to new members since 2004 and closed to future accrual since 2018, resulting in a reduction of the defined benefit obligation. Following closure members' deferred pensions will now be increased annually by inflation up to five per cent per annum (measured using the Government's annual Pension Increase (Review) Orders, which since 2011 have been based on CPI). As part of the closure of NAPS to future accrual in 2018, British Airways agreed to make certain additional transition payments to NAPS members if the deficit had reduced more than expected at either the 2018 or 2021 valuations. No payment was triggered by the 2018 valuation and no allowance for such payments has been made in the valuation of the defined benefit obligation on the expected outcome of the 2021 valuation. The NAPS actuarial valuation at
The Group operates a variety of post-employment benefit arrangements, covering both defined contribution and defined benefit schemes. The Group also has a scheme for flight crew who meet certain conditions and therefore have the option of being placed on reserve and retaining their employment relationship until reaching the statutory retirement age, or taking early retirement
Other reserves
Equity portion of convertible bond4
Merger reserve5
Redeemed capital reserve6
Total other reserves
Noncontrolling interest
Currency translation3
190
APS has been closed to new members since 1984, but remains open to future accrual. The benefits provided under APS are based on final average pensionable pay and, for the majority of members, are subject to inflationary increases in payment. The APS
British Airways provides certain additional post-retirement healthcare benefits to eligible employees in the US through the US Post-Retirement Medical Benefit plan (US PRMB) which is considered to be a defined benefit scheme. In addition, Aer Lingus operates certain defined benefit plans, both funded and unfunded.
The defined benefit plans expose the Company to actuarial risks, such as longevity risk, interest rate risk, inflation risk and market (investment) risk, including currency risk.
Cash payments in respect to pension obligations comprise normal employer contributions by the Group; deficit contributions based on the agreed deficit payment plan with APS and NAPS; and cash sweep payments relating to additional payments made conditional on the level of cash in British Airways. Total payments for the year to December 31, 2020 net of service costs were €313 million (2019: €865 million) being the employer contributions of €318 million (2019: €870 million) less the current service cost of €5 million (2019: €5 million) (note 30b).
On December 18, 2020 British Airways reached agreement with the Trustee of NAPS to defer deficit contributions on an interim basis for the period between October 1, 2020 and January 31, 2021. On February 19, 2021 British Airways reached further agreement with the Trustee of NAPS to defer deficit contributions previously agreed in October 2019 on the March 31, 2018 valuation, through to September 30, 2021. Under this deferral agreement, the deferred payments will be incorporated into the future deficit payment plan and associated deficit contributions arising from the triennial valuation of the NAPS scheme as at March 31, 2021. If the future deficit payment plan has not been agreed by September 30, 2021, the default position is that British Airways will return to making payments of €41 million (£38 million) per month from October 2021.
| 2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | APS | NAPS | Other1 | Total |
| Scheme assets at fair value | 8,537 | 22,240 | 408 | 31,185 |
| Present value of scheme liabilities | (8,143) | (22,151) | (714) | (31,008) |
| Net pension asset/(liability) | 394 | 89 | (306) | 177 |
| Effect of the asset ceiling2 | (124) | (479) | – | (603) |
| Other employee benefit obligations | – | – | (11) | (11) |
| December 31, 2020 | 270 | (390) | (317) | (437) |
| Represented by: | ||||
| Employee benefit assets | 282 | |||
| Employee benefit obligations | (719) | |||
| (437) |
| 20193 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | APS | NAPS | Other1 | Total |
| Scheme assets at fair value | 8,830 | 22,423 | 428 | 31,681 |
| Present value of scheme liabilities | (8,401) | (21,650) | (731) | (30,782) |
| Net pension asset/(liability) | 429 | 773 | (303) | 899 |
| Effect of the asset ceiling2 | (127) | (847) | – | (974) |
| Other employee benefit obligations | – | – | (11) | (11) |
| December 31, 2019 | 302 | (74) | (314) | (86) |
| Represented by: | ||||
| Employee benefit assets | 314 | |||
| Employee benefit obligations | (400) | |||
| (86) |
1 The present value of scheme liabilities for the US PRMB was €12 million at December 31, 2020 (2019: €15 million).
2 APS and NAPS have an accounting surplus under IAS 19, which would be available to the Group as a refund upon wind up of the scheme. This refund is restricted due to withholding taxes that would be payable by the Trustee.
191
www.iairgroup.com 195
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
3 Refer to note 2 for information relation to the reclassification from the Employee benefit obligations to deferred taxes at December 31, 2019.
30 Employee benefit obligations continued
Pension costs charged to operating result are:
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Defined benefit plans: | ||
| Current service cost | 5 | 5 |
| Past service cost1, 2 | 7 | 665 |
| 12 | 670 | |
| Defined contribution plans | 235 | 262 |
| Pension costs recorded as employee costs | 247 | 932 |
1 Refer to the Alternative performance measures section for amounts recorded within exceptional items in 2019.
2 Includes a past service credit of €nil (2019: €7 million) relating to schemes other than APS and NAPS.
Pension costs charged as finance costs are:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest income on scheme assets | (775) | |
| Interest expense on scheme liabilities | 710 | |
| Interest expense on asset ceiling | 14 | 39 |
| Net financing income relating to pensions | (4) | (26) |
| c Remeasurements recognised in the Statement of other comprehensive income |
||
| € million | 2020 | 20191 |
| Return on plan assets excluding interest income | (1,916) | |
| Remeasurement of plan liabilities from changes in financial assumptions | 3,423 | |
| Remeasurement of experience (gains)/losses | 193 | |
| Remeasurement of the APS and NAPS asset ceilings | (1,027) | |
| Exchange movements | (13) | |
| Pension remeasurements charged to Other comprehensive income | 660 |
1 Refer to note 2 for information relation to the reclassification from the Employee benefit obligations to deferred taxes at December 31, 2019.
A reconciliation of the opening and closing balances of the fair value of scheme assets is set out below:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| January 1 | 31,681 | 27,600 |
| Interest income | 599 | 775 |
| Return on plan assets excluding interest income | 2,288 | 1,916 |
| Employer contributions1 | 313 | 870 |
| Employee contributions | 14 | 6 |
| Benefits paid | (1,573) | (1,269) |
| Exchange movements | (2,137) | 1,783 |
| December 31 | 31,185 | 31,681 |
1 Includes employer contributions to APS of €2 million (2019: €5 million) and to NAPS of €303 million (2019: €816 million) of which deficit funding payments represented €nil for APS (2019: €nil) and €296 million for NAPS (2019: €797 million).
For both APS and NAPS, the Trustee has ultimate responsibility for decision making on investments matters, including the assetliability matching strategy. The latter is a form of investing designed to match the movement in pension plan assets with the movement in the projected benefit obligation over time. The Trustees' investment committee adopts an annual business plan which sets out investment objectives and work required to support achievement of these objectives. The committee also deals with the monitoring of performance and activities, including work on developing the strategic benchmark to improve the risk return profile of the scheme where possible, as well as having a trigger based dynamic governance process to be able to take advantage of opportunities as they arise. The investment committee reviews the existing investment restrictions, performance benchmarks and targets, as well as continuing to develop the de-risking and liability hedging portfolio.
Both schemes use derivative instruments for investment purposes and to manage exposures to financial risks, such as interest rate, foreign exchange and liquidity risks arising in the normal course of business. Exposure to interest rate risk is managed through the use of Inflation-Linked Swap contracts. Foreign exchange forward contracts are entered into to mitigate the risk of currency fluctuations.
196 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Scheme assets held by all defined benefit schemes operated by the Group at December 31 comprise:
| € | million |
|---|---|
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
Pension costs charged as finance costs are:
d Fair value of scheme assets
fluctuations.
Defined benefit plans:
30 Employee benefit obligations continued
€ million 2020 2019
Current service cost 5 5 Past service cost1, 2 7 665
Defined contribution plans 235 262 Pension costs recorded as employee costs 247 932
€ million 2020 2019 Interest income on scheme assets (599) (775) Interest expense on scheme liabilities 581 710 Interest expense on asset ceiling 14 39 Net financing income relating to pensions (4) (26)
€ million 2020 20191 Return on plan assets excluding interest income (2,288) (1,916) Remeasurement of plan liabilities from changes in financial assumptions 3,633 3,423 Remeasurement of experience (gains)/losses (355) 193 Remeasurement of the APS and NAPS asset ceilings (320) (1,027) Exchange movements 8 (13) Pension remeasurements charged to Other comprehensive income 678 660
1 Refer to note 2 for information relation to the reclassification from the Employee benefit obligations to deferred taxes at December 31, 2019.
€ million 2020 2019 January 1 31,681 27,600 Interest income 599 775 Return on plan assets excluding interest income 2,288 1,916 Employer contributions1 313 870 Employee contributions 14 6 Benefits paid (1,573) (1,269) Exchange movements (2,137) 1,783 December 31 31,185 31,681 1 Includes employer contributions to APS of €2 million (2019: €5 million) and to NAPS of €303 million (2019: €816 million) of which deficit funding
For both APS and NAPS, the Trustee has ultimate responsibility for decision making on investments matters, including the assetliability matching strategy. The latter is a form of investing designed to match the movement in pension plan assets with the movement in the projected benefit obligation over time. The Trustees' investment committee adopts an annual business plan which sets out investment objectives and work required to support achievement of these objectives. The committee also deals with the monitoring of performance and activities, including work on developing the strategic benchmark to improve the risk return profile of
the scheme where possible, as well as having a trigger based dynamic governance process to be able to take advantage of opportunities as they arise. The investment committee reviews the existing investment restrictions, performance benchmarks and
Both schemes use derivative instruments for investment purposes and to manage exposures to financial risks, such as interest rate, foreign exchange and liquidity risks arising in the normal course of business. Exposure to interest rate risk is managed through the use of Inflation-Linked Swap contracts. Foreign exchange forward contracts are entered into to mitigate the risk of currency
A reconciliation of the opening and closing balances of the fair value of scheme assets is set out below:
1 Refer to the Alternative performance measures section for amounts recorded within exceptional items in 2019. 2 Includes a past service credit of €nil (2019: €7 million) relating to schemes other than APS and NAPS.
c Remeasurements recognised in the Statement of other comprehensive income
payments represented €nil for APS (2019: €nil) and €296 million for NAPS (2019: €797 million).
targets, as well as continuing to develop the de-risking and liability hedging portfolio.
12 670
b Amounts recognised in the Income statement Pension costs charged to operating result are:
192
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Return seeking investments – equities | ||
| UK | 1,465 | 2,310 |
| Rest of world | 4,705 | 4,774 |
| 6,170 | 7,084 | |
| Return seeking investments – other | ||
| Private equity | 1,062 | 1,035 |
| Property | 1,798 | 2,135 |
| Alternative investments | 880 | 1,081 |
| 3,740 | 4,251 | |
| Liability matching investments | ||
| UK fixed bonds | 6,868 | 6,356 |
| Rest of world fixed bonds | 93 | 93 |
| UK index-linked bonds | 6,513 | 6,266 |
| Rest of world index-linked bonds | 11 | 120 |
| 13,485 | 12,835 | |
| Other | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 947 | 689 |
| Derivatives | (228) | (344) |
| Insurance contract | 1,660 | 1,740 |
| Longevity swap | 4,424 | 4,547 |
| Other | 987 | 879 |
| 31,185 | 31,681 |
All equities and bonds have quoted prices in active markets.
For APS and NAPS, the composition of the scheme assets is:
| December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | APS | NAPS | APS | NAPS | |
| Return seeking investments | 138 | 9,576 | 347 | 10,844 | |
| Liability matching investments | 2,286 | 11,092 | 1,897 | 10,828 | |
| 2,424 | 20,668 | 2,244 | 21,672 | ||
| Insurance contract and related longevity swap | 6,058 | – | 6,260 | – | |
| Other | 55 | 1,572 | 326 | 751 | |
| Fair value of scheme assets | 8,537 | 22,240 | 8,830 | 22,423 |
The strategic benchmark for asset allocations differentiate between 'return seeking assets' and 'liability matching assets' depending on the maturity of each scheme. At December 31, 2020, the benchmark for NAPS was 42.3 per cent (2019: 46 per cent) in return seeking assets and 57.8 per cent (2019: 54 per cent) in liability matching investments. Bandwidths are set around these strategic benchmarks that allow for tactical asset allocation decisions, providing parameters for the Investment Committee and their investment managers to work within. APS no longer has a 'strategic benchmark' as instead, APS now runs off its liquidation portfolio to a liability matching portfolio of bonds and cash. The actual asset allocation for APS at December 31, 2020 was 1.4 per cent (2019: 4 per cent) in return seeking assets and 98.6 per cent (2019: 96 per cent) in liability matching investments.
APS has an insurance contract with Rothesay Life which covers 24 per cent (2019: 24 per cent) of the pensioner liabilities for an agreed list of members. The insurance contract is based on future increases to pensions in line with inflation and will match future obligations on that basis for that part of the scheme. The insurance contract can only be used to pay or fund employee benefits under the scheme. APS also has secured a longevity swap contract with Rothesay Life, which covers an additional 20 per cent (2019: 20 per cent) of the pensioner liabilities for the same members covered by the insurance contract above. The value of the contract is based on the difference between the value of the payments expected to be received under this contract and the pensions payable by the scheme under the contract. The fees are linked to LIBOR, and an assumed future LIBOR rate has been derived based on swap prices at December 31, 2020.
During 2018 the Trustee of APS secured a buy-in contract with Legal & General. The buy-in contract covers all members in receipt of pension from APS at March 31, 2018, excluding dependent children receiving a pension at that date and members in receipt of equivalent pension (EPB) only benefits, who are alive on October 1, 2018. Benefits coming into payment for retirements after March 31, 2018 are not covered. The contract covers benefits payable from October 1, 2018 onwards. The policy covers approximately 60 per cent of all benefits APS expects to pay out in future. Along with existing insurance products (the asset swap and longevity swaps with Rothesay Life), APS is now 90 per cent protected against all longevity risk and fully protected in relation to all pensions that were already being paid as at March 31, 2018. It is also more than 90 per cent protected against interest rates and inflation (on a Retail Price Index (RPI) basis).
193
www.iairgroup.com 197
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
30 Employee benefit obligations continued
A reconciliation of the opening and closing balances of the present value of the defined benefit obligations is set out below:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| January 1 | 30,782 | 25,383 |
| Current service cost | 5 | 5 |
| Past service cost/(credit) | 7 | 665 |
| Interest expense | 581 | 710 |
| Remeasurements – financial assumptions | 3,633 | 3,423 |
| Remeasurements of experience (gains)/losses | (355) | 193 |
| Benefits paid | (1,573) | (1,269) |
| Employee contributions | 14 | 6 |
| Exchange movements | (2,086) | 1,666 |
| December 31 | 31,008 | 30,782 |
The defined benefit obligation comprises €24 million (2019: €30 million) arising from unfunded plans and €30,984 million (2019: €30,752 million) from plans that are wholly or partly funded.
A reconciliation of the effect of the asset ceiling used in calculating the IAS 19 irrecoverable surplus in APS is set out below:
| € million | 2020 | 20191 |
|---|---|---|
| January 1 | 974 | 1,868 |
| Interest expense | 14 | 39 |
| Remeasurements | (320) | (1,027) |
| Exchange movements | (65) | 94 |
| December 31 | 603 | 974 |
1 Refer to note 2 for information relation to the reclassification from the Employee benefit obligations to deferred taxes at December 31, 2019. As at January 1, 2019 the reclassification had the effect of increasing the asset ceiling by €503 million to €1,868 million. As at December 31, 2019, the reclassification had the effect of increasing the remeasurements by €246 million to €1,027 million.
The principal assumptions used for the purposes of the actuarial valuations were as follows:
| 2020 | 2019 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per cent per annum | APS | NAPS | Other schemes |
APS | NAPS | Other schemes |
| Discount rate1 | 1.20 | 1.40 | 0.5 – 2.4 | 1.85 | 2.05 | 0.8 – 3.2 |
| Rate of increase in pensionable pay2 | 2.95 | – | 2.5 | 2.90 | – | 2.5 |
| Rate of increase of pensions in payment3 | 2.95 | 2.25 | 1.1 – 3.5 | 2.90 | 2.15 | 1.2 – 3.5 |
| RPI rate of inflation | 2.95 | 2.80 | 2.5 – 2.7 | 2.90 | - | 2.5 – 2.8 |
| CPI rate of inflation | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.1 – 3.0 | - | 2.15 | 1.2 – 3.0 |
1 Discount rate is determined by reference to the yield on high quality corporate bonds of currency and term consistent with the scheme liabilities.
2 Rate of increase in pensionable pay is assumed to be in line with increases in RPI.
3 It has been assumed that the rate of increase of pensions in payment will be in line with CPI for NAPS and APS as at December 31, 2020.
Rate of increase in healthcare costs is based on medical trend rates of 6.25 per cent grading down to 5.00 per cent over five years (2019: 6.50 per cent to 5.00 per cent over five years).
In the UK, mortality rates for APS and NAPS are calculated using the standard SAPS mortality tables produced by the CMI. The standard mortality tables were selected based on the actual recent mortality experience of members and were adjusted to allow for future mortality changes. The current longevities underlying the values of the scheme liabilities were as follows:
| Mortality assumptions | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at age 60 for a: | ||
| – male currently aged 60 | 28.2 | 28.2 |
| – male currently aged 40 | 29.9 | 29.9 |
| – female currently aged 60 | 29.3 | 29.0 |
| – female currently aged 40 | 31.8 | 31.6 |
At December 31, 2020, the weighted-average duration of the defined benefit obligation was 12 years for APS (2019: 12 years) and 20 years for NAPS (2019: 19 years).
In the US, mortality rates were based on the MP-2020 mortality tables.
198 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
e Present value of scheme liabilities
f Effect of the asset ceiling
g Actuarial assumptions
30 Employee benefit obligations continued
€30,752 million) from plans that are wholly or partly funded.
reclassification had the effect of increasing the remeasurements by €246 million to €1,027 million.
The principal assumptions used for the purposes of the actuarial valuations were as follows:
Per cent per annum APS NAPS
2 Rate of increase in pensionable pay is assumed to be in line with increases in RPI.
In the US, mortality rates were based on the MP-2020 mortality tables.
(2019: 6.50 per cent to 5.00 per cent over five years).
Life expectancy at age 60 for a:
years for NAPS (2019: 19 years).
A reconciliation of the opening and closing balances of the present value of the defined benefit obligations is set out below:
A reconciliation of the effect of the asset ceiling used in calculating the IAS 19 irrecoverable surplus in APS is set out below:
€ million 2020 20191 January 1 974 1,868 Interest expense 14 39 Remeasurements (320) (1,027) Exchange movements (65) 94 December 31 603 974 1 Refer to note 2 for information relation to the reclassification from the Employee benefit obligations to deferred taxes at December 31, 2019. As at January 1, 2019 the reclassification had the effect of increasing the asset ceiling by €503 million to €1,868 million. As at December 31, 2019, the
2020 2019
Discount rate1 1.20 1.40 0.5 – 2.4 1.85 2.05 0.8 – 3.2 Rate of increase in pensionable pay2 2.95 – 2.5 2.90 – 2.5 Rate of increase of pensions in payment3 2.95 2.25 1.1 – 3.5 2.90 2.15 1.2 – 3.5 RPI rate of inflation 2.95 2.80 2.5 – 2.7 2.90 - 2.5 – 2.8 CPI rate of inflation 2.25 2.25 1.1 – 3.0 - 2.15 1.2 – 3.0 1 Discount rate is determined by reference to the yield on high quality corporate bonds of currency and term consistent with the scheme liabilities.
Rate of increase in healthcare costs is based on medical trend rates of 6.25 per cent grading down to 5.00 per cent over five years
Mortality assumptions 2020 2019
– male currently aged 60 28.2 28.2 – male currently aged 40 29.9 29.9 – female currently aged 60 29.3 29.0 – female currently aged 40 31.8 31.6 At December 31, 2020, the weighted-average duration of the defined benefit obligation was 12 years for APS (2019: 12 years) and 20
In the UK, mortality rates for APS and NAPS are calculated using the standard SAPS mortality tables produced by the CMI. The standard mortality tables were selected based on the actual recent mortality experience of members and were adjusted to allow for
3 It has been assumed that the rate of increase of pensions in payment will be in line with CPI for NAPS and APS as at December 31, 2020.
future mortality changes. The current longevities underlying the values of the scheme liabilities were as follows:
Other
schemes APS NAPS
Other schemes
€ million 2020 2019 January 1 30,782 25,383 Current service cost 5 5 Past service cost/(credit) 7 665 Interest expense 581 710 Remeasurements – financial assumptions 3,633 3,423 Remeasurements of experience (gains)/losses (355) 193 Benefits paid (1,573) (1,269) Employee contributions 14 6 Exchange movements (2,086) 1,666 December 31 31,008 30,782 The defined benefit obligation comprises €24 million (2019: €30 million) arising from unfunded plans and €30,984 million (2019:
194
Reasonable possible changes at the reporting date to significant actuarial assumptions, holding other assumptions constant, would have affected the present value of scheme liabilities by the amounts shown:
| (Decrease)/increase in scheme liabilities | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | |||
| € million | APS | NAPS | schemes |
| Discount rate (decrease of 5 basis points) | (22) | (429) | 16 |
| Future salary growth (increase of 10 basis points) | - | - | 7 |
| Future pension growth (increase of 10 basis points) | (33) | (374) | 3 |
| Future mortality rate (one year increase in life expectancy) | (33) | (826) | 5 |
Although the analysis does not take into account the full distribution of cash flows expected under the plan, it does provide an approximation of the sensitivity of the assumptions shown.
Pension contributions for APS and NAPS were determined by actuarial valuations made at March 31, 2018, using assumptions and methodologies agreed between the Group and Trustee of each scheme. At the date of the actuarial valuation, the actuarial deficit of NAPS amounted to €2,736 million. In order to address the deficit in the scheme, the Group has also committed to the following undiscounted deficit payments:
| € million | NAPS |
|---|---|
| Within 12 months | 124 |
| 2-5 years | 1,156 |
| Total expected deficit payments for NAPS | 1,280 |
The Group has determined that the minimum funding requirements set out above for NAPS will not be restricted. The present value of the contributions payable is expected to be available as a refund or a reduction in future contributions after they are paid into the plan. This determination has been made independently for each plan, subject to withholding taxes that would be payable by the Trustee.
Deficit payments in respect of local arrangements outside of the UK have been determined in accordance with local practice.
In total, the Group expects to pay €126 million in employer contributions and deficit payments to the two significant post-retirement benefit plans in 2021. This is made up of €125 million of deficit payments for NAPS after giving consideration to the aforementioned contribution deferral agreement and ongoing employer contributions of €1 million for APS.
Under the contribution deferral agreement between British Airways and the Trustee of NAPS, in the period up to December 31, 2023, no dividend payment is permitted from British Airways to IAG. From 2024 onwards, any dividends paid by British Airways will be matched by contributions to NAPS of 50 per cent of the value of dividends paid. Any such payments to NAPS will reduce the outstanding repayment balance and are capped at that level. The requirement to make such payments to NAPS ceases after deferred contributions have been repaid.
Details of contingent liabilities are set out below. The Group does not consider it probable that there will be an outflow of economic resources with regard to these proceedings and accordingly no provision for these proceedings has been recognised.
Contingent liabilities associated with income and deferred taxes are presented note 9. For information pertaining to previously reported contingent liabilities associated with the Airways Pension Scheme, refer to note 30. For information pertaining to previous contingent liabilities associated with the theft of customer data at British Airways that have been recognised as legal claims provisions refer to note 24.
There are a number of other legal and regulatory proceedings against the Group in a number of jurisdictions which at December 31, 2020 amounted to €56 million (December 31, 2019: €53 million).
The Group also has guarantees and indemnities entered into as part of the normal course of business, which at December 31, 2020 are not expected to result in material losses for the Group.
The Group has availed itself of government grants and assistance as follows:
The CJRS was implemented by the Government of the United Kingdom from March 1, 2020 to August 30, 2020, where those employees designated as being 'furloughed workers' were eligible to have 80 per cent of their wage costs paid up to a maximum of £2,500 per month.
From September 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020, the level eligibility reduced to 70 per cent of wage costs and up to a maximum of £2,197.50 per month. From October 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020, the level of eligibility reduced to 60 per cent of wage costs and up to a maximum of £1,875 per month. Following the introduction of further lockdown restrictions in the United Kingdom in November 2020, the CJRS was extended from November 1, 2020 to November 30, 2020 and then further to March 31, 2021 with the level of eligibility increased to 80 per cent of wage costs and a maximum of £2,500 per month.
195
www.iairgroup.com 199
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Such costs are paid by the Government to the Group in arrears. The Group is obliged to continue to pay the associated social security costs and employer pension contributions.
The TWSS was implemented by the government of Ireland from March 1, 2020 to August 30, 2020, where those employees designated as being furloughed workers are eligible to have 85 per cent of their wage costs paid up to a maximum of €410 per week. This scheme was replaced with the EWSS from September 1, 2020 and is expected to run through to March 31, 2021. For those qualifying employees (earning less than €1,462 per week), the government will reimburse wage costs up to a maximum of €350 per week. Such costs are paid by the government to the Group in arrears.
The total amount of the relief received under the CJRS, the TWSS and the EWSS by the Group during 2020 amounted to €344 million (2019: €nil).
The ERTE was implemented by the government of Spain from March 1, 2020 and is expected to run through to May 31, 2021. Under this plan, employment is temporarily suspended and those designated employees are paid directly by the government and there is no remittance made to the Group. The Group is obliged to continue to pay the associated social security costs.
Had those designated employees not been temporarily suspended during 2020, the Group would have incurred further employee costs of €214 million (2019: €nil).
On April 12, 2020, British Airways availed itself of the CCFF implemented by the Government of the United Kingdom. Under the CCFF, British Airways received €328 million (£298 million), with interest incurred at the prevailing market rate. Refer to note 23 for further details.
On April 30, 2020, Iberia and Vueling entered into syndicated financing agreements of €750 million and €260 million, respectively, with interest incurred at the prevailing market rate. The Instituto de Crédito Oficial ('ICO') in Spain has guaranteed 70 per cent of both financial agreements. Refer to note 23 for further details.
On December, 23, 2020, Aer Lingus entered into a financing arrangement for €75 million under the ISIF. Refer to note 23 for further details.
On December 31, 2020, British Airways entered into a 5 year term loan Export Development Guarantee Facility of €2.2 billion (£2.0 billion) underwritten by a syndicate of banks, with 80 per cent of the principal guaranteed by UKEF.
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
32 Government grants and assistance continued
The following transactions took place with related parties for the financial years to December 31:
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Sales of goods and services | ||
| Sales to associates and joint ventures1 | 12 | 6 |
| Sales to significant shareholders2 | 23 | 32 |
| Purchases of goods and services | ||
| Purchases from associates3 | 42 | 76 |
| Purchases from significant shareholders2 | 80 | 149 |
| Receivables from related parties | ||
| Amounts owed by associates4 | 1 | 2 |
| Amounts owed by significant shareholders5 | 1 | 8 |
| Payables to related parties | ||
| Amounts owed to associates6 | 2 | 3 |
| Amounts owed to significant shareholders5 | 1 | 18 |
1 Sales to associates: Consisted primarily of sales for airline related services to Dunwoody Airline Services (Holding) Limited (Dunwoody) of €9 million (2019: €4 million), €1 million (2019: €nil) to Viajes Ame S.A. and €1 million (2019: €1 million) to Serpista, S.A. and Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A. 2 Sales to and purchases from significant shareholders related to interline services with Qatar Airways.
3 Purchases from associates: Consisted primarily of €23 million of airport auxiliary services purchased from Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A. (2019: €50 million), €9 million of handling services provided by Dunwoody (2019: €10 million) and €7 million of maintenance services received from Serpista, S.A. (2019: €16 million).
4 Amounts owed by associates: Consisted primarily of €1 million of services provided to Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A., Serpista, S.A., Dunwoody and Empresa Hispano Cubana de Mantenimiento de Aeronaves, Ibeca, S.A. (2019: €1 million of services provided to Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A. and €1 million of services provided to Dunwoody, Iberia Cards and Empresa Hispano Cubana de Mantenimiento de Aeronaves, Ibeca, S.A.).
5 Amounts owed by and to significant shareholders related to Qatar Airways.
6 Amounts owed to associates: Consisted primarily of €2 million due to Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A., Empresa Hispano Cubana de Mantenimiento de Aeronaves, Ibeca, S.A., Viajes Ame S.A, Serpista, S.A. and Dunwoody (2019: €1 million due to Dunwoody and €2 million due to Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A., Serpista, S.A. and Empresa Hispano Cubana de Mantenimiento de Aeronaves, Ibeca, S.A.).
200 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
During the year to December 31, 2020 British Airways met certain costs of administering its retirement benefit plans, including the provision of support services to the Trustees. Costs borne on behalf of the retirement benefit plans amounted to €7 million (2019: €9 million) in relation to the costs of the Pension Protection Fund levy.
The Group has transactions with related parties that are conducted in the normal course of the airline business, which include the provision of airline and related services. All such transactions are carried out on an arm's length basis.
For the year to December 31, 2020, the Group has not made any provision for expected credit loss arising relating to amounts owed by related parties (2019: nil).
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS CONTINUED For the year to December 31, 2020
Employee costs
million (2019: €nil).
further details.
further details.
costs of €214 million (2019: €nil).
32 Government grants and assistance continued
€350 per week. Such costs are paid by the government to the Group in arrears.
Syndicated financing agreements – recognised within Long-term borrowings
The UK Export Finance (UKEF) – not recognised as at December 31, 2020
The Ireland Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) – recognised within Long-term borrowings
billion) underwritten by a syndicate of banks, with 80 per cent of the principal guaranteed by UKEF.
The following transactions took place with related parties for the financial years to December 31:
2 Sales to and purchases from significant shareholders related to interline services with Qatar Airways.
Aeroportuarios, S.A., Serpista, S.A. and Empresa Hispano Cubana de Mantenimiento de Aeronaves, Ibeca, S.A.).
5 Amounts owed by and to significant shareholders related to Qatar Airways.
both financial agreements. Refer to note 23 for further details.
33 Related party transactions
Sales of goods and services
Purchases of goods and services
Receivables from related parties
Payables to related parties
S.A. (2019: €16 million).
Temporary Redundancy Plan (ERTE) – no recognition in the financial statements of the Group
The Coronavirus Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF) – recognised within Short-term borrowings
no remittance made to the Group. The Group is obliged to continue to pay the associated social security costs.
The Temporary Wage Subsidy Scheme (TWSS) and the Employment Wage Subsidy Scheme (EWSS) – recognised net within
The TWSS was implemented by the government of Ireland from March 1, 2020 to August 30, 2020, where those employees designated as being furloughed workers are eligible to have 85 per cent of their wage costs paid up to a maximum of €410 per week. This scheme was replaced with the EWSS from September 1, 2020 and is expected to run through to March 31, 2021. For those qualifying employees (earning less than €1,462 per week), the government will reimburse wage costs up to a maximum of
The total amount of the relief received under the CJRS, the TWSS and the EWSS by the Group during 2020 amounted to €344
The ERTE was implemented by the government of Spain from March 1, 2020 and is expected to run through to May 31, 2021. Under this plan, employment is temporarily suspended and those designated employees are paid directly by the government and there is
Had those designated employees not been temporarily suspended during 2020, the Group would have incurred further employee
On April 12, 2020, British Airways availed itself of the CCFF implemented by the Government of the United Kingdom. Under the CCFF, British Airways received €328 million (£298 million), with interest incurred at the prevailing market rate. Refer to note 23 for
On April 30, 2020, Iberia and Vueling entered into syndicated financing agreements of €750 million and €260 million, respectively, with interest incurred at the prevailing market rate. The Instituto de Crédito Oficial ('ICO') in Spain has guaranteed 70 per cent of
On December 31, 2020, British Airways entered into a 5 year term loan Export Development Guarantee Facility of €2.2 billion (£2.0
€ million 2020 2019
Sales to associates and joint ventures1 12 6 Sales to significant shareholders2 23 32
Purchases from associates3 42 76 Purchases from significant shareholders2 80 149
Amounts owed by associates4 1 2 Amounts owed by significant shareholders5 1 8
Amounts owed to associates6 2 3 Amounts owed to significant shareholders5 1 18 1 Sales to associates: Consisted primarily of sales for airline related services to Dunwoody Airline Services (Holding) Limited (Dunwoody) of €9 million (2019: €4 million), €1 million (2019: €nil) to Viajes Ame S.A. and €1 million (2019: €1 million) to Serpista, S.A. and Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A.
3 Purchases from associates: Consisted primarily of €23 million of airport auxiliary services purchased from Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A. (2019: €50 million), €9 million of handling services provided by Dunwoody (2019: €10 million) and €7 million of maintenance services received from Serpista,
4 Amounts owed by associates: Consisted primarily of €1 million of services provided to Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A., Serpista, S.A., Dunwoody and Empresa Hispano Cubana de Mantenimiento de Aeronaves, Ibeca, S.A. (2019: €1 million of services provided to Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A. and €1 million of services provided to Dunwoody, Iberia Cards and Empresa Hispano Cubana de Mantenimiento de Aeronaves, Ibeca, S.A.).
On December, 23, 2020, Aer Lingus entered into a financing arrangement for €75 million under the ISIF. Refer to note 23 for
196
6 Amounts owed to associates: Consisted primarily of €2 million due to Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A., Empresa Hispano Cubana de Mantenimiento de Aeronaves, Ibeca, S.A., Viajes Ame S.A, Serpista, S.A. and Dunwoody (2019: €1 million due to Dunwoody and €2 million due to Multiservicios
In this instance, significant shareholders are those parties who have the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the Group, as a result of their shareholdings in the Group, but who do not have control over these policies.
At December 31, 2020 the Group had cash deposit balances with shareholders holding a participation of between 3 to 5 per cent, of €nil (2019: €nil).
Compensation received by the Group's Board of Directors and Management Committee, in 2020 and 2019 is as follows:
| Year to December 31 | ||
|---|---|---|
| € million | 2020 | 2019 |
| Base salary, fees and benefits | ||
| Board of Directors | ||
| Short-term benefits | 3 | 5 |
| Share based payments | – | 3 |
| Management Committee | ||
| Short-term benefits | 5 | 8 |
| Share based payments | – | 5 |
For the year to December 31, 2020 the Board of Directors includes remuneration for three Executive Directors (December 31, 2019: three Executive Directors). The Management Committee includes remuneration for 14 members (December 31, 2019: 12 members).
The Company provides life insurance for all executive directors and the Management Committee. For the year to December 31, 2020 the Company's obligation was €38,000 (2019: €63,000).
At December 31, 2020 the transfer value of accrued pensions covered under defined benefit pension obligation schemes, relating to the current members of the Management Committee totalled €1 million (2019: €1 million).
No loan or credit transactions were outstanding with Directors or offices of the Group at December 31, 2020 (2019: nil).
On January 19, 2021, the Group amended the original agreement announced on November 4, 2019, under which the Group had agreed to acquire the entire issued share capital of Air Europa. The amendment agreement reduces the total expected consideration for the acquisition to €500 million, which would be payable on the sixth anniversary of the completion of the acquisition. The acquisition is subject to the completion of negotiations with Sociedad Estatal de Participaciones Industriales in Spain and approval from the European Commission. Until the completion of these negotiations and receipt of the relevant approvals, the acquisition does not meet the recognition criteria under IFRS 3 Business combinations, and no accounting has been made for the transaction in these consolidated financial statements.
On February 19, 2021 British Airways reached further agreement with the Trustee of NAPS to extend the deferral of deficit contributions through to September 30, 2021. The deferral of such contributions will amount to €330 million (£300 million). Under the contribution deferral agreement between British Airways and the Trustee of NAPS, in the period up to December 31, 2023, no dividend payment is permitted from British Airways to IAG. From 2024 onwards, any dividends paid by British Airways will be matched by contributions to NAPS of 50 per cent of the value of dividends paid. Any such payments to NAPS will reduce the outstanding repayment balance and are capped at that level. The requirement to make such payments to NAPS ceases after deferred contributions have been repaid.
On February 22, 2021, British Airways entered into a 5 year term loan Export Development Guarantee Facility of €2.2 billion (£2.0 billion) underwritten by a syndicate of banks, with 80 per cent of the principal guaranteed by UKEF.
197
www.iairgroup.com 201
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
The performance of the Group is assessed using a number of alternative performance measures (APMs), some of which have been identified as key performance indicators of the Group. These measures are not defined under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), should be considered in addition to IFRS measurements and may differ to definitions given by regulatory bodies applicable to the Group. They are used to measure the outcome of the Group's strategy based on 'Unrivalled customer proposition', 'Value accretive and sustainable growth' and 'Efficiency and innovation'. Further information on why these APMs are used is provided in the Strategic priorities and key performance indicators section.
The definition of each APM, together with a reconciliation to the nearest measure prepared in accordance with IFRS is presented below.
198
The Group has not adjusted its APMs policy for the impact of COVID-19. However, under the existing exceptional items definition, certain costs arising from the impact of COVID-19 have been classified as exceptional items.
During 2020, the Group has made two changes to its disclosures and treatment of APMs compared with those disclosed in the Annual Report and Accounts for the year to December 31, 2019:
Exceptional items are those that in management's view need to be separately disclosed by virtue of their size or incidence in understanding the entity's financial performance. The exceptional items include: significant discontinuance of hedge accounting; significant restructuring; significant settlement agreements with the Group's pension schemes; significant changes in the long term fleet plans that result in the impairment of fleet assets and the recognition of associated provisions; and, legal settlements.
The table below reconciles the statutory income statement to the income statement before exceptional items of the Group:
| Year to December 31 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million | Statutory 2020 |
Exceptional items |
Before exceptional items 2020 |
Statutory 2019 |
Exceptional items |
Before exceptional items 2019 |
| Passenger revenue1 | 5,512 | (62) | 5,574 | 22,468 | 22,468 | |
| Cargo revenue | 1,306 | 1,306 | 1,117 | 1,117 | ||
| Other revenue | 988 | 988 | 1,921 | 1,921 | ||
| Total revenue | 7,806 | (62) | 7,868 | 25,506 | 25,506 | |
| Employee costs2, 6 | 3,560 | 313 | 3,247 | 5,634 | 672 | 4,962 |
| Fuel, oil costs and emissions charges1 | 3,735 | 1,694 | 2,041 | 6,021 | 6,021 | |
| Handling, catering and other operating costs | 1,340 | 1,340 | 2,972 | 2,972 | ||
| Landing fees and en-route charges | 918 | 918 | 2,221 | 2,221 | ||
| Engineering and other aircraft costs3 | 1,456 | 108 | 1,348 | 2,092 | 2,092 | |
| Property, IT and other costs4 | 782 | 28 | 754 | 811 | 811 | |
| Selling costs | 405 | 405 | 1,038 | 1,038 | ||
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment5 | 2,955 | 856 | 2,099 | 2,111 | 2,111 | |
| Currency differences | 81 | 81 | (7) | (7) | ||
| Total expenditure on operations | 15,232 | 2,999 | 12,233 | 22,893 | 672 | 22,221 |
| Operating (loss)/profit | (7,426) | (3,061) | (4,365) | 2,613 | (672) | 3,285 |
| Finance costs | (670) | (670) | (611) | (611) | ||
| Finance income | 41 | 41 | 50 | 50 | ||
| Net financing credit relating to pensions | 4 | 4 | 26 | 26 | ||
| Net currency retranslation credits | 245 | 245 | 201 | 201 | ||
| Other non-operating charges | (4) | (4) | (4) | (4) | ||
| Total net non-operating costs | (384) | (384) | (338) | (338) | ||
| (Loss)/profit before tax | (7,810) | (3,061) | (4,749) | 2,275 | (672) | 2,947 |
| Tax | 887 | 463 | 424 | (560) | (560) | |
| (Loss)/profit after tax for the year | (6,923) | (2,598) | (4,325) | 1,715 | (672) | 2,387 |
202 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
199
The rationale for each exceptional item is given below. In 2020 all items were associated with the impact of COVID-19, except the
The exceptional charge of €1,756 million represented by an expense of €62 million relating to revenue foreign currency derivatives, an expense of €1,781 million relating to fuel derivatives and a credit of €87 million related to the associated fuel foreign currency derivatives. These amounts relate to the discontinuance of hedge accounting of the associated foreign currency and fuel derivatives on forecast revenue and fuel consumption. These losses have arisen from the substantial deterioration in demand for air travel caused by COVID-19, which has caused a significant level of hedged passenger revenue transactions and fuel purchases in US dollars to no longer be expected to occur based on the Group's operating forecasts prevailing at the Balance sheet date. The Group's risk management strategy has been to build up these hedges gradually over a three-year period when the level of forecast passenger revenue and fuel consumption were higher than current expectations. Accordingly, the hedge accounting for these transactions has been discontinued and the losses recognised in the Income statement. The exceptional charge relating to revenue derivatives and fuel derivatives have been recorded in the Income statement within Passenger revenue and Fuel, oil and emission
The related tax credit was €273 million, with €11 million being attributable to the charge to Passenger revenue and €262 million
represent the Group-wide restructuring programme, which right-sizes the Group for the near term. While the restructuring programme affects all of the Group's operating companies, the exceptional charges in the year to December 31, 2020 relate to British Airways, Aer Lingus, Iberia and LEVEL only, due to the status of negotiations with employees and their representatives. The
the estimation of the additional cost to fulfil the hand back conditions associated with the leased aircraft that have been permanently stood down and impaired, which are discussed further below. The exceptional charge has been recorded within
The exceptional charge of €319 million (comprising €313 million of employee severance pay and €6 million of associated legal costs)
The exceptional charge of €108 million includes an inventory write-down expense of €71 million and a charge relating to contractual lease provisions of €37 million. The inventory write-down expense represents those expendable inventories that, given the asset impairments, are no longer expected to be utilised. The charge relating to the recognition of contractual lease provisions represents
The exceptional charge of €22 million represents the fine issued by the Information Commissioner's Office in the United Kingdom, relating to the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018. The exceptional charge has been recorded within Property, IT and
The total exceptional impairment expense of €856 million is represented by an impairment of fleet assets of €837 million and an impairment of other assets of €19 million. The fleet impairment relates to 82 aircraft, their associated engines and rotable inventories that have been stood down permanently and 2 further aircraft which have been impaired down to their recoverable value at December 31, 2020, which includes 32 Boeing 747 aircraft, 23 Airbus A320 aircraft, 15 Airbus A340 aircraft, 4 Airbus A330-200 aircraft, 2 Airbus A318 aircraft, 1 Airbus A321 aircraft, 1 Airbus A319 aircraft, 2 Boeing 777-200 aircraft and 4 Embraer E170 aircraft. Of the fleet impairment, €676 million is recorded within Property, plant and equipment relating to owned aircraft and €161 million is
Included within the impairment of other assets is an amount of €15 million relating to the landing rights, classified within Intangible assets, that were held by the operations of LEVEL in Paris. Following the decision to cease the operations of LEVEL in Paris, these
The impairment expense has arisen from the substantial deterioration in current and forecast demand for air travel caused by the COVID-19 outbreak, which has led the Group to re-assess the medium- and long-term capacity and utilisation of the fleet.
The exceptional expense of €672 million recognised in the year to December 31, 2019 related to the past service cost of the Airways Pension Scheme ('APS') settlement agreement described in note 30. This amount arose from the increase in the IAS 19 defined benefit liability of APS following the settlement agreement between the Trustee Directors of APS and British Airways which was approved by the High Court in November 2019. The settlement agreement established higher pensions in payment growth assumptions in future years, resulting in a non-cash increase to the IAS 19 defined benefit liability. The exceptional charge was
The table below provides a reconciliation of the post-exceptional to pre-exceptional condensed alternative income statement by
The exceptional impairment expenses have been recorded within Depreciation, amortisation and impairment in the Income
settlement provision in relation to the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018 (part 4).
exceptional charge has been recorded within Employee costs and Property, IT and other costs.
other costs in the Income statement, with a corresponding amount recorded in Provisions.
landing rights have been recorded at the lower of their carrying value and their recoverable value.
Subsequent to these impairments, all assets are held at their recoverable amounts.
1 Discontinuation of hedge accounting
being attributable to Fuel, oil costs and emissions charges.
charges, respectively.
2 Restructuring costs
The related tax credit was €53 million. 3 Engineering and other aircraft costs
Engineering and other aircraft costs. The related tax credit was €14 million.
There is no tax impact on the recognition of this charge.
recorded within Right of use assets relating to leased aircraft.
operating segment for the years to 31 December 2020 and 2019:
5 Impairment of fleet and associated assets
The related tax credit was €123 million.
6 Employee benefit obligations
recorded within Employee costs.
4 Settlement provision
statement.
The rationale for each exceptional item is given below. In 2020 all items were associated with the impact of COVID-19, except the settlement provision in relation to the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018 (part 4).
The exceptional charge of €1,756 million represented by an expense of €62 million relating to revenue foreign currency derivatives, an expense of €1,781 million relating to fuel derivatives and a credit of €87 million related to the associated fuel foreign currency derivatives. These amounts relate to the discontinuance of hedge accounting of the associated foreign currency and fuel derivatives on forecast revenue and fuel consumption. These losses have arisen from the substantial deterioration in demand for air travel caused by COVID-19, which has caused a significant level of hedged passenger revenue transactions and fuel purchases in US dollars to no longer be expected to occur based on the Group's operating forecasts prevailing at the Balance sheet date. The Group's risk management strategy has been to build up these hedges gradually over a three-year period when the level of forecast passenger revenue and fuel consumption were higher than current expectations. Accordingly, the hedge accounting for these transactions has been discontinued and the losses recognised in the Income statement. The exceptional charge relating to revenue derivatives and fuel derivatives have been recorded in the Income statement within Passenger revenue and Fuel, oil and emission charges, respectively.
The related tax credit was €273 million, with €11 million being attributable to the charge to Passenger revenue and €262 million being attributable to Fuel, oil costs and emissions charges.
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
presented below.
€ million
a Changes to APMs in 2020
provided in the Strategic priorities and key performance indicators section.
Annual Report and Accounts for the year to December 31, 2019:
longer required, this pro forma information is no longer required.
b (Loss)/profit after tax before exceptional items
certain costs arising from the impact of COVID-19 have been classified as exceptional items.
of the performance of each of the reportable operating segments of the Group; and
The performance of the Group is assessed using a number of alternative performance measures (APMs), some of which have been identified as key performance indicators of the Group. These measures are not defined under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), should be considered in addition to IFRS measurements and may differ to definitions given by regulatory bodies applicable to the Group. They are used to measure the outcome of the Group's strategy based on 'Unrivalled customer proposition', 'Value accretive and sustainable growth' and 'Efficiency and innovation'. Further information on why these APMs are used is
The Group has not adjusted its APMs policy for the impact of COVID-19. However, under the existing exceptional items definition,
During 2020, the Group has made two changes to its disclosures and treatment of APMs compared with those disclosed in the
– (Loss)/profit after tax before exceptional items – For the year to December 31, 2019, the Group presented exceptional items on the face of the Income statement using a three column approach to reflect the results of the Group on a pre and post exceptional basis to enable users to better understand the performance of the Group. During 2020, following the consideration of regulatory guidance, the Group has re-presented the Income statement to reflect a single column approach. Accordingly, for 2020, exceptional items and the associated narrative have been incorporated into this APM section of the consolidated financial statements. This disclosure has further been disaggregated by reportable operating segment to enable a greater understanding
– Pro forma financial information - The Group adopted IFRS 16 'Leases' on January 1, 2019 and applied the modified retrospective transition approach. In doing so, the comparative figures for 2018 were not restated. Accordingly, to provide a consistent basis for comparison with 2019, the Group introduced Pro forma financial information for 2018. As comparative figures for 2018 are no
Exceptional items are those that in management's view need to be separately disclosed by virtue of their size or incidence in understanding the entity's financial performance. The exceptional items include: significant discontinuance of hedge accounting; significant restructuring; significant settlement agreements with the Group's pension schemes; significant changes in the long term
Year to December 31
Statutory 2019
Exceptional items
Before exceptional items 2019
Before exceptional items 2020
fleet plans that result in the impairment of fleet assets and the recognition of associated provisions; and, legal settlements. The table below reconciles the statutory income statement to the income statement before exceptional items of the Group:
Statutory 2020
Exceptional items
Passenger revenue1 5,512 (62) 5,574 22,468 22,468 Cargo revenue 1,306 1,306 1,117 1,117 Other revenue 988 988 1,921 1,921 Total revenue 7,806 (62) 7,868 25,506 25,506
Employee costs2, 6 3,560 313 3,247 5,634 672 4,962 Fuel, oil costs and emissions charges1 3,735 1,694 2,041 6,021 6,021 Handling, catering and other operating costs 1,340 1,340 2,972 2,972 Landing fees and en-route charges 918 918 2,221 2,221 Engineering and other aircraft costs3 1,456 108 1,348 2,092 2,092 Property, IT and other costs4 782 28 754 811 811 Selling costs 405 405 1,038 1,038 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment5 2,955 856 2,099 2,111 2,111 Currency differences 81 81 (7) (7) Total expenditure on operations 15,232 2,999 12,233 22,893 672 22,221 Operating (loss)/profit (7,426) (3,061) (4,365) 2,613 (672) 3,285
Finance costs (670) (670) (611) (611) Finance income 41 41 50 50 Net financing credit relating to pensions 4 4 26 26 Net currency retranslation credits 245 245 201 201 Other non-operating charges (4) (4) (4) (4) Total net non-operating costs (384) (384) (338) (338) (Loss)/profit before tax (7,810) (3,061) (4,749) 2,275 (672) 2,947 Tax 887 463 424 (560) (560) (Loss)/profit after tax for the year (6,923) (2,598) (4,325) 1,715 (672) 2,387
The definition of each APM, together with a reconciliation to the nearest measure prepared in accordance with IFRS is
198
The exceptional charge of €319 million (comprising €313 million of employee severance pay and €6 million of associated legal costs) represent the Group-wide restructuring programme, which right-sizes the Group for the near term. While the restructuring programme affects all of the Group's operating companies, the exceptional charges in the year to December 31, 2020 relate to British Airways, Aer Lingus, Iberia and LEVEL only, due to the status of negotiations with employees and their representatives. The exceptional charge has been recorded within Employee costs and Property, IT and other costs.
The related tax credit was €53 million.
The exceptional charge of €108 million includes an inventory write-down expense of €71 million and a charge relating to contractual lease provisions of €37 million. The inventory write-down expense represents those expendable inventories that, given the asset impairments, are no longer expected to be utilised. The charge relating to the recognition of contractual lease provisions represents the estimation of the additional cost to fulfil the hand back conditions associated with the leased aircraft that have been permanently stood down and impaired, which are discussed further below. The exceptional charge has been recorded within Engineering and other aircraft costs.
The related tax credit was €14 million.
The exceptional charge of €22 million represents the fine issued by the Information Commissioner's Office in the United Kingdom, relating to the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018. The exceptional charge has been recorded within Property, IT and other costs in the Income statement, with a corresponding amount recorded in Provisions.
There is no tax impact on the recognition of this charge.
The total exceptional impairment expense of €856 million is represented by an impairment of fleet assets of €837 million and an impairment of other assets of €19 million. The fleet impairment relates to 82 aircraft, their associated engines and rotable inventories that have been stood down permanently and 2 further aircraft which have been impaired down to their recoverable value at December 31, 2020, which includes 32 Boeing 747 aircraft, 23 Airbus A320 aircraft, 15 Airbus A340 aircraft, 4 Airbus A330-200 aircraft, 2 Airbus A318 aircraft, 1 Airbus A321 aircraft, 1 Airbus A319 aircraft, 2 Boeing 777-200 aircraft and 4 Embraer E170 aircraft. Of the fleet impairment, €676 million is recorded within Property, plant and equipment relating to owned aircraft and €161 million is recorded within Right of use assets relating to leased aircraft.
Included within the impairment of other assets is an amount of €15 million relating to the landing rights, classified within Intangible assets, that were held by the operations of LEVEL in Paris. Following the decision to cease the operations of LEVEL in Paris, these landing rights have been recorded at the lower of their carrying value and their recoverable value.
The exceptional impairment expenses have been recorded within Depreciation, amortisation and impairment in the Income statement.
The impairment expense has arisen from the substantial deterioration in current and forecast demand for air travel caused by the COVID-19 outbreak, which has led the Group to re-assess the medium- and long-term capacity and utilisation of the fleet. Subsequent to these impairments, all assets are held at their recoverable amounts.
The exceptional expense of €672 million recognised in the year to December 31, 2019 related to the past service cost of the Airways Pension Scheme ('APS') settlement agreement described in note 30. This amount arose from the increase in the IAS 19 defined benefit liability of APS following the settlement agreement between the Trustee Directors of APS and British Airways which was approved by the High Court in November 2019. The settlement agreement established higher pensions in payment growth assumptions in future years, resulting in a non-cash increase to the IAS 19 defined benefit liability. The exceptional charge was recorded within Employee costs.
The table below provides a reconciliation of the post-exceptional to pre-exceptional condensed alternative income statement by operating segment for the years to 31 December 2020 and 2019:
www.iairgroup.com 203
199
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
| Year to December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| British Airways (£) | British Airways (€) | Iberia | Vueling | Aer Lingus | |||||||||||
| € million | Statutory | Exceptional items | Before exceptional items |
Statutory | Exceptional items | Before exceptional items |
Statutory | Exceptional items | Before exceptional items |
Statutory | Exceptional items | Before exceptional items |
Statutory | Exceptional items | Before exceptional items |
| Passenger revenue |
|||||||||||||||
| Cargo | 2,840 | (54) | 2,894 | 3,309 | (59) | 3,368 | 1,160 | - | 1,160 | 569 | - | 569 | 379 | (3) | 382 |
| revenue | 890 | - | 890 | 998 | - | 998 | 240 | - | 240 | - | - | - | 88 | - | 88 |
| Other | |||||||||||||||
| revenue | 217 | - | 217 | 251 | – | 251 | 859 | – | 859 | 5 | – | 5 | – | – | – |
| Total | |||||||||||||||
| revenue | 3,947 | (54) | 4,001 | 4,558 | (59) | 4,617 | 2,259 | – | 2,259 | 574 | – | 574 | 467 | (3) | 470 |
| Employee costs Fuel, oil costs and emissions |
1,916 | 221 | 1,695 | 2,168 | 243 | 1,925 | 798 | 14 | 784 | 196 | – | 196 | 217 | 24 | 193 |
| charges Depreciation, amortisation and |
1,996 | 837 | 1,159 | 2,317 | 984 | 1,333 | 716 | 344 | 372 | 314 | 154 | 160 | 286 | 144 | 142 |
| impairment Other operating |
1,475 | 399 | 1,076 | 1,659 | 445 | 1,214 | 612 | 242 | 370 | 345 | 68 | 277 | 157 | 24 | 133 |
| costs | 2,440 | 42 | 2,398 | 2,792 | 47 | 2,745 | 1,544 | 52 | 1,492 | 594 | 30 | 564 | 370 | 7 | 363 |
| Total expenditure on operations |
7,827 | 1,499 | 6,328 | 8,936 | 1,719 | 7,217 | 3,670 | 652 | 3,018 | 1,449 | 252 | 1,197 | 1,030 | 199 | 831 |
| Operating | |||||||||||||||
| loss | (3,880) (1,553) | (2,327) | (4,378) (1,778) (2,600) | (1,411) | (652) | (759) | (875) (252) | (623) | (563) (202) | (361) | |||||
| Operating margin (%) |
(98.3)% | (58.2)% | – | – | (62.5)% | (33.6)% | (152.3)% | (108.5)% | (120.4)% | (76.8)% |
€ million
Cargo
Other
Total
Employee
Depreciation, amortisation and
Fuel, oil costs and emissions
Other operating
Total expenditure
Operating
Operating
on
Passenger
Year to December 31, 2019 British Airways (£) British Airways (€) Iberia Vueling Aer Lingus
Statutory Exceptional items Before exceptional items Statutory Exceptional items Before exceptional items Statutory Exceptional items Before exceptional items Statutory Exceptional items Before exceptional items Statutory Exceptional items
revenue 11,899 - 11,899 13,525 - 13,525 4,053 - 4,053 2,437 - 2,437 2,060 - 2,060
revenue 711 - 711 808 - 808 291 - 291 – - – 54 - 54
revenue 680 - 680 773 - 773 1,301 - 1,301 18 - 18 11 - 11
revenue 13,290 - 13,290 15,106 - 15,106 5,645 - 5,645 2,455 - 2,455 2,125 - 2,125
costs 3,112 583 2,529 3,549 672 2,877 1,164 - 1,164 301 - 301 405 - 405
charges 3,237 - 3,237 3,679 - 3,679 1,202 - 1,202 548 - 548 460 - 460
impairment 1,106 - 1,106 1,258 - 1,258 390 - 390 250 - 250 130 - 130
costs 4,497 - 4,497 5,110 - 5,110 2,392 - 2,392 1,116 - 1,116 854 - 854
operations 11,952 583 11,369 13,596 672 12,924 5,148 - 5,148 2,215 - 2,215 1,849 - 1,849
profit 1,338 (583) 1,921 1,510 (672) 2,182 497 - 497 240 - 240 276 - 276
margin (%) 10.1 % 14.5 % – – 8.8 % 8.8 % 9.8 % 9.8 % 13.0 % 13.0 %
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES CONTINUED
200
204 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
201
Before exceptional
items
| Year to December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| British Airways (£) | British Airways (€) | Iberia | Vueling | Aer Lingus | |||||||||||
| € million | Statutory | Exceptional items | Before exceptional items |
Statutory | Exceptional items | Before exceptional items |
Statutory | Exceptional items | Before exceptional items |
Statutory | Exceptional items | Before exceptional items |
Statutory | Exceptional items | Before exceptional items |
| Passenger revenue |
11,899 | - | 11,899 | 13,525 | - | 13,525 | 4,053 | - | 4,053 | 2,437 | - | 2,437 | 2,060 | - | 2,060 |
| Cargo revenue |
711 | - | 711 | 808 | - | 808 | 291 | - | 291 | – | - | – | 54 | - | 54 |
| Other revenue |
680 | - | 680 | 773 | - | 773 | 1,301 | - | 1,301 | 18 | - | 18 | 11 | - | 11 |
| Total revenue |
13,290 | - | 13,290 | 15,106 | - | 15,106 | 5,645 | - | 5,645 | 2,455 | - | 2,455 | 2,125 | - | 2,125 |
| Employee costs Fuel, oil costs and |
3,112 | 583 | 2,529 | 3,549 | 672 | 2,877 | 1,164 | - | 1,164 | 301 | - | 301 | 405 | - | 405 |
| emissions charges Depreciation, |
3,237 | - | 3,237 | 3,679 | - | 3,679 | 1,202 | - | 1,202 | 548 | - | 548 | 460 | - | 460 |
| amortisation and impairment Other |
1,106 | - | 1,106 | 1,258 | - | 1,258 | 390 | - | 390 | 250 | - | 250 | 130 | - | 130 |
| operating costs |
4,497 | - | 4,497 | 5,110 | - | 5,110 | 2,392 | - | 2,392 | 1,116 | - | 1,116 | 854 | - | 854 |
| Total expenditure on operations |
11,952 | 583 | 11,369 | 13,596 | 672 | 12,924 | 5,148 | - | 5,148 | 2,215 | - | 2,215 | 1,849 | - | 1,849 |
| Operating profit |
1,338 | (583) | 1,921 | 1,510 | (672) | 2,182 | 497 | - | 497 | 240 | - | 240 | 276 | - | 276 |
| Operating margin (%) |
10.1 % | 14.5 % | – | – | 8.8 % | 8.8 % | 9.8 % | 9.8 % | 13.0 % | 13.0 % |
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES CONTINUED
Year to December 31, 2020 British Airways (£) British Airways (€) Iberia Vueling Aer Lingus
Statutory Exceptional items Before exceptional items Statutory Exceptional items Before exceptional items Statutory Exceptional items Before exceptional items Statutory Exceptional items Before exceptional items Statutory Exceptional items
revenue 2,840 (54) 2,894 3,309 (59) 3,368 1,160 - 1,160 569 - 569 379 (3) 382
revenue 890 - 890 998 - 998 240 - 240 - - - 88 - 88
revenue 217 - 217 251 – 251 859 – 859 5 – 5 – – –
revenue 3,947 (54) 4,001 4,558 (59) 4,617 2,259 – 2,259 574 – 574 467 (3) 470
costs 1,916 221 1,695 2,168 243 1,925 798 14 784 196 – 196 217 24 193
charges 1,996 837 1,159 2,317 984 1,333 716 344 372 314 154 160 286 144 142
impairment 1,475 399 1,076 1,659 445 1,214 612 242 370 345 68 277 157 24 133
costs 2,440 42 2,398 2,792 47 2,745 1,544 52 1,492 594 30 564 370 7 363
operations 7,827 1,499 6,328 8,936 1,719 7,217 3,670 652 3,018 1,449 252 1,197 1,030 199 831
loss (3,880) (1,553) (2,327) (4,378) (1,778) (2,600) (1,411) (652) (759) (875) (252) (623) (563) (202) (361)
margin (%) (98.3)% (58.2)% – – (62.5)% (33.6)% (152.3)% (108.5)% (120.4)% (76.8)%
Before exceptional
items
€ million
Cargo
Other
Total
Employee
Depreciation, amortisation and
Fuel, oil costs and emissions
Other operating
Total expenditure
Operating
Operating
on
Passenger
200
www.iairgroup.com 205
201
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES CONTINUED
Earnings are based on results before exceptional items after tax and adjusted for earnings attributable to equity holders and interest on convertible bonds, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, adjusted for the dilutive impact of the assumed conversion of the bonds and employee share schemes outstanding. The effect of the assumed conversion of the IAG €500 million convertible bond 2022 and outstanding employee share schemes is antidilutive for the year to December 31, 2020, and therefore has not been included in the diluted earnings per share calculation.
e Levered free cash flow (KPI)
f Net debt to EBITDA (KPI)
bearing deposits.
and/or to undertake inorganic growth opportunities.
Levered free cash flow represents the cash generated by the underlying businesses before shareholder returns and is defined as the net increase in cash and cash equivalents taken from the Cash flow statement, adjusting for movements in Current interestbearing deposits, less the cash inflows from the rights issue and adding back the cash outflows associated with dividends paid and the acquisition of treasury shares. The Group believes that this measure is useful to the users of the financial statements in understanding the underlying cash generating ability of the Group that is available to return to shareholders, to improve leverage
€ million 2020 2019 Net Increase in cash and cash equivalents 1,940 85 Less: (Decrease)/increase in current interest-bearing deposits (2,366) 103 Less: Net proceeds from rights issue (2,674) – Add: Dividends paid 53 1,308 Levered free cash flow (3,047) 1,496
To supplement total borrowings as presented in accordance with IFRS, the Group reviews net debt to EBITDA to assess its level of
net debt in comparison to the underlying earnings generated by the Group in order to evaluate the underlying business performance of the Group. This measure is used to monitor the Group's leverage and to assess financial headroom.
profitability of the Group and of the core operating cash flows generated by the business model.
Net debt is defined as long-term borrowings (both current and non-current), less cash, cash equivalents and current interest-
EBITDA is defined as operating profit before exceptional items, interest, taxation, depreciation, amortisation and impairment. The Group believes that this additional measure, which is used internally to assess the Group's financial capacity, is useful to the users of the financial statements in helping them to see how the Group's financial capacity has changed over the year. It is a measure of the
€ million Note 2020 2019 Interest-bearing long-term borrowings 23 15,679 14,254 Less: Cash and cash equivalents 19 (5,774) (4,062) Less: Current interest-bearing deposits 19 (143) (2,621) Net debt 9,762 7,571
Operating (loss)/profit b (7,426) 2,613 Add: Exceptional items b 3,061 672 Add: Depreciation, amortisation and impairment b 2,099 2,111 EBITDA (2,266) 5,396
Net debt to EBITDA (4.3) 1.4
| € million | Note | 2020 | 20191 |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Loss)/profit after tax attributable to equity holders of the parent | b | (6,923) | 1,715 |
| Exceptional items | b | (2,598) | (672) |
| (Loss)/profit after tax attributable to equity holders of the parent before exceptional | |||
| items | (4,325) | 2,387 | |
| Interest expense on convertible bonds | – | 26 | |
| Adjusted (loss)/earnings | (4,325) | 2,413 | |
| Weighted average number of shares used for basic earnings per share2 | 10 | 3,528 | 3,056 |
| Weighted average number of shares used for diluted earnings per share | 10 | 3,528 | 3,137 |
| Basic (loss)/earnings per share before exceptional items (€ cents) | (122.6) | 78.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted (loss)/earnings per share (€ cents) | (122.6) | 76.9 |
1 Earnings per share information has been restated for the comparative period presented, by adjusting the weighted average number of shares to include the impact of the rights issue (note 27). The discount element inherent in the rights issue has been accounted for as a bonus issue of 1,071,565 thousand shares in 2019.
2 In 2020, includes 734,657 thousand shares as the weighted average impact for 2,979,443 thousand new ordinary shares issued through the rights issue (note 27).
The Group monitors airline unit costs (per ASK, a standard airline measure of capacity) as a means of tracking operating efficiency of the core airline business. As fuel costs can vary with commodity prices, the Group monitors fuel and non-fuel costs individually. Within non-fuel costs are the costs associated with generating Other revenue, which typically do not represent the costs of transporting passengers or cargo and instead represent the costs of handling and maintenance for other airlines, non-flight products in BA Holidays and costs associated with other miscellaneous non-flight revenue streams. Airline non-fuel costs per ASK is defined as total operating expenditure before exceptional items, less fuel, oil costs and emission charges and less non-flight specific costs divided by total available seat kilometres (ASKs), and is shown on a constant currency basis.
| € million | Note | 2020 Reported |
ccy adjustment1 |
2020 ccy |
2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total expenditure on operations | b | 15,232 | (122) | 15,110 | 22,893 |
| Less: exceptional items within expenditure on operations | b | 2,999 | 2,999 | 672 | |
| Less: fuel, oil costs and emission charges before exceptional items |
b | 2,041 | (29) | 2,012 | 6,021 |
| Non-fuel costs | 10,192 | (93) | 10,099 | 16,200 | |
| Less: Non-flight specific costs | 851 | 1 | 852 | 1,654 | |
| Airline non-fuel costs | 9,341 | (94) | 9,247 | 14,546 | |
| ASKs | 113,195 | 113,195 | 337,754 | ||
| Airline non-fuel unit costs per ASK (€ cents) | 8.25 | 8.17 | 4.31 |
1 Refer to note h for the definition of the ccy adjustment
202
206 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES CONTINUED
has not been included in the diluted earnings per share calculation.
thousand shares in 2019.
d Airline non-fuel costs per ASK
issue (note 27).
c Basic earnings per share before exceptional items and adjusted earnings per share (KPI)
(Loss)/profit after tax attributable to equity holders of the parent before exceptional
costs divided by total available seat kilometres (ASKs), and is shown on a constant currency basis.
€ million Note
Less: fuel, oil costs and emission charges before exceptional
1 Refer to note h for the definition of the ccy adjustment
Earnings are based on results before exceptional items after tax and adjusted for earnings attributable to equity holders and interest on convertible bonds, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, adjusted for the dilutive impact of the assumed conversion of the bonds and employee share schemes outstanding. The effect of the assumed conversion of the IAG €500 million convertible bond 2022 and outstanding employee share schemes is antidilutive for the year to December 31, 2020, and therefore
€ million Note 2020 20191 (Loss)/profit after tax attributable to equity holders of the parent b (6,923) 1,715 Exceptional items b (2,598) (672)
items (4,325) 2,387 Interest expense on convertible bonds – 26 Adjusted (loss)/earnings (4,325) 2,413
Weighted average number of shares used for basic earnings per share2 10 3,528 3,056 Weighted average number of shares used for diluted earnings per share 10 3,528 3,137
Basic (loss)/earnings per share before exceptional items (€ cents) (122.6) 78.1 Adjusted (loss)/earnings per share (€ cents) (122.6) 76.9 1 Earnings per share information has been restated for the comparative period presented, by adjusting the weighted average number of shares to include the impact of the rights issue (note 27). The discount element inherent in the rights issue has been accounted for as a bonus issue of 1,071,565
2 In 2020, includes 734,657 thousand shares as the weighted average impact for 2,979,443 thousand new ordinary shares issued through the rights
The Group monitors airline unit costs (per ASK, a standard airline measure of capacity) as a means of tracking operating efficiency of the core airline business. As fuel costs can vary with commodity prices, the Group monitors fuel and non-fuel costs individually. Within non-fuel costs are the costs associated with generating Other revenue, which typically do not represent the costs of transporting passengers or cargo and instead represent the costs of handling and maintenance for other airlines, non-flight products in BA Holidays and costs associated with other miscellaneous non-flight revenue streams. Airline non-fuel costs per ASK is defined as total operating expenditure before exceptional items, less fuel, oil costs and emission charges and less non-flight specific
Total expenditure on operations b 15,232 (122) 15,110 22,893 Less: exceptional items within expenditure on operations b 2,999 2,999 672
items b 2,041 (29) 2,012 6,021 Non-fuel costs 10,192 (93) 10,099 16,200 Less: Non-flight specific costs 851 1 852 1,654 Airline non-fuel costs 9,341 (94) 9,247 14,546
ASKs 113,195 113,195 337,754
Airline non-fuel unit costs per ASK (€ cents) 8.25 8.17 4.31
2020 Reported
ccy adjustment1
2020
ccy 2019
202
Levered free cash flow represents the cash generated by the underlying businesses before shareholder returns and is defined as the net increase in cash and cash equivalents taken from the Cash flow statement, adjusting for movements in Current interestbearing deposits, less the cash inflows from the rights issue and adding back the cash outflows associated with dividends paid and the acquisition of treasury shares. The Group believes that this measure is useful to the users of the financial statements in understanding the underlying cash generating ability of the Group that is available to return to shareholders, to improve leverage and/or to undertake inorganic growth opportunities.
| € million | 2020 | 2019 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Increase in cash and cash equivalents | 1,940 | 85 | |||
| Less: (Decrease)/increase in current interest-bearing deposits | (2,366) | 103 | |||
| Less: Net proceeds from rights issue | (2,674) | – | |||
| Add: Dividends paid | 53 | 1,308 | |||
| Levered free cash flow (3,047) |
To supplement total borrowings as presented in accordance with IFRS, the Group reviews net debt to EBITDA to assess its level of net debt in comparison to the underlying earnings generated by the Group in order to evaluate the underlying business performance of the Group. This measure is used to monitor the Group's leverage and to assess financial headroom.
Net debt is defined as long-term borrowings (both current and non-current), less cash, cash equivalents and current interestbearing deposits.
EBITDA is defined as operating profit before exceptional items, interest, taxation, depreciation, amortisation and impairment. The Group believes that this additional measure, which is used internally to assess the Group's financial capacity, is useful to the users of the financial statements in helping them to see how the Group's financial capacity has changed over the year. It is a measure of the profitability of the Group and of the core operating cash flows generated by the business model.
| € million | Note | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest-bearing long-term borrowings | 23 | 15,679 | 14,254 |
| Less: Cash and cash equivalents | 19 | (5,774) | (4,062) |
| Less: Current interest-bearing deposits | 19 | (143) | (2,621) |
| Net debt | 9,762 | 7,571 | |
| Operating (loss)/profit | b | (7,426) | 2,613 |
| Add: Exceptional items | b | 3,061 | 672 |
| Add: Depreciation, amortisation and impairment | b | 2,099 | 2,111 |
| EBITDA | (2,266) | 5,396 | |
| Net debt to EBITDA | (4.3) | 1.4 |
www.iairgroup.com 207
203
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES CONTINUED
The Group monitors return on invested capital (RoIC) as it gives an indication of the Group's capital efficiency relative to the capital invested as well as the ability to fund growth and to pay dividends. RoIC is defined as EBITDA, less fleet depreciation adjusted for inflation, depreciation of other property, plant and equipment, and amortisation of software intangibles, divided by average invested capital and is expressed as a percentage.
Invested capital is defined as the average of property, plant and equipment and software intangible assets over a 12-month period between the opening and closing net book values. The fleet aspect of property, plant and equipment is inflated over the average age of the fleet to approximate the replacement cost of the associated assets.
| € million | Note | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBITDA | f | (2,266) | 5,396 |
| Less: Fleet depreciation multiplied by inflation adjustment | (1,921) | (2,040) | |
| Less: Other property, plant and equipment depreciation | (258) | (259) | |
| Less: Software intangible amortisation | (151) | (131) | |
| (4,596) | 2,966 | ||
| Invested capital | |||
| Average fleet value2 | 12 | 16,020 | 15,598 |
| Less: average progress payments3 | 12 | (1,117) | (1,297) |
| Fleet book value less progress payments | 14,903 | 14,301 | |
| Inflation adjustment1 | 1.18 | 1.19 | |
| 17,520 | 17,065 | ||
| Average net book value of other property, plant and equipment4 | 12 | 2,329 | 2,448 |
| Average net book value of software intangible assets5 | 14 | 652 | 603 |
| Total invested capital | 20,501 | 20,116 | |
| Return on Invested Capital | (22.4)% | 14.7 % |
1 Presented to two decimal places and calculated using a 1.5 per cent inflation (December 31, 2019: 1.5 per cent inflation) rate over the weighted average age of the fleet December 31, 2020: 9.8 years (December 31, 2019: 11.9 years).
2 The average net book value of aircraft is calculated from an amount of €16,675 million at December 31, 2019 and €15,365 million at December 31, 2020.
3 The average net book value of progress payments is calculated from an amount of €1,525 million at December 31, 2019 and €710 million at December 31, 2020.
4 The average net book value of other property, plant and equipment is calculated from an amount of €2,493 million at December 31, 2019 and €2,166 million at December 31, 2020.
5 The average net book value of software intangible assets is calculated from an amount of €666 million at December 31, 2019 and €638 million at December 31, 2020.
Movements in foreign exchange rates impact the Group's financial results. The Group reviews the results, including revenue and operating costs at constant rates of exchange (abbreviated to 'ccy'). The Group calculates these financial measures at constant rates of exchange based on a retranslation, at prior year exchange rates, of the current year's results of the Group. Although the Group does not believe that these measures are a substitute for IFRS measures, the Group does believe that such results excluding the impact of currency fluctuations year-on-year provide additional useful information to investors regarding the Group's operating performance on a constant currency basis. Accordingly, the financial measures at constant currency within the discussion of the Group Financial review should be read in conjunction with the information provided in the Group financial statements.
The following table represents the main average and closing exchange rates for the reporting periods. Where 2020 figures are stated at a constant currency basis, they have applied the 2019 rates stated below:
204
| Average | Closing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | ||
| Euro to pound sterling | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.10 | 1.18 | |
| US dollar to the euro | 1.13 | 1.12 | 1.22 | 1.11 | |
| US dollar to pound sterling | 1.27 | 1.27 | 1.35 | 1.31 |
208 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
| Name and address | Principal activity | Country of incorporation |
Percentage of equity owned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avios Group (AGL) Limited* | |||
| Astral Towers, Betts Way, London Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XY | Airline marketing | England | 100% |
| BA and AA Holdings Limited* Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB |
Holding company | England | 100% |
| BA Call Centre India Private Limited (callBA) F-42, East of Kailash, New-Delhi, 110065 |
Call centre | India | 100% |
| BA Cityflyer Limited* | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Airline operations | England | 100% |
| BA European Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Holding company | England | 100% |
| BA Excepted Group Life Scheme Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Life insurance | England | 100% |
| BA Healthcare Trust Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Healthcare | England | 100% |
| BA Holdco Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Holding company | England | 100% |
| BA Number One Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Dormant | England | 100% |
| BA Number Two Limited | |||
| IFC 5, St Helier, JE1 1ST | Dormant | Jersey | 100% |
| Bealine Plc | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Dormant | England | 100% |
| BritAir Holdings Limited* | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Holding company | England | 100% |
| British Airways (BA) Limited Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB |
Dormant | England | 100% |
| British Airways 777 Leasing Limited* Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB |
Aircraft leasing | England | 100% |
| British Airways Associated Companies Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Holding company | England | 100% |
| British Airways Avionic Engineering Limited* | Aircraft | ||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | maintenance | England | 100% |
| British Airways Capital Limited | |||
| Queensway House, Hilgrove Street, St Helier, JE1 1ES | Aircraft financing | Jersey | 100% |
| British Airways Holdings B.V. | |||
| Strawinskylaan 3105, Atrium, Amsterdam, 1077ZX | Holding company | Netherlands | 100% |
| British Airways Holidays Limited* | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Tour operator | England | 100% |
| British Airways Interior Engineering Limited* | Aircraft | ||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | maintenance | England | 100% |
| British Airways Leasing Limited* | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Aircraft leasing | England | 100% |
| British Airways Maintenance Cardiff Limited* | Aircraft | ||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | maintenance | England | 100% |
| British Airways Pension Trustees (No 2) Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Trustee company | England | 100% |
| British Midland Airways Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Former airline | England | 100% |
| British Midland Limited Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB |
Dormant | England | 100% |
| Diamond Insurance Company Limited 1st Floor, Rose House, 51-59 Circular Road, Douglas, IM1 1RE |
Dormant | Isle of Man | 100% |
| Flyline Tele Sales & Services GmbH Hermann Koehl-Strasse 3, 28199, Bremen |
Call centre | Germany | 100% |
| Gatwick Ground Services Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Ground services | England | 100% |
| Overseas Air Travel Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Transport | England | 100% |
| Speedbird Insurance Company Limited* | |||
| Canon's Court, 22 Victoria Street, Hamilton, HM 12 | Insurance | Bermuda | 100% |
| British Mediterranean Airways Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Former airline | England | 99% |
www.iairgroup.com 209
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
GROUP INVESTMENTS CONTINUED
| Name and address | Principal activity | Country of incorporation |
Percentage of equity owned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compañía Explotación Aviones Cargueros Cargosur, S.A. | |||
| Calle Martínez Villergas 49, Madrid, 28027 | Cargo transport | Spain | 100% |
| Compañía Operadora de Corto y Medio Radio Iberia Express, S.A.* | |||
| Calle Alcañiz 23, Madrid, 28006 | Airline operations | Spain | 100% |
| Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España, S.A. Operadora* | Airline operations | ||
| Calle Martínez Villergas 49, Madrid, 28027 | and maintenance | Spain | 100%1 |
| Iberia México, S.A.* | Storage and | ||
| Ejército Nacional 439, Mexico City, 11510 | custody services | Mexico | 100% |
| Iberia Operadora UK Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Dormant | England | 100% |
| Iberia Tecnología, S.A.* | Aircraft | ||
| Calle Martínez Villergas 49, Madrid, 28027 | maintenance | Spain | 100% |
| Auxiliar Logística Aeroportuaria, S.A.* | Airport logistics | ||
| Centro de Carga Aérea, Parcela 2 P5, Nave 6, Madrid, 28042 | and cargo terminal | ||
| management | Spain | 75% | |
| Compañía Auxiliar al Cargo Exprés, S.A.* | |||
| Centro de Carga Aérea, Parcela 2 P5, Nave 6, Madrid, 28042 | Cargo transport | Spain | 75% |
| Iberia Desarrollo Barcelona, S.L.* | Airport | ||
| Avenida de les Garrigues 38-44, Edificio B, | infrastructure | ||
| El Prat de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08220 | development | Spain | 75% |
| Aer Lingus | |||
| Percentage | |||
| Name and address | Principal activity | Country of incorporation |
of equity owned |
| Provision of human | |||
| resources support | |||
| Aer Lingus (Ireland) Limited | to fellow group | Republic of | |
| Dublin Airport, Dublin | companies | Ireland | 100% |
| Aer Lingus 2009 DCS Trustee Limited | Republic of | ||
| Dublin Airport, Dublin | Dormant | Ireland | 100% |
| Aer Lingus Beachey Limited | |||
| Penthouse Suite, Analyst House, Peel Road, IM1 4LZ | Dormant | Isle of Man | 100% |
| Aer Lingus Group DAC* | Republic of | ||
| Aer Lingus Beachey Limited | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Penthouse Suite, Analyst House, Peel Road, IM1 4LZ | Dormant | Isle of Man | 100% |
| Aer Lingus Group DAC* | Republic of | ||
| Dublin Airport, Dublin | Holding company | Ireland | 100%2 |
| Aer Lingus Limited* | Republic of | ||
| Dublin Airport, Dublin | Airline operations | Ireland | 100% |
| Aer Lingus (UK) Limited | |||
| Aer Lingus Base, Belfast City Airport, Sydenham Bypass, Belfast, Co. Antrim, BT3 | Northern | ||
| 9JH | Dormant | Ireland | 100% |
| ALG Trustee Limited | |||
| 33-37 Athol Street, Douglas, IM1 1LB | Trustee | Isle of Man | 100% |
| Dirnan Insurance Company Limited | |||
| Canon's Court, 22 Victoria Street, Hamilton, Bermuda, HM 12 | Insurance | Bermuda | 100% |
| Santain Developments Limited | Republic of | ||
| Dublin Airport, Dublin | Dormant | Ireland | 100% |
210 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
| IAG Loyalty | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage | |||
| Name and address | Principal activity | Country of incorporation |
of equity owned |
| Avios South Africa Proprietary Limited | |||
| Block C, 1 Marignane Drive, Bonaero Park, Gauteng, 1619 | Dormant | South Africa | 100% |
| IAG Loyalty Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Dormant | England | 100% |
| IAG Cargo | |||
| Percentage | |||
| Country of | of equity | ||
| Name and address | Principal activity | incorporation | owned |
| Routestack Limited Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB |
Shipping solutions | England | 100% |
| Zenda Group Limited Carrus Cargo Centre, PO Box 99, Sealand Road, London Heathrow |
|||
| Airport, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW6 2JS | Shipping solutions | England | 100% |
| Vueling | |||
| Country of | Percentage of equity |
||
| Name and address | Principal activity | incorporation | owned |
| Yellow Handling, S.L.U | |||
| Plaça Pla de l'Estany 5, Parque de Negocios Mas Blau II, | |||
| El Prat de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08820 | Ground handling services | Spain | 100% |
| Vueling Airlines, S.A.* | |||
| Plaça Pla de l'Estany 5, Parque de Negocios Mas Blau II, | |||
| El Prat de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08820 | Airline operations | Spain | 99.5% |
| LEVEL | |||
| Percentage | |||
| Country of | of equity | ||
| Name and address | Principal activity | incorporation | owned |
| FLYLEVEL UK Limited Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB |
Airline operations | England | 100% |
| Openskies SASU 3 Rue le Corbusier, Rungis, 94150 |
Airline operations | France | 100% |
| International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A. | |||
| Percentage | |||
| Name and address | Principal activity | Country of incorporation |
of equity owned |
| AERL Holding Limited | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Holding company | England | 100% |
| British Airways Plc* | |||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | Airline operations | England | 100%3 |
| FLY LEVEL, S.L. | |||
| Camino de la Muñoza s/n, El Caserío, | |||
| Iberia Zona Industrial 2, Madrid, 28042 | Airline operations | Spain | 100% |
| IAG Cargo Limited* | |||
| Carrus Cargo Centre, PO Box 99, Sealand Road, London Heathrow | |||
| Airport, Hounslow, TW6 2JS | Air freight operations | England | 100% |
| IAG Connect Limited | Inflight eCommerce | Republic of | |
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | platform | Ireland | 100% |
| IAG GBS Limited* | IT, finance, procurement | ||
| Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB | services | England | 100% |
| IAG GBS Poland sp z.o.o.* | IT, finance, procurement | ||
| Ul. Opolska 114, Krakow, 31-323 | services | Poland | 100% |
| IB Opco Holding, S.L. Calle Martínez Villergas 49, Madrid, 28027 |
Holding company | Spain | 100%1 |
| Veloz Holdco, S.L. | |||
| Plaça Pla de l'Estany 5, Parque de Negocios Mas Blau II, | |||
| El Prat de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08820 | Holding company | Spain | 100% |
* Principal subsidiaries
1 The Group holds 49.9% of both the total nominal share capital and the total number of voting rights in IB Opco Holding, S.L. (and thus, indirectly, in Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España, S.A. Operadora), such stake having almost 100% of the economic rights in these companies. The remaining shares, representing 50.1% of the total nominal share capital and the total number of voting rights belong to a Spanish company incorporated for the purposes of implementing the Iberia nationality structure.
2 The Group holds 49.75% of the total number of voting rights and the majority of the economic rights in Aer Lingus Group DAC. The remaining voting rights, representing 50.25 per cent, correspond to a trust established for implementing the Aer Lingus nationality structure.
3 The Group holds 49.9% of the total number of voting rights and 99.65% of the total nominal share capital in British Airways Plc, such stake having almost 100% of the economic rights. The remaining nominal share capital and voting rights, representing 0.35% and 50.1% respectively, are held by a trust established for the purposes of implementing the British Airways nationality structure.
www.iairgroup.com 211
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
GROUP INVESTMENTS CONTINUED
| Name and address | Country of incorporation |
Percentage of equity owned |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Empresa Hispano Cubana de Mantenimiento de Aeronaves, Ibeca, S.A. | |||||
| Avenida de Vantroi y Final, | |||||
| Jose Martí Airport, Havana | Cuba | 50% | |||
| Empresa Logística de Carga Aérea, S.A. | |||||
| Carretera de Wajay km 15, | |||||
| Jose Martí Airport, Havana | Cuba | 50% | |||
| Multiservicios Aeroportuarios, S.A. Avenida de Manoteras 46, 2ª planta, Madrid, 28050 |
Spain | 49% | |||
| Dunwoody Airline Services Limited | |||||
| Building 70, Argosy Road, East Midlands Airport, | |||||
| Castle Donnington, Derby, DE74 2SA | England | 40% | |||
| Serpista, S.A. | |||||
| Calle Cardenal Marcelo Spínola 10, Madrid, 28016 | Spain | 39% | |||
| Air Miles España, S.A. | |||||
| Avenida de Bruselas 20, Alcobendas, Madrid, 28108 | Spain | 26.7% | |||
| Inloyalty by Travel Club, S.L.U. | |||||
| Avenida de Bruselas 20, Alcobendas, Madrid, 28108 | Spain | 26.7% | |||
| Viajes Ame, S.A. | |||||
| Avenida de Bruselas 20, Alcobendas, Madrid, 28108 | Spain | 26.7% | |||
| DeepAir Solutions Limited | |||||
| Ground Floor North, 86 Brook Street, London, W1K 5AY | England | 24.75% | |||
| Joint ventures | |||||
| Percentage | |||||
| Country of | of equity | ||||
| Name and address | incorporation | owned | |||
| Sociedad Conjunta para la Emisión y Gestión de Medios de Pago EFC, S.A. Calle de O'Donnell 12, Madrid, 28009 |
Spain | 50.5% | |||
| Other equity investments | |||||
| The Group's principal other equity investments are as follows: | |||||
| Percentage | Shareholder's | Profit/(loss) | |||
| Country of | of equity | funds | before tax | ||
| Name and address | Incorporation | owned | Currency | (million) | (million) |
| Servicios de Instrucción de Vuelo, S.L. | |||||
| Camino de la Muñoza s/n, El Caserío, | |||||
| Iberia Zona Industrial 2, Madrid, 28042 | Spain | 19.9% | EUR | (71) | (10) |
| The Airline Group Limited | |||||
| 5th Floor, Brettenham House South, Lancaster Place, | |||||
| London, WC2N 7EN | England | 16.68% | GBP | 287 | 25 |
| Importwise Limited | |||||
| International House, 12 Constance Street, London, E16 2DQ | England | 14.8% | GBP | n/a | n/a |
| Comair Limited | South | ||||
| 1 Marignane Drive, Bonaero Park, Johannesburg, 1619 | Africa | 11.49% | ZAR | 760 | (2,091) |
| Travel Quinto Centenario, S.A. | |||||
| Calle Alemanes 3, Sevilla, 41004 | Spain | 10% | EUR | n/a | n/a |
| i6 Group Limited | |||||
| Farnborough Airport, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 6XA | England | 7.42% | GBP | 6 | (1) |
| Monese Limited | |||||
| 1 King Street, London, EC2V 8AU | England | 6.45% | GBP | (16) | (29) |
212 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Consolidated management report for the year ended December 31, 2020
This Management Report has been prepared in accordance with Article 262 of the Spanish Companies Act and Article 49 of the Spanish Commercial Code. Pursuant to this legislation, this Management Report must contain a fair review of the progress of the business and the performance of the company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces. In the preparation of this report, IAG has taken into consideration the guide published in 2013 by the Spanish National Securities Market Commission (CNMV) which establishes a number of recommendations for the preparation of Management Reports of listed companies.
The Management Report contains the following sections:
| 2 | Business model and strategy |
|---|---|
| 4 | Our strategic priorities and key performance indicators |
| 8 | Financial overview |
| 9 | Financial review |
| 22 | IAG Platform |
| 23 | Sustainability |
| 56 | Risk management and principal risk factors |
| 67 | Regulatory environment |
Both the Annual Corporate Governance Report and the Non-Financial Information Statement in response to the requirements of Law 11/2018, of December 28, (amending the Commercial Code, the revised Capital Companies Law approved by Legislative Royal Decree 1/2010, of July 2, 2010 and Audit Law 22/2015, of July 20, 2015), are part of this Management Report.
To be the world's leading airline group, employing exceptional talent and maximising sustainable value creation for our shareholders and providers of finance, customers and other stakeholders
IAG is the parent company of the Group and actively engages and works collaboratively with its portfolio of operating companies to drive synergies and maximise performance. Its independence from the operating companies allows for objective, flexible and rapid decision-making and enables IAG to implement the strategy to deliver the long-term vision for the Group. The operating companies are in turn able to focus their efforts on their target customers, competitive environment and their people.
The portfolio sits on the Group's common integrated platform which drives efficiency and simplicity while allowing each operating company to achieve individual performance targets and maintain its unique identity.
Defines portfolio attractiveness
Exerts vertical and horizontal influence across the Group
Sets the long-term strategy to deliver the vision for the Group
Corporate parent
Deep and real-time understanding of customer and competitive environment
Define product strategy for target customer segments
Standalone profit centres and independent credit identities
Individual brand, cultural identity and management teams
Provides common services and allows the Group's operations to benefit from cost reductions and synergies by leveraging the Group's scale
IAG combines leading airlines in Ireland, the UK and Spain with key non-airline businesses, enabling them to enhance their presence in the aviation market while retaining their individual brand identities.
The airlines each target specific customer markets and geographies providing choice across the full spectrum of customer needs and travel occasions.
The airlines' customers benefit from a larger combined network for both passengers and cargo and the airlines also utilise successful joint businesses and alliance partnerships to expand their global reach. The scale of the Group also allows it to more efficiently innovate and invest in new products and services to enhance the customer experience.
The people across our Group are pivotal in delivering the ethos of each of our companies and retaining and promoting talent is a key driver of our success.
Operationally focused companies Diversified customer base Complementary networks Distinct brands Employees pivotal to each operation's unique identity
Revenue share leaders in our home cities
Transatlantic leadership and a leading player intra-Europe
A key player in the consolidation of the airline sector
Retain and promote talent
COST EFFICIENCY
Continual total cost focus
Track record of successful restructuring during crises
10 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
INNOVATION
Dynamic and creative culture and workforce
At the forefront of digital innovation in the airline industry
Digital platform to grow revenue streams, enhance customer loyalty and drive cost efficiencies

