Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2017

Oct 10, 2017

64856_rns_2017-10-10_7f2ed3d1-969b-46de-8748-094e83b8ad9c.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Level 7, 600 Murray Street West Perth WA 6005

PO Box 273 West Perth WA 6872

==> picture [245 x 76] intentionally omitted <==

P 08 9486 9455 F 08 6210 1578 www.enrl.com.au

11 October 2017

ASX : ENR

Company Announcements Office Australian Securities Exchange 4th Floor, 20 Bridge Street Sydney NSW 2000

Drilling underway to target gold reefs at East Thomson’s

A 5,000m RC/aircore drill program at East Thomson’s Dome and Telfer West has commenced and will include:

1. RC drilling of the near surface, high grade gold reefs discovered at the Fold Closure prospect at East Thomson’s Dome including:

  • 2.9m @ 7.7g/t Au from 127.1m incl. 0.45m @ 25.4g/t Au from 129.55m to end of hole (“EOH”) in ETG0053

  • 2.5m @ 7.3g/t Au from 11.4m, part of 26.6m @ 1.0g/t Au from 4.2m in ETG0055 (see ASX announcement 14 September 2017)

2. RC drilling up dip and along strike of the newly discovered gold reef 500m north-west of the Fold Closure prospect at ETD:

  • 2m @ 26g/t Au from 178m, part of 6m @ 9g/t Au from 178m to EOH in ETG0045 (see ASX announcement 16 August 2017)

3. RC drilling of the gold stockwork corridor at Telfer West to test a recently identified surface geochemical anomaly

4. Aircore drilling of new targets identified at ETD and Telfer West

The directors of Encounter Resources Ltd (“Encounter / the Company”) are pleased to announce the commencement of a 5,000m RC/aircore drill program at the East Thomson’s Dome (“ETD”) and Telfer West Gold Projects. The program will be completed within the next six weeks.

Commenting on the upcoming program, Encounter Managing Director Will Robinson said:

“We are excited to commence the RC drill program on the back of last month’s discovery of multiple new high grade gold reefs at East Thomson’s Dome project, located 5km north-west of the Telfer gold-copper mine. The program will include detailed drilling at the Fold Closure prospect to determine continuity of mineralisation and as a prelude to potential resource drilling. We will also complete additional drilling adjacent to the new reef discovered in ETG0045 (6m @ 9g/t Au from 178m to end of hole).”

ETD - Fold Closure prospect – High grade reef system

Four diamond drill holes were completed by Encounter at the Fold Closure prospect in August 2017. Three of the four holes were drilled immediately south-east of a series of outcropping high grade gold reefs where drilling in the 1990s defined high grade near surface reef mineralisation including (see ASX release 14 February 2017):

  • 4m @ 29 g/t Au from 31m in NTR 5

  • 2m @ 33 g/t Au from 22m in NTR 12

  • 10m @ 9.8 g/t Au from 16m in NTR 17 incl. 2m @ 45.8 g/t Au from 20m

  • • 2m @ 76.2 g/t Au from 35m in NTR 57

  • • 7m @ 17.1 g/t Au from 16m in NTR 61 incl. 3m @ 37.6 g/t Au from 19m

Diamond holes ETG0053, ETG0054 and ETG0055 drilled by Encounter all intersected oxidised, reef-style gold mineralisation and returned high grade gold intersections including:

  • 2.9m @ 7.7g/t Au from 127.1m incl. 0.45m @ 25.4g/t Au from 129.55m to EOH in ETG0053

  • • 1m @ 3.2g/t Au from 80m in ETG0054

  • 2.5m @ 7.3g/t Au from 11.4m, part of 26.6m @ 1.0g/t Au from 4.2m in ETG0055

It appears the reef mineralisation at ETD is stacked, with more than one mineralised horizon intersected in the diamond drill holes. These high grade reefs at the Fold Closure prospect remain open down dip and along strike.

The current RC program will be drilled on a notional 40x40m spacing to test for continuity and test along strike and down dip for further extensions of the high grade mineralisation.

If successful, this drilling will be followed by resource drilling at ETD.

Follow up drilling of the gold reef discovered in ETG0045 at ETD

Encounter completed a program of 18 broad spaced RC holes for 3,816m over six 200m to 800m spaced traverses. This drilling was completed in July 2017 and was focused on the eastern half of a 2km long surface geochemical anomaly. Holes were planned to a nominal depth of 200m which was thought to be sufficient to test the important geochemical horizon at the base of oxidation. Anomalously deep oxidation at ETD resulted in many of the RC holes finishing above the target horizon.

