Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

GLOBE METALS & MINING LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2014

Sep 16, 2014

64965_rns_2014-09-16_7f694f42-7efe-4063-b93e-6c553394ec68.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX RELEASE

ASX RELEASE 30 June 2013

17 September 2014

Globe Completes Trenching at Chiziro Graphite Project

Investment Summary

  • ASX listed resources company (ASX:GBE)

  • 100% interest held on projects in Malawi including niobium, graphite and rare earths

  • Malawi Kanyika Niobium project in feasibility optimisation

Directors and Management

  • Non‐Executive Chairperson Ms Alice Wong

  • Managing Director Mr Alistair Stephens

  • Executive Director & Deputy CEO Ms Shasha Lu

  • Non‐Executive Director Mr Jingbin Tian

  • Independent Non‐executive Director Mr William Hayden Mr Bo Tan Mr Alex Ko

  • CFO & Company Secretary Ms Kerry Angel

FPOS 469,729,062 OPTIONS 9,100,000 (various)

Contact

Alistair Stephens Managing Director [email protected] T: +61 08 9327 0700

Globe Metals & Mining (“ Globe ” or “ the Company ”; ASX:GBE) has completed a trenching programme at the Chimutu Prospect within the Chiziro Graphite Project, situated approximately 25 kilometres northeast of Lilongwe in Malawi.

Seventeen trenches have been completed and the assays have been returned for the first eight (CZTR001‐CZTR008). The trenches targeted graphite mineralisation identified by a geological exploration programme, the results of which were reported to the ASX on 25th June 2014.

Highlights

  • Five of the eight trenches, with received assays intersected more than 25 metres of graphite mineralisation and greater than 8% Total Graphitic Carbon (TGC).

  • Three trenches demonstrated intersections of more than 100 metres with the wide at a grade exceeding 5% TGC with the widest intersection of 253m @ 5.4%TGC.

  • The 17 trenches completed have defined visible graphite mineralisation over six kilometres in strike length. Current assay results confirm graphite mineralisation greater than a 3,000 metre strike length.

  • Geological interpretation of the trenches confirms two main trends; named the “Main Trend” and the “Musinda Trend”.

  • Based on current results, Globe is planning a diamond drilling programme to test the depth of graphite mineralisation at Chimutu before year end, subject to Board approval.

  • Globe has commenced mineralogical testwork and is assessing infrastructure and logistics options for a potential mining operation.

  • Globe is assessing other graphite prospects within the Chiziro Graphite Project licence area.

Globe Metals and Mining Ltd | Level 1, Suite 2, 16 Ord Street, West Perth, WA, 6005 | PO Box 1811 West Perth WA 6872 | P: +61 8 9327 0700 F: +61 8 9327 0798 | web: www.globemetalsandmining.com.au | Email: [email protected] | ABN 33 114 400 609 | ASX:GBE

==> picture [40 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [49 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Globes’ Chiziro proje c t (EPL0299 ) is located approximat e ly 25 kilo m etres nort h east of Lil o ngwe, the capital city of Mal a wi (Figure 1). Globe has identified multipl e areas of large scal e graphite mineralis a tion in the project are a and is currently assessing the Chi m utu Prosp e ct in the so u thwest of the Chizir o Graphite P roject area.

==> picture [40 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [43 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [40 x 86] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [43 x 86] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [40 x 86] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [43 x 86] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [40 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [43 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [40 x 86] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [43 x 86] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Map showing location of the Chiziro Graphite Project in Malawi.

Based on the results from a ma p ping and r o ck chip sa m pling programme com p leted earli e r in 2014, Globe un d ertook a p r ogramme o f 17 trench e s (CZTR001 – CZTR016 & CZTR005 A ) designed t o define a six kilom e tre extent of graphit e mineralis a tion. A to t al of 6,26 6 metres o f trenching has been complete d .

The assa y s for eight t renches (C Z TR001‐ CZT R 008) have been returned and the results are c onsidered encouraging (refer Ta b le 1).

