Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

EMMERSON RESOURCES LIMITED Interim / Quarterly Report 2016

Jul 28, 2016

64876_rns_2016-07-28_223fe52f-8c4e-4118-a0fd-9e77c100014d.pdf

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [595 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [107 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

Quarterly Report for the Period Ending 30 June 2016

29 July 2016

Emmerson Resources Limited ABN 53 117 086 745

Highlights

  • Outstanding shallow high grade gold intersected at Edna Beryl West:

3 Kimberley Street West Leederville WA 6007 PO BOX 1573, West Perth WA 6872

Tel: (08) 9381 7838 Fax: (08) 9381 5375 [email protected]

ASX Code: ERM 378.3 million ordinary shares

Market Cap ~A$30.3 million (@ $0.08)

Available Cash A$5.2 million (30-06-16)

o 5m @ 27g/t gold, including

  • 2m @ 51g/t gold from 103m

o 13m @ 8.7g/t gold, including

o 7m @ 15g/t gold from 133m

  • New interpretation suggests that Edna Beryl West may extend to the extremely high grade Edna Beryl East mine at depth, representing a much larger, high grade gold deposit.

  • This new interpretation also highlights potential for repeated deeper hematite associated ironstone gold mineralisation within the Edna Beryl district, as evidenced from historic drilling such as:

o GRED27 with 6.6m at 4g/t Au, incl. 1m @ 19g/t & 1m @ 5.4g/t Au

Board of Directors Andrew McIlwain Non-executive Chairman

Rob Bills Managing Director & CEO

Allan Trench Non-executive Director

  • The Edna Beryl East mine is the subject of the “small mines tribute agreement” where development is currently underway and recent underground drilling (ASX: 16 March 2016) produced bonanza grades of:

  • 1.8m @ 140g/t gold (drill hole A)

  • 1.8m @ 309g/t gold (drill hole B)

o 1.8m @ 93.4g/t gold (drill hole C)

Website: www.emmersonresources.com.au

  • First production from Tribute Mining at Edna Beryl East is anticipated later this year following the permitting and approvals process which is almost completed.

  • Planning and permitting is underway to bring forward development of additional small mines, plus potential development of the high grade Chariot Gold Mine.

  • Small mines strategy to deliver a risk-free, near term income stream.

  • The recent 3,885m drill campaign in the Edna Beryl district was completed on 25[th] June and awaiting remaining assays that are due imminently.

  • Drilling and exploration fully funded under $15m earn-in agreement with Evolution Mining.

  • Field assessment of NSW exploration licence applications to commence.

  • Cash of $5.2 million at quarter end.

1 | P a g e

==> picture [595 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Tennant Creek gold-copper project

1. Edna Beryl West

Emmerson Resources Limited (“Emmerson”, ASX: ERM) and partner, Evolution Mining Limited (“Evolution”, ASX: EVN) are pleased to announce highly encouraging assay results from the recent drill program at Edna Beryl West, within Emmerson’s 100% owned project at Tennant Creek in the Northern Territory (figure1).

The significance of these results is not only reflected in extensions to previous shallow high-grade gold mineralisation, but more importantly provide the basis of a much expanded resource within the Edna Beryl district. This new interpretation suggests multiple, sub parallel “panels or ore shoots” that are structurally controlled both up and down plunge and also along strike. The four “ore shoots” identified to date connect the high grade gold mineralisation at Edna Beryl East and West (figure 2). Of significance is the paucity of drilling at depth, which by historic standards is still shallow and within 200m of the surface.

2. Completion of Further Drilling in the Edna Beryl District

A 3,885m reverse circulation (RC) drill campaign (phase 2) was completed on 25[th] June (table 2).

First results were released to the ASX on 05 July 2016 outlining further high grade gold intersections as follows:

o 6m @ 13.2 g/t gold, including

o 3m @11.2 g/t gold from 126m (EBWRC015)

  • 9m @ 5.33 g/t gold including

o 3m @ 10.4 g/t gold from 135m (EBWRC018)

All remaining assays from this drill campaign are pending including those from panel 3 where there is great potential to extend the mineralisation in all directions.

3. Small Mines & Chariot Mine Strategy

Edna Beryl East is the first of the small, very high grade gold mines presently undergoing permitting and development. Progress continues on site related infrastructure and approval of the Mine Management Plan. It is envisaged that this will be finalised during the next quarter and allow mining to commence.

In addition, planning and permitting is also underway for the remaining pipeline of the small mines, including the Chariot gold mine. Negotiations have commenced with the Edna Beryl Mining Company (EBMC) on the commercial terms of a similar ‘Tribute Style’ agreement for these additional small mines.

This has the potential to add further shareholder value through providing:

  • A risk-free, near term income stream from its non-core assets via a royalty agreement (until EVN completes its earn-in, ERM receives 100% of its share flowing from this agreement)

  • Future access to refurbished underground workings for near mine exploration

  • The opportunity to monetise a pipeline of other non-core assets within Emmerson’s extensive tenement holdings.

2 | P a g e

==> picture [595 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

4. September Quarter Activities

The following activities are planned for the September quarter:

  • Receipt and interpretation of assay results from the phase 2 RC drilling within the Edna Beryl District is aimed at confirming the geological interpretation and define further target extensions for drill testing.

  • RC drilling of oxide gold mineralisation at the Susan target (figure 3) plus a deeper diamond hole to test for primary gold mineralisation below existing drilling.

  • RC drill testing of the M5 and Black Eye targets within recently granted EL31249. These are high calibre gold - copper targets based on geological and geophysical attributes that have high correlation with known deposits.

  • Commencement of Tribute mining at Edna Beryl.

  • Continuation of the permitting and approval process for additional small mines plus the high-grade Chariot gold mine.

  • Field assessment of EL Applications in NSW generated by the Strategic Alliance with Kenex.

Emmerson Managing Director, Mr Rob Bills commented , “2016 is shaping up to be an exciting year for Emmerson as we work across the three strategic horizons of: a) application of new technology/ideas to discover/extend high grade gold-copper mineralisation within our Tennant Creek Project; b) accelerate our small mines initiative which aims to monetise existing resources and provide underground drill platforms for near mine exploration; c) in conjunction with our strategic alliance partner Kenex Limited (ASX March 2015), we are applying innovative targeting methodologies to identify new gold-copper projects in Australia – this initiative is focussed on increasing the success of discovery through using “big data” to pinpoint high quality epithermal gold-silver, porphyry copper-gold and iron oxide copper-gold projects. To date we have been successful in applying for four new projects in NSW but more on this later.”

Announcements

The Company has made the following announcements since the start of the quarter.

