Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

GREENWING RESOURCES LTD Capital/Financing Update 2010

Oct 12, 2010

65029_rns_2010-10-12_c66148e8-9ac1-4663-81ae-991132af4fcf.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX / Media Release

==> picture [143 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

13 October 2010

Operations Update and New Production Growth Initiative

Highlights

  • Mine development and Mill refurbishment on track for first concentrate sales in January 2011.

  • 25% increase in forecast earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) for Fossey Mine from $55M to $69M by incorporating current metal prices.

  • Increased production by mining of lower grade disseminated mineralisation, possibly with a pre-concentration circuit is being investigated to increase mill utilisation, lower unit costs and increase cash flow.

Australian polymetallic miner, Bass Metals Ltd ( ASX:BSM ) is pleased to provide the following update on the mine development and mill refurbishment activities associated with its company transforming Hellyer Mine Project, as well as a new production growth initiative underway.

HELLYER MINE PROJECT (HMP)

Mining

The Fossey decline is at approximately 850 metres. Current mine development activity is focussed on connecting the decline to the pilot drill hole for the first of two vertical ventilation shafts to enable the commencement of 212 metres of raise boring of the shaft(Refer Figure 1). Drilling of the pilot hole for the second ventilation shaft is planned to commence shortly. Water ingress into the decline remains high but is being managed by the recently upgraded mine dewatering system and connection to grid power.

In the second half of October the mine development activity will widen to include development of the first ore extraction level (465mRL) as well as continuation of the decline. Bass expects first ore to be intersected by the development drives on the 465 level in mid November and stoping production to commence in late December.

Mill Refurbishment

The refurbishment of the Hellyer Mill is progressing well and is approximately 85% complete. Commissioning of some components of the Mill circuit has already commenced. Commissioning the entire circuit will commence in November; initially with waste rock and then approximately 20,000 tonnes of Que River mineralised waste. The processing of Fossey ore and concentrate sales are scheduled to commence in January 2011.

Financial Performance

Bass has revised its estimates of the Fossey component of the HMP to incorporate current metal prices and exchange rates, resulting in a 25% increase in forecast earnings before interest and tax (EBIT), as summarised in Table 1.

Bass Metals’ Managing Director, Mike Rosenstreich said, “This is a very positive outcome which further strengthens the robust project financials, particularly given that the underlying technical plan was updated for both adverse and beneficial changes since the Hellyer Operating Plan (HOP) was completed in March 2010.”

16 Thelma Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 PO Box 1330 WEST PERTH WA 6872 Telephone (08) 6315 1300 Facsimile (08) 9481 2846 www.bassmetals.com.au

ASX / Media Release

==> picture [143 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

The base case prices are the metal prices and exchange rates assumed in the Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) and current prices reflect prices as at 30 September 2010 as summarised in Table 2.

The HMP is forecast to generate EBIT of $25 to $35 million per year based on current metal prices and exchange rates. In the first two years alone, when Fossey is mined, the forecast EBIT is approximately $69 million.

“The strong earnings and cash generating potential of the HMP will provide the capital that Bass plans to employ to grow its business” Rosenstreich commented.

A further positive aspect is that the rise in co-product commodity prices has further reduced the benchmark C1 cost of production to US$0.12/lb payable zinc after credits; placing the HMP well into the lowest quartile of world production costs.

Table 1: Financial Forecast for current and base case price scenarios.

Base case prices Base case prices Current Prices Current Prices
Financial Outcomes A$M A$/t ore A$M A$/t ore
Gross Revenue 235 268 246 280
Net Smelter Return 171 195 185 211
Site Operating costs 65 74 65 74
Royalties 16 19 17 20
EBITDA 90 102 103 117
Start-up Capital Costs 25 29 25 29
Ongoing Capital Expenditure 9 10 9 10
EBIT 55 63 69 78
EBIT Margin 32% 37%
C1 Cost-US$/lb Payable Zn
after credits
US$0.16 US$0.12

Table 2: Metal Price and exchange rate assumptions

UoM Base Case
(DFS )
Current
(30/9/10)
%
Change
Copper US$/t 6000 8064 34
Lead US$/t 2100 2300 10
Zinc US$/t 1950 2225 14
Silver US$/oz 17 22 29
Gold US$/oz 1000 1310 31
AUD USD 0.87 0.97 11

GROWTH PROJECTS

The production profile of the Hellyer operations is not “Mill” constrained. Bass has substantial growth potential through its existing infrastructure and resources, namely, an underutilised mill and extensive low-grade as well as high-grade Mineral Resources.

