AI assistant
DATA#3 LIMITED — AGM Information 2003
Nov 5, 2003
64791_rns_2003-11-05_133a5fa4-5e78-4004-b2fa-b7c0bb191f8f.pdf
AGM Information
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Data#3 Limited 2003 AGM Address - CEO's Review of Operations 6 November 2003

Ladies and Gentlemen
Firstly let me endorse the Chairman's welcome to you. It's a pleasure to have you all - our shareholders, key members of our management team and other supporters - to our head office once again.
As you are aware and as the Chairman has indicated, 2003, while impacted in absolute terms by the failure of Powerlan (Qld), was an excellent year both in 'underlying' financial and operational terms - our best ever.
| Ale Scorecard - Profit and Loss | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
| Revenue | |||||
| *Product | 105,000 | 102,000 | 99,100 | 145,000 | 160,684 |
| *Services | 27,000 | 28,600 | 27,250 | 26,500 | 31.925 |
| .Other | 780 | 400 | 800 | 1050 | 276 |
| Total Revenue | 133,000 | 131,000 | 127,000 | 172,600 | 192,885 |
| EBITDA | 4.846 | 2,193 | (480) | 5,475 | 4.697 |
| *Depreciation | (560) | (580) | (600) | (650) | (611) |
| *Goodwill | (230) | (330) | (2,380) | (320) | (323) |
| *Interest | (230) | (300) | (660) | (350) | (208) |
| Profit before Tax | 3,830 | 140 | (4,262) | 4,160 | 3,555 |
| Profit after Tax | 2,562 | (84) | (4.262) | 3,170 | 2,259 |
| Earnings per share | 20.8 | (0.6) | (29.25) | 21.7 | 15.46 |
| Dividends per share |
12.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 |
| Cumulative Dividends |
23.5 | 26.0 | 26.0 | 26.0 | 36.0 |
The picture since listing in 1997 now demonstrates the company's ability to recover from setbacks and deliver sustainable levels of return to shareholders. 2003 financial performance, while consigned to history has a number of points deserving of comment:
| Ale Scorecard-Profit and Loss | 1999 | 2000 | Services \$31.9M | 2003 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | |||||
| *Product | 105,000 | 102.000 | 99,100 | 145,0 | 160,684 |
| *Services | 27,000 | EBITDA \$4.7M | 26,500 | $\cdot$ 31,925 | |
| *Other | 780 | 1050 | 276 | ||
| Total Revenue | 133,000 | 1 Underlying \$5.7M | 192,885 | ||
| EBITDA | 4,846 | 2,193 | (480) | 5.475 | 4,697 |
| ·Depreciation | (560) | (58) | Earnings 15.46 cps | (611) | |
| *Goodwill | (230) | (33) | (323) | ||
| ·Interest | (230) | (30 Underlying 21.6 cps) | (208) | ||
| Profit before Tax | 3,830 | 140 | (4.262) | 3,555 | |
| Profit after Tax | 2,562 | Dividend + 10 cps | 3,17 | 2,259 | |
| Earnings per share | 30 Q | $(n, \pi)$ | ೊ 75 | 21.7 | 15.46 |
| Dividends per share |
Cumulative Dividends since 1998 + 36 cps |
0.0 | 10.0 | ||
| Cumulative Dividends |
23.5 | 26.0 | 26.0 | 26.0 | 36.0 |
a) The substantial growth in revenue came primarily as a result of 'joint venture' revenue not included in previous years and is not indicative of forward expectations. In fact we foresee revenue becoming less of an indicator of market share and possibly even declining as increasingly we expect to receive 'fees' for product sales rather than revenue
- b) 21% growth in services revenue to \$32M up from the previous year's \$26.5M is indicative of our focus on developing 'expertise' and its acceptance in a supply driven market
- c) The reported EBITDA of \$4.7M understates the underlying performance of around \$5.7M after the full year 'Powerlan' effect is taken into account
- d) Similarly, reported earnings per share of 15.5 cents understates the underlying performance of 20.7 cents
- e) The full year dividend of 10 cps was a welcome and rewarding return to shareholders for their patience and support,
and it is worth noting that cumulative dividends since listing stand at 36 cps.
| 2002 | 2003 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Assets | |||
| Cash | 5,193 | 34,65 | 9.466 |
| Receivables | 22.569 | 11,810 | |
| "Inventory | 1.296 | 790 | (506) |
| Total | 50,214 | 50,449 | 20,235 |
| Non-current Assets | |||
| *Plant & Equipment | 1.934 | 1,764 | (170) |
| ·Intangibles | 5.101 | 4,982 | (119) |
| Total | 8,246 | 7.660 | (586) |
| Current Liabilities | |||
| Payables | 21,983 | 43,768 | 21,785 |
| ·Interest bearing | 691 | 976. | 285 |
| Total | 28,343 | 47,082 | 18,739 |
| Non-current Liabilities | |||
| Interest bearing | 1,085 | 125 | (960) |
| Total | 2,250 | 1,216 | (1,034) |
| Net Assets | 7,867 | 9,811 | 944 |
The 30th June Balance Sheet has a number of anomalies also deserving of explanation. It can be seen that there was significant growth in cash on hand, receivables and payables over the previous year - all as a
result of the coincidence of receipts in advance of payments relating to billings under the former 'joint venture' contracts, and the timing of the financial year end.
| Current Assets ∗Cash 14,659 5.1934 22.569 34,379 Receivables "Inventory 1,296 790 Total 30,214 50,449 Non-current Assets Plant & Equipment 1,934 1.764 ·Intangibles 5,101 4.982 Total 8,246 7.660 Current Liabilities ·Payables 21.983. 43.768 *Interest bearing 691 976. Total 28,343 47,082 Non-current Liabilities |
2002 | 2003 | 30-Sep | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.095 | ||||
| 18,694 | ||||
| 1,872 | ||||
| 17,069 | ||||
| 216 | ||||
| Interest bearing | 1,085 | 125 | 125 | |
| Total 2,250 1,216 |
This situation had worked its way through by the end of the first quarter as you can see. Suffice to say the balance sheet is in good shape with insignificant levels of debt and cash levels still to be enhanced as payments flow from the Powerlan Qld administrator.
| The Scorecard-Other key measures | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 2003 | Change | |
| Underlying Operating cash Flow |
\$0.8M | \$1.8M | $Up$ \$1 $M$ |
| Staff Expenses as % Gross Margin |
68% | 66% | Down 2% |
| Debtors aged $>$ 60 days | 5.8% | 3.5% | Down 2.3% |
| Product 'ship to' times | 3.8 days | 3.9 days | No change |
| Customer satisfaction | n/a | 92% | |
| Staff satisfaction | 69% | 85% | Up 16% |
| # CustomerNet registrations | 48. | 135 | Up 180% |
| 310 | 325 | $U_D$ 5% | |
| Permanent Staff |
We measure our performance based on a number of other measures, some of which you can see here.
- a) Underlying operating cash flows even given the expense related to Powerlan Old were very strong at \$1.8M
- b) Staff expenses as a % of gross margin generated is a key measure of how we manage expenses to generate a return. The reduction of 2% over the previous year was an excellent outcome
- c) The control of debtors aging and levels of outstanding obviously contributed to operating cash flows and to the best of our knowledge are industry leading
- d) It's interesting to note that Dell, the acknowledged leader in direct supply of hardware product globally promotes 'ship to' times, the time between customer order and product shipment, of 10 days. Our consistent performance at under 4 days is first class and puts into perspective the value of the reseller that has the capacity to acquire product from multiple sources, as compared to the multi-national hardware vendors
- e) We had terrific results in customer and staff satisfaction levels endorsing our stakeholder vision to be Australia's leading IT solutions
company - the one that people want to work for, buy from and own shares in, and,
f) While we don't publish levels of services staff utilization, suffice to say, we have capacity within the current team to satisfy higher levels of demand with little increase in cost.