18/07/2016 Change of Share Registry 14/07/2016 Ceasing to be a substantial holder 14/07/2016 Change in substantial holding 07/07/2016 Change in substantial holding 05/07/2016 High Grade Gold intersected at Edna Beryl 04/07/2016 Trading Halt 29/06/2016 Change in substantial holding 08/06/2016 Change in substantial holding 19/05/2016 High Grade Gold Intersected at Edna Beryl 29/04/2016 Change in substantial holding 27/04/2016 Quarterly Activities and Cashflow Reports 19/04/2016 Investor Presentation Update 12/04/2016 Drilling to Target High Grade Gold Commences

Emmerson Resources Limited

==> picture [100 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Mr. Rob Bills Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer

3 | P a g e

==> picture [596 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

About Tennant Creek and Emmerson Resources

The Tennant Creek Mineral Field (TCMF) is one of Australia’s highest grade gold and copper fields producing over 5.5Mozs of gold and 470,000 tonnes of copper from a variety of deposits including Gecko, Orlando, Warrego, White Devil, Chariot and Golden Forty, all of which are within Emmerson Resources (ASX:ERM) exploration and joint venture portfolio. These deposits are considered to be highly valuable exploration targets and, utilising modern exploration techniques, Emmerson has been successful in discovering copper and gold mineralisation at Goanna and Monitor in late 2011, the first discoveries in the TCMF for over a decade. To date, Emmerson has only covered 5.5% of the total tenement package (in area) with these innovative exploration techniques and is confident that, with further exploration, more such discoveries will be made.

Emmerson holds 2,800km[2] of ground in the TCMF, owns the only gold mill in the region and holds a substantial geological database plus extensive infrastructure and equipment. Emmerson has consolidated 95% of the highly prospective TCMF where only 8% of the historical drilling has penetrated below 150m.

Emmerson is led by a board and management group of experienced Australian mining executives including former MIM and WMC mining executive Andrew McIlwain as non-executive chairman, and former senior BHP Billiton and WMC executive Rob Bills as Managing Director and CEO.

Pursuant to Farm-in agreement entered into with Evolution Mining Limited (Evolution) on 11 June 2014, Evolution is currently sole funding exploration expenditure of $15 million over three years to earn a 65% interest (Stage 1 Farm-in) in Emmerson’s tenement holdings in the TCMF. An option to spend a further $10 million minimum, sole funded by Evolution over two years following the Stage 1 Farm-in, would enable Evolution to earn an additional 10% (Stage 2 Farm-in) of the tenement holdings. Emmerson is acting as manager during the Stage 1 Farm-in and is receiving a management fee during this period. Exploration expenditure attributable to the Stage 1 Farm-in to date is approximately $9.5 million.

About Evolution Mining

Evolution Mining is a leading, growth-focussed Australian gold miner. Evolution operates seven wholly owned mines– Cowal in New South Wales, Cracow, Mt Carlton, Mt Rawdon and Pajingo in Queensland, and Edna May and Mungari in Western Australia.

Group production for FY15 from Evolution’s five existing operating assets (prior to completion of the Cowal and Mungari acquisitions) totalled 437,570 ounces gold equivalent at an All-In Sustaining Cost of A$1,036 per ounce. Evolution has guided FY16 attributable gold production from all seven operating assets of 770,000–820,000 ounces at an AISC of A$970–A$1,020 per ounce.

About Edna Beryl Mineralisation

Edna Beryl was discovered by prospectors in 1935 and mined underground in the 1940s and 1950s to a maximum depth of approximately 50 metres. Production up until 1952 was reportedly 2,700t of ore at an exceptional grade of 53g/t gold.

More recent exploration in the Edna Beryl East area between 1996 and 2000 by Giants Reef Mining (GRM) outlined additional high-grade gold mineralisation below the historic workings and resulted in an estimate being reported in 1998 by independent consultants in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Identified Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC: 1998). While this estimate does not meet the minimum reporting requirements for a Mineral Resource under the current 2012 JORC Code, Emmerson considers the Edna Beryl East mineralisation to constitute an Exploration Target of 5,000t to 10,000t at 20 to 30 g/t gold, however cautions that the potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature and, that there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.

4 | P a g e

==> picture [595 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Regulatory Information

The Company does not suggest that economic mineralisation is contained in the untested areas, the information contained relating to historical drilling records have been compiled, reviewed and verified as best as the Company was able. As outlined in this announcement the Company is planning further drilling programs to understand the geology, structure and potential of the untested areas. The Company cautions investors against using this announcement solely as a basis for investment decisions without regard for this disclaimer.

Competency Statement

The information in this report which relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Steve Russell BSc, Applied Geology (Hons), MAIG, MSEG. Mr Russell is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and types of deposits under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 edition and the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Russell is a full time employee of the Company and consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears .

5 | P a g e

==> picture [595 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Table1: Edna Beryl West significant drill hole intersections

AZI
East North RL Dip From To Width Au Ag Bi Cu Fe Pb Zn Mo Sb Sample
HoleID
(MGA94_53) (MGA94_53) AHD (deg) mag (m) (m) (m) (g/t) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) Type
d
(eg)
EBWRC001 416573.10 7864800.14 298.8 -67 349.5 133 146 13 8.69 1.47 69 573 25 29 54 71 10.5 1metre
Inc. 133 140 7 15.1 1.26 64 390 25 22 83 12 12.5 1metre
135 137 2 24.7 1.76 79 218 22 35 70 10 5.81 1metre
EBWRC003 416547.40 7864807.41 298.4 -66 348.5 103 108 5 27.1 4.43 391 67 17 40 97 10 0.69 1metre
Inc. 103 105 2 50.9 8.66 659 99 19 68 139 8 0.81 1metre
EBWRC008 416536.97 7864805.22 298.2 -66 349.0 90 96 6 1.14 0.91 101 0.00 21.0 24.8 110 12.8 1.09 3m
Comp
EBWRC012 416573.06 7864809.09 298.9 -66 349.4 120 126 6 13.2 38.4 0.24% 0.52 13.9 551 31 54.9 4.13 3m
Comp
Incl. 120 123 3 15.7 44.4 0.28% 0.54 13.3 558 35 52.8 4.68
EBWRC015 416536.29 7864791.06 298.2 -65 349.0 126 129 3 11.2 27.3 987 0.02 17.0 151 140 4.20 0.12 3m
Comp
EBWRC018 416582.29 7864804.00 299.1 -65 349.3 135 144 9 5.33 4.72 261 0.08 24.2 60.1 36.0 31.9 8.44 3m
Comp
Incl. 135 138 3 10.4 9.83 470 0.09 22.5 111 8.00 44.7 10.7

Note:

(1) All samples are1m riffle split samples.

(2) Gold analysis method by 25g fire assay with ICP-OES finish.

(3) Multi element analysis method by 4 acid digest & ICP-OES, ICP-MS finish.

(4) Intersections are reported as down hole lengths and not true width.

(5) Minimum cut-off of 0.5g/t Au. No maximum cut-off.

(6) Minimum cut-off of 0.5%Cu. No maximum cut-off.

(7) No internal dilution.

