AI assistant
CHARTER HALL GROUP — Governance Information 2016
Sep 29, 2016
64645_rns_2016-09-29_c09bdcf2-caf3-44e7-9178-4a9fae9971a4.pdf
Governance Information
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
Our commitment to corporate governance
Charter Hall Group (comprising Charter Hall Limited and the Charter Hall Property Trust, listed jointly on the ASX as a stapled security) (the Group or Charter Hall) is committed to delivering strong and sustainable returns to Securityholders and investors. The Board of Charter Hall recognises the importance of good governance in achieving these corporate objectives and in discharging its responsibilities to all stakeholders of the Group.
Charter Hall’s governance framework, as summarised in this Corporate Governance Statement (Statement), has been designed to ensure that the Group is effectively managed; that the statutory obligations are met, and that Charter Hall’s culture of corporate integrity is reinforced.
Due consideration has been given to the Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (3rd Edition) published in July 2014 by the ASX Corporate Governance Council, (ASX Corporate Governance Principles), and any departure from these Principles is noted below.
This Statement provides a summary of the key governance practices in place and (unless stated otherwise) which were followed throughout the financial year ended 30 June 2016.
Charter Hall’s key corporate policies can be found on its website at www.charterhall.com.au
Principle 1 – Lay solid foundations for management and oversight
Roles of the Board and management
ASX Corporate Governance Principle 1.1 – A listed entity should disclose:
-
(a) the respective roles and responsibilities of its board and management; and
-
(b) those matters expressly reserved to the board and those delegated to management.
The Board of Charter Hall is committed to effectively representing and promoting the Group, and thereby adding long-term value to all Securityholders. The Board is accountable to Securityholders for the management of Charter Hall’s business and affairs and, as such, is responsible for the overall strategy, governance and performance of the Group.
Information regarding directors
ASX Corporate Governance Principle 1.2 – A listed entity should:
-
(a) undertake appropriate checks before appointing a person, or putting forward to securityholders a candidate for election as a director; and
-
(b) provide securityholders with all material information in its possession relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re-elect a director.
Prior to being nominated for appointment to the Board, all relevant checks are undertaken by the Nomination Committee as to the experience and background of the proposed Non-Executive Director, including reference and police checks. Securityholders are provided with a summary biography of each Non-Executive Director who is proposed for election or re-election in the Notice of Meeting for each Annual General Meeting. This details the experience and skills of the Non-Executive Director, details of any other directorships or interests that may be perceived to materially influence his or her capacity to bring an independent judgement to bear on issues before the Board, the term of office currently served (if proposed for re-election) and whether or not the Board considers the Non-Executive Director qualifies as independent. Details of the Non-Executive Directors (NED) are also available on the Charter Hall website.
Non-Executive Directors and Senior Executives to have written agreements setting out terms of appointment
ASX Corporate Governance Principle 1.3 – A listed entity should have a written agreement with each Non-Executive Director and senior executive setting out the terms of their appointment.
Non-Executive Directors have been appointed under a formal letter which sets out the key terms and conditions of that appointment, including the term, time commitment, remuneration, requirement to disclose directors’ interests, the requirement to comply with key corporate policies, when independent professional advice may be sought, when the office of director may become vacant, indemnity and insurance arrangements and rights of access to corporate information.
The Managing Director and Group CEO and each senior executive has a formal job description and letter of appointment which sets out his/her duties and obligations, rights and responsibilities and entitlements.
To clarify the roles and responsibilities of directors and management, and to assist the Board in discharging its responsibilities, Charter Hall has established a governance framework which sets out the functions reserved to the Board and provides for the delegation of functions to Board Committees and management. Those functions and responsibilities reserved to the Board are set out in the Board Charter, which is available to view in the ‘Corporate Governance’ section of Charter Hall’s website.
The Board has delegated day-to-day management functions to the Managing Director and Group CEO, and Senior Executives, who are required to work within authority limits and delegations set out in a ‘Delegations of Authority’ document. This document is approved by the Board, and is an internal working document.
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 1
Governance framework
The diagram below summarises Charter Hall’s governance framework, including the functions reserved for the Board and those carried out by the standing Board Committees.
Charter Hall Board
The Board formally delegates certain functions to Board Committees and to Management via formal Board and Committee charters.
The Board directly retains responsibility for a range of matters including:
-
overseeing the Group’s strategic direction;
-
monitoring the operational and financial position and performance of the Group;
-
overseeing the Group’s risk management framework;
-
setting the financial and informational reporting requirements from management to the Board;
-
reporting to Securityholders and the ASX;
-
monitoring the effectiveness of and compliance with policies governing the operation of the Group;
-
reviewing and approving the annual operating budgets;
-
determining distribution policy and approving distributions;
-
approving decisions concerning the capital of the Group; and
-
overseeing and evaluating the performance of the Managing Director and Group CEO and other Senior Executives in the context of the Group’s strategies and objectives.
