AI assistant
DATA#3 LIMITED — Annual Report 2014
Aug 20, 2014
64791_rns_2014-08-20_bd0452c0-4a68-445f-bac8-f28285f3c4d5.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
APPENDIX 4E
ASX Preliminary Final Report
Name of entity
ABN
Data[#] 3 Limited 31 010 545 267
Reporting period
Previous corresponding period
Year ended 30 June 2014 Year ended 30 June 2013
RESULTS FOR ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE MARKET
| Results | $ |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues from ordinary activities | up | 8.1 % | to | $833,595,000 | |
| Profit from ordinary activities after tax attributable to members | down | 38.0 % | to | $7,524,000 | |
| Net profit for the period attributable to members | down | 38.0 % | to | $7,524,000 |
| Dividends | Amount per security |
Franked amount per security |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Current period | |||
| Interim dividend | 1.50 cents | 1.50 cents | |
| Final dividend | 3.00 cents | 3.00 cents | |
| Previous corresponding period | |||
| Interim dividend | 3.45 cents | 3.45 cents | |
| Final dividend | 3.55 cents | 3.55 cents |
The Record Date for determining entitlements to the dividend is 16 September 2014.
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF THE FIGURES REPORTED ABOVE
The current period’s results reflect solid performance in a challenging and volatile economic environment and a highly competitive and relatively flat technology market. The dividend payout ratio of 92% is higher than the previous year’s 89%, reflecting the company’s solid financial position and strong cash flow.
Please refer to the attached audited Annual Financial Report for the year ended 30 June 2014 for the following information:
-
Statement of comprehensive income
-
Balance sheet
-
Statement of changes in equity
-
Cash flow statement
-
Notes to the financial statements
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial Year 2014 | 1
APPENDIX 4E (CONTINUED) for the year ended 30 June 2014
RETAINED PROFITS
| Current | Previous | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| year | year | ||
| $’000 | $’000 | ||
| Retained profits at the beginning of financial period | 25,596 | 24,236 | |
| Net profit attributable to members | 7,524 | 12,138 | |
| Net transfers to and from reserves | - | - | |
| Dividends provided for or paid | (7,776) | (10,778) | |
| Retained profits at end of financial period | 25,344 | 25,596 |
ADDITIONAL DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Details of dividends declared or paid during or subsequent to the year ended 30 June 2014 are as follows:
| Record date | Payment date | Type | Amount per | Franked amount | Total dividend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| security | per security | $’000 | |||
| 16/9/2013 | 30/9/2013 | Final | 3.55 cents | 3.55 cents | 5,466 |
| 17/3/2014 | 31/3/2014 | Interim | 1.50 cents | 1.50 cents | 2,310 |
| 16/9/2014 | 30/9/2014 | Final | 3.00 cents | 3.00 cents | 4,619 |
TOTAL DIVIDEND PER SECURITY (INTERIM PLUS FINAL)
| Current year | Previous year | |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary securities | 4.50 cents | 7.0 cents |
DATA[#] 3 LIMITED DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
The Data[#] 3 Dividend Reinvestment Plan has been suspended from 1 September 2006.
NET TANGIBLE ASSETS PER SECURITY
| Current year | Previous year | |
|---|---|---|
| Net tangible asset backing per ordinary security | $0.17 | $0.17 |
CONTROL GAINED OVER ENTITIES HAVING A MATERIAL EFFECT
Not applicable
LOSS OF CONTROL OF ENTITIES HAVING A MATERIAL EFFECT
Not applicable
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial Year 2014 | 2
APPENDIX 4E (CONTINUED) for the year ended 30 June 2014
DETAILS OF AGGREGATE SHARE OF PROFITS (LOSSES) OF ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURE ENTITIES
Not applicable
COMPLIANCE WITH IFRS
The attached Annual Financial Report complies with Australian Accounting Standards, which include AIFRS. Compliance with AIFRS ensures that the financial report complies with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
COMMENTARY ON THE RESULTS FOR THE PERIOD
The results for 2014 reflect reasonably solid performance in a highly competitive and relatively flat technology market, with net profit after tax of $7.5 million, basic earnings per share of 4.89 cents and fully franked dividends for the year of 4.5 cents per share.
Please refer to the attached Operating and Financial Review for further information in relation to the results for the period.
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
This report is based on financial statements that have been audited.
Signed:
==> picture [112 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
John Grant Managing Director
Date: 21 August 2014
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial Year 2014 | 3
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
Following the difficult year in 2013, market conditions in 2014 in both the public and private sectors remained challenging and profitable growth was difficult to achieve. This was particularly so in our product-related businesses where our customers’ ability to create competitive pressure amid continued commoditisation impacted margins, and longer decision cycles together with relatively smaller transactions increased operating costs. Our services businesses showed modest growth but again this came with higher costs as we sought to maintain competitive scale across all locations.
Our original financial objective for 2014 was to at least match the performance of 2013, and the 2014 budget had a significant bias (of approximately 2/3) towards the second half.
Our 2014 plan to achieve this profit objective was underpinned by the company’s core purpose to deliver success to our customers by focusing on three key areas – our people, the solutions we offer our customers, and operational excellence. The 2014 plan also included the following key actions:
-
simplification of the business through a restructure from five areas of specialisation to three - Software Solutions, Infrastructure Solutions and Managed Solutions – all able to offer end to end solutions ‘from product to cloud’
-
creation of a new Consulting business aimed at engaging with our customers earlier in their IT strategic decision making cycle
-
continued investment to extend and transform the solutions Data[#] 3 offers to help customers transition to a Hybrid IT environment encompassing on-premises, outsourced and cloud services
-
consolidation of the company’s internal service units into one shared services business, and
-
a stronger focus on sales performance and productivity across the entire Data[#] 3 team.
The planned restructure of the business was completed in the first quarter, with the organisation moving from five areas of specialisation to three and consolidation of the internal services functions which enabled us to take some costs out of the business. This activity impacted more than we expected, particularly on the sales focus, as all business units were repositioned and sales teams reorganised and retargeted. With a poor outlook we also decided not to proceed with formation of the new consulting business as it demanded a level of investment we didn’t believe we could sustain at that time. During the second quarter the pipeline of opportunities started to strengthen. Activity levels improved further in the second half, particularly in the fourth quarter, and we succeeded in converting much of the strong pipeline that had developed and delivered a solid, albeit less than targeted, full year result.
Margin pressure detracted from what was a strong selling performance and we ended the year with a 41% tender win rate and a total win rate based on contract value of 51%.
We maintained investment in building our Hybrid IT solution set and capability and now offer a fully managed and integrated Hybrid Cloud incorporating Data[#] 3’s as-a-service infrastructure and those of our partners.
Throughout the year we renewed or secured a number of strategic, multi-year contracts in outsourcing and cloud services providing strong customer endorsement of our Hybrid IT strategy. These contracts will improve the returns we generate from the investments we’ve made in outsourcing and as-a-service over the longer term.
WHOLE OF COMPANY PERFORMANCE
Total revenue was $833.6 million, 8.1% higher than last year’s $771.0 million, with increases in both product and services revenues. We think this is a strong result given market conditions and the lack of a contract in 2014 comparable to our largest ever infrastructure contract at the Fiona Stanley Hospital in Perth in 2013.
Total gross profit (excluding other revenue) decreased by 3.0% from $122.5 million to $118.9 million reflecting a decline in product and services gross profit. Total gross margin decreased from 15.9% to 14.3% due to the competitive pressure and changes in sales mix within the product and services segments.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial Year 2014 | 4
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)
Total revenue ($M):
==> picture [188 x 99] intentionally omitted <==
Total gross profit ($M):
==> picture [170 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
Net profit before tax decreased by 37.9% from $17.5 million to $10.9 million as a consequence of the reduced gross profit and higher staff costs and operating costs.
Change in NPBT elements from 2013 to 2014 ($M):
==> picture [216 x 107] intentionally omitted <==
Net profit after tax decreased by 38.0% from $12.1 million to $7.5 million. This represented basic earnings per share of 4.9 cents, a decrease of 38.0% from 7.9 cents in the previous year.
The board declared fully franked dividends of 3.0 cents per share for the full year, representing a payout ratio of 92% compared to 89% in 2013.
Return on equity decreased from 35.8% to 22.4%.
Product revenue and gross profit
Total product revenue (hardware and software) increased by 9.0% from $639.6 million to $697.3 million. This demonstrated very strong underlying growth largely in software licensing.
This growth came in a generally more challenging market with commoditisation, longer sales cycles and competitive pressure impacting margin and selling costs compared to 2013.
As a consequence total product gross margin decreased from 10.0% to 8.9%, reducing total product gross profit (excluding other revenue) by 3.4% from $64.2 million to $62.0 million.
Product revenue ($M):
==> picture [173 x 97] intentionally omitted <==
Product gross profit ($M):
==> picture [175 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
Services revenue and gross profit
Total services revenue increased by 3.5% from $130.2 million to $134.8 million. Market conditions constrained growth in project services where costs to scale over all locations offset the small gains made. Maintenance revenues, which were boosted in the previous year by the Fiona Stanley Hospital contract, decreased slightly as expected but relatively speaking were very strong and ahead of target as customers continued to extend the life of existing equipment in preference to replacement. Outsourcing revenues grew solidly but at lower levels of profitability. Recruitment and contracting revenues increased, boosted by large multi-year ‘augmentation’ contracts.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial Year 2014 | 5
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)
This combination saw a decrease in total services gross margin from 44.8% to 42.2%, and the overall services gross profit decreased by 2.5% from $58.3 million to $56.8 million.
Services revenue ($M):
==> picture [179 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
Services gross profit ($M):
==> picture [182 x 104] intentionally omitted <==
Other revenue
Other revenue was composed almost entirely of interest income which increased from $1.1 million to $1.3 million due to higher daily cash balances in 2014 compared to 2013.
Operating expenses
Internal staff costs increased by 2.9% from $90.2 million to $92.9 million and other operating expenses increased by 3.8% from 16.0 million to $16.7 million. Overall, staff numbers remained relatively steady and average salaries increased in line with the broader industry trend. This increase was driven by general market pressure, particularly for the best people, higher selling costs in our product-related businesses, particularly software, and the decision to maintain competitive scale in services across all locations.
Additional depreciation and amortisation costs associated with the company’s investments in internal infrastructure, systems and premises accounted for $0.5 million of the increase in other operating expenses.
Cash flow
The net cash flow from operating activities was a strong inflow of $29.4 million, slightly lower than the previous year’s $30.5 million. As usual the operating cash flow and year-end cash balance were temporarily inflated due to the timing of receipts and payments around 30 June. The traditional May/June sales peak produces higher than normal collections pre-30 June that generate temporary cash surpluses which subsequently reverse after 30 June when the associated supplier payments occur. Consequently the year-end cash balance of $103.4 million was again inflated by this temporary surplus.
Due to the cash flow seasonality it is more meaningful to compare the average daily cash balance throughout the year which was $36.3 million, up from $31.1 million in 2013.
The key trade receivables indicator of average days’ sales outstanding remained ahead of target and better than the previous year, demonstrating the effectiveness of our focus on collections and credit management.
Performance against whole of company objectives
The plan for 2014 set a number of objectives. The progress we made against these is summarised below.
a. Our solutions must help our customers achieve their business objectives in a changing environment We continued to develop and expand the solutions we offer across what we uniquely describe as the Technology Consumption Model - consumption from one-time purchase to pay-per-use on or off customer premises. However, solutions and how our customers consume them are in transition and customers are confronted with many new primarily cloud-based alternatives from both global and niche suppliers. In this environment, while the investments we’ve made provide some points of difference, differentiation primarily comes as a result of how we engage with our customers and how effectively we can demonstrate what we offer aligns with their business objectives. This year, both satisfaction with the products and services we offer and overall customer satisfaction decreased. While some comfort can be drawn from this market flux, we are on notice to improve both these in the current year.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial Year 2014 | 6
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)
Satisfaction with products & services (out of 5):
==> picture [175 x 107] intentionally omitted <==
Overall customer satisfaction (out of 5):
==> picture [190 x 105] intentionally omitted <==
One again we achieved significant recognition both nationally and internationally from our partners:
-
Microsoft - Devices and Deployment Partner of the Year (Global award)
-
Microsoft - Enterprise Partner of the Year
-
Sophos – LAR Partner of the Year (for Australia and New Zealand)
-
RSA – Growth Partner of the Year
-
Eaton – Outstanding Reseller of the Year
-
VMware – Solution Provider of the Year (for Asia Pacific Japan)
-
VMware – End User Computing Partner of the Year (for Australia and New Zealand)
-
Symantec – Partner of the Year (for Australia and New Zealand)
-
Lenovo – Innovation Partner of the Year
-
Seek Annual Recruitment Awards - Medium-sized ICT Recruiter of Choice (Finalist).
For the seventh year in a row we were voted ARN’s Enterprise Reseller of the Year by our peers and we were also recognised as the ARN Channel Choice Award for Reseller of the Year for the second consecutive year.
b. Our people must continue to be the best in the industry and we must remain an employer of choice We finished the year with 667 permanent and 23 casual employees, compared to 2013’s 641 permanent and 50 casual employees. Our people continued to be committed and engaged through a difficult time, compounded by the disruption of restructuring the business. Overall satisfaction was at our target level, with the willingness to recommend Data[#] 3 as an employer to others remaining high at 93%.
