Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

ELEVRA LITHIUM LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2023

Nov 1, 2023

64838_rns_2023-11-01_ce3021d9-1b5c-4fa4-a256-9b8276ba3bdd.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ACN 091 951 978

==> picture [595 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [595 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Announcement
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [595 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

2 November 2023
----- End of picture text -----

NEW HIGH-GRADE ZONES ENCOUNTERED IN NAL DRILLING

  • New drilling at North American Lithium (NAL) operation, with latest results from 57 drillholes totalling 14,350m including:

  • 30.04m @ 1.22% Li2O from 132.12m in hole LAN-23-015a

  • 26.80m @ 1.10% Li2O from 133.85m in hole LAN-23-017

  • 45.20m @ 1.03% Li2O from 206.85m in hole LAN-23-019

  • 26.35m @ 1.54% Li2O from 72.3m in hole LAN-23-029

  • 37.90m @ 1.29% Li2O from 253.8m in hole LAN-23-031

  • 22.20m @ 1.52% Li2O from 225.55m in hole LAN-23-032

  • 68.30m @ 1.58% Li2O from 253.55 in hole LAN-23-032

  • 67.15m @ 1.44% Li2O from 353.95m in hole LAN-23-037

  • New high-grade lithium pegmatite mineralised zones identified in north-west extensions to NAL mine and outside current DFS pit shell

  • Lithium inside DFS pit shell continues to show continuity and consistency in grade and thickness, indicating potential for further resource conversion

  • Assay results pending for additional 152 holes (43,500m)

North American lithium producer Sayona Mining Limited (“Sayona”) (ASX:SYA; OTCQB:SYAXF) has identified multiple, high-grade lithium intercepts from recent drilling at the Company’s North American Lithium (NAL) operation (SYA 75%; Piedmont Lithium 25%) in Québec, Canada, including new mineralised zones outside the current Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) pit shell.

The results from 57 new drillholes totalling 14,350m have significantly increased the potential for a resource upgrade at the current single largest source of hard rock lithium production in North America.

The new high-grade mineralisation is located along the north-west margin of the NAL deposit, outside the current pit shell model. Lithium mineralisation inside the DFS pit shell continues to show continuity and consistency in grade and thickness, further indicating the potential for resource conversion, as well as resource definition below the DFS pit shell.

Sayona is continuing to increase its hard rock lithium resource base in Québec, with assay results pending from an additional 152 holes from 43,500m of drilling at NAL. The positive results follow the recent first shipments of spodumene (lithium) concentrate to the international lithium market, with Sayona continuing to advance NAL’s production ramp-up.

Sayona’s Interim CEO, James Brown, commented: “ These results are hugely significant for NAL, showing the potential for a resource upgrade at North America’s single largest source of hard rock lithium production.

==> picture [595 x 50] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

“Notably, some of the intercepts from this recent drilling program are thicker and higher grade than any previously encountered, increasing confidence in NAL’s mine life.”

“We look forward to seeing the results from the remaining assays as we work to expand the NAL resource, further highlighting the importance of this operation for not only the joint venture partners but for the AbitibiTémiscamingue region as a key source of high-grade lithium for the battery and EV revolution.”

Sayona is committed to continued engagement with local communities concerning the development of the NAL operation, including First Nations and other local community members, consistent with its proactive stakeholder engagement approach focused on achieving industry best practice.

Table 1: Selected Drill Hole Intercepts

Hole ID Easting Northing Total
length(m)
From To Description
LAN-23-001 291852 5365761 352.95 223.75 246.05 22.30m @ 1.28% Li2O from 223.75m
LAN-23-003 291942 5365647 217 129.4 150.7 21.30m @ 1.43% Li2O from 129.40m
LAN-23-006 291985 5365625 541 58.7 79.5 20.80m @ 1.43% Li2O from 58.70m
468.9 4951 26.20m @ 0.75% Li2O from 468.90m
LAN-23-009 291681 5365785 400 290.65 326.3 35.65m @ 0.85% Li2O from 290.65m
351.65 386.85 35.20m @ 1.31% Li2O from 351.65m
LAN-23-012 291707 5365748 505 83.5 104.3 20.80m @ 0.65% Li2O from 83.50m
376.3 399.8 23.50m @ 1.68% Li2O from 376.30m
LAN-23-012-W1 291824 5365871 625 372.1 396.05 23.95m @ 1.41% Li2O from 372.10m
LAN-23-015a 291761 5366142 382 132.12 162.16 30.04m @ 1.22% Li2O from 132.12m
LAN-23-016 291897 5365609 316 140.1 163.4 23.30m @ 0.91% Li2O from 140.10m
260.4 285.15 24.75m @ 1.20% Li2O from 260.40m
LAN-23-017 291875 5365630 373 133.85 160.65 26.80m @ 1.10% Li2O from 133.85m
LAN-23-019 291875 5365630 310 206.85 252.05 45.20m @ 1.03% Li2O from 206.85m
LAN-23-029 292091 5365886 198 72.3 98.65 26.35m @ 1.54% Li2O from 72.30m
LAN-23-030 291926 5365551 355 157.76 197.98 40.22m @ 0.71% Li2O from 157.76m
LAN-23-031 291915 5365894 397 253.8 291.7 37.90m @ 1.29% Li2O from 253.80m
295.8 322.9 27.10m @ 0.79% Li2O from 295.80m
LAN-23-032 291659 5366058 346 225.55 247.75 22.20m @ 1.52% Li2O from 225.55m
253.55 321.85 68.30m @ 1.58% Li2O from 253.55m
LAN-23-036a 292090 5365888 362 277 299 22.00m @ 1.19% Li2O from 277.00m
LAN-23-037 291884 5365805 433 353.95 421.1 67.15m @ 1.44% Li2O from 353.95m
LAN-23-040 292094 5365617 532 157.6 179.1 21.50m @ 0.87% Li2O from 157.60m
395.9 416.15 20.25m @ 0.89% Li2O from 395.90m
495.65 519.1 23.45m @ 0.78% Li2O from 495.65m
LAN-23-041 291811 5365670 696 330.75 362.6 31.85m @ 1.04% Li2O from 330.75m

Notes: The coordinates are in UTM NAD83 Zone 18 format. Intercept selection is based on pegmatite lithology using a 0.25% Li2O lower cut and maximum 4m of consecutive internal dilution with a minimum 2m interval and 0.6%+ Li2O intercept grade for inclusion (intercepts over 2m @ more than 0.6% Li2O are considered economic at NAL). Any non-pegmatite lithology within an intercept has been treated as having nil grade. The selection algorithm has been applied to all drill results and may not represent true thickness. A full listing of drill intercepts and drill collar information is presented as Table 2 and Table 3 at the end of this report.

