AI assistant
BUXTON RESOURCES LIMITED — Interim / Quarterly Report 2017
Mar 13, 2017
64585_rns_2017-03-13_716d0275-5c24-4644-9505-f95ab06d9c27.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ABN 86 125 049 550 INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2016
This interim financial report does not include all the notes of the type normally included in an annual financial report. This report is to be read in conjunction with the Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2016 and any public announcements made by Buxton Resources Limited during the interim reporting period in accordance with the continuous disclosure requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.
| Contents | Page |
|---|---|
| Corporate information | 3 |
| Directors' report | 4 |
| Auditor's independence declaration | 16 |
| Condensed statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income | 17 |
| Condensed statement of financial position | 18 |
| Condensed statement of cash flows | 19 |
| Condensed statement of changes in equity | 20 |
| Notes to the condensed financial statements | 21 |
| Directors' declaration | 24 |
| Independent review report to the members of Buxton Resources Limited | 25 |
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Buxton Resources Limited ABN: 86 125 049 550
Directors
Seamus Cornelius Eamon Hannon Anthony Maslin Feng (Frank) Xue
Auditors
Rothsay Auditors Level 1, Lincoln Building 4 Ventnor Avenue West Perth WA 6005
Company Secretary
Sam Wright
Registered office and principal place of business
Suite 1, 1st Floor 14-16 Rowland Street Subiaco WA 6008
PO Box 9028 Subiaco WA 6008
Ph: 08 9380 6063 Fax: 08 9381 4056 Web: www.buxtonresources.com.au
Share Register
Computershare Ltd Level 2, 45 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000
Home Exchange
ASX Limited ASX Code: BUX
DIRECTORS' REPORT
Your directors are pleased to present their report on Buxton Resources Limited for the half-year ended 31 December 2016.
DIRECTORS
The names of the directors who held office during or since the end of the half-year are:
Seamus Cornelius
Eamon Hannon
Anthony Maslin
Feng (Frank) Xue
Directors were in office for the entire period.
REVIEW AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operating results
The Company recorded a loss for the period ended 31 December 2016 of \$92,466 (2015; \$2,204,956).
At 31 December 2016 the Company held cash and term deposit balances of \$1,901,226 (2015; \$2,057,201).
Double Magic Ni & Cu – West Kimberley
During the half year, Buxton confirmed that the most attractive exploration target at Double Magic is a primary magmatic Ni-Cu sulphide deposit. Conceptually, this is likely to be a core of high-grade stringer or net-textured sulphides within a larger disseminated envelope (see Figure 1 below). Remobilised massive sulphide veins may or may not be present anywhere within several hundred metres.

Figure 1 – Disseminated primary Ni-Cu sulphides in hole DMDD001 (56.37-56.53 metres, HQ3 61mm diameter) at the Merlin Prospect. This mineralisation is non-conductive and cannot be detected by TEM.
Previous electrical surveys in the region have been confined to various types of Transient Electro-Magnetic (TEM) surveys such as VTEM, FLTEM and DHTEM. These surveys have effectively detected highly conductive but thin veins of remobilized massive sulphide at Double Magic. Critically however, TEM may not detect highgrade but much less conductive stringer or net-textured "massive matrix" sulphide zones or pods, and will not detect disseminated sulphides, which have been found to be completely non-conductive.
Benchtop testwork on Buxton's 2015 drillcore indicates even high-grade (>3% Ni) net-textured sulphide zones are only around 1/20th as conductive as the thin massive sulphide veins. The risk that extreme EM responses from remobilised massive sulphide veins could mask any response from primary Ni-Cu sulphides is considered by Buxton to be substantial, and real.
Induced Polarisation/Resistivity surveys measure electrical chargeability and resistivity properties of the rock mass, unlike TEM, which measures conductivity. Therefore, IP will detect the demonstrably chargeable disseminated, stringer, or net-textured zones but will not "see" distracting highly conductive bodies such as massive sulphide veins or graphite, for example.
Buxton chose to proceed with a ground-breaking IP survey at Double Magic because it has been recognized that the main exploration target type - primary magmatic sulphides - may not be detected by TEM, the only electrical survey technique applied in the region to date. Buxton's pioneering use of IP represents a paradigm shift for exploration in the West Kimberley. This IP survey is using some of the highest powered transmitters available as part of a complex array laid out over approximately 67 kilometres of transmitting and receiving lines.