6 | P a g e

==> picture [595 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Table2: June Quarter drill hole details

East(MGA94_5 North(MGA9 AZImag( Depth Sample Target
HoleID RLAHD Dip(deg) DrillDate DrillType
Tenement Number
3) 4_53) deg) (metres) Type Name
RHRC001 415261.87 7861785.32 301.01 -70.0 315.0 264 11/04/2016
RC
RC Chips Rhodes EL28776
EBWRC001 416573.10 7864800.14 298.80 -66.0 349.5 161 12/04/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl MLC705
EBWRC002 416547.76 7864805.43 298.39 -67.0 348.5 168 13/04/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl MLC705
EBWRC003 416547.40 7864807.41 298.41 -66.5 348.5 167 13/04/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl MLC705
EBWRC004 416537.54 7864790.42 298.53 -67.0 348.5 192 14/04/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl MLC705
SSRC011 419358.07 7826144.33 381.48 -60.0 175.5 108.0 16/04/201
RC Susan
Edna Beryl MLC524
SSRC012 419358.05 7826134.03 380.77 -60.0 175.5 78.0 ~~6~~
17/04/201
RC ~~S~~
Susan
Edna Beryl MLC524
EBWRC005 416517.91 7864805.21 298.13 -66.0 348.0 131 ~~6~~
5/06/2016
RC ~~S~~
RC Chips
Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC006 416516.46 7864776.71 298.05 -70.0 348.0 96 6/06/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC007 416516.21 7864778.67 298.02 -67.0 348.0 180 6/06/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC008 416536.97 7864805.22 298.20 -66.0 349.0 143 7/06/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC009 416546.82 7864780.13 298.23 -67.0 348.0 204 8/06/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC010 416546.97 7864814.13 298.26 -66.5 349.0 132 8/06/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC011 416565.38 7864829.08 299.40 -66.5 349.5 108 9/06/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC012 416573.06 7864809.09 298.97 -66.5 349.4 149 9/06/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC013 416573.38 7864790.91 298.65 -66.5 348.0 204 9/06/2016 RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC014 416583.39 7864826.57 298.87 -66.5 349.3 108 11/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC015 416536.29 7864791.06 298.25 -65.5 349.0 168 ~~6~~
12/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC016 416603.80 7864829.75 300.90 -66.5 348.8 126 ~~6~~
13/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC017 416603.78 7864809.07 300.05 -65.5 348.8 156 ~~6~~
14/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC018 416582.29 7864804.00 299.19 -65.5 349.3 162 ~~6~~
14/06,201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC019 416619.76 7864845.91 303.11 -60.0 355.0 84 ~~6~~
16/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC020 416623.79 7864837.87 303.01 -66.0 348.9 114 ~~6~~
16/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC021 416637.69 7864827.28 303.36 -65.0 349.0 126 ~~6~~
17/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC022 416689.75 7864856.15 308.09 -66.0 349.2 102 ~~6~~
17/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC023 416709.82 7864861.29 308.75 -65.5 348.9 102 ~~6~~
19/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC024 416645.81 7864777.06 300.12 -66.5 345.0 66 ~~6~~
19/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC025 416645.10 7864779.21 300.08 -65.5 345.0 246 ~~6~~
20/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC026 416657.62 7864802.05 302.18 -65.5 343.0 204 ~~6~~
21/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC027 416606.34 7864957.71 299.14 -60.0 160.3 150 ~~6~~
22/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC028 416594.98 7865013.00 299.26 -66.0 162.0 252 ~~6~~
23/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
~~6~~

7 | P a g e

==> picture [595 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

East North AZImag Depth Sample Target
HoleID RLAHD Dip (deg) Drill Date Drill Type
Tenement Number
(MGA94_53) (MGA94_53) (deg) (metres) Type Name
EBWRC029 416629.00 7864994.03 301.36 -66.0 161.0 210 24/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
EBWRC030 416573.49 7864793.00 298.77 -65.5 344.0 162 ~~6~~
25/06/201
RC RC Chips Edna Beryl ML C705
~~6~~
TOTAL
5,100m

8 | P a g e

==> picture [841 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [761 x 475] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 : – Location of Emmerson’s Tennant Creek Project and Edna Beryl Tribute Mine–highlighting projects that will be drilled in the next quarter (Edna Beryl, Susan, M5, ~~Black Eye, Venus and Retsina in the Northern Project Area).~~

9 | P a g e

==> picture [841 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [728 x 492] intentionally omitted <==

~~Figure 2 : Long Section of the Edna Beryl district and recently completed drilling in each of the four ore shoots or panels (pierce points as colour coded dots)~~

10 | P a g e

==> picture [841 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [730 x 460] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3. Susan long section showing all drilling with previous gold intersections, and interpreted magnetite-hematite ironstone plunge .

11 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

The exploration results contained within the above company release are in accordance with the guidelines of The Australasian Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code, 2012).

SECTION 1 SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA – EDNA BERYL EXPLORATION TARGET

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised
industry
standard
measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as
downhole gamma sondes, or handheld
XRF instruments, etc). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the broad
meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate
calibration
of
any
measurement tools or systems used.
Aspects
of
the
determination
of
mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report.
In cases where ‘industry standard’ work
has been done this would be relatively
simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling
was used to obtain 1 m samples from
which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a
30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases
more explanation may be required, such
as where there is coarse gold that has
inherent sampling problems. Unusual
commodities or mineralisation types (eg
submarine
nodules)
may
warrant
disclosure of detailed information.
 Drill holes (EBWRC001-004) were reported ASX: 19/05/2016.
 Drill holes reported in this release (EBWRC005-030) were drilled
during the period from 5/06/2016 – 25/06/2016
 Drilling targeted ironstone both to the east and to the west of the
known Edna Beryl mineralisation plus confirmation of historical
gold intersections within the Edna Beryl Deeps area (Panel 3).
 Holes were angled to optimally test the interpreted shear zone).
Drill holes have been drilled at an angle between 60 – 67
degrees).
 The Edna Beryl Exploration Target has been historically sampled
using RAB, Reverse Circulation (RC) and diamond drilling (DD)
techniques. 24 RAB holes for 1,140m, 29 RC/Percussion holes for
2,534m and 26 Diamond holes for 4,678.2m have been
completed. The drill hole spacing is nominal 10m x 10m grid
spacing. In areas of mineralisation spacing has been reduced to
5m x 5m. Holes have been angled to optimally test the host shear
zone. Typically, most drill holes have been drilled towards the
North at angles (dip) between 45 to 70 degrees from surface.
 EBWRC005-030RC chips are riffle split on site to obtain 3m
composite samples from which 2.5–3.0kg sample was pulverised
(at Genalysis in Alice Springs) to produce a 25g charge for
analysis by Aqua Regia digestion / ICP-MS/OES (Au, Ag, Bi, Cu,
Fe, Pb, Zn, Mo, U, Se, Sb).
 Individual 1m (re-split) samples are retained on the drill site.
Anomalous zones will be individually assayed (re-splits) once 3m
composite results are returned.
 Individual 1m samples are pulverised to produce a 25g charge for
analysis by four acid digest with an ICP/OES (Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn)
ICP/MS (Ag, Bi, Mo, Sb,) & Fire Assay/AAS (Au) finish.
 RC samples were collected via a fixed cone splitter that is
mounted to the drill rig under a 1200cfm cyclone.

