Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

FIRST AU LIMITED Governance Information 2021

Apr 19, 2021

64900_rns_2021-04-19_e9f141ed-da10-42f9-a83a-00222647ba73.pdf

Governance Information

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

FIRST AU LIMITED ABN 65 000 332 918 (COMPANY)

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT

This Corporate Governance Statement is current as at 29 March 2021 and has been approved by the Board of the Company.

This Corporate Governance Statement discloses the extent to which the Company has followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council in its publication Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (4[th] edition) ( Recommendations ). The Recommendations are not mandatory, however the Recommendations that have not been followed for any part of the reporting period have been identified and reasons provided for not following them along with what (if any) alternative governance practices were adopted in lieu of the recommendation during that period.

The Company has adopted a Corporate Governance Pack which provides the written terms of reference for the Company’s corporate governance duties. During the reporting period covered by this Corporate Governance Statement, the Company undertook a review of its corporate governance policies and procedures, including in the context of the ASX Corporate Governance Policies and Procedures (4[th] Edition). As a result of this review, the Company adopted new and amended corporate governance policies and procedures during the reporting period covered by this Corporate Governance Statement.

The Company’s corporate governance policies and procedures are available on the Company’s website at www.firstau.com/our-company/#governance .

It is noted that the Board does not consider that the Company will gain any benefit from individual Board committees (other than the audit committee) and that its resources would be better utilised in other areas as the Board is of the strong view that at this stage the experience and skill set of the current Board is sufficient to perform these roles. Under the Company’s Board Charter, the duties that would ordinarily be assigned to individual committees are currently carried out by the full Board under the written terms of reference for those committees.

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight
Recommendation 1.1 A listed entity should have and disclose a board
charter setting out:
(a) the respective roles and responsibilities of
its board and management; and
(b) those matters expressly reserved to the
board
and
those
delegated
to
management.
Yes The Company has adopted a Board Charter (which forms part of the Corporate Governance
Pack that is available on the website of the Company) that sets out the specific roles and
responsibilities of the Board, the Chair and management and includes a description of those
matters expressly reserved to the Board and those delegated to management.
The Board Charter is contained within the Company’s Corporate Governance Pack which is
available on the Company’s website.
The Board is responsible for the corporate governance of the Company. The Board develops
strategies for the Company, reviews strategic objectives and monitors performance against
those objectives. Clearly articulating the division of responsibilities helps manage expectations
and avoid misunderstandings about their respective roles and accountabilities.

1

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
In general, the Board assumes (amongst others) the following responsibilities:
(i)
providing leadership and setting the strategic objectives of the Company;
(ii) appointing and when necessary replacing the Executive Directors;
(iii) approving the appointment and when necessary replacement, of other senior executives;
(iv) undertaking appropriate checks before appointing a person, or putting forward to
security holders a candidate for election, as a Director;
(v) overseeing management's implementation of the Company's strategic objectives and its
performance generally;
(vi) approving operating budgets and major capital expenditure;
(vii) overseeing the integrity of the Company's accounting and corporate reporting systems
including the external audit;
(viii) overseeing the Company's process for making timely and balanced disclosure of all
material information concerning the Company that a reasonable person would expect to
have a material effect on the price or value of the Company's securities;
(ix) ensuring that the Company has in place an appropriate risk management framework and
setting the risk appetite within which the Board expects management to operate; and
(x) monitoring the effectiveness of the Company's governance practices.
Recommendation 1.2 A listed entity should:
(a) undertake appropriate checks before
appointing a director or senior executive
or putting someone forward for election
as a director; and
(b) provide security holders with all material
information in its possession relevant to a
decision on whether or not to elect or re-
elect a director.
Yes (a)
The Company has guidelines for the appointment and selection of the Board in its
Corporate Governance Pack. The Company’s Board Charter and the Remuneration and
Nomination Committee Charter (both contained in the Company’s Corporate Governance
Pack) requires that appropriate checks are undertaken before appointing a person, or
putting forward to security holders a candidate for election, as a Director. The Board
Charter further provides that prospective Directors will be requested to provide the
Company with a consent to undertaking background and other checks. These checks may
include checks in respect of character, experience, education, criminal history and
bankruptcy history (as appropriate).
(b)
Under the Board Charter, all material information relevant to a decision on whether or
not to elect or re-elect a Director must beprovided to securityholders in the Notice of

