GLOBE METALS & MINING LIMITED - Capital/Financing Update 2014

ASX RELEASE

ASX RELEASE 30 June 2013

25 August 2014

Investment Summary

ASX listed resources company (ASX:GBE)
100% interest held on projects in Malawi including niobium, graphite and rare earths

Machinga Nb‐Ta & REE Project Update

Globe Metals & Mining (“ Globe ” or “ the Company ”; ASX:GBE) has completed a soil and rock chip sampling programme at its Machinga project, in Malawi.

Malawi Kanyika Niobium project in feasibility optimisation

Highlights

Directors and Management

Non‐Executive Chairperson Ms Alice Wong
Managing Director Mr Alistair Stephens
Executive Director & Deputy CEO
Ms Shasha Lu
- The results of assays of 224 soil and 79 rock chip samples indicated potential niobium (Nb), tantalum (Ta) and rare earth element (REE) mineralisation.
- Preliminary geological investigations indicate similarities with Globe’s Kanyika Niobium Project.
Non‐Executive Director
Mr Jingbin Tian
Independent Non‐executive Director
Mr William Hayden Mr Bo Tan Mr Alex Ko
CFO & Company Secretary Ms Kerry Angel

FPOS 469,729,062 OPTIONS 9,450,000 (various)

Soil samples returned assays up to 2,490ppm Nb2O5 and 134ppm Ta2O5, which compares favourably with soil samples collected from over the KNP resource.
Rock chips assays up to 2,812ppm Nb2O5 and 180ppm Ta2O5, are similar to the resource grade of the KNP
In addition to the Nb‐Ta results, there are anomalous soil sample assays of up to 3,675ppm Total Rare Earth Oxides (TREO) including 391ppm yttrium (Y),
The sampling programmes to date (2013 & 2014) have now defined several Nb‐Ta and TREO anomalies.

Contact

Alistair Stephens Managing Director [email protected] T: +61 08 9327 0700

==> picture [40 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [49 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Summary

The Mac h inga Proje c t, located approximat e ly 210 kil o metres southeast of L i longwe (Fi g ure 1), is considered prospecti v e for Nb, Ta and rare e arth elements (REEs). W ithin the p roject area Globe has identified several are a s of potenti a l Nb‐Ta an d TREO mineralisation.

In the M a rch Quarte r ly Report, G lobe advised that it ha d received the assays o f 365 soil samples and that the r esults were sufficiently encouragin g to warran t further sa m pling to b e tter define the Nb‐Ta and TREO anomalism . Consequently further soil and rock chip sampling was com p leted duri n g the June Quarter and the assa y results of t h is work are now availa b le.

==> picture [16 x 205] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [16 x 204] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Map showing location of Machinga Project in Malawi.

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

The following updates shareholders on the status of the exploration activities at Machinga.

A geochemical sampling programme comprising 224 soil and 79 rock chip samples was completed with assays returned in July. The results are considered to be encouraging, and contouring of the soil assay results reveals the show the extent of the anomalism for the respective commodities (refer and Figures 2 & 3 below).

a) One Nb‐Ta near‐continuous anomaly (Anomaly A) covering 3.8 kilometres of strike at a 1000ppm Nb2O5 cut‐off contour level.
b) A further Nb‐Ta anomaly (Anomaly B) at the 1000ppm Nb2O5 cut‐off contour covering approximately 1.5 kilometres of strike, but remains open‐ended, to the west of the main anomaly described above.
c) Coincident with Anomaly A is a TREO anomaly (Anomaly C) covering 3.2 kilometres of strike at a 2000ppm TREO cut‐off contour level.
d) Partially coincident with Anomaly B, also at the 2000ppm TREO contour but extending a further 1.1 kilometres north is Anomaly D.

==> picture [40 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [49 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [5 x 547] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

Figure2: Map showing extent of Nb2O5 soil anomalism at the Machinga Project. NB: The rock chips are colour coded at the same levels as the soil assay contours

==> picture [40 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [49 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [52 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [52 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [52 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [52 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [52 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [52 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [52 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [52 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

Figure3: Map showing extent of TREO soil anomalism at the Machinga Project. NB: The rock chips are colour coded at the same levels as the soil assay contours

Based on geological m apping an d preliminar y geochemi c al analysis i t would ap p ear that th e source of the pote n tial Nb‐Ta m ineralisati o n at Machi n ga is the m ineral pyro c hlore [(Na C a)2Nb(Ta,U) 2 O6(OH,F)], which is t h e principal Nb‐Ta mineral at Globe ’ s Kanyika Niobium Proj e ct. The Nb‐ i n‐soil assay values are of similar tenor to th o se obtaine d previousl y from soil s a mpling co m pleted ove r the Kanyi k a Niobium Project resource.

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

To determine the potential source of the TREO (including yttrium) anomalism requires further geochemical analyses.

