ASARA RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2020

Mar 30, 2020

ASX/Media Announcement

31 March 2020

Drilling Intersects 4m at 12.6 g/t Gold at Kouri

Key Points:

• Potential for a high-grade gold shoot with the intersection of continuous high-grade gold mineralisation in four RC drill holes at the Diabatou Prospect, located 7km northeast of the 1.4Moz gold Mineral Resource.

• Latest RC drilling results from the Diabatou Prospect (0.5g/t gold cut-off) include:

• 4m at 12.6g/t gold from 77m, including 2m at 22.5g/t gold from 78m (MRC027); and

• 3m at 6.1g/t gold from 54m, including 1m at 15.5g/t gold from 54m (MRC028).

• The high-grade gold mineralisation has now been intersected over 100m of strike and to a depth of 70m . It remains open at depth and along strike to the east and west.

• There is a halo of lower grade gold mineralisation around the potential high-grade gold shoot. At 0.3g/t gold cutoff, the new intercepts at the Diabatou Prospect become:

• 8m at 6.5g/t gold from 76m (MRC027); and

• 10m at 2.1g/t gold from 47m (MRC028).

• The high-grade mineralisation is associated with a distinct zone of intense shearing within granite which offers a clear target for follow-up drilling planned as soon as exploration can re-commence.

• Samples for a further 4 RC drill holes from the Kogodou Prospect, immediately east of the Mineral Resource, are at the laboratory and assays are pending.

West African gold explorer, Golden Rim Resources Ltd (ASX: GMR) ( Golden Rim , Company ), is pleased to provide its latest drilling results from its Kouri Gold Project ( Kouri ) in Burkina Faso.

Assays have been received for 10 reverse circulation ( RC ) drill holes for a total of 1,046m. Three RC drill holes were located within the Mineral Resource area (BARC365, GRC007 tail, GRC010); two drill holes (MRC027 – MRC028) located at the Diabatou Prospect, and 5 drill holes (MRC029 – MRC033) located at the Perga Prospect.

The location details for these new drill holes are provided in Table 1. The new assay results are listed in Tables 2 and 3 and depicted in Figures 1 – 3.

Golden Rim Resources Ltd I ABN 39 006 710 774 I Level 2, 609 Canterbury Road, Surrey HillsVIC3127, Australia I PO Box 124, Surrey Hills VIC 3127, Australia www.goldenrim.com.au I info@goldenrim.com.au I T + 61 3 9836 4146

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [486 x 323] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1. Location of drill holes (with new gold intercepts in yellow boxes) and rock chip samples in the southern portion of the Diabatou Prospect over a satellite image which depicts the artisanal workings.

Diabatou Prospect

In the southern portion of the Diabatou Prospect, assay results have been received for an additional two RC drill holes (MRC027 – MRC028) completed around previous drill hole MRC016 which discovered high-grade gold ( 9m at 3.6g/t gold from 49m, including 1m at 15.1g/t gold from 50m) (Figure 1). The high-grade gold mineralisation is associated with an extensive east-northeast-trending zone of artisanal workings that extend over 200m. Previous rock chip sampling of mineralisation exposed in the artisanal workings returned results up to 14.7g/t gold .

New drill hole MRC027 intersected the same zone of high-grade mineralisation 25m beneath drill hole MRC016 with a drill intersection of 4m at 12.6g/t gold from 77m, including 2m at 22.5g/t gold from 78m (0.5g/t gold cut-off) or 8m at 6.5g/t gold from 76m, including 2m at 22.5g/t gold from 78m (0.3g/t cut-off) (Figure 2). The intercept in drill hole MRC027 indicates the gold grade of the mineralisation may be increasing at depth where its extent remains open.

Drill hole MRC028 intersected the same zone of high-grade mineralisation 50m along strike to the west of drill hole MRC016 and 25m west of the artisanal workings with drill intersections of 2m at 1.1g/t gold from 47m and 3m at 6.1g/t gold from 54m, including 1m at 15.5g/t gold from 54m (0.5g/t gold cut-off) or 10m at 2.1g/t gold from 47m, including 1m at 15.5g/t gold from 54m (0.3g/t gold cut-off) (Figure 1).