2

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [497 x 197] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [497 x 197] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Plan view of the 2023 drillholes

North-West Area - Section -500W

The intersected mineralisation was located at the north-west margin of the DFS pit design, ranging to approximately 235m below surface. The mineralisation takes the form of substantial 15m to 68m thick undeformed pegmatite dykes hosting 15-25% of spodumene.

The pegmatite dykes swarm is hosted at the margin of the Preissac-Lacorne granodiorite and dips 4555 degrees to the south-west. The zone is open at depth and laterally to the north-west. Highlights and interpretation are shown in Figure 2.

3

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [497 x 356] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Drilling Cross Section - 500W

Central Area – Sections -300W, -250W, -150W and -100W

A series of in-pit drill holes were drilled to demonstrate the continuity of the mineralisation between historical holes, aiming to convert Inferred Resources to Indicated and Measured Resources and potentially increase Mine Reserves.

Preliminary interpretation and modelling show that the program successfully confirmed the position of the existing zones and the potential for a high conversion of the resource categories within the DFS pit shell. Figures 3 to 5 show the highlights of the resource conversion drilling program.

4

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [491 x 391] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Drilling Cross Section -300W

5

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [497 x 379] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Drilling Cross Section -200W

6

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [495 x 358] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Drilling Cross Section -150W

The objectives of the 2023 drilling program at NAL comprise the conversion of Inferred Resources to Measured and Indicated Resources, as well as exploration for extensions of the NAL mineral resource to the north-west and south-east of the existing pit.

NAL recently reported a quarterly record of 31,486 dry metric tonnes of spodumene concentrate production, with three shipments conducted during the September quarter (refer ASX release 30 October 2023).

NAL comprises a contiguous group of 42 mineral titles (41 claims, one mining lease) spanning 1,493 hectares, situated near La Corne township in Québec's Abitibi-Témiscamingue region. The operation has a lithium mine and concentrator, with production of spodumene concentrate having recommenced in March 2023. The project lies 60 kilometres north of the city of Val d'Or, a major mining service centre, with access to road and rail infrastructure together with skilled labour.

Issued on behalf of the Board.

For more information, please contact:

James Brown Director/CEO Email: [email protected]

For investor/media queries, contact: Anthony Fensom, Republic PR Ph: +61 (0)407 112 623 Email: [email protected]

7

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

About Sayona Mining

Sayona Mining Limited is a North American lithium producer (ASX:SYA; OTCQB:SYAXF), with projects in Québec, Canada and Western Australia.

In Québec, Sayona’s assets comprise North American Lithium together with the Authier Lithium Project and its emerging Tansim Lithium Project, supported by a strategic partnership with American lithium developer Piedmont Lithium Inc. (Nasdaq:PLL; ASX:PLL). Sayona also holds a 60% stake in the Moblan Lithium Project in northern Québec.

In Western Australia, the Company holds a large tenement portfolio in the Pilbara region prospective for gold and lithium. Sayona is exploring for Hemi‐style gold targets in the world‐class Pilbara region, while its lithium projects include Company-owned leases and those subject to a joint venture with Morella Corporation (ASX:1MC).

For more information, please visit us at www.sayonamining.com.au

References to Previous ASX Releases

  • Quarterly Activities Report – 30 October 2023

  • DFS confirms NAL value with A$2.2B NPV – 14 April 2023

The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and all material assumptions and technical parameters continue to apply and have not materially changed. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcements.

Forward Looking Statements

This announcement contains certain forward-looking statements. Such statements are only predictions, based on certain assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond Sayona’s control. Actual events or results may differ materially from the events or results expected or implied in any forward-looking statement.

The inclusion of forward-looking statements in this announcement should not be regarded as a representation, warranty or prediction with respect to the accuracy of the underlying assumptions or that any forward-looking statements will be or are likely to be fulfilled.

Competent Person’s Statement

The information in this report is based on information compiled by Mr Simon Attwell, a Competent Person, and who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Attwell is an employee of Attgold Pty Ltd (“Attgold”) which provides full time geological services to Sayona.

Mr Attwell has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Attwell consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Qualified Persons Statement

Mr Ehouman N’Dah, P.Geo. of Sayona Inc. (a subsidiary of Sayona), Mr. Carl Corriveau, PGeo of Sayona Inc. are “qualified persons” as defined by National Instrument 43-101 and have reviewed and approved the disclosure of the scientific and technical information contained in this press release. Mr N’Dah and Mr Corriveau are members of the Ordre des Géologues du Québec.

8

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Table 2 – Table of Intercepts