Results from the Induced Polarisation (IP) survey completed during the half year are considered by Buxton to be outstanding.
This work has detected a previously unknown, very large body of moderately chargeable material at depth, beneath the entire Merlin prospect. The body appears to be >2 km long and at least several hundred metres across, ranging in depth between ~60 to 400m below surface. Adding to potential, this body appears to plunge down and be open beyond 500m depth at the eastern end, possibly indicating a magmatic feeder zone (see Figure 2).
At this early stage, Buxton considers that supporting surface and drillhole geochemistry, supporting geology, geometry and location of the body, as well as the structural/tectonic setting all indicate that the chargeable body will prove to be related to Ni-Cu sulphides within the Ruins Dolerite.

Figure 2 – Merlin IP survey volume looking north-east, chargeability iso-surface 20 mV/V displayed, topography above, horizontal model slice displayed at base is ~530m below surface (-420RL)
So far, only two drillholes have intersected this chargeability anomaly, being DMRC0004 and DMDD0003 drilled under Conductor C in 2015. Both holes may have just intersected the very top of the chargeable body (see Figure 3), returning intersections of;
- 18 metres @ 0.51% Ni, 0.21% Cu (DMRC0004 152-170m downhole, reported 2/11/15), and;
- 9.6 metres @ 0.59% Ni, 0.21% Cu (DMDD0003 142.4-152.0m downhole, reported 27/11/15).

Figure 3 – Cross-section looking north-west showing chargeability iso-surface 20mV/V with drilling
This chargeable body may represent a large volume of mafic rock which is prospective for accumulations of nickel-copper sulphides. It exhibits irregular geometries in places, which may further enhance potential for sulphide accumulations.
Buxton reminds readers that this chargeability anomaly could represent a number of different geological entities, such as;
- Mafic rock with variable grade nickel-copper sulphide mineralisation
- Disseminated magnetite within later mafic rocks, or within surrounding schists, or
- Some other mass of chargeable rock of an unexpected nature.
However, considering the supporting surface and drillhole geochemistry, size, location, geometry, lack of magnetic expression of the body, possible geological model/s as well as the structural and tectonic setting, it is Buxton's opinion that that the chargeable body will prove to be a reflection of nickel-copper sulphides within a large volume of Ruins Dolerite.
The contraction and focussing to depth of the chargeability anomaly at the eastern end, extending beyond the depth of investigation, may suggest a magmatic feeder chamber to the more flat-lying portion. Importantly, previous shallow drilling targeting TEM conductivity anomalies appears to have largely missed these deeper targets.
Buxton believes this survey has dramatically enhanced the prospectivity of Double Magic for magmatic nickel-copper sulphide deposits and added a massive amount of information to the evolving 3D geological picture. These results have also validated the innovative use of high-power 3D IP at Merlin.
Outcropping Ni-Cu Sulphides supports IP Results
As part of the extensive work program carried out at Double Magic during the 2016 field season detailed mapping and rock chip sampling defined nickel-copper sulphides in outcrop with a strike length of over 700m (Figure 4). This nickel-copper sulphide zone is directly up dip from the 2015 drilling at Conductor D and also interpreted to be directly related to the recent IP chargeable anomaly (announced 24/10/2016). Additional nickel-copper mineralisation was also identified at surface on Conductor C.
All geological indications are pointing towards potentially a much larger Ni-Cu mineralised system existing than was previously understood at Double Magic. The surface mineralisation extends the strike length of the Conductor D mineralisation from ~65m in drilling to over 700m on surface. The occurrence of this mineralisation adds confidence to the interpretation that the IP chargeability anomaly represents a large disseminated Ni-Cu sulphide target, with the top of the IP anomaly ranging from 60m to 100m from surface.

Figure 4 – Plan view of 2016 rock chip assay results Ni (ppm), highlighting ~700m strike of Ni-Cu sulphides in outcrop up dip from the drilling at Conductor D, showing the recently defined IP chargeability anomaly (20mV/V)
Comment: Eamon Hannon, Managing Director
"For over 18 months the Double Magic project has ticked all the key technical criteria required to host a large sulphide body. The latest round of results has added yet another layer of strong supporting evidence for the existence of a large Ni-Cu mineralised system."