2

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Meeting containing the resolution to elect or re-elect a Director.
Recommendation 1.3 A listed entity should have a written agreement
with each director and senior executive setting
out the terms of their appointment.
Yes The Board Charter requires that each Director and senior executive is a party to a written
agreement with the Company which sets out the terms of that Director’s or senior executive’s
appointment. The Remuneration and Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) is
responsible for ensuring that the Company has a written agreement with each of its Directors
and senior executives. The Company has had written agreements with each of its Directors
and senior executives for the past financial year.
Recommendation 1.4 The company secretary of a listed entity should
be accountable directly to the board, through
the chair, on all matters to do with the proper
functioning of the board.
Yes The Board Charter outlines the roles, responsibility and accountability of the Company
Secretary (or joint Company Secretaries). In accordance with this, the Company Secretary (or
joint Company Secretaries) is accountable directly to the Board, through the Chair, on all
matters to do with the proper functioning of the Board.
Recommendation 1.5 A listed entity should:
(a) have and disclose a diversity policy;
(b) through its board or a committee of the
board set measurable objectives for
achieving
gender
diversity
in
the
composition of its board, senior executives
and workforce generally; and
(c) disclose in relation to each reporting
period:
(1) the measurable objectives set for
that period to achieve gender
diversity;
(2) the
entity’s
progress
towards
achieving those objectives; and
(3) either:
(A) the respective proportions of
men and women on the board,
in senior executive positions and
across the whole workforce
(including how the entity has
defined “senior executive” for
these purposes); or
(B) if the entity is a “relevant
employer” under the Workplace
Gender EqualityAct,the entity’s
No (a) The Company has adopted a Diversity Policy which provides a framework for the
Company to establish and achieve measurable diversity objectives, including in respect of
gender diversity. The Diversity Policy allows the Board to set measurable gender diversity
objectives, if considered appropriate, and to assess annually both the objectives (if any
have been set) and the Company’s progress in achieving them.
(b) The Diversity Policy is available, as part of the Corporate Governance Pack, on the
Company’s website.
(c)
The Board values diversity and recognises the benefits it can bring to the organisation's
ability to achieve its goals. However, given the current stage of the Company's
operations, the Company has determined at this stage not to formally adopt a diversity
policy. The Company will re-assess this as the Company grows.
(d) the Company did not have any women across the whole organisation for the past
financial year.

3

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
most recent “Gender Equality
Indicators”, as defined in and
published under that Act.
If the entity was in the S&P / ASX 300 Index at
the commencement of the reporting period,
the measurable objective for achieving gender
diversity in the composition of its board should
be to have not less than 30% of its directors of
eachgender within a specifiedperiod.
Recommendation 1.6 A listed entity should:
(a) have
and
disclose
a
process
for
periodically evaluating the performance of
the board, its committees and individual
directors; and
(b) disclose for each reporting period whether
a performance evaluation has been
undertaken in accordance with that
process during or in respect of that period.
Yes (a) The Company’s Remuneration and Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board)
is responsible for evaluation the performance of the Board, its committees and individual
Directors on an annual basis. It may do so with the aid of an independent advisor. The
process for evaluating the performance of the Board, its committees and individual
Directors is set out in the Corporate Governance Pack which is available on the website of
the Company.
(b) The Corporate Governance Pack requires the Company to disclose whether or not
performance evaluations have been conducted during the relevant reporting period.
Performance evaluations were conducted in respect of the Board, its committees (if any)
and individual Directors for the past financial year (being the reporting period).
Recommendation 1.7 A listed entity should:
(a) have and disclose a process for evaluating
the performance of its senior executives at
least once every reporting period; and
(b) disclose for each reporting period whether
a performance evaluation has been
undertaken in accordance with that
process during or in respect of that period.
Yes (a) The Company’s Remuneration and Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board)
is responsible for evaluating the performance of the Company’s senior executives on an
annual basis. A senior executive, for these purposes, means key management personnel
(as defined in the Corporations Act) other than a non-executive Director. The Board may
do so with the aid of an independent advisor. The process for evaluating the
performance of senior executives is set out in the Corporate Governance Pack which is
available on the website of the Company.
(b) The Company had two senior executives during the past financial year, being Bryan Frost
who is the Executive Chairman and Managing Director and Richard Revelins who is an
Executive Director. The performance of the senior executives was assessed by the other
respective members of the Board in each case.
Principle 2: Structure the Board to add value
Recommendation 2.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a nomination committee which:
(1) has at least three members, a
majorityof whom are independent
Yes (a) The Company’s Remuneration and Nomination Committee Charter provides for the
creation of a Remuneration and Nomination Committee (if it is considered it will benefit
the Company), with at least three members, a majority of whom are independent
Directors, and which must be chaired by an independent Director.