The fixed cone splitter has three sample chutes for comparative
sampling, 2 chutes are synchronised for comparative samples and
1 Chute is independently set for the geologists field samples.
 Air Leg samples (ASX:16 Mar 2016) were collected from the floor
of the refurbished cross cut drive at Edna Beryl to a final depth of
1.83m or 6 foot.
 Samples were collected from approximately 53m below surface
level.
 Samples consisted of powdered (dust) and larger chips of red
hematite ironstone.
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg
core diameter, triple or standard tube,
depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit
or other type, whether core is oriented
and if so, by what method, etc).
 26 RC drill holes were drilled (this ASX release) in this second
program (EBWRC005-030 – see table in text).
 Total metres drilled are 3,885m. The shallowest hole was 66m
and deepest was 252m).
 The average drill hole length was 149m.
 RC drilling utilizes a 53/4inch, face sampling bit.
 RAB, RC and Diamond drilling accounts for 100% of the current
drilling at the Edna Beryl Exploration Target.
 RC recoveries are logged and recorded in the database and for
this program were considered excellent.
 Standard inner tube has been used.
 Three vertical air leg holes were spaced at 1m x 1m and drilled to
a final depth of 1.83m (ASX:16 Mar 2016).
 The diameter of the air leg drill steel outside diameter is 30mm.
 Two samples were collected from each drill hole.

12 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
 The first sample was collected from the surface of the drive floor to
a distance of 1.22m or 4 foot.
 The 1.22m hole was then blown out and cleaned via the air leg to
ensure minimal contamination.
 The second sample was then collected from 1.22 to a final depth
of 1.83m or 6 foot.
 Allthreeholeswere drilled thisway.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core
and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery
and
ensure
representative
nature of the samples.
Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential
loss/gain
of
fine/coarse
material.
 RC samples are visually checked for recovery, moisture and
contamination. No issues were encountered.
 If any issues or concerns are raised they are discussed at the time
with the drilling contractor and also recorded in our database and
drilling diary.
 Recoveries are considered good to excellent for the reported RC
drilling.
 RC samples are collected via a fixed cone splitter that is mounted
to the drill rig under a 1200cfm cyclone.
 The cyclone and splitter are routinely cleaned with more attention
spent during the drilling of damp or wet samples.
 There were no “wet samples” during this program.
 Emmerson consider that there is evidence for sample bias that
may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material. Visible (course) gold is identified in sections of historical
diamond core so caution is required.
 Air leg drill sample was collected as dust and chips were returned
to the surface of the cross cut drive.
 All samples were dry.
 Sample recoveryconsideredgood and representative.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and geotechnically
logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
Whether
logging
is
qualitative
or
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
 Standard operating procedures are employed by Emmerson for
logging RC samples.
 All RC samples are lithologically logged in one metre intervals.
 Drill hole logging data is directly entered into field tough book
computers via Logchief software. Look up codes and real time
validations reduce the risk of data entry mistakes.
 Field computer data (the drill log) are uploaded to Emmerson’s
relational database whereby the data undergoes a further set of
validations checks prior to final upload.
 Standardised codes are used for lithology, oxidation, alteration,
veining and presence of sulphide minerals.
 Structural logging of the RC drill samples was not possible.
 Magnetic susceptibility data for all individual 1m RC samples are
collected as per ERM procedure.
 All RC chips are stored in trays in 1m intervals.
 Representative RC chips and diamond core is available to all
geologists (a physical reference set) to ensure consistency of
logging.
 All historical drill core and RAB & RC samples was lithologically
logged.
 A detailed validation of all historical drilling data was completed in
2015 by a full time Emmerson Resources senior geologist.
 Standardised codes were used for lithology, oxidation, alteration
and presence of sulphide minerals.
 Structural logging of selected historical diamond drill core was
completed in 2016 recording orientation of veins, fractures and
lithological contacts.
 Information on structure type, dip, dip direction, alpha
angle, beta angle, texture, shape, roughness and fill
material is stored in the structure table of Emmerson’s
database.
 All drill core was reported to be photographed, however Emmerson
geologists could not locate digital or hard copy photography.

13 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
 Diamond core is stored in Tennant Creek howeverseveralholes
(or sections of holes are missing or incomplete. RC chips could
not be located.
 No geological logging was completed on the 3 air leg drill holes
however; the samples are described as brick red,heavyironstone.
Sub-
sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
If
non-core,
whether
riffled,
tube
sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
sampled wet or dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality
and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
Quality control procedures adopted for
all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
Measures taken to ensure that the
sampling is representative of the in situ
material collected, including for instance
results for field duplicate/second-half
sampling.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to
the grain size of the material being
sampled.
 Standard sampling operating procedures have used by Emmerson
during the Edna Beryl West drilling.
 The sample preparation of RC samples for follows industry best
practice in sample preparation involving oven drying, coarse
crushing of the sample down to ~10mm followed by pulverisation
of the entire sample (total prep) using LM5 grinding mills to a grind
size of 85% passing 75 micron.
 Pulverised material not required by the laboratory (pulps) including
duplicate samples are returned to ERM, logged into a database
and stored undercover at the Tennant Creek office.
 Coarse rejects are disposed of by the Laboratory.
 Entire air leg sample was hand delivered to the laboratory.
 14 samples in total of which 6 samples were reported (ASX:16
May 2016).
 Samples consisted of dust and chips and were all dry.
 Samples were not riffle spit.
 No duplicate samples were submitted.
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness
of
the
assaying
and
laboratory
procedures
used
and
whether
the
technique is considered partial or total.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors
applied and their derivation, etc.
Nature of quality control procedures
adopted
(eg
standards,
blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks)
and
whether
acceptable
levels
of
accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision
have been established.
 Field QC procedures involve the use of certified reference material
(CRM’s) as assay standards, and ERM include blanks, duplicates.
 QAQC protocols consist of the insertion of blanks at a rate of one
in every 40 samples, insertion of standards (CRM’s) at a rate of
approximately one in every 20 samples and duplicate field sample
analysis of at a rate of approximately one in every 20 samples.
 A selection of CRM’s is available to the geologists and insertion
points are predetermined prior to drilling.
 The geologist has the ability to override this predetermined
insertion based on visual and geological characteristics of the
current drill hole.
 Insertion of assay blanks is increased when visual mineralisation is
encountered and consists of insertion above and below the
mineralised zone.
 RC field duplicates are collected on the 3m composites samples,
using a riffle splitter.
 Individual 1m RC sample duplicates (re-splits) are also collected
using the same technique.
 Laboratory checks include CRM’s and/or in-house controls,
blanks, splits, and replicates that are analysed with each batch of
samples submitted. These QC results are reported along with
sample values in the final analytical report. Barren quartz washes
are also routinely used in zones of mineralisation.
 QAQC data is uploaded with the sample values into ERM’s
database through an external database administrator (contractor).
 A QAQC database is created as a separate table in the database
and includes all field and internal laboratory QC samples.
 QC data is reported through a series of control charts for analysis
and interpretation by the Exploration Manager or his/her delegate.
 The sample sizes are considered to be appropriate to correctly
represent the sulphide mineralisation at the Edna Beryl West
project based on the style of mineralisation (iron oxide copper
gold), the thickness and mineral consistency of the intersection(s).
 Emmerson’s sampling methodology (SOP) is available at any time
forpeer review.