nned by susta
The Group's strategy is underpinned by its target to be the leading airline group on sustainability. We remain committed to reducing our carbon footprint and to reach the goal of net zero CO2 emissions by 2050 and continue to prioritise other key sustainability issues including waste management, stakeholder engagement and employee engagement and welfare.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
We use a combination of financial and non-financial metrics to measure the performance and progress of our strategy:
• Operating result
• ASKs
See section Strategic priorities and key performance indicators
• EPS
See section Strategic priorities and key performance indicators
www.iairgroup.com 11
Our performance
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Group's portfolio of brands focused on supporting the wider community in tackling the impacts of the pandemic. In order to aid the COVID-19 relief efforts, the Group has flown critical equipment and essential medical supplies across the world, and each of the Group's airlines offered repatriation flights to bring customers safely home after the introduction of COVID-19-related travel restrictions and border closures. Each brand and operation also focused on supporting their local communities through charitable work such as volunteering at local hospitals, donating supplies and delivering care packages.
IAG's airlines have adapted the customer journey by introducing a range of measures to support consumer confidence. With the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in variable and unpredictable travel rules, the Group's airlines have implemented commercial reassurance measures for customers,
such as extending flexible booking policies and guaranteeing flights that will operate. In addition, IAG supported the development of a COVID-19 insurance product aimed to support and protect customers against travel restrictions and health concerns.
The Group has influenced and trialled industry guidelines for safe travel, such as ICAO's Council Aviation Recovery Taskforce (CART) 'Take-off' Guidance. IAG has also been working with government and industry bodies to call for an effective COVID-19 testing procedure which could be used to reduce or remove quarantine requirements and enhance passenger safety onboard. In support of this, British Airways, together with its joint business partner American Airlines and the oneworld alliance, has trialled COVID-19 testing on routes from the USA to London Heathrow. All brands have also updated their customer communications to provide clear guidance on the new airport and onboard procedures, COVID-19 specific entry requirements for relevant destinations and an overview of the enhanced cleaning measures adopted by the airline.
The Group will continue its leading work on safety, aiming to ensure its businesses can deliver an unrivalled customer proposition that adapts to meet changing customer expectations, regulatory requirements and drives customer trust as well as satisfaction. The brands will continue to deepen their understanding of changes in the needs and expectations of different customer types, in particular as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and will evolve their products and services to best deliver against the needs of the customer. Strong emphasis will be placed on digitalisation, including automating disruption management and delivering touchless travel solutions.
+10.9 pts vly
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
measures the customer's sentiment and loyalty to a brand. At IAG a transactional NPS is measured: customers respond about their likelihood of recommending an IAG operating carrier no more than seven days after taking a flight. Including NPS targets in the Group's employee bonus scheme has driven a stronger focus on improving the customer experience, which together with customer advocacy drives competitive
4
18 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
IAG's NPS in 2020 increased 10.9 points versus 2019, achieving record levels of customer satisfaction and growth across all IAG airlines. However, this score must be viewed in the context of the pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has altered customer expectations and demanded a significant change in the flying experience. IAG has adapted the customer journey by introducing a range of reassurance measures to protect the safety and wellbeing of our customers, including revised service routines to promote social distancing, increased levels of aircraft cleaning and the provision of complimentary personal protection packs to all customers on board. The customer response to these and other
reassurance measures has been overwhelmingly positive.
At the same time, the reduced flying schedule in 2020 has helped deliver improved on-time performance whilst the decrease in customer demand has contributed to lower load factors, both of which have historically been closely correlated with customer satisfaction.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the flying experience makes comparisons with prior and future periods challenging, however the Group's NPS performance in the first two months of 2020 (when customer demand was similar to that of the prior year) exceeded equivalent 2019 levels, suggesting a continuation of the positive customer satisfaction trends exhibited in recent years in the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Strategic priority
How we create value
Our performance
In 2020, the Group has primarily focused on securing its financial position so that, as the industry recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is well-placed to maintain and bolster the existing leadership positions it holds in its home cities of Barcelona, Dublin, London, and Madrid.
Despite challenging and changeable travel restrictions, the Group continually optimised its network to deploy aircraft on routes with the most demand and has worked closely with its joint business partners to ensure the relationships help support each other through the recovery, and continue to provide choice and flexibility to customers.
In response to the drop in demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and recognising that the full recovery would take at least three years, the Group took strong, decisive action to right-size its businesses, including grounding a large number of aircraft, accelerating the retirement of older, less fuelefficient aircraft and securing deferrals. Additionally, in October, IAG successfully secured €2.74 billion in funding through a capital increase which has helped strengthen the financial position of the Group's existing businesses. These actions will allow the Group to take advantage of opportunities for value-accretive growth that may arise as we recover from the pandemic.
5
As and when the global aviation industry starts to recover from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Group's priority will be to invest in strengthening and maintaining its leadership positions in each of its home cities by managing and optimising its networks to meet demand.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Following receipt of antitrust approval for Aer Lingus to join the Atlantic Joint Business in December 2020, IAG will progress the integration of Aer Lingus into the joint business. In addition, the Group will continue to leverage its other joint businesses, alliances and partnerships and where appropriate form new joint businesses.
The Air Europa acquisition remains subject to approval from competition authorities. If approval is received, IAG will then prioritise the integration of Air Europa into the Group and commence delivering the synergies brought about by the acquisition.
www.iairgroup.com 19

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS CONTINUED
6
20 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Definition and purpose Capacity in the airline industry is measured in available seat kilometres (ASKs) which is the number of seats available for sale multiplied by
Definition and purpose Return on Invested Capital (RoIC) is
Definition and purpose Operating margin is the Group operating result before exceptional items as a percentage of revenue. We use this indicator to measure the efficiency and profitability of our business and the financial performance of the individual operating companies
depreciation, other depreciation and software amortisation, divided by average invested capital. We use 12-months rolling RoIC to assess how well the Group generates returns in relation to the capital invested in the business together with its ability to fund growth and to pay dividends.
A R
, less adjusted fleet
Performance
in the year.
air travel.
Performance
The Group's RoIC fell 37.1 points versus last year to -22.4%. The decrease reflects the significant reduction in EBITDA of €7,662 million on similar levels of invested capital. The average age of fleet decreased from 11.9 years to 9.8 years reflecting the early fleet retirements of legacy aircraft but the average fleet value was in line with prior year, driven by the fleet additions
defined as EBITDA1
Definition and purpose
with achieving our other financial targets. Planned CAPEX
Definition and purpose Levered free cash flow is the cash generated in the year before returns to shareholders. It is used, in conjunction with leverage (measured as net debt to EBITDA), to measure the underlying cash generation of the business.
20 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
IAG significantly reduced planned gross CAPEX for the three years 2020
IAG's capacity was severely impacted by global travel restrictions, following initial lockdowns in March. Capacity recovered at a slow rate as strict quarantine rules and travel restrictions, put in place by governments, limited
Gross CAPEX (capital expenditure) is the total investment in fleet, customer product, IT and infrastructure (including leased right of use assets) before any proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment. We track the planned capital expenditure through our business planning cycle to ensure it is in line
demand. Recovery was then further impacted by the re-introduction of lockdowns as second and third wave COVID-19 infections swept across the UK, Europe and many other parts of the world. IAG's fleet plans have the flexibility to be able to adapt capacity as needed and react quickly to changes in demand when borders re-open and
The Group's operating margin fell by 68.4 points to -55.5 per cent. The Group acted quickly to implement initiatives to reduce non-fuel costs and to right-size the business; this helped to significantly reduce operating costs (excluding exceptional costs) and ensure IAG is well positioned to take advantage of a recovery in demand for
to 2022, reducing planned spend for the period from €14.2 billion3 to approximately €7 billion including the deferral of 68 fleet deliveries across the period. 2020 gross CAPEX reflected spend to maintain core IT infrastructure and cyber projects plus the addition of 34 aircraft during the year that could not be deferred. €0.5 billion of gross CAPEX has been delayed from late 2020 into 2021, due to aircraft delivery delays. The Group has also retired legacy aircraft early, with the two main fleet retirements being the Boeing 747 fleet of British Airways and the Airbus A340-600
The Group's levered free cash flow for 2020 was -€3,047 million, €4.5 billion lower than 2019, due to the significant impact of COVID-19 on the business. Cost savings have included the impact of employee furlough and equivalent schemes following measures taken by national governments, which were applied from April and these, together with other employee and supplier cost reductions, have helped reduce
restrictions are lifted.
fleet of Iberia.
Performance
operating cash costs.
the distance flown. 2020 performance
within the Group.
A
Targeting sustainable 15%
Targeting
12-15%
Average capacity (ASKs)
-55.5
2020
KPI or industry measure
2020
'18 '19 '20
-3,047
7361,496
Alternative performance measure
Measure linked to remuneration of Management Committee
A
R
-66.5%
'18 '19 '20
'18 '19 '20
-22.4
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS CONTINUED
Operating margin (%)1
16.9 14.7
14.4 12.9
RoIC (%)1
Gross CAPEX (€m)
1,939 million
Levered free cash flow (€m)1 A
| How we create value |
Efficiency and innovation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our performance |
Our activity in 2020 While the COVID-19 pandemic has drastically reduced consumer demand, IAG's common integrated platform has helped deliver necessary cost optimisation and improved efficiency through negotiations with third-party suppliers and has also provided revenue support through its non-passenger airline businesses. The IAG GBS procurement team has helped negotiate agreements to extend supplier payables, defer deliveries, secure temporary discounts, and amend payment terms, improving the Group's cash position. In addition, the IAG GBS Finance Operations rapidly established additional support to ensure a constant overview of working capital. IAG Tech continued its focus on enhancing new technology capabilities |
across the Group such as changes to the .com platforms to support bookings, improvements to contact centres and enhancements to disruption management solutions. Furthermore, IAG Tech delivered initiatives to reduce operating costs and improve efficiency through process automation and workflow. IAG Cargo and IAG Loyalty have experienced ongoing demand for their services despite the COVID-19 pandemic and contributed additional revenue for the Group. IAG Cargo has supported the sale of additional cargo space for operation of a number of cargo-only flights. IAG Loyalty signed a multi-year renewal, extending its worldwide commercial partnership with American Express, pursuant to which American Express made a payment to |
IAG Loyalty of approximately £750 million. Our priorities for 2021 In 2021, IAG will continue to analyse the potential to create more value by bringing other parts of the operations into the common integrated platform and whether such centralisation should be accelerated. The Group will also continue to invest in enhancing the existing platform, to provide quality services and solutions across the Group at faster pace and lower unit cost, and continue to support its operating companies to accelerate their digital transformation which will be critical as the Group recovers from the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| KPI or industry measure |
Adjusted EPS (€ cents)1 2 A 114.9 76.9 -122.6 '18 '19 '20 |
Definition and purpose R Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) represents the diluted earnings for the year before exceptional items attributable to ordinary shareholders. This indicator reflects the profitability of the business and the core elements of value creation for IAG's shareholders. |
Performance Adjusted earnings per share turned negative at -122.6 cents as the result after tax before exceptional items declined by €6.7 billion. The weighted average number of shares includes the impact of the new shares that were issued as part of the capital increase. The 2019 adjusted earnings per share figure has been restated to adjust for the bonus element of the capital increase. |
| A Alternative performance |
Net debt to EBITDA1 A Target ceiling 1.4 1.2 1.8x -4.3 '18 '19 '20 |
Definition and purpose Net debt to EBITDA is calculated as long-term borrowings (both current and non-current), less cash, cash equivalents and less other current interest-bearing deposits. This is divided by EBITDA. IAG uses this measure to monitor leverage, to assess financial headroom. |
Performance The Group's leverage increased significantly in 2020 with net debt to EBITDA turning negative to -4.3 times, which renders the metric less meaningful than previous years. Net debt rose by €2,191 million to €9,762 million primarily from the additional borrowing the Group entered into in 2020. Additional non-aircraft debt of €1,010 million was drawn down in Spain as part of the Instituto de Crédito Oficial ('ICO') facility and British Airways issued commercial paper worth €328 million (£298 million) using the UK's Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF). Aer Lingus also entered into a financing agreement with the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) for €150 million, with €75 million drawn down in December 2020. |
| measure | 1 For further detail refer to the Alternative performance measures section. RoIC |
7
Measure linked to remuneration of Management Committee R
www.iairgroup.com 21
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
3 As indicated during Capital Markets Day in November 2019.

"The Group took, and continues to take, decisive actions to preserve liquidity."
2020 has been an exceptional and challenging year for the Group, with the unparalleled set of circumstances brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic. IAG, thanks to its unique structure was able to react quickly, with an intense focus on liquidity.
The year had started well, with performance in January and February in line with previous plans. However, as the pandemic spread across the globe, the Group had to severely curtail its operations in the second quarter. The summer saw some easing of restrictions, with evidence of strong pent-up demand from customers to travel, but the impact of the virus increased again as winter approached, resulting in further restrictions on freedom of movement and travel being imposed. Passenger capacity for the year was only a third of that operated in 2019. One welcome development at the end of the year was that the UK agreed a trade deal with the EU, removing one source of uncertainty.
The Group took, and continues to take, decisive actions to preserve liquidity and to ensure it is positioned for the recovery, when it comes. Multiple workstreams and initiatives have been delivered, which can be summarised in five main areas: capacity, operating costs, working capital, capital expenditure and funding.
The Group reduced passenger capacity, with a focus on ensuring the remaining flying was cash-positive. The cargo operation introduced additional cargo-only flights and ended the year with record revenues. Many initiatives were implemented to reduce costs and the Group has made use of wage support and temporary redundancy arrangements in its home markets. Restructuring plans have been agreed and implemented during the year, leading to a reduction in employee numbers of over 10,000; additional flexibility has been introduced to make employee costs more variable with the level of activity. However, the cost savings achieved were outweighed by a 75 per cent drop in passenger revenue. In addition, exceptional charges were triggered by a fleet of aircraft, and fuel and foreign exchange hedging programmes too large for the significantly reduced operation. The resulting operating loss for the year was €7,426 million. The operating loss before exceptional items was €4,365 million, down €7,650 million on 2019.
The Group was able to negotiate a new eight year contract between American Express and IAG Loyalty, with an up-front receipt of €830 million. Capital expenditure was cut by more than half, following constructive discussions with aircraft manufacturers to delay deliveries of aircraft and payments planned for 2020 and the following years.
Despite the credit rating agencies' downgrades of their ratings for IAG and British Airways to below investment grade, the Group raised €1.4 billion of additional non-aircraft debt, including €1.0 billion
22 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
partly guaranteed by Spain's Instituto de Crédito Oficial ('ICO'), in addition to €0.8 billion of bridging facilities against aircraft. The successful completion of long-term financing for aircraft deliveries meant the bridging facilities were repaid in the year. Aircraft financing generated €2.2 billion, higher than the total capital expenditure of €1.9 billion. A €2.7 billion rights issue, which was fully subscribed, was completed in September. In December, the Group secured a €2.2 billion 5-year loan facility for British Airways, partly guaranteed by UK Export Finance.
The timing and shape of recovery is uncertain and hence the Group remains focused on preserving liquidity and transforming its businesses for the future. The Group continues to develop initiatives to improve its cost-base, with a focus on reducing fixed costs and making the remaining cost structure more flexible and variable with capacity. The Group continues to review and develop other funding initiatives to provide further resilience, should it be required. Due to all of the hard work undertaken to preserve liquidity, the Group enters 2021 with total liquidity, including the recent UK Export Finance debt, higher than at the start of 2020.
Chief Financial Officer
Due to the unprecedented impact of COVID-19 and governments' responses, many of the usual variance analysis and measures are significantly less meaningful than in previous years and in some cases measures used previously no longer provide relevant insight into understanding the performance of the Group. As a consequence, unlike in prior years, in this review there is no detail on industry growth rates and GDP by market, as in 2020 the main drivers of capacity and revenue were COVID-19 and the related governmental travel bans and restrictions, rather than broader economic factors. This review, therefore, is structured to provide detail about the impact of COVID-19 on the Group, including the measures the Group has taken to mitigate the financial impact of the pandemic. Where variances exceed 100 per cent they have been substituted with 'nm' for 'not meaningful' and the absolute values are shown.
The main impact of COVID-19 materialised as a significant drop in the demand for passenger flights, linked to both the pandemic itself and the travel restrictions introduced by national governments, which changed many times through the year, normally with no or very short notice, thereby creating uncertainty for customers.
As a result of the significantly reduced flying programme, aircraft had to be temporarily grounded, with some retired early. Jet fuel consumption was significantly lower than that on which the Group's hedging programme was based, leading to the discontinuation of hedge accounting for the related derivative financial instruments. In addition, the commodity price of jet fuel fell sharply, leading to significant losses related to the hedging programme.
The Group acted quickly to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on its liquidity and results, through reductions in operating and capital expenditure, together with working capital initiatives and additional funding. The success of these measures was recognised by all three credit rating agencies, however, the severity of the deterioration in operating conditions resulted in successive downgrading of both IAG's and British Airways' credit ratings to below investment grade. The main measures taken to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the Group are shown opposite and reviewed in further detail below.
| Demand and | • Passenger capacity 66.5% lower than 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| capacity | • Additional cargo flights, including for | ||
| essential equipment and supplies | |||
| Fleet reductions | • Temporary grounding and parking | ||
| of aircraft | |||
| • Early retirement of aircraft, including British | |||
| Airways Boeing 747-400s and Iberia Airbus | |||
| A340-600s, plus lease returns | |||
| • Pay cuts, wage support, furlough and | |||
| Operating costs | temporary reductions in hours worked and | ||
| employee numbers | |||
| • Restructuring in British Airways and Aer Lingus, with increased flexibility |
|||
| • Non-essential discretionary spend reduced | |||
| • Negotiated price reductions for | |||
| supplier costs | |||
| Capital | • Deferral of delivery of 68 aircraft | ||
| expenditure | • Reduction in other capital expenditure; | ||
| cyber spend retained | |||
| Working capital | • 2019 final dividend proposal withdrawn and | ||
| no 2020 dividend | |||
| • Reduction in trade receivables | |||
| • Impact of reduction in bookings for future | |||
| travel mitigated by customers opting to | |||
| take vouchers in lieu of cash refunds | |||
| • With agreement, deferred supplier | |||
| payments treasury settlements and lease payments |
|||
| • American Express loyalty contract renewal, with significant pre-payment |
|||
| • Accelerated tax refunds from 2021 to 2020 | |||
| and deferral of UK HMRC payments | |||
| • Deferred UK and US pension contributions | |||
| Funding | • Aircraft financed throughout year (sale and | ||
| leaseback and new €1 billion EETC facility) | |||
| • British Airways Revolving Credit Facility | |||
| extended by one year; other credit | |||
| lines secured | |||
| • €328 million commercial paper issued | |||
| under UK's CCFF | |||
| • €1 billion debt through ICO-backed loans | |||
| in Spain | |||
| • €75 million debt through ISIF-backed loans | |||
| in Ireland, potential for further €75 million | |||
| • £2 billion UK Export Finance loan agreed | |||
| • €2.7 billion equity increase | |||
www.iairgroup.com 23
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
In 2020, all of IAG's airlines significantly reduced passenger capacity, with total Group capacity, measured in Available seat kilometres (ASKs), down 66.5 per cent versus 2019. The early months of the year started in line with the Group's plans approved by the Board in December 2019, aside from a limited COVID-19 impact mainly in the Asia Pacific region with suspension of services to China at the end of January and other capacity reductions across the region. Passenger capacity was 1.4 per cent higher than 2019 in January and 2.9 per cent higher in February. From late February, as the virus spread across the globe, many governments placed significant restrictions on the movement of people and on travel across international borders. This led to the cancellation of all flights to, from and within Italy and extensive reductions across the whole network, with capacity in the first quarter down 10.5 per cent on 2019.
In the second quarter, due to the impact of the virus worldwide and the associated travel and border restrictions applying in most countries, the Group was only able to operate a skeleton passenger schedule, with capacity operated only 5 per cent of that operated in the same quarter 2019. The third quarter showed improvement and additional capacity was introduced, mainly driven by leisure demand and for those visiting friends and relatives (VFR); however, capacity was still down 78.6 per cent on the previous year. Where travel restrictions were removed the Group saw a strong level of travel demand from customers. Plans to increase capacity steadily during the fourth quarter had to be revised, as a second wave of infections swept across Europe and governments re-imposed lockdowns and travel restrictions. Capacity for the fourth quarter was down 73.4 per cent.
The IAG passenger load factor was down 20.8 points from 2019 to 63.8 points, also impacted by travel restrictions, which changed frequently, together with low demand and a higher than normal level of passengers not checking in for flights that were still operating ('no-shows'). One consequence of the reduction in passenger capacity across the industry was a reduction in hold space available for cargo purposes, leading to reduced overall cargo supply and a more favourable cargo yield environment than in the previous year.
| Total network | (66.5)% | 63.8 | (20.8) pts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asia Pacific | (70.7)% | 61.3 | (24.5) pts |
| Africa, Middle East and South Asia |
(61.4)% | 67.2 | (15.8) pts |
| Latin America and Caribbean | (64.3)% | 72.7 | (13.7) pts |
| North America | (69.3)% | 53.2 | (30.9) pts |
| Europe | (70.5)% | 64.6 | (19.0) pts |
| Domestic | (49.8)% | 71.0 | (16.2) pts |
| Year to December 31, 2020 | ASKs higher/ (lower) vly |
Passenger load factor |
Higher/ (lower) |
Together, IAG's Domestic and European markets continue to represent the Group's largest region. However, capacity across both was, and continues to be, significantly impacted by the travel restrictions and quarantines imposed by European governments.
Capacity in IAG's Domestic markets decreased by 49.8 per cent versus 2019. British Airways' capacity reflected demand from UK holidaymakers avoiding overseas destinations subject to quarantine restrictions, Scottish routes re-opened in quarter 2 and a new route to Newquay launched in the summer. Vueling focused its operations on connecting the Spanish peninsula with the Canary and Balearic Islands and Iberia maintained similar Domestic routes for connectivity. Aer Lingus' route between London and Belfast benefitted from UK citizens opting for domestic holidays, with load factors reaching 70 per cent in August. Passenger load factor in the region remained above 70 per cent as Spanish and UK government travel restrictions and quarantine rules prompted an increase in travellers opting for holidays in their home country.
The Group's capacity in Europe decreased 70.5 per cent year on year. As the COVID-19 outbreak started to spread, Vueling limited its operations outside of Spain as demand remained weak throughout 2020. Iberia maintained minimum operations to keep major European cities, including London, Paris and Madrid, connected in quarter 2 and expanded operations in quarter 3 to meet summer leisure demand. In quarter 3 British Airways had a good performance throughout the summer on the limited number of routes operated to destinations included on the UK Government's 'Travel Corridor' list. Aer Lingus' European operations were limited by the Irish government's 'Green List', which severely restricted travel and discouraged Irish citizens from non-essential travel. LEVEL's operations in Vienna and Amsterdam ceased on June 19, 2020.
IAG's North American market accounts for almost 30 per cent of the Group's ASKs. The region's capacity increase at the beginning of 2020 reflected the full-year impact of routes launched during 2019, including British Airways' route to Pittsburgh, Aer Lingus' route to Minneapolis and LEVEL's route to New York, JFK. Following the outbreak of COVID-19, a much-reduced flight schedule to North America operated, primarily for cargo purposes, with British Airways and Aer Lingus operating regular flights to New York, Boston, Washington and Chicago. Iberia resumed operations to Chicago in quarter 3 and LEVEL Spain restarted its route to JFK in September. Quarter 4 benefited from increased leisure and VFR travel around the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays, with routes to second-home markets such as Miami performing well. LEVEL France ceased operations on July 8, leading to the cancellation of its routes to Newark and Las Vegas. Passenger load factor for the region was the lowest for the Group as the United States government's COVID-19 restrictions allowed only residents and nationals to enter the country.
24 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Domestic and Europe
holidays in their home country.
Amsterdam ceased on June 19, 2020.
North America
governments.
Demand and capacity
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
quarter down 10.5 per cent on 2019.
than in the previous year.
Year to December 31, 2020
Africa, Middle East
IAG capacity
In 2020, all of IAG's airlines significantly reduced passenger capacity, with total Group capacity, measured in Available seat kilometres (ASKs), down 66.5 per cent versus 2019. The early months of the year started in line with the Group's plans approved by the Board in December 2019, aside from a limited COVID-19 impact mainly in the Asia Pacific region with suspension of services to China at the end of January and other capacity reductions across the region. Passenger capacity was 1.4 per cent higher than 2019 in January and 2.9 per cent higher in February. From late February, as the virus spread across the globe, many governments placed significant restrictions on the movement of people and on travel across international borders. This led to the cancellation of all flights to, from and within Italy and extensive reductions across the whole network, with capacity in the first
In the second quarter, due to the impact of the virus worldwide and the associated travel and border restrictions applying in most
The IAG passenger load factor was down 20.8 points from 2019 to 63.8 points, also impacted by travel restrictions, which changed frequently, together with low demand and a higher than normal level of passengers not checking in for flights that were still operating ('no-shows'). One consequence of the reduction in passenger capacity across the industry was a reduction in hold space available for cargo purposes, leading to reduced overall cargo supply and a more favourable cargo yield environment
Domestic (49.8)% 71.0 (16.2) pts Europe (70.5)% 64.6 (19.0) pts North America (69.3)% 53.2 (30.9) pts Latin America and Caribbean (64.3)% 72.7 (13.7) pts
and South Asia (61.4)% 67.2 (15.8) pts Asia Pacific (70.7)% 61.3 (24.5) pts Total network (66.5)% 63.8 (20.8) pts
ASKs higher/ (lower) vly
Passenger load factor
Higher/ (lower)
24 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
countries, the Group was only able to operate a skeleton passenger schedule, with capacity operated only 5 per cent of that operated in the same quarter 2019. The third quarter showed improvement and additional capacity was introduced, mainly driven by leisure demand and for those visiting friends and relatives (VFR); however, capacity was still down 78.6 per cent on the previous year. Where travel restrictions were removed the Group saw a strong level of travel demand from customers. Plans to increase capacity steadily during the fourth quarter had to be revised, as a second wave of infections swept across Europe and governments re-imposed lockdowns and travel restrictions. Capacity for the fourth quarter was down 73.4 per cent.
IAG capacity
Together, IAG's Domestic and European markets continue to represent the Group's largest region. However, capacity across both was, and continues to be, significantly impacted by the travel restrictions and quarantines imposed by European
Capacity in IAG's Domestic markets decreased by 49.8 per cent versus 2019. British Airways' capacity reflected demand from UK holidaymakers avoiding overseas destinations subject to
quarantine restrictions, Scottish routes re-opened in quarter 2 and a new route to Newquay launched in the summer. Vueling focused its operations on connecting the Spanish peninsula with the Canary and Balearic Islands and Iberia maintained similar Domestic routes for connectivity. Aer Lingus' route between London and Belfast benefitted from UK citizens opting for domestic holidays, with load factors reaching 70 per cent in August. Passenger load factor in the region remained above 70 per cent as Spanish and UK government travel restrictions and quarantine rules prompted an increase in travellers opting for
The Group's capacity in Europe decreased 70.5 per cent year on year. As the COVID-19 outbreak started to spread, Vueling limited its operations outside of Spain as demand remained weak throughout 2020. Iberia maintained minimum operations to keep major European cities, including London, Paris and Madrid, connected in quarter 2 and expanded operations in quarter 3 to meet summer leisure demand. In quarter 3 British Airways had a good performance throughout the summer on the limited number
of routes operated to destinations included on the UK Government's 'Travel Corridor' list. Aer Lingus' European operations were limited by the Irish government's 'Green List', which severely restricted travel and discouraged Irish citizens from non-essential travel. LEVEL's operations in Vienna and
IAG's North American market accounts for almost 30 per cent of the Group's ASKs. The region's capacity increase at the beginning of 2020 reflected the full-year impact of routes launched during 2019, including British Airways' route to Pittsburgh, Aer Lingus' route to Minneapolis and LEVEL's route to New York, JFK. Following the outbreak of COVID-19, a much-reduced flight schedule to North America operated, primarily for cargo purposes, with British Airways and Aer Lingus operating regular flights to New York, Boston, Washington and Chicago. Iberia resumed operations to Chicago in quarter 3 and LEVEL Spain restarted its route to JFK in September. Quarter 4 benefited from increased leisure and VFR travel around the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays, with routes to second-home markets such as Miami performing well. LEVEL France ceased operations on July 8, leading to the cancellation of its routes to Newark and Las Vegas. Passenger load factor for the region was the lowest for the Group as the United States government's COVID-19 restrictions allowed only residents and nationals to enter the country.
IAG's capacity in LACAR increased in January and February driven by Iberia's new route to Guayaquil, Ecuador launched in 2019 and additional frequencies on routes to Colombia, Peru and Brazil. LEVEL's growth reflected the annualisation of new routes launched in 2019 to Santiago de Chile and additional frequencies on routes to the French Caribbean. However, following the initial outbreak of COVID-19, LACAR operations were extremely limited, due to strict government restrictions and high COVID-19 case numbers impacting the region, with regular operations only starting to resume in quarter 3. British Airways operated a number of charter flights to the Caribbean in quarter 2 and restarted regular service to a number of destinations in quarter 3. In quarter 4 flights operated regularly to São Paulo, Antigua and Saint Lucia, benefiting from leisure travel over the holiday period. In quarter 2, Iberia's operations were mainly for repatriation and cargo purposes and routes to Panama City, Santo Domingo and Quito resumed in quarter 3. Quarter 4 benefited from significant VFR travel to the region with load factors to routes in Ecuador and Dominican Republic reaching over 80 per cent. LEVEL France operations to the French Caribbean ceased in July, however LEVEL Spain continues to operate and resumed limited operations to Buenos Aires in September and Santiago de Chile in December. Passenger load factor in this region was the highest for the Group, down only 13.7 points on 2019 to 72.7 per cent.
AMESA capacity increased in January and February primarily due to new routes launched in 2019 by British Airways, including to Dammam via Bahrain and Islamabad. Following the outbreak of COVID-19 and initial lockdowns, regular operations did not restart until quarter 3 with British Airways returning to Dubai, Kenya, Israel, India and Pakistan. Iberia restarted its regular service to Dakar, Senegal in July but did not reopen regular operations to Morocco and Israel in 2020. Vueling did not restart any regular operations to the region in 2020. Passenger load factor for the region was down 15.8 points versus 2019 to 67.2 per cent.
In the Asia Pacific region, the Group's capacity was down significantly on 2019 and it was the first region to see cancellations as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak in late January. British Airways, Iberia and Aer Lingus all operated government charter flights to the region, carrying back Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the first wave of the pandemic. Since then, there has been a steady return to flying with British Airways reopening routes to China, Hong Kong and Tokyo, although strict travel restrictions remain in place limiting capacity, with China only allowing international carriers to operate one flight per week on a single route. Passenger load factor was down 24.5 points to 61.3 per cent on a capacity decrease of 70.7 per cent.
Based on the extensive modelling the Group has undertaken in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group has sufficient liquidity for the going concern assessment period to March 31, 2022, and accordingly the Directors have adopted the going concern basis in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
There are a number of significant factors related to COVID-19 that are outside of the control of the Group, including the status and impact of the pandemic worldwide, including the emergence of new variants of the virus and potential resurgence of existing strains of the virus; the availability of vaccines worldwide, together with the speed at which they are deployed; the efficacy of those vaccines; and the restrictions imposed by national governments in respect of the freedom of movement and travel. Due to the uncertainty that these factors create, the Group is not able to provide certainty that there could not be more severe downside scenarios than those it has considered, including the sensitivities it has considered in relation to factors such as the impact on yield, capacity operated, cost mitigations achieved and the availability of aircraft financing to offset capital expenditure. In the event that such a scenario were to occur, the Group would need to implement additional mitigation measures and would likely need to secure additional funding over and above that which is contractually committed at February 25, 2021. The Group has been successful in raising financing since the outbreak of COVID-19, having financed all aircraft deliveries in 2020, secured an additional €3.6 billion of non-aircraft debt and having completed an equity increase of €2.7 billion in September 2020, which was fully subscribed. However, the Group cannot provide certainty that it will be able to secure additional funding, if required, in the event that a more severe downside scenario than those it has considered were to occur. Refer to note 2 of the consolidated financial statements for further information.
In light of the significant reduction in the Group's passenger capacity linked to the impact of COVID-19, the year saw a significant reduction in passenger revenue. The Group took action to mitigate the impact through exploiting cargo opportunities and by reducing costs. The Group also recognised exceptional charges for restructuring costs, the discontinuance of hedge accounting in relation to fuel and foreign currency derivatives and the impairment of aircraft and related assets either retired or stood down early. The net result was an operating loss for the year of €7,426 million, versus an operating profit in 2019 of €2,613 million. The reported loss after tax for the year was €6,923 million, versus a profit of €1,715 million in 2019.
| Statutory results € million |
2020 | 2019 | Higher/ (lower) vly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating (loss)/profit | (7,426) | 2,613 | (10,039) |
| (Loss)/profit before tax | (7,810) | 2,275 | (10,085) |
| (Loss)/profit after tax | (6,923) | 1,715 | (8,638) |
www.iairgroup.com 25
The Group uses Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) to analyse the underlying results of the business excluding exceptional items, which are those that in management's view need to be separately disclosed by virtue of their size or incidence in understanding the entity's financial performance. A summary of the exceptional items relating to 2019 and 2020 is given below, with more detail in the Alternative Performance Measures section, including the exceptional items by operating company.
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
| Income | (Charge)/credit to the Income statement € million |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| statement line | Exceptional item description | 20201 | 2019 |
| Passenger revenue |
Discontinuation of hedge accounting for foreign currency derivatives for revenue |
(62) | – |
| Employee costs |
Non-cash increase in liabilities in association with pension scheme settlement |
– | (672) |
| Employee costs |
Restructuring costs | (313) | – |
| Fuel, oil and emissions costs |
Discontinuation of hedge accounting for fuel and associated foreign exchange derivatives |
(1,694) | – |
| Engineering and other aircraft costs |
Inventory write-down and charge in relation to contractual lease provisions |
(108) | – |
| Property, IT and other costs |
Legal costs associated with employee restructuring programmes |
(6) | – |
| Property, IT and other costs |
Settlement provision in relation to the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018 |
(22) | – |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment |
Impairment of fleet and associated assets |
(856) | – |
| Tax | Tax on exceptional items | 463 | – |
1 In 2020 all items were associated with the impact of COVID-19, except the settlement provision in relation to the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018.
Excluding the impact of the exceptional items shown above, the operating loss for 2020 was €4,365 million, down €7,650 million from the operating profit of €3,285 million generated in 2019. The loss after tax and before exceptional items was €4,325 million, versus a profit after tax and before exceptional items of €2,387 million in 2019.
| Revenue | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (Loss)/profit after tax | (4,325) | 2,387 | (6,712) |
| (Loss)/profit before tax | (4,749) | 2,947 | (7,696) |
| Operating (loss)/profit | (4,365) | 3,285 | (7,650) |
| Alternative Performance Measures (before exceptional items), € million |
2020 | 2019 | Higher/ (lower) vly |
| Total revenue | 7,806 | (17,700) | (69.4)% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other revenue | 988 | (933) | (48.6)% |
| Cargo revenue | 1,306 | 189 | 16.9% |
| Passenger revenue1 | 5,512 | (16,956) | (75.5)% |
| € million | 2020 | Higher/ (lower) vly |
Higher/ (lower) vly |
1 Includes an exceptional charge of €62 million (2019: nil) related to discontinued hedge accounting of revenue foreign currency derivatives. Further information is given in the Alternative Performance Measures section.
The overall impact of the significantly reduced schedule and lower passenger load factors described above was a decrease in passenger revenue of €16,956 million, or 75.5 per cent versus 2019.
2020 was a record year for cargo revenue, as additional flights were operated to transport essential equipment and supplies, assisted by a dedicated charter team to develop solutions for customers and governments, recognising that IAG Cargo does not operate a dedicated freighter fleet. The cargo business identified markets most impacted by the reduction in air cargo supply, where demand would not be met by traditional freighter services and that could support the yields required to fly cargoonly services using passenger aircraft. The focus of cargo-only flying was to ensure a cash-positive contribution was achieved for the airlines and the Group. Cargo opportunities were increased by removing seats from five passenger aircraft and obtaining regulatory approvals to load cargo in the passenger cabins. During the year 4,003 additional cargo-driven flights were operated; these additional flights are not included in the passenger capacity figures for ASKs, as seats were not offered for general sale to passengers.
The overall impact of the cargo operation, including the additional cargo-driven flights linked to the COVID-19 response, was an increase in Cargo revenue of €189 million, or 16.9 per cent versus 2019.
26 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Excluding the impact of the exceptional items shown above, the operating loss for 2020 was €4,365 million, down €7,650 million from the operating profit of €3,285 million generated in 2019. The loss after tax and before exceptional items was €4,325 million, versus a profit after tax and before exceptional items of
Operating (loss)/profit (4,365) 3,285 (7,650) (Loss)/profit before tax (4,749) 2,947 (7,696) (Loss)/profit after tax (4,325) 2,387 (6,712)
Passenger revenue1 5,512 (16,956) (75.5)% Cargo revenue 1,306 189 16.9% Other revenue 988 (933) (48.6)% Total revenue 7,806 (17,700) (69.4)% 1 Includes an exceptional charge of €62 million (2019: nil) related to discontinued hedge accounting of revenue foreign currency
derivatives. Further information is given in the Alternative Performance
The overall impact of the significantly reduced schedule and lower passenger load factors described above was a decrease in
2020 was a record year for cargo revenue, as additional flights were operated to transport essential equipment and supplies, assisted by a dedicated charter team to develop solutions for customers and governments, recognising that IAG Cargo does not operate a dedicated freighter fleet. The cargo business identified markets most impacted by the reduction in air cargo supply, where demand would not be met by traditional freighter services and that could support the yields required to fly cargoonly services using passenger aircraft. The focus of cargo-only flying was to ensure a cash-positive contribution was achieved for the airlines and the Group. Cargo opportunities were increased by removing seats from five passenger aircraft and obtaining regulatory approvals to load cargo in the passenger cabins. During the year 4,003 additional cargo-driven flights were operated; these additional flights are not included in the
passenger capacity figures for ASKs, as seats were not offered for
The overall impact of the cargo operation, including the additional cargo-driven flights linked to the COVID-19 response, was an increase in Cargo revenue of €189 million, or 16.9 per cent
passenger revenue of €16,956 million, or 75.5 per cent
Higher/ (lower) vly
Higher/ (lower) vly
Higher/ (lower) vly
(before exceptional items), € million 2020 2019
€ million 2020
€2,387 million in 2019.
Revenue
(Charge)/credit to the Income statement € million 20201 2019
(62) –
– (672)
(1,694) –
(108) –
(6) –
(22) –
(856) –
The Group uses Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) to analyse the underlying results of the business excluding exceptional items, which are those that in management's view need to be separately disclosed by virtue of their size or incidence in understanding the entity's financial performance. A summary of the exceptional items relating to 2019 and 2020 is given below, with more detail in the Alternative Performance Measures section,
including the exceptional items by operating company.
Discontinuation of hedge accounting for foreign currency derivatives for
Discontinuation of hedge accounting for fuel and associated foreign exchange derivatives
Inventory write-down and charge in relation to contractual lease provisions
Legal costs associated with employee restructuring
Tax Tax on exceptional items 463 – 1 In 2020 all items were associated with the impact of COVID-19, except the settlement provision in relation to the theft of customer data at
Settlement provision in relation to the theft of customer data at British
programmes
Airways in 2018
Impairment of fleet and associated assets
Restructuring costs (313) –
Non-cash increase in liabilities in association with pension scheme settlement
Summary of exceptional items
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
statement line Exceptional item description
revenue
Income
Passenger revenue
Employee costs
Employee costs
Fuel, oil and emissions costs
Engineering and other aircraft costs
Property, IT and other costs
Property, IT and other costs
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment
British Airways in 2018.
Measures section. Passenger revenue
general sale to passengers.
versus 2019.
26 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
versus 2019. Cargo revenue
Alternative Performance Measures
The largest Other revenue streams for the Group in normal times are Iberia's Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Handling businesses, together with BA Holidays. Revenue from these activities was also significantly reduced versus the previous year, linked to lower activity levels associated with COVID-19. In the case of MRO and Handling, these revenues were affected by reduced demand following lower flight schedules and significant fleet reductions across the airline industry and hence lower maintenance requirements, although the reductions were less than the reduction in the level of passenger capacity. The BA Holidays business is closely linked to the passenger business and was therefore impacted by the significantly reduced passenger operation. Loyalty revenues were also down on 2019, as the lower flying programme led to a reduced number of redemptions of Avios and a reduced volume of the sale of Avios to third parties, linked to the reduced level of expenditure on travel. Other ancillary revenue streams were also affected by the impact of the pandemic, including handling recoveries in Terminal 7 at New York, JFK. In total Other revenue was down €933 million, or 48.6 per cent versus 2019.
The Group anticipates that as a result of COVID-19, demand will continue to be supressed for several years and will not reach levels seen in 2019 until at least 2023. The Group, therefore, took steps to reduce its aircraft fleet and the associated cost of maintenance.
During 2020, a significant number of aircraft were temporarily grounded and parked, with the limited operations focused on flying the more fuel-efficient new-generation aircraft, where possible. The Group also decided to accelerate the retirement of its older, four-engined longhaul fleet. British Airways retired its fleet of 32 Boeing 747-400 aircraft, and Iberia retired its fleet of 15 Airbus A340-600 aircraft. In addition to these retirements, 37 aircraft were stood down earlier than planned, either pending disposal or return to lessors, bringing the reductions in fleet numbers to 84 aircraft. However, the Group also took delivery of 34 aircraft during the year, detailed in the Capital expenditure section below.
The early retirement and stand-down of these aircraft led to an exceptional impairment charge of €837 million; there was also a €108 million exceptional charge related to a write-down of inventory and recognition of contractual end-of-lease provisions.
| Number of fleet in-service | 2020 | 2019 | Higher/ (lower) vly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shorthaul | 367 | 394 | (6.9)% |
| Longhaul | 166 | 204 | (18.6)% |
| 533 | 598 | (10.9)% |
241 of the 533 "in-service" fleet at the end of the year were temporarily grounded. In addition to the in-service fleet, there were a further 71 aircraft held by the Group pending disposal or lease return and 1 new aircraft that had been delivered to the Group and paid for but had not yet entered service.
Due to the reduced flying programme and significantly reduced revenues, the Group took action to offset the financial impact by reducing costs, together with measures to increase the variability and flexibility in its cost base. Total expenditure on operations before exceptional items fell from €22,221 million in 2019 to €12,233 million in 2020, a 44.9 per cent reduction, compared to the reduction in passenger capacity, measured in ASKs, of 66.5 per cent. The reduction in operating costs before exceptional items and excluding depreciation, amortisation and impairment was 49.6 per cent.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
| Higher/ | Higher/ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| € million | 2020 | (lower) vly | (lower) vly |
| Employee costs1 | 3,560 | (2,074) | (36.8)% |
1 Includes an exceptional charge of €313 million related to the restructuring programmes in British Airways, Aer Lingus, Iberia and LEVEL, undertaken to resize the Group as a consequence of COVID-19. A non-cash exceptional charge of €672 million in 2019 related to the impact of a settlement between British Airways and its oldest pension scheme, APS. Further information is given in the Alternative Performance Measures section.
National governments provided wage or job support mechanisms in each of IAG's main home markets and the operating companies used these facilities to reduce employee numbers and costs, with the direct impact of these mechanisms reducing employee costs by approximately €730 million. Other arrangements were agreed for staff not directly covered by such schemes and so costs were reduced at all levels in the organisation, with the Management Committee and Board members also seeing reductions as outlined in the Report of the Remuneration Committee.
In addition to temporary measures, both British Airways and Aer Lingus implemented longer-term restructuring, consistent with the expected multi-year impact of COVID-19 on demand. The restructuring measures will result in reductions at British Airways of approximately 10,000 employees (or one quarter of the workforce at June 2020) and 500 at Aer Lingus (or approximately 10 per cent of the workforce at June 2020); the substantial majority of employees affected had left the Group by the end of 2020. British Airways has also introduced more flexibility in certain operational areas, in order to be able to better adjust employee numbers and cost to the level of capacity operated. Iberia also made reductions in management numbers, together with restructuring related to staff outside of Spain. Iberia and Vueling made use of the temporary redundancy arrangements in Spain under an Expedientes de Regulación Temporal de Empleo ('ERTE') arrangement and hence did not incur restructuring costs in respect of non-managerial employees in Spain. The closure of LEVEL France led to an exceptional provision of €28 million for the associated employee restructuring costs. The total exceptional employee restructuring charges for the year included within Employee costs were €313 million.
In addition to the wage and pay support schemes and restructuring programmes outlined above, other measures were taken to further reduce employee costs, such as offering unpaid leave, the removal of bonuses and reduced non-mandatory training. Measures were taken at all levels across the Group.
www.iairgroup.com 27
Employee costs for the year decreased by €2,074 million, or 36.8 per cent compared with 2019; excluding exceptional items, employee costs reduced by €1,715 million, or 34.6 per cent.
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
| € million | 2020 | Higher/ (lower) vly |
Higher/ (lower) vly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel, oil costs and | |||
| emissions charges1 | 3,735 | (2,286) | (38.0)% |
1 Includes an exceptional charge of €1,694 million (2019: nil) related to discontinuation of hedge accounting for fuel derivatives and fuel foreign currency derivatives as a result of the impact of COVID-19. Further information is given in the Alternative Performance Measures section.
Commodity fuel prices fell dramatically following the spread of COVID-19 globally in March, with prices down approximately 75 per cent on levels experienced immediately beforehand. Although there was a partial recovery during the remainder of the year, prices were still at levels much lower than 2019.