==> picture [514 x 375] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Investment Audit, Risk and Remuneration and Nomination Committee
Committee (IC) Compliance Committee Human Resources Key functions:
The IC considers matters as (ARCC) Committee
To review and make
referred to it/delegated to it by Key functions: Key functions:
recommendations on:
the Board which may include
To oversee and review: To review and make
from time to time the approval • Board size and
recommendations on:
of the following: • the internal control and composition;
accountability systems; • the Group’s Human • criteria for Board
• acquisitions and disposals
of entities or assets on • the financial reporting Resources strategy; membership;
process, including • criteria for reviewing • appointment, induction
behalf of the Group in
accordance with the significant accounting the performance of the and re-election of
issues and judgements; Managing Director and directors;
relevant delegated
authority; • the appointment and Group CEO; • performance and
• investments in funds performance of the • remuneration framework enhancement of skills of
Auditor, including the and policy for Senior directors through continuing
managed by the CH
scope and effectiveness of Executives; education programs for
entity in accordance with
audits; • fixed annual remuneration directors; and
the relevant delegated
• the internal systems of risk and incentive outcomes for • Board succession.
authority; and
• disclosure documents management and control Senior Executives;
(ensuring that material • incentive plans for all
for capital raisings by
business risks employees;
funds managed by the
Responsible Entity. are identified); and • any other remuneration
• compliance processes matters that relate to
to meet legislative and executives; and
regulatory requirements. • remuneration policies
and fees for NEDs and
Committee members.
Managing Director and Group CEO
Chief Financial Officer Other Senior Executives Company Secretary
----- End of picture text -----
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 2
Board Committees
The Board has established four standing Board Committees to assist the Board in the execution of its responsibilities. Each Committee operates under a specific charter, which can be found in the ‘Corporate Governance’ section of Charter Hall’s website.
In accordance with its respective charter, each Board Committee must have at least three non-executive members; be comprised of a majority of ‘independent’ directors, and be chaired by an ‘independent’ Non-Executive Director. Director independence is discussed on page 8 of this statement.
During the reporting period, the membership of each Board Committee was as follows:
| Board Committee | Membership |
|---|---|
| Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee | David Deverall (Chair)1, Anne Brennan, David Clarke, Phil Garling (Chair)2, Peter Kahan3 |
| Remuneration and Human Resources Committee | Anne Brennan(Chair), Colin McGowan, Peter Kahan, PhilipGarling |
| Investment Committee | Colin McGowan(Chair), PhilipGarling, David Clarke, Peter Kahan |
| Nomination Committee | David Clarke(Chair), David Deverall1, Peter Kahan, Phil Garling4 |
- 1 David Deverall resigned from the Board, the ARCC and the Nominations Committee on 26 February 2016
2 Phil Garling was appointed Chair of the ARCC on 26 February 2016
3 Peter Kahan was appointed temporary member of the ARCC on 26 February 2016
4 Phil Garling was appointed to the Nominations Committee on 17 June 2016.
The membership of the Board Committees will change from time to time, depending on the needs of the Board and the directors’ rotation policy.
The number of Board and Board Committee meetings held during the reporting period and the number of meetings that were attended by each of the directors is presented in the Directors’ Report.
Management
The Board has delegated the responsibility for day-to-day management of the Group to the Managing Director and Group CEO, who is assisted by an Executive Leadership Group. The executives who report to the Managing Director and Group CEO are shown in the diagrams below.
The Managing Director and Group CEO must consult with the Chairman on any matters which the Managing Director and Group CEO considers are of such a sensitive, extraordinary or strategic nature as to warrant attention of the Board, regardless of value.
The authorisation thresholds for the control of expenditure and capital commitments have been established and are defined in the Group’s internal ‘Delegations of Authority’ document.
| MD & Group CEO David Harrison |
MD & Group CEO David Harrison |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIO Sean Mcmahon* |
Head of Offce Adrian Taylor |
Head of Industrial Paul Ford |
Head of Retail Greg Chubb |
CFO Paul Altschwager |
Head of Corporate Offce Richard Stacker |
People, Brand & Community Natalie Devlin |
CTO Aidan Coleman |
||||
| Group Counsel & Cosec Tracey Jordan |
LWR Fund Manager Avi Anger |
CQR Fund Manager Scott Dundas |
Head of Direct Nick Kelly |
- Sean McMahon commenced on 18 August 2016
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 3
Company Secretary
ASX Recommendation 1.4 – The Company Secretary of a listed entity should be accountable directly to the board, through the chair, on all matters to do with the proper functioning of the board.
The Company Secretary plays an important role in supporting the effectiveness of the Board by ensuring that Board policy and procedures are followed, co-ordinating the timely completion and dispatch of the Board agenda and briefing material, ensuring the business at Board and Committee meetings is accurately captured in the minutes and advising the Board and Committees on all governance matters.
The Company Secretary retains independent professional advisors at the request of the Board or Board Committee and helps to organise and facilitate the induction and professional development of directors.
All directors have direct access to the Company Secretary.
The appointment and removal of the Company Secretary is a matter for decision by the Board as a whole.
The Company Secretary is accountable to the Board, through the Chairman, on all governance matters.
Diversity
ASX Recommendation 1.5 – A listed entity should:
-
(a) have a diversity policy which includes requirements for the board or a relevant committee of the board to set measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and to assess annually both the objectives and the entity’s progress in achieving them;
-
(b) disclose that policy or a summary of it;
-
(c) disclose at the end of each reporting period the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by the board or a relevant committee of the board in accordance with the entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards achieving them, and either:
-
(i) the respective proportions of men and women on the board, in senior executive positions and across the whole organisation (including how the entity has defined “senior executive” for these purposes) or
-
(ii) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under the Workplace Gender Equality Act, the entity’s most recent “Gender Equality Indicators” as defined in, and published under, that Act.
Fostering a diverse and inclusive workforce is critical to the achievement of Charter Hall’s corporate goals. Diversity at Charter Hall includes respecting and valuing differences based on a wide range of personal characteristics including gender, age and ethnicity, as well as diversity of thought and background.