Hole ID Easting Northing Azimuth Dip Total
length (m)
From
(m)
To
(m)
Width
(m)
Li2O
(%)
Metal
factor
LAN-23-001 291852 5365761 46.3 -59.5 352.95 30.8 37.1 6.3 1.05 6.59
64.2 68.85 4.65 1.30 6.07
154.3 157.45 3.15 1.66 5.22
163.55 167.95 4.4 1.50 6.60
223.75 246.05 22.3 1.28 28.52
256.05 262.3 6.25 1.83 11.46
275.5 283.15 7.65 1.00 7.63
291.7 297 5.3 1.67 8.86
LAN-23-002 291804 5365802 44.6 -56.6 540 50.6 52.95 2.35 1.16 2.72
158.8 162.2 3.4 1.61 5.47
193.9 202.15 8.25 0.65 5.40
217.7 222.2 4.5 0.83 3.72
231.4 244.45 13.05 1.69 22.07
267.1 272.5 5.4 0.69 3.75
279.7 293 13.3 1.37 18.21
313 316.1 3.1 1.18 3.67
339.3 347.95 8.65 0.88 7.63
398.5 400.8 2.3 0.68 1.56
409.1 413.5 4.4 0.86 3.77
434.2 436.45 2.25 1.17 2.63
443.15 457 13.85 0.96 13.35
484.5 488.9 4.4 0.77 3.39
LAN-23-003 291942 5365647 47.3 -57.6 217 20 22.6 2.6 1.98 5.15
99 109.25 10.25 0.75 7.65
129.4 150.7 21.3 1.43 30.44
LAN-23-004 291729 5365829 46.0 -46.9 295 111.7 113.9 2.2 1.09 2.39
133.9 144 10.1 0.72 7.29
212.25 220.3 8.05 0.95 7.66
238.2 248.6 10.4 1.27 13.21
277 285.5 8.5 1.67 14.20
LAN-23-005 292003 5365660 44.5 -47.1 247 27.95 40.75 12.8 1.33 17.04
49.9 58.8 8.9 1.04 9.21
76.4 87.7 11.3 1.31 14.78
156.1 168.9 12.8 1.14 14.60
185.35 191.5 6.15 1.52 9.35
206.75 209.5 2.75 0.61 1.67
237.25 247 9.75 1.00 9.79
LAN-23-005-W1 292091 5365743 50.4 -44.4 198 185.4 192.4 7 1.61 11.28
LAN-23-005-W3 292123 5365771 47.1 -44.6 264 234 252.4 18.4 1.05 19.41
LAN-23-006 291985 5365625 41.9 -47.9 541 8.8 11.6 2.8 1.85 5.18

9

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID Easting Northing Azimuth Dip Total
length (m)
From
(m)
To
(m)
Width
(m)
Li2O
(%)
Metal
factor
58.7 79.5 20.8 1.43 29.68
93 97.5 4.5 1.05 4.71
113.1 128.45 15.35 1.02 15.69
205.05 224.9 19.85 1.49 29.48
267.9 270.4 2.5 1.65 4.14
288.8 297.75 8.95 1.53 13.69
337.05 341.05 4 1.73 6.92
415.45 417.5 2.05 0.69 1.40
468.9 495.1 26.2 0.75 19.68
LAN-23-007 292123 5365716 39.7 -47.1 46.4 13.7 18.2 4.5 0.63 2.85
LAN-23-008 291687 5365891 47.7 -50.1 142 80.5 84.05 3.55 1.10 3.91
130.1 134.5 4.4 1.38 6.06
LAN-23-009 291681 5365785 46.0 -49.5 400 58.1 60.25 2.15 1.56 3.35
73.95 81.1 7.15 0.60 4.32
221.95 226.95 5 1.50 7.53
290.65 326.3 35.65 0.85 30.12
351.65 386.85 35.2 1.31 46.18
LAN-23-009-W1 291858 5365964 48.5 -53.2 589 453.3 460.6 7.3 0.86 6.27
515.25 518.2 2.95 1.35 3.98
525.5 536 10.5 0.87 9.17
LAN-23-011 291656 5365963 37.4 -48.9 109 52 54.9 2.9 0.67 1.95
LAN-23-012 291707 5365748 38.9 -52.3 505 83.5 104.3 20.8 0.65 13.54
131.8 134.75 2.95 1.19 3.51
156.5 160.2 3.7 0.67 2.49
248.6 251.9 3.3 0.90 2.98
290.2 293 2.8 0.61 1.70
298.2 301.9 3.7 0.62 2.28
347.3 349.9 2.6 1.44 3.75
358.1 369.1 11 1.28 14.05
376.3 399.8 23.5 1.68 39.41
478.6 480.75 2.15 1.29 2.77
LAN-23-012-W1 291824 5365871 49.0 -48.0 625 290.5 293.15 2.65 0.97 2.56
344.25 348.85 4.6 1.48 6.81
355.95 365.05 9.1 1.56 14.23
372.1 396.05 23.95 1.41 33.70
533.8 537.2 3.4 1.14 3.89
LAN-23-013 291939 5365641 45.2 -69.9 181 23.3 25.95 2.65 1.17 3.10
110.71 112.8 2.09 1.07 2.24
129.26 136.05 6.79 0.99 6.744
141.5 160.75 19.25 1.10 21.25
168.8 179.6 10.8 0.61 6.55

10

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID Easting Northing Azimuth Dip Total
length (m)
From
(m)
To
(m)
Width
(m)
Li2O
(%)
Metal
factor
LAN-23-015 291761 5366142 45.3 -60.6 82 56.1 59.7 3.6 0.94 3.37
LAN-23-015a 291761 5366142 43.8 -58.3 382 116.16 119.8 3.64 1.76 6.39
132.12 162.16 30.04 1.22 36.77
168.33 179.81 11.48 1.54 17.73
186.07 199.24 13.17 0.83 10.94
265 270.82 5.82 0.72 4.18
288.29 306.53 18.24 0.90 16.47
319.62 323.5 3.88 1.07 4.15
335.14 337.59 2.45 1.02 2.505
365.92 373.43 7.51 0.97 7.26
LAN-23-016 291897 5365609 56.0 -45.1 316 120.6 131.45 10.85 0.63 6.78
140.1 163.4 23.3 0.91 21.25
240.8 245.95 5.15 1.33 6.84
260.4 285.15 24.75 1.20 29.75
300.65 304.55 3.9 0.96 3.75
LAN-23-017 291875 5365630 41.7 -58.2 373 97 99.35 2.35 0.87 2.04
122.15 125.15 3 1.10 3.30
133.85 160.65 26.8 1.10 29.48
207.05 213.6 6.55 1.20 7.84
250.35 254.4 4.05 0.91 3.69
295.45 298.45 3 0.81 2.44
354.25 356.3 2.05 1.18 2.42
LAN-23-019 291875 5365630 46.5 -70.7 310 43.95 49.2 5.25 0.60 3.17
76.55 85.95 9.4 0.72 6.72
99.7 108.45 8.75 1.48 12.93
206.85 252.05 45.2 1.03 46.38
LAN-23-020 292127 5365973 43.9 -50.7 325 7.45 17.4 9.95 1.60 15.95
55.55 61.4 5.85 1.54 9.03
98.05 112.7 14.65 1.12 16.47
156 161.25 5.25 1.69 8.85
185.5 198.5 13 1.02 13.29
294.6 300.15 5.55 1.67 9.27
LAN-23-021 292048 5365911 43.9 -50.2 85 69.25 75 5.75 1.35 7.78
LAN-23-022 291681 5365675 41.5 -48.4 661 15.6 23.75 8.15 1.33 10.86
38.4 42 3.6 0.80 2.89
163.85 172.55 8.7 1.79 15.56
194.9 202.9 8 0.81 6.48
LAN-23-023 291965 5365709 53.3 -47.8 66 21.3 25.7 4.4 1.16 5.10
LAN-23-025 292172 5365763 184.8 -88.3 82 61.2 67 5.8 0.98 5.67
LAN-23-026 291853 5365879 45.6 -66.7 220 26.9 29.35 2.45 1.13 2.77
72.7 83.9 11.2 1.09 12.16