Overall staff satisfaction (out of 5):
==> picture [170 x 106] intentionally omitted <==
% Recommend Data[#] 3 to others:
==> picture [180 x 106] intentionally omitted <==
This year we completed the expansion and refurbishment of our offices in Adelaide and Perth. The modern design of each office features a fully mobile and flexible workplace, similar to our Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne offices.
- c. Simplify our business, move quickly with change and opportunity and continually improve operational efficiency
While the restructure from five to three lines of business created some dislocation, overall it has simplified and focused the way we approach our customers. Consolidation of our internal services functions enabled us to reduce headcount and deliver some costs savings. Also, a focus on getting additional returns from investments we’d made in previous years drove further operational improvements particularly in our supply chain, and extension of our videoconferencing systems improved collaboration across all locations and lowered travel costs.
However with the decline in gross profit across the business and higher costs, our overall measure of productivity, the cost ratio (= gross profit/expenses), did not improve. We are very cognisant of the increasing costs but were reluctant to make substantial changes that we believed would be more damaging than beneficial particularly with the knowledge that small gains in revenue can deliver substantial increases in earnings. As a result we consciously accepted lower levels of utilisation in some areas in return for maintaining capacity and capability, and we firmly believe this to be the right decision in the midterm.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial Year 2014 | 7
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)
d. Performance must maximise returns to shareholders as we invest year on year to build a sustainable, high-performance organisation
In a market in which commoditisation is central to the product-centric areas of our business, and the need to invest to capture new revenues is central to the services-centric parts of our business, we were unable to achieve our earnings targets. It is small comfort that this is largely an industry-wide characteristic and we are looking at new sources of revenue to add gross profit to the business.
We extended our as-a-service platform into a data centre in Melbourne, which is connected to our Sydney and Brisbane data centre facilities. This allows us to offer our customers a fully supported national platform for our as-a-service offerings, with increased capacity and redundancy.
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL POSITION
Our balance sheet remains conservative with no material intangible assets and no material debt.
Trade receivables and payables are generally highest at year-end due to the traditional sales peak in May/June. Trade and other receivables at 30 June 2014 were $146.9 million and trade and other payables $216.9 million, reflecting the timing differences in the collections from customers and payments to suppliers around 30 June (referred to in the ‘Cash flow’ section).
The year-end cash balance increased from $85.3 million to $103.4 million due to these temporary surplus funds combined with the strong underlying operating cash flow.
The key trade receivables indicator of average days’ sales outstanding decreased and remained well ahead of target at 29 days, and the ageing of trade receivables reduced compared to the previous year. This is an excellent result which demonstrates our ongoing focus on collections and credit management.
Total inventory holdings decreased from $3.2 million to $2.5 million, reflecting the general reduced volume of product held in our warehousing and configuration centres pending sale to customers, and greater efficiencies achieved through enhancements to our supply chain system.
OPERATING RESULTS BY STATE
Performance across the states varied, reflecting the strength of local market conditions and the scale of our business in each location.
Queensland
As the largest part of our business in gross profit and headcount terms, performance in Queensland embodied most of the broader market’s characteristics. Government investment in technology remains well below its peak and while we have been successful in being appointed to two services panels and are in the final stages of negotiation to be included as a cloud panel provider, significant revenues are yet to flow. We continued to redirect our sales effort to the private sector, but this too remained investment constrained and as a consequence, revenue growth was lower than across the whole business at 4%, and gross profit declined by 5%.
New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory
Underpinned by significant growth in software licensing revenues and generally improved operating conditions across most of the sectors in which we operate, New South Wales performed strongly compared to 2013. Revenue grew 19% and while at lower margin due to the nature of the revenue mix, gross profit improved by 7%.
Victoria
Following on from a difficult 2013 and with significant wins in Infrastructure Solutions, Victoria was the best performing of our locations compared to 2013. Revenue increased 22% with solid growth in infrastructure product, services and maintenance contracts and in outsourcing. These came again at lower margin but drove gross profit up 10%. This growth was offset to some degree by a more difficult and competitive environment for our software licensing and software services businesses.
South Australia
Following a flat 2013 compared to the previous year, revenues again remained flat in what was our most challenged location. Software licensing achieved growth fuelled by the whole of government contract we manage for the South Australian Government, but this was more than offset by relatively significant declines in infrastructure product and related services revenues. This combination saw gross profit decrease by 6%.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial Year 2014 | 8
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)
Western Australia
After a very strong 2013 underpinned by the contract with Fiona Stanley Hospital, the business in Western Australia was expected to decline in 2014 and we planned to offset this to some degree through growth in services capability and capacity. We achieved this and the location has now a considerably more powerful market position as a result. However, even given some growth in software licensing revenue and gross profit, on a year to year basis overall revenues declined 32% and gross profit decreased by 18%.
OPERATING RESULTS BY AREA OF SPECIALISATION
During the year we restructured our organisation, moving from five areas of specialisation to three - Software Solutions, Infrastructure Solutions and Managed Solutions. These specialist businesses are all able to offer endto-end solutions ‘from product to cloud’. As a consequence of the restructure comparisons to past years in most areas of the business are difficult. The following commentary provides quantitative comparisons where they are still relevant and qualitative comparisons where they are not.
Software Solutions
Software Solutions helps our customers maximise business value from their software investments through effective procurement, deployment, management and use. Working with customers that span federal, state and local governments, education, health and the general commercial sector, the business offers a complete software solution from on premise to outsourced to cloud, to supply and manage the license, deploy and manage the software, and customise and improve user adoption of the software.
For the nineteenth consecutive year Software Licensing exceeded all targets growing revenue and gross profit in a market that at best was flat. This growth was achieved as it has in previous years, through a combination of increasing market share, navigating our way through continually changing vendor channel programs to maximise incentives, and further gains in operational efficiency. It also continued to transition more of its customers to licensed software in the public cloud provided by partners such as Microsoft, Symantec, VMWare and Adobe.
While small contributors in a relative sense, our asset management services business declined on the 2013 year as major engagements came to an end, and business productivity services improved on the previous year.
The slow start to the sales year that came as a consequence of the restructure impacted most significantly on Software Solutions project services which declined on the prior year.
We remained a member of Microsoft’s Worldwide Licensing Partner Engagement Board and have contributed strongly to Microsoft’s planning for changes to its channel programs. The Software Licensing team continued to be the most successful team in Australia, winning major awards with all our key software licensing partners including a global Microsoft award.
Infrastructure Solutions
Infrastructure Solutions helps our government and commercial customers maximise return from their infrastructure investments through cost-effective lifecycle hardware asset management services including procurement, quality control, deployment, tracking, and disposal; simplified multi-vendor maintenance services; unified communication and collaboration for mobile business users; and Hybrid IT infrastructure for delivery of IT services, on premises, outsourced and in the cloud.
We had anticipated that the constrained market conditions would most impact hardware procurement and our plan was to offset any decline with lower costs. However, the decline in product revenues of 5% and in gross profit of 13% over 2013 was greater than we could offset with an 11% decrease in costs.
We had also anticipated a decline in contract maintenance services given the stellar 2013 underpinned by the Fiona Stanley Hospital contract. However, the business finished the year very strongly with revenue decreasing 8% but gross profit remaining steady on higher sales margins.
After a poor year in project services in 2013, we planned and resourced for growth and the business delivered a 4% growth in gross profit.
On a consolidated basis, Infrastructure Solutions revenues declined 10% and gross profit declined 8%.
Data[#] 3 was appointed a member of the Hewlett-Packard Global Partner Advisory Board and remained a member of the Cisco Advisory Board for Asia Pacific.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial Year 2014 | 9
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)
Managed Solutions
Managed Solutions helps our customers’ IT groups deliver services to their business users ranging from workforce recruitment, contracting, resource augmentation and operational support to full operational infrastructure outsourcing. This business also takes responsibility for development and delivery of our Hybrid cloud infrastructure-as-a-service to both our Software Solutions and Infrastructure Solutions customers and to contracted outsourcing customers.
Recruitment, contracting and augmentation had a strong year in a challenging market. Revenue increased by 9%, boosted by augmentation contracts, and gross profit increased by 5%.
Outsourcing ramped up considerably as revenues increased 3%, but significant onboarding and transition projects associated with new contracts drove gross profit down by 3%. Contracts are structured to provide increasing returns over their term.
The responsibility for developing and delivering our hybrid as-a-service infrastructure, as with all providers in the market, represents an upfront investment for future cloud-based revenues. We secured some strategic customers and have an increasing pipeline, but with continuing investment, returns did not exceed investment in the year.
OUR STRATEGY AND PLAN FOR 2015
The strategic planning process for 2015 identified the following key external factors that will influence performance over the coming year:
-
a. No significant change in levels of total IT investment but a transition from on-premises commoditised software, hardware and related services to both outsourced and cloud-based IT service delivery, and revenue generating investment in areas such as mobility, mobile ‘apps’ and analytics
-
b. A transition to operating expenditure rather than investment related to capital expenditure
-
c. Continuing low industry returns on cloud investment
-
d. Our emerging strategic transition to a leading Hybrid IT solution provider in an increasingly service-centric business model
-
e. Leveraging our market power to partner with new organisations in new business opportunities.
Internally we see a number of opportunities to improve performance and profitability:
-
a. Improving win rates through the simpler go-to-market approach offered by the three areas of specialisation and no disruption at the start of the year
-
b. Improving returns from our services businesses through automation and consistent systems and management
-
c. Changing the business models and cost structures that underpin our product-centric businesses to maximise returns.
Our plan
The foundations for our plan are our vision, our core values and our high level strategy.
Acknowledging the transition that is occurring within our customers and in technology, our vision has been extended and is now to be an exceptional company in a world in transition.
Our core values guide how we behave:
-
Honesty & integrity
-
Respect & trust
-
Collaboration & teamwork
-
Excellence, agility & innovation
-
Take responsibility & go the extra mile.
Our core purpose remains to make our customers successful through what we do.
Our strategy is the pathway to enable our customers’ success. It unites Outstanding Solutions (which will increasingly transition from product centric to service centric), Remarkable People and Organisational Excellence through our Solutions Framework. We believe that making our customers more successful consistently over time will deliver exceptional performance.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial Year 2014 | 10
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)
==> picture [215 x 198] intentionally omitted <==
To guide our transition, our plan for 2015 has five strategic priorities with specific targets and actions within each for each part of the business that map to each staff member’s annual work plan. The strategic priorities are:
-
Outstanding Solutions transitioning from primarily product centric to increasingly service centric in a Hybrid IT world
-
Remarkable People who are high performing, innovative, skilful and confident of their future
-
Organisational Excellence through optimisation, alignment and continuous improvement
-
Customer Success for Business IT and the Business Consumer
-
Exceptional Performance that consistently improves returns to shareholders.
Executing our plan in 2015
We have implemented a refined organisation model for 2015. It retains the three core areas of Software, Infrastructure and Managed Solutions and an integrated and cost-effective ‘back office’, and adds a new business targeted at business applications.
The key objective of the plan is to increase earnings over 2014. With little change in market conditions, but with access to a very large marketplace, the plan’s key platform for organic growth is increases in sales capacity to drive market share. The plan anticipates relatively small growth in product revenues and strong growth in services – on premises, outsourced and cloud. There is clearly additional cost associated with this strategy, but the simple rationale is that if win rates are maintained, profitable growth will follow. It is also in contradiction to the previous two years where we have contracted early in the year. This does not mean that we won’t continue to drive cost out where we can, and we have identified our current product supply chain, enhanced automation of processes within our outsourcing business and cross business administration as areas we will pursue.
In addition the Application Solutions area of specialisation will drive new market opportunity via its reselling activities with Discovery Technology’s CCX Wi-Fi location tracking and content management system, and Data[#] 3’s Schools Suite, modules of which are currently installed in a growing number of schools around Australia. Both applications will also drive related Infrastructure Solutions and Managed Solutions revenues.
We are also actively seeking strategically sensible acquisitions and new partnership opportunities to introduce new revenue streams.
Across all our businesses, the major risks are:
-
Continuing changes in partner channel programs and incentives
-
Inability to recruit the sales team at a rate the plan assumes and that delivers the targeted revenues
-
� Pricing pressure beyond that which our plan assumes.
In summary
The trends in margin pressure and increased costs that developed in 2012 and the need to keep investing to remain competitively relevant combined to make 2014 our most challenging year for a very long time. Having taken costs and capacity out in the previous two years, the 2015 plan targets growth through market share gain and the introduction of additional complementary revenues. Our financial objective is to improve on the 2014 result.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial Year 2014 | 11
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Your directors present their report on Data[#] 3 Limited (“the company”, or “we”, “our”, or “us”) for the year ended 30 June 2014.
1. PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
We provide information technology solutions which draw on our broad range of products and services and our alliances with other industry providers. This includes software licensing and software asset management; the design, deployment and operation of desktop, network and data centre hardware and software infrastructure; and contract and permanent recruitment services.
There were no significant changes in the nature of our company’s activities during the year.