Charter Hall believes that people with different experiences, backgrounds and perspectives can provide unique view points and innovative solutions from which the business can benefit.
The promotion of greater gender diversity broadens the pool for recruitment of high quality directors and employees, is likely to support employee retention, and encourages greater innovation. It also allows the Group to connect with its diverse client base, providing it with a balanced perspective, and is a socially and economically responsible governance practice.
roles and to promote a culture that values diversity, inclusion and flexibility. To achieve these objectives, Charter Hall has put in place a strategy based around four key pillars: flexible working, inclusive culture, gender balance and external profile. Achievements against the strategy in respect of the financial year ended 30 June 2016 are summarised on the following page.
Charter Hall has spent significant time establishing the foundations for Diversity and Inclusion. Efforts have focused on re-designing the way in which Charter Hall employees work and moving to a more flexible “New Way of Working” approach Australia-wide. This has been supported by formalised induction initiatives, objective performance calibration, a menu of benefits to encourage flexible working, and focused talent development (both internal and external) to support leaders in managing dispersed teams and accelerating female talent.
Building upon these foundations, Charter Hall has focused more recently on extending the drive for diversity and inclusion. Initiatives undertaken at an executive level since 1 July 2015 include:
-
Re-positioning the Charter Hall business case to better leverage diversity of thought and develop commitment to the diversity and inclusion strategy through the business;
-
The Executive Leadership Group actively sponsoring this strategy with consistent behaviour and attitudes formalised through awareness of unconscious bias. Unconscious bias awareness training was cascaded through the business in FY16;
-
The Board agreeing targets for female participation:
| 2016 | 2018 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | Target | Target | |
| Female participation on | |||
| CHC Board (Non-Executive | |||
| Directors Only) | 20% | > 30% | > 35% |
| Female participation in | |||
| senior executivepositions | 20% | > 25% | > 35% |
| Female participation in | |||
| the workplace | 49% | 50% | 50%* |
*Female participation in senior executive positions is defined as senior management.
-
Agreeing aspirational and achievable gender targets for divisions and leadership levels;
-
Undertaking a gender pay review where performance and remuneration data was analysed and options was actioned to address any gender pay equity gaps;
-
Implementing an objective job framework for the top 50 roles that will highlight gender gaps and inform Charter Hall’s recruitment practices;
-
Committing to a 50:50 pledge for every recruitment / promotion decision panel and pool of candidates; and
-
Working with the industry as part of the Property Male Champions of Change (PMCC) program to identify and implement progressive, high impact actions to increase levels of women in executive positions and talent pipelines. Actions will be implemented at an organisational, as well as industry, level.
The Board has adopted a Diversity and Inclusion Policy, which is included in the ‘Corporate Governance’ section of Charter Hall’s website. This Policy contains the overriding objectives to increase the percentage of women in leadership and business related
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 4
FY15 Achievements:
| Pillar | Objectives Achievements |
|---|---|
| Flexible working– to entrench fexibility in a way that directly links business performance, productivity and sustainability with workforce well-being and sustainability. |
•Implement New Way of Working (NWOW) promoting fexibility, collaboration and engagement •Enhance fexibility by looking at job design across critical roles •Develop management capability to lead teams engaged in fexible work •Promote a suite of benefts focused on enhancing fexibility •Implemented the NWOW Activity Based Working across all offces Australia-wide; •Broadened the success profles considered for senior roles to focus on transferrable skills and experiences; •Manager development in leading diverse and dispersed teams; •Increased paid parental leave to the primary carer to 16 weeks and extended paid leave to the secondary carer to 2 weeks; •31 people took up our purchased leave beneft (one to two weeks per year); •4 of our people who went on carers’ parental leave returned to work, and 20 people took secondary carer’s leave; and •2 people took up our career break initiative. |
| Inclusive culture– create an environment where people with diverse backgrounds, skills and perspectives feel trusted, valued and respected and that they are able to contribute to the organisation. |
•Values are integrated into people lifecycle activities •Unconscious bias training •NWOW focused on three of our fve values – passion, collaboration and accountability through design, communication and change management initiatives; •Continued to embed an employee awards program which rewards our people for living our values; •Launched an induction program which ensures a consistent and inclusive approach to on-boarding for all of our offces Australia-wide; •Launched a Domestic Violence Policy to raise the profle of domestic violence as a signifcant business issue and foster a culture comfortable to call out unacceptable behaviour; and •Implemented unconscious bias training and awareness of a more conscious approach to decision making. |
| Gender balance– to achieve gender balance in all roles across our business. |
•Continue gender specifc development initiatives •Conduct gender pay analysis and develop a long term gender pay equity plan •Through FY16 we had a total of 77 internal promotions with 40 being male, and 37 female; •Launched a targeted development program for women and participated in the Women in Property Mentoring Program; •Completed a gender pay analysis and provided options to executive leaders to address gender pay equity for identifed females in each division. |
| •Implement gender targets and monitor progress Overall we have seen an increase in female representation across all levels of Charter Hall with females making up 49% of our workforce. We have seen an increase in females in leadership roles with female participation at 20% of the senior management team, and 20% of the Charter Hall Board; and Gender targets for divisions and leadership levels have been set through to FY20. Performance againsttargets has been mixed with solid increases inbusiness related roles and management with more moderate, but encouraging, increases at the Senior Management level. |
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 5
==> picture [596 x 91] intentionally omitted <==
| Pillar | Objectives | Achievements |
|---|---|---|
| External Profle– to develop | •Play an active role on the Property | •Led research with Ernst & Young and the Property |
| our employment brand so that | Council of Australia committees and | Council of Australia (PCA) to better understand |
| Charter Hall is perceived as a | working groups | the pathways to a career in property with a view to |
| “great place to work” by current employees and key external stakeholders (including active and passive candidates, tenants and investors) with an initial focus on gender. |
•Participate in creating initiatives that impact gender balance across the industry |
encouraging more women into the industry; •Managing Director and Group CEO is a member of the PCA’s Male Champions of Change working group; •Head of People, Brand and Community is a member of the PCA’s Women in Property Committee; •Head of Retail is an Implementation Leader of the |
| PCA’s Male Champion of Change initiative driving | ||
| research and actions to impact gender balance across | ||
| the industry; | ||
| •Foundation sponsor of the PCA’s Women in Property | ||
| Mentoring Program; and | ||
| •Head of Transactions and Head of Direct are mentors | ||
| in the Women in Property Mentoring Program. |
Board performance
ASX Corporate Governance Principle 1.6 – A listed entity should:
-
(a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the performance of the board, its committees and individual directors; and
-
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a performance evaluation was undertaken in that reporting period in accordance with that process.