11

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID Easting Northing Azimuth Dip Total
length (m)
From
(m)
To
(m)
Width
(m)
Li2O
(%)
Metal
factor
105.8 108.5 2.7 1.47 3.96
138.1 152.1 14 1.02 14.22
158.1 170.2 12.1 0.91 10.97
194.95 204.4 9.45 1.54 14.51
LAN-23-027 291659 5366058 45.4 -58.8 220.5 71.4 76.4 5 1.15 5.73
160.27 162.45 2.18 1.70 3.71
LAN-23-028 292057 5365851 41.6 -65.0 67 59 61.9 2.9 1.16 3.36
LAN-23-029 292091 5365886 49.8 -80.3 198 19.05 22.05 3 1.36 4.09
72.3 98.65 26.35 1.54 40.58
163.2 167.65 4.45 1.33 5.84
LAN-23-030 291926 5365551 42.2 -52.3 355 74.36 76.58 2.22 2.04 4.52
130.73 132.76 2.03 1.07 2.18
157.76 197.98 40.22 0.71 28.72
282.92 286.41 3.49 0.69 2.39
346.5 350.55 4.05 1.14 4.61
LAN-23-031 291915 5365894 43.0 -53.4 397 5.5 8.5 3 0.97 2.91
17.85 25.8 7.95 0.85 6.75
35.8 38.4 2.6 1.42 3.68
43.9 47.2 3.3 1.44 4.75
54.4 63.6 9.2 0.64 5.92
76.45 80.8 4.35 1.31 5.69
128.1 140.4 12.3 1.65 20.34
170.8 178.3 7.5 1.30 9.74
194.3 196.55 2.25 1.72 3.87
201.05 208.9 7.85 0.90 7.03
253.8 291.7 37.9 1.29 48.90
295.8 322.9 27.1 0.79 21.38
350.5 358.85 8.35 1.63 13.62
384.9 390 5.1 1.21 6.17
LAN-23-032 291659 5366058 43.0 -66.6 346 73.5 78.35 4.85 1.66 8.07
157.6 162 4.4 1.41 6.21
225.55 247.75 22.2 1.52 33.81
253.55 321.85 68.3 1.58 107.71
327.35 330.45 3.1 1.48 4.60
LAN-23-033 291856 5365885 49.2 -68.9 220 62.7 74.1 11.4 0.96 10.97
130.9 134.35 3.45 1.82 6.28
169.4 178.05 8.65 1.65 14.27
204.25 218.5 14.25 1.48 21.13
LAN-23-036a 292090 5365888 43.6 -63.4 362 52.1 66.85 14.75 1.41 20.77
74.2 77.65 3.45 1.15 3.96
83.3 88.3 5 1.43 7.15

12

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID Easting Northing Azimuth Dip Total
length (m)
From
(m)
To
(m)
Width
(m)
Li2O
(%)
Metal
factor
154.05 172 17.95 1.06 18.96
176.35 181 4.65 0.74 3.42
188 196 8 1.72 13.79
200.6 204.8 4.2 0.73 3.05
209.8 219.3 9.5 0.76 7.24
233.85 247.05 13.2 0.86 11.38
277 299 22 1.19 26.18
314.9 317.4 2.5 0.67 1.68
LAN-23-037 291884 5365805 44.7 -55.4 433 21.5 24.1 2.6 1.40 3.63
104.8 118.6 13.8 1.30 17.93
146.6 157 10.4 1.35 14.04
161.8 169.2 7.4 0.89 6.59
184.95 189.1 4.15 1.72 7.14
222.6 226.7 4.1 1.66 6.80
248.8 252.95 4.15 1.58 6.54
290.3 295.4 5.1 0.98 4.98
353.95 421.1 67.15 1.44 96.43
LAN-23-038 291852 5365480 44.2 -45.2 106 79.7 84.1 4.4 0.61 2.68
95.55 104.4 8.85 0.74 6.57
LAN-23-039 291978 5365388 42.1 -46.4 453.45 128.7 137.25 8.55 1.34 11.47
221.1 226.35 5.25 1.13 5.92
271.5 277.95 6.45 1.18 7.59
326.65 331.45 4.8 0.95 4.56
LAN-23-040 292094 5365617 42.8 -47.8 532 18.5 26.45 7.95 0.85 6.78
46 49.65 3.65 1.22 4.45
76.75 82.9 6.15 1.79 11.01
87.1 90.7 3.6 1.60 5.75
110.7 113.05 2.35 0.74 1.74
144.7 150.75 6.05 1.23 7.454
157.6 179.1 21.5 0.87 18.64
221.45 238.1 16.65 1.39 23.14
364.3 377.55 13.25 0.66 8.80
384.45 387 2.55 0.73 1.85
395.9 416.15 20.25 0.89 18.08
432.95 440.95 8 0.74 5.92
495.65 519.1 23.45 0.78 18.24
LAN-23-041 291811 5365670 42.1 -53.7 696 19.65 22.65 3 1.66 4.98
110.2 114.45 4.25 1.17 4.98
125.75 138.9 13.15 1.49 19.55
163.75 169.75 6 1.29 7.74
240.3 247 6.7 0.73 4.89

