AI assistant
Buzzi Unicem — Investor Presentation 2015
Nov 17, 2015
4218_ip_2015-11-17_6547572c-d985-4c5b-8108-c3a55b4ee4bb.pdf
Investor Presentation
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Investor Roadshow
Frankfurt – 17 November 2015
Executive summary
Volumes
- Cement up 1.0% in Q3 and 1.3% YTD (-2.6% in Q3 and flat YTD net of Korkino scope change). Ready-mix concrete down 2.3% YTD
- Italy: unfavorable Q3 (cement -8.4%), affected by weak domestic shipments (-11.8%); YTD cement is lower than previous year (-2.6%) and ready-mix flat (+0.5%)
- United States: progress maintained in Q3 (cement +3.1%) and YTD (cement +2.9%) with Texas down 1.1% and other regions up 3.9%
- Central Europe: cement sales in Q3 (-3.9%) and YTD (-4.9%) unable to rebount; ready-mix concrete showing signs of recovery only in the Netherlands (YTD +19.4%)
- Eastern Europe: poor shipments like-for-like in Q3, mainly due to Russia (-18.5%); favorable YTD variance achieved in Czech Republic and notably in Poland
- Prices
- Sound increase in USA and Ukraine (local currency); no variance in Germany; marginal weakness in Luxembourg, Czech Republic and Russia; prices dropping in Poland and Italy, where Q3 showed an energizing effect
- Foreign Exchange
- Positive impact on sales (€m 63.7) and Ebitda (€m 20.4), due to stronger dollar offsetting a much weaker ruble and hryvnia
- Costs
- High inflation in Ukraine, but elsewhere power and fuel continue to trend lower
- Results
- Revenues at €m 1,998.1 versus €m 1,898.7 (+5.2%)
- EBITDA at €m 352.1 (recurring €m 355.2) versus €m 302.5 (recurring €m 307.2)
- Outlook unchanged for financial year 2015
Volumes
Cement volumes and prices
Price trends by country
In local currency; FY12 = 100
FX changes
| 9 M 1 5 |
9 M 1 4 |
∆ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| E U R 1 = |
a g v |
a g v |
% |
| U S D |
1. 1 1 |
1. 3 6 |
1 8 7 + |
| R U B |
6 6 6 0 |
4 8 0 2 |
3 8 7 - |
| U A H |
2 4 0 1 |
1 5 1 5 |
8 5 5 - |
| C Z K |
2 7 3 5 |
2 7 5 0 |
0 5 + |
| P L N |
4 1 6 |
4 1 8 |
0 4 + |
| M X N |
1 3 7 7 |
1 7 7 7 |
2 3 + |
Net sales by country
| 9 M 1 5 |
9 M 1 4 |
∆ | ∆ | F o r e x |
S c o p e |
f- l- l ∆ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E U R m |
b a s |
% | b a s |
b a s |
% | ||
| I l t a y |
2 8 2 8 |
2 9 4 7 |
( 1 1. 9 ) |
4 0 - |
- | - | 4. 0 - |
| S U i t d t t n e a e s |
8 2 3 5 |
6 1 9 0 |
2 0 4 5 |
3 3 0 + |
1 6. 2 4 |
- | 9. 4 + |
| G e r m a n y |
4 2 9 8 |
4 6 6 3 |
( 3 6 6 ) |
7 8 - |
- | - | -7 8 |
| L b u x e m o u r g |
2 7 7 |
8 0 7 |
( 3 ) 5 |
4 4 - |
- | - | 4. 4 - |
| N h l d t e e r a n s |
4 8 5 |
4 2 7 |
5 8 |
1 3 6 + |
- | - | 1 3. 6 + |
| C h R / S l k i z e c e p o v a a |
1 0 0 8 |
1 0 0 1 |
0 8 |
0 8 + |
0. 5 |