2. DIVIDENDS
| Cents | $’000 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Final dividend recommended for the year ended 30 June 2014 | 3.00 | 4,619 | |
| Dividends paid in the year: | |||
| Interim for the year ended 30 June 2014 | 1.50 | 2,310 | |
| Final forthe yearended 30 June2013 | 3.55 | 5,466 | |
| 7,776 |
3. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
Information on the operations and financial position of the company and its business strategies and prospects is set out in the attached Operating and Financial Review, as follows:
| Page | |
|---|---|
| Whole of company performance | 4 |
| Review of financial position | 8 |
| Operating results by state | 8 |
| Operating results by area of specialisation | 9 |
| Our strategy and plan for 2015 | 10 |
4. BUSINESS STRATEGY
Our vision is to remain an exceptional company in a world in transition – one that unites to enable our customers’ success through the use of market-leading expertise, technologies and services; inspires our people to do their best every day; and rewards investors’ confidence and support.
For more information on our business strategy please refer to page 10 of the attached Operating and Financial Review.
5. EARNINGS PER SHARE
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cents | Cents | |
| Basic and diluted earnings per share | 4.89 | 7.88 |
6. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS
The company’s state of affairs did not change significantly during the year.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 12
DIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)
7. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE DATE
Except as disclosed in note 27 to the financial statements, no matter or circumstance has arisen since 30 June 2014 that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect:
-
(a) the company’s operations in future financial years; or
-
(b) the results of those operations in future financial years; or
-
(c) the company’s state of affairs in future financial years.
8. LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS
Information on likely developments and expected results is included in the attached Operating and Financial Review on pages 10-11.
9. DIRECTORS
The names and details of the company’s directors are set out below. Directors were in office for the entire financial year and remain in office at the date of this report.
Names, qualifications, experience and special responsibilities
R A Anderson, OAM, BCom, FCA, FCPA ( Chairman, non-executive director)
Independent non-executive director since 1997 and Chairman since 2000. Formerly a partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers, the firm’s Managing Partner in Queensland, and a member of the firm’s National Committee. Previously a member of the Capital Markets Board of Queensland Treasury Corporation and President of CPA Australia in Queensland.
During the past three years Mr Anderson has also served as a non-executive director of three other public companies: Namoi Cotton Cooperative Limited (director since 2001), Lindsay Australia Limited (director since 2002) and Villa World Group (director from 2002 to 2012). Mr Anderson is also president of the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association of Queensland.
Special responsibilities:
Chairman of the board Member of audit and risk committee Chairman of remuneration and nomination committee
G F Boreham, AM, BEcon ( non-executive director)
Independent non-executive director since 2011. Extensive experience in the IT industry, including 25 years at IBM, (Managing Director, IBM Australia, from 2006 to 2011 and various senior roles prior to 2006) and former Chair of Screen Australia (from 2008 to 2014) and Chair of the Australian Government’s Convergence Review in 2011 and 2012. Currently Chair of Advance, a not-for-profit organisation that supports Australia’s global community (since 2012).
J E Grant, BEng ( Managing Director)
Director of the company from its foundation in 1984; Chief Executive Officer or Managing Director from 1996; extensive experience in the IT industry; immediate past Chairman and a current Director of the Australian Information Industry Association, the ICT industry’s peak representative body; and the inaugural Chairman of the Australian Rugby League Commission.
I J Johnston, DipCM, GradDip App Fin & Inv, ASIA, ACIS, FAICD ( non-executive director)
Independent non-executive director since November 2007. Formerly Chairman Corporate Finance at Morgans Financial Limited and currently a member of its advisory board. Extensive experience in the banking and stockbroking industries including roles in treasury, corporate banking and equity capital markets.
During the past three years Mr Johnston has also served as a non-executive director of Cardno Limited (director since 2004).
Special responsibilities:
Chairman of audit and risk committee (from 30 May 2013, the date of his appointment) Member of remuneration and nomination committee
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 13
DIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)
9. DIRECTORS (CONTINUED)
W T Powell, BEcon ( non-executive director)
Independent non-executive director since 2002. Executive Chairman of the company from its foundation in 1984 and then Managing Director from 1989 to 1996. Prior to 1984 had extensive experience in the IT industry and was the Managing Director of Powell Clark and Associates, formed in 1977. Re-joined the board of Data[#] 3 Limited in 2002.
Special responsibilities:
Member of audit and risk committee (from 30 May 2013) Member of remuneration and nomination committee
Meetings of directors
The number of meetings of our board of directors (including meetings of the board committees) held during the year, and the numbers of meetings attended by each director were:
| Name | Full meetings | Full meetings | Full meetings | of directors | Meetings | of audit | Meetings of remuneration | Meetings of remuneration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and risk committee | and nomination committee | |||||||
| Meetings | Meetings | Meetings | Meetings | Meetings | Meetings | |||
| attended | **held *** | attended | **held *** | attended | **held *** | |||
| R A Anderson | 15 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||
| G F Boreham | 16 | 17 | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
| J E Grant | 16 | 17 | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
| I J Johnston | 17 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||
| W T Powell | 15 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
-
Number of meetings held during the time the director held office or was a member of the committee during the year.
-
** Not a member of the committee during the year.
10. COMPANY SECRETARY
Mr B I Hill, BBus, was appointed to the position of Company Secretary in 1997. He has served as our Financial Controller or Chief Financial Officer since 1992 and is a member of CPA Australia and a fellow of the Governance Institute of Australia.
Mr T W Bonner, LLB, BComm, ACIS, was appointed to the position of Joint Company Secretary in 2007. He has served as our General Counsel since 2005 and is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Governance Institute of Australia.
11. REMUNERATION REPORT
The remuneration report is set out under the following main headings:
-
A Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration B Details of remuneration
-
C Service agreements
-
D Share-based compensation
-
E Additional information
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 14
DIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)
11. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTINUED)
A Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration
Role of the remuneration committee
The remuneration and nomination committee is a separate committee of the board and is responsible for:
-
Data[#] 3’s remuneration, recruitment, retention and termination policies and procedures for senior executives
-
Senior executives’ remuneration and incentives
-
Superannuation arrangements
-
The remuneration for directors.
The committee’s objective in relation to remuneration policy is to motivate senior executives to pursue the long-term growth and success of Data[#] 3 and to demonstrate a clear relationship between senior executives’ performance and remuneration. The Corporate Governance Statement provides further information on the role of this committee.
Executives
The board and the remuneration committee address remuneration policies and practices generally, and determine remuneration packages and other terms of employment for our senior executives. Each year the board reviews executive remuneration and other terms of employment having regard to performance against goals set at the start of the year, relevant comparative information and may include independent expert advice. Remuneration packages are set at levels that are intended to attract and retain executives capable of managing our operations, achieving our strategic objectives, and increasing shareholder wealth.
The executive pay and reward framework has three components:
-
Base pay and benefits, including superannuation,
-
Short-term performance-related bonuses, and
-
Long-term incentives (applicable to the managing director only).
The combination of these comprises the executive’s remuneration.
Base pay
Base pay is structured as a total employment cost package which may be delivered as a combination of cash and prescribed non-financial benefits at the executive’s discretion. There are no guaranteed base pay increases included in any senior executives’ contracts.
Short-term performance-related bonuses
Performance-related cash bonus entitlements are linked to the achievement of financial and non-financial objectives which are relevant to meeting the company’s business objectives. In 2014 the proportion of the planned total executive remuneration for key management personnel that was performance-related (excluding the managing director’s long-term incentive discussed in Section C below) was 30% (2013: 30%). In 2014 actual short-term bonuses as a proportion of planned total executive remuneration was 23% (2013: 25%).
A major part of the bonus entitlement is determined by the actual performance against planned company and divisional profit targets relevant to each individual. Using a profit target ensures variable reward is only available when value has been created for shareholders and when profit is consistent with the business plan. In 2014 the planned profit-related component represented 70% of the total executive bonuses (2013: 70%). Profit targets for some areas of the business were not met in 2014, resulting in reduced bonus payments calculated on a pro rata basis. The balance of the executive bonus entitlement is determined by performance against agreed non-financial objectives relevant to each individual.
The executives’ cash bonus entitlements are assessed and paid either quarterly or six-monthly, based on the actual performance against the relevant full-year profit and key performance indicator targets. The board, together with certain senior managers, is responsible for assessing whether an individual’s targets have been met, and profit targets and key performance indicator targets are reviewed and reset annually.
Long-term incentives
Our managing director is eligible to earn a long-term incentive in the form of a cash payment. Details of the incentive are set out in Section C “Service agreements” below.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 15
DIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)
11. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTINUED)
Non-executive directors
Fees and payments to non-executive directors reflect the demands which are made on, and the responsibilities of, the directors. The board determines remuneration of non-executive directors within the maximum amount approved by the shareholders from time to time. This maximum currently stands at $500,000 per annum in total for salary and fees, to be divided among the non-executive directors in such a proportion and manner as they agree. Members of the board (non-executive directors) are paid a fixed remuneration comprising base fees, superannuation, and additional fees for those in the role of chair for the full board and chair of the audit and risk committee. Non-executive directors do not receive bonus payments or share options and are not provided with retirement benefits other than statutory superannuation. The board is composed of four non-executive directors and one executive director. The board undertakes a periodic review of its performance and the performance of the board committees.
B Details of remuneration
Compensation paid, payable, or provided by the company or on behalf of the company, to key management personnel is set out below. Key management personnel include all directors of the company and certain executives who, in the opinion of the board and managing director, have authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the company’s activities directly or indirectly. Comparative information is not shown for individuals who were not considered to be key management personnel in the previous year.
| Short-term | Short-term | Short-term | Long-term | Long-term | Post- employment |
Post- employment |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash salary and fees |
Cash bonus |
Long service |
LTI | Super- annuation |
Total | % perfor- |
|||||
| leave | mance | ||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | related | |||||
| Non-executive directors | |||||||||||
| Anderson, R. | 2014 | 103,500 | - | - | - | 9,574 | 113,074 | - | |||
| Chairman | 2013 | 103,500 | - | - | - | 9,315 | 112,815 | - | |||
| Boreham, G. | 2014 | 65,000 |
- | - | - | 6,013 | 71,013 | - | |||
| 2013 | 65,000 |
- | - | - | 5,850 | 70,850 | - | ||||
| Johnston, I. | 2014 | 74,750 | - | - | - | 6,914 | 81,664 | - | |||
| 2013 | 63,250 |
- | - | - | 5,693 | 68,943 | - | ||||
| Powell, W.T. | 2014 | 63,250 | - | - | - | 5,851 | 69,101 | - | |||
| 2013 | 74,750 |
- | - | - | 6,728 | 81,478 | - | ||||
| Subtotals – non-executive | 2014 | 306,500 | - | - | - | 28,352 | 334,852 | - | |||
| directors | 2013 | 306,500 |
- | - | - | 27,586 | 334,086 | - | |||
| Executive director | |||||||||||
| Grant, J. | 2014 | 530,801 | 117,140 | 8,842 | 113,269 | 17,775 | 787,827 | 29.2 | |||
| Managing Director | 2013 | 530,801 |
132,896 | 8,842 | 107,875 | 16,470 | 796,884 | 30.2 | |||
| Other key management personnel | |||||||||||
| Baynham, L. | 2014 | 306,000 | 158,949 | 6,987 | - | 17,775 | 489,710 | 32.5 | |||
| Group General Manager | 2013 | 300,000 |
172,593 | 12,536 | - | 16,470 | 501,599 | 34.4 | |||
| Hill, B. – Chief Financial | 2014 | 234,000 | 100,370 | 3,898 | - | 17,775 | 356,043 | 28.2 | |||
| Officer and Company Secretary | 2013 | 234,000 |
97,516 | 7,004 | - | 16,470 | 354,990 | 27.5 | |||
| Totals – key management | 2014 | 1,377,301 | 376,459 | 19,727 | 113,269 | 81,677 | 1,968,433 | ||||
| personnel | 2013 | 1,371,301 |
403,005 | 28,382 | 107,875 | 76,996 | 1,987,559 |
No director or executive received compensation in the form of share-based payments during the year ended 30 June 2014 (2013: nil).
C Service agreements
Terms of employment for the managing director and other key management personnel are formalised under rolling contracts. The contracts state that base salary and performance-related bonuses will be agreed annually, which occurs at the commencement of each financial year. The company may terminate the contracts without notice for gross misconduct; otherwise, either party may terminate the contract early with the agreed notice period, subject to termination payments as detailed below. Other major provisions of the contracts relating to remuneration of the managing director and the other key management personnel are as follows:
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 16
DIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)
11. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTINUED)
J Grant (Managing Director)
-
Five-year service agreement effective until 31 December 2015 unless terminated under the terms of the agreement.
-
A long-term incentive (LTI) is payable at the discretion of the board of directors based on Mr Grant’s performance over the term of the agreement assessed against agreed financial and non-financial targets, as follows:
-
total shareholder return (TSR) for the company that meets or exceeds the average TSR for a benchmark group comprising seven competitors;
-
strategic positioning of the company to deliver earnings, dividends and capital growth to shareholders, measured by the development and achievement of an approved annual strategic plan and growth of revenue and gross profit that exceeds the average of the benchmark group;
-
customer and people satisfaction relevant to strategic positioning, measured by the company’s annual survey and review processes; and
-
delivery of an effective and complete succession plan.