And when you've got a share price graph like this, its worth dwelling on for a moment, but not for too long, knowing, in football parlance, that 'you're only as good as your last game'.
| Jow does Data#3 compare (all numbers approximate) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 2002 | Data#3 | Volante | Tech One | Powerlan | KAZ |
| Price / Earnings | n/a | 9.9 | 31.3 | 8.57 | 37.2 |
| Share Price | 0.76 | 1.23 | 0.78 | 0.36 | 0.80 |
| # Shares '000 | 14,654 | 68,000 | 318,000 | 399,000 | 686.000 |
| Market Capitalisation 000 |
11.000 | 84,000 | 248,000 | 144,000 | 549,000 |
| 2 November 3 2003 | Data#3 | Volante | Tech One | Powerlan | KAZ |
| Price / Earnings | 14.3 | 20.5 | 19.3 | 8.0 | 152.6 |
| Share Price | 1.86 | 1.25 | 0.445 | 0.043 | 0.29 |
| # Shares '000 | 14.654 | 68.000 | 318.000 | 399.000 | 686,000 |
| Market Capitalisation '000 |
27,256 | 85,000 | 141,510 | 17,157 | 198,940 |
What is also worth dwelling on is Data#3's performance compared to other IT players. In February 2002, we did the analysis you can see here.
With the inevitable certainty that things change, the same analysis done earlier this week shows considerable change as you can see. While we have no misconception about our position as a 'small cap' company and accept that this will affect investor interest and hence our value, we trust that maintenance of current profit and dividends levels will see continued strength in the price of the company's shares.
And finally it is enlightening to look at the total return provided to shareholders since Data#3 listed. A shareholder who purchased at the time of listing at the issue price of \$1.25 has achieved total returns, i.e. the combination of share price gain and dividend, in excess of 8% per annum, a significant percentage of which has been fully franked. There are few other listed IT entities that have achieved such returns. We understand we need to deliver shareholders returns at the high end of the spectrum and believe we are able to do so over time. Our industry
and our company is always going to have its ups and downs - but investors who are prepared to stick with us through these times will be rewarded with the appropriate levels of return.