With previous drill hole MRC027, which intersected 6m at 9.5g/t gold from 63m (50m east of MRC016), the potential highgrade gold shoot has now been outlined over at least 100m in strike length. The mineralisation remains open along strike and the gold grade within the potential shoot may be increasing along strike to the east where the artisanal workings extend for a further 120m past the current drilling.

Page | 2

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

The high-grade gold mineralisation, at this stage, shows excellent continuity and is associated with a distinct zone of intense shearing, up to 10m wide, within the granite country rocks which offers a clear target for follow-up drilling. The gold mineralised zone strikes 070 – 075[0 ] and dips 65[0 ] south. Further RC drilling is planned at this target as soon as exploration re-commences.

==> picture [483 x 324] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2. Cross-section (A – A’) through previous drill hole MRC016 and new drill hole MRC027 (new intercepts in yellow boxes) at the Diabatou Prospect. The location of the section is depicted on Figure 1.

Mineral Resource Area

Infill RC drilling has been conducted on a 50m x 50m spacing in the northern portion of the 1.4Moz Mineral Resource beneath Guitorga Hill and extensional RC drilling has been conducted on a 100m x 50m spacing at the Kogodou Prospect for 550m along strike to the northeast of the Mineral Resource.

Samples for infill drill hole (BARC365) and one new drill hole (GRC010) completed at the Kogodou Prospect have been received. In addition, samples for an 18m extension to previous drill hole GRC007 at the Kogodou Prospect which ended in mineralisation (3m at 3.3g/t gold from 117m) were received.

The best intercepts from these new drill holes include:

• 1m at 3.2g/t gold from 44m (BARC365)

• 9m at 0.9g/t gold from 53m (BARC365)

• 13m at 0.6g/t gold from 2m (GRC010) (drill hole commenced in gold mineralisation)

Page | 3

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

No significant gold results were obtained in the extension of GRC007.

Samples for a further four RC drill holes (GRC011, GRC014, GRC015 and GRC017) completed at the Kogodou Prospect are at the laboratory in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso) and assays are pending (Table1 and Figure 3).

==> picture [488 x 325] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3. Location of new drill holes (with new gold intercepts in yellow boxes) that include infill drill holes in the northern portion of the Mineral Resource and drill holes to test for extensions of the Mineral Resource gold lodes to the northeast into the Kogodou Prospect over a combined ground magnetics and satellite image.

Perga Prospect

Assays were received for 5 RC drill holes (MRC029 – MRC33) completed at the Perga Prospect, located 10km northeast of the Mineral Resource.

Recent geological mapping identified an extensive zone of quartz vein mineralisation within strongly altered volcanic rocks at the Perga Prospect. Previous rock chip samples from the Perga Prospect include 22.2g/t gold, 18.9g/t gold and 13.0g/t gold.

The best gold results from drill holes MRC029 – MRC033 are summarised in Table 2. Intercepts are generally narrow and/or low grade.

Page | 4

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Commenting on the latest drilling results, Golden Rim’s Managing Director, Craig Mackay, said:

“We have now hit continuous high-grade gold in four holes at Diabatou and we may have discovered a gold shoot.

The high-grade gold mineralisation has now been delineated for 100m along strike and to 70m below surface and remains open in all directions.

We have seen the immensely positive impact the discovery of a high-grade gold shoot had on West African Resources’ (ASX:WAF) Sanbrado Gold Project, which is located only 100km down the road from Kouri. West African Resources announced its first gold pour at Sanbrado on 18 March 2020 and is expected to produce more than 300,000 ounces of gold in the first 12 months at AISC of less than US$600/ounce.

We now have a very clear target to follow up as soon as we are able to re-commence drilling and we eagerly look forward to determining the extent of the high-grade gold mineralisation at Diabatou.”

-ENDS-

For further information, visit www.goldenrim.com.au or please contact:

Golden Rim Resources Craig Mackay

Managing Director Golden Rim Resources +61 3 9836 4146 craig@goldenrim.com.au

This ASX Announcement was authorized for release by the Board of Golden Rim Resources Ltd.