The Group seeks to reduce the impact of volatile commodity prices by hedging prices up to three years in advance. The hedging programme is based on expected levels of activity, with the proportion hedged in line with treasury policies agreed with the Board.
In 2020, due to the rapid fall in the commodity fuel price, the Group has experienced losses on its fuel hedging derivatives. These hedging losses would have normally been offset against the reduced cost of physical fuel purchased. However, the impact of COVID-19 has led to a significant reduction in the requirement to purchase jet fuel, due to the significantly reduced flying programme. As a consequence, the Group had derivative contracts for which there was no corresponding purchase of jet fuel, leading to discontinuance of hedge accounting for these derivatives, with the mark-to-market loss of €1,781 million recognised as an exceptional charge in the Income statement. There was also a related mark-to-market gain recognised in the Income statement related to foreign exchange hedging of €87 million, bringing the net exceptional charge to €1,694 million for the year. These values are calculated based on the fuel curve and foreign exchange rates as at December 31, 2020 and the anticipated capacity to be operated for 2021 and 2022.
The Group continued to benefit from reduced fuel consumption associated with the investment in new fleet, together with the early retirement of older aircraft. Overall fuel, oil and emissions
charges were down €2,286 million, or 38.0 per cent versus 2019; excluding the exceptional net overhedging charge fuel, oil and emissions charges were down €3,980 million, or 66.1 per cent.
| € million | 2020 | Higher/ (lower) vly |
Higher/ (lower) vly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Handling, catering and other operating costs |
1,340 | (1,632) | (54.9)% |
| Landing fees and en-route charges |
918 | (1,303) | (58.7)% |
| Engineering and other aircraft costs1 |
1,456 | (636) | (30.4)% |
| Property, IT and other costs2 | 782 | (29) | (3.6)% |
| Selling costs | 405 | (633) | (61.0)% |
| Currency differences | 81 | 88 | nm |
1 Includes an exceptional charge of €108 million (2019: nil) related to an inventory write-down and a charge relating to contractual lease provisions. Further information is given in the Alternative Performance Measures section.
2 Includes an exceptional charge of €28 million (2019: nil) related to the penalty notice issued by the UK Information Commissioner's Office for the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018 (€22 million) and to the legal costs of the Group-wide restructuring programme undertaken in the year (€6 million). Further information is given in the Alternative Performance Measures section.
Handling, catering and other operating costs were down €1,632 million on 2019, or 54.9 per cent. In addition to volumelinked savings, including the reduced product costs associated with lower BA Holidays revenues, costs were reduced by management actions, such as the closure of airport lounges and by the necessary reduction in catering, linked to measures to reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19 to customers and staff.
Landing fees and en-route charges were down €1,303 million on 2019, or 58.7 per cent. Costs reduced in line with the lower flying programme, although there was some adverse impact from lost volume rebates and equivalent arrangements, including at London Heathrow, together with price increases from Eurocontrol.
Engineering and other aircraft costs reduced due to the reduction in flights operated, together with the reduction in Iberia's external MRO business and other savings in the wake of COVID-19. Engineering and other aircraft costs were down €636 million, or 30.4 per cent; excluding the exceptional charge, due to the write-down of inventory and provision for lease return costs, Engineering and other aircraft costs were down €744 million, or 35.6 per cent.
Property, IT and other costs were down €29 million, or 3.6 per cent, on 2019, including the final penalty notice issued by the UK Information Commissioner's Office regarding the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018; excluding the cost of this final penalty notice Property, IT and other costs were down €57 million or 7.0 per cent. Cost savings associated with the lower volume of IT transactions and reduced energy usage and rates were partly offset by the costs associated with IT infrastructure investment. The 2019 base included income from a settlement in respect of a British Airways data centre issue in 2017.
28 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Selling costs reduced with the significant drop in passenger revenue and lower forward bookings, together with a reduction in marketing and other discretionary expenditure in light of COVID-19. Selling costs were €633 million lower than the previous year, or 61.0 per cent.
Employee costs for the year decreased by €2,074 million, or 36.8 per cent compared with 2019; excluding exceptional items, employee costs reduced by €1,715 million, or 34.6 per cent.
emissions charges1 3,735 (2,286) (38.0)% 1 Includes an exceptional charge of €1,694 million (2019: nil) related to discontinuation of hedge accounting for fuel derivatives and fuel foreign currency derivatives as a result of the impact of COVID-19. Further information is given in the Alternative Performance Measures section. Commodity fuel prices fell dramatically following the spread of COVID-19 globally in March, with prices down approximately 75 per cent on levels experienced immediately beforehand. Although there was a partial recovery during the remainder of the
Higher/ (lower) vly
Higher/ (lower) vly Supplier costs
charges were down €2,286 million, or 38.0 per cent versus 2019; excluding the exceptional net overhedging charge fuel, oil and emissions charges were down €3,980 million, or 66.1 per cent.
operating costs 1,340 (1,632) (54.9)%
charges 918 (1,303) (58.7)%
costs1 1,456 (636) (30.4)% Property, IT and other costs2 782 (29) (3.6)% Selling costs 405 (633) (61.0)% Currency differences 81 88 nm 1 Includes an exceptional charge of €108 million (2019: nil) related to an inventory write-down and a charge relating to contractual lease provisions. Further information is given in the Alternative Performance
2 Includes an exceptional charge of €28 million (2019: nil) related to the penalty notice issued by the UK Information Commissioner's Office for the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018 (€22 million) and to the legal costs of the Group-wide restructuring programme undertaken in the year (€6 million). Further information is given in the Alternative
Handling, catering and other operating costs were down €1,632 million on 2019, or 54.9 per cent. In addition to volumelinked savings, including the reduced product costs associated with lower BA Holidays revenues, costs were reduced by management actions, such as the closure of airport lounges and by the necessary reduction in catering, linked to measures to reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19 to customers
Landing fees and en-route charges were down €1,303 million on 2019, or 58.7 per cent. Costs reduced in line with the lower flying programme, although there was some adverse impact from lost volume rebates and equivalent arrangements, including at London Heathrow, together with price increases from Eurocontrol. Engineering and other aircraft costs reduced due to the reduction in flights operated, together with the reduction in Iberia's external MRO business and other savings in the wake of COVID-19. Engineering and other aircraft costs were down €636 million, or 30.4 per cent; excluding the exceptional charge, due to the write-down of inventory and provision for lease return
costs, Engineering and other aircraft costs were down
Property, IT and other costs were down €29 million, or
respect of a British Airways data centre issue in 2017.
3.6 per cent, on 2019, including the final penalty notice issued by the UK Information Commissioner's Office regarding the theft of customer data at British Airways in 2018; excluding the cost of this final penalty notice Property, IT and other costs were down €57 million or 7.0 per cent. Cost savings associated with the lower volume of IT transactions and reduced energy usage and rates were partly offset by the costs associated with IT infrastructure investment. The 2019 base included income from a settlement in
Higher/ (lower) vly
Higher/ (lower) vly
€ million 2020
Handling, catering and other
Landing fees and en-route
Measures section.
Engineering and other aircraft
Performance Measures section.
€744 million, or 35.6 per cent.
Fuel, oil and emissions costs
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
Jet fuel price trend (\$/mt)
Apr-16
the Board.
Jan-16
Oct-16 Jul-16
Jan-17
Apr-17
Oct-17 Jul-17
Jan-18
Apr-18
The Group seeks to reduce the impact of volatile commodity prices by hedging prices up to three years in advance. The hedging programme is based on expected levels of activity, with the proportion hedged in line with treasury policies agreed with
In 2020, due to the rapid fall in the commodity fuel price, the Group has experienced losses on its fuel hedging derivatives. These hedging losses would have normally been offset against the reduced cost of physical fuel purchased. However, the impact of COVID-19 has led to a significant reduction in the requirement to purchase jet fuel, due to the significantly reduced flying programme. As a consequence, the Group had derivative contracts for which there was no corresponding purchase of jet fuel, leading to discontinuance of hedge accounting for these derivatives, with the mark-to-market loss of €1,781 million recognised as an exceptional charge in the Income statement. There was also a related mark-to-market gain recognised in the Income statement related to foreign exchange hedging of €87 million, bringing the net exceptional charge to €1,694 million for the year. These values are calculated based on the fuel curve and foreign exchange rates as at December 31, 2020 and the anticipated capacity to be operated for 2021 and 2022.
The Group continued to benefit from reduced fuel consumption associated with the investment in new fleet, together with the early retirement of older aircraft. Overall fuel, oil and emissions
Jul-18
Oct-18
Jan-19
Apr-19
Jul-19
Oct-19
Jan-20
Apr-20
Jul-20
Oct-20
Dec-20
28 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
and staff.
Fuel, oil costs and
€ million 2020
year, prices were still at levels much lower than 2019.
Ownership costs include depreciation, amortisation and impairment of tangible and intangible assets. The Group adopted IFRS 16 'Leases' from January 1, 2019, meaning right of use assets in respect of leases are included with the Balance sheet and associated depreciation of those right of use assets is included within depreciation.
| 2020 | Higher/ (lower) vly |
Higher/ (lower) vly |
|---|---|---|
| 2,955 | 844 | 40.0% |
1 Includes an exceptional charge of €856 million (2019: nil) related to the impairment of fleet assets and other assets. Further information is given in the Alternative Performance Measures section.
The increase in ownership costs of €844 million, or 40.0 per cent, is driven by the €856 million impairment charge in respect of the retirement of the British Airways Boeing 747-400 and Iberia Airbus A340-600 fleets, and related other assets, together with the early stand down or lease return of 37 other aircraft. Excluding these items, ownership costs would have been at a similar level to 2019.
Exchange rate impacts are calculated by retranslating current year results at prior year exchange rates. The reported revenues and expenditures are impacted by the translation of currencies other than euro to the Group's reporting currency of euro, primarily British Airways and IAG Loyalty. From a transaction perspective, the Group performance is impacted by the fluctuation of exchange rates, primarily exposure to the pound sterling, euro and US dollar. The Group typically generates a surplus in most currencies in which it does business, except the US dollar, for which capital expenditure, debt repayments and fuel purchases typically create a deficit which is managed and partially hedged. The Group hedges its economic exposure from transacting in foreign currencies but does not hedge the translation impact of reporting in euro.
Overall, in 2020 the Group operating loss before exceptional items was increased by €5 million due to adverse exchange rate impacts.
| € million Favourable/(adverse) |
2020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Translation impact |
Transaction impact |
Total exchange impact |
||
| Total exchange impact | ||||
| on revenue | 84 | 33 | 117 | |
| Total exchange impact on operating expenditures |
(31) | (91) | (122) | |
| Total exchange impact on operating loss |
53 | (58) | (5) |
| 2019 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| € million Favourable/(adverse) |
Translation impact |
Transaction impact |
Total exchange impact |
|
| Total exchange impact on revenue |
68 | 325 | 393 | |
| Total exchange impact on operating expenditures |
(58) | (268) | (326) | |
| Total exchange impact on operating profit |
10 | 57 | 67 |
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
The exchange rates for the Group were as follows:
| 2020 | 2019 | Higher/ (lower) vly |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Translation – Balance sheet | |||
| £ to € | 1.10 | 1.18 | (6.8%) |
| Translation – Income statement (weighted average) |
|||
| £ to € | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.0% |
| Transaction (weighted average) |
|||
| £ to € | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.0% |
| € to \$ | 1.13 | 1.12 | 0.9% |
| £ to \$ | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.0% |
Total net non-operating costs for the year were €384 million, versus €338 million in 2019. The main driver of the increase was finance costs up €59 million (9.7 per cent), related to interest on new debt and arrangement costs. In both years the finance costs were partially offset by net currency retranslation credits, mainly related to the retranslation of US dollar balances and related derivate financial instruments.
The tax credit for the period was €887 million (2019: tax charge of €560 million), with an effective tax rate (credit) for the Group of 11 per cent (2019: 25 per cent charge). The substantial majority of the Group's activities are taxed where the main operations are based, in the UK, Spain and Ireland, with corporation tax rates during 2020 of 19 per cent, 25 per cent and 12.5 per cent respectively, which results in an expected effective tax rate of 21 per cent. The difference between the expected effective tax rate of 21 per cent and the actual effective tax rate of 11 per cent was firstly due to not recognising tax credits in respect of certain current and prior period losses and deductible temporary differences; those losses and deductible temporary differences relate principally to Iberia, Openskies and Vueling. In addition, the UK Government retained its rate of corporation tax rate at 19 per cent from April 1, 2020, in place of the reduction to 17 per cent that had previously been enacted into law.
www.iairgroup.com 29
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
| British Airways £ million |
Aer Lingus € million |
Iberia € million |
Vueling € million |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-exceptional items1 |
2020 | Higher/ (lower) |
Higher/ (lower) |
2020 | Higher/ (lower) |
Higher/ (lower) |
2020 | Higher/ (lower) |
Higher/ (lower) |
2020 | Higher/ (lower) |
Higher/ (lower) |
| Passenger revenue | 2,840 | (9,059) | (76)% | 379 | (1,681) | (82)% | 1,160 | (2,893) | (71)% | 569 | (1,868) | (77)% |
| Cargo revenue | 890 | 179 | 25% | 88 | 34 | 63% | 240 | (51) | (18)% | – | – | – |
| Other revenue | 217 | (463) | (68)% | – | (11) | - | 859 | (442) | (34)% | 5 | (13) | (72)% |
| Total revenue | 3,947 | (9,343) | (70)% | 467 | (1,658) | (78)% | 2,259 | (3,386) | (60)% | 574 | (1,881) | (77)% |
| Fuel, oil costs and emissions charges |
1,996 | (1,241) | (38)% | 286 | (174) | (38)% | 716 | (486) | (40)% | 314 | (234) | (43)% |
| Employee costs | 1,916 | (1,196) | (38)% | 217 | (188) | (46)% | 798 | (366) | (31)% | 196 | (105) | (35)% |
| Supplier costs | 2,440 | (2,057) | (46)% | 370 | (484) | (57)% | 1,544 | (848) | (35)% | 594 | (522) | (47)% |
| Ownership costs2 | 1,475 | 369 | 33% | 157 | 27 | 21% | 612 | 222 | 57% | 345 | 95 | 38% |
| Operating loss | (3,880) | (5,218) | nm | (563) | (839) | nm | (1,411) | (1,908) | nm | (875) | (1,115) | nm |
| Operating margin | (98.3)% | (108.4) pts | (120.4)% | (133.4) pts | (62.5)% | (71.3) pts | (152.3)% | (162.1) pts | ||||
| Alternative Performance Measures1 | ||||||||||||
| Passenger revenue | 2,894 | (9,005) | (76)% | 382 | (1,678) | (81)% | 1,160 | (2,893) | (71)% | 569 | (1,868) | (77)% |
| Cargo revenue | 890 | 179 | 25% | 88 | 34 | 63% | 240 | (51) | (18)% | – | – | – |
| Other revenue | 217 | (463) | (68)% | – | (11) | - | 859 | (442) | (34)% | 5 | (13) | (72)% |
| Total revenue before exceptional items |
4,001 | (9,289) | (70)% | 470 | (1,655) | (78)% | 2,259 | (3,386) | (60)% | 574 | (1,881) | (77)% |
| Fuel, oil costs and emissions charges |
1,159 | (2,078) | (64)% | 142 | (318) | (69)% | 372 | (830) | (69)% | 160 | (388) | (71)% |
| Employee costs | 1,695 | (834) | (33)% | 193 | (212) | (52)% | 784 | (380) | (33)% | 196 | (105) | (35)% |
| Supplier costs | 2,398 | (2,099) | (47)% | 363 | (491) | (57)% | 1,492 | (900) | (38)% | 564 | (552) | (49)% |
| Ownership costs2 | 1,076 | (30) | (3)% | 133 | 3 | 2% | 370 | (20) | (5)% | 277 | 27 | 11% |
| Operating loss before exceptional |
||||||||||||
| items | (2,327) | (4,248) | nm | (361) | (637) | nm | (759) | (1,256) | nm | (623) | (863) | nm |
| Operating margin before exceptional items |
(58.2)% | (72.7) pts | (76.8)% | (89.8) pts | (33.6)% | (42.4) pts | (108.5)% | (118.3) pts |
1 Further detail is provided in the Alternative Performance Measures section.
2 Ownership costs reflects Depreciation, amortisation and impairment.
30 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Post-exceptional items1
Fuel, oil costs and
Total revenue before exceptional
Fuel, oil costs and
Operating loss before exceptional
Operating margin before exceptional
Alternative Performance Measures1
British Airways £ million
Higher/
(lower) 2020
Operating profit and loss performance of operating companies
Higher/ (lower)
1 Further detail is provided in the Alternative Performance Measures section. 2 Ownership costs reflects Depreciation, amortisation and impairment.
2020
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
Aer Lingus € million
Higher/
(lower) 2020
Higher/ (lower)
Passenger revenue 2,840 (9,059) (76)% 379 (1,681) (82)% 1,160 (2,893) (71)% 569 (1,868) (77)% Cargo revenue 890 179 25% 88 34 63% 240 (51) (18)% – – – Other revenue 217 (463) (68)% – (11) - 859 (442) (34)% 5 (13) (72)% Total revenue 3,947 (9,343) (70)% 467 (1,658) (78)% 2,259 (3,386) (60)% 574 (1,881) (77)%
emissions charges 1,996 (1,241) (38)% 286 (174) (38)% 716 (486) (40)% 314 (234) (43)% Employee costs 1,916 (1,196) (38)% 217 (188) (46)% 798 (366) (31)% 196 (105) (35)% Supplier costs 2,440 (2,057) (46)% 370 (484) (57)% 1,544 (848) (35)% 594 (522) (47)% Ownership costs2 1,475 369 33% 157 27 21% 612 222 57% 345 95 38% Operating loss (3,880) (5,218) nm (563) (839) nm (1,411) (1,908) nm (875) (1,115) nm Operating margin (98.3)% (108.4) pts (120.4)% (133.4) pts (62.5)% (71.3) pts (152.3)% (162.1) pts
Passenger revenue 2,894 (9,005) (76)% 382 (1,678) (81)% 1,160 (2,893) (71)% 569 (1,868) (77)% Cargo revenue 890 179 25% 88 34 63% 240 (51) (18)% – – – Other revenue 217 (463) (68)% – (11) - 859 (442) (34)% 5 (13) (72)%
items 4,001 (9,289) (70)% 470 (1,655) (78)% 2,259 (3,386) (60)% 574 (1,881) (77)%
emissions charges 1,159 (2,078) (64)% 142 (318) (69)% 372 (830) (69)% 160 (388) (71)% Employee costs 1,695 (834) (33)% 193 (212) (52)% 784 (380) (33)% 196 (105) (35)% Supplier costs 2,398 (2,099) (47)% 363 (491) (57)% 1,492 (900) (38)% 564 (552) (49)% Ownership costs2 1,076 (30) (3)% 133 3 2% 370 (20) (5)% 277 27 11%
items (2,327) (4,248) nm (361) (637) nm (759) (1,256) nm (623) (863) nm
30 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
items (58.2)% (72.7) pts (76.8)% (89.8) pts (33.6)% (42.4) pts (108.5)% (118.3) pts
Iberia € million
Higher/
(lower) 2020
Higher/ (lower)
Vueling € million
Higher/ (lower)
Higher/ (lower) The results after exceptional items for each operating company are shown previously, along with the Alternative Performance Measures, which exclude exceptional items, as detailed in the Alternative Performance Measures section.
The results for all operating companies were significantly impacted by COVID-19 in 2020 and the main items driving the results of the four main operating companies are therefore common, many of which have been covered above. All four of the operating companies saw significant reductions in passenger revenue and took measures to reduce operating costs and preserve liquidity. British Airways, Iberia and Aer Lingus benefited from additional cargo flights and higher cargo yields, with both British Airways and Aer Lingus generating higher cargo revenue than in 2019.
Employee costs fell due to the use of wage support or similar schemes, particularly in the UK and Ireland, with temporary redundancy programmes under the ERTE arrangement operating in Spain. British Airways and Aer Lingus undertook restructuring programmes during the year, with Iberia also making reductions in management numbers and reductions outside of Spain.
The operating companies all operate similar hedging programmes, under a centrally agreed Group policy, which resulted in overhedging of jet fuel purchases and related currency transactions. Excluding the impact of overhedging, fuel costs fell in line with the capacity reductions, with a small benefit from the efficiency of new-generation aircraft and a reduced effective price net of hedging.
Supplier costs also fell significantly at each of the operating companies, reflecting the impact of volume-related savings, linked to the significantly lower flying programmes, together with the negotiated cost-reduction initiatives and reductions in discretionary expenditure.
Ownership costs were impacted by the impairment of aircraft and related assets in each operating company, including the early retirement of the Boeing 747-400 fleet at British Airways and the Airbus A340-600 fleet at Iberia, together with other aircraft permanently stood down pending disposal or return to lessors.
Operating margins are much less meaningful than in previous years, given the significant impact of COVID-19, but are included for completeness; each main operating company saw a substantial operating loss in 2020, with cost reductions only able to mitigate part of the fall in revenues.
In response to COVID-19, the Group has agreed to defer 68 aircraft scheduled for delivery over the period 2020 to 2022 and to re-schedule certain pre-delivery payments to aircraft manufacturers. In November 2019, as announced at the IAG Capital Markets Day, it was anticipated capital expenditure would total €14.2 billion for the period 2020 to 2022. With aircraft deferrals and savings in other capital expenditure, linked to the response to COVID-19, the Group now expects capital expenditure over that period to be below €7 billion. Further deferrals are under discussion with the aircraft manufacturers.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
The Group did not enter into any new agreements to acquire additional aircraft in 2020, either from aircraft manufacturers or lessors.
In 2020 the Group took delivery of 34 aircraft, with 19 for British Airways, eight for Iberia, three for Vueling and four for Aer Lingus. As at December 31, 2020 one of these aircraft had yet to enter service and is therefore not included in the 'in service' fleet shown elsewhere in this report. The liquidity impact of the aircraft deliveries in the year was cash-positive, as the value of financing raised exceeded the final delivery payments made to the aircraft manufacturers, due to pre-delivery payments for those aircraft made in previous years, with total aircraft financing proceeds in the year of €2.2 billion.
| Aircraft deliveries | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Airbus A320 family | 15 | 32 |
| Airbus A330 | 2 | 3 |
| Airbus A350 | 7 | 8 |
| Boeing 777-300 | 4 | – |
| Boeing 787-10 | 2 | – |
| Embraer E190 | 4 | 2 |
| Total | 34 | 45 |
Capital expenditure for the year was reduced to €1.9 billion, more than 50 per cent down on the €4.2 billion anticipated for 2020 in November 2019. Capital expenditure was also lower than the revised projection of €2.7 billion for the year given in July 2020, mainly due to further aircraft delays, moving approximately €0.5 billion of aircraft delivery payments and associated financing into 2021.
Despite the reductions made to discretionary capital projects, the Group maintained its programme of cyber-related investments.
www.iairgroup.com 31
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
Capital expenditure authorised and contracted for at December 31, 2020 amounted to €10,545 million (2019: €12,830 million). Most of this commitment is denominated in US dollars and includes commitments until 2027 for 121 aircraft including 64 aircraft from the Airbus A320 family, 10 Boeing 787s, 18 Boeing 777s, one Airbus A330, 26 Airbus A350s and two Embraer E190.
The Group has certain rights to cancel commitments in the event of significant delays to aircraft deliveries caused by the aircraft manufacturers. No such rights had been exercised as at December 31, 2020.
| Aircraft future deliveries at December 31 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Airbus A320 family | 64 | 79 |
| Airbus A330 | 1 | 1 |
| Airbus A350 | 26 | 33 |
| Boeing 777-300 | – | 4 |
| Boeing 777-9 | 18 | 18 |
| Boeing 787-10 | 10 | 12 |
| Embraer E190 | 2 | – |
| Total | 121 | 147 |
The Group negotiated deferrals to supplier payments and lease payments. The Group rolled over fuel derivatives, monetised EU Emissions Trading Scheme credits and foreign currency derivatives that resulted in reduced cash outflow in 2020 of approximately €625 million; deferrals to future years account for approximately 60 per cent of this amount, with the majority due in 2021. Relief was given during the year in respect of the timing of VAT and other payments to the UK's HMRC and to Eurocontrol for regulated overlying charges, although both had reverted to normal terms by the end of the year.
In quarter 3 a multi-year renewal was signed with American Express, including an upfront payment of approximately €830 million (£754 million), with a significant amount being for the pre-purchase of Avios.
Trade receivables were reduced significantly, falling from €2,255 million (net of the provision for expected credit losses) at December 31, 2019 to €557 million at the end of 2020. Part of the reduction was due to the contraction in activity, with lower passenger and other revenue yet to be received by the Group, but the reduction was also achieved by ensuring outstanding amounts due from customers and government agencies were paid.
Deferred revenue on ticket sales, which includes loyalty points (Avios), fell €356 million to €5,130 million at December 31, 2020; €4,657 million is included in current liabilities and €473 million within non-current liabilities, associated with the renewal of the IAG Loyalty contract with American Express. The value of loyalty points (Avios) issued and yet to be recognised in revenue was up €0.8 billion versus 2019 at €2.7 billion, reflecting the American Express contract renewal and associated pre-payment, but sales in advance of carriage, related to passenger ticket sales, were down €1.2 billion versus 2019 at €2.4 billion. The cash impact of cancelled flights was partially mitigated by customers accepting vouchers for future travel in lieu of a cash refund, with the outstanding value of vouchers as at December 31, 2020 accounting for approximately half of the sales in advance of carriage balance.
Due to COVID-19 British Airways was eligible for refund of tax payments made to HMRC in 2019 and the Group was able to accelerate receipt into 2020, rather than 2021. Together with refunds in Ireland, the impact was to improve cash by approximately €175 million in 2020.
British Airways deferred monthly UK pension contributions that would otherwise have been due in quarter 4, 2020 to the value of €125 million, together with contributions of €375 million relating to the first three quarters of 2021. These payments are due to be added to the end of the schedule of deficit recovery contributions, which currently ends in March 2023. British Airways granted to the Trustee of NAPS security over certain property assets in respect of these deferred payments. British Airways has also agreed that it will not make dividend payments to IAG before the end of 2023 and that from 2024 dividends will be matched by a contribution to NAPS of 50 per cent of the dividend paid until the deferred contributions have been paid.
IAG's long-term objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital and to provide sustainable returns to shareholders. In November 2018, S+P and Moody's assigned IAG with a long-term investment grade credit rating with stable outlook. Ratings (as at February 25, 2021) are: S&P: BB (3 notch decline), Moody's: Ba2 (2 notch decline), based on the status of COVID-19 and related travel restrictions, together with the expected timing of the recovery of global air traffic.
The Group monitors leverage using net debt to EBITDA.
See Alternative Performance Measure section for calculation
32 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
The Group has a target of net debt to EBITDA below 1.8 times.
In 2020, due to the significant impact of COVID-19, EBITDA turned negative, rendering the net debt to EBITDA ratio much less meaningful than in normal times; the calculation for 2020 results in minus 4.3 times.
Deferred revenue on ticket sales, which includes loyalty points (Avios), fell €356 million to €5,130 million at December 31, 2020; €4,657 million is included in current liabilities and €473 million within non-current liabilities, associated with the renewal of the IAG Loyalty contract with American Express. The value of loyalty points (Avios) issued and yet to be recognised in revenue was up €0.8 billion versus 2019 at €2.7 billion, reflecting the American Express contract renewal and associated pre-payment, but sales in advance of carriage, related to passenger ticket sales, were down €1.2 billion versus 2019 at €2.4 billion. The cash impact of cancelled flights was partially mitigated by customers accepting vouchers for future travel in lieu of a cash refund, with the outstanding value of vouchers as at December 31, 2020 accounting for approximately half of the sales in advance of
Due to COVID-19 British Airways was eligible for refund of tax payments made to HMRC in 2019 and the Group was able to accelerate receipt into 2020, rather than 2021. Together with refunds in Ireland, the impact was to improve cash by
British Airways deferred monthly UK pension contributions that would otherwise have been due in quarter 4, 2020 to the value of €125 million, together with contributions of €375 million relating to the first three quarters of 2021. These payments are due to be
contributions, which currently ends in March 2023. British Airways granted to the Trustee of NAPS security over certain property assets in respect of these deferred payments. British Airways has also agreed that it will not make dividend payments to IAG before the end of 2023 and that from 2024 dividends will be matched by a contribution to NAPS of 50 per cent of the dividend paid until
added to the end of the schedule of deficit recovery
IAG's long-term objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital and to provide sustainable returns to shareholders. In November 2018, S+P and Moody's assigned IAG with a long-term investment grade credit rating with stable outlook. Ratings (as at February 25, 2021) are: S&P: BB (3 notch decline), Moody's: Ba2 (2 notch decline), based on the status of COVID-19 and related travel restrictions, together with the expected timing of the recovery of
The Group monitors leverage using net debt to EBITDA. See Alternative Performance Measure section for calculation
the deferred contributions have been paid.
carriage balance.
Funding and debt
global air traffic. Debt and capital
32 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
approximately €175 million in 2020.
Capital commitments
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
December 31, 2020.
Working capital and other initiatives
normal terms by the end of the year.
the pre-purchase of Avios.
agencies were paid.
Capital expenditure authorised and contracted for at December 31, 2020 amounted to €10,545 million (2019: €12,830 million). Most of this commitment is denominated in US dollars and includes commitments until 2027 for 121 aircraft including 64 aircraft from the Airbus A320 family, 10 Boeing 787s, 18 Boeing 777s, one Airbus A330, 26 Airbus A350s and two Embraer E190.
The Group has certain rights to cancel commitments in the event of significant delays to aircraft deliveries caused by the aircraft manufacturers. No such rights had been exercised as at
Aircraft future deliveries at December 31 2020 2019 Airbus A320 family 64 79 Airbus A330 1 1 Airbus A350 26 33 Boeing 777-300 – 4 Boeing 777-9 18 18 Boeing 787-10 10 12 Embraer E190 2 – Total 121 147
The Group negotiated deferrals to supplier payments and lease payments. The Group rolled over fuel derivatives, monetised EU Emissions Trading Scheme credits and foreign currency derivatives that resulted in reduced cash outflow in 2020 of approximately €625 million; deferrals to future years account for approximately 60 per cent of this amount, with the majority due in 2021. Relief was given during the year in respect of the timing of VAT and other payments to the UK's HMRC and to Eurocontrol for regulated overlying charges, although both had reverted to
In quarter 3 a multi-year renewal was signed with American Express, including an upfront payment of approximately €830 million (£754 million), with a significant amount being for
Trade receivables were reduced significantly, falling from €2,255 million (net of the provision for expected credit losses) at December 31, 2019 to €557 million at the end of 2020. Part of the reduction was due to the contraction in activity, with lower passenger and other revenue yet to be received by the Group, but the reduction was also achieved by ensuring outstanding amounts due from customers and government
| € million | 2020 | 2019 | Higher / (lower) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt | 14,254 | 12,704 | 1,550 |
| Cash and cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits |
(6,683) | (6,274) | (409) |
| Net debt at January 1 | 7,571 | 6,430 | 1,141 |
| Decrease/(increase) in cash net of exchange |
766 | (409) | 1,175 |
| Net cash outflow from repayments of borrowings and lease liabilities |
(2,514) | (2,237) | (277) |
| Net cash inflow from new borrowings |
3,567 | 2,286 | 1,281 |
| Non-cash impact from new leases |
1,179 | 1,199 | (20) |
| Increase in net debt from financing |
2,232 | 1,248 | 984 |
| Exchange and other non-cash movements |
(807) | 302 | (1,109) |
| Net debt at December 31 | 9,762 | 7,571 | 2,191 |
Gross debt increased by €1,425 million, principally driven by the non-aircraft debt raised by British Airways under the UK's CCFF mechanism (€328 million), loans backed by Spain's ICO of €750 million for Iberia and €260 million for Vueling, together with €75 million of debt backed by the Irish ISIF (see below). Cash fell by €766 million, leading to net debt €2,191 million higher at €9,762 million. Since the adoption of IFRS 16 from January 1, 2019 net debt includes leases for aircraft with financing arrangements formerly accounted for as operating leases.
The 2020 cash balance in IAG and other Group companies includes the balance of the proceeds from the capital increase retained in IAG and the net proceeds of the American Express renewal payment in IAG Loyalty.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
| € million | 2020 | 2019 | Higher/ (lower) |
|---|---|---|---|
| British Airways | 1,389 | 3,055 | (1,666) |
| Iberia | 822 | 1,121 | (299) |
| Aer Lingus | 266 | 580 | (314) |
| Vueling | 590 | 820 | (230) |
| IAG and other Group | |||
| companies | 2,850 | 1,107 | 1,743 |
| Cash and deposits | 5,917 | 6,683 | (766) |
Cash and interest-bearing deposits reduced by €766 million to €5,917 million, with the significant impact of COVID-19 on profitability offset by the mitigation measures taken by the Group, including additional borrowing and the €2.7 billion capital increase.
www.iairgroup.com 33
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
Despite some disruption to financial markets in respect of the aviation sector, linked to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Group has been able to continue to obtain efficient funding secured against aircraft deliveries. In total 36 aircraft were financed in the year, 4 of which were delivered in 2019, and with 13 involving sale and leaseback transactions, a further 11 direct leases from lessors and 12 on finance lease arrangements. Just two of the aircraft delivered in 2020 had not been financed as at the end of the year, although sale and leaseback transactions for these were agreed and executed in February 2021.
Proceeds from sale and leaseback transactions continue to cover substantially all of the Group's aircraft purchase price. An Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates (EETC) funding for \$1,005 million (€823 million) was successfully issued and closed for British Airways in November 2020, with \$577 million (€472 million) drawn down in December in the form of finance leases, with the remainder expected to be drawn in 2021, in line with aircraft deliveries. The issuance comprised a dual-tranche structure achieving a loan-to-value of 75 per cent against an independently appraised value of the aircraft.
In addition to long-term regular aircraft financing, the Group took steps to boost available liquidity through other lending and facilities. Short-term aircraft-backed financing facilities for British Airways (\$750 million, or €667 million) and Iberia (\$228 million, or €194 million) were secured in the second quarter. These facilities were fully drawn during the year but had been repaid in full by the end of the year, due to the Group's success in securing more efficient long-term financing.
The Group agreed new non-aircraft debt for each of its main operating companies. In March, British Airways completed its inaugural commercial paper issuance raising net proceeds of €328 million (£298 million) using the UK's Coronavirus Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF) with a maturity of 12 months. In April, Iberia and Vueling entered into floating rate syndicated financing agreements for €750 million and €260 million respectively, with the funds received in May. These loans are secured by a guarantee of 70 per cent of the amount borrowed from the Instituto de Crédito Oficial ('ICO') in Spain. There is no amortisation for the first three years and the loans mature in 2025; the loans do not include financial covenants but place some restrictions on the transfer of cash to the rest of the IAG companies. In December, the Irish Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) approved a €150 million facility for Aer Lingus with €75 million drawn down as a loan as at December 31, 2020; this loan also has restrictions regarding transfers of cash, from Aer Lingus to IAG and other Group companies. At the end of 2020 British Airways announced that it had received commitments for a 5-year Export Development Guaranteed term loan for £2.0 billion underwritten by a syndicate of banks, partially guaranteed (80 per cent) by UK Export Finance (UKEF) and containing some non-financial covenants, including restrictions on cash transfers to IAG. The facility was fully drawn down as a loan in February 2021.
The debt actions above resulted in total 'Proceeds from borrowings' for the year of €3,567 million. This includes the drawing down of the short-term aircraft financing facilities above, with the repayment of those facilities during the year shown in 'Repayments of borrowings and lease liabilities'.
During quarter 3 the Group launched a capital increase by rights issue, which was fully subscribed, with the Group's largest shareholder, Qatar Airways Group subscribing for its pro rated entitlement in full. The capital increase was successfully completed at the start of quarter 4, with gross proceeds of €2.7 billion received in October. As at December 31, 2020 none of the proceeds from the €2.7 billion capital increase had been allocated permanently to any of the Group's operating companies. British Airways received a loan from IAG of €1,645 million and Aer Lingus a loan of €50 million.
In March, British Airways' revolving credit facility (RCF) was extended to June 2021, with a committed amount of \$1.38 billion. The Group has secured other credit facilities during the year. At the end of the year committed general credit facilities, including the undrawn amount of the British Airways RCF, were €0.9 billion. In addition, the Group had committed aircraft financing facilities of €1.2 billion, which provide guaranteed financing against certain future aircraft deliveries, including the committed proceeds still to be drawn as part of the British Airways EETC issued in November 2020. In total, the Group had €2.1 billion of committed and undrawn general and aircraft facilities as at December 31, 2020.
As a result of the impact of COVID-19, on April 2, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Group resolved to withdraw the proposal to the subsequent Shareholders' Meeting to pay a final dividend for 2019 of 17 € cents per share, which would have resulted in a total payment of €337 million.
Total liquidity, measured as cash and interest-bearing deposits of €5,917 million and committed and undrawn general and aircraft facilities of €2,142 million, was €8,059 million at December 31, 2020. Including the €2.2 billion UKEF debt agreed in December 2020 results in pro forma liquidity of €10.3 billion.
34 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
The debt actions above resulted in total 'Proceeds from borrowings' for the year of €3,567 million. This includes the drawing down of the short-term aircraft financing facilities above, with the repayment of those facilities during the year shown in
During quarter 3 the Group launched a capital increase by rights issue, which was fully subscribed, with the Group's largest shareholder, Qatar Airways Group subscribing for its pro rated entitlement in full. The capital increase was successfully completed at the start of quarter 4, with gross proceeds of €2.7 billion received in October. As at December 31, 2020 none of the proceeds from the €2.7 billion capital increase had been allocated permanently to any of the Group's operating companies. British Airways received a loan from IAG of €1,645 million and
In March, British Airways' revolving credit facility (RCF) was extended to June 2021, with a committed amount of \$1.38 billion. The Group has secured other credit facilities during the year. At the end of the year committed general credit facilities, including the undrawn amount of the British Airways RCF, were €0.9 billion. In addition, the Group had committed aircraft financing facilities of €1.2 billion, which provide guaranteed financing against certain future aircraft deliveries, including the committed proceeds still to be drawn as part of the British Airways EETC issued in November 2020. In total, the Group had €2.1 billion of committed and undrawn general and aircraft facilities as at December 31, 2020.
As a result of the impact of COVID-19, on April 2, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Group resolved to withdraw the proposal to the subsequent Shareholders' Meeting to pay a final dividend for 2019 of 17 € cents per share, which would have resulted in a total
Total liquidity, measured as cash and interest-bearing deposits of €5,917 million and committed and undrawn general and aircraft facilities of €2,142 million, was €8,059 million at December 31, 2020. Including the €2.2 billion UKEF debt agreed in December
2020 results in pro forma liquidity of €10.3 billion.
'Repayments of borrowings and lease liabilities'.
Aer Lingus a loan of €50 million.
Liquidity facilities
Dividends
34 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
payment of €337 million. Liquidity and cashflow
Equity
Debt
and executed in February 2021.
FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
efficient long-term financing.
in February 2021.
independently appraised value of the aircraft.
Despite some disruption to financial markets in respect of the aviation sector, linked to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Group has been able to continue to obtain efficient funding secured against aircraft deliveries. In total 36 aircraft were financed in the year, 4 of which were delivered in 2019, and with 13 involving sale and leaseback transactions, a further 11 direct leases from lessors and 12 on finance lease arrangements. Just two of the aircraft
delivered in 2020 had not been financed as at the end of the year, although sale and leaseback transactions for these were agreed
Proceeds from sale and leaseback transactions continue to cover substantially all of the Group's aircraft purchase price. An Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates (EETC) funding for \$1,005 million (€823 million) was successfully issued and closed for British Airways in November 2020, with \$577 million (€472 million) drawn down in December in the form of finance leases, with the remainder expected to be drawn in 2021, in line with aircraft deliveries. The issuance comprised a dual-tranche structure achieving a loan-to-value of 75 per cent against an
In addition to long-term regular aircraft financing, the Group took steps to boost available liquidity through other lending and facilities. Short-term aircraft-backed financing facilities for British Airways (\$750 million, or €667 million) and Iberia (\$228 million, or €194 million) were secured in the second quarter. These facilities were fully drawn during the year but had been repaid in full by the end of the year, due to the Group's success in securing more
The Group agreed new non-aircraft debt for each of its main operating companies. In March, British Airways completed its inaugural commercial paper issuance raising net proceeds of €328 million (£298 million) using the UK's Coronavirus Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF) with a maturity of 12 months. In April, Iberia and Vueling entered into floating rate syndicated financing agreements for €750 million and €260 million respectively, with the funds received in May. These loans are secured by a guarantee of 70 per cent of the amount borrowed from the Instituto de Crédito Oficial ('ICO') in Spain. There is no
amortisation for the first three years and the loans mature in 2025; the loans do not include financial covenants but place some restrictions on the transfer of cash to the rest of the IAG companies. In December, the Irish Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) approved a €150 million facility for Aer Lingus with €75 million drawn down as a loan as at December 31, 2020; this loan also has restrictions regarding transfers of cash, from Aer Lingus to IAG and other Group companies. At the end of 2020 British Airways announced that it had received
commitments for a 5-year Export Development Guaranteed term loan for £2.0 billion underwritten by a syndicate of banks, partially guaranteed (80 per cent) by UK Export Finance (UKEF) and containing some non-financial covenants, including restrictions on cash transfers to IAG. The facility was fully drawn down as a loan
| € million | 2020 | 2019 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating (loss)/profit | (7,426) | 2,613 | (10,039) |
| Depreciation, amortisation and | |||
| impairment | 2,955 | 2,111 | 844 |
| Movement in working capital | 1,227 | (70) | 1,297 |
| Payment related to restructuring | (383) | (180) | (203) |
| Pension contributions net of service costs |
(313) | (865) | 552 |
| Provisions and other non-cash movements |
556 | 951 | (395) |
| Unrealised loss on discontinuance of fuel and foreign exchange hedge |
|||
| accounting | 569 | - | 569 |
| Interest paid | (548) | (481) | (67) |
| Interest received | 22 | 42 | (20) |
| Tax received/(paid) | 45 | (119) | 164 |
| Net cash (outflows)/inflows from operating activities |
(3,296) | 4,002 | (7,298) |
| Acquisition of PPE and intangible assets |
(1,939) (3,465) | 1,526 | |
| Sale of PPE and intangible assets | 1,133 | 911 | 222 |
| Decrease/(increase) in current | |||
| interest-bearing deposits | 2,366 | (103) | 2,469 |
| Other investing movements | 2 | (1) | 3 |
| Net cash flows from investing activities |
1,562 | (2,658) | 4,220 |
| Proceeds from borrowings | 3,567 | 2,286 | 1,281 |
| Repayments of borrowings | (978) | (730) | (248) |
| Repayment of lease liabilities | (1,536) | (1,507) | (29) |
| Dividend paid | (53) | (1,308) | 1,255 |
| Proceeds from rights issue | 2,674 | - | 2,674 |
| Net cash flows from financing | (1,259) | 4,933 | |
| activities | 3,674 | ||
| Net increase in cash and cash | |||
| equivalents | 1,940 | 85 | 1,855 |
| Net foreign exchange differences | (228) | 140 | (368) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at | |||
| January 1 | 4,062 | 3,837 | 225 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at year end |
5,774 | 4,062 | 1,712 |
| Interest-bearing deposits | |||
| maturing after more than three months |
143 | 2,621 | (2,478) |
| Cash, cash equivalents and | |||
| interest-bearing deposits | 5,917 | 6,683 | (766) |
Many of the significant cashflow items are already explained above, including in the sections on operating costs (fuel), capital expenditure, working capital and other initiatives and funding.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Restructuring payments include payments in Spain relating to redundancy programmes agreed in prior years, together with the cash paid in 2020 relating to the exceptional restructuring charge of €313 million (see Alternative Performance Measures section).
Pension payments in 2019 included an additional one-off payment of £250 million (€283 million) to the British Airways NAPS fund; 2020 benefited from the deferral of deficit contributions in quarter 4.
Of the exceptional charges for discontinuance of hedge accounting in respect of passenger revenue of €62 million and fuel, oil and emissions costs of €1,694 million in 2020, €1,187 million had been paid, leaving €569 million to be paid in future years, with the majority due in 2021.
Sale of property, plant and equipment and intangibles, in addition to the aircraft 13 sale and leaseback transactions discussed under 'Funding' above, includes the disposal of surplus engines and other equipment and property at London Heathrow.
Repayments of borrowings and lease liabilities includes the principal element of ongoing lease payments, together with short-term aircraft financing of €833 million, which was drawn and fully repaid during the year. There are no IAG bond payments falling due in 2021; based on the share price at December 31, 2020, the remaining €500 million IAG convertible bond will be due for repayment in November 2022.
The €53 million of cash outflow for dividends relates to the Spanish withholding tax in respect of the 2019 interim dividend, as the dividend was paid to shareholders in December 2019 and the related withholding tax was paid to the Spanish tax authorities in January 2020.
www.iairgroup.com 35
Vienna was closed.
brand model
A reshaped airline to face the
LEVEL is IAG's low-cost airline brand. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated government travel restrictions and advisories have had a very significant negative effect on LEVEL's business, with all the fleet grounded in March 2020. A strong focus on cost reduction and cash preservation has been maintained
In June, LEVEL Europe, the Group's Austria-based shorthaul operator, announced that it was entering insolvency and that it had ceased trading following all flights being grounded as of March 2020. The operations out of Vienna and Amsterdam were ceased and the base in
continues to provide scalable opportunities to develop innovative solutions and further
enhance synergies.
new challenges
since then.
Building IAG's longhaul low-cost
has ceased its activities.
market share.
In November, Openskies, the operator of LEVEL France, completed a consultation process on its proposed cessation of operations and the development of an Employment Safeguard Plan. Openskies
Looking forward
in environment.
service at the lowest cost.
LEVEL is now focused on creating value for the Group from its longhaul operation in Barcelona. Together with Vueling, it will reinforce the ambition of Barcelona as an IAG hub, with the aim to improve the capture of connecting traffic.
An agile network planning process has been implemented to adjust capacity rapidly to the situation and to any change
There will be a continued focus on direct distribution with the launch of a full reviewed booking flow with new pricing and merchandising functionalities, and the implementation of a new Customer Lifecycle improving upsell and repetition. The new Online Contact Centre, with reinforced omnichannel capabilities, will become the lever to improve customer
During 2020, LEVEL Spain has taken significant steps to improve key value drivers in digital distribution and ancillary merchandising and continues to operate
Important milestones have been achieved to increase LEVEL Spain's distribution in away markets and to improve product relevance, such as the enablement of the connectivity with Vueling on flylevel.com. LEVEL's unbundled fare distribution was activated on all the channels to improve its
longhaul flights from Barcelona.
| IAG Connect | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The IAG Platform enables Group operating companies to achieve revenue and cost synergies that would be hard to achieve as a standalone organisation. Integral to the Group's delivery model, the IAG Platform provides access to quality resources, common systems and centres of excellence, providing operating companies new to the Group with a 'plug and play' model they can quickly and efficiently join and rapidly realise benefits. All operating companies have benefited |
IAG Connect | IAG Connect is a "platform as a service" business, providing IAG airlines with an in-air connectivity capability (.air) agnostic of hardware and data provider. On top of this, IAG Connect uses the .air platform to provide in-flight services including entertainment, customer service, retail and loyalty via portal and seatback interfaces. During 2020, the IAG Connect management was transitioned to IAG Loyalty to allow it to further enhance customer relevancy of its products as well |
value to customers. | extend the value that the platform can create for customers across IAG airlines in the future. IAG Connect has continued to roll out Wi-Fi connectivity across the Group's fleet in 2020 and now covers 75 per cent of the Group's aircraft. Vast improvements have also been made to IAG Connect's processes to speed up delivery of new and enhanced products and services. IAG Connect's plans for 2021 include new products and features already in development to further add |
as provide access to an extensive partnership network. This will be used to
40 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020

Javier Ferrán Chairman
Building IAG's longhaul low-cost
has ceased its activities.
market share.
efficiency, modernisation and
innovation to support the Group
IAG Connect
IAG Connect is a "platform as a service" business, providing IAG airlines with an in-air connectivity capability (.air) agnostic of hardware and data provider. On top of this, IAG Connect uses the .air platform to provide in-flight services including entertainment, customer service, retail and loyalty via portal and seatback interfaces.
40 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
IAG Platform
During 2020, the IAG Connect management was transitioned to IAG Loyalty to allow it to further enhance customer relevancy of its products as well as provide access to an extensive partnership network. This will be used to
In November, Openskies, the operator of LEVEL France, completed a consultation process on its proposed cessation of operations and the development of an Employment Safeguard Plan. Openskies
Looking forward
in environment.
service at the lowest cost.
LEVEL is now focused on creating value for the Group from its longhaul operation in Barcelona. Together with Vueling, it will reinforce the ambition of Barcelona as an IAG hub, with the aim to improve the capture of connecting traffic.
An agile network planning process has been implemented to adjust capacity rapidly to the situation and to any change
There will be a continued focus on direct distribution with the launch of a full reviewed booking flow with new pricing and merchandising functionalities, and the implementation of a new Customer Lifecycle improving upsell and repetition. The new Online Contact Centre, with reinforced omnichannel capabilities, will become the lever to improve customer
extend the value that the platform can create for customers across IAG airlines in the future. IAG Connect has continued to roll out Wi-Fi connectivity across the Group's fleet in 2020 and now covers 75
IAG Connect
Vast improvements have also been made to IAG Connect's processes to speed up delivery of new and enhanced products and services. IAG Connect's plans for 2021 include new products and features already in development to further add
per cent of the Group's aircraft.
value to customers.
During 2020, LEVEL Spain has taken significant steps to improve key value drivers in digital distribution and ancillary merchandising and continues to operate
Important milestones have been achieved to increase LEVEL Spain's distribution in away markets and to improve product relevance, such as the enablement of the connectivity with Vueling on flylevel.com. LEVEL's unbundled fare distribution was activated on all the channels to improve its
longhaul flights from Barcelona.
Creating further opportunities for
brand model
A reshaped airline to face the
LEVEL is IAG's low-cost airline brand. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated government travel restrictions and advisories have had a very significant negative effect on LEVEL's business, with all the fleet grounded in March 2020. A strong focus on cost reduction and cash preservation has been maintained
In June, LEVEL Europe, the Group's Austria-based shorthaul operator, announced that it was entering insolvency and that it had ceased trading following all flights being grounded as of March 2020. The operations out of Vienna and Amsterdam were ceased and the base in
The IAG Platform enables Group operating companies to achieve revenue and cost synergies that would be hard to achieve as
Integral to the Group's delivery model, the IAG Platform provides access to quality resources, common systems and centres of excellence, providing operating companies new to the Group with a 'plug and play' model they can quickly and efficiently join and rapidly realise benefits. All operating companies have benefited hugely from the IAG Platform, which continues to provide scalable opportunities to develop innovative solutions and further
a standalone organisation.
enhance synergies.
new challenges
since then.
Vienna was closed.
IAG PLATFORM
"Our approach to corporate governance is all about ensuring our business can continue to grow sustainably long into the future for the benefit of all our stakeholders."
We have always been clear that the aviation industry must play a full part in tackling climate change, and we remain as committed as ever to leading that effort.
In 2019, we became the first airline group to commit to net zero carbon emissions by 2050. Throughout 2020 we worked hard to engage the wider industry with this goal, leading coalitions around the world both to create net zero roadmaps and to encourage others to adopt similar targets.
For example, in February we were instrumental in supporting the UK aviation sector to develop a roadmap and a net zero target through the Sustainable Aviation group. In September, we actively supported the oneworld alliance, which includes 13 airlines accounting for some 20 per cent of global aviation, to commit to the same 2050 goal.
We were active through Airlines for Europe and the Air Transport Action Group in developing roadmaps for airlines in Europe and globally. We are also working with partners to secure a net zero target for the global industry at the 2022 general assembly of the International Civil Aviation Organisation.
We were first in our industry to sign up to the UN Climate Ambition Alliance and the Race to Zero campaign, and are proud to be one of ten global companies recognised for our actions at the UN Climate Ambition summit in December, which marked the fifth anniversary of the Paris Climate Agreement.
Across the Group, our 30-year decarbonisation plan continued to make great progress. We sped up the retirement of Boeing 747s and Airbus A340s due to COVID-19, invested in new-generation aircraft, and British Airways partnered with ZeroAvia on developing commercial hydrogen flights.
Operationally, we continued to innovate, using special software to identify fuelsaving opportunities and investing in the i6 Group fuel management software company. Investment in sustainable fuels continued too, with our groundbreaking Altalto waste-to-jet fuel plant in the UK securing planning permission and a new
deal backing a pioneering Lanzajet alcohol-to-jet fuel plant in the USA.
Meanwhile, IAG became a founding member of the Coalition for Negative Emissions, which is advocating for policy support to advance greenhouse gas removal technology. I'm pleased to report that, through our Hangar 51 accelerator programme, eight of our business units are now partnering with environmental innovators.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Sustainability is not just about climate, of course, and we were busy on other fronts too in 2020. We made important improvements to our sustainability governance systems, in data collection, procurement and risk management. We also launched initiatives to support and enhance the wellbeing of our employees.
From the start of 2021, a new Safety, Environment and Corporate Responsibility sub-committee of the Board will meet quarterly to help us maintain and build on our sustainability leadership. This year we will carry out an in-depth materiality review with our stakeholders, and waste management and key social issues will be priority areas for the Group.
We will be doing more to engage with our employees, who will have critical roles to play in the transformation of the Group to ensure its sustainability and long-term resilience.
As you read the pages that follow, I hope you can see that we understand just how important sustainability is to the communities we serve, our customers, employees and investors.
We have always tried to lead the way on sustainability, often with great success. Even in these difficult times, our commitment to do so remains undiminished.
www.iairgroup.com 45
Chairman
This report has three sections: Governance, Planet and People and Prosperity.
IAG's sustainability strategy is aligned to IAG's three strategic priorities, as demonstrated in the diagram to the right.
Progress against the vision is measured against five strategic aims:
To support these ambitions, IAG's core business processes embed consideration of sustainability issues. Three-year business plans, one–year financial plans, procurement and financial approvals all address climate and sustainability impacts. Assessments of climate-related risks are integrated into an interdisciplinary Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process. Carbon prices are incorporated into fleet investment decisions.
In 2020, IAG implemented new management incentives explicitly linked to climate targets. These incentives were agreed by IAG's Management Committee, Remuneration Committee and Board in 2019, resulting in 60 of the most senior executives across the Group, including the IAG Chief Executive Officer, having a proportion of their annual incentives linked to achievement of annual carbon intensity targets. The 2020 annual incentive plan was cancelled due to COVID-19 but the intention is to reinstate it for 2021.

External recognition of leadership and progress in 2020 included:
46 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
reduction initiatives and value chain engagement. The full submission is on the IAG website; and
• Maintaining a 3 out of 4 overall rating in the Transition Pathways Initiative (TPI) Management Quality Index, meeting 15 out of 18 climate indicators.
Up until now IAG's priority focus has been addressing climate change impacts, but with the establishment of the new Safety, Environment and Corporate Responsibility Committee the focus will be broadened to include societal and employee issues.
IAG's sustainability initiatives and reporting are based on a 2017 assessment of which business activities have a material impact on the environment and people and are most important to key stakeholders. This materiality assessment was facilitated by the UK charitable trust Business in the Community (BITC) as an independent third party.
The assessment included workshops, stakeholder interviews, benchmarking against external materiality frameworks and the production of an IAG-specific materiality matrix. External stakeholders included investors, corporate customers, suppliers, NGOs and government. Sixteen material sustainability issues were identified and are listed to the right. IAG's most significant material issue is climate change. Four UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)1 – 5, 7, 8 and 13 – were identified as priority areas to support, amongst nine SDGs in total.
Here, material issues are grouped into the categories of Principles of Governance, Planet and People and Prosperity, to align with best practice indicated by the 2020 World Economic Forum report on 'Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism'.
These material issues align with the issues identified by IATA and GRI2 for the wider airline sector. The nine SDGs align with those identified by IATA and UK trade association Sustainable Aviation (SA).
Water consumption, biodiversity and light pollution are not currently assessed as material for IAG. These assessments are based on the small scale of impacts in these areas, and ongoing conversations with our stakeholders. Light pollution was not assessed during the 2017 materiality assessment as it was not identified as material by any key stakeholders. IAG does not have specific risk provisions, targets or guarantees related to these non-material issues.
Icons indicate alignment with UN SDGs

Planet
• Climate change3 • Energy use • Waste4 • Noise • Air quality
• Local economic impacts
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information


www.iairgroup.com 47
During 2021 IAG will repeat a full-scale materiality assessment, a year later than planned due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. This assessment will include issues that have arisen during the pandemic. Health, safety and wellbeing rose in importance during 2020.
| Goal | Description | See these subsections | 2020 highlight/s |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Gender equality |
Workforce overview | 45% women on the IAG Board and 30% across IAG senior executives |
| Inclusion and diversity | |||
| 7 | Affordable | Climate change | Secured planning permission for Europe's first waste-to-jet fuel plant and |
| and clean energy |
Sustainable aviation fuels |
invested in an alcohol-to-jet fuel plant in the USA | |
| 8 | Decent work and economic growth |
Workforce overview | Provided a range of internal and external resources to support employee wellbeing and COVID-19 safety |
| 13 | Climate action |
Stakeholder engagement |
Instrumental in driving coalitions at national, regional and global levels to set aviation climate strategies in line with a 1.5 degrees Celsius (1.5°C) |
| Climate change | ambition |

48 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
The IAG Board provides oversight and direction for sustainability programmes, and the IAG Management Committee provides the key forum for reviewing and challenging these programmes and setting their strategic direction.
Sustainability programmes across all operating companies and support functions are coordinated at Group level. IAG's sustainability strategy sets out the ambition and the wider context of these programmes. This strategy covers Group policies and objectives, governance structure, risk management, strategy and targets on material issues, sustainability performance indicators, and communications and stakeholder engagement plans. Each individual operating company within the Group has a distinct sustainability programme that is aligned with the Group strategy.
Group-wide policies relevant to sustainability include the Code of Conduct, Supplier Code of Conduct, and specific policies on Sustainability, Modern Slavery, Anti-Corruption and Bribery, Equal Opportunities, and Selection and Diversity. All of these have been approved by the Board of Directors. IAG will review the suite of sustainability-related policies in 2021 and update the sustainability section of the IAG website to reflect any changes.
In 2020, IAG strengthened its sustainability governance. A Sustainability Steering Group, comprised of representatives from each operating company, was established and meets quarterly to provide oversight of our environmental and social initiatives and reporting. A SAF Steering Group and People Working Group were established to report into this steering group. The IAG Sustainability Network held monthly calls rather than bi-annual meetings and representation was expanded to all operating companies.
In 2021 a Safety, Environment and Corporate Responsibility Board subcommittee will provide dedicated oversight of the Group's sustainability programme and a link between operating company management committees and the IAG Board. The 2021 governance structure is shown on the previous page and will enhance the rigour and oversight applied to sustainability initiatives and the level of feedback and challenge received.
Individual operating companies also continue to strengthen their environmental assessment and management. In 2020, British Airways and Vueling achieved Stage 1 certification for the IATA Environmental Assessment (IEnvA)1 management system in 2020 and have begun working towards Stage 2. Aer Lingus and Iberia are working towards Stage 1 certification in 2021. To date, 12 airlines worldwide have achieved IEnvA Stage 1 certification.
The full contents of this sustainability report are included in the IAG Non-Financial Information Statement, which is third-party verified to limited assurance and in line with ISAE30002 (Revised) standards.
IAG aligns sustainability reporting with current and emerging disclosure standards to ensure the Group discloses relevant and meaningful data on sustainability performance.
This includes compliance with obligations under EU Directive 2014/95/EU on non-financial reporting and its transposition in the UK and Spain, and the 2018 UK Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) regulation. IAG voluntarily aligns reporting with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidance, the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the IATA Airlines Reporting Handbook. IAG supported IATA and the GRI to develop the IATA handbook.
This report has been prepared in reference to GRI standards. Criteria for choosing specific GRI standards are based on compliance with Spanish Law 11/2018 and material issues. In cases where alignment was not possible, other standards aligned to airline industry guidance or internal frameworks were used. These are described in relevant sections.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
A table showing alignment with external frameworks and GRI standards is included at the end of this sustainability section.
Unless otherwise stated, the scope of environment performance data includes all IAG airlines, subsidiaries and cargo operations over which IAG has operational control. This scope is consistent with environment-related policies and KPIs. LEVEL (except jet fuel data), IAG Loyalty and IAG GBS functions are not in scope for environmental reporting as the environmental impacts of these business units are not material, but are in scope of policies and KPIs.
Unless otherwise stated, workforce and supply chain data include all IAG operating companies and support functions that are wholly or majority-owned.
Scope 1 emissions data related to intra-European flights is subject to further verification for compliance with the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and the UN Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). British Airways emissions data is typically verified again, to reasonable assurance standards, within six months of the year end.
In cases where full year data was not available, estimates have been applied based on business forecasts and data from prior months. Internal governance is in place to ensure that any estimations made are robust.
Any restatements are indicated next to relevant metrics with reasons provided.
www.iairgroup.com 49
1 IEnvA is the airline industry version of ISO 14001, the international standard for environmental management systems. IEnvA is tailored specifically for airlines and is fully compatible with the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO).
2 ISAE3000 is the assurance standard for compliance, sustainability and outsourcing audits, issued by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

IAG Global Business Services (IAG GBS) manages interactions with suppliers on behalf of the Group. During 2020, IAG GBS focused on minimising the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and drove further consolidation of the number of active suppliers from 27,033 in 2019 to 22,947 in 2020. This consolidation enables IAG GBS to focus more attention on building strategic partnerships.
IAG GBS has a dedicated Procurement Sustainability Programme which consists of four key aspects relating to the supply chain:
In September 2020, IAG GBS launched a new Group-wide Supplier Code of Conduct and issued this to the existing supply chain. This Code clarifies the standards of behaviour expected from suppliers working with any part of the business and emphasises the importance of sustainability. It has also been integrated into the supplier onboarding process. IAG will only work with businesses which share our standards and ways of working.
As a minimum, all suppliers undergo bi-annual screening for any legal, social, environmental and financial risks. In 2020, 1,043 suppliers received red flags on compliance issues during their bi-annual screening and 35 business-critical suppliers were highlighted to the operating companies in daily risk alerts. The Procurement and Compliance Teams assess any suppliers that are identified as having potentially higher levels of risk and implement a mitigation plan where necessary. Any issues are flagged to the risk owners within IAG to jointly take appropriate action.
IAG GBS carries out in-depth supplier audits as part of the Group's commitment to sustainability; these audits are based on potential geographical and procurement category risk. They are performed by independent inspectors with CSR expertise using the SEDEX Members Ethical Trade Audit (SMETA) methodology. In 2020, 25 audits were completed during the COVID-19 pandemic, with eight postponed until 2021. Of the audits carried out, 78 points were identified that required minor improvements in health and safety standards, and suppliers have implemented corrective actions.
In addition, joint programmes are in place with key suppliers to drive sustainable innovation and identify new ways to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and waste. Programmes include the continued development of SAF and carbon removal technology, as well as initiatives to use environmentally friendly packaging in lounges and inflight products.
In 2021, IAG GBS will continue to further consolidate and permanently right-size the Group supply chain with no more than 15,000 suppliers across all operating companies; pivoting the business to focus more on key partnerships in order to improve supply chain performance; and drive specific projects to deliver upon IAG's sustainability commitments.
| Year | Total number of suppliers |
Suppliers screened | Suppliers with additional compliance assessment |
Critical suppliers under regular risk monitoring |
Independent CSR audits in year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 22,947 | 22,947 | 1,818 | 35 | 25 |
| 2019 | 27,033 | 18,369 | 2,912 | n/a | 28 |
50 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
All Directors and employees are expected to act with integrity and in accordance with the laws of the countries in which they operate.
IAG's Group Code of Conduct, which is approved by the Board, sets out the general guidelines that govern the conduct of all Directors and employees of the Group when carrying out their duties in their business and professional relationships. Training and communications activities are carried out for Directors, employees and third parties on a regular basis to maintain awareness and understanding of the principles that govern the conduct of the Group.
If any employee has a concern about unethical behaviour or organisational integrity, they are encouraged to first speak with their manager or a member of the Legal, Compliance or Human Resources teams. Similarly, suppliers are encouraged to contact their primary contact within the business. IAG maintains Speak Up channels provided by independent third-party providers, Safecall and Ethicspoint, where concerns can be raised on an anonymous basis. These Speak Up channels are available to members of staff as well as suppliers, with information on how to access published in the Code of Conduct and Supplier Code of Conduct respectively.
The IAG Audit and Compliance Committee reviews the effectiveness of the Speak Up channels on an annual basis. This annual review considers the volume of reports by category; timeliness of follow-up; process and responsibility for follow-up; emerging themes and lessons; and any issues raised of significance to the financial statements or other areas of compliance.
In 2020, a total of 193 Speak Up reports were received compared with 282 in 2019. This decrease is believed to be largely due to the slowdown in business activity and furloughing of staff brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. These reports concerned issues relating to employment matters (63 per cent), dishonest behaviour/reputation (17 per cent), health and safety (18 per cent) and regulatory matters (2 per cent). Of the dishonest behaviour/reputation reports, none related to corruption matters versus two reports in 2019. All reports were followed up and investigated where appropriate.
IAG and its operating companies do not tolerate any form of bribery or corruption. This is made clear in our Group Code of Conduct and supporting policies which are available to all Directors and employees. Our anti-bribery policy statement is also set out in our Supplier Code of Conduct.
Each Group operating company has a Compliance Department responsible for managing the anti-bribery programme in their business. The compliance teams from across the Group meet regularly through Working Groups and Steering Groups, under the leadership of the IAG Group Compliance Director, and annually they conduct a review of bribery risks at operating company and Group level.
In 2020, the main risks identified were unchanged from the previous year and relate to the use of third parties, operational and commercial decisions involving government agencies, and the inappropriate use of gifts and hospitality. No compliance breaches were identified in 2020.
Anti-bribery and corruption training is mandatory for all IAG operating companies, Group functions and the Board and takes the form of e-learning supplemented by face-to-face sessions as necessary. Individual training requirements are set by each operating company and function, and are determined by factors such as the level and responsibilities of an employee. The Group-wide anti-bribery e-learning, which was rolled out in 2019, has a recurrence of three years. In 2020 a total of 1,984 employees completed the anti-bribery and corruption e-learning course, compared with 7,933 in 2019.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
To identify, manage and mitigate potential bribery and corruption risks, IAG uses risk-based third-party due diligence which includes screenings, external reports, interviews and site visits depending on the level of risk that a third party presents. Any risks identified during the due diligence process are analysed and a mitigation plan put in place as necessary. Certain risks could result in termination of the proposed or existing relationship with the counterparty. The IAG Audit and Compliance Committee receives an annual update on the anti-bribery compliance programme.
There were no legal cases regarding corruption brought against the Group and its operating companies in 2020 and management is not aware of any impending cases or underlying issues.
IAG has processes and procedures in place across the Group, such as supplier vetting and management, Know Your Counterparty procedures and financial policies and controls which help to combat money laundering in the business.
www.iairgroup.com 51
GRI 102-11, 102-15
Since 2019, sustainable aviation risks have been identified as a principal risk to IAG. Climate-related risks are considered and assessed under the Group Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework which is presented to the Board. More details on risk management procedures, and how Group risks inter-relate, can be found in the 'Risk Management and principal risk factors' section.
Sustainability risks and opportunities, including climate-related risks and opportunities, are also identified and assessed by the Group Sustainability team, in conjunction with the Group ERM team. This assessment includes risks over medium-term (two to five years) and long-term (greater than five year) timescales. These risks are bi-annually reported to and reviewed by the IAG Management Committee and the IAG Audit and Compliance Committee, and regularly reported to the IAG Chief of Staff who reports to the IAG CEO. Plans to mitigate risks are developed by relevant risk owners in specific areas of the business.
IAG allocates significant resources to environmental risk management. This includes a strategic commitment to invest US\$400 million (€360 million) over 20 years in SAF development, production and supply, along with a dedicated sustainable fuels team. This also includes a significant and continued investment over five years in the Honeywell GoDirect Flight Efficiency software, to manage risks related to operational efficiency, with dedicated representatives within operating companies to manage operational efficiency programmes. In addition, each of the Group's four main airlines are working towards IEnvA1 accreditation and have invested in people and IT resources to enable this.
IAG is committed to mitigating the impacts of hazards which have uncertain but potentially highly negative outcomes, on the environment or people, if they occur. As such, IAG adopts precautionary measures to mitigate these hazards, an approach known as the precautionary principle. The precautionary principle is applied to the planning of operations and the development and launch of new services, by integrating climate considerations into business plans and financial forecasts and aligning activities with the Flightpath Net Zero programme. Detailed risk mitigation measures are outlined in the tables on the following pages.
IAG was an early adopter of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidance on climaterelated scenario analysis and climatespecific risk assessments. In 2018, IAG followed the TCFD six-step process and analysed the implications of climate change on business activity in 2030. This analysis helped in reviewing the resilience of IAG's business strategies in the context of climate change and was instrumental in the 2019 design and adoption of IAG's Flightpath Net Zero climate strategy.
The 2018 exercise included two climate scenarios and the impacts of these scenarios on IAG's costs of inputs, operating costs, revenues, supply chain, and business interruption. Outputs included an initial qualitative assessment of how IAG could respond in terms of adapting the business model, portfolio mix, investments in transition capabilities and technologies and the potential impact on strategic and financial plans.
The scope of the exercise included:
A key finding was that IAG would incur additional operating costs under both climate scenarios. Under a two-degree scenario, most of this increase would result from carbon prices or climate-related policy interventions. Under a four-degree scenario, IAG was more likely to face increased costs from operational disruption as a result of extreme weather events becoming more frequent.
1 See Sustainability Governance section for IEnvA definition.
52 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
The results of this scenario analysis raised climate change awareness internally and have informed specific changes to IAG's business operations and strategy:
During 2020 IAG updated internal assessments of climate-related risks, by testing and revising assumptions on post-pandemic business growth and the regulatory context and future carbon price for all operating airlines. Forecasting of climate-related regulatory impacts is integrated into IAG's business and financial planning process.
In 2021 IAG plans to repeat climate-related scenario analysis in line with the latest TCFD recommendations and guidance.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
IAG categorises climate-related risks in line with Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidance. Specific risks are mitigated though existing processes, additional investments, or specific strategies as outlined in the table below. IAG uses internal carbon prices based on current EU ETS prices, the UK Department for Transport (DfT) Aviation Forecast, and International Energy Agency (IEA) CORSIA price forecasts. In 2020, EU ETS prices of €26/tonne and CORSIA prices of \$17/tonne were used to forecast the compliance costs of international flights.
www.iairgroup.com 53

| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher carbon price and stringent policy mechanisms |
A rising cost of carbon in regulatory market-based schemes such as the UK ETS and EU ETS would add to our operating costs. |
EU ETS prices rose 55% between 2018-20, from €16 to €25/tonne |
• Via the Flightpath Net Zero programme, setting and working towards ambitious climate targets to minimise the IAG footprint and exposure to climate regulation • Lobbying for effective global regulation and robust and fair policies to meet global climate goals |
| M | CORSIA unit prices were expected to rise at least 65% between 2020 and 20302 |
• Factoring carbon price forecasts into business decisions on fleet planning and investment • Continuing investment in modern fleet and innovations to ensure continual improvement in operational fuel efficiency • An effective procurement strategy for carbon credits to protect against price volatility • Driving and supporting low-carbon innovation via the Hangar 51 accelerator programme |
1 Risk and opportunity trends as assessed by IAG Sustainability in relation to external changes, rather than mitigating actions.
2 Pre-pandemic.
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A global patchwork of uncoordinated national and regional climate policies S |
Several countries and the EU have already adopted or are considering carbon taxes. The UK is establishing a UK ETS. Use of regional instruments such as taxes or mandates may lead to increased compliance costs, increasing regulatory complexity, and inequitable costs causing competitive distortion. Duplicate regulations and the inconsistent application of monitoring, verification and reporting requirements could have similar effects. |
Revenue impact due to reduced demand as a result of higher pricing |
• Lobbying for a global net zero target for aviation to be agreed at the ICAO General Assembly in 2022 • Allocating resources to engage with governments, trade associations, IATA and ICAO to help implement the UN CORSIA scheme, which represents a single effective global carbon-pricing solution for aviation • Supporting implementation and adoption of CORSIA, robust rules for monitoring and criteria for emissions reductions, and lobbying for universal adoption |
|
| TCFD risk category: Market |
| TCFD risk category: Acute physical | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions | |
| Increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events and local climate-related circumstances S |
Increased frequency of high winds, fog events, storms, turbulence, sustained extreme heat events or stronger jet stream would increase operating costs by increasing delays, fuel burn and requiring additional cooling and maintenance costs. Local climate-related circumstances such as fires, algal blooms and droughts could make destinations temporarily less attractive. |
Costs of delays and operational disruption including turbulence |
• Partnerships to mitigate operational disruption. For example, working with the UK National Air Traffic Service (NATS) and other air navigation service providers, a "Linear Holding" system called XMAN was launched at London Gatwick airport in 2019. If arriving aircraft are delayed by more than seven minutes, this system ensures they are slowed down, reducing stack holding and fuel burn and therefore CO2 emissions |
54 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable aviation fuels mandates M |
Scandinavian countries have introduced mandates for a proportion of SAF in aviation fuel, and the EU and Spain are considering mandates. Mandates would incentivise production but could force airlines to purchase SAF at an excessive price premium compared with conventional fuels. This could also create competitive distortion and lead to production of fuels with lower sustainability criteria. |
SAF is currently three to four times the cost of fossil fuels |
• Contributing to the 2020 World Economic Forum "Cleaner Skies for Tomorrow" initiative to develop scenarios on SAF uptake • Contributing to the 2020 EC ReFuelEU consultation, to ensure that any mandates do not create competitive distortion or carbon leakage • Working at UK and international levels to strengthen global climate regulations on SAF • Supporting policy incentives that help deliver SAF at prices competitive with conventional fuels through new technology development • IAG believes sustainable fuel mandates should preferably only be applied at a global level rather than a national or regional level to prevent competitive distortion |
See 'Sustainable Aviation Fuels' case study
www.iairgroup.com 55
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
| • Ongoing lobbying and engagement in projects and Destinations For example, extreme weather Potential revenue becoming events and physical impacts of loss due to initiatives designed to reduce the industry's impact on unattractive climate change such as flooding, changing travel climate change for visitors drought, forest fires, heat waves, choices that • Teams dedicated to assessing and understanding algal blooms, coral bleaching, affect markets changes in customer demand and managing network rising sea levels and reduced IAG flies to e.g. developments to respond to such changes snow cover in ski destinations Caribbean due to • Strategy to ensure aircraft and crew flexibility means we L could make certain destinations hurricanes, the are prepared and able to respond to shifting demand less desirable and impact Alps due to patterns customer demand. shorter ski seasons |
Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Potential target for direct action protests |
Direct action e.g. protests could disrupt flight operations and/or restrict staff and passenger access. |
Operational disruption |
• Close liaison with government agencies, airport operators and commercial organisations to assess challenges • Contingency and business interruption planning |

| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational activities deemed to be inconsistent with low-carbon behaviours (NEW) M |
Perceptions of our products and climate-related operational practices in relation to the IAG climate strategy and national and international climate goals. |
Changes in corporate accounts or travel policies |
• Minimising IAG's carbon footprint via the Flightpath Net Zero programme • Embedding sustainability considerations into business planning and operational decision-making • Engagement and collaboration with corporate customers to identify and address potential environmental desires or concerns • Effectively communicating actions to customers and suppliers and offering climate mitigation options |
|
| such as voluntary offsetting | ||||
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation on non-CO2 impacts (NEW) L |
New external research indicates the non-CO2 impacts of aviation are at least as significant as CO2. The EU is reviewing whether to incorporate these impacts into climate compliance schemes and climate-neutral objectives, which could increase compliance costs. |
A potentially higher obligation for climate mitigation |
• Via the Flightpath Net Zero programme • Working through trade associations and research partnerships to improve understanding of aviation's climate impacts • Engaging in research to better understand non-CO2 benefits of SAF |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of capital tied to decarbonisation strategy (NEW) M |
Governments, investors and lenders increasingly tying funding to decarbonisation strategies. |
Potential for higher rates on lending or an increase in resources required to secure funding |
• Quantifying the financial impacts of climate risks and opportunities • Robust and transparent external disclosures on climate impact and strategy • Engaging with financial stakeholders via IAG Investor Relations See 'Stakeholder engagement' section |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Persistent drought-induced water scarcity in some destinations |
Drought-induced water scarcity at outstations could increase the need for potable water carriage due to volume and quality concerns. |
Fuel costs due to increased potable water carriage |
• Teams dedicated to assessing and understanding changes in customer demand and managing network developments to respond to such changes |