Although many holes did not test the base of oxidation, the results received were highly encouraging with a well mineralised (+1g/t Au) trend defined over a strike length of +500m. In particular, RC drill hole ETG0045 finished in 6m @ 9.0g/t Au from 178m to EOH including 2m @ 26g/t Au from 178m. In September 2017, ETG0045 was extended with diamond drilling to 396m and assays from the diamond extension are expected later in October 2017.

The current RC drill program will close up drill spacing around the high grade gold intersection in ETG0045 as well as extending the RC drill pattern west over an untested portion of the surface geochemical anomaly.

==> picture [474 x 289] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: East Thomson’s Dome drilling and geochemical summary.

Gold Stockwork Zone at Telfer West

In July 2017, a program of RC drilling was completed at Telfer West which included two RC drill holes (ETG0067 and ETG0068). These holes were drilled 800m south-east and along strike of the Egg prospect where hole ETG0002 was drilled in December 2016. ETG0002 intersected an 80m wide, depth extensive zone of stock-work style gold mineralisation that included:

  • 38.6m @ 1.0g/t Au from 333m (including 4.2m @ 3.2g/t Au from 333.5m) and 36m @ 0.6g/t Au from 396m (including 3.2m @ 3.3g/t Au from 415.2m) (see ASX release 19 January 2017)

The first RC hole in the new area, ETG0067, returned 122m @ 0.2g/t Au with gold mineralisation strengthening towards the bottom of hole (see ASX release 31 July 2017). The RC pre-collar of ETG0068 contained a thick zone of oxidised gold mineralisation of 30m @ 1.1g/t Au from 96m which is located to the north-east of the new stock-work zone (see ASX release 31 July 2017).

ETG0067 and ETG0068 were extended with diamond tails in August 2017. Assay results from the diamond tails included sporadic gold mineralisation down hole but did not include significant extensions to the gold mineralisation drilled in the pre-collars. Assay results from the additional RC/diamond drill hole (ETG0070) that was completed 80m north-east of ETG0068 remain pending and will be received later in October 2017.

In addition, a surface geochemical program has been completed along the interpreted surface expression of the gold stockwork system at Telfer West. The program was successful in highlighting the stockwork zone surface position with assays up to 100 times background collected.

Soil samples collected over the 800m gap between the two competed drill lines has identified a coherent gold anomaly that has not been tested by previous drilling (Figure 2). The current drill program will test the centre of the new anomaly, 400m north-west of ETG0067, ETG0068 and ETG0070 and 400m south-east of the drill line containing ETG0002.

==> picture [474 x 343] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Telfer West Stockwork Corridor drilling and geochemical summary.

Aircore Drilling at Telfer West and ETD

The current drill program will include initial aircore drilling of three structural targets identified at Telfer West. These targets are located to the north-east and south of the main stockwork corridor (see Figure 3).

Detailed surface geochemical sampling at a 40x40m spacing was recently completed over a 600m section of the 2km regional anomaly at ETD. This program was designed to locate additional subcropping high grade reefs within the broader regional anomaly. A zone of elevated soil anomalism has been identified to the north-east of the Fold Closure prospect (Figure 1). A program of aircore drilling will be completed in this area to determine the significance of these anomalous results.

==> picture [468 x 322] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Telfer West summary plan (background magnetic image).

Background

Encounter holds exploration tenure over 2,000km² of the Paterson Province in Western Australia (WA), that hosts the Telfer gold-copper mine and the Nifty copper mine. Encounter is actively exploring for gold-copper deposits in the Telfer region as well as copper-cobalt and zinc-lead deposits at Yeneena.

The Company’s gold portfolio includes Telfer West, a recent shallow, high grade gold discovery and East Thomson’s Dome that includes a large scale gold soil anomaly identified adjacent to high grade outcropping gold reefs.

The copper-cobalt and zinc-lead prospects identified at Yeneena are located adjacent to major regional faults and have been identified through electromagnetics, geochemistry and structural targeting.

Separate to the projects in the Paterson Province, Encounter has an project generation alliance covering northern WA with Australia’s largest gold mining company, Newcrest Mining Limited (ASX:NCM).

==> picture [474 x 328] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Yeneena region leasing and targets areas.