4

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION EXPLANATION
directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting
period, the number of times the
committee
met
throughout
the
period and the individual attendances
of the members at those meetings; or
(b) if it does not have a nomination
committee, disclose that fact and the
processes it employs to address board
succession issues and to ensure that the
board has the appropriate balance of
skills,
knowledge,
experience,
independence and diversity to enable it to
discharge its duties and responsibilities
effectively.
(b) The Company did not have a Remuneration and Nomination Committee for the past
financial year as the Board did not consider the Company would benefit from its
establishment. In accordance with the Company’s Board Charter, the Board carries out
the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Remuneration and Nomination
Committee under the Remuneration and Nomination Committee Charter, including the
following processes to address succession issues and to ensure the Board has the
appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the entity to
enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively:
(i)
devoting time at least annually to discuss Board succession issues and consider
updating the Company’s Board skills matrix; and
(ii)
all Board members being involved in the Company’s nomination process, to the
maximum extent permitted under the Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rules.
Recommendation 2.2 A listed entity should have and disclose a board
skills matrix setting out the mix of skills that the
board currently has or is looking to achieve in
its membership.
Yes The Board regularly evaluates the mix of skills, experience and diversity at the Board level. The
Board believes that a highly credentialed Board, with a diversity of background, skills and
perspective will be effective in supporting and enabling delivery of good governance for the
Company and value for the Company’s shareholders. As at 31 December 2020, the Board
comprised five Directors from diverse backgrounds with a range of business experience, skills
and attributes. The following demonstrates the skills and experience of the Directors across
several dimensions that are relevant to the Company:
Managing and leadership
No of Directors
Holds senior management positions held outside the Company (past
and present)
5
Resource industry experience
Management/board representation on other resource entities (past
and present)
5
several dimensions that are relevant to the Company:
Managing and leadership No of Directors
Holds senior management positions held outside the Company (past
and present)
5
Resource industry experience
Management/board representation on other resource entities (past
and present)
5

5

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Experience in resource-based transactions, joint ventures, acquisitions
and/or disposals
5
Management of exploration and development activities – drilling,
surveying, etc
5
Governance or regulatory
Experience in governance of listed organisations (past and present) 4
Board membership of other listed entities (past and present) 3
Strategy
Experience in growing the business, assessing value based
opportunities,
think
strategically
and
review
and
challenge
management in order to make informed decisions and assess
performance against strategy
5
Experience in identifying, negotiating and executing transactions
including the acquisition of desirable opportunities
5
Financial acumen
Financial literacy 5
Recommendation 2.3 A listed entity should disclose:
(a) the names of the directors considered by
the board to be independent directors;
(b) if a director has an interest, position,
affiliation or relationship of the type
described in Box 2.3 but the board is of the
opinion that it does not compromise the
independence of the director, the nature
of the interest, position or relationshipin
Yes (a)
The Board Charter requires the disclosure of the names of Directors considered by the
Board to be independent. The Board considers Michael Quinert to be independent.
(b)
Michael Quinert received options during the reporting period. The options were issued
with shareholder approval as reasonable remuneration and therefore the Board
(excluding Michael Quinert) do not consider the options to impact upon the
independence of Michael Quinert. In addition, QR Lawyers, an entity of which Michael
Quinert is a partner, provides legal services to the Company on an as needed basis. The
Board (excluding Michael Quinert) do not consider the legal services provided by QR
Lawyers to constitute a material business relationshipthat impacts upon the