Bass has commenced work with Como Engineering to assess an exciting opportunity to increase metal production and cash-flow. The large 1.5 mtpa capacity of the Hellyer Mill provides Bass with the operational flexibility to process any additional amenable ore delivered to the Run of Mine (ROM) stockpile. It is therefore possible to achieve additional production

16 Thelma Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 PO Box 1330 WEST PERTH WA 6872 Telephone (08) 6315 1300 Facsimile (08) 9481 2846 www.bassmetals.com.au

ASX / Media Release

==> picture [143 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

growth from existing hard-rock resources by lowering the mine cut-off grade to include disseminated/lower grade ore types, either on a “stand-alone” or an incremental ore basis. This scenario could be further optimised with the inclusion of a pre-concentration module such as a Heavy Media Separation (HMS) plant which would up-grade the metal content of the feed grade into the flotation circuit of the plant, reducing processing costs (Refer Figure 2).

This growth opportunity has potential near term application at Fossey where the total mineralised zone comprises 2.3 million tonnes at approximately 5% Pb + Zn of which 0.8 million tonnes is the high grade massive base metal sulphide lens (15% Pb + Zn) comprising the Ore Reserve. The Hellyer Mineral Resource also has a significant stringer zone style mineralisation with typical grades of 0.3% Cu, 3% Pb, 5% Zn, 52 g/t Ag and 0.9 g/t Au, which could be viable without pre-concentration. This material is could be amenable to preconcentration and has significant potential for major resource upgrades as it has not been targeted specifically for resource drilling.

Inclusion of lower grade material on either a “stand-alone” or incremental cost basis has the potential to add ore tonnes to the processing schedule resulting in better mill utilisation and an increase in metal production. Inclusion of a pre-concentration module could improve metal recoveries, lower costs and reduce utilisation of the tailings dam.

Commentary

“Bass Metals is clearly on the cusp of a major growth phase based on existing resources and proven technologies,” Bass Managing Director, Mike Rosenstreich said.

“Our next mine - Fossey - is poised to commence production, with mine development and Mill refurbishment activities on track to start processing Fossey ore and achieve first concentrate sales in January 2011. Furthermore, we are assessing several exciting opportunities with strong potential to more fully utilise the large Hellyer Mill and increase metal output and cash flow,” Mr Rosenstreich added.

Contact Media

Mike Rosenstreich David Brook Managing Director – Bass Metals Ltd Professional Public Relations Tel: (+61-8) 6315 1300 Mob: (+61) (0) 415 096 804

About Bass Metals Ltd (ASX: BSM )

Bass Metals Ltd is a growth focussed and profitable Australian base and precious metal producer with a portfolio of high quality zinc, lead, copper and gold assets in the rich Mount Read Volcanic mineral belt in northwest Tasmania.

Listing in 2005, Bass delivered its maiden profit in 2008 from its profitable base metals production hub at Que River in Tasmania, which has generated $25 million in cash flow over the last two years.

The Company’s larger transformational Hellyer Mine Project is on track to commence production toward the end of 2010. With an initial through-put rate of 400,000 tonnes per annum (tpa), the 1.5 million tpa capacity Hellyer Mill will produce 53,000 tpa of zinc concentrate, 27,000 tpa of lead concentrates and 4,500 tpa of copper—silver-gold concentrates.

The Company also has an active and successful exploration programme and is currently following up on recent discoveries at Switchback and Fossey East which are high-grade and located in close proximity to existing mine and milling infrastructure.

Bass has an experienced Board and operating team who have a strong track record of delivering profitable production underpinned by exploration success and are highly motivated to improve on that record.

16 Thelma Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 PO Box 1330 WEST PERTH WA 6872 Telephone (08) 6315 1300 Facsimile (08) 9481 2846 www.bassmetals.com.au

ASX / Media Release

==> picture [143 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Mancala’s raise bore rig drilling the pilot hole for Return-airway Rise.

==> picture [388 x 270] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Conceptual design by Como Engineers for Bass HMS Plant.

==> picture [388 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 20] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 20] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 20] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [388 x 14] intentionally omitted <==

16 Thelma Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 PO Box 1330 WEST PERTH WA 6872 Telephone (08) 6315 1300 Facsimile (08) 9481 2846 www.bassmetals.com.au

Attachment 1: Bass Metals Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources (as at 30 June 2010)

Bass has a large and diversified Mineral Resource Inventory comprising high grade massive sulphide base and precious metal mineralisation, tailings from the former Hellyer Mine operations containing gold and base metal sulphides and a shallow, hard-rock gold-silver resource.

a. Ore Reserves

The Fossey deposit is the initial Ore Reserve for the HMP; a detailed summary is provided below in Table 1. This also includes a Inferred Mineral Resource component that occurs within the planed stoping shapes and is reported separately below as Mining Inventory (Table 1a). At Que River a minor Ore Reserve position remains as summarised in Table 1, based on the ore sales arrangement with MMG Rosebery. The PQ North mine is due for completion in September 2010 and there is no plan to mine and sell S-Lens ore under this sales arrangement. The previously reported S-lens Ore Reserve was based on these ore sales terms and has now been removed from the summary as Bass is assessing the S-Lens Resources for processing at Hellyer.