The procedure for evaluating Board performance requires each Independent Director to complete an annual performance evaluation. This is submitted to an independent party who collates and provides summarised and anonymous results to the Chairman, who then distributes the results to the full Board. Given the changes in composition of the Board during FY16, an internal performance self-assessment of the Board, Board Committees and individual directors was conducted during FY16, with a formal external board performance assessment to be conducted during FY17.
To ensure that Directors are well placed to discharge their duties effectively, they are provided with Board reports in advance of Board meetings which contain sufficient information to enable informed discussion of all agenda items.
Access to information
The Managing Director and Group CEO, Senior Executives and the Company Secretary supply the Board with regular reports and information to enable the Board to discharge its duties. Directors are entitled to request additional information where they consider such information is necessary to make informed decisions.
Independent professional advice
Directors are entitled to obtain independent professional advice at the cost of the Group.
Performance of Senior Executives
ASX Corporate Governance Principle 1.7 – A listed entity should:
-
(a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the performance of its Senior Executives; and
-
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting period in accordance with that process.
The Group defines its Senior Executives as the Managing Director and Group CEO and its Executive Leadership Group, some of whom are also Key Management Personnel (KMPs) as defined in the Remuneration Report, which forms part of the Directors’ Report.
A combination of financial and non-financial key performance indicators (KPIs) are used to monitor senior executive performance. Details of the KPIs adopted for the Joint Managing Directors/ Managing Director and Group CEO in FY16 are set out in the Remuneration Report.
The individual performance of the Managing Director and Group CEO is formally assessed on an annual basis by the Board. All KPIs are carefully considered by the Remuneration and Human Resources Committee, which evaluates the Managing Director and Group CEO’s performance and makes recommendations to the Board.
Executives reporting to the Managing Director and Group CEO are assessed annually against financial and non-financial KPIs. This assessment is undertaken by the Managing Director and Group CEO. Executive performance results are reported to the Board.
This performance evaluation process was in place and was followed for the reporting period.
Senior Executives are provided with access to continuing education to update and enhance their skills and knowledge.
An induction program exists for new Senior Executives to ensure each senior executive gains an understanding of the Group’s financial position, strategies, operations and risk management policies, as well as the responsibilities and roles of the Board and management.
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 6
Principle 2: Structure the Board to add value
Nomination Committee
ASX Recommendation 2.1 – The Board of a listed entity should:
-
(a) Have a nomination committee which:
-
(i) has at least three members, a majority of which are independent directors and;
-
(ii) is chaired by an independent director,
-
and disclose:
-
(iii) the charter of the committee;
-
(iv) the members of the committee; and
-
(v) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or
-
(b) if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs to address board succession issues and to ensure that the board has the appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience, independence and diversity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively.
The Board has established a Nomination Committee that reviews and, where appropriate, makes recommendations to the Board on the size and composition of the Board, including assessment of necessary and desirable competencies of Board members. Directors nominated for election require approval of the Board. The Committee is comprised of three Non-Executive Directors, the majority of whom are Independent Directors:
-
(i) Mr David Clarke – Independent Chairman;
-
(ii) Mr David Deverall – Independent Director (from 1 July 2015 to 26 February 2016);
-
(iii) Mr Phil Garling – Independent Director (from 17 June 2016); and
-
(iv) Mr Peter Kahan – Non-Executive Director.
The independence of the members is provided on page 8 of this statement. Details of the Committee’s meetings for the reporting period, and the attendance by members, are provided on page 16 in the Directors’ Report.
The Committee’s Charter is available to view under the ‘Corporate Governance’ section of Charter Hall’s website.
Board Skills Matrix
ASX Recommendation 2.2 – A listed entity should have and disclose a board skills matrix setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the board currently has or is looking to achieve in its membership.
Charter Hall aims to maintain a Board that comprises directors with a broad range of skills, expertise and experience who are able to effectively understand and manage the issues arising in Charter Hall’s business activities, review and challenge the performance of management and optimise the Group’s performance.
Guidelines have been adopted for director selection and nomination to the Board. Foremost is integrity, particular expertise (sector and functional) and the degree to which he/she complements the skill set of the existing Board members, his/her reputation and standing in the market and, in the case of prospective independent directors, the actual and perceived independence from Charter Hall.