-
The board must consider whether and how much to accrue by way of LTI at least once each financial year in relation to performance in the previous financial year. In 2014 the board approved an entitlement of $113,269 for the 2013 financial year (2013: $107,875). The total amount accrued over the term of the agreement may not exceed Mr Grant’s base salary (including statutory superannuation but excluding shortterm performance-related bonuses) for the 2015 calendar year and is payable after 31 December 2015 or on the earlier termination of the agreement.
-
Termination notice of six months is required.
-
Payment of a termination benefit on early termination by the company, other than for gross misconduct, of twelve months of his packaged salary together with an additional amount representing the performancerelated bonus earned up to the date of termination. If at the annual renewal date the company chooses not to continue the agreement, the company must provide six months’ notice and Mr Grant will be entitled to his packaged salary and performance bonus calculated up to the date of his termination.
L Baynham and B Hill
-
Termination notice of three months is required.
-
Payment of a termination benefit on early termination by the company, other than for gross misconduct, of six months of the packaged salary including performance-related bonuses. A termination benefit is provided for these individuals as these positions are considered more likely to be subject to early termination in the event of a significant business combination.
D Share-based compensation
Share-based compensation may be granted to directors and key management personnel under the Data[#] 3 Limited Employee Share Ownership Plan, the Data[#] 3 Limited Deferred Share and Incentive Plan, and the Data[#] 3 Limited Employee Option Plan.
No shares, rights, or options were granted to directors or key management personnel during the year ended 30 June 2014 (2013: nil), no rights or options vested or lapsed during the year (2013: nil), and no rights or options were exercised during the year (2013: nil).
Interests in shares
Ordinary shares held directly, indirectly or beneficially by each key management person, including their personally related entities, are shown below.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 17
DIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)
11. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTINUED)
| Balance | Other | Balance | Other | Balance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 July 2012 | changes* | 30 June 2013 | changes* | 30 June 2014 | ||||
| Directors: | ||||||||
| Anderson, R. | 600,000 | - | 600,000 | - | 600,000 | |||
| Boreham, G. | 42,150 | 41,000 | 83,150 | 55,211 | 138,361 | |||
| Grant, J. | 7,166,450 | (2,500,000) | 4,666,450 | - | 4,666,450 | |||
| Johnston, I. | 600,000 | - | 600,000 | - | 600,000 | |||
| Powell, W.T. | 3,900,000 | (100,000) | 3,800,000 | (100,000) | 3,700,000 | |||
| Other executives: | ||||||||
| Baynham, L. | 532,650 | - | 532,650 | - | 532,650 | |||
| Hill,B. | 516,650 | - | 516,650 | - | 516,650 | |||
| 13,357,900 | (2,559,000) | 10,798,900 | (44,789) | 10,754,111 |
E Additional information
Relationship between remuneration and company performance
The overall level of executive reward takes into account the company’s performance over a number of years, with greater emphasis given to improving performance over the prior year. Since 2009 total shareholder return was 12.8%. Our net profit grew from 2009 to a best-ever result in 2011, but since 2011 the difficult market conditions have seen the net profit decrease each year, resulting in a compounded average decrease in net profit of 5.2% since 2009. Over the same period average executive remuneration has increased by a compounded average rate of 5.9% per annum.
Cash bonuses
For each cash bonus included in the table in Section B, the percentage of the planned bonus that was actually earned in the financial year, and the percentage that was forfeited because the person did not meet the relevant profit or other performance-related criteria, are set out below.
| Name | Earned | Forfeited |
|---|---|---|
| % | % | |
| Baynham, L. | 76% | 24% |
| Grant, J. | 76% | 24% |
| Hill,B. | 87% | 13% |
2013 Annual General Meeting
We received 92% “yes” proxy votes on our Remuneration Report for the 2013 financial year, and the vote at the AGM was a unanimous “yes”.
Other transactions with key management personnel
Mr J E Grant, an executive director, is a director of Wood Grant & Associates Pty Ltd and has the capacity to significantly influence decision making of that entity. We engage Wood Grant & Associates Pty Ltd to assist with design and production of our annual financial reports. These transactions are made at arms’ length on normal commercial terms and conditions and at market rates. There were no other transactions during the year with key management personnel or their personally related entities.
| 2014 | 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| $ | $ | ||
| Amounts recognised as expense | |||
| Other expense | 19,400 | 19,400 |
12. SHARES UNDER OPTION
We have no unissued ordinary shares under option at the date of this report. No share options were granted or exercised during the financial year and up to the date of this report.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 18
DIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)
13. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
During the financial year, we paid a premium of $34,685 to insure the directors and members of the executive management team against any liability incurred by them in their capacity as officers, unless the liability arises out of conduct involving a lack of good faith. Our executive officers are also indemnified against any liability for costs and expenses incurred in defending civil or criminal proceedings involving them as such officers if judgement is given in their favour or if they are acquitted or granted relief.
14. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND PERFORMANCE
Our company is not subject to any particular and significant environmental regulations.
15. ROUNDING
The company is of a kind referred to in Class Order 98/0100, issued by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission, relating to the “rounding off” of amounts in the directors’ report and financial report. We have rounded off amounts in the directors’ report and financial report to the nearest thousand dollars, or in certain cases to the nearest dollar, in accordance with that class order.
16. AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
Pitcher Partners continued as our auditor in 2014. We employ Pitcher Partners on assignments additional to its statutory duties where the firm’s expertise and experience with our company are important. Fees we paid or owed to the auditor for these non-audit services during the year are set out in Note 25 of the financial statements.
The board of directors has considered the position, and in accordance with the advice received from the audit and risk committee is satisfied that the provision of the non-audit services is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001 . The directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services by the auditor did not compromise the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 for the following reasons:
-
all non-audit services have been reviewed by the audit and risk committee to ensure they do not impact the impartiality and objectivity of the auditor
-
none of the services undermine the general principles relating to auditor independence as set out in APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants .
A copy of the auditors’ independence declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 is set out on the following page.
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors.
==> picture [103 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
R A Anderson Director
Brisbane
21 August 2014
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 19
==> picture [289 x 175] intentionally omitted <==
The Directors Data[#] 3 Limited 67 High Street TOOWONG QLD 4066
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
As lead auditor for the audit of the financial report of Data[#] 3 Limited for the financial year ended 30 June 2014, I declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
-
(i) no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and
-
(ii) no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
This declaration is in respect of Data[#] 3 Limited.
PITCHER PARTNERS
==> picture [100 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
R C N Walker Partner Pitcher Partners Brisbane
21 August 2014
==> picture [474 x 75] intentionally omitted <==
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 20
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
for the year ended 30 June 2014
| 2014 | 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | $’000 | $’000 | |
| Revenue | |||
| Sale of goods | 2 | 697,319 | 639,644 |
| Services | 2 | 134,776 | 130,182 |
| Other | 5 | 1,500 | 1,216 |
| 833,595 | 771,042 | ||
| Expenses | |||
| Changes in inventories of finished goods | (869) | (1,076) | |
| Purchase of goods | (634,408) | (574,333) | |
| Employee and contractor costs directly on-charged (cost of sales on services) |
(41,907) | (38,286) | |
| Other cost of sales on services | (36,042) | (33,606) | |
| Internal employee and contractor costs | (92,854) | (90,220) | |
| Telecommunications | (1,396) | (1,522) | |
| Rent | 6 | (5,883) | (5,964) |
| Travel | (1,622) | (2,199) | |
| Professional fees | (583) | (457) | |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 6 | (2,516) | (2,036) |
| Finance costs | 6 | (147) | (282) |
| Other | (4,516) | (3,589) | |
| (822,743) | (753,570) | ||
| Profit before income tax expense | 10,852 | 17,472 | |
| Income tax expense | 7 | (3,328) | (5,334) |
| Profit for the year | 7,524 | 12,138 | |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | - | - | |
| Total comprehensive income | 7,524 | 12,138 | |
| Cents | Cents | ||
| Basic earnings per share | 8 | 4.89 | 7.88 |
| Diluted earnings per share | 8 | 4.89 | 7.88 |
The above statement of comprehensive income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 21
BALANCE SHEET
as at 30 June 2014
| 2014 | 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | $’000 | $’000 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 10 | 103,427 | 85,322 |
| Trade and other receivables | 11 | 146,936 | 108,084 |
| Inventories | 12 | 2,526 | 3,232 |
| Other | 13 | 3,193 | 2,603 |
| Total current assets | 256,082 | 199,241 | |
| Non-current assets | |||
| Property and equipment | 14 | 6,021 | 6,249 |
| Deferred tax assets | 7 | 2,342 | 2,186 |
| Intangible assets | 15 | 7,341 | 7,166 |
| Total non-current assets | 15,704 | 15,601 | |
| Total assets | 271,786 | 214,842 | |
| Current liabilities | |||
| Trade and other payables | 16 | 216,944 | 164,919 |
| Borrowings | 17 | 756 | 695 |
| Current tax liabilities | 98 | 218 | |
| Provisions | 18 | 1,984 | 1,734 |
| Other | 19 | 15,249 | 9,845 |
| Total current liabilities | 235,031 | 177,411 | |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | 17 | 402 | 1,158 |
| Provisions | 18 | 2,231 | 1,783 |
| Other | 19 | 500 | 616 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 3,133 | 3,557 | |
| Total liabilities | 238,164 | 180,968 | |
| Net assets | 33,622 | 33,874 | |
| Equity | |||
| Contributed equity | 21 | 8,278 | 8,278 |
| Retained earnings | 25,344 | 25,596 | |
| Total equity | 33,622 | 33,874 | |
The above balance sheet should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 22
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
for the year ended 30 June 2014
| Number of | Contributed | Retained | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary | Equity | Earnings | Shareholders’ | |
| Shares | Equity | |||
| ’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | |
| Balance at 1 July 2012 | 153,975 | 8,278 | 24,236 | 32,514 |
| Profit for the year | - | - | 12,138 | 12,138 |
| Othercomprehensiveincome,net oftax | - | - | - | - |
| Total comprehensive income | - | - | 12,138 | 12,138 |
| Payment ofdividends | - | - | (10,778) | (10,778) |
| Balance at 30 June 2013 | 153,975 | 8,278 | 25,596 | 33,874 |
| Profit for the year | - | - | 7,524 | 7,524 |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | - | - | - | - |
| Total comprehensive income | - | - | 7,524 | 7,524 |
| Payment ofdividends | - | - | (7,776) | (7,776) |
| Balance at 30 June 2014 | 153,975 | 8,278 | 25,344 | 33,622 |
The above statement of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 23
CASH FLOW STATEMENT
for the year ended 30 June 2014
| 2014 | 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | $’000 | $’000 | |
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Profit for the year | 7,524 | 12,138 | |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 2,895 | 2,036 | |
| Bad and doubtful debts | 207 | - | |
| Reversal of unused doubtful debts provision | - | (96) | |
| Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 1 | 38 | |
| Other | 15 | - | |
| Change in operating assets and liabilities | |||
| (Increase)/decrease in trade receivables | (35,311) | 32,009 | |
| Decrease in inventories | 706 | 1,007 | |
| (Increase) in other operating assets | (4,338) | (4,495) | |
| (Increase)/decrease in net deferred tax assets | (156) | 387 | |
| Increase/(decrease) in trade payables | 47,925 | (1,968) | |
| Increase/(decrease) in unearned income | 5,483 | (10,885) | |
| Increase in other operating liabilities | 3,999 | 1,260 | |
| (Decrease) in current tax liabilities | (120) | (1,681) | |
| Increase in provision for employee benefits | 589 | 739 | |
| Net cash inflow from operating activities | 29,419 | 30,489 | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Payments for property and equipment | 14 | (1,453) | (1,604) |
| Payments for software assets | 15 | (1,390) | (2,966) |
| Net cash outflow from investing activities | (2,843) | (4,570) | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Payment of dividends | 9 | (7,776) | (10,778) |
| Finance lease payments | 23 | (695) | (639) |
| Net cash outflow from financing activities | (8,471) | (11,417) | |
| Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents held | 18,105 | 14,502 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of financial year | 85,322 | 70,820 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of financial year | 10 | 103,427 | 85,322 |
The above cash flow statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 24
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The principal accounting policies we have adopted in the preparation of our financial report are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the periods presented, unless otherwise stated. The financial statements are for Data[#] 3 Limited.
(a) Basis of preparation of financial report
We have prepared these general purpose financial statements in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the Corporations Act 2001. These financial statements have also been prepared under the historical cost convention. Data[#] 3 Limited is a for-profit entity for the purpose of preparing the financial statements.
Our financial statements are presented in Australian dollars and we have rounded all values to the nearest thousand dollars ($’000), unless otherwise stated.
Compliance with IFRS
Our financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Changes in accounting standards and regulatory requirements
There are a number of new and amended accounting standards issued by the AASB which are applicable for reporting periods beginning on 1 July 2013. We have adopted all the mandatory new and amended accounting standards issued that are relevant to our operations and effective for the current reporting period. There was no material impact on the financial report as a result of the mandatory new and amended accounting standards adopted.
(b) Principles of consolidation
These financial statements are for Data[#] 3 Limited alone, as all subsidiaries of the company had no financial activity during financial years 2013 and 2014 and were wound up. References in this financial report to “we”, “us” or “our” refer to management speaking on behalf of Data[#] 3 Limited (“the company”).
Subsidiaries are all entities over which we have control; we control an entity when we are exposed to, or have the rights to, variable returns from our involvement with the entity and we have the ability to affect those returns through our power over the entity. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to us and are deconsolidated from the date on which control is transferred from us. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost in the financial statements of Data[#] 3 Limited. Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between companies we control are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries are changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the company.