56 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
| Opportunity title | Opportunity description | Potential financial impacts |
Actions to realise opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use of new aircraft technologies S |
Use of latest generation aircraft can reduce fuel burn and carbon impact by 25 to 40 per cent compared with aircraft they replace. |
Fuel savings and carbon cost savings |
• Continually investing in fleet modernisation that supports business needs and aligns with the Flightpath Net Zero programme • Retirement of older, less-efficient aircraft • Investment to realise opportunity: aircraft purchases and engine changes |
| Use of lower emission sources of energy (SAF) M |
Commercial and environmental opportunity to source cost effective sustainable fuel and reduce CO2 emissions, thereby reducing compliance costs for CORSIA and the EU ETS. |
Carbon cost savings from use of SAF/hydrogen |
• Ongoing lobbying for support for the development of new SAF technologies at the global, EU and UK levels See associated technology risk • Investment to realise opportunity: direct investments in SAF production, offtake agreements |
| Opportunity title | Opportunity description | Potential financial impacts |
Actions to realise opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Differentiate our | To differentiate IAG brands by | Greater | See mitigation measures for associated risk |
| brands | showing leadership, innovation and action to mitigate climate impacts, so attracting customers concerned about climate change. |
consumer loyalty | • Working with specific companies to help them reduce the impacts of their corporate travel |
| M | • Investment to realise opportunity: communications campaigns and percentage of profit into sustainability |
| Opportunity title | Opportunity description | Potential financial impacts |
Actions to realise opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher carbon price and strong |
Support stronger business case for investment in low-carbon |
Financial benefits from delivery of |
See mitigation measures for associated risk |
| policy incentives | technologies which accelerate decarbonisation progress. |
projects | • Investment to realise opportunity: internal people resource |

www.iairgroup.com 57
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
L
| Opportunity title | Opportunity description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Destinations becoming attractive for visitors |
Climate change could make certain destinations more attractive or accessible to visitors, for example a longer summer season. |
More flights to more attractive destinations |
See mitigation measures for associated risk • Investment to realise opportunity: n/a as incorporated into business planning |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operational noise restrictions and charges S |
Airport operators and regulators apply operational noise restrictions and charging regimes which may restrict airlines' ability to operate especially and introduce additional costs. |
Reduced flying on specific routes due to UK night flight regulation |
• Investing in new quieter aircraft as part of fleet modernisation • Continually improving operational practices including continuous descents, slightly steeper approaches, low-power low-drag approaches and optimised departures • Internal governance and training and external advocacy in UK, Ireland and Spain to manage challenges |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supply chain sustainability compliance |
Potential breach of compliance on sustainability, human rights or anti-bribery by an IAG supplier resulting in financial, legal, environmental, social and/ or reputational impacts. |
Penalties from breaches of regulation e.g. modern slavery and potential reputational |
See 'Supply chain' case study • IAG GBS procedures including Integrity, sanctions and CSR audits, IAG Know Your Counterparty due diligence for higher-risk third parties, Supplier Code of Conduct |
| S | damage | • Internal governance on supplier management to identify challenges and mitigation actions |
|
| • Supplier screening using external business intelligence databases which actively monitor supplier status and |
flag risks including sustainability
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Environment regulation compliance |
An inadvertent breach of Increasing compliance requirements with regulation, associated reputational damage increasing cost and fines. of compliance and increasing fines related to S non-compliance |
• Strengthening sustainability governance See 'Sustainability Governance' section |
|
| • Embedding sustainability considerations into business plans, financial plans, and business cases See 'Strategy' section |
|||
| • Internal governance, training and assigning ownership for environmental compliance obligations • Engaging with carbon market advisers to understand and mitigate compliance challenges and identify future opportunities |
|||
| • IEnvA certification to improve internal compliance |
58 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
process
GRI 102-43, 102-44
In 2020 IAG continued to engage with a wide range of stakeholders specifically on sustainability issues. Reasons for engaging with eight key stakeholder groups are outlined in the tables below.
IAG is a member of multiple trade associations, listed on the next page, and is proactively driving trade association positions towards consistency with global 1.5°C climate ambitions. Internal governance processes ensure that stakeholder engagement is consistent with IAG's material issues and environmental goals. Where positions with trade
associations are inconsistent, IAG representatives take roles on task forces and working groups and respond to consultations to communicate our stance and constructively move to alignment.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
www.iairgroup.com 59
| GRI 102-13 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Organisation | Scope | Key leadership role/s | Key leadership action |
| UN | Global | IAG CEO was the only aviation CEO to speak at UN Climate Ambition Summit in December 2020 |
First airline signatory to Business Ambition for 1.5°C pledge, which had 364 global signatories as of December 31, 2020. |
| Member of Race to Zero campaign | |||
| ICAO | Global | Keynote panel speakers at ICAO Global CO2 Stocktaking Event |
Supporting SAF sustainability standards Finalising rules for CORSIA scheme |
| Member of Fuels Task Group | |||
| SBTi | Global | One of sixteen airlines on the Technical Working Group for the aviation sector |
Active in-kind support to develop criteria and guidance for 'science-based' aviation targets, which SBTi will launch in 2021 |
| Jet Zero Council (JZC) |
UK | IAG representative chairs SAF Delivery Group |
Supported efforts to ensure primary focus of JZC is on SAF and supported set-up of the SAF |
| Member of fuels expert group | Delivery Group | ||
| Industry associations and alliances |
Scope | Key leadership role/s | Key leadership action |
| IATA | Global | IAG representative chairs IATA Sustainability and Environment |
Supporting moves for industry commitment to net zero emissions by 2050 |
| Advisory Council Representation on four key working groups – SAF, Fuels, Long term Targets, Waste Keynote panel speaker for SAF |
Finalising rules for CORSIA scheme to enable carbon neutral growth in international aviation |
||
| Air Transport Action | Global | symposium Keynote panel speaker at Global |
Five staff formally acknowledged for contributions to |
| Group (ATAG) | Sustainability Aviation Summit | Waypoint 2050 global decarbonisation roadmap | |
| oneworld | Global | IAG representative co-chairs the environmental and sustainability best practice steering group |
Instrumental in delivery of oneworld net zero commitment in September 2020 |
| British Airways representative leads waste workstream |
|||
| Airlines 4 Europe (A4E) |
European | Five staff contribute environmental expertise to working groups and consultations |
Initiated EU aviation carbon roadmap and contributed expertise |
| Created interactive decarbonisation roadmap to share with A4E airlines |
| Industry associations and alliances |
Scope | Key leadership role/s | Key leadership action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable | UK | Member of SA Council | Instrumental in delivery of net zero commitment and |
| Aviation (SA) | Member of multiple working groups | production of CO2 and fuels roadmaps in February 2020 |
|
| Hosted three workshops in 2019 to support the above | |||
| Royal Aeronautical Society (RAeS) |
UK | IAG on Executive Committee of Greener by Design group |
Supported RAeS Annual Climate Conference by sourcing eight speakers including British Airways CEO Sean Doyle |
| Coalition for Negative Emissions |
UK | One of 11 member organisations to launch this coalition in 2020 |
Lobbying UK Government to support negative emissions technologies |
| Grupo Español de Crecimiento Verde |
Spain | Iberia is one of 50 pioneering IBEX35 companies to join |
One of 34 members to sign letter calling for green recovery |
Unless otherwise stated, activities below relate to the Group. More details can be found in the indicated sections.
European Works Council (EWC) meetings for
Monthly IAG Sustainability Network meetings for
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Voluntary environmental and waste champions
Industry conferences and supplier sustainability
Investor relations contact with groups including institutional investors and shareholders, debtholders,
Disclosures to external rating agencies CDP, TPI,
Emphasised sustainability strategy in half year and full
See 'Community engagement and charitable giving'
IAG staff on academic boards at Cranfield, Heriot
IAG staff on steering board of Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
www.iairgroup.com 61
debt providers and credit rating agencies Conference calls with institutional investors
Participating in airport community forums
See 'Noise and air quality' case study
Industry conferences and workshops Contributing to NGO initiatives
Watt and Aston Supergen consortium
Engaging local schools in sports, charity and
Sustainanalytics, MSCI, Vigeo Eiris Surveyed investors on ESG preferences
See 'Innovation, research and development' case study
See 'Supply chain management' case study See 'Sustainable Aviation Fuel' case study
Connecting sustainability leads in the IAG operating
EEA staff
sustainability staff
Staff awareness campaigns
See 'Workforce overview' section
Hangar 51 accelerator programme
companies to suppliers
Procurement processes Screening and on-site audits
Via corporate website
year results presentations
learning events
case study
Meetings and visits
Community giving campaigns
Joint projects
workshops
Stakeholders Why we engage/key topics How we engage
To respond to demands from internal stakeholders
To improve recruitment and retention opportunities
To support manufacturers in improving aircraft
To identify opportunities to reduce supplier emissions
To understand their approach to ESG, to enable us to better align our programmes with their priorities To demonstrate action and leadership to external
operations, such as noise and air pollution, on quality of life in communities near where airlines operate
To maintain an informed position on sustainability
To share our expertise on SAF and carbon pricing for the benefit of industry progress on the environment
Workforce To align individual airline sustainability programmes
To share ideas and best practice
To drive positive employee engagement
with Group
Suppliers To minimise exposure to ESG risks
To gain support for SAF
stakeholders on IAG initiatives
To respond to legal obligations
Communities To minimise potentially negative impacts of aircraft
To increase IAG's positive wider impacts
For independent reviews of materiality
leadership
To maintain and increase transparency
efficiency
Shareholders and other financial stakeholders
NGOs and academic institutions
Unless otherwise stated, activities below relate to the Group. More details can be found in the indicated sections.
| Stakeholders | Why we engage/key topics | How we engage |
|---|---|---|
| Industry associations |
To develop common policy positions | See previous page |
| To improve lobbying effectiveness | Leading roles on task forces | |
| To ensure consistency between IAG sustainability | Contributing expertise to roadmaps | |
| goals and the goals of associations of which IAG or operating airlines are members |
Supporting relevant events/working groups | |
| To share our expertise on SAF and carbon pricing for the benefit of industry progress on the environment |
Driving and supporting discussions on achieving net zero emissions and 1.5°C-aligned pathways |
|
| Government | To support UK and EU commitments to net zero | Contributing to public policy consultations |
| and other regulators |
emissions | Attending UN summits and working groups |
| To build support for a net zero emissions target for aviation through the UN aviation regulator ICAO |
Through joint dialogue with trade associations | |
| To influence UK, Spanish, Irish, EU and global policies on taxes, SAF and carbon pricing, noise and airspace |
Meetings with government officials, ministers and parliamentarians |
|
| modernisation so that these policies are effective and | Senior representation on UK JZC and Airspace Board | |
| fair | Exploring new policy options for producing SAF from | |
| To increase research and funding for low-carbon | non-biological sources | |
| aircraft, SAF and carbon removal technologies | Supported successful Sustainable Aviation bid for £18 million in funding for SAF development in 2020 |
|
| Customers | To demonstrate IAG's sustainability commitments to action, initiatives and leadership |
Sharing Flightpath Net Zero material on the IAG website |
| To facilitate passenger action on the environment | Offering websites for British Airways and Aer Lingus passengers to offset their flight emissions |
|
| To stay attuned to changing customer demands | ||
| To offer employment opportunities | Social media communications | |
| Onboard communications e.g. in-flight entertainment | ||
| Customer surveys | ||
| Focus groups | ||
| Meetings and interviews |
60 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Unless otherwise stated, activities below relate to the Group. More details can be found in the indicated sections.
Industry associations
Royal Aeronautical Society (RAeS)
Coalition for Negative
Grupo Español de Crecimiento Verde
Sustainable Aviation (SA)
SUSTAINABILITY A. GOVERNANCE
Emissions
Industry associations
Government and other regulators
and alliances Scope Key leadership role/s Key leadership action
UK IAG on Executive Committee of Greener by Design group
UK One of 11 member organisations to launch this coalition in 2020
Stakeholders Why we engage/key topics How we engage
To ensure consistency between IAG sustainability goals and the goals of associations of which IAG or
To support UK and EU commitments to net zero
To build support for a net zero emissions target for aviation through the UN aviation regulator ICAO To influence UK, Spanish, Irish, EU and global policies on taxes, SAF and carbon pricing, noise and airspace modernisation so that these policies are effective and
To increase research and funding for low-carbon aircraft, SAF and carbon removal technologies
To facilitate passenger action on the environment To stay attuned to changing customer demands
To share our expertise on SAF and carbon pricing for the benefit of industry progress on the environment
To develop common policy positions To improve lobbying effectiveness
operating airlines are members
Customers To demonstrate IAG's sustainability commitments to action, initiatives and leadership
To offer employment opportunities
emissions
fair
Spain Iberia is one of 50 pioneering IBEX35 companies to join
Member of multiple working groups
Unless otherwise stated, activities below relate to the Group. More details can be found in the indicated sections.
2020
Sean Doyle
recovery
emissions technologies
See previous page
parliamentarians
website
60 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
non-biological sources
Leading roles on task forces
Contributing expertise to roadmaps
Supporting relevant events/working groups
zero emissions and 1.5°C-aligned pathways
Contributing to public policy consultations Attending UN summits and working groups Through joint dialogue with trade associations Meetings with government officials, ministers and
Driving and supporting discussions on achieving net
Senior representation on UK JZC and Airspace Board Exploring new policy options for producing SAF from
Supported successful Sustainable Aviation bid for £18 million in funding for SAF development in 2020
Sharing Flightpath Net Zero material on the IAG
passengers to offset their flight emissions
Social media communications
Customer surveys Focus groups
Meetings and interviews
Offering websites for British Airways and Aer Lingus
Onboard communications e.g. in-flight entertainment
Instrumental in delivery of net zero commitment and production of CO2 and fuels roadmaps in February
Hosted three workshops in 2019 to support the above
Supported RAeS Annual Climate Conference by sourcing eight speakers including British Airways CEO
Lobbying UK Government to support negative
One of 34 members to sign letter calling for green
UK Member of SA Council
| Stakeholders | Why we engage/key topics | How we engage |
|---|---|---|
| Workforce | To align individual airline sustainability programmes with Group |
European Works Council (EWC) meetings for EEA staff |
| To share ideas and best practice | Monthly IAG Sustainability Network meetings for | |
| To respond to demands from internal stakeholders | sustainability staff | |
| To drive positive employee engagement | Voluntary environmental and waste champions | |
| To improve recruitment and retention opportunities | Staff awareness campaigns | |
| Connecting sustainability leads in the IAG operating companies to suppliers |
||
| See 'Workforce overview' section | ||
| Suppliers | To minimise exposure to ESG risks | Procurement processes |
| To support manufacturers in improving aircraft | Screening and on-site audits | |
| efficiency | Joint projects | |
| To gain support for SAF | Hangar 51 accelerator programme | |
| To identify opportunities to reduce supplier emissions | Industry conferences and supplier sustainability workshops |
|
| See 'Supply chain management' case study | ||
| See 'Sustainable Aviation Fuel' case study | ||
| See 'Innovation, research and development' case study | ||
| Shareholders and other financial |
To understand their approach to ESG, to enable us to better align our programmes with their priorities |
Investor relations contact with groups including institutional investors and shareholders, debtholders, debt providers and credit rating agencies |
| stakeholders | To demonstrate action and leadership to external stakeholders on IAG initiatives |
Conference calls with institutional investors |
| To maintain and increase transparency | Via corporate website | |
| To respond to legal obligations | Disclosures to external rating agencies CDP, TPI, Sustainanalytics, MSCI, Vigeo Eiris |
|
| Surveyed investors on ESG preferences | ||
| Emphasised sustainability strategy in half year and full year results presentations |
||
| Communities | To minimise potentially negative impacts of aircraft | Participating in airport community forums |
| operations, such as noise and air pollution, on quality of life in communities near where airlines operate |
Community giving campaigns | |
| To increase IAG's positive wider impacts | Engaging local schools in sports, charity and learning events |
|
| See 'Noise and air quality' case study | ||
| See 'Community engagement and charitable giving' case study |
||
| NGOs and academic institutions |
For independent reviews of materiality | Meetings and visits |
| To maintain an informed position on sustainability | Industry conferences and workshops | |
| leadership | Contributing to NGO initiatives | |
| To share our expertise on SAF and carbon pricing for the benefit of industry progress on the environment |
IAG staff on academic boards at Cranfield, Heriot Watt and Aston Supergen consortium |
|
| IAG staff on steering board of Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) |
www.iairgroup.com 61
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
IAG's impact on climate change reduced dramatically in 2020, primarily reflecting the significant drop in flying activity. Scope 1 emissions dropped by 64 per cent, Scope 2 emissions dropped by 54 per cent and use of renewable energy rose by 11 percentage points. Emissions are expected to rise as the Group recovers from the COVID-19 pandemic. However, growth is decoupling from emissions and internal forecasts suggest 2019 could represent peak emissions due to current and future use of a more fuel-efficient fleet and expanded use of SAF.
IAG calculates its impact on climate change by multiplying fuel and energy use by appropriate conversion factors that are aligned with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. UK Government GHG conversion factors are applied across the Group as these are deemed to be the most robust factors available. IEA national electricity emissions factors, and gCO2/ kWh factors from national agencies, are used to calculate Scope 2 emissions.
IAG consumed a total of 43 million MWh of energy in 2020 with 86 per cent of electricity use and 0.6 per cent of total energy use being from renewable sources. 66 per cent of this consumption is attributed to the UK, based on British
Total GHG emissions in tonnes CO2e1 Scope 3 GHG emissions in tonnes CO2e1 2
Airways Scope 1 emissions and Group electricity use in UK-based offices.
IAG discloses its impact in terms of CO2-equivalent emissions, which includes CO2, CH4, and N2O. Scope 1 emissions in 2020 were:
Commentary on key metrics
Tonnes CO2e
Tonnes CO2e
CO2e
Flight-only emissions intensity
Scope 1 emissions and net Scope 1 emissions
Scope 2 emissions (market-based/ location-based)
Renewable electricity
Scope 3 emissions Tonnes
Metric Unit Description Commentary
passenger-km.
engines.
equivalent metric.
obligations.
of national electricity grids.
% The share of electricity generated by
national grid.
gCO2/pkm Grammes of CO2 per passenger kilometre is a standard industry measure of flight fuel efficiency. It is calculated by dividing total jet fuel use by total passenger-km, assuming 10 cargo-tonne-km is equivalent to one
and excludes no-show passengers. The passenger-km used in the 2020 calculation is 70,469 million and the cargo-
Direct emissions associated with IAG operations including use of jet fuel, diesel, petrol, natural gas, and halon. Sources of emissions include aircraft engines, boilers, auxiliary power units and ground vehicle
These emissions are primarily CO2 but other GHGs such as methane and nitrogen oxide are also reported as part of the CO2-
Net emissions are calculated by subtracting the volumes of offsets voluntarily purchased, volumes of offsets purchased to meet CORSIA compliance obligations, and allowances purchased from other sectors as part of meeting EU ETS compliance
Emissions associated with electricity use in, for example, offices, lounges, data centres and hangars. Market-based emissions are based on the carbon intensity of electricity purchased from suppliers. Location-based emissions are based on the carbon intensity
Indirect emissions associated with products IAG buys and sells. Analysis in 2018 and 2019 revealed that Scope 3 categories 2, 3, 9, and 14 represent approximately 99% of IAG's Scope 3 footprint. Other categories are calculated within six months of year-end.
renewable sources such as solar power and wind, based on volumes procured from renewable electricity suppliers. In cases where electricity sources were unavailable, the source of electricity is assumed to be the
tonne-km is 3,187 million.
For accuracy, IAG excludes the jet fuel use of franchises and cargo freight on other airlines, The 2020 worsening of fuel efficiency is driven by much lower load factors. Passenger numbers dropped by 73.6% and load factors dropped 20.8 percentage points due to the
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Between 2011 and 2019, IAG's average annual improvement in grammes of CO2/pkm was 1.6% per annum, ahead of the IATA industry
Group fuel efficiency is expected to be back
99.6% of Scope 1 emissions are from jet fuel. Commercial aircraft remain reliant on liquid kerosene for the foreseeable future.
While flying activity has decreased by 75%, Scope 1 emissions have only dropped by 64% due to the effect of continuing to fly aircraft
2020 net emissions are reduced by 168kt due to British Airways domestic offsetting. EU ETS allowances purchased from other sectors equate to a net reduction as per European Commission guidance. IAG has been disclosing net emissions since 2017
The 2020 decrease was driven by increased procurement of renewable electricity in Spain and at UK and Spanish airports, and higher use of renewables in national electricity grids. Where the electricity use of overseas offices was not avaiable, this was based on leased space in m2, multiplied by relevant kWh/m2 factors and IEA national electricity emissions
The drop in Scope 3 emissions is related to
70% of Scope 3 emissions are from fuel and energy-related activities (see pie chart on
The 2020 increase is driven by procurement of renewables in Vueling and Iberia and at UK and Spanish airports where we operate. The 2019 value has been restated using the latest verified data, more robust calculations of ground power, and national grid emissions
www.iairgroup.com 63
the drop in activity of the fleet.
factors published after year end.
COVID-19 pandemic.
target of 1.5%.
on track by 2023.
with emptier loads.
using this methodology.
factors.
previous page).
17% 564,000
235,000
• 0.01 MT methane (CH4)
This shows that CO2 is 99 per cent of the Scope 1 impact. IAG only discloses CH4 and N2O as non-CO2 GHGs, in line with the latest available UK Government GHG conversion factors. 7% 5% 158,000 1%
70%

1 Values rounded to nearest thousand tonnes.
2 Only material Scope 3 categories are reported here. Other Scope 3 categories are approximately 1% of IAG's Scope 3 footprint, based on past analysis.
62 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Emissions intensity (jet fuel) gCO2/pkm4 +18% 106.2 89.8 91.5 92.3 94.8 Renewable electricity % +11pts 86% 75%3 54% 54% nr
3 Restated using an updated methodology. More details provided on next page.
4 Definition of passenger-km provided on the next page.
Key Metric Unit vly 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Scope 1 CO2e MT CO2e -64% 11.02 30.78 29.99 28.76 28.26 Net Scope 1 CO2e MT CO2e -61% 10.85 27.60 27.22 26.17 nr Scope 2 location-based kt CO2e -23% 52.6 68.6 70.4 92.6 103.1 Scope 2 market-based kt CO2e -54% 10.0 21.73 40.7 61.9 92.9 Scope 3 MT CO2e -64% 3.24 9.04 8.79 7.88 7.64 Emissions intensity (jet fuel) gCO2/pkm4 +18% 106.2 89.8 91.5 92.3 94.8 Renewable electricity % +11pts 86% 75%3 54% 54% nr
Capital goods Franchises
17% 564,000
7% 235,000
5% 158,000 1%
Fuel and energy-related activities
Downstream transport and distribution All other Scope 3 categories
by appropriate conversion factors that are aligned with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. UK Government GHG conversion factors are applied across the Group as these are deemed to be the most robust factors available. IEA national electricity emissions factors, and gCO2/ kWh factors from national agencies, are used to calculate Scope 2 emissions.
Airways Scope 1 emissions and Group electricity use in UK-based offices. IAG discloses its impact in terms of CO2-equivalent emissions, which includes CO2, CH4, and N2O. Scope 1 emissions in
• 10.91 million tonnes (MT) carbon
This shows that CO2 is 99 per cent of the Scope 1 impact. IAG only discloses CH4 and N2O as non-CO2 GHGs, in line with the latest available UK Government GHG
Fuel and energy-related activities
Downstream transport and distribution All other Scope 3 categories
70% 2,286,000
Capital goods Franchises
17% 564,000
7% 235,000
5% 158,000 1%
• 0.10 MT nitrous oxide (N2O) • 0.01 MT methane (CH4)
2020 were:
oxide (CO2)
conversion factors.
70% 2,286,000
IAG consumed a total of 43 million MWh of energy in 2020 with 86 per cent of electricity use and 0.6 per cent of total energy use being from renewable sources. 66 per cent of this consumption is attributed to the UK, based on British
2 Only material Scope 3 categories are reported here. Other Scope 3 categories are approximately 1% of IAG's Scope 3 footprint, based on past analysis.
62 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously" 1 Values rounded to nearest thousand tonnes.
B. Planet
SUSTAINABILITY B. PLANET
expanded use of SAF.
Scope 1 77.0% 11,020,000
IAG calculates its impact on climate change by multiplying fuel and energy use
B.1. Climate change impacts
IAG's impact on climate change reduced dramatically in 2020, primarily reflecting the significant drop in flying activity. Scope 1 emissions dropped by 64 per cent, Scope 2 emissions dropped by 54 per cent and use of renewable energy rose by 11 percentage points. Emissions are expected to rise as the Group recovers from the COVID-19 pandemic. However, growth is decoupling from emissions and internal forecasts suggest 2019 could represent peak emissions due to current and future use of a more fuel-efficient fleet and
GRI 301-1, 302-1, 305-1, 305-2, 305-3, 305-4, 305-5
4 Definition of passenger-km provided on the next page.
3 Restated using an updated methodology. More details provided on next page.
Scope 2 0.4% 53,000
Total GHG emissions in tonnes CO2e1 Scope 3 GHG emissions in tonnes CO2e1 2
Scope 3 22.6% 3,243,000
| Metric | Unit | Description | Commentary | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight-only emissions intensity |
gCO2/pkm | Grammes of CO2 per passenger kilometre is a standard industry measure of flight fuel efficiency. It is calculated by dividing total jet fuel use by total passenger-km, assuming 10 cargo-tonne-km is equivalent to one passenger-km. |
The 2020 worsening of fuel efficiency is driven by much lower load factors. Passenger numbers dropped by 73.6% and load factors dropped 20.8 percentage points due to the COVID-19 pandemic. |
||
| For accuracy, IAG excludes the jet fuel use of franchises and cargo freight on other airlines, and excludes no-show passengers. |
Between 2011 and 2019, IAG's average annual improvement in grammes of CO2/pkm was 1.6% per annum, ahead of the IATA industry target of 1.5%. |
||||
| The passenger-km used in the 2020 calculation is 70,469 million and the cargo tonne-km is 3,187 million. |
Group fuel efficiency is expected to be back on track by 2023. |
||||
| Scope 1 emissions and net Scope 1 emissions |
Tonnes CO2e |
Direct emissions associated with IAG operations including use of jet fuel, diesel, petrol, natural gas, and halon. Sources of |
99.6% of Scope 1 emissions are from jet fuel. Commercial aircraft remain reliant on liquid kerosene for the foreseeable future. |
||
| emissions include aircraft engines, boilers, auxiliary power units and ground vehicle engines. These emissions are primarily CO2 but other |
While flying activity has decreased by 75%, Scope 1 emissions have only dropped by 64% due to the effect of continuing to fly aircraft with emptier loads. |
||||
| GHGs such as methane and nitrogen oxide are also reported as part of the CO2- equivalent metric. |
2020 net emissions are reduced by 168kt due to British Airways domestic offsetting. |
||||
| Net emissions are calculated by subtracting the volumes of offsets voluntarily purchased, volumes of offsets purchased to meet CORSIA compliance obligations, and allowances purchased from other sectors as part of meeting EU ETS compliance obligations. |
EU ETS allowances purchased from other sectors equate to a net reduction as per European Commission guidance. IAG has been disclosing net emissions since 2017 using this methodology. |
||||
| Scope 2 emissions (market-based/ location-based) |
Tonnes CO2e |
Emissions associated with electricity use in, for example, offices, lounges, data centres and hangars. Market-based emissions are based on the carbon intensity of electricity |
The 2020 decrease was driven by increased procurement of renewable electricity in Spain and at UK and Spanish airports, and higher use of renewables in national electricity grids. |
||
| purchased from suppliers. Location-based emissions are based on the carbon intensity of national electricity grids. |
Where the electricity use of overseas offices was not avaiable, this was based on leased space in m2, multiplied by relevant kWh/m2 factors and IEA national electricity emissions factors. |
||||
| Scope 3 emissions | Tonnes CO2e |
Indirect emissions associated with products IAG buys and sells. Analysis in 2018 and 2019 |
The drop in Scope 3 emissions is related to the drop in activity of the fleet. |
||
| revealed that Scope 3 categories 2, 3, 9, and 14 represent approximately 99% of IAG's Scope 3 footprint. Other categories are calculated within six months of year-end. |
70% of Scope 3 emissions are from fuel and energy-related activities (see pie chart on previous page). |
||||
| Renewable electricity |
% | The share of electricity generated by renewable sources such as solar power and wind, based on volumes procured from |
The 2020 increase is driven by procurement of renewables in Vueling and Iberia and at UK and Spanish airports where we operate. |
||
| renewable electricity suppliers. In cases where electricity sources were unavailable, the source of electricity is assumed to be the national grid. |
The 2019 value has been restated using the latest verified data, more robust calculations of ground power, and national grid emissions factors published after year end. |
www.iairgroup.com 63
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
| Metric | Unit | % vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emissions intensity (Scope 2) | gCO2/pkm | +154% | 0.51 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.35 |
| GHG reduction initiatives | Tonnes CO2e | -78% | 17.21 | 77.39 | 65.66 | nr | nr |
| Electricity | Mn kWh | -19% | 215.7 | 267.71 | 234.9 | 253.2 | nr |
| Energy | Mn MWh | -65% | 42.5 | 119.71 | 119.4 | 114.4 | 108.4 |
| Revenue per tonne CO2e | €/tonne CO2e | -15% | 705 | 827 | 811 | 796 | 796 |
| Jet fuel use | MT fuel | -64% | 3.45 | 9.65 | 9.41 | 9.02 | 8.86 |
| Fleet age | years | -7% | 10.6 | 11.4 | 11.3 | 11.4 | 10.8 |
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously"'
1 Restated using a more robust methodology and latest electricity emissions factors. Descriptions and commentary on these metrics is available in the 'Additional Disclosures' section of the IAG Non-Financial Information Statement.
IAG will deliver net zero emissions across its global operations by 2050. This aligns with worldwide efforts to keep average global average temperatures below a 1.5°C rise. IAG was the first airline group to commit to this goal and the first airline group to sign the UN Business Ambition for 1.5°C pledge.
In this context, net zero emissions means that all CO2 that IAG operations emit in a year will be balanced out by an equivalent amount of CO2 removed from the atmosphere. The net zero commitment covers Scope 1 and 2 CO2 emissions. IAG is committed to minimising non-CO2 impacts as well, and will review targets on these when the science around them becomes more robust. The focus is on reducing use of fossil jet fuel, as this accounts for 99 per cent of the Scope 1 and 2 footprint.
The pioneering Flightpath Net Zero programme underpins the IAG commitment. This programme includes 2025 and 2030 Group-wide targets, financial incentives for senior managers explicitly tied to delivery of carbon intensity targets for both the Group and operating airlines (See 'Sustainability strategy' section), and a published 30-year roadmap for achieving net zero.
IAG will minimise gross emissions through a combination of fleet modernisation, operational efficiency and SAF. In 2050, any remaining emissions will be neutralised by use of GHG removal technology. IAG sees carbon offsets as a transitional measure and is advocating for government support for GHG removal technology via membership of the Coalition for Negative Emissions. Net emissions will be reduced in the short- and medium-term by use of carbon offset and removal projects and funding emissions reductions via the UK and EU ETS.
Group-wide climate targets remain the same and have been re-baselined to 2019 due to the pandemic:
64 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
• Net zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 CO2 emissions by 2050.
IAG also had a target for a 10 per cent improvement in fuel efficiency between 2014 and 2020, from 97.5g CO2/pkm to 87.3g CO2/pkm. In 2019, IAG achieved 89.8gCO2/pkm and was on track. The 2020 target was not met due to a drop in passenger load factors as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Plans for fleet composition and capacity and operational efficiency initiatives should enable delivery of the 2025 fuel efficiency target of 80g CO2/pkm. In light of the ongoing impact of COVID-19, IAG will review this target in the first half of 2021.
In 2020 IAG was an active participant in the SBTi Technical Working Group for aviation, to develop methodologies for aviation climate targets aligned with a global climate scenario of well below 2 degrees. Once the SBTi finalises a targetsetting methodology for airlines in 2021, IAG plans to submit a target for approval. B.3. Climate change
IAG was the first airline group to publish a quantified roadmap to net zero emissions. This was based on comprehensive
In 2021, IAG will update this 30-year decarbonisation plan to account for the latest recovery forecasts, any acquisitions, policy and technology developments, and target-
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Net emissions
Transition to 100% GHG removals Market-based measures and osets
22MT
Gross emissions
• Iberia now has eight Airbus A320neos, three Airbus A321neos, and nine Airbus A350s, which are between 15 to 35 per cent more efficient than the aircraft
2050
45%
25%
30%
Percentage CO2 reductions
(SAF is 45% of fuel in 2050)
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
• Vueling has 25 Airbus A320neo aircraft, which achieve an 18 per cent reduction in fuel burn compared to the Airbus
• Aer Lingus retired its last two Boeing 757 aircraft and received a new Airbus A321neoLR which achieves a 20 per cent
www.iairgroup.com 65
they replaced;
Demand growth
Net emissions
Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) 80gCO2/pkm in 2025
A320ceo; and
reduction in fuel burn.
setting methodologies.
Million tonnes CO2 (MT)
31MT
2020 progress:
Demand growth
11MT
2015 2020
New aircraft and operations
• Across the Group 34 new, more
Airbus A340s respectively;
aircraft they replaced;
fuel-efficient aircraft were delivered and 62 older aircraft disposed of or retired; • British Airways and Iberia retired their entire fleets of 32 Boeing 747s and 15
• British Airways now has 23 Airbus 320/ 321neos, eight Airbus A350s and 32 Boeing 787s, all of which are 25 to 40 per cent more fuel-efficient than the
An updated roadmap scenario for IAG is shown on the right. This assumes a recovery to 2019 levels of passenger demand by 2024, and then annual demand growth of approximately two per cent to 2050, in line with IATA industry forecasts. The recovery path between 2020 and 2023 is illustrative and will change, but IAG remains committed to its 2025, 2030 and
The IAG ambition is for at least 45 per cent of fuel in 2050 to be from SAF, up from 30 per cent due to lower overall jet fuel use and continued policy support. Overall fuel efficiency will improve by at least 70% by
IAG continues to invest in next-generation aircraft and engine changes. These changes, along with fleet retirements, will play a major role in reducing emissions
2050 compared to 2019 levels.
Fleet modernisation
Supports SDGs 3,8,13
intensity per passenger.
roadmap
modelling.
2050 targets.
Metric Unit % vly 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Emissions intensity (Scope 2) gCO2/pkm +154% 0.51 0.20 0.22 0.28 0.35 GHG reduction initiatives Tonnes CO2e -78% 17.21 77.39 65.66 nr nr Electricity Mn kWh -19% 215.7 267.71 234.9 253.2 nr Energy Mn MWh -65% 42.5 119.71 119.4 114.4 108.4 Revenue per tonne CO2e €/tonne CO2e -15% 705 827 811 796 796 Jet fuel use MT fuel -64% 3.45 9.65 9.41 9.02 8.86 Fleet age years -7% 10.6 11.4 11.3 11.4 10.8
1 Restated using a more robust methodology and latest electricity emissions factors. Descriptions and commentary on these metrics is available in the
IAG will minimise gross emissions through a combination of fleet modernisation, operational efficiency and SAF. In 2050, any remaining emissions will be neutralised by use of GHG removal technology. IAG sees carbon offsets as a transitional measure and is advocating for government support for GHG removal technology via membership of the Coalition for Negative Emissions. Net emissions will be reduced in the short- and medium-term by use of carbon offset and removal projects and funding emissions reductions via the UK
IAG also had a target for a 10 per cent improvement in fuel efficiency between 2014 and 2020, from 97.5g CO2/pkm to 87.3g CO2/pkm. In 2019, IAG achieved 89.8gCO2/pkm and was on track. The 2020 target was not met due to a drop in passenger load factors as a result of the
Plans for fleet composition and capacity and operational efficiency initiatives should enable delivery of the 2025 fuel efficiency target of 80g CO2/pkm. In light of the ongoing impact of COVID-19, IAG will review this target in the first half of 2021. In 2020 IAG was an active participant in the SBTi Technical Working Group for aviation, to develop methodologies for aviation climate targets aligned with a global climate scenario of well below 2 degrees. Once the SBTi finalises a targetsetting methodology for airlines in 2021, IAG plans to submit a target for approval.
COVID-19 pandemic.
Group-wide climate targets remain the same and have been re-baselined to 2019
• Net zero CO2 emissions for British Airways UK domestic flights from
27.6 MT to 22 MT in 2030; and • Net zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 CO2
• 11 per cent improvement in fuel efficiency between 2019 and 2025, from 89.8g CO2/pkm to 80g CO2/pkm in 2025; • 20 per cent reduction in net CO2
emissions between 2019 and 2030, from
64 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
and EU ETS.
due to the pandemic:
January 1, 2020;
emissions by 2050.
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously"'
IAG will deliver net zero emissions across its global operations by 2050. This aligns with worldwide efforts to keep average global average temperatures below a 1.5°C rise. IAG was the first airline group to commit to this goal and the first airline group to sign the UN Business Ambition
In this context, net zero emissions means that all CO2 that IAG operations emit in a year will be balanced out by an equivalent amount of CO2 removed from the atmosphere. The net zero commitment covers Scope 1 and 2 CO2 emissions. IAG is committed to minimising non-CO2 impacts as well, and will review targets on these when the science around them becomes more robust. The focus is on reducing use of fossil jet fuel, as this accounts for 99 per cent of the Scope 1 and 2 footprint. The pioneering Flightpath Net Zero programme underpins the IAG commitment. This programme includes 2025 and 2030 Group-wide targets, financial incentives for senior managers explicitly tied to delivery of carbon intensity targets for both the Group and operating airlines (See 'Sustainability strategy' section), and a published 30-year
roadmap for achieving net zero.
for 1.5°C pledge.
Supports SDG 13
SUSTAINABILITY B. PLANET
'Additional Disclosures' section of the IAG Non-Financial Information Statement.
B.2. Climate change commitments – Flightpath Net Zero
IAG was the first airline group to publish a quantified roadmap to net zero emissions. This was based on comprehensive modelling.
An updated roadmap scenario for IAG is shown on the right. This assumes a recovery to 2019 levels of passenger demand by 2024, and then annual demand growth of approximately two per cent to 2050, in line with IATA industry forecasts. The recovery path between 2020 and 2023 is illustrative and will change, but IAG remains committed to its 2025, 2030 and 2050 targets.
The IAG ambition is for at least 45 per cent of fuel in 2050 to be from SAF, up from 30 per cent due to lower overall jet fuel use and continued policy support. Overall fuel efficiency will improve by at least 70% by 2050 compared to 2019 levels.
In 2021, IAG will update this 30-year decarbonisation plan to account for the latest recovery forecasts, any acquisitions, policy and technology developments, and targetsetting methodologies.

IAG continues to invest in next-generation aircraft and engine changes. These changes, along with fleet retirements, will play a major role in reducing emissions intensity per passenger.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
www.iairgroup.com 65
IAG continues to develop annual programmes of operational and fuel efficiency initiatives for both aircraft and ground operations. Representatives within each airline are working to reduce onboard fuel consumption and fly aircraft as efficiently as possible, without negatively affecting flight safety, passenger service offerings or flight schedules where possible.
The Honeywell GoDirect Flight Efficiency software is in use across the Group to identify and monitor fuel-saving opportunities.
Examples of fuel efficiency initiatives implemented over the past two years
include optimised engine washes, reducing the use of Auxiliary Power Units (APUs), landing light deployment, single engine taxi-in, continuous descent operations, lighter main wheels and reducing weight onboard.
lightweight trolleys to reduce weight onboard;

Carbon offsets and removals
IAG recognises the need for carbon offset and removal projects as a transitional means of meeting carbon reduction goals and to support customers in mitigating the and removal projects, they work in collaboration with key partners, carry out due diligence to select reputable providers, and select projects carefully to meet and align with verified quality standards.
portable solar lights to 40 rural health clinics in Zambia and Malawi; and • Vueling sponsored the not-for-profit GreenNova and their CAPTACO2 research project to capture CO2 from
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Since January 2020 British Airways has offset the carbon emissions on all flights within the UK. Equivalent emissions reductions have been achieved through British Airways' voluntary investment in a range of quality, Gold Standard- and Verified Carbon Standard (VCS)-verified carbon reduction projects. These projects include rainforest protection in the Congo Basin, energy-efficient cookstoves in Peru, renewable wind energy in Turkey and solar
the air.
energy projects in India.
2020 progress:
financial plans;
initiatives.
• Integrated waste roadmaps into operating company forecasting and
global policies to support this; • Iberia ran trials with environmental innovator Countalytics on using data analytics to help reduce food waste; and • Vueling replaced napkins, plastic cups, coffee stirrers and cutlery for passengers with recycled or sustainable alternatives and launched the KEEP CLEAN project to engage staff in waste reduction
• A British Airways representative sits on the IATA global working group on reducing SUP and lobbying for effective
www.iairgroup.com 67
• IAG supported the change of CORSIA baseline to 2019 from 2020, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; • Aer Lingus launched its carbon
offsetting programme for passengers. Projects include rainforest protection in Cambodia and Peru and sustainable cook stoves for communities in Sudan; • The British Airways Carbon Fund, in partnership with not-for-profit charity Pure Leapfrog, worked to deliver 14 high-quality carbon reduction projects in the UK and Africa. One example was delivering solar lighting systems and
Onboard services are IAG's main source of waste. Key inputs include onboard meals and newspapers supplied to passengers, and key outputs include plastic packaging, leftover food waste, drinks cans, and cabin items such as wrappers. Waste is typically offloaded and processed at airports by third-party caterers, with some materials recovered on-site and other materials incinerated or sent to landfill. The majority of cabin and catering waste is processed at IAG's hub airports – London Heathrow,
Dublin, Madrid and Barcelona.
increase food waste.
Where possible, IAG acts to reduce food waste while maintaining customer choice. For example, British Airways runs a pre-flight top-up catering service for London flights, to meet late changes to onboard catering requirements whilst minimising over-catering which would
2020 progress:
IAG voluntarily funds emissions avoidance and removal projects around the world, offering passengers the chance to do the same, and explores the use of carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) technology in our operations and SAF production. Since 2013, operating airlines have been funding emissions reductions in other sectors to meet compliance obligations under the EU ETS, and since 2019 have been participating in the UN CORSIA scheme to enable carbon-neutral growth on eligible international flights. When IAG or operating companies choose to voluntarily invest in carbon avoidance
GRI 306-1 (2020), 306-2 (2020), 306-3 (2020)
IAG has made great progress with waste tracking and waste initiatives over the past few years. For example, Iberia waste per passenger dropped 12 per cent from 2016 to 2019. Initiatives across the Group include reducing and recycling plastic, glass, metal cans, paper and food waste. The COVID-19 pandemic has set back progress by making it harder to calculate a waste baseline, pausing or delaying some waste initiatives, and driving temporary re-introductions of plastic items for health and safety reasons. For example, progress on the 2020 British Airways target to remove 700 tonnes of onboard single-use plastic (SUP) was unable to be tracked as result of changes to flying volumes, onboard catering and internal resources. However, in 2021 IAG plans to set new Group-wide waste reduction targets, update the Group Sustainability policy to place greater emphasis on waste, and comply with the EU SUP ban when it
Supports SDGs 7, 9, 13
impact of their flights.
B.4. Waste
Supports SDG 12
enters into force in July.
IAG is a leader in developing SAF by making direct investments in production capacity for "second generation" fuels, which use carbon-rich waste feedstocks, in addition to purchasing these fuels where mandates exist to do so. SAF is chemically almost identical to jet fuel from fossil fuels, but over its recent life cycle emits 70 to 100 per cent less CO2 and according to recent research materially reduces particulate emissions and non-CO2 effects. The Group's investments are backed up with SAF purchase agreements which are critical to the financeability of the new SAF production capacity.
The Group has committed to invest US\$400 million in SAF production over the next two decades. IAG's dedicated sustainable fuels team is also leading efforts to influence domestic, regional and international policy to support uptake and production of these fuels.
See 'Stakeholder engagement' section
IAG continues to work with technology developers to establish a range of SAF supply options for the future.
66 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Supports SDGs 7, 9, 13
Operational efficiency
IAG continues to develop annual programmes of operational and fuel efficiency initiatives for both aircraft and ground operations. Representatives within each airline are working to reduce onboard fuel consumption and fly aircraft as efficiently as possible, without negatively affecting flight safety, passenger service offerings or flight schedules where
include optimised engine washes, reducing the use of Auxiliary Power Units (APUs), landing light deployment, single engine taxi-in, continuous descent operations, lighter main wheels and reducing weight
lightweight trolleys to reduce weight
• Iberia installed more than 5,300 solar panels on its aircraft engine maintenance hangar in Madrid, working in partnership with specialist firm Getting Greener. From 2021 these solar panels will generate 80 million kWh a year for Iberia's hangars, workshops and offices; • Aer Lingus fully replaced its hangar lighting with energy-efficient lightemitting diode (LED) units; and • IAG Cargo planned trials of new electric vehicles at Heathrow and Dublin airports
• British Airways contributed to the formation of the SAF development company Lanzajet, has recently invested in the business, and has also committed to purchase 7,500 tonnes of SAF a year from Lanzajet's first alchohol-to-jet fuel plant in Georgia, USA from late 2022. In addition, the deal involves funding the early stage development of a larger SAF
biorefinery in the UK; and
supply options for the future.
SAF uptake.
• IAG contributed to the World Economic Forum "Cleaner Skies for Tomorrow" initiative to develop scenarios on global
IAG continues to work with technology developers to establish a range of SAF
onboard;
for 2021.
• IAG delivered 17,208 tonnes of CO2e savings through GHG initiatives, a 78 per cent drop compared with the 77,386 tonnes delivered in 2019, however the drop primarily reflects the decline in flights and operations due to the
• Vueling upgraded APUs to minimise energy consumption and is using
• IAG's SAF programme is on track and £0.5 million was invested in the Altalto waste-to-jet fuel plant in Immingham, England, a partnership between British Airways and fuels technology company
• Planning permission was secured for the Altalto project. Subject to financing, construction of the plant could start in late 2022 and it is planned to be operational in 2025, producing over 32,000 tonnes of SAF per year. This will be the UK's first dedicated sustainable
66 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
onboard. 2020 progress:
pandemic;
2020 progress:
Velocys;
jet fuels plant;
The Honeywell GoDirect Flight Efficiency software is in use across the Group to identify and monitor fuel-saving
Examples of fuel efficiency initiatives implemented over the past two years
IAG is a leader in developing SAF by making direct investments in production capacity for "second generation" fuels, which use carbon-rich waste feedstocks, in addition to purchasing these fuels where mandates exist to do so. SAF is chemically almost identical to jet fuel from fossil fuels, but over its recent life cycle emits 70 to 100 per cent less CO2 and according to recent research materially reduces particulate emissions and non-CO2 effects. The Group's investments are backed up with SAF purchase agreements which are critical to the financeability of the new SAF
The Group has committed to invest US\$400 million in SAF production over the next two decades. IAG's dedicated sustainable fuels team is also leading efforts to influence domestic, regional and international policy to support uptake and
See 'Stakeholder engagement' section
Sustainable Aviation Fuels
GRI 305-5
possible.
opportunities.
Supports SDGs 7, 8, 13
production capacity.
production of these fuels.
Supports SDGs 3, 13
SUSTAINABILITY B. PLANET
IAG recognises the need for carbon offset and removal projects as a transitional means of meeting carbon reduction goals and to support customers in mitigating the impact of their flights.
IAG voluntarily funds emissions avoidance and removal projects around the world, offering passengers the chance to do the same, and explores the use of carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) technology in our operations and SAF production. Since 2013, operating airlines have been funding emissions reductions in other sectors to meet compliance obligations under the EU ETS, and since 2019 have been participating in the UN CORSIA scheme to enable carbon-neutral growth on eligible international flights.
When IAG or operating companies choose to voluntarily invest in carbon avoidance
and removal projects, they work in collaboration with key partners, carry out due diligence to select reputable providers, and select projects carefully to meet and align with verified quality standards.

Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
portable solar lights to 40 rural health
clinics in Zambia and Malawi; and • Vueling sponsored the not-for-profit GreenNova and their CAPTACO2 research project to capture CO2 from the air.
Since January 2020 British Airways has offset the carbon emissions on all flights within the UK. Equivalent emissions reductions have been achieved through British Airways' voluntary investment in a range of quality, Gold Standard- and Verified Carbon Standard (VCS)-verified carbon reduction projects. These projects include rainforest protection in the Congo Basin, energy-efficient cookstoves in Peru, renewable wind energy in Turkey and solar energy projects in India.
IAG has made great progress with waste tracking and waste initiatives over the past few years. For example, Iberia waste per passenger dropped 12 per cent from 2016 to 2019. Initiatives across the Group include reducing and recycling plastic, glass, metal cans, paper and food waste.
The COVID-19 pandemic has set back progress by making it harder to calculate a waste baseline, pausing or delaying some waste initiatives, and driving temporary re-introductions of plastic items for health and safety reasons. For example, progress on the 2020 British Airways target to remove 700 tonnes of onboard single-use plastic (SUP) was unable to be tracked as result of changes to flying volumes, onboard catering and internal resources.
However, in 2021 IAG plans to set new Group-wide waste reduction targets, update the Group Sustainability policy to place greater emphasis on waste, and comply with the EU SUP ban when it enters into force in July.
Onboard services are IAG's main source of waste. Key inputs include onboard meals and newspapers supplied to passengers, and key outputs include plastic packaging, leftover food waste, drinks cans, and cabin items such as wrappers. Waste is typically offloaded and processed at airports by third-party caterers, with some materials recovered on-site and other materials incinerated or sent to landfill. The majority of cabin and catering waste is processed at IAG's hub airports – London Heathrow, Dublin, Madrid and Barcelona.
Where possible, IAG acts to reduce food waste while maintaining customer choice. For example, British Airways runs a pre-flight top-up catering service for London flights, to meet late changes to onboard catering requirements whilst minimising over-catering which would increase food waste.
www.iairgroup.com 67
| Metric | Unit | vly | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total onboard waste at hub airports | millon tonnes | -56% | 8.2 | 18.6 |
| Shorthaul waste per passenger | kg/pax | +63% | 0.13 | 0.08 |
| Longhaul waste per passenger | kg/pax | +69% | 1.96 | 1.16 |
| Overall waste per passenger | kg/pax | +58% | 0.41 | 0.26 |
| Metric | Description | Commentary | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waste/pax | Onboard catering waste generated per passenger, net of | Onboard waste at hub airports dropped 56 per cent. | |||
| recycling, and split between shorthaul and longhaul operations. Total includes cabin waste from Vueling as a split was unavailable. |
Onboard waste per passenger increased. Decreases, driven by reductions in onboard services and greater rates of recycling at hub airports, were offset by higher |
||||
| Passenger numbers are based on inbound passengers who have their waste processed at hub airports e.g. London Heathrow, London Gatwick, Madrid, Barcelona and Dublin. |
rates of cancelled bookings and greater use of disposable products for health and safety reasons. |
||||
| Shorthaul and longhaul flights are defined by distance and by onboard product. |
IAG is committed to reducing aircraft noise and air pollution, to minimise our impact on local communities near airports. The average noise per landing and take-off cycle (LTO) dropped by 10 per cent between 2015 and 2019.
Operating companies regularly monitor noise and air quality performance using national databases and global aircraft noise standards. They drive improvements through fleet modernisation and specific operational practices like continuous descents. They also engage with
stakeholders such as community groups, regulators and industry partners and participate in research and operational trials.
Over 98 per cent of the IAG fleet has met the ICAO Chapter 4 and ICAO CAEP 4 standards for several years so these are not disclosed in 2020. IAG typically reports on continuous descent (CDO) compliance but was unable to in 2020 due to limited data availability from
2020 metric Unit1 vly 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 ICAO Chapter 142 % at standard +5pts 58% 53% 50% 46% 46% CAEP Chapter 63 % at standard +2pts 80% 78% 74% 69% 68% CAEP Chapter 8 % at standard +5pts 40% 35% 29% 26% 25%
2 ICAO Chapter standards compare aircraft noise against standardised limits that are a combination of lateral, approach, and flyover noise levels. Higher
3 ICAO CAEP standards are for NOx emissions from aircraft engines. Higher standards are more stringent. The CAEP 6 NOx standard applies to engines
Hangar 51 structured ten-week accelerator programme. The Group has increased its engagement with global tech communities focused on sustainability and has seen a six-fold increase in the number of active
IAG supply chain;
company; and
transport industry.
Hangar 51 website.
In 2021 the Group will continue to engage with a range of emerging green technology disruptors. More details are available on the dedicated
• IAG partnered with other energy and travel companies to invest in i6 Group, a leading fuel management software
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
• Iberia, together with the Politécnica de Madrid University (UPM), has created La Cátedra Iberia with the goal of finding ways to decarbonise the air
www.iairgroup.com 69
programme and attracted applications from top innovators around the world; • Eight operating companies explored groundbreaking environmental pilots which include commercialisation of hydrogen powertrains with ZeroAvia, carbon-to-jet fuel technology, food waste reduction using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine vision, and managing sustainability within the
1 Based on the fleet position at the end of 2020, including parked aircraft and excluding leased aircraft
manufactured from January 1, 2008, and the CAEP 8 standard applies to engines manufactured from January 1, 2014.
projects in this area. 2020 progress:
• Hangar 51 held its first virtual
standards are more stringent. Chapter 14 applies to new aircraft certified from January 1, 2017.
B.6. Innovation, research and development
the National Air Traffic Services (NATS).
IAG leads the aviation industry in engaging with global sustainability innovators. As part of Hangar 51, IAG's core innovation platform, the Group continues to attract the world's top emerging technology companies working on sustainability
Types of engagement include supporting applications for grant funding, running accelerator programmes, incubation, investment opportunities, university collaborations, active pilots, and research and development consortiums. IAG representatives also sit on academic boards and public-private partnerships to support new technologies and innovation. Since 2019, sustainability has been one of the eight core challenge areas within the
solutions.
• IAG set a new Group target of a 10 per cent reduction in noise per LTO between 2020 and 2025.
| Metric | Unit | vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise per cycle | QC per LTO | -3.5% | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.07 | 1.06 | 1.08 |
| NOx per cycle | kg per LTO | +6.6% | 9.84 | 9.23 | 9.71 | nr | nr |
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously"'
| Metric | Description | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Noise per LTO cycle | Average noise per flight considering arrival and departure noise for each aircraft type. Based on the number of flights of all aircraft which operated during the year, including leased aircraft. Quota Count (QC) values from the UK Government are used to create a relative categorisation based on certified noise levels. For example, for a single flight, a Boeing 747 would have a score of 6.0 while an Airbus A320 would have a score of 1.0. |
The 2020 improvement is driven by the accelerated retirement of older aircraft such as the Airbus A340s and Boeing 747s. |
| NOx per LTO cycle | Average emissions of the air pollutant nitrogen oxide (NOx) as aircraft take off and land. The calculation considers the engine certifications and aircraft types of all aircraft which operated during the year, including leased aircraft, referencing information from the ICAO emissions database. |
Year-on-year trends can fluctuate due to multiple factors. The 2020 increase is driven by a relative increase in longhaul versus shorthaul flying at British Airways, and use of A330s in the Aer Lingus fleet. |
68 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Over 98 per cent of the IAG fleet has met the ICAO Chapter 4 and ICAO CAEP 4 standards for several years so these are not disclosed in 2020. IAG typically reports on continuous descent (CDO) compliance but was unable to in 2020 due to limited data availability from the National Air Traffic Services (NATS).
| 2020 metric | Unit1 | vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICAO Chapter 142 | % at standard | +5pts | 58% | 53% | 50% | 46% | 46% |
| CAEP Chapter 63 | % at standard | +2pts | 80% | 78% | 74% | 69% | 68% |
| CAEP Chapter 8 | % at standard | +5pts | 40% | 35% | 29% | 26% | 25% |
1 Based on the fleet position at the end of 2020, including parked aircraft and excluding leased aircraft
2 ICAO Chapter standards compare aircraft noise against standardised limits that are a combination of lateral, approach, and flyover noise levels. Higher standards are more stringent. Chapter 14 applies to new aircraft certified from January 1, 2017.
3 ICAO CAEP standards are for NOx emissions from aircraft engines. Higher standards are more stringent. The CAEP 6 NOx standard applies to engines manufactured from January 1, 2008, and the CAEP 8 standard applies to engines manufactured from January 1, 2014.
IAG leads the aviation industry in engaging with global sustainability innovators. As part of Hangar 51, IAG's core innovation platform, the Group continues to attract the world's top emerging technology companies working on sustainability solutions.
Metric Unit vly 2020 2019 Total onboard waste at hub airports millon tonnes -56% 8.2 18.6 Shorthaul waste per passenger kg/pax +63% 0.13 0.08 Longhaul waste per passenger kg/pax +69% 1.96 1.16 Overall waste per passenger kg/pax +58% 0.41 0.26
stakeholders such as community groups, regulators and industry partners and participate in research and operational
A320neos, which produce half the noise
Metric Unit vly 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Noise per cycle QC per LTO -3.5% 0.96 1.00 1.07 1.06 1.08 NOx per cycle kg per LTO +6.6% 9.84 9.23 9.71 nr nr
68 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
• Vueling grew its fleet of Airbus
noise of Airbus A321ceos;
of Airbus A320ceos; • Aer Lingus received an Airbus A321neoLR, which produces half the
Onboard waste at hub airports dropped 56 per cent. Onboard waste per passenger increased. Decreases, driven by reductions in onboard services and greater rates of recycling at hub airports, were offset by higher rates of cancelled bookings and greater use of disposable products for health and safety reasons.
• Iberia participated in the AVIATOR project, funded by the EU Horizon 2020 programme, to develop sensors to monitor air pollution at airports; and • IAG set a new Group target of a 10 per cent reduction in noise per LTO between
2020 and 2025.
The 2020 improvement is driven by the accelerated retirement of older aircraft such as
Year-on-year trends can fluctuate due to multiple factors. The 2020 increase is driven by a relative increase in longhaul versus shorthaul flying at British Airways, and use of A330s in the
the Airbus A340s and Boeing 747s.
Aer Lingus fleet.
Metric Description Commentary
recycling, and split between shorthaul and longhaul operations. Total includes cabin waste from Vueling as a
Passenger numbers are based on inbound passengers who have their waste processed at hub airports e.g. London Heathrow, London Gatwick, Madrid, Barcelona
Shorthaul and longhaul flights are defined by distance
trials.
Metric Description Commentary
departure noise for each aircraft type. Based on the number of flights of all aircraft which operated during the year, including leased aircraft. Quota Count (QC) values from the UK Government are used to create a relative categorisation based on certified noise levels. For example, for a single flight, a Boeing 747 would have a score of 6.0 while an Airbus A320 would have a score of 1.0.
oxide (NOx) as aircraft take off and land. The calculation considers the engine certifications and aircraft types of all aircraft which operated during the year, including leased aircraft, referencing information from the ICAO emissions database.
Noise per LTO cycle Average noise per flight considering arrival and
NOx per LTO cycle Average emissions of the air pollutant nitrogen
2020 progress:
Waste/pax Onboard catering waste generated per passenger, net of
split was unavailable.
and by onboard product.
and Dublin.
B.5. Noise and air quality GRI 305-7. Supports SDGs 3, 11
between 2015 and 2019.
SUSTAINABILITY B. PLANET
IAG is committed to reducing aircraft noise and air pollution, to minimise our impact on local communities near airports. The average noise per landing and take-off cycle (LTO) dropped by 10 per cent
Operating companies regularly monitor noise and air quality performance using national databases and global aircraft noise standards. They drive improvements through fleet modernisation and specific operational practices like continuous descents. They also engage with
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously"'
Types of engagement include supporting applications for grant funding, running accelerator programmes, incubation, investment opportunities, university collaborations, active pilots, and research and development consortiums. IAG representatives also sit on academic boards and public-private partnerships to support new technologies and innovation.
Since 2019, sustainability has been one of the eight core challenge areas within the
Hangar 51 structured ten-week accelerator programme. The Group has increased its engagement with global tech communities focused on sustainability and has seen a six-fold increase in the number of active projects in this area.
IAG supply chain;
• IAG partnered with other energy and travel companies to invest in i6 Group, a leading fuel management software company; and
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
• Iberia, together with the Politécnica de Madrid University (UPM), has created La Cátedra Iberia with the goal of finding ways to decarbonise the air transport industry.
In 2021 the Group will continue to engage with a range of emerging green technology disruptors. More details are available on the dedicated Hangar 51 website.
www.iairgroup.com 69
IAG aims to create an environment in which employees feel motivated, safe and able to thrive as this is central to the continued success of the Group. Core principles in the Code of Conduct include fair and equal treatment, nondiscrimination, fairness and respect for human rights. This Code applies to all Directors, managers and employees of the Group and e-learning training to support it is mandatory and applicable to all employees and Directors. Individual operating companies have responsibility for policies and procedures relating to their employees, including appropriate reward frameworks to ensure they can continue to attract and retain the best talent for every role.
At the end of 2020, 57,928 people were employed across the Group in 82 countries, a decrease of 20 per cent in the year. Our voluntary turnover rate for 2020 was 15 per cent compared with 7 per cent in 2019, a change that reflects the unfortunate but necessary resizing of the business.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, British Airways has worked closely with its trades unions to reach agreements to save jobs and reduce costs. In some areas this has reduced the need for redundancies by a significant number or even altogether. This has been coupled with voluntary measures such as unpaid leave and part-time working to reduce the size of the workforce as the demand for flying remained significantly reduced. Where redundancies have been necessary, a large proportion of these have been achieved through voluntary measures.
For those employees who were made redundant, support has been offered to help them find alternative employment and explore redeployment opportunities. In British Airways, for instance, retention pools have been created to support redundant employees back into the workplace, should the situation improve.
Measures to support employee satisfaction and talent management are primarily managed within operating companies. Each operating company has its own established methods of measuring employee satisfaction. IAG is currently working to align the talent management framework across the Group, focusing at Group level on the IAG Management Committee and their direct reports. IAG has a good track record of retaining and promoting talent into senior roles, as evidenced by the Management Committee appointments during 2020.
IAG has employees based in European countries which comply with the conventions of the International Labour Organization (ILO), covering subjects that are considered as fundamental principles and rights at work: freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining; the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labour; the effective abolition of child labour; and the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation. Outside of the EU, IAG recognises trade unions in many jurisdictions, has collective agreements and meets/exceeds all relevant labour standards.
IAG has a European Works Council (EWC) which brings together employee representatives from the different European Economic Area (EEA) Member States in which the Group operates. EWC representatives are informed about and, where appropriate, consulted on transnational matters which may impact employees in two or more EEA Member States. During 2020, IAG hosted one full meeting of the EWC (compared with two in 2019) and eight Select Committee meetings, which have all been held virtually since March.
70 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020