Director independence
ASX Recommendation 2.3 – A listed entity should disclose:
-
(a) the names of the directors considered to be independent directors; and
-
(b) if a director has an interest, position, association or relationship that may cause doubt about the independence of a director, but the board is of the opinion that it does not compromise the independence of the director, the nature of the interest, position, association or relationship in question and an explanation of why the board is of that opinion; and
-
(c) the length of service of each director.
ASX Recommendation 2.4 – A majority of the board of listed entity should be independent Directors.
The Board considers that a director is independent if he/she is independent of management and free of any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with, or could reasonably be perceived to interfere with, the exercise of unfettered and independent judgement. The Board evaluates the materiality of any interests or relationships that could be perceived to compromise independence on a case by case basis, having regard to the circumstances of each director.
The composition of the Board during the reporting period is set out below:
| Non | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | Executive | ||
| Period | Directors | Directors | Comment |
| 1 July 2015 to | |||
| 1 February2016 | 2 | 6 | |
| David Southon resigned | |||
| 1 February 2016 to | from the Board on | ||
| 26 February2016 | 1 | 6 | 1 February2016 |
| David Deverall resigned | |||
| 26 February 2016 | from the Board on | ||
| to 30 June 2016 | 1 | 5 | 26 February2016 |
Of the Non-Executive Directors, a majority were Independent Directors.
Directors are expected to be meticulous in their disclosure of any material personal or family contract or relationship. Directors must also strictly adhere to constraints on their participation and voting in relation to matters in which they may have an interest, in accordance with the Corporations Act and the Group’s policies.
The Board regularly assesses whether directors are independent, and each director is required to provide information relative to this assessment. It is noted that David Harrison due to his employment by the Group in an executive capacity, is not independent, and David Southon, due to his employment by the Group in an executive capacity, was not independent. In addition, Peter Kahan is considered not to be independent due to his role as Executive Deputy Chairman and Director of The Gandel Group, a substantial Securityholder of Charter Hall.
The Board and the Nomination Committee have developed a Board skills matrix. This matrix is used to identify any gaps in the skills and experience of the directors on the Board for the purposes of identifying the search and assessment criteria for new directors.
The Board skills matrix is available to view under the Corporate Governance section of Charter Hall’s website.
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 7
| Independent | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Position | (Yes/No) | Appointed |
| Anne Brennan | Non-Executive Director | Yes | 6 October 2010 |
| David Deverall | Non-Executive Director | Yes | 7 May2012 |
| David Clarke | Non-Executive Director | Yes | 10 April 2014 |
| David Harrison | ManagingDirector and GroupCEO, Executive Director | No | 30 August 2006 |
| Peter Kahan | Non-Executive Director | No | 1 October 2009 |
| Colin McGowan | Non-Executive Director | Yes | 6 April 2005 |
| David Southon | Former Joint ManagingDirector, Executive Director | No | 30 August 2006 |
| PhilipGarling | Non-Executive Director | Yes | 25 February2013 |
Details of the background, particular qualifications, expertise and period of service of each director are set out in the Directors’ Report.
Directors are entitled to seek independent professional advice at the expense of the Group as required to assist with the proper performance of their duties and functions (including their Board Committee functions), subject to the estimate of costs being first approved by the Chairman as reasonable.
Non-Executive Directors of the Board meet regularly without management present, in order to consider matters independently of management.
The Chairman of the Board
ASX Recommendation 2.5 – The Chair of the board of a listed entity should be an independent director and, in particular, should not be the same person as the CEO of the entity.
The Chairman is responsible for leadership of the Board and for the efficient organisation and conduct of the Board’s functioning. The Chairman seeks effective contribution of all directors and promotes constructive and respectful relations between directors, and between the Board and management.
The Chairman of the CHC Board is David Clarke, who is an independent Non-Executive Director.
Induction Program for Directors
ASX Recommendation 2.6 – A listed entity should have a program for inducting new directors and provide appropriate professional development opportunities for directors to develop and maintain the skills and knowledge needed to perform their role as directors effectively.
Principle 3: Act ethically and responsibly
Code of Conduct
ASX Recommendation 3.1 – A listed entity should:
(a) establish a code of conduct for its directors, Senior Executives and employees; and
(b) disclose that code or a summary of it.
Charter Hall has adopted a Code of Conduct which is periodically reviewed and endorsed by the Board. The Code of Conduct forms the basis for ethical behaviour by staff and is the framework that provides the foundation for maintaining and enhancing the Group’s reputation. The objective of the Code is to ensure that directors, other stakeholders and the broader community can be confident that the Group conducts its affairs honestly and in accordance with ethical values and practices.
The Code sets the standards for dealing ethically with employees, investors, customers, regulatory bodies and the financial and wider community. In addition to this, in order to deal specifically with responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical behaviour, the Group has adopted an Anti-Bribery, Fraud & Corruption Risk Management Policy.
Employees are trained regularly on matters pertaining to ethical behaviour in the workplace. Topics covered during the year ended 30 June 2016 included key aspects of the Code of Conduct, as well as Bullying and Harassment training, Fraud Awareness, Privacy, and Anti Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing.
The Anti-Bribery, Fraud & Corruption Risk Management Policy and a summary of Charter Hall’s Code of Conduct are available to view under the ‘Corporate Governance’ section of Charter Hall’s website.
The following structures are in place to support the Group’s Directors in performing their duties:
-
an induction program for new directors on the Board;
-
a formal annual performance self-assessment of the Board, Board Committees, and individual directors;
-
regular external review of Board performance; and
-
access by directors to continuing education to ensure that their skills and knowledge are updated and enhanced.