(c) Foreign currency translation
We measure items included in our financial statements using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (“the functional currency”). Our functional and presentation currency is Australian dollars.
We translate foreign currency transactions to Australian dollars using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the profit or loss, except when they are deferred in equity as qualifying cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges or are attributable to part of the net investment in a foreign operation. As at balance sheet date we have not entered any hedge transactions, as our risk from foreigndenominated transactions is not material.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 25
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(d) Revenue recognition
We recognise and measure revenue at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Amounts disclosed as revenue are net of returns, trade allowances, rebates and amounts collected on behalf of third parties. We recognise revenue for major business activities as follows:
(i) Sale of goods
We recognise revenue from the sale of goods when the goods are received at a customer’s specified location pursuant to a sales order, the risks of obsolescence and loss have passed to the customer, and the customer has either accepted the products in accordance with the sales contract, the acceptance provisions have lapsed, or we have objective evidence that all criteria for acceptance have been satisfied.
(ii) Rendering of services
We recognise revenue from services in accordance with the percentage of completion method. The stage of completion is measured by reference to labour hours incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated labour hours for each contract. Where it is probable that a loss will arise from a fixed price service contract, we immediately recognise the excess of total costs over revenue as an expense.
(iii) Bundled sales
We offer certain arrangements whereby customers can purchase computer systems together with a multi-year servicing arrangement. For these sales, the amount recognised as revenue upon sale of the computer systems is the fair value of the system in relation to the fair value of the sale taken as a whole. The remaining revenue, which relates to the service arrangement, is recognised over the service period. We determine the fair values of each element based on the current market price of each of the elements when sold separately. Any discount on the arrangement is allocated between the elements of the contract based on the fair value of the elements.
(iv) Interest income
Revenue is recognised as interest accrues using the effective interest method.
(v) Dividends
We recognise dividend income as revenue when the right to receive payment is established. This applies even if they are paid out of pre-acquisition profits. However, the investment may need to be tested for impairment as a consequence (refer to note 1(k)).
(e) Income tax
Income tax expense for the period is the tax payable on the current period’s taxable income based on the applicable income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements, and to unused tax losses.
We recognise deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences at the tax rates expected to apply when the assets are recovered or liabilities are settled, based on those tax rates which are enacted or substantively enacted for each jurisdiction. The relevant tax rates are applied to the cumulative amounts of deductible and taxable temporary differences arising from the initial recognition of an asset or a liability, except that no deferred tax asset or liability is recognised in relation to these temporary differences if they arose in a transaction (other than a business combination) that did not affect either accounting or taxable profit or loss at the time of the transaction.
We only recognise deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses if it is probable that future taxable amounts will be available to use those temporary differences and losses. We do not recognise deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax base of investments in subsidiaries where the parent entity is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
We recognise current and deferred tax in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively. We only offset deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities if they relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority, and a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 26
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(f) Leases
We classify leases of property and equipment where the company, as lessee, has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised at the lease’s inception at the lower of the fair value of the leased property or the present value of the minimum lease payments. We include the corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, in other short-term and long-term payables. Lease payments are allocated between the liability and interest expense. We depreciate each leased asset on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the asset’s useful life or the lease term.
We classify leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor as operating leases. Operating lease payments, net of any incentives received from the lessor, are charged to expense on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease. Where we are required to return the premises to their original condition at the end of the lease, we record a provision for lease remediation equal to the present value of the estimated liability.
(g) Cash and cash equivalents
For purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial institutions, and other short-term, highly-liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value, and bank overdrafts. We show any bank overdrafts within borrowings in current liabilities on the balance sheet.
(h) Trade receivables
Trade receivables, which are non-interest bearing and generally due for settlement within 30 days, are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost, less an allowance for impairment. We review collectability of trade receivables on an ongoing basis. Debts we know to be uncollectible are written off by reducing the carrying amount directly. We establish an allowance for impairment of trade receivables when there is objective evidence that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the receivables. We consider significant financial difficulties of the debtor, default payments or debts more than 120 days overdue where there are not extenuating circumstances to be objective evidence of impairment. The amount of the impairment loss is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate.
We recognise impairment losses in profit or loss within other expenses. When a trade receivable for which an impairment allowance had been recognised becomes uncollectible in a subsequent period, we write it off against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited to other revenue in the statement of comprehensive income.
(i) Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. We assign costs to individual items of inventory on a specific identification basis after deducting rebates and discounts. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
(j) Business combinations
We use the acquisition method of accounting to account for all business combinations, regardless of whether we acquire equity instruments or other assets. Consideration for an acquisition comprises the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred and the equity interests issued by the company. Consideration also includes the fair value of any contingent consideration arrangement and the fair value of any pre-existing equity interest in the subsidiary. We charge costs associated with the acquisition to expense as incurred. With limited exceptions, we initially measure identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination at their fair values at the acquisition date. On an acquisition-by-acquisition basis, we recognise any non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s net identifiable assets.
We record as goodwill the excess of the consideration of the acquisition and the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired (refer to note 1(n)). If those amounts are less than the fair value of the net identifiable assets of the subsidiary acquired, we recognise the difference directly in profit or loss as a bargain purchase.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 27
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(j) Business combinations (continued)
Where settlement of any part of cash consideration is deferred, we discount the amounts payable in the future to their present value as at the date of the exchange. The discount rate used is our incremental borrowing rate, being the rate at which a similar borrowing could be obtained from an independent financier under comparable terms and conditions.
Contingent consideration is classified either as equity or a financial liability. Amounts classified as a financial liability are subsequently remeasured to fair value with changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss.
(k) Impairment of assets
Goodwill and intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation; we test them annually for impairment, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate they might be impaired. We test other assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. We recognise an impairment loss for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell or value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, we group together assets that cannot be tested individually into the smallest group of assets that generate cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the cash-generating unit or CGU). For the purpose of goodwill impairment testing, we aggregate CGUs to which goodwill has been allocated so that the level at which impairment is tested reflects the lowest level at which goodwill is monitored for internal reporting purposes. We allocate goodwill acquired in a business combination to groups of CGUs that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination.
(l) Investments and other financial assets
Our investments and financial assets in the scope of AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement are categorised as follows: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, available-for-sale financial assets, loans and receivables, and held-to-maturity investments. The classification depends on the purpose for which the investments were acquired. We determine the classification of our investments at initial recognition and reevaluate this designation at each reporting date where appropriate. As at balance sheet date we have no financial assets at fair value through profit or loss or held-to-maturity investments or available for sale financial assets and have not entered any significant derivative contracts.
Recognition and derecognition
We recognise purchases and sales of investments on trade date. We initially recognise investments at fair value plus, for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit and loss, transaction costs; transaction costs on financial assets carried at fair value through profit and loss are charged directly to expense in the statement of comprehensive income. The fair values of quoted investments are based on current bid prices. If the market for a financial asset is not active, and for unlisted securities, we establish fair value using other valuation techniques such as reference to the fair values of recent arms’ length transactions involving the same or similar instruments, discounted cash flow analysis, and option pricing models refined to reflect the issuer’s specific circumstances. We derecognise financial assets when the right to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or been transferred.
Subsequent measurement
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss and available-for-sale financial assets are subsequently carried at fair value. We include realised and unrealised gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of the ‘financial assets at fair value through profit or loss’ category in profit or loss in the period in which they arise. Unrealised gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of non-monetary securities classified as available-for-sale are recognised as other comprehensive income until the investment is sold, collected or otherwise disposed, or until the investment is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in other comprehensive income is included in profit or loss. In the case of equity securities classified as available for sale, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of a security below its cost is considered as an indicator that the security is impaired. Impairment losses recognised in profit or loss on equity instruments classified as available-for-sale are not reversed through profit or loss.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 28
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(l) Investments and other financial assets (continued)
We carry loans and receivables and held-to-maturity investments at amortised cost using the effective interest method. We calculate amortised cost by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition over the period of maturity. For investments carried at amortised cost, gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the investments are derecognised or impaired, as well as through the amortisation process. Impairment losses are measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate.
If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised (such as an improvement in the debtor’s credit rating), we reverse the previously recognised impairment loss and recognise it in profit or loss.
(m) Property and equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortisation. We depreciate our equipment using the straight-line method to allocate cost, net of residual values, over the estimated useful lives of the assets, being three to 20 years. We calculate amortisation on leasehold improvements using the straight-line method over two to ten years.
If an asset is impaired, we immediately write down its carrying amount to its recoverable amount (refer to note 1(k)).
(n) Intangible assets
Goodwill
We initially measure goodwill on acquisition at cost, being the excess of the cost of the business combination over the acquirer’s interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities. Subsequently goodwill is carried at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired, and we write its value down when impaired (refer to note 1(k)).
Software
We capitalise costs incurred in purchasing or developing software where the software will provide a future financial benefit to the company. Costs of internally generated software that we capitalise from the date we have determined the software’s technical feasibility include external direct costs of materials and service and direct payroll and payroll-related costs of employees’ time spent on the project. Software assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. We calculate amortisation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, generally two to five years.
(o) Borrowings
Borrowings are initially recognised at fair value, net of transaction costs, and subsequently measured at amortised cost. Any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption amount is recognised in profit or loss over the period of the borrowing using the effective interest method. Borrowings are removed from the balance sheet when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged, cancelled or expired. The difference between the carrying amount of a financial liability that has been extinguished or transferred to another party and the consideration paid, including any non-cash assets transferred or liabilities assumed, is recognised in profit or loss as other income or finance costs.
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless we have an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting period.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 29
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(p) Financial guarantee contracts
We recognise financial guarantee contracts as a financial liability at the time the guarantee is issued. The liability is initially measured at fair value and subsequently at the higher of the amount determined in accordance with AASB 137 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets and the amount initially recognised less any cumulative amortisation.
The fair value of financial guarantees is determined as the present value of the difference in net cash flows between the contractual payments under the debt instrument and the payments that would be required without the guarantee, or the estimated amount that would be payable to a third party for assuming the obligations.
Where guarantees in relation to loans or other payables of subsidiaries or associates are provided for no compensation, we account for the fair values as contributions and recognise them as part of the cost of the investment.
(q) Provisions
We recognise provisions when we have a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. We measure provisions at the present value of management’s best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date, where the discount rate is a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as interest expense. If we are virtually certain that some or all of a provision will be reimbursed, such as under an insurance contract, we recognise the reimbursement as a separate asset. We present the expense relating to any provision in the statement of comprehensive income net of any reimbursement.
(r) Employee benefits
Wages, salaries, annual leave and sick leave
Liabilities for wages, salaries, including non-monetary benefits, and annual leave expected to be settled wholly within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect of employees’ services up to the reporting date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. Liabilities for annual leave expected to be settled at least 12 months after reporting date are measured at the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date, and discounted using market yields at the reporting date on national government bonds with terms to maturity that match the estimated future cash flows as closely as possible. Liabilities for sick leave, which are non-vesting, are recognised when the leave is taken and measured at the rates paid or payable.
Long service leave
The liability for long service leave which is not expected to be settled within 12 months after the end of the period in which the employee renders the related service is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and is measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date. We consider expected future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures and periods of service when estimating the liability. We discount expected future payments using market yields at the reporting date on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currency that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows.
We present the obligations as current liabilities in the balance sheet if we do not have an unconditional right to defer settlement for at least 12 months after the reporting date, regardless of when the actual settlement is expected to occur.
Post-employment benefits
We make contributions to defined contribution superannuation funds. We charge these contributions to expense as they are incurred.
Bonus plans
We recognise a liability for employee benefits in the form of bonus plans in other payables when we have a present legal or constructive obligation to make such payments as a result of past events and a reliable estimate of the obligation can be made. We measure liabilities for bonus plans at the amounts expected to be paid when they are settled; settlement occurs within 12 months.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 30
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(r) Employee benefits (continued)
Share-based compensation benefits
Share-based compensation benefits may be provided to employees via the Data[#] 3 Limited Deferred Share and Incentive Plan, an employee option plan, and an employee share ownership plan (ESOP). As at balance sheet date we have not provided any share-based compensation benefits to our employees under these plans.
The fair value of the incentives and options granted is recognised as an employee benefit expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and recognised over the period during which the employees become unconditionally entitled to the incentives or options. Fair value is determined using an appropriate option pricing model and takes into account factors such as exercise price, the term of the option, the share price at grant date and expected volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the option.
At each balance sheet date, we revise our estimate of the number of options that are expected to become exercisable. The employee benefit expense recognised each period takes into account the most recent estimate. Upon the exercise of options, the balance of the share-based payments reserve relating to those options is transferred to share capital.
The market value of shares issued under the ESOP is recognised in the balance sheet as share capital, with a corresponding charge to the statement of comprehensive income for employee benefits expense.
(s) Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is computed as profit attributable to owners of the company, adjusted to exclude costs of servicing equity (other than ordinary shares), divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account the after-tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares.
(t) Comparatives
We have reclassified comparative figures where necessary to ensure consistency with current year presentation.