14 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Verification
of sampling
and
assaying
The
verification
of
significant
intersections by either independent or
alternative company personnel.
The use of twinned holes.
Documentation of primary data, data
entry procedures, data verification, data
storage
(physical
and
electronic)
protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
 Emmerson’s Exploration Manager (Competent Person) has
discussed in detail the drill and sample collection procedures with
the driller and is satisfied that best practice has been followed.
 Emmerson’s Exploration Manager (Competent Person) has
discussed sample preparation and analyses with Genalysis
Intertek sample Prep and Lab Manager to confirm the integrity of
the sample assay process.
 Do to the high grade nature of the samples several repeats have
been carried out and the repeatability is considered to be
reasonable. .
 Original data sheets and files are retained to validate the contents
of the database against the original logging.

No twin drill holes have been completed at the Edna Beryl
Exploration Target.
Location of
data points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and downhole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
 Sample locations are shown in Figure 2 and Table 2 within the
main text.
 EBWRC005-030 drill hole collars were surveyed (set out and
picked up) using a differential GPS and by a suitably qualified
company employee.
 Collar survey accuracy is +/- 30 mm for easting, northing and
elevation coordinates.
 Co-ordinate system GDA_94, Zone 53.
 Topographic measurements are collected from the final survey drill
hole pick up.
 Downhole survey measurements were collected routinely every
6m down hole using an REFLEX EZ-Shot® electronic single shot
camera for RC.
 This survey camera equipment is quoted by the manufacturer to
have an accuracy of
o Azimuth 0-360º ± 0.5º
o Dip ± 90º ± 0.2º
 If the measurement is considered to be affected by magnetic
material (ironstone) then an average from the last non affected
and the next non affected measurement is used.
 There were no down hole survey issues during this drill program
and all collar positions have been validated by the Exploration
Manager.
Data
spacing
and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
Whether
the
data
spacing
and
distribution is sufficient to establish the
degree of geological and grade continuity
appropriate for the Mineral Resource and
Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
 EBWRC005 to EBWRC030 were spaced 10-15 metres apart in
dip and strike. This close spacing is necessary due to the style
and morphology of the shear zone being drill tested.
 The spacing of historic drill hole collars is erratic, possibly to allow
for the high degree of drilling deviation encountered in the
Tennant Creek Mineral Field.
 Identified mineralisation within the Edna Beryl Exploration Target
has been defined by drill holes on a section spacing of 10 m to 20
m with an average on-section spacing of 10 m.
 Emmerson considers the Edna Beryl mineralisation to be an
Advanced Exploration Target and that it is uncertain that following
evaluation and/or further exploration work that the historical
estimate will be able to be reported as Mineral Resources or Ore
Reserves in accordance with the requirements in Appendix 5A
(JORC Code).
 RC sampling is on 1 m intervals that may have originally
consisted of 3m composites.
 The air leg holes were space 1m apart.
 The cross cut drive is 2m x 1.1m.
Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.
 Exploration drilling is at a high angle to the mineralized bodies
and/or shear zone.
 Exploration drilling is perpendicular to mineralized bodies or shear
zone.
 No orientationbased sampling biashas been identifiedinthe data

15 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
structure If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.




at this point.
It is considered that the recent RC drilling (EBWRC005-
EBWRC030) is representative and that no sample bias has been
introduced.
Results at this stage suggest that the geological targets being
tested have been drilled in the correct orientation.
The 3 air leg holes were drilled vertically into the floor of the cross
cut drive.
Samples ended in ironstone material.
It is considered that the vertical drilling is representative and that
no sample biashas been introduced.
Sample
security
The measures taken to ensure sample
security.






Samples from EBWRC005 – 030 were selected, bagged and
labelled by site geologist and field assistants.
They are placed in sealed polyweave bags and then larger bulka
bags for transport to the assay laboratory.
The assay laboratory confirms that all samples have been received
and that no damage has occurred during transport.
Tracking is available through the internet and designed by the
Laboratory for ERM to track the progress of batches of samples.
Sample receipt is logged into ERM’s sample ledger.
While samples are being prepared in the Lab they are considered
to be secure.
While samples are being analysed in the Lab they are considered
to be secure.
Audits or
reviews
The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.



No formal audit has been completed on the historical samples.
An internal review of the sampling techniques, QAQC protocols
and data collectionhas not been conducted by Emmerson.
Digital Rock Services Pty Ltd (1998) and Rocksearch Australia
validated historical data on two separate occasions. Minor issues
were identified and remedied at the time.
In 2003 – 2004 a 52m shaft was sunk at the Edna Beryl
explorations target where mineralisation was intersected as per
the data.

SECTION 2 REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS – EDNA BERYL EXPLORATION TARGET

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status
Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material
issues with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.
The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
 The Edna Beryl Exploration Target lies wholly
within Mineral Lease C705 (ML C705).
 The Edna Beryl Exploration Target is located
37kms north of Tennant Creek Township and
3kms east of the Stuart Highway.
 Edna Beryl is situated on map sheet SE53-14
Tennant Creek 1:250,000 and sheet 5759 Flynn
1:100,000 at GDA coordinate 416500mE
7864700mN.
 ML C705 is located within Aboriginal Freehold
Land held by the Warumungu Aboriginal Land
Trust (NT portion 1754). The tenement is 100%
held by Emmerson Resources Limited.
 The exploration target is on Aboriginal freehold
land. An agreement under the Aboriginal Land
Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 has been
entered into between Emmerson Resources and
the Central Land Council on behalf of the
Aboriginal landowners. The agreement provides
for the protection of sites, the payment of
compensation and allows the landowners
unfettered access to the lease area (other than
the immediate mine site where there are
restrictions).