2

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1: Summary of Chimutu Prospect TGC Intersections to date

Trench
No
Easting Northing Azimuth Length Intersection Intersection Interval Grade TGC
(%)
Highest Assay
(% TGC)
Trend
(TN) (m) From (m) To (m) (m)
CZTR001 607825 8465941 132 225 12 24 12 5.4 8.6 Main
202 224 22 5.2 7.4
CZTR002 608187 8466155 127 180 45 56 11 5.7 11.6 Main
117 179 62 6.3 19.5
incl 148 173 25 9.0
CZTR003 608505 8466409 123 222 13 20 7 5.1 10.4 Main
67 87 20 5.0 10.6
114 140 26 10.0 24.9
CZTR004 608799 8466685 133 440 7 25 18 7.7 12.6 Main
47 71 24 7.1
incl 47 53 6 9.3
incl 62 70 8 9.1
89 158 69 7.3 18.5
incl 129 155 26 10.5
174 209 35 8.0 13.8
212 244 32 7.0 14.9
CZTR005 609034 8467007 130 324 6 36 30 8.4 18.8 Main
139 250 111 6.6 16.2
incl 157 188 31 8.7
incl 211 221 10 10.2
CZTR005A 608838 8467164 129 253 Awaiting Results Main
CZTR006 609419 8467187 130 350 83 336 253 5.4 20.9 Main
incl 83 95 12 9.7
incl 214 239 25 9.1
incl 279 292 13 11.5
CZTR007 609693 8467482 128 482 57 161 104 5.4 18.3 Main
incl 75 89 14 8.5
incl 109 127 18 8.1
incl 155 161 6 10.3
202 233 31 5.0 10.7
278 293 15 7.5 16.2
370 397 27 6.2 16.6
CZTR008 609975 8467769 129 290 73 85 12 9.3 13.6 Main
89 103 14 6.9 10.5
137 159 22 8.1 14.4
173 188 15 7.5 17.8
201 217 16 8.3 18.1
268 280 12 7.9 15.4
CZTR009 610279 8468022 130 345 Awaiting Results Main

3

==> picture [40 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [49 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Tren
No
ch
Eastin
g
Northing Azimuth Length Intersection Intersection Intersection Interv
al
Grade TG
(%)
C
Highest
(% T
Assay
GC)
T
rend
(TN) (m) Fro
m (m)
To
(m)
(m)
CZTR0
10
61049
3
8468377 135 535 Await
ing Results
M
ain
CZTR0
11
61072
9
8468694 129 312 Await
ing Results
M
ain
CZTR0
12
60963
6
8466460 085 900 Await
ing Results
Mu
sinda
CZTR0
13
61005
2
8466061 086 504 Await
ing Results
Mu
sinda
CZTR0
14
61016
0
8465656 085 332 Await
ing Results
Mu
sinda
CZTR0
15
61021
3
8465258 085 316 Await
ing Results
Mu
sinda
CZTR0
16
61025
0
8464860 084 256 Await
ing Results
Mu
sinda
Total 6,266

Figure 2 i l lustrates the location of the graph i te minerali s ation as well as summ a rises the st a tus of the samples f rom the trench progr a mme. Figure 3 illustr a tes the lo c ation and t enor of th e graphite intersecti o ns to date.

==> picture [36 x 88] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [21 x 175] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [36 x 88] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [21 x 174] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [36 x 88] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [36 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Plan showing location of trenches at the Chimutu Prospect and assaying progress.

4

==> picture [40 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [49 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [36 x 107] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [4 x 320] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [36 x 108] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 65] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [36 x 107] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 64] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Plan of the trenches where assays have been returned illustrating the extent of graphite mineralisation at the Chimutu Prospect (refer also Table 1).

Geological logging of t he trenche s confirms t h e existence of two grap h ite mineral i sed trends, named the Main and Musinda tr e nds. The tr e nch assays returned to date have d emonstrat e d mineralis a tion more than 5% T GC over ap p roximately 3 ,000 metr e s of strike f o r the Main T rend, and r e mains ope n ‐ended to the north e ast.

Within th e 5% TGC envelope, fiv e trenches c ontain one or more zo n es of high e r grade mineralisation greater t h an 8% TGC (refer Table 1 & Figure 3). All the t r ench assay s are expect e d to be co m pleted in the last q u arter of 20 1 4.