The Machinga Licence (EPL0230/07R) is currently being reviewed under the Ministry of Mines (MoM) renewal process. Although the licence has passed its renewal date Globe has met all its statutory commitments including the relinquishment of 50% of the EPL area as required under Malawi law and indications from the MoM are that it will be renewed imminently. Globe has requested written confirmation from the MoM and at this stage is confident that the EPL will be renewed.

ENDS

Competent Person: The information in this presentation that relates to Globe Metals & Mining (ASX:GBE) is based on information compiled, reviewed or prepared by Mr Fergus Jockel, Exploration Manager for Globe Metals & Mining, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy and of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Jockel has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposits under consideration and to the activities undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (the JORC Code). Mr Jockel consents to the inclusion in this presentation of the matters based on this information, in the form and context in which they appear.

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

JORC TABLE 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	Explanation		Commentary
*Sampling*	• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g.,		Rock chip samples were collected by
*techniques*	cut channels, random chips, or specific		Globe Metals and Mining Ltd where
	specialised industry standard		suitable outcrop was identified.
	measurement tools appropriate to the		Soil samples were collected along
	minerals under investigation, such as		predetermined samples lines.
	down hole gamma sondes, or handheld		The rock chips and soil samples
	XRF instruments, etc.). These examples		collected were approximately 2kg
	should not be taken as limiting the		each. Bagging and numbering were
	broad meaning of sampling.		done in the field to ensure
	• Include reference to measures taken to		representivity of the sampling
	ensure sample representivity and the		process.
	appropriate calibration of any		All samples collected at Machinga
	measurement tools or systems used.		were submitted at the ISO 17025
	• Aspects of the determination of		accredited Genalysis Laboratory
	mineralisation that are Material to the		Services (Intertek) in South Africa for
	Public Report. In cases where ‘industry		sample preparation. The sample
	standard’ work has been done this		pulps were then shipped to Perth,
	would be relatively simple (e.g.,		Western Australia for chemical
	‘reverse circulation drilling was used to		analysis applying the ICP‐MS
	obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg		technique and additional multi‐
	was pulverised to produce a 30 g		element work was done applying the
	charge for fire assay’). In other cases		ARU10/MS technique.
	more explanation may be required,
	such as where there is coarse gold that
	has inherent sampling problems.
	Unusual commodities or mineralisation
	types (e.g., submarine nodules) may
	warrant disclosure of detailed
	information.
*Drilling*	• Drill type (e.g., core, reverse		N/A
*techniques*	circulation, open‐hole hammer, rotary
	air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.)
	and details (e.g., core diameter, triple
	or standard tube, depth of diamond
	tails, face‐sampling bit or other type,
	whether core is oriented and if so, by
	_what method, etc.). _
*Drill sample*	• Method of recording and assessing		N/A
*recovery*	core and chip sample recoveries and
	results assessed.
	• Measures taken to maximise sample
	recovery and ensure representative
	nature of the samples.
	• Whether a relationship exists between
	sample recovery and grade and
	whether sample bias may have

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

	occurred due to preferential loss/gain
	of fine/coarse material.
*Logging*	• Whether core and chip samples have		All samples were geologically logged
	been geologically and geotechnically		following Globe Metals and Mining
	logged to a level of detail to support		procedures
	appropriate Mineral Resource
	estimation, mining studies and
	metallurgical studies.
	• Whether logging is qualitative or
	quantitative in nature. Core (or
	costean, channel, etc.) photography.
	• The total length and percentage of the
	relevant intersections logged.
*Sub‐sampling*	• If core, whether cut or sawn and		Sub‐sampling and sample preparation
*techniques and*	whether quarter, half or all core taken.		protocols were in accordance with
*sample*	• If non‐core, whether riffled, tube		acceptable exploration practices.
*preparation*	sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
	sampled wet or dry.
	• For all sample types, the nature,
	quality and appropriateness of the
	sample preparation technique.
	• Quality control procedures adopted for
	all sub‐sampling stages to maximise
	representivity of samples.
	• Measures taken to ensure that the
	sampling is representative of the in situ
	material collected, including for
	instance results for field
	duplicate/second‐half sampling.
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate
	to the grain size of the material being
	sampled.
*Quality of*	• The nature, quality and		All rock chips and soil samples were
*assay data and*	appropriateness of the assaying and		assayed at Genalysis Laboratory
*laboratory*	laboratory procedures used and		Perth.
*tests*	whether the technique is considered		Internal Laboratory Standards and
	partial or total.		Repeats were performed on each
	• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,		batch.
	handheld XRF instruments, etc., the		Quality control procedures adapted
	parameters used in determining the		by Genalysis are considered to be
	analysis including instrument make		adequate and to industry/ JORC
	and model, reading times, calibrations		standards.
	factors applied and their derivation,
	etc.
	• Nature of quality control procedures
	adopted (e.g., standards, blanks,
	duplicates, external laboratory checks)
	and whether acceptable levels of
	accuracy (i.e., lack of bias) and
	precision have been established.
*Verification of*	• The verification of significant		Globe Metal and Mining geologist
*sampling and*	intersections by either independent or		verified all samples prior to dispatch
*assaying*	alternative company personnel.		to the laboratory.
	• The use of twinned holes.		Documentation of samples is initially