(u) Corporate information
The financial report was authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the directors on 21 August 2014. Data[#] 3 Limited is a public company limited by shares, incorporated and domiciled in Australia. Its registered office and principal place of business is:
Data[#] 3 67 High Street TOOWONG QLD 4066
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 31
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
(v) Accounting standards not yet effective
Relevant Australian Accounting Standards that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet effective and have not been adopted for the annual reporting period ended 30 June 2014, are as follows:
| Standard/Interpretation | Application | Application | Application |
Application |
Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| date of | date | for | |||
| Standard(i) | the group(i) | ||||
| AASB 9_Financial Instruments - revised_and consequential amendments to other | 1 January |
1 July | 2018 | ||
| accounting standardsarising from its issue | 2018 | ||||
| AASB 9 addresses the classification and measurement of financial assets and | |||||
| liabilities. We anticipate this standard will have no material impact on the financial | |||||
| statements, but the full impact has not yet been assessed. AASB 9 is available for | |||||
| early adoption; we do not expect to adopt the new standard before its operative | |||||
| date. | |||||
| AASB 2012-3Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards - Offsetting | 1 January | 1 July | 2014 | ||
| Financial Assets and Liabilities | 2014 | ||||
| The amendments to AASB 132 clarify when an entity has a legally enforceable right | |||||
| to setoff financial assets and financial liabilities permitting entities to present | |||||
| balances net on the balance sheet. We anticipatethere will be no impact on our | |||||
| financial statements, as we currently do not offset any financial assets and liabilities. | |||||
| AASB 2013-3Amendments to AASB 136 – Recoverable Amount Disclosures for | 1 January |
1 July | 2014 | ||
| Non-Financial Assets | 2014 | ||||
| These amendments introduce additional disclosure requirements where the | |||||
| recoverable amount of impaired assets is based on fair value less cost of disposal. | |||||
| There will be no impact on our disclosures as we do not determine the recoverable | |||||
| amounts of impaired assets using fair value less cost of disposal. | |||||
| AASB 2013-4Amendments to AASB 139 – Financial Instruments: Recognition | 1 January | 1 July | 2014 | ||
| & Measurement | 2014 | ||||
| These amendments permit the continuation of hedge accounting in circumstances | |||||
| where a derivative, which has been designated as a hedging instrument, is novated | |||||
| from one counterparty to a central counterparty as a consequence of laws or | |||||
| regulations.We anticipatethere will be no impact on our financial statements, as we | |||||
| currently do not engage in hedging. | |||||
| Interpretation 21Levies | 1 January | 1 July | 2014 | ||
| This interpretation clarifies the accounting recognition of levies imposed by the | 2014 | ||||
| government aside from income taxes and fines/breaches.We anticipatethis | |||||
| interpretation will have no significant impact on our financial statements as it is not | |||||
| applicable to our current or foreseeable circumstances. | |||||
| IFRS 15Revenue from Contracts with Customers | 1 January | 1 July | 2017 | ||
| This new standard contains a single model that applies to contracts with customers | 2017 | ||||
| and two approaches to recognising revenue. The model features a contract-based | |||||
| five step analysis of transactions to determine whether, how much and when | |||||
| revenue is recognised.We anticipatethis interpretation will have no significant | |||||
| impact on our financial statements as it is not significantly different from our method | |||||
| of recognising revenue. |
(i) Application date is for annual reporting periods beginning on or after the date shown in the above table.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 32
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 2. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Our business is conducted primarily in Australia. Our management team makes financial decisions and allocates resources based on the information it receives from our internal management system. We attribute sales to an operating segment based on the type of product or service provided to the customer. Revenue from customers domiciled in Australia comprised 99% of external sales for the year ended 30 June 2014 (2013: 99%).
We report operating segments in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM). The CODM, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the board of directors. We do not allocate income tax, assets or liabilities to each segment because management does not include this information in its measurement of the performance of the operating segments. Segment revenues, expenses and results include transfers between segments. Such transfers are priced on an arm’s-length basis and are eliminated on consolidation.
We have identified two reportable segments, as follows:
-
Product - providing hardware and software licenses for our customers' desktop, network and data centre infrastructure; and
-
Services - providing consulting, project, managed and maintenance contracts, as well as workforce recruitment and contracting services, in relation to the design, implementation, operation and support of ICT solutions.
The following table shows summarised financial information by segment for the financial years ended 30 June 2014 and 2013.
| Product | Product | Product | Services | Services | Services | Total | Total | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||
| $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | ||||
| Revenue | |||||||||
| Total revenue | 697,319 | 639,644 | 140,122 | 142,155 | 837,441 | 781,799 | |||
| Inter-segment revenue | - | - | (5,346) | (11,973) | (5,346) | (11,973) | |||
| External revenue | 697,319 | 639,644 | 134,776 |
130,182 | 832,095 | 769,826 | |||
| Costs of sale | |||||||||
| Cost of goods sold | (635,277) | (575,409) | (635,277) | (575,409) | |||||
| Employee and contractor costs | (41,907) | (38,286) | (41,907) | (38,286) | |||||
| Othercosts ofsales onservices | (36,042) | (33,606) | (36,042) | (33,606) | |||||
| Gross profit | 62,042 | 64,235 | 56,827 |
58,290 | 118,869 | 122,525 | |||
| Other expenses | (44,518) | (37,718) | (55,430) | (55,222) | (99,948) | (92,940) | |||
| Segment profit | 17,524 | 26,517 | 1,397 |
3,068 | 18,921 | 29,585 | |||
| Unallocated corporate items | |||||||||
| Interest and other revenue | 1,500 | 1,216 | |||||||
| Internal employee and contractor costs |
(4,497) | (7,953) | |||||||
| Rent | (1,264) | (2,281) | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortisation | (2,253) | (929) | |||||||
| Other | (1,555) | (2,166) | |||||||
| (8,069) | (12,113) | ||||||||
| Profit before income tax | 10,852 | 17,472 | |||||||
| Reconciliation of revenue: | |||||||||
| External revenue | 832,095 | 769,826 | |||||||
| Unallocated corporate revenue: | |||||||||
| Interest and other revenue | 1,500 | 1,216 | |||||||
| Revenue | 833,595 | 771,042 |
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 33
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 2. SEGMENT INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
From 1 July 2013 we changed the structure of our internal organisation and in doing so changed the composition of our operating segments. We also changed the manner by which we allocate corporate overhead costs to the operating segments to achieve an equitable allocation. As a result, we have restated the corresponding information for the previous year.
NOTE 3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Significant accounting estimates and assumptions
We are often required to determine the carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities based on estimates and assumptions of future events. The key estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below.
Impairment of goodwill
We determine whether goodwill is impaired at least on an annual basis. This requires an estimation of the recoverable amount of the cash generating units to which the goodwill is allocated. The assumptions used in this estimation of recoverable amount and the carrying amount of goodwill are discussed in note 15.
NOTE 4. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Our business activities can expose us to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including foreign exchange risk, price risk, and cash flow and fair value interest rate risk), credit risk, and liquidity risk. Our overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on our financial performance. To date we have not used derivative financial instruments. We use sensitivity analysis to measure interest rate and foreign exchange risks, and aging analysis for credit risk. Risk management is carried out by our Chief Financial Officer (CFO) under policies approved by the board of directors. The CFO identifies, evaluates and mitigates financial risks in close cooperation with senior management.
All our financial assets are within the loans and receivables category, and our financial liabilities are all within the financial liabilities recorded at amortised cost category.
(a) Market risk
(i) Foreign exchange risk
Foreign exchange risk arises for us when future commercial transactions and recognised assets and liabilities are denominated in a currency other than the Australian dollar. From time to time we make sales to customers who require the currency of settlement to be a foreign currency. At 30 June 2014 and 2013 our exposure to foreign currency risk was immaterial.
(ii) Price risk
We are not exposed to equity securities or commodity price risk.
(iii) Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk
Our exposure to cash flow interest rate risk arises predominantly from cash and cash equivalents bearing variable interest rates. Our borrowings bear a fixed interest rate and are carried at amortised cost, so we are not exposed to fair value interest rate risk. At balance date we maintained the following variable rate accounts:
| 30 June | 30 June | 2014 | 30 June | 30 June | 30 June | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted | Balance | Weighted | Balance | ||||
| average | average | ||||||
| interest rate | interest rate | ||||||
| % | $’000 | % | $’000 | ||||
| Cash at bank and on hand | 1.4% | 4,427 | 0.3% | 6,322 | |||
| Deposits at call | 3.1% | 99,000 | 3.3% | 79,000 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2.9% | 103,427 | 3.0% | 85,322 |
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 34
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 4. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
(a) Market risk
(iii) Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk (continued)
At balance date, if the interest rates had changed, as illustrated in the table below, with all other variables remaining constant, after-tax profit and equity would have been affected as follows:
| After-tax profit | After-tax profit | Equity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher/(lower) | Higher/(lower) | ||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2014 2013 |
|
| $000 | $000 | $000 $000 |
|
| +0.25% (25 basis points) (2013: –0.25%) | 181 | (149) | 181 (149) |
| +1.00% (100 basis points) (2013: –1.00%) | 724 | (597) | 724 (597) |
(b) Credit risk
Credit risk arises from the financial assets of our company, which comprise cash and cash equivalents and trade and other receivables. Our exposure to credit risk arises from potential default of the counter party, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of these instruments. We do not hold any credit derivatives to offset the credit exposure. We have policies in place to ensure that sales of products and services are made to customers with an appropriate credit history; collateral is not normally obtained. We set risk limits for each individual customer in accordance with parameters set by the board. These limits are regularly monitored.
Specific information as to our credit risk exposures is as follows:
-
Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at one large financial institution.
-
During the 2014 year, sales to one government customer comprised 7% of revenue (2013: 3%).
-
At 30 June 2014, one government debtor comprised 25% of total debtors (2013: 7%), and the ten largest debtors comprised approximately 49% of total debtors (2013: 34%), of which 94% were accounts receivable from a number of government customers (2013: 74%).
-
Generally our customers do not have independent credit ratings. Our risk control procedures assess the credit quality of the customer taking into account its financial position, past experience and other factors. We set individual risk limits based on internal or external ratings in accordance with limits set by the board. Our credit management department regularly monitors compliance with credit limits. Management believes the credit quality of our customers is high based on the very low level of bad debt write-offs experienced historically. In 2014 bad debt write-offs as a percent of the trade receivables carrying amount was 0.04%, (2013: nil).
(c) Liquidity risk
Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities. We aim to maintain flexibility in funding by keeping committed credit lines available. We manage liquidity risk by monitoring cash flows and ensuring that adequate cash and unused borrowing facilities are maintained.
At reporting date we had used $2,556,000 (2013: 2,578,000) of the multi-option financing facility for bank guarantees and our corporate credit card facility and had access to the following undrawn borrowing facilities at the reporting date:
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| $’000 | $’000 | |
| Multi-option bank facility | 8,944 | 8,422 |
The multi-option facility is a comprehensive borrowing facility which includes a bank overdraft facility and is subject to certain financial undertakings. The facility is subject to annual review. Interest is variable and is charged at prevailing market rates. The weighted average interest rate for the year ended 30 June 2014 was 6.3% (2013: 6.7%).
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 35
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 4. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
(c) Liquidity risk (continued)
Maturity of financial liabilities
The table below categorises our financial liabilities into relevant maturity groups based on their contractual maturities, calculated as their undiscounted cash flows. All the financial liabilities are non-derivative.
| Less than | 6 – 12 | Between 1 | Between 2 |
Total |
Carrying | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months | months | and 2 | and 5 | contractual | amount | ||
| years | years | cash flows | |||||
| $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | ||
| At 30 June 2014 | |||||||
| Trade and other payables | 216,944 | - | - | - | 216,944 | 216,944 | |
| Financeleaseliabilities | 412 | 412 | 412 | - | 1,236 | 1,158 | |
| 217,356 | 412 | 412 | - | 218,180 | 218,102 | ||
| At 30 June 2013 | |||||||
| Trade and other payables | 164,919 | - | - | - | 164,919 | 164,919 | |
| Financeleaseliabilities | 412 | 412 | 824 | 412 | 2,060 | 1,853 | |
| 165,331 | 412 | 824 | 412 | 166,979 | 166,772 |
(d) Net fair values
The carrying amounts of financial assets (net of any provision for impairment) and current financial liabilities approximate net fair value primarily because of their short maturities. The carrying amount of the non-current borrowing approximates fair value because the interest rate applicable to the borrowing approximates current market rates.