Based on t hese encouraging resul t s, a diamond drilling pr o gram is bei n g planned b ut will not b e finalised until all a s says for th e trench pro g ram are co m plete. The purpose of t he drilling w ill be to tes t the tenor of graphi t e mineralis a tion to a d e pth of 80‐100 metres. G lobe is ass e ssing diam o nd drilling s pecifically for meta l lurgical test work pu r poses give n the importance of g raphite qu a lity to th e project’s commerc i al viability. T hese progr a mmes are subject to Board budget a pproval.

Globe is evaluating in f rastructure and logistic s options for the Chimut u Graphite Project. The prospect is located w ithin 10 kil o metres of a n operatin g railway th a t connects Lilongwe t o the port o f Nacala in Mozambi q ue, and is c lose to exis t ing electric a l infrastruc t ure that is s uitable for mining and processing operations.

Globe ha s identified o ther areas o f graphite m ineralisati o n within th e Chiziro lic e nce and is p lanning to undertak e further assessment o f these dur i ng the 2014 field sea s on includin g geologica l mapping, sampling a nd trenchi n g.

5

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Machinga EPL0230

Globe has been notified that the renewal for the Machinga EPL (EPL0230) has been granted by the Government of Malawi.

Competent person: The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Fergus Jockel, a competent person who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the Australian institute of Geoscientists. Fergus Jockel is a full‐time employee of the company and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertakening to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Fergus Jockel consents to the inclusion in the report of matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

ENDS

JORC TABLE 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria Explanation Commentary Commentary
Sampling • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, Channel samples were collected by
techniques random chips, or specific specialised industry Globe Metals and Mining Ltd on the
standard measurement tools appropriate to the floor of each trench. Most of the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole samples were derived from saprock.
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, Samples were collected and assayed
etc). These examples should not be taken as for Total Graphite Carbon (TGC)
limiting the broad meaning of sampling. analysis at the Bureau Veritas
• Include reference to measures taken to ensure Inspectorate Laboratories Pty Ltd (BV)
sample representivity and the appropriate in Rustenburg, South Africa.
calibration of any measurement tools or systems Approximately 2kg samples were
used. collected. Bagging and numbering
• Aspects of the determination of mineralisation were done in the field to ensure
that are Material to the Public Report. In cases representivity of the sampling
where ‘industry standard’ work has been done process.
this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse Sample preparation was carried out
circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m by BV. The samples were acidified and
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to roasted to remove carbonate and
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other organic carbon. The residual carbon
cases more explanation may be required, such as was determined by Total Combustion
where there is coarse gold that has inherent Analysis (TCA).
sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may
warrant disclosure of detailed information.

6

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Drilling
techniques
• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open‐hole
hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic,
etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face‐
sampling bit or other type, whether core is
_oriented and if so, by what method, etc). _
N/A
Drill sample
recovery
• Method of recording and assessing core and chip
sample recoveries and results assessed.
• Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and
ensure representative nature of the samples.
• Whether a relationship exists between sample
recovery and grade and whether sample bias may
have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
N/A
Logging
• Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a level
of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
photography.
• The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged.

All trenches were geologically logged
following Globe Metals and Mining
procedures.
Sub‐sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation
• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter,
half or all core taken.
• If non‐core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary
split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.
• For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub‐
sampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.
• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for field
duplicate/second‐half sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain
size of the material being sampled.

Field Duplicates were collected from
all trenches averaging an interval
spacing of 50 samples.

At BV the samples were sorted, dried
and weighed. Primary preparation
involved crushing the whole sample.
Sample splitting was done through a
riffle splitter to obtain a sub‐fraction
later pulverised in a vibrating
pulveriser.
Quality of
assay data and
laboratory
tests
• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the
assaying and laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
• For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld
XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in
determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation, etc.
• Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy
(ie lack of bias) and precision have been
established.

All channel samples were assayed for
TGC at the ISO 17025 accredited
Bureau Veritas Inspectorate
Laboratories Pty Ltd in South Africa.

Internal Laboratory Standards were
assayed every 25 samples and
Internal Repeats were performed on
every 16 samples.