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

	• Documentation of primary data, data		collected in notebooks and location
	entry procedures, data verification,		stored in hand held GPS units before
	data storage (physical and electronic)		being transferred to electronic
	protocols.		format.
	• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
*Location of*	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to		Hand held GPS units (GARMIN
*data points*	locate drill holes (collar and down‐hole		GPSMAP 78s) are used to define field
	surveys), trenches, mine workings and		location of all field samples. These
	other locations used in Mineral		locations are considered accurate to
	Resource estimation.		5m. The GPS has sufficient
	• Specification of the grid system used.		topographic control warranted for
	• Quality and adequacy of topographic		geochemical sampling. GPS data is
	control.		downloaded via MAP SOURCE into MS
			Excel.
*Data spacing*	• Data spacing for reporting of		Sample locations were selected after
*and*	Exploration Results.		an initial ground radiometric survey in
*distribution*	• Whether the data spacing and		2013. Once the survey was complete
	distribution is sufficient to establish the		an soil survey program was conducted
	degree of geological and grade		and following from those results
	continuity appropriate for the Mineral		additional samples were collected
	Resource and Ore Reserve estimation		during the recent program.
	procedure(s) and classifications
	applied.
	• Whether sample compositing has been
	applied.
*Orientation of*	• Whether the orientation of sampling		Structure unknown from rock chip
*data in*	achieves unbiased sampling of possible		and soil sampling.
*relation to*	structures and the extent to which this
*geological*	is known, considering the deposit type.
*structure*	• If the relationship between the drilling
	orientation and the orientation of key
	mineralised structures is considered to
	have introduced a sampling bias, this
	should be assessed and reported if
	material.
*Sample*	• The measures taken to ensure sample		Chain of custody for Globe Metal and
*security*	security.		Mining soil, rock chip and drill core
			samples was managed by the geology
			manager. Samples were collected
			from the Lilongwe office in Malawi by
			MANICA (a freight company based in
			Malawi) transport for delivery to
			Genalysis Laboratory in Johannesburg
			South Africa.
*Audits or*	• The results of any audits or reviews of		No audit of data has been completed
*reviews*	sampling techniques and data.		to date

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	Explanation	Commentary	Commentary
*Mineral*	• Type, reference name/number, location		Exploration is conducted within
*tenement and*	and ownership including agreements or		EPL0230/07 which is 100% held by
*land tenure*	material issues with third parties such as		Globe Metals and Mining Ltd. The
*status*	joint ventures, partnerships, overriding		EPL covers an area of 885 km2.
	royalties, native title interests, historical		The tenement is currently being
	sites, wilderness or national park and		reviewed under the Malawi Ministry
	environmental settings.		of Mines renewal process. Globe is
	• The security of the tenure held at the time		waiting for confirmation of the
	of reporting along with any known		renewal and part relinquishment of
	impediments to obtaining a licence to		the licence.
	operate in the area.
*Exploration* *done by other* *parties*	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.		The American Smelting and Refining Company (ASARCo) and the Atomic Energy Division of the Geological
			Survey of Britain carried out
			preliminary geological work in 1955.
			Exploration activities included car‐
			mounted scintillometer survey, an
			airborne scintillometer survey,
			geological mapping, trenching and
			diamond drilling. Radiometric
			anomalies were found within the
			basement gneisses associated with
			outcrops of fine‐grained epidotised
			rock, its pegmatitic equivalents, and
			an alkaline granite ring‐dyke
			peripheral to the Malosa pluton.
			None of the generated data was
			made available to Globe Metals.
			Detailed geological mapping over the
			Malosa‐Zomba Mountains were
			completed by Bloomfield et al in
			1965.
			During 1986, an airborne magnetic
			and radiometric survey was carried
			out by Hunting Geology and
			Geophysics Limited and interpreted
			by Paterson, Grant & Watson Limited
			(‘PGW’) in 1987 for a United Nations
			sponsored Development Programme.
			This survey located a number of
			Uranium channel radiometric
			anomalies within the Zomba region,
			including one with a peak value of
			about ten times background and a