6

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
question and an explanation of why the
board is of that opinion; and
(c)
the length of service of each director.
independence on Michael Quinert on the basis that such legal services are only
provided on an as needed basis on typical commercial rates and the Company has not
entered into a retainer or other formal retainer to engage QR Lawyers to provide legal
services over a specific period of time.
(c)
The Company’s Annual Report discloses the length of service of each Director, as at the
end of each financial year.
Recommendation 2.4 A majority of the board of a listed entity
should be independent directors.
No A majority (four out of five) of the Directors of the Company are not considered to be
independent Directors. Given the small size of the Company and its operations, the Board
does not consider it necessary to appoint further independent Directors at this time however
the Board and senior management (if any) will periodically review this position.
Recommendation 2.5 The chair of the board of a listed entity should
be an independent director and, in particular,
should not be the same person as the CEO of
the entity.
No Mr Bryan Frost is the Company's Executive Chairman and Managing Director and is not
considered to be an independent Director due to his interest in the securities of the Company
and his relationship as a Principal of the Company's Corporate Adviser. He is responsible for
the design, development and implementation of strategic plans for the Company in a cost-
effective and time-efficient manner. Mr Frost is responsible for the day-to-day operations of
the Company.
Recommendation 2.6 A listed entity should have a program for
inducting new directors and for periodically
reviewing whether there is a need for existing
directors
to
undertake
professional
development to maintain the skills and
knowledge needed to perform their role as
directors effectively.
Yes The Board Charter sets out an extensive induction process for new Directors which are to be
facilitated by the Company Secretary. The Remuneration and Nomination Committee (or, in its
absence, the Board) shall review the induction process periodically to ensure it remains
appropriate for new Directors.
The Board Charter sets out that the need for professional development of Directors shall be
reviewed each year by the Remuneration and Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the
Board). The Remuneration and Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) shall also
develop with the Directors an appropriate training and development program.
The induction process was completed with Gavin England, a Director who was appointed
during the course of the reporting period.
Principle 3: Act ethically and responsibly
Recommendation 3.1 A listed entity should articulate and disclose its
values.
No The Company has adopted a statement of values (which forms part of the Company’s
Corporate Governance Pack) that is available on the Company’s website. The statement of
values was adopted during the reporting period as part of the review of the corporate
governance policies and procedures. Accordingly, the Company does not fully comply with this
Recommendation as the statement of values was not in place for the entirety of the reporting
period.
Recommendation 3.2 A listed entity should: Yes (a)
The Company’s Corporate Code of Conduct applies to the Company’s Directors, senior