- | 0. 3 + |
| P l d o a n |
7 6 2 |
6 8 1 |
8 1 |
1 1. 9 + |
0. 3 |
- | 1 1. 4 + |
| U k i r a n e |
5 2 4 |
7 1. 9 |
( 1 9 5 ) |
2 7 2 - |
( 3 0. 6 ) |
- | 1 5. 4 + |
| R i u s s a |
1 3 6 2 |
1 6 2 7 |
( 4 0 0 ) |
2 2 7 - |
( ) 5 2. 7 |
2 5. 7 |
-7 4 |
| E l i i t i m n a o n s |
( 2 9. 1 ) |
( 2 0. 9 ) |
( 8. 3 ) |
||||
| T l t o a |
1, 9 9 8 1 |
1, 8 9 8 7 |
9 9 4 |
5 2 + |
6 3. 7 |
2 5. 7 |
0. 5 + |
| M i ( 1 0 0 % ) e x c o |
4 2 7 5 |
3 6 8 7 |
9 8 4 |
2 6 1 + |
4 5. |
- | 2 3. 2 + |
EBITDA by country
| 9 M 1 5 |
9 M 1 4 |
∆ | ∆ | F o r e x |
S c o p e |
l- f- l ∆ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E U R m |
b a s |
% | b a s |
b a s |
% | ||
| I l t a y |
( 1 9 ) 7 |
( 9 0 ) |
( 1 0 ) 7 |
1 0 0 > |
- | - | 1 0 0 > |
| U i d S t t t n e a e s |
2 1 6 2 |
1 3 5 2 |
8 1. 0 |
6 0 0 + |
3 8. 4 |
- | 3 1. 6 + |
| G e r m a n y |
2 6 5 |
2 5 7 |
( 0 1 ) |
0 2 - |
- | - | 0. 2 - |
| L b u x e m o u r g |
1 1. 6 |
1 3 0 |
( 1. 5 ) |
1 1. 2 - |
- | - | 1 1. 2 - |
| N h l d t e e r a n s |
1. 6 |
( 0 ) 7 |
2 3 |
1 0 0 > |
- | - | 1 0 0 > |
| C h R / S l k i e c e p o a a z v |
2 4 7 |
1 9 2 |
4 5 |
2 8 3 + |
0. 1 |
- | 2 7. 6 + |
| P l d o a n |
2 0 3 |
1 5 5 |
4 8 |
3 1. 1 + |
0. 1 |
- | 3 0. 6 + |
| U k i r a n e |
4 3 |
1 1. 8 |
( ) 7 5 |
6 3 9 - |
( 2. ) 5 |
- | 4 2. 8 - |
| R i u s s a |
4 0 5 |
6 4 8 |
( 2 4 3 ) |
3 7 5 - |
( 1 7 ) 5. |
2. 9 |
1 7. 8 - |
| T t l o a i r e c u r r n g |
3 5 2 1 3 5 5. 2 |
3 0 2 5 3 0 7. 2 |
4 9 5 4 8. 1 |
1 6 4 + 1 5. 6 + |
2 0. 4 2 0. 8 |
2. 9 2. 9 |
8. 7 + 8. 0 + |
| M i ( 1 0 0 % ) e x c o |
1 9 8 5 |
1 3 8 4 |
5 7 4 |
1. 4 5 + |
2. 2 |
- | 3 8. 2 + |
Net sales and EBITDA development
- In 9M 15 USA accounts for 3/5 of the total EBITDA
- Decreasing contribution from emerging markets, from 38% to 25% of EBITDA in 9M 15 vs 9M 14 due to forex and economic troubles
EBITDA variance analysis
Consolidated Income Statement
| 9 M 1 5 |
9 M 1 4 |
∆ | ∆ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E U R m |
b a s |
% | ||
| N S l t e a e s |
1, 9 9 8 1 |
1, 8 9 8 7 |
9 9 4 |
2 5 + |
| O t i h f l p e r a n g c a s o w ( E B I T D A ) |
3 5 2 1 |
3 0 2 5 |
4 9 5 |
1 6 4 + |
| f h i h, i o w c n o n r e c u r r n g % f l ( i ) o s a e s r e c u r r n g |
( 3. 2 ) 1 7. 8 % |
( 4. 6 ) 1 6. 2 % |
||
| D i i d i i t t t e p r e c a o n a n a m o r z a o n |
( 1 4 5 2 ) |
( 1 6 6 5 ) |
2 1. 3 |
|
| O i f i t t p e r a n g p r o ( E B I T ) |
2 0 6 9 |
1 3 6 1 |
0 8 7 |
|
| % f l o s a e s |
1 0. 4 % |
7. 2 % |
||
| E i t i q u y e a r n n g s |
5 5 7 |
3 6 4 |
1 9 3 |
|
| f N t i t e n a n c e c o s |
( ) 8 3 7 |
( ) 5 0 7 |
( ) 3 3 0 |
|
| P f i b f t t r o e o r e a x |
1 8 9 7 |
1 2 1. 8 |
1 5 7 |
|
| I t n c o m e a x e x p e n s e |
( 8 6 ) 5 |