The Ore Reserves in Table 1 are a sub-set of the Mineral Resources presented in Table 2 below.

Table 1: Tasmanian Ore Reserves as at 30 June 2010 – 5% Pb+Zn cut-off

Location JORC Classification Tonnes
kt
Copper
(%)
Lead
(%)
Zinc
(%)
Silver
(g/t)
Gold
(g/t)
Fossey1
Total Probable 824 0.3 5.3 8.9 126 2.4
Total Proved -
PQ~~2~~
(Que River)
Total Probable 12 0.2 7.4 13.2 209 2.6
Total Proved 1 0.3 6.4 10.4 232 4.2
Total Reserves 13 0.2 7.3 12.9 212 2.8
Total3 837 0.3 5.3 9.0 127 2.4
  1. Fossey Ore Reserve – Refer Competent Person statement Attachment 2 and Technical Checklist in Attachment 3 (A1).

  2. Que River Ore Reserve - Refer Competent Person statement Attachment 2 and Technical Checklist in Attachment 3 (A2).

  3. Rounding errors may occur.

Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off

**Location **

Tonnes
kt

Copper
(%)
Lead
(%)
Zinc
(%)
Silver
(g/t)
Gold
(g/t)
Fossey1 MiningInventory 62 0.2 3.8 6.2 84 1.9
Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off Table 1a: Tasmanian Mining Inventory as at 30 June 2010– 5% Pb+Zn cut-off

**Location **

Tonnes
kt

Copper
(%)
Lead
(%)
Zinc
(%)
Silver
(g/t)
Gold
(g/t)
Fossey1 MiningInventory 62 0.2 3.8 6.2 84 1.9
  1. Fossey Ore Reserve – Refer Competent Person statement Attachment 2 and Technical Checklist in Attachment 3, (A1).

b. Massive Sulphide Resources

The Fossey, Hellyer and Que River deposits comprise the Company’s massive base metal sulphide Mineral Resources. These estimates are reported at a (Pb+Zn)>5% cut off in Table 2 below in accordance with the JORC Code.

Table 2: Combined Polymetallic Massive Sulphide Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2010 – 5% Pb+Zn cut-off

Location
JORC
Classification
Tonnes
kt
Copper
(%)
Lead
(%)
Zinc
(%)
Silver
(g/t)
Gold
(g/t)
Fossey~~1~~ Indicated 690 0.4 6.1 10.4 143 2.5
Inferred 110 0.3 4.3 7.4 106 2.1
**Total ** 800 0.4 5.8 9.9 **137 ** 2.5
Hellyer
Remnants2
Indicated 640 0.4 4 6.8 83 1.3
Inferred 110 0.2 4.9 8.1 107 1.5
Total 750 0.3 4.1 7 87 1.3
Que River
Pb-Zn3
Indicated 160 0.2 3.8 6.5 96 1.2
Inferred 140 0.3 4.2 7.4 104 1.2
**Total ** 300 0.2 4 6.9 100 1.2
Que River
Cu3
Measured 60 1.7 0.7 2.1 69 0.3
Indicated 260 1.9 1.6 4.3 68 0.3
Inferred 60 2.5 0.2 0.6 33 0.2
**Total ** 380 2 1.3 3.4 63 0.3
Total~~4~~ Measured 60 1.7 0.7 2.1 69 0.3
Indicated 1,750 0.6 4.5 7.8 106 1.6
Inferred 420 0.6 3.8 6.6 95 1.4
Total 2,230 0.6 4.2 7.4 103 1.5
  1. Fossey Resource – Refer Competent Person statement Attachment 2 and Technical Checklist in Attachment 3 (A1).

  2. Hellyer Remnant Resource- Refer Competent Person statement Attachment 2 and Technical Checklist in Attachment 3 (A3).

  3. Que River Resource is estimated from 4 separate bodies, PQ, QR32, Nico and S Lens. Refer Competent Person statement Attachment 2 and Technical Checklist in Attachment 3 (A2 & A4).

  4. Rounding errors may occur.

Attachment 2: COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENTS

2.1 EXPLORATION RESULTS

The information within this report that relates to exploration results is based on information compiled by Mr Kim Denwer and Mr Michael Rosenstreich who are both full time employees of the Company. Mr Rosenstreich is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and Mr Denwer is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. They both, individually have sufficient experience relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposits under consideration and to the activities currently being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person(s) as defined in the 2004 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code)” and they consent to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears in this report.