"The Buxton team believes that we could have a tiger by the tail and all of the work to date suggests there is a high possibility for a significant Ni-Cu deposit to exist at our Double Magic project. Very exciting times ahead!"

Figure 5 – Cross-section looking north-west showing IP chargeability iso-surface 20mV/V with drilling and surface Ni-Cu sulphides
PGE Results Support Magmatic Genesis At Double Magic
During the quarter a selection of mineralised surface and diamond core samples were analysed for the full suite of six PGE elements (Os, Ir, Ru, Rh, Pt and Pd) using the fire assay method with a nickel sulphide collector at Bureau Veritas Ultra Trace, Canning Vale, Western Australia.
The samples selected were across a range of mineralisation styles (disseminated, net/matrix and massive sulphide) and grade ranges (0.47 - 6.35% Ni). These were selected as being representative of mineralisation so far identified at the Double Magic Ni-Cu Project.
Results just received show elevated levels across the entire range of PGEs, see Table 1. Note that Ni and Cu results are from previous analysis of the same samples by Intertek Genalysis. Drillhole locations are listed in Table 2.
Of particular significance are the IPGE results (Os, Ir and Ru). These elements are only present in magmatic systems as they are immobile therefore cannot be transported, for example by hydrothermal systems. This is of genetic importance and adds an additional layer of confidence to the interpretation that the Double Magic Project hosts a primary magmatic mineralising system with potential to host significant accumulations of Ni-Cu sulphides.
It should be noted that these PGE results would not be expected to result in economic credits.
| Sample | Os | Ir | Ru | Rh | Pt | Pd | Ni | Cu | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNITS | ppb | ppb | ppb | ppb | ppb | ppb | ppm | ppm | |
| Detection limit |
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | |
| Massive, | |||||||||
| 33589 | 13.3 | 19.9 | 41.1 | 34.1 | 347.0 | 255.0 | 63504 | 1347 | DMDD0003 144m |
| Net/matrix, | |||||||||
| BRC3385 | 3.9 | 6.6 | 17.5 | 7.7 | 15.5 | 53.0 | 32213 | 9979 | DMDD0001 52.1m |
| Disseminated, | |||||||||
| 33590 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 25.5 | 34.5 | 4695 | 1940 | DMDD0003 144.2m |
| Disseminated, | |||||||||
| 33648 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 24.5 | 20.0 | 7293 | 2450 | DMDD0004 48.5m |
| Disseminated, | |||||||||
| BRC3683 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 6.1 | 2.4 | 26.5 | 27.5 | 5628 | 2312 | 655,417mE |
| 8,127,283mN |
Table 1 – Platinum-Group Element results for selected mineralised samples from Double Magic
Finalised Induced Polarisation Survey Results
Final results, interpretation and documentation of the IP survey (first reported to the ASX 24/10/16) have been received from Buxton's geophysical consultants, Southern Geoscience Consultants. Final evaluation of data confirmed that "overall the acquired dataset is deemed to be of high quality and consistent/repeatable across the full survey areal coverage". The depth investigation level "has conservatively been estimated to be ~500m for larger volumetric targets within the central target corridor". However, the 100-400+ metre depth focus of the survey and resultant dipole spacing of 100 metres means that "shallow/localised IP anomalism will not be resolved in any great amount of detail", meaning that the implications of any IP responses, or lack thereof, within about 100m of surface should be considered with care.
Indications are that the chargeability anomaly may have three discrete internal zones, two isolated features to the east and a longer, broader feature to the west. Possible structural influences can be observed. Broadly speaking, the IP chargeability anomaly lies within a corridor beneath, and flanked by, known EM conductors (from VTEM, FLTEM and DHTEM surveys). Drilling has proven every one of those conductors to be the result of Ni-Cu sulphide accumulations.