About Golden Rim Resources

West African gold explorer, Golden Rim Resources Limited (ASX: GMR), is focused on the discovery and development of gold projects in West Africa.

With a decade of experience working in Burkina Faso, the Company is well placed to turn discoveries into real value for shareholders.

The Kouri Gold Project, located in north-east Burkina Faso, contains over 1.4Moz in defined Mineral Resources, with significant upside potential to grow.

Kouri is traversed by a significant NE-trending fault splay that is connected to the major Markoye Fault system. This fault system controls a number of major gold deposits in Burkina Faso, including Kiaka (5.9 Moz gold), Bomboré (5.2 Moz gold), Essakane (7 Moz gold) and Sanbrado (2.8 Moz gold). The mineralised fault system extends into western Niger where the 2.5 Moz Samira Hill is located. For more information: www.goldenrim.com.au

ASX Code: GMR Market Capitalisation: A$6m

Issued Shares: 1,163m

Page | 5

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1. RC drill hole collar details

Hole ID	Easting (m)	Northing (m)	RL (m)	Dip (o)	Azimuth (o)	EOH (m)	Prospect	Assaying Status
GRC007	181,113	1,409,315	292	-55	150	138	Kogodou	Received
GRC010	181,072	1,409,184	290	-55	150	150	Kogodou	Received
GRC011	181,098	1,409,141	290	-55	150	120	Kogodou	Pending
GRC014	181,249	1,409,279	290	-55	150	120	Kogodou	Pending
GRC015	181,283	1,409,419	290	-55	150	120	Kogodou	Pending
GRC017	181,333	1,409,332	290	-55	150	120	Kogodou	Pending
BARC365	180,861	1,409,132	305	-55	150	84	Banouassi	Received
MRC027	186556	1411787	283	-55	330	120	Diabatou	Received
MRC028	186496	1411791	285	-55	330	100	Diabatou	Received
MRC029	193,189	1,412,759	281	-55	150	130	Perga	Received
MRC030	191,540	1,410,367	282	-55	340	126	Perga	Received
MRC031	191,968	1,410,687	284	-55	340	120	Perga	Received
MRC032	188,945	1,409,896	280	-55	170	108	Perga	Received
MRC033	189,056	1,410,008	278	-55	170	90	Perga	Received

Notes:

• GRC prefix denotes RC drilling in the Gouéli Permit.

• BARC prefix denotes RC drilling at the Banouassi Prospect (Kouri Permit).

• MRC prefix denotes RC drilling at the Margou Permit.

• Co-ordinate projection: UTM, WGS 84 zone 31 North.

Table 2. Significant intercepts (≥0.5 g/t gold) from regional RC drilling at Kouri

Hole ID	From (m)	To (m)	Significant Gold Intersections
MRC027	77	81	4m at 12.6g/t
MRC027	78	80	incl. 2m at 22.5g/t
MRC027	103	106	3m at 0.8g/t
MRC028	47	49	2m at 1.1g/t
MRC028	54	57	3m at 6.1g/t
MRC028	54	55	Incl. 1m at 15.5g/t
MRC028	70	71	1m at 1.6g/t
MRC030	24	29	5m at 0.9g/t
MRC030	50	52	2m at 2.3g/t
MRC030	75	76	1m at 3.5g/t
MRC030	88	93	5m at 0.7g/t
MRC030	100	101	1m at 0.7g/t
MRC032	99	100	1m at 1.1g/t

Notes:

• FPF500 – 50g charge fire assay.

• Sample preparation and assaying conducted by BIGS Laboratory in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Page | 6

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Table 3. Significant intercepts (≥0.3 g/t gold) from the Mineral Resource infill and extensional drilling at Kouri

	Hole ID	From (m)	To (m)	Significant Gold Intersections
	BARC365	3	6	3m at 0.9g/t
		10	13	3m at 0.4g/t
		19	22	3m at 0.6g/t
		44	45	1m at 3.2g/t
		53	62	9m at 0.9g/t
		66	68	2m at 1.4g/t
		75	76	1m at 0.6g/t
	GRC010	2	15	13m at 0.6g/t
		21	26	5m at 0.3g/t
		34	35	1m at 0.4g/t
		83	84	1m at 0.3g/t
		87	88	1m at 0.4g/t

Notes:

• FPF500 – 50g charge fire assay.