2.2 MINERAL RESOURCES AND ORE RESERVES

The information in this report that relates to the Nico, S lens, QR 32 lenses at Que River and Fossey Mineral Resource estimates is based on information compiled by Mr Steve Richardson who is a fulltime employee of the company and a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Richardson has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code)”. Mr Richardson consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to the PQ resource estimate at Que River and the Fossey and Que River Reserve estimates is based on information compiled by Mr Tim Akerman who is a full time employee of Mancala and a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Akerman has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which they have undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Reserves (the JORC Code)”. Mr Akerman consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to Hellyer Remnant Ore Resource estimate is based on information compiled by Mr Neil Inwood who is a full time employee of Coffey Mining and a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Inwood has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which they have undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Reserves (the JORC Code)”. Mr Inwood consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on the work performed by Coffey Mining in the form and context in which it appears.

Attachment 3: APPENDICES: ORE RESERVE AND MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE CHECKLISTS

Appendix 1: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria- Fossey Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Estimate

Estimate
Criteria Comments
Geological setting Fossey is a Volcanic Hosted Massive Sulphide deposit comprising a stratiform zone of dominantly baritic mineralisation,
associated with areas of high-grade Base Metal Sulphide (BMS) and underlain by minor stringer and disseminated
mineralisation.
Tenement and land
status
Fossey occurs within Hellyer Mining Lease CML103M/87 and is wholly owned by Bass Metals Ltd.
Drilling All Bass Metals Ltd holes (27 holes in mineralisation) were diamond-drilled and NTW or NQ-sized core recovered (diameters
of 56mm or 47.6mm respectively). Historic holes (14 holes) were also diamond-drilled and are of NQ or BQ core size
(47.6mm or 36.4mm diameter respectively). >90% core recovery, averaged over the entire hole, was achieved during Bass
Metals Ltd drilling with close to 100% recovery in the ore zones. Similar high recoveries were achieved by historic drilling.
The Fossey resource has been drilled on 25m spaced sections oriented mine grid E-W. Drill-hole spacing is approximately
20-25malong these section lines.
Logging All drill holes have been geologically logged using standard Que-Hellyer logging codes. Wet and dry digital photographs of
all Bass Metals Ltd core were taken and RQD measurements were recorded at per drill-run intervals (average of 3.0m). For
historicholesRQD was alsomeasured and core photographs onslidefilm were taken.
Sampling For both Bass Metals Ltd and historic drilling half-core samples were collected at nominal 1.0m intervals or at lithological
boundaries. Sampling extended into barren host rocks or sub-grade mineralisation in both the hanging wall and footwall.
Assaying For Bass Metals Ltd drilling half core samples were submitted to Ammtec Laboratories in Burnie, Tasmania. Samples were
analysed for Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag, As, Fe (triple acid digest and AAS), Au (fire assay) and Ba (pressed powder XRF). SG
determination was conducted by the laboratory on each assay sample. QA-QC involved standards, blanks and duplicates
(one of each every 25 samples). Identification of problems with some Ammtec data led to re-submission of all assay pulp
samples, within mineralised zones planned for mining, to Amdel Laboratories in Adelaide, South Australia. At Amdel,
modified aqua regia digest was followed by Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag, As, Fe assay by ICP and Au by fire assay. Review by
independent experts recommended use of Amdel Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag, As and Fe values and Ammtec Au and Ba assays for
resource estimation. Historic assays were carried out on half core at Aberfoyle’s company laboratory (now the Ammtec
Burnie lab) using pressed powder XRF for Cu, Pb, Zn; AAS for Ag and As and Au by fire assay. Internal laboratory blanks
and standardswere the only QA-QCfor historicholes.
Surveying All Bass Metals Ltd drill-hole collar locations have been measured by a contract surveyor and historic holes by Hellyer Mine
surveyor.
Database integrity The drill-hole database used comprises Bass Metals Ltd drilling data recorded on Excel spreadsheet and historical data in
ASCII format, both imported into Datamine software. New assay results together with standard and blank results were
checked to ensure thesewerewithinacceptablelimits.
Geological
interpretation
The Fossey deposit strikes grid NNW and has the broad cross sectional form of a downward tapering wedge. The deposit
comprises three major zones:

_Massive Barite Zone -_The bulk of the deposit comprises massive barite, which is dominant in the stratigraphically
upper areas but also occurs locally in the underlying BMS zone;

_BMS Zone -_Underlying the massive barite zone is banded to massive BMS. Whilst the boundary of the footwall of the
BMS is a sharp contact, the internal boundary between the BMS and Barite zones is a gradational grade boundary;
and