16 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
 Emmerson Resources are in Joint Venture with
Evolution Mining.
 Exclusion Zones are identified within MLC 705
however does no impact on the Edna Beryl
Exploration Target area.
 Approval to drill the second phase of drilling was
received from Traditional Owners prior to drilling
commencement.
 MLC 705 is in good standing and no known
impediments exist.
Exploration done by
other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration
by other parties.
 Edna Beryl was discovered in 1935 and mined
in the 1940s and 1950s by excavation of vertical
shafts and horizontal drives to a maximum depth
of about 50 metres. Production up until 1952
was reportedly 2,700 tonnes of ore at an
average grade of 53 grams gold per tonne.
 Giants Reef Mining conducted all known
“modern” exploration in and around the Edna
Beryl Exploration Target Area.
 Giants Reef has carried out exploration on the
Edna Beryl area from 1990 to 2005 and during
this time identified significant gold mineralisation
below the original workings.
 An existing shaft sunk during the earlier mining
was refurbished in 1996.
 In 2004 – 2005 mining was conducted by the
Edna Beryl Mining Company (formally known as
Craig’s
Mining
Services)
in
a
Tribute
arrangement
with
Giants
Reef
Mining.
Approximately 410 ounces was produced during
this period from the upper mineralised pod from
an exploration shaft and drive to current depth of
52m.
 Influx of underground water plus declining gold
price ceased the operation in July2005.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.
 Gold and copper-gold deposits discovered in the
Tennant Creek gold field to date, are hosted in
the Lower Proterozoic Warramunga Formation;
a
metamorphosed
(greenschist
facies)
greywacke-siltstone-shale
sedimentary
sequence, that usually displays a pronounced
east-west cleavage. Ore occurs adjacent to
steeply
dipping,
lenticular
orpipe-
likemagnetite/haematite/chlorite/quartz
bodies
(‘ironstone’) that are found along east-west
trending structures. It is generally thought that
the magnetite/haematite was hydrothermally
formed in dilation zones along the controlling
structures, and that the deposition of gold,
sulphides and associated alteration minerals
was a later event with mineralisation possibly
being derived from a different source but
following the same structurally controlled path.
In plan view, the ironstone bodies tend to be
narrowest in the north-south direction and
elongated east west, reflecting the regional
cleavage and shearing. Edna Beryl clearly
follows this pattern. Their vertical dimensions
may run to hundreds of metres, beyond the
reach of surface drilling. Ore grades may occur
over substantial vertical intervals of an ironstone

17 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
pipe or lens, but are not expected to occur over
the entire length.
 The mineralisation style is considered to be Iron
Oxide Copper Gold.
 Supergene enrichmentisvery evident.
Drill hole
information
A summary of all information material to the
understanding
of
the
exploration
results
including
a
tabulation
of
the
following
information for all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL of the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o downhole length and interception depth
o hole length.
 A list of the drill holes, collar detail and
intersections is provided in the body of this text
Table 1 & 2and on figure 2.
Data aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging
techniques,
maximum
and/or
minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high
grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material
and should be stated.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short
lengths of high grade results and longer lengths
of low grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be shown
in detail.
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalent values should be clearly stated.
 Mineralized RC and Diamond intersections are
reported as down hole intervals and not
weighted averages.
 The results discussed are exploration results
only and no allowance is made for recovery
losses that may occur should mining eventually
result,
nor
metallurgical
flow
sheet
considerations.
Relationship
between
mineralization
widths and intercept
lengths
These relationships are particularly important in
the reporting of Exploration Results.
If the geometry of the mineralisation with
respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported.
If it is not known and only the downhole lengths
are reported, there should be a clear statement
to this effect (eg ‘downhole length, true width
_not known’). _
 The holes drilled within the Edna Beryl
Exploration Target area are perpendicular the
east-west striking mineralised zone. The holes
were designed and drilled perpendicular to the
steep dipping mineralised zone making the
intercepts approximate to true width.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and
tabulations of intercepts should be included for
any significant discovery being reported. These
should include, but not be limited to a plan view
of drill hole collar locations and appropriate
sectional views.
 Refer to Figures in body of text.
Balanced reporting Where
comprehensive
reporting
of
all
Exploration
Results
is
not
practicable,
representative reporting of both low and high
grades and/or widths should be practiced to
avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.
 Due to the age the Resource Estimation for the
Edna Beryl resource, Emmerson are cautious
and do not believe the historical Resource
Estimate can be reported in accordance with the
current 2012 JORC Code. Emmerson considers
the Edna Beryl mineralisation to be an Advanced
Exploration Target.
 It is uncertain that following evaluation and/or
further exploration work that the historical
estimate will be able to be reported as Mineral
Resources or Ore Reserves in accordance with
the requirements in Appendix 5A (JORC Code).
Other substantive
exploration data
Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but not
limited to): geological observations; geophysical
 Geotechnical logging was carried out on all
historical diamond drill holes for recovery, RQD
and number of defects (per interval). Information

18 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of treatment;
metallurgical
test
results;
bulk
density,
groundwater,
geotechnical
and
rock
characteristics;
potential
deleterious
or
contaminating substances.
on structure type, dip, dip direction, alpha angle,
beta angle, texture, shape, roughness and fill
material was stored in the structure table of the
Micromine database.
 Density measurements were collected by Giants
Reef geologists.
 Metallurgical testing of selected mineralised
Edna Beryl samples was conducted by Metcon
Laboratories Pty Ltd in 1996.
 Metallurgical testing concluded that 70% could
be gravity recovered with the remaining gold
cyanide soluble so that total gold extraction of
>98% could be obtained. Screen Fire Assay of
selected samples was conducted by Giants Reef
Mining.
 Geophysical magnetic susceptibility logging is
completed at 1m intervals on site (RC drilling)
and in the core shed for selected sections of
diamond core.
 Thin section samples were collected by Giants
Reef Mining to assist in the refinement of the
geological model.
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (eg
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions
or large-scale step-out drilling).
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible
extensions,
including
the
main
geological interpretations and future drilling
areas,
provided
this
information
is
not
commercially sensitive.
 A follow up program of RC drilling (Phase 3) is
planned to commence in August, 2016(pending
positive assay results) to further assist in
confirming the geological and grade continuity of
gold mineralisation already intersected.
 Geological interpretation as discussed in the text.
 Diamond drilling is being considered for the
Panel 3 target.
 Gyro survey of drill holes EBWRC001 – 030 is
planned for July, 2016
.