• GRC007 – Previous drill hole was extended because it ended in mineralisation. No significant intercepts were obtained in the extension (120 – 138m).

• Sample preparation and assaying conducted by BIGS Laboratory in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Page | 7

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 1: JORC Code (2012 Edition), Assessment and Reporting Criteria

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code Explanation	Explanation
Sampling Techniques	Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.	The sampling described in this report refers to reverse circulation (RC) drilling. RC samples are collected by a three-tier riffle splitter using downhole sampling hammers with nominal 127 to 140mm holes. Samples were all collected by qualified geologists or under geological supervision. The samples are judged to be representative of the rock being drilled. The nature and quality of sampling is carried out under QAQC procedures as per industry standards.
	Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.	Sampling is guided by Golden Rim’s protocols and Quality Control procedures as per industry standards. To ensure representative sampling, 1m RC samples are collected from a cyclone, passing them through a 3-tier riffle splitter (producing a 2kg sample). Duplicate samples are taken every 30thsample. Measures were taken to avoid wet RC drilling.
	Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.	Samples were submitted to BIGS Laboratory and ALS Laboratories in Ouagadougou for preparation and analysis. The entire sample is dried, coarse crushed and pulverised to better than 85% of the material passing through a 75-micron (Tyler 200 mesh) screen. RC samples have been assayed by either Fire Assay or BLEG analysis. Fire Assay: A 200g sub-sample is taken from the samples for analysis. A 50g charge weight is fused with litharge-based flux, cupelled and the prill dissolved in aqua regia and gold tenor is determined by AAS. BLEG: Gold by accelerated cyanide leach using LeachWELL assay tablets over 4 hours with AAS finish on a 1kg sample.
Drilling Techniques	Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open- hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).	The RC rig is EDM 2000 with rods diameter of 114,3mm. All drill holes were planned to be drilled an optimum angle for intersecting the mineralisation (50 to 60 degrees). Downhole surveying occurred (where-ever possible) at 30m intervals down hole. The location of each hole and rock chip sample was recorded by handheld GPS with positional accuracy of approximately +/-5m.
Drill sample recovery	Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.	All RC samples are weighed to determine recoveries. Samples are recovered directly from the rig (via the cyclone and a 3-tier riffle splitter) in 1m intervals.

Page | 8

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code Explanation	Explanation
	Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.	All drill samples are visually checked for recovery, moisture and contamination. A technician is always present at the rig to monitor and record recovery. Recoveries are recorded in the database. There are no significant sample recovery problems. The RC rig has an auxiliary compressor and boosters to help maintain dry samples. When wet samples are encountered, the RC drilling is discontinued.
	Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.	No relationship is seen to exist between sample recovery and grade. No sample bias is due to preferential loss/gain of any fine/coarse material due to the acceptable sample recoveries obtained by both drilling methods.
Logging	Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.	Logging of drill samples recorded lithology, mineralogy, mineralisation, weathering, alteration, colour and other features of the samples. The geological logging was done using a standardised logging system. This information and the sampling details were transferred into Golden Rim’s drilling database. All drilling has been logged to a standard that is appropriate for the category of Resource which is being reported.
	Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.	Logging is both qualitative and quantitative, depending on the field being logged.
	The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.	100% of each relevant intersection is logged in detail.
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.	No core in this report
	If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.	RC samples were collected on the rig using a three-tier riffle splitter. The majority of the samples were dry. On the rare occasion that wet samples were encountered, they were dried prior to splitting with a riffle splitter. The standard RC sample interval was 1m.
	For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.	Samples were transported by road to BIGS Laboratory and/or ALS Laboratory in Ouagadougou. The sample preparation for all samples follows industry best practice. At the laboratory, the entire sample is dried, coarse crushed and pulverised to better than 85% of the material passing through a 75-micron (Tyler 200 mesh) screen.
	Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.	Golden Rim has protocols that cover the sample preparation at the laboratories and the collection and assessment of data to ensure that accurate steps are used in producing representative samples.