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. Peter Bewick who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr. Bewick holds shares and options in and is a full time employee of Encounter Resources Ltd and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation under consideration to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Bewick consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on the information compiled by him, in the form and context in which it appears.

The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information in the relevant ASX releases and the form and context of the announcement has not materially changed.

SECTION 1SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA SECTION 1SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA
Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement
tools appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
New information reported in this announcement relates to a
soil sampling program at East Thomson’s Dome and Telfer
West. A total of 132 samples were collected at Telfer West in
this program with sample spacing of 100m spaced lines and
20m spaced samples. A 359 sample program was completed
at East Thomson’s Dome on a 40m by 40m grid.
Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement
tools or systems used
Soil sample locations were recorded by handheld GPS,
which has an estimated accuracy of +/- 5m.
Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to the Public
Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’
work has been done this would be relatively
simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was
used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg
was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for
fire assay’). In other cases more explanation
may be required, such as where there is
coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g. submarine
nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
information
Soil samples collected by Encounter at designated sample
locations and sieved in the field to -250 micron.
Approximately 300g of sieved material was then bagged in
pre-number geochemical bags. The samples from the soil
sampling were sent to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd
Laboratories in Perth, where they were dried, pulverised and
split to produce a 40g sub-sample for Aqua Regia digest and
ICP analysis.
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core
diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of
diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
what method, etc).
No drilling was conducted to collect these samples.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core and
chip sample recoveries and results assessed
Not applicable as no drilling was completed in this program.
Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative nature of
the samples
Not applicable as no drilling was completed in this program.
Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Not applicable as no drilling was completed in this program.
Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a level
of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
Soil sample locations were logged by field staff as either
colluvium, residual or alluvium.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
photography.
Geological logging is qualitative in nature.
The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged
Not applicable as no drilling was completed in this program.
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter,
half or all core taken.
Not applicable as no drilling was completed in this program
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary
split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.
Not applicable as no drilling was completed in this program
For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
Sample preparation was completed at Bureau Veritas
Minerals Pty Ltd Laboratories in Perth. Samples were dried,
pulverised (90% passing at a ≤75µM size fraction) and split
into a 40g sub – sample that was analysed using Aqua Regia
digest with an ICP finish.
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-
sampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.
Field QC procedures involve the use of commercial certified
reference materials (CRMs) and in house blanks. The
insertion rate of these will be at an average of 1:33.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
No duplicates were taken during this program.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain
size of the material being sampled.
The sample sizes are considered appropriate for this
geochemical program.
Quality of assay
data and
laboratory tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the
assaying and laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
The sample(s) for ICP analysis have been digested using an
Aqua Regia digest. This digest is appropriate for soil samples
however some minerals are not completely attacked.
Analytical methods used will be ICP – MS for Au and ICP (Al,
As, Bi, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zr).
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld
XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in
determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation, etc.
N/A – no geophysical or handheld XRF instruments were
used to determine information reported in this announcement
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g.
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have
been established.
Laboratory QAQC involves the use of internal lab standards
using certified reference material, blanks, splits and
replicates as part of in house procedures. Encounter also
submitted an independent suite of CRMs, blanks and field
duplicates (see above). A formal review of this data is
completed on an annual basis.
Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Verification of sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant
intersections by either independent or
alternative company personnel.
The intersections included in this report have been
verified by Will Robinson (Managing Director)
The use of twinned holes.
Not applicable as no drilling was completed in this
program.
Documentation of primary data, data
entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
Primary data is collected for East Thomson’s Dome on
paper logs and transferred onto Excel templates. Data
collected was sent offsite to Encounter’s Database
(Datashed software), which is backed up daily.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
na.
Location of data points Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Soil Sample locations are determined using a
handheld GPS.
Specification of the grid system used.
The grid system used is MGA_GDA94, zone 51.
Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
Estimated RLs were assigned during drilling and are
to be corrected at a later stage using the best
available DTM.
Data spacing and distribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
The soil sampling program at Telfer West was
collected at a 100m line spacing and 20m sample
spacing. Soil Sampling at East Thomson’s Dome was
collected on a 40m by 40m grid.
Whether the data spacing and distribution
is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity
appropriate for the Mineral Resource and
Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
No applicable for soil sampling results.
Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
No assay results from this program have been
averaged or composited.
Orientation of data in relation
to geological structure
Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.
The regular gridded nature of the soil sampling was
designed to ensure no sampling bias.
If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
Not applicable as no drilling was completed in this
program.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
The chain of custody is managed by Encounter.
Samples were delivered by Encounter personnel to
Newcrest’s Telfer Mine site and transported to the
assay laboratory via Goldstar Transport. Tracking
protocols have been emplaced to monitor the progress
of all samples batches.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
Sampling techniques and procedures are regularly
reviewed internally, as is data. To date, no external
audits have been completed on the soil sampling data.