_Footwall Zone -_Commonly underlying the BMS is low to moderate grade base metal mineralisation as disseminations
to stringer veins up to several 10’s ofcentimetres thick.
Estimation and
modelling
techniques
Within the Barite and BMS zones elements were estimated using Ordinary Kriging, restricted to mineralisation domain
boundaries. Variography of all elements was studied and grade continuity modelled. Due to the lower number of samples
gradewasinterpolatedinto thefootwall zone and theminor lenses using 3D inverse distanceinterpolation(power 2).
Cut-off parameters The outer boundary of the Fossey barite and BMS zones is based on sharp geological contacts. The internal boundary
between the two zones is gradational and a boundary of 4% (Pb+Zn) was chosen as the highest possible grade which
provided good continuity between holes and from section to section. Immediately underlying the BMS zone several holes
contain stringer vein and / or disseminated to semi-massive mineralisation. This domain was wireframed at a cutoff of
5%(Pb+Zn), although at the northern end and on 10,000N gold rich and base metal poor material was included at a 2 g/t Au
cut-off.
Previousmining Nomininghas yet takenplace atFossey.
Mining /
metallurgical
assumptions
No assumptions were made about mining factors for the resource estimation. For the reserve estimation some dilution
(<4.0% Pb+Zn) is internal to the ore body and falls within the coherent stope shapes; this is classified as planned dilution.
Planned dilution amounts to some 17k tonnes, or some 2% of the total reserve tonnage. In general, the unplanned dilution
has been estimated as a 1.0 to 1.5 metre failure envelope, some of which is mineralised. The average grade and waste of
this envelope has been calculated by digitising the void surrounding the planned stope into the geological block model. For
the primary stopes unplanned dilution is estimated to average 10%. Where dilution is defined as: Dilution (%) = (volume of
unplanned dilution) x 100/(volume of resource tonnage in stope envelope). For the pillars the failure envelope surrounding
the ore is assumed to be a little more adverse as the mining of the adjacent stope has already had an impact on the rock
mass thus the unplanned dilution is estimated to be 15%. In addition, an allowance has been made for dilution from the
cemented aggregate fill (CAF) which forms the northern and southern walls of the stopes. This is estimated as a 0.5 metre
failure/overbreak of the CAF walls. In total unplanned dilution for the pillars is estimated to 15%. Dilution grade has been
determined by averaging the block model grade within the dilution envelope. Where CAF is the diluents, a zero grade has
been applied.
The total unplanned waste rock dilution which is contained within the stope reserve amounts to: 55k tonnes at 0.1% Cu,
0.4% Pb, 0.8% Zn, 33 g/t Ag and 0.9 g/t Au at an average density of 3.62. In addition to dilution from stoping activities,
development within the resource model has been estimated to attract 5% dilution and a recovery of 95% of the diluted
resource volumes. Estimated dilution parameters at Fossey are consistent with the long term averages from Hellyer, where
similar stope geometries were adopted and where similar CAF strength was used.
Ore body recovery is estimated to be 95% of the diluted resource volumes as both the stopes and pillars are expected to be
stable. The net result is an overall dilution (stope, pillars and development) of approximately 12% waste for an estimated
recovery of 95%. The resource base underpinning the reserve estimate contains some 8% by mass (60k tonnes), material
categorised as Inferred. This material is largely constrained to the periphery of the resource limits. This material has been
includedinthemine productionschedule as aMiningInventory, butis excludedfromtheMineral ReserveEstimate.
Bulk density Where no bulk density measurement was available (only 34 of 1297 assay samples in the mineralised zones) regression
equations were developed to estimate bulk density from assay values. Bulk density was interpolated for each block.
Classification Classification of resources was undertaken by taking into account data integrity, grade continuity, geological confidence and
drill hole spacing.
Audits or reviews Resource estimatewasreviewed byresource consultant specialists duringHellyer Feasibility Study.

Appendix 2: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria - Que River Pb-Zn Mineral Resource and PQ Ore Reserve Estimate