Page | 9

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code Explanation	Explanation
		The crusher and pulveriser are flushed with barren material at the start of every batch.
	Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.	Sampling is carried out in accordance with Golden Rim’s protocols as per industry best practice. Field QC procedures involve the use of certified reference material as assay standards, blanks and duplicates for the auger samples. Field duplicates were taken on 1m RC splits using a riffle splitter.
	Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	The sample sizes are considered appropriate to correctly represent the style of mineralisation, the thickness and consistency of the intersections.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.	Fire Assay: A 200g sub-sample is taken from the RC samples for analysis. A 50g charge weight is fused with litharge-based flux, cupelled and the prill dissolved in aqua regia and gold tenor is determined by AAS. BLEG: Gold by accelerated cyanide leach over 4 hours using LeachWELL assay tablets with AAS finish on a 1kg sample. The analytical method is considered appropriate for this mineralisation style and is of industry standard. The quality of the assaying and laboratory procedures are considered to be appropriate for this deposit type.
	For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.	No geophysical tools were used to determine any element concentrations.
	Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.	Sample preparation checks for fineness were carried out by the laboratory as part of their internal procedures to ensure the grind size of 90% passing 75 microns. Internal laboratory QAQC checks are reported by the laboratory. Review of the internal laboratory QAQC suggests the laboratory is performing within acceptable limits. For RC samples, Golden Rim inserts one blank, one standard and one duplicate for every 30 samples.
Verification of sampling and assaying	The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.	Reported results are compiled and verified by the Company’s Senior Geologist and the Managing Director.
	The use of twinned holes.	None of the drill holes in this report are twinned.
	Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.	Primary field data is collected by Golden Rim geologists on standardised logging sheets. This data is compiled and digitally captured.

Page | 10

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code Explanation	Explanation
		The compiled digital data is verified and validated by the Company’s database geologist.
	Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	The primary data is kept on file. There were no adjustments to the assay data.
Location of data points	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.	Drill Collar locations and rock chip sample locations were recorded by handheld GPS with a positional accuracy of approximately +/- 5 metres. Down-hole surveys were completed at the end of every drill hole (where possible) using a Reflex down-hole survey tool. Measurements were taken at approximately every 50 meters. At the completion of the program all holes will be surveyed with a DGPS, which has locational accuracy of +/- 0.1m, X, Y and Z.
	Specification of the grid system used.	Location data was collected in either UTM grid WGS84, zone 31 North or UTM grid WGS84, zone 30 North
	Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	Topographic control was established by using a survey base station.
Data spacing and distribution	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	Drilling is conducted has been conducted along lines, with holes spaced at 25 to 50m along that line.
	Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.	Drill collar spacing and distribution are sufficient for exploration drilling.
	Whether sample compositing has been applied.	There was no sample composting.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.	All drill holes reported here were drilled approximately at right angles (150 or 180 degrees) to the strike of the target mineralisation.
	If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	No orientation-based sampling bias has been identified in the data at this point.
Sample security	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	Samples are stored on site prior to road transport by Company personnel to the laboratory in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Audits or reviews	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.	There has been no external audit or review of the Company’s techniques or data.