C.2. Health, safety and wellbeing
IAG is committed to the health and safety of our employees, customers and all others affected by our activities. This means operating in a healthy, safe and secure way in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, company policies and industry
standards. Health and safety are fundamental to our business, whether in the air or on the ground. It is our highest
C.3. Inclusion and diversity
IAG has a Group-wide Equal Opportunities
In terms of gender diversity and equality, IAG has set a target to reach 33 per cent women across senior executive levels by 2025 and has put in place an extensive programme of action to help deliver on this target. IAG monitors and reports on progress, including on the management
Iberia and Vueling have Equality Plans covering all employees in Spain. Vueling implemented this in 2014 and Iberia published an integrated plan in 2018 covering pilots, cabin crew and ground
policy to address and eliminate discrimination and promote equality of opportunity regardless of age, gender, disability, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation. At Group level, IAG also has a Directors Selection and Diversity Policy that sets out the principles that govern the selection process and the approach to diversity on the Board of Directors and the IAG Management Committee. These policies have been approved by the Board
IAG has robust governance processes in place led by the safety committees in each operating company. The IAG Board Safety Committee, chaired by the Group Chief Executive Officer, monitors all matters relating to the operational safety of IAG's airlines as well as to the systems and
1 This reflects the changes in Board composition made on December 31, 2020 in response to the outcome of Brexit as well as to meet the new Spanish
The Iberia "Quiero Ser" programme, to attract and promote female careers in the aviation industry, was postponed in 2020 due to the pandemic and plans to restart
commitment to promote gender equality
resources dedicated to safety activities
been carefully thought through alongside the latest advice from public health authorities and aviation regulators.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
To support employee wellbeing across the Group, each operating company created new websites and internal resources to support mental health and COVID-19 safety. For example, British Airways built on existing resources throughout 2020 and issued daily press updates which included wellbeing signposts, such as information about its Employee Assistance Programme and the UNMIND mental health digital application. The latter includes webinars, interviews and other resources and access was extended to family members of employees in the
Ethnic diversity is an issue of particular importance for British Airways. 18 per cent of British Airways UK staff have declared a Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic (BAME) background, up from 16 per cent in 2019, and compared with 14 per cent of the UK population. UK employees represent 50
British Airways aims to improve BAME representation in senior roles and 2020
• Continuing its reverse mentoring and cross-company mentoring trial, in collaboration with Business in the Community and an internal BAME
• Dialogue with BAME colleagues following the Black Lives Matter campaign, with feedback being shared with the management team and used to help create a race action plan.
www.iairgroup.com 71
per cent of the Group total.
achievements were:
network group; and
second half of 2020.
IAG's customers travel on aircraft and through buildings and environments that are subject to regulations applicable to health and safety in each country. Procedures, systems and technology used in our operations are designed to protect
employees and customers alike. As IAG continued to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic, the Group has followed expert guidance from bodies such as the IATA Council Aviation Recovery Taskforce (CART), the WHO, Public Health England and Spanish and Irish authorities. New hygiene measures have been introduced for all employees and customers. All these measures have
staff agreements. Both plans will be revised in 2021 to align with new
2020 progress on gender diversity: • 45 per cent women on the IAG Board, up from 33 per cent in 20191
• British Airways held a 'Power of Mentoring' event, with participation of other Group operating companies, to inspire and equip employees interested in mentoring with tools and guidance; • Aer Lingus achieved the "Investors in Diversity" Bronze accreditation; and • Iberia was awarded by Ellas Vuelan Alto (EVA) association for corporate
• 30 per cent women in senior executive levels (15 per cent on the Management Committee), maintaining the proportion
;
legislation.
reached in 2019;
across the Group.
Corporate Governance Code recommendation of at least 40 per cent female Director representation on the Board by 2023.
and diversity.
in 2021.
Supports SDG 3
GRI 406-1 Supports SDG 5
of Directors.
pipeline across the Group.
priority.
Within the Group, individual operating companies have responsibility for the policies and procedures relating to their employees, including reward frameworks to ensure they can continue to attract and retain the best talent for every role.
Due to the diverse nature of Group businesses, both in terms of jurisdictions and operations, all training policies and programmes are implemented at operating company level. Each is responsible for determining the specific courses offered within their organisation, the frequency with which training courses must be completed, and the employees required to attend. However, across the Group, all operating companies are required to run the following mandatory corporate training courses for their employees:
Corporate Governance Code recommendation of at least 40 per cent female Director representation on the Board by 2023.
IAG is committed to the health and safety of our employees, customers and all others affected by our activities. This means operating in a healthy, safe and secure way in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, company policies and industry standards. Health and safety are fundamental to our business, whether in the air or on the ground. It is our highest priority.
IAG has robust governance processes in place led by the safety committees in each operating company. The IAG Board Safety Committee, chaired by the Group Chief Executive Officer, monitors all matters relating to the operational safety of IAG's airlines as well as to the systems and
C. People and Prosperity
Measures to support employee satisfaction and talent management are primarily managed within operating companies. Each operating company has its own established methods of measuring employee satisfaction. IAG is currently working to align the talent management framework across the Group, focusing at Group level on the IAG Management Committee and their direct reports. IAG has a good track record of retaining and promoting talent into senior roles, as evidenced by the Management Committee
Within the Group, individual operating companies have responsibility for the policies and procedures relating to their employees, including reward frameworks to ensure they can continue to attract and retain the best talent for every role. Due to the diverse nature of Group businesses, both in terms of jurisdictions and operations, all training policies and programmes are implemented at operating company level. Each is responsible for determining the specific courses offered within their organisation, the frequency with which training courses must be completed, and the employees required to attend. However, across the Group, all operating companies are required to run the following mandatory corporate training
courses for their employees:
• Compliance with Competition Laws • Anti-bribery and Corruption
• Data Privacy, Security and Protection.
• Code of Conduct
Compliance
appointments during 2020.
relevant labour standards.
since March.
which brings together employee representatives from the different European Economic Area (EEA) Member States in which the Group operates. EWC representatives are informed about and, where appropriate, consulted on transnational matters which may impact employees in two or more EEA Member States. During 2020, IAG hosted one full meeting of the EWC (compared with two in 2019) and eight Select Committee meetings, which have all been held virtually
IAG has a European Works Council (EWC)
70 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
IAG has employees based in European countries which comply with the conventions of the International Labour Organization (ILO), covering subjects that are considered as fundamental principles and rights at work: freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining; the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labour; the effective abolition of child labour; and the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation. Outside of the EU, IAG recognises trade unions in many jurisdictions, has collective agreements and meets/exceeds all
C.1. Workforce overview
IAG aims to create an environment in which employees feel motivated, safe and able to thrive as this is central to the continued success of the Group. Core principles in the Code of Conduct include
discrimination, fairness and respect for human rights. This Code applies to all Directors, managers and employees of the Group and e-learning training to support it is mandatory and applicable to all employees and Directors. Individual operating companies have responsibility for policies and procedures relating to their employees, including appropriate reward frameworks to ensure they can continue to attract and retain the best
At the end of 2020, 57,928 people were employed across the Group in 82 countries, a decrease of 20 per cent in the year. Our voluntary turnover rate for 2020 was 15 per cent compared with 7 per cent in 2019, a change that reflects the unfortunate but necessary resizing of the
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, British Airways has worked closely with its trades unions to reach agreements to save jobs and reduce costs. In some areas this has reduced the need for redundancies by a significant number or even altogether. This has been coupled with voluntary measures such as unpaid leave and part-time working to reduce the size of the workforce as the demand for flying remained significantly reduced. Where redundancies have been necessary, a large proportion of these have been achieved
through voluntary measures.
For those employees who were made redundant, support has been offered to help them find alternative employment and explore redeployment opportunities. In British Airways, for instance, retention pools have been created to support redundant employees back into the workplace, should the situation improve.
GRI 403-4, 408-1, 409-1 Supports SDG 12
SUSTAINABILITY CONTINUED C. PEOPLE AND PROSPERITY
fair and equal treatment, non-
talent for every role.
business.
IAG has a Group-wide Equal Opportunities policy to address and eliminate discrimination and promote equality of opportunity regardless of age, gender, disability, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation. At Group level, IAG also has a Directors Selection and Diversity Policy that sets out the principles that govern the selection process and the approach to diversity on the Board of Directors and the IAG Management Committee. These policies have been approved by the Board of Directors.
In terms of gender diversity and equality, IAG has set a target to reach 33 per cent women across senior executive levels by 2025 and has put in place an extensive programme of action to help deliver on this target. IAG monitors and reports on progress, including on the management pipeline across the Group.
Iberia and Vueling have Equality Plans covering all employees in Spain. Vueling implemented this in 2014 and Iberia published an integrated plan in 2018 covering pilots, cabin crew and ground
staff agreements. Both plans will be revised in 2021 to align with new legislation.
resources dedicated to safety activities
IAG's customers travel on aircraft and through buildings and environments that are subject to regulations applicable to health and safety in each country. Procedures, systems and technology used in our operations are designed to protect
employees and customers alike. As IAG continued to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic, the Group has followed expert guidance from bodies such as the IATA Council Aviation Recovery Taskforce (CART), the WHO, Public Health England and Spanish and Irish authorities. New hygiene measures have been introduced for all employees and customers. All these measures have
across the Group.
The Iberia "Quiero Ser" programme, to attract and promote female careers in the aviation industry, was postponed in 2020 due to the pandemic and plans to restart in 2021.
1 This reflects the changes in Board composition made on December 31, 2020 in response to the outcome of Brexit as well as to meet the new Spanish
Ethnic diversity is an issue of particular importance for British Airways. 18 per cent of British Airways UK staff have declared a Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic (BAME) background, up from 16 per cent in 2019, and compared with 14 per cent of the UK population. UK employees represent 50 per cent of the Group total.
British Airways aims to improve BAME representation in senior roles and 2020 achievements were:
www.iairgroup.com 71
been carefully thought through alongside the latest advice from public health authorities and aviation regulators.
To support employee wellbeing across the Group, each operating company created new websites and internal resources to support mental health and COVID-19 safety. For example, British Airways built on existing resources throughout 2020 and issued daily press updates which included wellbeing signposts, such as information about its Employee Assistance Programme and the UNMIND mental health digital application. The latter includes webinars, interviews and other resources and access was extended to family members of employees in the second half of 2020.

Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information


IAG had no known cases of human rights violations across the Group during 2020. IAG GBS screens suppliers to identify and mitigate potential incidences of human rights violations, and modern slavery clauses feature in all new supplier contracts as well as contract renewals.
IAG is taking steps to prevent incidences of modern slavery within the Group and across its supply chains. In terms of policies associated with human rights, IAG asks suppliers to adhere to the third IAG Group Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement, which was published in 2019. This statement is made under section 54, part 5 of the 2015 UK Modern Slavery Act (MSA). IAG also supports the 2018 IATA resolution denouncing human trafficking
and reaffirming a commitment to tackle this issue.
Human trafficking is of particular concern to IAG and to the wider aviation industry, as the Group transports millions of passengers every year and has tens of thousands of suppliers across the world. To prevent human trafficking, operating airlines work closely with governments and the airports in which they operate to ensure that any suspected trafficking on our flights is identified, reported and dealt with appropriately.
Operating airlines train staff to recognise the signs of potential human trafficking situations, and provide procedures for reporting where any cases are suspected. This training is managed at airline level.

C.6 Workforce measures
manpower
employment type
employment contract
employee categories
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously".
retention schemes and it reflects normal contractual hours.
2 Actual number of people employed across the Group at December 31, 2020.
Metric Unit Sub-category vly 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Headcount Number of people2 -19.8% 57,928 72,268 71,134 nr nr
Spain: +3pts 34% 31% Ireland: +1pts 8% 7% India: 0pts 2% 2% USA: 0pts 1% 1% Other: 0pts 5% 5%
1 The mean of the manpower equivalent captured quarterly to reflect seasonality. This is not adjusted for time not worked whilst under COVID-19 job
Number of people UK: -4pts 50% 54%
equivalent1 -8.2% 60,612 66,034 64,734 63,422 63,387
Permanent: +3pts 97% 94% 94%
Cabin Crew: -4pts 31% 35% 35%
Pilots: +2pts 13% 11% 11% Airport: -1pts 25% 26% 26% Corporate: +3pts 20% 17% 18% Maintenance: 0pts 11% 11% 10%
Full-time: +5pts 79% 74% 75% nr nr Part-time: -5pts 21% 26% 25%
Temporary: nr nr -3pts 3% 6% 6%
nr nr
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
nr nr nr
www.iairgroup.com 73
GRI 102-7, 102-8, 401-1, 405-1
Composition % headcount by
Composition % headcount by
Composition % headcount by
Employees by country
Employment Average
British Airways, Aer Lingus and Vueling run training for pilots and cabin crew on identifying and responding to human trafficking, and Iberia will refresh such training in 2021. Guidance and procedures for flight crew and cabin crew are also included in the Aer Lingus and Vueling Operations Manuals. In 2020, Vueling supported the Spanish police in locating and arresting members of an organisation which trafficked women.
Key risks associated with human rights matters are included in the 'Sustainability risks and opportunities' section. In 2021, IAG plans to review the assessment of human rights risks within the business.
Supports SDG 11, GRI 201-1, 102-13
IAG operating companies have longstanding partnerships to support community causes both locally and around the world.
In 2020, €4.6 million was raised across the Group1 , a 19 per cent decrease from the €5.7 million raised in 2019 and an impressive contribution given reduced business activity. Sources were:
1 British Airways total based on January-November. The Group 2019 value has been restated due to the expansion of the scope of reported contributions.
72 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
C.4. Human rights and modern slavery
C.5. Community engagement and charitable support
and reaffirming a commitment to tackle
British Airways, Aer Lingus and Vueling run training for pilots and cabin crew on identifying and responding to human trafficking, and Iberia will refresh such training in 2021. Guidance and procedures for flight crew and cabin crew are also included in the Aer Lingus and Vueling Operations Manuals. In 2020, Vueling supported the Spanish police in locating and arresting members of an organisation
Key risks associated with human rights matters are included in the 'Sustainability risks and opportunities' section. In 2021, IAG plans to review the assessment of human rights risks within the business.
• Since 2011, Aer Lingus staff have an annual "Make a Difference" day for staff volunteering. While this did not go ahead in 2020, Aer Lingus was a significant contributor to the COVID-19 global response via flights of medical equipment between Europe and China;
• Since 2010, British Airways has been working with the "Flying Start" global charity programme, in partnership with Comic Relief. This programme has helped over 824,000 people in some of the world's poorest communities.
and
which trafficked women.
Human trafficking is of particular concern to IAG and to the wider aviation industry, as the Group transports millions of passengers every year and has tens of thousands of suppliers across the world. To prevent human trafficking, operating airlines work closely with governments and the airports in which they operate to ensure that any suspected trafficking on our flights is identified, reported and
Operating airlines train staff to recognise the signs of potential human trafficking situations, and provide procedures for reporting where any cases are suspected. This training is managed at airline level.
• Since 2019, British Airways has had a partnership with the British Red Cross focusing on support for UK community preparedness and crisis response work; • Since 2016, Vueling has been working with Save the Children and is the second-largest sponsor of this NGO in
• Since 2013, Iberia has been contributing to the UNICEF children's vaccination programme. This programme has paid for the vaccinations for more than a million children in Chad, Angola and
1 British Airways total based on January-November. The Group 2019 value has been restated due to the expansion of the scope of reported contributions.
72 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
this issue.
dealt with appropriately.
Key partnerships:
Spain;
Cuba;
Supports SDGs 3, 4, 5
SUSTAINABILITY CONTINUED C. PEOPLE AND PROSPERITY
IAG had no known cases of human rights violations across the Group during 2020. IAG GBS screens suppliers to identify and mitigate potential incidences of human rights violations, and modern slavery clauses feature in all new supplier contracts as well as contract renewals. IAG is taking steps to prevent incidences of modern slavery within the Group and across its supply chains. In terms of policies associated with human rights, IAG asks suppliers to adhere to the third IAG Group Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement, which was published in 2019. This statement is made under section 54, part 5 of the 2015 UK Modern Slavery Act (MSA). IAG also supports the 2018 IATA resolution denouncing human trafficking
Supports SDG 11, GRI 201-1, 102-13
IAG operating companies have longstanding partnerships to support
€5.7 million raised in 2019 and an impressive contribution given reduced business activity. Sources were: • 40.1% from customer contributions; • 35.5% from company donations; • 19.5% from employee contributions; and
• 4.8% from in-kind donations.
the world.
Group1
community causes both locally and around
In 2020, €4.6 million was raised across the
, a 19 per cent decrease from the
| Metric | Unit | Sub-category | vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employment | Average manpower |
|||||||
| equivalent1 | -8.2% | 60,612 | 66,034 | 64,734 | 63,422 | 63,387 | ||
| Headcount | Number of people2 | -19.8% | 57,928 | 72,268 | 71,134 | nr | nr | |
| Composition | % headcount by | Full-time: | +5pts | 79% | 74% | 75% | nr | nr |
| employment type | Part-time: | -5pts | 21% | 26% | 25% | |||
| Composition | % headcount by employment contract |
Permanent: | +3pts | 97% | 94% | 94% | nr | |
| Temporary: | -3pts | 3% | 6% | 6% | nr | |||
| Composition | % headcount by employee categories |
Cabin Crew: | -4pts | 31% | 35% | 35% | nr | nr |
| Pilots: | +2pts | 13% | 11% | 11% | ||||
| Airport: | -1pts | 25% | 26% | 26% | ||||
| Corporate: | +3pts | 20% | 17% | 18% | ||||
| Maintenance: | 0pts | 11% | 11% | 10% | ||||
| Employees by country |
Number of people | UK: | -4pts | 50% | 54% | |||
| Spain: | +3pts | 34% | 31% | nr nr |
nr | |||
| Ireland: | +1pts | 8% | 7% | |||||
| India: | 0pts | 2% | 2% | |||||
| USA: | 0pts | 1% | 1% | |||||
| Other: | 0pts | 5% | 5% |
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously".
1 The mean of the manpower equivalent captured quarterly to reflect seasonality. This is not adjusted for time not worked whilst under COVID-19 job retention schemes and it reflects normal contractual hours.
2 Actual number of people employed across the Group at December 31, 2020.
www.iairgroup.com 73
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
| Metric | Unit | Sub-category | vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender diversity |
% women at Board level |
+12pts | 45% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 25% | |
| Gender diversity |
% women at senior executive level |
0pts | 30% | 30% | 27% | 24% | 23% | |
| Gender diversity |
% women at Group level |
-1pts | 43% | 44% | 45% | 44% | 44% | |
| Age diversity | % of managerial staff in | <30 | -1pts | 3% | 4% | 7% | 6% | |
| each age band | 30-50 | +2pts | 57% | 55% | 57% | 65% | nr | |
| 50+ | -1pts | 40% | 41% | 36% | 29% | |||
| Age diversity | % of non-managerial | <30 | -3pts | 18% | 21% | 22% | 17% | |
| staff in each age band | 30-50 | +4pts | 54% | 50% | 50% | 51% | nr | |
| 50+ | -1pts | 28% | 29% | 28% | 32% | |||
| Workforce | % voluntary and | Voluntary | +9pts | 16% | 7% | 8% | 8% | |
| turnover | non-voluntary | Non-voluntary | +3pts | 5% | 2% | 3% | 2% | nr |
| Workforce | Overall % by age group <30 | -21pts | 16% | 37% | 35% | |||
| turnover | 30-50 | -3pts | 33% | 36% | 34% | nr | nr | |
| 50+ | +24pts | 51% | 27% | 31% | ||||
| Overall % by gender Workforce |
Women | +5pts | 52% | 47% | 51% | |||
| turnover | Men | -5pts | 48% | 53% | 49% | nr | nr | |
| GRI 102-41, 403-9, 404-1 | Additional workforce metrics | |||||||
| Metric | Unit | vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Social dialogue and trade unions |
% covered by collective bargaining agreements |
+2pts | 89% | 87% | 86% | 88% | 88% | |
| Average hours of training |
Average hours per employee per year |
-45.4% | 26.4 | 48.4 | 41.1 | 45.8 | 34.9 | |
| Lost Time Injury (LTI) frequency rate |
LTI per 200,000 hours worked |
-44.5% | 2.41 | 4.341 | 4.201 | nr | nr | |
| LTI severity rate | Average days lost per LTI |
+67.0% | 37.80 | 22.64 | 21.12 | nr | nr |
Description and commentary for key workforce metrics
seasonality.
December 31, 2020.
December 31, 2020.
has a defined end date.
and Maintenance.
which they are based.
manpower equivalent
people
employment type, contract and employee categories
Number of people
% women at Board, senior executive, and Group level
Age diversity % of staff in
each age band
% voluntary and nonvoluntary turnover
Employment Average
Headcount Number of
Composition % headcount by
Employees by country
Gender diversity
Workforce turnover
Metric Unit Description Commentary
Manpower equivalent is the number of employees adjusted to include part-time workers, overtime and contractors.
The average is the mean of the manpower equivalent captured quarterly to reflect
Headcount is the actual number of people employed across the Group (employees) at
Composition is a breakdown of headcount as at
Definitions of full-time and part-time vary across the Group. A temporary employment contract
The employee category breakdown portrays the distribution of the major groups within IAG's workforce "in the air" – Pilots and Cabin Crew – and "on the ground" – Airport, Corporate
This metric depicts the distribution of the Group's employees according to the country in
The share of women as a proportion of all staff at specific levels of seniority across the Group. IAG has published objectives for 33% women on the Board by 2020 and 33% women across the Group's senior executive levels by 2025.
The 'on the ground' managerial population includes all airport, corporate and maintenance roles equivalent to a manager across the Group. The 'in the air' managerial population includes all pilot and cabin crew roles equivalent to Captains
Measured as the number of leavers as a percentage of the average number of Group employees in the year. The number of leavers excludes temporary contracts and death in service. Voluntary turnover occurs when employees choose to leave (e.g. resignation, retirement, voluntary redundancy) and nonvoluntary turnover occurs when employees leave for reasons other than a personal decision (e.g. compulsory redundancy, dismissal). The table on the previous page shows the overall breakdown of turnover by age and gender.
and Cabin Service Managers.
The 8.2% decrease reflects the employee restructuring at British Airways and Aer Lingus. This measure accounts for employees' contractual schedule of work and therefore does not account for the impact of COVID-19 job retention scheme.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Overall headcount decreased over the year by 19.8%. This reflects the employee restructuring at
A higher proportion of temporary employee leavers in 2020 increased the ratio of permanent employees to 97%. The employee category, where business restructuring had the highest impact, was cabin crew which explains the decrease in its proportion of all Group employee categories. Airport employees, the second most-reduced category, combined with cabin crew represents over 80 per cent of all part-time employees which explains the increase of the proportion of full-time
The decrease in the proportion of Group employees based in the UK is due to the redundancies at British Airways. At the end of 2020 IAG had employees based in 82 countries.
There were 193 senior executives as at December
IAG maintained the proportion of women in senior executive levels – 30% by the end of 2020. IAG achieved its 2020 Board target in 2018 and has increased the proportion of women on the Board
A decrease in the proportion of women across the whole Group is explained by 48% of total turnover made up of cabin crew, which was composed of
The decrease in the proportion of employees over 50 years of age is explained by the higher uptake (over 50%) of voluntary redundancy measures in
The decrease in the proportion of employees under 30 years of age is explained by the end of
The overall annual turnover in 2020 was 21% – a total of 13,654 employees, of which 3,456 were non-voluntary leavers. This compares to 9% in 2019, a total of 6,206 of which 1,372 were non-
unfortunate but necessary resizing of the business due to COVID-19. A recruitment freeze across the
Over 88% of total Group turnover was at British Airways, the largest employer within the Group,
www.iairgroup.com 75
The increase in turnover was due to the
Group in 2020 also impacted turnover.
mostly through voluntary measures.
British Airways and Aer Lingus.
Group employees.
31, 2020.
to 45%.
71% women in 2019.
temporary contracts.
voluntary leavers.
this age band.
Fatalities 0pts 0 0 1 nr nr
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously". In the table above this can refer to multiple years.
1 The 2018 and 2019 LTI frequency rates have been restated due to change in standardising factor to better align to GRI standards.
74 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
C.6 Workforce measures
Age diversity % of managerial staff in each age band
Age diversity % of non-managerial
Additional workforce metrics GRI 102-41, 403-9, 404-1
Social dialogue and trade unions
Average hours of
Lost Time Injury (LTI) frequency rate
training
% women at Board
% women at senior
% women at Group
staff in each age band
% covered by collective bargaining
LTI severity rate Average days lost per
Average hours per
LTI per 200,000 hours
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously". In the table above this can refer to multiple years.
% voluntary and non-voluntary
Metric Unit Sub-category vly 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Overall % by age group <30 -21pts 16% 37% 35%
level +12pts 45% 33% 33% 25% 25%
executive level 0pts 30% 30% 27% 24% 23%
level -1pts 43% 44% 45% 44% 44%
50+ +24pts 51% 27% 31%
Metric Unit vly 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Fatalities 0pts 0 0 1 nr nr
74 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
1 The 2018 and 2019 LTI frequency rates have been restated due to change in standardising factor to better align to GRI standards.
Overall % by gender Women +5pts 52% 47% 51% nr nr Men -5pts 48% 53% 49%
agreements +2pts 89% 87% 86% 88% 88%
employee per year -45.4% 26.4 48.4 41.1 45.8 34.9
worked -44.5% 2.41 4.341 4.201 nr nr
LTI +67.0% 37.80 22.64 21.12 nr nr
<30 -1pts 3% 4% 7% 6%
50+ -1pts 40% 41% 36% 29%
<30 -3pts 18% 21% 22% 17%
50+ -1pts 28% 29% 28% 32%
30-50 +2pts 57% 55% 57% 65% nr
30-50 +4pts 54% 50% 50% 51% nr
Voluntary +9pts 16% 7% 8% 8% nr Non-voluntary +3pts 5% 2% 3% 2%
30-50 -3pts 33% 36% 34% nr nr
GRI 102-7, 102-8, 401-1, 405-1
SUSTAINABILITY CONTINUED C. PEOPLE AND PROSPERITY
Gender diversity
Gender diversity
Gender diversity
Workforce turnover
Workforce turnover
Workforce turnover
| Metric | Unit | Description | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employment | Average manpower equivalent |
Manpower equivalent is the number of employees adjusted to include part-time workers, overtime and contractors. The average is the mean of the manpower equivalent captured quarterly to reflect seasonality. |
The 8.2% decrease reflects the employee restructuring at British Airways and Aer Lingus. This measure accounts for employees' contractual schedule of work and therefore does not account for the impact of COVID-19 job retention scheme. |
| Headcount | Number of people |
Headcount is the actual number of people employed across the Group (employees) at December 31, 2020. |
Overall headcount decreased over the year by 19.8%. This reflects the employee restructuring at British Airways and Aer Lingus. |
| Composition | % headcount by employment type, contract and employee categories |
Composition is a breakdown of headcount as at December 31, 2020. Definitions of full-time and part-time vary across the Group. A temporary employment contract has a defined end date. The employee category breakdown portrays the distribution of the major groups within IAG's workforce "in the air" – Pilots and Cabin Crew – and "on the ground" – Airport, Corporate and Maintenance. |
A higher proportion of temporary employee leavers in 2020 increased the ratio of permanent employees to 97%. The employee category, where business restructuring had the highest impact, was cabin crew which explains the decrease in its proportion of all Group employee categories. Airport employees, the second most-reduced category, combined with cabin crew represents over 80 per cent of all part-time employees which explains the increase of the proportion of full-time Group employees. |
| Employees by country |
Number of people |
This metric depicts the distribution of the Group's employees according to the country in which they are based. |
The decrease in the proportion of Group employees based in the UK is due to the redundancies at British Airways. At the end of 2020 IAG had employees based in 82 countries. |
| Gender diversity |
% women at Board, senior executive, and Group level |
The share of women as a proportion of all staff at specific levels of seniority across the Group. IAG has published objectives for 33% women on the Board by 2020 and 33% women across the Group's senior executive levels by 2025. |
There were 193 senior executives as at December 31, 2020. IAG maintained the proportion of women in senior executive levels – 30% by the end of 2020. IAG achieved its 2020 Board target in 2018 and has increased the proportion of women on the Board to 45%. A decrease in the proportion of women across the whole Group is explained by 48% of total turnover made up of cabin crew, which was composed of |
| Age diversity | % of staff in each age band |
The 'on the ground' managerial population includes all airport, corporate and maintenance roles equivalent to a manager across the Group. The 'in the air' managerial population includes all pilot and cabin crew roles equivalent to Captains and Cabin Service Managers. |
71% women in 2019. The decrease in the proportion of employees over 50 years of age is explained by the higher uptake (over 50%) of voluntary redundancy measures in this age band. The decrease in the proportion of employees under 30 years of age is explained by the end of temporary contracts. |
| Workforce turnover |
% voluntary and non voluntary turnover |
Measured as the number of leavers as a percentage of the average number of Group employees in the year. The number of leavers excludes temporary contracts and death in service. Voluntary turnover occurs when employees choose to leave (e.g. resignation, retirement, voluntary redundancy) and non voluntary turnover occurs when employees leave for reasons other than a personal decision (e.g. compulsory redundancy, dismissal). The table on the previous page shows the overall breakdown of turnover by age and gender. |
The overall annual turnover in 2020 was 21% – a total of 13,654 employees, of which 3,456 were non-voluntary leavers. This compares to 9% in 2019, a total of 6,206 of which 1,372 were non voluntary leavers. The increase in turnover was due to the unfortunate but necessary resizing of the business due to COVID-19. A recruitment freeze across the Group in 2020 also impacted turnover. Over 88% of total Group turnover was at British Airways, the largest employer within the Group, mostly through voluntary measures. |
www.iairgroup.com 75
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
| Key: Green is GRI CORE | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainability section | Sustainability subsection | GRI Standard | Other frameworks |
| Governance | Sustainability strategy, governance | 102-43, -44, -46, -47, -48 | |
| Governance | Supply chain governance and management | 308-2, 414-2 | |
| Governance | Ethics and integrity | 102-16, 102-17, 205-1, -2, -3 | |
| Governance | Sustainability risks & opportunities | 102-11, 102-15 | |
| Governance | Stakeholder engagement | 102-13, 102-43, -44 | |
| Planet | Climate change impacts, commitments, roadmap |
305-1, -2, -3, -4, -5 See next table |
UK SECR TR-AL-110a1, -a2 |
| Planet | Noise and air quality | 305-7 | |
| People and Prosperity | Workforce overview | 403-4, 408-1, 409-1 | |
| People and Prosperity | Inclusion and diversity | 406-1 | |
| People and Prosperity | Community engagement and support | 102-13, 201-1 | |
| Relevant Planet metrics | Partial/full alignment with GRI standard | SASB | |
| Scope 1 | 305-1 | TR-AL-110a | |
| Scope 2 | 305-2 | ||
| Scope 3 | 305-3 | ||
| Emissions intensity | 305-4 | ||
| Electricity, energy | 302-1 | ||
| Jet fuel use | 301-1 | ||
| GHG reduction initiatives | 305-5 | ||
| Waste | 306-1 (2020), 306-2 (2020), 306-3 (2020) | ||
| Relevant People metrics | Partial/full alignment with GRI standard | ||
| Employment | 102-7 | ||
| Headcount | 102-7 | ||
| Employment composition | 102-8 | ||
| Employees by country | 102-8 | ||
| Gender diversity | 405-1 | ||
| Age diversity | 405-1 | ||
| Workforce turnover | 401-1 | ||
| Social dialogue and trade unions | 102-41 | TR-AL-310a1 | |
| Hours of training | 404-1 | ||
| Lost Time Injury (LTI) frequency rate | 403-9 | ||
| Fatalities | 403-9 |
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) – recommended disclosures
opportunities.
related risks.
Section of the Annual Report TCFD-related information in the section Page reference Chairman's letter and Q&A Strategy (b) See pages 3-5 Business model Strategy (b) See page 11 Engaging with our stakeholders Strategy (b) See pages 12-17 Sustainability A.1. Strategy Strategy (b) See pages 46-48 Sustainability A.2. Governance Governance (a, b) See page 49
Sustainability B.1. Climate impacts Metrics (a, b, c) See pages 62-64
commitments Metrics (a, b, c) See page 64 Sustainability B.3. Climate change roadmap Metrics (a, b, c) See pages 65-67 Risk Management and principal risk factors Governance (a, b), Risk (a, b, c) See pages 78-88
short-, medium- and long-term.
businesses, strategy and financial planning.
climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario.
integrated into the organisation's overall risk management.
opportunities and performance against targets.
Governance (b), Strategy (a, b, c),
a. Describe the Board's oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities.
b.Describe the organisation's processes for managing climate-related risks.
opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process.
b.Describe management's role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and
b.Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation's
c. Describe the resilience of the organisation's strategy, taking into consideration different
a. Describe the organisation's processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks.
c. Describe how processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks are
b.Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2 and, if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, and the
a. Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate-related risks and
c. Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related risks and
Risk (b, c), Metrics (a, b) See pages 52-58
www.iairgroup.com 77
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
a. Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the
See below for where relevant information can be found in the Annual Report.
TCFD section TCFD recommendation
Governance
Strategy
material.
Risk management
climate-related risks.
Metrics and targets
opportunities
Disclose the organisation's governance around climaterelated risks and opportunities.
Disclose the actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation's businesses, strategy and financial planning where such information is
Disclose how the organisation identifies, assesses and manages
Disclose the metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant climate-related risks and opportunities where such information is material.
Sustainability A.5. Sustainability risks and
Sustainability B.2. Climate change
76 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
See below for where relevant information can be found in the Annual Report.
Summary of alignment with external frameworks
Governance Supply chain governance and management 308-2, 414-2
Governance Sustainability risks & opportunities 102-11, 102-15 Governance Stakeholder engagement 102-13, 102-43, -44
People and Prosperity Workforce overview 403-4, 408-1, 409-1
Relevant Planet metrics Partial/full alignment with GRI standard SASB Scope 1 305-1 TR-AL-110a
Social dialogue and trade unions 102-41 TR-AL-310a1
76 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Planet Noise and air quality 305-7
People and Prosperity Inclusion and diversity 406-1 People and Prosperity Community engagement and support 102-13, 201-1
Waste 306-1 (2020), 306-2 (2020), 306-3 (2020) Relevant People metrics Partial/full alignment with GRI standard
Planet Climate change impacts, commitments, roadmap
Scope 2 305-2 Scope 3 305-3 Emissions intensity 305-4 Electricity, energy 302-1 Jet fuel use 301-1 GHG reduction initiatives 305-5
Employment 102-7 Headcount 102-7 Employment composition 102-8 Employees by country 102-8 Gender diversity 405-1 Age diversity 405-1 Workforce turnover 401-1
Hours of training 404-1 Lost Time Injury (LTI) frequency rate 403-9 Fatalities 403-9
Governance Sustainability strategy, governance 102-43, -44, -46, -47, -48
Governance Ethics and integrity 102-16, 102-17, 205-1, -2, -3
Sustainability section Sustainability subsection GRI Standard Other frameworks
305-1, -2, -3, -4, -5 See next table
UK SECR TR-AL-110a1, -a2
Key: Green is GRI CORE
SUSTAINABILITY CONTINUED C. PEOPLE AND PROSPERITY
| TCFD section | TCFD recommendation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Governance | |||||||
| Disclose the organisation's | a. Describe the Board's oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities. | ||||||
| governance around climate related risks and opportunities. |
b.Describe management's role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities. |
||||||
| Strategy | |||||||
| Disclose the actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks |
a. Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the short-, medium- and long-term. |
||||||
| and opportunities on the organisation's businesses, strategy and financial planning |
b.Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation's businesses, strategy and financial planning. |
||||||
| where such information is material. |
c. Describe the resilience of the organisation's strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario. |
||||||
| Risk management | |||||||
| Disclose how the organisation | a. Describe the organisation's processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks. | ||||||
| identifies, assesses and manages | b.Describe the organisation's processes for managing climate-related risks. | ||||||
| climate-related risks. | c. Describe how processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organisation's overall risk management. |
||||||
| Metrics and targets | |||||||
| Disclose the metrics and targets | a. Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate-related risks and | ||||||
| used to assess and manage | opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process. | ||||||
| relevant climate-related risks and opportunities where such |
b.Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2 and, if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, and the related risks. |
||||||
| information is material. | c. Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets. |
||||||
| Section of the Annual Report | TCFD-related information in the section | Page reference | |||||
| Chairman's letter and Q&A | Strategy (b) | See pages 3-5 | |||||
| Business model | Strategy (b) | See page 11 | |||||
| Engaging with our stakeholders | Strategy (b) | See pages 12-17 | |||||
| Sustainability A.1. Strategy | Strategy (b) | See pages 46-48 | |||||
| Sustainability A.2. Governance | Governance (a, b) | See page 49 | |||||
| Sustainability A.5. Sustainability risks and opportunities |
Governance (b), Strategy (a, b, c), Risk (b, c), Metrics (a, b) See pages 52-58 |
||||||
| Sustainability B.1. Climate impacts | Metrics (a, b, c) | See pages 62-64 | |||||
| Sustainability B.2. Climate change commitments |
Metrics (a, b, c) | See page 64 | |||||
| Sustainability B.3. Climate change roadmap | Metrics (a, b, c) | See pages 65-67 | |||||
| Risk Management and principal risk factors | Governance (a, b), Risk (a, b, c) | See pages 78-88 |
www.iairgroup.com 77
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for ensuring that IAG has an appropriate risk management framework, including the determination of the nature and extent of risk it is willing to take to achieve its strategic objectives. The Board has oversight of the Group's operations to ensure that internal controls are in place and operate effectively. Management is responsible for the effective operation of the internal controls and execution of the agreed risk mitigation plans.
The Group has an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) policy which has been approved by the Board. This policy sets the framework for a comprehensive risk management process and methodology, ensuring a robust identification and assessment of the risks facing the Group, including emerging risks. Enterprise risks are assessed and plotted on an Enterprise risk map (with individual risk maps produced for each operating company and relevant function, such as IAG Tech and IAG Group Business Services, and for the overall Group). This process is led by the Management Committee and best practices are shared across the Group.
This year, in response to the pandemic crisis, the risk management framework has further evolved to: develop the Group's assessment of the interdependencies of risks; built on scenario planning to quantify risk impact under different assumptions; and consider the risks within the Group's risk map that have increased either as a result of the external environment or as a result of decisions made by the business in response to the external environment. The process adopted this year has helped the Board and management to respond quickly to the new and rapidly changing risk landscape, enabling clear understanding and identification of emerging risks arising from the impact of the pandemic and of how the pandemic has affected existing risks included within the Group's existing risk maps.
Across the Group, risk owners are responsible for identifying potential risks and appropriately managing the related business decisions within their area of responsibility. As the Group transforms, the level of change and agility required creates risks and opportunities. For these business transformational risks, business
owners are assigned, and the business will agree appropriate mitigations and timelines for implementation, following discussions with all relevant stakeholders. All risks are assessed for likelihood and impact against the Group's three-year Business Plan and strategy. Key controls and mitigations are documented including appropriate response plans. Where risk treatments require time to implement, short-term mitigations are assessed and the timeline to risk mitigation and consequent risk acceptance discussed and agreed. Every principal risk has clear Management Committee oversight.
As part of the risk management framework, potential emerging risks and longer-term threats are considered to identify new trends, competitor actions, regulations, governments' interventions, or business disruptors that could impact the Group's business strategy and plans. These emerging risks are monitored within the overall risk framework as 'on watch' until they are re-assessed to be no longer a potential threat to the business or where an assessment of the risk impact over the next two to three years can be made, and appropriate mitigations can be put in place. Following the pandemic impact, consideration of other high-impact, low likelihood risks have been discussed.
IAG considers risks to the Strategic Business Plan over the short term up to two years, medium term from three to five years and in the longer term beyond five years. Risk outcomes are quantified as the potential cash impact to the business plan over two years, as well as potential brand reputation, regulatory scrutiny and share price considerations.
The risk management framework is embedded across the Group. Risk maps are discussed, and risk potential impacts assessed for each operating company and Group functions that support the business, such as IAG Tech and IAG GBS, and at the Group level, and the enterprise risk function ensures consistency over the risk management process.
Risk maps are reviewed by each operating company's management committee, which considers the accuracy and completeness of the map, significant movements in risk and any changes required to the response plans addressing those risks. Where the Group's operating companies have a reliance on other parts
78 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
of the Group for services delivery, risks are reflected appropriately across risk maps to ensure accountability is clear. Each operating company's management committee confirms to its operating company board as to the identification, quantification and management of risks within its operating company as a whole at least annually.
The management committee of each operating company escalates risks that have a Group impact or require Group consideration in line with the Group ERM framework.
At the Group level, key risks from the operating companies, together with Group-wide risks, are maintained in a Group risk map. The IAG Management Committee reviews risk during the year including the Group risk map semiannually in advance of reviews by the Audit and Compliance Committee in accordance with the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code and the Spanish Good Governance Code for Listed Companies.
The IAG Board of Directors discusses risk and considers the risk environment as part of wider Board discussions at every meeting in addition to the bi-annual risk map review, including a review of the assessment of IAG's performance against its risk appetite, scenarios for assessment of viability and the outputs from the viability modelling. The Board has ongoing early sight of management consideration of potential scenarios to enable it to challenge subjectivities and confirm rationale.
IAG has a risk appetite framework which includes statements informing the business, either qualitatively or quantitatively, of the Board's appetite for certain risks. Each risk appetite statement formalises how performance is monitored either on a Group-wide basis or within major projects. The framework remained in place throughout the year, with the Board assessing its appetite to tolerance of certain risks through additional reviews with management. The highly regulated and commercially competitive environment, together with the businesses' operational complexity, exposes the Group to a number of risks. 2020 has heightened IAG's exposure to certain of these risks as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic's unprecedented impact on the travel and aviation industry. Management
remains focused on mitigating these risks at all levels in the business although many remain outside our control; for example, changes in political and economic environment, government restrictions over travel and movement of their citizens, governance requirements and regulations, external events causing operational disruption including civil unrest, adverse weather or pandemic, volatility in the markets and availability of funding and changes in the competitive landscape.
Risks are grouped into four categories: strategic, business and operational, financial including tax and treasury, compliance and regulatory risks.
Guidance is provided below on the key risks that may threaten the Group's business model, future performance, solvency and liquidity.
Where there are particular circumstances that mean that the risk is more likely to materialise, those circumstances are described below. No new principal risks were identified through the risk management discussions across the Group's businesses this year. Where the existing principal risks have been reconsidered to reflect the challenges faced by the Group following the COVID-19 pandemic impact, these are highlighted by the 'C19' symbol in the table below. Additional key business responses implemented by management are also set out.

The list is not intended to be exhaustive but does reflect those risks that the Board and Management Committee believe to be the most likely risks to have a material impact on the Group.
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for ensuring that IAG has an appropriate risk management framework, including the determination of the nature and extent of risk it is willing to take to achieve its strategic objectives. The Board has oversight of the Group's operations to ensure that internal controls are in place and operate effectively. Management is responsible for the effective operation of the internal controls and execution of the
environment
RISK MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS
Managing risk in an extremely
owners are assigned, and the business will agree appropriate mitigations and timelines for implementation, following discussions with all relevant stakeholders. All risks are assessed for likelihood and impact against the Group's three-year Business Plan and strategy. Key controls and mitigations are documented including appropriate response plans. Where risk treatments require time to implement, short-term mitigations are assessed and the timeline to risk mitigation and consequent risk acceptance discussed and agreed. Every principal risk has clear Management Committee oversight. As part of the risk management framework, potential emerging risks and longer-term threats are considered to identify new trends, competitor actions, regulations, governments' interventions, or business disruptors that could impact the Group's business strategy and plans. These emerging risks are monitored within the overall risk framework as 'on watch' until they are re-assessed to be no longer a potential threat to the business or where an assessment of the risk impact over the next two to three years can be made, and appropriate mitigations can be put in place. Following the pandemic impact, consideration of other high-impact, low likelihood risks have been discussed. IAG considers risks to the Strategic Business Plan over the short term up to two years, medium term from three to five years and in the longer term beyond five years. Risk outcomes are quantified as the potential cash impact to the business plan over two years, as well as potential brand reputation, regulatory scrutiny and share price considerations. The risk management framework is embedded across the Group. Risk maps are discussed, and risk potential impacts assessed for each operating company and Group functions that support the business, such as IAG Tech and IAG GBS, and at the Group level, and the enterprise risk function ensures consistency over the
of the Group for services delivery, risks are reflected appropriately across risk maps to ensure accountability is clear. Each operating company's management committee confirms to its operating company board as to the identification, quantification and management of risks within its operating company as
a whole at least annually.
Group ERM framework.
for Listed Companies.
rationale.
The management committee of each operating company escalates risks that have a Group impact or require Group consideration in line with the
At the Group level, key risks from the operating companies, together with Group-wide risks, are maintained in a Group risk map. The IAG Management Committee reviews risk during the year including the Group risk map semiannually in advance of reviews by the Audit and Compliance Committee in accordance with the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code and the Spanish Good Governance Code
The IAG Board of Directors discusses risk and considers the risk environment as part of wider Board discussions at every meeting in addition to the bi-annual risk map review, including a review of the assessment of IAG's performance against its risk appetite, scenarios for assessment of viability and the outputs from the viability modelling. The Board has ongoing early sight of management consideration of potential scenarios to enable it to challenge subjectivities and confirm
IAG has a risk appetite framework which includes statements informing the business, either qualitatively or
quantitatively, of the Board's appetite for certain risks. Each risk appetite statement formalises how performance is monitored either on a Group-wide basis or within major projects. The framework remained in place throughout the year, with the Board assessing its appetite to tolerance of certain risks through additional reviews with management. The highly regulated
environment, together with the businesses' operational complexity, exposes the Group to a number of risks. 2020 has heightened IAG's exposure to certain of these risks as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic's unprecedented impact on the travel and aviation industry. Management
and commercially competitive
risk management process. Risk maps are reviewed by each operating company's management committee, which considers the accuracy and completeness of the map, significant movements in risk and any changes required to the response plans addressing those risks. Where the Group's operating companies have a reliance on other parts
78 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
challenging and uncertain
agreed risk mitigation plans. The Group has an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) policy which has been approved by the Board. This policy sets the framework for a comprehensive
risk management process and methodology, ensuring a robust
across the Group.
identification and assessment of the risks facing the Group, including emerging risks. Enterprise risks are assessed and plotted on an Enterprise risk map (with individual risk maps produced for each operating company and relevant function, such as IAG Tech and IAG Group Business Services, and for the overall Group). This process is led by the Management Committee and best practices are shared
This year, in response to the pandemic crisis, the risk management framework has further evolved to: develop the Group's assessment of the interdependencies of risks; built on scenario planning to quantify risk impact under different assumptions; and consider the risks within the Group's risk map that have increased either as a result of the external environment or as a result of decisions made by the business in response to the external environment. The process adopted this year has helped the Board and management to respond quickly to the new and rapidly changing
risk landscape, enabling clear understanding and identification of emerging risks arising from the impact of the pandemic and of how the pandemic has affected existing risks included within
the Group's existing risk maps.
Across the Group, risk owners are responsible for identifying potential risks and appropriately managing the related business decisions within their area of responsibility. As the Group transforms, the level of change and agility required creates risks and opportunities. For these business transformational risks, business
Approach and process
market for supply of services.
Open competition and markets are in the long-term best interests of the airline industry and consumers. The Group seeks to mitigate the risk from government intervention or changes to the regulations that can have a significant impact on operations.

Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
www.iairgroup.com 79
Status The pandemic resulted in restrictions being imposed, which have required capacity adjustments, including fleet adjustments and new operating procedures to recommence flying. The operations of the Group's suppliers, including aircraft manufacturers, have also been impacted by the pandemic, which has increased the risk of significant business interruption, delays or disruptions, such as a temporary suspension of operations, a lack of availability of labour to support supplier operations and/or longer-term problems in maintaining supply, whether as a result of suppliers entering insolvency or otherwise. This may lead to shortages of business-critical services and/or increased costs to secure such services.
The Group continues to lobby and raise awareness of the negative impacts of ATC airspace restrictions and performance issues on the aviation sector and economies across Europe, particularly through a future recovery period.
The Group relies on the provision of airport infrastructure and is dependent on the timely delivery of appropriate facilities. A third runway expansion proposal at London Heathrow and additional facilities at Dublin Airport are among examples where the Group supports solutions that are efficient, cost effective and of value to our customers.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| IAG is dependent on the timely entry of new aircraft and the engine performance of aircraft to improve operational efficiency and resilience and support the delivery of the Group sustainability programme. |
Any sub-optimal service delivery or asset supplied by a critical supplier can impact on the Group airlines' operational and financial performance as well as disrupting our customers. Infrastructure decisions or changes in policy by governments, regulators or other entities could impact operations but are outside of the Group's control. London Heathrow has no spare runway capacity. An uncontrolled increase in the planned cost of expansion could result in increased landing charges. Airport charges represent a significant operating cost to the airlines and have an impact on operations. |
• The Group mitigates engine and fleet performance risks, including unacceptable levels of carbon emissions to the extent possible by working closely with the engine and fleet manufacturers, as well as retaining flexibility with existing aircraft return requirements. • The Group engages in regulatory reviews of supplier pricing, such as the UK Civil Aviation Authority's periodic review of charges at London Heathrow and London Gatwick airports. • The Group is active at an EU policy level and in consultations with airports covered by the EU Airport Changes Directive. • The Group pro-actively works with suppliers to ensure operations are maintained and the impact to their businesses understood, with mitigations implemented where necessary. • The Group procurement function has led an ongoing review of all critical contracts across the Group's businesses. |
| IAG is dependent on the timely, on-budget delivery of infrastructure changes, particularly at key airports. |
||
| IAG is dependent on resilience within the operations of ATC services to ensure that its flight operations are delivered as scheduled. |
||
| IAG is dependent on the performance and costs of critical third-party suppliers that provide services to our customers and the Group such as airport operators, border control and caterers. The impact of the pandemic on the Group's supply chain will also impact the Group where suppliers face ongoing financial stress or restructuring where they exit the |
RISK MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS CONTINUED

4. Digital disruption 1
digital customer experience, which together with the Group's exploitation of technology, reduces the impact digital disruptors can have.
5. Sustainable aviation 1
Status IAG was the first airline group to commit to a target of net zero carbon emissions by 2050, including adding management targets in current incentive arrangements. Sustainable Aviation, oneworld and Airlines for Europe have also all now committed to net zero emissions by 2050. There is an emerging trend of introduction of aviation "eco taxes" globally. The Group has accelerated the retirement of its aged fleet of Boeing 747s and Airbus A340s during 2020, in response to the pandemic. The Group also maintained its plans and initiatives to meet climate change commitments. IAG was an early adopter of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidelines for climate-related scenario analysis and climate-specific risk assessments. During 2020 the Group has updated its assessment of climate-related risks, by testing and revising the assumptions on updated forecasts for future business growth and the regulatory context and future carbon price. The Group has also embedded forecasting of its
While 2020 was a year of unprecedented disruption and uncertainty due the pandemic, other key aspects of aviation policy continued to be developed in relation to sustainability. In July the European Commission published a roadmap for its legislative initiative aimed at implementing the
Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), alongside the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.
IAG is committed to being the leading airline group in sustainability. This means that environmental
considerations are integrated into the business strategy at every level and the Group uses its influence to drive progress across the industry.
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
Competitors and new entrants to the travel market may use technology more effectively and disrupt the Group's
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
business model.
climate impacts into its strategic, business and financial planning processes.
See the Sustainability risk and opportunities section
Increasing global concern about climate change and the impact of carbon affects Group airlines' performance as customers seek alternative methods of transport or reduce their levels of travel.
New taxes and increasing price of carbon impact on demand for air travel. Customers may choose to reduce the
amount they fly.
Technology disruptors may use tools to position themselves between our brands
and our customers.
Status The Group has established an IAG Tech function which brings together the digital and IT departments from across the Group under the Group's Chief Information Officer (CIO). All of the Group's businesses have a Chief Digital and Information Officer (CDIO) who represents their business within IAG Tech. This has strengthened IAG Tech's focus on understanding business requirements, helping to transform the Group's businesses and deliver a
• IAG Tech is responsible for digital and IT.
management committee.
• IAG Customer Steering Group.
disruptors.
• Operating companies' CDIOs are members of the IAG Tech
• The Group continues to develop platforms such as the New Distribution Capability, changing distribution arrangements
• IAG climate change strategy to meet target of net zero
• Fleet replacement plan will introduce aircraft into the fleet that are up to 40 per cent more carbon efficient. • IAG investment in sustainable aviation fuels of
US\$400 million, including British Airways' partnership with
• Participating in CORSIA, the ICAO global aviation carbon
• British Airways offsets all UK domestic flight carbon
• Management incentives aligned to IAG's targets. • Partnering with ZeroAvia to explore hydrogen-powered
carbon emissions by 2050.
emissions.
Velocys.
aircraft technology.
offsetting scheme.
• The Group's CIO and Chief Transformation Officer are members of the IAG Management Committee.
and moving from indirect to direct channels. • IAG Tech continues to create early engagement and leverages new opportunities with start-ups and technology
2 3
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
2
www.iairgroup.com 81
Status The Group's ability to attract and secure bookings, and therefore revenue depends on the public recognition of the Group's airlines' brands and their associated reputation. The Group's airlines brands are, and will continue to be, vulnerable to adverse market or customer perception. Reliability, including on-time performance, is a key element of the brands and of each customer's experience. IAG remains focused on strengthening its customercentricity to ensure that its operating companies continue to adapt and focus their business models to meet changing customer expectations. The Group's airlines have implemented strict hygiene and social distancing measures to ensure customer and employee safety in line with EASA regulations. British Airways was awarded a Skytrax 4-star Airline Safety rating in November, the first airline to receive such a rating.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Erosion of the brands, through either a single event or a series of events, may adversely impact the Group's leadership position with customers and ultimately affect future revenue and profitability. If the Group is unable to meet the expectations of its customers and does not engage effectively to maintain their emotional attachment, then the Group may face brand erosion and loss of market share. |
The Group's brands are well positioned in their respective markets and have significant commercial value. Any change in engagement or travel preferences could impact the financial performance of the Group. IAG will continue to focus on its customer propositions to ensure competitiveness in its chosen priority customer demand spaces and to ensure that it adapts to meet changing customer expectations. The Group is clear on the key levers to improve brand perception and satisfaction for each of its operating company brands. |
• All IAG airlines are considered within the brand portfolio review. • Brand initiatives for each operating company have been identified and are aligned to the Strategic Business Plan. • Product investment to enhance the customer experience supports the brand propositions and is provided for in the Strategic Business Plan. • All airlines track and report internally on their Net Promoter Score (NPS) to measure customer satisfaction. • IAG Customer Steering Group meets monthly and shares initiatives. • New hygiene protocols are being adopted across the Group's airlines to address regulatory requirements resulting from the pandemic. • Enhanced disruption management tools within airlines to allow customers to manage their travel preferences. • The Group's global loyalty strategy builds customer loyalty within IAG airlines. • The Group's focus on sustainability and sustainable aviation including the IAG Climate Change strategy to meet the target of net zero carbon emissions by 2050. • Robust portfolio process to determine the right investments |

government initiatives, represents the Group's interest and
forecasts likely changes to laws and regulations.
Status The scale of governmental support and aviation-specific state aid measures have varied by market and the potential consequential impact to the competitive landscape is under continuous assessment. Governmental restrictions, introduced to address the pandemic risk, have been fragmented and volatile and have required significant agility within our networks to manage the impact on our customers and business. The Group announced plans in 2019 to acquire Air Europa, which is owned by Globalia, subject to regulatory approvals. In November 2020, the Group reached an amended agreement with Globalia, which is still subject to the satisfactory negotiation with Sociedad Estatal de Participaciones (SEPI) regarding the non-financial terms associated with the financial support provided by SEPI to Air Europa in 2020. The acquisition is still subject to approval by the European Commission.
across the Group.
The Group continues to monitor and discuss the negative impacts of government policies such as the imposition of Air Passenger Duty (APD).
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Competitor capacity growth in excess of demand growth could materially impact margins. |
The markets in which the Group operates are highly competitive. The Group faces direct competition on its routes, as well as from indirect flights, charter services and other modes of transport. Some competitors have other competitive advantages such as government support or benefits from insolvency protection. Regulation of the airline industry covers many of the Group's activities including route flying rights, airport landing rights, |
• The IAG Management Committee meets weekly. Additional Management Committee meetings, to address strategic issues arising from the responses of regulators and governments to |
| Any failure of a joint business or a joint business partner could adversely impact the Group's airline business operations and financial performance. |
the pandemic, were convened throughout the year. • The Board of Directors discusses strategy throughout the year and dedicates two days per year to undertake a detailed review of the Group's strategic plans. Similar to the additional Management Committee meetings, additional Board meetings were convened throughout the year. |
|
| Some of the markets in which the Group operates remain regulated by governments, in some instances controlling capacity and/or restricting |
||
| • The Group strategy function supports the Management Committee by identifying where resources can be devoted to exploit profitable opportunities. |
||
| market entry. Changes in such restrictions may have a negative impact on margins. |
departure taxes, security and environmental controls. The Group's ability to comply with and influence |
• The airlines' revenue management departments and systems optimise market share and yield through pricing and inventory management activity. Additional processes and reviews have allowed daily and weekly route analysis as required to respond to the rapidly changing environment resulting from government actions. |
| Governments' support schemes for the aviation sector create distortionary effects across the markets in which IAG's airlines operate. |
changes to regulations is key to maintaining operational and financial performance. |
|
| • The Group maintains rigorous cost control and targeted investment to remain competitive. The Group Procurement function has led an ongoing review of all critical contracts. |
||
| • The Group has restructured its businesses and operations to meet the challenge of the current environment. |
||
| • The portfolio of brands provides flexibility as capacity can be deployed at short notice as needed. |
||
| • The IAG Management Committee regularly reviews the commercial performance of joint business agreements. |
||
| • The Group's airlines review their relationships with business partners supported where appropriate by the Group strategy function. |
||
| • The Group's government affairs department monitors |
80 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
C19
2 3
C19
• All IAG airlines are considered within the brand
Score (NPS) to measure customer satisfaction. • IAG Customer Steering Group meets monthly and
of net zero carbon emissions by 2050.
were convened throughout the year.
exploit profitable opportunities.
resulting from government actions.
deployed at short notice as needed.
strategy function.
• New hygiene protocols are being adopted across the Group's airlines to address regulatory requirements resulting
• Enhanced disruption management tools within airlines to allow customers to manage their travel preferences. • The Group's global loyalty strategy builds customer loyalty
• The Group's focus on sustainability and sustainable aviation including the IAG Climate Change strategy to meet the target
• Robust portfolio process to determine the right investments
• The IAG Management Committee meets weekly. Additional Management Committee meetings, to address strategic issues arising from the responses of regulators and governments to the pandemic, were convened throughout the year. • The Board of Directors discusses strategy throughout the year and dedicates two days per year to undertake a detailed review of the Group's strategic plans. Similar to the additional Management Committee meetings, additional Board meetings
• The Group strategy function supports the Management Committee by identifying where resources can be devoted to
• The Group maintains rigorous cost control and targeted investment to remain competitive. The Group Procurement function has led an ongoing review of all critical contracts. • The Group has restructured its businesses and operations to
• The IAG Management Committee regularly reviews the commercial performance of joint business agreements. • The Group's airlines review their relationships with business partners supported where appropriate by the Group
• The Group's government affairs department monitors government initiatives, represents the Group's interest and
forecasts likely changes to laws and regulations.
• The portfolio of brands provides flexibility as capacity can be
meet the challenge of the current environment.
• The airlines' revenue management departments and systems optimise market share and yield through pricing and inventory management activity. Additional processes and reviews have allowed daily and weekly route analysis as required to respond to the rapidly changing environment
• Brand initiatives for each operating company have been identified and are aligned to the Strategic Business Plan. • Product investment to enhance the customer experience supports the brand propositions and is provided for in the
• All airlines track and report internally on their Net Promoter
portfolio review.
shares initiatives.
from the pandemic.
within IAG airlines.
across the Group.
Strategic Business Plan.
Strategic continued
Erosion of the brands, through either a single event or a series of events, may adversely impact the Group's leadership position with customers and ultimately affect future revenue and profitability.
If the Group is unable to meet the expectations of its customers and does not engage effectively to maintain their emotional attachment, then the Group may face brand erosion and loss of
approval by the European Commission.
Competitor capacity growth in excess of demand growth could materially
Any failure of a joint business or a joint business partner could adversely impact the Group's airline business operations and financial performance. Some of the markets in which the Group operates remain regulated by governments, in some instances controlling capacity and/or restricting market entry. Changes in such restrictions may have a negative impact
Governments' support schemes for the aviation sector create distortionary effects across the markets in which
impact margins.
on margins.
IAG's airlines operate.
market share.
2. Brand reputation 1
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
RISK MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS CONTINUED
The Group's brands are well positioned in their respective markets and have significant commercial value. Any change in engagement or travel preferences could impact the financial
The Group is clear on the key levers to improve brand perception and satisfaction for each of its operating
and volatile and have required significant agility within our networks to manage the impact on our customers and business.
The markets in which the Group operates are highly competitive. The Group faces direct competition on its routes, as well as from indirect flights, charter services and other modes of transport. Some competitors have other competitive advantages such as government support or benefits from
Regulation of the airline industry covers many of the Group's activities including route flying rights, airport landing rights,
insolvency protection.
departure taxes, security and environmental controls. The Group's ability to comply with and influence changes to regulations is key to maintaining operational and financial performance.
3. Competition, consolidation and government regulation 1
Status The scale of governmental support and aviation-specific state aid measures have varied by market and the potential consequential impact to the competitive landscape is under continuous assessment. Governmental restrictions, introduced to address the pandemic risk, have been fragmented
The Group announced plans in 2019 to acquire Air Europa, which is owned by Globalia, subject to regulatory approvals. In November 2020, the Group reached an amended agreement with Globalia, which is still subject to the satisfactory negotiation with Sociedad Estatal de Participaciones (SEPI) regarding the non-financial terms associated with the financial support provided by SEPI to Air Europa in 2020. The acquisition is still subject to
80 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
The Group continues to monitor and discuss the negative impacts of government policies such as the imposition of Air Passenger Duty (APD).
performance of the Group. IAG will continue to focus on its customer propositions to ensure competitiveness in its chosen priority customer demand spaces and to ensure that it adapts to meet changing customer expectations.
company brands.
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
Status The Group's ability to attract and secure bookings, and therefore revenue depends on the public recognition of the Group's airlines' brands and their associated reputation. The Group's airlines brands are, and will continue to be, vulnerable to adverse market or customer perception. Reliability, including on-time performance, is a key element of the brands and of each customer's experience. IAG remains focused on strengthening its customercentricity to ensure that its operating companies continue to adapt and focus their business models to meet changing customer expectations. The Group's airlines have implemented strict hygiene and social distancing measures to ensure customer and employee safety in line with EASA regulations. British Airways was awarded a Skytrax 4-star Airline Safety rating in November, the first airline to receive such a rating.

Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Status The Group has established an IAG Tech function which brings together the digital and IT departments from across the Group under the Group's Chief Information Officer (CIO). All of the Group's businesses have a Chief Digital and Information Officer (CDIO) who represents their business within IAG Tech. This has strengthened IAG Tech's focus on understanding business requirements, helping to transform the Group's businesses and deliver a digital customer experience, which together with the Group's exploitation of technology, reduces the impact digital disruptors can have.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Technology disruptors may use tools to position themselves between our brands and our customers. |
Competitors and new entrants to the travel market may use technology more effectively and disrupt the Group's business model. |
• IAG Tech is responsible for digital and IT. • Operating companies' CDIOs are members of the IAG Tech management committee. • The Group's CIO and Chief Transformation Officer are members of the IAG Management Committee. • IAG Customer Steering Group. • The Group continues to develop platforms such as the New Distribution Capability, changing distribution arrangements and moving from indirect to direct channels. • IAG Tech continues to create early engagement and leverages new opportunities with start-ups and technology disruptors. |

www.iairgroup.com 81
Status IAG was the first airline group to commit to a target of net zero carbon emissions by 2050, including adding management targets in current incentive arrangements. Sustainable Aviation, oneworld and Airlines for Europe have also all now committed to net zero emissions by 2050. There is an emerging trend of introduction of aviation "eco taxes" globally. The Group has accelerated the retirement of its aged fleet of Boeing 747s and Airbus A340s during 2020, in response to the pandemic. The Group also maintained its plans and initiatives to meet climate change commitments.
IAG was an early adopter of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidelines for climate-related scenario analysis and climate-specific risk assessments. During 2020 the Group has updated its assessment of climate-related risks, by testing and revising the assumptions on updated forecasts for future business growth and the regulatory context and future carbon price. The Group has also embedded forecasting of its climate impacts into its strategic, business and financial planning processes.
While 2020 was a year of unprecedented disruption and uncertainty due the pandemic, other key aspects of aviation policy continued to be developed in relation to sustainability. In July the European Commission published a roadmap for its legislative initiative aimed at implementing the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), alongside the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Increasing global concern about climate change and the impact of carbon affects Group airlines' performance as customers seek alternative methods of transport or reduce their levels of travel. |
IAG is committed to being the leading airline group in sustainability. This means that environmental considerations are integrated into the business strategy at every level and the Group uses its influence to drive progress across the industry. |
• IAG climate change strategy to meet target of net zero carbon emissions by 2050. • British Airways offsets all UK domestic flight carbon emissions. • Fleet replacement plan will introduce aircraft into the fleet |
| New taxes and increasing price of carbon impact on demand for air travel. Customers may choose to reduce the amount they fly. |
that are up to 40 per cent more carbon efficient. • IAG investment in sustainable aviation fuels of US\$400 million, including British Airways' partnership with Velocys. • Management incentives aligned to IAG's targets. |
|
| • Partnering with ZeroAvia to explore hydrogen-powered aircraft technology. |
||
| • Participating in CORSIA, the ICAO global aviation carbon offsetting scheme. |
||
The safety and security of customers and employees is a fundamental value to the Group.
RISK MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS CONTINUED

light of the pandemic.
cash.
Any breakdowns in the
of the airlines.
behaviours.
forward.
bargaining process with the unionised workforces may result in subsequent strike action which may disrupt operations and adversely affect business performance and customer perceptions
Our people are not engaged, or they do not display the required leadership
The Group businesses fail to attract, motivate, retain or develop its people to deliver service and brand excellence. Digital and agile skillsets are not in place
transformation and drive the business
to execute on the required
The dependency on IT systems for key business and customer processes is increasing and the failure of a critical system may cause significant disruption to the operation and lost revenue. The level of transformational change at pace required by the Group's airlines may result in disruption to operations as the legacy environment is addressed. Obsolescence within the IAG Tech estate could result in service outages and/or operational disruption or delays in implementation of the Group's transformation, particularly if the Group needs to defer investment to preserve
8. IT systems and IT infrastructure 1
Status The Group recognises the importance of technology across the business and has brought all of its digital and IT resources together into IAG Tech, reporting to the Chief Information Officer, a member of the IAG Management Committee. The IAG Tech management committee has established a new governance structure that is mirrored across into the Group's businesses to ensure that IT investment and operating company requirements are appropriately prioritised and delivered. There is an increased focus on service delivery and services management as the Group addresses its legacy environment. Plans and investment to upgrade or transform away from obsolete systems or architecture have been subject to ongoing review in the
9. People, culture and employee relations 1
Status Additional safety procedures have been introduced to protect the Group's staff and customers, in line with industry recommendations. Where
Employee consultations have been undertaken as required and appropriate in relation to restructuring necessitated by the pandemic. Where possible, the Group has utilised government wage support schemes. In November 2020, the Unite union representing the Group's cargo handling business in the UK balloted its members for industrial action in December. An agreement was reached in January 2021 between the union and the cargo business. The resilience and engagement of our people and leaders has been critical through the pandemic period to ensuring the Group is best positioned to resume operations and adapt as needed to the uncertain external environment. As the Group rapidly transforms all its operations to adjust for the new
In 2021, the Company will be bringing a new remuneration policy to shareholders for approval that will be closely aligned to the Company's strategy
All Operating Companies recognise the critical role that their employees will play in the recovery and transformation of the Group and they are
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
baggage operators.
possible, the Group's staff are working from home and in line with governments' recommendations.
environment, the engagement and support of the Group's employees is going to be a critical enabler.
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
airlines.
the pace required.
The Group has a large unionised workforce represented by a number of different trades unions. IAG relies on the successful agreement of collective bargaining arrangements across its operating companies to operate its
The right skillsets and culture are needed to transform our businesses at
and will support the aim of attracting and retaining exceptional talent across the Group.
focusing on improving organisational health and employee engagement.
IAG is dependent on IT systems for most key business processes. Increasingly, the integration within IAG's supply chain means that the Group is also dependent on the performance of suppliers' IT infrastructure e.g. airport
3
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
3
C19
www.iairgroup.com 83
C19
• IAG Tech works with the Group operating companies to deliver digital and IT change initiatives to enhance security
• Operating companies' IT Boards are in place to review
• Reversion plans are developed for migrations on critical
• System controls, disaster recovery and business continuity arrangements exist to mitigate the risk of a critical system
• Robust portfolio process to determine the right investments
• Collective bargaining takes place on a regular basis with the operating companies' human resources specialists, who have
• Succession planning within and across operating companies. • IAG Tech refresh of professional development framework. • Operating companies' engagement surveys and subsequent
a strong skillset in industrial relations. • Operating companies' people strategies.
action plans. • IAG Code of Conduct.
• IAG Tech leadership and professional development
and stability.
framework.
failure.
delivery timelines.
IT infrastructure.
across the Group.
Status The risks from cyber threats has been heightened in the year as many of the Group's employees and suppliers' employees moved to workingfrom-home arrangements in line with governments' advice and restrictions, requiring analyses of security arrangements and authentications over access to corporate environments. More widely, the external environment saw an increase in the frequency of phishing attacks as cyber criminals attempted to take advantage of remote working practices.
The regulatory regimes associated with data and infrastructure security are also becoming more complex with different regulators applying different framework approaches and guidance for reporting. The Group airlines are subject to the requirements of privacy legislation such as GDPR and the National Information Security Directive (NISD).
In relation to the theft of customer data in 2018 the UK Information Commissioner's Office issued a final penalty notice to British Airways. Despite significant reductions in the Group's capital expenditure, in response to the liquidity impact of the pandemic, investment in cyber security systems remained at levels originally planned.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| The Group could face financial loss, disruption or damage to brand reputation arising from an attack on the Group's systems by criminals, foreign governments or hacktivists. |
The cyber threat environment remains challenging for all organisations, including the airline industry. Cyber threat actors, criminals, foreign governments and hacktivists have the capacity and motivation to attack the airline industry for financial gain and other political or social reasons. The fast-moving nature of this risk means that the Group will always retain a level of vulnerability. |
• The Group has a Board-approved cyber strategy that drives investment and operational planning. This is regularly reviewed by the IAG Audit and Compliance Committee, IAG Management Committee and the IAG Tech leadership. • There is oversight of critical systems and suppliers to ensure |
| If the Group does not adequately protect customer and employee data, it could breach regulation and face penalties and loss of customer trust. Changes in working practices and environments for the Group's employees and third-party suppliers could result in new weaknesses in the cyber and data security control environment. |
that the Group understands the data it holds, that it is secure, and regulations are adhered to. • A cyber risk management framework ensures the risk is reviewed across all operating companies. • The Group Cyber Governance board assesses the portfolio of cyber projects quarterly and each operating company reviews their own cyber projects on a quarterly basis. • The IAG Chief Information Security Office supports the Group businesses providing assurance and expertise around strategy, policy, training and security operations for the Group. • Threat Intelligence is used to analyse cyber risks to the Group. • Data Protection Officers are in place in all operating companies, coordinated through a Group wide Privacy Steering Group. • New working practices have been reviewed to ensure the integrity of the cyber and data security environment and controls with additional oversight measures being |
implemented as required. • All third-party suppliers have confirmed their adherence to IAG security requirements within any revised security protocols.

Status The outbreak of the pandemic in 2020 resulted in an unprecedented level of disruption to the aviation sector, as well as global economic impacts. Other potential high-impact, low-likelihood events have been considered that could have the potential to disrupt IAG and/or the aviation sector. Many of these events remain outside of the Group's control such as adverse weather, another pandemic, civil unrest or terrorist event seen in cities served by the Group's airlines.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| An event causing significant network disruption or the inability to promptly |
The Group's airlines may be disrupted by a number of different events. |
• Management has business continuity plans to mitigate this risk to the extent feasible with focus on operational and financial resilience and customer and colleague safety and recovery. • Resilience to minimise the impact of ATC airspace restrictions and strike action on the Group's customers and operations |
| recover from short term disruptions may result in lost revenue, customer disruption and additional costs to the Group. |
A single prolonged event, or a series of events in close succession, impact on the Group's airlines' operational capability and brand strength. |
|
| The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to continue to have an adverse effect on the Group over the period of the Business Plan, as would any future pandemic outbreak or other material event that results in the imposition of governments' restrictions on travel and the movement of its populations. |
The Group needs to adhere to local governments' restrictions and regulations especially related to safety and public health and is therefore sensitive to any consequential impact to demand. |
are in place. |
82 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
2 3
3
C19
C19
• The Group has a Board-approved cyber strategy that drives investment and operational planning. This is regularly reviewed by the IAG Audit and Compliance Committee, IAG Management Committee and the IAG Tech leadership. • There is oversight of critical systems and suppliers to ensure that the Group understands the data it holds, that it is secure,
• A cyber risk management framework ensures the risk is
• The Group Cyber Governance board assesses the portfolio of cyber projects quarterly and each operating company reviews
• The IAG Chief Information Security Office supports the Group businesses providing assurance and expertise around strategy, policy, training and security operations for the
• Threat Intelligence is used to analyse cyber risks to the Group. • Data Protection Officers are in place in all operating companies, coordinated through a Group wide Privacy
• New working practices have been reviewed to ensure the integrity of the cyber and data security environment and controls with additional oversight measures being
• All third-party suppliers have confirmed their adherence to IAG security requirements within any revised security
• Management has business continuity plans to mitigate this risk to the extent feasible with focus on operational and financial resilience and customer and colleague safety and
• Resilience to minimise the impact of ATC airspace restrictions and strike action on the Group's customers and operations
and regulations are adhered to.
Group.
Steering Group.
protocols.
recovery.
are in place.
implemented as required.
reviewed across all operating companies.
their own cyber projects on a quarterly basis.
Business and operational
6. Cyber attack and data security
attempted to take advantage of remote working practices.
National Information Security Directive (NISD).
systems remained at levels originally planned.
The Group could face financial loss, disruption or damage to brand reputation arising from an attack on the Group's systems by criminals, foreign governments or hacktivists.
If the Group does not adequately protect customer and employee data, it could breach regulation and face penalties and loss of customer trust. Changes in working practices and environments for the Group's employees and third-party suppliers could result in new weaknesses in the cyber and data security control environment.
cities served by the Group's airlines.
An event causing significant network disruption or the inability to promptly recover from short term disruptions may result in lost revenue, customer disruption and additional costs to the
The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to continue to have an adverse effect on the Group over the period of the Business Plan, as would any future pandemic outbreak or other material event that results in the imposition of governments' restrictions on travel and the movement of its populations.
Group.
The safety and security of customers and employees is a fundamental value to the Group.
RISK MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS CONTINUED
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
a level of vulnerability.
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
demand.
Status The risks from cyber threats has been heightened in the year as many of the Group's employees and suppliers' employees moved to workingfrom-home arrangements in line with governments' advice and restrictions, requiring analyses of security arrangements and authentications over access to corporate environments. More widely, the external environment saw an increase in the frequency of phishing attacks as cyber criminals
The regulatory regimes associated with data and infrastructure security are also becoming more complex with different regulators applying different framework approaches and guidance for reporting. The Group airlines are subject to the requirements of privacy legislation such as GDPR and the
In relation to the theft of customer data in 2018 the UK Information Commissioner's Office issued a final penalty notice to British Airways. Despite significant reductions in the Group's capital expenditure, in response to the liquidity impact of the pandemic, investment in cyber security
7. Event causing significant network disruption 1
Status The outbreak of the pandemic in 2020 resulted in an unprecedented level of disruption to the aviation sector, as well as global economic impacts. Other potential high-impact, low-likelihood events have been considered that could have the potential to disrupt IAG and/or the aviation sector. Many of these events remain outside of the Group's control such as adverse weather, another pandemic, civil unrest or terrorist event seen in
82 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
The Group's airlines may be disrupted by a number of different events. A single prolonged event, or a series of events in close succession, impact on the Group's airlines' operational capability and brand strength. The Group needs to adhere to local governments' restrictions and regulations especially related to safety and public health and is therefore sensitive to any consequential impact to
The cyber threat environment remains challenging for all organisations, including the airline industry. Cyber threat actors, criminals, foreign governments and hacktivists have the capacity and motivation to attack the airline industry for financial gain and other political or social reasons. The fast-moving nature of this risk means that the Group will always retain

Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Status The Group recognises the importance of technology across the business and has brought all of its digital and IT resources together into IAG Tech, reporting to the Chief Information Officer, a member of the IAG Management Committee. The IAG Tech management committee has established a new governance structure that is mirrored across into the Group's businesses to ensure that IT investment and operating company requirements are appropriately prioritised and delivered. There is an increased focus on service delivery and services management as the Group addresses its legacy environment. Plans and investment to upgrade or transform away from obsolete systems or architecture have been subject to ongoing review in the light of the pandemic.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| The dependency on IT systems for key business and customer processes is increasing and the failure of a critical system may cause significant disruption to the operation and lost revenue. |
IAG is dependent on IT systems for most key business processes. Increasingly, the integration within IAG's supply chain means that the Group is also dependent on the performance of suppliers' IT infrastructure e.g. airport baggage operators. |
• IAG Tech works with the Group operating companies to deliver digital and IT change initiatives to enhance security and stability. • Operating companies' IT Boards are in place to review delivery timelines. |
| The level of transformational change at pace required by the Group's airlines may result in disruption to operations as |
• IAG Tech leadership and professional development framework. • Reversion plans are developed for migrations on critical |
|
| the legacy environment is addressed. | IT infrastructure. | |
| Obsolescence within the IAG Tech estate could result in service outages and/or operational disruption or delays in implementation of the Group's transformation, particularly if the Group needs to defer investment to preserve cash. |
• System controls, disaster recovery and business continuity arrangements exist to mitigate the risk of a critical system failure. |
|
| • Robust portfolio process to determine the right investments across the Group. |
||
| 9. People, culture and employee relations | 1 |

www.iairgroup.com 83
Status Additional safety procedures have been introduced to protect the Group's staff and customers, in line with industry recommendations. Where possible, the Group's staff are working from home and in line with governments' recommendations.
Employee consultations have been undertaken as required and appropriate in relation to restructuring necessitated by the pandemic. Where possible, the Group has utilised government wage support schemes. In November 2020, the Unite union representing the Group's cargo handling business in the UK balloted its members for industrial action in December. An agreement was reached in January 2021 between the union and the cargo business. The resilience and engagement of our people and leaders has been critical through the pandemic period to ensuring the Group is best positioned to resume operations and adapt as needed to the uncertain external environment. As the Group rapidly transforms all its operations to adjust for the new
environment, the engagement and support of the Group's employees is going to be a critical enabler. In 2021, the Company will be bringing a new remuneration policy to shareholders for approval that will be closely aligned to the Company's strategy and will support the aim of attracting and retaining exceptional talent across the Group.
All Operating Companies recognise the critical role that their employees will play in the recovery and transformation of the Group and they are focusing on improving organisational health and employee engagement.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Any breakdowns in the bargaining process with the unionised workforces may result in subsequent strike action which may disrupt operations and adversely affect business performance and customer perceptions of the airlines. |
The Group has a large unionised workforce represented by a number of different trades unions. IAG relies on the successful agreement of collective bargaining arrangements across its operating companies to operate its airlines. The right skillsets and culture are needed to transform our businesses at the pace required. |
• Collective bargaining takes place on a regular basis with the operating companies' human resources specialists, who have a strong skillset in industrial relations. • Operating companies' people strategies. • Succession planning within and across operating companies. • IAG Tech refresh of professional development framework. • Operating companies' engagement surveys and subsequent action plans. • IAG Code of Conduct. |
| Our people are not engaged, or they do not display the required leadership behaviours. |
||
| The Group businesses fail to attract, motivate, retain or develop its people to deliver service and brand excellence. Digital and agile skillsets are not in place to execute on the required transformation and drive the business forward. |
RISK MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS CONTINUED

Financial
as to protect the Group. 12. Debt funding
fleet growth plans.
Failure to finance ongoing operations, committed aircraft orders and future
New financial arrangements, in addition
arrangements, and government support schemes (as applicable) may impact plans to transform the Group and will influence the timing for IAG to resume paying dividends to its shareholders.
13. Financial and treasury-related risk
fuel and foreign exchange hedges.
Failure to manage the volatility in the price of oil and petroleum products.
Failure to manage the impact of interest rate changes on floating finance debt and floating operating leases. Failure to manage the financial counterparties credit exposure arising from cash investments and derivatives
Failure to manage currency risk on revenue, purchases, cash and borrowings in foreign currencies in currencies other than the airlines' local currencies of euro and sterling.
trading.
to the repayment of existing
banks, partially guaranteed (80 per cent) by UK Export Finance (UKEF).
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
operating results.
IAG balances the relatively high business and operational risks inherent in its business through managing liquidity and financial risks so
Status Despite disruption in the financial markets since the spread of the pandemic, the Group has proactively focused on protecting liquidity by renewing and extending credit facilities and agreeing new aircraft leases, together with agreeing additional one-year funding facilities in advance of a future improvement in market conditions. Aircraft were successfully financed on long-term arrangements during the year and the additional one-year facilities were repaid. The Group also raised additional equity, with net proceeds of €2.7 billion received in early October. In December British Airways announced that it had received commitments for a 5-year Export Development Guaranteed term loan for £2.0 billion underwritten by a syndicate of
Status The financial markets were impacted by the uncertainty derived from the pandemic. The imposed travel ban resulted in reduced jet fuel consumption. The Group's reduced capacity in addition to sharp decline in jet fuel prices in the first half of 2020 amounted to an exceptional loss on
The approach to fuel risk management, financial risk management, interest rate risk management, proportions of fixed and floating debt management and financial counterparty credit risk management and the Group's exposure by geography have all been re-evaluated this year to ensure the Group
The Group has substantial debt that will need to be repaid or refinanced. The Group's ability to finance ongoing operations, committed aircraft orders and future fleet growth plans is vulnerable to various factors including financial market conditions, financial institutions' appetite for secured aircraft financing and the financial market's perceptions of the future resilience and cashflows of the Group.
responds to the rapidly changing financial environment appropriately. Details are set out in the Group financial statements.
The volatility in the price of oil and petroleum products can have a material impact on the Group's operating results. The volatility in currencies other than the airlines' local currencies can have a material impact on the Group's
The volatility in floating interest rates can have a material impact on the Group's operating results. The Group is exposed to nonperformance of financial contracts that
may result in financial losses.
2 3
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
2 3
C19
www.iairgroup.com 85
C19
• The IAG Board and Management Committee have reviewed the Group's financial position and financing strategy on a very frequent basis (often weekly) throughout the period of the
• The Group has maintained clear focus on protecting liquidity. • Additional funding arrangements entered into, including
• Fuel price risk is partially hedged through the purchase of oil derivatives in accordance with the Group risk appetite. • All airlines hedge in line with the Group hedging policy under
Management Committee regularly review the Group's fuel and
• All airlines review routes to countries with exchange controls to monitor delays in the repatriation of cash and/or with the
• The Group has a financial counterparty credit limit allocation by airline and by type of exposure and monitors the financial
• The IAG Management Committee and the IAG Audit and Compliance Committee regularly review the financial risks
• The IAG Audit and Compliance Committee and IAG
• Currency risk is hedged through matching inflows and outflows and managing the surplus or shortfall through
• The impact of rising interest rates is mitigated through structuring selected new debt and lease deals at fixed rates throughout their term as well as through derivatives
risk of material local currency devaluation.
and counterparty risk on an ongoing basis.
pandemic.
raising additional equity.
the Group Treasury oversight.
foreign exchange derivatives.
and the hedged amounts.
currency positions.
instruments.
Status The pandemic has resulted in governments around the world implementing, at very short notice, numerous, differing and wide-ranging measures in an attempt to contain the spread of the virus, such as travel restrictions, curfews, quarantines, lockdowns and restrictions on non-essential services. This has led to an unprecedented decrease in the demand for both domestic and international air travel and has also resulted in severe economic downturns and rising unemployment levels in a number of countries and regions. These are being actively monitored and near-term capacity plans are refreshed dynamically, according to the latest status.
There can also be no certainty as to the level of demand for the Group's services after any restrictions are lifted; the Group anticipates that global passenger demand will not return to 2019 levels until at least 2023.
Wider macroeconomic trends are being monitored such as tensions between the US and China, particularly over the terms of the trade deal and how the new administration in the US plans to engage with the Chinese government. The imposition of tariffs by the EU on the US in response to the findings of a WTO review could also result in an escalation of application of tariffs elsewhere. The stress of the pandemic could have further farreaching impacts including currency devaluations, new tax regimes on corporates and individuals as well as changes in control of governments and new government policies.
Following the referendum decision in 2016, the UK left the EU on December 31, 2020 under the terms of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and the UK. This agreement includes all arrangements for aviation that would otherwise be covered by a typical air services agreement and the business has made all necessary adjustments.
See the Regulatory environment section
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Economic deterioration in either a domestic market or the global economy may have a material impact on the Group's financial position, while foreign |
IAG remains sensitive to political and economic conditions in the markets globally. |
• The Board and the Management Committee review the financial outlook and business performance of the Group through the financial planning process and regular reforecasts (frequently during 2020). |
| exchange, fuel price and interest rate movements create volatility. |
• Reviews are used to drive the Group's financial performance through the management of capacity, together with appropriate cost control measures including the balance between fixed and variable costs, management of capital expenditure, and actions to improve liquidity. External economic outlook, fuel prices and exchange rates are carefully considered when developing strategy and plans and are regularly reviewed by the Board and IAG Management Committee as part of business performance monitoring. |
|
| Uncertainty or failure to plan and respond to economic change or downturn impacts the operations of the Group. |
||
| Political decisions to respond to the pandemic impact economies across all |
||
| markets, causing longer-term economic stress. |
• IAG Government Affairs function and the Group's operating companies have been in discussions with governments regarding restrictions and approaches for the implementation |

of consistent, customer-centric testing regimes.
Status The IAG Safety Committee of the Board continued to monitor the safety performance of IAG's airlines. Safety and security responsibility lies with each Group airline in accordance with its applicable standards. See the Safety Committee report.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| A failure to prevent or respond effectively to a major safety or security incident or intelligence may adversely impact the Group's brands, operations and financial performance. |
The safety and security of our customers and employees are fundamental values for the Group. |
• The corresponding safety committees of each of the airlines of the Group satisfy themselves that they have the appropriate resources and procedures which include compliance with Air Operator Certificate requirements. |
| • Incident centres respond in a structured way in the event of a safety or security incident or intelligence. |
||
| • The Board's Safety Committee shares best practices between Group airlines. |
84 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
2
2
C19
• The Board and the Management Committee review the financial outlook and business performance of the Group through the financial planning process and regular reforecasts
of consistent, customer-centric testing regimes.
safety or security incident or intelligence.
Group airlines.
• The corresponding safety committees of each of the airlines of the Group satisfy themselves that they have the appropriate resources and procedures which include compliance with Air Operator Certificate requirements. • Incident centres respond in a structured way in the event of a
• The Board's Safety Committee shares best practices between
• Reviews are used to drive the Group's financial performance through the management of capacity, together with appropriate cost control measures including the balance between fixed and variable costs, management of capital expenditure, and actions to improve liquidity. External economic outlook, fuel prices and exchange rates are carefully considered when developing strategy and plans and are regularly reviewed by the Board and IAG Management Committee as part of business performance monitoring. • IAG Government Affairs function and the Group's operating companies have been in discussions with governments regarding restrictions and approaches for the implementation
(frequently during 2020).
Business and operational continued
RISK MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS CONTINUED
plans are refreshed dynamically, according to the latest status.
new government policies.
passenger demand will not return to 2019 levels until at least 2023.
agreement and the business has made all necessary adjustments.
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
markets globally.
with each Group airline in accordance with its applicable standards. See the Safety Committee report. Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
The safety and security of our customers and employees are fundamental values for the Group.
IAG remains sensitive to political and economic conditions in the
See the Regulatory environment section
Economic deterioration in either a domestic market or the global economy may have a material impact on the Group's financial position, while foreign exchange, fuel price and interest rate movements create volatility.
Uncertainty or failure to plan and respond to economic change or downturn impacts the operations of the
Political decisions to respond to the pandemic impact economies across all markets, causing longer-term economic
11. Safety or security incident
A failure to prevent or respond effectively to a major safety or security incident or intelligence may adversely impact the Group's brands, operations
and financial performance.
Group.
stress.
10. Political and economic environment 1
Status The pandemic has resulted in governments around the world implementing, at very short notice, numerous, differing and wide-ranging measures in an attempt to contain the spread of the virus, such as travel restrictions, curfews, quarantines, lockdowns and restrictions on non-essential services. This has led to an unprecedented decrease in the demand for both domestic and international air travel and has also resulted in severe economic downturns and rising unemployment levels in a number of countries and regions. These are being actively monitored and near-term capacity
There can also be no certainty as to the level of demand for the Group's services after any restrictions are lifted; the Group anticipates that global
Following the referendum decision in 2016, the UK left the EU on December 31, 2020 under the terms of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and the UK. This agreement includes all arrangements for aviation that would otherwise be covered by a typical air services
Status The IAG Safety Committee of the Board continued to monitor the safety performance of IAG's airlines. Safety and security responsibility lies
84 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Wider macroeconomic trends are being monitored such as tensions between the US and China, particularly over the terms of the trade deal and how the new administration in the US plans to engage with the Chinese government. The imposition of tariffs by the EU on the US in response to the findings of a WTO review could also result in an escalation of application of tariffs elsewhere. The stress of the pandemic could have further farreaching impacts including currency devaluations, new tax regimes on corporates and individuals as well as changes in control of governments and
IAG balances the relatively high business and operational risks inherent in its business through managing liquidity and financial risks so as to protect the Group.

Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
Status Despite disruption in the financial markets since the spread of the pandemic, the Group has proactively focused on protecting liquidity by renewing and extending credit facilities and agreeing new aircraft leases, together with agreeing additional one-year funding facilities in advance of a future improvement in market conditions. Aircraft were successfully financed on long-term arrangements during the year and the additional one-year facilities were repaid. The Group also raised additional equity, with net proceeds of €2.7 billion received in early October. In December British Airways announced that it had received commitments for a 5-year Export Development Guaranteed term loan for £2.0 billion underwritten by a syndicate of banks, partially guaranteed (80 per cent) by UK Export Finance (UKEF).
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to finance ongoing operations, committed aircraft orders and future fleet growth plans. New financial arrangements, in addition to the repayment of existing arrangements, and government support schemes (as applicable) may impact plans to transform the Group and will influence the timing for IAG to resume paying dividends to its shareholders. |
The Group has substantial debt that will need to be repaid or refinanced. The Group's ability to finance ongoing operations, committed aircraft orders and future fleet growth plans is vulnerable to various factors including financial market conditions, financial institutions' appetite for secured aircraft financing and the financial market's perceptions of the future resilience and cashflows of the Group. |
• The IAG Board and Management Committee have reviewed the Group's financial position and financing strategy on a very frequent basis (often weekly) throughout the period of the pandemic. • The Group has maintained clear focus on protecting liquidity. • Additional funding arrangements entered into, including raising additional equity. |

www.iairgroup.com 85
Status The financial markets were impacted by the uncertainty derived from the pandemic. The imposed travel ban resulted in reduced jet fuel consumption. The Group's reduced capacity in addition to sharp decline in jet fuel prices in the first half of 2020 amounted to an exceptional loss on fuel and foreign exchange hedges.
The approach to fuel risk management, financial risk management, interest rate risk management, proportions of fixed and floating debt management and financial counterparty credit risk management and the Group's exposure by geography have all been re-evaluated this year to ensure the Group responds to the rapidly changing financial environment appropriately. Details are set out in the Group financial statements.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to manage the volatility in the price of oil and petroleum products. |
The volatility in the price of oil and petroleum products can have a material |
• Fuel price risk is partially hedged through the purchase of oil derivatives in accordance with the Group risk appetite. |
| Failure to manage currency risk on revenue, purchases, cash and borrowings in foreign currencies in currencies other than the airlines' local currencies of euro and sterling. |
impact on the Group's operating results. The volatility in currencies other than the airlines' local currencies can have a material impact on the Group's operating results. |
• All airlines hedge in line with the Group hedging policy under the Group Treasury oversight. • The IAG Audit and Compliance Committee and IAG Management Committee regularly review the Group's fuel and currency positions. |
| Failure to manage the impact of interest rate changes on floating finance debt and floating operating leases. |
The volatility in floating interest rates can have a material impact on the Group's operating results. |
• Currency risk is hedged through matching inflows and outflows and managing the surplus or shortfall through foreign exchange derivatives. |
| Failure to manage the financial counterparties credit exposure arising from cash investments and derivatives trading. |
The Group is exposed to non performance of financial contracts that may result in financial losses. |
• All airlines review routes to countries with exchange controls to monitor delays in the repatriation of cash and/or with the risk of material local currency devaluation. • The impact of rising interest rates is mitigated through structuring selected new debt and lease deals at fixed rates throughout their term as well as through derivatives instruments. |
| • The Group has a financial counterparty credit limit allocation by airline and by type of exposure and monitors the financial and counterparty risk on an ongoing basis. |
||
| • The IAG Management Committee and the IAG Audit and Compliance Committee regularly review the financial risks and the hedged amounts. |

Status Tax is managed in accordance with the Tax Strategy, found in the Corporate Policies section of the IAG website. Further information about taxes paid and collected by IAG is set out in note 9 of the Group financial statements.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| The Group is exposed to systemic tax risks arising from either change to tax legislation and accounting standards or challenges by tax authorities on the interpretation or application of tax legislation. Businesses and consumers may be subject to higher levels of taxation as governments seek to recover the national debts arising from pandemic support measures. The Group's stakeholders' expectations |
Payment of tax is a legal obligation. Changes in the tax regulatory environment, including changes in tax rates, may result in additional tax costs for the Group and in additional complexity in complying with such changes. The Group's tax strategy aims to balance the needs of our key stakeholders, recognising that tax is one of Group's positive contributions to the economies and wider societies of the countries in which IAG operates. |
• The Group adheres to the tax policy approved by the IAG Board and is committed to complying with all tax laws, to acting with integrity in all tax matters and to working openly with tax authorities. • Tax risk is managed by the operating companies in conjunction with the IAG Tax Department. • Tax risk is overseen by the Board through the Audit and Compliance Committee. • The Group seeks to understand its stakeholders' expectations on tax matters e.g. cooperative working with tax authorities and its interaction with non-governmental organisations. |
| of the tax behaviours of large |
corporates may lead to reputational risk from the Group's management of tax.
The Group has no tolerance for breaches of legal or regulatory requirements.
RISK MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS CONTINUED
Status Following the referendum decision in 2016, the UK left the EU on December 31, 2020 under the terms of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and the UK. IAG initiated the remedial plans on the ownership and control of its European airlines that were agreed with all national regulators in 2019. The Group will continue to encourage stakeholders in the UK and EU to normalise ownership of airlines in line with other business sectors.
| Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations • IAG will continue to monitor regulatory developments The governance structure the Group has Airlines are subject to a significant in place includes nationality structures degree of regulatory control. In order affecting the ownership and control of airlines in the UK and |
||
|---|---|---|
| to protect Aer Lingus', British Airways' for air carriers to hold EU operating EU. and Iberia's route and licences, an EU airline must be operating licences. majority-owned and effectively controlled by EU nationals. British IAG could face a challenge to its Airways is a UK carrier and not subject ownership and control structure. to the same requirement. |

2 3
Status The Group has maintained its focus on compliance with key regulations and mandatory training programmes have continued throughout the year. As employees have exited the Group businesses following restructuring, access to systems and processes has been reviewed and removed from these employees in a timely manner.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| The Group is exposed to the risk of individual employees' or groups of employees' inappropriate and/or |
Carrying out business in a compliant manner and with integrity is fundamental to the values of the |
• The Group has clear frameworks in place including comprehensive Group-wide policies designed to ensure compliance. |
| unethical behaviour resulting in reputational damage, fines or losses to the Group. |
Group, as well as the expectation of the Group's customers and stakeholders. |
• There are mandatory training programmes in place to educate Board members and employees as required for their roles in these matters. |
| • Compliance professionals specialising in competition law and anti-bribery legislation support and advise the Group's businesses. |
||
| • IAG Code of Conduct framework and training. | ||
| • Data Protection Officers are in place in all operating companies. |
||
| • IAG Compliance Steering Group. | ||
86 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
2 3
2 3
2 3
C19
• The Group adheres to the tax policy approved by the IAG Board and is committed to complying with all tax laws, to acting with integrity in all tax matters and to working openly
• Tax risk is managed by the operating companies in conjunction with the IAG Tax Department.
• Tax risk is overseen by the Board through the Audit and
• IAG will continue to monitor regulatory developments affecting the ownership and control of airlines in the UK and
• The Group has clear frameworks in place including comprehensive Group-wide policies designed to
• There are mandatory training programmes in place to educate Board members and employees as required for
anti-bribery legislation support and advise the
• IAG Code of Conduct framework and training. • Data Protection Officers are in place in all operating
• Compliance professionals specialising in competition law and
ensure compliance.
Group's businesses.
companies.
their roles in these matters.
• IAG Compliance Steering Group.
• The Group seeks to understand its stakeholders' expectations on tax matters e.g. cooperative working with tax authorities and its interaction with non-governmental organisations.
with tax authorities.
Compliance Committee.
Financial continued
The Group is exposed to systemic tax risks arising from either change to tax legislation and accounting standards or challenges by tax authorities on the interpretation or application of tax
Businesses and consumers may be subject to higher levels of taxation as governments seek to recover the national debts arising from pandemic
The Group's stakeholders' expectations of the tax behaviours of large corporates may lead to reputational risk from the Group's management of tax.
Compliance and regulatory
15. Group governance structure
The governance structure the Group has in place includes nationality structures to protect Aer Lingus', British Airways'
16. Non-compliance with key regulation and laws
taxes paid and collected by IAG is set out in note 9 of the Group financial statements.
RISK MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS CONTINUED
The Group has no tolerance for breaches of legal or regulatory requirements.
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
Airlines are subject to a significant degree of regulatory control. In order for air carriers to hold EU operating licences, an EU airline must be majority-owned and effectively controlled by EU nationals. British Airways is a UK carrier and not subject
Carrying out business in a compliant manner and with integrity is fundamental to the values of the Group, as well as the expectation of the Group's customers and stakeholders.
to the same requirement.
Risk description Strategic relevance Mitigations
Payment of tax is a legal obligation. Changes in the tax regulatory environment, including changes in tax rates, may result in additional tax costs for the Group and in additional complexity in complying with such changes. The Group's tax strategy aims to balance the needs of our key stakeholders, recognising that tax is one of Group's positive contributions to the economies and wider societies of the countries in which IAG operates.
Status Tax is managed in accordance with the Tax Strategy, found in the Corporate Policies section of the IAG website. Further information about
Status Following the referendum decision in 2016, the UK left the EU on December 31, 2020 under the terms of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and the UK. IAG initiated the remedial plans on the ownership and control of its European airlines that were agreed with all national regulators in 2019. The Group will continue to encourage stakeholders in the UK and EU to normalise ownership of airlines in line with other business
Status The Group has maintained its focus on compliance with key regulations and mandatory training programmes have continued throughout the year. As employees have exited the Group businesses following restructuring, access to systems and processes has been reviewed and removed from
86 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
EU.
14. Tax
legislation.
sectors.
the Group.
See section 10
and Iberia's route and operating licences.
IAG could face a challenge to its ownership and control structure.
these employees in a timely manner.
The Group is exposed to the risk of individual employees' or groups of employees' inappropriate and/or unethical behaviour resulting in reputational damage, fines or losses to
support measures.
The business model and strategic priorities are set out in the Business Model and Strategic Priorities section. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the business is also set out in the Chief Executive Officer's review and the Financial review.
As part of the review of the business model and assessment of Group strategy alignment to the external environment, the Directors have assessed key threats and trends faced by the industry, emerging risks and opportunities arising from the pandemic as well as other structural industry risks and non sector-specific risks over a timeframe beyond the plan period, for example climate change risk. These are considered in the light of how they could impact our business model and relevance, our operations or our customers and include changes in regulations, customer trends and behaviours, macroeconomic predictions on growth, regional market opportunities and technology trends and infrastructure developments that could impact our operations, as well as more existential threats to the aviation industry.
When developing the Group's three year Business Plan ('Business Plan'), longer-term considerations have been assessed by the Management Committee in conjunction with the priorities faced by the business during the next three years in responding to the impact of the pandemic crisis on the Group's businesses. The Board has also conducted its annual strategy session in addition to increased review meetings during the year, where these longer-term considerations have been assessed in parallel with the near-term priorities and adaptions required by the Group. Following this process, short-, medium- and longer-term plans, challenges and opportunities have been identified and actions agreed.
The Group has undertaken extensive analysis, forecasting and scenario modelling over the last 12 months. It has refined the models and developed the depth of the analysis to ensure that the stresses considered reflected specifics to markets and regions across Aer Lingus, British Airways, Iberia and Vueling as well as the analysis completed at the Group level. Assumptions have been refined based on the impact of the pandemic on the airlines and other businesses through 2020 and into 2021. The modelling was refreshed in February 2021 for the latest available information and predictions. This refresh of the Business Plan formed the Base Case ('Base Case') for the purposes of the Viability (and Going Concern) assessment.
During 2020 and in January and February 2021, the Board reviewed, on many occasions, scenarios stressing the financial plans for both the second half of 2020 and for the period to December 2023. These exercises leveraged the existing processes and models used for viability assessment within the Group. When considering the viability of the Group, for the purposes of this report, the Directors have evaluated the risk landscape facing the Group and recommended plausible but severe downside scenarios that could impact the Group's refreshed three-year Business Plan (the 'Base Case') to determine the Group's resilience to such impacts. The results of these severe but plausible downside scenarios (as described below) on the Base Case have been presented both pre and post an assessment of the likely effectiveness of the mitigations that management reasonably believes would be available over this period (and not already reflected in the Base Case).
The scenarios have been defined by management and designed to consider principal risks that could materialise over the viability period and weaken the Group's liquidity position. Each scenario considered the impact on liquidity, solvency and the ability to raise financing in an uncertain and volatile environment. When considering the mitigations, management has assessed mitigations that are available to the business beyond operating cost reductions including further financing, capital expenditure plans and potential disposals. Options that may not have been previously considered as mitigations were presented with recommendations for the Board to review. In assessing the potential mitigations, the Board considered, amongst other matters, the expected speed of implementation in response to the uncertainty and the future flexibility required for the Group to adapt further as needed.
Sensitivities in the scenarios' assumptions have been highlighted by management and challenged by the Board. In addition, the Board reviewed the results of reverse stress testing, which demonstrated the level of revenue decline (before mitigations) that would result in the Group using all available cash balances and compared this to the outputs from the scenarios analyses.
Management has assessed and the Board considered the longer-term sustainability and climate-related risks, applying scenario analysis techniques as set out by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) process, and their potential impact on the Group's viability over the next three years.
For more details of the Group's sustainability risks and opportunities, see Sustainability section.
www.iairgroup.com 87
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
RISK MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS CONTINUED
| No.Title | Link to principal risks |
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Downside Case considering the impacts of delays in the removal of government restrictions beyond the assumptions in the Base Case in 2021, further delaying recovery based on demand sensitivity experienced in 2020. This could be caused by factors such as the slower than expected pace of roll out of vaccines and/or governments' risk appetite to remove restrictions and allow movement of their populations. |
3, 7, 10, 12, 13 |
| The Downside Case modelled significant capacity ASK reductions by airline and by region, including adjustments to non passenger revenues. Passenger yield assumptions were also significantly reduced to reflect the constantly evolving and changing governmental restrictions that adversely impact the airlines and, therefore, customers' willingness to fly. |
||
| As part of the modelling, consideration was given to some of the key factors that could influence the evolution of cash in the Downside Case. |
||
| Cost mitigations were considered across all operating cost lines, including sensitivities around the impact of cost variability being lower than that assumed. Fuel was modelled directly, based on fuel curves and hedging plans. Working capital and capital expenditure adjustments were applied within the scenario. |
||
| Capacity recovery modelled by geographical region saw capacity gradually increasing from a reduction of 79 per cent versus 2019 in quarter 1 of 2021 to 18 per cent in quarter 1 of 2022. Across the Viability period to December 2023, the Group has assumed a gradual easing of travel restrictions, by geographical region, based on deployment of vaccines. Travel corridors between countries are assumed to be introduced from quarter 3 2021. The capacity reduction equates on average, to a Group passenger revenue stress of over 10 per cent across the total three year period compared to the Base Case. |
||
| Sensitivities around mitigating actions were presented to allow the Board to challenge the ability of the Group to respond to the range of potential outcomes. The impact of a further delay in recovery was also considered, with a setback in early 2022, which could be linked to further resurgence of COVID-19, delays in vaccination, or the need to modify vaccines leading to restrictions being re-introduced in the early months of 2022. |
||
| The period to March 2022 of this Downside Case scenario has also been applied as the Downside Case set out in the going concern analysis (see note 2 of the Group financial statements). |
||
| 2 | A stress to model the impact of a ransomware attack on an IAG airline. The scenario assumes a disruption period resulting from the attack, impacting customers and operations of the affected airline. |
6, 7, 8 |
| 3 | A revenue stress on shorthaul operations across the Group to reflect changes in customer behaviours towards shorthaul travel where other travel options exist or taxation regimes impact demand. |
5 |
| Increasing global concern about climate change and the impact of carbon is expected to grow in future years especially with the potential implementation of new taxes and eco-initiatives (see Sustainable aviation section 5). This scenario was not considered to be severe by management but allowed the Board to understand the potential impacts of the Sustainability agenda on the Group's future financial performance. |
The Directors have assessed the viability of the Group over three-years to December 2023 considering the ongoing impact of the pandemic on the external environment and aviation industry and the assumptions adopted in the refreshed Business Plan ('the Base Case' for the purposes of this Statement), the strategy of the Group and the Board's risk appetite. Although the prospects of the Group are considered over a longer period, the Directors have determined that a three-year period is an appropriate time frame for assessment as it is aligned with the Group's strategic planning period (as reflected in the Base Case) and the external uncertainties facing the aviation sector more widely are significantly beyond any experience to date and regularly unexpectedly change. The Board recognises the pace of change required within the Group to further adapt and respond to this environment in addition to the rapidly changing competitive landscape and wider global macroeconomic conditions.
The Group has modelled the impact of mitigating actions to offset further deterioration in demand and capacity, including reductions in operating
expenditure and capital expenditure. The Group expects to be able to continue to secure financing for future aircraft deliveries and in addition has further potential mitigating actions it would pursue in the event of adverse liquidity experience.
Further details on debt financing can be found in the Going Concern disclosures in note 2 of the Group financial statements.
Based on this assessment, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation, meet its liabilities as they fall due and raise financing as required over the period to December 2023. However, this is subject to a number of significant factors related to the pandemic that are outside of the control of the Group. In reaching this assessment the Directors have made the following assumptions when considering both the Base Case and the Downside Case:
88 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
Due to the uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic and potential for future waves of the pandemic and the impact on travel restrictions and/or demand, the Group is not able to provide certainty that there could not be more severe downside scenarios than those it has considered, including the stresses it has considered in relation to factors such as the impact on yield, capacity operated, cost mitigations achieved and fuel price variations. In the event that such a scenario were to occur, the Group would need to implement additional mitigation measures and would likely need to secure additional funding over and above that which is contractually committed at February 25, 2021. The Group has been successful in raising financing since the outbreak of COVID-19, however the Group cannot provide certainty that it will be able to secure additional funding, if required, in the event that a more severe downside scenario than those it has considered were to occur.
Link to principal risks
3, 7, 10, 12, 13
6, 7, 8
• the pandemic does not result in further
our airlines' operations.
prolonged and substantial capacity reductions and groundings into H2 2022 or beyond; and • any new virus strain or threat to public health that emerges during the viability period can be managed within vaccination and testing regimes and do not result in new government regulations that further significantly affect
Due to the uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic and potential for future waves of the pandemic and the impact on travel restrictions and/or demand, the Group is not able to provide certainty that there could not be more severe downside scenarios than those it has considered, including the stresses it has considered in relation to factors such as the impact on yield, capacity operated, cost mitigations achieved and fuel price variations. In the event that such a scenario were to occur, the Group would need to implement additional mitigation measures and would likely need to secure additional funding over and above that which is contractually committed at February 25, 2021. The Group has been successful in raising financing since the outbreak of COVID-19, however the Group cannot provide certainty that it will be able to secure additional funding, if required, in the event that a more severe downside scenario than those it has considered were to occur.
5
Scenarios modelled
Downside Case.
Viability Statement
conditions.
The Directors have assessed the viability of the Group over three-years to December 2023 considering the ongoing impact of the pandemic on the external environment and aviation industry and the assumptions adopted in the refreshed Business Plan ('the Base Case' for the purposes of this Statement), the strategy of the Group and the Board's risk appetite. Although the prospects of the Group are considered over a longer period, the Directors have determined that a three-year period is an appropriate time frame for assessment as it is aligned with the Group's strategic planning period (as reflected in the Base Case) and the external uncertainties facing the aviation sector more widely are significantly beyond any experience to date and regularly unexpectedly change. The Board recognises the pace of change required within the Group to further adapt and respond to this environment in addition to the rapidly changing competitive landscape and wider global macroeconomic
The Group has modelled the impact of mitigating actions to offset further deterioration in demand and capacity, including reductions in operating
restrictions and allow movement of their populations.
RISK MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS CONTINUED
capital expenditure adjustments were applied within the scenario.
restrictions being re-introduced in the early months of 2022.
concern analysis (see note 2 of the Group financial statements).
Sustainability agenda on the Group's future financial performance.
from the attack, impacting customers and operations of the affected airline.
travel where other travel options exist or taxation regimes impact demand.
1 A Downside Case considering the impacts of delays in the removal of government restrictions beyond the assumptions in the Base Case in 2021, further delaying recovery based on demand sensitivity experienced in 2020. This could be caused by
The Downside Case modelled significant capacity ASK reductions by airline and by region, including adjustments to nonpassenger revenues. Passenger yield assumptions were also significantly reduced to reflect the constantly evolving and changing governmental restrictions that adversely impact the airlines and, therefore, customers' willingness to fly.
As part of the modelling, consideration was given to some of the key factors that could influence the evolution of cash in the
Cost mitigations were considered across all operating cost lines, including sensitivities around the impact of cost variability being lower than that assumed. Fuel was modelled directly, based on fuel curves and hedging plans. Working capital and
Capacity recovery modelled by geographical region saw capacity gradually increasing from a reduction of 79 per cent versus 2019 in quarter 1 of 2021 to 18 per cent in quarter 1 of 2022. Across the Viability period to December 2023, the Group has assumed a gradual easing of travel restrictions, by geographical region, based on deployment of vaccines. Travel corridors between countries are assumed to be introduced from quarter 3 2021. The capacity reduction equates on average, to a Group passenger revenue stress of over 10 per cent across the total three year period compared to the Base Case.
Sensitivities around mitigating actions were presented to allow the Board to challenge the ability of the Group to respond to the range of potential outcomes. The impact of a further delay in recovery was also considered, with a setback in early 2022, which could be linked to further resurgence of COVID-19, delays in vaccination, or the need to modify vaccines leading to
The period to March 2022 of this Downside Case scenario has also been applied as the Downside Case set out in the going
2 A stress to model the impact of a ransomware attack on an IAG airline. The scenario assumes a disruption period resulting
3 A revenue stress on shorthaul operations across the Group to reflect changes in customer behaviours towards shorthaul
not considered to be severe by management but allowed the Board to understand the potential impacts of the
sector;
Increasing global concern about climate change and the impact of carbon is expected to grow in future years especially with the potential implementation of new taxes and eco-initiatives (see Sustainable aviation section 5). This scenario was
expenditure and capital expenditure. The Group expects to be able to continue to secure financing for future aircraft deliveries and in addition has further potential mitigating actions it would pursue in the event of adverse liquidity experience. Further details on debt financing can be found in the Going Concern disclosures in note 2 of the Group financial statements. Based on this assessment, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation, meet its liabilities as they fall due and raise financing as required over the period to December 2023. However, this is subject to a number of significant factors related to the pandemic that are outside of the control of the Group. In reaching this assessment the Directors have made the following assumptions when considering both the Base Case and the Downside Case: • the Group will continue to have access to funding options and that the capital markets retain a level of stability and appetite for funding within the aviation
• the Group can implement any further structural changes required in agreement with any union consultation processes
88 INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2020
and regulatory approvals;
factors such as the slower than expected pace of roll out of vaccines and/or governments' risk appetite to remove
No.Title
Regulatory matters assumed more than their usual level of prominence and scrutiny in 2020 with two topics dominating the policy agenda: the introduction of regulations around the world to restrict international air travel in response to the spread of COVID-19 and the continuing Brexit negotiations as the transition period for the UK's departure from the European Union (EU) came to a close at the end of December.
Throughout the year, IAG's airlines contributed directly to the development of rules in respect of responses to the COVID-19 pandemic that impacted aviation and travel in order to maintain operations to the greatest extent possible while ensuring customer and staff safety. The Group also provided input during 2020 to the Brexit discussions in support of a positive negotiated settlement to benefit UK and European citizens.
IAG also worked with regulators and authorities around the world on key policy areas such as sustainability in order to try and secure the best long-term outcomes for its customers.
When the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, states around the world began to close their borders to different degrees, leading to a dramatic impact on worldwide traffic volumes.
IAG aimed throughout 2020 to work constructively with regulators and contributed to their deliberations wherever possible on how to respond to the virus to allow safe, continued operations and to demonstrate the inherent safety of air services themselves.
In Ireland, Spain and the UK, IAG's airlines worked with national regulators as they developed their policies to ensure these were practically deliverable and balanced so as to allow air transport to continue safely and that guidance to industry and restrictions on travel were, where possible, measured and workable. British Airways made a significant contribution to the development of the ICAO's Council Aviation Recovery Task Force (CART) process, running trial protocols and becoming the first airline worldwide to be assessed against its criteria. Similarly, working directly, and with industry association Airlines for Europe (A4E), IAG experts helped the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) develop guidelines on aviation health safety
protocols. However, where IAG believed measures were severely detrimental to its own and its customers' interests, and provided no health benefit, the Group also acted. This included working with other airlines in the UK to bring a Judicial Review challenge to the UK Government's imposition of blanket quarantine measures. These measures were ultimately amended to satisfy the Group's objections at the time.
As the crisis endured, IAG worked with partner and competitor airlines as well as with academic partners to provide data on the efficacy of different approaches to COVID-19 testing. The Group also operated programmes to trial different approaches for testing in support of enabling states to safely remove quarantine policies that restrict travel. IAG staff continue to take every opportunity to work with national regulators and policy makers as the spread of the virus and the deployment of vaccines influences changes to regulatory requirements. In particular IAG continues to promote the need for a digital solution to the sharing and verification of personal data, health certificates and other requirements for travel. This includes working with individual developers, for example the VeriFly app successfully trialled by British Airways and contributing to potential industry-wide solutions such as those being promoted by IATA.
The UK formally left the EU on January 31, 2020 remaining bound by the EU's laws and benefiting as if it were a member state in a transition period running until December 31, 2020.
During 2020 there was therefore no change to air services between the EU and the UK. Throughout the year IAG engaged with regulators and policy makers in the UK, Brussels and a number of EU Member States to ensure that the needs of IAG's customers after Brexit are understood and, in particular, that policymakers recognise the economic and social importance of uninterrupted air services between the EU and the UK.
After protracted negotiations the UK and the EU agreed an overall trade deal that includes air transport. This agreement ensures that all IAG airlines' flights could continue as they did before Brexit. The only change is a very minor limitation on codeshare arrangements.
During 2020, the UK Government also finalised agreements with all other countries with which it needed to replace existing EU-wide arrangements for air services, including formally signing on November 17, 2020 the agreement reached in 2018 with the US.
Strategic Report
Corporate Governance
Financial Statements
Additional Information
IAG implemented plans to ensure that its EU-licensed airlines continue to comply with EU ownership and control rules following Brexit. These remedial plans were approved by national regulators in Spain and Ireland. The plans include the implementation of a national ownership structure for Aer Lingus and changes to the Group's longstanding national ownership structure in Spain.
It is notable that the Brexit agreement recognises the potential benefits of the continued liberalisation of ownership and control of air carriers and commits the EU and UK to examining options in that area during 2021. The Group will continue to encourage regulators around the world to normalise ownership of airlines in line with other business sectors.
While 2020 was a year of unprecedented disruption and uncertainty due to the COVID-19 pandemic, other key aspects of aviation policy continued to be developed in particular in relation to sustainability. In July the European Commission published a roadmap for its legislative initiative aimed at implementing the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA).
With its strong credentials in this field, IAG provided key input to the joint product of the European aviation industry, initiated by A4E, "Destination 2050, aviation's roadmap to carbon neutrality by 2050." Published in December, this roadmap shows how European aviation can reduce emissions through new aircraft and engine technology, operational efficiency, sustainable aviation fuels, economic measures (such as CORSIA) and greenhouse gas removal technology.
IAG continued to highlight the need for reform of the European air traffic management system and airport charges legislation to make the industry fit for a new future. The Group continues to demonstrate the economic and social value of aviation, through trade, tourism and bringing families together as tools to support economic recovery from the pandemic.
www.iairgroup.com 89
The 2020 Spanish Annual Corporate Governance Report of International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A., prepared according to Circular 1/2020, of October 6, of the Spanish National Stock Exchange Commission is part of this Management Report and, from the date of the publication of the 2020 Financial Statements, is available in the Spanish National Stock Exchange Commission website and in the International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A. website, being incorporated by reference to this report as appropriate.



The present statement was prepared to comply with the requirements of Law 11/2018, of December 28, 2018 on nonfinancial information and diversity (amending the Commercial Code, the revised Capital Companies Law approved by Legislative Royal Decree 1/2010, of July 2, 2010 and Audit Law 22/2015, of July 20, 2015), and is part of the Group's Management Report.
We provide information about environmental, social, employeerelated, and human rights-related issues, which is relevant to the Company and important for the execution of business activities.
The consolidated statement of non-financial information contains the following sections:
| 2 | Business model |
|---|---|
| Sustainability | |
| A. Governance | |
| 4 | A.1.-A.2. Management approach |
| 8 | A.3. Supply chain governance and management |
| 9 | A.4. Ethics and integrity |
| 10 | A.5. Sustainability risks and opportunities |
| 17 | A.6. Stakeholder engagement |
| B. Planet | |
| 20 | B.1. Climate change impacts |
| 22 | B.2.-B.3. Climate change commitment and roadmap |
| 25 | B.4. Waste |
| 26 | B.5. Noise and air quality |
| 27 | B.6. Innovation, Research & Development |
| C. People and Prosperity | |
| 28 | C.1. Workforce overview |
| 29 | C.2. Health, safety and wellbeing |
| 29 | C.3. Inclusion and diversity |
| 30 | C.4. Human rights and modern slavery |
| 30 | C.5. Community giving and charitable support |
| 31 | C.6. Workforce measures |
| 34 | Risk Management and principal risk factors |
| 45 | Regulatory environment |
| 46 | Additional disclosures |
| 46 | B.7. Additional environmental metrics and commentary |
| 47 | C.7. Additional workforce metrics and commentary |
| 57 | C.8. Public subsidies and tax information |
To be the world's leading airline group, employing exceptional talent and maximising sustainable value creation for our shareholders and providers of finance, customers and other stakeholders
IAG is the parent company of the Group and actively engages and works collaboratively with its portfolio of operating companies to drive synergies and maximise performance. Its independence from the operating companies allows for objective, flexible and rapid decision-making and enables IAG to implement the strategy to deliver the long-term vision for the Group. The operating companies are in turn able to focus their efforts on their target customers, competitive environment and their people.
The portfolio sits on the Group's common integrated platform which drives efficiency and simplicity while allowing each operating company to achieve individual performance targets and maintain its unique identity.
attractiveness
Exerts vertical and horizontal influence across the Group
Sets the long-term strategy to deliver the vision for the Group
Corporate parent
Deep and real-time understanding of customer and competitive environment
Define product strategy for target customer segments
Standalone profit centres and independent credit identities
Individual brand, cultural identity and management teams
Provides common services and allows the Group's operations to benefit from cost reductions and synergies by leveraging the Group's scale
IAG combines leading airlines in Ireland, the UK and Spain with key non-airline businesses, enabling them to enhance their presence in the aviation market while retaining their individual brand identities.
The airlines each target specific customer markets and geographies providing choice across the full spectrum of customer needs and travel occasions.
The airlines' customers benefit from a larger combined network for both passengers and cargo and the airlines also utilise successful joint businesses and alliance partnerships to expand their global reach. The scale of the Group also allows it to more efficiently innovate and invest in new products and services to enhance the customer experience.
The people across our Group are pivotal in delivering the ethos of each of our companies and retaining and promoting talent is a key driver of our success.
Operationally focused companies Diversified customer base Complementary networks Distinct brands Employees pivotal to each operation's unique identity
Revenue share leaders in our home cities
Transatlantic leadership and a leading player intra-Europe
A key player in the consolidation of the airline sector
Retain and promote talent
COST EFFICIENCY
Continual total cost focus
Track record of successful restructuring during crises
INNOVATION
Dynamic and creative culture and workforce
At the forefront of digital innovation in the airline industry
Digital platform to grow revenue streams, enhance customer loyalty and drive cost efficiencies

rpinned by sustaina
The Group's strategy is underpinned by its target to be the leading airline group on sustainability. We remain committed to reducing our carbon footprint and to reach the goal of net zero CO2 emissions by 2050 and continue to prioritise other key sustainability issues including waste management, stakeholder engagement and employee engagement and welfare.
We use a combination of financial and non-financial metrics to measure the performance and progress of our strategy:
See section Strategic priorities and key performance indicators
See section Strategic priorities and key performance indicators
See section Strategic priorities and key performance indicators
• NPS
• Average manpower equivalent
See section Sustainability
See section Sustainability
• Gender diversity
• Grams of CO2/pkm
This report has three sections: Governance, Planet and People and Prosperity.
IAG has maintained a vision to be the world's leading airline group on sustainability. Sustainability underpins our business strategy and is fundamental to our long-term growth. IAG is committed to minimising its environmental impact and improving its social impact, whilst executing on Group strategy, and delivering best practices in both programmes and processes. IAG also aspires to drive improvements in the sustainability performance of the global aviation industry.
IAG's sustainability strategy is aligned to IAG's three strategic priorities, as demonstrated in the diagram to the right.
Progress against the vision is measured against five strategic aims:
To support these ambitions, IAG's core business processes embed consideration of sustainability issues. Three-year business plans, one–year financial plans, procurement and financial approvals all address climate and sustainability impacts. Assessments of climate-related risks are integrated into an interdisciplinary Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process. Carbon prices are incorporated into fleet investment decisions.
In 2020, IAG implemented new management incentives explicitly linked to climate targets. These incentives were agreed by IAG's Management Committee, Remuneration Committee and Board in 2019, resulting in 60 of the most senior executives across the Group, including the IAG Chief Executive Officer, having a proportion of their annual incentives linked to achievement of annual carbon intensity targets. The 2020 annual incentive plan was cancelled due to COVID-19 but the intention is to reinstate it for 2021.

External recognition of leadership and progress in 2020 included:
reduction initiatives and value chain engagement. The full submission is on the IAG website; and
• Maintaining a 3 out of 4 overall rating in the Transition Pathways Initiative (TPI) Management Quality Index, meeting 15 out of 18 climate indicators.
Up until now IAG's priority focus has been addressing climate change impacts, but with the establishment of the new Safety, Environment and Corporate Responsibility Committee the focus will be broadened to include societal and employee issues.
IAG's sustainability initiatives and reporting are based on a 2017 assessment of which business activities have a material impact on the environment and people and are most important to key stakeholders. This materiality assessment was facilitated by the UK charitable trust Business in the Community (BITC) as an independent third party.
The assessment included workshops, stakeholder interviews, benchmarking against external materiality frameworks and the production of an IAG-specific materiality matrix. External stakeholders included investors, corporate customers, suppliers, NGOs and government. Sixteen material sustainability issues were identified and are listed to the right. IAG's most significant material issue is climate change. Four UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)1 – 5, 7, 8 and 13 – were identified as priority areas to support, amongst nine SDGs in total.
Here, material issues are grouped into the categories of Principles of Governance, Planet and People and Prosperity, to align with best practice indicated by the 2020 World Economic Forum report on 'Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism'.
These material issues align with the issues identified by IATA and GRI2 for the wider airline sector. The nine SDGs align with those identified by IATA and UK trade association Sustainable Aviation (SA).
Water consumption, biodiversity and light pollution are not currently assessed as material for IAG. These assessments are based on the small scale of impacts in these areas, and ongoing conversations with our stakeholders. Light pollution was not assessed during the 2017 materiality assessment as it was not identified as material by any key stakeholders. IAG does not have specific risk provisions, targets or guarantees related to these non-material issues.
Icons indicate alignment with UN SDGs

Planet
• Climate change3 • Energy use • Waste4 • Noise • Air quality


During 2021 IAG will repeat a full-scale materiality assessment, a year later than planned due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. This assessment will include issues that have arisen during the pandemic. Health, safety and wellbeing rose in importance during 2020.
| Goal | Description | See these subsections | 2020 highlight/s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Gender equality |
Workforce overview | 45% women on the IAG Board and 30% across IAG senior executives | |
| Inclusion and diversity | ||||
| 7 | Affordable and clean energy |
Climate change | Secured planning permission for Europe's first waste-to-jet fuel plant and | |
| Sustainable aviation fuels |
invested in an alcohol-to-jet fuel plant in the USA | |||
| 8 | Decent work and economic growth |
Workforce overview | Provided a range of internal and external resources to support employee wellbeing and COVID-19 safety |
|
| 13 | Climate action |
Stakeholder engagement |
Instrumental in driving coalitions at national, regional and global levels to set aviation climate strategies in line with a 1.5 degrees Celsius (1.5°C) |
|
| Climate change | ambition |

The IAG Board provides oversight and direction for sustainability programmes, and the IAG Management Committee provides the key forum for reviewing and challenging these programmes and setting their strategic direction.
Sustainability programmes across all operating companies and support functions are coordinated at Group level. IAG's sustainability strategy sets out the ambition and the wider context of these programmes. This strategy covers Group policies and objectives, governance structure, risk management, strategy and targets on material issues, sustainability performance indicators, and communications and stakeholder engagement plans. Each individual operating company within the Group has a distinct sustainability programme that is aligned with the Group strategy.
Group-wide policies relevant to sustainability include the Code of Conduct, Supplier Code of Conduct, and specific policies on Sustainability, Modern Slavery, Anti-Corruption and Bribery, Equal Opportunities, and Selection and Diversity. All of these have been approved by the Board of Directors. IAG will review the suite of sustainability-related policies in 2021 and update the sustainability section of the IAG website to reflect any changes.
In 2020, IAG strengthened its sustainability governance. A Sustainability Steering Group, comprised of representatives from each operating company, was established and meets quarterly to provide oversight of our environmental and social initiatives and reporting. A SAF Steering Group and People Working Group were established to report into this steering group. The IAG Sustainability Network held monthly calls rather than bi-annual meetings and representation was expanded to all operating companies.
In 2021 a Safety, Environment and Corporate Responsibility Board subcommittee will provide dedicated oversight of the Group's sustainability programme and a link between operating company management committees and the IAG Board. The 2021 governance structure is shown on the previous page and will enhance the rigour and oversight applied to sustainability initiatives and the level of feedback and challenge received.
Individual operating companies also continue to strengthen their environmental assessment and management. In 2020, British Airways and Vueling achieved Stage 1 certification for the IATA Environmental Assessment (IEnvA)1 management system in 2020 and have begun working towards Stage 2. Aer Lingus and Iberia are working towards Stage 1 certification in 2021. To date, 12 airlines worldwide have achieved IEnvA Stage 1 certification.
The full contents of this sustainability report are included in the IAG Non-Financial Information Statement, which is third-party verified to limited assurance and in line with ISAE30002 (Revised) standards.
IAG aligns sustainability reporting with current and emerging disclosure standards to ensure the Group discloses relevant and meaningful data on sustainability performance.
This includes compliance with obligations under EU Directive 2014/95/EU on non-financial reporting and its transposition in the UK and Spain, and the 2018 UK Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) regulation. IAG voluntarily aligns reporting with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidance, the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the IATA Airlines Reporting Handbook. IAG supported IATA and the GRI to develop the IATA handbook.
This report has been prepared in reference to GRI standards. Criteria for choosing specific GRI standards are based on compliance with Spanish Law 11/2018 and material issues. In cases where alignment was not possible, other standards aligned to airline industry guidance or internal frameworks were used. These are described in relevant sections.
A table showing alignment with external frameworks and GRI standards is included at the end of this sustainability section.
Unless otherwise stated, the scope of environment performance data includes all IAG airlines, subsidiaries and cargo operations over which IAG has operational control. This scope is consistent with environment-related policies and KPIs. LEVEL (except jet fuel data), IAG Loyalty and IAG GBS functions are not in scope for environmental reporting as the environmental impacts of these business units are not material, but are in scope of policies and KPIs.
Unless otherwise stated, workforce and supply chain data include all IAG operating companies and support functions that are wholly or majority-owned.
Scope 1 emissions data related to intra-European flights is subject to further verification for compliance with the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and the UN Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). British Airways emissions data is typically verified again, to reasonable assurance standards, within six months of the year end.
In cases where full year data was not available, estimates have been applied based on business forecasts and data from prior months. Internal governance is in place to ensure that any estimations made are robust.
Any restatements are indicated next to relevant metrics with reasons provided.
1 IEnvA is the airline industry version of ISO 14001, the international standard for environmental management systems. IEnvA is tailored specifically for airlines and is fully compatible with the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO).
2 ISAE3000 is the assurance standard for compliance, sustainability and outsourcing audits, issued by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

IAG Global Business Services (IAG GBS) manages interactions with suppliers on behalf of the Group. During 2020, IAG GBS focused on minimising the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and drove further consolidation of the number of active suppliers from 27,033 in 2019 to 22,947 in 2020. This consolidation enables IAG GBS to focus more attention on building strategic partnerships.
IAG GBS has a dedicated Procurement Sustainability Programme which consists of four key aspects relating to the supply chain:
In September 2020, IAG GBS launched a new Group-wide Supplier Code of Conduct and issued this to the existing supply chain. This Code clarifies the standards of behaviour expected from suppliers working with any part of the business and emphasises the importance of sustainability. It has also been integrated into the supplier onboarding process. IAG will only work with businesses which share our standards and ways of working.
As a minimum, all suppliers undergo bi-annual screening for any legal, social, environmental and financial risks. In 2020, 1,043 suppliers received red flags on compliance issues during their bi-annual screening and 35 business-critical suppliers were highlighted to the operating companies in daily risk alerts. The Procurement and Compliance Teams assess any suppliers that are identified as having potentially higher levels of risk and implement a mitigation plan where necessary. Any issues are flagged to the risk owners within IAG to jointly take appropriate action.
IAG GBS carries out in-depth supplier audits as part of the Group's commitment to sustainability; these audits are based on potential geographical and procurement category risk. They are performed by independent inspectors with CSR expertise using the SEDEX Members Ethical Trade Audit (SMETA) methodology. In 2020, 25 audits were completed during the COVID-19 pandemic, with eight postponed until 2021. Of the audits carried out, 78 points were identified that required minor improvements in health and safety standards, and suppliers have implemented corrective actions.
In addition, joint programmes are in place with key suppliers to drive sustainable innovation and identify new ways to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and waste. Programmes include the continued development of SAF and carbon removal technology, as well as initiatives to use environmentally friendly packaging in lounges and inflight products.
In 2021, IAG GBS will continue to further consolidate and permanently right-size the Group supply chain with no more than 15,000 suppliers across all operating companies; pivoting the business to focus more on key partnerships in order to improve supply chain performance; and drive specific projects to deliver upon IAG's sustainability commitments.
| Year | Total number of suppliers |
Suppliers screened | Suppliers with additional compliance assessment |
Critical suppliers under regular risk monitoring |
Independent CSR audits in year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 22,947 | 22,947 | 1,818 | 35 | 25 |
| 2019 | 27,033 | 18,369 | 2,912 | n/a | 28 |
All Directors and employees are expected to act with integrity and in accordance with the laws of the countries in which they operate.
IAG's Group Code of Conduct, which is approved by the Board, sets out the general guidelines that govern the conduct of all Directors and employees of the Group when carrying out their duties in their business and professional relationships. Training and communications activities are carried out for Directors, employees and third parties on a regular basis to maintain awareness and understanding of the principles that govern the conduct of the Group.
If any employee has a concern about unethical behaviour or organisational integrity, they are encouraged to first speak with their manager or a member of the Legal, Compliance or Human Resources teams. Similarly, suppliers are encouraged to contact their primary contact within the business. IAG maintains Speak Up channels provided by independent third-party providers, Safecall and Ethicspoint, where concerns can be raised on an anonymous basis. These Speak Up channels are available to members of staff as well as suppliers, with information on how to access published in the Code of Conduct and Supplier Code of Conduct respectively.
The IAG Audit and Compliance Committee reviews the effectiveness of the Speak Up channels on an annual basis. This annual review considers the volume of reports by category; timeliness of follow-up; process and responsibility for follow-up; emerging themes and lessons; and any issues raised of significance to the financial statements or other areas of compliance.
In 2020, a total of 193 Speak Up reports were received compared with 282 in 2019. This decrease is believed to be largely due to the slowdown in business activity and furloughing of staff brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. These reports concerned issues relating to employment matters (63 per cent), dishonest behaviour/reputation (17 per cent), health and safety (18 per cent) and regulatory matters (2 per cent). Of the dishonest behaviour/reputation reports, none related to corruption matters versus two reports in 2019. All reports were followed up and investigated where appropriate.
IAG and its operating companies do not tolerate any form of bribery or corruption. This is made clear in our Group Code of Conduct and supporting policies which are available to all Directors and employees. Our anti-bribery policy statement is also set out in our Supplier Code of Conduct.
Each Group operating company has a Compliance Department responsible for managing the anti-bribery programme in their business. The compliance teams from across the Group meet regularly through Working Groups and Steering Groups, under the leadership of the IAG Group Compliance Director, and annually they conduct a review of bribery risks at operating company and Group level.
In 2020, the main risks identified were unchanged from the previous year and relate to the use of third parties, operational and commercial decisions involving government agencies, and the inappropriate use of gifts and hospitality. No compliance breaches were identified in 2020.
Anti-bribery and corruption training is mandatory for all IAG operating companies, Group functions and the Board and takes the form of e-learning supplemented by face-to-face sessions as necessary. Individual training requirements are set by each operating company and function, and are determined by factors such as the level and responsibilities of an employee. The Group-wide anti-bribery e-learning, which was rolled out in 2019, has a recurrence of three years. In 2020 a total of 1,984 employees completed the anti-bribery and corruption e-learning course, compared with 7,933 in 2019.
To identify, manage and mitigate potential bribery and corruption risks, IAG uses risk-based third-party due diligence which includes screenings, external reports, interviews and site visits depending on the level of risk that a third party presents. Any risks identified during the due diligence process are analysed and a mitigation plan put in place as necessary. Certain risks could result in termination of the proposed or existing relationship with the counterparty. The IAG Audit and Compliance Committee receives an annual update on the anti-bribery compliance programme.
There were no legal cases regarding corruption brought against the Group and its operating companies in 2020 and management is not aware of any impending cases or underlying issues.
IAG has processes and procedures in place across the Group, such as supplier vetting and management, Know Your Counterparty procedures and financial policies and controls which help to combat money laundering in the business.
GRI 102-11, 102-15
Since 2019, sustainable aviation risks have been identified as a principal risk to IAG. Climate-related risks are considered and assessed under the Group Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework which is presented to the Board. More details on risk management procedures, and how Group risks inter-relate, can be found in the 'Risk Management and principal risk factors' section.
Sustainability risks and opportunities, including climate-related risks and opportunities, are also identified and assessed by the Group Sustainability team, in conjunction with the Group ERM team. This assessment includes risks over medium-term (two to five years) and long-term (greater than five year) timescales. These risks are bi-annually reported to and reviewed by the IAG Management Committee and the IAG Audit and Compliance Committee, and regularly reported to the IAG Chief of Staff who reports to the IAG CEO. Plans to mitigate risks are developed by relevant risk owners in specific areas of the business.
IAG allocates significant resources to environmental risk management. This includes a strategic commitment to invest US\$400 million (€360 million) over 20 years in SAF development, production and supply, along with a dedicated sustainable fuels team. This also includes a significant and continued investment over five years in the Honeywell GoDirect Flight Efficiency software, to manage risks related to operational efficiency, with dedicated representatives within operating companies to manage operational efficiency programmes. In addition, each of the Group's four main airlines are working towards IEnvA1 accreditation and have invested in people and IT resources to enable this.
IAG is committed to mitigating the impacts of hazards which have uncertain but potentially highly negative outcomes, on the environment or people, if they occur. As such, IAG adopts precautionary measures to mitigate these hazards, an approach known as the precautionary principle. The precautionary principle is applied to the planning of operations and the development and launch of new services, by integrating climate considerations into business plans and financial forecasts and aligning activities with the Flightpath Net Zero programme. Detailed risk mitigation measures are outlined in the tables on the following pages.
IAG was an early adopter of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidance on climaterelated scenario analysis and climatespecific risk assessments. In 2018, IAG followed the TCFD six-step process and analysed the implications of climate change on business activity in 2030. This analysis helped in reviewing the resilience of IAG's business strategies in the context of climate change and was instrumental in the 2019 design and adoption of IAG's Flightpath Net Zero climate strategy.
The 2018 exercise included two climate scenarios and the impacts of these scenarios on IAG's costs of inputs, operating costs, revenues, supply chain, and business interruption. Outputs included an initial qualitative assessment of how IAG could respond in terms of adapting the business model, portfolio mix, investments in transition capabilities and technologies and the potential impact on strategic and financial plans.
The scope of the exercise included:
A key finding was that IAG would incur additional operating costs under both climate scenarios. Under a two-degree scenario, most of this increase would result from carbon prices or climate-related policy interventions. Under a four-degree scenario, IAG was more likely to face increased costs from operational disruption as a result of extreme weather events becoming more frequent.
1 See Sustainability Governance section for IEnvA definition.
The results of this scenario analysis raised climate change awareness internally and have informed specific changes to IAG's business operations and strategy:
During 2020 IAG updated internal assessments of climate-related risks, by testing and revising assumptions on post-pandemic business growth and the regulatory context and future carbon price for all operating airlines. Forecasting of climate-related regulatory impacts is integrated into IAG's business and financial planning process.
In 2021 IAG plans to repeat climate-related scenario analysis in line with the latest TCFD recommendations and guidance.
IAG categorises climate-related risks in line with Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidance. Specific risks are mitigated though existing processes, additional investments, or specific strategies as outlined in the table below. IAG uses internal carbon prices based on current EU ETS prices, the UK Department for Transport (DfT) Aviation Forecast, and International Energy Agency (IEA) CORSIA price forecasts. In 2020, EU ETS prices of €26/tonne and CORSIA prices of \$17/tonne were used to forecast the compliance costs of international flights.

| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher carbon price and stringent policy mechanisms |
A rising cost of carbon in regulatory market-based schemes such as the UK ETS and EU ETS would add to our operating costs. |
EU ETS prices rose 55% between 2018-20, from €16 to €25/tonne |
• Via the Flightpath Net Zero programme, setting and working towards ambitious climate targets to minimise the IAG footprint and exposure to climate regulation • Lobbying for effective global regulation and robust and fair policies to meet global climate goals |
| M | CORSIA unit prices were expected to rise at least 65% between 2020 and 20302 |
• Factoring carbon price forecasts into business decisions on fleet planning and investment • Continuing investment in modern fleet and innovations to ensure continual improvement in operational fuel efficiency • An effective procurement strategy for carbon credits to protect against price volatility • Driving and supporting low-carbon innovation via the Hangar 51 accelerator programme |
1 Risk and opportunity trends as assessed by IAG Sustainability in relation to external changes, rather than mitigating actions.
2 Pre-pandemic.
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| A global patchwork of uncoordinated national and regional climate policies S |
Several countries and the EU have already adopted or are considering carbon taxes. The UK is establishing a UK ETS. Use of regional instruments such as taxes or mandates may lead to increased compliance costs, increasing regulatory complexity, and inequitable costs causing competitive distortion. Duplicate regulations and the inconsistent application of monitoring, verification and reporting requirements could have similar effects. |
Revenue impact due to reduced demand as a result of higher pricing |
• Lobbying for a global net zero target for aviation to be agreed at the ICAO General Assembly in 2022 • Allocating resources to engage with governments, trade associations, IATA and ICAO to help implement the UN CORSIA scheme, which represents a single effective global carbon-pricing solution for aviation • Supporting implementation and adoption of CORSIA, robust rules for monitoring and criteria for emissions reductions, and lobbying for universal adoption |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changing customer behaviour S |
Ethical and sustainability concerns being an increasing factor in consumer choices may mean some consumers choose to travel less frequently, less far, or choose different travel modes. |
Potential revenue impact from reduced or changed travel behaviours and corporate travel budgets |
• Using all available tools, as well as influencing global policy and driving industry-wide action, to minimise IAG's carbon footprint • Acting in advance of potential changes in behaviour by effectively communicating the Flightpath Net Zero programme to customers and suppliers and offering climate mitigation options such as voluntary offsetting |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable aviation fuels mandates M |
Scandinavian countries have introduced mandates for a proportion of SAF in aviation fuel, and the EU and Spain are considering mandates. Mandates would incentivise production but could force airlines to purchase SAF at an excessive price premium compared with conventional fuels. This could also create competitive distortion and lead to production of fuels with lower sustainability criteria. |
SAF is currently three to four times the cost of fossil fuels |
• Contributing to the 2020 World Economic Forum "Cleaner Skies for Tomorrow" initiative to develop scenarios on SAF uptake • Contributing to the 2020 EC ReFuelEU consultation, to ensure that any mandates do not create competitive distortion or carbon leakage • Working at UK and international levels to strengthen global climate regulations on SAF • Supporting policy incentives that help deliver SAF at prices competitive with conventional fuels through new technology development • IAG believes sustainable fuel mandates should preferably only be applied at a global level rather than a national or regional level to prevent competitive distortion |
See 'Sustainable Aviation Fuels' case study
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Destinations becoming unattractive for visitors L |
For example, extreme weather events and physical impacts of climate change such as flooding, drought, forest fires, heat waves, algal blooms, coral bleaching, rising sea levels and reduced snow cover in ski destinations could make certain destinations less desirable and impact customer demand. |
Potential revenue loss due to changing travel choices that affect markets IAG flies to e.g. Caribbean due to hurricanes, the Alps due to shorter ski seasons |
• Ongoing lobbying and engagement in projects and initiatives designed to reduce the industry's impact on climate change • Teams dedicated to assessing and understanding changes in customer demand and managing network developments to respond to such changes • Strategy to ensure aircraft and crew flexibility means we are prepared and able to respond to shifting demand patterns |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Potential target for direct action protests |
Direct action e.g. protests could disrupt flight operations and/or restrict staff and passenger access. |
Operational disruption |
• Close liaison with government agencies, airport operators and commercial organisations to assess challenges • Contingency and business interruption planning |

| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operational activities deemed to be inconsistent |
Perceptions of our products and climate-related operational practices in relation to the IAG climate strategy and national and international climate goals. |
Changes in corporate accounts or travel policies |
• Minimising IAG's carbon footprint via the Flightpath Net Zero programme • Embedding sustainability considerations into |
| with low-carbon behaviours (NEW) |
business planning and operational decision-making • Engagement and collaboration with corporate customers to identify and address potential environmental desires or concerns |
||
| M | • Effectively communicating actions to customers and suppliers and offering climate mitigation options such as voluntary offsetting |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation on non-CO2 impacts (NEW) L |
New external research indicates the non-CO2 impacts of aviation are at least as significant as CO2. The EU is reviewing whether to incorporate these impacts into climate compliance schemes and climate-neutral objectives, which could increase compliance costs. |
A potentially higher obligation for climate mitigation |
• Via the Flightpath Net Zero programme • Working through trade associations and research partnerships to improve understanding of aviation's climate impacts • Engaging in research to better understand non-CO2 benefits of SAF |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of capital tied to decarbonisation strategy (NEW) M |
Governments, investors and lenders increasingly tying funding to decarbonisation strategies. |
Potential for higher rates on lending or an increase in resources required to secure funding |
• Quantifying the financial impacts of climate risks and opportunities • Robust and transparent external disclosures on climate impact and strategy • Engaging with financial stakeholders via IAG Investor Relations See 'Stakeholder engagement' section |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Persistent drought-induced water scarcity in some destinations |
Drought-induced water scarcity at outstations could increase the need for potable water carriage due to volume and quality concerns. |
Fuel costs due to increased potable water carriage |
• Teams dedicated to assessing and understanding changes in customer demand and managing network developments to respond to such changes |

| Opportunity title | Opportunity description | Potential financial impacts |
Actions to realise opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use of new aircraft technologies S |
Use of latest generation aircraft can reduce fuel burn and carbon impact by 25 to 40 per cent compared with aircraft they replace. |
Fuel savings and carbon cost savings |
• Continually investing in fleet modernisation that supports business needs and aligns with the Flightpath Net Zero programme • Retirement of older, less-efficient aircraft • Investment to realise opportunity: aircraft purchases and engine changes |
| Use of lower emission sources of energy (SAF) M |
Commercial and environmental opportunity to source cost effective sustainable fuel and reduce CO2 emissions, thereby reducing compliance costs for CORSIA and the EU ETS. |
Carbon cost savings from use of SAF/hydrogen |
• Ongoing lobbying for support for the development of new SAF technologies at the global, EU and UK levels See associated technology risk • Investment to realise opportunity: direct investments in SAF production, offtake agreements |
| Opportunity title | Opportunity description | Potential financial impacts |
Actions to realise opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Differentiate our brands M |
To differentiate IAG brands by showing leadership, innovation and action to mitigate climate impacts, so attracting customers concerned about climate change. |
Greater consumer loyalty |
See mitigation measures for associated risk • Working with specific companies to help them reduce the impacts of their corporate travel • Investment to realise opportunity: communications campaigns and percentage of profit into sustainability |
| Opportunity title | Opportunity description | Potential financial impacts |
Actions to realise opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher carbon price and strong policy incentives |
Support stronger business case for investment in low-carbon technologies which accelerate decarbonisation progress. |
Financial benefits from delivery of projects |
See mitigation measures for associated risk • Investment to realise opportunity: internal people resource |

L
| Opportunity title | Opportunity description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Destinations becoming attractive for visitors |
Climate change could make certain destinations more attractive or accessible to visitors, for example a longer summer season. |
More flights to more attractive destinations |
See mitigation measures for associated risk • Investment to realise opportunity: n/a as incorporated into business planning |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operational noise restrictions and charges S |
Airport operators and regulators apply operational noise restrictions and charging regimes which may restrict airlines' ability to operate especially and introduce additional costs. |
Reduced flying on specific routes due to UK night flight regulation |
• Investing in new quieter aircraft as part of fleet modernisation • Continually improving operational practices including continuous descents, slightly steeper approaches, low-power low-drag approaches and optimised departures • Internal governance and training and external advocacy in UK, Ireland and Spain to manage challenges |
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supply chain sustainability compliance S |
Potential breach of compliance on sustainability, human rights or anti-bribery by an IAG supplier resulting in financial, legal, environmental, social and/ or reputational impacts. |
Penalties from breaches of regulation e.g. modern slavery and potential reputational damage |
See 'Supply chain' case study • IAG GBS procedures including Integrity, sanctions and CSR audits, IAG Know Your Counterparty due diligence for higher-risk third parties, Supplier Code of Conduct • Internal governance on supplier management to identify challenges and mitigation actions |
| • Supplier screening using external business intelligence databases which actively monitor supplier status and |
flag risks including sustainability
| Risk title | Risk description | Potential financial impacts |
Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Environment regulation compliance |
An inadvertent breach of compliance requirements with associated reputational damage |
Increasing regulation, increasing cost |
• Strengthening sustainability governance See 'Sustainability Governance' section |
| S | and fines. | of compliance and increasing fines related to non-compliance |
• Embedding sustainability considerations into business plans, financial plans, and business cases See 'Strategy' section |
| • Internal governance, training and assigning ownership for environmental compliance obligations |
|||
| • Engaging with carbon market advisers to understand and mitigate compliance challenges and identify future opportunities |
|||
| • IEnvA certification to improve internal compliance process |
GRI 102-43, 102-44
In 2020 IAG continued to engage with a wide range of stakeholders specifically on sustainability issues. Reasons for engaging with eight key stakeholder groups are outlined in the tables below.
IAG is a member of multiple trade associations, listed on the next page, and is proactively driving trade association positions towards consistency with global 1.5°C climate ambitions. Internal governance processes ensure that stakeholder engagement is consistent with IAG's material issues and environmental goals. Where positions with trade
associations are inconsistent, IAG representatives take roles on task forces and working groups and respond to consultations to communicate our stance and constructively move to alignment.
| GRI 102-13 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Organisation | Scope | Key leadership role/s | Key leadership action |
| UN | Global | IAG CEO was the only aviation CEO to speak at UN Climate Ambition Summit in December 2020 |
First airline signatory to Business Ambition for 1.5°C pledge, which had 364 global signatories as of December 31, 2020. |
| Member of Race to Zero campaign | |||
| ICAO | Global | Keynote panel speakers at ICAO Global CO2 Stocktaking Event |
Supporting SAF sustainability standards Finalising rules for CORSIA scheme |
| Member of Fuels Task Group | |||
| SBTi | Global | One of sixteen airlines on the Technical Working Group for the aviation sector |
Active in-kind support to develop criteria and guidance for 'science-based' aviation targets, which SBTi will launch in 2021 |
| Jet Zero Council (JZC) |
UK | IAG representative chairs SAF Delivery Group |
Supported efforts to ensure primary focus of JZC is on SAF and supported set-up of the SAF |
| Member of fuels expert group | Delivery Group | ||
| Industry associations and alliances |
Scope | Key leadership role/s | Key leadership action |
| IATA | Global | IAG representative chairs IATA Sustainability and Environment |
Supporting moves for industry commitment to net zero emissions by 2050 |
| Advisory Council Representation on four key working groups – SAF, Fuels, Long term Targets, Waste Keynote panel speaker for SAF symposium |
Finalising rules for CORSIA scheme to enable carbon neutral growth in international aviation |
||
| Air Transport Action Group (ATAG) |
Global | Keynote panel speaker at Global Sustainability Aviation Summit |
Five staff formally acknowledged for contributions to Waypoint 2050 global decarbonisation roadmap |
| oneworld | Global | IAG representative co-chairs the environmental and sustainability best practice steering group |
Instrumental in delivery of oneworld net zero commitment in September 2020 |
| British Airways representative leads waste workstream |
|||
| Airlines 4 Europe (A4E) |
European | Five staff contribute environmental expertise to working groups and consultations |
Initiated EU aviation carbon roadmap and contributed expertise |
| Created interactive decarbonisation roadmap to share with A4E airlines |
| Scope | Key leadership role/s | Key leadership action |
|---|---|---|
| UK | Member of SA Council | Instrumental in delivery of net zero commitment and |
| Member of multiple working groups | production of CO2 and fuels roadmaps in February 2020 |
|
| Hosted three workshops in 2019 to support the above | ||
| UK | IAG on Executive Committee of Greener by Design group |
Supported RAeS Annual Climate Conference by sourcing eight speakers including British Airways CEO Sean Doyle |
| UK | One of 11 member organisations to launch this coalition in 2020 |
Lobbying UK Government to support negative emissions technologies |
| Spain | Iberia is one of 50 pioneering IBEX35 companies to join |
One of 34 members to sign letter calling for green recovery |
Unless otherwise stated, activities below relate to the Group. More details can be found in the indicated sections.
| Stakeholders | Why we engage/key topics | How we engage |
|---|---|---|
| Industry associations |
To develop common policy positions | See previous page |
| To improve lobbying effectiveness | Leading roles on task forces | |
| To ensure consistency between IAG sustainability | Contributing expertise to roadmaps | |
| goals and the goals of associations of which IAG or operating airlines are members |
Supporting relevant events/working groups | |
| To share our expertise on SAF and carbon pricing for the benefit of industry progress on the environment |
Driving and supporting discussions on achieving net zero emissions and 1.5°C-aligned pathways |
|
| Government and other regulators |
To support UK and EU commitments to net zero | Contributing to public policy consultations |
| emissions | Attending UN summits and working groups | |
| To build support for a net zero emissions target for aviation through the UN aviation regulator ICAO |
Through joint dialogue with trade associations | |
| To influence UK, Spanish, Irish, EU and global policies on taxes, SAF and carbon pricing, noise and airspace |
Meetings with government officials, ministers and parliamentarians |
|
| modernisation so that these policies are effective and | Senior representation on UK JZC and Airspace Board | |
| fair | Exploring new policy options for producing SAF from non-biological sources |
|
| To increase research and funding for low-carbon | ||
| aircraft, SAF and carbon removal technologies | Supported successful Sustainable Aviation bid for £18 million in funding for SAF development in 2020 |
|
| Customers | To demonstrate IAG's sustainability commitments to action, initiatives and leadership |
Sharing Flightpath Net Zero material on the IAG website |
| To facilitate passenger action on the environment | Offering websites for British Airways and Aer Lingus passengers to offset their flight emissions |
|
| To stay attuned to changing customer demands | ||
| To offer employment opportunities | Social media communications | |
| Onboard communications e.g. in-flight entertainment | ||
| Customer surveys | ||
| Focus groups | ||
| Meetings and interviews |
Unless otherwise stated, activities below relate to the Group. More details can be found in the indicated sections.
| Stakeholders | Why we engage/key topics | How we engage |
|---|---|---|
| Workforce | To align individual airline sustainability programmes with Group |
European Works Council (EWC) meetings for EEA staff |
| To share ideas and best practice | Monthly IAG Sustainability Network meetings for sustainability staff |
|
| To respond to demands from internal stakeholders | ||
| To drive positive employee engagement | Voluntary environmental and waste champions | |
| To improve recruitment and retention opportunities | Staff awareness campaigns | |
| Connecting sustainability leads in the IAG operating companies to suppliers See 'Workforce overview' section |
||
| Suppliers | To minimise exposure to ESG risks | Procurement processes |
| To support manufacturers in improving aircraft | Screening and on-site audits | |
| efficiency | Joint projects | |
| To gain support for SAF | Hangar 51 accelerator programme | |
| To identify opportunities to reduce supplier emissions | Industry conferences and supplier sustainability workshops |
|
| Shareholders and other |
To understand their approach to ESG, to enable us to better align our programmes with their priorities |
See 'Innovation, research and development' case study Investor relations contact with groups including institutional investors and shareholders, debtholders, |
| financial | To demonstrate action and leadership to external | debt providers and credit rating agencies |
| stakeholders | stakeholders on IAG initiatives | Conference calls with institutional investors |
| To maintain and increase transparency | Via corporate website | |
| To respond to legal obligations | Disclosures to external rating agencies CDP, TPI, Sustainanalytics, MSCI, Vigeo Eiris |
|
| Surveyed investors on ESG preferences | ||
| Emphasised sustainability strategy in half year and full year results presentations |
||
| Communities | To minimise potentially negative impacts of aircraft | Participating in airport community forums |
| operations, such as noise and air pollution, on quality of life in communities near where airlines operate |
Community giving campaigns | |
| To increase IAG's positive wider impacts | Engaging local schools in sports, charity and learning events |
|
| See 'Noise and air quality' case study See 'Community engagement and charitable giving' |
| NGOs and academic institutions |
For independent reviews of materiality | Meetings and visits |
|---|---|---|
| To maintain an informed position on sustainability | Industry conferences and workshops | |
| leadership | Contributing to NGO initiatives | |
| To share our expertise on SAF and carbon pricing for the benefit of industry progress on the environment |
IAG staff on academic boards at Cranfield, Heriot Watt and Aston Supergen consortium |
|
| IAG staff on steering board of Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) |
case study
IAG's impact on climate change reduced dramatically in 2020, primarily reflecting the significant drop in flying activity. Scope 1 emissions dropped by 64 per cent, Scope 2 emissions dropped by 54 per cent and use of renewable energy rose by 11 percentage points. Emissions are expected to rise as the Group recovers from the COVID-19 pandemic. However, growth is decoupling from emissions and internal forecasts suggest 2019 could represent peak emissions due to current and future use of a more fuel-efficient fleet and expanded use of SAF.
IAG calculates its impact on climate change by multiplying fuel and energy use by appropriate conversion factors that are aligned with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. UK Government GHG conversion factors are applied across the Group as these are deemed to be the most robust factors available. IEA national electricity emissions factors, and gCO2/ kWh factors from national agencies, are used to calculate Scope 2 emissions.
IAG consumed a total of 43 million MWh of energy in 2020 with 86 per cent of electricity use and 0.6 per cent of total energy use being from renewable sources. 66 per cent of this consumption is attributed to the UK, based on British
Airways Scope 1 emissions and Group electricity use in UK-based offices.
IAG discloses its impact in terms of CO2-equivalent emissions, which includes CO2, CH4, and N2O. Scope 1 emissions in 2020 were:
17%
7% 235,000
• 0.01 MT methane (CH4)
This shows that CO2 is 99 per cent of the Scope 1 impact. IAG only discloses CH4 and N2O as non-CO2 GHGs, in line with the latest available UK Government GHG conversion factors. 5% 158,000 1%
70%

| Key Metric | Unit | vly | All other Scope 3 categories 2020 |
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 CO2e | MT CO2e | -64% | 11.02 | 30.78 | 29.99 | 28.76 | 28.26 |
| Net Scope 1 CO2e | MT CO2e | -61% | 10.85 | 27.60 | 27.22 | 26.17 | nr |
| Scope 2 location-based | kt CO2e | -23% | 52.6 | 68.6 | 70.4 | 92.6 | 103.1 |
| Scope 2 market-based | kt CO2e | -54% | 10.0 | 21.73 | 40.7 | 61.9 | 92.9 |
| Scope 3 | MT CO2e | -64% | 3.24 | 9.04 | 8.79 | 7.88 | 7.64 |
| Emissions intensity (jet fuel) | gCO2/pkm4 | +18% | 106.2 | 89.8 | 91.5 | 92.3 | 94.8 |
| Renewable electricity | % | +11pts | 86% | 75%3 | 54% | 54% | nr |
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously"
1 Values rounded to nearest thousand tonnes.
2 Only material Scope 3 categories are reported here. Other Scope 3 categories are approximately 1% of IAG's Scope 3 footprint, based on past analysis.
3 Restated using an updated methodology. More details provided on next page.
4 Definition of passenger-km provided on the next page.
| Metric | Unit | Description | Commentary | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight-only emissions intensity |
gCO2/pkm | Grammes of CO2 per passenger kilometre is a standard industry measure of flight fuel efficiency. It is calculated by dividing total jet fuel use by total passenger-km, assuming 10 cargo-tonne-km is equivalent to one |
The 2020 worsening of fuel efficiency is driven by much lower load factors. Passenger numbers dropped by 73.6% and load factors dropped 20.8 percentage points due to the COVID-19 pandemic. |
||
| passenger-km. For accuracy, IAG excludes the jet fuel use of franchises and cargo freight on other airlines, and excludes no-show passengers. |
Between 2011 and 2019, IAG's average annual improvement in grammes of CO2/pkm was 1.6% per annum, ahead of the IATA industry target of 1.5%. |
||||
| The passenger-km used in the 2020 calculation is 70,469 million and the cargo tonne-km is 3,187 million. |
Group fuel efficiency is expected to be back on track by 2023. |
||||
| Scope 1 emissions and net Scope 1 emissions |
Tonnes CO2e |
Direct emissions associated with IAG operations including use of jet fuel, diesel, petrol, natural gas, and halon. Sources of |
99.6% of Scope 1 emissions are from jet fuel. Commercial aircraft remain reliant on liquid kerosene for the foreseeable future. |
||
| emissions include aircraft engines, boilers, auxiliary power units and ground vehicle engines. |
While flying activity has decreased by 75%, Scope 1 emissions have only dropped by 64% due to the effect of continuing to fly aircraft |
||||
| These emissions are primarily CO2 but other GHGs such as methane and nitrogen oxide are also reported as part of the CO2- equivalent metric. |
with emptier loads. 2020 net emissions are reduced by 168kt due to British Airways domestic offsetting. |
||||
| Net emissions are calculated by subtracting the volumes of offsets voluntarily purchased, volumes of offsets purchased to meet CORSIA compliance obligations, and allowances purchased from other sectors as part of meeting EU ETS compliance obligations. |
EU ETS allowances purchased from other sectors equate to a net reduction as per European Commission guidance. IAG has been disclosing net emissions since 2017 using this methodology. |
||||
| Scope 2 emissions (market-based/ location-based) |
Tonnes CO2e |
Emissions associated with electricity use in, for example, offices, lounges, data centres and hangars. Market-based emissions are based on the carbon intensity of electricity |
The 2020 decrease was driven by increased procurement of renewable electricity in Spain and at UK and Spanish airports, and higher use of renewables in national electricity grids. |
||
| purchased from suppliers. Location-based emissions are based on the carbon intensity of national electricity grids. |
Where the electricity use of overseas offices was not avaiable, this was based on leased space in m2, multiplied by relevant kWh/m2 factors and IEA national electricity emissions factors. |
||||
| Scope 3 emissions | Tonnes CO2e |
Indirect emissions associated with products IAG buys and sells. Analysis in 2018 and 2019 |
The drop in Scope 3 emissions is related to the drop in activity of the fleet. |
||
| revealed that Scope 3 categories 2, 3, 9, and 14 represent approximately 99% of IAG's Scope 3 footprint. Other categories are calculated within six months of year-end. |
70% of Scope 3 emissions are from fuel and energy-related activities (see pie chart on previous page). |
||||
| Renewable electricity |
% | The share of electricity generated by renewable sources such as solar power and wind, based on volumes procured from |
The 2020 increase is driven by procurement of renewables in Vueling and Iberia and at UK and Spanish airports where we operate. |
||
| renewable electricity suppliers. In cases where electricity sources were unavailable, the source of electricity is assumed to be the national grid. |
The 2019 value has been restated using the latest verified data, more robust calculations of ground power, and national grid emissions factors published after year end. |
| Metric | Unit | % vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emissions intensity (Scope 2) | gCO2/pkm | +154% | 0.51 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.35 |
| GHG reduction initiatives | Tonnes CO2e | -78% | 17.21 | 77.39 | 65.66 | nr | nr |
| Electricity | Mn kWh | -19% | 215.7 | 267.71 | 234.9 | 253.2 | nr |
| Energy | Mn MWh | -65% | 42.5 | 119.71 | 119.4 | 114.4 | 108.4 |
| Revenue per tonne CO2e | €/tonne CO2e | -15% | 705 | 827 | 811 | 796 | 796 |
| Jet fuel use | MT fuel | -64% | 3.45 | 9.65 | 9.41 | 9.02 | 8.86 |
| Fleet age | years | -7% | 10.6 | 11.4 | 11.3 | 11.4 | 10.8 |
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously"'
1 Restated using a more robust methodology and latest electricity emissions factors. Descriptions and commentary on these metrics is available in the 'Additional Disclosures' section of the IAG Non-Financial Information Statement.
IAG will deliver net zero emissions across its global operations by 2050. This aligns with worldwide efforts to keep average global average temperatures below a 1.5°C rise. IAG was the first airline group to commit to this goal and the first airline group to sign the UN Business Ambition for 1.5°C pledge.
In this context, net zero emissions means that all CO2 that IAG operations emit in a year will be balanced out by an equivalent amount of CO2 removed from the atmosphere. The net zero commitment covers Scope 1 and 2 CO2 emissions. IAG is committed to minimising non-CO2 impacts as well, and will review targets on these when the science around them becomes more robust. The focus is on reducing use of fossil jet fuel, as this accounts for 99 per cent of the Scope 1 and 2 footprint.
The pioneering Flightpath Net Zero programme underpins the IAG commitment. This programme includes 2025 and 2030 Group-wide targets, financial incentives for senior managers explicitly tied to delivery of carbon intensity targets for both the Group and operating airlines (See 'Sustainability strategy' section), and a published 30-year roadmap for achieving net zero.
IAG will minimise gross emissions through a combination of fleet modernisation, operational efficiency and SAF. In 2050, any remaining emissions will be neutralised by use of GHG removal technology. IAG sees carbon offsets as a transitional measure and is advocating for government support for GHG removal technology via membership of the Coalition for Negative Emissions. Net emissions will be reduced in the short- and medium-term by use of carbon offset and removal projects and funding emissions reductions via the UK and EU ETS.
Group-wide climate targets remain the same and have been re-baselined to 2019 due to the pandemic:
IAG also had a target for a 10 per cent improvement in fuel efficiency between 2014 and 2020, from 97.5g CO2/pkm to 87.3g CO2/pkm. In 2019, IAG achieved 89.8gCO2/pkm and was on track. The 2020 target was not met due to a drop in passenger load factors as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Plans for fleet composition and capacity and operational efficiency initiatives should enable delivery of the 2025 fuel efficiency target of 80g CO2/pkm. In light of the ongoing impact of COVID-19, IAG will review this target in the first half of 2021.
In 2020 IAG was an active participant in the SBTi Technical Working Group for aviation, to develop methodologies for aviation climate targets aligned with a global climate scenario of well below 2 degrees. Once the SBTi finalises a targetsetting methodology for airlines in 2021, IAG plans to submit a target for approval.

IAG was the first airline group to publish a quantified roadmap to net zero emissions. This was based on comprehensive modelling.
An updated roadmap scenario for IAG is shown on the right. This assumes a recovery to 2019 levels of passenger demand by 2024, and then annual demand growth of approximately two per cent to 2050, in line with IATA industry forecasts. The recovery path between 2020 and 2023 is illustrative and will change, but IAG remains committed to its 2025, 2030 and 2050 targets.
The IAG ambition is for at least 45 per cent of fuel in 2050 to be from SAF, up from 30 per cent due to lower overall jet fuel use and continued policy support. Overall fuel efficiency will improve by at least 70% by 2050 compared to 2019 levels.
In 2021, IAG will update this 30-year decarbonisation plan to account for the latest recovery forecasts, any acquisitions, policy and technology developments, and targetsetting methodologies.

IAG continues to invest in next-generation aircraft and engine changes. These changes, along with fleet retirements, will play a major role in reducing emissions intensity per passenger.
IAG continues to develop annual programmes of operational and fuel efficiency initiatives for both aircraft and ground operations. Representatives within each airline are working to reduce onboard fuel consumption and fly aircraft as efficiently as possible, without negatively affecting flight safety, passenger service offerings or flight schedules where possible.
The Honeywell GoDirect Flight Efficiency software is in use across the Group to identify and monitor fuel-saving opportunities.
Examples of fuel efficiency initiatives implemented over the past two years
IAG is a leader in developing SAF by making direct investments in production capacity for "second generation" fuels, which use carbon-rich waste feedstocks, in addition to purchasing these fuels where mandates exist to do so. SAF is chemically almost identical to jet fuel from fossil fuels, but over its recent life cycle emits 70 to 100 per cent less CO2 and according to recent research materially reduces particulate emissions and non-CO2 effects. The Group's investments are backed up with SAF purchase agreements which are critical to the financeability of the new SAF production capacity.
The Group has committed to invest US\$400 million in SAF production over the next two decades. IAG's dedicated sustainable fuels team is also leading efforts to influence domestic, regional and international policy to support uptake and production of these fuels.
See 'Stakeholder engagement' section
include optimised engine washes, reducing the use of Auxiliary Power Units (APUs), landing light deployment, single engine taxi-in, continuous descent operations, lighter main wheels and reducing weight onboard.
lightweight trolleys to reduce weight onboard;
• Iberia installed more than 5,300 solar panels on its aircraft engine maintenance hangar in Madrid, working in partnership with specialist firm Getting Greener. From 2021 these solar panels will generate 80 million kWh a year for Iberia's hangars, workshops and offices;

IAG continues to work with technology developers to establish a range of SAF supply options for the future.

Supports SDGs 7, 9, 13
IAG recognises the need for carbon offset and removal projects as a transitional means of meeting carbon reduction goals and to support customers in mitigating the impact of their flights.
IAG voluntarily funds emissions avoidance and removal projects around the world, offering passengers the chance to do the same, and explores the use of carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) technology in our operations and SAF production. Since 2013, operating airlines have been funding emissions reductions in other sectors to meet compliance obligations under the EU ETS, and since 2019 have been participating in the UN CORSIA scheme to enable carbon-neutral growth on eligible international flights.
When IAG or operating companies choose to voluntarily invest in carbon avoidance
and removal projects, they work in collaboration with key partners, carry out due diligence to select reputable providers, and select projects carefully to meet and align with verified quality standards.

portable solar lights to 40 rural health clinics in Zambia and Malawi; and
• Vueling sponsored the not-for-profit GreenNova and their CAPTACO2 research project to capture CO2 from the air.
Since January 2020 British Airways has offset the carbon emissions on all flights within the UK. Equivalent emissions reductions have been achieved through British Airways' voluntary investment in a range of quality, Gold Standard- and Verified Carbon Standard (VCS)-verified carbon reduction projects. These projects include rainforest protection in the Congo Basin, energy-efficient cookstoves in Peru, renewable wind energy in Turkey and solar energy projects in India.
IAG has made great progress with waste tracking and waste initiatives over the past few years. For example, Iberia waste per passenger dropped 12 per cent from 2016 to 2019. Initiatives across the Group include reducing and recycling plastic, glass, metal cans, paper and food waste.
The COVID-19 pandemic has set back progress by making it harder to calculate a waste baseline, pausing or delaying some waste initiatives, and driving temporary re-introductions of plastic items for health and safety reasons. For example, progress on the 2020 British Airways target to remove 700 tonnes of onboard single-use plastic (SUP) was unable to be tracked as result of changes to flying volumes, onboard catering and internal resources.
However, in 2021 IAG plans to set new Group-wide waste reduction targets, update the Group Sustainability policy to place greater emphasis on waste, and comply with the EU SUP ban when it enters into force in July.
Onboard services are IAG's main source of waste. Key inputs include onboard meals and newspapers supplied to passengers, and key outputs include plastic packaging, leftover food waste, drinks cans, and cabin items such as wrappers. Waste is typically offloaded and processed at airports by third-party caterers, with some materials recovered on-site and other materials incinerated or sent to landfill. The majority of cabin and catering waste is processed at IAG's hub airports – London Heathrow, Dublin, Madrid and Barcelona.
Where possible, IAG acts to reduce food waste while maintaining customer choice. For example, British Airways runs a pre-flight top-up catering service for London flights, to meet late changes to onboard catering requirements whilst minimising over-catering which would increase food waste.
| Metric | Unit | vly | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total onboard waste at hub airports | millon tonnes | -56% | 8.2 | 18.6 |
| Shorthaul waste per passenger | kg/pax | +63% | 0.13 | 0.08 |
| Longhaul waste per passenger | kg/pax | +69% | 1.96 | 1.16 |
| Overall waste per passenger | kg/pax | +58% | 0.41 | 0.26 |
| Metric | Description | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Waste/pax | Onboard catering waste generated per passenger, net of | Onboard waste at hub airports dropped 56 per cent. |
| recycling, and split between shorthaul and longhaul operations. Total includes cabin waste from Vueling as a split was unavailable. |
Onboard waste per passenger increased. Decreases, driven by reductions in onboard services and greater rates of recycling at hub airports, were offset by higher |
|
| Passenger numbers are based on inbound passengers who have their waste processed at hub airports e.g. London Heathrow, London Gatwick, Madrid, Barcelona and Dublin. |
rates of cancelled bookings and greater use of disposable products for health and safety reasons. |
|
| Shorthaul and longhaul flights are defined by distance and by onboard product. |
IAG is committed to reducing aircraft noise and air pollution, to minimise our impact on local communities near airports. The average noise per landing and take-off cycle (LTO) dropped by 10 per cent between 2015 and 2019.
Operating companies regularly monitor noise and air quality performance using national databases and global aircraft noise standards. They drive improvements through fleet modernisation and specific operational practices like continuous descents. They also engage with
stakeholders such as community groups, regulators and industry partners and participate in research and operational trials.
| Metric | Unit | vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise per cycle | QC per LTO | -3.5% | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.07 | 1.06 | 1.08 |
| NOx per cycle | kg per LTO | +6.6% | 9.84 | 9.23 | 9.71 | nr | nr |
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously"'
| Metric | Description | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Noise per LTO cycle | Average noise per flight considering arrival and departure noise for each aircraft type. Based on the number of flights of all aircraft which operated during the year, including leased aircraft. Quota Count (QC) values from the UK Government are used to create a relative categorisation based on certified noise levels. For example, for a single flight, a Boeing 747 would have a score of 6.0 while an Airbus A320 would have a score of 1.0. |
The 2020 improvement is driven by the accelerated retirement of older aircraft such as the Airbus A340s and Boeing 747s. |
| NOx per LTO cycle | Average emissions of the air pollutant nitrogen oxide (NOx) as aircraft take off and land. The calculation considers the engine certifications and aircraft types of all aircraft which operated during the year, including leased aircraft, referencing information from the ICAO emissions database. |
Year-on-year trends can fluctuate due to multiple factors. The 2020 increase is driven by a relative increase in longhaul versus shorthaul flying at British Airways, and use of A330s in the Aer Lingus fleet. |
Over 98 per cent of the IAG fleet has met the ICAO Chapter 4 and ICAO CAEP 4 standards for several years so these are not disclosed in 2020. IAG typically reports on continuous descent (CDO) compliance but was unable to in 2020 due to limited data availability from the National Air Traffic Services (NATS).
| 2020 metric | Unit1 | vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICAO Chapter 142 | % at standard | +5pts | 58% | 53% | 50% | 46% | 46% |
| CAEP Chapter 63 | % at standard | +2pts | 80% | 78% | 74% | 69% | 68% |
| CAEP Chapter 8 | % at standard | +5pts | 40% | 35% | 29% | 26% | 25% |
1 Based on the fleet position at the end of 2020, including parked aircraft and excluding leased aircraft
2 ICAO Chapter standards compare aircraft noise against standardised limits that are a combination of lateral, approach, and flyover noise levels. Higher standards are more stringent. Chapter 14 applies to new aircraft certified from January 1, 2017.
3 ICAO CAEP standards are for NOx emissions from aircraft engines. Higher standards are more stringent. The CAEP 6 NOx standard applies to engines manufactured from January 1, 2008, and the CAEP 8 standard applies to engines manufactured from January 1, 2014.
IAG leads the aviation industry in engaging with global sustainability innovators. As part of Hangar 51, IAG's core innovation platform, the Group continues to attract the world's top emerging technology companies working on sustainability solutions.
Types of engagement include supporting applications for grant funding, running accelerator programmes, incubation, investment opportunities, university collaborations, active pilots, and research and development consortiums. IAG representatives also sit on academic boards and public-private partnerships to support new technologies and innovation.
Since 2019, sustainability has been one of the eight core challenge areas within the
Hangar 51 structured ten-week accelerator programme. The Group has increased its engagement with global tech communities focused on sustainability and has seen a six-fold increase in the number of active projects in this area.
IAG supply chain;
In 2021 the Group will continue to engage with a range of emerging green technology disruptors. More details are available on the dedicated Hangar 51 website.
IAG aims to create an environment in which employees feel motivated, safe and able to thrive as this is central to the continued success of the Group. Core principles in the Code of Conduct include fair and equal treatment, nondiscrimination, fairness and respect for human rights. This Code applies to all Directors, managers and employees of the Group and e-learning training to support it is mandatory and applicable to all employees and Directors. Individual operating companies have responsibility for policies and procedures relating to their employees, including appropriate reward frameworks to ensure they can continue to attract and retain the best talent for every role.
At the end of 2020, 57,928 people were employed across the Group in 82 countries, a decrease of 20 per cent in the year. Our voluntary turnover rate for 2020 was 15 per cent compared with 7 per cent in 2019, a change that reflects the unfortunate but necessary resizing of the business.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, British Airways has worked closely with its trades unions to reach agreements to save jobs and reduce costs. In some areas this has reduced the need for redundancies by a significant number or even altogether. This has been coupled with voluntary measures such as unpaid leave and part-time working to reduce the size of the workforce as the demand for flying remained significantly reduced. Where redundancies have been necessary, a large proportion of these have been achieved through voluntary measures.
For those employees who were made redundant, support has been offered to help them find alternative employment and explore redeployment opportunities. In British Airways, for instance, retention pools have been created to support redundant employees back into the workplace, should the situation improve.
Measures to support employee satisfaction and talent management are primarily managed within operating companies. Each operating company has its own established methods of measuring employee satisfaction. IAG is currently working to align the talent management framework across the Group, focusing at Group level on the IAG Management Committee and their direct reports. IAG has a good track record of retaining and promoting talent into senior roles, as evidenced by the Management Committee appointments during 2020.
IAG has employees based in European countries which comply with the conventions of the International Labour Organization (ILO), covering subjects that are considered as fundamental principles and rights at work: freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining; the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labour; the effective abolition of child labour; and the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation. Outside of the EU, IAG recognises trade unions in many jurisdictions, has collective agreements and meets/exceeds all relevant labour standards.
IAG has a European Works Council (EWC) which brings together employee representatives from the different European Economic Area (EEA) Member States in which the Group operates. EWC representatives are informed about and, where appropriate, consulted on transnational matters which may impact employees in two or more EEA Member States. During 2020, IAG hosted one full meeting of the EWC (compared with two in 2019) and eight Select Committee meetings, which have all been held virtually since March.

Within the Group, individual operating companies have responsibility for the policies and procedures relating to their employees, including reward frameworks to ensure they can continue to attract and retain the best talent for every role.
Due to the diverse nature of Group businesses, both in terms of jurisdictions and operations, all training policies and programmes are implemented at operating company level. Each is responsible for determining the specific courses offered within their organisation, the frequency with which training courses must be completed, and the employees required to attend. However, across the Group, all operating companies are required to run the following mandatory corporate training courses for their employees:
Supports SDG 3
IAG is committed to the health and safety of our employees, customers and all others affected by our activities. This means operating in a healthy, safe and secure way in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, company policies and industry standards. Health and safety are fundamental to our business, whether in the air or on the ground. It is our highest priority.
IAG has robust governance processes in place led by the safety committees in each operating company. The IAG Board Safety Committee, chaired by the Group Chief Executive Officer, monitors all matters relating to the operational safety of IAG's airlines as well as to the systems and
IAG has a Group-wide Equal Opportunities policy to address and eliminate discrimination and promote equality of opportunity regardless of age, gender, disability, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation. At Group level, IAG also has a Directors Selection and Diversity Policy that sets out the principles that govern the selection process and the approach to diversity on the Board of Directors and the IAG Management Committee. These policies have been approved by the Board of Directors.
In terms of gender diversity and equality, IAG has set a target to reach 33 per cent women across senior executive levels by 2025 and has put in place an extensive programme of action to help deliver on this target. IAG monitors and reports on progress, including on the management pipeline across the Group.
Iberia and Vueling have Equality Plans covering all employees in Spain. Vueling implemented this in 2014 and Iberia published an integrated plan in 2018 covering pilots, cabin crew and ground
staff agreements. Both plans will be revised in 2021 to align with new legislation.
resources dedicated to safety activities
IAG's customers travel on aircraft and through buildings and environments that are subject to regulations applicable to health and safety in each country. Procedures, systems and technology used in our operations are designed to protect
employees and customers alike. As IAG continued to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic, the Group has followed expert guidance from bodies such as the IATA Council Aviation Recovery Taskforce (CART), the WHO, Public Health England and Spanish and Irish authorities. New hygiene measures have been introduced for all employees and customers. All these measures have
across the Group.
The Iberia "Quiero Ser" programme, to attract and promote female careers in the aviation industry, was postponed in 2020 due to the pandemic and plans to restart in 2021.
Ethnic diversity is an issue of particular importance for British Airways. 18 per cent of British Airways UK staff have declared a Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic (BAME) background, up from 16 per cent in 2019, and compared with 14 per cent of the UK population. UK employees represent 50 per cent of the Group total.
British Airways aims to improve BAME representation in senior roles and 2020 achievements were:
been carefully thought through alongside authorities and aviation regulators.
To support employee wellbeing across the Group, each operating company created new websites and internal resources to support mental health and COVID-19 safety. For example, British Airways built on existing resources throughout 2020 and issued daily press updates which included wellbeing signposts, such as information about its Employee Assistance Programme and the UNMIND mental health digital application. The latter includes webinars, interviews and other resources and access was extended to family members of employees in the second half of 2020.
the latest advice from public health



IAG had no known cases of human rights violations across the Group during 2020. IAG GBS screens suppliers to identify and mitigate potential incidences of human rights violations, and modern slavery clauses feature in all new supplier contracts as well as contract renewals.
IAG is taking steps to prevent incidences of modern slavery within the Group and across its supply chains. In terms of policies associated with human rights, IAG asks suppliers to adhere to the third IAG Group Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement, which was published in 2019. This statement is made under section 54, part 5 of the 2015 UK Modern Slavery Act (MSA). IAG also supports the 2018 IATA resolution denouncing human trafficking
and reaffirming a commitment to tackle this issue.
Human trafficking is of particular concern to IAG and to the wider aviation industry, as the Group transports millions of passengers every year and has tens of thousands of suppliers across the world. To prevent human trafficking, operating airlines work closely with governments and the airports in which they operate to ensure that any suspected trafficking on our flights is identified, reported and dealt with appropriately.
Operating airlines train staff to recognise the signs of potential human trafficking situations, and provide procedures for reporting where any cases are suspected. This training is managed at airline level.

British Airways, Aer Lingus and Vueling run training for pilots and cabin crew on identifying and responding to human trafficking, and Iberia will refresh such training in 2021. Guidance and procedures for flight crew and cabin crew are also included in the Aer Lingus and Vueling Operations Manuals. In 2020, Vueling supported the Spanish police in locating and arresting members of an organisation which trafficked women.
Key risks associated with human rights matters are included in the 'Sustainability risks and opportunities' section. In 2021, IAG plans to review the assessment of human rights risks within the business.
IAG operating companies have longstanding partnerships to support community causes both locally and around the world.
In 2020, €4.6 million was raised across the Group1 , a 19 per cent decrease from the €5.7 million raised in 2019 and an impressive contribution given reduced business activity. Sources were:
1 British Airways total based on January-November. The Group 2019 value has been restated due to the expansion of the scope of reported contributions.
| Metric | Unit | Sub-category | vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employment | Average manpower |
|||||||
| equivalent1 | -8.2% | 60,612 | 66,034 | 64,734 | 63,422 | 63,387 | ||
| Headcount | Number of people2 | -19.8% | 57,928 | 72,268 | 71,134 | nr | nr | |
| Composition | % headcount by | Full-time: | +5pts | 79% | 74% | 75% | nr | nr |
| employment type | Part-time: | -5pts | 21% | 26% | 25% | |||
| Composition | % headcount by employment contract |
Permanent: | +3pts | 97% | 94% | 94% | nr | |
| Temporary: | -3pts | 3% | 6% | 6% | nr | |||
| Composition | % headcount by employee categories |
Cabin Crew: | -4pts | 31% | 35% | 35% | nr | |
| Pilots: | +2pts | 13% | 11% | 11% | nr | |||
| Airport: | -1pts | 25% | 26% | 26% | ||||
| Corporate: | +3pts | 20% | 17% | 18% | ||||
| Maintenance: | 0pts | 11% | 11% | 10% | ||||
| Employees by country |
Number of people | UK: | -4pts | 50% | 54% | |||
| Spain: | +3pts | 34% | 31% | nr nr |
nr | |||
| Ireland: | +1pts | 8% | 7% | |||||
| India: | 0pts | 2% | 2% | |||||
| USA: | 0pts | 1% | 1% | |||||
| Other: | 0pts | 5% | 5% |
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously".
1 The mean of the manpower equivalent captured quarterly to reflect seasonality. This is not adjusted for time not worked whilst under COVID-19 job retention schemes and it reflects normal contractual hours.
2 Actual number of people employed across the Group at December 31, 2020.
| Metric | Unit | Sub-category | vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender diversity |
% women at Board level |
+12pts | 45% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 25% | |
| Gender diversity |
% women at senior executive level |
0pts | 30% | 30% | 27% | 24% | 23% | |
| Gender diversity |
% women at Group level |
-1pts | 43% | 44% | 45% | 44% | 44% | |
| Age diversity | % of managerial staff in | <30 | -1pts | 3% | 4% | 7% | 6% | |
| each age band | 30-50 | +2pts | 57% | 55% | 57% | 65% | nr | |
| 50+ | -1pts | 40% | 41% | 36% | 29% | |||
| Age diversity | % of non-managerial | <30 | -3pts | 18% | 21% | 22% | 17% | nr |
| staff in each age band | 30-50 | +4pts | 54% | 50% | 50% | 51% | ||
| 50+ | -1pts | 28% | 29% | 28% | 32% | |||
| Workforce | % voluntary and | Voluntary | +9pts | 16% | 7% | 8% | 8% | |
| turnover | non-voluntary | Non-voluntary | +3pts | 5% | 2% | 3% | 2% | nr |
| Workforce | Overall % by age group <30 | -21pts | 16% | 37% | 35% | |||
| turnover | 30-50 | -3pts | 33% | 36% | 34% | nr | nr | |
| 50+ | +24pts | 51% | 27% | 31% | ||||
| Workforce | Overall % by gender | Women | +5pts | 52% | 47% | 51% | ||
| turnover | Men | -5pts | 48% | 53% | 49% | nr | nr | |
| GRI 102-41, 403-9, 404-1 | Additional workforce metrics | |||||||
| Metric | Unit | vly | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Social dialogue and trade unions |
% covered by collective bargaining agreements |
+2pts | 89% | 87% | 86% | 88% | 88% | |
| Average hours of training |
Average hours per employee per year |
-45.4% | 26.4 | 48.4 | 41.1 | 45.8 | 34.9 | |
| Lost Time Injury (LTI) | LTI per 200,000 hours |
frequency rate worked -44.5% 2.41 4.341 4.201 nr nr LTI severity rate Average days lost per LTI +67.0% 37.80 22.64 21.12 nr nr Fatalities 0pts 0 0 1 nr nr
Note: "nr" means "not reported previously". In the table above this can refer to multiple years.
1 The 2018 and 2019 LTI frequency rates have been restated due to change in standardising factor to better align to GRI standards.
| Metric | Unit | Description | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employment | Average manpower equivalent |
Manpower equivalent is the number of employees adjusted to include part-time workers, overtime and contractors. The average is the mean of the manpower equivalent captured quarterly to reflect |
The 8.2% decrease reflects the employee restructuring at British Airways and Aer Lingus. This measure accounts for employees' contractual schedule of work and therefore does not account for the impact of COVID-19 job retention scheme. |
| seasonality. | |||
| Headcount | Number of people |
Headcount is the actual number of people employed across the Group (employees) at December 31, 2020. |
Overall headcount decreased over the year by 19.8%. This reflects the employee restructuring at British Airways and Aer Lingus. |
| Composition | % headcount by employment type, contract and employee categories |
Composition is a breakdown of headcount as at December 31, 2020. Definitions of full-time and part-time vary across the Group. A temporary employment contract has a defined end date. The employee category breakdown portrays the distribution of the major groups within IAG's workforce "in the air" – Pilots and Cabin Crew – and "on the ground" – Airport, Corporate and Maintenance. |
A higher proportion of temporary employee leavers in 2020 increased the ratio of permanent employees to 97%. The employee category, where business restructuring had the highest impact, was cabin crew which explains the decrease in its proportion of all Group employee categories. Airport employees, the second most-reduced category, combined with cabin crew represents over 80 per cent of all part-time employees which explains the increase of the proportion of full-time Group employees. |
| Employees by country |
Number of people |
This metric depicts the distribution of the Group's employees according to the country in which they are based. |
The decrease in the proportion of Group employees based in the UK is due to the redundancies at British Airways. At the end of 2020 IAG had employees based in 82 countries. |
| Gender diversity |
% women at Board, senior executive, and Group level |
The share of women as a proportion of all staff at specific levels of seniority across the Group. |
There were 193 senior executives as at December 31, 2020. |
| IAG has published objectives for 33% women on the Board by 2020 and 33% women across the Group's senior executive levels by 2025. |
IAG maintained the proportion of women in senior executive levels – 30% by the end of 2020. IAG achieved its 2020 Board target in 2018 and has increased the proportion of women on the Board to 45%. |
||
| A decrease in the proportion of women across the whole Group is explained by 48% of total turnover made up of cabin crew, which was composed of 71% women in 2019. |
|||
| Age diversity | % of staff in The 'on the ground' managerial population each age includes all airport, corporate and maintenance band roles equivalent to a manager across the Group. |
The decrease in the proportion of employees over 50 years of age is explained by the higher uptake (over 50%) of voluntary redundancy measures in this age band. |
|
| The 'in the air' managerial population includes all pilot and cabin crew roles equivalent to Captains and Cabin Service Managers. |
The decrease in the proportion of employees under 30 years of age is explained by the end of temporary contracts. |
||
| Workforce turnover |
% voluntary and non voluntary turnover |
Measured as the number of leavers as a percentage of the average number of Group employees in the year. The number of leavers excludes temporary contracts and death in service. Voluntary turnover occurs when |
The overall annual turnover in 2020 was 21% – a total of 13,654 employees, of which 3,456 were non-voluntary leavers. This compares to 9% in 2019, a total of 6,206 of which 1,372 were non voluntary leavers. |
| employees choose to leave (e.g. resignation, retirement, voluntary redundancy) and non voluntary turnover occurs when employees leave for reasons other than a personal decision (e.g. compulsory redundancy, dismissal). The table on the previous page shows the overall breakdown of turnover by age and gender. |
The increase in turnover was due to the unfortunate but necessary resizing of the business due to COVID-19. A recruitment freeze across the Group in 2020 also impacted turnover. |
||
| Over 88% of total Group turnover was at British Airways, the largest employer within the Group, mostly through voluntary measures. |
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for ensuring that IAG has an appropriate risk management framework, including the determination of the nature and extent of risk it is willing to take to achieve its strategic objectives. The Board has oversight of the Group's operations to ensure that internal controls are in place and operate effectively. Management is responsible for the effective operation of the internal controls and execution of the agreed risk mitigation plans.
The Group has an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) policy which has been approved by the Board. This policy sets the framework for a comprehensive risk management process and methodology, ensuring a robust identification and assessment of the risks facing the Group, including emerging risks. Enterprise risks are assessed and plotted on an Enterprise risk map (with individual risk maps produced for each operating company and relevant function, such as IAG Tech and IAG Group Business Services, and for the overall Group). This process is led by the Management Committee and best practices are shared across the Group.
This year, in response to the pandemic crisis, the risk management framework has further evolved to: develop the Group's assessment of the interdependencies of risks; built on scenario planning to quantify risk impact under different assumptions; and consider the risks within the Group's risk map that have increased either as a result of the external environment or as a result of decisions made by the business in response to the external environment. The process adopted this year has helped the Board and management to respond quickly to the new and rapidly changing risk landscape, enabling clear understanding and identification of emerging risks arising from the impact of the pandemic and of how the pandemic has affected existing risks included within the Group's existing risk maps.
Across the Group, risk owners are responsible for identifying potential risks and appropriately managing the related business decisions within their area of responsibility. As the Group transforms, the level of change and agility required creates risks and opportunities. For these business transformational risks, business
owners are assigned, and the business will agree appropriate mitigations and timelines for implementation, following discussions with all relevant stakeholders. All risks are assessed for likelihood and impact against the Group's three-year Business Plan and strategy. Key controls and mitigations are documented including appropriate response plans. Where risk treatments require time to implement, short-term mitigations are assessed and the timeline to risk mitigation and consequent risk acceptance discussed and agreed. Every principal risk has clear Management Committee oversight.
As part of the risk management framework, potential emerging risks and longer-term threats are considered to identify new trends, competitor actions, regulations, governments' interventions, or business disruptors that could impact the Group's business strategy and plans. These emerging risks are monitored within the overall risk framework as 'on watch' until they are re-assessed to be no longer a potential threat to the business or where an assessment of the risk impact over the next two to three years can be made, and appropriate mitigations can be put in place. Following the pandemic impact, consideration of other high-impact, low likelihood risks have been discussed.
IAG considers risks to the Strategic Business Plan over the short term up to two years, medium term from three to five years and in the longer term beyond five years. Risk outcomes are quantified as the potential cash impact to the business plan over two years, as well as potential brand reputation, regulatory scrutiny and share price considerations.
The risk management framework is embedded across the Group. Risk maps are discussed, and risk potential impacts assessed for each operating company and Group functions that support the business, such as IAG Tech and IAG GBS, and at the Group level, and the enterprise risk function ensures consistency over the risk management process.
Risk maps are reviewed by each operating company's management committee, which considers the accuracy and completeness of the map, significant movements in risk and any changes required to the response plans addressing those risks. Where the Group's operating companies have a reliance on other parts
of the Group for services delivery, risks are reflected appropriately across risk maps to ensure accountability is clear. Each operating company's management committee confirms to its operating company board as to the identification, quantification and management of risks within its operating company as a whole at least annually.
The management committee of each operating company escalates risks that have a Group impact or require Group consideration in line with the Group ERM framework.
At the Group level, key risks from the operating companies, together with Group-wide risks, are maintained in a Group risk map. The IAG Management Committee reviews risk during the year including the Group risk map semiannually in advance of reviews by the Audit and Compliance Committee in accordance with the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code and the Spanish Good Governance Code for Listed Companies.
The IAG Board of Directors discusses risk and considers the risk environment as part of wider Board discussions at every meeting in addition to the bi-annual risk map review, including a review of the assessment of IAG's performance against its risk appetite, scenarios for assessment of viability and the outputs from the viability modelling. The Board has ongoing early sight of management consideration of potential scenarios to enable it to challenge subjectivities and confirm rationale.
IAG has a risk appetite framework which includes statements informing the business, either qualitatively or quantitatively, of the Board's appetite for certain risks. Each risk appetite statement formalises how performance is monitored either on a Group-wide basis or within major projects. The framework remained in place throughout the year, with the Board assessing its appetite to tolerance of certain risks through additional reviews with management. The highly regulated and commercially competitive environment, together with the businesses' operational complexity, exposes the Group to a number of risks. 2020 has heightened IAG's exposure to certain of these risks as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic's unprecedented impact on the travel and aviation industry. Management
remains focused on mitigating these risks at all levels in the business although many remain outside our control; for example, changes in political and economic environment, government restrictions over travel and movement of their citizens, governance requirements and regulations, external events causing operational disruption including civil unrest, adverse weather or pandemic, volatility in the markets and availability of funding and changes in the competitive landscape.
Risks are grouped into four categories: strategic, business and operational, financial including tax and treasury, compliance and regulatory risks.
Guidance is provided below on the key risks that may threaten the Group's business model, future performance, solvency and liquidity.
Where there are particular circumstances that mean that the risk is more likely to materialise, those circumstances are described below. No new principal risks were identified through the risk management discussions across the Group's businesses this year. Where the existing principal risks have been reconsidered to reflect the challenges faced by the Group following the COVID-19 pandemic impact, these are highlighted by the 'C19' symbol in the table below. Additional key business responses implemented by management are also set out.

The list is not intended to be exhaustive but does reflect those risks that the Board and Management Committee believe to be the most likely risks to have a material impact on the Group.
market for supply of services.
Open competition and markets are in the long-term best interests of the airline industry and consumers. The Group seeks to mitigate the risk from government intervention or changes to the regulations that can have a significant impact on operations.

Status The pandemic resulted in restrictions being imposed, which have required capacity adjustments, including fleet adjustments and new operating procedures to recommence flying. The operations of the Group's suppliers, including aircraft manufacturers, have also been impacted by the pandemic, which has increased the risk of significant business interruption, delays or disruptions, such as a temporary suspension of operations, a lack of availability of labour to support supplier operations and/or longer-term problems in maintaining supply, whether as a result of suppliers entering insolvency or otherwise. This may lead to shortages of business-critical services and/or increased costs to secure such services.
The Group continues to lobby and raise awareness of the negative impacts of ATC airspace restrictions and performance issues on the aviation sector and economies across Europe, particularly through a future recovery period.
The Group relies on the provision of airport infrastructure and is dependent on the timely delivery of appropriate facilities. A third runway expansion proposal at London Heathrow and additional facilities at Dublin Airport are among examples where the Group supports solutions that are efficient, cost effective and of value to our customers.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| IAG is dependent on the timely | Any sub-optimal service delivery or asset | • The Group mitigates engine and fleet performance |
| entry of new aircraft and the engine | supplied by a critical supplier can impact | risks, including unacceptable levels of carbon |
| performance of aircraft to improve operational | on the Group airlines' operational and | emissions to the extent possible by working closely |
| efficiency and resilience and support | financial performance as well as | with the engine and fleet manufacturers, as well |
| the delivery of the Group sustainability | disrupting our customers. | as retaining flexibility with existing aircraft |
| programme. | Infrastructure decisions or changes in | return requirements. |
| IAG is dependent on the timely, on-budget | policy by governments, regulators or | • The Group engages in regulatory reviews of supplier |
| delivery of infrastructure changes, particularly | other entities could impact operations | pricing, such as the UK Civil Aviation Authority's |
| at key airports. | but are outside of the Group's control. | periodic review of charges at London Heathrow and |
| IAG is dependent on resilience | London Heathrow has no spare | London Gatwick airports. |
| within the operations of ATC services to ensure | runway capacity. | • The Group is active at an EU policy level and in |
| that its flight operations are delivered | An uncontrolled increase in the planned | consultations with airports covered by the EU Airport |
| as scheduled. | cost of expansion could result in | Changes Directive. |
| IAG is dependent on the performance and costs of critical third-party suppliers that provide services to our customers and the Group such as airport operators, border control and caterers. The impact of the pandemic on the Group's supply chain will also impact the Group where suppliers face ongoing financial stress or restructuring where they exit the |
increased landing charges. Airport charges represent a significant operating cost to the airlines and have an impact on operations. |
• The Group pro-actively works with suppliers to ensure operations are maintained and the impact to their businesses understood, with mitigations implemented where necessary. • The Group procurement function has led an ongoing review of all critical contracts across the Group's businesses. |

Status The Group's ability to attract and secure bookings, and therefore revenue depends on the public recognition of the Group's airlines' brands and their associated reputation. The Group's airlines brands are, and will continue to be, vulnerable to adverse market or customer perception. Reliability, including on-time performance, is a key element of the brands and of each customer's experience. IAG remains focused on strengthening its customercentricity to ensure that its operating companies continue to adapt and focus their business models to meet changing customer expectations. The Group's airlines have implemented strict hygiene and social distancing measures to ensure customer and employee safety in line with EASA regulations. British Airways was awarded a Skytrax 4-star Airline Safety rating in November, the first airline to receive such a rating.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Erosion of the brands, through either a single event or a series of events, may adversely impact the Group's leadership position with customers and ultimately affect future revenue and profitability. |
The Group's brands are well positioned in their respective markets and have significant commercial value. Any change in engagement or travel preferences could impact the financial |
• All IAG airlines are considered within the brand portfolio review. • Brand initiatives for each operating company have been identified and are aligned to the Strategic Business Plan. • Product investment to enhance the customer experience |
| If the Group is unable to meet the expectations of its customers and does not engage effectively to maintain their emotional attachment, then the Group may face brand erosion and loss of market share. |
performance of the Group. IAG will continue to focus on its customer propositions to ensure competitiveness in its chosen priority customer demand spaces and to ensure that it adapts to meet changing customer expectations. The Group is clear on the key levers to improve brand perception and satisfaction for each of its operating company brands. |
supports the brand propositions and is provided for in the Strategic Business Plan. • All airlines track and report internally on their Net Promoter Score (NPS) to measure customer satisfaction. • IAG Customer Steering Group meets monthly and shares initiatives. • New hygiene protocols are being adopted across the Group's airlines to address regulatory requirements resulting from the pandemic. • Enhanced disruption management tools within airlines to allow customers to manage their travel preferences. • The Group's global loyalty strategy builds customer loyalty within IAG airlines. • The Group's focus on sustainability and sustainable aviation including the IAG Climate Change strategy to meet the target of net zero carbon emissions by 2050. • Robust portfolio process to determine the right investments across the Group. |

Status The scale of governmental support and aviation-specific state aid measures have varied by market and the potential consequential impact to the competitive landscape is under continuous assessment. Governmental restrictions, introduced to address the pandemic risk, have been fragmented and volatile and have required significant agility within our networks to manage the impact on our customers and business. The Group announced plans in 2019 to acquire Air Europa, which is owned by Globalia, subject to regulatory approvals. In November 2020, the Group reached an amended agreement with Globalia, which is still subject to the satisfactory negotiation with Sociedad Estatal de Participaciones (SEPI) regarding the non-financial terms associated with the financial support provided by SEPI to Air Europa in 2020. The acquisition is still subject to approval by the European Commission.
The Group continues to monitor and discuss the negative impacts of government policies such as the imposition of Air Passenger Duty (APD).
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Competitor capacity growth in excess of demand growth could materially impact margins. |
The markets in which the Group operates are highly competitive. The Group faces direct competition on its routes, as well as from indirect flights, charter services and other modes of transport. Some competitors have other competitive advantages such as government support or benefits from insolvency protection. Regulation of the airline industry covers many of the Group's activities including route flying rights, airport landing rights, departure taxes, security and environmental controls. The Group's ability to comply with and influence changes to regulations is key to maintaining operational and financial performance. |
• The IAG Management Committee meets weekly. Additional Management Committee meetings, to address strategic issues arising from the responses of regulators and governments to |
| Any failure of a joint business or a joint business partner could adversely impact the Group's airline business operations and financial performance. |
the pandemic, were convened throughout the year. • The Board of Directors discusses strategy throughout the year and dedicates two days per year to undertake a detailed review of the Group's strategic plans. Similar to the additional |
|
| Some of the markets in which the Group operates remain regulated by governments, in some instances controlling capacity and/or restricting market entry. Changes in such restrictions may have a negative impact on margins. Governments' support schemes for the aviation sector create distortionary effects across the markets in which IAG's airlines operate. |
Management Committee meetings, additional Board meetings were convened throughout the year. • The Group strategy function supports the Management Committee by identifying where resources can be devoted to exploit profitable opportunities. • The airlines' revenue management departments and systems optimise market share and yield through pricing and inventory management activity. Additional processes and reviews have allowed daily and weekly route analysis as required to respond to the rapidly changing environment resulting from government actions. • The Group maintains rigorous cost control and targeted investment to remain competitive. The Group Procurement function has led an ongoing review of all critical contracts. • The Group has restructured its businesses and operations to meet the challenge of the current environment. • The portfolio of brands provides flexibility as capacity can be deployed at short notice as needed. • The IAG Management Committee regularly reviews the commercial performance of joint business agreements. • The Group's airlines review their relationships with business partners supported where appropriate by the Group strategy function. |
|
| • The Group's government affairs department monitors government initiatives, represents the Group's interest and |
forecasts likely changes to laws and regulations.