In conclusion, Southern Geoscience Consultants (SGC) commented that "In the case of Double Magic and geological observations from mapping/limited drilling to date it is believed that the most likely source of the main/primary IP anomalism is disseminated sulphides (whether mineralised/non‐mineralised remains to be tested). There is also the possibility that IP anomalism could be related to disseminated magnetite within later mafic rock types....It is believed unlikely that the IP anomalism is sourced by either graphite bearing rock types or clays/alterations/structure."
| Hole ID | Conductor | East | North | RL | Az | Dip | EOH(m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMDD0001 | D | 655.437 | 8,127,236 | 151 | 214 | -75 | 134.6 |
| DMDD0003 | 655,146 | 8,126,706 | 117 | 030 | $-52$ | 204.2 | |
| DMDD0004 | 655,409 | 8,127,210 | 147 | 337 | -60 | 75.2 |

Table 2 – Details of text-referenced diamond drillholes (all previously reported). MGA Zone 51 (GDA94)
Figure 6 – Location of Buxton's two West Kimberley projects, also showing the location of Panoramic's Savannah Ni-Cu Mine
Sentinel Project Ni & Cu – West Kimberley
Buxton has taken advantage of a softer nickel price and quieter market sentiment during the first half of 2016 to consolidate the Company's strategic position, in the West Kimberley particularly. Leveraging off the Company's large and growing proprietary technical knowledge base, Buxton has pegged three new Exploration Licenses in the West Kimberley, being pending applications E04/2406, E04/2407 and the March 2016 granted E04/2408, now named Sentinel (see Fig 1 for locations of granted licenses).
Buxton's wholly owned E04/2408 Sentinel Project was granted on the 16th of March 2016. The Project is located approximately 110km along strike to the southeast from the Double Magic Project (See Fig 5 overleaf for regional geology).
The ground was applied for based on the likely presence of prospective rocks assigned to the Ruins Dolerite, similar to the rocks seen at Double Magic. Buxton's 2015 results proved that the Ruins Dolerite does host better-than-economic Ni-Cu sulphide grades. The granted Sentinel Project, as well as other tenement applications made by Buxton in the Hooper Complex, all contain significant but under-explored mapped occurrences of Ruins Dolerite.
Not only does Sentinel contain significant quantities of mapped Ruins Dolerite, it has the only recorded occurrence of peridotite within the Ruins Dolerite (Derrick and Playford, 1973, Lennard River Explanatory Notes). Peridotite (an ultramafic rock predominantly composed of olivine and pyroxene) indicates a more primitive part of the magmatic system, typically the most prospective part of mafic-ultramafic systems for primary magmatic Ni-Cu sulphide mineralisation.
An initial field reconnaissance trip to the Sentinel Project was undertaken during July, with regional geological and lithogeochemical traverses completed. Rock chip samples have also been collected for petrographic review. Assessment of results is ongoing.

Figure 5 – Detailed location and regional geology for Buxton's West Kimberley projects
Zanthus/Widowmaker Project Ni & Cu – Fraser Range
On 24 August 2016, Buxton announced that it has entered into a joint venture agreement with Independence Group NL (ASX: IGO) in respect of its Zanthus (E28/1959) and Widowmaker (E28/2201) tenements (the Tenements) located in the Fraser Range, Western Australia (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Location of the Tenements in the Fraser Range, Western Australia
Buxton's Managing Director, Mr Eamon Hannon said "The formation of this joint venture in the Fraser Range with Independence Group is a great result for Buxton shareholders. Buxton has received \$1.5 million in cash and will be free carried on all expenditure until a Decision to Mine is made on the Tenements – at which point Buxton will have a 10% interest in possibly a world-class nickel deposit. We are excited about the potential upside from this joint venture.
The Fraser Range is a highly prospective ground package, however requires the significant financial resources of a leading diversified mining house like Independence Group to undertake aggressive exploration campaigns.
The joint venture will enable Buxton to achieve considerable cost and administrative savings and help fasttrack its highly promising flagship Double Magic Project in the Kimberley region of Western Australia."
Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, Buxton grants to IGO the sole and exclusive right to acquire a 90% interest in the Tenements by IGO immediately paying \$1.5 million in cash. Buxton will maintain a 10% interest in the Tenements.
Buxton and IGO will associate in an unincorporated joint venture for the purpose of exploring, and if warranted, developing and mining the Tenements in relation to all minerals other than iron ore. Buxton shall be free-carried by IGO until such time as a Decision to Mine is made in respect of the Tenements.
At this point, Buxton may elect to either participate in development by contributing capital pro-rata based on its JV interest, have its remaining 10% interest purchased by IGO for market value, or dilute to a Net Smelter Return Royalty (NSR).