19 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Mining Tenements Held at 30 June 2016 (Northern Territory, Australia)

Tenement
Name
Interest
EL10114
McDougall
100%
EL10124
Speedway
100%
EL10313
Kodiak
100%
EL10406
Montana
100%
EL23285
Corridor 2
100%
EL23286
Corridor 3
100%
EL23905
Jackie
100%
EL26594
Bills
100%
EL26595
Russell
100%
EL26787
Rising Ridge
100%
EL27011
Snappy Gum
100%
EL27136
Reservoir
100%
EL27164
Hawk
100%
EL27408
Grizzly
100%
EL27537
Chappell
100%
EL27538
Mercury
100%
EL28601
Malbec
100%
EL28602
Red Bluff
100%
EL28603
White Devil
100%
EL28618
Comstock
100%
EL28760
Delta
100%
EL28761
Quartz Hill
100%
EL28775
Trinity
100%
EL28776
Whippet
100%
EL28777
Bishops Creek
100%
EL28913
Amstel
100%
EL29012
Tetley
100%
EL29488
Rocky
100%
EL30167
Dolomite
100%
EL30168
Caroline
100%
EL30301
Grey Bluff East
100%
EL30488
Colombard
100%
EL30584
Juno North
100%
EL30614
Franc
100%
EL30748
Battery Hill
100%
EL31249
Prosperity
100%
EL9403
Jess
100%
EL9958
Running Bear
100%
ELA27539
Telegraph
100%
ELA27902
Lynx
100%
ELA30123
Mosquito Creek
100%
ELA30505
Golden East
100%
ELA30516
Barkly Highway
100%
ELA30746
Mule
100%
ELA30747
Power ofWealth
100%
ELA30749
Mary Anne
100%
Tenement
Name
Interest
ELA7809
Mt Samuel
100%
HLDC100
Sally No Name
100%
HLDC101
Sally No Name
100%
HLDC37
Warrego, No 1
100%
HLDC39
Warrego Min,
100%
HLDC40
Warrego, No 2
100%
HLDC41
Warrego, No 3
100%
HLDC42
Warrego, S7
100%
HLDC43
Warrego , S8
100%
HLDC44
Warrego, No.2
100%
HLDC45
Warrego, No.1
100%
HLDC46
Warrego, No.1
100%
HLDC47
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC48
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC49
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC50
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC51
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC52
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC53
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC54
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC55
Warrego, No.4
100%
HLDC56
Warrego, No.5
100%
HLDC58
Wiso Line, No.6
100%
HLDC59
Warrego, No.6
100%
HLDC69
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC70
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC71
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC72
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC73
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC74
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC75
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC76
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC77
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC78
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC79
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC80
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC81
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC82
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC83
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC84
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC85
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC86
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC87
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC88
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC89
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC90
Wiso Basin
100%
Tenement
Name
Interest
HLDC91
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC92
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC93
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC94
Warrego, No.4
100%
HLDC95
Warrego, No.3
100%
HLDC96
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC97
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC98
Wiso Basin
100%
HLDC99
Wiso, No.3 pipe
100%
MA23236
Udall Road
100%
MA27163
Eagle
100%
MA30798
Little Ben
100%
MCC174
Mt Samuel
100%
MCC203
Galway
100%
MCC211
Shamrock
100%
MCC212
Mt Samuel
85%
MCC239
West Peko
100%
MCC240
West Peko
100%
MCC287
Mt Samuel
100%
MCC288
Mt Samuel
100%
MCC308
Mt Samuel
85%
MCC316
The Trump
100%
MCC317
The Trump
100%
MCC334
Estralita Group
100%
MCC340
The Trump
100%
MCC341
The Trump
100%
MCC344
Mt Samuel
100%
MCC364
Estralita
100%
MCC365
Estralita
100%
MCC366
Estralita
100%
MCC524
Gibbet
100%
MCC55
Mondeuse
100%
MCC56
Shiraz
100%
MCC57
Mondeuse
100%
MCC66
Golden Forty
100%
MCC67
Golden Forty
100%
MCC9
Eldorado
100%
MCC925
Brolga
100%
MCC926
Brolga
100%
ML22284
Billy Boy
100%
ML23216
Chariot
100%
ML23969
GeckoHeadframe
100%
ML29917
Havelock
100%
ML29919
Orlando
100%
ML30096
Malbec
100%
ML30176
Queen of Sheba
100%

20 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Mining Tenements Held at 30 June 2016 (Northern Territory, Australia)

Tenement
Name
Interest
ML30177
North Star
100%
ML30322
Verdot
100%
ML30322
Verdot
100%
ML30620
Kia Ora
100%
ML30623
Pinnacles Sth
100%
ML30636
Jacqueline the
100%
ML30712
Battery Hill
100%
ML30713
The Pup
100%
ML30714
Pedro
100%
ML30715
Red Bluff North
100%
ML30716
Comstock
100%
ML30742
Black Cat
100%
ML30743
True Blue
100%
ML30744
Scheurber
100%
ML30745
Bomber
100%
ML30781
Smelter
100%
ML30782
Dark
100%
ML30783
Semillon
100%
ML30784
Noir
100%
ML30815
Blue Moon
100%
ML30864
Verdelho
100%
ML30865
Dong Dui
100%
ML30867
Thurgau
100%
ML30870
Rising Star
100%
ML30871
Colombard
100%
ML30872
The Extension
100%
ML30873
Pinot
100%
ML30874
Merlot
100%
ML30875
Grenache
100%
ML30885
Zinfandel
100%
ML30886
EXP212
100%
ML30888
Warrego
100%
ML30893
Troy
100%
ML30909
Archimedes
100%
ML30910
Marsanne
100%
ML30911
Wolseley
100%
ML30912
Ivanhoe
100%
ML30937
Gris
100%
ML30938
EXP195
100%
ML30945
Metallic Hill
100%
ML30946
Sauvignon
100%
ML30947
Warrego East
100%
ML31021
Gecko 3
100%
ML31023
Gecko 1
100%
ML31055
EXP 80
100%
ML31057
Durif
100%
Tenement
Name
Interest
ML31074
Rocky Range
100%
ML31075
Franc
100%
ML31076
Jubilee
100%
ML31123
Gibbet1
100%
MLA29526
Blue Moon
100%
MLA29527
Wiso
100%
MLA29528
Wiso
100%
MLA29529
Wiso
100%
MLA29530
Wiso
100%
MLA29531
Wiso
100%
MLA29532
Wiso
100%
MLC120
Cabernet/Nav 7
100%
MLC121
Cabernet/Nav 7
100%
MLC122
Cabernet/Nav 7
100%
MLC123
Cabernet/Nav 7
100%
MLC127
Peko East Ext 4
100%
MLC129
Peko Sth- East
100%
MLC130
Golden Forty
100%
MLC131
Golden Forty
100%
MLC132
Golden Forty
100%
MLC133
Golden Forty
100%
MLC134
Golden Forty
100%
MLC135
Golden Forty
100%
MLC136
Golden Forty
100%
MLC137
Golden Forty
100%
MLC138
Golden Forty
100%
MLC139
Golden Forty
100%
MLC140
Golden Forty
100%
MLC141
Golden Forty
100%
MLC142
Golden Forty
100%
MLC143
Golden Forty
100%
MLC144
Golden Forty
100%
MLC146
Golden Forty
100%
MLC147
Golden Forty
100%
MLC148
Golden Forty
100%
MLC149
Golden Forty
100%
MLC15
Eldorado 4
100%
MLC158
Warrego gravel
100%
MLC159
Warrego gravel
100%
MLC16
Eldorado 5
100%
MLC160
Warrego gravel
100%
MLC161
Warrego gravel
100%
MLC162
Warrego gravel
100%
MLC163
Warrego gravel
100%
MLC164
Warrego gravel
100%
MLC165
Warrego gravel
100%
Tenement
Name
Interest
MLC176
Chariot
100%
MLC177
Chariot
100%
MLC18
West Gibbet
100%
MLC182
Riesling
100%
MLC183
Riesling
100%
MLC184
Riesling
100%
MLC204
Argo West
100%
MLC205
Argo West
100%
MLC206
Argo West
100%
MLC207
Argo West
100%
MLC208
Argo West
100%
MLC209
Argo West
100%
MLC21
Gecko
100%
MLC217
Perserverance
30%
MLC218
Perserverance
30%
MLC219
Perserverance
30%
MLC220
Perserverance
30%
MLC221
Perserverance
30%
MLC222
Perserverance
30%
MLC223
Perserverance
30%
MLC224
Perserverance
30%
MLC253
Mulga 1
100%
MLC254
Mulga 1
100%
MLC255
Mulga 1
100%
MLC256
Mulga 2
100%
MLC257
Mulga 2
100%
MLC258
Mulga 2
100%
MLC259
Mulga 2
100%
MLC260
Mulga 2
100%
MLC261
Mulga 2
100%
MLC32
Golden Forty
100%
MLC323
Gecko
100%
MLC324
Gecko
100%
MLC325
Gecko
100%
MLC326
Gecko
100%
MLC327
Gecko
100%
MLC342
Tinto
100%
MLC343
Rocky Range
100%
MLC344
Rocky Range
100%
MLC345
Rocky Range
100%
MLC346
Rocky Range
100%
MLC347
Golden Forty
100%
MLC348
Brolga
100%
MLC349
Brolga
100%
MLC35
Golden Forty
100%
MLC350
Brolga
100%