At last year's AGM I suggested that market conditions for the IT industry would remain subdued, that there were no 'silver bullets' emerging to drive growth, that investor expectations needed to be tempered but that growth could come through increased market share. I believe that in the main these predictions were realized and that we were able to grow by defending and nurturing existing customer relationships, by acquiring new customers through our specialty areas in application and technology solutions and by the acquisition of Stockford Limited's Navision business which proved to be complementary to our existing operations and provided additional strong customer relationships. Together with continued focus on lowering our cost structure and on disciplined management and operations, we had another excellent year.
The Annual Report provides more detail on the 2003 financial year. I'll spend the rest of my time on the outlook for the business $-$ both financially and strategically.

We've set a plan this year that has significant bias in profitability toward the second half on the basis that we expect better market conditions then. We also proposed to invest in the first half to secure stronger positions in the enterprise technology market in NSW, to acquire top level services certifications in networking and security and in Microsoft technologies and to maintain our position in the ACT in preparation for the re-tendering of the group outsourcing contracts. In all we are targeting a full year EBITDA of around \$5.7M, equal to the underlying result in 2003. At the end of the first quarter we were ahead of that plan and while we do not have final numbers for October, we know it has been very strong. These business targets have been set in the broader context of targets for total shareholder return with the major component over the next 2 to 3 years being in income.
Our EBITDA forecast to the half year ranges from a low of around \$2.4M to a high of around \$3.2M translating to earnings per share ranging from around 9 cents to 14 cents. In this forecast, as you would expect there are a number of significant transactions scheduled for finalisation. Clearly, circumstances outside our control could effect their conclusion and hence would affect this forecast but on balance we are comfortable to put this range forward.
Beyond the half year there are a number of factors that we are positioning to either minimise the effect of or take advantage of. The most critical issue to be dealt with is the determination of our major hardware vendor partners, particularly HP, to deal directly with the larger enterprises. We are actively engaged with them and our large customers to minimise this effect but there will be revenue loss that will need offsetting. This situation is being exacerbated in Queensland by a trend in some Government agencies to issue tenders for hardware only to the multi-national vendors. Again we are actively engaged with the reseller community and the Government to reverse this trend but in the meantime there will be contract opportunities not available to us.
While these factors have not yet had any significant effect on us, they cause us to look to alternatives.
In general, improving our ability to compete and win is dependent on three things:
- a) Having the specialist sales and technical skills in the areas of most value to our customers
- b) Further developing our customer management and engagement processes to strengthen relationships with them such that we are their preferred partner, and
c) Leveraging the full capability of our business to deliver integrated solutions particularly to the small to medium business sector.
To this end we are hiring or training staff in the areas of Microsoft application and infrastructure technologies, Cisco networking and security, enterprise computing and software licensing and asset management. The announcements this morning of the acquisition of the Microsoft 'web' services company f5 and further developing our capability as a technology specialist for SAP customers rather than continuing as a reseller of the SAP application are in keeping with this.
We are also refreshing our sales team composition adding new management and staff with specialist experience and adding services sales specialists to drive services revenue growth. Countering these areas of increased staff numbers we have reduced our involvement in areas where expertise counts less such as in desktop support and hardware maintenance.
Geographically we have less than the critical mass reguired to be successful in Victoria and the ACT and are looking at opportunities to scale further.
In truth, none of this is 'rocket science'. It is simply a matter of understanding what is going on and reacting early. As a consequence and as I said previously, there will be ups and downs but over time we believe the trend will always be improving.

In closing, in 2003, as I have said, we had a terrific result both in financial and operational terms - certainly one of the best in the Information Technology sector. We are comfortable about the outlook for the half-year particularly, and believe we understand the mid-term issues and have begun addressing them.
My sincere thanks go once again to the people who make up the Data#3 team. They have delivered wise counsel and real results to our customers through the challenges of the past year. My thanks also go to our customers who continue to choose us to partner them in meeting their business goals and whose needs drive us to ever more creative solutions; to our suppliers whose support has shown the true value of our partnership and whose technical excellence is the solid base on which our solutions are built; and to our shareholders whose patience and support are starting to receive their just returns.
Thank you
John Grant CFO. Data#3 Limited