( 6 6 ) 4 |
8 7 |
|
| N f i t t e p r o |
1 2 0 3 |
4 5 5 |
6 4 9 |
|
| M i i t i n o r e s |
( 2 7 ) |
( 3 9 ) |
1. 3 |
|
| C f l i d t d t i t o n s o a e n e p r o |
1 1 7 6 |
5 1. 4 |
6 6 2 |
|
| C h f l ( 1 ) a s o w |
2 6 5 5 |
2 2 1. 8 |
4 3 7 |
1 9 7 + |
(1) Net Profit + amortization & depreciation
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement
| 9 M 1 5 |
9 M 1 4 |
2 0 1 4 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| E U R m |
|||
| C h d f i t t a s g e n e r a e r o m o p e r a o n s |
3 0 8 2 |
2 6 6 6 |
3 9 0 7 |
| % f l o s a e s |
1 5. 4 % |
1 4. 0 % |
1 5. 6 % |
| I i d t t n e r e s p a |
( 4 9 5 ) |
( 5 5 5 ) |
( 8 7 2 ) |
| I t i d n c o m e a x p a |
( ) 4 2 9 |
( ) 2 6 2 |
( ) 5 8 9 |
| N t h b t i t i i t i e c a s y o p e r a n g a c v e s |
2 1 5 8 |
1 8 4 9 |
2 4 4 6 |
| % f l o s a e s |
1 0. 8 % |
9. 7 % |
9. 8 % |
| C i l d i 1 ) t t a p a e p e n r e s x u |
( 2 2 8 ) 5 |
( 1 2 6 ) 5 |
( 1 8 ) 7 7 |
| E i t i t t q u y n v e s m e n s |
( ) 0 1 |
( ) 2 3 5 |
( ) 1 3 6 8 |
| D i i d d i d v e n s p a |
( 1 1. 3 ) |
( 1 2 1 ) |
( 1 1. 9 ) |
| D i i d d f i t e n s r o m a s s o c a e s v |
2 3 5 |
2 2 1 |
4 0 3 |
| D i l f f i d d i t t t s p o s a o x e a s s e s a n n v e s m e n s |
1 7 6 |
3 0 1 |
5 8 6 |
| f f T l t i d i d d i t i r a n s a o n e r e n c e s a n e r v a v e s |
( ) 2 3 0 |
8 5 |
0 9 |
| A d i b l t t c c r e n e r e s p a a e u y |
( 7 6 ) |
( 7 0 ) |
2 4 |
| I i d t t n e r e s r e c e e v |
4 7 |
8 7 |
1 1. 0 |
| O t h e r |
( ) 5 0 |
1. 6 |
3 1 |
| C h i t d b t a n g e n n e e |
( 1 1. 2 ) |
8 6 7 |
3 4 5 |
| f ( f ) N t i i l i t i d i d e n a n c a p o s o n e n o p e r o |
( 1, 0 3 9 ) 7 |
( 1, 0 1 0 ) 5 |
( 1, 0 6 2 ) 7 |
1) of which expansion projects 125.5 in 2015 and 34.4 in 2014
Net Financial Position
| S 1 5 e p |
D 1 4 e c |
∆ | S 1 4 e p |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E U R m |
b a s |
|||
| C h d h f i i l t t a s a n o e r n a n c a a s s e s |
3 9 0 4 |
4 2 1. 7 |
( 3 1. 4 ) |
1. 9 5 5 |
| S h d b t- t t o r e r m e |
( 2 1 8 ) 7 |
( 1 ) 7 5 5 |
( 4 3 2 ) |
( 2 0 4 ) 5 |
| N t h t- t h e s o r e r m c a s |
1 7 1. 7 |
2 4 6 3 |
( 4 6 ) 7 |
3 4 6 5 |
| L f i i l t t o n g e r m n a n c a a s s e s - |
1 5 9 |
1 7 3 |
1. 3 |
1 1. 2 |
| L d b t t o n g e r m e - |
( 1, 2 6 1. ) 5 |
( 1, 3 2 6 3 ) |
6 4 8 |
( 1, 3 6 8 2 ) |
| N d b t t e e |
( 1, 0 3 9 ) 7 |
( 1, 0 6 2 ) 7 |
( 1 1. 2 ) |
( 1, 0 1 0 ) 5 |
Gross debt breakdown (€m 1,480.2)
pag 12 Investor Roadshow | November 17, 2015
Debt maturity profile
- Total debt and borrowings stood at €m 1,413 at September 2015
- As at September 2015 available €m 448m of undrawn committed facilities (€m 400m for Buzzi Unicem, €m 48 for Dyckerhoff)