Criteria Comments

Geological setting Three base metal resources occur in separate lenses at Que River; these are PQ, Nico, and QR 32 Lenses. The lenses are
examples of Volcanic Hosted Massive Sulphide deposits. Mineralisation style is diverse and includes footwall stringer veins,
disseminations,local replacement, epiclastic brecciahosted tomassivehigh-grade basemetalsulphidemineralisation.
Tenement and land
status
All lenses occur within Que River Mining Lease 68M/84 which is wholly owned by Bass Metals Ltd.
Drilling The resource estimate at Nico is based on 15 historic diamond drill holes of NQ or BQ core size (47.6mm or 36.4mm
diameter respectively). Core recoveries are not available but expected to range from poor in weathered near surface rocks
to almost 100% in fresh material. The Nico Lens resource has been drilled on 25m spaced sections oriented mine grid E-W.
Drill-hole spacing is generally 25m along these section lines. At QR32 all Bass Metals Ltd holes (7 holes within the lens)
were diamond-drilled and NTW-sized core recovered (diameter of 56mm). Historic drilling (70 holes) was also diamond-
drilled and is of NQ or BQ core size. Core recoveries range from poor in weathered near surface rocks to almost 100% in
fresh material. The QR32 Lens resource has been drilled on 12.5m to 25m spaced sections oriented mine grid E-W. Drill-
hole spacing generally 10-20m along these section lines. At PQ lens drilling comprises Bass Metals Ltd NTW and historic
NQ and BQ diamond drilling on a 12.5m by 12.5m spaced pattern. Core recoveries again range from poor in weathered
nearsurfacerocks to almost100%in fresh material.
Logging All drill holes have been geologically logged using standard Que-Hellyer Mine logging codes. Wet and dry digital
photographs of all Bass Metals Ltd core were taken and RQD measurements were recorded at per drill-run intervals
(average of 3.0m). For historic holes RQD was also measured but core photographs on slide film were taken only for some
holes.
Sampling Half-core samples were collected at nominal 1.0m intervals or at lithological boundaries. Sampling extends into barren or
sub-grademineralisation inboththehangingwallandfootwall.
Assaying For Bass Metals Ltd drilling half core samples were submitted to Ammtec Laboratories located in Burnie, Tasmania.
Samples were analysed for; Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag, As, Fe (triple acid digest and AAS); Au (fire assay) and Ba (pressed powder
XRF). SG determination was conducted by the laboratory on each assay sample. QA-QC involved standards (every 25
samples) and blanks (every 25 samples). Historic assays were carried out at Aberfoyle’s company laboratory (now the
Ammtec Burnie lab) using pressed powder XRF for Cu, Pb, Zn; AAS for Ag and As and Au by fire assay. Internal laboratory
blanks and standardswere the only QA-QCfor historicholes.
Surveying All Bass Metals Ltd drill-hole collar locations have been measured by a contract surveyor and historic holes by Que River
Mine surveyor.
Database integrity The drill hole database used comprises historical data in ASCII format and Bass Metals Ltd drill data recorded on Excel
spreadsheet, with both imported into Datamine software. In addition, original 1:500 scale mine geology cross-sections, long
projections and level plans were available. New assay results together with standard and blank results were checked to
ensure thesewerewithinacceptablelimits (required before thelaboratory jobwas accepted).
Geological
interpretation
All Que River lenses (except S Lens) are stratiform lenses of stringer, disseminated, semi-massive to massive sulphide that
lie at the same stratigraphic horizon, with their present geometric position attributed to folding and faulting. PQ Lens is the
main ore lens and is sub-vertical but locally folded, with a strike length around 800m, down-dip extent of 225m, maximum
thickness of 34m and average thickness of 8m. Nico Lens is a sub-cropping, sub-vertical lens, with a strike length of 175m
and down-dip extent of around 140m. Thickness ranges from less than one metre to around 10m. QR32 Lens is a sub-
cropping, sub-vertical lens, with a strike length and down-dip extent of around 225m. Thickness ranges from less than one
metre to around15m.
Estimation and
modelling
techniques
At Nico elements were estimated using 2D inverse distance interpolation (power 2) and an anisotropic search radius was
used for each block. At QR32 single structure spherical variograms were prepared and modelled. Continuity axes were
inferred from the orientation of the lens and high grade pods. 3D Ordinary Kriging was undertaken, constrained by the
interpreted ore zone wire frames. At PQ Lens tonnage and grade estimation has been undertaken using a simple polygonal
model with length weighted averages to estimate grades.
Cut-off parameters A 5% (Pb+Zn) outline has been used historically at Que River to correlate mineralised intercepts, as this was seen as a
natural cut-off that provided good continuity, closely following geological boundaries. This cut-off was used to define Nico
Lens and PQ Lens Resources. For QR32 Lens assays were converted to an A$ dollar value based on long term average
metal prices. Log probability plots of dollar-value suggested a natural boundary at A$70, separating background
mineralisation from the ore system and this was used to define the shape of the mineralized zone. Internal geologically
logged high grade Base Metal Sulphide pods were also wire framed. Resources were tallied using a block cut-off grade of
5% (Pb+Zn).
Previous mine
production
Mining of PQ Lens was carried out from 1980 to 1990. No mining has occurred at Nico Lens, whilst some mining of high
grade pods within QR32 Lens was carried out from underground during the 1980’s. Details on mined out areas were
sourcedfromanend of minelifereport andminelong projections.
Mining factors or
assumptions
No assumptions were made about mining for resource calculations. For PQ reserve estimate resources have been modified
to obtain the reserves by:

Inclusion of dilution at zero grade at a rate of 10% of the resource tonnage;

Application of a 90% recovery factor to the diluted resource;
Having beensubject tomine designprocedures.
Metallurgical factors No assumptionshave been made aboutmetallurgicaltreatment.
Bulk density At Nico and QR32 Lenses some assays from early holes do not have density data. Using the available measured density
data, amultiplelinear regression was developed to estimate densityforthese samplesfromCu,Pb andZngrades.
Classification Classification of resources was undertaken by taking into account data integrity, grade continuity, geological confidence and
drill hole spacing.
Audits or reviews No audits or reviewshave beencompleted.