7

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
(a) have and disclose a code of conduct for its
directors,
senior
executives
and
employees; and
(b) ensure that the board or a committee of
the board is informed of any material
breaches of that code.
executives and employees.
(b)The Company’s Corporate Code of Conduct (which forms part of the Company’s
Corporate Governance Pack) is available on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 3.3 A listed entity should:
(a) have and disclose a whistleblower policy;
and
(b) ensure that the board or a committee of
the board is informed of any material
incidents reported under that policy.
Yes (a) The Company has adopted a whistleblower policy that is available on its website.
(b) Breaches of the whistleblower policy are to be reported to the Company secretary who
shall be responsible, subject to compliance with the terms of the whistleblower policy,
for reporting the breach directly to the Board.
Recommendation 3.4 A listed entity should:
(a) have and disclose an anti-bribery and
corruption policy; and
(b) ensure that the board or committee of the
board is informed of any material
breaches of that policy.
No (a) The Company has adopted an anti-bribery and corruption policy that forms part of the
Corporate Governance Pack that is available on the website of the Company.
(b) Breaches of the anti-bribery and corruption policy are to be reported to the Company
secretary who shall be responsible for reporting the breach directly to the Board.
The anti-bribery and corruption policy of the Company was adopted during the reporting
period as part of the review of the corporate governance policies and procedures. Accordingly,
the Company does not fully comply with this Recommendation as the anti-bribery and
corruption policy was not in place for the entirety of reporting period.
Principle 4: Safeguard the integrity of Corporate Reports
Recommendation 4.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a) have an audit committee which:
(1) has at least three members, all of
whom are non-executive directors
and
a
majority
of
whom
are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
who is not the chair of the board,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the
relevant
qualifications
and
experience of the members of the
committee; and
No Whilst the Board has a separate audit committee it does not comply with the
Recommendations as it does not have at least three members that are non-executive.
The Board attend audit committee meetings. The audit committee is chaired by Mr Michael
Quinert who is an independent Director.
The Charter of the audit committee is to review and make recommendations to the Board in
relation to:
(i)
the adequacy of the entity’s corporate reporting processes;
(ii)
whether the entity’s financial statements reflect the understanding of the committee
members of, and otherwise provide a true and fair view of, the financial position and
performance of the entity;
(iii)
the appropriateness of the accounting judgements or choices exercised by
management in preparing the entity’s financial statements;
(iv)
the appointment or removal of the external auditor;

8

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
(5) in relation to each reporting period,
the number of times the committee
met throughout the period and the
individual
attendances
of
the
members at those meetings; or
(b) if it does not have an audit committee,
disclose that fact and the processes it
employs that independently verify and
safeguard the integrity of its corporate
reporting, including the processes for the
appointment and removal of the external
auditor and the rotation of the audit
engagement partner.
(v)
the rotation of the audit engagement partner;
(vi)
the scope and adequacy of the external audit;
(vii)
the independence and performance of the external auditor;
(viii)any proposal for the external auditor to provide non-audit services and whether it
might compromise the independence of the external auditor.
Recommendation 4.2 The board of a listed entity should, before it
approves the entity’s financial statements for a
financial period, receive from its CEO and CFO a
declaration that, in their opinion, the financial
records of the entity have been properly
maintained and that the financial statements
comply with the appropriate accounting
standards and give a true and fair view of the
financial position and performance of the entity
and that the opinion has been formed on the
basis of a sound system of risk management
and internal control which is operating
effectively.
Yes The Company’s Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires the CEO and CFO (or, if none, the
person(s) fulfilling those functions) to provide a sign off on these terms. The Company has
obtained a sign off on these terms for each of its financial statements in the past financial year.
Recommendation 4.3 A listed entity should disclose its process to
verify the integrity of any periodic corporate
report it releases to the market that is not
audited or reviewed by an external auditor.
Yes Periodic financial or other reports released in or for a particular financial period which are not
audited or reviewed by the external auditor are to be peer-reviewed internally and signed off
on by the CFO (or the person(s) fulfiling that role, if any) and the Board prior to release
(including release as an announcement to ASX).
Principle 5: Make Timely and Balanced Disclosure
Recommendation 5.1 A listed entity should have and disclose a
written policy for complying with its continuous
disclosure obligations under listing rule 3.1.
Yes The Company has adopted a Communication and Disclosure Policy that contains its policy for
complying with its continuous disclosure obligations under listing rule 3.1. The Communication
and Disclosure Policy forms part of the Corporate Governance Pack that is available on the
website of the Company.