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 8
Principle 4: Safeguard integrity in corporate reporting
Audit Committee
ASX Recommendation 4.1 – The board of a listed entity should:
-
(a) have an audit committee which:
-
(i) has at least three members, all of whom are Non-Executive Directors and a majority of whom are independent directors; and
-
(ii) is chaired by an independent director, who is not chair of the board,
and disclose:
-
(iii) the charter of the committee;
-
(iv) the relevant qualifications and experience of the members of the committee; and
-
(v) in relation to each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or
-
(b) if it does not have an audit committee, disclose the fact and the processes it employs that independently verify and safeguard the integrity of its corporate reporting, including the processes for the appointment and removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement partner.
The Board has established an Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee (ARCC) to oversee the quality and integrity of accounting, audit, financial and risk management practices for the Group. The ARCC is comprised of only independent directors, and is chaired by an independent director who is not the Chairman of the Board.
The Board has developed a Charter which sets out the Committee’s role, responsibilities, composition, structure and membership requirements.
As stated in its Charter, the responsibilities of the ARCC in relation to financial reporting are to:
-
review the internal control and compliance systems of the Group;
-
monitor the integrity of the financial statements of the Group;
-
consider significant financial reporting issues and judgements made in connection with the Group’s financial statements;
-
review and inform the Board on matters relating to the Auditor;
-
monitor compliance by the Group with legal and regulatory requirements;
-
regularly monitor risk management reports provided by management; and
-
assess at regular intervals whether the Group’s compliance plan, internal financial control systems, risk management policies and risk management systems are adequate.
The Committee’s current membership is set out on page 6 of this Statement and the independence of the members is provided in the Directors’ Report. Details of the Committee’s meetings for the reporting period, and the attendance by members, are provided on page 16 in the Directors’ Report. It is noted that Peter Kahan (Non-Executive Director) is a temporary member of the Committee until David Deverall’s replacement is formally appointed.
The Board regularly assesses the skills and expertise of members of the ARCC, and has determined that members of the ARCC collectively have an appropriate level of financial and property industry expertise to discharge their responsibilities.
CEO and CFO Declaration
ASX Recommendation 4.2 – The board of a listed entity should, before it approves the entity’s financial statements for a financial period, receive from its CEO and CFO a declaration that, in their opinion, the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained, and that the financial statements comply with the appropriate accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the entity and that the opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operating effectively.
The Board receives a declaration provided in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act from the Managing Director and Group CEO and the Chief Financial Officer that the Group’s consolidated financial statements are founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks. This declaration is supported by a review and sign-off process from senior managers on the key items that make up the risk management and control systems.
External Auditor
ASX Recommendation 4.3 – A listed entity that has an AGM should ensure that its external auditor attends its AGM and is available to answer questions from Securityholders relevant to the audit.
The Board has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) as the Group’s Auditor. PwC is expected to carry out its responsibilities in accordance with Australian law and audit firm policy in respect of partner rotation.
In order to ensure the independence of the Auditor, the Board has adopted a Policy requiring that:
-
the Auditor remain independent from Charter Hall;
-
the Auditor monitor its independence and report to the Board every six months on its continuing independence;
-
non-audit assignments undertaken by the Auditor are in accordance with the Policy; and
-
all non-audit assignments are reported to the Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee.
The Auditor attends the Group’s Annual General Meeting and is available to answer Securityholder questions on the conduct of the audit, and the preparation and content of the Auditor’s Report.
The Charter Hall Group Auditor Independence Policy is available to view under the ‘Corporate Governance’ section of Charter Hall’s website.
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 9
Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure
Continuous Disclosure
ASX Recommendation 5.1 – A listed entity should:
-
(a) have a written policy for complying with its continuous disclosure obligations under the Listing Rules; and
-
(b) disclose that policy or a summary of it.
Charter Hall strives to provide timely, open and accurate information to all stakeholders, including Securityholders, regulators and the wider investment community. This includes presenting a balanced approach to disclosure. The Board has adopted a Continuous Disclosure and Communications Policy which summarises the internal processes to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rules and Australian law in respect of continuous disclosure. A Continuous Disclosure Committee has also been established by management to review issues surrounding continuous disclosure and to determine whether disclosure is required, and make corresponding recommendations to the Board.
The Policy includes procedures for dealing with potentially price-sensitive information, including referral to the Continuous Disclosure Committee and the Board where necessary, for a determination as to the appropriate disclosure required.
Charter Hall’s Company Secretary is the ASX liaison person.
The Continuous Disclosure and Communications Policy is available to view under the ‘Corporate Governance’ section of Charter Hall’s website.
Principle 6: Respect the rights of security holders
Provide information to investors
ASX Recommendation 6.1 – A listed entity should provide information about itself and its governance to investors via its website. Charter Hall provides information to Securityholders, including:
-
the right for Securityholders to receive an annual report and updates which keep them informed of Charter Hall’s performance and operations;
-
placement under the ‘News’ section of Charter Hall’s website of market-sensitive information in the form of ASX announcements or webcasts; Securityholders also have the ability under this section of the website to register to receive email alerts on the Group’s announcements to the ASX;
-
placement under the ‘Investor’ section of Charter Hall’s website of distribution and tax information, unit price performance, financial results information including the results webcast, investor presentations, past and current reports to Securityholders and past Securityholder meeting information; and
-
presentations to investor roadshows that are required to be lodged with the ASX are uploaded to the ‘News’ section of Charter Hall’s website.