Appendix 3: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria - Hellyer Remnant Mineral Resource Estimate

Criteria Comments
Geological setting Hellyer is a VMS style deposit, occurring as polymetallic massive sulphide mineralisation within a mafic – felsic volcano-
sedimentary sequence.
Tenement and land
status
Hellyer occurs within CML 103M and is 100% owned by Hellyer Mill Operations a wholly owned subsidiary of Bass Metals
Ltd.
Drilling Historic drilling through the Hellyer deposit is predominantly on a 20 metre by 20 metre spacing with some 10 metre by 10
metre infill. The local mine grid is orientated approximately 022° AMG. A total of 957 diamond drill holes and 1,548 channel
samples are present in the Hellyer database and define the Hellyer mineralisation. Diamond drilling took place over the
depositfrom 1983 to2000.Ofthese,453 diamond drill holes and251channelsampleswere usedinthisresource estimate.
Logging Alldrill holeshave beengeologicallylogged using standard Que-Hellyer Minelogging codes.
Sampling Half-core samples were collected at nominal 1.0m intervals or at lithological boundaries. Sampling extends into barren or
sub-grademineralisation inboththehangingwallandfootwall.
Assaying No QAQC data was available, and sources suggest that no QAQC work was done apart from internal laboratory checks.
Surveying All holes were measured bya Hellyer Mine surveyor.
Database integrity The supplied database contained some inconsistencies:

Duplicated collar entries with different co-ordinates;

Duplicated surveys with different measurements;

Inconsistencies with depths (assay/collar/survey);

Duplicated samples and grades assigned to different holes; and

Overlapping intervals.
Most, though not all, oftheinconsistenciesfell withinthemined-outvoid.Comments, changes and deletionswere entered
into a spreadsheet thatwas passed to the clientforcomment before theresource estimation wasmade. into a spreadsheet thatwas passed to the clientforcomment before theresource estimation wasmade.
Geological
interpretation
Confidence in the geological interpretation at Hellyer is high. Three geological domains were distinguished:

Stringer;