13

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID Easting Northing Azimuth Dip Total
length (m)
From
(m)
To
(m)
Width
(m)
Li2O
(%)
Metal
factor
330.75 362.6 31.85 1.04 33.19
412.85 417.1 4.25 0.77 3.27
LAN-23-042 291962 5366030 42.3 -55.4 289 22.8 32.65 9.85 1.58 15.56
62.05 77.65 15.6 1.70 26.50
101.6 105.5 3.9 1.03 4.00
121.7 132.5 10.8 1.77 19.07
161.5 177.2 15.7 0.62 9.66
234.15 239.6 5.45 1.13 6.17
259.35 262.75 3.4 1.32 4.48
LAN-23-046 291961 5365790 334.6 -89.5 111 7.6 13.3 5.7 0.94 5.36
LAN-23-047 292313 5366003 44.2 -54.1 181 119.2 121.3 2.1 0.83 1.75
LAN-23-050 292238 5366023 45.2 -49.4 197 125.3 130.8 5.5 0.77 4.23
LAN-23-051 292777 5365291 45.1 -52.0 163 108.3 120 11.7 1.56 18.26
LAN-23-052 292377 5365340 44.2 -55.1 109 18.55 24.65 6.1 1.06 6.47
LAN-23-059 293271 5365223 44.7 -49.7 301 49.8 52.9 3.1 1.58 4.88
LAN-23-061a 291132 5365928 41.5 -42.2 298 247.2 257.1 9.9 0.97 9.58

Notes: The coordinates are in UTM NAD83 Zone 18 format. Intercept selection is based on pegmatite lithology using a 0.25% Li2O lower cut and maximum 4m of consecutive internal dilution with a minimum 2m interval and 0.6%+ Li2O intercept grade for inclusion (intercepts over 2m @ more than 0.6% Li2O are considered economic at NAL). Any non-pegmatite lithology within an intercept has been treated as having nil grade. The selection algorithm has been applied to all drill results and may not represent true thickness. “NSV” stands for “no significant value”.

Table 3 – Drill holes parameters

Hole ID Easting Northing Elevation Azimuth Dip Total Length (m)
LAN-23-001 291852 5365762 447.6 45.0 -58.6 353.0
LAN-23-002 291803 5365802 445.5 45.0 -55.6 540.0
LAN-23-003 291942 5365647 460.0 45.0 -58.6 217.0
LAN-23-004 291730 5365831 435.8 46.5 -46.3 295.0
LAN-23-005 291994 5365659 464.5 44.0 -46.2 247.0
LAN-23-005-W1 292091 5365743 344.2 44.0 -46.2 27.0
LAN-23-005-W2 292102 5365753 329.5 44.0 -46.2 45.0
LAN-23-005-W3 292123 5365771 301.8 44.0 -46.2 30.0
LAN-23-006 291984 5365624 460.4 42.9 -47.8 541.0
LAN-23-007 292120 5365712 446.6 43.7 -46.5 48.0
LAN-23-008 291687 5365891 427.9 44.7 -50.0 142.0
LAN-23-009 291678 5365785 444.9 44.0 -49.6 400.0
LAN-23-009-W1 291858 5365964 144.1 44.0 -49.6 196.0
LAN-23-011 291656 5365963 420.5 44.8 -49.0 109.0
LAN-23-012 291703 5365744 449.1 43.1 -52.0 505.0

14

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID Easting Northing Elevation Azimuth Dip Total Length (m)
LAN-23-012-W1 291824 5365871 218.2 43.1 -52.0 338.4
LAN-23-013 291942 5365647 460.0 45.2 -69.1 181.0
LAN-23-015 291761 5366144 420.6 43.4 -57.7 82.0
LAN-23-015a 291761 5366144 420.6 43.3 -58.3 382.0
LAN-23-016 291903 5365610 437.3 45.0 -45.1 316.0
LAN-23-017 291875 5365629 436.2 41.6 -57.9 373.0
LAN-23-019 292169 5365763 430.7 43.5 -70.2 310.0
LAN-23-020 292120 5365823 428.5 44.9 -50.2 325.0
LAN-23-021 292169 5365921 427.5 44.9 -50.1 85.0
LAN-23-022 291682 5365679 440.7 43.3 -49.6 661.0
LAN-23-023 291952 5365705 462.1 43.0 -49.9 45.5
LAN-23-024 291913 5365745 452.1 43.1 -52.8 53.3
LAN-23-025 292169 5365763 430.7 0.0 90.0 82.0
LAN-23-026 291832 5365870 435.9 44.1 -66.2 220.0
LAN-23-027 291663 5366063 415.2 44.4 -58.9 220.5
LAN-23-028 292057 5365851 434.2 39.0 -65.0 67.0
LAN-23-029 292089 5365886 429.2 52.1 -80.1 198.0
LAN-23-030 291922 5365556 454.1 44.1 -52.0 355.0
LAN-23-031 291916 5365900 435.4 42.9 -53.1 397.0
LAN-23-032 291659 5366058 414.6 44.1 -66.0 346.0
LAN-23-033 291832 5365870 435.9 44.0 -55.0 220.0
LAN-23-036 292089 5365886 429.2 44.1 -62.9 23.5
LAN-23-036a 292089 5365886 429.2 44.1 -62.9 362.0
LAN-23-037 291887 5365814 443.8 43.0 -53.8 433.0
LAN-23-038 291849 5365479 445.8 45.0 -45.0 106.0
LAN-23-039 291975 5365390 442.3 43.9 -45.1 453.5
LAN-23-040 292093 5365619 459.6 42.7 -47.8 532.0
LAN-23-041 291812 5365670 435.2 42.3 -53.5 696.0
LAN-23-042 291940 5366020 423.1 41.4 -54.1 289.0
LAN-23-043 292008 5365767 450.8 43.1 -46.1 112.0
LAN-23-045 292153 5365279 420.0 45.2 -48.1 112.0
LAN-23-046 291962 5365797 445.5 43.0 90.0 111.0
LAN-23-047 292327 5366015 410.3 45.2 -54.0 181.0
LAN-23-050 292237 5366024 408.0 45.1 -50.0 197.0
LAN-23-051 292776 5365289 414.0 45.1 -52.0 163.0
LAN-23-052 292776 5365289 414.0 45.1 -52.0 109.0
LAN-23-054 292384 5365962 414.0 42.9 -77.1 202.0
LAN-23-056 293266 5365222 397.0 45.1 -50.0 300.5
LAN-23-058 292506 5365831 430.4 44.9 -45.0 202.0
LAN-23-059 293372 5365116 402.5 45.2 -50.2 301.0

15

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID Easting Northing Elevation Azimuth Dip Total Length (m)
LAN-23-061a 291133 5365932 396.7 45.0 -45.1 298.0
LAN-23-063 292653 5365674 425.8 45.0 -50.1 214.0
Total (m) 14,350.2

N otes: The coordinates are in UTM NAD83 Zone 18 format.