Quality control procedures adopted
by BV are considered to be adequate.

7

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Verification of
sampling and
assaying
• The verification of significant intersections by
either independent or alternative company
personnel.
• The use of twinned holes.
• Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

Globe Metals and Mining geologists
will verify all graphite intersections in
the field before back‐filling of
trenches.

Geological data was initially collected
on paper logs. The collected field data
was entered by the Exploration
geologist into MS Excel spread sheets
and emailed to the GIS and Database
Geologist in Perth for collation and
storage. This data was categorised
into: Coordinates, Sample inventory,
and Geologylog.
Location of
data points
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill
holes (collar and down‐hole surveys), trenches,
mine workings and other locations used in
Mineral Resource estimation.
• Specification of the grid system used.
• Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

The start point of all trenches was
initially determined using a Garmin
GPS. Later all trenches were
resurveyed by DGPS to an accuracy of
0.01 metre.

The grid system is UTM Zone 36
Southern Hemisphere (WGS84)

Points along trenches were also
surveyed for height asl to 0.01 metre
by DGPS.

The azimuth of the trenches was
determined using a compass.

Sampling locations along trenches
were determined bymeasuringtape.
Data spacing
and
distribution
• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
• Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of geological and
grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
procedure(s) and classifications applied.
• Whether sample compositing has been applied.

The trenches are at 400m spacing and
samples were collected at 1m interval
in graphitic zones and at 2 m interval
in zones considered to be non‐
mineralised or not of economic
interest (medium grained graphite,
etc.).
Orientation of
data in
relation to
geological
structure
• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves
unbiased sampling of possible structures and the
extent to which this is known, considering the
deposit type.
• If the relationship between the drilling orientation
and the orientation of key mineralised structures
is considered to have introduced a sampling bias,
this should be assessed and reported if material.

Trenching was conducted across two
geological structures: Main Zone and
Musinda Zone. The former strikes NE‐
SW and the trenches were oriented
perpendicular to the structure.
Musinda Zone trends north‐south and
the trenches run east‐west.
Sample
security
• The measures taken to ensure sample security.

Chain of custody for Globe Metals and
Mining trench samples was managed
in the field by the geology manager.
Samples were collected from the
Lilongwe office in Malawi by MANICA
(a freight company in Malawi) for
delivery to Bureau Veritas in South
Africa.
Audits or
reviews
• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling
techniques and data.

No audit of data has been completed
to date.

8

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria
Explanation
Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status
• Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material
issues with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.
• The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Chiziro Graphite Project

Exploration is conducted within
EPL0299/10 which is 100% held by
Globe Metals and Mining Ltd. The EPL
covers an area of 1,098km2.

The tenement is in good standing and
no known impediments exist.
Exploration
done by other
parties
• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration
by other parties.

A feasibility study concluded at
Katengeza prospect during the early
1990s (though the workers could not
be established) delineated 2 700 000 t
of graphite ore averaging 5.8% carbon
(157 000t contained carbon) and of
this resource 1 700 000 t is proven.
The methodology applied during
resource estimation remains unknown
and it does not comply with best
practice international standards, e.g.,
JORC, NI43‐101.

In 1995 Little Belt Consulting Services
on behalf of Industrix (Malawi) and
Cachet (Canada) estimated 1 300 000 t
probable and 650 000 t proven in
Chimutu prospect. Compliance with
criteria for public reporting of mineral
resources and mineral reserves could
not be verified and it does not comply
with best practice international
standards, e.g., JORC, NI43‐101.
Geology
• Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.
The licence area is underlain by
gneisses, schists and granulites which
belong to the Basement Complex, and
forming part of the Malawi Province
of the Mozambique belt. Graphitic
granulites and graphitic schists have
been mapped throughout the licence
area. This basement package was
intruded by pegmatite bodies (dykes
and sills).
Metamorphosed mafic and ultramafic
rocks have been observed in very few
areas. Field evidence has supported
that the basement rocks were