SECTION 2 REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS

SECTION 2 REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS
Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Mineral
tenement
and land
tenure
status
Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material
issues with third parties including joint
ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties,
native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
The Telfer West project sits within E45/4613 and the East
Thomson’s Dome project is located within the tenements
E45/3446, P45/2750-2 and P45/3032 which are all 100% held by
Hamelin Resources Pty Ltd, a 100% owned subsidiary of
Encounter.
The Telfer West project area is subject to a production royalty of
A$1 per dry metric tonne of ore mined.
These tenements are contained completely within land where the
Martu People have been determined to hold native title rights.
No historical or environmentally sensitive sites have been
identified in the area of work.
Exploration
done by
other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
The Telfer West and East Thomson’s Dome Areas have been
exposed to more than 30 years of gold and base metal exploration
since the early 1970’s. Companies that have previously held the
ground or been involved in joint ventures include Newmont
Australia Ltd, Newcrest Mining Ltd, Duval Mining Australia Ltd,
Geopeko Ltd, Marathon Petroleum Pty Ltd, Western Mining
Corporation, MIM Exploration Pty Ltd, Mount Burgess Mining NL,
BHP Minerals Pty Ltd, Cove Mining NL and various other smaller
companies and individuals.
Previous exploration activities have included, geochemical lag and
soil sampling, geological mapping, photo-lithological
interpretations, rock chip sampling, RAB drilling, RC drilling,
diamond core drilling, PIMA studies, and geophysical surveys (IP
surveys, EM surveys and aeromagnetic surveys).
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation
The Telfer West and East Thomson’s Dome project is situated in
the Proterozoic Paterson Province of Western Australia. A
simplified geological interpretation shows a domal feature with
Malu Formation in the core of the fold being overlain by the Telfer
Formation forming the uppermost unit. The Telfer West and East
Thomson’s Dome projects are considered prospective for
sediment – hosted ‘Telfer style’ gold-copper mineralisation.
Drill hole
information
A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results
including tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill holes:

Easting and northing of the drill hole
collar

Elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in meters)
of the drill hole collar

Dip and azimuth of the hole

Down hole length and interception
depth

Hole length
Soil sampling results and locations from Telfer West that are
reported in the announcement are shown within this
announcement in Figure 2.
Data
aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of
high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
Material and should be stated.
All results discussed in this announcement from Telfer West are
shown in Figure 2 and have been colour coded bases on the
legend provided.
Where aggregated intercepts incorporate
short lengths of high grade results and
longer lengths of low grade results, the
procedure used for such aggregation should
be stated and some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in detail.
All results reported have not been modified or aggregated.
The assumptions used for any reporting of
metal equivalent values should be clearly
stated.
No metal equivalents have been reported in this announcement.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Relationship These relationships are particularly important in the
between reporting of exploration results.
mineralisation If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to
widths and the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be Not applicable as no drilling was completed in this
intercept lengths reported. If it is not known and only the down hole program.
lengths are reported, there should be a clear
statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true
width not known’).
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and
tabulations of intercepts should be included for any
significant discovery being reported. These should
include, but not be limited to a plane view of drill
Refer to body of this announcement.
hole collar locations and appropriate sectional
views.
Balanced Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration
Reporting Results is not practical, representative reporting of All results discussed in this announcement from Telfer
both low and high grades and/or widths should be West are shown in Figure 2 and have been colour
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of coded bases on the legend provided.
Exploration Results.
Other Other exploration data, if meaningful and material,
substantive should be reported including (but not limited to):
exploration data geological observation; geophysical survey results;
geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size
and method of treatment; metallurgical test results;
bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
All meaningful and material information has been
included in the body of the text. No metallurgical or
mineralogical assessments have been completed.
characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g.
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or
large – scale step – out drilling). RC drilling of the Telfer West gold anomaly will be
Further Work Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible completed in the coming two weeks. Aircore drilling of
extensions, including the main geological anomalous soil geochemical results from East
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided Thomson’s Dome will be completed in November 2017.
this information is not commercially sensitive.