16

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 1

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (eg
cut channels, random chips, or
specific specialised industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to
the minerals under investigation,
such as down hole gamma sondes,
or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken
as limiting the broad meaning of
sampling.
Samples are obtained from diamond drilling (NQ and
HQ, diameter core).
Sample database has been established in UTM
coordinates (NAD 83 Zone 18).
Include reference to measures taken
to ensure sample representivity and
the appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
Geological logging of recovered drill core visually
identified pegmatite and its constituent mineralogy to
determine the intervals for sampling. Lithium bearing
spodumene is easily identified. The drill core was
photographed and logged prior to sampling. Sampling
has been determined on geological characteristics and
ranges from between 0.25m and 1m in length. Core
was cut using a diamond saw core-cutter and half core
sampled. All pegmatite material intersected downhole
has been sampled.
Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report. In cases where
‘industry standard’ work has been
done this would be relatively simple
(eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was
used to obtain 1 m samples from
which 3 kg was pulverised to produce
a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
cases, more explanation may be
required, such as where there is
coarse gold that has inherent
sampling problems. Unusual
commodities or mineralisation types
(eg submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information.
Sample preparation and assaying methods are industry
standard and appropriate for this type of
mineralisation. The project is supported by core
samples taken by diamond drilling (no other sampling
methods were used). Reference materials (standards
and blank) as well as core twin and pulp duplicates
were added to the sequence prior to shipping.
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details
(eg core diameter, triple or standard
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type, whether
core is oriented and if so, by what
method, etc).
Drilling from surface was carried out by diamond
drilling methods, using standard tube to recover NQ
and HQ size core (no other drilling methods were used).
Core was not orientated. Downhole drill azimuth and
dip has been determined by TN-14 azimuth aligner and
downhole Reflex EZ-TRAC multi and single shot
recording instruments.

17

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing
core and chip sample recoveries and
results assessed.
Drilling was completed directly into the hard (fresh)
rock, starting at the surface, and core recovery
approximates 100% (no other sampling methods were
used). .
Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative
nature of the samples.
To ensure representative nature of the samples, core
has been marked up, and core recovery and RQD
measurements recorded. Core recoveries were typically
high and are considered acceptable and it is not
believed a bias has been introduced into the sampling
system.
Whether a relationship exists
between sample recovery and grade
and whether sample bias may have
occurred due to preferential loss/gain
of fine/coarse material.
There is no correlation or bias between the grades
obtained and core recovery.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and geotechnically
logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.
All drill core has been geologically logged to a level of
detail appropriate for the project. Geological logging,
RQD measurements and structural information has
been completed. The logging is qualitative and is
supported by core photography of marked up core. The
logging and its level of detail was of sufficient quality
and appropriate to support Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc) photography.
Geological logging recorded qualitative descriptions of
lithology, alteration, mineralisation, veining, and
structure. Logging also includes measurement of core
recovery and RQD.
The total length and percentage of
the relevant intersections logged.
All the drilled footage for holes in the current release
has been described and included in the database.
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and
whether quarter, half or all core taken.
Drill core has been cut in half by diamond saw with half-
core samples packaged, grouped into bulk bags for
dispatch to the laboratory.
Half core sampling is considered an appropriate
method to ensure a sufficient quantity of sample is
collected for it to be representative of the drill material
and appropriate for the grain size of the material being
sampled.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube
sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
sampled wet or dry.
There was no sampling method other than diamond
drilling (core drilling).
For all sample types, the nature,
quality and appropriateness of the
sample preparation technique.
Sampling, sample preparation and quality control
protocols are considered appropriate for the material
being sampled.
Sample preparation was conducted in independent
accredited laboratory, ALS laboratories in Val-d’Or,
Quebec).
Each core sample is dried and weighed, and the entire
sample is crushed to 70%passing2 mm. A split of up

18

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary
to 250 g is taken using a riffle splitter and pulverised to
better than 85% passing 75 μm.
Quality control procedures adopted
for all sub-sampling stages to
maximise representivity of samples.
The core samples have been selected by visual logging
methods and is considered appropriate for the
analytical work being carried out and, in an industry,
standard way.
Measures taken to ensure that the
sampling is representative of the in-
situ material collected, including for
instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
Remaining half core, crushed sample (reject) and
pulverised sample (pulp) are retained for further
analysis and quality control checks.
Whether sample sizes are
appropriate to the grain size of the
material being sampled.
Samples sizes are considered appropriate for the style
of mineralisation.
Quality of
assay data and
laboratory
tests

The nature, quality and
appropriateness of the assaying and
laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered
partial or total.
All samples were analysed at independent accredited
laboratories (in Val-d’Or, Quebec). All samples were
analysed by ME-MS-89L Sodium Peroxide Fusion and
ICP-MS finish using a 0.2 g aliquot of pulverised
material. Sayona has regularly inserted 3rd party
reference control samples and blank samples in the
sample stream to monitor assay and laboratory
performance. Assaying was completed by ALS
Laboratories, Vancouver.
It is believed the sampling, assaying and laboratory
procedures are representative of the drilled material
and appropriate for the project.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make
and model, reading times,
calibrations factors applied and their
derivation, etc.
There was no sampling method other than diamond
drilling. No geophysical tools or XRF instruments have
been used in determining mineralisation.
Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (eg standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
and precision have been established.
Assay sample of Certified Reference Material, half core
duplicate sampling and insertion of blanks into the
sample sequence has been undertaken to ensure
QA/QC. Protocols include systematic insertion of CRM
standards at approximately 1 in every 25 samples and
alternating blank samples of quartz and core duplicate
samples for every 1 in 25 samples in previous operator
programs (SOQUEM). Since June 2022, Sayona's
protocols have switched to a control sample insertion
of every 1 in 20 samples.
The CRM material used for monitoring lithium values
are OREAS 750, OREAS 751, OREAS 752 and OREAS
753. These standards have been selected to reflect the
target mineralisation. Assays of quality control samples
were compared with reference samples in database
and verified as acceptable prior to use of data from
analysed batches.