BMS; and

Remnant pillars and surrounds.
These were further subdivided based on position west or east of the Jack Fault, and on higher or lower grade within those
zones. Inall36 separatewireframe solidswere produced.
Estimation and
modelling techniques
Statistical analyses on 1 metre composites were completed. Variography and search neighbourhood analysis were also
conducted as input into grade estimation. The method used to obtain grade estimates for Pb, Zn and Cu was Ordinary
Kriging on accumulated grade times density, with grade back- calculated following estimation. Density, Au and Ag was
estimated using OrdinaryKriging.
Cut-off parameters No cut-off grade was applied to the base metal sulphide zones as this mineralisation was defined geologically. The other
mineralised zones (‘Stringer’ and ‘Remnant Pillar and Surrounds’) were modelled based upon a combination of a nominal
1% combinedPb +Zngrade andlogged geology.
Mining / metallurgical
assumptions
No assumptions were made about mining or metallurgical factors.
Previous mine
production
Underground mining commenced on the Hellyer deposit in 1986 and stopped in 2000. 16.9 Mt @ 0.4% Cu, 7.2% Pb, 13.8%
Zn, 167 g/t Ag and 2.5 g/t Au. There is a good model of the voids, which generally ties in well with the working plans
generated at the time of mining. However, no allowance has been made for possible fracturing and spoiling at open faces.
The wireframes were modelled to the outer limit of the void model, but it is quite possible that this face has migrated
outwards, and that themodelledwireframevolumeis over-estimated.
Bulk density Specific gravity (air pycnometer) measurements were made for the bulk of the samples. The relative bulk density (specific
gravity) which is assumed to be equivalent to dry insitu bulk density has been estimated by Ordinary Kriging based upon the
air pycnometer measurements reported from the samples. The density used for reporting has been multiplied by a factor of
0.95 to takeinto account the effect ofpore spaces.
Classification Resource classification was developed from the confidence levels of key criteria including drilling methods, geological
understanding and interpretation, sampling, data density and location, grade estimation and quality. Historic mining (voids
and drives) have been depleted from the resource model. The availability of good quality working plans dating back to the
time of the Hellyer mine operations and discussions with several former senior technical employees at that time also
contributed significantly to this process.
Appendix 4:Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria -S lens, Que River Mineral Resource Estimate
Criteria Comments
Geological setting S Lens is a Volcanic Hosted Massive Sulphide deposit. Mineralisation comprises massive to stringer base metal
sulphides.
Tenement and land
status
S Lens occurs within Que River Mining Lease 68M/84 and is wholly owned by Bass Metals Ltd.
Drilling All Bass Metals Ltd holes (22 holes) were diamond-drilled and NTW-sized core recovered (diameter of 56mm). Historic
drilling (92 holes) was also diamond-drilled and is of NQ or BQ core size (47.6mm or 36.4mm diameter respectively). An
average 94% core recovery was achieved during Bass Metals Ltd drilling. Similar high recoveries were achieved by
historic drilling. The S Lens resource has been drilled on 12.5m to 25m spaced sections oriented mine grid E-W. Drill-hole
spacingis approximately10-20malong these section lines.
Logging All drill holes have been geologically logged using standard Que-Hellyer mine logging codes. Wet and dry digital
photographs of all Bass Metals Ltd core were taken and RQD measurements were recorded at per drill-run intervals
(average of 3.0m). For historic holes RQD was also measured and core photographs on slide film were taken for all holes
except themostrecent 34 holes.
Sampling For Bass Metals Ltd and historic drilling half-core samples were collected at nominal 1.0m intervals or at lithological
boundaries.Sampling extendedinto barrenorsub-grademineralisation inboththehangingwallandfootwall.
Assaying For Bass Metals Ltd drilling half core samples were submitted to Ammtec Laboratories located in Burnie, Tasmania.
Samples were analysed for; Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag, As, Fe (triple acid digest and AAS); Au (fire assay) and Ba (pressed powder
XRF). SG determination was conducted by the laboratory on each assay sample. QA-QC involved standards (every 25
samples) and blanks (every 25 samples). Historic assays were carried out at Aberfoyle’s company laboratory (now the
Ammtec Burnie lab) using pressed powder XRF for Cu, Pb, Zn; AAS for Ag and As and Au by fire assay. Internal
laboratory blanks and standardswere the only QA-QCfor historicholes.
Surveying All Bass Metals Ltd drill-hole collar locations have been measured by a contract surveyor and historic holes by Que River
Mine surveyor.
Database integrity The drill hole database used comprises historical data in ASCII format and Bass Metals Ltd drill data recorded on Excel
spreadsheet, with both imported into Datamine software. In addition, original 1:500 scale mine geology cross-sections and
long projection were available. New assay results together with standard and blank results were checked to ensure these
werewithinacceptablelimits (required before thelaboratory jobwas accepted).
Geological
interpretation
S Lens is an outcropping, sub-vertical lens of stringer, disseminated, semi-massive to locally massive sulphide, with a
strike length 300m and down-dip extent of around 200m. Thickness ranges from less than one metre to over 12m and
averages 4.5m. Ore contacts are occasionally sharp but more often are diffuse and grade controlled. The lens is strongly
zoned, from dominantly copper rich in the south (Copper Zone) to relatively Zn-Pb rich in the north (Zinc Zone). S Lens
sulphide mineralogy is relatively simple, comprising sphalerite - galena ± chalcopyrite (Zinc Zone) and chalcopyrite
(Copper Zone).
Estimation and
modelling techniques
Multiple elements were estimated using 2D inverse distance interpolation (power 2). An anisotropic search radius was
usedforeachblock.
Cut-off parameters Historically a 5% (Pb+Zn) outline has been used at Que River to correlate mineralised intercepts. This was seen as a
natural cut-off that provided good continuity, closely following geological boundaries. However, S Lens mineralisation is
more variable in style. Although the 5% (Pb+Zn) outline was generally successful in the northern, Zn rich, part of S Lens,
it was often necessary elsewhere to use geology, principally the logged massive pyrite boundary, or the 1% Cu contour
where stringerand disseminated Cumineralisationextendsinto alteredvolcanics.
Previous mine
production
Some underground mining of the Zinc Zone was carried out during the late 1980’s. Details on mined out areas were
sourced from an end of mine life report and discussions with the ex-Que River Mine Captain, who supervised the mining of
SLens.
Mining / metallurgical
assumptions
No assumptions were made about mining or metallurgical factors
Bulk density Some assays from early holes do not have density data (88 of 983 samples within the ore lens). Using the available air
pycnometer density data, a multiple linear regression was developed to estimate density for these samples from Cu, Pb
andZngrades.
Classification Classification of resources was undertaken by taking into account data integrity, grade continuity, geological confidence
and drill hole spacing.
Audits /reviews No audits or reviewshave beencompleted.