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

			length of 7 km that is coincident with
			the eastern margin of the Malosa
			Pluton.
			In November 2009 Resource Star
			Limited completed an orientation soil
			sampling program over Machinga
			Main Anomaly, during which a total
			of 136 samples were collected.
*Geology*	• Deposit type, geological setting and style	•	The licence area is dominated by
	of mineralisation.		rocks of the Mesozoic Chilwa Alkaline
			Province (granite, syenite and
			nepheline‐syenite plutons and have
			associated volcanic vents
			characterised by carbonatite and
			agglomerate). The Malosa Pluton
			consists of a heterogeneous mixture
			of syenitic and granitic rocks.
		•	The REE‐Nb‐Ta mineralisation at
			Machinga is associated with the
			eastern margin of the Malosa Pluton
			of Chilwa Alkaline Province age.
			Uranium and thorium anomalies are
			also associated with the REE‐Nb‐Ta
			mineralisation.
*Drill hole* *Information*	• A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration		N/A
	results including a tabulation of the
	following information for all Material drill
	holes:
	• easting and northing of the drill hole
	collar
	• elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
	elevation above sea level in metres) of
	the drill hole collar
	• dip and azimuth of the hole
	• down hole length and interception
	depth
	• hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is
	justified on the basis that the information
	is not Material and this exclusion does
	not detract from the understanding of the
	report, the Competent Person should
	clearly explain why this is the case.
*Data* *aggregation*	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,		N/A
*methods*	maximum and/or minimum grade
	truncations (e.g., cutting of high grades)
	and cut‐off grades are usually Material
	and should be stated.
	• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
	short lengths of high grade results and

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

	longer lengths of low grade results, the
	procedure used for such aggregation
	should be stated and some typical
	examples of such aggregations should be
	shown in detail.
	• The assumptions used for any reporting
	of metal equivalent values should be
	clearly stated.
*Relationship*	• These relationships are particularly
*between*	important in the reporting of Exploration	
*mineralisation*	Results.
*widths and*	• If the geometry of the mineralisation with
*intercept*	respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
*lengths*	nature should be reported.
	• If it is not known and only the down hole
	lengths are reported, there should be a
	clear statement to this effect (e.g., ‘down
	_hole length, true width not known’). _
*Diagrams*	• Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant		Appropriate maps are included in the body of the report
	discovery being reported These should
	include, but not be limited to a plan view
	of drill hole collar locations and
	appropriate sectional views.
*Balanced* *reporting*	• Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and		Reporting of results in this report is considered balanced.
	high grades and/or widths should be		All results have been reported
	practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
	Exploration Results.
*Other* *substantive*	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including		Refer to body of text.
*exploration data*	(but not limited to): geological
	observations; geophysical survey results;
	geochemical survey results; bulk samples
	– size and method of treatment;
	metallurgical test results; bulk density,
	groundwater, geotechnical and rock
	characteristics; potential deleterious or
	contaminating substances.
*Further work*	• The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g., tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large‐scale step‐out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of		Current geological assessments include follow‐up soil and rock chip sampling testing known Machinga Main Zone (Anomalies A – D).
	possible extensions, including the main
	geological interpretations and future
	drilling areas, provided this information is
	not commercially sensitive.

==> picture [40 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [49 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Contact:

Alistair Stephens Shasha Lu Managing D irector Deputy CEO and Ex Globe Met a ls & Mining L td Globe Metals & Mi Tel: +61 (0 ) 8 9327 070 0 Tel: + 6

Deputy CEO and Ex e cutive Direc t or Globe Metals & Mi n ing Ltd Tel: + 6 1 (0) 8 9327 0 700

==> picture [54 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [9 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

About Globe Metals & Mining

Globe is a resources c o mpany, wit h a strategy t o grow the c ompany’s gl o bal investm e nt opportu n ities in the minerals i n dustry.

Globe’s Kanyika Niobiu m Project is located in M a lawi, which will produce niobium and tantalum products; key additives i n steels and electronics.

Globe’s co r porate head office in Pert h , Australia is supported b y a regional o p erational off i ce in Lilong w e, Malawi.

==> picture [55 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [9 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

AI assistant

GLOBE METALS & MINING LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2014

64965_rns_2014-08-24_4371d2bd-acc4-44d5-816f-d7df807b4a0b.pdf

ASX RELEASE

ASX RELEASE 30 June 2013

25 August 2014

Investment Summary

Machinga Nb‐Ta & REE Project Update

Highlights

Directors and Management

Contact

Summary

ENDS

JORC TABLE 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Contact:

About Globe Metals & Mining

AI assistant

GLOBE METALS & MINING LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2014

64965_rns_2014-08-24_4371d2bd-acc4-44d5-816f-d7df807b4a0b.pdf

ASX RELEASE

ASX RELEASE 30 June 2013

25 August 2014

Investment Summary

Machinga Nb‐Ta & REE Project Update

Highlights

Directors and Management

Contact

Summary

ENDS

JORC TABLE 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Contact:

About Globe Metals & Mining

More from GLOBE METALS & MINING LIMITED

GLOBE METALS & MINING LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2014