Industrial capex
In the period 2007-2014 equal to €m 2,992, of which €m 1,010 for expansion projects *
Expansion capex
Maryneal, Texas – USA
- To be completed in 1H 2016
- New line with a capacity of 1.2m tons per year (versus 0.6m currently)
- Total cost: \$m 260
- Aimed at capturing the demand growth of Texas in oil and gas, residential and infrastructure
- Cost saving thanks to increased efficiency and environmental footprint reduction
Apazapan, Veracruz - Mexico
- To be completed in 1Q 2017
- Second line with a capacity of 1.3m tons per year, to double the current 1.3m
- Aimed at preserving market share in a growing consumption trend
- Total cost: \$m 200
Recent strategic move: new offer addressed to Sacci 1/3
- RATIONALE 4-
-
1- Active role in the consolidation process of the domestic industry
-
3- Domestic consumption at extremely low level (trough?) with chances to rebound 2- Easier to adjust production capacity in a less fragmented market
-
Operating leverage thanks to greater capacity utilization
- 5-Gradual recovery of profitability in Italy
-
Major player of the country, operating in the central and northern regions
- Market share estimated at 6%; adequate vertical integration in ready-mix concrete
- About 1.3 m ton cement sales in 2014
- Filed for composition with creditors at the beginning of May
Recent strategic move: new offer addressed to Sacci 2/3
- Buzzi Unicem submitted to SACCI a binding offer to acquire its cement and readymix concrete business units, under the composition plan opened last May
- The offer provides for the purchase of 5 cement plants (Cagnano Amiterno, Castelraimondo, Tavernola Bergamasca, Greve in Chianti and Livorno), 3 terminals currently idle (Manfredonia, Ravenna and Vasto) and 27 ready-mix concrete plants, mainly located in central Italy
- It does not include minority interests in Cementerie Aldo Barbetti (35%) and Cementi Costantinopoli (40%)
- The offer will be valid and binding until 31 March 2016, provided that SACCI incorporates it as an integral part in its application for composition to the Court of Rome
- The provisional financial commitment amounts to €m 74, plus earn-out clause according to Ebitda achieved in Italy over the next four years (in any case no less than €m 25)
pag17
Recent strategic move: new offer addressed to Sacci 3/3
Appendix
Buzzi Unicem at a Glance
- International multi-regional, "heavy-side" group, focused on cement, ready-mix and aggregates
- Dedicated management with a long-term vision of the business
- Highly efficient, low cost producer with strong and stable cash flows
- Successful geographic diversification with leading positions in attractive markets