Page | 11

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Explanation
Mineral tenement and land tenure status	Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.	The reported drilling results are from the Kouri, Gouéli and Margou permits. Golden Rim owns 100% of the permits.
	The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	Tenure is in good standing.
Exploration done by other parties	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	The area that is presently covered by the Kouri Project has undergone some previous mineral exploration.
Geology	Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	The Kouri Project covers part of a highly prospective Lower Proterozoic Birimian, Samira Hill Greenstone belt and is traversed by a significant NE-trending fault splay which is connected to the major Markoye Fault system. This fault system controls several major gold deposits in Burkina Faso, including Kiaka (5.9 Moz), Bomboré (5.2 Moz) and Essakan (7 Moz). The mineralisation lies in a package of highly altered volcanic and volcaniclastic host rocks and is associated with a major gold-in-soil anomaly and a prominent dilational structural jog along a regional NE-trending shear zone.
Drill hole Information	A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: • easting and northing of the drill hole collar elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar • dip and azimuth of the hole • down hole length and interception depth • hole length.	The body of the report contains tables summarising the RC location data (Hole ID, Easting, Northing, Dip, Azimuth and total Depth) and a list of significant (gold ≥ 0.3g/t for the Mineral Resource) intercepts. Appropriate locality maps for some of the holes also accompanies this announcement. Further information referring to the drill hole results can be found on Golden Rim’s website http://www.goldenrim.com.au/site/News-and-Reports/ASX- Announcements
	If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
Data aggregation methods	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.	RC samples are taken at 1m intervals. For the 0.3 g/t Au cut-off calculations, up to 3m (down hole) of internal waste, unless the total intercept grade falls below 0.3 g/t gold (Mineral Resource). No weighting or high-grade cutting techniques have been applied to the data reported. Assay results are quoted rounded to 1 decimal place.
	Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.	Not applicable in this document as no exploration results are announced.

Page | 12

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Explanation
	The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.	Metal equivalent values are not reported in this announcement.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths	These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.	The reported drilling results are from exploration drilling, designed to test possible extensions to the known Mineral Resource.
	If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.	The orientation of the mineralised zone has been established and the RC drilling was planned in such a way as to intersect mineralisation in a perpendicular manner.
	If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’).	Not applicable in this document
Diagrams	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.	Maps are provided in the main text.
Balanced reporting	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.	The accompanying document is considered to represent a balanced report.
Other substantive exploration data	Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.	There is no other exploration data which is considered material to the results reported in the announcement.
Further work	The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).	Promising results will be followed up (where practicable) with trenching and further RC or diamond drilling. Exploration and infill drilling will continue to target projected lateral and depth extensions of the mineralisation and to increase the confidence in the Mineral Resource.
	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.	Refer to main body of this report.

Page | 13

==> picture [595 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Competent Persons Statements

The information in this report relating to previous exploration results and the Mineral Resource at Kouri are extracted from the announcements: High-Grade Gold Discovered within Mineral Resource at Kouri dated 10 March 2020; Major Extensions to Gold Lodes Comprising 1.4Moz Mineral Resource at Kouri dated 14 February 2020; Multiple Structures Hosting High-Grade Gold Identified East of 1.4Moz Mineral Resource at Kouri dated 3 February 2020, More High-Grade Gold Results Obtained at Kouri dated 20 December 2019; New High-Grade Gold Zone Discovered at Kouri dated 19 December 2019; Second Extensive High Grade Gold Target Identified at Kouri dated 11 November 2019; 1.6km Geophysical Anomaly Associated with High Grade Gold at Kouri dated 1 November 2019; Major Exploration Campaign Accelerates at Kouri dated 15 October 2019; Drilling Further Extends Gold Mineralisation Beyond Existing 1.4Moz Mineral Resource at Kouri dated 2 September 2019; Second High-Grade Zone Discovered in Granite at Kouri dated 28 August 2019; 784g/t Gold Bonanza Intercept at Kouri dated 5 August 2019; 1.4 Million Oz of Gold in Upgraded Kouri Mineral Resource dated 3 December 2018; and has been reported in accordance with the 2012 edition of the JORC Code. These announcements are available on the Company’s website (www.goldenrim.com.au). The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in these announcements and, in the case of the Mineral Resource estimate, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning estimate continue to apply and have not materially changed.

Forward Looking Statements

Certain statements in this document are or maybe “forward-looking statements” and represent Golden Rim’s intentions, projections, expectations or beliefs concerning among other things, future exploration activities. The projections, estimates and beliefs contained in such forward-looking statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of Golden Rim, and which may cause Golden Rim’s actual performance in future periods to differ materially from any express or implied estimates or projections. Nothing in this document is a promise or representation as to the future. Statements or assumptions in this document as to future matters may prove to be incorrect and differences may be material. Golden Rim does not make any representation or warranty as to the accuracy of such statements or assumptions.

Page | 14