The parties agree that IGO will grant to Buxton the exclusive right to explore and develop iron ore on the Tenements. The terms of such an exclusive right are to be finalised in a formal agreement to be entered into at the same time as the formal exploration joint venture agreement is completed.
Buxton's 100% owned Zanthus Magnetite Project is located on the Tenements and contains an Initial Inferred JORC Resource of 103.6Mt at 26.5% Fe, with good potential to expand the resource. The Zanthus Ni-Cu Project is located approximately 60km along strike from IGO's Nova Ni-Cu-Co Project in the emerging Fraser Range Nickel Province, Western Australia. The project covers an area of 367km2. Gravity data was gathered over an area of 137km2 of the potential gneiss units interpreted as being similar to those that host "the Eye" mafic - ultramafic intrusive that contains the Nova-Bollinger deposit.
Buxton's Widowmaker Project is also located in the Fraser Range and covers an area of approximately 225km2. The Fraser Range Nickel Province is host to a number of significant discoveries, most notably IGO's Nova Project with Buxton's Widowmaker Project located 22km along strike.
Approximately 15km of strike length of the favourable lithological host-rock package is interpreted to underlie the Widowmaker Project with multiple, significant Ni, Cu and PGE anomalies identified in a historical calcrete soil sampling database.
COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT
The information in this report that relates to exploration results and geology for the Double Magic Project is based on information previously reported under the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves based on information compiled by Mr Rolf Forster, Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, and Mr Derek Marshall, Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Forster is an Independent Consultant to Buxton Resources Limited and Mr Marshall is a full-time employee. Mr Forster and Mr Marshall have sufficient experience which is relevant to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a "Competent Person", as defined in the 2012 edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Forster and Mr Marshall consent to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this report that relates to exploration results and geology for the Widowmaker and Zanthus projects is based on information previously reported under the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves based on information compiled and/or reviewed by Mr Eamon Hannon, Fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and MD at Buxton Resources Limited. No material changes have occurred to this information. Mr Hannon has sufficient experience which is relevant to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a "Competent Person", as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves and consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters reviewed by him in the form and context in which they appear. There have been no material changes to the information reported in the previous report.
The information in this announcement that relates to Geophysical Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Russell Mortimer, who is employed as a Consultant to the Company through geophysical consultancy Southern Geoscience Consultants Pty Ltd. Mr Mortimer is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a member of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists and has sufficient experience of relevance to the styles of mineralisation and the types of deposits under consideration, and activities undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Mortimer consents to the inclusion in the report of matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.
CORPORATE
During the period the Company issued 5,900,000 options to Directors, employees and consultants. The unlisted options have an exercise price of 15 cents and an expiry date on 30 November 2019.
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Buxton held its Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on 21 November 2016 at Steve's Wine Cellar, 30 The Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia and all resolutions that were put were unanimously passed on a show of hands.
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO REPORTING DATE
Subsequent to the balance date no matter or circumstance has arisen which has significantly affected, or may significantly affect the operations of the Company, the result of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Company in subsequent financial years.
AUDITOR'S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
A copy of the auditor's independence declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 is set out on the following page.
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of directors.