9

==> picture [141 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

subjected to upper amphibolite
metamorphism as well as granulite
facies.
The majority of the Chiziro project is
covered by thick surficial deposits
including residual soils, alluvium and
colluvium which are believed to have
formed due to prolonged weathering
since mid‐Tertiary.
The basement rocks are complexly
deformed but the pegmatite bodies
are massive and undeformed.
Drill hole
Information
• A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results
including a tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill holes:
• easting and northing of the drill hole collar
• elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation
MAT Consulting, based in Malawi, was
contracted to carry out precise
surveying of the trenches using a
DGPS. The survey work was completed
by mid‐August 2014.
above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
collar
• dip and azimuth of the hole
• down hole length and interception depth
• hole length.
• If the exclusion of this information is justified on
the basis that the information is not Material
and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent
Person should clearly explain why this is the
case.
Data • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting For determining the reported intersections the
aggregation averaging techniques, maximum and/or following criteria was used;
methods minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high 8% TGC average.
grades) and cut‐off grades are usually Material Minimum width 10m.
and should be stated. Maximum internal dilution 5m <8%, as
• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short long as overall intersection averages
lengths of high grade results and longer lengths >8%.
of low grade results, the procedure used for such Rounding off to one decimal place
aggregation should be stated and some typical after calculation.
examples of such aggregations should be shown No top cut was applied.
in detail.
• The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalent values should be clearly stated.
Relationship • These relationships are particularly important in The relationship between the reported
between the reporting of Exploration Results. intersections and the dip of the
mineralisation • If the geometry of the mineralisation with mineralisation is unknown as the
widths and respect to the drill hole angle is known, its results are from horizontal trenches
intercept nature should be reported. with no inclination.
lengths • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths
are reported, there should be a clear statement
to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width
_not known’). _
Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and
tabulations of intercepts should be included for
any significant discovery being reported These
Appropriate maps are included in the
body of the report.

10

==> picture [40 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [49 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

s
o
s
hould include
f drill hole co
ectional view
, but not be li
llar locations
s.
mited to a pla
and appropri
n view
ate
s
o
s
hould include
f drill hole co
ectional view
, but not be li
llar locations
s.
mited to a pla
and appropri
n view
ate
Balanced
reporting
W
E
r
g
a
R
here compre
xploration Re
epresentative
rades and/or
void misleadi
esults.
hensive repo
sults is not pr
reporting of
widths shoul
ng reporting
rting of all
acticable,
both low and
d be practiced
of Exploration
high
to

Report
conside

All resu
ing of results
red balanced
lts have been
in this report
.
reported.
is
Other
substantive
exploration
data
O
m
li
s
s
m
g
c
c
ther explorat
aterial, shou
mited to): ge
urvey results;
amples – size
etallurgicalt
roundwater,
haracteristics
ontaminating
ion data, ifm
ld be reported
ological obser
geochemical
and method
est results; bu
geotechnical
; potential de
substances.
eaningful and
including (b
vations; geop
survey result
of treatment;
lk density,
and rock
leterious or
ut not
hysical
s; bulk
Further wo
rk
T
(
e
D
p
g
a
c
he nature an
eg tests for la
xtensions orl
iagrams clea
ossible exten
eological inte
reas, provide
ommercially s
d scale of plan
teral extensio
arge‐scale ste
rly highlightin
sions, includin
rpretationsa
d this informa
ensitive.
ned furtherw
ns or depth
p‐out drilling
g the areaso
g the main
nd future dril
tion is not
ork
).
f
ling

Follow
results
progra
up programs
of the curren
m and Board
depend on th
t trenching
approval.
e

Contact: Alistair Stephens Shasha Lu Managing D irector Deputy CEO and Ex e cutive Direc t or Globe Met a ls & Mining L td Globe Metals & Mi n ing Ltd Tel: +61 (0 ) 8 9327 070 0 Tel: + 6 1 (0) 8 9327 0 700

==> picture [54 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [9 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

About Globe Metals & Mining

Globe is a resources c o mpany, wit h a strategy t o grow the c ompany’s gl o bal investm e nt opportu n ities in the minerals i n dustry.

Globe’s co r porate head office in Pert h , Australia is supported b y a regional o p erational off i ce in Lilong w e, Malawi.

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [54 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [9 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

11