ASX Recommendation 6.2 – A listed entity should design and implement an investor relations program to facilitate effective two-way communication with investors.
ASX Recommendation 6.3 – A listed entity should disclose the policies and processes it has in place to facilitate and encourage participation at meetings of securityholders.
Charter Hall is committed to providing Securityholders with timely communications regarding matters that impact or have the potential to influence the investment performance of the Charter Hall Group. The Charter Hall Group understands its regulatory requirements in respect to continuous disclosure and various other legal obligations as a consequence of its listing on the Australian Securities Exchange.
Charter Hall employs a dedicated Investor Relations team with the objective of implementing a structured Investor Relations program to provide effective, concise and clear communication of relevant matters for investors’ consideration in respect to their investment, or potential investment, in the Charter Hall Group.
A dedicated website has been established at www.charterhall.com.au to assist Securityholders in obtaining current and historic information in respect to their investment, or prospective investment, in the Charter Hall Group.
All relevant ASX announcements, reports, results presentations and other media announcements are logged on this website for review by current and prospective Securityholders.
Securityholders are able to elect to receive communications from, and send communications to, the entity and its security registry electronically.
In addition to the investor website, the annual Investor Relations program includes:
-
the preparation and release of Annual and Half Year results presentations and financial reports which include detailed information on various aspects of the Group’s Property Funds Management (PFM) business operational activities in addition to the Group’s Property Investment (PI) portfolio positioning and performance;
-
a live web-cast of annual and half-year results presentations, with web-casts being made available for review by Securityholders via Charter Hall’s website;
-
the preparation and release of an Annual “Property Book” providing a detailed overview of every asset and portfolio managed by the Group in which the PI portfolio retains a co-investment;
-
an Annual Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability (CR&S) report providing Securityholders with an overview of Charter Hall’s key objectives and performance against objectives in respect to important CR&S matters;
-
an Annual Review report and various half-yearly “Investor Focus” newsletters providing Securityholders with information on ongoing activities within the Group’s funds management business, and in addition, its opinion on market conditions with an outlook commentary;
-
an Annual General Meeting providing the opportunity for Securityholders to personally meet members of the Charter Hall Executive Leadership Group and Board;
-
engagement, communication and dialogue with major Securityholders by the Independent Non-Executive Board Directors separately from senior management; and
-
participation in select retail investor conferences and broker sponsored forums to provide an opportunity for retail investors to learn about the Charter Hall Group’s business activities and meet with Senior Executives.
ASX Recommendation 6.4 – A listed entity should give securityholders the option to receive communications from, and send communications to, the entity and its security registry electronically.
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 10
In addition to the Investor Relations program noted above, the REIT engages independent specialist market feedback consulting firms to survey its major Unitholders and seek feedback on their opinions on the REIT’s business activities, performance, the effectiveness of its communications and investor relations program and also general opinions on the REIT and its team overall.
Principle 7: Recognise and Manage Risk
Risk Committee
ASX Recommendation 7.1 – The board of a listed entity should:
-
(a) have a risk committee or committees to oversee risk, each of which:
-
(i) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent directors; and
-
(ii) is chaired by an independent director,
-
and disclose:
-
(iii) the charter of the committee;
-
(iv) the members of the committee; and
-
(v) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or
-
(b) if it does not have a risk committee, disclose the fact and the processes it employs for overseeing the entity’s risk management framework.
ASX Recommendation 7.2 – The board or a committee of the board should:
-
(a) review the entity’s risk management framework at least annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be sound; and
-
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether such a review has taken place.
Management has implemented a risk management framework under the oversight of the ARCC and the Board. The ARCC is responsible for reviewing, and reporting to the Board on, the internal control and risk management systems of Charter Hall and assessing the information presented by management. In addition, the ARCC regularly assesses whether Charter Hall’s compliance plan, internal financial control systems, risk management policies and risk management systems are adequate.
Membership and details of the meetings of the ARCC are set out in the Directors’ Report.
Charter Hall’s Risk and Compliance Manager is responsible for daily risk and compliance processes across the business and monitors the efficiency of Charter Hall’s risk management framework (including compliance systems) on an ongoing basis. The aim is to ensure that appropriate procedures, staff education and reporting arrangements are in place to support the risk management framework.
Management conducts an annual Operational Risk Self-Assessment (ORSA) where key risks and controls are considered and their effectiveness assessed. The results of this assessment are reported to the ARCC and the Board.
During the reporting period, management has reported to the ARCC on the manner in which it manages its material risks, the effectiveness of the risk management framework and the results of the annual ORSA.
The Board places considerable importance on maintaining a strong control environment through an organisational structure with clearly drawn lines of accountability and authority.
Managing conflicts
Charter Hall has implemented a governance framework to safeguard the interests of investors in the investment vehicles, which at times may conflict with those of Charter Hall as sponsor of related vehicles. As part of this framework, the Group has established a Conflicts of Interest and Related Party Transactions Policy for identifying and managing conflicts.
The Policy provides guidance on the management of conflicts of interest arising between Charter Hall-managed vehicles and their related parties and requires that:
-
related party transactions be identified and conducted on arm’s length terms;
-
related party transactions be tested by reference to whether they meet market standards; and
-
decisions about transactions between Charter Hall-managed vehicles and Charter Hall, or its affiliates, be made by independent members of the Board or Investment Committees (where they have been appointed).