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| $’000 | $’000 | |
| NOTE 5. OTHER REVENUE | ||
| Interest | 1,296 | 1,090 |
| Other recoveries | 204 | 126 |
| 1,500 | 1,216 | |
| NOTE 6. EXPENSES | ||
| Cost of goods sold | 635,277 | 575,409 |
| Depreciation and amortisation of property and equipment (note 14) | 1,680 | 1,513 |
| Amortisation of intangibles (note 15) | ||
| Amortisation of intangibles included in depreciation and amortisation expense | 836 | 523 |
| Amortisation of intangibles included in other cost of sales on services | 379 | - |
| 1,215 | 523 | |
| 2,895 | 2,036 | |
| Employee benefits expense | 85,031 | 82,426 |
| Termination benefits expense | 1,040 | 414 |
| Defined contribution superannuation expense | 6,619 | 6,219 |
| Other charges against assets | ||
| Impairment of trade receivables (note 11) | 207 | - |
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 36
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
| 2014 2013 |
|
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| NOTE 6. EXPENSES (CONTINUED) Rental expenses on operating leases Minimum lease payments Straight lining lease rentals Rental expenses–other |
4,830 4,162 229 413 824 1,389 |
| 5,883 5,964 |
|
| Finance costs Interest and finance charges paid/payable Unwinding of discount on provisions and other payables |
132 268 15 14 |
| 147 282 |
|
| Loss on disposal of property and equipment NOTE 7. INCOME TAX Income tax expense The major components of income tax expense are: Current income tax expense Deferred income tax relating to the origination and reversal of temporary differences Adjustments for current tax of prior years |
1 38 3,419 4,947 (95) 387 4 - |
| Income tax expense | 3,328 5,334 |
| A reconciliation between income tax expense and the product of accounting profit before income tax multiplied by the company’s applicable income tax rate is as follows: Accounting profit before income tax |
10,852 17,472 |
| Income tax calculated at the Australian tax rate: 30% (2013: 30%) Tax effect of amounts which are not deductible in calculating taxable income: Non-deductible items |
3,256 5,242 68 92 |
| Under provision in prior year | 3,324 5,334 4 - |
| Income tax expense | 3,328 5,334 |
We paid income taxes of $3,151,000 during financial year 2014 (2013: $6,500,000).
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 37
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
| Balance sheet | Balance sheet | Balance sheet | Balance sheet | Balance sheet | Statement | Statement | Statement | of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| comprehensive | income | |||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | |||||||
| NOTE 7. INCOME TAX (CONTINUED) | ||||||||||
| Deferred income tax | ||||||||||
| Deferred income tax for the company comprises: | ||||||||||
| Deferred tax assets | ||||||||||
| Accrued liabilities | 1,965 | 1,928 | 37 | 237 | ||||||
| Provisions | 1,310 | 1,055 | 255 | 179 | ||||||
| Lease incentive liability | 194 | 253 | (59) | (7) | ||||||
| Other | 463 | 198 | 204 | 166 | ||||||
| 3,932 | 3,434 | 437 | 575 | |||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | ||||||||||
| Lease incentive assets | (79) | (138) | 59 | 7 | ||||||
| Accrued income | (1,511) | (1,104) | (407) | (963) | ||||||
| Other | - | (6) | 6 | (6) | ||||||
| (1,590) | (1,248) | (342) | (962) | |||||||
| Net deferred tax assets | 2,342 | 2,186 | ||||||||
| Deferred income tax revenue/(expense) | 95 | (387) | ||||||||
No tax losses are available for offset against future taxable profits (2013: nil).
| 2014 | 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Number | ||
| NOTE 8. EARNINGS PER SHARE | |||
| (a) Weighted average number of shares | |||
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares for share |
basic and diluted earnings per | 153,974,950 | 153,974,950 |
(b) Other information concerning earnings per share
-
Earnings for the purpose of the calculation of basic earnings per share and also diluted earnings per share is
-
the profit for the year.
-
Rights and options granted are considered to be potential ordinary shares. Details relating to rights and options are set out in note 26. No rights or options were on issue during 2014 or 2013; therefore there was no impact on the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 38
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
| 2014 | 2013 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $’000 | $’000 | ||||
| NOTE 9. DIVIDENDS | |||||
| Dividends paid on ordinary shares during the year | |||||
| Final fully franked dividend for 2013: 3.55c per share (2012: 3.55c) | 5,466 | 5,466 | |||
| Interim fully franked dividend for 2014: 1.50c per share | (2013: 3.45c) | 2,310 | 5,312 | ||
| 7,776 | 10,778 | ||||
| Dividends declared (not recognised as a liability at year end) | |||||
| Final fullyfranked dividend for 2014: 3.00c (2013: 3.55c) | 4,619 | 5,466 | |||
| The tax rate at which dividends paid have been franked | is 30% (2013: 30%). | ||||
| Dividends declared will be franked at the rate of 30% (2013: 30%). | |||||
| Franking credit balance | |||||
| Franking credits available for subsequent financial years | based on a tax rate of 30% | ||||
| (2013: 30%) | 15,289 | 15,594 | |||
| The above amounts represent the balance of the franking account as at the end of | |||||
| the financial year, adjusted for: | |||||
| (a) franking credits that will arise from the payment of the current tax liability; | |||||
| (b) franking debits that will arise from the payment of dividends recognised as a | |||||
| liability at the reporting date; and | |||||
| (c) franking credits that will arise from the receipt of dividends recognised as | |||||
| receivables at the reporting date. | |||||
| The dividend recommended by the directors since year end, but not recognised as | |||||
| a liability at year end, will result in a reduction in the franking account of $1,980,000 | |||||
| (2013: $2,343,000). | |||||
| NOTE 10. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | |||||
| Cash at bank and on hand | 4,427 | 6,322 | |||
| Deposits at call | 99,000 | 79,000 | |||
| 103,427 | 85,322 | ||||
| NOTE 11. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES | |||||
| Trade receivables | 135,956 | 100,700 | |||
| Allowance for impairment (a) | (152) | - | |||
| 135,804 | 100,700 | ||||
| Other receivables (b) | 11,132 | 7,384 | |||
| 146,936 | 108,084 |
(a) Allowance for impairment
We recognised an impairment loss of $207,000 in the current year (2013: nil). Impairment amounts are included in other expense in the statements of comprehensive income. Movements in the provision for impairment loss were as follows:
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 39
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 11. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES (CONTINUED)
| $’000 | |
|---|---|
| Carrying amount at 1 July 2012 | 143 |
| Unused provision reversed during the year | (96) |
| Receivableswrittenoffduring the year | (47) |
| Carrying amount at 30 June 2013 | - |
| Impairment loss recognised during the year | 207 |
| Receivableswrittenoffduring the year | (55) |
| Carrying amount at 30 June 2014 | 152 |
Our ageing of overdue trade receivables as at 30 June 2014 is as follows:
| 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Considered | Past due | Considered | Past due | |||||
| impaired | but not | impaired | but not | |||||
| impaired | impaired | |||||||
| $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | |||||
| 31-60 days | - | 10,981 | - | 8,037 | ||||
| 61-90 days | - | 2,386 | - | 2,775 | ||||
| 91-120 days | 2 | 1,006 | - | 578 | ||||
| +120 days | 150 | 684 | - | 1,113 | ||||
| 152 | 15,057 | - | 12,503 |
There are no trade receivables that would otherwise be past due or impaired whose payment terms have been renegotiated. For trade receivables that are past due but not impaired, each customer’s account has been placed on hold where deemed necessary until full payment is made. Each of these debtors has been contacted, and we are satisfied that payment will be received in full.
(b) Other receivables
These amounts generally arise from accrued rebates or transactions outside our usual operating activities. Interest is normally not charged, collateral is not normally obtained, and the receivables are normally due within 30 days of recognition. None of these receivables are past due.
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| $’000 | $’000 | |
| NOTE 12. INVENTORIES | ||
| Goods held for sale – at cost | 2,526 | 3,232 |
| Inventories recognised as expense in cost of goods sold during the year ended 30 | ||
| June 2014 amounted to $177,302,000 (2013: $185,195,000). | ||
| NOTE 13. OTHER CURRENT ASSETS | ||
| Prepayments | 3,105 | 2,509 |
| Security deposits | 88 | 94 |
| 3,193 | 2,603 |
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 40
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| $’000 | $’000 | |
| NOTE 14. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT | ||
| Leasehold improvements – at cost | 9,887 | 8,661 |
| Accumulated amortisation | (4,170) | (2,622) |
| 5,717 | 6,039 | |
| Equipment – at cost | 806 | 602 |
| Accumulated depreciation | (502) | (392) |
| 304 | 210 | |
| 6,021 | 6,249 | |
| (a) Assets in the course of construction | ||
| The carrying amounts of the assets disclosed above include the following | ||
| expenditure in relation to leasehold improvements which are currently in the course | ||
| of construction: | ||
| Leasehold improvements | - | 535 |
| (b) Leased assets | ||
| Leasehold improvements include the following amounts where we are a lessee | ||
| under a finance lease: | ||
| Cost | 3,380 | 3,380 |
| Accumulated depreciation | (1,211) | (873) |
| Carrying amount | 2,169 | 2,507 |
| Leasehold | Equipment | Total |
| improvements | ||
| $’000 | $’000 | $’000 |
| Carrying amount at 1 July 2012 6,042 |
154 | 6,196 |
| Additions 1,463 |
141 | 1,604 |
| Disposals (38) |
- | (38) |
| Depreciationand amortisationexpense (1,428) |
(85) | (1,513) |
| Carrying amount at 30 June 2013 6,039 |
210 | 6,249 |
| Additions 1,246 |
207 | 1,453 |
| Disposals (1) |
- | (1) |
| Depreciation and amortisation expense (1,567) |
(113) | (1,680) |
| Carrying amount at 30 June 2014 5,717 |
304 | 6,021 |
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 41
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| $’000 | $’000 | |
| NOTE 15. INTANGIBLE ASSETS | ||
| Goodwill – at cost | 4,919 | 4,919 |
| Accumulated impairment | (587) | (587) |
| 4,332 | 4,332 | |
| Software assets – at cost | 2,413 | 1,996 |
| Accumulated amortisation and impairment | (1,674) | (1,184) |
| 739 | 812 | |
| Internally generated software assets – at cost | 3,232 | 2,259 |
| Accumulated amortisationandimpairment | (962) | (237) |
| 2,270 | 2,022 | |
| 7,341 | 7,166 | |
| (a) Software under development | ||
| The carrying amounts of the assets disclosed above include the following | ||
| expenditure in relation to internally generated software assets which are currently | ||
| being developed: | ||
| Internally generated software assets | - | 762 |
| Goodwill | Software | Internally | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| assets | generated software |
|||
| $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | |
| Carrying amount at 1 July 2012 | 4,332 | 391 | - | 4,723 |
| Additions | - | 707 | 2,259 | 2,966 |
| Amortisation expense | - | (286) | (237) | (523) |
| Carrying amount at 30 June 2013 | 4,332 | 812 | 2,022 | 7,166 |
| Additions | - | 417 | 973 | 1,390 |
| Amortisationexpense | - | (490) | (725) | (1,215) |
| Carrying amount at 30 June 2014 | 4,332 | 739 | 2,270 | 7,341 |
Intangibles – software assets
Software assets include those we have developed ourselves and those we have purchased. Our software accounting policy is set out in note 1(n). We review the useful lives and potential impairment of all software assets at the end of each financial year.
Goodwill impairment testing
We have allocated goodwill to our cash-generating units (CGUs) according to operating segment, unless the segment did not exist at the time of the business acquisition which generated the goodwill. Goodwill summarised by reporting segment is shown below.
| Goodwill | |
|---|---|
| $’000 | |
| Product | 2,860 |
| Services | 1,472 |
| 4,332 |
We determined the recoverable amount of each operating segment based on a value-in-use calculation using cash flow projections on the basis of financial projections approved by senior management for financial year 2015. We applied a 12% before-tax discount rate to cash flow projections. We have extrapolated cash flows beyond the 2015 financial year using an average growth rate of 3.5%.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 42
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 15. INTANGIBLE ASSETS (CONTINUED)
Key assumptions used in value-in-use calculations
We determined budgeted gross profits based on past performance and our expectations for the future. The discount rate was estimated based on our weighted average cost of capital at the date of impairment test. We believe that no reasonably possible change in any of the key assumptions would cause the carrying value of the goodwill to be materially different from its recoverable amount.
| 2014 2013 |
|
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| NOTE 16. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES Current Trade payables – unsecured Other payables–unsecured |
188,226 140,301 28,718 24,618 |
| 216,944 164,919 |
|
| Trade and other payables are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 to 60 days of recognition. NOTE 17. BORROWINGS |
|
| Current Finance lease liabilities – secured (note 23(c)) |
756 695 |
| Non–current Finance lease liabilities – secured (note 23(c)) |
402 1,158 |
| NOTE 17. BORROWINGS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Current | ||
| Finance lease liabilities – secured (note 23(c)) | 756 | 695 |
| Non–current | ||
| Finance lease liabilities – secured (note 23(c)) | 402 | 1,158 |
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | Non- | Total | Current | Non- | Total | |
| current | current | |||||
| $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | |
| NOTE 18. PROVISIONS | ||||||
| Employee benefits | 1,984 | 1,891 | 3,875 | 1,734 | 1,552 | 3,286 |
| Leaseremediation(note1(f)) | - | 340 | 340 | - | 231 | 231 |
| 1,984 | 2,231 | 4,215 | 1,734 | 1,783 | 3,517 |
Movements in provisions other than employee benefits are as follows:
| Lease | ||
|---|---|---|
| remediation | ||
| $’000 | ||
| Balance at 1 July 2012 | 230 | |
| Arising during the year | 7 | |
| Used during the year | (20) | |
| Increase to presentvalue | 14 | |
| Balance at 30 June 2013 | 231 | |
| Arising during the year | 94 | |
| Increase to presentvalue | 15 | |
| Balance at 30 June 2014 | 340 |
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 43
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| $’000 | $’000 | |
| NOTE 19. OTHER LIABILITIES | ||
| Current | ||
| Unearned income | 15,102 | 9,619 |
| Lease incentives | 147 | 226 |
| 15,249 | 9,845 | |
| Non–current | ||
| Lease incentives | 500 | 616 |
| Unearned income comprises amounts received in advance of the provision of | ||
| goods or services. | ||
| NOTE 20. SECURED LIABILITIES | ||
| Secured liabilities (current and non-current) | ||
| Finance lease liabilities (note 23(c)) | 1,158 | 1,853 |
| Total secured liabilities | 1,158 | 1,853 |
Assets pledged as security
All our assets are pledged as security for bank facilities (refer to note 4). Leasehold improvements subject to finance lease (refer to note 14) effectively secure lease liabilities as noted above.