21 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Mining Tenements Held at 30 June 2016 (Northern Territory, Australia)

Tenement
Name
Interest
MLC351
Brolga
100%
MLC352
Golden Forty
100%
MLC353
Golden Forty
100%
MLC354
Golden Forty
100%
MLC355
Golden Forty
100%
MLC36
Golden Forty
100%
MLC362
Lone Star
100%
MLC363
Lone Star
100%
MLC364
Lone Star
100%
MLC365
Lone Star
100%
MLC366
Lone Star
100%
MLC367
Lone Star
100%
MLC368
Lone Star
100%
MLC369
Lone Star
100%
MLC37
Golden Forty
100%
MLC370
Lone Star
100%
MLC371
Lone Star
100%
MLC372
Lone Star
100%
MLC373
Lone Star
100%
MLC374
Lone Star
100%
MLC375
Lone Star
100%
MLC376
Mulga 1
100%
MLC377
Mulga 1
100%
MLC378
Mulga 1
100%
MLC379
Mulga 1
100%
MLC38
Memsahib East
100%
MLC380
Mulga 1
100%
MLC381
Mulga 1
100%
MLC382
Mulga 1
100%
MLC383
Mulga 1
100%
MLC384
Mulga 2
100%
MLC385
Mulga 2
100%
MLC386
Mulga 2
100%
MLC387
Mulga 2
100%
MLC4
Peko Extended
100%
MLC406
Comet
100%
MLC407
Comet
100%
MLC408
Comet
100%
MLC409
Comet
100%
MLC432
Mulga 1
100%
MLC48
Tinto
100%
MLC49
Mt Samual
100%
MLC498
Eldorado
100%
MLC499
Eldorado
100%
MLC5
Peko Extended
100%
MLC50
Eldorado Anom
100%
MLC500
Eldorado
100%
Tenement
Name
Interest
MLC501
Eldorado
100%
MLC502
Eldorado
100%
MLC503
Eldorado
100%
MLC504
Eldorado
100%
MLC505
Eldorado
100%
MLC506
Marion Ross
100%
MLC51
Eldorado Anom
100%
MLC518
Ellen, Eldorado
100%
MLC52
Muscadel
100%
MLC520
Great Northern
100%
MLC522
Aga Khan
100%
MLC523
Eldorado
100%
MLC524
Susan
100%
MLC527
Mt Samual
100%
MLC528
Dingo Eldorado
100%
MLC529
Cats Whiskers
100%
MLC53
Golden Forty
100%
MLC530
Lone Star
100%
MLC535
Eldorado No 5
100%
MLC54
Golden Forty
100%
MLC546
The Mount
100%
MLC55
Golden Forty
100%
MLC554
White Devil
100%
MLC557
White Devil
100%
MLC558
New Hope
100%
MLC559
White Devil
100%
MLC56
Golden Forty
100%
MLC560
White Devil
100%
MLC57
Perserverence
30%
MLC576
Golden Forty
100%
MLC577
Golden Forty
100%
MLC581
Eldorado ABC
100%
MLC582
Eldorado ABC
100%
MLC583
Eldorado ABC
100%
MLC584
Golden Forty
100%
MLC585
Golden Forty
100%
MLC586
Golden Forty
100%
MLC591
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC592
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC593
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC594
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC595
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC596
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC597
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC598
Golden Forty
100%
MLC599
Mt Samuel
85%
MLC601
TC8 Lease
100%
Tenement
Name
Interest
MLC602
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC603
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC604
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC605
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC606
Lone Star
100%
MLC607
Lone Star
100%
MLC608
Lone Star
100%
MLC609
Lone Star
100%
MLC610
Lone Star
100%
MLC611
Lone Star
100%
MLC612
Lone Star
100%
MLC613
Lone Star
100%
MLC614
Lone Star
100%
MLC615
Lone Star
100%
MLC616
Lone Star
100%
MLC617
Mt Samuel
50%
MLC619
True Blue
85%
MLC626
Caroline
100%
MLC644
Enterprise
100%
MLC645
Estralita
100%
MLC654
TC8 Lease
100%
MLC66
Traminer
100%
MLC675
Black Angel
100%
MLC676
Black Angel
100%
MLC683
Eldorado
100%
MLC69
Gecko
100%
MLC692
Warrego Mine
100%
MLC70
Gecko
100%
MLC700
White Devil
100%
MLC702
100%
MLC705
Apollo 1
100%
MLC78
Gecko
100%
MLC85
Gecko
100%
MLC86
Gecko
100%
MLC87
Gecko
100%
MLC88
Gecko
100%
MLC89
Gecko
100%
MLC90
Gecko
100%
MLC91
Carraman/Klond
100%
MLC92
Carraman/Klond
100%
MLC93
Carraman/Klond
100%
MLC94
Carraman/Klond
100%
MLC95
Carraman/Klond
100%
MLC96
Osprey
100%
MLC97
Osprey
100%
MLCA708
100%

22 | P a g e

==> picture [597 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Mining Tenements Held at 30 June 2016 (New South Wales, Australia)

Tenement
ELA5252
ELA5253
ELA5255
ELA5256
Name
Wellington
Fifield
Temora
Parkes
Interest
90%
90%
90%
90%

23 | P a g e