The Group has also established protocols for the Board in identifying and managing conflicts, including:
-
Board members must declare their interests as required under the Corporations Act, ASX Listing Rules and other general law requirements;
-
Board members with a material personal interest in a matter are not to be present at a Board meeting during the consideration of the matter and subsequent vote unless the Board (excluding the relevant Board member) resolves otherwise; and
-
Board members with a conflict not involving a material personal interest may be required to absent themselves from the relevant deliberations of the Board.
The Policy is available to view under the ‘Corporate Governance’ section of Charter Hall’s website.
The Group also has a conflicts protocol for dealing with competing deals (e.g. acquisitions, leasing). Such deals may arise out of the fact that Charter Hall is also the manager of other listed and unlisted vehicles, and the Group may transact with them from time to time, or share employees or information with other Charter Hall companies or managed vehicles.
Personal conflicts that might arise generally for directors and employees are covered by the Code of Conduct referred to earlier in this Statement.
Internal Audit
ASX Recommendation 7.3 – A listed entity should:
-
(a) disclose that it has an internal audit function, how the function is structured and what role it performs; or
-
(b) if it does not have an internal audit function, that fact and the processes it employs for evaluating and continually improving the effectiveness of its risk management and internal control processes.
The Board places considerable importance on maintaining a strong control environment through an organisation structure with clearly drawn lines of accountability and authority. Charter Hall has implemented an internal audit function outsourced to Ernst & Young which delivers regular reporting to the ARCC and the Board as well as implementing action plans with management.
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 11
Sustainability
ASX Recommendation 7.4 – A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material exposure to economic, environmental, and social sustainability risks and, if it does, how it manages or intends to manage those risks.
Charter Hall is committed to playing a leading role in achieving a sustainable future, and the Board has adopted a Sustainability Policy which forms the basis for integrating environmental and social governance issues into the Group’s activities. This Policy is available to view under the ‘About Us’ section of Charter Hall’s website. In addition, Charter Hall’s sustainability objectives are outlined in Charter Hall’s Securityholder Review.
Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly
Remuneration Committee
ASX Recommendation 8.1 – The board of a listed entity should:
-
(a) have a remuneration committee which:
-
(i) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent directors; and
-
(ii) is chaired by an independent director,
-
and disclose:
-
(iii) the charter of the committee;
-
(iv) the members of the committee; and
-
(v) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or
-
(b) if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose the fact and the processes it employs for setting the level and composition of remuneration for directors and Senior Executives and ensuring that such remuneration is appropriate and not excessive.
ASX Recommendation 8.2 – A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive Directors and the remuneration of executive Directors and other senior executives.
The Board has established a Remuneration and Human Resources Committee to assist the Board in implementing the Group’s human resources strategies. The Committee operates under a Charter approved by the Board, is comprised of only Non-Executive Directors, with a majority being ‘independent’, and is chaired by an Independent Director. Broadly, the Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board in respect of: executive remuneration and incentive policies; equity based incentive schemes; diversity and inclusion objectives; talent management and succession planning; and recruitment, retention, performance measurement and termination policies and procedures.
The Committee also reviews the remuneration of the Non-Executive Directors, all key appointments and terminations to the Executive Leadership Group, and the standard contractual terms applicable to management. Stakeholder engagement is also a focus, as well as the disclosure of Charter Hall’s remuneration framework in public materials, such as this Financial Report. From a policy perspective, the Committee assists the Board in ensuring that:
-
directors and executives are fairly and responsibly remunerated having regard to the performance of Charter Hall, the performance of the executives and the general remuneration environment;
-
Charter Hall has effective policies and procedures to attract, motivate and retain talented individuals to meet its needs; and
-
people policies and practices align with Charter Hall’s vision, values and overall objectives and comply with the relevant legislation, reflect current governance and mitigate against operational, financial and reputational risk. The Committee’s current membership is set out on page 3 of this Statement and the independence of members is provided on page 8 of this Statement. Details of meetings held and attendance by each Committee member are contained in the Directors’ Report.
From time to time, the Committee may commission the assistance of external consultants to ensure the Group’s remuneration policies remain appropriate, follow best practice and address the requirements of the Group’s stakeholders.
Charter Hall distinguishes the structure of Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration from that of Executive Directors and senior managers.
Further information is provided in the Remuneration Report on pages 17–37 of the Director’s Report.
The Remuneration and Human Resources Committee’s Charter is available to view under the ‘Corporate Governance’ section of Charter Hall’s website.
ASX Recommendation 8.3 – A listed entity which has an equity based remuneration scheme should:
-
(a) have a policy on whether participants are permitted to enter into transactions (whether through the use of derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk of participating in the scheme; and
-
(b) disclose that policy or a summary of it.
The Group has adopted a Securities Trading Policy which regulates the manner in which directors, Senior Executives and staff involved in the management of the Group can deal in Charter Hall stapled securities, including the Performance Rights Offer Plan. The Policy specifies the periods in which personal trading is permitted, the restrictions that apply to directors and Senior Executives, and the procedures for obtaining prior clearance for trading during a trading window.
Staff compliance with the Policy is monitored under Charter Hall’s risk management framework. The Policy is subject to annual review by the Board, and has been lodged with the ASX.
The Securities Trading Policy is available to view under the ‘Corporate Governance’ section of Charter Hall’s website.
-
an appropriate human resources strategy is implemented to enable Charter Hall to deliver on its business strategy;
-
remuneration policies and practices are in line with strategic goals and enable Charter Hall to attract and retain high calibre executives and directors who will create value for Securityholders;
Charter Hall Group
Corporate Governance Statement 2016 12