9

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 5.2 A listed entity should ensure that its board
receives
copies
of
all
material
market
announcements promptly after they have been
made.
Yes The Company Secretary circulates all market announcements to the Board immediately prior
to, or shortly after, release to ASX in accordance with the Board Charter and the
Communication and Disclosure Policy.
Recommendation 5.3 A listed entity that gives a new and substantive
investor or analyst presentation should release
a copy of the presentation materials on the ASX
Market Announcements Platform ahead of the
presentation.
Yes The Company Secretary is responsible for releasing presentation materials to ASX ahead of the
presentation occurring.
Principle 6: Respect the Rights of Security Holders
Recommendation 6.1 A listed entity should provide information
about itself and its governance to investors via
its website.
Yes The Company provides information about itself and its corporate governance policies and
procedures, including its corporate governance statement prepared in respect of each
reporting period, via its website (www.firstau.com).
Recommendation 6.2 A listed entity should have an investor relations
program that facilitates effective two-way
communication with investors.
No The Communication and Disclosure Policy sets out the investor relations program of the
Company that is proposed to facilitate effect two-way communication with investors and is
available on the Company’s website as part of the Company’s Corporate Governance Pack.
The Communication and Disclosure Policy of the Company was adopted during the reporting
period as part of the review of the corporate governance policies and procedures. Accordingly,
the Company does not fully comply with this Recommendation as the Communication and
Disclosure Policy was not in place for the entirety of reporting period.
Recommendation 6.3 A listed entity should disclose how it facilitates
and encourages participation at meetings of
security holders.
No The Board Charter sets out how shareholders are encouraged to participate in meetings. The
Communication and Disclosure Policy provides for shareholder meetings being structured to
provide effective communication to shareholders and allow the reasonable opportunity for
shareholder participation, including to ask questions of the Company and, in the case of an
AGM, the external auditor of the Company.
The Communication and Disclosure Policy of the Company was adopted during the reporting
period as part of the review of the corporate governance policies and procedures. Accordingly,
the Company does not fully comply with this Recommendation as the Communication and
Disclosure Policy was not in place for the entirety of reporting period.
Recommendation 6.4 A
listed
entity
should ensure
that
all
substantive resolutions at a meeting of security
holders are decided by a poll rather than by a
show of hands.
Yes As set out in the Board Charter, all substantive resolutions are to be determined by way of a
poll rather than by a show of hands. All substantive resolutions considered at meetings of
security holders during the reporting period were decided by a poll.

10

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 6.5 A listed entity should give security holders the
option to receive communications from, and
send communications to, the entity and its
security registry electronically.
Yes The Company has always provided shareholders with the opportunity to communicate with
the Company by electronic means.
As set out in the Communication and Disclosure Policy, shareholders are given the option to
send and receive communications from the Company and its registry by electronic means.
The Shareholder Communication Strategy provides that security holders can register with the
Company to receive email notifications when an announcement is made by the Company to
the ASX, including the release of the Annual Report, half yearly reports and quarterly reports.
Links are made available to the Company’s website on which all information provided to the
ASX is immediately posted.
The Company’s email address ([email protected]) is provided on the Company’s website and
management (usually the Company Secretary (with the authority of the Board) or the
Executive Director) responds to shareholder communication when received.
Principle 7: Recognise and Manage Risk
Recommendation 7.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a committee or committees to
oversee risk, each of which:
(1) has at least three members, a
majority of whom are independent
directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting
period, the number of times the
committee
met
throughout
the
period and the individual attendances
of the members at those meetings; or
(b) if it does not have a risk committee or
committees that satisfy (a) above, disclose
that fact and the processes it employs for
overseeing the entity’s risk management
framework.
Yes (a) The Company’s Corporate Governance Pack contains an Audit and Risk Committee
Charter that provides for the creation of an Audit and Risk Committee (if it is considered
it will benefit the Company), with at least three members, all of whom must be
independent Directors, and which must be chaired by an independent Director.
A copy of the Corporate Governance Pack is available on the Company’s website.
(b) The Company did not have an Audit and Risk Committee for the past financial year as the
Board did not consider the Company would benefit from its establishment. In accordance
with the Company’s Board Charter, the Board carries out the duties that would ordinarily
be carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee under the Audit and Risk Committee
Charter including the Board devoting time at all Board meetings to fulfilling the roles and
responsibilities associated with overseeing risk and maintaining the entity’s risk
management framework and associated internal compliance and control procedures.
Recommendation 7.2 The board or a committee of the board should: Yes A review of the risk framework including, where applicable, performance of segments of the