19

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary
The assaying techniques and quality control protocols
used are considered appropriate for the data to be
reported in its current form and estimation of Mineral
Resources.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant
intersections by either independent or
alternative company personnel.
Sampling intervals defined by the geologist have
assigned sample identification numbers prior to core
cutting.
The results have been reviewed by multiple geologists.
The company conducts internal data verification
protocols which have been followed. The verification of
significant intersections has been completed company
personnel and Qualified Person.
There are no currently known drilling, sampling,
recovery, or other factors that could materially affect
the accuracy or reliability of the data.
The use of twinned holes. No twinned holes have been completed.
Documentation of primary data, data
entry procedures, data verification,
data storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
All sampling and assay information were stored in a
secure GeoticLog database with restricted access. This
data has been verified against original laboratory assay
results.
Assay results from the laboratory with corresponding
sample identification are loaded directly into the
GeoticLog database.
Discuss any adjustment to assay
data.
Li% has been converted to Li2O% for the purposes of
reporting. The conversion used is Li2O = Li x 2.153. No
other adjustments to assay data have been undertaken.
Location of
data points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used
to locate drill holes (collar and down-
hole surveys), trenches, mine
workings and other locations used in
Mineral Resource estimation.
The drilling collars are positioned using a Trimble R8
differentiel GPS by our internal technicians.
Drill rig alignment was attained using an electronic
azimuth aligner (TN-14 azimuth aligner). Downhole
survey was collected at 3m intervals using Reflex EZ-
TRAC instruments.
Specification of the grid system used. The grid system used is UTM NAD83 zone 18.
Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
The quality and adequacy of the topographic control
and drill hole database are considered appropriate for
the work undertaken and data to be used for estimation
of Mineral Resources.
Data spacing
and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of
Exploration Results.
The drill hole spacing ranges from 50–80m within the
mineral resource area.
The spacing between drill hole fences is typically on
drill sections spaced 50m apart in 2022-2023.
The drilling grid is looser in areas at the exploration
stage and may include isolated drill holes.
Whether the data spacing and
distribution is sufficient to establish
the degree of geological and grade
continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
The data spacing is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity for the exploration
results reported.
Further drilling is required to determine the extent of
currently defined mineralisation.

20

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary
procedure(s) and classifications
applied.
Whether sample compositing has
been applied.
Samples are not composited.
For the purposes of illustrating exploration results,
lithium values for pegmatite dykes are obtained by
weighted average of individual samples.
Orientation of
data in relation
to geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of
possible structures and the extent to
which this is known, considering the
deposit type.
Drilling may intersect mineralisation at various angles
but is typically orthogonal to the Lithium pegmatites
dykes. Some drill positions have utilized the same drill
pad but with a variable dip to intersect the target
mineralisation at depth.
If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered
to have introduced a sampling bias,
this should be assessed and reported
if material.
Relationship between the drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised structures is appropriate.
Drill holes exploring the extents of the NAL deposit
intersect the main pegmatite dykes with the right angle.
Sample
security
The measures taken to ensure
sample security.
All reasonable measures and Industry standard sample
security and storage have been undertaken.
The security of samples is controlled by tracking
samples from drill rig, core logging, sampling,
laboratory to database. Drill core was delivered from
the drill rig to the project core yard every shift. On
completion of geological and geotechnical logging,
core processing was completed by Explo-Logik’s
personnel, and/or by their representatives, and then
sent to the laboratory.
Audits or
reviews
The results of any audits or reviews
of sampling techniques and data.
Internal reviews of core handling, sample preparation
and assays laboratories were conducted on a regular
basis by Sayona personnel and/or by owner’s
representatives.
Mr. Pierre-Luc Richard, P.Geo., completed independent
review of logging and sampling.
Sayona’s internal Qualified Person also conducted site
visits and review application of core logging and
sampling protocols and procedures.
The sample preparation, security and analytical
procedures are consistent with current industry
standards and are appropriate for the styles of
mineralisation identified. There are no identified drilling,
sampling or recovery factors that materially impact the
adequacy and reliability of the results of the drilling
program in place at the NAL Project.

21

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status

Type, reference name/number,
location and ownership including
agreements or material issues with
third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties,
native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
The property is located in La Corne Township in the
Abitibi‐Témiscamingue region, approximately 38 km
southeast of Amos, 15 km west of Barraute and 60 km
north of Val‐d’Or in the Province of Québec, Canada. The
site is approximately 550 km north of Montreal and is
serviced by road, rail and air. The property is centred near
coordinates 291,964 m E and 5,365,763 m N, Zone 18N
as located on the NTS map sheet 32C5.
The NAL property consists of a contiguous group of 42
mineral titles (41 claims, 1 mining lease). All the claims
are registered in the name of Sayona Québec Inc. for a
total area of 1,49256 ha. The mining lease was granted
to QLI on 29 May 2012, based on a Pre‐Feasibility Study
(PFS) filed at the time in support of the application to be
granted such a lease. The mining lease has an initial term
of 20 years, expiring on 28 May 2032.
Forty mineral titles (39 claims and 1 mining lease) are no
royalties applicable to any mineral substances that may
eventually be extracted from the lands subject to the
mining titles.
Two mineral titles are subject to 1% Net Smelter Return
(NSR) to Lise Daigle (90%)-Marc Dekeyser (10%).
The company has obtained approval for deforestation of
the future development of the current pit to the east.
There are no known significant issues that are believed
to materially impact the mine’s ability to operate.
The security of the tenure held at
the time of reporting along with any
known impediments to obtaining a
licence to operate in the area.
All claims are in good standing as of April 24, 2024.
Exploration done
by other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
Historic information is compiled from NI 43‐101
Technical Reports prepared for the current owner and
previous owners and discussion with NAL staff.
Exploration started in 1942 by Sullivan Mining Group,
followed by Quebec Lithium Corporation, Cambior Inc.,
Canada Lithium Corp., which merged later with Sirocco
Mining Inc to form RB Energy Inc.
Between 2008 and 2012, Canada Lithium Corp. carried
out exploration work on the property. This work
consisted of geological compilation, surface mapping,
outcrop channel sampling, diamond drilling and
metallurgical tests. All this work is detailed in the first NI
43‐101 Report in 2012.
In 2016, NAL carried out a surface drilling campaign to
the east of the pit.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and
style of mineralisation.
The project is located in the region of The Archean
Preissac‐ La Corne syn‐ to post‐tectonic intrusion that
was emplaced in the southern Volcanic Zone of the