Seamus Cornelius
Director Perth, 14 th March 2017


CONDENSED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE HALF-YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2016
| Note | Half-year ended | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Dec 2016 | 31 Dec 2015 | ||
| \$ | \$ | ||
| Revenue from continuing operations | 3 | 1,500,000 | 7,845 |
| Depreciation expense | (7,456) | (8,884) | |
| Salaries and employee benefits expense | (269,016) | (275,105) | |
| Share based payment expense | (497,904) | (324,883) | |
| Exploration and evaluation expense | (668,669) | (1,432,311) | |
| Corporate expense | (73,010) | (116,571) | |
| Administration expense | (83,943) | (67,518) | |
| Loss from operating activities | (99,998) | (2,217,427) | |
| Finance income | 7,532 | 12,471 | |
| Finance cost | - | - | |
| Net finance income | 7,532 | 12,471 | |
| Loss before income tax | (92,466) | (2,204,956) | |
| Income tax expense | - | - | |
| TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE PERIOD | (92,466) | (2,204,956) | |
| Basic and diluted loss per share (cents) | (0.10) | (2.50) |
The above condensed statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2016
| 31 December | 30 June | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2016 | 2016 | |
| \$ | \$ | ||
| CURRENT ASSETS | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,773,226 | 1,374,221 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 34,217 | 25,998 | |
| Other financial assets | 128,000 | 128,000 | |
| Other current assets | 20,222 | 13,651 | |
| TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 1,955,665 | 1,541,870 | |
| NON-CURRENT ASSETS | |||
| Deferred exploration expenditure | 656,862 | 656,862 | |
| Plant and equipment | 33,111 | 41,162 | |
| TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSSETS | 689,973 | 698,024 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 2,645,638 | 2,239,894 | |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||
| Trade and other payables | 137,948 | 137,642 | |
| TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 137,948 | 137,642 | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 137,948 | 137,642 | |
| NET ASSETS | 2,507,690 | 2,102,252 | |
| EQUITY | |||
| Issued capital | 4 | 14,891,078 | 14,884,484 |
| Reserve | 6 | 1,837,863 | 1,973,646 |
| Accumulated losses | (14,221,251) | (14,755,878) | |
| TOTAL EQUITY | 2,507,690 | 2,102,252 |
The above condensed statement of financial position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE HALF-YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2016
| Accumulated | Option reserve | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Issued capital | losses | Total | ||
| \$ | \$ | \$ | \$ | |
| Balance at 1 July 2015 | 12,931,994 | (11,893,057) | 1,475,954 | 2,514,891 |
| Total comprehensive income for the period |
- | (2,204,956) | - | (2,204,956) |
| Shares issued for cash | 2,025,700 | - | - | 2,025,700 |
| Shares issued under exploration agreements |
58,837 | - | - | 58,837 |
| Share issue costs | (132,046) | - | - | (132,046) |
| Share option payments | - | - | 324,883 | 324,883 |
| Balance at 31 December 2015 | 14,884,485 | (14,098,013) | 1,800,837 | 2,587,309 |
| Balance at 1 July 2016 | 14,884,484 | (14,755,878) | 1,973,646 | 2,102,252 |
| Total comprehensive income for the period |
- | (92,466) | - | (92,466) |
| Expiry of options | - | 627,093 | (627,093) | - |
| Share-based payments | 6,594 | - | 491,310 | 497,904 |
| Balance at 31 December 2016 | 14,891,078 | (14,221,251) | 1,837,863 | 2,507,690 |
The above condensed statement of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE HALF-YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2016
| Half-year ended | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31 Dec 2016 | 31 Dec 2015 | |
| \$ | \$ | |
| Cashflows from operating activities | ||
| Cash receipts from customers | - | 7,845 |
| Payments for exploration and evaluation | (689,070) | (1,544,853) |
| Payments to suppliers | (182,988) | (125,232) |
| Payments to staff | (236,673) | (274,403) |
| Interest received | 7,736 | 17,504 |
| Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities | (1,100,995) | (1,919,139) |
| Cashflows from investing activities | ||
| Transfers from term deposits | - | 128,000 |
| Proceeds from the sale of exploration interests | 1,500,000 | - |
| Net cash outflow from investing activities | 1,500,000 | 128,000 |
| Cashflows from financing activities | ||
| Proceeds from the issue of shares | - | 2,025,700 |
| Payments for share issue costs | - | (132,046) |
| Net cash inflow from financing activities | - | 1,893,654 |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 399,005 | 102,515 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 1,374,221 | 1,954,686 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | 1,773,226 | 2,057,201 |
The above condensed statement of cash flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1: BASIS OF PREPARATION OF THE INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT
This general purpose financial report for the interim half-year reporting period ended 31 December 2016 has been prepared in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 134 Interim Financial Reporting and the Corporations Act 2001.
This interim financial report does not include all the notes of the type normally included in an annual financial report. Accordingly, this report is to be read in conjunction with the annual report for the year ended 30 June 2016 and any public announcements made by Buxton Resources Limited during the interim period in accordance with the continuous disclosure requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.
The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year and corresponding interim reporting period, except as set out below.
New and amended standards adopted by the Company
The Company has adopted all the new, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the AASB that are relevant to their operations and effective for the current reporting period. The adoption of these Accounting Standards and Interpretations did not have any significant impact on the financial performance or position of the Company during the interim reporting period.