Status The Group has established an IAG Tech function which brings together the digital and IT departments from across the Group under the Group's Chief Information Officer (CIO). All of the Group's businesses have a Chief Digital and Information Officer (CDIO) who represents their business within IAG Tech. This has strengthened IAG Tech's focus on understanding business requirements, helping to transform the Group's businesses and deliver a digital customer experience, which together with the Group's exploitation of technology, reduces the impact digital disruptors can have.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Technology disruptors may use tools to position themselves between our brands and our customers. |
Competitors and new entrants to the travel market may use technology more effectively and disrupt the Group's business model. |
• IAG Tech is responsible for digital and IT. • Operating companies' CDIOs are members of the IAG Tech management committee. • The Group's CIO and Chief Transformation Officer are members of the IAG Management Committee. • IAG Customer Steering Group. • The Group continues to develop platforms such as the New Distribution Capability, changing distribution arrangements and moving from indirect to direct channels. • IAG Tech continues to create early engagement and leverages new opportunities with start-ups and technology disruptors. |
See the Sustainability risk and opportunities section

Status IAG was the first airline group to commit to a target of net zero carbon emissions by 2050, including adding management targets in current incentive arrangements. Sustainable Aviation, oneworld and Airlines for Europe have also all now committed to net zero emissions by 2050. There is an emerging trend of introduction of aviation "eco taxes" globally. The Group has accelerated the retirement of its aged fleet of Boeing 747s and Airbus A340s during 2020, in response to the pandemic. The Group also maintained its plans and initiatives to meet climate change commitments.
IAG was an early adopter of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidelines for climate-related scenario analysis and climate-specific risk assessments. During 2020 the Group has updated its assessment of climate-related risks, by testing and revising the assumptions on updated forecasts for future business growth and the regulatory context and future carbon price. The Group has also embedded forecasting of its climate impacts into its strategic, business and financial planning processes.
While 2020 was a year of unprecedented disruption and uncertainty due the pandemic, other key aspects of aviation policy continued to be developed in relation to sustainability. In July the European Commission published a roadmap for its legislative initiative aimed at implementing the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), alongside the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Increasing global concern about climate change and the impact of carbon affects Group airlines' performance as customers seek alternative methods of transport or reduce their levels of travel. |
IAG is committed to being the leading airline group in sustainability. This means that environmental considerations are integrated into the business strategy at every level and the Group uses its influence to drive progress across the industry. |
• IAG climate change strategy to meet target of net zero carbon emissions by 2050. • British Airways offsets all UK domestic flight carbon emissions. • Fleet replacement plan will introduce aircraft into the fleet |
| New taxes and increasing price of carbon impact on demand for air travel. Customers may choose to reduce the amount they fly. |
that are up to 40 per cent more carbon efficient. • IAG investment in sustainable aviation fuels of US\$400 million, including British Airways' partnership with Velocys. • Management incentives aligned to IAG's targets. |
|
| • Partnering with ZeroAvia to explore hydrogen-powered aircraft technology. |
||
| • Participating in CORSIA, the ICAO global aviation carbon offsetting scheme. |
The safety and security of customers and employees is a fundamental value to the Group.

Status The risks from cyber threats has been heightened in the year as many of the Group's employees and suppliers' employees moved to workingfrom-home arrangements in line with governments' advice and restrictions, requiring analyses of security arrangements and authentications over access to corporate environments. More widely, the external environment saw an increase in the frequency of phishing attacks as cyber criminals attempted to take advantage of remote working practices.
The regulatory regimes associated with data and infrastructure security are also becoming more complex with different regulators applying different framework approaches and guidance for reporting. The Group airlines are subject to the requirements of privacy legislation such as GDPR and the National Information Security Directive (NISD).
In relation to the theft of customer data in 2018 the UK Information Commissioner's Office issued a final penalty notice to British Airways. Despite significant reductions in the Group's capital expenditure, in response to the liquidity impact of the pandemic, investment in cyber security systems remained at levels originally planned.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| The Group could face financial loss, disruption or damage to brand reputation arising from an attack on the Group's systems by criminals, foreign governments or hacktivists. |
The cyber threat environment remains challenging for all organisations, including the airline industry. Cyber threat actors, criminals, foreign governments and hacktivists have the capacity and motivation to attack the airline industry for financial gain and other political or social reasons. The fast-moving nature of this risk means that the Group will always retain a level of vulnerability. |
• The Group has a Board-approved cyber strategy that drives investment and operational planning. This is regularly reviewed by the IAG Audit and Compliance Committee, IAG Management Committee and the IAG Tech leadership. • There is oversight of critical systems and suppliers to ensure |
| If the Group does not adequately protect customer and employee data, it could breach regulation and face penalties and loss of customer trust. Changes in working practices and environments for the Group's employees and third-party suppliers could result in new weaknesses in the cyber and data security control environment. |
that the Group understands the data it holds, that it is secure, and regulations are adhered to. • A cyber risk management framework ensures the risk is reviewed across all operating companies. • The Group Cyber Governance board assesses the portfolio of cyber projects quarterly and each operating company reviews their own cyber projects on a quarterly basis. • The IAG Chief Information Security Office supports the Group businesses providing assurance and expertise around strategy, policy, training and security operations for the Group. • Threat Intelligence is used to analyse cyber risks to the Group. • Data Protection Officers are in place in all operating companies, coordinated through a Group wide Privacy Steering Group. • New working practices have been reviewed to ensure the integrity of the cyber and data security environment and controls with additional oversight measures being implemented as required. • All third-party suppliers have confirmed their adherence to IAG security requirements within any revised security |

Status The outbreak of the pandemic in 2020 resulted in an unprecedented level of disruption to the aviation sector, as well as global economic impacts. Other potential high-impact, low-likelihood events have been considered that could have the potential to disrupt IAG and/or the aviation sector. Many of these events remain outside of the Group's control such as adverse weather, another pandemic, civil unrest or terrorist event seen in cities served by the Group's airlines.
protocols.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| An event causing significant network disruption or the inability to promptly recover from short term disruptions may result in lost revenue, customer disruption and additional costs to the Group. The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to continue to have an adverse effect on the Group over the period of the Business Plan, as would any future pandemic outbreak or other material event that results in the imposition of governments' restrictions on travel and the movement of its populations. |
The Group's airlines may be disrupted by a number of different events. A single prolonged event, or a series of events in close succession, impact on the Group's airlines' operational capability and brand strength. The Group needs to adhere to local governments' restrictions and regulations especially related to safety and public health and is therefore sensitive to any consequential impact to demand. |
• Management has business continuity plans to mitigate this risk to the extent feasible with focus on operational and financial resilience and customer and colleague safety and recovery. • Resilience to minimise the impact of ATC airspace restrictions and strike action on the Group's customers and operations are in place. |

Status The Group recognises the importance of technology across the business and has brought all of its digital and IT resources together into IAG Tech, reporting to the Chief Information Officer, a member of the IAG Management Committee. The IAG Tech management committee has established a new governance structure that is mirrored across into the Group's businesses to ensure that IT investment and operating company requirements are appropriately prioritised and delivered. There is an increased focus on service delivery and services management as the Group addresses its legacy environment. Plans and investment to upgrade or transform away from obsolete systems or architecture have been subject to ongoing review in the light of the pandemic.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| The dependency on IT systems for key business and customer processes is increasing and the failure of a critical system may cause significant disruption to the operation and lost revenue. |
IAG is dependent on IT systems for most key business processes. Increasingly, the integration within IAG's supply chain means that the Group is also dependent on the performance of suppliers' IT infrastructure e.g. airport baggage operators. |
• IAG Tech works with the Group operating companies to deliver digital and IT change initiatives to enhance security and stability. • Operating companies' IT Boards are in place to review delivery timelines. |
| The level of transformational change at pace required by the Group's airlines may result in disruption to operations as the legacy environment is addressed. |
• IAG Tech leadership and professional development framework. • Reversion plans are developed for migrations on critical IT infrastructure. |
|
| Obsolescence within the IAG Tech estate could result in service outages and/or operational disruption or delays |
• System controls, disaster recovery and business continuity arrangements exist to mitigate the risk of a critical system failure. |
|
| in implementation of the Group's transformation, particularly if the Group needs to defer investment to preserve cash. |
• Robust portfolio process to determine the right investments across the Group. |
|
| 9. People, culture and employee relations | 1 |
forward.

Status Additional safety procedures have been introduced to protect the Group's staff and customers, in line with industry recommendations. Where possible, the Group's staff are working from home and in line with governments' recommendations.
Employee consultations have been undertaken as required and appropriate in relation to restructuring necessitated by the pandemic. Where possible, the Group has utilised government wage support schemes. In November 2020, the Unite union representing the Group's cargo handling business in the UK balloted its members for industrial action in December. An agreement was reached in January 2021 between the union and the cargo business. The resilience and engagement of our people and leaders has been critical through the pandemic period to ensuring the Group is best positioned to resume operations and adapt as needed to the uncertain external environment. As the Group rapidly transforms all its operations to adjust for the new environment, the engagement and support of the Group's employees is going to be a critical enabler.
In 2021, the Company will be bringing a new remuneration policy to shareholders for approval that will be closely aligned to the Company's strategy and will support the aim of attracting and retaining exceptional talent across the Group.
All Operating Companies recognise the critical role that their employees will play in the recovery and transformation of the Group and they are focusing on improving organisational health and employee engagement.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Any breakdowns in the bargaining process with the unionised workforces may result in subsequent strike action which may disrupt operations and adversely affect business performance and customer perceptions of the airlines. |
The Group has a large unionised workforce represented by a number of different trades unions. IAG relies on the successful agreement of collective bargaining arrangements across its operating companies to operate its airlines. The right skillsets and culture are needed to transform our businesses at the pace required. |
• Collective bargaining takes place on a regular basis with the operating companies' human resources specialists, who have a strong skillset in industrial relations. • Operating companies' people strategies. • Succession planning within and across operating companies. • IAG Tech refresh of professional development framework. • Operating companies' engagement surveys and subsequent action plans. • IAG Code of Conduct. |
| Our people are not engaged, or they do not display the required leadership behaviours. |
||
| The Group businesses fail to attract, motivate, retain or develop its people to deliver service and brand excellence. Digital and agile skillsets are not in place to execute on the required transformation and drive the business |
See the Regulatory environment section

Status The pandemic has resulted in governments around the world implementing, at very short notice, numerous, differing and wide-ranging measures in an attempt to contain the spread of the virus, such as travel restrictions, curfews, quarantines, lockdowns and restrictions on non-essential services. This has led to an unprecedented decrease in the demand for both domestic and international air travel and has also resulted in severe economic downturns and rising unemployment levels in a number of countries and regions. These are being actively monitored and near-term capacity plans are refreshed dynamically, according to the latest status.
There can also be no certainty as to the level of demand for the Group's services after any restrictions are lifted; the Group anticipates that global passenger demand will not return to 2019 levels until at least 2023.
Wider macroeconomic trends are being monitored such as tensions between the US and China, particularly over the terms of the trade deal and how the new administration in the US plans to engage with the Chinese government. The imposition of tariffs by the EU on the US in response to the findings of a WTO review could also result in an escalation of application of tariffs elsewhere. The stress of the pandemic could have further farreaching impacts including currency devaluations, new tax regimes on corporates and individuals as well as changes in control of governments and new government policies.
Following the referendum decision in 2016, the UK left the EU on December 31, 2020 under the terms of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and the UK. This agreement includes all arrangements for aviation that would otherwise be covered by a typical air services agreement and the business has made all necessary adjustments.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Economic deterioration in either a domestic market or the global economy may have a material impact on the Group's financial position, while foreign |
IAG remains sensitive to political and economic conditions in the markets globally. |
• The Board and the Management Committee review the financial outlook and business performance of the Group through the financial planning process and regular reforecasts (frequently during 2020). |
| exchange, fuel price and interest rate movements create volatility. |
• Reviews are used to drive the Group's financial performance through the management of capacity, together with appropriate cost control measures including the balance between fixed and variable costs, management of capital expenditure, and actions to improve liquidity. External economic outlook, fuel prices and exchange rates are carefully considered when developing strategy and plans and are regularly reviewed by the Board and IAG Management Committee as part of business performance monitoring. |
|
| Uncertainty or failure to plan and respond to economic change or downturn impacts the operations of the Group. |
||
| Political decisions to respond to the pandemic impact economies across all markets, causing longer-term economic stress. |
||
| • IAG Government Affairs function and the Group's operating companies have been in discussions with governments regarding restrictions and approaches for the implementation |

of consistent, customer-centric testing regimes.
Status The IAG Safety Committee of the Board continued to monitor the safety performance of IAG's airlines. Safety and security responsibility lies with each Group airline in accordance with its applicable standards. See the Safety Committee report.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| A failure to prevent or respond effectively to a major safety or security incident or intelligence may adversely impact the Group's brands, operations and financial performance. |
The safety and security of our customers and employees are fundamental values for the Group. |
• The corresponding safety committees of each of the airlines of the Group satisfy themselves that they have the appropriate resources and procedures which include compliance with Air Operator Certificate requirements. |
| • Incident centres respond in a structured way in the event of a safety or security incident or intelligence. |
||
| • The Board's Safety Committee shares best practices between |
Group airlines.
IAG balances the relatively high business and operational risks inherent in its business through managing liquidity and financial risks so as to protect the Group.

Status Despite disruption in the financial markets since the spread of the pandemic, the Group has proactively focused on protecting liquidity by renewing and extending credit facilities and agreeing new aircraft leases, together with agreeing additional one-year funding facilities in advance of a future improvement in market conditions. Aircraft were successfully financed on long-term arrangements during the year and the additional one-year facilities were repaid. The Group also raised additional equity, with net proceeds of €2.7 billion received in early October. In December British Airways announced that it had received commitments for a 5-year Export Development Guaranteed term loan for £2.0 billion underwritten by a syndicate of banks, partially guaranteed (80 per cent) by UK Export Finance (UKEF).
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to finance ongoing operations, committed aircraft orders and future fleet growth plans. New financial arrangements, in addition to the repayment of existing arrangements, and government support schemes (as applicable) may impact plans to transform the Group and will influence the timing for IAG to resume paying dividends to its shareholders. |
The Group has substantial debt that will need to be repaid or refinanced. The Group's ability to finance ongoing operations, committed aircraft orders and future fleet growth plans is vulnerable to various factors including financial market conditions, financial institutions' appetite for secured aircraft financing and the financial market's perceptions of the future resilience and cashflows of the Group. |
• The IAG Board and Management Committee have reviewed the Group's financial position and financing strategy on a very frequent basis (often weekly) throughout the period of the pandemic. • The Group has maintained clear focus on protecting liquidity. • Additional funding arrangements entered into, including raising additional equity. |

Status The financial markets were impacted by the uncertainty derived from the pandemic. The imposed travel ban resulted in reduced jet fuel consumption. The Group's reduced capacity in addition to sharp decline in jet fuel prices in the first half of 2020 amounted to an exceptional loss on fuel and foreign exchange hedges.
The approach to fuel risk management, financial risk management, interest rate risk management, proportions of fixed and floating debt management and financial counterparty credit risk management and the Group's exposure by geography have all been re-evaluated this year to ensure the Group responds to the rapidly changing financial environment appropriately. Details are set out in the Group financial statements.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to manage the volatility in the price of oil and petroleum products. |
The volatility in the price of oil and petroleum products can have a material impact on the Group's operating results. The volatility in currencies other than the airlines' local currencies can have a material impact on the Group's operating results. |
• Fuel price risk is partially hedged through the purchase of oil derivatives in accordance with the Group risk appetite. |
| Failure to manage currency risk on revenue, purchases, cash and borrowings in foreign currencies in currencies other than the airlines' local currencies of euro and sterling. |
• All airlines hedge in line with the Group hedging policy under the Group Treasury oversight. • The IAG Audit and Compliance Committee and IAG Management Committee regularly review the Group's fuel and currency positions. |
|
| Failure to manage the impact of interest rate changes on floating finance debt and floating operating leases. |
The volatility in floating interest rates can have a material impact on the Group's operating results. |
• Currency risk is hedged through matching inflows and outflows and managing the surplus or shortfall through foreign exchange derivatives. |
| Failure to manage the financial counterparties credit exposure arising from cash investments and derivatives trading. |
The Group is exposed to non performance of financial contracts that may result in financial losses. |
• All airlines review routes to countries with exchange controls to monitor delays in the repatriation of cash and/or with the risk of material local currency devaluation. • The impact of rising interest rates is mitigated through structuring selected new debt and lease deals at fixed rates throughout their term as well as through derivatives instruments. • The Group has a financial counterparty credit limit allocation by airline and by type of exposure and monitors the financial and counterparty risk on an ongoing basis. • The IAG Management Committee and the IAG Audit and Compliance Committee regularly review the financial risks and the hedged amounts. |

2 3
2 3
Status Tax is managed in accordance with the Tax Strategy, found in the Corporate Policies section of the IAG website. Further information about taxes paid and collected by IAG is set out in note 9 of the Group financial statements.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| The Group is exposed to systemic tax risks arising from either change to tax legislation and accounting standards or challenges by tax authorities on the interpretation or application of tax legislation. Businesses and consumers may be subject to higher levels of taxation as governments seek to recover the national debts arising from pandemic support measures. The Group's stakeholders' expectations of the tax behaviours of large corporates may lead to reputational risk from the Group's management of tax. |
Payment of tax is a legal obligation. Changes in the tax regulatory environment, including changes in tax rates, may result in additional tax costs for the Group and in additional complexity in complying with such changes. The Group's tax strategy aims to balance the needs of our key stakeholders, recognising that tax is one of Group's positive contributions to the economies and wider societies of the countries in which IAG operates. |
• The Group adheres to the tax policy approved by the IAG Board and is committed to complying with all tax laws, to acting with integrity in all tax matters and to working openly with tax authorities. • Tax risk is managed by the operating companies in conjunction with the IAG Tax Department. • Tax risk is overseen by the Board through the Audit and Compliance Committee. • The Group seeks to understand its stakeholders' expectations on tax matters e.g. cooperative working with tax authorities and its interaction with non-governmental organisations. |
The Group has no tolerance for breaches of legal or regulatory requirements.
See section 10
Status Following the referendum decision in 2016, the UK left the EU on December 31, 2020 under the terms of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement
between the EU and the UK. IAG initiated the remedial plans on the ownership and control of its European airlines that were agreed with all national regulators in 2019. The Group will continue to encourage stakeholders in the UK and EU to normalise ownership of airlines in line with other business sectors.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| The governance structure the Group has in place includes nationality structures to protect Aer Lingus', British Airways' and Iberia's route and operating licences. IAG could face a challenge to its ownership and control structure. |
Airlines are subject to a significant degree of regulatory control. In order for air carriers to hold EU operating licences, an EU airline must be majority-owned and effectively controlled by EU nationals. British Airways is a UK carrier and not subject |
• IAG will continue to monitor regulatory developments affecting the ownership and control of airlines in the UK and EU. |
| to the same requirement. |
Status The Group has maintained its focus on compliance with key regulations and mandatory training programmes have continued throughout the year. As employees have exited the Group businesses following restructuring, access to systems and processes has been reviewed and removed from these employees in a timely manner.
| Risk description | Strategic relevance | Mitigations |
|---|---|---|
| The Group is exposed to the risk of individual employees' or groups of employees' inappropriate and/or |
Carrying out business in a compliant manner and with integrity is fundamental to the values of the |
• The Group has clear frameworks in place including comprehensive Group-wide policies designed to ensure compliance. |
| unethical behaviour resulting in reputational damage, fines or losses to the Group. |
Group, as well as the expectation of the Group's customers and stakeholders. |
• There are mandatory training programmes in place to educate Board members and employees as required for their roles in these matters. |
| • Compliance professionals specialising in competition law and anti-bribery legislation support and advise the Group's businesses. |
||
| • IAG Code of Conduct framework and training. | ||
| • Data Protection Officers are in place in all operating companies. |
||
| • IAG Compliance Steering Group. | ||
The business model and strategic priorities are set out in the Business Model and Strategic Priorities section. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the business is also set out in the Chief Executive Officer's review and the Financial review.
As part of the review of the business model and assessment of Group strategy alignment to the external environment, the Directors have assessed key threats and trends faced by the industry, emerging risks and opportunities arising from the pandemic as well as other structural industry risks and non sector-specific risks over a timeframe beyond the plan period, for example climate change risk. These are considered in the light of how they could impact our business model and relevance, our operations or our customers and include changes in regulations, customer trends and behaviours, macroeconomic predictions on growth, regional market opportunities and technology trends and infrastructure developments that could impact our operations, as well as more existential threats to the aviation industry.
When developing the Group's three year Business Plan ('Business Plan'), longer-term considerations have been assessed by the Management Committee in conjunction with the priorities faced by the business during the next three years in responding to the impact of the pandemic crisis on the Group's businesses. The Board has also conducted its annual strategy session in addition to increased review meetings during the year, where these longer-term considerations have been assessed in parallel with the near-term priorities and adaptions required by the Group. Following this process, short-, medium- and longer-term plans, challenges and opportunities have been identified and actions agreed.
The Group has undertaken extensive analysis, forecasting and scenario modelling over the last 12 months. It has refined the models and developed the depth of the analysis to ensure that the stresses considered reflected specifics to markets and regions across Aer Lingus, British Airways, Iberia and Vueling as well as the analysis completed at the Group level. Assumptions have been refined based on the impact of the pandemic on the airlines and other businesses through 2020 and into 2021. The modelling was refreshed in February 2021 for the latest available information and predictions. This refresh of the Business Plan formed the Base Case ('Base Case') for the purposes of the Viability (and Going Concern) assessment.
During 2020 and in January and February 2021, the Board reviewed, on many occasions, scenarios stressing the financial plans for both the second half of 2020 and for the period to December 2023. These exercises leveraged the existing processes and models used for viability assessment within the Group. When considering the viability of the Group, for the purposes of this report, the Directors have evaluated the risk landscape facing the Group and recommended plausible but severe downside scenarios that could impact the Group's refreshed three-year Business Plan (the 'Base Case') to determine the Group's resilience to such impacts. The results of these severe but plausible downside scenarios (as described below) on the Base Case have been presented both pre and post an assessment of the likely effectiveness of the mitigations that management reasonably believes would be available over this period (and not already reflected in the Base Case).
The scenarios have been defined by management and designed to consider principal risks that could materialise over the viability period and weaken the Group's liquidity position. Each scenario considered the impact on liquidity, solvency and the ability to raise financing in an uncertain and volatile environment. When considering the mitigations, management has assessed mitigations that are available to the business beyond operating cost reductions including further financing, capital expenditure plans and potential disposals. Options that may not have been previously considered as mitigations were presented with recommendations for the Board to review. In assessing the potential mitigations, the Board considered, amongst other matters, the expected speed of implementation in response to the uncertainty and the future flexibility required for the Group to adapt further as needed.
Sensitivities in the scenarios' assumptions have been highlighted by management and challenged by the Board. In addition, the Board reviewed the results of reverse stress testing, which demonstrated the level of revenue decline (before mitigations) that would result in the Group using all available cash balances and compared this to the outputs from the scenarios analyses.
Management has assessed and the Board considered the longer-term sustainability and climate-related risks, applying scenario analysis techniques as set out by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) process, and their potential impact on the Group's viability over the next three years.
For more details of the Group's sustainability risks and opportunities, see Sustainability section.
| No.Title | Link to principal risks |
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Downside Case considering the impacts of delays in the removal of government restrictions beyond the assumptions in the Base Case in 2021, further delaying recovery based on demand sensitivity experienced in 2020. This could be caused by factors such as the slower than expected pace of roll out of vaccines and/or governments' risk appetite to remove restrictions and allow movement of their populations. |
3, 7, 10, 12, 13 |
| The Downside Case modelled significant capacity ASK reductions by airline and by region, including adjustments to non passenger revenues. Passenger yield assumptions were also significantly reduced to reflect the constantly evolving and changing governmental restrictions that adversely impact the airlines and, therefore, customers' willingness to fly. |
||
| As part of the modelling, consideration was given to some of the key factors that could influence the evolution of cash in the Downside Case. |
||
| Cost mitigations were considered across all operating cost lines, including sensitivities around the impact of cost variability being lower than that assumed. Fuel was modelled directly, based on fuel curves and hedging plans. Working capital and capital expenditure adjustments were applied within the scenario. |
||
| The following assumptions were applied to the Downside Case. Capacity recovery modelled by geographical region saw capacity gradually increasing from a reduction of 79 per cent versus 2019 in quarter 1 of 2021 to 18 per cent in quarter 1 of 2022. Across the Viability period to December 2023, the Group has assumed a gradual easing of travel restrictions, by geographical region, based on deployment of vaccines. Travel corridors between countries are assumed to be introduced from quarter 3 2021. The capacity reduction equates on average, to a Group passenger revenue stress of over 10 per cent across the total three year period compared to the Base Case. |
||
| Sensitivities around mitigating actions were presented to allow the Board to challenge the ability of the Group to respond to the range of potential outcomes. The impact of a further delay in recovery was also considered, with a setback in early 2022, which could be linked to further resurgence of COVID-19, delays in vaccination, or the need to modify vaccines leading to restrictions being re-introduced in the early months of 2022. |
||
| The period to March 2022 of this Downside Case scenario has also been applied as the Downside Case set out in the going concern analysis (see note 2 of the Group financial statements). |
||
| 2 | A stress to model the impact of a ransomware attack on an IAG airline. The scenario assumes a disruption period resulting from the attack, impacting customers and operations of the affected airline. |
6, 7, 8 |
| 3 | A revenue stress on shorthaul operations across the Group to reflect changes in customer behaviours towards shorthaul travel where other travel options exist or taxation regimes impact demand. |
5 |
| Increasing global concern about climate change and the impact of carbon is expected to grow in future years especially with the potential implementation of new taxes and eco-initiatives (see Sustainable aviation section 5). This scenario was not considered to be severe by management but allowed the Board to understand the potential impacts of the Sustainability agenda on the Group's future financial performance. |
The Directors have assessed the viability of the Group over three-years to December 2023 considering the ongoing impact of the pandemic on the external environment and aviation industry and the assumptions adopted in the refreshed Business Plan ('the Base Case' for the purposes of this Statement), the strategy of the Group and the Board's risk appetite. Although the prospects of the Group are considered over a longer period, the Directors have determined that a three-year period is an appropriate time frame for assessment as it is aligned with the Group's strategic planning period (as reflected in the Base Case) and the external uncertainties facing the aviation sector more widely are significantly beyond any experience to date and regularly unexpectedly change. The Board recognises the pace of change required within the Group to further adapt and respond to this environment in addition to the rapidly changing competitive landscape and wider global macroeconomic conditions.
The Group has modelled the impact of mitigating actions to offset further deterioration in demand and capacity, including reductions in operating
expenditure and capital expenditure. The Group expects to be able to continue to secure financing for future aircraft deliveries and in addition has further potential mitigating actions it would pursue in the event of adverse liquidity experience.
Further details on debt financing can be found in the Going Concern disclosures in note 2 of the Group financial statements.
Based on this assessment, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation, meet its liabilities as they fall due and raise financing as required over the period to December 2023. However, this is subject to a number of significant factors related to the pandemic that are outside of the control of the Group. In reaching this assessment the Directors have made the following assumptions when considering both the Base Case and the Downside Case:
Due to the uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic and potential for future waves of the pandemic and the impact on travel restrictions and/or demand, the Group is not able to provide certainty that there could not be more severe downside scenarios than those it has considered, including the stresses it has considered in relation to factors such as the impact on yield, capacity operated, cost mitigations achieved and fuel price variations. In the event that such a scenario were to occur, the Group would need to implement additional mitigation measures and would likely need to secure additional funding over and above that which is contractually committed at February 25, 2021. The Group has been successful in raising financing since the outbreak of COVID-19, however the Group cannot provide certainty that it will be able to secure additional funding, if required, in the event that a more severe downside scenario than those it has considered were to occur.
Regulatory matters assumed more than their usual level of prominence and scrutiny in 2020 with two topics dominating the policy agenda: the introduction of regulations around the world to restrict international air travel in response to the spread of COVID-19 and the continuing Brexit negotiations as the transition period for the UK's departure from the European Union (EU) came to a close at the end of December.
Throughout the year, IAG's airlines contributed directly to the development of rules in respect of responses to the COVID-19 pandemic that impacted aviation and travel in order to maintain operations to the greatest extent possible while ensuring customer and staff safety. The Group also provided input during 2020 to the Brexit discussions in support of a positive negotiated settlement to benefit UK and European citizens.
IAG also worked with regulators and authorities around the world on key policy areas such as sustainability in order to try and secure the best long-term outcomes for its customers.
When the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, states around the world began to close their borders to different degrees, leading to a dramatic impact on worldwide traffic volumes.
IAG aimed throughout 2020 to work constructively with regulators and contributed to their deliberations wherever possible on how to respond to the virus to allow safe, continued operations and to demonstrate the inherent safety of air services themselves.
In Ireland, Spain and the UK, IAG's airlines worked with national regulators as they developed their policies to ensure these were practically deliverable and balanced so as to allow air transport to continue safely and that guidance to industry and restrictions on travel were, where possible, measured and workable. British Airways made a significant contribution to the development of the ICAO's Council Aviation Recovery Task Force (CART) process, running trial protocols and becoming the first airline worldwide to be assessed against its criteria. Similarly, working directly, and with industry association Airlines for Europe (A4E), IAG experts helped the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) develop guidelines on aviation health safety
protocols. However, where IAG believed measures were severely detrimental to its own and its customers' interests, and provided no health benefit, the Group also acted. This included working with other airlines in the UK to bring a Judicial Review challenge to the UK Government's imposition of blanket quarantine measures. These measures were ultimately amended to satisfy the Group's objections at the time.
As the crisis endured, IAG worked with partner and competitor airlines as well as with academic partners to provide data on the efficacy of different approaches to COVID-19 testing. The Group also operated programmes to trial different approaches for testing in support of enabling states to safely remove quarantine policies that restrict travel. IAG staff continue to take every opportunity to work with national regulators and policy makers as the spread of the virus and the deployment of vaccines influences changes to regulatory requirements. In particular IAG continues to promote the need for a digital solution to the sharing and verification of personal data, health certificates and other requirements for travel. This includes working with individual developers, for example the VeriFly app successfully trialled by British Airways and contributing to potential industry-wide solutions such as those being promoted by IATA.
The UK formally left the EU on January 31, 2020 remaining bound by the EU's laws and benefiting as if it were a member state in a transition period running until December 31, 2020.
During 2020 there was therefore no change to air services between the EU and the UK. Throughout the year IAG engaged with regulators and policy makers in the UK, Brussels and a number of EU Member States to ensure that the needs of IAG's customers after Brexit are understood and, in particular, that policymakers recognise the economic and social importance of uninterrupted air services between the EU and the UK.
After protracted negotiations the UK and the EU agreed an overall trade deal that includes air transport. This agreement ensures that all IAG airlines' flights could continue as they did before Brexit. The only change is a very minor limitation on codeshare arrangements.
During 2020, the UK Government also finalised agreements with all other countries with which it needed to replace existing EU-wide arrangements for air services, including formally signing on November 17, 2020 the agreement reached in 2018 with the US.
IAG implemented plans to ensure that its EU-licensed airlines continue to comply with EU ownership and control rules following Brexit. These remedial plans were approved by national regulators in Spain and Ireland. The plans include the implementation of a national ownership structure for Aer Lingus and changes to the Group's longstanding national ownership structure in Spain.
It is notable that the Brexit agreement recognises the potential benefits of the continued liberalisation of ownership and control of air carriers and commits the EU and UK to examining options in that area during 2021. The Group will continue to encourage regulators around the world to normalise ownership of airlines in line with other business sectors.
While 2020 was a year of unprecedented disruption and uncertainty due to the COVID-19 pandemic, other key aspects of aviation policy continued to be developed in particular in relation to sustainability. In July the European Commission published a roadmap for its legislative initiative aimed at implementing the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA).
With its strong credentials in this field, IAG provided key input to the joint product of the European aviation industry, initiated by A4E, "Destination 2050, aviation's roadmap to carbon neutrality by 2050." Published in December, this roadmap shows how European aviation can reduce emissions through new aircraft and engine technology, operational efficiency, sustainable aviation fuels, economic measures (such as CORSIA) and greenhouse gas removal technology.
IAG continued to highlight the need for reform of the European air traffic management system and airport charges legislation to make the industry fit for a new future. The Group continues to demonstrate the economic and social value of aviation, through trade, tourism and bringing families together as tools to support economic recovery from the pandemic.
IAG does not take out any specific insurance to cover environment risks but does purchase forward carbon credits to cover future liabilities.
Water consumption is not a material issue for IAG. However, water use is monitored across the Group and IAG consumed 423,196 m3 of water in 2020 in offices and ground facilities. This represents a 35 per cent drop from the 655,285 m3 consumed in 2019. The reduction is driven by reduced activity in offices as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
| Metric | Description | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Emissions intensity (Scope 2) Scope 2, location-based electricity divided by business activity, as measured in revenue passenger kilometres including cargo. Scope 2 emissions intensity is measured in units of CO2-equivalent, which includes CO2, CH4 and N2O and complements the flight-only emissions intensity metric in section B.1. |
The 154% increase in 2020 is temporary and due to passenger-km decreasing much more than the decrease in emissions from electricity. These drops were 75% and 23% respectively. |
|
| GHG reduction initiatives Reductions in CO2-equivalent emissions as a result of specific initiatives which started in the reporting year. This excludes reductions deliver initiatives. from externally-driven changes applicable to all airlines e.g. airspace changes. See examples in the Operational efficiency subsection in section B.3. |
The 78% decrease in 2020 is in line with the reduction in flying activity and is also a result of reduced staff available to |
|
| Electricity | Consumption of electricity across IAG ground facilities, in millions of kilowatt hours. This includes usage in main offices, overseas offices, hub airports and maintenance facilities. A detailed description of how this value is calculated is provided next to the Scope 2 emissions metric in section B.1. |
The 19% decrease in 2020 was less than the drop in flying activity, because a number of ground facilities and offices remained open during the COVID-19 pandemic even with lower occupancy. |
| The 2019 kWh has been restated based on the latest verified data, latest electricity emissions factors, and a more accurate methodology for calculating electricity from fixed-electrical ground power. |
||
| Energy | Measured in million MWh and based on fuel and electricity use. |
The 65% decrease in 2020 is due to reduced flying activity. Jet fuel consumption accounts for 99% of IAG's energy use. |
| Energy use from fuel is based on the volumes of jet fuel, diesel, petrol, natural gas and gas oil, multiplied by appropriate UK Government conversion factors. |
0.6% of energy use is from renewable sources, based on renewable electricity purchases. IAG is investing in sustainable aviation fuels and expects these to contribute to Group energy use from late 2022. |
|
| Energy use from electricity is based on kWh, calculated as described above. |
||
| Revenue per tonne CO2e | Calculated by dividing total Group revenue by tonnes of Scope 1 and 2 CO2-equivalent. |
Pre-pandemic, this metric was increasing due to the use of more efficient aircraft and retirement of older aircraft. |
| The 15% decrease in 2020 is temporary and is due to a decrease in passengers and load factors, so lower average revenues per flight. |
||
| Jet fuel use | Commercial aircraft remain reliant on liquid kerosene for the foreseeable future. Jet fuel use is correlated with flying activity. |
The 64% decrease in 2020 is due to a large drop in flying activity, as a result of lower demand and COVID-19 flight restrictions. |
| Fleet age | The average age of aircraft in the IAG fleet as of December 31, 2020. |
The 7% decrease in 2020 is driven by the accelerated retirement of aircraft such as British Airways B747s and Iberia Airbus A340s. |
GRI 102-41, 403-9, 404-1
Description and commentary for additional workforce metrics mentioned in section C.6. Social & employee related matters - Labour relations, Training


% covered by collective bargaining agreements
| Country | 2019 | vly | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| UK | 89% | +3pts | 92% |
| Spain | 94% | +2pts | 96% |
| Republic of Ireland | 87% | 0pts | 87% |
| India | 13% | +7pts | 20% |
| USA | 67% | -1pts | 66% |
| Other Countries | 41% | +2pts | 43% |
Collective bargaining can cover a wide array of issues pertaining to working conditions, such as remuneration, working time, perks and benefits, and occupational safety and health. This coverage rate refers to the proportion of employees who are covered by one or more collective agreements. Calculated using headcounts at the end of the reporting period.
Refer to Risk Management and principal risk factors section.
The higher coverage rate is due to reporting improvements and changes in workforce composition.
| Employee Category | 2019 | vly | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cabin Crew | 45% | -1pts | 44% |
| Pilots | 19% | 0pts | 19% |
| Airport | 18% | -4pts | 14% |
| Corporate | 6% | +4pts | 10% |
| Maintenance | 12% | +1pts | 13% |
Calculated by translating training data for operating companies per full-time equivalent (FTE) into training hours per Group Average Manpower Equivalent (AME). All mandatory and non-mandatory training is in scope. Total training hours are broken down by employee category.
The 2020 decrease in average hours of training per employee was due to the wide-ranging effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on airline operations and the consequential training requirements. All non-mandatory training was stopped or reduced, including all non-committed head office, corporate, leadership and management training. Safety, compliance and operationally essential training, including for new entrants, continued. For those training courses that did physically take place, the number of attendees was reduced in order to comply with social distancing rules.
In 2020, 1,601,959 training hours were recorded versus 3,193,961 in 2019, representing a drop of 50%.
Description and commentary for additional workforce metrics mentioned in section C.6. Social and employee-related matters - Health and safety

LTI per 200,000 hours worked
A lost time injury (LTI) is a non-fatal injury arising out of, or during, work, which will lead to a loss of productive work time.
The unit is LTI per 200,000 hours worked, using actual hours worked.
During 2020, 570 LTIs were recorded versus 1,864 in 2019. This change reflects the reduction in hours worked, especially in operational roles where the risk of injuries is higher.
The LTI frequency rate for men was 2.30, versus 4.19 in 2019, whilst the rate for women was 2.65, versus 4.57 in 2019.

Average days lost per LTI
This measures the impact of occupational accidents as reflected in time off work by the affected workers.
Days lost per LTI is expressed as an average by dividing the total lost days due to injuries by the total number of LTIs in the reporting period.
The LTI severity rate for men was 34.51 (versus 23.03 in 2019) whilst the rate for women was 44.18 (versus 22.09 in 2019). Even though there was a decrease of 49% in the number of days lost due to injury, the increased severity rate is due to a higher proportion of days lost reported being respective to injuries taking place in previous year, whilst the number of LTIs also dropped 69%.

Number of fatalities
Work-related fatalities. To align with GRI guidance, fatalities as a result of commuting accidents are only included in cases where the transport has been organised by the business, such as via a company or contracted bus or vehicle.The exception is employees in Spain, where inclusion of these types of fatalities is a legal requirement.
There were no fatalities in 2020.
* These rates have been restated at year end due to changes in standardising factors to better align with GRI 403-9.
| GRI 102-8 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual average number of contracts | 2019 | vly | 2020 | ||
| Overall employment contract and employment type | Permanent | 68,104 | -7.9% | 62,728 | |
| Temporary | 5,195 | -47.0% | 2,753 | ||
| Full-time | 54,918 | -7.9% | 50,581 | ||
| Part-time | 18,381 | -18.9% | 14,900 | ||
| 2019 | vly | 2020 | |||
| Age bands by employment contract and employment type | Permanent | <30 | 16% | -1pts | 15% |
| 30–50 | 52% | +1pts | 53% | ||
| >50 | 32% | 0pts | 32% | ||
| Temporary | <30 | 59% | -3pts | 56% | |
| 30–50 | 38% | +3pts | 41% | ||
| >50 | 3% | 0pts | 3% | ||
| Full-time | <30 | 22% | -2pts | 20% | |
| 30–50 | 50% | +2pts | 52% | ||
| >50 | 28% | 0pts | 28% | ||
| Part-time | <30 | 11% | -2pts | 9% | |
| 30–50 | 52% | +2pts | 54% | ||
| >50 | 37% | 0pts | 37% | ||
| Gender by employment contract and employment type | Permanent | Men | 56%* | +1pts | 57% |
| Women | 44%* | -1pts | 43% | ||
| Temporary | Men | 54%* | -2pts | 52% | |
| Women | 46%* | +2pts | 48% | ||
| Full-time | Men | 61%* | +1pts | 62% | |
| Part-time | Women | 39%* | -1pts | 38% | |
| Men | 38%* | -1pts | 37% | ||
| Women | 62%* | +1pts | 63% | ||
| Employee categories by employment contract and employment type Permanent | Cabin Crew | 35%* | -2pts | 33% | |
| Pilots | 12% | +1pts | 13% | ||
| Airport | 25%* | 0pts | 25% | ||
| Corporate | 17%* | +1pts | 18% | ||
| Maintenance | 11%* | 0pts | 11% | ||
| Temporary | Cabin Crew | 32%* | +2pts | 34% | |
| Pilots | 1% | -1pts | 0% | ||
| Airport | 52%* | -8pts | 44% | ||
| Corporate | 9%* | +3pts | 12% | ||
| Maintenance | 6%* | +4pts | 10% | ||
| Full-time | Cabin Crew | 31%* | -1pts | 30% | |
| Pilots | 12%* | +1pts | 13% | ||
| Airport | 23%* | -1pts | 22% | ||
| Corporate | 20%* | +1pts | 21% | ||
| Maintenance | 14%* | 0pts | 14% | ||
| Part-time | Cabin Crew | 47%* | -1pts | 46% | |
| Pilots | 8% | +1pts | 9% | ||
| Airport | 39%* | -2pts | 37% | ||
| Corporate | 5% | +2pts | 7% | ||
| Maintenance | 1% | 0pts | 1% |
The numbers for each employment contract and type are based on an average of four values, each captured at the end of each quarter during the year.
Refer to 'Composition' commentary in 'Description and commentary for key workforce metrics' in section C.6. Workforce Measures.
* These values have been restated due to the reallocation of a number of employees into different categories.
| 2019 | vly | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employee category | |||
| Cabin Crew | 21% | +26pts | 47% |
| Pilots | 6% | +12pts | 18% |
| Airport | 39% | -4pts | 35% |
| Corporate | 27% | +1pts | 28% |
| Maintenance | 7% | +5pts | 12% |
| 2019 | vly | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | -6pts | 23% |
| 29% | +12pts | 41% |
| 42% | -6pts | 36% |
| 61% | -9pts | 52% |
| 39% | +9pts | 48% |
Refer to 'Workforce turnover' description in 'Description and commentary for key workforce metrics' in section C.6. Workforce Measures.
Refer to 'Workforce turnover' commentary in 'Description and commentary for key workforce metrics' in section C.6. Workforce Measures.
| Overall | Men | Women | Salary Gap | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seniority level | vly | 2019 | 2020 | vly | 2019* | 2020 | vly | 2019* | 2020 | vly | 2019* | 2020 |
| Senior executives | -24% | 273,825 208,209 | -23% 284,330 220,325 | -25% | 233,935 | 175,670 | +2.5pts | 17.70% | 20.30% | |||
| Other management | -13% | 93,158 | 80,808 | -14% | 98,721 | 85,279 | -12% | 83,381 | 73,324 | -1.5pts | 15.50% | 14.00% |
| All other employees | 7% | 42,382 | 45,402 | 5% | 46,469 | 48,793 | 8% | 37,581 | 40,652 | -2.4pts | 19.10% | 16.70% |
| Total workforce | 6% | 43,488 | 46,224 | 5% | 47,636 | 49,832 | 8% | 38,369 | 41,467 | -2.7pts | 19.50% | 16.80% |
| Overall | Men | Salary Gap | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age band | vly | 2019 | 2020 | vly | 2019* | 2020 | vly | 2019* | 2020 | vly | 2019* | 2020 |
| <30 | 1% | 29,708 | 30,149 | 7% | 31,194 | 33,377 | -2% | 28,884 | 28,445 | +7.4pts | 7.40% | 14.80% |
| 30–50 | 3% | 44,518 | 45,828 | 2% | 48,346 | 49,319 | 3% | 40,704 | 41,984 | -0.9pts | 15.80% | 14.90% |
| >50 | 2% | 56,096 | 57,276 | 3% | 56,690 | 58,152 | 1% | 55,433 | 56,102 | +1.3pts | 2.20% | 3.50% |
| Total workforce | 6% | 43,488 | 46,224 | 5% | 47,636 | 49,832 | 8% | 38,369 | 41,467 | -2.7pts | 19.50% | 16.80% |
The median remuneration broken down by gender, age and seniority level; and salary gap were reported for the first time in 2019. The elements in scope for the reported figures include basic salary, shift pay, allowances and employer pension contributions, taxable benefits and annual incentives. The reporting methodology was developed in 2019 to arrive at comparable pay for each employee – from which median pay is calculated – based on amounts of pay respective to time worked, taking into account basic and variable remuneration.
All remuneration is extrapolated to a full-time annual equivalent for comparability. This is very important in an industry with a high proportion of part-time and temporary employees with highly variable working schedules. Employees who joined or left the Group during the year are included where they were employed for at least 15% of the year. Some limited exclusions apply in special cases, such as employees impacted by special leave for at least 10% of the year.
'Senior executives' includes operating companies' management committee members, directors and other senior/executive positions. 'Other management' includes all other management roles, excluding pilots and cabin crew managerial roles which are included within 'All other employees'.
Salary gap refers to the difference between men's and women's median earnings (based on total pay) across the organisation, expressed as a percentage of men's earnings.
2019 data has been restated due to the reallocation of a number of employees, as well as some pay elements, into different categories for alignment with 2020. Remuneration for the IAG Management Committee has been excluded from both 2019 and 2020 data because it is reported in the Board and Management Committee section of this report.
For calculation purposes, all remuneration amounts respective to government subsidies or company top-up pay, which are associated with time not worked, are excluded, in order to align with the methodology described above.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on the remuneration of everyone in the Group. The 2020 dataset includes 64,565 employees. This represents over 100% of the workforce at year-end, due to the number of employees who left the Group towards the end of the year.
Government subsidy schemes and company top-up pay varied across the three key geographical areas of Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom, impacting almost 50,000 employees during the year. All remuneration relating to government subsidies or company top-up pay has been excluded. Only remuneration paid during time worked has been included to be consistent with the methodology.
Voluntary salary reduction schemes were introduced for 'Senior Executives' from April to December, with salary reductions ranging from 15% to 50%. These temporary salary reductions did not represent a reduction in working hours. Voluntary salary reduction schemes were introduced for 'Other Management' employees, for those employees not part of any Government subsidy schemes, from April to December, with salary reductions ranging from 5% to 50%. In many cases, these included a reduction in working hours. The effect of these temporary reductions can be seen in the 24% fall in median pay for 'Senior Executives' and the 13% fall in median pay for 'Other Management'.
* These values have been restated to align employee categories and pay elements with 2020 reporting.
The increase in median pay for 'All Other Employees' is due to a number of factors, including annual pay uplifts implemented before the impact of COVID-19, new collective bargaining agreements implemented in Vueling and Iberia and bonus payments made in 2020 in relation to 2019 performance. With many employees having worked significantly reduced hours during the year, the extrapolation to a full-time annual equivalent can lead to an increase in overall average pay when all of the fixed and variable pay elements are taken into account. This impact was particularly pronounced in Iberia. Making extrapolations when there are low levels of activity gives rise to data that is more difficult to compare in respect to the prior year.
Total employee costs before exceptional items for the Group fell by 34.6% from €4,962m in 2019 to €3,247m in 2020, while Average Manpower Equivalents (AME) fell by 8.2% from 66,034 in 2019 to 60,612 in 2020, including time under job retention schemes.
The overall median salary gap for the total workforce reduced from 19.5% in 2019 to 16.8% in 2020. The median salary gap for 'Senior Executives' increased from 17.7% to 20.3% in 2020, due to joiners and leavers at the senior executive level. However, when considering this relatively small population (137 men and 59 women), the mean can be more meaningful, and when looking at the mean data for 'Senior Executives' the salary gap actually reduced from 16.0% to 13.9% in 2020 compared to 2019.
Government subsidy schemes and company top-up pay varied across the three key geographical areas of Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom. Outlined below are the key components of schemes that cover 92% of the Group's employees.
Following the UK Government announcement regarding the JRS, furloughing of employees began from April. Through agreements with trade unions, the JRS was used each month since April 2020. All employee groups have been impacted by the JRS.
Under the terms of the current JRS rules, employers can claim 80% of an employee's usual salary for hours not worked, up to a maximum of £2,500 per month. As part of the agreements reached with the Trade Unions, since April 2020, UK operating companies continued to top up employees' pay to 80%, for all employee groups. Since April 2020, UK operating companies have sought to furlough as many employees as possible given the reduced operations and flying schedules.
In late March, Aer Lingus placed all employees on reduced working hours of 50% with the exception of senior executives and some other managers who continued to work 100% hours on 50% pay. This decision pre-dated the Irish Government's introduction of the TWSS aimed at supporting businesses in maintaining employment levels. Aer Lingus made use of this government subsidy and the values for employees were calculated based on the following conditions:
An initial cap was set at 70% of Average Net Weekly Pay (AWNP) subject to:
TWSS was amended for payroll after May 4, as follows:
On September 1, 2020, the Irish Government replaced TWSS with EWSS. Under EWSS, qualifying employers could claim a flat rate rebate, to the employer, for eligible employees on their payroll. Unlike the TWSS which was a net subsidy paid through payroll directly to an employee, the EWSS is a payment paid to the employer. Aer Lingus received an amount per employee between €151.50 and €350 depending on the employee's gross weekly pay.
In Iberia, ERTE was implemented from April 1, 2020, initially affecting 12,150 employees from all areas of the company. From June, a significant percentage of Iberia's workforce were put onto short time working to cover operational needs on a voluntary basis. ERTE figures increased again after the activity peak of summer.
The employees affected by ERTE are subsidised directly from the government from the time they are not actively employed, through an unemployment subsidy corresponding to 70% of the regulatory base with a maximum payment of €1,098.09 for employees with no children and €1,411.83 with two or more children. The minimum unemployment subsidy is €501.98. The unemployment subsidy is paid according to the days affected within a month. Where employees are partially affected, the employee earns their regular salary from the company for the days they are actively employed.
Both Iberia and Vueling supplemented this with a top-up payment according to their monthly pay levels, from April to November 2020.
In Vueling, the ERTE was also implemented from April 1, 2020, initially affecting 4,081 employees from all areas of the company. ERTE figures increased again after the activity peak of summer.
Average remuneration of Board members and Directors, including variable remuneration, allowances, professional indemnity, contributions to pension and welfare systems and any other parts of the remuneration broken down by gender

For 2020, there was only one male Executive Director who was on the Board for the whole year, and this was the CFO of IAG. This should be borne in mind when making comparisons with previous years. His remuneration is made up of basic salary, taxable benefits (company car and private health), employer pension contributions, annual incentive, and long-term incentive, personal accident and travel insurance, and life insurance. Including only those members who were on the Board for the whole of 2020, the Board also had eight non-executive directors, comprising four men and four women. Non-executive directors' remuneration is made up of basic fees, travel benefits, and personal accident and travel insurance.
The Management Committee data excludes the Executive Director who is a Board member. Including only Management Committee members who were in employment for the whole of 2020, the Management Committee consisted of five men and two women. Their remuneration is made up of the same elements as for the Executive Director. For 2019, only people who were in service for the whole year are included; the differences being that there were eight non-executive directors (consisting of five men and three women) and eight Management Committee members (consisting of six men and two women). For 2019, the figures have been restated to include personal accident and travel insurance, and life insurance.
These figures are derived from the methodology as per the Remuneration Report filed with the Spanish National Securities Market Commission (CNMV).

The average (mean) remuneration for men on the Board is considerably higher than the average for women because the remuneration of executive directors is much greater than that of non-executive directors and the fee for the Chairman is much higher than that of other non-executive directors. The posts of executive directors and Chairman are held by men.
Comparing 2020 to 2019, the average remuneration for men and women has fallen because of the fall in the annual incentive pay-out, which affects the Executive Director on the Board, and all members of the Management Committee, and also because of the salary and fee reductions in 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which affected all members of the Board and Management Committee.
As there are only two women on the Management Committee the average remuneration by gender has not been shown for reasons of confidentiality.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, employees who normally work in office environments were advised, where possible, to work from home. This brought additional challenges in encouraging employees to disconnect from work.
Employees have been offered lots of information and guidance on creating and managing a healthy work-life balance through digital employee portals.
Across the Group, there are a number of policies and initiatives in place designed to promote a healthy work-life balance. These include flexible working policies such as working from home, and flexible start and finish times dependent on job role, all designed to support employees in managing their home and work life.
Regarding co-parenting responsibilities, there are policies on job-sharing, maternity, adoption, paternity and shared parental leave. There are active online platforms for working parents and carers to share ideas and to offer support to one another.
Working hours organisation
Time worked and holidays are different in each operating company as per the respective collective bargaining agreements.

Employees with disabilities as a percentage of headcount at the end of the year. In Spain, the disabilities in scope are medically certified, while in other countries the disabilities in scope are self-declared.
The 2020 percentage remains the same as in 2019, even though the total number of employees with disabilities changed, due to turnover.
The total number of employees wih disabilities in 2020 is 593, compared with 717 in 2019.
Collecting disability information on employees is not a legal requirement in the UK or Ireland, unlike in Spain.
Aer Lingus data is not in scope.

The absenteeism rate is based on total employee absences divided by total scheduled hours or days in the reporting period, expressed as a percentage.
The 2020 methodology split absenteeism and time scheduled into two categories. Absences for "on the ground" employees are measured in hours. Absences for "in the air" employees are measured in days. The reason for this change is to increase the accuracy of flight staff absence reporting, as these absences are typically recorded in days. Days for cabin crew and pilots vary widely in terms of hours. In 2019, flight staff absences were based on an estimated number of hours, and therefore not comparable to 2020.
"On the ground" employee categories include all corporate, airport and maintenance categories and "in the air" includes all pilots and cabin crew.
For the purpose of this metric, only unplanned or unauthorised absences – which mean employees missing partial or whole days of work – are included. Examples in scope are short-term and long-term sickness, time off due to injuries, and no-shows, which are absences without leave or permission.
In 2020, 2,319,959 hours of absence for "on the ground" employees and 154,328 days for "in the air" employees were recorded. Less than 5% of Group employees are not in scope, mainly overseas employees.
Under the 2019 methodology, IAG reported a total of 4,347,592 hours of absenteeism for the overall workforce.

An occupational illness is a medical condition or disease that develops gradually over time as a result of work performed and/or exposure to risk factors in the workplace. The illness must be confirmed by a medical diagnosis.
Occupational illnesses in scope for the UK follow Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations (RIDDOR) standards and can be found at the Health and Safety Executive's (HSE) website.
Occupational illnesses in scope for Spain are published in the Royal Decree 1299/2006.
No occupational illnesses were reported in 2020.
Results of collective agreements, especially in the field of health and safety
IAG operating companies comply with all relevant legislation and work hard to improve and maintain workforce engagement and representation. Operating companies use a combination of human resources and employee engagement programmes and technology, to share information about the business with employees, their representatives and Trade Unions. The vast majority of employees are represented through collective bargaining agreements and Group companies have well-established mechanisms for negotiation and dialogue with relevant trade unions and employee groups. This includes regular reviews of matters relating to the health and safety in the workplace.
British Airways has regular health and safety engagement with trade unions at a local, departmental and directorate level across all areas of the business with escalation to the Corporate Safety team. Iberia has a health and safety committee in each relevant work centre which meets every two months. Aer Lingus holds regular meetings with both health and safety and employee representatives, with Corporate Safety in attendance, and Vueling holds quarterly meetings with a health and safety committee, composed of Vueling management and trade union appointed safety representatives.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, additional and regular meetings have been held right across the operationg companies and employees, employee representatives and trade union representatives have been updated regularly on risks, actions and changes to ways of working on board aircraft to mitigate risks. This has been done in conjunction with health and safety assessments for airport and office environments.
GRI 103-2
The Group complies with all relevant legislation regarding accessibility for disabled employees and customers in our buildings and operations. Operating airlines also work with a variety of external organisations, such as the Business Disability Forum in the UK, to help inform and support efforts and strategy. They continue to listen and respond to customers' needs.
British Airways is particularly active on this issue and has built on its accessibility strategy during 2020. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic means that it may be more challenging for customers with additional needs to travel, so there was a greater need to ensure messaging on social distancing and sanitation reflected the needs of people with a range of disabilities i.e. hard of hearing or austistic customers.
The employee and customer accessibility strategies work in conjunction by ensuring front-line employees, such as cabin crew, are trained in disability awareness. This training a particular focus on hidden disabilities.
Iberia is constantly reviewing its processes to care for people with special needs. All processes go through inspections by AESA. In 2020, the Iberia website was updated with improvements to help to facilitate the booking experience of customers with special needs. Iberia was awarded a certificate of compliance with web content accessibility guidelines established by the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium), achieving AA level.
Aer Lingus continually monitors all web content and services to ensure alignment with level AA of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.
Vueling began improving its booking website to make it easier for visually disabled people to use. Changes included a new accessibility section, new page design, more time to book, and an improved email confirmation process.
IAG sees work experience as a valuable way of supporting local employment, by engaging young people with IAG's business and preparing them for potential careers in aviation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic a number of existing programmes have been paused but British Airways had the following initiatives:
Aer Lingus also launched its first cybersecurity apprenticeship programme.
The Iberia "Quiero ser" program, to attract and promote female careers in the aviation industry, has been postponed to 2021 due to the pandemic.
IAG airline customers are able to provide feedback and details of complaints in multiple ways, including via IAG airline websites, by mail, or by phoning customer contact centres. The types of customer complaint received vary significantly but typically relate to delays and cancellations, baggage, journey experience, bookings and reservations. To handle customer complaints, IAG airlines have dedicated customer relations teams who are specially trained to deliver excellent customer service and resolve issues quickly and in a satisfactory manner. Through their complaint systems, IAG airlines actively track and monitor resolution of customer complaints using metrics including the time between a complaint being received and the first communication provided back to the customer, or the number of cases raised that have been successfully closed.
In 2020, across the IAG airlines, an average of 6.5 complaints were received per 1,000 flown passengers, compared to an average of 3.2 complaints received per 1,000 flown passengers in 2019. The ratio of complaints received in 2020 was negatively impacted by the disruption caused due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and further exacerbated by the significant consequential reduction in passenger volumes.
All IAG airlines also provide facilities for customers to exercise their rights to claim compensation under Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of February 11, 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights. Customers are additionally able to use the IAG airline contact channels to submit claims for financial compensation relating to baggage incidents and other out of pocket expenses, which are assessed and resolved by IAG's customer relations teams.
During the year to December 31, 2020, in addition to EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) allowances granted at zero cost, Group public subsidies amounted to €474 million (2019: €94 million). The majority of the public subsidies received related to furlough and job retention schemes in the UK and Ireland, for British Airways and Aer Lingus respectively.
Operating companies in the Group receive some EU ETS emission allowances at zero cost and purchase the remainder in the EU ETS market. In addition to COVID-19 related public subsidies, the €474 million includes €122 million relating to the value of allowances at zero cost in 2020. EU ETS allowances were valued at the December 31, 2020 carbon market prices.
For the year to December 31, 2019, the substantial majority of public subsidies were related to EU ETS allowances issued at zero cost to the operating companies in the Group. These were valued at December 31, 2019 carbon market prices.
The Group has also received government assistance, which is not considered as public subsidies in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and is therefore not included in the amount above, for the following:


Profits by country – the Group's consolidated accounting profit for the year split by country in which it is taxable.
The decrease in profits taxable in our main countries of operation in 2020 reflects losses arising due to the global outbreak of COVID-19, which has had a material impact on the global airline and travel sectors.

of Ireland
countries1
Taxes paid by country – the Group's consolidated cash tax payments for the year split by country in which they were made.
The total net tax receipt of €45 million reflects refunds of corporate income taxes in respect of prior year tax paid in Ireland and Spain. A refund of UK corporation tax was net off against other tax payables during the year and is therefore not reflected in this amount. The UK offset against other taxes partly explains why the tax receipts of €45 million are lower than the expected tax credit for the Group of €887 million, however this difference is primarily because tax repayments for losses are not based on accounting profits and losses, instead repayment of much of the accounting credit will be delayed until future taxable profits arise.
The decrease in taxes paid by country in our main countries of operation in 2020 reflects the tax losses arising due to the global outbreak of COVID-19.
1 "Other" comprises Austria, Belgium, Bermuda, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, France, Germany, Guatemala, Honduras, Hong Kong, India, Isle Of Man, Italy, Japan, Jersey, Maldives, Mexico, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Puerto Rico, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland and United States.
| Reporting criteria/ | NFIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Area | GRI standard | page ref |
| General Information | ||
| Business model description | GRI 102-2 (P), 102-4 (P) | Pg 2 |
| Organisation and structure | GRI 102-7 (P) | Pg 2 |
| Market presence | GRI 102-6 (P) | Pg 2 |
| Objectives and strategies | GRI 102-15 (P) | Pg 4 |
| Main factors and trends that may affect future performance | GRI 102-15 (P) | Pg 4 |
| Reporting framework used | GRI standards | Pg 7 |
| Materiality assessment | GRI 102-43 (P), 102-44 (P) | Pg 5 |
| 102-46 (P), 102-47 (F) | ||
| Social & employee related matters | ||
| Management approach | ||
| Description of the applicable policies and the result of these policies | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 7 |
| Main risks related to these issues | GRI 102-15 (P) | Pg 38, 39, 40, 42 |
| Employment | ||
| Total number of employees and distribution by country, gender, age and job | GRI 102-7 (P), 405-1 (P) | Pg 31-33 |
| category | ||
| Employment contracts distribution and annual average distributed by gender, age and job category |
GRI 102-8 (P) | Pg 49 |
| Total number of dismissals and its distribution by gender, age and job category | GRI 401-1 (P) | Pg 32, 33, 50 |
| Average remuneration broken down by gender, age and job category | GRI 405-2 (P) | Pg 51-52 |
| Salary gap | (2) | Pg 29, 51, 52 |
| Average remuneration of board members and directors | Remuneration reporting to CNMV | Pg 53 |
| Policies to allow employees to disconnect from work | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 54 |
| Number of employees with disabilities | GRI 405-1 (P) | Pg 54 |
| Working organisation | ||
| Working hours organisation | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 54 |
| Absenteeism rates | (1) | Pg 54 |
| Measures to promote work-life balance | GRI 401-2 (P) | Pg 54 |
| Health and safety | ||
| Occupational health and safety conditions | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 29 |
| Number of workplace accidents and accident rates broken down by gender | GRI 403-9 (P), (1) | Pg 48 |
| Occupational illness cases broken down by gender | GRI 403-10 (P) | Pg 55 |
| Labour relations | ||
| Social dialogue organisation | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 55 |
| Percentage of employees covered by collective agreements broken down by country |
GRI 102-41 (F) | Pg 47 |
| Results of collective agreements, especially in the field of health and safety | GRI 103-2 (P), 403-4 (P) | Pg 55 |
| Training | ||
| Policies implemented | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 28 |
| Total number of training hours broken down by employee category | GRI 404-1 (P) | Pg 47 |
| Universal accessibility of people with disabilities | ||
| Universal accessibility of people with disabilities Equality |
GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 56 |
| Measures taken to promote equal treatment and opportunities between women and men |
GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 28, 29 |
| Equality plans | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 29 |
| Measures taken to promote employment | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 56 |
| Protocols against sexual harassment and on the basis of gender | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 29 |
| Integration and universal accessibility for persons with disabilities | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 56 |
| Policy against all types of discrimination and policy on diversity | GRI 103-2 (P), 406-1 (P) | Pg 29 |
| Environmental matters | ||
| Management approach | ||
| Description of the applicable policies and the result of these policies | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 7 |
| Main risks related to these issues | GRI 102-15 (P) | Pg 10-16, 37 |
| Environmental management | ||
| Information of the current and foreseeable impact of the Company's activities on the environment |
GRI 103-2 (P), 102-15 (P) | Pg 10, 20 |
| Environmental assessment and certification procedure | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 7 |
| Resources devoted to environmental risks prevention | GRI 103-2 (P), (1) | Pg 10 |
| Implementation of the precautionary principle | GRI 102-11 (F) | Pg 10 |
| Amount of provisions and warranties for environmental risks | GRI 103-2 (P), (1) | Pg 46 |
Note: (F) means fully compliant, (P) means partially compliant. (1) means internal framework: see the specific methodology used in corresponding pages. (2) difference between men's and women's median pay, divided by men's median pay.
| Area | Reporting criteria/ GRI standard |
NFIS page ref |
|---|---|---|
| Pollution | ||
| Measures to prevent, reduce or repair emissions | ||
| (including noise and light pollution) | GRI 103-2 (P), 305-7 (P), (1), light pollution not material | Pg 5, 22, 26-27 |
| Circular economy and waste prevention and management | ||
| Measures related to prevention, recycling, reuse and other | ||
| form of waste recovery and disposal | GRI 306 - Waste 2020: 306-1 (P), 306-2 (P), 306-3 (P) | Pg 25, 26 |
| Actions to avoid food waste | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 25, 27 |
| Sustainable use of resources | ||
| Water consumption | GRI 303-3 (P) | Pg 46 |
| Raw materials consumption | GRI 301-1 (F) | Pg 22, 46 |
| Direct and indirect energy consumption | GRI 302-1 (F) | Pg 22, 46 |
| Measures to improve energy efficiency | GRI 103-2 (P), 305-5 (F) | Pg 23, 24 |
| Use of renewable energy | GRI 302-1 (P) | Pg 20, 21, 46 |
| Climate change | ||
| Relevant aspects regarding greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) | GRI 305-1 (F), 305-2 (F), 305-3 (F), 305-4 (F) | Pg 20 |
| Measures to adapt to climate change | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 10-16 |
| Objective related to GHG reduction | GRI 103-2 (P), 305-5 (F) | Pg 22, 23 |
| Biodiversity | ||
| Measures to preserve or restore biodiversity | Not material | Pg 5 |
| Respect for human rights | ||
| Management approach | ||
| Description of the applicable policies and the result of these policies | GRI 102-16 (F), 103-2 (P) | Pg 30 |
| Main risks related to these issues | GRI 102-15 (P) | Pg 30 |
| Specific contents | ||
| Implementation of human rights due diligence procedures | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 30 |
| Measures to prevent and manage potential human rights abuses | GRI 103-2 (P), 102-17 (F) | Pg 30 |
| Reported cases of human rights violations | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 30 |
| Promotion and compliance with ILO´s provisions | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 28 |
| Elimination of forced or compulsory labour | GRI 409-1 (P) | Pg 28 |
| Effective abolition of child labour | GRI 408-1 (P) | Pg 28 |
| Anti-corruption and bribery matters | ||
| Management approach | ||
| Description of the applicable policies and the result of these policies | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 9 |
| Main risks related to these issues | GRI 102-15 (F) | Pg 9, 42 |
| Specific contents | ||
| Measures to prevent corruption and bribery | GRI 205-1 (P), 205-2 (P), 205-3 (P) | Pg 9 |
| Measures to prevent money-laundering | GRI 103-2 (P), 102-16 (F), 102-17 (F) | Pg 9 |
| Contributions to not-for-profit organisations | GRI 201-1 (P), (1) | Pg 30 |
| Other information on the Company | ||
| Management approach | ||
| Description of the applicable policies and the result of these policies | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 34, 35 |
| Main risks related to these issues | GRI 102-15 (P) | Pg 35-42 |
| Commitment to sustainable development | ||
| Impact of the Company's activities on employment and local development | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 56 |
| Impact of the Company's activities on local populations and territories | GRI 103-2 (P), (1) | Pg 56 |
| Relations with actors in the local communities and forms of engagement with them |
GRI 102-43 (P), 102-44 (P) | Pg 17, 18 |
| Partnership or sponsorship actions | GRI 103-2 (P), 102-13 (F) | Pg 17, 18, 30 |
| Sustainable supply chain management | ||
| Inclusion of social, gender equality and environmental | ||
| issues in the procurement policy | GRI 308-2 (P), 414-2 (P), (1) | Pg 8 |
| Consideration of suppliers' and subcontractors' social and environmental | ||
| responsibility in relations with them | GRI 308-2 (P), 414-2 (P), (1) | Pg 8 |
| Supervision and audit systems | GRI 308-2 (P), 414-2 (P), (1) | Pg 8 |
| Consumer relationship management | ||
| Measures to protect consumer health and safety | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 29, 56 |
| Claims systems and complaints | GRI 102-43 (P), (1) | Pg 56 |
| Complaints received and their outcome | GRI 103-2 (P) | Pg 56 |
| Tax information and transparency | ||
| Profits broken down by country | GRI 207-4 (P) | Pg 57 |
| Corporate income tax paid | GRI 207-4 (P) | Pg 57 |
| Public subsidies received | GRI 201-4 (P), Accounting criteria | Pg 57 |
Note: (F) means fully compliant, (P) means partially compliant. (1) means internal framework: see the methodology used in the corresponding pages.
The Board of Directors of International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A., in compliance with the provisions of Article 253 of the Capital Companies Law and of Article 37 of the Commercial Code, proceeded to formulate on February 25, 2021 the consolidated financial statements and the consolidated management report of the company for the year to December 31, 2020, which appear in the attached documents preceding this sheet.
In witness whereof, the members of the Board of Directors of International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A. signed below on February 25, 2021:
| Javier Ferrán Larraz Chairman |
Luis Gallego Martín Chief Executive Officer |
|---|---|
| Giles Agutter | Peggy Bruzelius |
| Eva Castillo Sanz | Margaret Ewing |
| Heather Ann McSharry | Robin Phillips |
| Emilio Saracho Rodríguez de Torres | Lucy Nicola Shaw |
Alberto Terol Esteban
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.