NOTE 21. CONTRIBUTED EQUITY
(a) Movements in ordinary share capital
There were no movements in ordinary share capital during the years ended 30 June 2014 and 2013.
(b) Ordinary shares
All ordinary shares issued as at 30 June 2014 and 2013 are fully paid. Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the company in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held. On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy is entitled to one vote, and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote. Ordinary shares have no par value and the company has an unlimited amount of authorised capital. Subject to legislative requirements, the directors control the issue of shares in the company.
(c) Share options
No share options are outstanding as at 30 June 2014 (refer to note 26).
(d) Capital management
When managing capital (equity), the board's objective is to ensure the company continues as a going concern as well as to maintain optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. The board adjusts the capital structure as necessary to take advantage of favourable costs of capital or high returns on assets. As the market is constantly changing, the board may change the amount of dividends to be paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or reduce debt that may be incurred to acquire assets.
During 2014, the board paid dividends of $7,776,000 (2013: $10,778,000). The board's intent for dividend payments is to maintain the historical dividend payout ratio; however, market conditions will be taken into consideration prior to the declaration of each dividend.
We are not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 44
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 22. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
At 30 June 2014 we had provided bank guarantees totalling $2,037,000 (2013: $1,860,000) to lessors as security for premises we lease and $269,000 (2013: $468,000) to customers for contract performance. The guarantees will remain in place for the duration of the relevant contracts. Bank guarantees are secured by charges over all our assets.
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| $’000 | $’000 | |
| NOTE 23. COMMITMENTS | ||
| (a) Capital commitments | ||
| Capital expenditure contracted for at the reporting date but not recognised as | ||
| liabilities is as follows: | ||
| Leasehold improvements | - | 1,036 |
| (b) Non-cancellable operating leases | ||
| Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as | ||
| follows: | ||
| Within one year | 4,953 | 4,770 |
| Later than one year but not later than five years | 13,609 | 13,910 |
| Laterthan five years | 2,529 | 5,058 |
| 21,091 | 23,738 | |
| Operating leases include leases of premises and office equipment. Under the | ||
| relevant lease agreements (mainly premises) the rentals are subject to periodic | ||
| review to market and/or for CPI increases. Operating leases are under normal | ||
| commercial operating lease terms and conditions. | ||
| (c) Finance leases | ||
| Commitments related to finance leases as at 30 June are payable as follows: | ||
| Within one year | 824 | 824 |
| Later than oneyear but not later than fiveyears | 412 | 1,236 |
| 1,236 | 2,060 | |
| Less: futurefinance charges | (78) | (207) |
| Recognised as a liability | 1,158 | 1,853 |
| The present value of finance lease liabilities is as follows: | ||
| Within one year | 756 | 695 |
| Later than one year but not later than five years | 402 | 1,158 |
| 1,158 | 1,853 |
We lease our head office fitout under a finance lease which expires in December 2015 (refer to note 14(b)). The fitout becomes our property on expiry of the lease. The lease liability is secured by the fitout assets.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 45
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| $ | $ | |
| NOTE 24. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL | ||
| Key management personnel compensation is set out below. | ||
| Short-term employee benefits | 1,753,760 | 1,774,306 |
| Long-term employee benefits | 132,996 | 136,257 |
| Post-employment benefits | 81,677 | 76,996 |
| 1,968,433 | 1,987,559 |
Transactions with key management personnel
Mr J E Grant, an executive director, is a director of Wood Grant & Associates Pty Ltd and has the capacity to significantly influence decision making of that entity. We engage Wood Grant & Associates Pty Ltd to assist with design and production of our annual financial reports. These transactions are made at arms’ length on normal commercial terms and conditions and at market rates. There were no other transactions during the year with key management personnel or their personally related entities.
| 2014 2013 |
|
|---|---|
| $ $ |
|
| Amounts recognised as expense Otherexpense |
19,400 19,400 |
| NOTE 25. REMUNERATION OF AUDITOR During the year the following fees were paid or payable to the auditor for audit and non-audit services: Audit and other assurance services Audit and review of financial statements IT controls review services |
150,000 138,000 - 26,500 |
| 150,000 164,500 |
|
| Non-audit services Acquisition due diligence services Tax compliance services |
57,550 8,900 7,400 6,700 |
| 64,950 15,600 |
|
| Total remuneration | 214,950 180,100 |
No remuneration was paid to related practices of Pitcher Partners. We employ Pitcher Partners on assignments additional to its statutory duties where the firm’s expertise and experience with our company are important.
NOTE 26. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
Data[#] 3 Limited Employee Share Ownership Plan
The establishment of the Data[#] 3 Limited Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP) was approved by shareholders at the 2007 annual general meeting. The object of the plan is to recognise the contribution of eligible employees by providing them with an opportunity to share in the future growth of the company.
Under the ESOP, all full-time and part-time employees of the company, excluding directors, may be offered fully paid ordinary shares in the company, at no consideration, with a total value in any given financial year not exceeding the exemption requirements of the Tax Act or any limit placed by the board of directors (currently $1,000). Shares are offered under the ESOP at the sole discretion of the board of directors. The market value of shares issued under the ESOP, measured as the weighted average market price at which the company’s shares are traded during the one week period up to and including the day of issue, is recognised in the balance sheet as share capital, and compensation expense is recorded as part of employee benefits costs in the period the shares are granted.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 46
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 26. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)
Shares issued under the ESOP are subject to a holding lock period which concludes the earlier of three years after issuance of the shares or cessation of employment of the participant. During the holding lock period, the shares are not transferable and no security interests can be held against them. In all other respects the shares rank equally with other fully paid ordinary shares on issue (see note 21(b)).
Where shares are issued to employees of subsidiaries within the group, the subsidiaries compensate Data[#] 3 Limited for the fair value of these shares. To 30 June 2014 no shares have been issued under the ESOP. The ESOP is currently being held in abeyance until such time as the directors determine that the plan should be implemented.
Data[#] 3 Limited Deferred Share and Incentive Plan
The establishment of the Data[#] 3 Limited Deferred Share and Incentive Plan (DSIP) was approved by shareholders at the 2007 annual general meeting. The plan is designed to provide full-time and part-time employees, including directors, with medium and long-term incentives to recognise ongoing contribution to the achievement of company objectives and to encourage them to have a personal interest in the future growth and development of the company. Under the DSIP the board of directors may award selected employees DSIP securities in the form of either a DSIP share or a DSIP incentive, being a right to a future share. The market value of shares issued under the DSIP, measured as the weighted average market price at the date of grant, is recognised in the balance sheet as share capital, and compensation expense is recorded as part of employee benefits costs in the period the shares are granted. DSIP incentives are accounted for as described in note 1(r).
DSIP securities remain in the DSIP until performance conditions (in the case of DSIP incentives) or disposal conditions (in the case of DSIP shares) are met. The performance conditions are designed from time to time having regard to various hurdles approved by the board of directors, such as the individual's key performance indicators and the company's performance, by reference to commonly employed external measures such as Total Shareholder Return or Earnings Per Share Growth, as well as pertinent internal measures, such as the successful execution of a business plan over a three-year period. Several performance conditions may apply to the one invitation. To this extent, the performance conditions will be commensurate with the company's remuneration philosophy, aligning the interests of participants with shareholders. Generally, shares are not issued under the DSIP unless the related performance conditions are met.
Where shares or incentives are issued to employees of subsidiaries within the group, the subsidiaries compensate Data[#] 3 Limited for the fair value of these shares. To 30 June 2014 no shares or incentives have been issued under the DSIP. The DSIP is currently being held in abeyance until such time as the directors determine that the plan should be implemented.
Data[#] 3 Limited Employee Option Plan
The Data[#] 3 Limited Employee Option Plan (the plan) was approved at an extraordinary general meeting of the company held on 5 November 1997. All full-time and part-time employees of the company, including directors, are eligible to participate in the plan.
No options were granted, exercised or outstanding under the plan during the year ended 30 June 2014 (2013: nil).
NOTE 27. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On 20 August 2014 Data[#] 3 Limited acquired 42.5% of the issued capital of Discovery Technology Pty Ltd, a company specialising in wi-fi analytics, at a cost of $2,500,000.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 47
DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION
In the opinion of the directors:
-
(a) the financial statements and notes set out on pages 21 to 47 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including:
-
(i) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional reporting requirements; and
-
(ii) giving a true and fair view of the company’s financial position as at 30 June 2014 and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date; and
-
(b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable; and
Note 1(a) confirms that the financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
The directors have been given the declarations by the managing director and chief financial officer required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 .
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors.
==> picture [102 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
R A Anderson Director
Brisbane
21 August 2014
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 48
==> picture [290 x 176] intentionally omitted <==
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF DATA[#] 3 LIMITED
Report on the financial report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Data[#] 3 Limited, which comprises the statement of financial position as at 30 June 2014, the statement of comprehensive income, the statement of changes in equity and the statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the directors’ declaration of the company.
Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In Note 1, the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB101 Presentation of Financial Statements , that the financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards .
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the company’s preparation of the financial report gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
==> picture [474 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 49
==> picture [152 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
Independence
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 .
Opinion
In our opinion:
-
(a) the financial report of Data[#] 3 Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including:
-
giving a true and fair view of the company’s financial position as at 30 June 2014 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and
-
complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001 ; and
-
(b) the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1.
Report on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the Remuneration Report comprising section 11 of the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2014. The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration Report in accordance with Section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 . Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Opinion
In our opinion the Remuneration Report of Data[#] 3 Limited for the year ended 30 June 2014 complies with Section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
PITCHER PARTNERS
==> picture [100 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
R C N Walker Partner
Brisbane, Queensland 21 August 2014
==> picture [474 x 75] intentionally omitted <==
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 50
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
The shareholder information set out below was applicable as at 18 August 2014.
1. DISTRIBUTION OF EQUITY SECURITIES
- (a) Analysis of numbers of equity security holders by size of holding:
| Number of shares | % of issued capital | Number of holders | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 to 1,000 | 230,567 | 0.15 | 369 |
| 1,001 to 5,000 | 3,660,048 | 2.38 | 1,126 |
| 5,001 to 10,000 | 7,922,636 | 5.15 | 955 |
| 10,001 to 50,000 | 40,584,884 | 26.36 | 1,690 |
| 50,001 to 100,000 | 22,436,317 | 14.57 | 298 |
| 100,001 and over | 79,140,498 | 51.40 | 174 |
| 153,974,950 | 100.00 | 4,612 |
- (b) There were 152 holders of less than a marketable parcel of ordinary shares.
2. TWENTY LARGEST QUOTED EQUITY SECURITY HOLDERS
| Name | Ordinary | shares | shares | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number held | % of issued shares | |||
| Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited | 8,150,953 | 5.29 | ||
| J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited | 7,611,675 | 4.94 | ||
| HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited | 5,195,750 | 3.37 | ||
| Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited | 4,096,000 | 2.66 | ||
| Oakport Pty Ltd | 3,255,178 | 2.11 | ||
| Powell Clark Trading Pty Ltd | 2,895,370 | 1.88 | ||
| Wood Grant & Associates Pty Ltd | 2,167,330 | 1.41 | ||
| Thomson Associates Pty Ltd | 2,000,000 | 1.30 | ||
| Elterry Pty Ltd | 1,940,000 | 1.26 | ||
| J E Grant | 1,791,000 | 1.16 | ||
| J T Populin | 1,690,140 | 1.10 | ||
| Portfolio Services Pty Ltd | 1,673,807 | 1.09 | ||
| W T & E M Powell | 1,000,000 | 0.65 | ||
| M G & J T Populin | 782,280 | 0.51 | ||
| Densley Pty Ltd | 761,540 | 0.49 | ||
| W T Powell | 760,000 | 0.49 | ||
| J D & C E Densley | 682,340 | 0.44 | ||
| M T Pitt | 658,260 | 0.43 | ||
| Banksia Administration Services Pty Ltd | 637,000 | 0.41 | ||
| Sundowner ProductionsPtyLtd | 632,852 | 0.41 | ||
| 48,381,475 | 31.42 |
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 51
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
3. SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDERS
Substantial shareholders in the company are set out below:
| Name | Number held | % of issued shares |
|---|---|---|
| Celeste Funds Management Limited | 12,925,442 | 8.39 |
| Commonwealth Bankof Australia | 10,109,424 | 6.57 |
4. UNQUOTED EQUITY SECURITIES
Not applicable.
5. VOTING RIGHTS
The voting rights attaching to the ordinary shares, set out in the company’s constitution, are:
(a) every shareholder present at a general meeting has one vote on a show of hands; and (b) on a poll, each shareholder has one vote for each fully paid share held.
Options have no voting rights.
Data[#] 3 Limited | Financial report 2014 | 52