- Italy (# 2 cement producer), US (# 4 cement producer), Germany (# 2 cement producer), joint venture in Mexico (# 4 cement producer)
- Significant positions in Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Russia and Ukraine, as well as entry point in Slovenia and Algeria
- High quality and environmentally friendly assets
- Leading product and service offering
- Conservative financial profile and balanced growth strategy
"Value creation through lasting, experienced know-how and operating efficiency"
Ownership structure
Cement plants location and capacity
2014 Consumption vs. Peak
Historical series of cement consumption by country
Historical EBITDA development by country
| EU Rm |
20 07 |
20 08 |
20 09 |
20 10 |
20 11 |
20 12 |
20 13 |
20 14 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ita ly |
EB ITD A |
20 6.4 |
143 .4 |
92 .7 |
32 .5 |
10 .3 |
-5. 9 |
-18 .1 |
-18 .7 |
|
| in ma rg |
21 .5% |
16. 9% |
13. 1% |
5.3 % |
1.8 % |
-1. 2% |
-4. 2% |
-4. 8% |
||
| Ge rm an y |
EB ITD A |
138 .9 |
102 .7 |
116 .3 |
76 .3 |
90 .3 |
72 .2 |
108 .1 |
88 .6 |
|
| in ma rg |
27 .0% |
17. 3% |
22 .0% |
13. 9% |
14. 2% |
12. 0% |
18. 0% |
14. 7% |
||
| Lu mb |
EB ITD A |
21 .5 |
17 .4 |
14 .1 |
16 .4 |
33 .4 |
13 .8 |
19 .7 |
17 .8 |
|
| xe ou rg |
in ma rg |
23 .5% |
19. 5% |
0% 17. |
7% 17. |
.6% 29 |
13. 3% |
18. 1% |
16. 8% |
|
| Ne the rla nd |
EB ITD A |
8.1 | 7.2 | 4.5 | 0.6 | 1.6 | -5. 5 |
-8. 2 |
-1. 9 |
|
| s | in ma rg |
% 5.8 |
% 5.4 |
4.0 % |
0.5 % |
1.4 % |
-6. 3% |
-11 .3% |
3% -3. |
|
| Cz h R ec ep |
EB ITD A |
70 .3 |
73 .2 |
44 .2 |
32 .8 |
35 .2 |
25 .4 |
19 .2 |
27 .0 |
|
| in ma rg |
32 .6% |
28 .1% |
25 .2% |
20 .5% |
20 .5% |
17. 0% |
14. 6% |
20 .2% 18 .2 .1 20 .4% .3 11 .0 12. 5% .6 73 .4 35 .0% 20 7.3 24 .2% .5 Ad tio f op n o S 1 IFR 1 42 2.7 16 .9% |
||
| Po lan d |
EB ITD A |
52 .1 |
70 .0 |
31 .2 |
33 .4 |
36 .9 |
21 .8 |
27 | ||
| in ma rg |
36 .5% |
38 .1% |
25 .7% |
25 .8% |
26 .6% |
20 .0% |
26 .8% |
|||
| Uk rai ne |
EB ITD A |
58 .1 |
49 .9 |
-4. 5 |
-10 .5 |
6.9 | 15 .8 |
12 | ||
| in ma rg |
32 .4% |
23 .8% |
-6. 0% |
-12 .8% |
6.2 % |
11. 8% |
10. 0% |
|||
| Ru ia |
EB ITD A |
94 .7 |
173 .2 |
42 .1 |
39 .7 |
65 .7 |
96 .1 |
92 | ||
| ss | in ma rg |
47 .9% |
64 .8% |
42 .6% |
32 .0% |
37 .4% |
41 .0% |
37 .2% |
||
| US A |
EB ITD A |
304 .1 |
20 5.8 |
13 1.3 |
88 .7 |
71 .4 |
123 .9 |
15 1.0 |
||
| in ma rg |
35 .7% |
27 .4% |
21 .4% |
14. 8% |
12. 8% |
18. 2% |
20 .7% |
|||
| Me xic o |
EB ITD A |
91 .9 |
79 .9 |
69 .9 |
.2 77 |
82 .6 |
97 .5 |
77 | ||
| .4% .9% in 43 38 ma rg 38 .7% |
36 .2% |
34 .7% |
.2% 36 |
.2% 33 |
||||||
| EB ITD A |
104 6.3 |
92 2.7 |
54 1.7 |
38 7.0 |
43 4.3 |
45 5.1 |
48 1.2 |
|||
| Gr ou p |
in ma rg |
29 .9% |
26 .2% |
.3% 20 |
14 .6% |
15 .6% |
16 .2% |
17 .5% |