22

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Abitibi Greenstone Belt of the Superior Province of
Québec.
The rocks are split between granodiorite of the La Corne
batholith, volcanics, and gabbro as well as the
pegmatites dykes that mainly intrude the granodiorite
and the volcanics.
Volcanic rocks on the property are represented by dark
green mafic metavolcanics and medium grey silicified
intermediate volcanics. The mafic rocks are medium grey
to dark grey-green, and cryptocrystalline to very fine
grained. Both mafic and intermediate volcanic rocks are
affected by moderate to strong pervasive silicification,
minor chloritisation and patchy to pervasive lithium
alteration.
The granodiorite is medium grey to greenish grey,
massive, coarse grained to porphyritic, and exhibits a
salt‐pepper appearance.
The main mineral constituents are light grey to greenish
white plagioclase (40‐45 vol%), dark green to black
amphibole, most likely hornblende (15‐20 vol%), mica (20
vol%), represented by biotite and muscovite, grey quartz
(10‐ 15%vol) and minor epidote, chlorite and
disseminated sulphides.
Three different types of facies of pegmatites dykes have
been identified based on mineralogy and textures: PEG1,
PEG2 and PEG3. The main differences between the three
types of pegmatite dykes are the amount of spodumene
in the dyke, the feldspar and quartz content, the texture
of the pegmatite, and the presence or absence of zoning.
Pegmatite mineralisation occurs as a swarm of dykes
ranging in thickness from 1.5 m – 60 m, striking NWSE
and dipping subvertical to 50 degrees NE.
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information
material to the understanding of
the exploration results including a
tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill
holes:
easting and northing of the drill
hole collar
elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in
metres) of the drill hole
collar dip and azimuth of the hole
down hole length and interception
depth
hole length.
New information on the NAL project drill holes is
illustrated on Figures (plan views, sections, results
tables) in this announcement.
The coordinates in the Figures and Table are in metres in
UTM NAD83 Zone 18 and elevation are above sea level.
The selection of the most significant intercepts was
based on visual appraisal of high metal factors (% Li2O
content x length in m) within spodumene pegmatite
intercepts. Table 2 in the main body text of this report
includes collar dip and azimuth of the hole, down hole
length and interception depth, and hole length.
Depending on the azimuths and plunges of the selected
boreholes, the drilled lengths are apparent and are not
true thicknesses.
If the exclusion of this information
is justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this
exclusion does not detract from the
All drill holes are reported.

23

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
understanding of the report, the
Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.
Data aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results,
weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations (eg cutting of high
grades) and cut-off grades are
usually Material and should be
stated.
Significant assay intercepts are reported as weighted
average over total pegmatite intercepts (Table 2).
Intercept selection is based on pegmatite lithology using
a 0.25% Li2O lower cut and maximum 4m of consecutive
internal dilution with a minimum 2m interval and 0.6%+
Li2O intercept grade for inclusion. Any non-pegmatite
lithology within an intercept has been treated as having
nil grade. The selection algorithm has been applied to all
drill results and may not represent true thickness.
Where aggregate intercepts
incorporate short lengths of high
grade results and longer lengths of
low grade results, the procedure
used for such aggregation should
be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations
should be shown in detail.
Aggregation of Li2O content to obtain the weighted
average of a significant intercept is constrained within
single pegmatite dykes.
The assumptions used for any
reporting of metal equivalent values
should be clearly stated.
No metal equivalent use.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept lengths
These relationships are particularly
important in the reporting of
Exploration Results.
Drilling is not always perpendicular to the dip of
mineralisation and true widths are less than downhole
widths. Lithium pegmatites corresponds to a series of
stacked dykes of variable true thicknesses.
If the geometry of the
mineralisation with respect to the
drill hole angle is known, its nature
should be reported.
If it is not known and only the down
hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this
effect (eg ‘down hole length, true
width not known’).
Pegmatite intercepts (% Li2O over m) are expressed over
down hole length (not over true width).
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections
(with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for
any significant discovery being
reported These should include, but
not be limited to a plan view of drill
hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views.
Maps and geological setting as well as drill hole
collar locations are included in the main body text of this
report and Figure 1.
Balanced
reporting
Where comprehensive reporting of
all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative
reporting of both low and high
grades and/or widths should be
All the assay results received and complete until the date
is reported here.

24

==> picture [595 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
practiced to avoid misleading
reporting of Exploration Results.
Other substantive
exploration data

Other exploration data, if
meaningful and material, should be
reported including (but not limited
to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results;
geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test
results; bulk density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential
deleterious or contaminating
substances.
The drill results reported are consistent with geological
observations as described.
No other meaningful exploration data is reported.
Further work The nature and scale of planned
further work (eg tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).
Further work includes further drilling to outline the
geometry and extents to the lithium pegmatite dyke
swarm identified to date.
Exploration and step–out drilling is planned to extend the
limits of the mineralized system and for potential
discovery of additional pegmatite dykes.
Diagrams clearly highlighting the
areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is
not commercially sensitive.
Refer to Figures in the release and previous exploration
releases for drill hole information of the previously
reported illustrations of drill holes and assays, and
potential areas.

25