11

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
(a) review the entity’s risk management
framework at least annually to satisfy itself
that it continues to be sound and that the
entity is operating with due regard to the
risk appetite set by the board; and
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting
period, whether such a review has taken
place.
entity, human resources, environment, continuous disclosure obligations and financial matters
covering internal control and cash flow was undertaken by the Board.
It was considered that regular risk reviews were unnecessary unless the nature of the
operations of the Company changed.
Recommendation 7.3 A listed entity should disclose:
(a) if it has an internal audit function, how the
function is structured and what role it
performs; or
(b) if it does not have an internal audit
function, that fact and the processes it
employs for evaluating and continually
improving
the
effectiveness
of
its
governance,
risk
management
and
internal control processes.
Yes (a)
If the Company were to have an internal audit function, the Audit and Risk Committee
Charter provides for the Audit and Risk Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) to
structure the internal function and define the role it would perform.
(b)
The Company did not have an internal audit function for the reporting period. The
Company employed the following process for evaluating and continually improving the
effectiveness of its risk management and internal control processes:
(i)
the Board monitors the need for an internal audit function having regard to the
size, location and complexity of the Company’s operations;
(ii)
the Board periodically undertakes an internal review of financial systems and
processes where systems are considered to require improvement these systems
are developed; and
(iii)
The Board reviews risk management and internal compliance procedures at each
Board meeting and monitors the quality of the accounting function.
Recommendation 7.4 A listed entity should disclose whether it has
any material exposure to environmental or
social risks and, if it does, how it manages or
intends to manage those risks.
No The Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires the Audit and Risk Committee (or, in its
absence, the Board) to assist management in determining whether the Company has any
material exposure to environmental or social risks and, if it does, how it manages or intends to
manage those risks.
The Company’s Corporate Governance Pack requires the Company to disclose whether it has
any material exposure to environmental or social risks and, if it does, how it manages or
intends to manage those risks. The Board did not complete a formal analysis of material
exposure to environmental and social risks during the reporting period.
A formal risk management process specifically considering material exposure to environmental
and social risks will be updated again in the near future.
Principle 8: Remunerate Fairly and Responsibly
Recommendation 8.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a remuneration committee which:
Yes (a) The Company’s Corporate Governance Pack contains a Remuneration and Nomination
Committee Charter that provides for the creation of a Remuneration and Nomination

12

RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
(1) has at least three members, a
majority of whom are independent
directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting
period, the number of times the
committee
met
throughout
the
period and the individual attendances
of the members at those meetings; or
(b) if it does not have a remuneration
committee, disclose that fact and the
processes it employs for setting the level
and composition of remuneration for
directors and senior executives and
ensuring that such remuneration is
appropriate and not excessive.
Committee (if it is considered it will benefit the Company), with at least three members, a
majority of whom must be independent Directors, and which must be chaired by an
independent Director.
(b) The Company did not have a Remuneration and Nomination Committee for the past
financial year as the Board did not consider the Company would benefit from its
establishment. In accordance with the Company’s Board Charter, the Board carries out
the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Remuneration Committee under
the Remuneration Committee Charter. The Board devotes time at least annually at a
Board meeting to assess the level and composition of remuneration for Directors to
ensure remuneration is appropriate and not excessive.
Recommendation 8.2 A listed entity should separately disclose its
policies
and
practices
regarding
the
remuneration of non-executive directors and
the remuneration of executive directors and
other senior executives.
No The Company’s Corporate Governance Pack requires the Board to separately disclose its
policies and practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive Directors and the
remuneration of executive Directors and senior executives.
The policies and practices regarding remuneration of the Company was adopted during the
reporting period as part of the review of the corporate governance policies and procedures.
Accordingly, the Company does not fully comply with this Recommendation as the policies and
practices regarding remuneration was not in place for the entirety of reporting period.
Recommendation 8.3 A listed entity which has an equity-based
remuneration scheme should:
(a) have a policy on whether participants are
permitted to enter into transactions
(whether through the use of derivatives or
otherwise) which limit the economic risk
of participating in the scheme; and
(b) disclose that policy or a summary of it.
Yes (a)
The Company did not have an equity based remuneration scheme during the past
financial year.
(b)
Not applicable.

13