Impact of standards issued but not yet applied by the Company
The Company has also reviewed all new Standards and Interpretations that have been issued but are not yet effective for the half-year ended 31 December 2016. As a result of this review the Directors have determined that there is no impact, material or otherwise, of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations on its business and, therefore, no change necessary to Company accounting policies.
NOTE 2: SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner that is consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision maker has been identified as the full Board of Directors.
The Company operates in predominantly one business and geographical segment, being mineral exploration in Australia.
NOTE 3: REVENUE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
| 1 July 2016 to 31 December 2016 December \$ 2011December |
1 July 2015 to 31 December 2015 December \$ 2011December |
|
|---|---|---|
| Sale of exploration interest | 1,500,000 | - |
| Rental income Sundry income |
- - |
7,392 453 |
| Total for the period | 1,500,000 | 7,845 |
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 4: ISSUED CAPITAL
| 31 December 2016 | 30 June 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| \$ | \$ | |
| Issued and paid up capital | ||
| Fully paid ordinary shares | 14,891,078 | 14,884,484 |
| Six months to | Year to | |
| 31 December 2016 Number |
30 June 2016 Number |
|
| Movements in fully paid shares on issue | ||
| At beginning of period | 20092009 88,462,921 |
77,525,121 |
| Share-based payment | 82,418 | - |
| Issued for exploration interest | - | 427,800 |
| Issued for cash | - | 10,510,000 |
| Balance at end of period | 88,545,339 | 88,462,921 |
NOTE 5: OPTIONS
| Six months to 31 December 2016 |
Year to 30 June 2016 |
|
|---|---|---|
| \$ | \$ | |
| Movements in options over ordinary shares on issue Unlisted |
||
| Balance at beginning of period | 27,350,000 | 19,150,000 |
| Issue of unlisted options during the period | 5,900,000 | 11,400,000 |
| Expiry of options during the period | (7,275,000) | (3,200,000) |
| Balance at end of period | 25,975,000 | 27,350,000 |
| Listed | ||
| Balance at beginning of period | - | 4,194,450 |
| Expiry of options during the period | - | (4,194,450) |
| Balance at end of period | - | - |
NOTE 6: RESERVES
| Six months to 31 December 2016 |
Year to 30 June 2016 \$ |
|---|---|
| 1,475,954 | |
| - | |
| 497,692 | |
| 1,837,863 | 1,973,646 |
| \$ 1,973,646 (627,093) 491,310 |
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 7: CONTINGENCIES
There has been no change in contingent liabilities or assets since the last annual reporting date.
NOTE 8: SIGNIFICANT EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO REPORTING DATE
Subsequent to the balance date no matter or circumstance has arisen which has significantly affected, or may significantly affect the operations of the Company, the result of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Company in subsequent financial years.
NOTE 9: COMMITMENTS
Exploration commitments
In order to maintain current rights of tenure to mining tenements and permits, the Company has the following discretionary exploration expenditure requirements up until expiry of leases. These obligations, which are subject to renegotiation upon expiry of the leases, are not provided for in the financial statements and are payable:
| 31 December | 30 June | |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2016 | |
| \$ | \$ | |
| Within one year | 1,788,178 | 1,175,720 |
| Later than one year but not later than 5 years | 4,353,320 | 5,278,880 |
| 6,141,498 | 6,454,600 |
If the Company decides to relinquish certain leases and/or does not meet these obligations, assets recognised in the statement of financial position may require review to determine the appropriateness of carrying values. The sale, transfer or farm-out of exploration rights to third parties will reduce or extinguish these obligations.
Operating lease commitments
| 31 December | 30 June | |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2016 | |
| \$ | \$ | |
| Within one year | 24,900 | 24,900 |
| Later than one year but not later than 5 years | 14,525 | 26,975 |
| 39,425 | 51,875 |
DIRECTORS' DECLARATION
In the opinion of the Directors of the Company:
-
- The attached financial statements and notes thereto are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 including:
- (a) complying with Accounting Standard AASB 134 "Interim Financial Reporting" and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
- (b) giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity's financial position as at 31 December 2016 and of its performance for the half-year then ended.
-
- There are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors made pursuant to s.303(5) of the Corporations Act 2001.
On behalf of the Directors
Seamus Cornelius Director Perth,14 th March 2017

| Dated | March |
|---|---|